ELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION SPRING 2012 PROBLEM

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION SPRING 2012 PROBLEM"

Transcription

1 ELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION SPRING 2012 PROBLEM No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES, INC., HOWARD SPRAGUE, and ELOISE WALKER, Petitioners, v. ANDREW GRIFFITH, SECRETARY OF THE NORTH GREENE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and WILLIAM PORTER, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NORTH GREENE, Respondents. RECORD ON APPEAL Page 1 of 11

2 No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH CIRCUIT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES, INC., HOWARD SPRAGUE, and ELOISE WALKER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ANDREW GRIFFITH, SECRETARY OF THE NORTH GREENE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and WILLIAM PORTER, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NORTH GREENE, Defendants-Appellants. Argued May 12, 2011 Decided June 30, 2011 On appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Greene. Before: Monroe, Raleigh, and Madison, Circuit Judges. MADISON, Circuit Judge. The defendants appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Greene granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and holding that: (1) the North Greene House of Representatives policy of opening its proceedings with prayer, which frequently include sectarian references, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution; and (2) by authorizing a Support Life Page 2 of 11

3 license plate, while rejecting a pro-choice alternative license plate, the defendants have engaged in viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. 1 I. Background On May 18, 2009, Plaintiffs Howard Sprague and Eloise Walker attended a legislative hearing that the North Greene House of Representatives Transportation Committee held on House Bill 952, An Act to Authorize the Department of Transportation to Issue Various Special Registration Plates. Mr. Sprague and Ms. Walker are members of the North Greene chapter of Constitutional Rights Advocates, Inc., a national organization whose mission is to protect and defend the Constitutional rights of every American, with a focus on the separation of Church and State. 2 The Act proposed to authorize several new specialty license plates, including a plate bearing the message Support Life, which the plaintiffs contend is an anti-abortion message. Mr. Sprague and Ms. Walker had attended the hearing to testify in favor of a pro-choice alternative license plate. Like all public meetings of the North Carolina House of Representatives, or any of its committees, the hearing began with an invocation delivered by a local religious leader. The particular prayer given that day ended with the phrase, and this we pray in your son Jesus name, Amen. The May 18, 2009 prayer also made a number of references to specific tenets of the Christian faith, including the Cross of Calvary and the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ. According to Mr. Sprague and Ms. Walker, the prayer offended them and made them feel unwelcome to the point they decided not to testify at the hearing, believing their position would not be seriously considered because it represented a non-christian perspective. The Transportation Committee recommended House Bill 952 for passage. The bill was eventually passed by both chambers of the North Greene General Assembly and signed into law by Governor Patrick Henry on June 30, The Act authorized a total of ten specialty license plates, which brought the total number of specialty license plates that North Greene offers to more than The Act directs the Department of Transportation to produce plates bearing the Support Life slogan when it receives 400 prepaid applications from drivers desiring the plate. Under the Act, the Support Life plate costs drivers who choose to purchase the plate $50 per year in addition to the regular registration fee. From this additional fee, $25 will go to the North Greene Pregnancy Crisis Center, a private organization that runs pregnancy crisis clinics and counsels women about the dangers of abortion, government assistance available to low-income mothers, and laws regarding single mothers entitlement to child support payments from fathers. 1 The North Greene Constitution includes provisions virtually identical to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The analysis under both is the same. Accordingly, this opinion will address plaintiffs claims under the United States Constitution. 2 Constitutional Rights Advocates, Inc. joined this suit as a plaintiff on behalf of the named plaintiffs and its other members. The parties have stipulated that Constitutional Rights Advocates, Inc. is a proper plaintiff, and the issue of its standing is not a question before this Court. Likewise, the parties have stipulated that the defendants are proper parties to this lawsuit. 3 The specialty plates authorized by the North Greene General Assembly represent a broad array of interests, including Organ Donation, Save the Sea Turtles, In God We Trust, Support Our Troops, U.S. Equine Rescue League, AIDS Awareness, and many of the state s colleges, including its two rival universities, the public University of North Greene, and the private Oak University. Page 3 of 11

4 Under the Act, no funds generated by the sale of the Support Life plate may be used to support any person, organization, agency, or institution that provides, promotes, or refers for abortion. In drafting what became the final version of the Act, North Greene legislators invited design submissions from the public, held public hearings, and deliberated over many varying license plate designs. Some of the plate designs were revised and edited several times at the request of legislators before being included in the final version of the bill signed into law. Many plate design submissions were rejected. Indeed, the district court found that since the start of North Greene s specialty license plate program in 2002 more than 500 plates were submitted, from which just over 100 have been approved through legislation such as House Bill 952. The House also rejected an amendment to House Bill 952 that proposed to authorize a pro-choice plate bearing the slogan Support Women s Choice. The plaintiffs asserted that they would purchase plates that bear a pro-choice message if such were made available. Since its creation roughly 204 years ago, the North Greene House of Representatives has started its legislative sessions and committee meetings with prayer. Pursuant to this longstanding practice, meetings of the House generally begin with a brief prayer, usually delivered by a North Greene cleric or clergy member. Following complaints about the prayers in 2005 and again in 2007, the North Greene House of Representatives adopted House Rule 1(b)(2), Policy Regarding Opening Invocations Before Official Meetings of the North Greene House of Representatives, at the start of the 2008 session of the General Assembly. The policy applies to all official meetings of members of the House of Representatives, including formal legislative sessions, committee meetings, and hearings. The policy formalizes the practice of having prayers at meetings of the House of Representatives. According to the policy, the purpose of the opening prayer is to solemnize the proceedings of the North Greene House of Representatives, to encourage participants to act on their noblest instincts, to foster the humility that recognition of a higher hand in human affairs can bring, and to celebrate the diversity of religious beliefs in the State. The policy also states that the invocations are the private expressions of the speakers who deliver them and are not representative of any legislator s affiliations or preference. The policy further provides the chamber and gallery shall remain silent in respectful observance of the invocation; however no House members, or members of the public present, shall be required to stand, bow, kneel, or otherwise make any gesture displaying their adherence to the content of the invocation. The policy codified the House s practice, started in 2000, of having the House clerk select clergy members from the Congregations List. This list, which contains the contact information for nearly every religious group with an established presence in the State of North Greene, is updated each year using the Yellow Pages, Internet research, and suggestions from House members. The list includes congregations from North Greene s many varying and diverse faiths, including Christians, Jews, Muslims, Unitarian Universalists, Buddhists, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Bahá'ís, Jains, Sikhs, and Native American spiritualists. The clerk mails invitations addressed to the religious leader of each of these congregations approximately one month prior to the start of the legislative session. The religious leaders who respond are scheduled by the clerk for House meetings on a first-come, first-served basis. Once each legislative meeting has been assigned a religious leader for its invocation, the clerk assigns the remaining religious Page 4 of 11

5 leaders to various additional meetings and hearings as they are scheduled throughout the legislative session. In some years, the number of legislative meetings scheduled exceeds the number of religious leaders who respond. When this occurs, the clerk cycles back through the list of responding religious leaders, resulting in some leaders receiving invitations to speak at more than one legislative meeting. Pursuant to the policy, however, no religious leader is permitted to give a prayer at consecutive meetings or to give more than three invocations during a calendar year. The customary invitation sent by the clerk to the invocation speaker, as described by House Rule 1(b)(2), request[s]... that the invocation not be used to convert others to the particular faith of the speaker, and that speakers refrain from disparaging any faith or belief different than their own. The policy also provides that speakers should keep in mind the spirit of respect and ecumenism out of which this opportunity is offered, and consider using nondenominational references to the Divine. The policy, however, does not provide the House clerk or any House member the power to enforce these requests. Instead, it specifically provides that no House member, nor any House staff, shall review or alter the content of any invocation to be offered. Despite the diverse array of religious leaders invited to give invocational prayers, the majority of respondents are Christian. Historically, the House s invocational speakers have almost always been Christian; however, in recent years, especially after the House adopted its prayer policy, the invocational prayers have been given by a more diverse group of religious leaders. The district court found that out of the more than 300 invocational prayers given between the 2005 legislative session (when the first complaint was received) and the filing of this lawsuit in January, 2010, 4 approximately 85% of the religious leaders were from Christian churches, 14% from Jewish temples, and 1% from other denominations or faiths, including Islamic mosques and Hindu temples. Defendants offered a demographic study into evidence at the district court showing that 82% of the State s citizens who report a religious preference identify themselves as Christian. In addition to the high percentage of Christian ministers and religious leaders who have given invocations, the plaintiffs also object to the prevalence of sectarian references in these prayers. In the time period analyzed, although most prayers made non-denominational references to God, only one prayer referenced a specific, non-christian deity. Nearly half of all prayers delivered during the time period contained sectarian references identifiable as exclusively Christian. Many of the overtly Christian prayers invoked Jesus name while others referenced specific tenets and articles of Christianity. For example, the prayer given at the May 18, 2009 Transportation Committee hearing, delivered by Reverend Dan Joyce of the Friendlyville Tree of Life Church, included the following: Heavenly Father, today we are overjoyed that we may pray in the way made possible by your son, the Lord Jesus Christ, who died for our sins on the Cross of Calvary. We pray that you bless 4 This time period has been stipulated by the parties as representing: (1) conditions characteristic of the practice both prior to and after the adoption of the policy; and (2) time during which defendant Rep. William Porter has served as Speaker of the House. Page 5 of 11

6 today s proceedings with your divine guidance. And we ask that you provide this esteemed body, and the citizens of this great State who come to speak before it, with wisdom, with focus, and with the strength to do your work. We are so grateful that today we can look to the Gospel, and see how you instituted government on this Earth. We humbly submit ourselves, our lives, and our work to you, Dear Lord. For it is you who watches over us. And this we pray in your son Jesus name, Amen. After attending the May 18, 2009 hearing, plaintiffs Sprague and Walker filed this lawsuit, alleging that the overall atmosphere of the Transportation Committee hearing made them feel that their position was unwelcome and challenging the adoption of the Support Life license plate. Plaintiff Constitutional Rights Advocates, Inc. joined in the lawsuit on behalf of plaintiffs and its other members in the State of North Greene. Plaintiffs requested: (1) a declaratory judgment that the House s practice of beginning official meetings with sectarian prayer violated the Establishment Clause and that the General Assembly s authorization of a Support Life license plate, while rejecting a pro-choice alternative, opened a state-created forum for private speech to one viewpoint on abortion and not the other in violation of the First Amendment; and (2) an injunction preventing the use of prayer in future House proceedings and blocking the issuance of the Support Life license plate. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. It concluded that the defendants had violated the Establishment Clause by beginning House meetings with sectarian prayer and had committed unlawful viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment by authorizing the Support Life plate without a pro-choice alternative. The district court issued an injunction prohibiting the House from continuing its invocation practice and prohibiting the Department of Transportation from issuing the Support Life license plates. The defendants now appeal. A. Legislative Prayer II. Discussion At every level of government, legislative bodies throughout the United States use prayer to solemnize important proceedings. It is a tradition as old as the Nation itself. In recent years, though, the federal courts have been called on to determine whether prayer by legislative bodies especially prayers involving sectarian references conflicts with the First Amendment s foundational principle that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. U.S. Const. amend. I. A close look at these cases and the history of legislative prayers reveals that such prayers, whether at the national, state, or local level, do not conflict with the Establishment Clause provided that the legislature does not have the motive to advance religion. After all, the first Congress, which adopted the practice of legislative prayer within three days of approving the language of the First Amendment, could not have understood legislative prayer to violate the Establishment Clause. Page 6 of 11

7 The Supreme Court directly confronted the constitutionality of legislative prayer in the landmark ruling of Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983). In Marsh, the Supreme Court acknowledged that legislative prayers were deeply embedded in the history and tradition of the United States. In particular, the Marsh Court upheld the State of Nebraska s legislative prayer practice because there is no indication that the prayer opportunity has been exploited to proselytize or advance any one, or to disparage any other, faith or belief. Marsh, 463 U.S. at 795. With this ruling, the Supreme Court affirmed the longstanding practice of legislative prayer as used by the Nebraska legislature. Since Marsh, however, two distinct lines of interpretation have evolved in the circuit and district courts. The source of the disagreement stems from the subsequent Supreme Court ruling in County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989), which some courts take to limit the holding in Marsh to nonsectarian legislative prayers. In Marsh, the Supreme Court noted that [t]he content of the prayer is not of concern to judges absent an indication of the exploitation of prayer, and that it is not for [courts] to embark on a sensitive evaluation or to parse the content of a particular prayer. Marsh, 463 U.S. at 795. However, the Court in Allegheny seemed to emphasize the fact that the prayer giver in Marsh had removed all sectarian references from his invocations: The legislative prayers involved in Marsh did not violate [the Establishment Clause] because the particular chaplain had removed all references to Christ. Allegheny, 492 U.S. at 603 (quoting Marsh, 463 U.S. at 793 n. 14). Thus, one line of interpretation relies on Allegheny s suggestion that the presence of sectarian references is determinative, taking Allegheny to supersede Marsh s instruction against scrutinizing the content of prayers. Under this interpretation, legislative prayers are unconstitutional if they contain sectarian references attributable to one religion, despite attempts by government bodies to discourage sectarian references or invite diverse speakers. Recent decisions in the Fourth Circuit, see Joyner v. Forsyth County, 53 F.3d 341 (4th Cir. 2011), and the Seventh Circuit, see Hinrichs v. Bosma, 440 F.3d 393 (7th Cir. 2006), have employed Allegheny s commentary on Marsh to limit legislative prayer practices that are similar to the policy at issue in this case. Drawing on this line of cases, the district court concluded that, because the North Greene House of Representatives invocation policy produced multiple incidents of sectarian prayer, it runs afoul of the Establishment Clause. The problem with this analysis is threefold. First, it ignores the fact that Allegheny was not a legislative prayer case. Allegheny concerned a town s religious holiday displays, and the plurality s discussion of Marsh was included only as a response to Justice Kennedy s assertion in dissent that Marsh should provide the applicable standard for holiday displays as well. None of the dicta in Allegheny, however, supersedes Marsh s discussion of legislative prayer. Second, in Allegheny, the constitutionality of religious displays turned on the effect of the display on viewers: The effect of the display depends upon the message that the government s practice communicates: the question is what viewers may fairly understand to be the purpose of the display. Allegheny, 492 U.S. at 595. When analyzing the constitutionality of the Nebraska legislature s retaining the same Presbyterian minister for 16 years, the Marsh court expressly rejected the invitation to focus on the effect of giving preference to his religious views. Marsh, 463 U.S. at Instead, in the legislative prayer context, the Court analyzed the government s intent: [a]bsent proof that the chaplain's reappointment stemmed from an Page 7 of 11

8 impermissible motive, we conclude that his long tenure does not in itself conflict with the Establishment Clause. Marsh, 463 U.S. at 793 (emphasis added). Third, the Supreme Court recently explained in Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005), that sectarian content did not shape Marsh s outcome: Indeed, we rejected the claim that an Establishment Clause violation was presented because the prayers had once been offered in the Judeo-Christian tradition: In Marsh, the prayers were often explicitly Christian, but the chaplain removed all references to Christ the year after the suit was filed. Van Orden, 545 U.S. at 688 n. 8. Thus, we reject the district court s reasoning that Allegheny requires us to consider the content of the prayers in this case absent a showing of the government s intent to proselytize or disparage a particular faith. Instead, we adopt the interpretation of Marsh that the Eleventh Circuit adopted in Pelphrey v. Cobb County, 547 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2008). In Pelphrey, the Eleventh Circuit confronted facts similar to the present case and determined that Marsh required the court to focus on the motives underlying the government s prayer policy, not the effect of the prayer on observers or the specific content of the invocations. Here, North Greene s House Rule 1(b)(2) explicitly provides that the purpose of its invocations is to solemnize proceedings, not to advance religion. North Greene affirms that the spirit of the invocation is respect and ecumenism and, therefore, encourages its speakers to consider using non-denominational references to the Divine. Given that the House makes a demonstrated effort to invite clergy from nearly every religious group with an established presence in the state to offer invocations, there is no impermissible motive. North Greene does not seek to exploit the prayer opportunity to proselytize or advance any one, or to disparage any other, faith or belief. Marsh, 463 U.S. at 795. Under the correct interpretation of Marsh, no inquiry into the content or effect of the invocations is necessary. Although individual prayer givers may make sectarian references, the House neither regulates the content of any prayer nor precludes any religious speaker from giving an invocation. Accordingly, we conclude that the prayer policy and practices of the House of Representatives of the State of North Greene do not violate the Establishment Clause. B. Specialty License Plates The district court concluded that, in allowing a Support Life specialty license plate without also allowing a pro-choice alternative, North Greene state officials violated the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In its decision, the court determined that, by authorizing specialty license plates, North Greene created a forum for private speech, and by rejecting the pro-choice plate, the defendants engaged in unlawful viewpoint discrimination. The district court s decision turns on its finding that the specialty license plates constitute mixed, or hybrid speech i.e., that they contain elements of both government and private speech. This is the dispositive issue because, if the specialty license plates constitute government Page 8 of 11

9 speech only, then there is no First Amendment violation. As the Supreme Court recently explained, a government entity has the right to speak for itself and may express its views selectively without running afoul of the First Amendment. See Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460 (2009). The government s freedom to speak as it wishes relies in part on political accountability: When the government speaks, for instance to promote its own policies or to advance a particular idea, it is, in the end, accountable to the electorate and the political process for its advocacy. If the citizenry objects, newly elected officials later could espouse some different or contrary position. Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez, 531 U.S. 533, 542 (2001) (citing Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth, 529 U.S. 217 (2000)). In concluding that North Greene s Support Life license plate did not constitute pure government speech, the district court applied a four-factor test used by several circuits to determine similar hybrid cases. In analyzing instances where both government and private entities appear to be speaking, this test examines: (1) the central purpose of the program in which the speech in question occurs; (2) the degree of editorial control exercised by the government or private entities over the content of the speech; (3) the identity of the literal speaker ; and (4) whether the government or the private entity bears the ultimate responsibility for the content of the speech. Planned Parenthood of South Carolina, Inc. v. Rose, 361 F.3d 786, (4th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted). 5 Applying this test to the present case, the district court found that while the first two factors tend to favor a finding of government speech, factors three and four suggest private speech. The district court found that the central purpose of the overall license plate program was to generate revenue for state-supported programs. It also found that the North Greene General Assembly had complete editorial control over which plates it selected to issue from the roughly 500 that have been proposed. However, the district court found that a reasonable observer would determine that private citizens were the literal speakers of the message displayed on the license plates. The court referenced the Supreme Court s decision in Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977), for the proposition that, in exercising the choice to purchase the Support Life plate, the private speaker bears the ultimate responsibility for the content of the speech. The district court went on to conclude that: (1) as such, the State of North Greene s specialty license plate program establishes a forum for private speech; and (2) by favoring the message of private citizens who desire a Support Life license plate over those who want a Support Women s Choice license plate, the defendants engaged in impermissible viewpoint discrimination. The district court erred in using this test in light of new Supreme Court precedent, which provides a clearer explanation of government speech. In Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, 5 See also Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. v. Comm'r of the Virginia DMV, 288 F.3d 610, 618 (4th Cir.2002); Wells v. City and County of Denver, 257 F.3d 1132, 1141 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 997, 122 S.Ct. 469, 151 L.Ed.2d 384 (2001); Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo., 203 F.3d 1085 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 814, 121 S.Ct. 49, 148 L.Ed.2d 18 (2000); Downs v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist., 228 F.3d 1003, 1011 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 994, 121 S.Ct. 1653, 149 L.Ed.2d 636 (2001). Page 9 of 11

10 the Supreme Court confirmed that the control element is the crucial consideration in determining whether speech is government or private, holding that the installation of monuments in a city park constituted government speech, despite the fact that private parties designed and donated the monuments. Summum, 555 U.S. at 461. Although the placement of monuments constituted a mix of private and government speech, the city could still claim the protection of the government speech doctrine because it has effectively controlled the messages sent by the monuments in the Park by exercising final approval authority over their selection. Id. at 473 (citing Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association, 544 U.S. 550 (2005)). In Summum, the Court relied heavily on Johanns, in which the Court concluded that a program compelling beef producers to fund advertising merited government speech protection. Despite the fact that the advertising create[d] the perception that the advertisements speak for beef producers such as respondents, the government exercise[d] final approval authority over every word used in every promotional campaign and, as a result, was deemed to qualify for protection under the government speech doctrine: When, as here, the government sets the overall message to be communicated and approves every word that is disseminated, it is not precluded from relying on the government-speech doctrine merely because it solicits assistance from nongovernmental sources in developing specific messages. Id. Thus, the correct focus in government vs. private speech cases under Johanns and Summum is on how much control the government body has over the content of the message disseminated. Here, the provisions of the specialty license plate program show that the North Greene General Assembly had complete editorial control over the Support Life and all other license plates. The district court found that, out of more than 500 plate designs submitted, the House selected only around 100 for final approval. Many of the plates were subject to House member prompted revisions. 6 Although private citizens pay for the opportunity to display the Support Life plate, the North Greene General Assembly has complete control over the decision to create or reject a proposed specialty plate. Though the plate may have been designed by a private entity, the North Greene General Assembly accepted this design and had final approval of its content. The fact that the government enlists third parties to disseminate its message does not diminish North Greene s control over the decision to issue Support Life license plates. Because only government speech was involved in the authorization of the Support Life license plate, there was no First Amendment speech violation in this case. III. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we hold that the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is REVERSED. 6 It is not clear from the record whether the specific Support Life license plate at issue in this case was ever revised. Page 10 of 11

11 No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES, INC., HOWARD SPRAGUE, and ELOISE WALKER, Petitioner, v. ANDREW GRIFFITH, SECRETARY OF THE NORTH GREENE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and WILLIAM PORTER, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NORTH GREENE, Respondents. ORDER Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth Circuit is GRANTED. The issues before the Court are: 1. Whether the North Greene House of Representatives policy and practice of opening its proceedings with prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution? 2. Whether North Greene state officials engaged in viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution by authorizing a Support Life license plate while rejecting a pro-choice alternative license plate? Page 11 of 11

RESOLUTION NO. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO VI-B-1 AUGUST 2, 2010 RESOLUTION NO. PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 10-041 A RESOLUTION RELATED TO CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS; CODIFYING ITS POLICY REGARDING INVOCATIONS BEFORE MEETINGS OF THE LAKELAND CITY COMMISSION;

More information

Summary of Purpose and Why:

Summary of Purpose and Why: Meeting Date: July 14,2015 REQUESTED COMMISSION ACTION: Agenda Item 30 Consent Ordinance x Resolution Consideration! Discussion Presentation SHORT TITLE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY

More information

International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Conference Las Vegas, Nevada. Work Session X

International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Conference Las Vegas, Nevada. Work Session X International Municipal Lawyers Association 2015 Annual Conference Las Vegas, Nevada Work Session X Exploring the History and Future of Legislative Prayer in Light of Town of Greece v. Galloway Deborah

More information

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG WEBBER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GILEAD, Petitioner, WINSTON SMITH, Respondent.

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG WEBBER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GILEAD, Petitioner, WINSTON SMITH, Respondent. No. 13-9100 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG WEBBER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GILEAD, Petitioner, v. WINSTON SMITH, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 14-144 In the Supreme Court of the United States JOHN WALKER III, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. TEXAS DIVISION, SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INC., ET AL.

More information

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRAYERS BEFORE TOWN BOARD MEETINGS HELD CONSTITUTIONAL. Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct (2014).

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRAYERS BEFORE TOWN BOARD MEETINGS HELD CONSTITUTIONAL. Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct (2014). CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRAYERS BEFORE TOWN BOARD MEETINGS HELD CONSTITUTIONAL. Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2014). TAYLOR PHILLIPS In Town of Greece v. Galloway, the United

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 I. Contrary to the Fourth

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 I. Contrary to the Fourth i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 I. Contrary to the Fourth Circuit s Decision, Deliberative Body Invocations May

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States NO. In the Supreme Court of the United States PHIL BERGER, President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate, AND THOM TILLIS, Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives, Petitioners, v. AMERICAN

More information

2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 912 F.Supp.2d 363 United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA, Dean Debnam, Christopher Heaney, Susan Holliday, CNM, MSN, and Maria

More information

Is it unconstitutional to display a religious monument, memorial, or other item on public property?

Is it unconstitutional to display a religious monument, memorial, or other item on public property? These issue summaries provide an overview of the law as of the date they were written and are for educational purposes only. These summaries may become outdated and may not represent the current state

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States NO. 12-696 In the Supreme Court of the United States TOWN OF GREECE, v. Petitioner, SUSAN GALLOWAY AND LINDA STEPHENS, Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals

More information

WHEN THE EXCEPTION BECOMES THE RULE: MARSH AND SECTARIAN LEGISLATIVE PRAYER POST-SUMMUM

WHEN THE EXCEPTION BECOMES THE RULE: MARSH AND SECTARIAN LEGISLATIVE PRAYER POST-SUMMUM University of Cincinnati Law Review Volume 79 Issue 3 Article 3 10-17-2011 WHEN THE EXCEPTION BECOMES THE RULE: MARSH AND SECTARIAN LEGISLATIVE PRAYER POST-SUMMUM Scott Gaylord Follow this and additional

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cv EAK-MAP. versus

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cv EAK-MAP. versus Case: 12-11613 Date Filed: 03/26/2013 Page: 1 of 39 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-11613 D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cv-01538-EAK-MAP ATHEISTS OF FLORIDA, INC.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION John Doe v. Gossage Doc. 10 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV-070-M UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION JOHN DOE PLAINTIFF VS. DARREN GOSSAGE, In his official capacity

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 12-696 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States TOWN OF GREECE, Petitioner, v. SUSAN GALLOWAY AND LINDA STEPHENS, Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 12-798 In The Supreme Court of the United States MARTIN COUNTY AND MARTIN COUNTY BOARD, Petitioner, v. ANNE DHALIWAL Respondent. On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The

More information

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE Post Office Box 7482 Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-7482 JOHN W. WHITEHEAD Founder and President TELEPHONE 434 / 978-3888 FACSIMILE 434/ 978 1789 www.rutherford.org Sheriff Donald

More information

CRS-2 served a secular legislative purpose because the Commandments displays included the following notation: The secular application of the Ten Comma

CRS-2 served a secular legislative purpose because the Commandments displays included the following notation: The secular application of the Ten Comma Order Code RS22223 Updated October 8, 2008 Public Display of the Ten Commandments Summary Cynthia Brougher Legislative Attorney American Law Division In 1980, the Supreme Court held in Stone v. Graham

More information

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. RONALD KIDWELL, ET AL., Petitioners, CITY OF UNION, OHIO, ET AL., Respondents.

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. RONALD KIDWELL, ET AL., Petitioners, CITY OF UNION, OHIO, ET AL., Respondents. NO. 06-1226 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONALD KIDWELL, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CITY OF UNION, OHIO, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of

More information

LICENSE TO DISCRIMINATE: CHOOSE LIFE LICENSE PLATES AND THE GOVERNMENT SPEECH DOCTRINE

LICENSE TO DISCRIMINATE: CHOOSE LIFE LICENSE PLATES AND THE GOVERNMENT SPEECH DOCTRINE \\server05\productn\n\nvj\8-2\nvj209.txt unknown Seq: 1 1-APR-08 13:20 LICENSE TO DISCRIMINATE: CHOOSE LIFE LICENSE PLATES AND THE GOVERNMENT SPEECH DOCTRINE W. Alexander Evans* I. INTRODUCTION The line

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0-jgb-dtb Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 0 David J. Kaloyanides SBN 0 E: djpkaplc@me.com DAVID J.P. KALOYANIDES A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Central Avenue Chino, CA 0 T: ( -0/F: (

More information

Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities

Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities Thursday, September 19, 2013; 9:30 11:30 a.m. Randy E. Riddle, Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai League of California Cities 2013 Annual Conference;

More information

TOWN OF GREECE, Petitioner, v. SUSAN GALLOWAY AND LINDA STEPHENS, Respondents.

TOWN OF GREECE, Petitioner, v. SUSAN GALLOWAY AND LINDA STEPHENS, Respondents. No. 12-696 In The Supreme Court of the United States TOWN OF GREECE, Petitioner, v. SUSAN GALLOWAY AND LINDA STEPHENS, Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second

More information

December 2, 2015 VIA U.S. MAIL & ELECTRONIC MAIL. Chancellor Gene Block University of California Los Angeles Chancellor s Office

December 2, 2015 VIA U.S. MAIL & ELECTRONIC MAIL. Chancellor Gene Block University of California Los Angeles Chancellor s Office December 2, 2015 VIA U.S. MAIL & ELECTRONIC MAIL Chancellor Gene Block University of California Los Angeles Chancellor s Office Dear Chancellor Block, The undersigned national legal organizations the American

More information

October 15, By & U.S. Mail

October 15, By  & U.S. Mail (202) 466-3234 (202) 898-0955 (fax) www.au.org 1301 K Street, NW Suite 850, East Tower Washington, DC 20005 October 15, 2014 By Email & U.S. Mail Florida Department of Management Services Office of the

More information

Case 4:11-cv Document 25 Filed in TXSD on 07/28/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER

Case 4:11-cv Document 25 Filed in TXSD on 07/28/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER Case 4:11-cv-02585 Document 25 Filed in TXSD on 07/28/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,

More information

VS. ARIZONA LIFE COALITION; GARY PAISLEY, Respondents. On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

VS. ARIZONA LIFE COALITION; GARY PAISLEY, Respondents. On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit STACEY STANTON; MICHAEL FRIAS; BRIAN LANG; JOHN SPEARMAN; TERRY CONNOR; WILLIAM A. ORDWAY; and LELA STEFFEY, Members of the Arizona License Plate Commission, VS. Petitioners, ARIZONA LIFE COALITION; GARY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Case No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Case No. COMPLAINT de Haan Law Firm, PLLC 0 N Stone Ave. Suite Tucson, Arizona 01 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - Stuart P. de Haan, State Bar No. Attorney for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. In the Supreme Court of the United States JOHN WALKER III, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. TEXAS DIVISION, SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INC., ET AL. ON PETITION

More information

Identifying Government Speech

Identifying Government Speech Faulkner University From the SelectedWorks of Andy G Olree 2009 Identifying Government Speech Andy G Olree Available at: https://works.bepress.com/andy_olree/3/ IDENTIFYING GOVERNMENT SPEECH ABSTRACT The

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Columbia Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Columbia Division UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Columbia Division Matthew Alexander Nielson, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., ~ vs. ~ Plaintiffs, School District Five of Lexington

More information

Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities

Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CITY ATTORNEYS DEPARTMENT September 19, 2013 A City May Sponsor an Expressive Program or Activity in Number of Ways

More information

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 18-1254 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL ATHEISTS, INC., a Delaware non-profit organization, HOWARD SPRAGUE, and FLOYD LAWSON, on behalf of the organization, Petitioners, v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Case No. 101 CV 556 OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC. Plaintiff, JUDGE KATHLEEN O'MALLEY v. ROBERT ASHBROOK,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RUTHELLE FRANK, et al., v. SCOTT WALKER, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 11-CV-1128 Defendants. LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS OF WISCONSIN,

More information

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

In the House of Representatives, U.S., H. Res. 132 In the House of Representatives, U.S., March 20, 2003. Whereas on June 26, 2002, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Newdow v. United States Congress (292 F.3d 597; 9th Cir. 2002) (Newdow

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:17-cv-05595 Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 1 Michael P. Hrycak NJ Attorney ID # 2011990 316 Lenox Avenue Westfield, NJ 07090 (908)789-1870 michaelhrycak@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiffs

More information

Legislative Prayers and Judicial Sins: How Not to Think About Constitutional Foundings

Legislative Prayers and Judicial Sins: How Not to Think About Constitutional Foundings Legislative Prayers and Judicial Sins: How Not to Think About Constitutional Foundings Jamin Raskin 1 American University Washington College of Law United States Marsh v. Chambers: Using History to Evade

More information

CRS-2 morning and that the federal and state statutes violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. 4 The Trial Court Decision. On July 21

CRS-2 morning and that the federal and state statutes violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. 4 The Trial Court Decision. On July 21 Order Code RS21250 Updated July 20, 2006 The Constitutionality of Including the Phrase Under God in the Pledge of Allegiance Summary Henry Cohen Legislative Attorney American Law Division On June 26, 2002,

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 12-1039 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PLANNED PARENTHOOD

More information

Public Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols

Public Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols Public Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols Cynthia Brougher Legislative Attorney February 2, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... INTEREST OF AMICUS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 1 CONCLUSION... 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... INTEREST OF AMICUS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 1 CONCLUSION... 4 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 1 CONCLUSION... 4 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Page Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980)... 3

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 17-874 ELIZABETH NORTON, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Calvada, v. BRIAN WONG, Petitioner, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORATI TO THE

More information

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., et al.,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., et al., No. 10-1973 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., et al., v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv UU.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv UU. Case: 12-13402 Date Filed: (1 of 10) 03/22/2013 Page: 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-13402 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-21203-UU [DO NOT PUBLISH]

More information

Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe. This case concerning prayer in public

Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe. This case concerning prayer in public Embury 1 Kathleen Embury College Level C and E 6 th Period Supreme Court Writing Assignment 3/20/14 On June 19 th, 2000, Supreme Court Justice Stevens declared the majority verdict for the case Santa Fe

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Columbia Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Columbia Division 3:12-cv-01427-CMC Date Filed 06/11/12 Entry Number 6 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Columbia Division Matthew Alexander Nielson; J.Z., a Minor Under age 18 by his

More information

Case 1:10-cv Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case 1:10-cv-00583 Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM J. KELLY, v. Plaintiff, JESSE WHITE, in his capacity as Illinois

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND VERIFIED COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND VERIFIED COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND GRACE C. OSEDIACZ, : Plaintiff : : vs. : CA No. 03- : CITY OF CRANSTON, by and : through its Treasurer, Randy Rossi, : STEPHEN P. LAFFEY, individually

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 10-35542 08/15/2011 08/29/2011 ID: 7857330 7874546 DktEntry: 41-1 42-2 Page: 1 of 67 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED AUG 15 2011 NAMPA CLASSICAL ACADEMY;

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY FILED NOV 0 PM : Hon. Beth M. Andrus KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --01- SEA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY MARK ELSTER and SARAH PYNCHON, Plaintiffs,

More information

First Amendment and Specialty License Plates: The Choose Life Controversy, The

First Amendment and Specialty License Plates: The Choose Life Controversy, The Missouri Law Review Volume 73 Issue 4 Fall 2008 Article 15 Fall 2008 First Amendment and Specialty License Plates: The Choose Life Controversy, The Stephanie S. Bell Follow this and additional works at:

More information

Case: 3:09-cv wmc Document #: 35 Filed: 03/31/11 Page 1 of 13

Case: 3:09-cv wmc Document #: 35 Filed: 03/31/11 Page 1 of 13 Case: 3:09-cv-00767-wmc Document #: 35 Filed: 03/31/11 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RANDY R. KOSCHNICK, v. Plaintiff, ORDER 09-cv-767-wmc GOVERNOR

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 12-1077 In the Supreme Court of the United States KENNETH TYLER SCOTT AND CLIFTON POWELL, Petitioners, v. SAINT JOHN S CHURCH IN THE WILDERNESS, CHARLES I. THOMPSON, AND CHARLES W. BERBERICH, Respondents.

More information

OCTOBER 2017 LAW REVIEW CONTENT-BASED PARK PERMIT DECISIONS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

OCTOBER 2017 LAW REVIEW CONTENT-BASED PARK PERMIT DECISIONS UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONTENT-BASED PARK PERMIT DECISIONS UNCONSTITUTIONAL James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2017 James C. Kozlowski Controversy surrounding monuments to the Confederacy in public parks and spaces have drawn increased

More information

TESTIMONY OF JAY WORONA, GENERAL COUNSEL TO THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION. before THE NEW YORK CITY COUNCIL EDUCATION COMMITTEE

TESTIMONY OF JAY WORONA, GENERAL COUNSEL TO THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION. before THE NEW YORK CITY COUNCIL EDUCATION COMMITTEE TESTIMONY OF JAY WORONA, GENERAL COUNSEL TO THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION before THE NEW YORK CITY COUNCIL EDUCATION COMMITTEE on RESOLUTION NO. 1155 CALLING UPON THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 14-144 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JOHN WALKER III,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 13-1234 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Greg Weber, Governor of the State of Gilead, Petitioner, v. Winston Smith, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURTS FOR THE FOURTEENTH

More information

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Case: 17-13025 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 1 of 20 No. 17-13025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AMANDA KONDRAT YEV, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA,

More information

APRIL 2017 LAW REVIEW PARK PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL WEDDING PHOTOS

APRIL 2017 LAW REVIEW PARK PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL WEDDING PHOTOS PARK PERMIT FOR COMMERCIAL WEDDING PHOTOS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2017 James C. Kozlowski The First Amendment prohibits laws "abridging the freedom of speech" and is applicable to the states through

More information

Case 1:07-cv Document 29 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv Document 29 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case 1:07-cv-06048 Document 29 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DAWN S. SHERMAN, a minor, through ) ROBERT I. SHERMAN,

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-1315 In The Supreme Court of the United States GARY LOCKE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Petitioners, v. JOSHUA DAVEY, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT

More information

Case 1:10-cv RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29

Case 1:10-cv RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29 Case 1:10-cv-00135-RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29 John E. Bloomquist James E. Brown DONEY CROWLEY BLOOMQUIST PAYNE UDA P.C. 44 West 6 th Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1185 Helena, MT 59624

More information

NO In The Supreme Court of the United States. KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, FRANK BUONO, Respondent.

NO In The Supreme Court of the United States. KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, FRANK BUONO, Respondent. NO. 08-472 In The Supreme Court of the United States KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, v. FRANK BUONO, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals

More information

The Government Speech Doctrine and Its Effect on the Democratic Process

The Government Speech Doctrine and Its Effect on the Democratic Process The Government Speech Doctrine and Its Effect on the Democratic Process When the government speaks... to promote its own policies or to advance a particular idea, it is, in the end, accountable to the

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 20 September 2016

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. COA Filed: 20 September 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA15-1381 Filed: 20 September 2016 Wake County, No. 15 CVS 4434 GILBERT BREEDLOVE and THOMAS HOLLAND, Plaintiffs v. MARION R. WARREN, in his official capacity

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States Nos. 16-1146, 16-1140, 16-1153 In the Supreme Court of the United States A WOMAN S FRIEND PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC AND ALTERNATIVE WOMEN S CENTER, Petitioners, v. XAVIER BECERRA, Attorney General of the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Case No. Judge

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Case No. Judge IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1 CHRISTOPHER SPENCER 2 KENNETH BUCK, Case No. Judge vs. Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 07-689 In the Supreme Court of the United States GARY BARTLETT, ET AL., v. Petitioners, DWIGHT STRICKLAND, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the North Carolina Supreme Court

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MIKE CAMPBELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:18-CV-04129-BCW ) CHERI TOALSON REISCH, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv WLS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv WLS Case 1:14-cv-00042-WLS Document 71 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 9 Case: 15-13628 Date Filed: 07/28/2016 Page: 1 of 8 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-13628

More information

Case 7:11-cv MFU Document 10 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division

Case 7:11-cv MFU Document 10 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division Case 7:11-cv-00435-MFU Document 10 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division DOE 1, by Doe 1 s next friend and parent, DOE 2, who also

More information

Nos & In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Nos & In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Case: 13-57126 10/22/2014 ID: 9286977 DktEntry: 37 Page: 1 of 31 Nos. 13-57126 & 14-55231 444444444444444444444444 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit STEVE TRUNK, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

More information

United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver

United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver By: Roland C. Goss August 31, 2015 On October 6, 2015, the second day of this

More information

Case 4:92-cv SOH Document 72 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 730

Case 4:92-cv SOH Document 72 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 730 Case 4:92-cv-04040-SOH Document 72 Filed 01/17/19 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 730 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION MARY TURNER, et al. PLAINTIFFS V. CASE NO.

More information

No. 07,1500 IN THE. TIMOTHY SULLIVAN and LAWRENCE E. DANSINGER, Petitioners, CITY OF AUGUSTA, Respondent.

No. 07,1500 IN THE. TIMOTHY SULLIVAN and LAWRENCE E. DANSINGER, Petitioners, CITY OF AUGUSTA, Respondent. No. 07,1500 IN THE FILED OpI=:IC~.OF THE CLERK ~ ~M~"~ d6"~rt, US. TIMOTHY SULLIVAN and LAWRENCE E. DANSINGER, Petitioners, CITY OF AUGUSTA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED

More information

MOTION TO DECLARE [TEEN SEX STATUTE] UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED AND TO DISMISS THE CHARGES AGAINST THE CHILD

MOTION TO DECLARE [TEEN SEX STATUTE] UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED AND TO DISMISS THE CHARGES AGAINST THE CHILD STATE OF DISTRICT COURT DIVISION JUVENILE BRANCH IN THE MATTER OF, A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN CASE NO.: MOTION TO DECLARE [TEEN SEX STATUTE] UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS APPLIED AND TO DISMISS THE CHARGES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 3:14-cv-213 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 3:14-cv-213 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 3:14-cv-213 GENERAL SYNOD OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, et al., v. Plaintiffs, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as the Attorney

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION JASON KESSLER, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:17CV00056

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 08-4170 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2008 CRYSTAL DOYLE ET AL., Petitioners, v. ARIF NOORANI, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Fourteenth Circuit Court of Appeals,

More information

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. WILLIAM SEMPLE, et al.,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. WILLIAM SEMPLE, et al., No. 18-1123 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM SEMPLE, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellees WAYNE W. WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Colorado, Defendant-Appellant.

More information

No. 88 C 2328 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION. May 25, 1989, Decided

No. 88 C 2328 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION. May 25, 1989, Decided RAY WEBSTER and MATTHEW DUNNE, by and through his parents and next best friends, PHILIP and HELEN DUNNE, Plaintiffs, v. NEW LENOX SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 122 and ALEX M. MARTINO, and as Superintendent of New

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No Case: 10-56971, 05/21/2015, ID: 9545868, DktEntry: 313-1, Page 1 of 3 (1 of 22) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No. 10-56971 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

More information

Case 5:10-cv M Document 7 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:10-cv M Document 7 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:10-cv-01186-M Document 7 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MUNEER AWAD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-10-1186-M ) PAUL ZIRIAX,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF HIDALGO COUNTY TEXAS, INCORPORATED;

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF HIDALGO COUNTY TEXAS, INCORPORATED; IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF HIDALGO COUNTY TEXAS, INCORPORATED; PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF LUBBOCK, INCORPORATED; PLANNED PARENTHOOD

More information

Limiting the Federal Forum: The Dangers of an Expansive Interpretation of the Tax Injunction Act

Limiting the Federal Forum: The Dangers of an Expansive Interpretation of the Tax Injunction Act comment Limiting the Federal Forum: The Dangers of an Expansive Interpretation of the Tax Injunction Act In Henderson v. Stalder, 1 the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the Tax Injunction

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

In the Supreme Court of the United States PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI NO. In the Supreme Court of the United States BRADLEY JOHNSON, v. Petitioner, POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals

More information

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER V. FLORIDA ET AL. 517 U.S. 44 (1996)

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER V. FLORIDA ET AL. 517 U.S. 44 (1996) SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER V. FLORIDA ET AL. 517 U.S. 44 (1996) CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act provides that an Indian tribe may

More information

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30 Case 2:16-cv-00038-DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30 Marcus R. Mumford (12737) MUMFORD PC 405 South Main Street, Suite 975 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 428-2000 Email: mrm@mumfordpc.com

More information

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Attorney General Pam Bondi, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees / Cross-Appellants, v.

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 16-1436 In the Supreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF

More information

Supreme Court Review

Supreme Court Review Supreme Court Review Presented by the State and Local Legal Center Hosted by the National Association of Counties Featuring John Bursch, Warner Norcross & Judd, Tony Mauro, The National Law Journal/ Legal

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 05-657 JOHN AARON DUHON, ET AL VERSUS LAFAYETTE CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT ************** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE,

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 12-929 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. J-CREW MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States

More information

Limitations on the Use of Mandatory Dues

Limitations on the Use of Mandatory Dues Limitations on the Use of Mandatory Dues Often during BOG meetings reference is made to Keller, generally in the context of whether an action under consideration is or would be a violation of Keller. Keller

More information

Case: Document: 33 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pages: 12. September 30, 2013

Case: Document: 33 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pages: 12. September 30, 2013 Gino J. Agnello, Clerk Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 September 30, 2013 Re: Shepard v. Madigan, No. 13-2661 Dear Mr. Agnello: We submit this letter

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO; THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ALBUQUERQUE/BERNALILLO COUNTY, INC.; SAGE COUNCILL NEW MEXICO

More information

ACLJ American Center fo r Law & Justice *

ACLJ American Center fo r Law & Justice * ... *,...... ~'7~. ACLJ American Center fo r Law & Justice * February 17,2012 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS and ELECTRONIC MAIL Dr. Joseph Sheehan, Superintendent Sheboygan Area School District Re: Dr. Matt Driscoll,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. JONATHAN CORBETT, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-12426 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-24106-MGC [DO NOT PUBLISH] FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER Case 113-cv-00544-RWS Document 16 Filed 03/04/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION THE DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and DR. EUGENE

More information