2 Non-tariff measures/non-tariff barriers All government imposed and sponsored actions or omissions that act as prohibitions or restrictions on trade, other than ordinary custom duties and other duties and charges on imports and exports. WTO Glossary: Non-tariff measures, such as quotas, import licensing systems, sanitary regulations, prohibitions, etc. Same as non-tariff barriers.
3 Key facts on non-tariff barriers While tariff barriers have been systematically reduced since the late 1940s, non-tariff barriers have in recent decades gradually become an ever more prominent instrument of protection; Unlike tariff barriers, non-tariff barriers not only affect trade in goods but also trade in services; While non-tariff barriers have become a prominent instrument of protection, they often also serve important public policy objectives.
4 Main types of non-tariff barriers Prohibitions absolute or conditional Quotas global or bilateral Licensing automatic or non-automatic, and usually contain some form of quota Indirect: e.g. State trading operations, mixing regulations; minimum price, voluntary export constraint
6 Quantitative restrictions Quantitative restriction is a measure that limits the quantity of a product that may be imported or exported.
7 Quantitative restrictions The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) requires the general elimination of these restrictions except in defined circumstances. Members' notifications on quantitative restrictions are compiled in a WTO database which is accessible to the public.
8 Types of quantitative restrictions WTO QR Database %2fHome.aspx&lang=en Indicative list in is provided in Annex 2 of G/L/59/Rev.1.
9 Tariff-quota v. quantitative restrictions Tariff quotas may be distinguished from import quotas. A tariff quota permits the import of a certain quantity of a commodity duty-free or at a lower duty rate, while quantities exceeding the quota are subject to a higher duty rate. An import quota, on the other hand, restricts imports absolutely.
10 Why are custom duties preferred over quantitative restrictions? Tariffs are more transparent Price increases with tariffs go to government but with quantitative restrictions they go to domestic competitors ( quota rent ) Open to less corruption in the setting They do not impose absolute limits on trade
11 Jurisprudence EC Bananas III para. 33. In contrast to quantitative restrictions, tariff quotas do not fall under the prohibition in Article XI:1 and are in principle lawful under the GATT 1994, provided that quota tariff rates are applied consistently with Article I. Members are required, in accordance with Article II, to provide treatment no less favourable than that bound in their Schedules of Concessions. Accordingly, in-quota and out-of-quota tariffs must not exceed bound tariff rates, and import quantities made available under the tariff quota must not fall short of the scheduled amount. In addition, tariff quotas are, under the terms of Article XIII:5, made subject to the disciplines of Article XIII.
12 Key issues Non-discrimination at the core? Additional elements Quantitative restrictions (border measures?) Customs formalities (border measures, not in focus) Market access unnecessary trade barriers Market access harmonization of technical regulations and standards The range of domestic measures covered The issue of «attribution» The role of external actors and additional commitments m (video overview of QR)
13 Other non-tariff barriers on trade in goods Lack of transparence Unfair and arbitrary application of trade measures Customs formalities and procedures Government procurement laws and practices Others.
14 Key texts The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement (TBT) The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)
15 GATT (I) Article III National Treatment on Internal Taxation and Regulation 1. The contracting parties recognize that internal taxes and other internal charges, and laws, regulations and requirements affecting the internal sale, offering for sale, purchase, transportation, distribution or use of products, and internal quantitative regulations requiring the mixture, processing or use of products in specified amounts or proportions, should not be applied to imported or domestic products so as to afford protection to domestic production.*
16 GATT (II) Article XI General Elimination of Quantitative Restrictions 1. No prohibitions or restrictions other than duties, taxes or other charges, whether made effective through quotas, import or export licences or other measures, shall be instituted or maintained by any contracting party on the importation of any product of the territory of any other contracting party or on the exportation or sale for export of any product destined for the territory of any other contracting party.
17 GATT (III) Application: EC-Asbestos: Article III (not XI) applies because EU rules applied to both importated AND domestic products. India-Autos: Both Article III and XI can apply separately. Article III applies when competitive opportunities on the domestic market are affected Article XI applies when the opportunities for import are affected
18 GATT (IV) Equally applicable to import and export India-Autos: Trade balancing requirement fell under GATT XI (p. 280) China-Raw Materials Broad range of measures - Colombia-Ports of Entry However, Article XI interpreted broadly to include restrictions on import emerging from measures which create uncertainties and affect investment plans, restrict market access for imports or make importation prohibitively costly Other measures in Article XI to be interepreted broadly Argentina-Hides and Leather Panel was stricter though in requiring proof of trade effects
19 GATT (V) Broad range of measures Minimum import and export prices Restrictions on points of entry Non-mandatory measures covered (Japan Semi- Conductor) Also indirect («de facto») The special issue of «sensitive» products Primary products extending to fish, textiles See exceptions in Art XI: 2 but also requirements China Raw Materials:
20 GATT (VI) Article XIII Non-discriminatory Administration of Quantitative Restrictions 1. No prohibition or restriction shall be applied by any contracting party on the importation of any product of the territory of any other contracting party or on the exportation of any product destined for the territory of any other contracting party, unless the importation of the like product of all third countries or the exportation of the like product to all third countries is similarly prohibited or restricted.
21 TBT (I) Relationship to GATT, the SPS and GP Agreements (art. 1.4 and 1.5) (1) Technical regulations «Mandatory» (2) Standards Voluntary, but de facto mandatory(?) National standards vs. international standards (3) Conformity assessment procedures df (NB! page 13) Which actors? Non-governmental?
22 TBT (II) Non-discrimination, art.2 Note: only very recent case law! Same as GATT Arts. I and III? «Like products»? Too early to tell? «Treatment no less favourable»? The fact that GATT Art. XX is not available Preamble to the TBT Agreement Legitimate regulatory distinction Even-handedness
23 TBT (III) Unnecessary obstacle, art. 2.2 Applies also to standards (Annex 3.E) and conformity assessment (art ) Why has it not yet been applied? Complex provision Trade restrictive how restrictive? Legitimate objective which objectives? Link to measure Not more trade restrictive than necessary to achieve objective + risk of non-fulfilment
24 TBT (IV) Harmonization, art. 2.4 Pros and cons of harmonization Applies also to standards (Annex 3.F) and conformity assessment (art. 5.4) Which standardizing bodies? Open-ended? ISO and IEC + SPS Agreement bodies Openness and recognition Which standards State consent/majority decisions? Performance (art. 2.8) Used as basis shifting burden of proof The presumption art Effectiveness and appropriateness of standard
25 TBT (V) TBT Trasnperancy requirement p.25 df TBT Information Management System
26 Test I (placing the lecture in the context of dispute resolution) 1. Two WTO Members that are also signatories to a regional integration agreement with a dispute settlement system have a controversy about a technical standard. The technical standards falls simultaneously under both the regional trade agreement and the WTO Agreement (in particular, the TBT Agreement and Article III of GATT 1994). Is it possible to initiate WTO dispute settlement proceedings right away? 1) No. The dispute settlement system of the regional trade agreement has priority. The DSB will reject any request for the establishment of a panel until the regional procedure is completed. 2) Yes. Dispute settlement systems under regional trade agreements are available only after the completion of the WTO procedure. The complainant must thus always start by bringing its complaint to the WTO. 3) Yes. The complainant can start with either forum for initiating the dispute, but it can only use one of the two and it must choose. This is to avoid contradictory outcomes in two separate disputes. 4) Yes. As far as dispute settlement is concerned, the two systems are separate and independent one from another. Under each dispute settlement system the adjudicatory body would decide according to the rules governing that system.
27 Test II 2. Patria has brought a complaint against Tramontana about apple import restrictions that are inconsistent with Article XI:1 of the GATT Tramontana had claimed in the prior bilateral consultations that its measures are justified, inter alia, by Article XI:2 of GATT 1994 but in the panel proceedings it does not submit arguments relating to Article XI:2. Should the panel examine the case under Article XI:2 on its own initiative? 1) Panels are responsible for applying the WTO law to assess whether a violation has actually occurred. If Article XI:2 is applicable as a matter of scope, the panel must apply that provision. 2) Yes. The consultations prior to the panel procedure are part of the dispute settlement process and the content of the discussions are known to the panel. It is sufficient for Tramontana to have invoked Article XI:2 in the consultations. 3) The panel should examine the case under Article XI:2 and include findings in this regard in its report, but it should ignore these findings for its conclusions about the case. 4) Panels consistently examine only those provisions on which the complainant bases its case and those on which the respondent relies in defence. Unless the respondent invokes Article XI:2 - possibly in response to a question by the panel - the panel should not examine the case under Article XI:2 of the GATT 1994.
28 Test III 3. In a WTO dispute, the complainant has claimed 15 different violations (in its request for the establishment of the panel and further in its submissions and oral statements) of the same covered agreement. The panel would like to know whether it has to address all of these claims. 1) The request for the establishment of the panel determines the terms of reference for a panel. The panel s mandate, therefore, is to address each single claim of violation raised by the complainant. 2) The panel is free to choose among the different claims, but it must at least deal with one of the claims, irrespective of whether this results in a finding of a violation or not. 3) The panel must stop its examination as soon as it has found one violation of the covered agreement in order to respect the principle of judicial economy. 4) The panel only needs to address the claims that are necessary to fully resolve the matter at issue and may exercise judicial economy as regards the other claims.
29 Test IV 4. Who bears the burden of proof in a WTO dispute? 1) The panel bears the burden of proof because it is responsible for establishing the facts and has the authority and means to conduct the fact-finding. 2) The complainant bears the burden of proof in every situation. This means that if there is any uncertainty, the complainant loses the case. 3) Who bears the burden of proof depends on a case-by-case analysis and will be decided according to principles of fairness and due process. 4) The complainant must assert and prove its claim of a violation or other nullification or impairment, and the respondent bears the burden of proof that the conditions of exceptions are met.
IN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION Russian Federation Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union WT/DS475 Third Party Submission by Norway Geneva 10 March
WT/DS477/AB/R/Add.1 WT/DS478/AB/R/Add.1 9 November 2017 (17-6042) Page: 1/26 Original: English INDONESIA IMPORTATION OF HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS AB-2017-2 Report of the Appellate
Trade and Public Policies: NTMs in the WTO Xinyi Li Trade Policies Review Division, WTO Secretariat 12 th ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop December 2016 1 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EFTA STATES AND TURKEY Note: Austria, Finland and Sweden withdrew from the Convention establishing the European Free Trade Association (the Stockholm Convention) on 31 December 1994.
Introduction to the WTO Will Martin World Bank 10 May 2006 1 Issues What is the WTO and how does it work? Implications of being a member of the WTO multilateral trading system 2 WTO as an international
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION WT/DS34/AB/R 22 October 1999 (99-4546) Original: English TURKEY RESTRICTIONS ON IMPORTS OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING PRODUCTS AB-1999-5 Report of the Appellate Body Page i I. Introduction...
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TURKEY AND BULGARIA PREAMBLE The Republic of Turkey and the Republic of Bulgaria (hereinafter called the "Parties"); Reaffirming their commitment to the principles of market
GATT Article XX Exceptions 17 October 2016 GATT Article XX Exceptions - Purpose Allow WTO members to adopt and maintain measures that aim to promote or protect important societal values and interests Even
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CROATIA AND SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA AND SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO ON AMENDMENTS TO THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA
Introduction to the WTO Non-tariff Measures and the SPS & TBT Agreements Gretchen H. Stanton Agriculture and Commodities Division World Trade Organization Introduction to the WTO 1. General Introduction
INTERIM FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY Interim Free Trade Agreement Between the Republic of Turkey
AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING A FREE TRADE AREA BETWEEN THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY Agreement Establishing a Free Trade Area between the Arab Republic of Egypt and the Republic of Turkey
INTERIM ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SADC EPA STATES, ON THE ONE PART, AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND ITS MEMBER STATES, ON THE OTHER PART JOINT TEXT INITIALLED ON 23 NOVEMBER 2007 IN BRUSSELS
Introduction to WTO and the SPS Agreement Anneke Hamilton Agriculture and Commodities Division 12 September 2013 SADC Workshop, South Africa Outline Introduction to WTO Use of Non-Tariff Measures (NTMs)
Chapter 27 The WTO Agreements: An Introduction to the Obligations and Opportunities for Biosafety CHEE YOKE LING AND LIM LI CHING THIRD WORLD NETWORK The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety is an extremely
Asbestos and World Trade 2011 National Asbestos Meeting Denver, CO Doug Farquhar National Conference of State Legislatures General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) World Trade Organization (WTO) Established
Introduction to World Trade Organization Risk Analysis Training Purpose/Focus Introduce WTO History and Mandate Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement Role of Risk Analysis Standard Setting Bodies Technical
Part ⅡChapter 16 Dispute Settlement Procedures under WTO Chapter 16 Dispute Settlement Procedures under WTO As mentioned in the Preface, this Report aims to present specific measures for resolving issues
General Agreement on Trade in Services: Part I Malcolm Langford Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo Co-Director, Centre for Law and Social Transformation, CMI and University of Bergen
Page 1 of 11 Israel-US Free Trade Area Agreement 22 May 1985 Agreement on the Establishment of a Free Trade Area between the Government of Israel and the Government of the United States of America April
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TURKEY AND TUNISIA THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING A FREE TRADE AREA BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND THE REPUBLIC OF TUNISIA PREAMBLE The Republic of Turkey and The
AGREEMENT ON SOUTH ASIAN FREE TRADE AREA (SAFTA) The Governments of the SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) Member States comprising the People s Republic of Bangladesh, the Kingdom
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Committee on Regional Trade Agreements WT/REG203/1 19 September 2005 (05-4125) Original: English FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TURKEY AND TUNISIA The following joint communication,
What are the WTO rules that affect animal welfare? Can you have trade bans? FROM THE PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT Overview This briefing covers trade bans under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules and is
CHAPTER 1 NTMs: Definition, Data, and International Regulations Efforts to streamline NTMs have been hampered by lack of a clear conceptual definition and data on the use of NTMs, their impact on domestic
This document contains an EU proposal for a legal text on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures in the Trade Part of a possible modernised EU-Mexico Association Agreement. It has been tabled for discussion
An Open Access Journal from The Law Brigade (Publishing) Group 1 WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION AND GLOBAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: DEVELOPING COUNTRIES PERSPECTIVE Written by Balaji Naika B.G.* 1. Introduction The
EU EXTERNAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS Common Customs Tariff (CCT) Common Commercial Policy (CCP) R.Greaves LEGAL PERSONALITY & COMPETENCES (Article 235 TFEU) Articles 2-6 TFEU on categories and areas of Union
WTO E-LEARNING COPYRIGHT 12 Introduction to Rules of Origin in the WTO OBJECTIVE Overview of the Rules of Origin in the WTO. M y C o u r s e s e r i e s I. INTRODUCTION Rules of origin are the criteria
TRADE IN CIVIL AIRCRAFT 8 AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN CIVIL AIRCRAFT PREAMBLE Signatories to the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft, hereinafter referred to as "this Agreement"; Noting that Ministers on 2-4
PECC Trade Forum May 17-19 2002, Lima Peru Standards in Trade Facilitation -Linking the Lessons of the WTO, OECD and APEC - Chan-Hyun Sohn Senior Fellow Korean Institute for International Economic Policy
Chapter 4 Classification of Non-tariff Measures in Cambodia Chap Sotharith Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace C. Ruth Elisabeth L. Tobing Center for Inclusive and Sustainable Development Prasetiya
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Annex to the SADC Protocol on Trade Approved by the SADC Committee of Ministers of Trade on 17 July 2014, Gaborone, Botswana Page 1 of 28 ANNEX IX CONCERNING TECHNICAL
CENTRE WILLIAM-RAPPARD, RUE DE LAUSANNE 154, 1211 GENÈVE 21, TÉL. 022 73951 11 TRADE POLICY REVIEW OF SOUTH AFRICA 1-2 JUNE 1993 GATT Council's Evaluation GATT/1583 3 June 1993 The GATT Council conducted
Asia Pacific Trade Facilitation Forum 2014 24 25 September 2014, BITEC Bangkok, Thailand Implications of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement for Asia and the Pacific Asia Pacific Trade Facilitation Forum
ii Dispute Settlement N O T E The Course on Dispute Settlement in International Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property consists of forty modules. This Module has been prepared by Mr. Edwini Kessie
ESA/STAT/AC.340/12 16 August 2017 UNITED NATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS STATISTICS DIVISION Meeting of the Expert Group on International Statistical Classifications New York, 6-8 September
Accomplishment of the WTO Dispute Settlement system - A Review of Some WTO Jurisprudence 1 Mitsuo Matsushita Introduction More than 10 years have passed since the establishment of the WTO and it is time
Decision of the Council No. 17 of 1969 relating to the accession of Iceland Decision of the Council No. 17 of 1969 relating to the accession of Iceland 1 THE COUNCIL, Having regard to the application for
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THAILAND AND AUSTRALIA PREAMBLE The Kingdom of Thailand and Australia, hereinafter in this Agreement referred to as the Parties ; Inspired by the traditional links of friendship
EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on the Community Trade Mark No. 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 13, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble TITLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Community
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION G/TBT/1/Rev.8 23 May 2002 (02-2849) Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade DECISIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE SINCE 1 JANUARY 1995 Note by the Secretariat
The GMO Dispute before the WTO: Legal Implications for the Trade and Environment Debate Francesco Sindico NOTA DI LAVORO 11.2005 JANUARY 2005 NRM Natural Resources Management Francesco Sindico, Departamento
RM Official Gazette, No. 28/04 FOREIGN TRADE LAW This Law shall regulate foreign trade. SECTION ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Scope of Application Article 2 Definitions When used in this Law, the following
GLOBAL TRADE AND MARKETING A Nepalese Perspective Bijendra Man Shakya Associate Professor (Economics) Shanker Dev Campus Tribhuvan University RATNA PUSTAK BHANDAR Kathmandu, Nepal CONTENTS List of Boxes
31.3.2009 Official Journal of the European Union L 84/1 I (Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory) REGULATIONS COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 260/2009 of 26 February
WTO Plus Commitments in RTAs Presented By: Shailja Singh Assistant Professor Centre for WTO Studies New Delhi Some Basic Facts WTO is a significant achievement in Multilateralism Regional Trade Agreements
1 UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION On the Fundamentals of the State Regulation of Foreign Trade Activity (No. 164-FZ of December 8, 2003) Adopted by the State Duma October 17, 2003 Approved by the Council of Federation
United States Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Objectives The objectives of this Agreement, as elaborated more specifically through its principles and rules, including national treatment, most-favored-nation
22 January 1990 UNITED STATES - RESTRICTIONS ON THE IMPORTATION OF SUGAR AND SUGAR-CONTAINING PRODUCTS APPLIED UNDER THE 1955 WAIVER AND UNDER THE HEADNOTE TO THE SCHEDULE OF TARIFF CONCESSIONS 1. INTRODUCTION
The World Trade Organization s Doha Development Agenda The Doha Negotiations after Six Years Progress Report at the End of 2007 TRADE FACILITATION LAW OFFICES OF STEWART AND STEWART 2100 M STREET NW WASHINGTON,
THE LAW AND POLITICS OF WTO WAIVERS Stability and Flexibility in Public International Law ISABEL FEICHTNER CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Acknowledgements page xiv 1 Why study the WTO waiver? 1 PART i: The
II. Trade and public policies: A closer look at non-tariff measures in the 21 st century The World Trade Report 2012 ventures beyond tariffs to examine other policy measures that can affect trade. Regulatory
International trade: Rights and obligations of OIE Members Introduction This document is a guide to the rights and obligations of OIE Members with regard to international trade and trade disputes. In part
23 February 2017 (17-1107) Page: 1/59 RUSSIAN FEDERATION MEASURES ON THE IMPORTATION OF LIVE PIGS, PORK AND OTHER PIG PRODUCTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION AB-2016-5 Report of the Appellate Body - 2 - Table
Harnessing trade for sustainable development and a green economy World Trade Organization Centre William Rappard Rue de Lausanne 154 CH-1211 Geneva 21 Switzerland Tel: +41 (0)22 739 51 11 Fax: +41 (0)22
A Comparative Guide to the Chile-United States Free Trade Agreement and the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement A STUDY BY THE TRIPARTITE COMMITTEE Chapter Ten: Initial
CHAPTER 3 TRADE DISTORTIONS AND MARKETING BARRIERS MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Perhaps, the most credible argument for protectionist measures is a) keeping money at home b) reducing unemployment c) enhancing national
A CASE OF DOUBLE STANDARDS: THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR GEORGINA BEASLEY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Laws (with
Studies in global economic law 13 Consumers, Trade Regulation and Competition Policy Bearbeitet von Sabina Nüesch 1. Auflage 2010. Taschenbuch. 374 S. Paperback ISBN 978 3 03911 767 3 Format (B x L): 15
ARTICLE XVIII GOVERNMENTAL ASSISTANCE TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT I. TEXT OF ARTICLE XVIII, RELEVANT INTERPRETATIVE NOTES AND UNDERSTANDING ON THE BALANCE- OF-PAYMENTS PROVISIONS OF THE GATT 1994... 488 II.
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Preamble The Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter
American Journal of Economics and Business Administration 1 (3): 219-224, 2009 ISSN 1945-5488 2009 Science Publications Multilateral Environmental Agreements versus World Trade Organization System: A Comprehensive
THE GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE (GATT 1994) The following legal text of GATT 1994 is that of GATT 1947 as rectified, amended or modified by the terms of legal instruments that entered into force
ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration Trade Facilitation Measures Under Free Trade Agreements: Are They Discriminatory Against Non-Members? Shintaro Hamanaka, Aiken Tafgar, and Dorothea
TALKING DISPUTES 3 JULY 2015 Geneva, Switzerland Presentation of the Appellate Body s findings in India Agricultural Products Eugenia Costanza Laurenza Senior Associate, FratiniVergano European Lawyers
MAY 20011 An Introduction to the WTO Dispute Settlement System In this article two legal oficers from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade provide a practical guide to the World Trade Organization's
2002 Southern African Customs Union (SACU) Agreement BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA, THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO, THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA, THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA AND THE KINGDOM OF
MEMO/04/23 Brussels, 4 February 2004 Trade implications of EU enlargement: Facts and Figures Key Figures (2002) EU 15 EU 25 Population million (% of world) 379 (6.1%) 455 (7.3%) GDP billion (% of world)
Basic glossary of terms commonly used in the World Trade Organization (WTO) This glossary forms part of the series of notes that the Center for Strategic Analysis for Agriculture (CAESPA) of the Inter-
This document contains a new EU proposal for a legal text on State-Owned Enterprises in the Trade Part of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement. It has been tabled for discussion with Mercosur. The actual
Adopted text - Trade mark regulation The following document is an unofficial summary of the text adopted by the legal affairs committee (JURI) of the European Parliament from 17 December 2013. The text
TRADE SUMMARY MEXICO In 1999, two-way merchandise trade with Mexico reached a record $196.8 billion, an increase of $23.3 billion (13.5 percent) over 1998. Mexico has surpassed Japan to become the United
EU Internal Market Law Course held by Prof Gaetano Vitellino Lecture No 2 «Economic and Political Reasons for Building a European Single Market» Prof Gaetano Vitellino Why national markets should be integrated
Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA Directorate for European Affairs DEA The major bilateral agreements Switzerland EU August 2017 Bilateral agreements Switzerland EU B. I B. II 2 The first bilateral
PROMOTING TRADE THROUGH REDUCING NON-TARIFF BARRIERS IN SOUTH ASIA Dr. Selim Raihan Professor of Economics, University of Dhaka and Executive Director, SANEM Regional consultation on "Deepening Economic
16.6.2017 L 154/1 I (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2017/1001 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (codification) (Text with EEA relevance)
Chapter 19 TRADE AND LABOUR Gabrielle Marceau* I. Introduction 540 A. From the ITO to the WTO on Labour Issues 541 B. States Must Comply With Both Their WTO and ILO Obligations 541 C. The Legal Relationship
Intellectual Property and the Judiciary 17 th EIPIN Congress Strasbourg, 30 January 2016 Intellectual Property in WTO Dispute Settlement Roger Kampf WTO Secretariat The views expressed are personal and
PREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMMON MARKET OF THE SOUTH (MERCOSUR) AND THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN CUSTOMS UNION (SACU) The Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay
Welcome to KACT 2017 Tariff and Trade Affairs Track Harmonized System 1 Your facilitator Izaak Wind Former Deputy Director WCO Tariff and Trade Affairs 2 KACT 2017 June, 21 23, 2017 Harmonized System Program
International Standards and the WTO Steve Charnovitz* The purpose of this paper is to provide background on the topic of international standards and their relationship to the World Trade Organization (WTO).