NYSSBA S 6th ANNUAL DISTRICT CLERK WORKSHOP. Elections Update
|
|
- Alannah Alexander
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NYSSBA S 6th ANNUAL DISTRICT CLERK WORKSHOP Elections Update Prepared and Presented by Kimberly A. Fanniff Senior Staff Counsel September 15 Rochester September 22 Albany September 29 Long Island
2 SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTIONS Appeal of Reed, 55 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,871 (2016). In Appeal of Reed, the petitioner challenged his election loss alleging the electronic voting machine did not count a write in ballot for him. Had the vote been counted Reed and the other candidate, Hatcher, would have tied. The district clerk averred that during the course of the election there was no review of the scanned ballots to determine if write-in votes were cast on the ballots. The day after the election the clerk reviewed the scanned ballots and discovered this disputed ballot which contained write-in votes for candidates in spots other than those so designated. Upon the advice of counsel, the ballot was not counted to avoid improperly conducting a recount, which only the commissioner may order. The district as part of its papers stated it did not object to the commissioner ordering a recount or new vote if it was determined an error occurred. The commissioner examined a certified copy of the ballot in question and identified two issues. First, rather than filling in the oval next to the voter s candidate of choice, the voter wrote the names of his selections under each seat. Compounding this error, the voter did not write his selections in the boxes designated for write-ins but rather in a box directly under each candidate s name. According to the commissioner, a voter is not precluded from writing in a candidate s name even if it is already printed on the ballot. In determining whether the ballot should be counted, the commissioner considered interpretations of election law as guidance for interpreting the education law. Cases in the election law context have allowed votes for candidates to be counted when the names were written in the correct column but the wrong row. Where the intent of the voters is apparent it should not be frustrated by technical rules. Similarly, Education Law 2034 provides that if it is impossible to determine the voter s choice than the ballot shall not be counted for such office. The commissioner determined, in this case, it was not impossible to determine the choice of the voter in question. Based on the foregoing, the commissioner found that the petitioner established both that irregularities occurred and affected the outcome of the election. Specifically, she found error that the ballots were not reviewed for write-in votes and that the ballot in question should have been counted. As such she annulled the election results and ordered a new election be held no later than annual vote in May Appeal of the Bd. of Educ. of Hempstead UFSD, 55 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,878 (2016). In Appeal of the Board of Education of Hempstead Union Free School District, the board sought to annul the May 2015 election results for two board seats. In its petition, the board alleges respondents Jackson and Toure, the two highest vote getters, filed defective campaign expenditure reports, that campaign workers for the respondents engaged in threats and fraud to gain entry into voting booths with voters for the purpose of influencing the voters, improper electioneering and irregularities with absentee ballots. The Hempstead Board hired 4 Spanish-language translators, certified as bilingual by the local civil service commission to be in the voting room. At issue, in the appeal, was the presence of a volunteer translator not hired by the district, who accompanied at least one voter into the voting booth. According to the commissioner, the school district could insist its translators be utilized by the voters since election law provisions allowing voters to seek help from a person of their own choosing are not applicable. The commissioner declined to find that one instance of the volunteer translator gaining access to the voting booth with a voter affected the results of the election. The district also claimed individuals working for the respondents campaigns engaged in electioneering just outside the voting room. Furthermore, the joint campaign manager for the respondent
3 loudly challenged the impartiality of the district s translators in the voting room. The commissioner stated that proof of improper electioneering alone is not sufficient basis to invalidate election results. Here the district did not identify any specific individuals to whom the statements were made or provide evidence that the statements influenced voters. To prevent similar problems, districts should ensure distance markers are prominently placed marking the no electioneering zone. The district also alleged issues with the absentee ballot process. According to statements from two residents, Mason and Jordan, an unidentified woman appeared at their home the night before the election and gave one of the voters, Mason, an absentee ballot to fill out. As part of his statement, Mason explained he did not mail an application for an absentee ballot, he is capable of voting on his own, and that he was not aware an application with a legally compelling reason was required in order to vote by absentee ballot. Additionally, the district submitted an affirmation detailing that absentee ballots were being hand-delivered to the polling site by a group of individuals. According to the commissioner, no law prevents individuals from carrying multiple absentee ballots into the polling place on the day of election and it would be entirely speculative to conclude that such conduct raises doubt as to the integrity of the voting process. The commissioner also points out in a footnote that the statements from Mason and Jordan were not sworn. Both statements contained language that the signatory was duly sworn and made the affidavit under penalty of perjury but neither was sworn to or signed before a notary public. As such, the commissioner stated that the statements are considered unsworn. Deficient campaign expenditure statements were also raised in the Hempstead appeal. Under the law if a candidate spends less than $500 he or she simple needs to attest to that. However, if a candidate spends $500 or more he or she must provide an itemized list of expenditures and contributions. The statements must be filed at three points, 30 days before the election, 5 days before and 20 days after the election. Special rules apply if candidates receive a contribution in excess of $1,000 after the close of a reporting period. Respondents Toure and Jackson filed their first two statements (initially due April 20 and May 14) on May 18. Jackson s first statement said she had no expenditures or contributions and her second statement said she did not have expenditures or contributions in excess of $500. Toure s first statement claimed no expenditures or contributions but her second statement identified expenditures and contributions in excess of $500, but an itemized statement was not attached to the report. The commissioner opined that a candidate s incomplete statement of campaign expenditures is not a sufficient basis to set aside election results. Furthermore, enforcement of the filing requirements is through a proceeding instituted in state supreme court, thus depriving the commissioner jurisdiction. The commissioner also found that the petitioner failed to establish that the role of money affected the outcome of the election. Appeals of Ghezzi and Farr, 55 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,890 (2016). The decision in Appeals of Ghezzi and Farr emphasizes the difficult burden a petitioner bears when seeking to overturn an election. A petitioner must provide sufficient evidence to overcome the presumption of regularity in the conduct of elections. In this case, the commissioner found that based on the record before her, the petitioners failed to prove that the irregularities which occurred affected the outcome of the election or were so pervasive as to affect the fundamental fairness of the election. As proof of the alleged irregularities the petitioners submitted 29 boiler plate affidavits where voters checked off various irregularities described in general terms that they observed or experienced. The commissioner found particularly significant the fact that none of the 29 voters who filled out affidavits stated that they were unable to vote no. Many of petitioners claims were rooted in alleged violations of the election law. Generally speaking, the election law does not apply to school district elections. Education Law section 2609, applicable to small city school districts, including Albany, states that elections shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the election law except as otherwise provided herein (emphasis
4 supplied). The commissioner explained that where the education law contains specific provisions pertaining to school district votes that conflict with the election law, the education law prevails. As such, the commissioner rejected claims regarding alleged violations of the election law as it relates to limitations of number of voters assigned to election districts, locked ballot boxes, and paper ballot procedures. The petitioners claimed the district failed to provide a sufficient number of ballots for the scanner machines causing long lines and chaos at the polling places. The school district admitted that 8 of its 15 polling sites ran out of ballots at some point during the day. However, the district provided 25 paper ballots to each polling place in case such shortage were to occur. The district instructed election inspectors to make copies of the paper ballots, if that supply ran low in order to insure ballots were available. According to the commissioner, the board did not supply a sufficient number of ballots but the emergency measures put in place were reasonable. The commissioner noted that while one polling place endured significant delay (45 minutes), the petitioners failed to show that the distribution of an insufficient number of ballots resulted in a sufficient number of voters being unable to vote so as to overturn the results. Long lines and inconvenience for voters did not constitute an interference that affected the outcome of the vote. The commissioner, however, urged the district to take steps to avoid such a situation in the future. The petitioners also alleged absentee ballots were improperly counted before the closing of the polls. Affidavits submitted did show that at one polling place an inspector started counting the absentee ballots shortly before the closing of the polls. However, voters who were present were able to challenge absentee ballots as the inspector was opening them. The commissioner deemed this violation de minimus and determined it did not affect the outcome of the election. The commissioner also rejected petitioners claim that not all permanently disabled voters were mailed an absentee ballot because the district clerk submitted an affidavit stating that she mailed an absentee ballot to every voter on the list supplied to her by the board of elections. As such the commissioner determined the claim was entirely speculative and dismissed it. The commissioner also rejected claims that the election inspectors lacked proper training and the district violated the provisions against improper advocacy. The education law does not contain any specific training requirements for election inspectors and the district showed it provided training on procedures to the inspectors. Lastly, the commissioner concluded the flyer the petitioners challenged as improperly advocating for passage of the bond was purely factual in nature. The commissioner ruled that on the record before her the petitioners did not establish that the irregularities compromised the electoral process such that the will of the voters could not be ascertained and the fundamental fairness of the process was impacted. Ultimately, the petitioners failed to submit proof that the irregularities committed resulted in a sufficient number of voters not voting to cast doubt on the outcome of the referendum. Appeal of Bishop, 55 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,892 (2016). The commissioner of education refused to overturn a district s revote on the budget finding that the petitioner failed to prove any irregularities occurred, let alone affected the outcome of the election. The board of education held a regularly scheduled meeting on the night of the revote. The petitioner claimed this was in violation of Education Law 2025, which provides that no motions shall be in order during the hours specified for voting. According to the commissioner, this provision is archaic an pertains to the time when all school district meetings were held by hand or voice vote rather than by ballot. Generally, school elections are now held by ballot with or without the use of voting machines. Since the board meeting was not a meeting in which voters convened to decide the budget and elect board members, it was permissible for the board to hold a meeting on the day of the re-vote. The commissioner also rejected petitioner s argument that the board s appointment of the business administrator to serve as clerk pro tem while the district clerk was serving as election
5 chairperson led to voter confusion. Prior commissioner decisions have established that it is permissible for the board to appoint the district clerk as chairperson and another individual as temporary clerk. Lastly, the commissioner found there were an appropriate number of election inspectors present throughout the vote. The petitioner claimed the board failed to provide a sufficient number of inspectors. While the board had initially appointed only 2 inspectors, when 4 were required, the superintendent using his delegated authority to make emergency appointments had appointed another two inspectors prior to the re-vote. Therefore, the district was compliant with the requirement that it have two inspectors for each voting machine. Based on the foregoing, the petitioner failed to prove any irregularities occurred and the commissioner upheld the results of the budget re-vote. Appeal of Nahas, 55 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,816 (Aug. 18, 2015). In March 2015, the district held a bond vote to approval $69 million bond for renovations, repairs and new construction on the district s schools and administrative offices. Petitioner challenged the outcome of the bond vote alleging the district provided grossly incorrect statement regarding the tax impact of the referendum. In order to invalidate a school district vote a petitioner must establish not only the irregularities occurred but that the irregularities actually affected the outcome of the election, were so pervasive they vitiated the electoral process or demonstrate informality to the point of laxity in adherence to the Education Law. According to the petitioner, the board understated the impact of the bond referendum stating that the total additional cost would be $106/year on the average tax payer. Petitioner alleged the actual impact is $106/year only until 2023 and thereafter it will be approximately $500/year. The district explained that it characterized the impact as a net tax impact as the district will retire a 2001 bond previously approved in 2023 and that the tax impact of the 2015 bond would essentially replace the impact of the retired bond. The district felt it was easier to describe a net impact rather than characterizing a decrease in taxes when the 2001 bond was retired and an increase in taxes based upon the 2015 bond. The district also stated that it held numerous informational meetings at which the tax impact of the proposed bond was discussed and explained. The commissioner determined that even if the information provided by the district was incorrect or misleading that petitioner failed to prove such information affected the outcome of the election. Petitioner s claim was merely speculative and she failed to sustain her burden of proof because mere speculation as to the effect of alleged irregularities does provide a sufficient basis to overturn an election. Appeal of Leger-Vargas, 54 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,771 (June 17, 2015). Appeal of O Brien, 54 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,772 (June 17, 2015). Appeal of Munoz-Feliciano, 54 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,773 (June 17, 2015). In Appeal of Leger-Vargas, Appeal of O Brien, and Appeal of Munoz-Feliciano three unsuccessful candidates outlined the same or similar alleged irregularities regarding the election. The petitioners claimed the district violated the prohibition against exhorting the voters through certain correspondence and allowing robo-calls supporting certain candidates to be made from a district system. Additionally, the petitioners challenged the appointment of the election chairperson and procedure used to tally the votes. To invalidate election results a petitioner must establish that irregularities occurred and that such irregularities actually affected the outcome of the election, were so pervasive as to vitiate the electoral process or demonstrated a clear and convincing picture of informality to the point of laxity in adherence to the Education Law. A sitting board member sent s from her personal account to a number of residents questioning the impartiality of the petitioners and indicating they were aligned with a special interest
6 group in the district. The petitioners alleged the s amounted to slander, libel, defamation, intimidation, cyberbullying and more. According to the commissioner, because the board member sent the s from her personal account and did not indicate that she was speaking on behalf of the board no improper advocacy occurred. Individual board members are entitled to express their individual views about issues concerning the district and engage in partisan activities provided no district funds are expended. The superintendent received an the day before the election with an attached flyer in support of certain candidates that bore the district s logo. He forwarded the to several staff members asking if anyone knew of the source of the or flyer. The district argued it only shared the for investigative purposes. The commissioner concluded such investigatory activities did not constitute improper advocacy. The appeals also asserted that a robo-call in support of the winning candidates was made from the district s parent notification system. The candidates who sponsored the robo-call provided an invoice with proof of payment to an outside company and also stated telephone numbers were not obtained through the district. Additionally, district staff asserted only they had access to the parent notification system and it was not used as alleged. The commissioner determined the petitioners did not establish district resources were improperly used. The education law requires school boards to appoint a qualified voter as chairperson of the election. In 2012, the board appointed as chairperson its then president, who was present for the election and tallying the ballots. Petitioners alleged this was improper. The commissioner explained that the education law does not contain any restriction barring a board member from serving as chairperson. An allegation the ballots were improperly counted behind closed doors was rejected as well. The chairperson provided an affidavit stating that the ballots were counted in the presence of others and no one was excluded from witnessing the tally. The mere presence of the president was not enough to invalidate the results. The commissioner declined to annul the election results based upon any of the alleged irregularities and noted removal of the superintendent or board members was moot since they no longer served in those positions. The commissioner noted that the petitioners failed to submit any voter affidavits demonstrating that the alleged actions of the respondents influenced his or her vote and therefore, did not establish any election irregularity occurred. The decision also reiterates the commissioner lacks authority to resolve defamation or slander claims, issue reprimands or fines or order someone to issue an apology. Nonetheless, the commissioner urged the board to ensure school officials and employees are mindful to avoid even an appearance of impropriety. Appeal of Emond, 54 Ed Dep t Rep, Dec. No. 16,754 (May 8, 2015). An unsuccessful write-in candidate challenged the results of the 2014 district election alleging electioneering and other improprieties affected the outcome of the election. Emond was serving as a per diem substitute in the district at the time of the election. She understood that if elected she would be unable to continue to substitute teach. In her petition, Emond claimed that an election inspector told voters that votes cast for Emond would not be counted because she was a school employee and that such statement discouraged individuals from voting for her. While Emond, submitted 9 voter affidavits only 6 affidavits addressed the issue of the comment. According to the commissioner, she failed to establish that the alleged irregularity affected the outcome of the election because petitioner lost by 95 votes. Additionally, the petitioner argued the district failed to provide for voter privacy. The district was using lever voting machines but was unable to secure additional paper for those machines to accommodate a large write in vote. Instead, the district prepared paper ballots for anyone to use who wished to vote for a write in candidate. Further detracting from voter privacy was the failure of the district to provide any sort of screened area for voters to fill out the ballot. The district acknowledged that it improperly provided separate paper ballots only for write-in candidates contrary to prior commissioner s
7 decisions. The four voters who submitted affidavits addressing voter privacy each stated that while uncomfortable with the lack of privacy they still cast a vote for the candidate of his or her choice. Therefore, the commissioner found these irregularities did not affect the outcome of the election. However, the commissioner cautioned the district to ensure full compliance with commissioner s decisions in future elections and to review its election practices with respect to voter privacy. Appeal of Berg, 53 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,616 (June 20, 2014). Berg challenged several irregularities with respect to the conduct of the May 2013 budget vote. First Berg argued that the school district improperly published and disseminated materials that advocated for passage of the budget. School districts are barred from using public monies to advocate for partisan positions. Here the district published a budget newsletter which contained statements linking the district s property values with the strength of the school system. The commissioner has not found such statements to constitute improper advocacy but has found they present close questions. As such he reminded the school district to ensure that any future newsletters are strictly objective and factual. Petitioner also argued that the school district improperly demarcated the 100 foot antielectioneering zone and such failure violated petitioner s constitutional rights. The distance markers were allegedly place in excess of 100 feet from the entrance to the polling place. The commissioner dismissed this claim as moot given that petitioner only sought an order to ensure that the school complied with the 100 foot anti electioneering zone and the school district offered evidence it had complied with the requirement at its June 2013 revote. Appeal of Touré, 54 Ed Dept Rep, Dec. No. 16,600 (August 28, 2014). The commissioner of education annulled the election results with respect to the May 2014 election of a school board member in the Hempstead school district. In Appeal of Toure, the commissioner cited a degree of laxity in the handling of absentee ballots that threatened the integrity of the (May 20) election. In the May balloting, seven individuals vied for two seats- one full term and a second for a shorter term to fill a vacancy. The issue in the appeal involved who was entitled to the shorter term. On election day, the petitioner who was the second-highest vote-getter, received 712 votes, while the third, an incumbent, received 691 votes. At a board meeting on election day, the incumbent made a motion for the board to suspend accepting the candidates until the remaining absentee ballots could be verified the following day. At an emergency meeting the day after the election, as a result of the final tally, the incumbent won the shorter term seat by six votes. Petitioner appealed and was granted interim relief precluding the school district from declaring a winner. To overturn an election, a petitioner must prove not only that irregularities occurred but that the irregularities actually affected the outcome of the election. The commissioner found that there was no question here that there were irregularities throughout the election. The only question to be determined was if irregularities regarding the issuance and receipt of absentee ballots, actually affected the outcome of the election. As of Friday, prior to the election, the district clerk had mailed 231 absentee ballots. By the date of the election an additional 301 absentee ballots had been issued. The commissioner expressed concern that the extraordinarily high volume of absentee ballots issued one business day prior to the election, coupled with evidence that individuals improperly solicited false applications and votes on behalf of the incumbent, suggest a severe risk of fraud that vitiated the fundamental fairness of the election. In addition, the school district had failed to maintain a list of the absentee ballots that were sent out. Therefore, it could not be determined how many absentee ballot applications were received, how many ballots were issued, whether those issued were valid in accordance with law or whether the absentee ballots were validly cast. For these reasons, the commissioner overturned the election results for
8 the shorter term vacancy and ordered a new election. The commissioner also admonished the board to ensure that all future board meetings and elections are conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of law, regulations and board policies.
Frequent Legal Challenges to School Elections and Budget Votes
Frequent Legal Challenges to School Elections and Budget Votes Minimize the Risk in Your District Presented By: Aileen Abrams, Esq. Assistant Counsel New York State School Boards Association 24 Century
More informationTITLE 8. ELECTIONS ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS
. ELECTIONS ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1. DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION... 8-1-1 Sec. 8-1101. Definitions.... 8-1-1 Sec. 8-1102. Construction.... 8-1-2 CHAPTER 2. MISCELLANEOUS... 8-1-2 Sec. 8-1201.
More informationFrom: Associate Attorney General Anne Edwards and Assistant Attorney General Steve LaBonte.J..&\~
ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 33 CAPITOL STREET CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-6397 JOSEPH A. FOSTER ATTORNEY GENERAL ANNM. RICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL VIA FACSIMILE & E-MAIL To: Local Election
More informationCHAPTER 49 STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE TRIBAL LAW ELECTION ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 49 STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE TRIBAL LAW ELECTION ORDINANCE Section 49.1 Section 49.2 Section 49.3 Section 49.4 Election Board Duty of Election Board Tribal Caucus Nomination at the Caucus Section 49.5
More informationROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE ORDINANCE NO Amended: Petition Resolution No
ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE ORDINANCE NO.86-10 Amended: Petition Resolution No. 2008-201 ELECTION CODE ROSEBUD SIOUX TRIBE Be it ordained by the Rosebud Sioux Tribal Council that a Rosebud Sioux Tribal Election
More informationINFORMATION TO VOTERS
Notice of Spring Election and Sample Ballots April 4, 2017 OFFICE OF THE KENOSHA COUNTY CLERK TO THE VOTERS OF KENOSHA COUNTY: Notice is hereby given of a spring primary election to be held in County of
More informationGUIDE FOR POLL WATCHERS
GUIDE FOR POLL WATCHERS STATE OF ALASKA DIVISION OF ELECTIONS B02 (REV 03/2016) DIVISION OF ELECTIONS DIRECTORY Alaska Division of Elections Web Site: www.elections.alaska.gov Director of Elections 240
More informationLOCAL UNION ELECTION GUIDE
LOCAL UNION ELECTION GUIDE International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers IBEW Local Union Election Guide Every three or four years our members are afforded the most fundamental of democratic rights,
More informationFrom: Associate Attorney General Anne Edwards and Assistant Attorney General Brian Buonamano
To: Local Election Officers From: Associate Attorney General Anne Edwards and Assistant Attorney General Brian Buonamano Re: Memorandum regarding Election laws, Procedures and Potential Issues for November
More informationCounty Referendum Guide
County Referendum Guide Candace J. Grubbs, County Clerk-Recorder/Registrar of Voters 155 Nelson Avenue, Oroville CA 95965-3411 Phone: (530) 538-7761 Fax: (530) 538-6853 Website: http://buttevotes.net This
More information2016 Poll Worker Training
2016 Poll Worker Training Provided by the: State Board of Election Commissioners (SBEC) 501 Woodlane, Suite 401N, Little Rock, AR 72201 1-800-411-6996 www.arkansas.gov/sbec info.sbec@sos.arkansas.gov SBEC
More informationMontana Constitution
Montana Constitution Article III Section 4. Initiative. (1) The people may enact laws by initiative on all matters except appropriations of money and local or special laws. (2) Initiative petitions must
More informationOffice of Al Schmidt City Commissioner of Philadelphia
Office of Al Schmidt City Commissioner of Philadelphia July 18, 2012 The Honorable Stephanie Singer City Commissioner, Chair The Honorable Anthony Clark City Commissioner Voting irregularities present
More information2016 Poll Worker Training
2016 Poll Worker Training Provided by the: State Board of Election Commissioners 501 Woodlane, Suite 401N Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-1834 1-800-411-6996 Complaints in 2014 Other 26% Poll Worker 22%
More information2019 ESEA ELECTION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
2019 ESEA ELECTION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 12/28/2018 I. DECLARATION OF CANDIDACY...Page 1 A. Declaration of Candidates... B. Speeches by Candidates. C. Procedure for Withdrawal... D. Election Procedures...
More informationCHAPTER 9 CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS
CHAPTER 9 CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, all sections within this chapter were included in the original Government Code of Guam enacted by P.L. 1-088 (Nov. 29, 1952), and repealed and
More informationINSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION FOR CHALLENGERS, WATCHERS, AND OTHER ELECTION OBSERVERS Published by: State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator 151 West Street, Suite
More informationALABAMA Frequently Asked Questions
ALABAMA Frequently Asked Questions Disclaimer: This guide is designed for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The Election
More informationAssembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections
Assembly Bill No. 45 Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to public office; requiring a nongovernmental entity that sends a notice relating to voter registration
More informationTITLE 6 ELECTIONS (ELECTION COMMISSION)
TITLE 6 ELECTIONS (ELECTION COMMISSION) COMPILER NOTE: The Guam Election Commission pursuant to its authority granted by 3 GCA 2103 and 2104 amended this entire title. In conformance with the Rule Making
More informationPOLLING TOUR GUIDE U.S. Election Program. November 8, 2016 I F E. S 30 Ye L A
POLLING TOUR GUIDE November 8, 2016 O N FOR ELECT OR A L AT A TI ars ON STEMS AL FOUND SY I F E S 30 Ye I 2016 U.S. Election Program INTE RN Polling Tour Guide November 8, 2016 2016 U.S. Election Program
More informationCherokee Code Chapter 161 Elections
0 0 0 0 Cherokee Code Chapter Elections Article I. - Offices Sec. -. - Election dates. (a) The Cherokee General Election shall be held on the first Thursday in September 0 and each two years thereafter.
More informationEXHIBIT C NOTICE OF REFERENDUM OREGON SCHOOL DISTRICT NOVEMBER 6, 2018
EXHIBIT C NOTICE OF REFERENDUM OREGON SCHOOL DISTRICT NOVEMBER 6, 2018 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that at an election to be held in the Oregon School District on November 6, 2018, the following proposed Initial
More information-- INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM PETITIONS --
November 6, 2008 -- INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM PETITIONS -- The following provides information on launching a petition drive to amend the state constitution, initiate new legislation, amend existing legislation
More information2. There is no limit to the number of campaigners allowed outside of the prohibited area
. * VIRGINIA* DEPARTMENT of ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS 1100 Bank Street, 1" Floor Richmond, VA 23219 elections. virginia.gov Toll-free: (Voice) 800-552-9745 (TDD) 800-260-3466 804-864-8901 info@elections.virginia.gov
More informationElection Board Training
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSIONERS Election Board Training (Primary, General, and Special Elections) City Commissioners Rooms 130, 132, 134 City Hall Philadelphia, PA 19107 Phone: (215) 686-3460,
More informationNew Mexico Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS
Disclaimer: This guide is designed for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The Election Protection Coalition does not warrant
More informationSignedzd~ ~ ELECTIONS ACT KCFNS 8/2011. /&.s ~ef~ftfl;# KA: 'YU:'K'T'H'/CHE:K'TLES7ET'H' FIRST NATIONS GOVERNMENT. lids law enacted on April 1, 2011
KA: 'YU:'K'T'H'/CHE:K'TLES7ET'H' FIRST NATIONS GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS ACT KCFNS 8/2011 lids law enacted on April 1, 2011 Signedzd~ ~ Christina Cox, Tyee Ha'wilth, Ka:'yu:'k't'h' First Natio Signed FT cis
More informationBYLAWS OF THE STUDENT ASSOCIATION: ELECTION COMMISSION
BYLAWS OF THE STUDENT ASSOCIATION: ELECTION COMMISSION 4.1 Election Commission This Commission is set-up solely to administer and monitor all elections and referenda of the UW-L SA. The objectives of the
More informationReferred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing elections. (BDR )
* S.B. 0 SENATE BILL NO. 0 SENATOR SETTELMEYER PREFILED FEBRUARY, 0 Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections SUMMARY Revises provisions governing elections. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect
More informationCHAPTER 4 ELECTIONS COMMISSION AND ELECTIONS ARTICLE I. ELECTIONS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 4 ELECTIONS COMMISSION AND ELECTIONS ARTICLE I. ELECTIONS COMMISSION Section 4-1-10. Authority. (A) The Elections Commission shall exist as a service to the student body, conducting the student
More informationCITY OF BAYONNE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MUNICIPAL BUILDING 630 AVENUE C BAYONNE, NJ TEL: (201) FAX: (201)
JAMES M. DAVIS MAYOR CITY OF BAYONNE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MUNICIPAL BUILDING 630 AVENUE C BAYONNE, NJ 07002 TEL: (201) 858-6029 FAX: (201) 823-4391 CITY OF BAYONNE MUNICIPAL ELECTION MAY 8, 2018 ROBERT
More informationJohn G. Barisone Atchison, Barisone, Condotti & Kovacevich 333 Church Street Santa Cruz, CA THE INITIATIVE PROCESS AFTER PROPOSITION 218
John G. Barisone Atchison, Barisone, Condotti & Kovacevich 333 Church Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 THE INITIATIVE PROCESS AFTER PROPOSITION 218 T ABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION
More information*HB0348* H.B ELECTION CODE - ELECTRONIC VOTING 2 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS
LEGISLATIVE GENERAL COUNSEL 6 Approved for Filing: E.N. Weeks 6 6 01-27-06 5:00 PM 6 H.B. 348 1 ELECTION CODE - ELECTRONIC VOTING 2 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS 3 2006 GENERAL SESSION 4 STATE OF UTAH 5
More information2018 NEW MEXICO GENERAL ELECTION CALENDAR
2018 NEW MEXICO GENERAL ELECTION CALENDAR This calendar is intended only to be a summary of statutory deadlines for the convenience of election officers. In all cases the relevant sections of the law should
More informationTITLE 2112 ELECTIONS ELECTION ORDINANCE ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS
TITLE 2112 ELECTIONS ELECTION ORDINANCE ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1- AUTHORITY This Election Ordinance is authorized by and adopted pursuant to Article VI, Section 5 and Article XII of the Constitution
More informationNOMINATION RULES OF THE ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTY
NOMINATION RULES OF THE ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTY As passed by the Campaign Committee, November 22, 2016, revised on July 20, 2017 and further revised on January 28, 2018. SECTION A AUTHORITY AND INTERPRETATION
More informationThe Constitution of the DePaul University College of Law Student Bar Association
The Constitution of the DePaul University College of Law Student Bar Association Preamble We, the students of DePaul University College of Law, in order to enhance the value of student degrees, increase
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION Short Title: Election Modifications. (Public) April 15, 2015
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE BILL Committee Substitute Favorable // Senate Rules and Operations of the Senate Committee Substitute Adopted // Fourth Edition Engrossed // Proposed
More informationA Report on Accessibility of Polling Places in the November 2005 Election: The Experience of New York City Voters
A Report on Accessibility of Polling Places in the November 2005 Election: The Experience of New York City Voters Administering elections in a jurisdiction as large as New York City, with more than four
More informationCARLISLE HOME RULE CHARTER. ARTICLE I General Provisions
CARLISLE HOME RULE CHARTER We, the people of Carlisle, under the authority granted the citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to adopt home rule charters and exercise the rights of local self-government,
More informationDURING VOTING HOURS. On election day, open the poll promptly at 7:30 a.m. and keep the poll open continuously until 7:30 p.m.
DURING VOTING HOURS Open the Poll On election day, open the poll promptly at 7:30 a.m. and keep the poll open continuously until 7:30 p.m. Process Voters Step 1: Ask the voter to state his or her name,
More informationNO. NATHAN MACIAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. NATHAN MACIAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Contestant - Petitioner v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DOUG MILLER Contestee - Respondent COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS ORIGINAL PETITION INITIATING ELECTION CONTEST, REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE,
More informationLevy County Candidate Handbook
Levy County Candidate Handbook 2015-2016 1 To those interested in running for local office: This information has been compiled for those interested in running for elected office in Levy County. It is designed
More informationVOTER INFORMATI ON VOTE SAR A SOTA COUNTY. Ron Turner SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
VOTER INFORMATI ON VOTE SAR A SOTA COUNTY Ron Turner SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS F O A TABLE OF CONTENTS Election schedule... 4 Who may register and vote?... 4 Persons not entitled to vote... 4 How do I register?...
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY, 0 Sponsored by: Senator NIA H. GILL District (Essex and Passaic) Senator SHIRLEY K. TURNER District (Hunterdon and Mercer) SYNOPSIS Requires
More informationVOTERGA SAFE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
VOTERGA SAFE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Recommended Objectives, Proposed Requirements, Legislative Suggestions with Legislative Appendices This document provides minimal objectives, requirements and legislative
More informationSecretary of State s Election Law Changes HF 2620
BILL SUMMARY Status of Bill: House State Government Committee Committee: House State Government Floor Manager: Rep. Mary Gaskill Research Analyst: Jenifer Parsons 281-3452 jenifer.parsons@legis.state.ia.us
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 163 Article 14A 1
Article 14A. Voting. Part 1. Definitions. 163-165. Definitions. In addition to the definitions stated below, the definitions set forth in Article 15A of Chapter 163 of the General Statutes also apply to
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1489
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 0 0 State of Arkansas nd General Assembly As Engrossed: H// A Bill Regular Session, 0 HOUSE BILL By: Representative
More informationCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE 1102 Q STREET SACRAMENTO, CA (916) September 16, 2004
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE 1102 Q STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-6511 (916) 445-8752 HTTP://WWW.CCCCO.EDU To: From: Subject: Superintendents and Presidents Steven
More informationArticle 1 - Name and Purpose
Draft November 2, 2012 Oregon Nurses Association Sacred Heart Home Care Services Bargaining Unit Bylaws Ratified March 7, 2007 December 14, 2007 Ratified November 30, 2012 Article 1 - Name and Purpose
More information3 GCA ELECTIONS CH. 11 CANVASS, VOTE TABULATION & DECLARATION OF RESULTS
CHAPTER 11 CANVASS, VOTE TABULATION & NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, all sections within this chapter were included in the original Government Code of Guam enacted by P.L. 1-088 (Nov. 29, 1952), and repealed
More information1This chapter explains the different types of Election Judges and Election Coordinators and important things to know about
UNDERSTANDING THE ROLES AT THE POLLING PLACE 1This chapter explains the different types of Election Judges and Election Coordinators and important things to know about these roles. You should read Chapter
More information2013 Onondaga County Board of Elections
2013 Onondaga County Board of Elections Election Inspector Certification Course 1 * INDICATES NEW INFORMATION * Welcome from Commissioners Helen Kiggins Walsh and Dustin Czarny As an Election Inspector,
More informationKETCIDKAN INDIAN CORPORATION ORDINANCE 5: SPECIAL ELECTION
KETCIDKAN INDIAN CORPORATION ORDINANCE 5: SPECIAL ELECTION PASSED BY THE MEMBERSHIP IN A REFERENDUM VOTE-JANUARY, 1994 The purpose of this Ordinance is to outline and define Election Procedures in accordance
More informationfor making a frivolous challenge. Colorado could improve its laws by requiring that a challenge be based
2. STATE LAWS GOVERNING ELECTION DAY CHALLENGES STATE WHO CAN CHALLENGE ON ELECTION DAY? LEGAL BASIS FOR CHALLENGING A VOTER S ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR MAKING AND DETERMINING VALIDITY OF CHALLENGES COLORADO
More informationHow to Conduct Local Union Elections
How to Conduct Local Union Elections Education Department Revised 2014 Communications Workers of America 501 Third St, NW Washington, D.C. 20001-2197 (202) 434-1100 www.cwa-union.org How to Conduct Local
More information1This chapter explains the different types of Election Judges and Election Coordinators and important things to know about
UNDERSTANDING THE ROLES AT THE POLLING PLACE 1This chapter explains the different types of Election Judges and Election Coordinators and important things to know about these roles. You should read Chapter
More informationRegistrar of Voters Certification. Audit ( 9 320f)
Registrar of Voters Certification Section 7 Post Election Audits and Re canvasses 1 Audit ( 9 320f) See: SOTS Audit Procedure Manual Purpose Mandatory post election hand count audits conducted by ROV s
More informationReferred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Creates a modified blanket primary election system.
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS AND ELECTIONS MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections SUMMARY Creates a modified blanket primary election system.
More informationRULES ON POLL WATCHERS, VOTE CHALLENGES, AND PROVISIONAL VOTING (Effective April 22, 2006; Revised October 28, 2017)
RULES ON POLL WATCHERS, VOTE CHALLENGES, AND PROVISIONAL VOTING (Effective April 22, 2006; Revised October 28, 2017) Agency # 108.00 STATE BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS 501 Woodlane, Suite 401N Little
More informationSECTION 8. ELECTION AND VOTER REGISTRATION RECORDS
Douglas County s Retention Schedule SECTION 8. ELECTION AND VOTER REGISTRATION RECORDS s documenting the registration of voters and the conduct, administration and results of Douglas County elections.
More informationColifornio Stote Association of Counties
Colifornio Stote Association of Counties 1100 K Street Suite 101 Socromento (olilornio 95814 Te.'cphone 916.327.7500 916.441.5507 Hon. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Chief Justice 350 McAllister Street San Francisco,
More information2010 Version 2010 NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ELECTION PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS
2010 NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ELECTION PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. THE ELECTION... 2 III. NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL BOUNDARIES... 3 IV. DEFINITION OF STAKEHOLDER... 5 V. THE STAKEHOLDER
More informationCHARTER OF THE CITY OF MT. HEALTHY, OHIO ARTICLE I INCORPORATION, POWERS, AND FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Page 1 of 17 CHARTER OF THE CITY OF MT. HEALTHY, OHIO PREAMBLE We, the people of the City of Mt. Healthy, in order to fully secure and exercise the benefits of self-government under the Constitution and
More informationRunning for Municipal Office in Alberta
Running for Municipal Office in Alberta A Guide for Candidates Alberta Municipal Affairs Updated 2017 G o v e r n m e n t o f A l b e r t a Alberta Municipal Affairs Running for Municipal Office in Alberta
More informationOklahoma Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS
Oklahoma 2018 Frequently Asked Questions Disclaimer: This guide is designed for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The Election
More informationCONSTITUTION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN PARTY
CONSTITUTION OF THE SASKATCHEWAN PARTY The Saskatchewan Party is created as a provincial party without ties to any federal party and is to be governed and controlled by its members. 1. NAME AND PRINCIPLES
More informationCHAPTER 4 TRIBAL ELECTION LAW
CHAPTER 4 TRIBAL ELECTION LAW 1.1 General Elections Biennially, on successive even-numbered years, on the 2 nd Saturday in September, the Penobscot Nation shall hold its elections for the choice of Chief,
More informationAAUP Election Rules 1
AAUP Election Rules 1 These Election Rules, which are from time to time revised, are established by the Council pursuant to the AAUP Constitution to govern the conduct of elections of elective members
More informationElectronic Voting A Strategy for Managing the Voting Process Appendix
Electronic Voting A Strategy for Managing the Voting Process Appendix Voter & Poll Worker Surveys Procedure As part of the inquiry into the electronic voting, the Grand Jury was interested in the voter
More informationCandidate Filings and Financial Disclosure Requirements
Candidate Filings and Financial Disclosure Requirements General Filing Information Candidates with Political Party Affiliation Who Seek a Partisan Office: A candidate who is affiliated with a political
More informationVoting in Maine s Ranked Choice Election. A non-partisan guide to ranked choice elections
Voting in Maine s Ranked Choice Election A non-partisan guide to ranked choice elections Summary: What is Ranked Choice Voting? A ranked choice ballot allows the voter to rank order the candidates: first
More informationCh. 171 VOTING RIGHTS Subpart D. ELECTIONS
Ch. 171 VOTING RIGHTS 4 171.1 Subpart D. ELECTIONS Chap. Sec. 171. VOTING RIGHTS... 171.1 172. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 172.1 173. FEES... 173.1 174. REPORTS OF POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS... 174.1 175. SPECIAL
More informationCentral Springfield Little League Virginia District 9 Since 1954
Central Springfield Little League Virginia District 9 Since 1954 CENTRAL SPRINGFIELD LITTLE LEAGUE CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS ARTICLE I: NAME This organization shall be known as the Central Springfield Little
More information[First Reprint] SENATE, No. 549 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION
[First Reprint] SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator NIA H. GILL District (Essex and Passaic) Co-Sponsored by: Senator Stack
More informationI. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures. A. Objectives
I. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures A. Objectives The fundamental objectives of these CMP Disciplinary Policy and Procedures (hereafter also collectively referred to as Rules ) are to protect the public
More informationCAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE
NORTH DAKOTA CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE These resources are current as of 8/7/14. We do our best to periodically update these resources and welcome any comments or questions regarding new
More informationPoll Worker Training Questions
Poll Worker Training Questions Registration: 1. Can a voter use a driver s license from another state when registering? Yes, as long as they also show some other document with their name, current residence
More informationHOW TO DO A COUNTY REFERENDUM A Guide to Placing a County Referendum on the Ballot
HOW TO DO A COUNTY REFERENDUM A Guide to Placing a County Referendum on the Ballot Prepared by The Mariposa County Clerk/Elections Department 4982 10 th Street / PO Box 247 Mariposa, CA 95338 209-966-2007
More informationCITY OF BERKELEY CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT
CITY OF BERKELEY CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT 5% AND 10% INITIATIVE PETITION REQUIREMENTS & POLICIES 1. Guideline for Filing 2. Berkeley Charter Article XIII, Section 92 3. State Elections Code Provisions 4.
More informationUndergraduate Student Government. Election Rules
Undergraduate Student Government Election Rules (1) Establishment Pursuant to (H)(2) of the USG Constitution; all election stipulations and rules shall be outlined in the USG election rules. The election
More informationR U L E S O F P R O C E D U R E CITY COUNCIL THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER
R U L E S O F P R O C E D U R E CITY COUNCIL THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE DENVER CITY COUNCIL Table of Contents Rule 1. Rule 2. Rule 3. Rule 4. Rule 5. Rule 6. Meetings. 1.1
More informationFAYETTEVILLE-MANLIUS LITTLE LEAGUE CONSTITUTION (5/17/2016)
FAYETTEVILLE-MANLIUS LITTLE LEAGUE CONSTITUTION (5/17/2016) This constitution is adapted from a Constitution recommended for adoption by all local leagues. The latest version can be obtained at www.littleleague.org.
More informationAnchorage Hockey Officials, Inc. BYLAWS. Bylaws of the Anchorage Hockey Officials Inc. A non profit corporation of the State of Alaska
Anchorage Hockey Officials, Inc. BYLAWS Bylaws of the Anchorage Hockey Officials Inc. A non profit corporation of the State of Alaska Article 1 Name Section 1.1 Name Article 2 Mission Section 2.1 Mission
More informationARTICLE 7. ELECTIONS
From the IAAO Bylaws: ARTICLE 7. ELECTIONS Section 7.1. Generally. A. The officers (other than the Secretary-Treasurer and Executive Director) and the Regular At-Large Directors shall be elected by plurality
More information(Bill No. 38) Electoral System Referendum Act
HOUSE USE ONLY CHAIR: WITH / WITHOUT 3rd SESSION, 65th GENERAL ASSEMBLY Province of Prince Edward Island 67 ELIZABETH II, 2018 (Bill No. 38) Electoral System Referendum Act Hon. Jordan K. M. Brown Justice
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. The Citizen Initiative Process
April 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction The Citizen Initiative Process What is a Citizen Initiative? Who Can Use the Citizen Initiative Process? Beginning the Process: The Notice of Intent Petition Forms
More informationHOUSE BILL NO. HB0040. Sponsored by: Joint Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Interim Committee A BILL. for
0 STATE OF WYOMING LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB000 Election Code revisions. Sponsored by: Joint Corporations, Elections & Political Subdivisions Interim Committee A BILL for 0 AN ACT relating to elections;
More information2015 Election Workshop for City Clerks
2015 Election Workshop for City Clerks Betsie Kimbrough Idaho Secretary of State s Office Justin Ruen Association of Idaho Cities This presentation will cover: The basics of Idaho s consolidated election
More informationHow to do a County Referendum
How to do a County Referendum A Guide to Placing a County Referendum on the Ballot Prepared by The Madera County Elections Division 200 W. 4th Street Madera CA 93637 {559) 675-7720 {559) 675-7870 FAX www.votemadera.com
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 163 Article 20 1
SUBCHAPTER VII. ABSENTEE VOTING. Article 20. Absentee Ballot. 163-226. Who may vote an absentee ballot. (a) Who May Vote Absentee Ballot; Generally. Any qualified voter of the State may vote by absentee
More informationThe Constitution and By-Laws. The Washington Teachers Union, Local 6. American Federation of Teacher, AFL-CIO
The Constitution and By-Laws Of The Washington Teachers Union, Local 6 American Federation of Teacher, AFL-CIO Adopted March 16, 1981 Revised October 21, 2004 THE CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I NAME ARTICLE II
More informationSTATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 52nd Legislature (2009) By: Terrill AS INTRODUCED
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Session of the nd Legislature (0) HOUSE BILL No. AS INTRODUCED By: Terrill An Act relating to initiative and referendum; amending O.S. 01, Sections 1,,,.1,,,.1,,, as amended by Section,
More informationALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS ELECTION DAY WHAT TO DO IF (REV 12/2009)
ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS ELECTION DAY WHAT TO DO IF (REV 12/2009) A. PRECINCT BOARD MEMBER FAILS TO REPORT (CEC 12313) Do not delay opening the polls. Voters must be allowed to begin voting at
More informationPeralta Community College District AP This administrative procedure is the full Peralta Student Election Code Manual.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 5410 ASSOCIATED STUDENTS ELECTIONS This administrative procedure is the full Peralta Student Election Code Manual. STUDENT ACTIVITIES: STUDENT ELECTIONS CODE (Pursuant to Education
More informationTown of Scarborough, Maine Charter
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Maine Town Documents Maine Government Documents 7-1-1993 Town of Scarborough, Maine Charter Scarborough (Me.) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/towndocs
More informationCandidate s Guide to the Regular City Election
Candidate s Guide to the Regular City Election November 5, 2013 Prepared by the Office of the Iowa Secretary of State (515) 281-0145 sos@sos.iowa.gov http://sos.iowa.gov/elections/candidates/index.html
More informationMunicipal Annexation Procedure in West Virginia
WV Municipal League Municipal Annexation Procedure in West Virginia Reference WV Code Chapter 8, Article 6, Sections 1-6 Three Ways to Annex 1. Annexation with election. 2. Annexation without an election.
More information