#ACURatings Conservative.org

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "#ACURatings Conservative.org"

Transcription

1 #ACURatings Conservative.org AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW i

2 Table of Contents About ACUF... 1 Ratings Background & Methodology... 2 Legislatures in Rank Order... 3 Metrics... 4 Highlights...5 Rankings Nationwide Results Republican Delegations Democratic Delegations Partisan Divide Upper Chambers...35 Lower Chambers...36 States with Most Superlatives Support ACUF...4 American Conservative Union Foundation

3 Board of Directors ACUF Executive Committee Matt Schlapp Chairman Millie Hallow Vice Chair Van D. Hipp, Jr. Treasurer Kimberly Bellissimo Secretary Dan Schneider Executive Director Board Members José Cárdenas Gordon Chang Jonathan Garthwaite Charlie Gerow Niger Innis Adam Laxalt Willes K. Lee Mary Matalin Carolyn D. Meadows Thomas Winter ACU Executive Committee Matt Schlapp Chairman Charlie Gerow Vice Chairman Carolyn D. Meadows 2 nd Vice Chair Bob Beauprez Treasurer Board Members Jackie Arends Larry Beasley Kimberly Bellissimo Steve Biegun Morton C. Blackwell Jamie Burke José Cárdenas Muriel Coleman Sean Fieler Alan M. Gottlieb Van D. Hipp, Jr. Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser Ron Christie Secretary Ed Yevoli At-Large Dan Schneider Executive Director Ed McFadden Priscilla O Shaughnessy Ron Robinson Mike Rose Peter Samuelson Sabrina Schaeffer Terry Schilling Matt Smith Chris Turner Bill Walton Thomas Winter The ACUF Legislative Ratings Team Francis Finnegan Larry Hart Fred McGrath Tyler Muench Luke Schneider 21 N Union Street Suite 37 Alexandria, VA (22) #ACURatings Conservative.org

4 About ACUF The American Conservative Union was founded in 1964 by William F. Buckley, Jr. and other conservative luminaries as an umbrella organization to harness the collective strength of the conservative revolution. ACU excels in combining ideas with action, developing policy positions based on conservative political philosophy and educating and training thousands of grassroots activists. Dating back to 1974, ACU hosts the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the world s largest gathering of conservatives. CPAC serves as a platform for the nation s elected officials, thought leaders and grassroots activists and organize around the seminal issues facing our country. The ACU Foundation (ACUF) is the 51(c)(3), educational arm of ACU. Since 1971, ACUF has produced the nation s longest-running conservative congressional scorecard. In the states, ACUF is the only organization that evaluates every single bill and produces individual scores for every single lawmaker in each of the 99 legislative chambers in all 5 states. Furthermore, ACUF and its Senior Fellows provide conservative solutions to some of our nation s most pressing issues through their work with the Foundation s five Policy Centers: Criminal Justice Reform; 21st Century Property Rights; Human Dignity; Statesmanship and Diplomacy; and Arts & Culture. AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 1

5 #ACURatings Conservative.org Letter from the Chairman... 2 ACU & ACUF Board Members... 3 Selecting the Votes Winners & Losers... 4 OH Senate Statistics... 5 OH Senate Vote Descriptions... 6 OH Senate Scores... 7 OH House Statistics... 9 OH House Vote Descriptions... 1 OH House Scores Ratings Background ACUF s state legislative ratings were first established in 211 as a pilot program rating five states. It has since grown to evaluate all 5 states, 99 legislative chambers and over 7,4 elected officials. For each state, ACUF produces an individualized scorecard containing key bills voted on during that state s legislative session for each lawmaker. Year in Review is a compilation of all the data contained in each of these 5 individual state scorecards. Methodology Like ACUF s Ratings of Congress, the Foundation s state legislative ratings illustrate how an elected official views the role of government in an individual s life. When determining a stance on a particular issue, ACUF begins by defining conservatism: the political philosophy that sovereignty resides in the person. Then, we apply the Founders belief that the proper role of government is to protect life, liberty and property. 217 RATINGS of OHIO TABLE OF CONTENTS In order to depict how closely a lawmaker adheres to conservative principles, ACUF selects from the full spectrum of issues relating to the economy, social issues and government integrity. Some key areas include taxation, spending, education, labor, licensure, regulation, environment, life, free speech, and Second Amendment rights. All individual state analyses are conducted after the adjournment of a legislative session to ensure that no issue is neglected. Each lawmaker is evaluated on a zero to 1 scale, with a score of 1 representing a voting record that is perfectly aligned with conservative principles. Officials who earn a score of 9 percent or higher are presented with ACUF s highest honor, the Award for Conservative Excellence, while those who earn a score of 8 percent or greater, but less than 9 percent, are presented with the Award for Conservative Achievement. Additionally, any lawmaker who earns a score of 1 percent or less is recognized as part of ACUF s Coalition of the Radical Left. 2 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

6 Legislatures in Rank Order RANK STATE RANK STATE 1 Tennessee same 26 Nebraska 8 2 Ohio 9 3 Wyoming 4 4 Kentucky 9 5 Florida 1 6 Texas 3 7 West Virginia 9 8 Utah 7 9 Missouri 4 1 South Dakota North Carolina Alaska Alabama 1 14 Wisconsin 7 15 Louisiana Idaho 6 17 Pennsylvania 2 18 Iowa Michigan 3 2 Montana 3 21 Arkansas Indiana 2 23 Georgia 9 24 Virginia 4 25 Arizona Oklahoma 7 28 North Dakota 2 29 Minnesota 2 3 Mississippi Nevada 6 32 Colorado 4 33 New Hampshire 6 34 Delaware 6 35 Connecticut 6 36 Kansas 3 37 Illinois 1 38 Washington 3 39 New York same 4 Oregon 4 41 Maine 8 42 New Mexico California 1 44 Vermont 5 45 South Carolina same 46 New Jersey 3 47 Rhode Island same 48 Maryland 2 49 Hawaii 1 5 Massachusetts same *Arrows indicate change in rank from the previous year. Same indicates no change in ranking. AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 3

7 Metrics 14,372 bills evaluated 1,893 bills scored 7,434 legislators rated To determine this year s rankings, ACUF evaluated over 14, bills that were introduced in the 217 legislative session running from January 1 to December 31. Of those bills, ACUF ultimately selected 1,893 pieces of legislation across all 5 states that best illustrated how an elected official views the role of government in an individual s life. The Foundation calculated individual scores for a total of 7,433 state lawmakers based on over 144, votes cast on the 1,893 bills selected. ACUF provided a score for each legislative chamber of the states, which is based upon the average individual scores of all members within that respective chamber. A state s overall score is calculated by averaging each state s two legislative chambers together in order to better reflect the differences in political power between the chambers. (The exception being Nebraska, the nation s only unicameral legislature comprising a single legislative chamber, upon which the state s overall score was based.) 4 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

8 The Highlights For the third consecutive year, Tennessee earned ACUF s We the People Award for earning the nation s highest overall score of percent. Massachusetts was the most liberal state for the second consecutive year, earning an overall score of 15.6 percent. The Tennessee Senate earned the award for the most conservative upper chamber (86.2 percent) and the Wyoming House earned the award for the most conservative lower chamber (75.87 percent). The average state score rose 1.85 percentage points to percent for the 217 legislative session, and a total of 31 states earned higher overall scores compared to the 216 legislative session. South Dakota was the state with the greatest year-over-year increase with a 2.85 percent improvement. The following seven states saw significant improvement (an increase of 1 percent or more): Ohio, Iowa, Alaska, Kentucky, Louisiana, Connecticut and Wyoming. The following states faltered by more than 1 percent compared to the 216 session: Mississippi, Indiana, New Mexico and Kansas. South Carolina once again earned the lowest overall score among the 24 states where control both chambers and the governorship (31.56 percent), while Delaware received the highest overall score among the seven states where control both chambers and the legislature (45.53 percent). Of course, governors ultimately decide whether to sign or veto legislation. Based on our interactions, three governors stood out as particularly strong leaders in driving a conservative agenda: Matt Bevin (Kentucky), Scott Walker (Wisconsin) and Pete Ricketts (Nebraska). TN: Most Conservative Legislature MA: Least Conservative Legislature SC: Least Conservative Legislature under Republican Control DE: Most Conservative Legislature under Democrat Control Additionally, ACU appreciates the determined and principled actions of Paul LePage (Maine) for his use of the veto pen to stop a radical liberal agenda. With 132 vetoes in 217, LePage s seven-year record stood at 551 vetoes at the end of the legislative year. Conversely, a handful of governors consistently vetoed conservative reforms: John Kasich (Ohio), Terry McAuliffe (Virginia), Mark Dayton (Minnesota), and Steve Bullock (Montana). Gov. Kasich has been especially disappointing considering of the Ohio General Assembly were ranked as the most conservative in the nation for 217 (97.69 percent). AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 5

9 #1 TENNESSEE 78.21% 86.2% 9.91% 56.51% 7.22% 83.89% ACUF Percentage by Party 34.% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #2 OHIO 74.53% 73.59% 97.2% 11.11% 75.47% 98.35% ACUF OHIO Percentage ACU PERCENTAGE by Party -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 29.69% 6 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

10 #3 WYOMING 72.87% 69.86% 72.89% 42.59% 75.87% 81.44% 44.31% WYOMING ACUF Percentage ACU PERCENTAGE by Party -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #4 KENTUCKY 71.61% 77.5% 87.12% 52.32% 66.17% 81.75% 38.57% KENTUCKY ACUF Percentage ACU PERCENTAGE by Party -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 7

11 #5 FLORIDA 69.79% 68.95% 88.64% 34.6% 7.63% 91.5% ACUF Percentage FLORIDA by Party 3.41% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #6 TEXAS 69.2% 72.2% 91.41% 36.75% 66.2% 8.43% ACUF Percentage TEXAS by Party 4.93% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 8 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

12 #7 WEST VIRGINIA 67.3% 68.4% 81.68% 43.5% 66.1% 86.24% ACUF Percentage by Party 3.38% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #8 UTAH 66.7% 69.47% 77.58% 3.53% 63.92% 74.66% ACUF Percentage by Party 12.55% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 9

13 #9 MISSOURI 66.42% 66.53% 84.55% 18.5% 66.3% 82.55% ACUF MISSOURI Percentage by Party 22.48% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #1 SOUTH DAKOTA 66.11% 67.83% 74.39% 36.13% 64.39% 69.3% ACUF Percentage by Party 35.92% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 1 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

14 #11 NORTH CAROLINA 64.21% 64.92% 81.51% 36.1% 63.51% 83.89% ACUF Percentage by Party 32.97% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #12 ALASKA 63.78% 67.1% 82.44% ACUF Percentage by Party 23.82% 6.55% 87.78% % -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 11

15 #13 ALABAMA 62.32% 65.99% 74.51% 37.99% 58.64% 63.11% ACUF Percentage by Party 45.62% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #14 WISCONSIN 62.3% ASSEMBLY 61.67% 89.85% 18.32% 62.93% 91.18% ACUF Percentage by Party 13.7% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 12 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

16 #15 LOUISIANA 62.18% 58.45% 64.98% 46.39% 65.91% 71.94% ACUF Percentage by Party 56.43% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #16 IDAHO 61.8% 6.9% 65.67% ACUF Percentage IDAHO by Party 37.85% 62.69% 68.35% % -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 13

17 #17 PENNSYLVANIA 58.6% 61.85% 77.38% 28.85% 55.34% 78.99% ACUF Percentage by Party 14.18% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #18 IOWA 58.46% 61.44% 91.84% 18.55% 53.64% 87.57% ACUF Percentage by Party 1.9% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 14 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

18 #19 MICHIGAN 57.39% 6.9% 77.8% 16.63% 54.69% 8.68% ACUF Percentage by Party 18.3% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #2 MONTANA 57.18% 58.26% 84.22% 11.75% 56.1% 85.81% ACUF Percentage by Party 13.34% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 15

19 #21 ARKANSAS 56.93% 55.9% 65.53% 3.22% 57.96% 69.59% ACUF Percentage by Party 24.53% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #22 INDIANA 56.91% 56.69% 63.24% 16.89% 57.13% 72.91% ACUF Percentage by Party 2.84% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 16 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

20 #23 GEORGIA 55.72% 6.81% 71.23% 38.73% 5.63% 66.77% ACUF Percentage by Party 2.51% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #24 VIRGINIA 55.18% 51.99% 82.83% 17.9% 58.37% 81.57% ACUF VIRGINIA Percentage by Party 11.98% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 17

21 #25 ARIZONA 54.99% 56.33% 89.14% 12.54% 53.64% 87.16% ACUF Percentage by Party 6.72% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #26 NEBRASKA 54.98% 217 ACUF Percentage by Party UNICAMERAL/ NON PARTISAN % 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% Lawmakers 18 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

22 #27 OKLAHOMA 54.57% 56.57% 62.49% 19.11% 52.57% 63.52% ACUF Percentage by Party 22.25% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #28 NORTH DAKOTA 54.22% 49.85% 57.5% 2.25% 58.59% 64.67% ACUF NORTH Percentage DAKOTA by Party 21.16% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 19

23 #29 MINNESOTA 53.15% 49.18% 88.8% 8.41% 57.12% 9.3% ACUF Percentage by Party 12.3% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #3 MISSISSIPPI 5.31% 48.27% 56.89% 34.49% 52.34% 67.95% ACUF Percentage by Party 27.76% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 2 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

24 #31 NEVADA 49.71% 52.57% 86.29% 27.11% 46.84% 82.81% ACUF Percentage by Party 26.86% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #32 COLORADO 48.3% 5.53% 78.97% 2.43% 45.52% 86.76% ACUF Percentage by Party 14.32% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 21

25 #33 NEW HAMPSHIRE 47.79% 49.5% 8.23%.56% 46.52% 8.55% ACUF Percentage by Party 6.32% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #34 DELAWARE 46.15% 47.85% 65.2% 32.23% 44.44% 62.77% ACUF Percentage by Party 32.72% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 22 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

26 #35 CONNECTICUT 44.86% 43.39% 5.4% 36.75% 46.33% 54.31% ACUF Percentage by Party 38.96% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #36 KANSAS 43.24% 43.31% 48.88% 24.72% 43.17% 49.8% ACUF Percentage by Party 29.6% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 23

27 #37 ILLINOIS 42.42% 38.99% 69.92% 18.37% 45.84% 8.34% ACUF Percentage by Party 19.18% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #38 WASHINGTON 41.64% 43.59% 67.16% 2.95% 39.68% 75.36% ACUF WASHINGTON Percentage by Party 5.42% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 24 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

28 #39 NEW YORK 41.43% 47.3% 58.3% 28.86% 35.55% 77.91% ACUF Percentage by Party 17.76% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #4 OREGON 4.6% 4.71% 73.83% 15.38% 39.41% 72.68% ACUF Percentage by Party 14.95% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 25

29 #41 MAINE 39.59% 34.6% 58.28% 8.42% 45.11% 85.29% ACUF Percentage by Party 9.13% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #42 NEW MEXICO 36.46% 31.4% 73.59% 3.27% 41.52% 79.6% ACUF Percentage by Party 8.58% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 26 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

30 #43 CALIFORNIA 32.36% ASSEMBLY 33.33% 88.96% 6.54% 31.39% 8.42% ACUF Percentage by Party 8.7% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #44 VERMONT 31.93% 3.89% 73.57% 16.11% 32.96% 8.53% ACUF Percentage by Party 4.24% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 27

31 #45 SOUTH CAROLINA 31.56% 22.67% 26.41% 16.6% 4.44% 5.15% ACUF Percentage by Party 21.8% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #46 NEW JERSEY 29.23% ASSEMBLY 27.42% 6.61% 8.5% 31.5% 8.84% ACUF Percentage by Party 8.6% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 28 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

32 #47 RHODE ISLAND 27.38% 19.79% 67.82% 11.79% 34.96% 86.78% ACUF Percentage by Party 25.95% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #48 MARYLAND 26.55% 24.6% 64.4% 7.72% 28.57% 72.94% ACUF Percentage by Party 4.19% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 29

33 #49 HAWAII 23.93% 24.95% n/a 24.95% 22.9% 29.26% ACUF Percentage by Party 22.19% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% #5 MASSACHUSETTS 15.6% 11.95% 67.31% 1.24% 18.17% 76.46% ACUF Percentage by Party 1.31% -9% 1-19% 2-29% 3-39% 4-49% 5-59% 6-69% 7-79% 8-89% 9-1% 3 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

34 Nationwide Results: Republican vs. Democrat Average Lawmaker Score: 51.34% Across 7,434 lawmakers in 5 states AVERAGE REPUBLICAN SCORE: 75.5% Across 4,222 in 5 states AVERAGE DEMOCRATIC SCORE: 18.83% Across 3,176 in 5 states Legislators Receiving CONSERVATIVE EXCELLENCE: Legislators Receiving CONSERVATIVE ACHIEVEMENT: Legislators Qualifying for COALITION OF THE RADICAL LEFT: 9%-1% 8%-89% %-1% 825 1,71 1,63 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 31

35 States with Most and Least Conservative Republican State Delegations Ohio had the most conservative Republican delegation with an average score of percent. Hawaii had the least conservative Republican delegation with an average score of percent. These scores are calculated by averaging each state s upper and lower chamber Republican scores in order to better reflect the differences in political power between the chambers. MOST CONSERVATIVE BY STATE Republican Average REPUBLICAN DELEGATION RATING 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 97.69% 9.52% 9.7% 89.71% 89.55% Ohio Wisconsin Florida Iowa Minnesota 88.49% 87.4% Arizona Tennessee 85.92% Texas 85.11% Alaska 85.2% Montana LEAST CONSERVATIVE BY STATE Republican Average 1% 9% 8% REPUBLICAN DELEGATION RATING 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 38.28% 29.26% Hawaii South Carolina 6.86% 62.42% 63.1% 63.9% 52.17% 49.34% Kansas Connecticut North Dakota Mississippi Oklahoma Delaware 67.1% Idaho 67.56% Arkansas 32 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

36 States with Most and Least Conservative Democratic Delegation Louisiana had the most conservative Democratic delegation with an average score of percent. Massachusetts had the least conservative Democratic delegation with a score of 1.28 percent. These scores are calculated by averaging each state s upper and lower chamber Democrat scores in order to reflect the differences in political power between the chambers. MOST CONSERVATIVE BY STATE Democrat Average DEMOCRATIC DELEGATION RATING 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 51.41% 45.44% 45.25% 43.45% 41.81% Louisiana Kentucky Tennessee Wyoming Alabama 38.84% 37.86% 36.71% 36.3% 34.54% Texas Connecticut West Virginia South Dakota North Carolina LEAST CONSERVATIVE BY STATE Democrat Average DEMOCRATIC DELEGATION RATING 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % Massachusetts 5.93% 5.96% 1.28% 3.44% New Hampshire New Mexico Maryland 7.62% 8.32% 8.77% 9.63% 1.18% 1.36% California New Jersey Maine Arizona Vermont Minnesota AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 33

37 States with Greatest Partisan Divide Minnesota had the largest disparity between Republican and Democrat scores (79.19 percentage point difference). Sixteen states had partisan divides of 6 percent or more, while the average partisan divide among all states was 5.4 percent. Disparity 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % Minnesota 79.19% 78.86% 77.29% 77.7% 76.95% 75.39% 74.51% Arizona Ohio California New Hampshire Iowa Wisconsin 72.47% 7.67% Montana New Mexico 66.87% Vermont 89.55% 88.49% 97.69% 84.69% 8.39% 89.71% 9.52% 85.2% 76.6% 77.5% 1.36% 9.63% 2.4% 7.62% 3.44% 14.32% 16.1% 12.55% 5.93% 1.18% 34 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

38 States with Most and Least Conservative Upper Chambers Tennessee had the most conservative upper chamber with a score of 86.2 percent, meaning that over 86 percent of votes by both and were aligned with conservative principles. Massachusetts had the least conservative upper chamber with a score of percent. MOST CONSERVATIVE UPPER CHAMBERS BY STATE Upper Chamber Average 1% SCORE OF UPPER CHAMBER 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 86.2% 77.5% Tennessee Kentucky 73.59% Ohio 72.2% 69.86% 69.47% 68.95% 68.4% 67.83% 67.1% Texas wyoming Utah Florida West Virginia South Dakota Alaska LEAST CONSERVATIVE UPPER CHAMBERS BY STATE Upper Chamber Average SCORE OF UPPER CHAMBER 1% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 11.95% Massachusetts Rhode Island 27.42% 19.79% 22.67% 24.6% 24.95% South Carolina Maryland Hawaii New Jersey 31.4% 33.33% 34.6% 3.89% Vermont New Mexico California Maine AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 35

39 States with Most and Least Conservative Lower Chambers Wyoming had the most conservative lower chamber with a score of percent, meaning that over 75 percent of votes by both and were aligned with conservative principles. Massachusetts had the least conservative lower chamber with a score of percent. MOST CONSERVATIVE LOWER CHAMBERS BY STATE Lower Chamber Average 1% 9% 8% SCORE OF LOWER CHAMBER 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 75.87% 75.47% Wyoming Ohio 7.63% 7.22% Florida Tennessee 66.3% 66.17% 66.2% 66.1% 65.91% 64.39% Missouri Kentucky Texas West Virginia Louisiana South Dakota LEAST CONSERVATIVE LOWER CHAMBERS BY STATE Lower Chamber Average 1% 9% 8% 7% SCORE OF LOWER CHAMBER 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 18.17% Massachusetts 28.57% 22.9% Hawaii Maryland 34.96% 35.55% 31.5% 31.39% 32.96% New Jersey California Vermont Rhode Island New York 39.41% 39.68% Oregon Washington 36 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

40 States with the Greatest Percentages of Award Winners At 64 percent, Ohio had the greatest percentage of its legislature receiving awards, with 6 percent of lawmakers receiving the Award for Conservative Excellence and 4 percent receiving the Award for Conservative Achievement. Hawaii, Connecticut and South Carolina tied for last place, all without a single lawmaker receiving an award. Lawmakers who earn scores of 9 percent or above are presented with ACUF s Award for Conservative Excellence and those who earn scores of between 8 percent and 89 percent are presented with ACUF s Award for Conservative Achievement. Excellence Achievement Radical Left Other 3% 6% 4% 3% 4% FL WI 46% 6% 5% 11% 14% 9% % OHIO FLORIDA WISCONSIN 9% 14% 46% NC 41% 44% TN 42% 4% NORTH CAROLINA % TENNESSEE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 37

41 States with the Greatest Percentages of "Radical Left" Members Lawmakers who earn scores of 1 percent or below are recognized as part of ACUF s Coalition of the Radical Left. With 8 percent of lawmakers qualifying, Massachusetts had the highest percentage of Radical Left members. Excellence Achievement Radical Left Other 1% % 24% 8% 36% 5% 24% 11% 1% MA MD CA 59% 67% 55% MASSACHUSETTS MARYLAND CALIFORNIA 8% 5% 7% 33% 32% 17% NJ NM 54% 44% NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO 38 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

42 Ratings of Congress Visit us online at conservative.org to view the oldest conservative scorecard with nearly five decades of congressional voting records th Edition RATINGS of CONGRESS 115 th United States Congress, First Session 217 WINNERS & LOSERS 9-1% AWARD FOR CONSERVATIVE EXCELLENCE US US US US US US US US US US Cruz Daines Flake Lee Paul Sasse Allen Arrington Babin Banks Barr Biggs Black Blackburn Brat Brooks, M. Buck Budd Burgess Byrne Carter, B. Chabot Collins, D. Comer Conaway Davidson DeSantis DesJarlais Duncan, Jeff Farenthold Ferguson Flores Foxx Franks Gaetz Garrett Goodlatte Gosar Gowdy Graves, T. Griffith Grothman Guthrie Harris Hensarling Hice Higgins, C. Holding Hudson Huizenga Hultgren Johnson, M. Johnson, S. Jordan Labrador Lamborn Loudermilk Marchant McClintock McHenry Meadows Messer Olson Palmer Perry Pittenger Ratcliffe Rice, T. Rokita Rooney, F. Ross Rouzer Sanford Schweikert Sensenbrenner Sessions Smith, J. Smith, L. Taylor Wagner Walker Walorski Weber Webster Wenstrup Williams Woodall Yoho 8-89% US Barrasso Blunt Boozman Burr Cassidy Corker Cornyn Cotton Crapo Enzi Ernst TABLE OF CONTENTS AWARD FOR CONSERVATIVE ACHIEVEMENT Letter from the Chairman...2 ACU & ACUF Board Members...3 US US US Selecting the US Votes...3 US US Grassley Hoeven Inhofe Johnson Kennedy Lankford McConnell Moran Perdue Risch Roberts Rounds Rubio Scott Shelby Strange Thune Tillis Toomey Wicker Young Abraham 217 Winners Collins, & Losers C....4 Granger Kustoff Aderholt US Senate Statistics Cramer...6 Graves, G. LaHood Amodei US Senate Vote Crawford Descriptions Graves,...7 S. LaMalfa Barton US Senate Scores Culberson...1 Handel Latta US House Statistics...19 Bergman Dunn Harper Lewis, Jason US House Vote Descriptions...2 Bilirakis Emmer Hill Long US House Scores...23 Bishop, M. Estes Hollingsworth Love Bishop, R. Brady, K. Carter, J. Cheney Fleischmann Gallagher Gibbs Gohmert Hunter Jenkins, L. Kelly, T. King, S. Massie McCaul McMorris Rodgers McSally US Mitchell Mooney Mullin Newhouse Noem Norman Nunes Pearce Poe Posey Renacci US Roby Roe Rohrabacher Rooney, T. Royce Russell Scott, A. Smith, Adrian Stewart Thornberry Tipton US Trott Walberg Walters Westerman Wilson, J. Wittman Womack Yoder Young, David 4 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION S 217 Ratings of Congress 115 th Congress, First Session To view the individualized scores of over 8, state and federal elected officials visit: #ACURatings Conservative.org AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW 39

43 Contribute to the Foundation ACUF's Center for Legislative Accountability Founded in 1971 as the original conservative scorecard, ACUF ratings are the gold standard for holding elected officials accountable for their votes. Today, ACUF remains the only organization to rate every lawmaker in America, every session, across the full spectrum of issues. Expanding on that legacy, ACUF s newly launched Center for Legislative Accountability exists to demonstrate that conservative governance yields the best outcomes for society by equipping legislators, thought leaders and activists with evidence of the link between pursuing conservative policies and creating the greatest opportunities for people to lead fulfilling lives. To accomplish that mission, ACUF educates American citizens through its ratings initiative about how over 8, federal and state elected officials view the role of government in a person s life, holds those officials accountable for the way they voted on the full spectrum of conservative issues, and works with those officials on the policy areas on which they can improve to advance freedom. Ratings of the States: Year in Review is the premier publication of the Center for Legislative Accountability. Unlike other publications, which compare states by analyzing current fiscal and social environments, Year in Review indicates the future likelihood of states enacting conservative solutions by providing a blueprint of the voting and political trends of each state. For more about the Center for Legislative Accountability: membership@conservative.org Donate to ACU Foundation by visiting Follow us on 4 AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW

44 ACUF Conservatives

45 21 N Union Street Suite 37 Alexandria, VA (22) #ACURatings Conservative.org

#ACURatings Conservative.org

#ACURatings Conservative.org ACUConservative @ACUFoundation #ACURatings Conservative.org AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION FOUNDATION RATINGS OF THE STATES - YEAR IN REVIEW i ACUConservative @ACUFoundation #ACURatings Conservative.org Table

More information

Congressional Scorecard

Congressional Scorecard Congressional Scorecard 114th Congress First 2015 How to Judge a Member s Voting Record AFSCME selects a few roll-call votes from the hundreds cast by members of Congress every session. In choosing these

More information

MOC First State or District Party. Full Committee/FSGG/ Leadership Position. Rep/Sen MOC Last Name

MOC First State or District Party. Full Committee/FSGG/ Leadership Position. Rep/Sen MOC Last Name Rep/Sen MOC Last Name MOC First Name State or District Party Full Committee/FSGG/ Leadership Position Rep Aderholt Robert Alabama Republican Full Committee Rep Roby Martha Alabama Republican Full Committee

More information

H. R. 620 [Report No ]

H. R. 620 [Report No ] IB Union Calendar No. 403 115TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 620 [Report No. 115 539] To amend the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to promote compliance through education, to clarify the requirements

More information

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research Arkansas (reelection) Georgia (reelection) Idaho (reelection) Kentucky (reelection) Michigan (partisan nomination - reelection) Minnesota (reelection) Mississippi

More information

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY Harry S Truman School of Public Affairs University of Missouri ANALYSIS OF STATE REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Andrew Wesemann and Brian Dabson Summary This report analyzes state

More information

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/  . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES State Member Conference Call Vote Member Electronic Vote/ Email Board of Directors Conference Call Vote Board of Directors Electronic Vote/ Email

More information

2016 Club for Growth Senate Rating

2016 Club for Growth Senate Rating Motion to stop debate on a bill to require an audit of the Federal eserve Override of veto of bill to disapprove of the EPA's "Waters of the U.S." regulation Amendment to require agencies to repeal one

More information

If you have questions, please or call

If you have questions, please  or call SCCE's 17th Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute: CLE Approvals By State The SCCE submitted sessions deemed eligible for general CLE credits and legal ethics CLE credits to most states with CLE requirements

More information

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge Citizens for Tax Justice 202-626-3780 September 23, 2003 (9 pp.) Contact: Bob McIntyre We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing

More information

Appropriations Subcommittees that work on Indian Affairs

Appropriations Subcommittees that work on Indian Affairs Appropriations Subcommittees that work on Indian Affairs Note: See below the list for explanations of the committee names (CJS, Int, L-HHS, and T-HUD) and what they work on. Pick information from the budget

More information

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State 2016 Voter s by Alabama 10/24/2016 https://www.alabamavotes.gov/electioninfo.aspx?m=vote rs Alaska 10/9/2016 (Election Day registration permitted for purpose of voting for president and Vice President

More information

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office Kory Goldsmith, Interim Legislative Services Officer Research Division 300 N. Salisbury Street, Suite 545 Raleigh, NC 27603-5925 Tel. 919-733-2578

More information

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS 2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS MANUAL ADOPTED AT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA July 2008 Affix to inside front cover of your 2005 Constitution CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES Constitution

More information

2015 Vietnam Advocacy Day Schedule

2015 Vietnam Advocacy Day Schedule 2015 Vietnam Advocacy Day Schedule Wednesday, June 17, 2015 2:00 PM Congressional Hearing Meetings with Congressional staff 11:00 AM Ryan Silverberg (Rep. John Kline) Minnesota 12:30 PM Dave Hanke (Senator

More information

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment Group Activities 12C Apportionment 1. A college offers tutoring in Math, English, Chemistry, and Biology. The number of students enrolled in each subject is listed

More information

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance. The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance. Privilege and Communication Between Professionals Summary of Research Findings Question Addressed: Which jurisdictions

More information

MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS ON U.S.-TURKEY RELATIONS AND TURKISH AMERICANS BICAMERAL th Congress Listing by State as of March 19, 2018

MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS ON U.S.-TURKEY RELATIONS AND TURKISH AMERICANS BICAMERAL th Congress Listing by State as of March 19, 2018 MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS ON U.S.-TURKEY RELATIONS AND TURKISH AMERICANS BICAMERAL - 115 th Congress Listing by State as of March 19, 2018 U.S. Senate: 4 Members U.S. House of Representatives:

More information

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws By Emily Hoban Kirby and Mark Hugo Lopez 1 June 2004 Recent voting

More information

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills. ills and ill Processing 3-17 Referral of ills The first major step in the legislative process is to introduce a bill; the second is to have it heard by a committee. ut how does legislation get from one

More information

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5 Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5 Michele D. Ross Reed Smith LLP 1301 K Street NW Suite 1000 East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 202 414-9297 Fax: 202 414-9299 Email:

More information

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Contact: Dr. Wenlin Liu, Chief Economist WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY CHEYENNE -- Wyoming s total resident population contracted to 577,737 in

More information

Midterm Elections 2018 Results

Midterm Elections 2018 Results Midterm Elections 2018 Results This packet contains three different sheets to track the results of the 2018 midterm elections. You may choose to only assign one of the sheets or multiple depending on your

More information

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Gender Parity Index INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY - 2017 State of Women's Representation Page 1 INTRODUCTION As a result of the 2016 elections, progress towards gender parity stalled. Beyond Hillary Clinton

More information

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs Federal Rate of Return FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs Texas has historically been, and continues to be, the biggest donor to other states when it comes to federal highway

More information

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean? 1 What are the colors of our flag? Red, white, and blue 2 What do the stars on the flag mean? One for each state 3 How many stars are there on our flag? There are 50 stars on our flag. 4 What color are

More information

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President

Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination. Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President Race to the White House Drive to the 2016 Republican Nomination Ron Nehring California Chairman, Ted Cruz for President July 18 21, 2016 2016 Republican National Convention Cleveland, Ohio J ul y 18 21,

More information

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health 1 ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1 Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health LAWS ALABAMA http://www.legislature.state.al.us/codeofalabama/1975/coatoc.htm RULES ALABAMA http://www.alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/alabama.html

More information

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules About 4,051 pledged About 712 unpledged 2472 delegates Images from: https://ballotpedia.org/presidential_election,_2016 On the news I hear about super

More information

Background Information on Redistricting

Background Information on Redistricting Redistricting in New York State Citizens Union/League of Women Voters of New York State Background Information on Redistricting What is redistricting? Redistricting determines the lines of state legislative

More information

2016 us election results

2016 us election results 1 of 6 11/12/2016 7:35 PM 2016 us election results All News Images Videos Shopping More Search tools About 243,000,000 results (0.86 seconds) 2 WA OR NV CA AK MT ID WY UT CO AZ NM ND MN SD WI NY MI NE

More information

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE STATE RENEWAL Additional information ALABAMA Judgment good for 20 years if renewed ALASKA ARIZONA (foreign judgment 4 years)

More information

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? 1 Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and keep themselves and their party in power. 2 3 -The U.S. Constitution requires that the

More information

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish

Apportionment. Seven Roads to Fairness. NCTM Regional Conference. November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA. William L. Bowdish Apportionment Seven Roads to Fairness NCTM Regional Conference November 13, 2014 Richmond, VA William L. Bowdish Mathematics Department (Retired) Sharon High School Sharon, Massachusetts 02067 bilbowdish@gmail.com

More information

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 Item 1. Issuer s Identity UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 Name of Issuer Previous Name(s) None Entity Type

More information

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1 National State Law Survey: Limitations 1 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware DC Florida Georgia Hawaii limitations Trafficking and CSEC within 3 limit for sex trafficking,

More information

Congressional Scorecard. 112th Congress First Session How to Judge a Member s Voting Record

Congressional Scorecard. 112th Congress First Session How to Judge a Member s Voting Record 112th Congress First 2011 How to Judge a Member s Record selects a few roll-call votes from the hundreds cast by members of Congress every session. In choosing these votes, attempts to fairly represent

More information

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Youth Voter Increases in 2006 By Mark Hugo Lopez, Karlo Barrios Marcelo, and Emily Hoban Kirby 1 June 2007 For the

More information

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS Knowledge Management Office MEMORANDUM Re: Ref. No.: By: Date: Regulation of Retired Judges Serving as Arbitrators and Mediators IS 98.0561 Jerry Nagle, Colleen Danos, and Anne Endress Skove October 22,

More information

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily). Exhibit E.1 Alabama Alabama Secretary of State Mandatory Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily). PAC (annually), Debts. A filing threshold of $1,000 for all candidates for office, from statewide

More information

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge 67 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 202 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:0 P.M. EST, SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 200 Date: September 26, 200

More information

State Complaint Information

State Complaint Information State Complaint Information Each state expects the student to exhaust the University's grievance process before bringing the matter to the state. Complaints to states should be made only if the individual

More information

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide Rhoads Online Appointment Rules Handy Guide ALABAMA Yes (15) DOI date approved 27-7-30 ALASKA Appointments not filed with DOI. Record producer appointment in SIC register within 30 days of effective date.

More information

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020 [Type here] Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 0 0.00 tel. or 0 0. 0 0. fax Info@electiondataservices.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December, 0 Contact: Kimball W. Brace Tel.: (0) 00 or (0) 0- Email:

More information

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS Group Activities 12C Apportionment 1. A college offers tutoring in Math, English, Chemistry, and Biology. The number of students enrolled in each subject

More information

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010 ALABAMA: G X X X de novo District, Probate, s ALASKA: ARIZONA: ARKANSAS: de novo or on the de novo (if no ) G O X X de novo CALIFORNIA: COLORADO: District Court, Justice of the Peace,, County, District,

More information

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview 2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview ʺIn Clinton, the superdelegates have a candidate who fits their recent mold and the last two elections have been very close. This year is a bad year for Republicans.

More information

American Government. Workbook

American Government. Workbook American Government Workbook WALCH PUBLISHING Table of Contents To the Student............................. vii Unit 1: What Is Government? Activity 1 Monarchs of Europe...................... 1 Activity

More information

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers Alabama Ala. Code 5-17-4(10) To exercise incidental powers as necessary to enable it to carry on effectively the purposes for which it is incorporated

More information

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs Overview Financial crimes and exploitation can involve the illegal or improper

More information

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships A Report of the Center for Women in Government & Civil Society, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany, State University of New

More information

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE THE PROBLEM: Federal child labor laws limit the kinds of work for which kids under age 18 can be employed. But as with OSHA, federal

More information

CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN IS A 501(C) 3) TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION

CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN IS A 501(C) 3) TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATION Citizens Research Council of Michigan 625 SHELBY STREET, SUITE 1B, DETROIT, Ml 48226,3220 (313) 961-5377 FAX (313) 9614)648 1502 MICHIGAN NATIONAL TOWER, LANSING, Ml 48933-1738 (517) 485-9444 FAX (547)

More information

National Latino Peace Officers Association

National Latino Peace Officers Association National Latino Peace Officers Association Bylaws & SOP Changes: Vote for ADD STANDARD X Posting on Facebook, Instagram, text message and etc.. shall be in compliance to STANDARD II - MISSION NATIONAL

More information

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents Legislative Documents 7-45 Electronic Access to Legislative Documents Paper is no longer the only medium through which the public can gain access to legislative documents. State legislatures are using

More information

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote STATE OF VERMONT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE HOUSE 115 STATE STREET MONTPELIER, VT 05633-5201 December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote To Members

More information

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code Notice Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2009 Classification Code N 4520.201 Date March 25, 2009 Office of Primary Interest HCFB-1 1. What is the purpose of this

More information

Judicial Selection in the States

Judicial Selection in the States Judicial S in the States Appellate and General Jurisdiction Courts Initial S, Retention, and Term Length INITIAL Alabama Supreme Court X 6 Re- (6 year term) Court of Civil App. X 6 Re- (6 year term) Court

More information

Healthy Aging Programs and the Affordable Care Act

Healthy Aging Programs and the Affordable Care Act Healthy Aging Programs and the Affordable Care Act Howard Bedlin, Vice President, Public Policy & Advocacy Marci Phillips, Director, Public Policy & Advocacy January 5, 2017 Improving the lives of 10 million

More information

2008 Voter Turnout Brief

2008 Voter Turnout Brief 2008 Voter Turnout Brief Prepared by George Pillsbury Nonprofit Voter Engagement Network, www.nonprofitvote.org Voter Turnout Nears Most Recent High in 1960 Primary Source: United States Election Project

More information

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

Bylaws of the. Student Membership Bylaws of the American Meat Science Association Student Membership American Meat Science Association Articles I. Name and Purpose 1.1. Name 1.2. Purpose 1.3. Affiliation II. Membership 2.1. Eligibility

More information

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015 Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015 State Statute Year Statute Alabama* Ala. Information Technology Policy 685-00 (Applicable to certain Executive

More information

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017 United States s Arlington, Texas The Economic Indices for the U.S. s have increased in the past 12 months. The Middle Atlantic Division had the highest score of all the s, with an score of 114 for. The

More information

Who Runs the States?

Who Runs the States? Who Runs the States? An in-depth look at historical state partisan control and quality of life indices Part 1: Partisanship of the 50 states between 1992-2013 By Geoff Pallay May 2013 1 Table of Contents

More information

Table 4.15 THE SECRETARIES OF STATE, 2005

Table 4.15 THE SECRETARIES OF STATE, 2005 Table 4.15 THE, 2005 Maximum Length of Number of consecutive State or other Method of regular term Date of Present previous terms allowed jurisdiction Name and party selection in years first service term

More information

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session HB 52 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE House Bill 52 Judiciary (Delegate Smigiel) Regulated Firearms - License Issued by Delaware, Pennsylvania,

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Identifying the Importance of ID. Overview. Policy Recommendations. Conclusion. Summary of Findings 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Identifying the Importance of ID Overview Policy Recommendations Conclusion Summary of Findings Quick Reference Guide 3 3 4 6 7 8 8 The National Network for Youth gives

More information

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees Limitations on Contributions to Committees Term for PAC Individual PAC Corporate/Union PAC Party PAC PAC PAC Transfers Alabama 10-2A-70.2 $500/election Alaska 15.13.070 Group $500/year Only 10% of a PAC's

More information

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018 NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2018-004 January 2, 2018 Trading by U.S. Residents Canadian Derivatives Clearing Corporation (CDCC) maintains registrations with various U.S. state securities regulatory authorities

More information

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION PREVIEW 08 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION Emboldened by the politics of hate and fear spewed by the Trump-Pence administration, state legislators across the nation have threatened

More information

Healthy Aging Programs and the Affordable Care Act

Healthy Aging Programs and the Affordable Care Act Healthy Aging Programs and the Affordable Care Act Howard Bedlin, Vice President, Public Policy & Advocacy Marci Phillips, Director, Public Policy & Advocacy January 6, 2017 Improving the lives of 10 million

More information

tongress of tl)e Wniteb ~tates

tongress of tl)e Wniteb ~tates tongress of tl)e Wniteb ~tates ~oust of ~tprtstntatibts Da.61)ington,1D 20515 February 21, 20 18 The Honorable Paul D. Ryan Speaker U.S. House of Representatives H-232 The Capitol Washington, D.C. 20515

More information

Franklin D. Roosevelt. Pertaining to the. Campaign of 1928

Franklin D. Roosevelt. Pertaining to the. Campaign of 1928 Franklin D. Roosevelt Pa~ers Pertaining to the Campaign of 1928 Accession Numbers: Ms 41-61, Ms 46-64, Ms.48-21, Ms 55-1 The papers were presented to the Library in November of 19L,0 by Franklin D. Roosevelt.

More information

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12 Parties and Elections Selections from Chapters 11 & 12 Party Eras in American History Party Eras Historical periods in which a majority of voters cling to the party in power Critical Election An electoral

More information

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate by Vanessa Perez, Ph.D. January 2015 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Continuing Disparities in the and Voting Populations 6-10 4 National

More information

The Electoral College And

The Electoral College And The Electoral College And National Popular Vote Plan State Population 2010 House Apportionment Senate Number of Electors California 37,341,989 53 2 55 Texas 25,268,418 36 2 38 New York 19,421,055 27 2

More information

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/03/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-01963, and on FDsys.gov 6715-01-U FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

More information

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools State-by-State Chart of -Specific s and Prosecutorial Tools 34 States, 2 Territories, and the Federal Government have -Specific Criminal s Last updated August 2017 -Specific Criminal? Each state or territory,

More information

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; June 26, 2003 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES 2003-R-0469 By: Kevin E. McCarthy, Principal Analyst

More information

U.S. House. U.S. House

U.S. House. U.S. House MCF CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY 1 - JUNE 30, 2018 Name State Candidate Amount Party Total Defend America PAC AL Sen. Richard Shelby $1,000 REP Leadership Reaching For A Brighter America PAC AL Rep. Robert Aderholt

More information

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary

Democratic Convention *Saturday 1 March 2008 *Monday 25 August - Thursday 28 August District of Columbia Non-binding Primary Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and s Chronologically http://www.thegreenpapers.com/p08/events.phtml?s=c 1 of 9 5/29/2007 2:23 PM Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and s Chronologically Disclaimer: These

More information

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008

Regulating Elections: Districts /252 Fall 2008 Regulating Elections: Districts 17.251/252 Fall 2008 Major ways that congressional elections are regulated The Constitution Basic stuff (age, apportionment, states given lots of autonomy) Federalism key

More information

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 3-13-2015 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS.

More information

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing

ACTION: Notice announcing addresses for summons and complaints. SUMMARY: Our Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is responsible for processing This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/23/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-03495, and on FDsys.gov 4191-02U SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

More information

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008

Immigrant Policy Project. Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008 Immigrant Policy Project April 24, 2008 Overview of State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration January - March 2008 States are still tackling immigration related issues in a variety of policy

More information

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA

DETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA FORMAT SUMMARY FOR MEMBER DATA Variable Congress Office Identification number Name (Last, First, Middle) District/class State (postal abbr.) State code (ICPSR) Party (1 letter abbr.) Party code Chamber

More information

House Standing Committee Chairs and Ranking Minority Members: Rules Governing Selection Procedures

House Standing Committee Chairs and Ranking Minority Members: Rules Governing Selection Procedures House Standing Committee Chairs and Ranking Minority Members: Rules Governing Selection Procedures Judy Schneider Specialist on the Congress November 19, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov

More information

Department of Justice

Department of Justice Department of Justice ADVANCE FOR RELEASE AT 5 P.M. EST BJS SUNDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1995 202/307-0784 STATE AND FEDERAL PRISONS REPORT RECORD GROWTH DURING LAST 12 MONTHS WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The number of

More information

Testimony on Senate Bill 125

Testimony on Senate Bill 125 Testimony on Senate Bill 125 by Daniel Diorio, Senior Policy Specialist, Elections and Redistricting Program National Conference of State Legislatures March 7, 2016 Good afternoon Mister Chairman and members

More information

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation)

ASSOCIATES OF VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. BYLAWS (A Nonprofit Corporation) Article I Name The name of the corporation is Associates of Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc., as prescribed by the Articles of Incorporation, hereinafter referred to as the Corporation. Article II Purposes

More information

Election Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R Would Change Current Law

Election Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R Would Change Current Law Election Year Restrictions on Mass Mailings by Members of Congress: How H.R. 2056 Would Change Current Law Matthew Eric Glassman Analyst on the Congress August 20, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS

More information

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008 Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008 United States Supreme Court North Carolina Supreme Court Refunds of Unconstitutional

More information

James Inhofe Senate Republican Oklahoma Russell Senate Office Building

James Inhofe Senate Republican Oklahoma Russell Senate Office Building Name House/Senate Political Party Homestate/-district Email/ Contactform Adress (DC) John McCain (Chairman) Senate Republican Arizona https://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact-form 218 Russell

More information

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points)

Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam. Study Packet. your Final Exam will be held on. Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points) Mrs. Yuen s Final Exam Study Packet your Final Exam will be held on All make up assignments must be turned in by YOUR finals day!!!! Part 1: Fifty States and Capitals (100 points) Be able to identify the

More information

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts

Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts John Szmer, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Robert K. Christensen, University of Georgia Erin B. Kaheny., University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

More information

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case [Type here] 6171 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 20112 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December 22, 2015 Contact: Kimball

More information

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010 Topic: Registered Agents Question by: Kristyne Tanaka Jurisdiction: Hawaii Date: 27 October 2010 Jurisdiction Question(s) Does your State allow registered agents to resign from a dissolved entity? For

More information

2008 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE SCORECARD

2008 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE SCORECARD 2008 U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE SCORECARD While education policy falls largely into the hands of state leaders to decide, the role of a U.S. Senator can be instrumental in advancing - or stopping reform in

More information

CONSTITUTION of the ASSOCIATION OF STATE CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATORS. ARTICLE I Name

CONSTITUTION of the ASSOCIATION OF STATE CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATORS. ARTICLE I Name CONSTITUTION of the ASSOCIATION OF STATE CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATORS ARTICLE I Name The name of this organization shall be the Association of State Correctional Administrators. ARTICLE II Objective The

More information

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits Wendy Underhill Program Manager Elections National Conference of State Legislatures prepared for Oregon s Joint Interim Task Force on

More information