Media Law. Exam notes
|
|
- Elwin Cole
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Media Law Exam notes
2 Table of contents Freedom of speech 3 Open justice 8 General contempt of court 21 Sub judice contempt 31 Liability for defamation 39 Defamation defences 59 Defamation privileges 72 Defamation remedies 82
3 Freedom of speech Role of the media The media is an important institution that can serve to hold powerful people and organisation to public account. The public sphere The concept of the media as a public sphere traces back to the work of Habermas. The public sphere captured the notion that the media served as an interface between society and the state. Habermas view of the media was one free from state and private commercial interests. Mass media is thus an aberration of Habermas public sphere. Nevertheless, the internet has restored the concept of Habermas public sphere by allowing many small-scale publishers to convert private opinion into public opinion. The fourth estate The media is said to serve as the fourth estate of government (the other three being the executive, legislature and judiciary (formerly, the monarch, clergy and parliament)). It operates as a check on executive power and public institutions, in the interests of society. However, the shift towards tabloid and sensationalist media coverage undermines the ideal of the fourth estate. Public vs private media The divide between public broadcasting and commercial media organisations is important. Public broadcasters embody the modern day public sphere / fourth estate, by remaining free from commercial conflicts of interests and (largely) free from government interference. Only commercial media organisations can truly be said to be free from state influence, but reliance on advertising revenue streams hinders such organisations from engaging in unbiased reporting. Regulation of the media The media is regulated on two fronts: public (statute) and private (civil claims). Public regulatory constraints Public regulatory constraints can be classified into five categories: 1. Platform access regulation regulates media organisations through access to the publicly-owned broadcasting spectrum.!3
4 2. Content access regulation anti-siphoning laws prevent one media company from buying up key content (typically live sport). 3. Journalistic conduct regulation limits the ways in which journalists gather information for published stories (see, eg, Surveillance Devices Act 2004). 4. Content regulation direct regulation of particular type of conduct and when that content is allowed to be broadcast. 5. Professional standards regulation various associations convene to agree on standards of broadcast media or print media. Private regulatory constraints Private law regulatory constraints relate to the civil actions that may be brought against actors in the media: (1) defamation; (2) brach of confidence; (3) passing-off; (4) copyright; (5) injurious falsehood; (6) negligence; (7) trespass; (8) vilification; (9) breach of contract. Freedom of expression Freedom of expression, and freedom of the press, are seen as essential elements of free society. In Australia, no specific legal protection exists for freedom of expression. However the High Court has held that an implied freedom of political communication is an indispensable incident of the constitutionally-entrenched system of representative government (Lange). Freedom Freedom is a flexible concept. Freedom of speech has traditionally been conceived as a negative liberty that prevented government interference with expression. However, some positive intervention may be required in order to protect the freedom (for example, a rule requiring broadcasters to provide airtime for a right of reply). Rationales There are broadly three rationales for freedom of expression: (1) truth; (2) democracy; and (3) selfdetermination. 1. Truth truth emerges where there is open discussion and unrestricted competition between opposing viewpoints The work of JS Mill in On Liberty supports this rationale, as well as Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes in Abrams v US: the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market. There are, however, valid criticisms of the truth rationale. For example, the truth may not necessarily emerge in the competition of ideas: not all of the participants in the exchange of views have equal influence. Even if it is accepted that, in time, the truth will emerge, the short-term acceptance of false opinion can be damaging.!4
5 2. Democratic that freedom of expression is necessary for a system of representative government This rationale is the one adopted by the High Court. The implied freedom of political communication is regarded as a necessary incident of the system of representative government set out in the Constitution. However, free communication that rests on this rationale must necessarily be limited to political communications, and must therefore not extend to matters such as art, scent and literature. Many of the criticisms applicable to the truth rationale are applicable here as well. Both rationales rest on the assumption that each participant in the marketplace of ideas has the same level of influence. This is clearly note borne out in reality. 3. Self-determination that freedom of expression has an inherent value: the ability to communicate thoughts and opinions freely is an intrinsic part of being human Under this rationale, any restrictions whether on political or non-political communications would impinge upon the individual freedom of each person s ability to express themselves. The only restrictions that may be allowable under this rationale are prohibitions on communications that are physically harmful, such as yelling Fire! in a crowded theatre. Express protections of freedom of expression Different legal systems offer different protection for freedom of expression. In Australia, constitutional protection of freedom of expression was established in 1992, by two decisions delivered by the High Court. In Nationwide News and Australian Capital Television, the High Court held that an implied freedom of political communication exists as an incident of the system of representative and responsible government. The position of the law was refined in Lange v ABC where the Court unanimously held that the implied freedom of political communication does not confer personal rights to freedom of speech, but rather operates as control on legislative and executive power. The United States Constitution contains an express protection of free speech in the First Amendment: Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press. Read literally, this is an unqualified protection. However, the Supreme Court has read it down to avoid imminent lawless action (Brandenburg v Ohio). Defamation law in the United States is circumscribed by the First Amendment: there must be actual malice before liability can arise for defendants, at least for public individuals who invite attention and comment (Gertz v Robert Welch Inc).!5
6 The European Convention on Human Rights includes a right to freedom of expression. Unlike the First Amendment, a number of exceptions are set out. Article 10 (European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises. 2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary. Implied freedom in Australia As set out above, the twin 1992 cases of Nationwide News and Australian Capital Television established the implied freedom of political communication. However, the members of the Court did not share a unanimous conception of the freedom. Mason CJ described it as a freedom of communication in relation to public affairs and political discussion. Brennan J referred to the freedom of the Australian people to discuss governments and political matters. Deane and Toohey JJ considered that the Constitution s implication of freedom of communication extends to all political matters, including matters relating to other levels of government within the national system. McHugh J offered the narrowest interpretation. People have a constitutional right to convey and receive opinions, arguments and information concerning matters intended or likely to affect voting in an election for the Senate or the House of Representatives. In Theophanous v Herald and Weekly Times Ltd in 1994, the Court extended the freedom by creating a constitutional defence to defamation occurring in the context of political debate. Lange represented a retreat of the court s conception of the implied freedom. There, the Court decided that the implied freedom of political communication does not confer any personal rights to freedom of speech, but operates as a check on legislative and executive power. Scope Today, the scope of the freedom is limited to communications of government or political matters that enable decisions about voting in elections of members of the Commonwealth legislature. Lange sets out a two-step test: 1. Does the law effectively burden freedom of communication about government to political matters either in its terms, operation or effect?!6
7 2. If the law effectively burdens that freedom, is the law reasonably appropriate and adapted to serve a legitimate end in a manner which is compatible with the maintenance of the system of government prescribed by the Constitution. Lange David Lange, the then Prime Minister of New Zealand, was the subject of a report on the ABC current affairs program Four Corners and brought defamation proceedings against the broadcaster; the report alleged that the Labour Party, then in government, had come to be improperly under the influence of large business interests as a result of large donations made to the Party in the lead up to the 1987 election. The Court reformulated and clarified the views it expressed in earlier cases, the freedom of political communication drawn from ss 7, 24, 64 and 128 of the Constitution can validly extend only so far as is necessary to give effect to [the] sections. Cheryl Saunders argues that the text and structure approach of the Lange decision is only superficially limiting: Public issues not currently on the legislative agenda are obviously relevant since the failure to adopt a policy may be just as revealing as a decision to act. Added to these are communications on many matters that are not themselves explicitly political (detention of asylum seekers, same sex marriage, IVF availability, legitimacy of war and torture, etc)...voters understanding of, and attitudes towards, questions like these, and ultimately their vote at a federal election, might depend on their capacity to communicate about religion, moral philosophy, history, medical science and sociology, at least as much as they depend on explicitly political communication.!7
8 Open justice The principle of open justice The principle of open justice is a fundamental tenet of the common law: unless strictly necessary, court proceedings must be conducted in open court. The principle of open justice is so critical for media lawyers because most of the public are unable to personally attend court. The public therefore rely on the media to provide them with reports of what has taken place in court. While some take the view that journalists are an indispensable part of open justice (see Lord Denning in The Road to Justice below) others debate whether the media only focus on what are regarded as newsworthy cases. Road to Justice, Lord Denning A newspaper reporter is in every court. He sits through the dullest cases in the Court of Appeal and the most trivial cases before the magistrates. He says nothing but writes a lot. He notes all that goes on and makes a fair and accurate report of it. He supplies it for use either in the national press or in the local press according to the public interest it commands. He is, I verily believe, the watchdog of justice. If he is to do his work properly and effectively we must hold fast to the principle that every case must be heard and determined in open court. It must not take place behind locked doors. Every member of the public must be entitled to report in the public press all that he has seen and heard. The reason for this rule is the very salutary influence which publicity has for those who work in the light of it. The judge will be careful to see that the trial is fairly and properly conducted if he realises that any unfairness or impropriety on his part will be noted by those in court and may be reported in the press. He will be more anxious to give a correct decision if he knows that his reasons must justify themselves at the bar of public opinion. Corollaries of the principle Butler and Rodrick identify a number of important corollaries of the principle of open justice: 1. No member of the court may seek anonymity (Felixstowe Justices ex parte Leigh); Felixstowe The role of the journalist and his importance for the public interest in the administration of justice has been commented upon on many occasions. No one nowadays surely can doubt that his presence in court for the purpose of reporting proceedings conducted therein is indispensable. Without him, how is the public to be informed of how justice is being administered in our courts? (Watkins LJ) 2. Magistrates and judges must pronounce their decisions in open court, and publish their reasons (Wandin Springs v Wagner; Soulemezis v Dudley);!8
9 Soulemezis courts are under a general duty to provide reasons; this obligation is an incident of the judicial process and essential for facilitating an effective right of appeal; however, the content of this duty is unclear and varies with the circumstances of the case, the complexity of the issues and the availability of appeal rights. 3. Evidence communicated to the court is communicated publicly (Attorney-General v Leveller Magazine); AG v Leveller appellants were magazine publishers and journalists who published the name of a witness, a member of the security services, despite the fact an order had been made for his name not to be disclosed. Court held that Scott v Scott (see below) is the general rule, but since the purpose of the general rule is to serve the ends of justice it may be necessary to depart from it where the nature or circumstances of the particular proceedings are such that the [general rule] would frustrate or render impracticable the administration of justice. Concluded that the witness had provided evidence that could lead to his identity being discovered; thus the conviction for contempt of court was overturned. 4. What passes in court an be reported at large to the public by those who choose to attend (Raybos v Jones). Relevant case law Scott v Scott is regarded as the leading modern authority on the principle of open justice. Scott v Scott Mrs Scott applied to have her marriage to Mr Scott annulled on the basis of Mr Scott impotence; the proceedings were conducted in camera and the decree pronounced; later, Mrs Scott instructed her solicitor to obtain a copy of the transcript and sent it to members of Mr Scott s family; Mr Scott applied to have his ex-wife punished for contempt of court. House of Lords held that the open justice principle may only be derogated from where necessary, not merely where convenient. The applicant seeking the proceedings be closed must show that by nothing short of exclusion of the public can justice be done. Matters of mere delicacy are insufficient to warrant a derogation of the open justice principle. The only instance where proceedings ought to be closed is where the administration of justice would be rendered impracticable (i.e., only where absolutely necessary). Scott v Scott was first endorsed by the High Court in Dickason v Dickason in 1913, and is routinely reaffirmed. Russell v Russell It is the ordinary rule [that] proceedings shall be conduced publicly and in open view (Scott v Scott) The public administration of justice tends to maintain confidence in the integrity and independence of the courts It distinguishes [Court s] activities from the of administrative officials for publicity is the authentic hall-mark of judicial as distinct from administrative procedure (Gibbs J). Hogan v Hinch Derryn Hinch was charged with breaching suppression orders by naming convicted sex offenders on air. French CJ noted: An essential characteristic of courts is that they sit in public. That principle is a mean to an end, and not an end in itself. Its rationale is the benefit that flows from subjective court proceedings to public and professional scrutiny. It is also critical to the maintenance of public confidence in the courts. However, French CJ went on to state that the principle of open justice is not absolute: the application of the open justice principle may be limited in the exercise of a superior court s inherent jurisdiction or an inferior court s implied powers. This may be done where it is necessary to secure the proper administration of justice.!9
10 Rationales and purposes of open justice 1. Open justice is said to aid the administration of justice. It acts as a bastion against the arbitrary exercise of power by judges, and serves to ensure high judicial performance. Publicity is the very soul of justice. It is the keenest spur to exertion and the surest of all guards against improbity. It keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial. It is to publicity, more than anything else put together, that the English system of procedure owes its being the least bad system as yet extant, instead of being the worst (Bentham). 2. Open justice acts as a check on the veracity of witnesses. Witnesses are more likely to tell the truth if they have to testify in public. 3. Open justice benefits litigants. While some litigants seek to resolve matters privately, many seek public vindication for the wrong that they have suffered. Public trials ensure that litigants get to have their day in court. 4. Open justice also benefits the public at large. When proceedings are conducted in public, it helps to educate the communication about what the law is, what conduct is unacceptable, and what legal precedents are establish that bind all of society. Role of the media As noted above, in the modern world, court processes are only truly open if they are able to be published by the media. This is because many people cannot attend court hearings for themselves. However, despite their pivotal role, the media have no greater common law right to attend and report court proceedings than any other member of the public. Some accomodations have been made (such as relaxing the restrictions on audio recordings, and special seating) but in terms of substantive right, the media are in the same position as the common man. Achieving the Aims of Open Justice, Sharon Rodrick Rodrick argues that there are three functions of or rationales for open justice: (1) oversight of the courts to ensure judges perform to an acceptable standard; (2) education of expected community standards, and improved confidence of the courts system; and (3) a free speech function. Rodrick argues that the media can act as vehicles through which the court achieves the functions of the principle of open justice. However, in many cases, the media fails in this idealised role. Nevertheless, the media remains the most significant bridge between the public and the courts. Accordingly, the courts seek to build a constructive relationship with the media by: engaging with the media (by writing op-eds); by responding to criticism directly (rather than relying on the AG s traditional duty to defend the courts); producing brief summaries of decisions so that the crux of a decision may be easily digested. Rodrick recommends that courts should take an active role in engaging more with the public directly (and bypassing the media), noting that the internet and social media create platforms to facilitate such communication.!10
11 Constitutional basis of open justice principle Unlike some countries, Australia does not have a Bill of Rights with an express protection of freedom of expression or freedom to a fair and public trial. However, two sources of constitutional rights relating to these matters can be identified: 1. It may be argued that the structure of ch III of the Constitution implies that all state and federal courts must be open to the public. In Russell v Russell, the High Court held that Parliament could not validly require state courts to sit in camera (closed) invariably, as to do so would be to alter the nature of the court. However it was also stated that parliaments could require certain cases to be invariably held in camera, and that this would not be inconsistent with the courts essential characteristics. 2. A second approach relies on the implied freedom of political communication. Several cases have dealt with the issue of whether communication about courts and their judgments constitutes government or political communication, and judges remain divided over whether the communication must have some link with acts or omissions of the legislature or executive government. Three rules of open justice The overarching principle of open justice gives rise to a number of substantive open justice rules. 1. Judicial proceedings are conducted, and decisions pronounced, in open court; 2. Evidence is communicated publicly to those present in the court; and 3. Nothing should be done to discourage the making of fair and accurate reports of judicial proceedings, including by the media. 4. [Bosland and Gill advocate for a fourth rule of open justice the public reasons rule which provides:] Courts must give public reasons for all but minor interlocutory decisions (stemming from the decisions in Soulemezis, Ives v WA [No 2], Idoport v NAB and Mifsud v Campbell). Common law exceptions to open justice The substantive rules stemming from the principle of open justice are not absolute (Fairfax v Local Court). Bosland and Gill state that in circumstances where it is necessary to avoid prejudice to the administration of justice, in particular proceeding or to avoid some other relevant harm court can derogate from the open justice rules. John Fairfax Group v Local Court issue arose as to whether the Magistrate had the power to make a pseudonym order. Kirby P noted that the normal rule is that justice is administered in open court, but that there are limited, strictly confined derogations from the principle of open justice either permitted by the common law or by statute.!11
Media Law Semester MEDIA LAW
MEDIA LAW Semester 1, 2016 1 Table of Contents Media, law and their Relationship. 3 Free Speech... 6 Offensive Speech and Sedition..... 13 Media Ownership. 23 Open Justice,.. 26 Suppression Orders... 28
More informationTHEOPHANOUS v HERALD & WEEKLY TIMES LTD* STEPHENS v WEST AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS LTD*
THEOPHANOUS v HERALD & WEEKLY TIMES LTD* STEPHENS v WEST AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS LTD* Introduction On 12 October 1994 the High Court handed down its judgments in the cases of Theophanous v Herald & Weekly
More informationTOPIC 1 PART 1: The Media and Open Justice
TOPIC 1 PART 1: The Media and Open Justice A. THE PRINCIPLE OF OPEN JUSTICE The constitutional significance of the principle of open justice was first recognised by Lord Shaw in Scott v Scott (1913). It
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS (JERSEY) LAW 2000
HUMAN RIGHTS (JERSEY) LAW 2000 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2007 This is a revised edition of the law Human Rights (Jersey) Law 2000 Arrangement HUMAN RIGHTS (JERSEY) LAW 2000 Arrangement
More informationELECTORAL REGULATION RESEARCH NETWORK/DEMOCRATIC AUDIT OF AUSTRALIA JOINT WORKING PAPER SERIES
ELECTORAL REGULATION RESEARCH NETWORK/DEMOCRATIC AUDIT OF AUSTRALIA JOINT WORKING PAPER SERIES HIGH COURT CHALLENGES AND THE LIMITS OF POLITICAL FINANCE LAW Professor George Williams (Anthony Mason Professor,
More informationPART 2: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Criminal Justice System
PART 2: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Chapter 2: The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Criminal Justice System Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The European Convention on Human Rights the essential background
More informationROBERTS & ANOR v BASS
Case notes 257 ROBERTS & ANOR v BASS In Roberts v Bass' the High Court considered the balance between freedom of expression in political and governmental matters, and defamatory publication during an election
More informationEuropean Convention on Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 Council of Europe Treaty Series, No. 5 Note on the text The text of the Convention is presented as amended by the provisions of
More informationINTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Article 19 Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and
More informationSpeaking Out in Public
Have Your Say Speaking Out in Public Last updated: 2008 These Fact Sheets are a guide only and are no substitute for legal advice. To request free initial legal advice on an environmental or planning law
More informationUNAUTHORISED USE OF YOUR IMAGE
INFORMATION SHEET UNAUTHORISED USE OF YOUR IMAGE Introduction What can you do to stop someone using your image in a photograph, film or video without your permission? With the introduction of new technologies
More informationCONTEMPT OF COURT ACT
LAWS OF KENYA CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT NO. 46 OF 2016 Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org Contempt of Court No. 46 of 2016 Section
More informationMemorandum by. ARTICLE 19 International Centre Against Censorship. Algeria s proposed Organic Law on Information
Memorandum by ARTICLE 19 International Centre Against Censorship on Algeria s proposed Organic Law on Information London, June 1998 Introduction The following comments are an analysis by ARTICLE 19, the
More informationCourt Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 No 106
New South Wales Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 No 106 Contents Part 1 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Definitions 2 4 Inherent jurisdiction and powers of courts
More informationHouse Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs
Australian Broadcasting Corporation submission to the House Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs and to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee on their respective inquiries
More informationChapter 12 Some other key rights: freedom of thought, conscience, religion, opinion, expression, association and assembly
in cooperation with the Chapter 12 Some other key rights: freedom of thought, conscience, religion, opinion, expression, association and assembly Facilitator s Guide Learning objectives To familiarize
More informationHigh Court of Australia
[Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback] High Court of Australia You are here: AustLII >> Databases >> High Court of Australia >> 1997 >> [1997] HCA 25 [Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent
More informationKENYA - THE CONSTITUTION
KENYA - THE CONSTITUTION Article 70 Whereas every person in Kenya is entitled to the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual, that is to say, the right, whatever his race, tribe, place of origin
More informationChairman s Ruling on Applications by certain persons to withhold their names from a list of core participants
Chairman s Ruling on Applications by certain persons to withhold their names from a list of core participants 1. Some time ago I stated that it was my intention to publish on the Inquiry s website the
More informationIntroduction. Australian Constitution. Federalism. Separation of Powers
Introduction Australian Constitution Commonwealth of Australia was formed on 1st January 1901 by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Imp) Our system is a hybrid model between: United Kingdom
More informationIn Unions New South Wales v New South Wales,1 the High Court of Australia
Samantha Graham * UNIONS NEW SOUTH WALES v NEW SOUTH WALES (2013) 304 ALR 266 I Introduction In Unions New South Wales v New South Wales,1 the High Court of Australia considered the constitutional validity
More informationHUDOC: List of Keywords Article by Article
The legal issues dealt with in each case are summarized in a list of Keywords, chosen from a thesaurus of terms taken (in most cases) directly from the text of the European Convention on Human Rights and
More informationTopic 10: Implied Political Freedoms
Topic 10: Implied Political Freedoms Implied Freedom of Political Communication P will challenge the validity of (section/act) on the grounds that it breaches the implied freedom of political communication
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 76682/01 by P4 RADIO HELE NORGE
More informationCourt Security Act 2005 No 1
New South Wales Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 5 Operation of Act and effect on other powers 5 Entry and use of court premises
More informationCommon law reasoning and institutions
Common law reasoning and institutions England and Wales Common law reasoning and institutions I. The English legal system and the common law tradition II. Courts, tribunals and other decision-making bodies
More informationHuman Rights Bill No., A Bill for an Act to respect, protect and promote human rights
2009-2010 The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Presented and read a first time Human Rights Bill 2009 No., 2009 A Bill for an Act to respect, protect and promote human
More informationAustralian Constitutional Law
Australian Constitutional Law Contents What is in the exam?... Error! Bookmark not defined. Interpretation of the Constitution... Error! Bookmark not defined. Characterisation of the law... 3 Subject matter
More informationCriminal Organisation Control Legislation and Cases
Criminal Organisation Control Legislation and Cases 2008-2013 Contents Background...2 Suggested Reading...2 Legislation and Case law By Year...3 Legislation and Case Law By State...4 Amendments to Crime
More informationVOLKSTAAT COUNCIL THE NATURE AND APPLICATION OF A BILL OF RIGHTS
VOLKSTAAT COUNCIL THE NATURE AND APPLICATION OF A BILL OF RIGHTS 1) A bill of fundamental rights must provide for the diversity of rights arising within a multinational society. 2) Within the multi-national
More informationABA Formal Op. 334 Page 1 ABA Comm. on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Formal Op American Bar Association
ABA Formal Op. 334 Page 1 American Bar Association LEGAL SERVICES OFFICES: PUBLICITY; RESTRICTIONS ON LAWYERS' ACTIVITIES AS THEY AFFECT INDEPENDENCE OF PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT; CLIENT CONFIDENCES AND SECRETS.
More informationTAJJOUR V NEW SOUTH WALES, FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, AND THE HIGH COURT S UNEVEN EMBRACE OF PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW
TAJJOUR V NEW SOUTH WALES, FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, AND THE HIGH COURT S UNEVEN EMBRACE OF PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW DR MURRAY WESSON * I INTRODUCTION In Tajjour v New South Wales, 1 the High Court considered
More informationCROWN LAW MEDIA PROTOCOL FOR PROSECUTORS
CROWN LAW MEDIA PROTOCOL FOR As at 1 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose... 1 Principles... 1 Other Matters Likely to Affect Interaction with Media... 2 Guidance... 3 Comment prior to charge... 3 Comment
More informationTHE APPLICATION OF THE IMPLIED FREEDOM OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION TO STATE ELECTORAL FUNDING LAWS I INTRODUCTION
2012 The Application of Implied Freedom of Political Communication 625 THE APPLICATION OF THE IMPLIED FREEDOM OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION TO STATE ELECTORAL FUNDING LAWS ANNE TWOMEY I INTRODUCTION Recent
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS
DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS Dr.V.Ramaraj * Introduction International human rights instruments are treaties and other international documents relevant to international human rights
More informationDEFAMATION. 5. A statement is not defamatory unless it has caused or is likely to cause serious financial loss to a person (s.1 of the 2013 Act).
Legal Topic Note LTN 30 February 2014 DEFAMATION 1. A defamatory statement is one which tends to lower a person in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally or to cause him to be shunned
More informationFREEDOM OF EXPRESSION UNDER FIRE BRIEFING TO THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT ON THE NEW MEDIA LEGISLATION
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION UNDER FIRE BRIEFING TO THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT ON THE NEW MEDIA LEGISLATION Amnesty International Publications First published in March 2011 by Amnesty International Publications
More informationSOUTH AFRICAN BILL OF RIGHTS CHAPTER 2 OF CONSTITUTION OF RSA NO SOUTH AFRICAN BILL OF RIGHTS
7. Rights SOUTH AFRICAN BILL OF RIGHTS 1. This Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa. It enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of human
More informationDEFAMATION LAW FOR MATERIAL PUBLISHED BEFORE 1 JANUARY 2006
INFORMATION SHEET DEFAMATION LAW FOR MATERIAL PUBLISHED BEFORE 1 JANUARY 2006 NOTE: This information sheet applies to publications published prior to 1 January 2006. Please refer to our Information Sheet
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: FILE NO: DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: DELIVERED ON: DELIVERED AT: HEARING DATE: JUDGE: ORDER: CATCHWORDS: Old Newspapers P/L v Acting Magistrate
More informationKEYNOTE ADDRESS: FAKE NEWS, WEAPONIZED DEFAMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
KEYNOTE ADDRESS: FAKE NEWS, WEAPONIZED DEFAMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT Erwin Chemerinsky The issue of false speech has been part of the United States since early American history. In 1798, Congress
More informationUNIFORM NATIONAL DEFAMATION LAW by Tom Blackburn SC
UNIFORM NATIONAL DEFAMATION LAW by Tom Blackburn SC Tom Blackburn 2006 1. The law of defamation is not a subject with respect to which the Australian Federal Parliament is given express power to legislate.
More informationThe Code of Conduct for the Mass Media and Journalists on the Manner of Reporting About Elections Regulation Number 6/2010
The Code of Conduct for the Mass Media and Journalists on the Manner of Reporting About Elections Regulation Number 6/2010 Whereas the need to ensure the upcoming elections is credible, transparent, free,
More informationCHAPTER 2 BILL OF RIGHTS
7. Rights CHAPTER 2 BILL OF RIGHTS (1) This Bill of Rights is a cornerstone of democracy in South Africa. It enshrines the rights of all people in our country and affirms the democratic values of human
More informationAFRICAN DECLARATION. on Internet Rights and Freedoms. africaninternetrights.org
AFRICAN DECLARATION on Internet Rights and Freedoms africaninternetrights.org PREAMBLE Emphasising that the Internet is an enabling space and resource for the realisation of all human rights, including
More informationLAWS1205 Australian Public Law 1 st Semester 2011
LAWS1205 Australian Public Law 1 st Semester 2011 How to Use this Script: These sample exam answers are based on problems done in past years. Since these answers were written, the law has changed and the
More informationChapter Two. Flights of Fancy: The Implied Freedom of Political Communication 20 Years On. Michael Sexton
Chapter Two Flights of Fancy: The Implied Freedom of Political Communication 20 Years On Michael Sexton The implied freedom of political communication is something of a case study for the discovery and
More informationEuropean Convention on Human Rights
European Convention on Human Rights European Convention on Human Rights as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13 The text of the Convention is presented
More informationGUIDE TO THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT
GUIDE TO THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT The Parliament of New Zealand is based on the Westminster model. It has a constitutional monarch, a sovereign Parliament and the fundamental business of government is
More informationAMENDMENT OF STATE CONSTITUTIONS - MANNER AND FORM
LAWS5007 Public Law Introduction to public law AMENDMENT OF STATE CONSTITUTIONS - MANNER AND FORM Issue: can a provision be amended only by abiding by manner and form provisions? State legislation/constitutions
More informationDeclaration on Media Freedom in the Arab World
Declaration on Media Freedom in the Arab World Preamble Reaffirming that freedom of expression, which includes media freedom, is a fundamental human right which finds protection in international and regional
More informationDEMOCRATIC RIGHTS 1. What is Guantanamo known for? 2. What was the basic reason for the ethnic massacre in Kosovo?
DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS 1. What is Guantanamo known for? i) It is known for prison there and the violation of human rights. About 600 people were secretly picked up by the US forces from all over the world and
More informationThe Independence of the Judiciary: The Need for Judicial Independence in a Future Democratic Burma
L E G A L I S S U E S O N B U R M A J O U R N A L R ULE OF LAW IN BURMA The Independence of the Judiciary: The Need for Judicial Independence in a Future Democratic Burma The recognition of judicial independence
More informationSubmission to the Joint Committee on the draft Investigatory Powers Bill
21 December 2015 Submission to the Joint Committee on the draft Investigatory Powers Bill 1. The UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
More informationPRESS FREEDOM IN AFRICA How can States achieve compliance with standards set by the African courts and African Union, online and offline
PRESS FREEDOM IN AFRICA How can States achieve compliance with standards set by the African courts and African Union, online and offline 4 November 2016, Columbia Law School, New York Handout on key treaty
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct The North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct is hereby amended to read as follows: Preamble
More informationSupreme Court New South Wales
Supreme Court New South Wales Case Name: Munsie v Dowling (No. 7) Medium Neutral Citation: Munsie v Dowling (No. 7) [2015] NSWSC 1832 Hearing Date(s): 30 November 2015 Date of Orders: 4 December 2015 Date
More information14/02/2014. Legislation Courts and Policing Essential Reading(s) Mills, B.(2011) The Criminal Trial The Federation Press: Melbourne
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING This material has been copied and communicated to you by or on behalf of the University of Western Sydney pursuant to Part VA and VB of the
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW EXAM NOTES
LAW2111 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EXAM NOTES INDEX ISSUE SPOTTING GUIDE... TERRITORIALITY... MANNER AND FORM... COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATIVE POWER AND CHARACTERISATION... EXTERNAL AFFAIRS POWER... CORPORATIONS POWER...
More informationRwanda: Proposed media law fails to safeguard free press
STATEMENT Rwanda: Proposed media law fails to safeguard free press ARTICLE 19 05 Jan 2012 A revised media law promised by the Rwandan government prior to and during its Universal Periodic Review at the
More informationDEFAMATION. Greens Local Councillor Forum
DEFAMATION Greens Local Councillor Forum 1. What is defamation? Defamation is a good old common law tort that, to a large extent in NSW, has been codified in the Defamation Act 1974. A statement is defamatory
More informationRunning head: JRN 339 WEEK 1 ASSIGNMENT 1
Running head: JRN 339 WEEK 1 ASSIGNMENT 1 Freedom of Speech: United States vs. United Kingdom Juliana Ordonez JRN 339 Global Journalism Andrea Dilworth April 23, 2018 JRN 339 WEEK 1 ASSIGNMENT 2 Freedom
More informationStatewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament
Statewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament Introduction The Commission s proposal for a Framework Decision on a European evidence warrant, first introduced in November
More informationThe Fundamentals of Human Rights: A Universal Declaration.
The Fundamentals of Human Rights: A Universal Declaration. 1948 "EVERYONE IS BORN FREE AND EQUAL IN DIGNITY AND RIGHTS." The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 10 December The General Assembly of the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and GRENADA TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD. Mr. P. R. Campbell for the Appellant Mr. S. E. Commissiong for the Respondent
SAINT VINCENT & THE GRENADINES CIVIL APPEAL NO.1 OF 1997 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: ESLEE CARBERRY and GRENADA TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD Appellant Respondent Before: The Hon. Mr. C.M. Dennis Byron Chief
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA169/04
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA169/04 BETWEEN AND TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Appellant ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW ZEALAND Respondent Hearing: 9 September 2004 Coram: McGrath J Hammond J William
More informationGC / MCS 115 CHAPTER 14. Ethical Considerations
GC / MCS 115 CHAPTER 14 Ethical Considerations A Short History of the First Amendment Defining and Refining the First Amendment 6. Free Press vs. Fair Trial Ø Free Press (First Amendment) Ø Fair Trial
More informationTHE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT Provision PART 1 PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose of this Act 1 The purpose of this Act is (a) to facilitate the disclosure and investigation
More informationCCPA Analysis Of Bill C-36 An Act To Combat Terrorism
research analysis solutions CCPA Analysis Of Bill C-36 An Act To Combat Terrorism INTRODUCTION The Canadian government has a responsibility to protect Canadians from actual and potential human rights abuses
More informationInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976
Selected Provisions Article 2 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976 1. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to
More informationThe Danish Courts an Organisation in Development
The Danish Courts an Organisation in Development Introduction The Danish Courts are going through a period of structural upheaval. Currently the Danish judicial system is undergoing sweeping reforms that
More informationCHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT
REFUGEES [CAP. 420. 1 CHAPTER 420 REFUGEES ACT AN ACT to make provisions relating to and establishing procedures with regard to refugees and asylum seekers. ACT XX of 2000. 1st October, 2001 PART I General
More informationIs there a public interest in exposing details of the private lives of celebrities? Richard Spearman QC
Is there a public interest in exposing details of the private lives of celebrities? Richard Spearman QC I think that the answer to this question is that, generally speaking, there is no real or genuine
More informationSubmission to the Independent Media Inquiry
Submission to the Independent Media Inquiry Chris Berg Research Fellow, Institute of Public Affairs October 2011 1 Introduction The Independent Inquiry into Media and Media Regulation raises troubling
More informationMedia Briefing on The Crown in Court (NZLC R 135, 2015) Part 2 National Security Information in Proceedings
Media Briefing on The Crown in Court (NZLC R 135, 2015) Part 2 National Security Information in Proceedings 1. The central policy issue we grapple with in this part of the Report is how to manage proceedings
More informationCONSULTATIVE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN PROSECUTORS (CCPE)
CCPE(2015)3 Strasbourg, 20 November 2015 CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN PROSECUTORS (CCPE) Opinion No.10 (2015) of the Consultative Council of European Prosecutors to the Committee of Ministers of the
More informationCHAPTER 383 HONG KONG BILL OF RIGHTS PART I PRELIMINARY
CHAPTER 383 HONG KONG BILL OF RIGHTS An Ordinance to provide for the incorporation into the law of Hong Kong of provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as applied to Hong
More informationTHE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Effective 1 January 2019 Table of Contents I. General... 1 Rule 1. Courts of Criminal Appeals... 1 Rule 2. Scope of Rules; Title...
More informationAmerican Convention on Human Rights
American Convention on Human Rights O.A.S.Treaty Series No. 36, 1144 U.N.T.S. 123, entered into force July 18, 1978, reprinted in Basic Documents Pertaining to Human Rights in the Inter-American System,
More informationUNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Cambodia 3 4 This publication is produced by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
More informationAn Act to modify the general law relating to the tort of defamation and for other purposes.
Version: 1.9.2013 South Australia Defamation Act 2005 An Act to modify the general law relating to the tort of defamation and for other purposes. Contents Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title 3 Objects of
More informationPolicy statement on Human Rights and the Legal Profession
Policy statement on Human Rights and the Legal Profession Key principles and commitments May 2017 The Policy was first adopted by Directors in June 2016. Key principles and commitments: background and
More informationUnions NSW v New South Wales [2013] HCA 58
SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 29, 6 Unions NSW v New South Wales [2013] HCA 58 Part 6 of the Election Funding, Expenditure and Disclosures Act 1981 (NSW) included the following four regulatory measures (amounts
More informationCommercial Law Outline. 4 th Edition
1 Commercial Law Outline 4 th Edition 2 Commercial Law Notes (Weeks 1-12) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Business and the Law... 4 A. The Nature of law... 4 II. The Australian Legal System... 5 A. Legal Systems...
More informationUniversal Declaration of Human Rights Resolution 217 A (III) Preamble
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was written between January 1947 and December 1948 by an eightmember group from the UN Commission on Human Rights with Eleanor Roosevelt as chairperson. Their
More informationOverview of Human Rights & Henkel s Framework for Responsible Business Practices
ILO Fundamental Principles & Rights at Work Principle 1: Freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining. Respecting the rights of employees to freedom of association
More informationUS CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE
US CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,
More informationSeminar organized by Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic and ACA-Europe
NEJVYŠŠÍ SPRAVNI SOUD Seminar organized by Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic and ACA-Europe Supreme administrative courts and evolution of the right to publicity, privacy and information.
More informationTopic 1: Freedom of Speech.
Topic 1: Freedom of Speech. Society values free speech as people are free to say what they want. Free speech extends beyond written and spoken word to painting, sketching or cartoon. Free speech also refers
More informationPrivate Investigators Bill 2005
Private Investigators Bill 2005 A Draft Bill Setting Out The Regulatory Requirements For The Private Investigation Profession in Australia This draft Bill has been researched and prepared by the Australian
More informationJUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES. Judge Howard Riddle, Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate) In the Westminster Magistrates Court.
JUDICIARY OF ENGLAND AND WALES Judge Howard Riddle, Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate) In the Westminster Magistrates Court The Queen v E7 Wednesday 10 th September 2014 This defendant, known as
More informationTIPS ON RUNNING CIVIL MATTERS IN THE LOCAL COURT. 1. Overview of the Local Court Civil Jurisdiction
1 1. Overview of the Local Court Civil Jurisdiction Jurisdiction The Local Court s jurisdiction arises from s 9 Local Court Act 2007 NSW ( LCA ). Because the Local Court exists by virtue of a statute and
More informationRULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Financial Services Tribunal Tribunal des services financiers RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL Ce document est également disponible en français TABLE
More informationIt now has over 200 countries in the General Assembly which is like a world parliament.
Fact Sheet United Nations The United Nations was established in 1945. It now has over 200 countries in the General Assembly which is like a world parliament. In 1948 the General Assembly of the UN proclaimed
More informationFreedom from harm, freedom of speech
Freedom from harm, freedom of speech Implementing No Platform policies This briefing explains these policies and details legal advice on their use in students unions Introduction Most students unions want
More informationC-451 Workplace Psychological Harassment Prevention Act
Proposed Canadian National Law C-451 Workplace Psychological Harassment Prevention Act Second Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, 51-52 Elizabeth II, 2002-2003 An Act to prevent psychological harassment
More informationAPRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY
APRIL 2017 RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT & VIOLENCE POLICY The Royal Canadian Golf Association, operating as ( ), is committed to providing a sport and work environment that
More informationNo Platform Policies. A guide for students unions
No Platform Policies A guide for students unions Introduction Most students unions want to promote a safe environment for students, where students can be free to go about their lives free from racism and
More informationAlbanian draft Law on Freedom of the Press
The Representative on Freedom of the M edia Statement on Albanian draft Law on Freedom of the Press by ARTICLE 19 The Global Campaign For Free Expression January 2004 Introduction ARTICLE 19 understands
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More information