CRJ 551 DRNC Scenario (for Module 8) 2. Explain supervisory liability under the U.S. Constitution and relevant statutes.
|
|
- Octavia Craig
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CRJ 551 DRNC Scenario (for Module 8) This Scenario is aligned with the following course objectives: 2. Explain supervisory liability under the U.S. Constitution and relevant statutes. 3. Summarize the exclusionary rule s effect on criminal prosecutions and civil liability. 4. Compare police power, authority, and responsibility with limits on police authority. 6. Determine general police authority to detain, including consensual encounters, investigative detention, and stop-and-frisk. 7. Define lawful arrest; determine situations of lawful arrest with and without a warrant. 12. Explain the circumstances under which a search may be conducted without a warrant. Background The following story is a fictional account of an incident related to the mythical Democratic-Republican National Convention (DRNC) event in Miami, Florida. The story is loosely based on an amalgamation of real-life occurrences leading up to the Free Trade Area of the Americas conference in Miami, Florida, in The names of all the characters in the story are fictional. As you read the story, keep in mind what ethical and legal issues are likely to arise. At the end of the story, you will be asked to respond to several questions related to this scenario. Case Study Greenpeace v. Miami-Dade County One month had elapsed since the conclusion of the DRNC event in Miami-Dade County. By most accounts, the event went well. There were only a few reports of vandalism with only minor damage to some storefront businesses in Downtown Miami. The most severe injury associated with the event occurred as the result of an accidental car crash near the entrance to the Port of Miami. The driver of a cargo truck lost control of his rig as he turned onto Port Boulevard and the truck jackknifed. The driver sustained a broken leg as a result. No other serious injuries, accidental or intentional, were reported throughout the week of the event. The Miami-Dade Police reported only 25 event-related arrests during the entire week. By comparison, there were 234 reported arrests during the FTAA event in As expected, there were several citizen complaints filed against the Miami-Dade Police officers during the event. The MDPD Police Legal Bureau had anticipated that complaints and lawsuits would be filed, and they were ready to defend against myriad litigations. This was the pattern that had occurred in all previous events such as this one, starting with the WTO civil disturbances in Seattle in 1999 and continuing with a number of similar special events over the years. Indeed, the filing of civil lawsuits against the police after these events had become part of the protest groups playbook. Just like the police planned for the before, during, and after of these large scale special events, so did the opposition.
2 Political influencer groups such as Root Cause, Amnesty International, and Greenpeace (to name just a few) consider civil litigation after the event to be an important tactic at their disposal. The post-event litigation is viewed as a continuation of a never-ending political struggle against the establishment authorities. One of those civil suits was filed by the ACLU on behalf of the organization Greenpeace. The case was filed as Greenpeace v. Miami-Dade County. Also named in the lawsuit were Major Louis Warren (Incident Commander for the DNRC special event) and Captain Earl Bishop (Commander of Task Force 5). The Circumstances Leading Up to the Case On the fourth day of the DRNC event, there was an AFL-CIO/Teamsters rally that was scheduled to occur at the Amphitheater within the secured Bayfront Park area (refer to the map attachment titled DRNC Area of Operations PowerPoint). The event planners had reluctantly agreed to open the Amphitheater for a one-hour pep rally for up to a thousand participants. Months earlier, police planners, including Major Warren and Captain Bishop had argued against this move because the Amphitheater was located within the fenced-in secure exclusionary zone that had been designated months before. Allowing a crowd of 1,000 participants to enter the middle of the exclusionary zone was thought to be an unnecessarily risky move. Once inside the exclusionary zone, such a large number of protestors could be difficult to control. Their proximity to the main venue at the American Airlines Arena and to the sole entrance into the Port of Miami was also a concern. This was a critical choke point where the slightest disruption by protestors could lead to considerable chaos in the entire area. Another reason why the police planners opposed the idea of allowing a rally at the Amphitheater was that they considered it as being unnecessary. The police planners had already designated a First Amendment Zone directly north of the American Airlines Arena. This First Amendment Zone was ideal in that it was only 300 feet from the AA arena, thus allowing the protestors a nearby area where they had direct line-of-sight to the main venue. In this location the protestors were near enough to see and been seen by the many TV cameras covering the event. The First Amendment Zone was set up in the City s Bicentennial Park, which had adequate restroom facilities and shade. It was an ideal location to stage a protest, while at the same time, it was separated from the AA arena by a deep-water cut-in. This 300 foot separation between the First Amendment Zone and the AA arena provided a safe buffer zone that kept the convention attendees separate and safe from the protestors. Despite the advice of Major Warren and other police planners, the policy makers at the political level decided to press the issue and allow for a one-hour event at the Amphitheater within the exclusionary zone. As a concession, the police planners were at least able to get the policy makers to agree to make this a ticketed event, where only people with the proper tickets and credentials would be allowed to enter. This allowed the police and security guards to make all participants in the rally be subject to a limited search as a condition of entry into the venue. This was a compromise that all parties (including the AFL-CIO and Teamsters) agreed to, but not everyone was in complete agreement with the idea of allowing potential protestors inside the exclusionary zone.
3 On the day of the AFL-CIO/Teamster rally at the Bayfront Park Amphitheater, there were very few incidents of note. Approximately one-thousand ticketed participants passed through entry gates without any problems. Similar to a ticketed sporting event or concert, the people going inside the venue had provided tacit consent to a limited body and package search as a condition of entry. This was an acceptable practice used at football games, concerts, and theme parks such as Disney World and Universal Studios. Despite the mostly uneventful rally, there was one incident which proved problematic, and eventually led to the lawsuit by Greenpeace against Miami-Dade Police. Earlier that day there had been several reports of protestors hanging banners from the Metro-rail station in Overtown. There was another report of a small group of protestors chaining themselves to each other with contraptions called Sleeping Dragons. Arrests were made in both incidents. As the rally at the Amphitheater commenced, there were still about a hundred people standing in line waiting to get in. Security guards at the entry gate called for Miami-Dade Police to respond, as a minor disturbance had broken out. Two males wearing Greenpeace t-shirts were attempting to gain entry into the rally. Both of them had entry tickets on their possession and were wearing school-type backpacks. When the security guards asked them to open the backpacks so that they could inspect the contents inside, the two gentlemen from Greenpeace refused. At that point, the guards advised the two gentlemen that they would not be allowed into the venue unless they agreed to the search. For a few brief moments, the two Greenpeace protestors became irate and argued with the security guards. Meanwhile, the people in line waiting to get into the event were becoming increasingly impatient since the rally had already commenced. After a brief argument, the two Greenpeace protestors decided to walk away as they saw two Miami-Dade Police officers walking toward the entry gate. Moments later, the security guard who had called for the police pointed out the two Greenpeace protestors to the two police officers. The guard stated, officers those two guys who are leaving I think they may have something in their backpacks that they don t want me to see. The two officers followed the two Greenpeace protestors and were able to catch up to them as they walked away at a brisk pace. The officers ordered the two protestors to stop and they did. One officer asked the Greenpeace protestors, What s in the backpack? One of the protestors said, nothing just my personal items. The officer grabbed hold of one of the backpacks and pulled it off the back of the protestor. Without asking permission, the officer opened the backpack and pulled out several items. Inside the bag were two spray paint cans, a can of pepper spray, a cell phone, 20 of rope, a pair of leather gloves, a first-aid kit, a pair of handcuffs, and a pocket knife. The second bag also contained many of the same items, but had a slingshot and ball bearings in it too. Both Greenpeace protestors were placed under arrest for carrying concealed weapons. The items inside both backpacks were impounded as evidence. The arresting officers placed the two Greenpeace protestors into the caged backseat of one of the police cars and transported them to the temporary booking facility nearby. While en-route to the booking
4 facility, the officers raised a Homeland Security Task Force detective on the radio and asked him to meet them there. A protocol had been established whereby all prisoners would be interrogated by Homeland Security investigators prior to being booked into the jail. Upon arrival at the booking facility, the two prisoners were separated into different holding cells. This is a standard procedure for interrogating subjects. The reason for separating the prisoners is to keep them from corroborating their stories, and so that the interrogating detective can try to get them in a contradiction that can later be used against them. The Homeland Security detective interrogated the first prisoner in one room, while the two arresting officers sat in another room with the second subject as they filled out their A-Forms (arrest affidavits) and property reports. At no time were Miranda warnings read to either of the two subjects in custody. Later it was earned that the detective had wrongly assumed that the two arresting officers had read the subjects their Miranda warnings. Since the two officers had not interrogated the subjects, they had not seen any reason for reading the warnings. They had assumed that the interrogating detective would read the Miranda warnings at the appropriate time. Regardless of who was at fault, the Miranda warnings were not read to either subject. During the course of the interrogations, the Homeland Security detective learned from one of the subjects that there were at least two other Greenpeace protestors who were planning on chaining themselves to the outer Amphitheater fence with handcuffs in an attempt to disrupt the event and attract television media coverage. According to the account of one of the arrested protestors, the second pair of protestors was also supposed to be wearing Greenpeace t-shirts and had backpacks filled with handcuffs, slingshots, and pepper spray just like they had. Upon learning of the plan of the other Greenpeace protestors to handcuff themselves to the exterior fence of the Amphitheater, the Homeland Security detective radioed a BOLO (Be On the Look Out) for the two subjects matching the description provided by one of the arrested protestors. Within minutes, other officers in the area spotted the second pair of Greenpeace protestors as they mingled with the large crowd that was gathering outside the Amphitheater as the rally was going on inside. Based on the description and the account provided by one of the arrested protestors, the officers stopped and seized the backpack from the two new protestors. Thinking they had sufficient probable cause, the officers searched the two backpacks and found a number of items such as handcuffs, pepper spray, slingshots, ball bearings, and pocket knives. Based on the information provided by one of the first two arrestees, and the search and seizure of the weapons inside the two new backpacks, the second pair of protestors was arrested and charged with Carrying Concealed Weapons. Post-Arrest A month later, lawyers for the four defendants (the Greenpeace protestors) filed a motion in the County Court, Criminal Misdemeanor Division to suppress the stops and the evidence recovered in the packs.
5 Written Exercise Instructions For this assignment, you are to play the role of the Miami-Dade County Court, Criminal Misdemeanors Division judge who is hearing the motion to suppress on behalf of the four defendants. Your job is to write an opinion finding whether the physical evidence and testimonial evidence is admissible at trial (or not), and to state the law that supports your ruling. Your ruling will be divided in two sections: one for the two protesters who were first arrested, and a second ruling for the second two who were arrested. You are to include in your ruling all of the legal issues you identify. These legal issues have been covered in the course material. You are not required to cite cases by name (you may if you wish), but cite the legal theories that are relevant to resolving the motions to suppress. The minimum length is 1,200 words. You are to double-space the paper and use APA format. You are to include the Saint Leo core value of personal development within the ruling as it pertains to officer conduct. Written exercise grades are weighted as follows (total 80 points): a. Organization of paper: 20 points b. Mechanics and writing process (spelling, grammar, clarity of thought, writing): 20 points c. Correct statements of the law: 20 points d. Core value integration: 20 points Resources (click the links below) DRNC Area of Operations PowerPoint (PDF file) Related scenario from CRJ-550
Know Your. Help End Discriminatory, Abusive & Illegal Policing!
Know Your Rights! Help End Discriminatory, Abusive & Illegal Policing! ChangeTheNYPD.org @changethenypd facebook.com/changethenypd For updates via mobile text, text justice to 877877 This brochure describes
More informationVictoria Police Manual
General Category Operations Topic Searches Victoria Police Manual VPM Instruction 105-1 Searches of persons Originally Issued 11/07/03 Last Updated 08/01/07 Update History 1. Policy Police members have
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ROBERT B. SYKES (#3180 bob@sykesinjurylaw.com ALYSON E. CARTER (#9886 alyson@sykesinjurylaw.com ROBERT B. SYKES & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 311 South State Street, Suite 240 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone
More informationJudicial Decision-Making and the Constitution
Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution Florida v. J.L. Overview: The goal of this activity is to understand how judges make decisions through the interpretation and application of law. In this lesson,
More informationORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to define legal implications and procedures involved when a search is performed.
Page 1 of 5 YALE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Integrity, Trust, Commitment and Courage Since 1894 ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW 312 EFFECTIVE DATE: REVIEW DATE: 19 MAR 2012 ANNUAL
More informationArrest, Search, and Seizure
Criminal Law for Paralegals: Chapter 2 Introduction Tab Text Chapter 2 Arrest, Search, and Seizure Introduction This chapter addresses arrests, searches, and seizures. Both arrests and search warrants
More informationPeople v. Ross, No st District, October 17, 2000
People v. Ross, No. 1-99-3339 1st District, October 17, 2000 SECOND DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EARL ROSS, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Circuit Court of
More informationSouth Florida Seaports Internal Conspiracy Project
97-70 South Florida Seaports Internal Conspiracy Project 1. Abstract: South Florida has long been recognized as a major entry point for narcotics, specifically cocaine and marijuana arriving from South
More informationHONORABLE JOSEPH ANTHONY GROSSO ACTING JUSTICE. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Ind. No. N10344/03
SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM PART K-12 QUEENS COUNTY 125-01 QUEENS BOULEVARD KEW GARDENS, NY 11415 P R E S E N T : HONORABLE JOSEPH ANTHONY GROSSO ACTING JUSTICE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE
More informationTHE MULTI-FACETED ROLE OF MIAMI-DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CARLOS ALVAREZ
1 THE MULTI-FACETED ROLE OF MIAMI-DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CARLOS ALVAREZ Miami-Dade County covers more than one thousand square miles with a multi-cultural population of more than 2.5 million people.
More informationJudicial Decision-Making and the Constitution
Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution OVERVIEW: The goal of this activity is to understand how judges make decisions through the interpretation and application of law. In this lesson, students
More informationHandling Encounters With Law Enforcement
Handling Encounters With Law Enforcement This handout was written in 2001 and is valid in the United States in general. Remember, however, that laws change over time, so legal information must be regularly
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 10, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D13-1796 Lower Tribunal No. 12-3833 The State of
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed March 14, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D10-2415 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationA GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO
A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO A GUIDE TO POLICE SERVICES IN TORONTO This booklet is intended to provide information about the police services available in Toronto, how to access police services,
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,195 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, MICHAEL DEAN HAYNES, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,195 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MICHAEL DEAN HAYNES, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Ellis District
More informationOhio Investigative Unit Policy Number : INV PRISONER TRANSPORTATION
Ohio Investigative Unit Policy Number : INV 200.28 PRISONER TRANSPORTATION Date of Revision : 9/1/2009 2:37:12 PM Priority Review : INV Distribution : INV Summary of Revisions F 9 Clarified restraint restrictions,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010 Opinion filed June 30, 2010. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D09-1346 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationSecurity Guard Test Questions and Answers PDF
Security Guard Test Questions and Answers PDF Question : Where can I find a PDF with the questions and answers from the unarmed security exam? Answer : The Security Officer Network provides a complementary
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, PIERRE BARLEE COLLINS DOB: 03/15/1982 5450 Douglas Dr. N. #129 Crystal, MN 55429 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,398 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, TYLER REGELMAN, Appellee.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,398 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. TYLER REGELMAN, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Geary District
More informationMaricopa County Attorney Officer Involved Shooting Response Protocol
Maricopa County Attorney Officer Involved Shooting Response Protocol January, 2016 MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING RESPONSE PROTOCOL PREAMBLE Law enforcement officers perform the vital
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 31, 2003 v No. 235191 Calhoun Circuit Court CURTIS JOHN-LEE BANKS, LC No. 00-002668-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationNorth Orange County Community College District ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Chapter 7 Human Resources AP 7600 Campus Safety Officer
Reference: Education Code Sections 72330.5, et seq.; Government Code Sections 3300, et seq. 1.0 Campus Safety Departments 1.1 The objectives of the District=s campus safety departments are to promote a
More informationCase 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 6:14-cv-00227-JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT MCCOLLOM Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More informationHandbook for Strengthening Harmony Between Immigrant Communities and the Edmonton Police Service
Handbook for Strengthening Harmony Between Immigrant Communities and the Edmonton Police Service Handbook for Strengthening Harmony This handbook is intended to help you understand the role of policing
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LEWIS, J. No. SC12-573 ANTHONY MACKEY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [October 17, 2013] This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Third District
More informationYALE UNIVERSITY SURVEY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SURVEY C
YALE UNIVERSITY SURVEY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SURVEY C 2007-08 We are interested in high school students interest in politics and government. This is not a quiz and we do not expect you to know all of
More informationCASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D15-5289
More information1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 06, NO. 33,666 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 06, 2016 4 NO. 33,666 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Plaintiff-Appellee, 7 v. 8 WESLEY DAVIS, 9 Defendant-Appellant.
More informationDATE: June 21, Mayor Ted Wheeler. Response to questions from June 13, 2017 letter. Dear Mayor Wheeler,
DATE: June 21, 2017 TO: RE: Mayor Ted Wheeler Response to questions from June 13, 2017 letter Dear Mayor Wheeler, Thank you for your letter of June 13, 2017 and the opportunity to address your questions
More informationPOLICE TRAFFIC STOPS & HOW SHOULD YOU ACT? WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS. Special Report Handling A Police Traffic Stop
POLICE TRAFFIC STOPS WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS & HOW SHOULD YOU ACT? Special Report Handling A Police Traffic Stop Know your rights When can your car be searched? How to conduct yourself during a traffic stop
More informationTEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date November 1, 2015
Effective Date February 1, 2008 Reference Amended Date November 1, 2015 Distribution All Personnel City Manager City Attorney TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Review Date January 1, 2017
More informationGENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE
GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE : ASSOCIATED MANUAL: CHIEF OF POLICE: REVISED DATE: 08/20/2018 RELATED ORDERS: NO. PAGES: 1of 9 NUMBER: Search and Seizure This
More informationMock Examination - Working as a Security Officer
Mock Examination - Working as a Security Officer The multiple choice questions below are an example of the kinds of questions you might expect if you are taking the Working as a Security Officer examination.
More informationCase 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:15-cv-80521-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JEAN PAVLOV, individually and as Personal Representative
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Ramsey State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, LINWOOD MICHAEL KAINE DOB: 07/13/1992 3100-10th Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN 55407 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No. District
More informationJOC AUTHORISATION & SAPS CATEGORISATION GUIDELINE
JOC AUTHORISATION & SAPS CATEGORISATION GUIDELINE Attached for ease of reference is a copy of the Safety at Sports and Recreational Events Act 2010 The Act sets out to ensure the safety of people attending
More informationCourse Security Services. Unit IV U.S. Constitution and Constitutional Issues
Course Security Services Unit IV U.S. Constitution and Constitutional Issues Essential Questions What is one of the jurisdictional differences between private security and police and how do the 4 th, 5
More informationSHOPLIFTING Detention and Use of Force
SHOPLIFTING Detention and Use of Force By Ralph Witherspoon, CPP Each year shoplifting incidents cost retail merchants in the United States well over $10 billion in losses. For the many stores operating
More informationCOMMONWEALTH PEDRO DA VIEGA FINDINGS AND RULINGS ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
SUFFOLK. SS, COMMONWEALTH v. BOSTON MUNICIPAL COURT CENTRAL DIVISION DOCKETNO. 1607CR3699 ~ ~ lb IE SEP 1 3 2017 ~ PEDRO DA VIEGA Boston Municipal Court Dept Civil Division FINDINGS AND RULINGS ON DEFENDANT'S
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Washington State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, NHAN LAP TRAN DOB: 01/28/1979 699 Guthrie Avenue Oakdale, MN 55128 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No. District Court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) NO. 67147-2-I Respondent/ ) Cross-Appellant, ) DIVISION ONE ) v. ) ) JUAN LUIS LOZANO, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant/ ) FILED:
More informationLesson 1: Role of the Judicial Branch in the US
Judicial Branch Powerpoint Questions 1. What is the role of federal courts? Lesson 1: Role of the Judicial Branch in the US 2. What is the purpose of the Supreme Court? 3. Define District Courts. 4. What
More informationPOLICE AND THE LAW USE OF FORCE
POLICE AND THE LAW USE OF FORCE OBJECTIVE BASIS Allows for informal decision making BUT Formal requirements of the U.S. Constitution Controls formal criminal justice process Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Dakota State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, JOHN DAVID EMERSON DOB: 04/12/1948 3710 145th Street #210 Rosemount, MN 55068 Defendant. District Court 1st Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationAB 953 Field-Testing: Stop Report 1
AB 953 Field-Testing: Stop Report 1 AB 953 Field-Testing * Begin new report 1. Agency name: * [url("ori")] 2. Date of Stop (e.g., 01/01/2017): * 3. Start Time of Stop (e.g., 15:30): * 4. End Time of Stop
More informationTEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date June 1, 2017
Effective Date February 1, 2008 Reference Amended Date June 1, 2017 Distribution All Personnel City Manager City Attorney TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Review Date January 1, 2018 Pages
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,223 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. In the Matter of A.A-M. MEMORANDUM OPINION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,223 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of A.A-M. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Wyandotte District Court; DELIA M. YORK, judge.
More informationA GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT SYSTEM IN VIRGINIA
- 0 - A GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT SYSTEM IN VIRGINIA prepared by the CHARLOTTESVILLE TASK FORCE ON DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2! How This Guide Can Help You 2!
More informationThis policy outlines the process and procedures to be considered and followed by members when making an arrest.
CHAPTER: 1.9 Page 1 of 7 NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS MANUAL CHAPTER: 1.9 TITLE: ARRESTS EFFECTIVE: REVISED: PURPOSE This policy outlines the process and procedures to be considered and followed
More informationRules for the Event LIFE BALL 2018
Rules for the Event LIFE BALL 2018 Event Venue: Vienna City Hall, Rathausplatz 1, 1010 Wien Organizer: Preamble Legal scope The rules for the event (hereinafter referred to as Event Rules ) apply to the
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge. April 5, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D16-4752 DANIEL HEATH WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge.
More informationBowie State University Police Department General Order
Bowie State University Police Department General Order Subject: Laws and Rules of Arrest Number: 2 Effective Date: July 2003 Rescinds: N/A Approved: Acting Director Roderick C. Pullen This article contains
More information2. If the DUI/DWAI arrestee is non-combative: a. The arrestee may be permitted to sign the summons.
9113 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 1. Police agents shall have the discretion of handling arrests for: driving under the influence and driving while ability impaired in the following manner, if it is the
More informationRecording of Officers Increases Has Your Agency Set The Standards for Liability Protection? Let s face it; police officers do not like to be recorded, especially when performing their official duties in
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0271p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. KEVIN PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationMOTION TO SUPPRESS. 1. Approximately 78 grams of marijuana seized from the co-defendants vehicle on
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. 08CRSXXXXX STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA vs. SP MOTION TO SUPPRESS COMES NOW, Defendant, SP, by and through
More informationPreparedness Kit. Deportation. What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family
Deportation Preparedness Kit What to Do, Who to Call, How to Safeguard your Family Published with generous funding from: P.O. Box 87131 San Diego, CA 92138-7131 619.232.2121 info@aclusandiego.org www.aclusandiego.org
More informationCourt Security Act 2005 No 1
New South Wales Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 5 Operation of Act and effect on other powers 5 Entry and use of court premises
More informationA. Official - any member of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) the rank of Sergeant or above.
GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Title Transportation of Prisoners Series / Number GO - PCA - 502.01 Effective Date Distribution January 12, 2001 A Replaces General Order 502.1 (Processing Prisoners)
More informationSubject FIELD INTERVIEWS, INVESTIGATIVE STOPS/DETENTIONS, WEAPONS PAT-DOWNS & SEARCHES. DRAFT 7 April By Order of the Police Commissioner
Subject STOPS/DETENTIONS, WEAPONS PAT-DOWNS & Date Published Page DRAFT 7 April 2018 1 of 18 POLICY By Order of the Police Commissioner It is the policy of the Baltimore Police Department (BPD) to conduct
More informationCriminal Justice 100
Criminal Justice 100 Based upon the "California Peace Officers Legal Sourcebook" published by the California Department of Justice. Hemet High School Hemet Unified School District (2017-2018) (Student
More informationINVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT
INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COURTESY COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT NOTES INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN TERRY v. OHIO (1968)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARTHE BIEN-AIME, R.N., * * Plaintiff, * * CIVIL ACTION
More informationWhen used in this directive, the following terms shall have the meanings designated:
GENERAL ORDER DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Subject Police-Citizen Contacts, Stops, and Frisks Topic Series Number OPS 304 10 Effective Date August 30, 2013 Replaces: General Order 304.10 (Police-Citizen Contacts,
More informationFLORIDA STATE FAIR POLICIES
FLORIDA STATE FAIR POLICIES 1. Prohibited Items on the Fairgrounds The following items shall not be brought onto on the Fairgrounds unless specifically authorized: Bicycles, skateboards, roller blades,
More informationYouth Justice: your guide to cops and court in New South Wales. Supplement - February Transit Officers
Youth Justice: your guide to cops and court in New South Wales Supplement - February 2007 The following section is a new section and should be read following the Chapter After court which ends on page
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : CR-1373-2015 v. : : BARRY JOHN RINEHIMER, : CRIMINAL DIVISION Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER On September 25,
More informationDEFINITIONS. Accuse To bring a formal charge against a person, to the effect that he is guilty of a crime or punishable offense.
DEFINITIONS Words and Phrases The following words and phrases have the meanings indicated when used in this chapter according to Black s Law Dictionary, common dictionary, and/or are distinctive to law
More informationDELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT
DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT Policy 7.4 Searches Without a Warrant Effective Date: 05/01/15 Replaces: 2-5 Approved: Ivan Barkley Chief of Police Reference: DPAC: 1.2.3 I. POLICY In order to ensure that constitutional
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Case SC10- v. ) ) ANTHONY LENARD HANKERSON, ) ) (Lower court case 4D08-3055) Respondent. ) ) ANSWER BRIEF AS TO JURISDICTION (On Petition
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 11/9/2009 :
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2009-Ohio-5927.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO PREBLE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2009-02-005 : O P I N I O N - vs - 11/9/2009
More informationUS SUPREME COURT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT LAW REGARDING ENTRY ONTO PROPERTY IS NOT CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FOR PURPOSES OF DENYING AN OFFICER QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
November 2013 Texas Law Enforcement Handbook Monthly Update is published monthly. Copyright 2013. P.O. Box 1261, Euless, TX 76039. No claim is made regarding the accuracy of official government works or
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed July 25, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D09-3070 Lower Tribunal No. 09-16900
More informationINVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS 1
Case 1:08-cv-01034-AT Document 571-3 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 79 Attachment 3 INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS 1 Learning Objectives: Understand the different levels of Investigative Encounters and the tools you
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, JAMAR PIERRE MULLINS DOB: 12/11/1984 1027 Morgan Ave N Apt 14 Minneapolis, MN 55411 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District
More informationLAWS OF CORRECTION & CUSTODY ALABAMA PEACE OFFICERS STANDARDS & TRAINING COMMISSION
LAWS OF CORRECTION & CUSTODY ALABAMA PEACE OFFICERS STANDARDS & TRAINING COMMISSION LESSON OBJECTIVES Understand basic jail procedures and the booking process Know prisoners constitutional rights Understand
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION JOSHUA BILLS, Plaintiff, v. JORDAN M. NELSON, Defendant. No. 18-cv-784 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT 1. Plaintiff, Joshua
More informationFrom the Attorneys at the Legacy Counsel James Publishing
Was That Police Search and Seizure Action Legal? From the Attorneys at the Legacy Counsel www.legacycounselfirm.com James Publishing Contents I. Introduction... 4 II. The Ground Rules... 6 A. The Police
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. The State of New Hampshire. Thomas Auger Docket No. 01-S-388, 389 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE STRAFFORD, SS. SUPERIOR COURT The State of New Hampshire v. Thomas Auger Docket No. 01-S-388, 389 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS The defendant is charged with one count
More informationDELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT
DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT Policy 7.5 Search Warrants Effective Date: 05/01/15 Replaces: 2-2 Approved: Ivan Barkley Chief of Police Reference: N/A I. POLICY The Federal and State Constitutions guarantee
More informationCharles W. Thompson, Jr. Executive Director/General Counsel International Municipal Lawyers Association
Charles W. Thompson, Jr. Executive Director/General Counsel International Municipal Lawyers Association Court receives about 10,000 petitions a year. Last year a little under 9,000 petitions. About 21%
More informationMarquette University Police Department
Marquette University Police Department Policy and Procedure Manual Policy: 4.2 Issued: May 1, 2015 Date Revised: N/A WILEAG Standards: 1.6.1, 1.7.4, 1.7.5, 1.7.6 IACLEA Standards: 2.2.2, 2.2.3 4.2.00 Purpose
More informationANTHONY ROMANAHENG MODIKOE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY J U D G M E N T
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) NOT REPORTABLE Case No.: 2927/2010 Date heard: 27-30 August 2012 Date delivered: 13 December 2012 In the matter between: ANTHONY ROMANAHENG
More informationUtah County Law Enforcement Officer Involved Incident Protocol
Utah County Law Enforcement Officer Involved Incident Protocol TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC... PAGE I. DEFINITIONS...4 A. OFFICER INVOLVED INCIDENT...4 B. EMPLOYEE...4 C. ACTOR...5 D. VICTIM...5 E. PROTOCOL
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: March 8, 2012 102657 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAWRENCE
More informationRule 318D - STRIP SEARCH, VISUAL BODY CAVITY SEARCH, AND BODY CAVITY SEARCH PROCEDURES
Rules and Procedures Rule 318D December 13, 2005 Rule 318D - STRIP SEARCH, VISUAL BODY CAVITY SEARCH, AND BODY CAVITY SEARCH PROCEDURES This rule is issued to establish guidelines, regulations and procedures
More informationSummary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017
Summary of Investigation SiRT File # 2017-036 Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017 John L. Scott Interim Director June 12, 2018 Background: On December 4, 2017, SiRT Interim Director, John Scott,
More informationI. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS RESPECT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. Page 1 of 8
Policy Title: Search, Apprehension and Arrest Accreditation Reference: Effective Date: February 25, 2015 Review Date: Supercedes: Policy Number: 6.05 Pages: 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 2.1.3, 2.1.7, 2.5.3, 4.3.1, 4.3.4
More informationThe Fourth Amendment places certain restrictions on when and how searches and seizures
Handout 1.4: Search Me in Public General Fourth Amendment Information The Fourth Amendment places certain restrictions on when and how searches and seizures can be conducted. The Fourth Amendment only
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT PETER CREIGHTON AND
THE SUPREME COURT APPEAL NUMBER 230/2009 HIGH COURT RECORD NUMBER 2003/13989p Fennelly J. O Donnell J. McKechnie J. BETWEEN PETER CREIGHTON PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT AND IRELAND, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE MINISTER
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 112,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. GUILLERMO FUERO-MENDOZA, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Lyon
More informationFAQ: Preparing, Presenting, and Closing a Case
Question 1: What is the general procedure of placing a suspect under arrest and transport him or her to the detention facility? Answer 1: When first placed under arrest, the subject should be put in handcuffs.
More information"New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Latest 'Investigatory Stop' Ruling"
"New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Latest 'Investigatory Stop' Ruling" On December 13, 2012, the Supreme Court of New Jersey determined whether the investigatory stop of Don C. Shaw was constitutional under
More informationVideo Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched
Garden State CLE 21 Winthrop Road Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 (609) 895-0046 fax- 609-895-1899 Atty2starz@aol.com Video Course Evaluation Form Attorney Name Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of
More informationContent Review Form PREREQUISITE COURSE
Target Course: Penal Code 832 Course Content Review Form PREREQUISITE COURSE Prerequisite Course: Must meet state screening requirements Instructions: 1. List exit competencies (skills) from Prerequisite
More informationDRAFT CUSTOMS CONTROL RULES FOURTH BATCH NOTE TO STAKEHOLDERS
DRAFT CUSTOMS CONTROL RULES FOURTH BATCH NOTE TO STAKEHOLDERS Please note that the various Chapters of the Control Act deal comprehensively with the topics dealt with in the corresponding Chapters of the
More informationPolicy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES
Cobb County Police Department Policy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES Effective Date: November 1, 2017 Issued By: Chief M.J. Register Rescinds: Policy 5.11 (February 1, 2015) Page 1 of 9 The words he, his, him,
More informationKnow Your Rights: What to do if you are stopped by the police or Immigration or there is an Immigration raid
Know Your Rights: What to do if you are stopped by the police or Immigration or there is an Immigration raid These rights apply to: Non-citizens inside the U.S. Special Note: Foreign nationals at the border
More information