References. Downloaded from Elgar Online at 08/19/ :58:16AM via free access

Transcription

1 References Andersen, Scott and Christian Lau (2001), Hedging Hopes with Fears in China s Accession to the World Trade Organization: The Transitional Special Product Safeguard for Chinese Exports, Geneva: Powell, Goldstein, Frazer and Murphy. Avi-Yonah, R. and J. Slemrod (2002), (How) should trade agreements deal with income tax issues?, ITPF/Brookings Conference on Tax Systems and International Trade, 9 December. Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (1990), A theory of managed trade, American Economic Review, 80: Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (1995), Protection and the business cycle, NBER Discussion Paper Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (2005), Enforcement, private political pressures and the GATT/WTO escape clause, Journal of Legal Studies, 34: Baldwin, Robert and Michael O. Moore (1991), Political aspects of the administration of the trade remedy laws, in Richard Boltuck and Robert E. Litan (eds), Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, pp Bhagwati, Jagdish and V.K. Ramaswami (1963), Domestic distortions, tariffs, and the theory of optimum subsidy, Journal of Political Economy, 71: Bhagwati, Jagdish and Petros C. Mavroidis (2004), Killing the Byrd Amendment with the right stone, World Trade Review, 3: 1 9. Bloningen, Bruce A. (2000), US antidumping filings and the threat of retaliation, manuscript. Bloningen, Bruce (2001), Database on U.S. antidumping cases [www. uoregon.edu]. Bloningen, B. and T.J. Prusa (2003), Antidumping, in E. Kwan and James Harrigan (eds), Handbook of International Trade, Oxford: Blackwell. Boltuck, R. (1991), Assessing the effects on the domestic industry of price dumping, in P.K.M. Tharakan (ed.), Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures, Amsterdam: North Holland. Bourgeois, J. and P.A. Messerlin (1998), The European Community s experience, in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum 1998, Washington, Petros C. Mavroidis, DC: The Patrick Brookings A. Messerlin Institution, and Jasper pp. M Wauters

2 580 References Bown, Chad P. (2005) Global antidumping database, World Bank Policy Research Paper No 3737, see Bown, Chad P. and Meredith A. Crowley (2006), Policy externalities: How US antidumping affects Japanese exports to the EU, European Journal of Political Economy, 22(3): Clarida, Richard H. (1996), Dumping in theory, in policy, and in practice, in Jagdish Bhagwati and Robert Hudec (eds), Fair Trade and Harmonization, Cambridge: The MIT Press. Congressional Budget Office (1998), Antidumping Action in the U.S. and Around the World: An Analysis of International Data, Washington: Congressional Budget Office. Crandall, Robert W. (1993), The economic effect of antidumping policies on international trade in steel, mimeo, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Croley, Steve and John H. Jackson (1996) WTO dispute procedures, standard of review, and deference to national governance, American Journal of International Law, 90: D Andrea Tyson, Laura (1992), Who s Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Deardorff, Alan (1987), Safeguards policy and the conservative social welfare function, in Henryk Kierzkowski, Protection and Competition in International Trade: Essays in Honor of W.M. Corden, Oxford: Blackwell. Deardorff, Alan (1989), Economic perspectives on antidumping law, in J. Jackson and E. Vermulst (eds), Antidumping Law and Practice: A Comparative Study, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. De Vault, James M. (1993), The impact of the U.S. Unfair Trade Laws: a preliminary assessment, Weltwirschaftliches Archiv, 129(4): Esserman, Susan and Robert Howse (2004), Trade disputes require fairer arbitration, The Financial Times, 12 September (accessible at Finger, J. Michael (ed.) (1993), Antidumping: How it Works and Who Gets Hurt, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Finger, J. Michael (1998), GATT experience with safeguards: making economic and political sense of the possibilities that the GATT allows to restrict imports, Working Paper, The World Bank. Finger, Michael J. and Julio J. Nogues (2006), Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin American Trading Liberalization: Fighting Fire with Fire, Washington, DC: World Bank. Francois, J.F., and K.H. Hall (1993), COMPAS: Commercial Policy Analysis Petros System, C. Mavroidis, Washington, Patrick DC: A. International Messerlin and Jasper Trade M. Commission. Wauters

3 References 581 Gallaway, Michael P., Bruce A. Bloningen, and Joseph E. Flynn (1999), Welfare costs of US antidumping and countervailing duty laws, Journal of International Economics, 49: GATT Secretariat (1994), The results of the Uruguay Round Multilateral Trade Negotiations, World Trade Organization [ en/doc/c16.pdf#c16.1]. Greene, William H. (1993), Econometric Analysis, New York: Macmillan, 2nd edn. Grossman, Gene M. (1986), Imports as a cause of injury: the case of the US steel industry, Journal of Industrial Economics, 20: Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman (2001), Special Interest Politics, Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press. Grossman, Gene M. and Petros C. Mavroidis (2003), Would ve or should ve? Impaired benefits due to copyright infringement, in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The Case Law of 2001: The ALI Reporters Studies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp Grossman, Gene M. and Petros C. Mavroidis (2004), Not for attribution: United States definitive safeguard measures on imports of circular welded carbon quality line pipe from Korea (WTO Doc. WT/DS212/AB/R), in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The WTO Case-Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters Studies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp Grossman, Gene M. and Petros C. Mavroidis (2005), Recurring misunderstanding of non-recurring subsidies, in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The WTO Case-Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters Studies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp Gupta, Poonam and Arvind Panagariya (2006), Injury investigations in antidumping and the super-additivity effect: a theoretical explanation, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, 142: Hansen, Wendy L. and Thomas J. Prusa. (1996), Cumulation and ITC decision making: the sum of the parts is greater than the whole, Economic Inquiry, 34: Hindley, Brian and Patrick A. Messerlin (1996), Antidumping industrial policy: legalized protectionism in the WTO and what to do about it, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC: The AEI Press. Hoekman, Bernard M. and Petros C. Mavroidis (1996), Dumping, antidumping and antitrust, Journal of World Trade, 30: Hoekman, Bernard M. and Michel Kostecki (2001), The Political Economy of the World Trading System, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Horlick, Gary and Peggy Clark (1994), The 1994 WTO Subsidies Agreement, Petros C. Mavroidis, World Patrick Competition, A. Messerlin 17: and Jasper M. Wauters

4 582 References Horn, Henrik and Petros C. Mavroidis (2003), US Lamb, in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The WTO Case-Law of 2001: The American Law Institute Reporters Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp Horn, Henrik and Petros C. Mavroidis (2005a), A comment on US Offset Act (Byrd Amendment), in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The WTO Case Law of 2003, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Horn, Henrik and Petros C. Mavroidis (2005b), What is a subsidy?, in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp Horn, Henrik and Petros C. Mavroidis (2006), WTO dispute settlement database, available at Hovenkamp, Herbert (2005), Federal Antitrust Policy (St Paul, Minn: Thomson, West. Howse, Robert and Robert W. Staiger (2006), United States Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (original complaint by the European Communities) recourse to arbitration by the United States under 22.6 of the DSU, WT/DS136/ ARB, 24 February 2004: A legal and economic analysis, World Trade Review, 4(2): Irwin, Douglas (1998), The semiconductor industry, in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum 1998, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Irwin, Douglas (2002), Reciprocity and the origins of US trade liberalization, in Jagdish Bhagwati (ed.), Going Alone: The Case for Relaxed Reciprocity in Freeing Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Irwin, Douglas, A. (2003), Causing problems? The WTO review of causation and injury attribution in US. Section 201 cases, World Trade Review, 2: Janow, Merit and Robert W. Staiger (2003), Canada-measures affecting the importation of dairy products and the exportation of milk, in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis, The WTO Case-Law of 2001: The American Law Institute Reporters Studies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp Kelly, Kenneth (1988), The analysis of causality in escape clause cases, Journal of Industrial Economics, 37: Kelly, Kenneth A. and Morris E. Morkre (1998), Do unfairly traded imports injure domestic industries?, Review of International Economics, 6: Knetter, Michael M. and Thomas J. Prusa (2000), Macroeconomic factors and anti-dumping filings: evidence from four countries, NBER, Working Paper Petros No C. Mavroidis, Patrick A. Messerlin and Jasper M. Wauters

5 References 583 Kommerzkollegium (1999), Further Actions within the EU in the Field of Antidumping, Stockholm. Krugman, Paul (1983), Targeted industrial policies: theory and evidence, Industrial Change and Public Policy, Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank, Kansas, Laird, Sam and Patrick A. Messerlin (2003), Trade policy regimes and development strategies: a comparative study, in Robert Devlin and Antoni Estevadeordal (eds), Bridges for Development: Policies and Institutions for Trade and Integration, Washington, DC: InterAmerican Development Bank. Lindsey, Brink (1999), The U.S. Antidumping Law rhetoric versus reality, Cato Institute, Center for Trade Policy Studies, no. 7. Lindsey, Brink and Dan Ikenson (2001), Coming Home to Roost: Proliferating Antidumping Laws and the Growing Threat to U.S. Exports, Washington, DC: Cato Institute. Mattoo, Aaditya and Petros C. Mavroidis (1995), The EEC/Japan consensus on cars: interaction between trade and competition policies, World Economy, 18: Mavroidis, Petros C. (1993), Government Procurement Agreement; the Trondheim case: the remedies issue, Aussenwirtschaft, 48: Messerlin, Patrick A. (1989), The EC antidumping regulations: a first economic appraisal, , Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Septembre. Messerlin, Patrick A. (1990), Antidumping regulations or pro-cartel laws? The EC chemical cases, World Economy, 13: Messerlin, Patrick A. (1990), Antidumping regulations or pro-cartel laws? The EC chemical cases, The World Economy, 13(4): Messerlin, Patrick A. (1995), Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures, Background papers on the Uruguay Round, OCDE, Paris. Messerlin, Patrick A. (1996), Competition policy and antidumping reform, in J.J. Schott (ed.), The World Trading System: Challenges Ahead, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Messerlin, Patrick A. (2000a), Antidumping and safeguards, in Jeff Schott (ed.), The WTO After Seattle, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Messerlin, Patrick A. (2000b), An economic perspective on antidumping and safeguards, Seminar on Antidumping and Safeguards, Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation, Department of International Trade and Economic Affairs, Beijing. Messerlin, Patrick A. (2001), Measuring the Costs of Protection in the EC: EC Commercial Policy in the 2000s, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Messerlin, Patrick A. (2004), Antidumping and safeguard, in D. Bhattasali, S. Petros Li and C. Mavroidis, W. Martin Patrick (eds), A. China Messerlin the and WTO: Jasper M. Accession, Wauters - Policy Reform

6 584 References and Poverty Reduction, Washington, DC: Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank. Messerlin, Patrick A. (2007), The Doha Round: where do we stand, Working Paper, Groupe d Economie Mondiale, Messerlin, Patrick A. and Yoshiyuki Noguchi (1998), Antidumping policies in electronic products, in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum 1998, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Miranda, J., R.A. Torres and M. Ruiz (1998), The international use of antidumping: , Journal of World Trade, 32(5): Morkre, Morris E. and Harold E. Kruth (1989), Determining whether dumped or subsidized imports injure domestic industries: International Trade Commisison Approach, Contemporary Economic Policy, July, 7(3): Morkre, Morris and Kenneth H. Kelly (1994), Effects of Unfair Imports on Domestic Industries, U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Cases, , Washington, DC: Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission. Murray, Tracy and Donald J. Rousslang (1989), A method for estimating injury caused by unfair trade practices, International Review of Law and Economics, 9: Palmeter, N. David (1991), The antidumping law: a legal and administrative nontariff barrier, in Richard Boltuck and Robert E. Litan (eds), Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, pp Palmeter, N. David (1995), US implementation of the Uruguay Round Antidumping Code, Journal of World Trade, 29: Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (1993), International competition rules for the GATT-MTO world trade and legal system, Journal of World Trade, 27: Prusa, T.J. (1992), Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn?, Journal of International Economics, 33: Prusa, Thomas, J. (1997), The trade effects of the US antidumping actions, in Robert C. Feenstra (ed.), The Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp Prusa, T.J. (1998), Cumulation and antidumping: a challenge to competition, The World Economy, 21(8): Prusa, Thomas J. (2001), On the spread and impact of antidumping, Canadian Journal of Economics, 34: Prusa, Thomas J. (2005), Anti-dumping: a growing problem in international trade, The World Economy, 28(5): Prusa, Thomas J. and David Sharp (2001), A simultaneous equations approach to antidumping injury investigations, Journal of Forensic Petros Economics, C. Mavroidis, 14(1): Patrick A. Messerlin and Jasper M. Wauters

7 References 585 Scherer, F.M. (1996), International trade and competition policy, May, mimeo, Harvard University. Shin, Hyun Ja (1998), Possible instances of predatory pricing in recent U.S. antidumping cases, in Lawrence, Robert Z. (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum 1998, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Smith, Alasdair and Antony Venables (1991), Counting the cost of voluntary export restraints in the European market, in E. Helpman and A. Razin (eds), International Trade and Trade Policy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Snape, Richard H. (1987), The importance of frontier barriers, in Henryk Kierzkowski (ed.), Protection and Competition in International Trade: Essays in Honor of W.M. Corden, London: Basil Blackwell, pp Snape, Richard H. (1991), International regulation of subsidies, The World Economy, June, 14(2): Staiger, Robert W. and Frank A. Wolack (1989), Strategic use of antidumping laws to enforce tacit international collusion, NBER Working Paper, No Sykes, Alan (1990), GATT safeguards reform: the injury test, in Michael Trebilcock and R. York, Fair Exchange: Reforming Trade Remedy Laws, Policy Study 11, Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute. Sykes, Alan (1991), Protectionism as a safeguard : a positive analysis of GATT Article XIX with normative speculations, University of Chicago Law Review, Winter. Sykes, Alan O. (2003), The Safeguards mess: a critique of WTO jurisprudence, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 187 (2D series), Chicago: University of Chicago Law School. Tharakan, P.K.M., D. Greenaway and J. Tharakan (1998), Cumulation and injury determination of the European Community in antidumping cases, Weltwirtschaflitches Archiv, 134(2), Trebilcock, Michael and Robert Howse (2006), International Trade Regulation, London: Routledge, 3rd edn. U.S. International Trade Commission (1995), The economic effects of antidumping and countervailing duty orders and suspension agreements, U.S. ITC, June, Publication 2900, Washington, DC. Vandenbussche, Hylke, Jozef Konings, and Linda Springael (1999), Import diversion under European antidumping policy, NBER, Working Paper No Vermulst, Edwin (2000), Contingent protection provisions in China s draft protocol on accession to the WTO, Seminar on Antidumping and Safeguards, Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation, Department of International Trade and Economic Affairs, Beijing. Vermulst, Edwin and Paul Waer (1997), EC Antidumping Law and Practice, London: Petros C. Sweet Mavroidis, & Maxwell. Patrick A. Messerlin and Jasper M. Wauters

8 586 References Viner, Jacob (1923) [Reprint in 1966], Dumping: A Problem in International Trade, New York: A.M. Kelley. Wang, Lei (2003), China s new antidumping regulations: improvement to comply with the WTO rules, East Associates, Beijing [lwang@ealawfirm.com]. Willig, Robert D. (1998), Economic effects of antidumping policy, in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum 1998, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Winters, L.A., M. Rubin and A.R. Bond (1998), Antidumping action on American imports from Russia, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 39(4): WTO (World Trade Organization) (2001), Market access: unfinished business, post-uruguay round inventory and issues, Special Studies, 6, Geneva. Zanardi, Maurizio (2004), Antidumping: what are the numbers to discuss?, The World Economy, Petros C. Mavroidis, Patrick A. Messerlin and Jasper M. Wauters