The Forum. An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election. Barry C. Burden
|
|
- Rhoda Hamilton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Forum Volume 2, Issue Article 2 POST-ELECTION 2004 An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election Barry C. Burden Harvard University, bcburden@wisc.edu Copyright c 2004 by the authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher, bepress, which has been given certain exclusive rights by the author. The Forum is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress).
2 An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election Barry C. Burden Abstract The consensus immediately following the 2004 presidential election was that Bush won because of support for moral values. I challenge this interpretation by showing that Bush won because of widespread increase in his support among white and married women. I hypothesize that this is a response to concerns about domestic security rather than support for Bush s position against gay marriage. In addition, Bush was generally helped by higher turnout, though Kerry s efforts brought down the Republican vote share in battleground states. KEYWORDS: elections, presidency, political parties, voting Barry C. Burden is Associate Professor of Government at Harvard University. He is co-author of Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government (University of Michigan Press) and editor of Uncertainty in American Politics (Cambridge University Press). Burden has also published articles in the American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, British Journal of Political Science, Legislative Studies Quarterly, and elsewhere on American electoral politics and representation.
3 Burden: An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election 1 In the immediate aftermath of the 2004 presidential election, a journalistic consensus emerged to explain George W. Bush s victory. Despite the sluggish economy and deteriorating situation in Iraq, voters supported Bush primarily because of his values. One prominently featured exit poll question showed moral values to be the most important issue for voters, ahead of terrorism, Iraq, and the economy. Backlash against the Massachusetts court ruling allowing gay marriage and attraction of Bush s appeals to Christian faith helped bring out socially conservative voters and cement Bush s second term. This explains why Bush won Ohio, for example, where an anti-gay marriage proposal was on the ballot. However compelling this story might be, it is wrong. Instead, Bush won because married and white women increased their support for the Republican ticket. Though definitive evidence from the National Election Study will not arrive until spring, I hypothesize that women responded especially well to Bush s handling of national security in the post-september 11 environment. The increase in voter turnout in 2004 also helped Bush to a degree, but the Democrats mobilization of young people kept Bush s margins down in battleground states. Yet it was women who helped Bush improve his vote share in most states. The shrinking of the gender gap and expansion of the marriage gap made the difference. In this article I briefly account for the factors behind Bush s rise in the stateby-state popular vote between 2000 and This is not the same as identifying who elected Bush. That sort of analysis would put responsibility on white men since they voted for Bush and comprise almost half of the active electorate. Instead, I focus on what changed between 2000 and In this view, it is white women who are responsible because they showed more aggregate change. Identifying a cause for this shift looks for an explanation also in things that changed in the past four years. For example, John Kerry was not exactly Al Gore, so differences between Bush s two opponents could be a factor. But I suggest that such differences are dwarfed by a much larger intervention: the attacks of September 11. Turnout was up in 2004 because the perceived heightening of the stakes after 9-11 and because of intense competition between the candidates in a small number of battleground states. Higher turnout also appears to have helped Bush slightly. But it was the shift of married white women from the Democratic camp to the Republican camp that gave him the edge in Little New in 2004 Simply put, Bush won the 2004 presidential election because he improved his share of the vote in a wide range of states. It was not a distinct surge in the Bible Belt or Midwest or any other socially conservative region that put the Republican ticket over the top. The overwhelming pattern is one of stasis. The geographic Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2008
4 2 The Forum Vol. 2 [2004], No. 4, Article 2 basis of the vote in 2004 closely replicated patterns exhibited in the 2000 election. As Table 1 shows, only three states changed partisan hands. The other 47 (and Washington, DC) went to the same party in both elections. Table 1: Few States Change Hands Winner in 2000 Bush Gore Winner Bush 29 2 in 2004 Kerry 1 19 In the midst of great stability, even small changes can have important consequences. For example, reapportionment after the 2000 election helped Bush in an important way. The newly distributed Electoral College vote gave more weight to the Republican South and West, less to the Democratic Northeast and Midwest. As a result, many of the states Bush won in 2000 became worth more electoral votes in The 271 electoral votes Bush collected in 2000 were worth 278 electoral votes in 2004, a gain of seven before the 2004 campaign even began. In addition to this initial advantage, Bush managed to win two new states in 2004 while only losing one that he had captured in The one state he lost New Hampshire was worth just four electoral votes. The two new states he won Iowa and New Mexico combined for 15 electoral votes. Bush gained 2.9 points in the nationwide popular vote between 2000 and In the two-party vote, his gain was a smaller 1.6 points. As Figure 1 shows, that gain was spread across many states. The graph displays Bush s share of the twoparty vote in both years. Most states are above the 45-degree line, demonstrating that Bush gained in more states than where he lost. Bush improved in 32 states, by an average of 2.5 points. The few states where his support fell appreciably are those where Nader ran particularly well in The four circles farthest below the line are Vermont (where Nader got 7% in 2000), Alaska (10%), Montana (6%), and Oregon (5%). Most voters who chose Nader in 2000 either dropped out or decided to support Kerry in All told, Bush s share of the two-party vote fell in only 19 states, by an average of 1.3 points. This is roughly half the size of the average gain in the other 31 states.
5 Burden: An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election 3 Figure 1: Bush Gains in Most States Bush 2-Party Share of 2004 Vote Bush 2-Party Share of 2000 Vote Note: Washington, DC removed for presentation purposes. Surprising is that his support dropped off most in traditional Republican strongholds in the Mountain West (Alaska, Montana, and Idaho) and upper New England (Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine). His biggest gains came in some historically Democratic states such as Hawaii, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and New York. Bush even ran better in Kerry s home state of Massachusetts than he had against Gore in The nearly uniform increase across the county challenges the notion that evangelicals or Latinos or any other concentrated group is responsible for his victory. Rather, a widely-distributed increase must be due to getting more votes from a widely-distributed demographic group. I posit that women were the key swing constituency. Exit polls show the gender gap at just three points in 2004, less than half of what it was in Men actually voted for Kerry as much or more than they had for Gore, but women swung decidedly to Bush compared to Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2008
6 4 The Forum Vol. 2 [2004], No. 4, Article 2 More specifically, married white women are almost entirely responsible for the change in the Bush vote. White women split equally between the major party candidates in 2000, and had favored the Democrats by five points in But in 2004 exit polls show that they reversed course, voting for Bush As 36% of the voters in 2004, white women s five point swing could theoretically be responsible for most of Bush s gain (5 points 36 percent 1.8 points). Married women showed a similar shift to the Republicans. They voted against Bush in 2000 but for Bush in In the larger context of so much geographic and demographic stability, these are seismic shifts. The shifts are found exclusively among white and married women. 1 Improvement among these demographic groups is consistent with the widespread bounce Bush got in It is also tentative support for the popular security mom thesis, though concerns about security also affected women without children. Though we cannot be certain from exit poll data, they suggest that concerns about national security helped improve Bush s standing among white women. While it is impossible at this point to rule out any effect of moral issues in driving up Bush s support among women, their influence is suspect. Most importantly, surveys show that women are consistently more liberal than men when it comes to gay marriage and other cultural issues. A Pew study conducted a year before the election showed women supporting both gay marriage and civil unions more than men did. 2 In addition, there is not much evidence that social conservatives turned out disproportionately more in Protestants made up 54% of the voters according to exit polls in both 2000 and Those who attend church weekly were 27% of voters in 2000 and 26% of voters in 2004, hardly a surge. In addition, these two groups gave Bush as much or more of their vote in 2000 than they did in Voter Turnout Voter turnout was up appreciably in 2004, but the increase was far from historic. As Figure 2 shows, by one measure turnout increased 4.3 percentage points over 2000 to 58.9%. 3 This comes in just below the 1992 level. It is an improvement in particular on 1996, when turnout hit its lowest point in decades. 1 The presentation of exit poll data after the election do not allow for the simultaneous examination of marital status, race, and gender. The National Election Study will allow study of the interaction between sex and marital status in a more sophisticated manner Throughout I use McDonald and Popkin s (2001) turnout calculations based on the voting eligible population. How turnout is measured particularly what denominator is used to calculate the percentage is a source of some debate.
7 Burden: An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election 5 But 2004 does not touch the higher turnout elections of the 1950s and 1960s. Though an improvement, it should not be regarded as record-setting in any sense. Figure 2: Voter Turnout Up Modestly in 2004 Voter Turnout Since 1952, the range between the highest turnout election (1960) and lowest (1996) is a mere 11.2 points. But the variation among states in any given year is far greater. State turnout in 2004 ran from a low of 47.9% in Hawaii to a high of 78.0% in Minnesota. This is a range of some 30 points, which far exceeds the small changes in overall turnout from one election year to the next. Changes in voter turnout between 2000 and 2004 varied dramatically across the states depending on whether the presidential election was closely fought there or not. For example, though overall turnout rose, it actually fell in California and New York, where the outcome was not in doubt. It was driven up more than 10 points in South Dakota due to the high-powered U.S. Senate race there. More generally, the battleground states saw turnout up by 7.4 points on average while the remaining states saw turnout rise by only 4.6 points. 4 It was only the slide in 4 I use the 11 battleground states identified by Nagourney and Seelye (2004). Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2008
8 6 The Forum Vol. 2 [2004], No. 4, Article 2 turnout among some noncompetitive states that kept nationwide turnout from creeping higher. A more rigorous analysis of changes in voter turnout is presented in Table 2. The dependent variable is the change in turnout in each state between 2000 and The explanatory variables account for the presence of minor party candidates, the two-party distribution of the vote, the intensity of the major-party race, and whether initiatives banning gay marriage were on the ballot. The first column includes all states and DC; the second column excludes the 16 states where Ralph Nader was not on the ballot. Both models are estimated using ordinary least squares regression to evaluate these influences simultaneously. Table 2: Turnout Up in Battleground States, Down Where Nader Does Well Nader s 4-Way Share of the Vote -3.24** (1.40) -3.41** (1.49) Badnarik s 4-Way Share of the Vote 4.11 (4.21) 3.07 (4.50) Kerry s 4-Way Share of the Vote -.06* (.03) -.06 (.04) Battleground State 2.53** (.83) 2.35** (.98) Gay Marriage Initiative on Ballot.71 (.82).004 (1.03) Constant 8.21*** (1.71) 8.70*** (2.22) Adjusted R Number of Cases Ordinary least squares regression coefficients with standard errors in parentheses. * p <.10, ** p <.05, *** p <.01, two tailed test Least surprising in these results is that turnout was higher by two to three points in battleground states. The parties concentrated their advertising efforts in a small number of media markets in A rich literature in political science has already pointed to the relationship between elite mobilization and voter turnout (Rosenstone and Hansen 1993). The face-to-face canvassing that was so prominent in 2004 is an especially effective way to boost turnout (Green and Gerber 2004). These techniques were used extensively in swing states such as Ohio, Florida, and Wisconsin, but much less elsewhere. Contrary to much media analysis, the results show that mobilization around gay marriage ballot measures had no aggregate effect on turnout. Any additional
9 Burden: An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election 7 stimulus among the evangelical right was offset by those opposed to the gay marriage bans. This result contrasts quite sharply with claims such as the Atlanta Journal-Constitution s Jim Galloway s conclusion that the presidential election just behind us was all about God, values, gay marriage and turnout of the white, conservative Christians in unprecedented numbers. Though gay marriage or President Bush s appeals to faith might have increased turnout among conservative religious adherents, it made no more (or less) of a contribution to turnout than did increases among the Democratic base. Finally, there is scant evidence that the two most prominent minor party candidates increased turnout. Libertarian Michael Badnarik appeared on all but one state ballot and drew almost as many votes as Nader did. But in the end he was not responsible for any of the increase in voter turnout. Nader not only failed to bring out new voters but turnout actually increased less in states where he ran well, namely politically lopsided states in the Northeast and Mountain West. This was in stark contrast to 2000 where roughly half of Nader s support came from new voters. The reason for this negative effect is probably that the closeness of the vote in some states encouraged strategic voting by Nader supporters (Burden 2003). An interesting side note is that support for Badnarik and Nader does not appear to run along ideological lines. Though one might have suspected that the two candidates would appeal to quite different constituencies given their contrasting platforms, in practice they drew support from similar constituencies. The correlation between their state vote shares is a robust.84. Even limiting the analysis to states where Nader was on the ballot, the correlation is.64. This suggests that support for the two candidates was driven at least as much by protest against the two major parties as it was for their specific policy agendas. The Partisan Consequences of Turnout The 2004 election challenged the conventional wisdom that Democrats always benefit from higher voter turnout. While most partisans believe this to be true, political science research suggests that most turnout effects are negligible, though high turnout tends to help the Democrats in more elections than not (Citrin, Schickler, and Sides 2003). Yet before the election nearly every observer expected that high turnout would help Kerry. Independent 527 groups such as America Coming Together hired canvassers in battleground states to register and turn out Democratic voters. Young people are notoriously difficult to turn out, but they were expected to favor Kerry. In short, higher turnout should have hurt Bush. This reasoning appears dead wrong. Table 3 explains Bush s state share of the vote in 2004 as a function of turnout and other factors. Based on the stability in the vote demonstrated above, I assume that the Bush vote in 2004 is largely a Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2008
10 8 The Forum Vol. 2 [2004], No. 4, Article 2 replication of his vote in I also include the change in turnout from 2000, whether the state was a battleground, and whether anti-gay marriage initiatives and Ralph Nader appeared on the ballot. Table 3: Bush Gains Where Turnout is Up, Loses Where the Race is Closely Fought Bush Share of 2-Party Vote in *** (.03) Change in Voter Turnout from 2000 to * (.14) Battleground State -2.19** (.91) Gay Marriage Initiative on Ballot -.14 (.82) Nader on Ballot.24 (.72) Constant 3.92** (1.73) Adjusted R 2.95 Number of Cases 51 Ordinary least squares regression coefficients with standard errors in parentheses. * p <.10, ** p <.05, *** p <.01, two tailed test The sharpest finding in Table 3 is that, if anyone, Bush not Kerry benefited from higher turnout. Though the efforts of the 527 groups and the Democrats themselves surely increased turnout, it was the Republicans who were advantaged in the end. For every four percentage points that turnout increased between 2000 and 2004, Bush gained a full point. At the same time, Bush generally did worse in battleground states than elsewhere. (This result holds even if the model controls for the South, where Bush did best.) So while turnout per se helped Bush, mobilization by pro-kerry groups in battleground states kept Bush s margins down. This might be because the Democrats so narrowly targeted the swing states while mostly ignoring the rest of the country. Again, there are no effects of anti-gay marriage initiatives. These ballot measures had no effect on Bush s vote share, nor did the presence of Nader on the ballot hurt Kerry this time.
11 Burden: An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election 9 Concluding Thoughts Based on the rudimentary analysis reported here, several of the media s immediate conclusions about the 2004 presidential election appear to be in doubt. First, the election was not fundamentally about mass support of right-wing religious values. Though evangelical conservatives turned out at a higher rate than in 2000, so did just about every other demographic group. There is no evidence that the presence of gay marriage initiatives on 11 state ballots had any effect on Bush s vote share or turnout more generally. It is ironic then that the increase in voter turnout (mostly in non-battleground states) helped Bush rather than Kerry. Perhaps the multifaceted mobilization effort waged by the Kerry campaign, the Democratic National Committee, 527 groups, and other anti-bush forces was not coordinated enough (either by law or practice) to provide much of a net advantage. In this view, the unified field effort of the Bush campaign was simply more efficient at turning out its voters. Even so, the Republicans were not turning out Christian conservatives disproportionately. Rather, Bush s strength was distributed quite widely. His vote share actually increased more in blue states than red states, which makes the centrality of moral values in his victory difficult to accept. A more plausible explanation is that white married women, who unlike other subpopulations are distributed rather evenly across the states, are responsible for almost all of Bush s increase between 2000 and Men voted almost identically to how they had in 2000, but women gave the Republicans four more percentage points in This was enough to provide the popular vote victory for Bush that he was denied four years earlier. Precisely why white women moved is a matter to be resolved with further study. It is probable that at least some women decided to stick by the incumbent administration as a source of stability in a time of international turmoil. These socalled security moms (not all of whom were actually mothers) showed concern about future terrorist attacks and believed that the military action in Iraq was a reasonable part of the war on terror. Bush s trespassing on traditional Democratic issues such as education did not hurt his cause among women either. Kerry might have made a stronger mark on these issues had he not been forced to explain what seemed like inconsistent positions. This lack of clarity might be an inherent part of Kerry s personality or a strategic mistake made by the campaign. More likely, it highlights a general liability faced by senators who run for president (Burden 2002). Senator Kerry voted for the Iraq invasion and admitted that he would have done it again later, even after learning that weapons of mass destruction and links with Al Qaeda were unsubstantiated. He could not adequately explain his decision to vote against $87 billion in supplemental funding for the war or why he opposed No Child Left Behind despite voting for it Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2008
12 10 The Forum Vol. 2 [2004], No. 4, Article 2 in the Senate. Even though female voters disagreed with many of Bush s actions, enough preferred the certainty of a second term to the ambiguity of the Kerry message. Temporary shifts like the ones that occurred among white and married women following 9-11 are not likely to be good predictors of future electoral coalitions. Whether Karl Rove s plan to transform the two Bush victories into lasting Republican dominance comes to fruition is an open question. But it is clear that 2000 and 2004 are something of a crossroads. These two elections are the closest consecutive presidential elections since the 1880s. And the Republican margins in the Congress are the slimmest in the history of the American two-party system. Time will tell us whether post-september 11 politics are fleeting or they usher in a new era of party alignments. References Burden, Barry C United States Senators as Presidential Candidates. Political Science Quarterly 117: Burden, Barry C Minor Parties in the 2000 Presidential Election In Models of Voting in Presidential Elections: The 2000 U.S. Election, ed. Herbert F. Weisberg and Clyde Wilcox. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Citrin, Jack, Eric Schickler, and John Sides What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections. American Journal of Political Science 47: Galloway, Jim Religious Vote Fuels Victory for GOP. Atlanta Journal- Constitution. November 4. Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber Get Out The Vote! How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Michael P. McDonald, and Samuel Popkin The Myth of the Vanishing Voter. American Political Science Review 95: Nagourney, Adam, and Katharine Q. Seelye Bush and Kerry Focus Campaigns on 11 Key States. New York Times. October 24. Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York, NY: MacMillan.
Moral Values Take Back Seat to Partisanship and the Economy In 2004 Presidential Election
Moral Values Take Back Seat to Partisanship and the Economy In 2004 Presidential Election Lawrence R. Jacobs McKnight Land Grant Professor Director, 2004 Elections Project Humphrey Institute University
More informationCIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Youth Voter Increases in 2006 By Mark Hugo Lopez, Karlo Barrios Marcelo, and Emily Hoban Kirby 1 June 2007 For the
More information2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview
2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview ʺIn Clinton, the superdelegates have a candidate who fits their recent mold and the last two elections have been very close. This year is a bad year for Republicans.
More informationEconomic Issues in Ohio Work to Kerry s Advantage
ABC NEWS POLL: THE RACE IN OHIO 10/17/04 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 5 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 19, 2004 Economic Issues in Ohio Work to Kerry s Advantage The economy and jobs dominate as the top issue in Ohio,
More informationSwing Voters in Swing States Troubled By Iraq, Economy; Unimpressed With Bush and Kerry, Annenberg Data Show
DATE: June 4, 2004 CONTACT: Adam Clymer at 202-879-6757 or 202 549-7161 (cell) VISIT: www.naes04.org Swing Voters in Swing States Troubled By Iraq, Economy; Unimpressed With Bush and Kerry, Annenberg Data
More informationKey Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead
Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead November 2018 Bill McInturff SLIDE 1 Yes, it was all about Trump. SLIDE 2 A midterm record said their vote was a message of support or opposition to
More informationAP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ. Voter Trends in A Final Examination. By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017
AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ Voter Trends in 2016 A Final Examination By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Voter Trends in 2016 A Final Examination By Rob Griffin,
More informationLatinos and the Mid- term Election
Fact Sheet Novem ber 27, 2006 Latinos and the 2 0 0 6 Mid- term Election Widely cited findings in the national exit polls suggest Latinos tilted heavily in favor of the Democrats in the 2006 election,
More informationChanges in Party Identification among U.S. Adult Catholics in CARA Polls, % 48% 39% 41% 38% 30% 37% 31%
The Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate Georgetown University June 20, 2008 Election 08 Forecast: Democrats Have Edge among U.S. Catholics The Catholic electorate will include more than 47 million
More informationIn the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004
In the Margins Political Victory in the Context of Technology Error, Residual Votes, and Incident Reports in 2004 Dr. Philip N. Howard Assistant Professor, Department of Communication University of Washington
More informationCampaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30
Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30 Current Events, Recent Polls, & Review Background influences on campaigns Presidential
More informationThe Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate
The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu May, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the pro-republican
More informationWho Runs the States?
Who Runs the States? An in-depth look at historical state partisan control and quality of life indices Part 1: Partisanship of the 50 states between 1992-2013 By Geoff Pallay May 2013 1 Table of Contents
More informationThe Battleground: Democratic Perspective September 7 th, 2016
The Battleground: Democratic Perspective September 7 th, 2016 Democratic Strategic Analysis: By Celinda Lake, Daniel Gotoff, and Corey Teter As we enter the home stretch of the 2016 cycle, the political
More information2008 Voter Turnout Brief
2008 Voter Turnout Brief Prepared by George Pillsbury Nonprofit Voter Engagement Network, www.nonprofitvote.org Voter Turnout Nears Most Recent High in 1960 Primary Source: United States Election Project
More informationMathematics of the Electoral College. Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University
Mathematics of the Electoral College Robbie Robinson Professor of Mathematics The George Washington University Overview Is the US President elected directly? No. The president is elected by electors who
More informationPaul M. Sommers Alyssa A. Chong Monica B. Ralston And Andrew C. Waxman. March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO.
WHO REALLY VOTED FOR BARACK OBAMA? by Paul M. Sommers Alyssa A. Chong Monica B. Ralston And Andrew C. Waxman March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 10-19 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS MIDDLEBURY
More informationThe Role of the Rising American Electorate in the 2012 Election
Date: November 9, 2012 To: From: Interested Parties Page Gardner, Women s Voices, Women Vote Action Fund; Stanley B. Greenberg, Democracy Corps/GQRR; Erica Seifert, Democracy Corps; David Walker, GQRR
More informationDecember 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote
STATE OF VERMONT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE HOUSE 115 STATE STREET MONTPELIER, VT 05633-5201 December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote To Members
More informationTo understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on
To understand the U.S. electoral college and, more generally, American democracy, it is critical to understand that when voters go to the polls on Tuesday, November 8th, they are not voting together in
More information2016 State Elections
2016 State Elections By Tim Storey and Dan Diorio Voters left the overall partisan landscape in state legislatures relatively unchanged in 2016, despite a tumultuous campaign for the presidency. The GOP
More informationThe sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.
3 The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes. Last Time Mood Was Positive: 154 Months Ago 01/2004: 47% RD 43% WT The Mood of the Country Rasmussen Reports 11/20 11/22: 30% - 58% The
More informationPlease note: additional data sources are referenced throughout this presentation, including national exit polls and NBC/WSJ national survey data.
Public Opinion Strategies is pleased to present key findings from two national surveys of 800 actual voters conducted on November 6, 2012. These surveys were merged, for a total of 1,600 actual voters
More informationBy David Lauter. 1 of 5 12/12/2016 9:39 AM
Clinton won as many votes as Obama in 2012 just not in the states wher... 1 of 5 12/12/2016 9:39 AM Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.8 million, according to a final tally. The result
More informationThis report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by
This report was prepared for the Immigration Policy Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation by Rob Paral and Associates, with writing by Rob Paral and Madura Wijewardena, data processing by Michael
More informationElecting our President with National Popular Vote
Electing our President with National Popular Vote The current system for electing our president no longer serves America well. Four times in our history, the candidate who placed second in the popular
More informationNATIONAL: 2018 HOUSE RACE STABILITY
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Friday, November 2, 2018 Contact: PATRICK MURRAY
More informationRepresentational Bias in the 2012 Electorate
Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate by Vanessa Perez, Ph.D. January 2015 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 4 2 Methodology 5 3 Continuing Disparities in the and Voting Populations 6-10 4 National
More informationTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth
THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES by Andrew L. Roth INTRODUCTION The following pages provide a statistical profile of California's state legislature. The data are intended to suggest who
More informationCIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws By Emily Hoban Kirby and Mark Hugo Lopez 1 June 2004 Recent voting
More informationEXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE,
WHS (2009) ISSN: 1535-4738 Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 2010 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. EXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, 1964-2008 ABSTRACT The purpose of this work is to examine the sources
More informationBLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY
BLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics The University of Akron Executive Summary The Bliss Institute 2006 General Election Survey finds Democrat Ted Strickland
More informationMarist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu National Poll: The Candidates and the Campaign 2004 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
More informationTHE 2004 YOUTH VOTE MEDIA COVERAGE. Select Newspaper Reports and Commentary
MEDIA COVERAGE Select Newspaper Reports and Commentary Turnout was up across the board. Youth turnout increased and kept up with the overall increase, said Carrie Donovan, CIRCLE s young vote director.
More information1. A Republican edge in terms of self-described interest in the election. 2. Lower levels of self-described interest among younger and Latino
2 Academics use political polling as a measure about the viability of survey research can it accurately predict the result of a national election? The answer continues to be yes. There is compelling evidence
More informationAllocating the US Federal Budget to the States: the Impact of the President. Statistical Appendix
Allocating the US Federal Budget to the States: the Impact of the President Valentino Larcinese, Leonzio Rizzo, Cecilia Testa Statistical Appendix 1 Summary Statistics (Tables A1 and A2) Table A1 reports
More informationEndnotes on Campaign 2000 SOME FINAL OBSERVATIONS ON VOTER OPINIONS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, December 21, 2000 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Andrew Kohut, Director Endnotes on Campaign 2000 SOME FINAL OBSERVATIONS ON VOTER OPINIONS Overlooked amid controversies over
More informationWhy The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice
Why The National Popular Vote Bill Is Not A Good Choice A quick look at the National Popular Vote (NPV) approach gives the impression that it promises a much better result in the Electoral College process.
More informationNational Public Radio The Campaign on the Eve of the Conventions
March 13, 2006 August 20, 2008 National Public Radio The Campaign on the Eve of the Conventions August 21, 2008 1,124 Likely Voters Presidential Battleground States in the presidential battleground: blue
More informationThe Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate
The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu November, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the
More informationAmerican Dental Association
American Dental Association May 2, 2016 Bill McInturff SLIDE 1 Heading into the Election Year SLIDE 2 Direction of country remains strongly negative for over a decade. Right Track Wrong Direction WT 80
More informationCIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States
FACT SHEET CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement Youth Voting in the 2004 Battleground States By Emily Kirby and Chris Herbst 1 August 2004 As November 2 nd quickly
More informationBackground Information on Redistricting
Redistricting in New York State Citizens Union/League of Women Voters of New York State Background Information on Redistricting What is redistricting? Redistricting determines the lines of state legislative
More informationObama s Majority and Republican Marginalization
October 24, 2008 Obama s Majority and Republican Marginalization National and Presidential Battleground Surveys Methodology and Overview The results of the following survey are cited throughout this presentation:
More informationMore State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case
[Type here] 6171 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 20112 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: December 22, 2015 Contact: Kimball
More informationMEMORANDUM INTERESTED PARTIES FROM: ED GOEAS BATTLEGROUND POLL DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, The Tarrance Group Page 1
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: INTERESTED PARTIES ED GOEAS BATTLEGROUND POLL DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 In a historic campaign that has endured many twists and turns, this year s presidential election is sure
More informationThe Changing Face of Labor,
The Changing Face of Labor, 1983-28 John Schmitt and Kris Warner November 29 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 4 Washington, D.C. 29 22-293-538 www.cepr.net CEPR
More information2010 Legislative Elections
2010 Legislative Elections By Tim Storey State Legislative Branch The 2010 state legislative elections brought major change to the state partisan landscape with Republicans emerging in the best position
More informationThis journal is published by the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.
Article: National Conditions, Strategic Politicians, and U.S. Congressional Elections: Using the Generic Vote to Forecast the 2006 House and Senate Elections Author: Alan I. Abramowitz Issue: October 2006
More informationElection of Worksheet #1 - Candidates and Parties. Abraham Lincoln. Stephen A. Douglas. John C. Breckinridge. John Bell
III. Activities Election of 1860 Name Worksheet #1 Candidates and Parties The election of 1860 demonstrated the divisions within the United States. The political parties of the decades before 1860 no longer
More information2013 Boone Municipal Election Turnout: Measuring the effects of the 2013 Board of Elections changes
2013 Boone Municipal Election Turnout: Measuring the effects of the 2013 Board of Elections changes George Ehrhardt, Ph.D. Department of Government and Justice Studies Appalachian State University 12/2013
More informationUnion Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015
January 21 Union Byte 21 By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite 4 Washington, DC 29 tel: 22-293-38 fax: 22-88-136 www.cepr.net Cherrie
More informationNational Population Growth Declines as Domestic Migration Flows Rise
National Population Growth Declines as Domestic Migration Flows Rise By William H. Frey U.S. population trends are showing something of a dual personality when viewed from the perspective of the nation
More informationNew Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.
New Americans in the VOTING Booth The Growing Electoral Power OF Immigrant Communities By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D. Special Report October 2014 New Americans in the VOTING Booth:
More informationBush 2004 Gains among Hispanics Strongest with Men, And in South and Northeast, Annenberg Data Show
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: December 21, 2004 CONTACT: Adam Clymer at 202-879-6757 or 202 549-7161 (cell) VISIT: www.naes04.org Bush 2004 Gains among Hispanics Strongest with Men, And in South and Northeast,
More informationINTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
Gender Parity Index INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY - 2017 State of Women's Representation Page 1 INTRODUCTION As a result of the 2016 elections, progress towards gender parity stalled. Beyond Hillary Clinton
More informationHousehold Income, Poverty, and Food-Stamp Use in Native-Born and Immigrant Households
Household, Poverty, and Food-Stamp Use in Native-Born and Immigrant A Case Study in Use of Public Assistance JUDITH GANS Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy The University of Arizona research support
More informationPolitical Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections
Political Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections Christopher N. Lawrence Department of Political Science Duke University April 3, 2006 Overview During the 1990s, minor-party
More informationU.S. Catholics split between intent to vote for Kerry and Bush.
The Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate Georgetown University Monday, April 12, 2004 U.S. Catholics split between intent to vote for Kerry and Bush. In an election year where the first Catholic
More informationThe Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back: Extended memo from post-election research
Date: November 27, 2018 To: Interested parties From: Stanley Greenberg, Greenberg Research Nancy Zdunkewicz, Page Gardner, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund The Rising American Electorate & White
More informationTHE AP-GfK POLL. Conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media
GfK Custom Research North America THE AP-GfK POLL Conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media Interview dates: September 5-10, 2008 Interviews: 1,217 adults; 812 likely voters Margin of error: +/- 2.8
More informationIn 2008, President Obama and Congressional Democrats
Report MODERATE POLITICS NOVEMBER 2010 Droppers and Switchers : The Fraying Obama Coalition By Anne Kim and Stefan Hankin In 2008, President Obama and Congressional Democrats assembled a broad and winning
More informationCopyrighted Material CHAPTER 1. Introduction
CHAPTER 1 Introduction OK, but here s the fact that nobody ever, ever mentions Democrats win rich people. Over $100,000 in income, you are likely more than not to vote for Democrats. People never point
More informationParties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12
Parties and Elections Selections from Chapters 11 & 12 Party Eras in American History Party Eras Historical periods in which a majority of voters cling to the party in power Critical Election An electoral
More informationPartisan Preference of Puerto Rico Voters Post-Statehood
TO FROM Interested Parties Chris Anderson and Andrew Schwartz DATE April 16, 2018 SUBJECT Partisan Preference of Puerto Rico Voters Post-Statehood Conventional wisdom holds that, if Puerto Rico were admitted
More informationOhio State University
Fake News Did Have a Significant Impact on the Vote in the 2016 Election: Original Full-Length Version with Methodological Appendix By Richard Gunther, Paul A. Beck, and Erik C. Nisbet Ohio State University
More informationYoung Voters in the 2010 Elections
Young Voters in the 2010 Elections By CIRCLE Staff November 9, 2010 This CIRCLE fact sheet summarizes important findings from the 2010 National House Exit Polls conducted by Edison Research. The respondents
More informationUnderstanding the Role of the ACA in the 2014 Elections
Understanding the Role of the ACA in the 2014 Elections Robert J. Blendon, Sc.D. Professor of Health Policy and Political Analysis Harvard School of Public Health/ Kennedy School of Government October
More informationThe Macro Polity Updated
The Macro Polity Updated Robert S Erikson Columbia University rse14@columbiaedu Michael B MacKuen University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Mackuen@emailuncedu James A Stimson University of North Carolina,
More informationShould Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund
Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? 1 Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and keep themselves and their party in power. 2 3 -The U.S. Constitution requires that the
More informationTHE FIELD POLL FOR ADVANCE PUBLICATION BY SUBSCRIBERS ONLY.
THE FIELD POLL THE INDEPENDENT AND NON-PARTISAN SURVEY OF PUBLIC OPINION ESTABLISHED IN 1947 AS THE CALIFORNIA POLL BY MERVIN FIELD Field Research Corporation 601 California Street, Suite 900 San Francisco,
More informationPolitical Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections
Political Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections Christopher N. Lawrence Department of Political Science Duke University April 3, 2006 Overview During the 1990s, minor-party
More informationChapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1 What is a Party? The party organization is the party professionals who run the party at all levels by contributing time, money, and skill. The party in government
More informationFOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018
FOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Carroll Doherty, Director of Political Research Jocelyn Kiley, Associate Director, Research Bridget Johnson, Communications Associate 202.419.4372
More informationStan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner
Date: June 21, 2013 From: Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Not so fast 2014 Congressional Battleground very competitive First survey
More informationGender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts
Gender, Race, and Dissensus in State Supreme Courts John Szmer, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Robert K. Christensen, University of Georgia Erin B. Kaheny., University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
More informationAmerican Values Survey Initial Report
Initial Report FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 10:00 AM Robert P. Jones, Ph.D. Director and Senior Fellow Dan Cox Policy & Values Research Associate September 20, 2006 A Project of 2006 AMERICAN
More informationWhat is The Probability Your Vote will Make a Difference?
Berkeley Law From the SelectedWorks of Aaron Edlin 2009 What is The Probability Your Vote will Make a Difference? Andrew Gelman, Columbia University Nate Silver Aaron S. Edlin, University of California,
More informationTHE EFFECT OF EARLY VOTING AND THE LENGTH OF EARLY VOTING ON VOTER TURNOUT
THE EFFECT OF EARLY VOTING AND THE LENGTH OF EARLY VOTING ON VOTER TURNOUT Simona Altshuler University of Florida Email: simonaalt@ufl.edu Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Kenny Abstract This paper explores the effects
More informationWorking Paper: The Effect of Electronic Voting Machines on Change in Support for Bush in the 2004 Florida Elections
Working Paper: The Effect of Electronic Voting Machines on Change in Support for Bush in the 2004 Florida Elections Michael Hout, Laura Mangels, Jennifer Carlson, Rachel Best With the assistance of the
More informationDiscussion Guide for PRIMARIES in MARYLAND: Open vs. Closed? Top Two/Four or by Party? Plurality or Majority? 10/7/17 note without Fact Sheet bolded
Discussion Guide for PRIMARIES in MARYLAND: Open vs. Closed? Top Two/Four or by Party? Plurality or Majority? DL: Discussion Leader RP: if also have Resource Person from Study 10/7/17 note: It takes about
More informationObama s Support is Broadly Based; McCain Now -10 on the Economy
ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: ELECTION TRACKING #8 EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 5 p.m. Monday, Oct. 27, 2008 Obama s Support is Broadly Based; McCain Now -10 on the Economy With a final full week of campaigning
More informationRegional Variations in Public Opinion on the Affordable Care Act
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law Advance Publication, published on September 26, 2011 Report from the States Regional Variations in Public Opinion on the Affordable Care Act Mollyann Brodie Claudia
More informationGrowth in the Foreign-Born Workforce and Employment of the Native Born
Report August 10, 2006 Growth in the Foreign-Born Workforce and Employment of the Native Born Rakesh Kochhar Associate Director for Research, Pew Hispanic Center Rapid increases in the foreign-born population
More informationThe Changing Presidential Race after the Conventions
Date: September 15, 2008 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps Stan Greenberg and James Carville The Changing Presidential Race after the Conventions Report on national survey and survey of presidential
More informationThe 2004 Election Aiken County Exit Poll: A Descriptive Analysis
The 2004 Election Aiken County Exit Poll: A Descriptive Analysis November 12, 2004 A public service research report co-sponsored by the USCA History and Political Science Department and the USCA Social
More informationRed Shift. The Domestic Policy Program. October 2010
The Domestic Policy Program TO: Interested Parties FROM: Anne Kim, Domestic Policy Program Director Jon Cowan, President, Third Way RE: The Deciders: Moderates in 2010 October 2010 Amid growing concerns
More informationSMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM
14. REFORMING THE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES: SMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM The calendar of presidential primary elections currently in use in the United States is a most
More informationTHE TARRANCE GROUP. Interested Parties. Brian Nienaber. Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey
THE TARRANCE GROUP To: From: Re: Interested Parties Ed Goeas Brian Nienaber Key findings from the Battleground Week 6 Survey The Tarrance Group with its partners Lake Research Partners, POLITICO, and George
More informationELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward?
1 ELECTION OVERVIEW + Context: Mood of the Electorate + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward? + Appendix: Polling Post-Mortem 2 2 INITIAL HEADLINES + Things
More informationMarist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Phone 845.575.5050 Fax 845.575.5111 www.maristpoll.marist.edu POLL MUST BE SOURCED: NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist Poll* Trump Leads
More information2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA
Southern Tier East Census Monograph Series Report 11-1 January 2011 2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA The United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 2, requires a decennial census for the
More informationA Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy
THE strategist DEMOCRATIC A Journal of Public Opinion & Political Strategy www.thedemocraticstrategist.org A TDS Strategy Memo: Why Democrats Should Ignore Swing Voters and Focus on Voter Registration
More informationWho Really Voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012?
Who Really Voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012? Helena N. Hlavaty a, Mohamed A. Hussein a, Peter Kiley-Bergen a, Liuxufei Yang a, and Paul M. Sommers a The authors use simple bilinear regression on statewide
More informationRural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008
June 8, 07 Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 08 To: From: Interested Parties Anna Greenberg, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner William Greener, Greener and
More informationChapter 8. Political Participation and Voting
Chapter 8 Political Participation and Voting Forms of Political Participation Forms of Political Participation Forms of Political Participation Traditional political participation: various activities designed
More informationConstitutional Reform in California: The Surprising Divides
Constitutional Reform in California: The Surprising Divides Mike Binder Bill Lane Center for the American West, Stanford University University of California, San Diego Tammy M. Frisby Hoover Institution
More informationEdging toward an earthquake Report on the WVWV March National Survey
Date: April 1, 2016 To: Page Gardner, Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund From: Stan Greenberg and Nancy Zdunkewicz, Edging toward an earthquake Report on the WVWV March National Survey new poll on
More informationTHE 2004 NATIONAL SURVEY OF LATINOS: POLITICS AND CIVIC PARTICIPATION
Summary and Chartpack Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation THE 2004 NATIONAL SURVEY OF LATINOS: POLITICS AND CIVIC PARTICIPATION July 2004 Methodology The Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation
More informationThe US Electoral College: the antiquated key to presidential success
The US Electoral College: the antiquated key to presidential success by Rodney Tiffen/ October 2008 T he United States has the oldest surviving democratic constitution in the world. In the context of its
More information