IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER. 2015, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant

Transcription

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. CHARLES R. PEDRI, No Disciplinary Docket No.3 No. 41 DB 2015 Attorney Registration No (Luzerne County) ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 14 1 h day of May, 2015, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated April 21, 2015, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 215(g), and it is ORDERED that Charles R. Pedri is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E A True Copy_ Patricia Nicola As Of 5/14/LOlS Atl;est: ~ }ZWAJ Chief Cler Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

2 BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL Petitioner No. 41 DB 2015 v. Attorney Registration No CHARLES R. PEDRI (Luzerne County) RECOMMENDATION OF THREE-MEMBER PANEL OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA The Three"Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, consisting of Board Members Tracey McCants Lewis, Douglas W. Leonard and P. Brennan Hart, has reviewed the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent filed in the above-captioned matter on March 13, The Panel approves the Joint Petition consenting to a five year suspension and recommends to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that the attached Petition be Granted. The Panel further recommends that any necessary expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this matter shall be paid by the respondent-attorney as a condition to the grant of the Petition. Date: Lf/:1. 1 /2o 1 ~ Tracey ants Lewis, P el Chair The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

3 MAR/09/2015/J.!ON 06:18AM Disciplinary Board FAX llo P. 001 BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, No. '/( DB..JD!s:' v. CHARLES R. PEDRI, Attorney Reg. No (Luzerne County) JOIN! PETITION IN SUPPORT OF DISCIPLINE ON CONSENT fjjrsuantto Pa. R.D.E. 215fd) Petitioner, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, by Paul J. Killion, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, and Kristin A. Wells, Disciplinary Counsel, and, Charles R. Pedrl, file this Jo.lnt Petition In Support of Discipline on Consent under Rule 215(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (hereinafter "Pa.R.D.E.") and respectfully state and aver the following: 1. Petitioner, whose principal office Is located at the Pennsylvania Judicial Center, 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2700, P.O. Box 62485, Harrisburg, PA 17106, Is Invested, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 207, with the power and the duty to Investigate all matter'> involving alleged misconduct of an attorney admitted to practice law In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and to prosecute all disciplinary proceedings brought In accordance with th(l various provisions of \he aforesaid Rules. FILED MAR Ofiico cf t::v Sociotary The Dlsciplin:::ry Board of tho Supremo Court cl Pcnnsylvanin.

4 MAR/09/2015/MO!I 06:18 AM Disoipl inary Bw.rd FAX No P, , Charles R. Pedri, was born on September 1, 1951, was admitted to practice law in Pennsylvania on October 27, 1976, has a registered public address of 1 West Broad Street, Suite 3, Hazleton, Pennsylvania, 18201, and Is subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Disciplinary 13oard of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. 3. is represented by counsel Samuel C. Stratton, 301 South High Street, West Chester, Pennsylvania SPECIFIC FACTUAL ADMISSIONS AND RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT VIOLATED 4. 's misconduct Involves the conversion of $105,586.80, which was to be held in trust by in his capacity as Hazel Township Solicitor for Hazel Spindle, LLC, repeated misrepresentations regarding tl1e status of those funds, atld failure to disburse the funds despite repeated requests to do so. In or about February, 2013,, In his capacity as Hazel Township Solicitor, received $105, to hold in trust for Hazel Spindle, a developer, pursuant to a development agreement between Hazel Spindle and Hazel Township. In or about May, 2014, Hazel Township approved the release of the funds to Hazel Spindle, and was Instructed accordingly. Over the course of the next seven months, Hazel Spindle repeatedly requested rel.ease of the funds. On each occasion, misrepresented the status of the funds by suggesting he was holding the funds In trust when, in fact, had converted the funds to his own use. Finally, In January, 2015, upon being presehted wrth notice of intent to file a complaint for recovery of the escrow funds, admitted to Hazel Spindle's counsel that he had con verted the funds. 2

5 MAR/09/2015/lJOJl 06:18 AM Disci pi inary Board FAX No P On January 22, 2015, the undersigned counsel sent a DB-7 Request for Statement of 's Position, outlining In detail the conduct summarized above. submitted a DB 7 Response on Februaty 20, 2015, wherein he admitted to the allegations and Rule violations contained in the DB-7, and further Informed ODC that the $105, had been repaid. Disciplinary Counsel Wells has confirmed repayment of the funds. 6. As part of the investlgation, 's IOLTA bank account records for the period of October 1, 2010, through December 21, 2014, were reviewed. This review detected several irregularities, including oomingling activity, In 's use of his IOL TA account in addition to the above-detailed conversion. DISCIPLINARY RULE VIOLATIONS 7. admits to violating the following Rules of Professional Conduct and Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement in this. matter: a. RPC 1.15(b) A lawyer shall hold ail Rule 1.15 Funds and property separate from the lawyer's own property. Such property shall be identified and appropriately safeguarded; b. RPC 1.15(e) [A] lawyer shall promptly deliver to the client or third person any property, including but not limited to Rule 1.15 Funds, that the client or third person is entitled to receive: c. RPC 4.1 (a) In the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person: d. RPC 8 A(b) It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to... commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer In other respects; e. RPC 8.4{c) It Is professional misconduct for a lawyer to... engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresr;jnlatlon. 3

6 MAR/09/2015/IJOll 06:18 AM Disciplinary Board FAX No P. 004 SPECIFIC JOINT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DISCIPLINE 8. Petitioner and jointly recommend thai the appropriate discipline for is a five-year Suspension. hereby consents to the discipline being imposed upon him by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Attached to this Petition is 's executed Affidavit required by Pa.R.D.E. 215(d), stating that he consents to the recommended discipline and Including the mar'ldatory acknowledgements contained in Pa.R.D.E. 215(d)(1) through (4). 9. In support of Petitioner and 's Joint Recommendation, It is respectfu!ly submitted as follows: a. The mitigating circumstances are that: i. has been practicing Jaw for 38 years and has no prior disciplinmy history; li. In his DB-7 Response, admitted that he engaged In misconduct and violated the above Rules of Professional Conduct by converting the trust funds, mi~representfng the status of those funds, and falling to disburse the funds upon request; iii. is remorseful for and embarrassed by his conduct and understands he should be disciplined, as evldenced by his consent to. receiving a five-year Suspension. 10. Discipline for misconduct arising from allegations of trust fund conversion ranges from three years, see Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Michael, 1370 DD No. 4

7 I!AR/09/2015/J.!Oll 06:18 AM Disciplinary Board FAX No, P, (2008), to disbarment. See, e.g., Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 506 A.2d 872 (Pa. 1986). 11. The parties respectfully submit that a five-year suspension, given the facts of tile Instant matter, Is consistent with the.above cited disciplinary authority. WHEREFORE, Petitioner and respectfully request that Pursuant to Pa.R.DE 215, a three-member panel of the Disciplinary Board review and approve the above Joint Petition In Support of Discipline on Consent and file Its recommendation with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in which it is recommended th~?t the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania enter an Order Suspending for Five Years for the conduct set forth herein. Respectfully submitted, Date: q t1 arm ZOI'.J ay: b11;:jic :l tlun ltis\in A:werrs Disciplinary Counsel Attorney Registration No Commonweafth Avenue, Suite 5800 P.O. Box Harrisburg, PA Telephone (717) Date;_Yn~c..~=,.U. 1.l.c\S By: ~ K. ~, CHARLES R. PEDRI Attorney Registration No West Broad Street, Suite 3 Hazelton, PA Telephone (570)

8 MAR/09/2015/MON 06:18AM Disciplimry Board FAX No p 006 BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, No. DB v. CHARLES R. PEDRI, Attorney Reg. No (Luzerne County) VERIFICATION The statements made in the foregoing Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent Pursuant to Pa.R.O.E:. 215(d) are true and correct to Uw best of my knowledge, Information, and belief. This statement Is made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S relating to unsworn falsificaiion to authorities. Date: 9 March 201'0 By: ~fae~ \Lub Date:_M<'~Aeh II 1 ~o Lf By: Disciplinary Counsel Attorney Registration No Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 5800 P.O. Box Harrisburg, PA Telephone (717) a~ f?~-- CHARLES R. PEDRI Attorney Registration No West Broad Street, Suite 3 Hazelton, PA Telephone (570)

9 MAR/09/2015/MOll 06:18AM Disciplinary Board FAX No P. 007 BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. No. DB Attorney Reg, No CHARLES R. PEDRI, (Luzerne County) RESPONDENT'S AFFIDAVIT UNDER RULE 2i5(d) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT I, Charles R. Pedri, In the above-captioned matter, hereby consent to the Imposition of a fiile-year Suspension, as jointly recommended by the Petitioner, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and myself, in a Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on. Consent and further state: 1. My consent is freely and voluntarily rendered; I am not being subjected to coercion or duress; I am fully aware of the Implications of submitting the consent; 2. I am aware there is presently pending a proceeding Involving allegations that I have been guilty of misconduct as set forth In the Joint Petttion; 3. I acknowledge that the material facts set forth In the Joint Petition are true; 4. I consent because I know that if the charges continued to be prosecuted in the pending proceeding, I could not successfully defend against them; and 7

10 MAR/09/2015/MOII 06:18AM Disciplinary Board FAX Ho P I acknowledge that I am fully aware of my right to consult and employ counsel to represent me In the instant proceeding. By: a ca_,_}ly, K. r/2e.... CHARLES R. PEDRI Attorney Registration No West Broad Street, Suite 3 Hazelton, PA Telephone (570)