Grandfathering of Emergency Medical Services Under Section 201 of the Emergency Medical Services Act By Derek Cole*
|
|
- Osborne Harper
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Reprinted with Permission of the State Bar of California Vol. 37, No. 4 Fall 2014 An Official Publication of the State Bar of California Public Law Section MCLE SELF-STUDY ARTICLE (Check end of this article for information on how to access 1.0 self-study credit.) Grandfathering of Emergency Medical Services Under Section 201 of the Emergency Medical Services Act By Derek Cole* I. INTRODUCTION The Emergency Medical Services System and the Prehospital Emergency Medical Care Personnel Act, 1 or as it is generally known, the EMS Act, comprehensively regulates emergency medical care in California. Enacted in 1980, the Act provides for the creation of emergency medical procedures and protocols, certification of emergency medical personnel, and coordination of emergency responses by fire departments, ambulance transporters, hospitals, and other providers within the emergency medical services ( EMS ) system. One section of the EMS Act that has generated controversy is Health & Safety Code section , or as it is more commonly referred to, Section 201. This section is one of two grandfather statutes in the EMS Act. 2 Section 201 gives certain cities and fire districts the ability to continue administration of EMS as they provided when the Inside this Issue Grandfathering of Emergency Medical Services Under Section 201 of the Emergency Medical Services Act By Derek Cole Page 1 Message from the Chair By K. Scott Dickey Page 9 Wendy Patrick Honored as 2014 Public Lawyer of the Year Page 10 Remarks of the 2014 Ronald M. George Public Lawyer of the Year Award Recipient Wendy Patrick By Wendy Patrick Page 11 Community Choice Aggregation An Alternative Way to Providing Electricity Service By Local Government By Greg Stepanicich Page 13 University of San Diego Law School Student Wins Public Law Student Writing Competition Page 19 Leggo My Home Rule: Charter Cities and State Municipal Interference By Catherine Ferguson Page 20 To Ban or Not to Ban: How California Cities and Counties Can Effectively Regulate Oil and Gas Fracking Activity without the Risk of a Total Ban By Dr. Robert H. Freilich & Neil M. Popowitz Page 25 Litigation and Case Law Update By K. Scott Dickey Page 34 Legislative Update By Kenneth J. Price Page 39 Public Law Section Forges Partnerships with California Law Schools to Initiate Panel Receptions with Public Officials and Practitioners By John M. Applebaum Page 42
2 Act was first adopted. The section states in full: Upon the request of a city or fire district that contracted for or provided, as of June 1, 1980, prehospital emergency medical services, a county shall enter into a written agreement with the city or fire district regarding the provision of prehospital emergency medical services for that city or fire district. Until such time that an agreement is reached, prehospital emergency medical services shall be continued at not less than the existing level, and the administration of prehospital EMS by cities and fire districts presently providing such services shall be retained by those cities and fire districts, except the level of prehospital EMS may be reduced where the city council, or the governing body of a fire district, pursuant to a public hearing, determines that the reduction is necessary. Notwithstanding any provision of this section the provisions of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1798) shall apply. 3 Section 201 was added late in the legislative process that led to passage of the EMS Act. It was included to address concerns some cities expressed about the legislation s potential impact on their authority to continue providing EMS programs they had established. Intended as a temporary and transitional provision, Section 201 is today viewed by some city and firedistrict EMS providers as the source of an important right to exercise control over certain aspects of their EMS programs. This view has occasionally led to tension and in a few instances, litigation with the local EMS agencies that regulate these providers. Because Section 201 has become so significant to the manner in which the EMS Act is administered, this article is intended to provide a summary of the section, both as written and as judicially construed. Section 201 can best be explained by focusing on its five distinct clauses, each of which is explained separately below. Before analyzing these clauses, this article examines the EMS Act s legislative intent, and specifically Section 201 s late emergence in the Act s legislative history. This discussion will provide helpful context for understanding the section s substantive provisions. II. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND INTENT With EMS being popularized by television shows like M*A*S*H and Emergency!, 4 the demand for government to provide EMS grew significantly in the late 1960s and especially in the 1970s. By the late 1970s, however, regulation of EMS in California remained haphazard. 5 At the time, state law authorized public agencies to provide ambulance services, 6 but nothing in the law required EMS providers to coordinate or integrate their activities. The Legislature began to seriously consider EMS regulation in late 1978, when Senator John Garamendi introduced SB Initially, Garamendi s bill was modest, addressing training and certification for EMS programs. But the bill underwent a two-year odyssey 7 during which its scope was greatly broadened. In late 1980, when finally enacted, the EMS Act contained 100 provisions in nine separate chapters. The new EMS Act created a two-tiered system of regulation. At the state level, it created the Emergency Medical Services Authority, charged with setting standards for and coordinating EMS activities throughout the state. 8 At the local level, the act created local EMS agencies, or LEMSAs, 9 which serve either a single county or multiple counties. LEMSAs are required to plan, implement, and evaluate an [EMS] system for the territories they cover. 10 Importantly, no party is permitted to provide advanced life support ( ALS ) or limited ALS services unless it is an authorized part of a local system. 11 With its dual layers of regulation, the EMS Act replaced the disjointed system that had previously existed with one that emphasized cooperation at all levels, and between all EMS providers. The Act sought to achieve integration and coordination of EMS throughout the state within an overall system by creating a comprehensive system governing virtually every aspect of prehospital emergency medical services. 12 Concerned about the impact of such comprehensive new regulation, some cities particularly those that had invested significantly in
3 developing their own EMS programs expressed reservations about the effect the proposed legislation would have on their administration of EMS. In June 1980, the League of California Cities expressed these concerns to Senator Garamendi, writing that the cities primary concern lies with staffing levels, transportation, and system organization and management. 13 As the League explained: [W]e think that staffing levels of city paramedic programs, and the transportation and system organization[,] which we would assume means where paramedics are stationed, how they [are] dispatched with engine companies and the utilization of their time, whether or not they are full time firemen or not, etc., are fundamentally management decisions of the city fire department and ultimately the city council. 14 The League added: We believe this is because city taxpayers are financially supporting this program and city management is responsible for their efficient utilization. The city council is responsible for the level of service and the cost of the program, wholly unrelated to medical questions. 15 The Legislature responded to these concerns by adding Section 201 to the EMS Act. This new section was intended to remove any doubt that cities that had established EMS programs could continue the services they had been providing before the Act s passage. As the State Supreme Court has observed, [t]he apparent purpose of this grandfathering provision was to allow such entities to protect the investments they had already made in various assets, as well as to ensure against disruption of adequate emergency medical services. 16 At the same time, the Supreme Court has recognized the section was intended to be transitional. 17 Section 201 evinces a manifest legislative expectation that cities and counties will eventually come to an agreement with regard to the provision of [EMS]. 18 The Court has thus construed Section 201 not as a broad recognition or authorization of autonomy in the administration of emergency medical services for cities and fire districts but [as] essentially a grandfathering of existing emergency medical service operations until such time as these services are integrated into the larger EMS system. 19 Indeed, the Court has observed, the statute makes clear that cities and fire districts have not only the right but the obligation to continue to provide emergency medical services until an agreement is reached with a county. 20 As its history demonstrates, Section 201 was intended to fill the gap between the EMS Act s passage and the time in which city and fire-district EMS providers reached agreements with their LEMSAs regarding the EMS they provided. In theory, the notion that Section 201 would be transitional and temporary may have made sense in 1980, when the Legislature considered adopting a comprehensive new scheme for regulating EMS. But in practice, not all cities and fire districts were willing to surrender what they felt were and continue to feel are important rights concerning the control of the EMS they provide. And because the EMS Act left it to these agencies to decide when and more importantly, whether to enter into agreements concerning their EMS, it created a mechanism for grandfathered rights under Section 201 to continue indefinitely, even if that was not intended. III. SECTION 201 S FIVE CLAUSES Section 201 can best be understood with reference to five distinct clauses that appear within its three long sentences and 146 words. Reorganizing these clauses into a more convenient order than they appear in the Act, the clauses separately address the following subjects: (1) which entities qualify as grandfathered providers; (2) when such providers may reduce service; (3) what rights they have to continue service; (4) when they are subject to medical control by LEMSAs; and (5) when and how their grandfathered rights terminate by agreement. Each clause is discussed below in this order. A. Grandfathered Providers At the threshold, it is important to identify who qualifies for grandfathering under Section 201. The section defines these providers as those cities or fire districts 21 that contracted for or provided, as of June 1, 1980, prehospital [EMS] 22 Under the Act, EMS 3
4 are defined as the services utilized in responding to a medical emergency. 23 Clearly, such services include the providing of basic life support, 24 ALS, 25 and limited ALS. 26 A trial court has also found that emergency medical dispatch the handling of 911 phone calls and relaying of information to responding emergency personnel may also be a type of EMS under Section So long as a city or fire district was providing any of these services as of June 1, 1980 or if it contracted for such services as of that time then it qualifies as a grandfathered provider under Section 201. Case law has established, however, that if a provider ceased providing any such services after enactment of the EMS Act, it cannot resume providing such service under Section Just as with a grandfathered nonconforming use in the zoning context, a grandfathered Section 201 right can be lost through abandonment. B. Reductions in Service Emphasizing that Section 201 was as much about obligating cities and fire districts to continue providing EMS as it was about ensuring their right to continue such services, Section 201 specifies a procedure agencies must follow if they desire to reduce the level of EMS. It states, the level of prehospital EMS may be reduced where the city council, or the governing body of a fire district, pursuant to a public hearing, determines that the reduction [in service] is necessary. 29 The type of public hearing Section 201 requires is not specified, but at a minimum should be one that satisfies the public-notice and comment requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. 30 Also, no statutory or judicial guidance exists as to when a reduction in service is necessary. But given Section 201 was intended, in part, to protect municipal investments, the term presumably was meant to allow agencies to also reduce services when they conclude the cost of continuing to provide such services is no longer feasible. C. Continuation of Service So long as a city or fire district does not elect to reduce EMS per the previously described clause, Section 201 provides that it shall continue to provide services at least the same level as existed in Specifically, the section states that until an agreement is reached with a county (this type of agreement is discussed below) prehospital emergency medical services shall be continued at not less than the existing level, and the administration of prehospital EMS by cities and fire districts presently providing such services shall be retained by those cities and fire districts. 31 Although this is the clause that assures grandfathered cities and districts of their right to continue providing EMS, the clause is phrased in mandatory language, again emphasizing Section 201 is as much an obligation statute as it is one that confers rights. In defining what specific rights grandfathered EMS providers possess, moreover, the key word 4 of this clause is retained. The State Supreme Court has interpreted this word to mean that cities and fire districts may only provide those services they were providing at the time the EMS Act was enacted. As the Court has explained, grandfathered providers can retain only those administrative powers that they already possessed. 32 Thus, while they may increase the level of service they provide such as by increasing staffing or acquiring additional emergency vehicles and equipment they may not add new types of emergency services they were not providing as of For example, a city that did not provide ambulance service prior to 1980 cannot later claim a right under Section 201 to provide ALS. 33 Those familiar with zoning law will recognize this prohibition as being similar to that which prevents nonconforming uses from expanding to include different types of land uses. D. Submission to LEMSA Medical Control Despite having a right to continue providing EMS, grandfathered providers remain subject to [a] significant constraint placed on [their] administrative discretion. 34 The last sentence of Section 201 states, [n]otwithstanding any provision of this section the provisions of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1798) shall apply. This sentence refers to the portion of the EMS Act that requires LEMSAs, under the direction of a medical director, to assert medical control over a local EMS system. 35 Thus, even if grandfathered under Section 201, city and fire districts still must
5 comply with LEMSA policies that are medical in nature. When is a LEMSA policy a function of its medical-control authority? This question has been the most frequent subject of disagreement concerning the interpretation of Section 201. Unfortunately, no clear line can be drawn between when a particular policy ceases being a medical one, and infringes upon grandfathered rights. But the EMS Act does suggest the line should generally be drawn to favor the assertion of LEMSA control. The Act defines medical control broadly to include policies concerning dispatch, patient destination policies, patient care guidelines, and quality assurance requirements. 36 The State Supreme Court has expounded on the definition, observing, [t]he Legislature conceived of medical control in fairly expansive terms, encompassing matters directly related to regulating the quality of emergency medical services, including policies and procedures governing dispatch and patient care. 37 In County of San Bernardino v. City of San Bernardino, 38 the Court applied this rationale to uphold a LEMSA policy concerning how ambulance providers were dispatched in response to emergency calls for service. To prevent a city provider from favoring the dispatching of its own resources in response to medical emergencies, one of the policies at issue required that when public and private responders arrived at an emergency scene at the same time, the first responder would be responsible for patient care. The other policy required that public and private providers be dispatched at the same level of response. The Court found these policies encompassed medical control because they pertain[ed] to the speed with which EMS providers other than the City will be dispatched to the scene of an emergency, and how the various EMS providers will interact at the emergency scene. 39 Consequently, the policies [were] highly relevant to the provision of emergency medical care, affecting the speed and effectiveness of the response. 40 E. Termination of Grandfathered Rights by Agreement When does an EMS provider cease being grandfathered? Considering that the Legislature intended grandfathering to be a temporary status when it enacted the EMS Act, 41 the answer to this question may be surprising. On its face, Section 201 states that a grandfathered provider shall continue to provide EMS until such time that an agreement is reached with its LEMSA. 42 The LEMSA s obligation to enter into this agreement, in turn, does not arise until the grandfathered city or fire district requests an agreement. 43 The answer to when grandfathered status is lost, therefore, depends on the grandfathered provider. The provider loses such status when it asks to enter into an agreement with its LEMSA concerning the EMS it provides. And if it never does so, it arguably may retain its grandfathered status in perpetuity. Surely, the Legislature did not intend this result. Given its expressed intent to promote coordination and integration 5 throughout the EMS system, the Legislature likely did not contemplate that providers would retain grandfathered status nearly three-and-a-half decades after the EMS Act s passage. But whatever the reasons for the continued existence of grandfathered providers today fear of the loss of local control or municipal revenue may be a factor Section 201 clearly left the decision to integrate into local EMS systems for cities and fire districts to make. As to what constitutes an agreement under Section 201, neither the Legislature nor the courts have provided any guidance as to the meaning of that term. The subject was litigated extensively in a trial court, however, resulting in an unpublished but helpful judicial opinion. In County of San Joaquin v. City of Stockton, 44 the Stanislaus County Superior Court considered whether a 1986 agreement between those parties constituted an agreement under Section 201. The Court concluded the parties had entered into such an agreement based on covenants that the city desired to participate in a countywide ALS program, agreed to meet all policies as have been or may be established by the county EMS agency, and authorized that agency to terminate the city s ability to provide ALS in the event of noncompliance. 45 The court accordingly found that upon entry into the agreement, the city s rights under Section 201 had terminated. 46
6 IV. CONCLUSION Despite the intent that it be a temporary and transitional provision, Section 201 has taken on a greater importance within the overall EMS Act scheme than the Legislature contemplated. In recent years, the affected parties have proposed a variety of legislative fixes to Section 201 to provide greater clarity regarding the rights and obligations of grandfathered providers. Until the Legislature acts on any of these or a compromise proposal, the full integration and coordination the EMS Act seeks to promote may not be achieved. 1 * Derek Cole is a partner with Cota Cole LLP and focuses his practice on municipal law and litigation. He has advised or represented counties, cities, and private parties in a number of matters concerning the Emergency Medical Services Act. Endnotes Health & Saf. Code 1797 et seq. 2 The other grandfathering provision in the EMS Act is Health & Safety Code This section allows local EMS agencies to create exclusive operating areas for EMS providers that have provided services continuously, and in the same manner and scope, as they provided on January 1, Unlike a Section 201 grandfathered right, a Section 224 right is a discretionary one that a local EMS agency may grant. As Section 224 grandfathered rights could (and should) be the subject of their own article, they are beyond the scope of what is covered here. 3 Health & Saf. Code See Manish N. Shah, MD, The Formation of the Emergency Medical Services System, American Journal of Public Health (March 2006), available at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC /. 5 County of San Bernardino v. City of San Bernardino (1997) 15 Cal.4th 909, See Gov. Code 54980(b)-(c). 7 County of San Bernardino, supra, at p Health & Saf. Code Health & Saf. Code Health & Saf. Code Health & Saf. Code See County of San Bernardino, supra, 15 Cal.4th at p. 915 ( The Legislature s desire to achieve coordination and integration is evident throughout ). 13 Id. at p Ibid. 15 Ibid. 16 Valley Medical Transport, Inc. v. Apple Valley Fire Protection Dist. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 747, San Bernardino, supra, 15 Cal.4th at p Ibid. 19 Valley Medical, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 758 (emphasis added). 20 Ibid. (emphasis added). 21 Neither Section 201 nor the EMS Act defines the term fire district. But presumably, the Legislature meant to include those fire districts organized under the Fire Protection District Law of 1961, which was superseded in 1987 by the Bergeson Fire District Law. See Health & Saf. Code et seq. 22 Health & Saf. Code Health & Saf. Code See Health & Saf. Code (defining basic life support as emergency first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedures which, as a minimum, include recognizing respiratory and cardiac arrest and starting the proper application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to maintain life without invasive techniques until the victim may be transported or until advanced life support is available ). 6
7 25 See Health & Saf. Code (defining ALS to include special services designed to provide definitive prehospital emergency medical care, including, but not limited to, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac monitoring, cardiac defibrillation, advanced airway management, intravenous therapy, administration of specified drugs and other medicinal preparations, and other specified techniques and procedures administered by authorized personnel under the direct supervision of a base hospital as part of a local EMS system at the scene of an emergency, during transport to an acute care hospital, during interfacility transfer, and while in the emergency department of an acute care hospital until responsibility is assumed by the emergency or other medical staff of that hospital ). 26 See Health & Saf. Code (defining limited ALS to mean special service designed to provide prehospital emergency medical care limited to techniques and procedures that exceed basic life support but are less than advanced life support and are those procedures specified pursuant to Section ) Statement of Decision, County of San Joaquin v. City of Stockton, Stanislaus Superior Court Case No. CV (May 7, 2009), 11. Valley Medical, supra, 17 Cal.4th at pp Health & Saf. Code See Gov. Code et seq. Health & Saf. Code San Bernardino, supra, 15 Cal.4th at p Id. at p Valley Medical, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p See Health & Saf. Code 1798(a) ( The medical direction and management of an emergency medical services system shall be under the medical control of the medical director of the local EMS agency. This medical control shall be maintained in accordance with standards for medical control established by the authority. ). 36 Health & Saf. Code San Bernardino, supra, 15 Cal.4th at p Cal.4th Id. at p Id. at p Id. at pp , emphasis added ( [T]he phrase [u]ntil such time that an agreement is reached does indeed suggest an intent on the part of the legislative drafters that agreements between cities and counties be reached, and that this pre-agreement period would be temporary. ). Health & Saf. Code Id. Stanislaus Superior Court, Case No Statement of Decision, County of San Joaquin v. City of Stockton, Stanislaus Superior Court Case No (June 3, 2010), pp Id. Although this decision was appealed, the parties settled the case before the appellate court could decide the case on the merits. This article is available as a complimentary online self-study CLE article for members of the Public Law Section. Visit the members only area at for your coupon code and instructions on how to access the online self-study articles. 7
Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. AMERICARE MEDSERVICES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, vs.
Case: 17-55565, 11/08/2017, ID: 10648446, DktEntry: 54-1, Page 1 of 5 (1 of 24) Case No. 17-55565 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICARE MEDSERVICES, INC., Plaintiff and
More informationCalifornia Statutes Pertaining to Automated External Defibrillators Updated July 11, Health and Safety Code Division 2.5
California Statutes Pertaining to Automated External Defibrillators Updated July 11, 2013 Health and Safety Code Division 2.5 I. Section 1797.190. The authority may establish minimum standards for the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Filed 8/3/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX GERARDO ALDANA, v. Plaintiff and Appellant, 2d Civil No. B259538 (Super.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-jls-afm Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Jarod Bona () jarod.bona@bonalawpc.com Bona Law PC Executive Square, Suite 0 La Jolla, CA....0 (fax) Attorney for Plaintiff AmeriCare MedServices,
More informationORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Manteca does ordain as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANTECA AMENDING MANTECA MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 8, CHAPTER 8.35, SECTIONS 8.35.010, 8.35.020, 8.35.030, 8.35.040 AND 8.35.050, RELATING TO MEDICAL MARIJUANA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-jls-afm Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 Jarod Bona () jarod.bona@bonalawpc.com Bona Law PC Executive Square, Suite 0 La Jolla, CA....0 (fax) William A. Markham (0) wm@markhamlawfirm.com
More informationOPEN MEETING LAWS IN CALIFORNIA: RALPH M. BROWN ACT
OPEN MEETING LAWS IN CALIFORNIA: RALPH M. BROWN ACT December 2011 401 Mendocino, Suite 100 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 707.545.8009 www.meyersnave.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE, AND SCOPE
More informationGIC Consolidated with GIC County of San Diego v. San Diego NORML. Tentative Ruling re Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings
GIC860665 Consolidated with GIC861051 County of San Diego v. San Diego NORML Tentative Ruling re Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings First, the Court states what this ruling is not about. This ruling
More informationDear Chief Justice George and Associate Justices of the California Supreme Court:
California Supreme Court 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102 Re: County of Orange v. Barratt American, Inc. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 420 Amicus Curiae Letter In Support of Review (Rule
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LAKE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
1 1 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. ) 00 Fell Street #1 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () - Email: joeelford@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE
More informationCOMMENT TO REVISED DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON THE OIL, GAS AND SOLUTION MINING REGULATORY PROGRAM DECEMBER 2011
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW COMMITTEE Jeffrey B. Gracer Chair 460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: (212) 421-2150 jgracer@sprlaw.com LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE Mark A. Levine Chair 2 Park Avenue
More informationSenate Statutes - Title V ( Judicial Branch) - Updated
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Legislative Branch Publications Student Government 12-31-2012 Senate Statutes - Title V ( Judicial Branch) - Updated 04-29-13 Adam Aldridge University of South
More informationLOCAL CLAIMS FILING REGULATIONS
City Attorneys Department League of California Cities Continuing Education Seminar February 2003 Kevin D. Siegel Anne Q. Pollack Attorneys LOCAL CLAIMS FILING REGULATIONS INTRODUCTION The Tort Claims Act
More information42 USC 233. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE CHAPTER 6A - PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE SUBCHAPTER I - ADMINISTRATION AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Part A - Administration 233. Civil actions or proceedings against
More informationDecember 17, (Third District Court of Appeal Case No. C066996)
REMY I MOOSE I MANLEY LLP Whitman F. Manley wma nley@rmmenvirolaw.com The Honorable William J. Murray The Honorable Vance W. Raye The Honorable Harry E. Hull California Court of A peal, Third Appellate
More informationCOUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS
COUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS Last Updated: September 27, 2016 DISCLAIMER:
More informationGerald L. Hobrecht, City Attorney (Staff Contacts: Gerald Hobrecht (707) and Scott Whitehouse, (707) )
Agenda Item No. 6A January 26, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Laura Kuhn, City Manager Gerald L. Hobrecht, City Attorney (Staff Contacts: Gerald Hobrecht (707) 449-5105
More informationCOUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS
COUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSIONS Last Updated: September 27, 2016 DISCLAIMER:
More informationSample argument that Estrada retroactivity applies to SB 180
Parts in blue print are instructions to user, not to be included in filed document unless so noted. Sample argument that Estrada retroactivity applies to SB 180 Note: Substantial parts of this argument
More informationMarch 25, Request for Publication Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (First District Court of Appeal Case No.
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Co-un-of Appt~al Firs,t Appellate.District FILED MAR 2 6 2013 REMY M 0 0 S E I M A N L E Diana Herbert, Clerk March 25, 2013 Ltby The Honorable William R. McGuiness, Administrative
More informationrequire that cities provide for or allow the establishment and or operation of medical marijuana
ORDINANCE NO 793 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADDING CHAPTER 77 44 TO TITLE 17 THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT
More informationPublic Notice REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) GENERAL COUNSEL & EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LEGAL SERVICES
Public Notice REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) GENERAL COUNSEL & EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LEGAL SERVICES Release Date: November 1, 2017 Deadline for Submission: January 5, 2018 Contact person: Karin Hennings, Administrative
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Honorable City Council Roxanne Diaz, City Attorney Date: October 18, 2016 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 16-1684 - REPEALING CHAPTER 9.30 OF TITLE 9 OF THE NORWALK MUNICIPAL
More informationCity Attorney s Synopsis
Eff: /6/16 ORDINANCE NO. 16-3,87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AMENDING TITLE 3 (BUSINESSES AND LICENSES), TITLE 5 (POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY) AND TITLE 10 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE
More informationTOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS
This presentation provides the reader with the structure and statutory workings of the Optional Municipal Charter Law That Law provides the statutory guidance under which the Township operates. The purpose
More informationEMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICES ACT
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 15, 2017 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer Suite 700, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton,
More informationLesson: The Manner in which a Democratic Society Resolves Disputes
Courts in the Community Colorado Judicial Branch Office of the State Court Administrator Updated December 2018 Lesson: The Manner in which a Democratic Society Resolves Disputes Objective: Provide students
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-55565, 11/07/2017, ID: 10646966, DktEntry: 53-2, Page 1 of 41 17-55565 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMERICARE MEDSERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF
More informationCASENOTE CAL-OSHA REGULATIONS APPLY TO A LANDLORD WHO HIRES AN UNLICENSED PERSON TO PAINT HIS RENTAL PROPERTY BY JAMES G. RANDALL LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS
CASENOTE CAL-OSHA REGULATIONS APPLY TO A LANDLORD WHO HIRES AN UNLICENSED PERSON TO PAINT HIS RENTAL PROPERTY BY JAMES G. RANDALL LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS Unlike a homeowner hiring one to do work on his personal
More informationCounty Structure & Powers
County Structure & Powers There is a fundamental distinction between a county and a city. Counties lack broad powers of self-government that California cities have (e.g., cities have broad revenue generating
More informationThe inhabitants of the Town of Winthrop, within the territorial limits established by law,
TOWN OF WINTHROP CHARTER ARTICLE 1 INCORPORATION; SHORT TITLE; DEFINITIONS SECTION 1-1: INCORPORATION The inhabitants of the Town of Winthrop, within the territorial limits established by law, shall continue
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DATE: JUDGE: January 6, 2017 10:00 a.m. HON. SHELLEYANNE W. L. CHANG DEPT. NO.: CLERK: 24 E. HIGGINBOTHAM CALIFORNIA DISABILITY SERVICES ASSOCIATION, a
More informationORDINANCE NO. City Attorney s Synopsis
Eff: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK AMENDING TITLE 3 (BUSINESSES AND LICENSES), TITLE 5 (POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY) AND TITLE 10 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE BURBANK MUNICIPAL
More information/ 8 ~Qb ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE NO. / 8 ~Qb AN INTERIM ZONING/URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF SISKIYOU EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ESTABLISHED BY SISKIYOU COUNTY ORDINANCE 17-11 AND CONTINUED BY ORDINANCE 17-12 PROHIBITING
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. HARVEY S. ROSEFF, JOANN SMITH, EUGENIA C. MORAN, MERWYN LEE and NELSON A. DROBNESS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 11/30/17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S230793 v. ) ) Ct.App. 4/2 E062760 TIMOTHY WAYNE PAGE, ) ) San Bernardino County Defendant and Appellant.
More informationCHAPTER 121. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
CHAPTER 121 AN ACT concerning the codification of certain recommendations of the Governor s Advisory Committee on Police Standards and supplementing Title 52 of the Revised Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the
More informationF.S MEDICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSPORTATION Ch. 401
F.S. 1983 MEDICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSPORTATION Ch. 401 the Division of Communications is authorized to apply for and accept federal funding assistance in the development and implementation of
More informationMayers v. Volt Management (Cal. Ct. App.): FEHA/Arbitration.
March 14, 2012 Mayers v. Volt Management (Cal. Ct. App.): FEHA/Arbitration. Stephen Mayers filed a lawsuit against his former employer, Volt Management Corp., and its parent corporation, Volt Information
More informationEnvironmental Defense Fund, Inc., et al. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et al. Supreme Court of California.
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., et al. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et al. Supreme Court of California. 26 Cal.3d 183, 605 P.2d 1, 161 Cal. Rptr. 466 (1980) Three corporations and three individuals,
More informationINTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417
INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417 AN URGENCY MEASURE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA ADOPTED AS AN INTERIM ORDINANCE IMPOSING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES,
More informationThe Senate of The State of Texas Austin
CRISS COLE DISTRICT 6 AUSTIN The Senate of The State of Texas Austin May 25, 1965 COMMITTEES VICE-CHAIRMAN BANKING INSURANCE MEMBER: COUNTIES, CITIES, TOWNS EDUCATION FINANCE LEGISLATIVE, CONGRESSIONAL
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by
More informationA Guide to the Legislative Process - Acts and Regulations
A Guide to the Legislative Process - Acts and Regulations November 2008 Table of Contents Introduction Choosing the Right Tools to Accomplish Policy Objectives What instruments are available to accomplish
More informationThere Are Viable Alternatives to Court-Run Legal Services Programs
There Are Viable Alternatives to Court-Run Legal Services Programs Part Three: Trilogy on Legal Services By Thomas F. Coleman Part Three of this Trilogy looks at methods of providing legal services to
More informationCase No. C IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
Case No. C080685 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT RICHARD STEVENSON and KATY GRIMES, Petitioners and Appellants, vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Respondent.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SHARON MCPHAIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED November 9, 2004 v No. 248126 Wayne Circuit Court ATTORNEY GENERAL of the STATE of LC No. 03-305475-CZ MICHIGAN, and
More information79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 64
79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2017 Regular Session Enrolled Senate Bill 64 Printed pursuant to Senate Interim Rule 213.28 by order of the President of the Senate in conformance with presession filing
More informationAssembly Bill No. 243 CHAPTER 688
Assembly Bill No. 243 CHAPTER 688 An act to add Article 6 (commencing with Section 19331), Article 13 (commencing with Section 19350), and Article 17 (commencing with Section 19360) to Chapter 3.5 of Division
More informationNo. 340/ April 2017 REGULATION. on procurement by parties operating in the water, energy, transportation and postal service sectors.
Translated from the Icelandic. In the event of any discrepancies between the translation and the text in Icelandic, the original text shall take precedence. No. 340/2017 12 April 2017 REGULATION on procurement
More informationFor purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases have the following meanings:
Page 1 of 14 Chapter 418-16 - SAFE DRUG DISPOSAL Sections: 418-16.202 - Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases have the following meanings: (e) "Approved stewardship
More informationSAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY CERTIFICATE/LICENSE DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR PREHOSPITAL PERSONNEL
SAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY I. PURPOSE CERTIFICATE/LICENSE DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR PREHOSPITAL PERSONNEL Policy Reference No.: 2070 Review Date: January 1, 2013 Supersedes: September
More informationSummary of Comments and Responses Net Neutrality (220-RICR ) b. The regulation exceeds the scope of the Executive Order.
I. CTIA a. CTIA believes regulation is preempted by Federal Law and violates the commerce clause. RESPONSE: The State is not preempted or in violation of the commerce clause. As a purchaser of services,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TO: THE ABOVE-ENTITLED HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES
KENNETH M. SIGELMAN & ASSOCIATES KENNETH M. SIGELMAN (State Bar No. 100238 PENELOPE A. PHILLIPS (State Bar No. 106170 1901 First Avenue, 2 nd Flr. San Diego, California 92101-2382 Telephone: (619 238-3813
More informationCITY of ALBUQUERQUE SEVENTEENTH COUNCIL
CITY of ALBUQUERQUE SEVENTEENTH COUNCIL COUNCIL BILL NO. ENACTMENT NO. SPONSORED BY: [+Bracketed/Underscored Material+] - New 0 ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ASSISTED OUTPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAM; DEFINING TERMS;
More informationMarch 16, Via TrueFiling
Whitman F. Manley wmanley@rmmenvirolaw.com Via TrueFiling Hon. Dennis M. Perluss, Presiding Justice Hon. John L. Segal, Associate Justice Hon. Kerry R. Bensinger, Associate Justice California Court of
More informationObjectives. treatment. (community consensus) policies. experience and development of a policy. Ø Ø Historical overview of non-beneficial
Objectives Ø Ø Historical overview of non-beneficial treatment Ø Ø Review of various opinions (community consensus) Ø Ø Review of various California facility policies Ø Ø Review Southern California Kaiser
More informationFrequently Asked Questions for Municipalities LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES RECORDS
Frequently Asked Questions for Municipalities The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy (FOIP) Act aims to strike a balance between the public s right to know and the individual s right to privacy,
More informationTOWN OF SANDWICH. Town Charter. As Adopted by Town Meeting May 2013 and approved by the Legislature February Taylor D.
TOWN OF SANDWICH Town Charter As Adopted by Town Meeting May 2013 and approved by the Legislature February 2014 Taylor D. White Town Clerk 1 SB 1884, Chapter 22 of the Acts of 2014 THE COMMONWEALTH OF
More informationCOPY IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. (Sacramento) ----
Filed 5/9/08 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COPY IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL et al., Petitioners, C055614 (Super. Ct.
More informationCity of El Cenizo, Texas, et al v. State of Texas Doc. 79 Att. 1
City of El Cenizo, Texas, et al v. State of Texas Doc. 79 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION City of El Cenizo, Texas, et al. Plaintiffs,
More informationCalifornia Judicial Branch
Page 1 of 7 JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Tel 415-865-4200 TDD 415-865-4272 Fax 415-865-4205 www.courts.ca.gov FACT SHEET October 2015 California Judicial
More information106TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 2498
TH CONGRESS D SESSION H. R. AN ACT To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for recommendations of the Secretary of Health and Human Services regarding the placement of automatic external defibrillators
More informationStatutory Interpretation LAWS314 Exam notes
Statutory Interpretation LAWS314 Exam notes STATUTORY INTERPRETATION LAWS314 Introduction......... 1 Legislation...... 1 The court s role in interpretation.. 1 Interpretation v construction 1 History of
More informationAdam W. Hofmann Partner
Adam serves as the Appellate, Assistant Practice Group Leader. He represents both public and private clients in civil writs, appeals, and mandate proceedings. He has briefed and argued cases in the Ninth
More informationDue Diligence in Business Transactions with Tribal Governments and Enterprises
feature article Due Diligence in Business Transactions with Tribal Governments and Enterprises by Maurice R. Johnson and Benjamin W. Thompson Legislature in 2004. Maurice R. Johnson Maurice R. Johnson
More informationTRINITY COUNTY. Board Item Request Form Phone
County Contract No. Department County Counsel TRINITY COUNTY 7.03 Board Item Request Form 2011-06-07 Contact Derek Cole Phone 623-1382 Reqested Agenda Location County Matters Requested Board Action: Waive
More information2A:62A-23 Legislative findings relative to acquisition, deployment, use of automated external defibrillators; immunity from civil liability.
2A:62A-23 Legislative findings relative to acquisition, deployment, use of automated external defibrillators; immunity from civil liability. 1. The Legislature finds that: a. More than 350,000 Americans
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1 1 ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General COLLEEN M. MELODY PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ Assistant Attorneys General Seattle, WA -- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF VENTURA VENTURA MINUTE ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF VENTURA VENTURA MINUTE ORDER DATE: 01/29/2014 TIME: 10:55:00 AM Judicial Officer Presiding: Mark Borrell CLERK: Hellmi McIntyre REPORTER/ERM: CASE NO: 56-2013-00433986-CU-WM-VTA
More informationMedical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESTIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN
Medical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESTIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN Medical Staff Bylaws Part 2: INVESIGATIONS, CORRECTIVE ACTION, HEARING AND APPEAL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION
More informationLEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
0 TIMOTHY J. SABO, SB # E-mail: sabo@lbbslaw.com KAREN A. FELD, SB# E-Mail: kfeld@lbbslaw.com 0 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 00 San Bernardino, California 0 Telephone: 0..0 Facsimile: 0.. Attorneys for
More informationSedona Provides Updated, Practical Guidance for Legal Holds
Sedona Provides Updated, Practical Guidance for Legal Holds ALERT February 4, 2019 Jason Lichter lichterj@pepperlaw.com Matthew J. Hamilton hamiltonm@pepperlaw.com This article was published in the February
More informationResolving Legislative Differences in Congress: Conference Committees and Amendments Between the Houses
Order Code 98-696 GOV Resolving Legislative Differences in Congress: Conference Committees and Amendments Between the Houses Updated October 25, 2007 Elizabeth Rybicki Analyst in American National Government
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Filed 8/12/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT FRIENDS OF THE WILLOW GLEN TRESTLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, H041563 (Santa Clara County
More informationS12A0200. HARALSON COUNTY et al. v. TAYLOR JUNKYARD OF BREMEN, INC. This Court granted the application for discretionary appeal of Haralson
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: July 2, 2012 S12A0200. HARALSON COUNTY et al. v. TAYLOR JUNKYARD OF BREMEN, INC. HINES, Justice. This Court granted the application for discretionary appeal of
More informationPUBLIC HEALTH (AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS) REGULATIONS 2006 BR 5 / 2006 PUBLIC HEALTH ACT : 24
BR 5 / 2006 PUBLIC HEALTH ACT 1949 1949 : 24 PUBLIC HEALTH (AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS) ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS 1 Short title 2 Definitions 3 Register of automatic external defibrillators 4 Registration
More informationSenate Bill No. 135 CHAPTER 249
Senate Bill No. 135 CHAPTER 249 An act to amend Section 56036 of, and to repeal and add Division 3 (commencing with Section 61000) of Title 6 of, the Government Code, and to amend and renumber Section
More informationCALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE DIVISION 3. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTS PART 1. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1. SHORT TITLE... 61000 CHAPTER 2. DEFINITIONS... 61010-61017 PART 2. FORMATION CHAPTER 1. INITIATION...61100-61107.1
More informationThis appeal challenges the trial court s determination that the Department of
Filed 10/18/10 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE DEREK BRENNER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES,
More information1. Minor criminal cases and civil disputes are decided in the appellate courts.
Chapter 02 The Resolution of Private Disputes True / False Questions 1. Minor criminal cases and civil disputes are decided in the appellate courts. True False 2. The plaintiff can sue the defendant in
More informationThe Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment
January 10, 2011 Constitutional Guidance for Lawmakers The Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment In a certain sense, the Tenth Amendment the last of the 10 amendments that make
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF CANADA S MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM
AN OVERVIEW OF CANADA S MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM I. WHY CANADA HAS A SEPARATE MILITARY JUSTICE SYSTEM 1. Canada s military justice system is a unique, self-contained system that is an integral part of the
More informationof Citizens for Beach Rights v. City of San Diego, Case No. D069638, Filed Filed March March 28, 28, Haller: and Rules of Court, rule (c).
Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District. Division One Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District. Division One Kevin J. Lane, Clerk/Administrator 1901 Harrison 1 Street - Suite - Suite 900 Kevin J.
More informationTO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California BILL LOCKYER. Attorney General : OPINION : No.
Page 1 of 6 TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California BILL LOCKYER Attorney General OPINION No. 04-809 of July 14, 2005 BILL LOCKYER Attorney General SUSAN
More informationExpedited Procedures in the House: Variations Enacted into Law
Expedited Procedures in the House: Variations Enacted into Law Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process September 16, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationMichigan General Procedures DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE Date: revised March 25, 2014 Page 1 of 6
Date: revised March 25, 2014 Page 1 of 6 Do-Not-Resuscitate The purpose of this policy is to provide a guideline to prehospital providers, who under certain circumstances may accommodate patients who do
More informationMEMORANDUM. The court rule from which proposed section 46A:18-4 is derived, Rule 6:6-6b.,
To: New Jersey Law Revision Commission From: Marna L. Brown Re: Memorandum on Orderly Removal Issue Date: January 9, 2012 MEMORANDUM This memorandum primarily examines a specific issue raised by Roger
More informationBroward Regional EMS Council June 5, :30 p.m. MINUTES
Call to Order Chair 1:39 pm Roll Call Chair skipped the formal calling of the role, quorum was validated through a count of members present. Quorum met. Approval of Minutes from March 6, 2014 MOTION: Dr.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT B233498
Filed 8/27/12 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN ME DOE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. B233498 (Los Angeles County Super.
More informationand 13 C.F.R should be consulted for what those exceptions are.
24 Contract Management November 2010 In the April 2010 issue of Contract Management Magazine, the various elements to consider before entering into a teaming arrangement were discussed in the article,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1 Americans for Safe Access 1 Webster Street #0 Oakland, CA 1 Telephone: (1 - Fax: ( -00 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE REVIEW OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA GUARANTEE ACT, 1988 (Vic).
SUBMISSION TO THE REVIEW OF THE FLORA AND FAUNA GUARANTEE ACT, 1988 (Vic). INTRODUCTION 1. This submission is made by Lawyers for Forests Incorporated (LFF). 2. LFF is a not for profit voluntary association
More informationFines, Fees, and Bail Practices: Challenges and Opportunities
Trends in State Courts Fines, Fees, and Bail Practices: Challenges and Opportunities www.ncsc.org Trends in State Courts The Third Generation of Bail Reform Timothy Schnacke Executive Director, Center
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Filed 11/7/06 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX A. J. WRIGHT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, 2d Civil No. B176929 (Super.
More informationORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and
ORDINANCE NO. 18-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH AMENDING SUBSECTIONS (Y) (FF) (GG) (HH) (II) AND (JJ) OF SECTION 4000.20; SUBSECTION (A) OF SECTION 4000.40; SUBSECTION
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Term, A.D. 2003
No. 96210 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Term, A.D. 2003 PATRICIA ABRAMS, individually, ) Petition for Leave to Appeal from the and as Special Administrator of ) First District Appellate Court of Illinois,
More informationCase 3:11-cv JRS Document Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 3720
Case 3:11-cv-00754-JRS Document 126-1 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 3720 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division EXHIBIT A GREGORY THOMAS BERRY,
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN B262029
Filed 9/16/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN SERGIO PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. B262029 (Los Angeles
More informationEthics Informational Packet COMMUNICATION WITH ADVERSE PARTY. Courtesy of The Florida Bar Ethics Department
Ethics Informational Packet COMMUNICATION WITH ADVERSE PARTY Courtesy of The Florida Bar Ethics Department 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Florida Ethics Opinions Pg. # (Ctrl + Click) OPINION 09-1... 3 OPINION 90-4...
More information