Time-Sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences. An Experimental Investigation of the Rally Around the Flag Effect.
|
|
- Delphia Sherman
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 An Experimental Investigation of the Rally Around the Flag Effect Journal: Manuscript ID: TESS-0.R Manuscript Type: Original Article Specialty Area: Political Science
2 Page of 0 0 An Experimental Investigation of the Rally Around the Flag Effect Few political phenomena have received as sustained scholarly attention over the last forty years as the rally around the flag effect. Initial treatments argued that the rally was a reflexive response driven by patriotism to external events (Mueller 0). However, subsequent studies have found that not all foreign crises or even uses of force generate a rally; accordingly, a series of case study and large-n analyses have endeavored to understand the factors that produce rallies of varying sizes in some instances and not in others. Although prior scholarship has proposed many factors that may influence the size of a rally, this study focuses on two in particular: the reaction of other domestic political elites and the nature of the president s response to a crisis. Summarizing a wealth of research (e.g. Brody, Zaller, Baker and Oneal 00, Kam and Ramos 00), Groeling and Baum (00, ) argue that the reaction of other domestic political elites is the most widely accepted explanation for the rally-around-the-flag phenomenon. Existing scholarship has also paid some attention to the varying nature of presidential responses to foreign crises, but with mixed results. For example, James and Rioux () find that rallies increased as the level of the president s response increased; however, the rally dissipated if the president ultimately resorted to military force. Baker and Oneal (00), by contrast, find modest evidence that presidents enjoy a greater rally effect when they escalate a crisis to the use of force or war than when force is merely threatened. This proposal breaks new ground by using an experiment to assess the relative influence of these two factors in shaping public support for the president s handling of a hypothetical crisis scenario. Coupled with a Large-n studies have examined the influence of a myriad of domestic and international factors on the size of the rally including the state of the domestic economy, the proximity of elections, the salience of the dispute in the mass media, whether the Soviet Union was involved, the nature of the principal policy objective of the use of force, the reaction of the UN and other international organizations, and crisis severity among others (inter alia, see: Jentleson, Lian and Oneal, Oneal and Bryan, Oneal and Joyner, Chapman and Reiter 00, Chapman 00, 00, Fang 00, Grieco et al 0).
3 Page of 0 0 similar experiment already conducted on a nationally representative sample of Britons, it will also afford the first ever cross-national experimental investigation into the dynamics driving the rally effect. Using Experiments to Explore the Rally Effect Much prior research on the rally effect has focused on comparative case studies and large-n multivariate analyses of the forces driving the size of rallies in the wake of events in the ICB, MIDs and Blechman and Kaplan use of force data sets. Both methods have important advantages; however, one problem that virtually all analyses relying on observational data alone share is the almost intractable difficulty of controlling for all of the differences between idiosyncratic historical cases to isolate the causal influence of any one variable. For example, Brody () compares the sizeable rally President Ford received after his attempt to rescue the crew of the Mayaguez in with the absence of a rally for President Johnson after the seizure of the Pueblo in. He attributes this to elite discourse elites rallied behind Ford, but split on the wisdom of Johnson s diplomatic approach. While elite reactions were very different in the two ship seizure cases, the presidential responses to the crisis were also dramatically different; given the multiple differences between even these cases chosen for their close similarities, it is all but impossible to determine which factor or factors were most responsible for the divergent public reactions. Experimental methods offer significant advantages in this regard and can complement prior research. However, using experimental approaches in this context entails a problem of its own (in addition to standard concerns about external validity). The rally effect is traditionally measured as the change in presidential approval in the wake of an international crisis or use of Multivariate large-n analyses are better equipped to test the relative influence of various factors on the size of the rally effect; however, even here it is virtually impossible to control for the myriad of idiosyncrasies that distinguish the various cases in the commonly used data sets from one another.
4 Page of 0 0 force. As such, there are difficulties in using experiments to measure the rally effect directly. However, experiments can easily assess the relative importance of various factors in determining the degree to which the public supports the president s handling of a crisis. While this is distinct from the rally effect, the two are closely related. One particularly plausible mechanism that explains the significant variance in rally effects observed in previous research is that foreign crises do not reflexively lead to increases in presidential approval, but rather prime the public to weight foreign policy more heavily when evaluating the president. When the public supports the president s handling of the crisis, his approval rating is poised to increase accordingly. By contrast, when public support for his crisis management is low, no rally in approval ratings should emerge. Experimental Design All respondents are informed of the following hypothetical scenario: A band of African rebels has captured an American merchant ship in the Red Sea. They have taken 0 Americans hostage. Respondents are then randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Groups one and two are told that the president has decided to try to negotiate the hostages release and that members of Congress either support or oppose the decision. Groups three and four are told that the president has decided to use military force to try to rescue the hostages and that members of Congress either support or oppose the decision. All respondents are then asked whether they support or oppose the president s handling of the crisis. This will afford a test of the relative importance of the nature of the presidential response and the reaction of congressional elites. The experiment then proceeds to a second stage in which subjects are informed about the outcome of the president s policy. Respondents initially assigned to treatments one and two are It is possible to administer the approval question, then present respondents with a hypothetical scenario, and then re-ask them the approval question to measure the change. However, such an approach is potentially problematic in a number of ways.
5 Page of 0 0 now assigned to one of two new treatment groups informing them that after several weeks or after several days of negotiations the hostages were safely released. Respondents initially assigned to treatments three and four are randomly assigned to one of four new treatment groups. All three groups are told that the military action succeeded in rescuing all 0 hostages; however, they are given varying information concerning the resulting American casualties (0; ; ; + dozens wounded). All respondents are then asked again whether they support or oppose the president s handling of the crisis. Several hypotheses will be tested at this stage. First, comparisons across the latter four treatments afford an interesting test between theories emphasizing the importance of American casualties (e.g. Mueller 0, Gartner and Segura ) and those emphasizing the public s willingness to tolerate casualties as long as the mission succeeds (e.g. Eichenberg 00, Gelpi, Feaver and Reifler 00). Second, the analysis will examine whether initial congressional reactions continue to influence support for the president s handling of the crisis after its successful resolution. Third, the analysis will test whether the president received greater levels of support in the use of force conditions even those that entailed casualties than in the negotiation conditions, which would indicate a strong, baseline public preference for an aggressive military response in such a scenario. Because the proposed experiment comprises only units of length, the maximum sample size of,000 respondents is requested. This will insure sufficient sample sizes in each cell to explore how the effects of each treatment are conditional on respondents partisan affiliations. Preliminary Results and Significance of Proposed Work In August 0, a similar version of the proposed experiment was administered to a nationally-representative sample of,000 Britons (Table ). Both elite reaction and the nature of The additional treatment is to insure that the speed of the ultimate resolution, rather than the chosen tactic of negotiation, is not driving any observed differences between the use of force and negotiation scenarios. This would accord with research in cognitive psychology (e.g. Kahneman and Renshon 00).
6 Page of 0 0 the PM s response significantly influenced public support. However, in the British case the nature of the PM s response was the greatest determinant of public approval. In this specific hypothetical scenario, Britons plainly preferred an aggressive military response; at the initial stage, support for the PM was 0% higher in the use of force case even when it was opposed by many MPs than in the negotiation case when supported by MPs. This greater support continued over to the outcome stage, as regardless of whether MPs supported or opposed the PM s policy, a greater percentage of Britons supported the PM when he resorted to force than when he tried a diplomatic route, even though all hostages were freed in both scenarios and only the military option resulted in the death of servicepersons. By isolating the causal influence of three aspects of a rally event the nature of the executive response, the reaction of other domestic political elites, and the ultimate outcome of the crisis (including the number of casualties sustained) the proposed experiment will complement existing observational studies and afford the most definitive test to date of multiple theoretical claims drawn from the extensive literature on rally effects. The experimental results will also speak to important debates within the broader literature on public support for war (e.g. Berinsky 00, Gelpi, Feaver and Reifler 00). Moreover, coupling this experiment with the UK results will create unique opportunities for cross-national, comparative research on use of force opinion formation. Such designs are exceedingly rare in the existing literature. As a result, the proposed study promises to shed valuable insight both into whether the influence of each experimental factor is the same in two different political contexts, and into whether the variable influence of each factor falls along the same partisan/ideological lines in both countries.
7 Page of 0 0 Table : Support for the PM s Handling of the Ship Seizure Crisis Across Treatments Initial Response: MPs support MPs oppose Use of force % % Negotiate % % Note: All differences in percentages across each row and column are statistically significant, p <.0. Final Response: MPs support MPs oppose Use of force released, KIA % % Negotiate released % % Note: Use of force, MP support/opposition difference is significant, p <.0. Negotiate, MP support/opposition difference is significant, p <.. MP support, use of force/negotiate difference is significant, p <.0. MP opposition, use of force/negotiate difference is significant, p <..
8 Page of 0 0 References Baker, William and John Oneal. 00. Patriotism or Opinion Leadership?: The Nature and Origin of the Rally Round the Flag Effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution : -. Berinsky, Adam. 00. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Brody, Richard.. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Chapman, Terrence. 00. International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics, and Institutional Legitimacy. Journal of Conflict Resolution : -. Chapman, Terrence. 00. Audience Beliefs and International Organization Legitimacy. International Organization : -. Chapman, Terrence and Dan Reiter. 00. The United Nations Security Council and the Rally Round the Flag Effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution : -0. Eichenberg, Richard. 00. Victory Has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Force, -00. International Security : 0-. Fang, Songying. 00. The Informational Role of International Institutions and Domestic Politics. American Journal of Political Science : -. Gartner, Scott and Gary Segura.. War, Casualties, and Public Opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution : -0. Gelpi, Christopher, Peter D. Feaver, Jason Reifler. 00. Paying the Human Costs of War : American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. Princeton University Press. Grieco, Joseph, Christopher Gelpi, Jason Reifler and Peter Feaver. 0. Let s Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and American Public Support for War. International Studies Quarterly : -. Groeling, Timothy and Matthew Baum. 00. Crossing the Water s Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage, and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon. Journal of Politics 0: -. James, Patrick and Jean-Sebastian Rioux.. International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the United States, -. Political Research Quarterly : -. Jentleson, Bruce.. The Pretty-Prudent Public: Post-Post Vietnam American Opinion on the
9 Page of 0 0 use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly : -. Kahneman, Daniel and Jonathan Renshon. 00. Why Hawks Win. Foreign Policy : -. Kam, Cindy and Jennifer Ramos. 00. Understanding the Surge and Decline in Presidential Approval Following /. Public Opinion Quarterly : -0. Lian, Bradley and John Oneal.. Presidents, the Use of Military Force, and Public Opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution : -0. Mueller, John. 0. Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review : -. Oneal, John and Anna Lillian Bryan.. The Rally Round the Flag Effect in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises, -. Political Behavior : -. Oneal, John, Bradley Lian and James Joyner.. Are the American People Pretty Prudent? Public Responses to the Use of Force, -. International Studies Quarterly : -. Zaller, John.. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10 Page of 0 0 Experimental Design The experiment begins by providing all respondents the following prompt: Please consider the following scenario that may occur in the future: A band of African rebels has captured an American merchant ship in the Red Sea. They have taken 0 Americans hostage. Respondents are then randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: INITIAL TREATMENT GROUP : The President has decided to try to negotiate their release. Congressional leaders of both parties SUPPORT the President s decision not to use force. INITIAL TREATMENT GROUP : The President has decided to try to negotiate their release. Congressional leaders of both parties OPPOSE the President s decision not to use force. INITIAL TREATMENT GROUP : The President has decided to use military force to try to rescue the hostages. Congressional leaders of both parties SUPPORT the President s decision to use force. INITIAL TREATMENT GROUP : The President has decided to use military force to try to rescue the hostages. Congressional leaders of both parties OPPOSE the President s decision to use force. All respondents are then asked the following question: Q: Do you support or oppose the President s handling of the crisis? Strongly support Support Neither support nor oppose Oppose Strongly oppose Respondents are then provided an additional prompt concerning the outcome of the president s policy choice. Respondents in initial treatment groups and are randomly assigned to ONE of two outcome treatment groups:
11 Page of 0 0 OUTCOME TREATMENT GROUP : After weeks of negotiations, the rebels released the boat and all 0 American hostages were safely returned. OUTCOME TREATMENT GROUP : After several days of negotiations, the rebels released the boat and all 0 American hostages were safely returned. Respondents in initial treatment groups and are randomly assigned to ONE of the following four outcome treatment groups: OUTCOME TREATMENT GROUP : The military action succeeded in freeing all 0 American hostages. However, American soldiers were killed in the attack, and dozens were wounded. OUTCOME TREATMENT GROUP : The military action succeeded in freeing all 0 American hostages. However, American soldiers were killed in the attack. OUTCOME TREATMENT GROUP : The military action succeeded in freeing all 0 American hostages. However, American soldiers were killed in the attack. OUTCOME TREATMENT GROUP : The military action succeeded in freeing all 0 American hostages. No American soldiers were killed in the attack. All respondents are then asked the following question: Q: Do you support or oppose the President s handling of the crisis? Strongly support Support Neither support nor oppose Oppose Strongly oppose
12 Page of 0 0 This concludes the experiment itself. Time-permitting, we also propose asking all respondents the following manipulation checks: Q: Based on what you read, did congressional leaders support or oppose the president s decision? Support Oppose Don t Know Q: Based on what you read, how many American servicemen killed in an effort to release the hostages? 0 Don t Know
13 Page of 0 0 Table : Results of 0 Pilot Experiment Responses to initial query: Congress support Congress oppose Use of force 0% % Negotiate % % Responses to final query after learning of mission outcome: Use of force released, KIA Weeks of negotiations released Congress support Table : Results of 0 Follow-Up Experiment Responses to initial query: Responses to final query after learning of mission outcome: Use of force released, KIA Days of negotiations released Congress oppose % % % % Congress support Congress oppose Use of force % % Negotiate % % Congress support Congress oppose % % % %
Wartime Estimates of Costs and Benefits & Public Approval of the Iraq War
Scott Sigmund Gartner UC Davis ssgartner@ucdavis.edu January 18, 2007 Wartime Estimates of Costs and Benefits & Public Approval of the Iraq War Introduction Do people weigh a war s anticipated costs and
More informationRisk Tolerance and Support for Potential Military Interventions. David L. Eckles. Terry College of Business
Risk Tolerance and Support for Potential Military Interventions David L. Eckles Terry College of Business Department of Insurance, Legal Studies, and Real Estate University of Georgia 206 Brooks Hall Athens,
More informationTHE ACCURACY OF MEDIA COVERAGE OF FOREIGN POLICY RHETORIC AND EVENTS
THE ACCURACY OF MEDIA COVERAGE OF FOREIGN POLICY RHETORIC AND EVENTS MADALINA-STELIANA DEACONU ms_deaconu@yahoo.com Titu Maiorescu University Abstract: The current study has extended past research by elucidating
More informationFinding the Water s Edge: When Partisanship Influences Foreign Policy Attitudes
Finding the Water s Edge: When Partisanship Influences Foreign Policy Attitudes Sarah Maxey Post-Doctoral Fellow Perry World House, University of Pennsylvania Prepared for presentation at the International
More informationLet s Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and American Public Support for War 1
International Studies Quarterly (2011) 55, 563 583 Let s Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and American Public Support for War 1 Joseph M. Grieco, and Christopher Gelpi Duke University Jason
More informationOpting Out in 2012: Military Casualties, Vote Choice, and Voter Turnout in Obama s Bid for Reelection. Christopher Gelpi.
Opting Out in 2012: Military Casualties, Vote Choice, and Voter Turnout in Obama s Bid for Reelection Christopher Gelpi Kristine Kay The Ohio State University Abstract: We investigate whether American
More informationThe Inter-Temporal Tradeoff in Mobilizing Support for War
The Inter-Temporal Tradeoff in Mobilizing Support for War Connor Huff, Robert Schub Abstract How do leaders statements about conflict duration affect public support for their handling of war? We build
More informationIn 1971, U.S. National Security Advisor Henry
The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining: Presidential Rhetoric and the Role of Party Robert F. Trager Lynn Vavreck University of California, Los Angeles University of California, Los Angeles We analyze
More informationIn August 2005, senators Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and
Crossing the Water s Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage, and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon Tim Groeling Matthew A. Baum University of California, Los Angeles Harvard University The most widely
More informationElites, Events and British Support for the War in Afghanistan
Elites, Events and British Support for the War in Afghanistan Douglas Kriner Assistant Professor of Political Science Boston University dkriner@bu.edu Graham Wilson Professor of Political Science Boston
More informationForeign Voices, Party Cues, and U.S. Public Opinion about Military Action
International Journal of Public Opinion Research Vol. 30 No. 3 2018 ß The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.
More informationSensitivity to casualties in the battlefield
Sensitivity to casualties in the battlefield Presented at the International Association of Political Science XXIV World Congress, July 23-28, 2016 HAMANAKA, Shingo, Ph.D. Ryukoku University, Kyoto, Japan
More informationThe elasticity of reality and British support for the war in Afghanistan
632181BPI0010.1177/1369148116632181The British Journal of Politics and International RelationsKriner and Wilson research-article2016 Article The elasticity of reality and British support for the war in
More informationLet s Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and American Public Support for War. Joseph M. Grieco. Duke University.
Let s Get a Second Opinion: International Institutions and American Public Support for War Joseph M. Grieco Duke University Christopher Gelpi Duke University Jason Reifler Georgia State University Peter
More informationInternational/Defense Issues: Civil Liberties, Terrorism, and War
International/Defense Issues: Civil Liberties, Terrorism, and War How We See Ourselves Pew Research Center, 2011 Chicago Council on Global Affairs, 2012 Pew Research Center, 2011 How Others See Us Percent
More informationFaculty Research Working Papers Series
Faculty Research Working Papers Series Crossing the Water s Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon, 1979-2003 Matthew A. Baum John F. Kennedy School of Government
More informationResearch Statement Research Summary Dissertation Project
Research Summary Research Statement Christopher Carrigan http://scholar.harvard.edu/carrigan Doctoral Candidate John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Regulation Fellow Penn Program on
More informationNews from the Frontlines: An Experimental Study of Foreign Policy Issues and Presidential Vote Choice
News from the Frontlines: An Experimental Study of Foreign Policy Issues and Presidential Vote Choice Christopher Gelpi Duke University Draft please do not cite without permission Comments are very welcome
More informationChristopher Gelpi. Professor of Political Science Duke University
Christopher Gelpi Professor of Political Science Duke University Homepage: http://www.duke.edu/~gelpi 406 Perkins Library Office Phone: (919) 660-4318 Department of Political Science Mobile Phone: (919)
More informationPatriotism, or Bread and Circuses? A Brief Discussion of the September-October 2001 Rally Round the Flag Effect
Patriotism, or Bread and Circuses? A Brief Discussion of the September-October 2001 Rally Round the Flag Effect Mark Tallman Illinois State University, USA I can hear you, the rest of the world hears you.
More informationSensitivity to Casualties in the Battlefield: The Case of Israel
Research article Sensitivity to Casualties in the Battlefield: The Case of Israel Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 2018, Vol. 3(1) 46 60 ª The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalspermissions.nav
More informationEric M. Uslaner, Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement (1)
Eric M. Uslaner, Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement (1) Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement Eric M. Uslaner Department of Government and Politics University of Maryland College Park College Park,
More informationIssue Importance and Performance Voting. *** Soumis à Political Behavior ***
Issue Importance and Performance Voting Patrick Fournier, André Blais, Richard Nadeau, Elisabeth Gidengil, and Neil Nevitte *** Soumis à Political Behavior *** Issue importance mediates the impact of public
More informationThis paper is a work in progress; no part of this paper can be cited or quoted without a written permission from the author
This paper is a work in progress; no part of this paper can be cited or quoted without a written permission from the author Public Opinion, Foreign Policy, and Intervening Variables: Under What Conditions
More informationOffice Hours: MW 1:30-2:30, or by appointment Phone:
Prof. Matthew A. Baum Fall 2009 Office: T244 MW 2:40-4 p.m. Email: Matthew_Baum@Harvard.edu Location: T301 Office Hours: MW 1:30-2:30, or by appointment Phone: 495-1291 DPI-611/Gov. 2881 Mass Media, Public
More informationA Survey of Expert Judgments on the Effects of Counterfactual US Actions on Civilian Fatalities in Syria,
A Survey of Expert Judgments on the Effects of Counterfactual US Actions on Civilian Fatalities in Syria, 2011-2016 Lawrence Woocher Simon-Skjodt Center for the Prevention of Genocide Series of Occasional
More informationJack S. Levy September 2015 RESEARCH AGENDA
Jack S. Levy September 2015 RESEARCH AGENDA My research focuses primarily on the causes of interstate war, foreign policy decisionmaking, political psychology, and qualitative methodology. Below I summarize
More informationChristopher F. Gelpi
Christopher Gelpi Chair of Peace Studies & Conflict Resolution Mershon Center for International Security Studies Professor of Political Science Christopher F. Gelpi Chair of Peace Studies and Conflict
More informationPublic Prudence and its Support for Counter-Terrorism Initiatives
Public Prudence and its Support for Counter-Terrorism Initiatives George Shambaugh School of Foreign Service & Department of Government Georgetown University shambaug@georgetown.edu William Josiger Department
More information1 Prof. Matthew A. Baum Fall Office Hours: MW 1:30-2:30, or by appointment Phone:
1 Prof. Matthew A. Baum Fall 2009 Office: T244 MW 11:40-1 p.m. Email: Matthew_Baum@Harvard.edu Location: T301 Office Hours: MW 1:30-2:30, or by appointment Phone: 495-1291 DPI-608 Political Communication
More informationNEW JERSEY: DEM HAS SLIGHT EDGE IN CD11
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Wednesday, 27, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769
More informationNational Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board Submission of Professor Martin H. Malin and Professor Jon M. Werner in response to the National Labor Relations Board s Request for Information Regarding Representation Election
More informationElite Military Support and the Use of Force 1
Elite Military Support and the Use of Force 1 Kyle A. Dropp 2 Jim Golby and Peter Feaver 1 Please do not cite without the authors permission. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do
More informationChapter 2: Core Values and Support for Anti-Terrorism Measures.
Dissertation Overview My dissertation consists of five chapters. The general theme of the dissertation is how the American public makes sense of foreign affairs and develops opinions about foreign policy.
More informationForthcoming in Political Communication
Forthcoming in Political Communication Democratic Peace, Domestic Audience Costs, and Political Communication Philip B. K. Potter University of Michigan Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy and Department
More informationIntroduction to the Volume
CHAPTER 1 Introduction to the Volume John H. Aldrich and Kathleen M. McGraw Public opinion surveys provide insights into a very large range of social, economic, and political phenomena. In this book, we
More informationAmy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents
Amy Tenhouse Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents In 1996, the American public reelected 357 members to the United States House of Representatives; of those
More informationAn Exploration of Female Political Representation: Evidence from an Experimental Web Survey. Mallory Treece Wagner
An Exploration of Female Political Representation: Evidence from an Experimental Web Survey Mallory Treece Wagner The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga WPSA April 20, 2019 Dear reader, The following
More informationPennsylvania Republicans: Leadership and the Fiscal Cliff
Pennsylvania Republicans: Leadership and the Fiscal Cliff A Survey of 430 Registered Republicans in Pennsylvania Prepared by: The Mercyhurst Center for Applied Politics at Mercyhurst University Joseph
More informationContent Analysis of Network TV News Coverage
Supplemental Technical Appendix for Hayes, Danny, and Matt Guardino. 2011. The Influence of Foreign Voices on U.S. Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science. Content Analysis of Network TV
More informationMEMORANDUM. Independent Voter Preferences
MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties FROM: Ed Gillespie, Whit Ayres and Leslie Sanchez DATE: November 9, 2010 RE: Post-Election Poll Highlights: Independents Propel Republican Victories in 2010 The 2010 mid-term
More informationBarbara Koremenos The continent of international law. Explaining agreement design. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Rev Int Organ (2017) 12:647 651 DOI 10.1007/s11558-017-9274-3 BOOK REVIEW Barbara Koremenos. 2016. The continent of international law. Explaining agreement design. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
More informationGoing Public and the Problem of Avoiding Presidential/Congressional Compromise
Going Public and the Problem of Avoiding Presidential/Congressional Compromise Lydia Andrade, Ph.D. University of the Incarnate Word San Antonio, Texas Every president seeks to determine or influence policy.
More informationUniversity of Groningen. Conversational Flow Koudenburg, Namkje
University of Groningen Conversational Flow Koudenburg, Namkje IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document
More informationThe advent of the modern media has also made going public more appealing. The proliferation of televisions in
Going Public and the Problem of Avoiding Presidential/Congressional Compromise From AP Government and Politics: United States Balance of Power Between Congress and the President Special Focus, 2008 Lydia
More informationAmerican Voters and Elections
American Voters and Elections Instructor Information: Taeyong Park Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis Email: t.park@wustl.edu 1. COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will provide
More informationShane Singh, University of Georgia. and. Jaroslav Tir, University of Colorado Boulder
Shane Singh, University of Georgia and Jaroslav Tir, University of Colorado Boulder Introduction Do female voters respond differently to their countries militarized engagements than their male counterparts?
More informationPublic Evaluations of Presidents
Pepperdine University From the SelectedWorks of Brian Newman 2009 Public Evaluations of Presidents Brian Newman, Pepperdine University Paul Gronke, Reed College Available at: https://works.bepress.com/brian_newman/3/
More informationThe role of ideology in foreign policy attitude formation
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Theses and Dissertations Summer 2012 The role of ideology in foreign policy attitude formation Nicholas Fred Martini University of Iowa Copyright 2012 Nicholas Fred
More informationSIERRA LEONE 2012 ELECTIONS PROJECT PRE-ANALYSIS PLAN: INDIVIDUAL LEVEL INTERVENTIONS
SIERRA LEONE 2012 ELECTIONS PROJECT PRE-ANALYSIS PLAN: INDIVIDUAL LEVEL INTERVENTIONS PIs: Kelly Bidwell (IPA), Katherine Casey (Stanford GSB) and Rachel Glennerster (JPAL MIT) THIS DRAFT: 15 August 2013
More informationJournals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists
THE PROFESSION Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists James C. Garand, Louisiana State University Micheal W. Giles, Emory University long with books, scholarly
More informationTesting Political Economy Models of Reform in the Laboratory
Testing Political Economy Models of Reform in the Laboratory By TIMOTHY N. CASON AND VAI-LAM MUI* * Department of Economics, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1310,
More informationHuman Rights and Public Support for War
Human Rights and Public Support for War Michael Tomz Jessica L. P. Weeks January, 2018 Working Paper No. 1026 Human Rights and Public Support for War Michael Tomz Department of Political Science Stanford
More informationIDEOLOGY, THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT RULING, AND SUPREME COURT LEGITIMACY
Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 4, Winter 2014, pp. 963 973 IDEOLOGY, THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT RULING, AND SUPREME COURT LEGITIMACY Christopher D. Johnston* D. Sunshine Hillygus Brandon L. Bartels
More informationParty Cue Inference Experiment. January 10, Research Question and Objective
Party Cue Inference Experiment January 10, 2017 Research Question and Objective Our overarching goal for the project is to answer the question: when and how do political parties influence public opinion?
More informationMarking Success, Criticizing Failure, and Rooting for Our Side: The Tone of American War News from Verdun to Baghdad
Marking Success, Criticizing Failure, and Rooting for Our Side: The Tone of American War News from Verdun to Baghdad Scott L. Althaus, a Nathaniel Swigger, b Christopher Tiwald, b Svitlana Chernykh, b
More informationLeaders, Advisers, and the Political Origins of Elite Support for War. Elizabeth N. Saunders George Washington University
Leaders, Advisers, and the Political Origins of Elite Support for War Elizabeth N. Saunders George Washington University esaunder@gwu.edu Conditionally Accepted, Journal of Conflict Resolution Abstract:
More informationPresidents and The US Economy: An Econometric Exploration. Working Paper July 2014
Presidents and The US Economy: An Econometric Exploration Working Paper 20324 July 2014 Introduction An extensive and well-known body of scholarly research documents and explores the fact that macroeconomic
More informationChapter 16 Section 1 Notes: The Eisenhower Era
Name: Chapter 16 Section 1 Notes: The Eisenhower Era The Election of 1952 In 1952, Harry Truman chose not to run for reelection believing as president was enough. The prevented any person from serving
More informationSupplementary/Online Appendix for:
Supplementary/Online Appendix for: Relative Policy Support and Coincidental Representation Perspectives on Politics Peter K. Enns peterenns@cornell.edu Contents Appendix 1 Correlated Measurement Error
More informationWhen War Hits Home: The Geography of Military Losses and Support for War in Time and Space
When War Hits Home: The Geography of Military Losses and Support for War in Time and Space Scott L. Althaus Associate Professor, Depts. of Political Science and Communication University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
More informationWhat Gets Covered? How Media Coverage of Elite Debate Drives the Rally-'Round-the-Flag Phenomenon,
What Gets Covered? How Media Coverage of Elite Debate Drives the Rally-'Round-the-Flag Phenomenon, 1979-1998. In seeking to explain the causes of the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon, some scholars have
More informationU.S. Abortion Attitudes Closely Divided
http://www.gallup.com/poll/122033/u.s.-abortion-attitudes-closely- Divided.aspx?version=print August 4, 2009 U.S. Abortion Attitudes Closely Divided Forty-seven percent of Americans identify as pro-life,
More informationTopline Report The Pursuit of Gender Equality in American Foreign Policy: A Survey of American Public Opinion. November 1, 2017
Topline Report The Pursuit of Gender Equality in American Foreign Policy: A Survey of American Public Opinion November 1, 2017 Richard C. Eichenberg Associate Professor of Political Science College of
More informationGOP Electability Test (Romney/Perry/Cain)
GOP Electability Test (Romney/Perry/Cain) Overview Evolving Strategies launched a national survey experiment testing each of the three GOP frontrunners (Romney, Cain, and Perry) in a head-to-head match
More informationElectoral Margins and American Foreign Policy 1
International Studies Quarterly (2013) 57, 505 518 Electoral Margins and American Foreign Policy 1 Philip B. K. Potter University of Michigan Conventional wisdom holds that large margins of electoral victory
More informationPEACE THROUGH INSECURITY: Tenure and International Conflict. Giacomo Chiozza and H. E. Goemans
PEACE THROUGH INSECURITY: Tenure and International Conflict Giacomo Chiozza and H. E. Goemans Giacomo Chiozza is a Ph.D. candidate in the department of Political Science at Duke University. E-mail: gc4@duke.edu
More informationOne. After every presidential election, commentators lament the low voter. Introduction ...
One... Introduction After every presidential election, commentators lament the low voter turnout rate in the United States, suggesting that there is something wrong with a democracy in which only about
More informationHalf See 2012 Campaign as Dull, Too Long Modest Interest in Gadhafi Death, Iraq Withdrawal
1 NEWS Release. 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel (202) 419-4350 Fax (202) 419-4399 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Andrew Kohut, Director
More informationWinning with the bomb. Kyle Beardsley and Victor Asal
Winning with the bomb Kyle Beardsley and Victor Asal Introduction Authors argue that states can improve their allotment of a good or convince an opponent to back down and have shorter crises if their opponents
More information5.1d- Presidential Roles
5.1d- Presidential Roles Express Roles The United States Constitution outlines several of the president's roles and powers, while other roles have developed over time. The presidential roles expressly
More informationA Functional Analysis of 2008 and 2012 Presidential Nomination Acceptance Addresses
Speaker & Gavel Volume 51 Issue 1 Article 5 December 2015 A Functional Analysis of 2008 and 2012 Presidential Nomination Acceptance Addresses William L. Benoit Ohio University, benoitw@ohio.edu Follow
More informationOne flag, two rallies: Mechanisms of public opinion formation in Israel during the 2014 Gaza war
One flag, two rallies: Mechanisms of public opinion formation in Israel during the 2014 Gaza war In the summer of 2014, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) launched an extensive operation against Hamas in
More informationCase Study: Get out the Vote
Case Study: Get out the Vote Do Phone Calls to Encourage Voting Work? Why Randomize? This case study is based on Comparing Experimental and Matching Methods Using a Large-Scale Field Experiment on Voter
More informationMissing Voices: Polling and Health Care
Forum Missing Voices: Polling and Health Care Adam J. Berinsky Michele Margolis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract Examining data on the recent health care legislation, we demonstrate that
More informationHeading into the Conventions: A Tied Race July 8-12, 2016
CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL For release: Thursday, July 14 th, 2016 7:00 am EDT Heading into the Conventions: A Tied Race July 8-12, 2016 The race for President is all tied up. Hillary Clinton led Donald
More informationNorth Carolina Races Tighten as Election Day Approaches
North Carolina Races Tighten as Election Day Approaches Likely Voters in North Carolina October 23-27, 2016 Table of Contents KEY SURVEY INSIGHTS... 1 PRESIDENTIAL RACE... 1 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION ISSUES...
More informationPERCEPTION OF BIAS IN NEWSPAPERS IN THE 1 6 ELECTION. Bean Baker * Charles Cannell. University of Michigan
Mi? PERCEPTION OF BIAS IN NEWSPAPERS IN THE 1 6 ELECTION Bean Baker * Charles Cannell University of Michigan In the past several national political campaigns there have been"maaerenen complaints, particularly
More informationAn Inter-group Conflict Model Integrating Perceived Threat, Vested Interests and Alternative Strategies for Cooperation
An Inter-group Conflict Model Integrating Perceived Threat, Vested Interests and Alternative Strategies for Cooperation Objectives 1. A selective & brief review of emerging research on intergroup conflict
More informationChapter 19: Going To war in Vietnam
Heading Towards War Vietnam during WWII After the French were conquered by the Germans, the Nazi controlled government turned the Indochina Peninsula over to their Axis allies, the. returned to Vietnam
More informationBritish Public Reactions to Military and Civilian Casualties: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Experiment.
British Public Reactions to Military and Civilian Casualties: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Experiment. Graeme A.M. Davies University of Leeds and Robert Johns 1 University of Essex Paper to be presented
More informationThe People, The Press and The War In The Gulf. A Special Times Mirror News Interest Index
FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 1991, A.M. The People, The Press and The War In The Gulf A Special Times Mirror News Interest Index FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald S. Kellermann, Director Andrew
More informationPENNSYLVANIA: DEM GAINS IN CD18 SPECIAL
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Monday, 12, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769
More informationDATA ANALYSIS USING SETUPS AND SPSS: AMERICAN VOTING BEHAVIOR IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
Poli 300 Handout B N. R. Miller DATA ANALYSIS USING SETUPS AND SPSS: AMERICAN VOTING BEHAVIOR IN IDENTIAL ELECTIONS 1972-2004 The original SETUPS: AMERICAN VOTING BEHAVIOR IN IDENTIAL ELECTIONS 1972-1992
More informationRed Oak Strategic Presidential Poll
Red Oak Strategic Presidential Poll Fielded 9/1-9/2 Using Google Consumer Surveys Results, Crosstabs, and Technical Appendix 1 This document contains the full crosstab results for Red Oak Strategic s Presidential
More informationJason Matthew Roberts Curriculum Vitae January 2010
Jason Matthew Roberts Curriculum Vitae January 2010 Department of Political Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Phone: 919-962-8286 361 Hamilton Hall Fax: 919-962-0432 CB 3265 jroberts@unc.edu
More informationThe Laws of War and Public Opinion: An Experimental Study
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics 2014 The Laws of War and Public Opinion: An Experimental
More informationReality Asserts Itself: Public Opinion on Iraq and the Elasticity of Reality
Reality Asserts Itself: Public Opinion on Iraq and the Elasticity of Reality Matthew A+ Baum and Tim Groeling Abstract Prevailing theories hold that U+S+ public support for a war depends primarily on its
More informationElection 2015: Liberals edge Conservatives as volatile electorate mulls final choice before last campaign weekend
Page 1 of 22 Election 2015: Liberals edge Conservatives as volatile electorate mulls final choice before last campaign weekend Momentum and softness of NDP vote give Liberals more room to grow late in
More informationJeffrey M. Stonecash Maxwell Professor
Campbell Public Affairs Institute Inequality and the American Public Results of the Fourth Annual Maxwell School Survey Conducted September, 2007 Jeffrey M. Stonecash Maxwell Professor Campbell Public
More informationAsian Americans and Politics: Voting Behavior and Political Involvement. Elizabeth Hoene Bemidji State University
Asian Americans and Politics: Voting Behavior and Political Involvement Elizabeth Hoene Bemidji State University Political Science Senior Thesis Bemidji State University Dr. Patrick Donnay, Advisor March
More informationnetw rks Reading Essentials and Study Guide Politics and Economics, Lesson 3 Ford and Carter
and Study Guide Lesson 3 Ford and Carter ESSENTIAL QUESTION How do you think the Nixon administration affected people s attitudes toward government? How does society change the shape of itself over time?
More informationLatino Attitudes on the War in Iraq, the Economy and the 2004 Election
A Project of the University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communication 1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 1919 M Street NW, Suite 460 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: Washington, 202-419-3600 DC 20036
More informationThe Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll
The Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll The Cook Political Report-LSU Manship School poll, a national survey with an oversample of voters in the most competitive U.S. House
More informationSurvey of Pennsylvanians on the Issue of Health Care Reform KEY FINDINGS REPORT
The Morning Call/ Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion Survey of Pennsylvanians on the Issue of Health Care Reform KEY FINDINGS REPORT Release Date November 17, 2009 KEY FINDINGS: 1. As the national
More informationJason Matthew Roberts Curriculum Vitae November 2010
Jason Matthew Roberts Curriculum Vitae November 2010 Department of Political Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Phone: 919-962-8286 361 Hamilton Hall Fax: 919-962-0432 CB 3265 jroberts@unc.edu
More informationPublic Attitudes towards Use of Force Abroad: An Experimental Analysis for the Microfoundational
Public Attitudes towards Use of Force Abroad: An Experimental Analysis for the Microfoundational roots of external intervention 1 Ali Çarkoğlu acarkoglu@ku.edu.tr Belgin San-Akca bakca@ku.edu.tr Department
More informationAmericans Open to Dissenting Views on the War on Terrorism SEPTEMBER 11 SHOCK SLOW TO RECEDE 42% STILL DEPRESSED
FOR RELEASE: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2001, 4:00 P.M. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Andrew Kohut, Director Carroll J. Doherty, Editor Americans Open to Dissenting Views on the War on Terrorism SEPTEMBER 11 SHOCK
More informationINDIANA: PREZ CONTEST TIGHTENS; BAYH MAINTAINS SENATE EDGE
Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling Follow on Twitter: @MonmouthPoll Released: Friday, 14, Contact: PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769
More informationEMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, am EDT. A survey of Virginians conducted by the Center for Public Policy
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2008 10am EDT COMMONWEALTH POLL A survey of Virginians conducted by the Center for Public Policy Contact: Cary Funk, Survey Director and Associate Professor,
More information