received growth hormones, a ban that was instituted pursuant to concerns that eating such beef could be carcinogenic. 5 Discussions reached a fever
|
|
- Branden Ward
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of International Economic Law (2000) Oxford University Press EU COMMUNICATION ON THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE Natalie McNelis * INTRODUCTION On 2 February 2000, the Commission of the European Communities published a communication on the precautionary principle, 1 a term which describes a cautious approach to managing potential threats to the environment, human, animal, or plant health. Precautionary principle talk is heard when scientific evidence is inconclusive. There is, according to some scientists, a risk perhaps unquantified, perhaps uncertain, but possible nonetheless. The precautionary principle stands for the proposition that when in doubt, authorities should err on the side of caution when, for example, the health of human beings is at stake they can, even should, act without waiting for certainty. While there are merits to that approach, the Communication does not place restrictions on the use of the precautionary principle sufficient to avoid protectionist abuses. BACKGROUND The precautionary principle has garnered much support in Europe in recent times, in the wake of a series of food scandals. To cite a few examples, there was the discovery back in that there was a potential risk that BSE 3 ( mad cow disease ) could jump the species barrier and cause a similar malady in humans who consumed affected beef. Then in January 1998, the WTO Appellate Body held that the EU was not entitled under the WTO SPS Agreement 4 to maintain its prohibition on marketing beef from cattle that had received growth hormones, a ban that was instituted pursuant to concerns that eating such beef could be carcinogenic. 5 Discussions reached a fever * Senior associate, Stibbe Simont Monahan Duhot, Brussels. Correspondence address: Stibbe Simont Monahan Duhot, Henri Wafelaertsstraat 47 51, 1060 Brussels, Belgium. natalie.mcnelis@stibbe.be 1 COM(2000) 1 final, hereafter cited as Communication. 2 In March 1996, the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee stated that eating beef from cattle that had BSE was the most likely cause of certain cases of Creutzfeld Jakob Disease, or CJD in humans, see ECJ, Case C-180/96, UK v. Commission, [1998] ECR 2211, para 9. 3 Bovine spongiform encephalopathy. 4 The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. 5 Appellate Body Report European Communities Measures Affecting Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, adopted 13 February 1998.
2 546 Natalie McNelis pitch when the dioxin crisis denuded supermarket shelves across Belgium in late spring There, it was discovered that the meat and eggs of chickens that had consumed tainted feed contained levels of the noxious chemical dioxin capable of harming people who ate it. Currently, the precautionary principle is figuring prominently in the debate about the proper EU approach to issues such as the repercussions of Genetically Modified Organisms ( GMOs ) on human, animal, and plant health. 6 THE COMMUNICATION That context, and other elements such as the comments of the Appellate Body on the precautionary principle in its report in the Hormones case, 7 complaints by WTO Members (notably the US) that the precautionary principle is not adequately defined, and calls from the EU institutions for more clarity, 8 spurred the EU to solidify its thoughts on the precautionary principle in this Communication. The Commission says that its Communication aims first of all to inform the public and other Community institutions of the manner in which the Commission has applied the precautionary principle in the past and intends to apply it in the future. The Commission notes that its goal is to establish a common understanding of the factors leading to recourse to the precautionary principle and to establish guidelines for its use based on reasoned and coherent principles. The Commission takes pains to emphasize that this Communication is not the final word on the subject, but rather a contribution to the debate. Triggering factors and types of measures To begin with, the Commission describes the precautionary principle itself, highlighting the factors that trigger recourse to it and the kind of measures that result from its application. According to the Commission, the precautionary principle only comes into play when a potential risk has been identified, it has 6 For example, reference to the precautionary principle has been added in the proposed Directive to replace Directive 90/220/EEC on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs (see Common Position of the Council of 9 December 1999, with a view to adopting Directive 2000/... / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of... on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs (see Common Position of the Council of 9 December 1999, with a view to adopting Directive 2000/... /EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of... on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/ 220/EEC, OJ 2000 C 64/1, at whereas 8, Article 1 and Article 4(1)). 7 Cited above, at paras For instance, in a Resolution of 28 June 1999 on Community consumer policy , the Council calls on the Commission: to be in the future even more determined to be guided by the precautionary principle in preparing proposals for legislation and in its other consumer-related activities and develop as a priority clear and effective guidelines for the application of this principle. The Commission says in the Communication that its paper is part of the Commission s response, Communication, para. 1.
3 EU Communication on the Precautionary Principle 547 been scientifically studied, and the results of scientific inquiries are mixed or inconclusive. In such a situation, decision-makers may have to respond, sometimes under varying degrees of pressure from public opinion. According to the Commission, the appropriate response is the result of an eminently political decision, a function of the risk level that is acceptable to the society on which the risk is imposed. 9 The trigger for precautionary action is that the desired level of protection for the environment or health could be jeopardized. The Commission specifies that the absence of scientific proof of factors such as the cause effect relationship or a quantitative evaluation of the probability of adverse effects should not be used to justify inaction, and also notes that the minority view of scientists should be taken into account. 10 With regard to the type of measures flowing from the precautionary principle approach, the Commission notes that they can vary enormously, from the less radical (a decision to fund research or inform the public) to the more extreme (instituting a ban of the products concerned). The Commission stresses its wish to rely on procedures as transparent as possible and to involve all interested parties at the earliest possible stage. Guidelines for the use of the precautionary principle Next, the Commission provides some guidelines for the use of the precautionary principle, as it acknowledges that inappropriate application of this principle could lead to unacceptable trade restrictions. It calls for decision-makers to take a structured approach, involving as complete and objective a scientific evaluation as possible. In the Commission s view, in selecting the best course of action, authorities must weigh the risk to the environment or health against the freedom and rights of individuals, industry, and organizations. The Commission clarifies that, to achieve the proper balance, measures based on the precautionary principle should be, inter alia: proportionate, non-discriminatory, consistent, should involve an examination of the benefits and costs of action or lack of action, and they should follow up on scientific developments. First, according to the Commission, proportionality means that measures have to be commensurate with the level of protection desired. They must do no more and no less than what is necessary to make it possible to achieve that level of protection. Regarding the level of protection, the Commission states that authorities must not strive for zero risk, which can rarely be achieved, and it comments that in some cases, a measure such as a total ban might be inappropriate, while in others, it might be the only response to a potential risk. Second, the Communication states that measures must be nondiscriminatory. This means that like situations must be treated as like, and 9 Communication, para Communication, para 6.2.
4 548 Natalie McNelis different situations should not be treated in the same way. Furthermore, measures should not arbitrarily make distinctions on the basis of geographical origin or the nature of the production process. Third, and similarly, an authority should maintain a consistent approach across the board. In other words, in adopting measures, regard should be had to measures already adopted in similar circumstances. For example, where scientific uncertainty exists and an authority intends to take measures based on the precautionary principle, it should try to ensure that those measures are comparable in nature and scope with measures already taken in equivalent areas in which all the scientific data are available. Fourth, the Commission calls for a cost-benefit analysis of action versus inaction, taking into account both the long and the short term. Relevant to this cost-benefit analysis, the Commission says, are not only economic factors; in fact, the Commission states that non-economic interests should be given pride of place. Fifth, the Communication states that measures cannot simply be put into place in an era of scientific uncertainty, and then left in place permanently. Where measures are adopted in a climate of scientific uncertainty, authorities must continue to monitor the issue and to conduct further research to elicit the additional information required for a more objective assessment of the risk. As and when the understanding of a particular risk evolves, measures should be modified, or if appropriate, abolished. Finally, the Commission points out that one way of applying the precautionary principle is to prohibit placing certain products (such as drugs, pesticides, and food additives) on the market until they are proven safe. This reverses the burden of proof, so that certain types of products are hazardous until proven safe, rather than safe until proven hazardous. According to the Commission, this would place the onus of financing necessary research on the persons or businesses with an economic interest in the production and/or marketing of the product in question. Then, if the authority concerned is convinced that the studies show that the product is safe, it can approve its placing in the market. If it is not convinced, it can maintain the prohibition. In other words, the Commission speaks of two layers of the precautionary principle here: one is in presuming the product hazardous until proven safe, and the second is in the evaluation of the relevant scientific evidence. The Commission calls it inappropriate for prior approval to be applied systematically. Rather, it says that the possibility of reversing the burden of proof should be examined on a case-by-case basis. COMMENT AND CONCLUSION A consumer reading this Communication will most likely agree wholeheartedly with the approach it advocates. After all, if authorities are not sure whether a substance or process is dangerous to an interest like health, they
5 EU Communication on the Precautionary Principle 549 had certainly better be cautious. However, there is a larger point at issue here: are authorities accepting the responsibility delegated to them to grapple with these questions? The Commission acknowledges the danger that the precautionary principle could be used to justify unwarranted restrictions on trade, that it could in certain cases serve as a justification for disguised protectionism. 11 This danger indeed seems acute when one considers the responses of governments around the world to the above-mentioned food scandals: their measures banning imports of the product concerned were immediate and downright gleeful. In response, the Commission announces that one of the objectives of this Communication is to avoid unwarranted recourse to the precautionary principle. It calls upon decision-makers to balance the freedom and rights of individuals, industry and organisations with the need to reduce the risk of adverse effects to the environment, human, animal, or plant health. It says that achieving the correct balance requires a structured decision-making process, relying on detailed scientific and other objective information. The Commission notes that actions taken must be proportionate, nondiscriminatory, transparent and coherent. 12 However, looking closely at the Communication, it does not place meaningful constraints on the application of the precautionary principle. 13 For example, with regard to the balancing that the Commission calls for, it is admittedly tipped in favor of adopting preventative measures. To explain, one element of the Commission s structured decision-making process is a cost-benefit analysis. However, in weighing the costs and benefits, there is a thumb on the scale non-economic interests, says the Commission, will weigh heavier than economic interests. 14 There is undoubtedly merit to that stance; human lives should not be counted in terms of dollars and cents. That being said, calling for a cost-benefit analysis is meaningless unless it is subject to some strictures that ensure that any sort of non-economic interest will not trump a more important economic concern. The balancing act especially threatens to be skewed when the cost is domestic and the benefit is foreign. Another element of worrying discretion is in the determination of the level of protection chosen. According to the Commission (and in saying this it has 11 Communication, para Communication, para 1 of Summary and at para 6.3 et seq. 13 In this regard, see also the reaction of the US government to the Commission Communication, expressed at the April meeting of the Codex Alimentarius Commission s General Principles Committee in Paris. Although the US welcomed the EU s efforts, it particularly criticized the Communication s failure to give a clear definition of the precautionary principle. The US in particular expressed the concern that the precautionary principle could lead to a reliance on political considerations rather than scientific ones in determining food safety standards, as reported in Inside US Trade, vol 18, no 14 (7 April 2000). 14 Communication, para
6 550 Natalie McNelis the support of the WTO Appellate Body 15 ), it considers that it is entitled to prescribe the level of protection, notably as regards environmental protection and human, animal and plant health, that it considers appropriate. 16 The choice of a level of protection is left entirely open. The danger is that an authority could adopt a level of protection completely out of proportion to the risk involved. However, the proportionality principle, though cited, is not accepted as a limitation in this regard. To explain, there are potentially two types of proportionality controls at issue here. On the one hand, there is the question of whether the level of protection chosen is proportionate to the kind of risk that is at stake. In other words, would it be appropriate to aim for a very high level of protection when the risk is one in a million? On the other hand, there is the question of whether the measure itself is proportionate to the level of protection sought. There, the question might be, is a total ban proportionate to the goal of reaching that high level of protection? When the Communication addresses proportionality, it is concerned only with the second concept: The measures envisaged must make it possible to achieve the appropriate level of protection... [m]easures based on the precautionary principle must not be disproportionate to the desired level of protection... (emphasis added). 17 The Commission does not consider that the proportionality limitation applies to the question of what level of protection would be appropriate, in other words, how risk-averse authorities can be except to say that authorities should not strive for zero risk and to say that in certain cases a total ban may not be a proportional response to a potential risk. 18 However, it is rather here that more guidelines and structure is needed in order to ensure that the level of protection chosen is proportionate to the risk at issue. An overarching observation is that the Communication seems to place the blame for any overzealous application of the precautionary principle on politics and political pressure. The Communication begins by almost bemoaning the fact that advances in mass communication ensure that the public is more aware of potential risks, and earlier. In such a situation, the Commission says decision-makers may have to respond, sometimes under varying degrees of pressure from public opinion. According to the Commission, the news reports often result in fears, which must be met 15 Appellate Body Report, Hormones, above, note 5, para 172, and WTO Appellate Body Report, Australia Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/AB/R, adopted 6 November 1998, para Communication, end of para Communication, para Ibid. Note that in calling zero risk inappropriate, the Commission constrains itself more than the WTO Appellate Body decisions would require. There, the Appellate Body has explicitly said that Members can define their level of protection as zero risk, Appellate Body Report, Australia Salmon, above, note 15, para 125.
7 EU Communication on the Precautionary Principle 551 with preventative measures. 19 The appropriate response, says the Commission, is the result of an eminently political decision, a function of the risk level that is acceptable to the society on which the risk is imposed. 20 This repeated reference to politics raises the concern that the Commission would excuse hiding behind politics and political pressure, rather than calling for authorities to take and stand behind carefully thought-out decisions. As the Commission highlights, applications of the precautionary principle can result in unjustified restrictions of trade, which in turn can quell innovation. Take, for example, the biotechnology field, an industry which is booming and which promises to grow incrementally in the years to come. There are already indications that biotechnical research can lead to discoveries with a positive impact for mankind, for instance in the area of the development of new medicines and new types of food. 21 It would be unfortunate if investment in such research was discouraged by an overly restrictive reaction from authorities. One cannot underestimate the challenges authorities face in their decisionmaking process when such fundamental issues are at stake. The public has entrusted in them the daunting responsibility of guarding their health and well-being, as well as the health and well-being of future generations. That being said, the public has entrusted its government with more than that: it has delegated to them the task of investigating and evaluating risks, and determining the appropriate responses to them in light of all the interests at stake. Elected officials and the authorities they appoint cannot hide behind politics in order to avoid taking difficult decisions. Rather, they should give the public some credit, have the courage of their own convictions, and be prepared to stand behind and explain the stances that they take Communication, para Communication, para An example is the engineering of golden rice, which aims to compensate for vitamin deficiencies in certain diets by the genetic modification of rice in order to incorporate beta-carotene. 22 Ten days after the Communication, the Commission published a White Paper on Food Safety (COM (1999) 719 final). There it unveiled a more proactive approach, advocating the creation of an independent food safety authority. This might allay some of the concerns about the Communication. The EU governments have backed the proposal but have stopped short of giving the authority decision-making powers.
The Precautionary Principle in EU Policies
The Precautionary Principle in EU Policies An Overview of Recent Developments Mattia Pellegrini, DG SANCO 02 Strategy and Analysis The story of the Tour Madou LSC asks the Commission to abide by the principle
More informationReview of the Operation of the SPS Agreement DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION
Review of the Operation of the SPS Agreement Gretchen Stanton Paper prepared for: The World Bank s Integrated Program Of Research And Capacity Building To Enhance Participation Of Developing Countries
More informationThe Precautionary Principle, Trade and the WTO
The Precautionary Principle, Trade and the WTO A Discussion Paper for the European Commission Consultation on Trade and Sustainable Development November 7th 2000 Peter Hardstaff, Trade Policy Officer,
More informationIN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION. Russian Federation Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union
IN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION Russian Federation Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union WT/DS475 Third Party Submission by Norway Geneva 10 March
More informationWTO ANALYTICAL INDEX SPS Agreement Article 5 (Jurisprudence)
1 ARTICLE 5... 5 1.1 Text of Article 5... 5 1.2 General... 6 1.2.1 Standard of review... 6 1.2.2 Risk assessment versus risk management... 8 1.3 Article 5.1... 9 1.3.1 General... 9 1.3.2 "based on" an
More informationIntroduction to World Trade Organization. Risk Analysis Training
Introduction to World Trade Organization Risk Analysis Training Purpose/Focus Introduce WTO History and Mandate Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement Role of Risk Analysis Standard Setting Bodies Technical
More informationTRADE, LABELING, TRACEABILITY AND ISSUES IN BIOSAFETY MANAGEMENT
TRADE, LABELING, TRACEABILITY AND ISSUES IN BIOSAFETY MANAGEMENT - THE SRI LANKAN PERSPECTIVE - Mrs. Gothami Indikadahena Deputy Director of Commerce Department of Commerce 07.04.2004 Management of Bio-Safety
More informationP7_TA-PROV(2014)0125 Biocidal products ***I
P7_TA-PROV(2014)0125 Biocidal products ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 February 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation
More informationDiscussion Following the Remarks of Ms. Coffield and Mr. Frechette
Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 26 Issue Article 42 January 2000 Discussion Following the Remarks of Ms. Coffield and Mr. Frechette Discussion Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj
More informationGLOBAL HEALTH GOVERNANCE IN THE WTO: ASSESSING THE APPELLATE BODY S INTERPRETATION OF THE SPS AGREEMENT AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SPS MEASURES IN RTAs
GLOBAL HEALTH GOVERNANCE IN THE WTO: ASSESSING THE APPELLATE BODY S INTERPRETATION OF THE SPS AGREEMENT AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SPS MEASURES IN RTAs By Dr. Delroy S. Beckford * Health protection has loomed
More informationFDA's Consideration of Codex Alimentarius Standards in Light of International Trade Agreements
Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1998 FDA's Consideration of Codex Alimentarius Standards in Light of International Trade Agreements Lucinda Sikes Berkeley Law Follow
More informationDGB 3B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 5 November 2015 (OR. en) 2013/0435 (COD) PE-CONS 38/15 DENLEG 90 AGRI 362 CODEC 956
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 5 November 2015 (OR. en) 2013/0435 (COD) PE-CONS 38/15 DLEG 90 AGRI 362 CODEC 956 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: REGULATION OF
More informationTrading Precaution: The Precautionary Principle and the WTO
UNU-IAS Report Trading Precaution: The Precautionary Principle and the WTO This report was prepared by Sabrina Shaw and Risa Schwartz. Sabrina Shaw is on leave from the Secretariat of the World Trade Organization
More information(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS
11.12.2015 L 327/1 I (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2015/2283 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 25 November 2015 on novel foods, amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the
More informationREGULATION (EU) No 649/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals
L 201/60 Official Journal of the European Union 27.7.2012 REGULATION (EU) No 649/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals
More informationThe ERF Study The Precautionary Principle Application and Way Forward
The ERF Study The Precautionary Principle Application and Way Forward European Risk Forum Foreword This study focuses on the Precautionary Principle and how it has been applied in practice and makes recommendations
More informationCHAPTER 5 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES. Article 1: Definitions
CHAPTER 5 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES 1. For the purposes of this Chapter: Article 1: Definitions Competent Authority means those authorities within each Party recognised by the national government
More information13346/15 JDC/psc 1 DPG
Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 October 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0435 (COD) 13346/15 INFORMATION NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council CODEC 1403 DENLEG
More informationScientific Principle under the SPS Agreement
2010 International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics IPEDR vol.3 (2011) (2011) IACSIT Press, Hong Kong Scientific Principle under the SPS Agreement Eun Sup Lee Department of International
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2002R0178 EN 28.04.2006 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B REGULATION (EC) No 178/2002 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More informationBiotechnology, Food, and Agriculture Disputes or Food Safety and International Trade
Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 26 Issue Article 41 January 2000 Biotechnology, Food, and Agriculture Disputes or Food Safety and International Trade Serge Frechette Follow this and additional
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 23.11.2006 COM(2006) 713 final Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the provisional prohibition of the use and sale in Hungary of genetically modified
More informationFordham Environmental Law Review
Fordham Environmental Law Review Volume 16, Number 2 Article 2 The Cartagena Protocol and the WTO: Will the EU Biotech Products Case Leave Room for the Protocol? Robyn Neff Fordham University School of
More informationChapter 27 The WTO Agreements: An Introduction to the Obligations and Opportunities for Biosafety
Chapter 27 The WTO Agreements: An Introduction to the Obligations and Opportunities for Biosafety CHEE YOKE LING AND LIM LI CHING THIRD WORLD NETWORK The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety is an extremely
More informationWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION WT/DS291/R/Add.3 29 September 2006 (06-4234) Original: English EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES MEASURES AFFECTING THE APPROVAL AND MARKETING OF BIOTECH PRODUCTS Reports of the Panel Addendum
More information(Acts whose publication is obligatory) of 23 February 2005
16.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 70/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) REGULATION (EC) NO 396/2005 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 February 2005 on maximum
More informationLIST OF KEY MARKET ACCESS BARRIERS IN MEXICO UNDER THE MARKET ACCESS STRATEGY 22 September 2016 MAAC/
Barrier LIST OF KEY MARKET ACCESS BARRIERS IN MEXICO UNDER THE MARKET ACCESS STRATEGY 22 September 2016 MAAC/2016-037 Description Protection and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights The huge market
More informationFree Trade and the Precautionary Principle
Magister iuris, Lecturer of Environmental Law Free Trade and the Precautionary Principle This article aims to compare the different approaches to the precautionary principle in the European Union and in
More informationTRADE AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM
TRAINFORTRADE 2000 TRADE AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE MULTILATERAL TRADING SYSTEM Module 2 2 Table of Contents PREFACE...3 I. TRADE AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE WTO...4 A. BACKGROUND...4 B. THE COMMITTEE ON TRADE
More informationTHE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION & ITS IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE RELATIONS
CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES CEPS WORKING DOCUMENT NO. 186 OCTOBER 2002 THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION & ITS IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE RELATIONS STEPHEN WOOLCOCK CEPS Working
More informationSANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES. Ensuring safe trading without unnecessary restrictions
SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES Ensuring safe trading without unnecessary restrictions Did you know? Agricultural products worth over US$ 1,765 billion were traded in 2013.WTO rules help to ensure
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 10.2.2009 COM(2009) 56 final Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the provisional prohibition of the use and sale in Austria of genetically
More informationCHAPTER FIVE SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES
CHAPTER FIVE SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES The objectives of this Chapter are: Article 5.1 Objectives to protect human, animal or plant life or health in the respective territories of the Parties
More informationThe Parties to this Protocol, Being Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, hereinafter referred to as the Convention,
Preamble 131. The preamble of an international agreement sets out the context in which the agreement was negotiated and concluded. Under general rules of treaty interpretation the preamble is not considered
More informationCAN YOU PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE? THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AT THE WTO
University of Turin From the SelectedWorks of Elisa Vecchione December 14, 2011 CAN YOU PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE? THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AT THE WTO Elisa Vecchione Available at: https://works.bepress.com/vecchione/4/
More informationEU Mercosur negotiations. Chapter on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Draft consolidated text ARTICLE 1 OBJECTIVES
This document contains the consolidated text resulting from the 28 th round of negotiations (3-7 July 2017) on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures in the Trade Part of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement.
More informationWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION WT/DS76/AB/R 22 February 1999 (99-0668) Original: English JAPAN MEASURES AFFECTING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS AB-1998-8 Report of the Appellate Body Page i I. Introduction... 1 II.
More informationBEFORE THE WTO APPELLATE BODY. European Communities - Measures concerning meat and meat products (Hormones) (AB ) APPELLEE SUBMISSION
BEFORE THE WTO APPELLATE BODY European Communities - Measures concerning meat and meat products (Hormones) (AB-1997-4) APPELLEE SUBMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES UNDER RULE 23 OF THE WORKING PROCEDURES
More informationThe GMO Dispute before the WTO: Legal Implications for the Trade and Environment Debate Francesco Sindico
The GMO Dispute before the WTO: Legal Implications for the Trade and Environment Debate Francesco Sindico NOTA DI LAVORO 11.2005 JANUARY 2005 NRM Natural Resources Management Francesco Sindico, Departamento
More informationInternational Decisions. European Communities - Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products
Boston College Law School From the SelectedWorks of David A. Wirth October, 1998 International Decisions. European Communities - Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products David A. Wirth, Boston College
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 6.3.2007 COM(2007) 90 final 2007/0037 (COD) C6-0086/07 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation No 11
More informationChapter 10 STANDARDS AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS
Chapter 10 STANDARDS AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS 1. OVERVIEW OF RULES (1)Background of Rules 1) Standards and conformity assessment system Quality related to products "Standards" and assessment of
More informationWhat are the WTO rules that affect animal welfare? Can you have trade bans? FROM THE PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
What are the WTO rules that affect animal welfare? Can you have trade bans? FROM THE PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT Overview This briefing covers trade bans under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules and is
More informationNewsletter from the European Commission- DG Trade- G2- SPS & Biotechnology Team
4 th Edition September 2004 Newsletter from the European Commission- DG Trade- G2- SPS & Biotechnology Team Dear reader, Summer is a time for travel, to see new things, new people, and new customs. It
More informationby Faith Thompson Campbell
Analysis of the World Trade Organization SPS Agreement MEMORANDUM by Faith Thompson Campbell To: Scientific Colleagues Concerned About USDA Phytosanitary Programs From: Faith Thompson Campbell tel: 202-547-9120
More informationMarkus Böckenförde, Grüne Gentechnik und Welthandel Summary Chapter I:
Summary Chapter I: 1. Presently, end consumers of commercially sold GMOs do not have any specific advantage from modern biotechnology. Whether and how much farmers benefit economically from planting is
More informationDistr. RESTRICTED. TD/B/COM.1/CRP.4 26 February 2007 ENGLISH ONLY WTO PANEL REPORT ON THE "EC BIOTECH" CASE: CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT
Distr. RESTRICTED TD/B/COM.1/CRP.4 26 February 2007 ENGLISH ONLY TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD Commission on Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities Eleventh session Geneva, 19 23 March 2007 Item 6
More informationWhat Price Safety? The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications. Giandomenico Majone European University Institute
What Price Safety? The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications Giandomenico Majone European University Institute Abstract The European Commission is actively promoting the precautionary principle
More informationJapan-EU EPA (SPS) (Non-Paper) Article 1: Objectives
Disclaimer: The negotiations between the EU and Japan on the Economic Partnership Agreement (the EPA) have been finalised. In view of the Commission's transparency policy, we are hereby publishing the
More informationCHAPTER 6 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES ARTICLE 6.1. Scope
CHAPTER 6 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES ARTICLE 6.1 Scope 1. This Chapter applies to the preparation, adoption and application of all sanitary and phytosanitary (hereinafter referred to as "SPS")
More informationEU MIDT DIGITAL TACHOGRAPH
EU MIDT DIGITAL TACHOGRAPH MIDT IPC EU-MIDT/Implementation Policy Committee/008-2005 02/05/2005 SUBJECT Procedure on Test Tool Approval EC Interpretative Communication and ECJ Ruling SUBMITTED BY Mirna
More informationTHE AGREEMENT ON THE APPLICATION OF SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES AND THE AGREEMENT ON TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE 1
American Bar Association Symposium: The First Five Years of the WTO January 20-21, 2000 Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, D.C. THE AGREEMENT ON THE APPLICATION OF SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.9.2017 COM(2017) 492 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE
More information11261/2/09 REV 2 TT/NC/ks DG I
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 5 March 2010 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2008/0002 (COD) 11261/2/09 REV 2 DLEG 51 CODEC 893 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: Position of the Council
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 27 October 2016 (OR. en)
Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 October 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2016/0205 (NLE) 2016/0206 (NLE) 2016/0220 (NLE) 13463/1/16 REV 1 LIMITE PUBLIC WTO 294 SERVICES 26
More information(Text with EEA relevance) (2010/C 122 E/03)
C 122 E/38 Official Journal of the European Union 11.5.2010 POSITION (EU) No 6/2010 OF THE COUNCIL AT FIRST READING with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
More informationWTO and the Environment: Case Studies in WTO Law. Dr. Christina Voigt University of Oslo, Department of Public and International Law
WTO and the Environment: Case Studies in WTO Law Dr. Christina Voigt University of Oslo, Department of Public and International Law 1. Overview: 1. Trade and Environment: the Debate 2. The Multilateral
More information9 January 2017 Without prejudice CHAPTER [XX] SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES. Article X.1. Objectives
9 January 2017 Without prejudice This document is the European Union's (EU) proposal for a legal text on sanitary and phytosanitary measures in the EU-Philippines FTA. It has been tabled for discussion
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2013) XXX draft COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard
More informationUnited States - Certain Measures Affecting Imports of Poultry from China. Just Another SPS Case?
European University Institute From the SelectedWorks of Lukasz A Gruszczynski 2011 United States - Certain Measures Affecting Imports of Poultry from China. Just Another SPS Case? Lukasz A Gruszczynski,
More informationSupplementary Rebuttal Submission by the European Communities
European Communities Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (DS/291, DS292, DS293) Geneva 15 November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. THE BURDEN OF PROOF...
More informationThe GMO Panel: Applications of WTO Law to Trade in Agricultural Biotech Products
European Integration Vol. 31, No. 3, 409 429, May 2009 ARTICLE The GMO Panel: Applications of WTO Law to Trade in Agricultural Biotech Products GILBERT R. WINHAM Department of Political Science and Faculty
More informationEU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement EU TEXTUAL PROPOSAL. Chapter on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
This document contains an EU proposal for a legal text on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures in the Trade Part of a possible modernised EU-Mexico Association Agreement. It has been tabled for discussion
More informationCommunity Directives relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public contracts:
Final version of 29/11/2007 COCOF 07/0037/03-EN EUROPEAN C0MMISSION GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING FINANCIAL CORRECTIONS TO BE MADE TO EXPENDITURE CO- FINANCED BY THE STRUCTURAL FUNDS OR THE COHESION FUND
More informationTHE IMPLICATION OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LLM RESEARCH PAPER LAWS 544 TOPICS IN ENVRONMENTAL LAW
FITRIA ANINDHITA H. WIBOWO THE IMPLICATION OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LLM RESEARCH PAPER LAWS 544 TOPICS IN ENVRONMENTAL LAW FACULTY OF LAW 2014 1 Contents Abstract...iii I INTRODUCTION...1
More informationSanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Annex VIII to the SADC Protocol on Trade
Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Annex VIII to the SADC Protocol on Trade Approved by the SADC Committee of Ministers of Trade on 17 July, 2014, Gaborone, Botswana Page 1 of 18 ANNEX VIII CONCERNING SANITARY
More informationTrade WTO Law International Economic Law
Trade WTO Law International Economic Law Prof. Seraina Grünewald / Prof. Christine Kaufmann 13/20/27 March 2014 III. Dispute Settlement 2 1 Dispute Settlement 1. Principles Prompt and amicable settlement
More informationCHAPTER 6 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES. (a) to protect human, animal or plant life or health in the territory of each Party;
CHAPTER 6 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES Article 79: Objectives The objectives of this Chapter are: (a) to protect human, animal or plant life or health in the territory of each Party; (b) to facilitate
More informationAnalysis of the possible effects of the CETA free trade agreement on the environment, human and animal health and democratic decision-making
Analysis of the possible effects of the CETA free trade agreement on the environment, human and animal health and democratic decision-making 2016:1 The National Board of Trade is a Swedish government agency
More informationUnited States Panama Trade Promotion Agreement
United States Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Objectives The objectives of this Agreement, as elaborated more specifically through its principles and rules, including national treatment, most-favored-nation
More informationFood Regulation and Trade: Toward a Safe and Open Global System An Overview and Synopsis. Tim Josling, Donna Roberts and David Orden
Food Regulation and Trade: Toward a Safe and Open Global System An Overview and Synopsis Tim Josling, Donna Roberts and David Orden Tim Josling (josling@stanford.edu) is Senior Fellow at the Stanford Institute
More information29 May 2017 Without prejudice CHAPTER [XX] TRADE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Article X.1. Objectives and Scope
29 May 2017 Without prejudice This document is the European Union's (EU) proposal for a legal text on trade and sustainable development in the EU-Indonesia FTA. It has been tabled for discussion with Indonesia.
More informationEFSA s policy on independence. How the European Food Safety Authority assures the impartiality of professionals contributing to its operations.
Executive Summary At its meeting held on 16 March 2016, EFSA s Management Board discussed a conceptual approach to the review of the Policy on independence and scientific decision making process it had
More informationIntroduction to WTO and the SPS Agreement. Anneke Hamilton Agriculture and Commodities Division 12 September 2013 SADC Workshop, South Africa
Introduction to WTO and the SPS Agreement Anneke Hamilton Agriculture and Commodities Division 12 September 2013 SADC Workshop, South Africa Outline Introduction to WTO Use of Non-Tariff Measures (NTMs)
More informationCHAPTER 6 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES. Article 6.1. Definitions
CHAPTER 6 SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES Article 6.1 Definitions 1. For the purposes of this Chapter, the definitions in Annex A of the SPS Agreement are incorporated into and made part of this Chapter,
More informationAddressing non-tariff barriers to maximize Indonesia trade potential I N T E R N A T I O N A L T R A D E F O R U M D R I N T A N S O E P A R N A
Addressing non-tariff barriers to maximize Indonesia trade potential I N T E R N A T I O N A L T R A D E F O R U M D R I N T A N S O E P A R N A Non Tariff Measures Vs Non Tariff Barries NTMs : Non-Tariff
More informationWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION RESTRICTED S/WPDR/W/27 2 December 2003 (03-6404) Working Party on Domestic Regulation "NECESSITY TESTS" IN THE WTO Note by the Secretariat 1 1. At the request of the Working Party
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 7.3.2003 SEC(2003) 297 final 2001/0291 (COD) COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2013) XXX draft COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.12.2010 COM(2010) 759 final 2010/0364 (COD) C7-0001/11 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007
More informationINTERPRETATION OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS IN THE SPS AGREEMENT
INTERPRETATION OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS IN THE SPS AGREEMENT James J. Nedumpara Associate Professor, Jindal Global Law School Abstract The Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures ( SPS Agreement
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) and Article 168(4)(b) thereof,
27.6.2014 Official Journal of the European Union L 189/33 REGULATION (EU) No 653/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 15 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 as regards electronic
More informationInternational rules and Institutions on food
International rules and Institutions on food Paolo Borghi IP Erasmus Global Food Law and Quality (GFLQ) Viterbo February 4th, 2013 Origins of GATT, creation of the WTO, and general legal framework about
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.5.2013 COM(2013) 288 final 2013/0150 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 concerning the making
More informationChapter 2 The precautionary principle and its normative challenges
33 Literature reference: von Schomberg, R. (2006 in print), 'The precautionary principle and its normative challenges', in E. Fisher, J. Jones and R. von Schomberg. (eds) (2006), Implementing the Precautionary
More informationThe Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Rolando Alcala Agriculture and Commodities Division World Trade Organization
The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Rolando Alcala Agriculture and Commodities Division World Trade Organization Bird Flu BSE Plant Pests SARS MRL 2 Agreement on the
More informationPublic access to documents containing personal data after the Bavarian Lager ruling
Public access to documents containing personal data after the Bavarian Lager ruling I. Introduction I.1. The reason for an additional EDPS paper On 29 June 2010, the European Court of Justice delivered
More information16826/10 ADD1 AA/rm 1 DG B II
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 8 February 2011 16826/10 ADD1 COVER NOTE from: V 803 AGRILEG 147 AGRI 496 MI 486 DLEG 141 CODEC 1358 Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi
More informationASIL Insight January 13, 2010 Volume 14, Issue 2 Print Version. The WTO Seal Products Dispute: A Preview of the Key Legal Issues.
ASIL Insight January 13, 2010 Volume 14, Issue 2 Print Version The WTO Seal Products Dispute: A Preview of the Key Legal Issues By Simon Lester Introduction The recent adoption by the European Parliament
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Brussels, 1 February 2018 Rev1 NOTICE TO STAKEHOLDERS WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED
More informationAN EU PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN THE US-EU TTIP NEGOTIATIONS
1 AN EU PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN THE US-EU TTIP NEGOTIATIONS Alan Matthews alan.matthews@tcd.ie Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Presentation to the Session Transatlantic Trade
More informationStrengthening aspects of the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial in criminal proceedings
Briefing Initial Appraisal of a European Commission Impact Assessment Strengthening aspects of the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial in criminal proceedings Impact Assessment
More informationPRIVATE STANDARDS AND THE WTO COMMITTEE ON SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES
PRIVATE STANDARDS AND THE WTO COMMITTEE ON SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES Christiane Wolff Counsellor, World Trade Organization 1 Original: English Summary: Private standards have been under discussion
More informationThe Precautionary Principle and WTO Law: Divergent Views Toward the Role of Science in Assessing and Managing Risk
The Precautionary Principle and WTO Law: Divergent Views Toward the Role of Science in Assessing and Managing Risk by Lawrence A. Kogan INTRODUCTION THE DEBATE SURROUNDING THE USE OF SCIENCE TO ASSESS
More informationGreen 10 position paper on post-brexit EU-UK collaboration in the field of environmental protection
Green 10 position paper on post-brexit EU-UK collaboration in the field of environmental protection 8 May 2018 While there remains considerable uncertainty regarding the shape of the future EU-UK relationship
More informationIN THE EYE OF THE STORM Genetically modified crops in Europe, past and future
IN THE EYE OF THE STORM Genetically modified crops in Europe, past and future 17 A long-running scare story Europe has seen its share of food crises in recent times. Some are fairly short-lived, such as
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT 5 April 2001
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 5 April 2001 (Failure of a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations Fortification of foodstuffs with iron and vitamins Protection of public health Precautionary principle) In Case
More informationOpinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on the GEOGRAPHICAL RISK OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY (GBR) in GREECE
Scientific Steering Committee December 2002 Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on the GEOGRAPHICAL RISK OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY (GBR) in GREECE Adopted by the SSC on 6 December 2002-1
More informationObjectives of this presentation
European Commission Directorate-General for Health & Consumers The EU Risk Analysis Approach and the Perspectives for a Global Risk Assessment Dialogue OECD- Group on Regulatory Policy, Paris 1-2 December
More informationTable ronde / Roundtable. Jeudi le 11 mai 2006 Thursday May 11, h
Program and Overview Table ronde / Roundtable organized by Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Anne Petitpierre, Professors at the Faculty of Law Jeudi le 11 mai 2006 Thursday May 11, 2006 14.00-17.30 h
More information