3-4 House Campaign Expenditures: Open House Seats, Major Party General Election

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "3-4 House Campaign Expenditures: Open House Seats, Major Party General Election"

Transcription

1 Chapter 3: Campaign Finance in Congressional Elections Table of Contents Number Title Page 3-1 The Cost of Winning an Election, (in nominal and 2016 dollars) House Campaign Expenditures: Major Party General Election Candidates, (full 3 cycle), Adjusted for inflation, 2016 Dollars 3-3 House Campaign Expenditures: Incumbents and Challengers, Major Party General Election Candidates by Election Outcome, (full cycle), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Dollars House Campaign Expenditures: Open House Seats, Major Party General Election 10 Candidates by Election Outcome, (full cycle), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars 3-5 Senate Campaign Expenditures: Major Party General Election Candidates, (full 13 cycle, net dollars), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars 3-6 Senate Campaign Expenditures: Incumbents and Challengers, Major Party General 16 Election Candidates by Election Outcome, (full cycle), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars 3-7 Senate Expenditures: Open Senate Seats, Major Party General Election Candidates, by 19 Election Outcome, (full cycle, mean net dollars), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars 3-8 Campaign Funding Sources: House and Senate Major Party General Election Candidates, Number Political Action Committees Making Contributions to Candidates, PAC Contributions to Congressional Candidates (in $ millions), Adjusted for 34 Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars 3-11 How PACs Distributed Their Contributions to Congressional Candidates, Political Party Contributions, Coordinated and Independent Expenditures for Congressional 41 Candidates, , Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars 3-13 Hard and Soft Money Raised by National Party Committees, (in millions of 43 dollars), Adjusted for inflation, 2016 Dollars 3-14 Non-Party Independent Expenditures in House and Senate Elections, , Adjusted for inflation, 2016 Dollars 45

2 Table 3-1 The Cost of Winning an Election, (in nominal and 2016 dollars) House Winners Nominal Dollars 2016 Dollars Senate Winners Nominal Dollars 2016 Dollars ,516,021 1,516,021 10,464,068 10,464, ,466,533 1,486,795 9,655,660 9,789, ,596,953 1,669,382 10,351,556 10,821, ,434,760 1,579,196 8,993,945 9,899, ,362,239 1,518,564 7,101,029 7,915, ,259,791 1,499,795 8,835,416 10,518, ,038,391 1,319,328 7,183,825 9,127, ,644 1,216,237 3,728,644 4,974, ,907 1,178,999 7,198,423 a 10,032, , ,027 4,655,806 6,855, ,198 1,049,664 3,921,653 5,998, , ,335 4,488,195 7,268, , ,945 3,353,115 5,736, , ,213 3,298,324 6,056, , ,303 3,746,225 7,600, , ,418 3,067,559 6,717,

3 Note: Inflation adjustment based on average 2016 CPI. a. Jon Corzine (D-N.J.) spent $63,209,506. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) spent $29,941,194. The remaining Senate winners in 2000 spent an average of $4,737,365. Source: Campaign Finance Institute analysis of Federal Election Commission data. 2

4 Table 3-2 House Campaign Expenditures: Major Party General Election Candidates, (full cycle), Adjusted for inflation, 2016 Dollars All Candidates Total expenditures 815,947, ,493, ,442,101 1,022,983, ,712, ,942, ,803,784 a 701,725,178 a Mean expenditure 1,128,559 1,108,513 1,231,431 1,280,330 1,194,578 1,185, , ,187 (n=723) (n=751) (n=784) (n=799) (n=754) (n=755) (n=752) (n=712) Mean, Democrats 979,324 1,002,234 1,077,861 1,383,880 1,194,334 1,012, , ,181 (n=367) (n=377) (n=390) (n=388) (n=410) (n=414) (n=380) (n=353) Mean, Republicans 1,282,405 1,215,645 1,383,442 1,182,574 1,194,870 1,395,024 1,083, ,348 (n=356) (n=374) (n=394) (n=411) (n=344) (n=341) (n=371) (n=358) Incumbents Mean, all incumbents 1,679,092 1,466,230 1,731,375 1,709,220 1,486,220 1,501,900 1,304,334 a 1,167,069 a (n=387) (n=386) (n=378) (n=393) (n=399) (n=402) (n=401) (n=387) Mean, Democrats 1,205,852 1,431,339 1,463,197 1,896,583 1,386,586 1,171,016 1,214,807 1,116,629 (n=169) (n=182) (n=162) (n=236) (n=229) (n=191) (n=190) (n=188) Mean, Republicans 1,737,944 1,497,357 1,932,509 1,427,577 1,620,435 1,801,419 1,386,644 1,216,385 (n=218) (n=204) (n=216) (n=157) (n=170) (n=211) (n=210) (n=198) Challengers Mean, all challengers 434, , , , , , , ,778 (n=254) (n=271) (n=288) (n=325) (n=284) (n=289) (n=284) (n=226) Mean, Democrats 562, , , , , , , ,809 (n=156) (n=149) (n=170) (n=111) (n=146) (n=190) (n=158) (n=115) Mean, Republicans 206, , , , , , , ,995 (n=98) (n=122) (n=118) (n=214) (n=139) (n=99) (n=126) (n=111) Open seats Mean, all open-seat candidates 1,594,721 1,377,100 1,137,335 1,266,689 1,748,609 1,806,915 1,485,891 1,502,855 (n=82) (n=94) (n=118) (n=81) (n=71) (n=64) (n=67) (n=99) Mean, Democrats 1,614,543 1,114,761 1,206,299 1,073,550 1,832,058 1,878,576 1,319,551 1,435,287 (n=42) (n=46) (n=58) (n=41) (n=36) (n=33) (n=32) (n=50) Mean, Republicans 1,434,706 1,628,509 1,070,669 1,464,656 1,662,776 1,730,630 1,637,974 1,573,298 (n=40) (n=48) (n=60) (n=40) (n=35) (n=31) (n=35) (n=49) 3

5 ,503,155 a 584,883,629 a 646,538,116 a 560,646,773 a 564,195,569 a 431,774,874 a 456,711, ,429, ,595, ,051, , , , , , , , , , ,212 (n=740) (n=719) (n=818) (n=787) (n=813) (n=731) (n=742) (n=736) (n=733) (n=767) 934, , , , , , , , , ,674 (n=372) (n=358) (n=412) (n=386) (n=410) (n=381) (n=397) (n=397) (n=399) (n=411) 1,007, , , , , , , , , ,394 (n=366) (n=360) (n=405) (n=400) (n=402) (n=349) (n=344) (n=340) (n=334) (n=356) 1,155,618 a 963,175 a 1,033,309 a 905,074 a 1,009,988 a 765, , , , ,089 (n=400) (n=400) (n=382) (n=382) (n=349) (n=405) (n=408) (n=389) (n=408) (n=383) 1,052, , ,931 1,003,088 1,053, , , , , ,744 (n=201) (n=189) (n=168) (n=224) (n=211) (n=247) (n=245) (n=231) (n=254) (n=216) 1,265,725 1,047,804 1,138, , , , , , , ,154 (n=197) (n=210) (n=213) (n=157) (n=137) (n=158) (n=163) (n=158) (n=154) (n=167) 525, , , , , ,829 a 277, , , ,338 (n=272) (n=254) (n=331) (n=302) (n=290) (n=270) (n=283) (n=262) (n=273) (n=270) 617, , , , , , , , , ,654 (n=136) (n=136) (n=191) (n=110) (n=111) (n=104) (n=126) (n=123) (n=119) (n=137) 434, , , , , , , , , ,794 (n=136) (n=118) (n=140) (n=192) (n=179) (n=165) (n=157) (n=139) (n=154) (n=133) 1,650,097 1,160, , , , ,592 1,071, , , ,526 (n=68) (n=65) (n=105) (n=103) (n=174) (n=56) (n=51) (n=86) (n=52) (n=114) 1,482,793 1,114, , , , ,475 1,001, , , ,712 (n=35) (n=33) (n=53) (n=52) (n=88) (n=30) (n=26) (n=43) (n=26) (n=58) 1,827,539 1,207,368 1,007, , , ,880 1,163, , , ,316 (n=33) (n=32) (n=52) (n=51) (n=86) (n=26) (n=24) (n=43) (n=26) (n=56) 4

6 ,608, ,049, ,277, ,453, , , , ,889 (n=752) (n=787) (n=819) (n=810) 417, , , ,854 (n=396) (n=416) (n=429) (n=434) 478, , , ,953 (n=356) (n=371) (n=390) (n=376) 480, , , ,249 (n=391) (n=377) (n=382) (n=382) 460, , , ,612 (n=248) (n=249) (n=254) (n=218) 516, , , ,114 (n=143) (n=128) (n=128) (n=163) 354, , , ,805 (n=277) (n=299) (n=335) (n=323) 271, , , ,524 (n=105) (n=109) (n=122) (n=162) 405, , , ,501 (n=172) (n=190) (n=213) (n=161) 587, , , ,221 (n=84) (n=111) (n=102) (n=106) 525, , , ,578 (n=43) (n=58) (n=53) (n=54) 652, , , ,120 (n=41) (n=53) (n=49) (n=52) 5

7 Note: The data include primary and general election expenditures for major party general-election candidates only. a. Includes one or more Independents. Independents are included only if they are incumbents or winning non-incumbents. Source: Campaign Finance Institute analysis of Federal Election Commission data. 6

8 Table 3-3 House Campaign Expenditures: Incumbents and Challengers, Major Party General Election Candidates by Election Outcome, (full cycle), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Dollars Incumbent won with 60% or more Incumbents 1,253,907 1,248,892 1,360,775 1,281,935 1,242,644 1,160,804 1,104,575 a 1,028,284 a 912,761 a 791,337 a (n=294) (n=296) (n= 256) (n= 251) (n=305) (n=300) (n=343) (n=336) (n=326) (n=309) Democrats 1,096,199 1,032,380 1,286,785 1,286,897 1,211,248 1,087,516 1,061, , , ,635 (n=140) (n=118) (n= 128) (n= 109) (n=197) (n=180) (n=166) (n=159) (n=167) (n=144) Republicans 1,397,278 1,392,421 1,434,765 1,278,125 1,299,911 1,270,737 1,145,868 1,055, , ,048 (n=154) (n=178) (n= 128) (n= 142) (n=108) (n=120) (n=176) (n=176) (n=157) (n=164) Challengers 130, , , , , , , , , ,052 (n=163) (n=182) (n= 171) (n=185) (n=191) (n=188) (n=230) (n=179) (n=198) (n=161) Democrats 158, , , , , , , , , ,484 (n=94) (n=122) (n=83 ) (n= 98) (n=84) (n=99) (n=126) (n=95) (n=96) (n=89) Republicans 91,546 78, , , , , , , , ,839 (n=69) (n=60) (n= 88) (n= 87) (n=107) (n=89) (n=104) (n=86) (n=102) (n=72) Incumbent won with <60% Incumbents 2,246,538 2,041,708 2,358,369 2,256,533 2,187,831 2,274,876 2,394,862 1,971,262 2,017,330 1,516,093 (n=85) (n=77) (n= 100) b (n= 87) (n=75) (n=80) (n=51) (n=46) (n=68) (n=85) Democrats 1,659,688 1,995,132 2,123,001 2,127,131 2,514,626 2,537,387 2,011,964 1,618,501 2,042,379 1,550,145 (n=27) (n=53) (n= 28) (n= 74) (n=27) (n=11) (n=19) (n=26) (n=32) (n=44) Republicans 2,519,726 2,144,563 2,449,901 2,993,131 2,004,009 2,233,026 2,622,208 2,429,850 1,995,063 1,479,552 (n=58) (n=24) (n= 72) (n= 13) (n=48) (n=69) (n=32) (n=20) (n=36) (n=41) Challengers 807, , ,922 1,260,410 1,227,834 1,196,483 1,056,746 1,134,469 1,215, ,398 (n=79) (n=76) (n= 95) b (n= 87) (n=75) (n=79) (n=49) (n=43) (n=68) (n=86) Democrats 974,403 1,193, ,060 1,835,815 1,127,726 1,041,661 1,070,241 1,610,499 1,298, ,546 (n= 53) (n=25) (n= 69) (n= 13) (n=48) (n=69) (n=30) (n=18) (n=36) (n=42) Republicans 467, ,367 1,442,941 1,159,326 1,405,807 2,264,745 1,035, ,727 1,122, ,121 (n=26) (n=51) (n= 26) (n= 74) (n=27) (n=10) (n=19) (n=25) (n=32) (n=44) Incumbent was defeated Incumbents 2,882,057 3,006,252 3,250,698 2,793,442 2,626,755 3,342,374 3,147,217 2,466,187 3,525,637 1,979,841 (n=8) (n=13) (n= 32) b (n= 55) (n=19) (n=22) (n=7) b (n=8) b (n=6) (n=6) Democrats 2,754,797 2,994,634 2,634,715 2,828,567 2,203,464 NA 3,283,750 2,392,092 1,857,656 1,257,794 (n=2) (n=11) (n= 12) (n= 53) (n=5) (n=5) (n=5) (n=2) (n=1) Republicans 2,924,478 3,070,147 3,620,287 1,862,611 2,777,930 3,342,374 2,805,883 2,589,680 4,359,628 2,124,250 (n=6) (n=2) (n= 20) (n= 2) (n=14) (n=22) (n=2) (n=3) (n=4) (n=5) Challengers 2,735,595 2,129,202 2,589,745 1,894,496 2,217,031 2,186,247 2,122,152 2,138,885 2,759,934 1,691,798 (n=8) (n=13) (n= 22) b (n= 55) (n=19) (n=22) (n=5) (n=4) (n=6) (n=6) Democrats 2,900,822 2,481,241 2,747,631 1,938,180 2,439,893 2,186,247 2,194,807 2,637,914 3,455,649 1,780,524 (n=7) (n=2) (n= 18) (n= 2) (n=14) (n=22) (n=2) (n=2) (n=4) (n=5) Republicans 1,579,008 2,065,196 1,879,258 1,892,848 1,593,019 NA 2,073,714 1,639,856 1,368,505 1,248,172 (n=1) (n=11) (n= 4) (n= 53) (n=5) (n=0) (n=3) (n=2) (n=2) (n=1) 7

9 ,411 a 731, ,104 a 657, , , , , , , , ,624 (n=262) (n=263) (n=234) (n=313) (n=359) (n=330) (n=318) (n=264) (n=284) (n=287) (n=272) (n=251) 725, , , , , , , , , , , ,248 (n=124) (n=120) (n=138) (n=197) (n=220) (n=209) (n=183) (n=178) (n=170) (n=184) (n=185) (n=194) 860, , , , , , , , , , , ,584 (n=137) (n=143) (n=95) (n=116) (n=139) (n=121) (n=135) (n=86) (n=114) (n=103) (n=87) (n=57) 159, , , , , , , , , , ,527 69,058 (n=212) (n=183) (n=187) (n=180) (n=234) (n=202) (n=184) (n=163) (n=170) (n=209) (n=225) (n=193) 149, , ,049 79, , , ,557 91, , , , ,210 (n=115) (n=96) (n=76) (n=65) (n=102) (n=85) (n=99) (n=62) (n=75) (n=84) (n=81) (n=56) 171, , , , , , , , , , ,882 52,645 (n=96) (n=87) (n=111) (n=115) (n=132) (n=117) (n=85) (n=101) (n=95) (n=125) (n=144) (n=137) 1,518,305 1,163,580 a 1,333,046 1,115,171 1,420,178 1,720,108 1,011, , , , , ,591 (n=99) (n=85) (n=91) (n=77) (n=44) (n=52) (n=74) (n=90) (n=76) (n=71) (n=98) (n=90) 1,406,646 1,181,855 1,418,072 1,155,308 1,398,411 2,054, ,428 1,110, , , , ,991 (n=41) (n=70) (n=57) (n=44) (n=23) (n=20) (n=58) (n=35) (n=50) (n=51) (n=62) (n=20) 1,597,237 1,084,890 1,190,503 1,061,655 1,444,018 1,510,868 1,144, , , , , ,764 (n=58) (n=14) (n=34) (n=33) (n=21) (n=32) (n=16) (n=55) (n=26) (n=20) (n=36) (n=70) 797, , , , , , , , , , , ,369 (n=98) (n=85) (n=84) (n=75) (n=44) (n=46) (n=72) (n=84) (n=76) (n=71) (n=98) (n=90) 823, , , , , , , , , , , ,302 (n=58) (n=14) (n=29) (n=31) (n=21) (n=28) (n=16) (n=53) (n=26) (n=20) (n=36) (n=70) 760, , , , , , , , , , , ,100 (n=40) (n=71) (n=55) (n=44) (n=23) (n=18) (n=56) (n=31) (n=50) (n=51) (n=62) (n=20) 1,677,533 1,604,892 1,519,424 1,224,177 1,939,697 1,275,907 1,069,683 1,127, , , , ,453 (n=21) (n=34) (n=24) b (n=15) (n=5) (n=6) (n=16) (n=29) (n=31) (n=19) (n=12) (n=40) 1,086,695 1,604,892 1,621,330 1,082,891 1,897,930 1,156,459 1,116, , , , , ,761 (n=3) (n=34) (n=16) (n=6) (n=2) (n=1) (n=13) (n=3) (n=28) (n=14) (n=7) (n=4) 1,790,495 NA 1,315,611 1,318,369 1,967,542 1,299, ,146 1,156, , , , ,751 (n=18) (n=0) (n=8) (n=9) (n=3) (n=5) (n=3) (n=26) (n=3) (n=5) (n=5) (n=36) 1,664,714 1,131, , ,295 a 1,268, ,535 1,191, , , , , ,640 (n=21) (n=34) (n=19) (n=15) (n=5) (n=11) (n=16) (n=23) (n=31) (n=19) (n=12) (n=40) 1,628,884 NA 601, ,160 1,641,112 1,105, , ,181 1,030, , , ,247 (n=18) (n=0) (n=6) (n=8) (n=3) (n=9) (n=3) (n=22) (n=4) (n=5) (n=5) (n=36) 1,883,978 1,131, , , , ,746 1,332, , , , , ,186 (n=3) (n=34) (n=13) (n=6) (n=2) (n=2) (n=13) (n=1) (n=27) (n=14) (n=7) (n=4) 8

10 Note: The data include primary and general election expenditures for major party general-election candidates only. a. Includes one or more Independents. Independents are included only if they are incumbents or winning non-incumbents. b. The N for incumbents in "Incumbent was defeated" is greater than that of challengers because some races were incumbent v. incumbent races. Source: Campaign Finance Institute analysis of Federal Election Commission data. 9

11 Table 3-4 House Campaign Expenditures: Open House Seats, Major Party General Election Candidates by Election Outcome, (full cycle), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars All Winners 1,676,095 1,881,499 1,588,367 1,539,706 2,126,111 2,244,912 1,910,551 1,721,598 1,902,128 1,463,569 1,174,901 (n=46) (n=49) (n=62) (n=42) (n=36) (n=33) (n=36) (n=49) (n=36) (n=34) (n=53) Democrats 1,647,188 1,681,721 1,861,744 1,414,542 2,424,632 2,101,289 1,849,803 1,650,484 1,816,138 1,398,350 1,146,107 (n=18) (n=15) (n=31) (n=7) (n=19) (n=20) (n=15) (n=18) (n=10) (n=18) (n=24) Republicans 1,694,678 1,969,636 1,314,992 1,564,739 1,792,471 2,465,870 1,953,942 1,762,890 1,935,201 1,536,940 1,198,729 (n=28) (n=34) (n=31) (n=35) (n=17) (n=13) (n=21) (n=31) (n=26) (n=16) (n=29) Winners with 60% or more 1,569,854 1,472,124 1,502,242 1,291,185 1,969,770 1,393,544 1,643,938 1,525,901 1,500,746 1,111, ,167 (n=25) (n=25) (n=33) (n=26) (n=11) (n=15) (n=20) (n=24) (n=14) (n=11) (n=18) Democrats 1,187,857 1,333,855 1,697, ,884 2,459,321 1,448,474 1,215,622 1,733,556 1,349, , ,745 (n=9) (n=10) (n=19) (n=4) (n=6) (n=11) (n=8) (n=8) (n=4) (n=8) (n=8) Republicans 1,784,728 1,564,303 1,237,835 1,357,785 1,382,309 1,242,489 1,929,481 1,422,074 1,561,147 1,492,813 1,066,905 (n=16) (n=15) (n=14) (n=22) (n=5) (n=4) (n=12) (n=16) (n=10) (n=3) (n=10) Winners with <60% 1,802,572 2,307,930 1,686,373 1,882,615 2,194,901 2,954,384 2,243,817 1,909,467 2,157,551 1,631,958 1,266,821 (n=21) (n=24) (n=29) (n=16) (n=25) (n=18) (n=16) (n=25) (n=22) (n=23) (n=35) Democrats 2,106,519 2,377,453 2,122,480 2,028,539 2,408,621 2,899,174 2,574,580 1,584,026 2,127,066 1,742,243 1,265,288 (n=9) (n=5) (n=12) (n=3) (n=13) (n=9) (n=7) (n=10) (n=6) (n=10) (n=16) Republicans 1,574,612 2,289,635 1,378,532 1,848,940 1,963,371 3,009,594 1,986,556 2,126,427 2,168,985 1,547,123 1,268,110 (n=12) (n=19) (n=17) (n=13) (n=12) (n=9) (n=9) (n=15) (n=16) (n=13) (n=19) All losers 1,337, , , ,332 1,360,321 1,340, ,739 1,274,804 1,366, , ,985 (n=36) (n=45) (n=56) (n=39) (n=35) (n=31) (n=31) (n=47) (n=32) (n=31) (n=52) Democrats 1,591, , ,752 1,003,345 1,169,771 1,535, ,682 1,310,334 1,349, , ,813 (n=24) (n=31) (n=27) (n=34) (n=17) (n=13) (n=17) (n=31) (n=25) (n=15) (n=29) Republicans 828, , , ,078 1,540,286 1,199,624 1,164,022 1,205,964 1,427, , ,984 (n=12) (n=14) (n=29) (n=5) (n=18) (n=18) (n=14) (n=16) (n=7) (n=16) (n=23) Losers with >40% 2,222,636 1,242,989 1,128,565 1,570,599 1,728,744 2,005,098 1,745,065 1,629,662 2,049,367 1,122, ,846 (n=20) (n=24) (n=27) (n=16) (n=25) (n=18) (n=16) (n=25) (n=20) (n=22) (n=35) Democrats 2,922,241 1,280, ,138 1,644,209 1,562,130 2,134,022 1,350,808 1,495,734 2,154, ,334 1,005,458 (n=12) (n=17) (n=14) (n=13) (n=12) (n=9) (n=9) (n=15) (n=15) (n=12) (n=19) Republicans 1,173,229 1,151,312 1,521,026 1,251,617 1,882,543 1,876,174 2,251,968 1,830,554 1,733,631 1,372, ,807 (n=8) (n=7) (n=13) (n=3) (n=13) (n=9) (n=7) (n=10) (n=5) (n=10) (n=16) Losers with 40% or less 230, , , , , , , , , , ,855 (n=16) (n=21) (n=29) (n=23) (n=10) (n=13) (n=15) (n=22) (n=12) (n=9) (n=17) Democrats 261, , , , , , ,165 1,136, , , ,685 (n=12) (n=14) (n=13) (n=21) (n=5) (n=4) (n=8) (n=16) (n=10) (n=3) (n=10) Republicans 137, , ,381 32, , ,075 76, , ,711 52, ,956 (n=4) (n=7) (n=16) (n=2) (n=5) (n=9) (n=7) (n=6) (n=2) (n=6) (n=7) 10

12 , ,490 1,136,140 1,230,333 1,146,951 1,018,498 (n=52) (n=91) (n=30) (n=27) (n=46) (n=26) 1,095, ,829 1,079,396 1,118,427 1,129, ,633 (n=14) (n=57) (n=18) (n=13) (n=22) (n=8) 930,534 1,008,449 1,221,259 1,334,248 1,163,390 1,031,330 (n=38) (n=34) (n=12) (n=14) (n=24) (n=18) 1,001, ,800 1,135,125 1,103,535 1,189, ,597 (n=21) (n=44) (n=14) (n=11) (n=19) (n=8) 951, , , ,056 1,177, ,495 (n=3) (n=33) (n=9) (n=7) (n=7) (n=3) 1,009,411 1,503,070 1,447,233 1,643,374 1,197, ,657 (n=18) (n=11) (n=5) (n=4) (n=12) (n=5) 957, ,901 1,137,029 1,317,507 1,116,711 1,088,232 (n=31) (n=47) (n=16) (n=16) (n=27) (n=18) 1,134,840 1,124,411 1,197,060 1,495,692 1,106,555 1,180,513 (n=11) (n=24) (n=9) (n=6) (n=15) (n=5) 859, ,890 1,059,849 1,210,597 1,129,410 1,052,741 (n=20) (n=23) (n=7) (n=10) (n=12) (n=13) 918, , , , , ,523 (n=51) (n=83) (n=26) (n=24) (n=40) (n=26) 832, , , , , ,668 (n=38) (n=31) (n=12) (n=13) (n=21) (n=18) 1,167, , , , , ,695 (n=13) (n=52) (n=14) (n=10) (n=19) (n=8) 1,106, , ,297 1,146, , ,333 (n=31) (n=47) (n=16) (n=16) (n=23) (n=18) 965, , ,469 1,025, , ,428 (n=20) (n=23) (n=8) (n=9) (n=10) (n=13) 1,362, , ,123 1,407, , ,291 (n=11) (n=24) (n=8) (n=6) (n=13) (n=5) 626, , , , , ,197 (n=20) (n=36) (n=10) (n=8) (n=15) (n=8) 685, ,812 1,032, , , ,494 (n=18) (n=8) (n=4) (n=4) (n=9) (n=5) 93, , , , , ,700 (n=2) (n=28) (n=6) (n=4) (n=6) (n=3) 11

13 Note: The data include primary and general election expenditures for major party general-election candidates only. Source: Campaign Finance Institute analysis of Federal Election Commission data. 12

14 Table 3-5 Senate Campaign Expenditures: Major Party General Election Candidates, (full cycle, net dollars), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars All candidates Total expenditures 554,571, ,399, ,178, ,391,774 c 434,022, ,038,715 a 466,945, ,592, ,031, ,908, ,469,171 Mean expenditure 8,277,186 7,935,199 a 9,748,873 8,808,335 6,576,104 9,431,364 6,866,852 6,057,946 8,121,685 5,559,217 5,422,595 (n=67) (n=71) (n=63) (n=71) (n=66) (n=65) (n=68) (n=62) (n=66) (n=66) (n=65) Mean, Democrats 8,435,559 8,740,188 11,299,735 7,851,056 6,541,121 10,250,150 7,147,261 6,140,671 8,495,648 5,126,628 5,179,354 (n=34) (n=34) (n=28) (n=32) (n=34) (n=31) (n=34) (n=30) (n=33) (n=34) (n=32) Mean, Republicans 8,114,015 7,234,767 8,848,350 9,452,088 6,613,273 8,375,755 6,586,444 5,980,392 7,747,721 6,018,843 5,658,466 (n=33) (n=36) (n=33) (n=38) (n=32) (n=32) (n=34) (n=32) (n=33) (n=32) (n=33) Incumbents Mean, all incumbents 10,146,576 11,048,388 11,186,288 a 10,477,899 8,642,944 11,221,964 8,343,435 6,051,192 6,314,739 6,962,616 6,475,606 (n=29) (n=27) (n=22) (n=23) (n=30) (n=29) (n=26) (n=27) (n=29) (n=29) (n=20) Mean, Democrats 8,868,486 13,440,462 11,782,499 13,869,469 7,077,621 11,381,319 9,425,030 8,194,657 5,119,278 6,715,368 7,965,972 (n=7) (n=16) (n=15) (n=12) (n=12) (n=14) (n=14) (n=12) (n=11) (n=15) (n=7) Mean, Republicans 10,553,241 7,858,956 11,098,252 6,778,004 9,686,493 10,427,622 7,081,575 4,336,421 7,045,300 7,227,525 5,673,102 (n=22) (n=12) (n=6) (n=11) (n=18) (n=14) (n=12) (n=15) (n=18) (n=14) (n=13) Challengers Mean, all challengers 5,755,449 5,093,236 7,553,852 5,789,569 4,227,541 6,738,010 3,081,210 3,849,364 4,395,200 4,629,697 4,757,202 (n=28) (n=27) (n=19) (n=20) (n=26) (n=28) (n=26) (n=21) (n=27) (n=27) (n=17) Mean, Democrats 7,399,879 3,577,707 18,906,060 1,974,134 5,689,106 8,487,975 1,975,237 2,911,230 4,573,869 3,850,571 4,466,784 (n=21) (n=10) (n=3) (n=7) (n=17) (n=14) (n=12) (n=11) (n=17) (n=14) (n=11) Mean, Republicans 822,157 5,997,449 5,425,314 7,844,034 1,466,810 4,988,045 b 4,029,185 4,881,311 4,091,464 5,468,755 5,289,633 (n=7) (n=16) (n=16) (n=13) (n=9) (n=14) (n=14) (n=10) (n=10) (n=13) (n=6) Open seats Mean, all Open 9,916,822 7,282,931 10,207,156 a 9,593,169 6,481,844 12,367,185 a 10,619,074 9,383,845 23,423,334 3,999,063 5,074,433 (n=10) (n=16) (n=22) (n=28) (n=10) (n=8) (n=16) (n=14) (n=10) (n=10) (n=28) Mean, Democrats 11,555,355 5,792,742 8,293,691 5,460,095 8,150,371 13,194,853 10,919,198 7,694,386 29,257,712 3,933,370 4,345,919 (n=6) (n=8) (n=10) (n=13) (n=5) (n=3) (n=8) (n=7) (n=5) (n=5) (n=14) Mean, Republicans 7,459,022 8,773,122 12,600,092 13,046,347 4,813,316 13,051,206 10,318,949 11,073,304 17,588,955 4,064,754 5,802,946 (n=4) (n=8) (n=11) (n=14) (n=5) (n=4) (n=8) (n=7) (n=5) (n=5) (n=14) 13

15 ,617, ,420, ,363, ,710, ,688, ,930, ,622, ,016, ,149, ,744, ,436,369 6,465,965 4,817,693 4,751,691 5,677,427 5,995,353 5,375,903 4,431,586 3,224,133 3,502,206 2,511,844 2,129,792 (n=70) (n=69) (n=67) (n=66) (n=67) (n=61) (n=64) (n=67) (n=68) (n=64) (n=65) 5,497,762 4,813,314 4,527,052 5,945,002 4,949,958 4,991,030 4,679,214 3,409,556 2,808,049 2,403,875 2,374,633 (n=35) (n=35) (n=34) (n=33) (n=33) (n=31) (n=32) (n=34) (n=35) (n=33) (n=34) 7,434,168 4,822,204 4,983,137 5,409,853 7,010,002 5,773,605 4,183,961 3,033,094 4,238,432 2,600,997 1,861,359 (n=35) (n=34) (n=33) (n=33) (n=34) (n=30) (n=32) (n=33) (n=33) (n=30) (n=31) 12,425,877 6,343,944 6,570,316 7,604,209 7,389,855 5,867,187 4,621,416 3,791,447 4,939,808 2,631,257 2,705,380 (n=26) (n=27) (n=32) (n=27) (n=28) (n=28) (n=29) (n=25) (n=22) (n=25) (n=25) 8,345,179 4,875,317 6,641,796 7,013,853 5,940,602 4,054,025 4,218,716 3,948,639 2,275,690 2,122,147 2,559,585 (n=16) (n=15) (n=17) (n=15) (n=9) (n=12) (n=18) (n=19) (n=11) (n=17) (n=15) 6,323,048 8,179,728 6,489,304 8,342,152 8,076,343 7,227,057 5,280,375 3,293,665 7,603,930 3,759,724 2,924,074 (n=10) (n=12) (n=15) (n=12) (n=19) (n=16) (n=11) (n=6) (n=11) (n=7) (n=10) 6,473,081 3,121,961 3,120,361 3,686,656 4,159,429 2,867,689 3,026,909 2,454,092 2,568,539 1,907,718 1,619,093 (n=26) (n=26) (n=29) (n=27) (n=27) (n=25) (n=29) (n=24) (n=21) (n=23) (n=22) 1,985,852 4,363,447 2,561,686 4,370,609 4,186,311 3,500,573 3,770,510 1,622,395 3,056,342 2,722,502 1,900,081 (n=10) (n=12) (n=14) (n=12) (n=18) (n=15) (n=11) (n=6) (n=11) (n=8) (n=10) 9,237,112 2,056,283 3,641,793 3,139,494 4,105,661 1,918,360 2,572,487 2,731,323 2,031,957 1,473,166 1,384,933 (n=16) (n=14) (n=15) (n=15) (n=9) (n=10) (n=18) (n=18) (n=10) (n=15) (n=12) 4,864,676 4,999,067 2,937,118 5,821,403 6,872,351 11,494,582 10,303,356 3,298,815 3,021,390 3,192,857 1,954,543 (n=18) (n=16) (n=6) (n=12) (n=12) (n=8) (n=6) (n=18) (n=25) (n=16) (n=18) 4,265,833 5,371,854 1,715,207 6,421,658 5,754,932 13,391,261 10,774,098 3,462,925 3,048,409 2,683,924 2,593,298 (n=9) (n=8) (n=3) (n=6) (n=6) (n=4) (n=3) (n=9) (n=13) (n=8) (n=9) 5,463,518 4,626,278 4,159,029 5,221,148 7,989,770 9,597,903 9,832,614 3,134,707 2,992,118 3,701,785 1,315,788 (n=9) (n=8) (n=3) (n=6) (n=6) (n=4) (n=3) (n=9) (n=12) (n=8) (n=9) 14

16 Note: The data include primary and general election expenditures for major party general-election candidates only. a. Includes one or more Independents. b. Alan Schlesinger (CT-Rep) is not included in the data. He raised $221,019 and was third in the voting. c data includes Charlie Crist (FL) who started as a Republican and finished second as an Independent in the Florida Senate race does not include Democrats McAdams (AK) and Meek (FL) who finished third in their respective races. Source: Campaign Finance Institute analysis of Federal Election Commission data. 15

17 Table 3-6 Senate Campaign Expenditures: Incumbents and Challengers, Major Party General Election Candidates by Election Outcome, (full cycle), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars Incumbent won with 60% or more Incumbents 7,279,785 6,508,825 7,439,848 a 7,932,423 5,581,865 7,954,505 5,984,864 4,385,704 4,769,373 3,888,295 3,699,459 5,847,191 (n=18) (n=13) (n=12) (n=13) (n=17) (n=17)) (n=18) (n=16) (n=20) (n=19) (n=6) (n=10) Democrats 7,830,756 8,859,676 8,454,327 9,351,228 6,475,010 10,312,132 7,295,477 6,376,405 4,682,015 4,610,702 3,467,713 2,811,042 (n=6) (n=3) (n=8) (n=5) (n=10) (n=11)) (n=10) (n=6) (n=10) (n=9) (n=2) (n=3) Republicans 7,004,300 5,803,571 6,290,742 7,045,670 4,305,944 3,632,189 4,346,597 3,191,283 4,856,731 3,238,129 3,815,333 7,148,396 (n=12) (n=10) (n=3) (n=8) (n=7) (n=6)) (n=8) (n=10) (n=10) (n=10) (n=4) (n=7) Challengers 1,048,520 1,432,112 1,475,361 1,596,566 1,292,958 2,685,591 1,272,596 1,133,386 1,065, ,420 1,165,622 1,623,215 (n=17) (n=12) (n=10) (n=10) (n=13) (n=16) (n=18) (n=10) (n=18) (n=17) (n=3) (n=10) Democrats 1,464,926 1,854, ,863 2,058,146 1,770, , ,129 1,213, , , ,927 2,211,645 (n=11) (n=9) (n=1) (n=5) (n=6) (n=5) (n=8) (n=6) (n=9) (n=10) (n=2) (n=7) Republicans 285, ,122 1,590,417 1,134, ,666 3,690,474 2,075,369 1,012,714 1,453, ,657 2,029, ,210 (n=6) (n=3) (n=9) (n=5) (n=7) (n=11) (n=10) (n=4) (n=9) (n=7) (n=1) (n=3) Incumbent won with <60% Incumbents 14,489,234 12,837,560 13,352,418 13,506,658 c 12,198,612 14,976,033 a 11,974,615 7,236,405 7,997,865 9,731,854 7,729,238 8,602,746 (n=10) (n=12) (n=9) (n=8) (n=8) (n=6) (n=7) (n=8) (n=3) (n=7) (n=13) (n=14) Democrats 15,094,864 12,889,471 15,586,123 17,972,116 10,090,675 15,301,671 11,205,396 7,878, ,747,261 9,765,276 9,749,868 (n=1) (n=8) (n=7) (n=5) (n=2) (n=3) (n=3) (n=4) (n=0) (n=5) (n=5) (n=11) Republicans 14,421,941 12,733,740 5,534,450 6,064,227 12,901,258 11,919,696 12,551,529 6,594,408 7,997,865 9,693,334 6,456,715 4,397,233 (n=9) (n=4) (n=2) (n=3) (n=6) (n=2) (n=4) (n=4) (n=3) (n=2) (n=8) (n=3) Challengers 12,476,328 5,059,165 a 10,580,430 9,941,337 4,783,680 12,329,895 b 5,511,177 3,428,779 3,843,454 7,262,746 5,600,075 8,982,210 (n=10) (n=12) (n=8) (n=8) (n=8) (n=6) (n=7) (n=8) (n=3) (n=7) (n=13) (n=14) Democrats 13,413,204 6,565,100 12,152,171 1,764,105 5,208,968 14,913,980 5,387,456 3,291,025 3,843,454 6,337,507 5,386,522 1,674,933 (n=9) (n=3) (n=1) (n=2) (n=6) (n=3) (n=4) (n=4) (n=3) (n=2) (n=8) (n=3) Republicans 4,044,441 4,404,196 10,355,895 12,667,081 3,507,817 9,745,809 5,676,138 3,566, ,632,842 5,941,758 10,975,104 (n=1) (n=8) (n=7) (n=6) (n=2) (n=3) (n=3) (n=4) (n=0) (n=5) (n=5) (n=11) Incumbent was defeated Incumbents 18,322,239 17,070,520 36,648,390 14,908,460 13,361,544 16,725,697 25,379,463 11,773,229 10,624,400 19,971,764 6,835,280 8,921,481 (n=1) (n=5) (n=1) (n=2) (n=5) (n=6) (n=1) (n=3) (n=6) (n=3) (n=1) (n=2) Democrats NA 17,070, ,908,460 NA NA 25,379,463 14,281,920 9,491,917 10,497,894 #VALUE! 8,921,481 (n=0) (n=5) (n=0) (n=2) (n=0) (n=0) (n=1) (n=2) (n=1) (n=1) (n=0) (n=2) Republicans 18,322,239 NA 36,648, ,361,544 16,725,697 NA 6,755,848 10,850,896 24,708,699 6,835,280 NA (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=5) (n=6) (n=0) (n=1) (n=5) (n=2) (n=1) (n=0) Challengers 18,564,438 12,045,449 44,126,144 10,147,515 10,967,640 11,952,574 18,626,483 6,268,118 14,659,779 20,984,150 4,574,595 13,158,500 (n=1) (n=5) (n=1) (n=2) (n=5) (n=6) (n=1) (n=3) (n=6) (n=3) (n=1) (n=2) Democrats 18,564,438 NA 44,126, ,967,640 11,952,574 NA 4,841,527 12,025,763 18,461,221 4,574,595 NA (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=5) (n=6) (n=0) (n=1) (n=5) (n=2) (n=1) (n=0) Republicans NA 12,045, ,147,515 NA NA A 18,626,483 6,981,414 27,829,858 26,030,008 #VALUE! 13,158,500 (n=0) (n=5) (n=0) (n=2) (n=0) (n=0)) (n=1) (n=2) (n=1) (n=1) (n=0) (n=2) 16

18 ,611,323 4,250,509 5,545,415 4,298,972 3,724,040 3,717,194 3,385,686 1,678,805 1,435,664 2,177,268 (n=13) (n=19) (n=15) (n=14) (n=18) (n=13) (n=10) (n=7) (n=11) (n=11) 4,552,772 4,479,528 4,707,286 3,661,819 3,744,176 3,486,429 3,555,296 2,057,898 1,435,664 2,177,268 (n=9) (n=10) (n=10) (n=8) (n=7) (n=12) (n=6) (n=4) (n=11) (n=11) 4,743,060 3,996,045 7,221,677 5,148,507 3,711,224 6,486,365 3,131,270 1,173, (n=4) (n=9) (n=5) (n=6)) (n=11) (n=1) (n=4) (n=3) 0 0 1,199,936 1,550,489 1,179, , ,640 1,934, , , ,492 1,085,411 (n=12) (n=16) (n=15) (n=13) (n=15) (n=13) (n=9) (n=6) (n=9) (n=8) 1,018, ,652 1,633, , ,421 1,055, , , (n=4) (n=8) (n=5) (n=5) (n=10) (n=1) (n=4) (n=3) 0 0 1,290,817 2,295, ,931 1,393,961 1,174,080 2,007, , , ,492 1,085,411 (n=8) (n=8) (n=10) (n=8) (n=5) (n=12) (n=5) (n=3) (n=9) (n=8) 7,784,566 9,684,613 12,649,968 11,417,389 10,407,789 5,531,938 2,753,740 9,189,776 2,124,939 2,763,230 (n=10) (n=12) (n=8) (n=7) (n=7) (n=14) (n=6) (n=8) (n=5) (n=14) 4,860,706 9,730,749 13,854,784 24,170,866 4,235,193 6,011,616 2,321,380 2,157,321 5,221,565 3,610,956 (n=4) (n=7) (n=4) (n=1) (n=4) (n=5) (n=4) (n=2) (n=1) (n=4) 9,733,806 9,620,022 11,445,151 9,291,810 18,637,916 5,265,450 3,618,455 11,533,930 1,350,784 2,424,144 (n=6) (n=5) (n=4) (n=6) (n=3) (n=9) (n=2) (n=6) (n=4) (n=10) 3,906,671 5,262,292 7,677,893 7,422,429 5,304,164 4,017,538 2,519,112 3,960,723 1,514,128 1,451,400 (n=10) (n=12) (n=8) (n=7) (n=7) (n=14) (n=6) (n=8) (n=5) (n=14) 5,187,663 5,376,649 6,510,570 4,359,622 9,306,254 4,052,736 3,318,668 4,464,900 1,191,350 1,238,368 (n=6) (n=5) (n=4) (n=6) (n=3) (n=9) (n=2) (n=6) (n=4) (n=10) 1,985,183 5,180,609 8,845,214 25,799,255 2,302,598 3,954,181 2,119,335 1,224,098 2,805,247 1,983,982 (n=4) (n=7) (n=4) (n=1) (n=4) (n=5) (n=4) (n=2) (n=1) (n=4) 8,373,411 13,275,039 5,233,161 9,544,089 8,131,336 4,125,193 4,934,098 3,343,710 4,147,169 2,499,656 (n=4) (n=1) (n=4) (n=7) (n=3) (n=2) (n=9) (n=7) (n=9) (n=2) 6,417,578 NA 2,715,796 NA 5,498,306 4,041,673 4,934,098 2,497,273 3,012,535 NA (n=2) (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) (n=9) (n=5) (n=5) (n=0) 10,390,829 13,275,039 6,072,283 9,544,089 9,447,851 4,208,713 NA 5,459,802 5,565,463 2,499,656 (n=2) (n=1) (n=3) (n=7) (n=2) (n=1) (n=0) (n=2) (n=4) (n=2) 6,920,912 2,535,150 5,105,144 6,784,199 7,082,805 1,972,591 3,982,835 3,379,438 3,308,604 3,308,562 (n=4) (n=1) (n=4) (n=7) (n=3) (n=2) (n=9) (n=7) (n=9) (n=2) 8,581,470 2,535,150 6,079,444 6,784,199 8,572,798 3,945,180 NA 3,202,838 4,253,650 3,308,562 (n=2) (n=1) (n=3) (n=7) (n=2) (n=1) (n=0) (n=2) (n=4) (n=2) 5,260,355 NA 2,182,240 NA 4,102,821 2,440,354 3,982,835 3,450,079 2,552,565 NA (n=2) (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) (n=9) (n=5) (n=5) (n=0) 17

19 Notes: The data include primary and general-election expenditures for major party general-election candidates only. The Federal Election Commission included the following disclaimer along with its 1986 data, and Vital Statistics considers it appropriate for all years: "The small N's and unique nature of some Senate campaigns make all measures of central tendency like averages or medians problematic and, as a result, the Commission would not include tables such as these in its regular release of information." a. Includes one or more Independents. Independents are included only if they are incumbents or winning non-incumbents. b. Alan Schlesinger (CT-Rep) is not included in the data. He raised $221,019 and was third in the voting. c. The Incumbents and Challengers in the category "Incumbent won with < 60%" are unbalanced due to the Alaska race which featured a Republican Incumbent and Challenger. The Democrat (McAdams) finished third and is not included. Source: Campaign Finance Institute analysis of Federal Election Commission data. 18

20 Table 3-7 Senate Expenditures: Open Senate Seats, Major Party General Election Candidates, by Election Outcome, (full cycle, mean net dollars), Adjusted for Inflation, 2016 Mean Net Dollars All winners 12,257,080 8,522,139 8,405,993 9,410,750 c 9,628,978 9,060,528 12,579,387 c 12,519,461 9,609,476 30,140,365 5,625,936 5,479,319 (n=5) (n=8) (n=8) (n=11) (n=14) (n=5) (n=4) (n=8) (n=7) (n=5) (n=5) (n=14) Democrats 14,967,437 10,431,727 10,289,555 9,973,711 6,050,168 12,345,284 10,533,254 15,411,402 3,903,935 35,718,773 5,180,876 6,933,977 (n=3) (n=1) (n=1) (n=7) (n=3) (n=3) (n=2) (n=2) (n=1) (n=4) (n=2) (n=5) Republicans 8,191,546 8,249,341 8,136,913 10,227,584 10,605,016 4,133,395 22,102,948 11,555,481 10,560,399 7,826,729 5,922,657 4,671,176 (n=2) (n=7) (n=7) (n=3) (n=11) (n=2) (n=1) (n=6) (n=6) (n=1) (n=3) (n=9) Winners with 60% or more 10,295,886 6,130,888 6,047,332 4,436,079 c 8,010,430 8,914,487 8,943,286 c 13,708,967 NA NA 4,033,138 3,853,198 (n=3) (n=4) (n=4) (n=2) (n=5) (n=3) (n=2) (n=2) (n=0) (n=0) (n=2) (n=2) Democrats 12,948,470 n/a n/a 5,852,629 NA 11,345,929 10,738,479 18,261,440 NA NA 5,763,665 4,179,106 (n=2) (n=0) (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=2) (n=1) (n=1) (n=0) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) Republicans 4,990,718 6,130,888 6,047,332 NA 8,010,430 4,051,603 NA 9,156,494 NA NA 2,302,611 3,527,289 (n=1) (n=4) (n=4) (n=0) (n=5) (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) Winners with <60% 15,198,872 10,913,390 10,764,654 10,516,233 10,528,171 9,279,590 16,215,488 12,122,959 9,609,476 30,140,365 a 6,687,802 5,750,340 (n=2) (n=4) (n=4) (n=9) (n=9) (n=2) (n=2) (n=6) (n=7) (n=5) (n=3) (n=12) Democrats 19,005,370 10,431,727 10,289,555 10,660,557 6,050,168 14,343,994 10,328,029 12,561,363 3,903,935 35,718,773 4,598,086 7,622,694 (n=1) (n=1) (n=1) (n=6) (n=3) (n=1) (n=1) (n=1) (n=1) (n=4) (n=1) (n=4) Republicans 11,392,374 11,073,944 10,923,020 10,227,584 12,767,172 4,215,187 22,102,948 12,035,279 10,560,399 7,826,729 7,732,662 4,814,161 (n=1) (n=3) (n=3) (n=3) (n=6) (n=1) (n=1) (n=5) (n=6) (n=1) (n=2) (n=8) All losers 7,576,564 6,043,725 5,961,356 11,003,562 9,557,359 c 3,903,160 12,154,981 8,718,687 9,158,214 16,706,303 b 2,372,188 4,669,547 (n=5) (n=8) (n=8) (n=11) (n=14) (n=5) (n=4) (n=8) (n=7) (n=5) (n=5) (n=14) Democrats 8,143,274 5,130,030 5,060,114 4,373,644 5,283,073 1,858,003 18,518,051 9,421,797 8,326,128 3,413,470 3,101,700 2,908,111 (n=3) (n=7) (n=7) (n=3) (n=10) (n=2) (n=1) (n=6) (n=6) (n=1) (n=3) (n=9) Republicans 6,726,498 12,439,584 12,270,048 13,489,781 21,997,893 5,266,597 10,033,958 6,609,356 14,150,731 20,029,512 1,277,921 7,840,131 (n=2) (n=1) (n=1) (n=8) (n=3) (n=3) (n=3) (n=2) (n=1) (n=4) (n=2) (n=5) Losers with >40% 12,757,941 10,239,905 10,100,348 12,621,886 12,559,634 5,081,776 14,150,395 10,055,047 9,155,633 16,706,303 3,519,658 5,261,149 (n=2) (n=4) (n=4) (n=9) (n=9) (n=2) (n=2) (n=6) (n=7) (n=5) (n=3) (n=12) Democrats 13,607,106 9,506,679 9,377,115 4,373,644 7,840,504 2,131,129 18,518,051 10,069,107 8,326,128 3,413,470 4,474,797 3,138,641 (n=1) (n=3) (n=3) (n=3) (n=6) (n=1) (n=1) (n=5) (n=6) (n=1) (n=2) (n=8) Republicans 11,908,775 12,439,584 12,270,048 16,746,007 21,997,893 8,032,424 9,782,738 9,984,746 14,150,731 20,029,512 1,609,382 9,506,163 (n=1) (n=1) (n=1) (n=6) (n=3) (n=1) (n=1) (n=1) (n=1) (n=4) (n=1) (n=4) Losers with 40% or less 4,122,312 1,847,544 1,822,364 3,721,103 4,153,265 c 3,117,415 10,159,568 4,709,607 NA NA 650,984 1,119,935 (n=3) (n=4) (n=4) (n=2) (n=5) (n=3) (n=2) (n=2) (n=0) (n=0) (n=2) (n=2) Democrats 5,411,358 1,847,544 1,822,364 NA 1,446,927 1,584,878 NA 6,185,250 NA NA 355,509 1,063,866 (n=2) (n=4) (n=4) (n=0) (n=4) (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) Republicans 1,544,221 n/a n/a 3,721,103 NA 3,883,684 10,159,568 3,233,964 NA NA 946,458 1,176,002 (n=1) (n=0) (n=0) (n=2) (n=0) (n=2) (n=2) (n=1) (n=0) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) 19

21 ,471,615 5,711,084 4,159,029 7,668,285 8,380,882 (n=9) (n=8) (n=3) (n=6) (n=7) 0 7,145, ,522,639 5,944,713 (n=0) (n=5) (n=0) (n=2) (n=4) 5,471,615 3,320,327 4,159,029 6,241,107 11,629,108 (n=9) (n=3) (n=3) (n=4) (n=3) 4,461,124 2,037,417 2,819,397 3,812,666 4,853,598 (n=4) (n=1) (n=2) (n=2) (n=2) NA 2,037,417 NA 5,846,323 4,505,435 (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) 4,461,092 NA 2,819,397 1,779,008 5,201,762 (n=4) (n=0) (n=2) (n=1) (n=1) 6,265,435 6,235,893 6,838,292 9,596,095 9,791,797 (n=5) (n=7) (n=1) (n=4) (n=5) NA 8,422,568 NA 15,198,956 6,424,473 (n=0) (n=4) (n=0) (n=1) (n=3) 6,265,435 3,320,327 6,838,292 7,728,475 14,842,782 (n=5) (n=3) (n=1) (n=3) (n=2) 4,265,833 4,287,048 1,715,207 3,974,522 6,464,442 (n=9) (n=8) (n=3) (n=6) (n=7) 4,265,833 2,415,716 1,715,207 4,371,167 4,777,066 (n=9) (n=3) (n=3) (n=4) (n=3) NA 5,409,848 NA 3,181,231 7,729,975 (n=0) (n=5) (n=0) (n=2) (n=4) 4,538,594 4,777,756 3,556,794 5,539,723 8,073,165 (n=5) (n=7) (n=1) (n=4) (n=5) 4,538,594 2,415,716 3,556,794 5,456,337 6,583,431 (n=5) (n=3) (n=1) (n=3) (n=2) NA 6,549,286 NA 5,789,874 9,066,321 (n=0) (n=4) (n=0) (n=1) (n=3) 3,924, , , ,121 2,442,634 (n=4) (n=1) (n=2) (n=2) (n=2) 3,924,882 NA 794,416 1,115,653 1,164,336 (n=4) (n=0) (n=2) (n=1) (n=1) NA 852,097 NA 572,586 3,720,930 (n=0) (n=1) (n=0) (n=1) (n=1) 20

22 Notes: The data include primary and general-election expenditures for major party general-election candidates only. The Federal Election Commission included the following disclaimer along with its 1986 data, and Vital Statistics considers it appropriate for all years: "The small N's and unique nature of some Senate campaigns make all measures of central tendency like averages or medians problematic and, as a result, the Commission would not include tables such as these in its regular release of information." a. Jon Corzine (D-NJ) spent $63,209,506. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) spent $29,871,577. Excluding these candidates, the remaining winners (n=3) in open Senate seats spent an average of $5,014,773. For Democrats the average would be $4,714,403 (n=2). The Republican figure would be unchanged. b. Rick Lazio spent $40,576,273. Excluding him from the candidates who lost with more than 40%, the average for all candidates would be $4,838,961 (n=4). The average for Republican candidates would be $5,635,583 (n=3). The average for Democrats would be unchanged. c. Includes one or more Independents. Source: Campaign Finance Institute analysis of Federal Election Commission data. 21

23 Table 3-8 Campaign Funding Sources: House and Senate Major Party General Election Candidates, Party and Candidate Status Number of candidates Contributions plus party coordinated expenditures on behalf of candidates ($ millions) Individuals PAC's Percentage of funding from Party (contributions plus coordinated expenditures) Candidate to self (contribution s plus loans) Other House, 2016 All candidates % 39% 1% 5% 4% All Democrats % 35% 1% 6% 2% Incumbents % 48% 0% 1% 2% Challengers % 16% 3% 7% 1% Open Seats % 16% 2% 22% 0% All Republicans % 41% 1% 4% 6% Incumbents % 47% 1% 0% 7% Challengers % 10% 2% 27% 2% Open Seats % 17% 2% 25% 1% Senate, 2016 All candidates % 16% 5% 2% 10% All Democrats % 10% 3% 3% 8% Incumbents % 24% 0% 0% 6% Challengers % 6% 3% 5% 8% Open Seats % 7% 4% 2% 11% All Republicans % 22% 7% 0% 12% Incumbents % 24% 7% 0% 12% Challengers % 3% 1% 3% 3% Open Seats % 17% 6% 0% 11% House, 2014 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2014 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats

24 House, 2012 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2012 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 2010 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2010 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 2008 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents

25 Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2008 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 2006 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2006 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 2004 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2004 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans

26 Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 2002 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2002 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents < 1 6 Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 2000 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents < 1 7 Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 2000 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 1998 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats

27 All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 1998 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 1996 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 1996 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats House, 1994 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers Open Seats All Republicans Incumbents Challengers Open Seats Senate, 1994 All candidates All Democrats Incumbents Challengers

REPORT # Legislative Elections: An Analysis of Clean Election Participation and Outcomes

REPORT # Legislative Elections: An Analysis of Clean Election Participation and Outcomes REPORT #5 2012 Legislative Elections: An Analysis of Clean Election Participation and Outcomes 1 The Money in Politics Project is a program of Maine Citizens for Clean Elections, a nonpartisan organization

More information

LESSON Money and Politics

LESSON Money and Politics LESSON 22 157-168 Money and Politics 1 EFFORTS TO REFORM Strategies to prevent abuse in political contributions Imposing limitations on giving, receiving, and spending political money Requiring public

More information

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19 AT 4 PM

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19 AT 4 PM P O L L Interviews with 1,019 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on December, 2006. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus

More information

REPORT #14. Clean Election Participation Rates and Outcomes: 2016 Legislative Elections

REPORT #14. Clean Election Participation Rates and Outcomes: 2016 Legislative Elections REPORT #14 Clean Election Participation Rates and Outcomes: 2016 Legislative Elections 1 The Money in Politics Project is a program of Maine Citizens for Clean Elections, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization

More information

Washington, D.C. Update

Washington, D.C. Update Washington, D.C. Update 2016 AMGA CMO Council March 9, 2016 Chester Speed, J.D., LL.M, Vice-President, Public Policy Presentation Outline AMGA Priority Issues Risk Survey Legislative Agenda Elections 1

More information

CH. 9 ELECTIONS AND CAMPAIGNS

CH. 9 ELECTIONS AND CAMPAIGNS APGoPo - Unit 3 CH. 9 ELECTIONS AND CAMPAIGNS Elections form the foundation of a modern democracy, and more elections are scheduled every year in the United States than in any other country in the world.

More information

Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline,

Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline, Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline, 1994-2010 July 2011 By: Katherine Sicienski, William Hix, and Rob Richie Summary of Facts and Findings Near-Universal Decline in Turnout: Of

More information

NEW JERSEY VOTERS TAKE ON 2008

NEW JERSEY VOTERS TAKE ON 2008 Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-263-5858 (office) 732-979-6769 (cell) pdmurray@monmouth.edu Released: Wednesday, 30, For more information: Monmouth University Polling Institute 400 Cedar Avenue West Long Branch,

More information

NEWS RELEASE. Respond to: P.O. Box 185 Trenton, New Jersey (609) or Toll Free Within NJ ELEC (3532)

NEWS RELEASE. Respond to: P.O. Box 185 Trenton, New Jersey (609) or Toll Free Within NJ ELEC (3532) Election Law Enforcement Commission E L EC 1973 NEWS RELEASE Respond to: P.O. Box 185 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0185 (609) 292-8700 or Toll Free Within NJ 1-888-313-ELEC (3532) CONTACT: JEFF BRINDLE EXECUTIVE

More information

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Gender Parity Index INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY - 2017 State of Women's Representation Page 1 INTRODUCTION As a result of the 2016 elections, progress towards gender parity stalled. Beyond Hillary Clinton

More information

What do you know about how our president is elected?

What do you know about how our president is elected? What do you know about how our president is elected? The Electoral College When we talk about this election process, we say that our president and vice president are elected by the Electoral College.

More information

Subject: Pinellas County Congressional Election Survey

Subject: Pinellas County Congressional Election Survey 9887 4 th St. N., Suite 200 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 Phone: (727) 245-1962 Fax: (727) 577-7470 Email: info@stpetepolls.org Website: www.stpetepolls.org Matt Florell, President Subject: Pinellas County

More information

U.S Presidential Election

U.S Presidential Election U.S Presidential Election The US has had an elected president since its constitution went into effect in 1789. Unlike in many countries, the Presidential election in the US is rather a year-long process

More information

Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline,

Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline, Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline, 1994-2012 July 2013 Summary of Facts and Findings Near-Universal Decline in Turnout: Of 171 regularly scheduled primary runoffs in U.S House

More information

Winning Florida The Importance of Central Florida and the Puerto Rican Vote

Winning Florida The Importance of Central Florida and the Puerto Rican Vote Winning Florida The Importance of Central Florida and the Puerto Rican Vote Republican Election Results The Importance of Central Florida Presidential: As Central Florida goes, so goes Florida; as Florida

More information

Number Title Page. 2-3 Net Party Gains in House and Senate Seats, General and Special Elections,

Number Title Page. 2-3 Net Party Gains in House and Senate Seats, General and Special Elections, Chapter 2: Congressional Elections Table of Contents Number Title Page 2-1 Turnout in Presidential and House Elections, 1930-2014 (percentage of voting age population) 2-2 Popular Vote and House Seats

More information

It's good to be here with you in Florida, the current home of thousands of chads and the former home of one Elian.

It's good to be here with you in Florida, the current home of thousands of chads and the former home of one Elian. 1 Thank you for the warm welcome. It's good to be here with you in Florida, the current home of thousands of chads and the former home of one Elian. I gotta believe that the people of Florida will be happy

More information

PRESS RELEASE. Sunday, June 27 th, 2004 Jon Bartholomew, (207) Arn Pearson, (207)

PRESS RELEASE. Sunday, June 27 th, 2004 Jon Bartholomew, (207) Arn Pearson, (207) PRESS RELEASE Embargoed, For Release: For More Information: Sunday, June 27 th, 2004 Jon Bartholomew, (207) 712-8471 Arn Pearson, (207) 766-0951 Clean Elections Candidates Win Majority of Primary Elections

More information

Chapter 10 Elections and Campaigns

Chapter 10 Elections and Campaigns Chapter 10 Elections and Campaigns WHO GOVERNS? 1. How do American elections determine the kind of people who govern us? 2. What matters most in deciding who wins presidential and congressional elections?

More information

Election Recap. Ned Monroe National Association of Manufacturers Senior Vice President, External Relations

Election Recap. Ned Monroe National Association of Manufacturers Senior Vice President, External Relations 11/10/201 Election Recap Ned Monroe National Association of Manufacturers Senior Vice President, External Relations Results as of :4 AM, November 9, 201 201 Electoral College map Donald Trump wins the

More information

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE TRUMP Trump s approval remains relatively unchanged Trump s approval rating has dropped one point to 43% - potentially driven by a shift with independent voters. Despite slight improvements to his favorability

More information

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots

a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots a rising tide? The changing demographics on our ballots OCTOBER 2018 Against the backdrop of unprecedented political turmoil, we calculated the real state of the union. For more than half a decade, we

More information

Presentation Outline

Presentation Outline 2016 Elections November 10, 2016 Grant Couch, Director, Government Relations Christina Lavoie, JD, Assistant Director, Public Policy and Operations Jamie Miller, MBA, Director, Government Relations Presentation

More information

NEW HAMPSHIRE: CLINTON PULLS AHEAD OF SANDERS

NEW HAMPSHIRE: CLINTON PULLS AHEAD OF SANDERS Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Tuesday, 3, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769

More information

American Dental Association

American Dental Association American Dental Association May 2, 2016 Bill McInturff SLIDE 1 Heading into the Election Year SLIDE 2 Direction of country remains strongly negative for over a decade. Right Track Wrong Direction WT 80

More information

IN THE KNOW: The Supreme Court s Decision on Corporate Spending: Now What?

IN THE KNOW: The Supreme Court s Decision on Corporate Spending: Now What? IN THE KNOW: The Supreme Court s Decision on Corporate Spending: Now What? On January 21, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a 5 4 decision to allow corporations and unions unprecedented freedom

More information

Campaign 16. A Hawthorn Group visit with Kansas City Chamber June 24, 2016

Campaign 16. A Hawthorn Group visit with Kansas City Chamber June 24, 2016 Campaign 16 A Hawthorn Group visit with Kansas City Chamber June 24, 2016 Agenda I. The Knowns II. The Unknowns III. The Early Appeals IV. The Hard Questions Bring Down Title The Knowns It s a Big Political

More information

Welcome to this month's edition of the AMA's Very Influential Physician (VIP) Insider. Read on for details about these topics:

Welcome to this month's edition of the AMA's Very Influential Physician (VIP) Insider. Read on for details about these topics: Welcome to this month's edition of the AMA's Very Influential Physician (VIP) Insider. Read on for details about these topics: Election 2018: An Increasingly Divided Nation Yields Divided Results AMPAC

More information

To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on

To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on Tuesday, November 8th, they are not voting together in

More information

Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties

Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties Building off of the previous chapter in this dissertation, this chapter investigates the involvement of political parties

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-00095-MW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION NANCY CAROLA JACOBSON, TERENCE FLEMING, SUSAN BOTTCHER, PRIORITIES

More information

State Activity Report

State Activity Report Legislative Analysis Political Outlook State Activity Report May 19, 2014 State Legislative Analysis and Political Outlook State Legislative Trends: As we approach the midpoint of 2014, and as many state

More information

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE TRUMP Trump s Approval Improved Moderately in Key States Nationally and at the state level, Trump s approval stayed relatively steady since our April report, with 43% approving of his job performance and

More information

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE U S SENATE PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE U S SENATE PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE U S SENATE PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI Page 1 Page 2 the u s senate the u s senate pdf the u s senate The United States Senate consists of 100 members, 2 from each of the 50 states. Below

More information

Trends in Campaign Financing, Report for the Campaign Finance Task Force October 12 th, 2017 Zachary Albert

Trends in Campaign Financing, Report for the Campaign Finance Task Force October 12 th, 2017 Zachary Albert 1 Trends in Campaign Financing, 198-216 Report for the Campaign Finance Task Force October 12 th, 217 Zachary Albert 2 Executive Summary:! The total amount of money in elections including both direct contributions

More information

THE 2014 ELECTION PRESENTATION BY JIM JENSEN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CONGRESSIONAL AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

THE 2014 ELECTION PRESENTATION BY JIM JENSEN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CONGRESSIONAL AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS THE 2014 ELECTION PRESENTATION BY JIM JENSEN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CONGRESSIONAL AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS FEDERAL DEMONSTRATION PARTNERSHIP SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 What is at stake? The House of Representatives

More information

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead November 2018 Bill McInturff SLIDE 1 Yes, it was all about Trump. SLIDE 2 A midterm record said their vote was a message of support or opposition to

More information

Senate 2018 races. Cook Political Report ratings. Updated October 4, Producer Presentation Center

Senate 2018 races. Cook Political Report ratings. Updated October 4, Producer Presentation Center Senate 2018 races Cook Political Report ratings Updated October 4, 2018 Producer Presentation Center 1 Control of the Senate will depend on the nine Toss Up seats Cook Political Report ratings ALL 2018

More information

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE TRUMP Trump s Net Approval Near Even or Underwater in Most States Nationally, 42% approve of Trump while 5 disapprove Net favorability among Independents is at -8 Among key Senate states, Trump s approval

More information

Congressional Elections

Congressional Elections Name: Government In America, Chapter 12 Big Idea Questions Guided Notes The Representatives and Senators The Members: in total - 100 Senators and 435 members of the House Requirements to be a member of

More information

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE TRUMP Trump s Net Approval Near Even or Underwater in Most States Nationally, 42% approve of Trump while 5 disapprove Net favorability among Independents is at -18 Among key Senate states, Trump s approval

More information

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE TRUMP Trump s Approval Remains Static With Voters Trump s approval rating holds steady from last month with 4 approving of the President s performance while 52% disapprove. Trump remains underwater in

More information

Electing a President. The Electoral College

Electing a President. The Electoral College Electing a President The Electoral College The Original Electoral College System Compromise between allowing Congress to choose a chief executive and direct popular election -Allowing Congress goes against

More information

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE TRUMP Trump s Approval Improved Moderately with Independents in Key States Trump s approval rating continues to hold steady 4 approve of the President s performance while 52% disapprove. Trump remains

More information

Survey of Likely Voters 45 th Legislative District Senate Special Election General Election

Survey of Likely Voters 45 th Legislative District Senate Special Election General Election Survey of Likely Voters 45 th Legislative District 2017 Senate Special Election General Election Survey fielded October 14-19, 2017 www.washingtonstatewire.com Methodology: This survey was conducted using

More information

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010 Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010 Our Hard Work in 2006 Our Hard Work in 2008 Who We re Fighting Speaker Boehner?

More information

American political campaigns

American political campaigns American political campaigns William L. Benoit OHIO UNIVERSITY, USA ABSTRACT: This essay provides a perspective on political campaigns in the United States. First, the historical background is discussed.

More information

RUBIO LEADS IN FLORIDA SENATE RACE, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY SWING STATE POLL FINDS; TOOMEY UP IN PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO SENATE RACE TIED

RUBIO LEADS IN FLORIDA SENATE RACE, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY SWING STATE POLL FINDS; TOOMEY UP IN PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO SENATE RACE TIED Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director, (203) 535-6203 Tim Malloy, Assistant Director (203) 645-8043 Rubenstein Associates, Inc., Public Relations Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JUNE 22, 2016 RUBIO

More information

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug 1 Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients 321 N. Clark Street, Suite 2800,Chicago, IL 60654 312.832.4500 2

More information

Campaigns & Elections. US Government POS 2041

Campaigns & Elections. US Government POS 2041 Campaigns & Elections US Government POS 2041 Votes for Women, inspired by Katja Von Garner. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvqnjwk W7gA For Discussion Do you think that democracy is endangered by the

More information

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30 Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30 Current Events, Recent Polls, & Review Background influences on campaigns Presidential

More information

Legal Challege to Winner Take All Jeffrey and Deni Dickler May 9, 2017 Slide 1

Legal Challege to Winner Take All Jeffrey and Deni Dickler May 9, 2017 Slide 1 Slide 1 MOPAG Call to Action I m Jeffrey Dickler, part of a small group from MOPAG and MOmentum bringing together resources for a legal challenge to Missouri s method of selecting presidential electors

More information

Competitiveness of Legislative Elections in the United States: Impact of Redistricting Reform and Nonpartisan Elections

Competitiveness of Legislative Elections in the United States: Impact of Redistricting Reform and Nonpartisan Elections Competitiveness of Legislative Elections in the United States: Impact of Redistricting Reform and Nonpartisan Elections Introduction Anti competitive state laws detract from the power and purpose of elections

More information

The US Economy: Are Republicans or Democrats Better?

The US Economy: Are Republicans or Democrats Better? The US Economy: Are Republicans or Democrats Better? Before one can address the title question, it is necessary to answer three preliminary questions: What period of time should be used in the comparison?

More information

To: Interested Parties From: Mark Penn, Chief Strategist Date: July 9, 2007 Re: After 6 Months

To: Interested Parties From: Mark Penn, Chief Strategist Date: July 9, 2007 Re: After 6 Months From: Clinton Campaign, Press Office [mailto:press@hillaryclinton.com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:27 PM To: Jonathan Martin Subject: CAMPAIGN MEMO: After 6 Months To: Interested Parties From: Mark Penn,

More information

Republican National Committee

Republican National Committee Republican National Committee Office of the Political Director November 16, 2010 Dear Chairman Steele, This letter is to inform you that I will be leaving my position as Political Director of the Republican

More information

2013 Cost Index Report

2013 Cost Index Report 2013 Cost Index Report N.J. Election Law Enforcement Commission www.elec.state.nj.us July, 2012 Election Law Enforcement Commission E EC L 1973 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Commission would like to thank Deputy

More information

Running head: WOMEN IN POLITICS AND THE MEDIA 1. Women in Politics and the Media : The United States vs. The Czech Republic

Running head: WOMEN IN POLITICS AND THE MEDIA 1. Women in Politics and the Media : The United States vs. The Czech Republic Running head: WOMEN IN POLITICS AND THE MEDIA 1 Women in Politics and the Media : The United States vs. The Czech Republic Kyle F. Jones Kent State University WOMEN IN POLITICS AND THE MEDIA 2 Females

More information

Unit #2: Political Beliefs/Political Behaviors AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia

Unit #2: Political Beliefs/Political Behaviors AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia Unit #2: Political Beliefs/Political Behaviors AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia Name: Date: Period: Thurs 10/10 (Tues 10/15) Grading FRQs Conservative and liberal views of the Affordable Care Act Video:

More information

FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, MARCH 25 AT 7 PM

FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, MARCH 25 AT 7 PM Interviews with 1,030 adult Americans, including 953 registered voters, conducted by telephone by Research Corporation on March 19-21,. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample

More information

PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS

PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS Number of Representatives October 2012 PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS ANALYZING THE 2010 ELECTIONS TO THE U.S. HOUSE FairVote grounds its analysis of congressional elections in district partisanship.

More information

Graph of 2012 campaign spending

Graph of 2012 campaign spending P ford residence southampton, ny Graph of 2012 campaign spending 15-3-2014 Below is a tally of the money raised and spent through September by the presidential candidates, the national party committees

More information

Ganske. When examining this race one thing stands out right away, the money. Incumbent

Ganske. When examining this race one thing stands out right away, the money. Incumbent Daniel Zacharda American Congress Dr. Lindaman 12/4/2014 Iowa Senate Race In 2002 Senator Tom Harkin was up for election facing Republican challenger Greg Ganske. When examining this race one thing stands

More information

The Electoral College

The Electoral College The Electoral College 1 True or False? The candidate with the most votes is elected president. Answer: Not necessarily. Ask Al Gore. 2 The 2000 Election The Popular Vote Al Gore 50,996,039 George W. Bush

More information

Unit #2: Political Beliefs/Political Behaviors AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia

Unit #2: Political Beliefs/Political Behaviors AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia Unit #2: Political Beliefs/Political Behaviors AP US Government & Politics Mr. Coia Name: Date: Period: Mon 10/6 AP Gov course evaluation Grading FRQs Conservative and liberal views Explain Election Interview

More information

The Electoral College

The Electoral College The Electoral College H. FRY 2014 What is the Electoral College? The Electoral College is NOT a University! College: -noun An organized association of persons having certain powers and rights, and performing

More information

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.

Please note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data. Public Opinion Strategies is pleased to present key findings from two national surveys of 800 actual voters conducted on November 6, 2012. These surveys were merged, for a total of 1,600 actual voters

More information

GOV. KASICH IS NUMBER ONE IN OHIO PRESIDENTIAL RACE, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; CLINTON TIES OR TRAILS ALL REPUBLICANS

GOV. KASICH IS NUMBER ONE IN OHIO PRESIDENTIAL RACE, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; CLINTON TIES OR TRAILS ALL REPUBLICANS Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director, Quinnipiac University Poll (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Associates, Inc. Public Relations Contact: Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: FEBRUARY 24, 2016 GOV. KASICH IS

More information

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local

Gerrymandering: t he serpentine art VCW State & Local Gerrymandering: the serpentine art VCW State & Local What is gerrymandering? Each state elects a certain number of congressional Reps. Process is controlled by the party in power in the state legislature

More information

Introduction to Women in Politics

Introduction to Women in Politics Introduction to Women in Politics Jaclyn J. Kettler Boise State University NEW Leadership Idaho May 22, 2018 1 Outline Political Participation of Women Representation of Women Barriers Facing Women in

More information

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, DECEMBER 10 AT 4 PM

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, DECEMBER 10 AT 4 PM Interviews with 1,002 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on December 6-9,. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage

More information

Trump, Populism and the Economy

Trump, Populism and the Economy Libby Cantrill, CFA October 2016 Trump, Populism and the Economy This material contains the current opinions of the manager and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been

More information

ELECTION ANALYSIS. & a Look Ahead at #WomenInPolitics

ELECTION ANALYSIS. & a Look Ahead at #WomenInPolitics Welcome! ELECTION ANALYSIS & a Look Ahead at 2016 OUR SPEAKERS Celinda Lake, national pollster Alma Hernández, SEIU CA political director David Allgood, CA League of Conservation Voters political director

More information

CLINTON MAINTAINS LEAD IN THE DEMOCRATIC RACE January 9-12, 2008

CLINTON MAINTAINS LEAD IN THE DEMOCRATIC RACE January 9-12, 2008 CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL For release: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:00 P.M. EST CLINTON MAINTAINS LEAD IN THE DEMOCRATIC RACE January 9-12, 2008 There have been two different winners in two different

More information

The Role of Money in the 2002 Congressional Elections

The Role of Money in the 2002 Congressional Elections July 2003 The Role of Money in the 2002 Congressional Elections Written by Adam Lioz U.S. PIRG Education Fund July 2003-1 - Acknowledgements This report was written by Adam Lioz, Democracy Advocate for

More information

Political Science 4891H The 2012 American Elections Professor Asher Autumn Semester, 2012 SYLLABUS

Political Science 4891H The 2012 American Elections Professor Asher Autumn Semester, 2012 SYLLABUS Political Science 4891H The 2012 American Elections Professor Asher Autumn Semester, 2012 SYLLABUS The course will examine the 2012 elections from three distinct perspectives: 1.) the legal, institutional

More information

Party Money in the 2006 Elections:

Party Money in the 2006 Elections: Party Money in the 2006 Elections: The Role of National Party Committees in Financing Congressional Campaigns A CFI Report By Anthony Corrado and Katie Varney The Campaign Finance Institute is a non-partisan,

More information

New Sachs/Mason-Dixon Florida Poll Shows Bill Nelson Vulnerable to Defeat in 2012

New Sachs/Mason-Dixon Florida Poll Shows Bill Nelson Vulnerable to Defeat in 2012 ! For Immediate Release: Contact: Janelle Pepe February 15, 2011 (850) 222-1996 New Sachs/Mason-Dixon Florida Poll Shows Bill Nelson Vulnerable to Defeat in 2012 Tallahassee Florida s Senior U.S. Senator

More information

President Obama Leads in Florida, Ohio & Pennsylvania September 18-24, 2012

President Obama Leads in Florida, Ohio & Pennsylvania September 18-24, 2012 Quinnipiac University/CBS News/New York Times Poll For release: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:00 A.M. EDT President Obama Leads in Florida, Ohio & Pennsylvania September 18-24, 2012 Recent national and

More information

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE Friday, Nov. 7, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE Friday, Nov. 7, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE Friday, Nov. 7, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT: Mark Hugo Lopez, Director of Hispanic Research Molly Rohal, Communications Associate

More information

Industry News: Ford And General Motors To Close Flight Departments And Dispose Of Aircraft

Industry News: Ford And General Motors To Close Flight Departments And Dispose Of Aircraft Latest News Industry News: Ford And General Motors To Close Flight Departments And Dispose Of Aircraft NATA News NATA News Volume 7, Issue 49, December 8, 2008 In the wake of criticism for using their

More information

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14 SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14 The document below will provide insights on what the new Senate Majority means, as well as a nationwide view of House, Senate and Gubernatorial election results. We will continue

More information

Election Overview: Democrats take the House, Republicans Retain Control of the Senate

Election Overview: Democrats take the House, Republicans Retain Control of the Senate Steven C. Anderson, IOM, CAE President & Chief Executive Officer November 7, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: NACDS Members Steven C. Anderson, IOM, CAE President and Chief Executive Officer NACDS Analysis of 2018

More information

The Widening Partisan Gender Gap in the U.S. Congress

The Widening Partisan Gender Gap in the U.S. Congress The Widening Partisan Gender Gap in the U.S. Congress MARCH 1, 2013 Karen Beckwith, Case Western Reserve University In many ways, America s 2012 elections brought government as usual. As an incumbent president

More information

On Election Night 2008, Democrats

On Election Night 2008, Democrats Signs point to huge GOP gains in legislative chambers. But the question remains: How far might the Democrats fall? By Tim Storey Tim Storey is NCSL s elections expert. On Election Night 2008, Democrats

More information

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11 AT 4 PM

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11 AT 4 PM Interviews with 1,017 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on September 7-9, 2007. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus

More information

9. Some industries like oil and gas companies largely support candidates. A) Democrats B) Republicans C) Libertarians D) Independent candidates

9. Some industries like oil and gas companies largely support candidates. A) Democrats B) Republicans C) Libertarians D) Independent candidates Name: Date: 1. is the constitutional clause that delegates control of elections to the state governments. A) Time, place, and manner clause B) Time and place clause C) Time clause D) Election clause 2.

More information

Applying Ranked Choice Voting to Congressional Elections. The Case for RCV with the Top Four Primary and Multi-Member Districts. Rob Richie, FairVote

Applying Ranked Choice Voting to Congressional Elections. The Case for RCV with the Top Four Primary and Multi-Member Districts. Rob Richie, FairVote Applying Ranked Choice Voting to Congressional Elections The Case for RCV with the Top Four Primary and Multi-Member Districts Rob Richie, FairVote American Exceptionalism: Inescapable Realities for Reformers

More information

Amy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents

Amy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents Amy Tenhouse Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents In 1996, the American public reelected 357 members to the United States House of Representatives; of those

More information

Post-Election Outlook Federal Budget & Tax Landscape

Post-Election Outlook Federal Budget & Tax Landscape Post-Election Outlook Federal Budget & Tax Landscape NCSL SALT Task Force Seminar Dana Point, California G. William Hoagland Sr. Vice President Bipartisan Policy Center November 18, 2016 Federal Budget:

More information

Chapter Ten: Campaigning for Office

Chapter Ten: Campaigning for Office 1 Chapter Ten: Campaigning for Office Learning Objectives 2 Identify the reasons people have for seeking public office. Compare and contrast a primary and a caucus in relation to the party nominating function.

More information

RACIAL GERRYMANDERING

RACIAL GERRYMANDERING Racial Gerrymandering purposeful drawing of boundaries of electoral districts in such a way that dilutes the vote of racial minorities or fails to provide an opportunity for racial minorities to elect

More information

Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010? A Second Look Over the Horizon. Alfred G. Cuzán. Professor of Political Science

Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010? A Second Look Over the Horizon. Alfred G. Cuzán. Professor of Political Science Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010? A Second Look Over the Horizon Alfred G. Cuzán Professor of Political Science The University of West Florida Pensacola, FL 32514 acuzan@uwf.edu An earlier,

More information

RULES OF TENNESSEE REGISTRY OF ELECTION FINANCE CHAPTER CAMPAIGN FINANCE RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS

RULES OF TENNESSEE REGISTRY OF ELECTION FINANCE CHAPTER CAMPAIGN FINANCE RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS RULES OF TENNESSEE REGISTRY OF ELECTION FINANCE CHAPTER 0530-1-3 CAMPAIGN FINANCE RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS 0530-1-3-.01 Elections 0530-1-3-.07 Independent Campaign Expenditures 0530-1-3-.02 Campaign Contributions

More information

FLORIDA: CLINTON MAINTAINS LEAD; TIGHT RACE FOR SENATE

FLORIDA: CLINTON MAINTAINS LEAD; TIGHT RACE FOR SENATE Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Tuesday, 20, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769

More information

POLITICAL TELEVISION ADVERTISING (NAT FOR 2000 CAMPAIGN (June 1 - November 7)

POLITICAL TELEVISION ADVERTISING (NAT FOR 2000 CAMPAIGN (June 1 - November 7) POLITICAL TELEVISION ADVERTISING (NAT 1. Presidential Race - Comparison of Spending on Ads Through November 7 1996 ADVERTISING FOR BUSH Bush Campaign $39,210,195 (Dole) $33,000,000 Republican Party $44,744,774

More information

The Cook Political Report 2012 Election Outlook

The Cook Political Report 2012 Election Outlook The Cook Political Report 2012 Election Outlook Presented by: David Wasserman, U.S. House Editor Southwest Ag Issues Summit September 10, 2012 Email: dwasserman@cookpolitical.com Web: http://www.cookpolitical.com

More information

Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond

Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond Robert S. Erikson Columbia University 2018 Conference by the Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston Triple Play: Election 2018; Census 2020; and

More information

Purposes of Elections

Purposes of Elections Purposes of Elections o Regular free elections n guarantee mass political action n enable citizens to influence the actions of their government o Popular election confers on a government the legitimacy

More information

Florida's Future State and County Policies: 2010 Elections Will Be Significant in Future Policy Choices 1

Florida's Future State and County Policies: 2010 Elections Will Be Significant in Future Policy Choices 1 FE827 Florida's Future State and County Policies: 2010 Elections Will Be Significant in Future Policy Choices 1 Rodney L. Clouser 2 Introduction Implications of the 2010 election cycle on policy decisions

More information