Case No , consolidated with No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
|
|
- Jason Hardy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 1 of 14 Case No , consolidated with No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through XAVIER BECERRA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF MARYLAND, by and through BRIAN FROSH, ATTORNEY GENERAL and MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MINNESOTA, by and through MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF OREGON, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, by and through JOSH SHAPIRO, ATTORNEY GENERAL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and ANDREW K. WHEELER, Acting Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. AMENDED PETITION FOR REVIEW
2 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 2 of 14 Pursuant to Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1)), Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and D.C. Circuit Rule 15, the State of California, by and through its Attorney General and the California Air Resources Board; the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, by and through its Attorney General and Department of the Environment, Minnesota, by and through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington; the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by and through its Attorney General and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; and the District of Columbia, hereby petition this Court for review of the final action of Respondent United States Environmental Protection Agency and former Administrator E. Scott Pruitt, titled Conditional No Action Assurance Regarding Small Manufacturers of Glider Vehicles (July 6, 2018) (Attachment 1). 2
3 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 3 of 14 Dated: July 24, 2018 XAVIER BECERRA State of California By: /s/ David A. Zonana DAVID A. ZONANA Supervising Deputy Attorney General MEGAN K. HEY M. ELAINE MECKENSTOCK MELINDA PILLING Deputy Attorneys General California Department of Justice 1515 Clay Street, Suite 2000 Oakland, CA Tel.: (510) David.Zonana@doj.ca.gov California, by and through Xavier Becerra, Attorney General and California Air Resources Board Respectfully submitted, GURBIR S. GREWAL State of New Jersey DAVID C. APY By: /s/ Jung W. Kim JUNG W. KIM Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General R.J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market St., P.O. Box 093 Trenton, NJ Tel.: (609) Jung.Kim@law.njoag.gov New Jersey 3
4 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 4 of 14 GEORGE JEPSEN State of Connecticut By: /s/ Scott N. Koschwitz SCOTT N. KOSCHWITZ MATTHEW I. LEVINE Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General P.O. Box 120, 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT Tel.: (860) Scott.Koschwitz@ct.gov Attorneys for Petitioner the State of Connecticut MATTHEW P. DENN State of Delaware By: /s/ Valerie S. Edge VALERIE SATTERFIELD EDGE Deputy Attorney General Delaware Department of Justice 102 W. Water Street Dover, DE Tel.: (302) Valerie.Edge@state.de.us Delaware LISA MADIGAN State of Illinois MATTHEW J. DUNN Chief, Environmental Enforcement/ Asbestos Litigation Division By: /s/ Daniel I. Rottenberg DANIEL I. ROTTENBERG Illinois Attorney General s Office 69 W. Washington St., 18th Floor Chicago, IL Tel.: (312) DRottenberg@atg.state.il.us JANET T. MILLS State of Maine By: /s/ Gerald D. Reid GERALD D. REID Chief, Natural Resources Division 6 State House Station Augusta. ME Tel.: (207) Jerry.Reid@maine.gov Maine Illinois 4
5 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 5 of 14 BRIAN E. FROSH State of Maryland By: /s/ Roberta R. James ROBERTA R. JAMES Office of the Attorney General Maryland Department of the Environment 1800 Washington Blvd. Baltimore, MD Tel.: (410) Roberta.James@maryland.gov Maryland by and through Brian Frosh, Attorney General and the Maryland Department of the Environment MAURA HEALEY Commonwealth of Massachusetts By: /s/ Carol Iancu CAROL IANCU Environmental Protection Division One Ashburton Place, 18th Floor Boston, MA Tel: (617) Carol.Iancu@state.ma.us Attorneys for Petitioner Commonwealth of Massachusetts LORI SWANSON State of Minnesota By: /s/ Max Kieley MAX KIELEY 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 900 St. Paul, MN Tel.: (651) Max.Kieley@ag.state.mn.us Attorneys for the State of Minnesota, by and through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency HECTOR H. BALDERAS State of New Mexico By: /s/ William Grantham WILLIAM GRANTHAM BRIAN E. MCMATH Assistant Attorneys General 201 Third St. NW, Suite 300 Albuquerque, NM Tel.: (505) wgrantham@nmag.gov New Mexico 5
6 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 6 of 14 BARBARA D. UNDERWOOD State of New York By: /s/ Danielle C. Fidler DANIELLE C. FIDLER Environmental Protection Bureau 120 Broadway, 26 th Floor New York, NY Tel.: (212) Danielle.Fidler@ag.ny.gov New York ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM State of Oregon JOSHUA H. STEIN State of North Carolina By: /s/ Asher P. Spiller ASHER P. SPILLER North Carolina Department of Justice P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina Tel.: (919) aspiller@ncdoj.gov North Carolina By: /s/ Paul Garrahan PAUL GARRAHAN Attorney-in-Charge Natural Resources Section Oregon Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, OR Tel.: (503) Paul.Garrahan@doj.state.or.us Oregon 6
7 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 7 of 14 JOSH SHAPIRO Commonwealth of Pennsylvania By: /s/ Michael J. Fischer MICHAEL J. FISCHER Chief Deputy Attorney General KRISTEN M. FURLAN Assistant Director Bureau of Regulatory Counsel Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA Tel.: (215) mfischer@attorneygeneral.gov kfurlan@pa.gov PETER F. KILMARTIN Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island By: /s/ Gregory S. Schultz GREGORY S. SCHULTZ Special Rhode Island Department of Attorney General 150 South Main Street Providence, RI Tel: (401) gschultz@riag.ri.gov Attorney for Petitioner State of Rhode Island Attorneys for Petitioner Commonwealth of Pennsylvania by and through Josh Shapiro, Attorney General and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 7
8 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 8 of 14 ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General for the State of Washington By: /s/ Katharine G. Shirey KATHARINE G. SHIREY Office of the Attorney General P.O. Box Olympia, WA Tel.: (360) KayS1@atg.wa.gov Washington KARL A. RACINE District of Columbia THOMAS J. DONOVAN, JR. Attorney General for the State of Vermont By: /s/ Nicholas F. Persampieri NICHOLAS F. PERSAMPIERI Office of the Attorney General 109 State Street Montpelier, VT Tel.: (802) Nick.Persampieri@vermont.gov Attorneys for Petitioner the State of Vermont By: /s/ Loren L. Alikhan LOREN L. ALIKHAN Solicitor General Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 600 South Washington, D.C Tel: (202) Loren.AliKhan@dc.gov Attorneys for Petitioner District of Columbia 8
9 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 9 of 14 Attachment 1 Conditional No Action Assurance Regarding Small Manufacturers of Glider Vehicles (July 6, 2018)
10 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 10 of 14 UNITEDSTATESEN~RONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY WASHI NGTON, D.C July 6, 2018 OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Conditional No Action Assurance Regarding Small Manufacturers of Glider Vehicles FROM: Susan Parker Bodine,ZL_ f~ ~~ Assistant Administrator Office ofenforcement and Compliance Assurance TO: Bill Wehrum Assistant Administrator Office of Air and Radiation Pursuant to your attached request of July 6, 2018, I am today providing a "no action assurance" relating to: (1) those small manufacturers to which 40 C.F.R (t) applies that either are manufacturing or that have manufactured glider vehicles in calendar year 2018 (Small Manufacturers); and (2) to those companies to which 40 C.F.R (t)(l)(vii) applies that sell glider kits to such Small Manufacturers (Suppliers). As noted in your memorandum, in conjunction with EPA's having promulgated in 2016 the final rule entitled Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy- Duty Engines and Vehicles-Phase 2, see 81 Fed. Reg. 73,478 (Oct. 25, 2016) (the HD Phase 2 Rule), the Agency specified that glider vehicles were "new motor vehicles" ( and glider vehicle engines to be "new motor vehicle engines") within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. 7550(3). Effective January 1, 2017, Small Manufacturers were permitted to manufacture glider vehicles in 2017 in the amount ofthe greatest number produced in any one year during the period of without having to meet the requirements of 40 C.F.R (Interim Allowance). After this transitional period, beginning on January 1, 2018, small manufacturers of glider vehicles have been precluded from manufacturing more than 300 glider vehicles ( or fewer, if a particular manufacturer's highest annual production volume between 2010 and 2014 had been below 300 vehicles), unless they use engines that comply with the emission standards applicable to the model year in which the glider vehicle is manufactured. On November 16, 2017, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking, proposing to repeal the emissions standards and other requirements of the HD Phase 2 Rule as they apply to glider vehicles, glider engines, and glider kits. See 82 Fed. Reg. 53,442 (Nov. 16, 2017) (November 16 NPRM).
11 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 11 of 14 We understand that after taking into consideration the public comments received, and following further engagement with stakeholders and other interested entities, the Office ofair and Radiation (OAR) has determined that additional evaluation of several matters is required before it can take final action on the November 16 NPRM. Consequently, OAR now recognizes that finalizing the November 16 NPRM will require more time than it had previously anticipated. In the meantime, Small Manufacturers who, in reliance on the November 16 NPRM, have reached their calendar year 2018 annual allocation under the HD Phase 2 Rule must cease production for the remainder ofcalendar year 2018 of additional glider vehicles, resulting in the loss ofjobs and threatening the viability of these Small Manufacturers. As noted in your memorandum, OAR now intends to move as expeditiously as possible to undertake rulemaking in which it will consider extending the compliance date applicable to Small Manufacturers to December 31, Consistent with the intent and purpose ofoar's planned course ofaction, this no action assurance provides that EPA will exercise its enforcement discretion with respect to the applicability of 40 C.F.R to Small Manufacturers that in 2018 and 2019 produce for each ofthose two years up to the level of their Interim Allowances as was available to them in calendar year under 40 C.F.R (1)(3). This no action assurance further provides that EPA will exercise its enforcement discretion with respect to Suppliers that sell glider kits to those Small Manufacturers to which this no action assurance applies. This no action assurance will remain in effect until the earlier of: (1) 11 :59 p.m. (EDT), July 6, 2019; or (2) the effective date ofa final rule extending the compliance date applicable to small manufacturers of glider vehicles. The issuance of this no action assurance is in the public interest to avoid profound disruptions to small businesses while EPA completes its reconsideration of the HD Phase 2 Rule. The EPA reserves its right to revoke or modify this no action assurance. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please contact Rosemarie Kelley ofmy staff at (202) , or kelley.rosemarie@epa.gov. Attachment cc: Byron Bunker, OAR, OTAQ Rosemarie Kelley, OECA, OCE Phillip Brooks, OECA, OCE, AED 2
12 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 12 of 14 vehicles" within the meaning of CAA section 216(3), glider engines would be found not to constitute "new motor vehicle engines" within the meaning of CAA section 216(3), and glider kits would not be treated as "incomplete" new motor vehicles. Under this proposed interpretation, EPA would lack authority to regulate glider vehicles, glider engines, and glider kits under CAA section 202(a)(l). EPA also sought comment on whether, were it not to promulgate this proposed interpretation of the CAA, the Agency should increase the interim provision's allocation available to small manufacturers above the current applicable limits (i.e., at most, 300 glider vehicles per year). 82 Fed. Reg. 53,447. Further, EPA solicited comment on whether the compliance date for glider vehicles and glider kits set forth at 40 C.F.R should be extended. Id. After taking into consideration the public comments received, and following further engagement with stakeholders and other interested entities, OAR has determined that additional evaluation of a number of matters is required before it can take final action on the November 16 NPRM. As a consequence, OAR now recognizes that finalizing the November 16 NPRM will require more time than we had previously anticipated. OAR intends to complete this rulemaking as expeditiously as possible under these circumstances, consistent with the Agency' s responsibility to ensure that whatever final action it may take conforms with the Clean Air Act and is based on reasoned decision making. In the meantime, while the emissions standards and other requirements ofthe 2016 Rule applicable to glider vehicles became effective on January 1, 2017, and the Interim Allowance for calendar year 2017 ceased to apply as of January 1, As a consequence, Small Manufacturers who, in reliance on the November 16 NPRM, have reached their calendar year 2018 interim annual allocation under the HD Phase 2 Rule must cease production for the remainder of 2018, resulting in the loss ofjobs and threatening the viability of these Small Manufacturers. In light ofthese circumstances, OAR now intends to move as expeditiously as possible to undertake rulemaking to consider extending the compliance date applicable to Small Manufacturers until December 31, Concurrently, we intend to continue to work towards expeditiously completing a final rule. OAR requests a No Action Assurance in order to preserve the status quo as it was at the time of the November 16 NPRM until such time as we are able to take final action on extending the applicable compliance date. Specifically, OAR requests that 0 ECA exercise its enforcement discretion with respect to Small Manufacturers who in 2018 and 2019 produce for each of those two years up to the level of their Interim Allowance as was available to them in 2017 under 40 C.F.R (t)(3). OAR requests that OECA leave this No Action Assurance in place for one year from the date of issuance, or until such time as EPA takes final action to extend the compliance date, whichever comes sooner. I appreciate your prompt consideration ofthis request. -2-
13 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 13 of 14 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: FROM TO: Enforcement Discretion Regarding Companies that Are Producing or that Have Produced Glider Vehicles in Calendar Year 2018!~;i::1:':ministrator l~itj Office of Air and Radiation Susan Parker Bodine Assistant Administrator Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance f-l The Office ofair and Radiation (OAR) requests that the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) exercise enforcement discretion (No Action Assurance) with respect to both those small manufacturers to which 40 C.F.R (1) applies that either are manufacturing or that have manufactured glider vehicles in calendar year 2018 (Small Manufacturers), and to those companies to which 40 C.F.R (t)(l)(vii) applies that sell glider kits to such small manufacturers (Suppliers). Specifically, as a bridge to a rulemaking in which we will consider extending the deadline for Small Manufacturers to comply with 40 C.F.R , OAR requests that OECA provide assurance that it will exercise enforcement discretion for up to one year with respect to the applicability to Small Manufacturers and their Suppliers of 40 C.F.R Further, OAR requests that OECA provide assurance that it will not take enforcement action against those Suppliers that elect to sell glider kits to those Small Manufacturers of glider vehicles to which this No Action Assurance applies. In conjunction with EPA' s having promulgated in 2016 the final rule entitled Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles- Phase 2, 81 Fed. Reg. 73,478 (Oct. 25, 2016) (the HD Phase 2 Rule), the Agency clarified that glider vehicles were "new motor vehicles" ( and glider vehicle engines to be "new motor vehicle engines") within the meaning of42 U.S.C. 7550(3). EPA in the HD Phase 2 Rule also stated that glider kits constituted "incomplete motor vehicles." Effective January 1, 2017, Small Manufacturers were permitted to manufacture glider vehicles in 2017 in the amount of the greatest number produced in any one year during the period without meeting the requirements of 40 C.F.R (Interim Allowance). After this transitional period, beginning on January 1, 2018, small manufacturers of glider vehicles have been precluded from manufacturing more than 300 glider vehicles (or fewer, if a particular manufacturer' s highest annual production volume from between 2010 and 2014 had been below 300 vehicles), unless they use engines that comply with the emission standards applicable to the model year in which the glider vehicle is manufactured. On November 16, 2017, EPA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking, proposing to repeal the emissions standards and other requirements of the HD Phase 2 Rule as they apply to glider vehicles, glider engines, and glider kits. 82 Fed. Reg. 53,442 (Nov. 16, 2017) (November 16 NPRM). In the November 16 NPRM, EPA proposed an interpretation of the Clean Air Act (CAA) under which glider vehicles would be found not to constitute "new motor -1-
14 USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/24/2018 Page 14 of 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 24, 2018, this Amended Petition for Review was electronically served on all parties through the appellate electronic case filing system. By: /s/ Melinda Pilling MELINDA PILLING Deputy Attorney General
USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/19/2017 Page 1 of 7
USCA Case #17-1185 Document #1700174 Filed: 10/19/2017 Page 1 of 7 STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU October 19, 2017 BY CM/ECF
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #17-1145 Document #1683433 Filed: 07/11/2017 Page 1 of 11 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, ) EARTHWORKS,
More informationEPA Final Brief in West Virginia v. EPA, D.C. Cir. No , Doc. # (filed April 22, 2016), at 61.
Attorneys General of New York, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota (by and through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency), New Jersey,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT SET IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Petitioners, Respondent.
Case: 10-1131 Document: 1265212 Filed: 09/10/2010 Page: 1 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SET IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, INC. et
More informationORAL ARGUMENT HEARD EN BANC ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN CASE NO ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN CASE NO
USCA Case #15-1363 Document #1670114 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 16 ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD EN BANC ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN CASE NO. 15-1363 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN CASE NO. 17-1014 IN THE UNITED
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee
USCA Case #16-5202 Document #1709177 Filed: 12/15/2017 Page 1 of 3 No. 16-5202 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff Appellee
More informationCase 1:18-cv JDB Document 69 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-01747-JDB Document 69 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., v. Plaintiffs, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Civ.
More informationDear Majority Leader McConnell and Minority Leader Schumer; Speaker Ryan and Minority Leader Pelosi:
Attorneys General of New York, California, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia, and the Secretary of the
More informationNos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. MEXICHEM FLUOR, INC., ET AL.
USCA Case #15-1328 Document #1695217 Filed: 09/27/2017 Page 1 of 27 Nos. 15-1328, 15-1329 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MEXICHEM FLUOR, INC., ET AL., Petitioners
More informationATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND. January 23, 2008
ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND THE STATES OF ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, ILLINOIS, IOWA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, OREGON,
More informationCase 1:17-cv RDM Document 16 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00999-RDM Document 16 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PRIVATE POSTSECONDARY SCHOOLS, Plaintiff, v. ELISABETH
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #18-1011 Document #1718363 Filed: 02/16/2018 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, et al.
More informationCase 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action ) No. 13-1553 (GK) v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. Plaintiffs,
Case 4:18-cv-00167-O Document 182 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 2474 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION TEXAS, WISCONSIN, ALABAMA, ARKANSAS,
More informationCase 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4
Case :-cv-00-sws Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 REED ZARS Wyo. Bar No. - Attorney at Law 0 Kearney Street Laramie, WY 00 Phone: (0) 0- Email: reed@zarslaw.com XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California
More informationCase 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00243-RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and ) NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ) ASSOCIATION, ) )
More information[ARGUED APRIL 12, 2016; DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 2016] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
[ARGUED APRIL 12, 2016; DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 2016] No. 15-1177 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PHH CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. Plaintiffs,
Case 4:18-cv-00167-O Document 224 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 6 PageID 2733 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION TEXAS, WISCONSIN, ALABAMA, ARKANSAS,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED
Case: 09-1237 Document: 1210401 Filed: 10/08/2009 Page: 1 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE ) UNITED STATES OF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STATES OF NEW YORK, CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, MARYLAND, NEW JERSEY, OREGON, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, and WASHINGTON; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS;
More informationORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^
S I A USCA Case #16-1447 Document #1653071 Filed: 12/27/2016 Page 1 of 6 ^^^[ITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL^ THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRClM w&nw ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^ FOR'DTSTRCTOFCOLUIVIBIACIRCUIT
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,
USCA Case #17-1145 Document #1683079 Filed: 07/07/2017 Page 1 of 15 NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT No. 17-1145 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CLEAN AIR
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE ) REGULATION, INC., et al., ) Case No. 09-1322 ) (and consolidated cases Petitioners,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED
Case: 09-1322 Document: 1227011 Filed: 01/22/2010 Page: 1 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, ) INC.,
More informationJuly 1, Dear Administrator Nason:
Attorneys General of the States of California, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont,
More informationMrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)
Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam Study Packet your Final Exam will be held on All make up assignments must be turned in by YOUR finals day!!!! Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points) Be able to identify the
More informationCase 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00243-RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and ) NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #12-1272 Document #1384888 Filed: 07/20/2012 Page 1 of 9 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT White Stallion Energy Center,
More informationUSCA Case # Document # Filed: 08/02/2017 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #17-1145 Document #1687021 Filed: 08/02/2017 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 17-1145 CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, EARTHWORKS, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE
More informationINSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY
INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY Harry S Truman School of Public Affairs University of Missouri ANALYSIS OF STATE REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Andrew Wesemann and Brian Dabson Summary This report analyzes state
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 16, No & No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1541226 Filed: 03/09/2015 Page 1 of 27 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 16, 2015 No. 14-1112 & No. 14-1151 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationUNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933
Item 1. Issuer s Identity UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 Name of Issuer Previous Name(s) None Entity Type
More informationVOTER WHERE TO MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION FORM. Office of the Secretary of State P.O. Box 5616 Montgomery, AL
STATE REGISTRATION DEADLINES ACTUAL REGISTRATION DEADLINE VOTER REGISTRATION FORM USED WHERE TO MAIL VOTER REGISTRATION FORM FOR MORE INFORMATION ALABAMA Voter registration is closed during the ten days
More informationAttorney General Doug Peterson News Release
Attorney General Doug Peterson News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Suzanne Gage July 22, 2015 402.471.2656 suzanne.gage@nebraska.gov AG PETERSON CALLS ON PHONE CARRIERS TO OFFER CALL- BLOCKING
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1492 Document #1696614 Filed: 10/03/2017 Page 1 of 9 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) SIERRA CLUB,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT ON APRIL 16, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #14-1146 Document #1536848 Filed: 02/10/2015 Page 1 of 38 ORAL ARGUMENT ON APRIL 16, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, et
More informationCase 2:16-cv SWS Document 228 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF WYOMING
Case 2:16-cv-00285-SWS Document 228 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 8 Robin Cooley, CO Bar #31168 (admitted pro hac vice Joel Minor, CO Bar #47822 (admitted pro hac vice Earthjustice 633 17 th Street, Suite 1600
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO
USCA Case #17-1014 Document #1668929 Filed: 03/31/2017 Page 1 of 6 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO. 17-1014 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO. 15-1363 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1166 Document #1671681 Filed: 04/18/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT WALTER COKE, INC.,
More informationNo (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1381 Document #1675253 Filed: 05/15/2017 Page 1 of 14 ORAL ARGUMENT REMOVED FROM CALENDAR No. 15-1381 (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #18-1085 Document #1725473 Filed: 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 15 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #17-1014 Document #1668936 Filed: 03/31/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, ET
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Case: 10-1215 Document: 1265178 Filed: 09/10/2010 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, et al., ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 10-1131
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Case: 08-1200 Document: 1274843 Filed: 11/01/2010 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al., Petitioners, No. 08-1200 and consolidated
More informationIf you have questions, please or call
SCCE's 17th Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute: CLE Approvals By State The SCCE submitted sessions deemed eligible for general CLE credits and legal ethics CLE credits to most states with CLE requirements
More informationCase 2:16-cv SWS Document 63 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF WYOMING
Case 2:16-cv-00285-SWS Document 63 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 11 REED ZARS Wyo. Bar No. 6-3224 Attorney at Law 910 Kearney Street Laramie, WY 82070 Phone: (307) 760-6268 Email: reed@zarslaw.com KAMALA D.
More informationORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #12-1100 Document #1579258 Filed: 10/21/2015 Page 1 of 8 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
More informationCase 1:10-cv JDB Document 8-1 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-00380-JDB Document 8-1 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. ELECTION SYSTEMS and SOFTWARE, Inc., Defendant.
More information0 Smithsonian Institution
0 Smithsonian Institution Date: January 2, 2019 From: Subject: Brenda Malone Director, Office of Human Resources Furlough Decision Notice In the absence of either a Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 appropriation,
More informationWYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Contact: Dr. Wenlin Liu, Chief Economist WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY CHEYENNE -- Wyoming s total resident population contracted to 577,737 in
More information2016 us election results
1 of 6 11/12/2016 7:35 PM 2016 us election results All News Images Videos Shopping More Search tools About 243,000,000 results (0.86 seconds) 2 WA OR NV CA AK MT ID WY UT CO AZ NM ND MN SD WI NY MI NE
More informationNew Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge
67 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 202 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:0 P.M. EST, SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 200 Date: September 26, 200
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 18-70506, 03/16/2018, ID: 10802098, DktEntry: 29, Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; SANTA CLARA COUNTY CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO
USCA Case #17-1092 Document #1671332 Filed: 04/17/2017 Page 1 of 7 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO. 17-1014 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO. 15-1363 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1363 Document #1600435 Filed: 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 6 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, 2016 No. 15-1363 (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1381 Document #1668276 Filed: 03/28/2017 Page 1 of 12 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) STATE OF NORTH
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #17-1145 Document #1686475 Filed: 07/31/2017 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, EARTHWORKS, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND,
More informationLimited Liability Corporations List of State Offices Contact Information
Limited Liability Corporations List of State Offices Contact Information Alabama The Alabama LLC ALA. CODE s. 10-12-1 State Capitol Corporations Div. P.O. Box 5616 Montgomery, AL 36103-5616 334-242-5324
More informationA. ALLEGATIONS. WHEREAS, Glazer has cooperated and has agreed to continue to cooperate fully with the ongoing Attorneys General s Investigation;
An Agreement Among the Attorneys General of the States and Commonwealths of Connecticut, Alabama, Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
More informationWe re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge
Citizens for Tax Justice 202-626-3780 September 23, 2003 (9 pp.) Contact: Bob McIntyre We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO
USCA Case #15-1379 Document #1671083 Filed: 04/14/2017 Page 1 of 8 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO. 17-1014 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO. 15-1363 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationCase 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-04540-WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in
More informationBylaws of the Prescription Monitoring Information exchange Working Group
Bylaws of the Prescription Monitoring Information exchange Working Group ` Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Article I. Introduction... 6 Article II. Purpose... 6 Article III. Membership... 6 Article
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1219 Document #1609250 Filed: 04/18/2016 Page 1 of 16 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) UTILITY SOLID WASTE ACTIVITIES
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1219 Document #1693477 Filed: 09/18/2017 Page 1 of 11 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) UTILITY SOLID
More information/mediation.htm s/adr.html rograms/adr/
Alaska Alaska Court System AK http://www.state.ak.us/courts /mediation.htm A variety of programs are offered in courts throughout the state. Alabama Arkansas Alabama Center for AL http://www.alabamaadr.org
More informationMS4 Remand Rule. Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015 Background on the MS4 Remand MS4 Remand Background Current Phase II Regulations Small MS4 General Permits (40 CFR 122.33-34) If
More informationNo and No Consolidated IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 18-15475, 04/05/2018, ID: 10825798, DktEntry: 33-1, Page 1 of 38 No. 18-15380 and No. 18-15475 Consolidated IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #17-1145 Document #1679553 Filed: 06/14/2017 Page 1 of 14 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, EARTHWORKS, ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationFederalR eg ister Environm entald o cu m en ts
Page 1 of 9 file:///j:/air/airq uality/aq PortalFiles/Perm its/op /Section_110_Approval.htm Last updated o n Monday, Ju ly 0 7, 2 0 0 8 FederalR eg ister Environm entald o cu m en ts Y o u are h ere: EPA
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Identifying the Importance of ID Overview Policy Recommendations Conclusion Summary of Findings Quick Reference Guide 3 3 4 6 7 8 8 The National Network for Youth gives
More informationUSCA Case # Document # Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) )
USCA Case #17-1099 Document #1668154 Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 MAR 2 4 2017 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
More informationACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/23/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-03495, and on FDsys.gov 4191-02U SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2) the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and its Administrator, Gina McCarthy (collectively EPA ). WHEREAS,
More informationCase 3:17-cv EDL Document 50 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 21
Case :-cv-00-edl Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 0 ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General of Washington KELLY T. WOOD, WSBA #00 WILLIAM R. SHERMAN, WSBA # STACEY S. BERNSTEIN, WSBA #0 Assistant Attorneys General
More informationORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C
USCA Case #15-1485 Document #1590492 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT DEC 2 Z015 RECEIVED ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED SThTES Cbifp UNITED STATES
More informationCongressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada
2015 Congressional Districts Potentially Affected by Shipments to Yucca Mountain, Nevada Fred Dilger PhD. Black Mountain Research 10/21/2015 Background On June 16 2008, the Department of Energy (DOE) released
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO
USCA Case #17-1014 Document #1671066 Filed: 04/13/2017 Page 1 of 8 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO. 17-1014 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO. 15-1363 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationTHE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS (and a few other things) Gary Moncrief University Distinguished Professor of Political Science Boise State University NEW LEADERSHIP IDAHO 2017 Lets start with a few other things
More informationCA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.
AL ALABAMA Ala. Code 10-2B-15.02 (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A-2-15.02.] No monetary penalties listed. May invalidate in-state contracts made by unqualified foreign corporations.
More informationCase 1:18-cv ELH Document 20-1 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:18-cv-02849-ELH Document 20-1 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 22 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Baltimore Division THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5 Michele D. Ross Reed Smith LLP 1301 K Street NW Suite 1000 East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 202 414-9297 Fax: 202 414-9299 Email:
More informationPREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION
PREVIEW 08 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION Emboldened by the politics of hate and fear spewed by the Trump-Pence administration, state legislators across the nation have threatened
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO
USCA Case #17-1014 Document #1670187 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 11 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO. 17-1014 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO. 15-1363 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1385 Document #1670218 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Murray Energy Corporation,
More informationCase 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cv-0-rs Document 0 Filed 0// Page of CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General CARLOTTA P. WELLS Assistant Director KATE BAILEY STEPHEN EHRLICH CAROL FEDERIGHI Trial Attorneys United States
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.
Richard Smith WSBA # Marc Zemel WSBA # Smith & Lowney, PLLC East John Street Seattle, Washington ( 0- Attorneys for Plaintiff BILL GREEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
More informationUSCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No
USCA Case #11-5121 Document #1319507 Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No. 11-5121 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT IN RE COALITION
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 1 of 6 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association,
More informationThe Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs
The Impact of Wages on Highway Construction Costs Updated Analysis Prepared for the Construction Industry Labor-Management Trust and the National Heavy & Highway Alliance by The Construction Labor Research
More information28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS CHAPTER 6 - BANKRUPTCY JUDGES 152. Appointment of bankruptcy judges (a) (1) Each bankruptcy judge to be appointed for a judicial
More informationStates Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012
Source: Weekly State Tax Report: News Archive > 2012 > 03/16/2012 > Perspective > States Adopt Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012 2012 TM-WSTR
More informationCase 3:17-cv EDL Document 11 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 21
Case :-cv-00-edl Document Filed 0// Page of XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California DAVID A. ZONANA Supervising Deputy Attorney General GEORGE TORGUN, State Bar No. 0 MARY S. THARIN, State Bar No.
More informationUNIFORM ADULT GUARDIANSHIP AND PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS JURISDICTION ACT
D R A F T FOR DISCUSSION ONLY UNIFORM ADULT GUARDIANSHIP AND PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS JURISDICTION ACT NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS MEETING IN ITS ONE-HUNDRED-AND-FIFTEENTH
More informationImmigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008
Immigrant Policy Project April 24, 2008 Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008 States are still tackling immigration related issues in a variety of policy
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #19-1007 Document #1773328 Filed: 02/13/2019 Page 1 of 33 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
USCA Case #11-1403 Document #1436665 Filed: 05/17/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., vs. Appellants, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
More informationMOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AS PETITIONERS. The State of New York, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, States of Arizona,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL S FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA by and through ) ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR, ) and the CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES ) BOARD, ) Docket No. 08- ) Petitioners,
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-01052 Document 1 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE STATE OF FLORIDA By Attorney General Pamela Jo Bondi THE STATE OF MAINE By
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #13-1108 Document #1670157 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 7 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE,
More information