Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid Universiteit Gent Academiejaar
|
|
- Melina Baker
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid Universiteit Gent Academiejaar THE LEGAL ARCHITECTURE FOR THE POST-KYOTO CLIMATE CHANGE REGIME Masterproef van de opleiding Master in de rechten Ingediend door Lara Desimpel studentennr major nationaal en internationaal publiekrecht en milieurecht Promotor: Prof. dr. Frank Maes Commissaris: Nils Goeteyn
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... II! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... VII! LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...VIII! INTRODUCTION...IX! MASTER DISSERTATION... 1! 1.! CLIMATE CHANGE: AN OVERVIEW... 1! A.! WHAT IS CLIMATE CHANGE?... 1! B.! THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE... 3! B.1! THE INSTITUTION... 3! B.2! ITS FINDINGS... 5! 2.! THE START OF INTERNATIONAL ACTION... 6! A.! THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE... 6! A.1! HISTORY... 6! A.2! OBJECTIVE AND PRINCIPLES... 7! A.2.1! Objective... 8! A.2.2! The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CDR)... 9! A.2.3! The precautionary principle... 12! A.3! COMMITMENTS... 13! A.4! INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK... 15! B.! LIKE-MINDED PARTIES FOUND EACH OTHER: NEGOTIATING BLOCKS... 18! C.! THE 1997 KYOTO PROTOCOL... 21! C.1! HISTORY... 21! C.2! COMMITMENTS... 24! C.3! INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK... 29! C.4! COMPLIANCE MECHANISM... 30! II
3 C.5! COMMENTS... 33! 3.! THE RACE TO REPLACE KYOTO... 34! A.! IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROBLEM... 34! B.! IDENTIFICATION OF SOME KEY ISSUES POST ! B.1! BROADENING OF THE PARTICIPATION... 35! B.1.1! Large developing nations... 35! B.1.2! The United States of America... 37! B.2! COMPLIANCE... 37! 4.! PROGRESS AFTER THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE KYOTO- PROTOCOL. 38! A.! MONTREAL CONFERENCE (2005)... 38! A.1! MEETING OF THE PARTIES (CMP1)... 38! A.2! CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES (COP11)... 40! B.! BALI CONFERENCE (2007)... 40! B.1! MEETING OF THE PARTIES (CMP3)... 41! B.1.1! AWG-KP... 41! B.1.2! Article 9 of the Kyoto Protocol... 42! B.2! CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES (COP13)... 42! C.! COPENHAGEN CONFERENCE (2009)... 46! C.1! MEETING OF THE PARTIES (CMP5)... 47! C.2! CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES (COP15)... 47! C.3! THE COPENHAGEN ACCORD... 48! C.3.1! Content... 48! C.3.2! Legal status... 52! D.! CANCUN CONFERENCE (2010)... 54! D.1! MEETING OF THE PARTIES (CMP6)... 54! D.2! CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES (COP16)... 55! D.3! CANCUN AGREEMENTS... 55! III
4 5.! THE POST-2012 LEGAL REGIME... 58! A.! A LEGALLY BINDING REGIME?... 58! B.! WHAT EXACTLY ARE THE LEGAL OPTIONS?... 63! B.1! AMENDMENTS TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL... 63! B.1.1! Procedure for amending the Protocol- Article 20 Kyoto Protocol... 63! B.1.2! Strengths and weaknesses... 65! B.1.3! Negotiating positions... 66! B.1.4! Current proposals?... 67! B.1.5! Will there be a gap?... 68! B.2! AMENDMENTS TO THE UNFCCC... 69! B.2.1! Procedure to amend the Convention- Article 15 UNFCCC... 69! B.2.2! Strengths and weaknesses... 69! B.2.3! Negotiating positions... 70! B.2.4! Current proposals to amend?... 70! B.2.5! Will there be a gap?... 70! B.3! A NEW PROTOCOL UNDER THE UNFCCC... 71! B.3.1! Procedure for the adoption of a protocol- Article 17 UNFCCC... 71! B.3.2! Strengths and weaknesses... 73! B.3.3! Negotiating positions... 74! B.3.4! Current proposals?... 74! B.3.5! Will there be a gap?... 75! B.4! EXPAND COP DECISIONS... 75! B.4.1! Procedure to adopt decisions... 75! B.4.2! Legal value of COP decisions... 76! B.4.3! Strengthen COP decisions by unilateral declarations?... 79! B.4.4! Strengths and weaknesses... 80! B.4.5! Negotiating positions... 81! IV
5 B.4.6! Will there be a gap?... 81! B.5! PROCEED OUTSIDE THE UNFCCC FRAMEWORK... 82! C.! CAN WE AVOID A GAP POST-2012?... 83! C.1! LEGAL OPTIONS TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO GAP... 83! C.1.1! Provisional application of a follow-up agreement... 83! C.1.2! Extending the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol... 85! C.1.3! Proceeding through COP decisions while working towards an LBA... 86! C.2! LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF A GAP... 86! C.2.1! Keeping the flexible mechanisms into force after the first commitment period?... 86! C.2.1.1! In general... 86! C.2.1.2! Joint Implementation... 87! C.2.1.3! The Clean Development Mechanism... 89! C.2.1.4! Emission Trading... 90! C.2.2! Compliance mechanism... 91! 6.! CONCLUSION... 92! NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING... 94! INDEX OF AUTHORITIES... 96! A.! LEGISLATION... 96! A.1! TREATIES... 96! A.2! RESOLUTIONS... 96! A.3! OTHER... 96! B.! UNFCCC DOCUMENTS... 97! B.1! COP DECISIONS... 97! B.2! CMP DECISIONS... 98! B.3! UNFCCC- CUBMISSIONS FROM PARTIES ! B.4! OTHER UNFCCC DOCUMENTS ! C.! OTHER SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ! V
6 C.1! CASE LAW OF THE ICJ ! C.2! UNITED NATIONS DOCUMENTS ! C.3! IPCC DOCUMENTS ! D.! WRITINGS OF LEARNED AUTHORS ! D.1! MONOGRAPHS ! D.2! ARTICLES ! D.3! INTERNET SOURCES ! E.! MISCELLANEOUS ! VI
7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Although writing a master dissertation is mainly an individual work, several people have helped me in different ways. I wish to thank them for their efforts. First of all, I wish to thank my promotor, Dr. Frank Maes, who has always been enthusiastic about this topic and put documents to my disposal that helped me a lot. I am equally grateful to Nils Goeteyn, who helped me with his insightful comments. A sincere thanks to both of them for their willingness to supervise my dissertation and constructive commentaries to the text. Furthermore, I would like to thank Lieven Stalmans, who helped me look at the problem from the side of the industry, which is not very familiar to me. Lastly, a special thanks to my parents, family and friends who, with their kind support, have contributed directly and indirectly to the pages that follow below. VII
8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AA: Assigned Amount AAU: Assigned Amount Unit AOSIS: Alliance of Small Island States AWG-KP: Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol AWG-LCA: Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention CDM: Clean Development Mechanism CER: Certified Emission Reduction COP: Conference of the Parties CMP: Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol ERU: Emission Reduction Unit EU: European Union G-77: Group of 77 GHG: Greenhouse Gas ICJ: International Court of Justice IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change JI: Joint Implementation LDC: Least Developed Country NAMA: Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action QELRO: Quantified Emission Limitation and Reduction Objective RMU: Removal Unit UG: Umbrella Group UN: United Nations UNCED: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development UNEP: United Nations Environment Programme UNFCCC: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change US: United States of America WMO: World Meteorological Organization WTO: World Trade Organization VIII
9 INTRODUCTION Background Climate change is increasingly recognized as the greatest environmental challenge of our time. Sea level rise, loss of biodiversity, increase of heat-related mortality and water stress are only some of the effects that we are experiencing, or will start experiencing in the near future. The reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are generally acknowledged and the conclusions of its latest report made the case for urgent action to fight climate change stronger than ever before. To combat global climate change will demand a global answer, in the form of an unprecedented international cooperation and a fundamental switch of our economy and way of living. The main cause for the problem is namely fundamental to our world economies: the burning of fossil fuels for energy use. In this sense, climate change is essentially development issue. Any solution to the problem will therefore have to embrace the needs and interests of all countries, or countries will fail to abide by it. Because of the enormous interests that are in play, progress in the negotiations is only made slowly. Fundamental disagreements between developed and developing Parties, between the United States and the European Union, between large developing nations and small islands generally dominate the negotiations. Despite the doomsday scenarios that occupy the climate change field, there is no point in taking a cynical view or apathetic stance. Even if the solution can never be perfect, many good things can happen and will have to happen. IX
10 Description of the problem In order to combat climate change, Parties concluded the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Five years later, the Kyoto Protocol to this Convention was adopted. Although this protocol can hardly be regarded as perfect, it indicated a significant milestone. The Kyoto Protocol sets forth emission reduction and limitation commitments for developed nations, in a specific time period from 2008 until A new agreement must enter into force by 1 January 2013, or a gap between the two legal regimes will occur. This gap would be damaging from an ecological point of view, would abate incentives for public and private entities to combat climate change and it endangers the continuation of the mechanisms established by the Kyoto Protocol. Since the entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol, Parties are negotiating on how the legal architecture of the post-2012 period should look like. Obviously, circumstances have changed a lot since the time of the conclusion of the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol. The political and economic reality of some non-annex I Parties is fundamentally different than a few decades ago. Some nations who qualified as developing nations at the time, are now members of the OECD, or classify as high-income countries in the World Bank data. Furthermore, the acknowledgement that greenhouse gas emissions of some developing nations are reaching levels close to, or as high as those of developed nations is a compelling argument to claim that the responsibility can no longer solely lie on the developed nations as such defined in the UNFCCC. Up to now, Parties have been unable to reach consensus on the post-2012 legal architecture of the climate change regime. Developed nations prefer a regime that includes obligations for all large emitters, whether they are developed or developing nations. Developing countries for their part claim that developed nations still need to take responsibility for their historical emissions, and call out that even if their average emissions are as high; the emissions per capita are still far below those of as developed nations. Despite these fundamental differences, a strong system of international governance will be necessary, both for ecological reasons and to manage the huge investments that are being made by both the public and private sector. X
11 Approach In this thesis, I aim to provide an overview of the problems that arise with the legal architecture of the climate change regime. I will start in the first chapter with providing a brief introduction to the process of climate change itself, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and its findings. In the second chapter, the two existing treaties on the subject, the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol are examined. How did these two agreements come about? Which commitments do they contain, and how is compliance with these commitments ensured? After this overview of the existing framework, the third chapter summarizes the post-2012 problem and identifies some key issues. The fourth chapter then continues with the progress that is made with regards to a solution for the post-2012 problem. The different Conferences and Meetings of the Parties to the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol with relevance to the subject are analyzed. The fifth chapter lists the legal options that exist for the post-kyoto legal framework. The procedure, strengths and weaknesses, negotiating positions of the parties with regard to those options and information relating to a gap are examined. Additionally, the possibilities to avoid a gap between the first commitment period and a follow-up agreement are examined. The sixth chapter is the final chapter of this thesis. It offers a prospect with regards to the coming decisions, and gives a reflection on this dissertation. XI
12 MASTER DISSERTATION 1. CLIMATE CHANGE: AN OVERVIEW A. WHAT IS CLIMATE CHANGE? According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 1, climate change means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods (UNFCCC, article 1.2, emphasis added). The cause of this human-induced climate change is an excess of heat-trapping gases, or greenhouse-gases (GHGs). These gases operate much like the glass of a greenhouse. Under normal circumstances, part of the sun s energy radiates back into space after it has reached the earth. GHGs disturb this process, by preventing more energy from radiating back and therefore cause an additional warming of the earth. 2 GHGs mainly emanate from the burning of fossil fuels, agriculture, waste dumps and deforestation. 3 The warming that will occur due to the increase in GHGs is expected to cause severe adverse impacts on the environment, human health, economic activity, food security and natural resources. 4 More concretely, climate change will increase desertification, land degradation, the intensity of floods, the incidence of heat-related mortality, the severity of droughts, and decrease food security and crop yields. 5 By means of example; scientists believe that by 2020, 1 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, May 9, 1992, S. Treaty Doc. No , 1771 U.N.T.S. 107 (hereinafter: UNFCCC); elaborated infra in 2.A: The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2 UNFCCC, Fact sheet: An introduction to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol, 3 IPCC (ed.), Summary for Policymakers in IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, (1) (hereinafter: IPCC, Summary Policymakers), 5. 4 IPCC (ed.), Summary for Policymakers in IPCC, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (1) (hereinafter: Working Group I Report), Working Group I Report, supra note 4,
13 between 75 and 250 million people in Africa will be exposed to water stress due to climate change. In some countries, yields from agriculture could be reduced up to 50%. And in large parts of the world, a significant loss of biodiversity is projected to occur. 6 The United Nations (UN) General Assembly focussed on climate change on numerous occasions. 7 In April 2007, the United Kingdom brought the matter for the UN Security Council, calling it a matter of collective security in a fragile and increasingly interdependent world. 8 It was the first -and until now only- time that the Security Council debated on the effects of climate change on international peace and security. Some governments contested the suitability of this forum, while others welcomed the initiative. 9 The view that climate change may constitute a threat to international, national and human security has also been taken up by the UN Development Program and the UN Secretary General. 10 The main scientific basis for the observance of climate change, are the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 6 IPCC, Summary Policymakers, supra note 3, Resolution 65/159 of the United Nations General Assembly, (4 March 2011) UN Doc. A/RES/65/159; Resolution 64/73 of the United Nations General Assembly, (29 January 2010), UN Doc. A/RES/64/73; Resolution 43/53 of the United Nations General Assembly (6 December 1988), UN Doc. A/RES/43/53 (1988) (hereinafter: Resolution 43/53 GA); For an overview of all resolutions in this field: wer&npp=50&ipp=20&spp=20&profile=bib&ri=1&source=%7e%21horizon&index=.sw&term=clim ate+change+and+.ud%3dares%2f*&x=0&y=0&aspect=power. 8 Security Council, SC/9000, Security Council holds first- ever debate on impact of climate change on peace, security, hearing over 50 speakers, 17 April 2007, Department of Public Information, 9 Ibid; F. SINDICO, Climate Change: A Security (Council) Issue?, CCLR 2007, vol 1., 29-34; UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, UNEP Year Book An Overview of Our Changing Environment, Nairobi, UNEP, 2008 (hereinafter: UNEP, UNEP Year Book 2008), 14; J. BRUNNÉE, Climate change, global environmental justice and international environmental law in J. EBBESSON and P. OKOWA, (eds.) Environmental law and justice in context, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008, (316) 328; C. SCHWARTE and R. BYRNE, International climate change litigation and the negotiation process, Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development Working paper 2010, (1) (hereinafter: C. SCHWARTE, International climate change litigation), For an overview of this estimation, see: B. WISNER et al., Climate Change and Human Security, (15 April 2007), 2
14 B. THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE B.1 The institution In 1988, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) established the IPCC. 11 The IPCC is an intergovernmental body, open to all member countries of the United Nations (UN) and the WMO. 12 Its goal is to provide clear scientific assessments on the current state of knowledge in climate change and the potential environmental and socio-economic impacts. 13 Despite the fact that the IPCC is open to all countries, not all countries have a same influence in the results. In the beginning, the IPCC struggled with legitimacy concerns because of a lack of effective participation of developing countries. It led to the establishment of an ad hoc working group to increase developing country partaking. 14 Notwithstanding efforts from an IPCC Trust Fund to help out in the financing of research in developing countries, the division between OECD 15 and non-oecd researchers in the making of the latest IPCC Assessment Report was still 2:1. 16 The work of the IPCC is divided among three working groups. The first working group examines the physical science basis, the second the impacts, adaptation and vulnerability and the third the mitigation of climate change. The IPCC does not conduct any research itself. To the contrary, it reviews and assesses information produced by thousands of scientists 11 This joint action was endorsed by the General Assembly: Resolution 43/53 GA, supra note Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Organization, (As of 2 April 2011, 194 countries are members of the IPCC). 13 Resolution 43/53 GA, supra note 7, 5; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Organization, 14 WMO/UNEP INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE, Report of the Second Session of the WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Nairobi, World Climate Programme Publication Series, 1989, The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1961, consists of 34 member countries that negotiate, study and coordinate a social and economic policy: 16 This unequal division is used by some developing countries as a ground to undermine the IPCC results: J. BARNETT and J. CAMPBELL, Climate Change and Small Island States- Power, Knowledge and the South Pacific, London, Earthscan, 2010 (hereinafter: J. BARNETT, J. CAMPBELL, Climate Change and Small Island States), 61-62; To the contrary, it is hard to see another way to remedy this situation than with a Trust Fund. 3
15 all over the world. 17 This assessment involves peer review by experts, as well as review by governments. Governments also participate in the plenary Sessions where results are adopted and approved. 18 If governments endorse the IPCC reports, this implies recognition of the authority of their scientific content. 19 The IPCC is considered to be the leading international body for the assessment of climate change Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Principles governing IPCC work, Vienna, 1998, 3, 18 This participation by governments presumably even renders the results weaker than if they would have been written by scientists alone: H. E. OTT, Climate Policy Post A Roadmap, Tällberg Foundation Discussion Paper 2007, (1) (hereinafter: H. E. OTT, Climate Policy Post-2012), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Organization, For example: UNFCCC, Other Action taken by the Conference of the Parties, Annex: The Geneva Ministerial Declaration, in Report of the Conference of the Parties on its second session, held at Geneva from 8 to 19 July 1996, Addendum Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties, FCCC/CP/1996/15/Add.1, (29 October 1996) (hereinafter: Geneva Ministerial Declaration), 71, 2: Recognize and endorse the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as currently the most comprehensive and authoritative assessment of the science of climate change. 20 Geneva Ministerial Declaration, supra note 19, 2; UNFCCC, Decision 1/CP.11, Dialogue on longterm cooperative action to address climate change by enhancing implementation of the Convention, in Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eleventh session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005, Addendum Part Two Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh session, FCCC/CP/2005/5/Add.1, (30 March 2006) (hereinafter: Decision 1/CP.11), 3: Agrees that the dialogue will be informed by the best available scientific information and assessment on climate change and its impacts from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ; J. BARNETT, J. CAMPBELL, Climate Change and Small Island States, supra note 16, 53; P. W. BIRNIE, A. E. BOYLE and C. REDGWELL, International law and the environment, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, 337; A. DESSLER, and E. PARSON, The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change- A Guide to the Debate, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006 (hereinafter: A. DESSLER, E. PARSON, The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change), 12; P. G. HARRIS (ed.), Europe and global climate change: politics, foreign policy and regional cooperation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2007, 6; S. FREELAND, The Kyoto Protocol: An Agreement without a future?, UNSW Law Journal 2001, vol. 24, (532) (hereinafter: S. FREELAND, The Kyoto Protocol: An Agreement without a future?), 534; A. MACEY, Climate Change: Governance Challenges for Copenhagen, Global Governance 2009, vol.15, (443) (hereinafter: A. MACEY, Governance Challenges for Copenhagen),
16 B.2 Its findings The IPCC s Fourth Assessment Report injected a new sense of urgency into the climate change negotiations. 21 It ensures that warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level. 22 According to the IPCC, it is very likely 23 that the increase in global average temperature is due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. 24 The global GHG emissions due to human activities have grown since pre-industrial times, with an increase of 70% between 1970 and Although this report already puts its conclusions in strong terms, it must be noted that it only reviewed scientific research published until the beginning of The Global Carbon Project, a consortium of research programmes, states that emissions have increased faster than any of the scenarios set by the IPCC. 26 The IPCC moreover submits that there is high confidence that neither adaptation nor mitigation alone, 27 can avoid all the impacts of climate change; they can complement each other to significantly reduce the risks of climate change. 28 The scientific debate between the believers and the climate change skeptics is generally over. Today, the vast majority of scientists and policy makers concurs with the findings of the IPCC. In this thesis, I will depart from the IPCC s findings without questioning these scientific data. 21 J. BRUNNÉE, From Bali to Copenhagen: Towards a Shared Vision for a Post-2012 Climate Regime?, MJIL 2010, vol.25, (86) (hereinafter: J. BRUNNÉE, From Bali to Copenhagen), 90; A. M. HALVORSSEN, Global Response to Climate Change- From Stockholm to Copenhagen, DULR 2008, vol. 85, (841) (hereinafter: A.M. HALVORSSEN, Global Response to Climate Change), 842; A. JORDAN and T. RAYNER, The evolution of climate policy in the European Union: an historical overview in A. JORDAN, D. HUITEMA, H. VAN ASSELT, T. RAYNER and F. BERKHOUT, Climate Change Policy in the European Union- Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation?, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, (52) 71; S. OBERTHÜR, EU Leadership on Climate Change: Living up to the Challenges in European Commission, The European Union and World Sustainable Development: Visions of Leading Policy Makers & Academics, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008, (41) Working Group I Report, supra note 4, Very likely means more than 90 percent likely: Working Group I Report, supra note 4, 3, no Working Group I Report, supra note 4, 15; IPCC, Summary Policymakers, supra note 3, Ibid. 26 UNEP, UNEP Year Book 2008, supra note 9, Adaptation refers to the preparation for climate change that cannot be avoided, mitigation to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions: T. E. WIRTH, A Way forward on Climate Change, HLPR 2008, vol. 2, (313) (hereinafter: T. E. WIRTH, A Way forward on Climate Change), Summary Policymakers, supra note 3, 19. 5
17 2. THE START OF INTERNATIONAL ACTION A. THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE A.1 History Already in the 1980 s, the UN General Assembly declared that climate change was a common concern of mankind and that necessary and timely action should be taken to deal with this issue. 29 After the presentation by the IPCC of its first Assessment Report, 30 negotiations about a Climate Treaty were initiated immediately. The actual decision to establish one single intergovernmental negotiating process, namely the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change 31, was taken by the General Assembly. 32 Only 15 months after the foundation of this Negotiating Committee, an agreement was reached. This agreement, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), was signed during the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in It entered into force on 21 March 1994: 90 days after the fiftieth ratification, in accordance with article 23.1 UNFCCC. 33 The UNFCCC is, as the name says, a framework treaty. This implies that from a formal point of view, the UNFCCC is legally binding, it indicates the overall objective and the guiding principles and it installs the procedures and institutions to implement the convention. To the 29 Resolution 43/53 GA, supra note 7; Resolution 44/207 of the United Nations General Assembly (22 December 1989), UN Doc. A/RES/44/207 (1989): Both resolutions were adopted without a vote, implying they obtained widespread and strong support. 30 IPCC, First Assessment Report, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Its mandate was to prepare an adequate framework convention on climate change: IISD, Summary of the first Conference of the Parties for the Framework Convention on Climate Change: 28 March- 7 April 1995, ENB 1995, (1) Resolution 45/212 of the United Nations General Assembly (21 December 1990), UN Doc. A/Res. 45/212 (1990), UNFCCC, Status of Ratification of the Convention, 6
18 contrary, the normative content of the convention is relatively weak. 34 When states decide to become a Party to an initial framework treaty, they still retain much of their sovereign elbowroom, as such treaty does not contain strict legal obligations. 35 Framework treaties are often 36 followed by Protocols, ensuing more stringent obligations. 37 This less demanding form of a framework convention was presumably chosen since at the time, Parties were unable to agree on concrete and binding emission limitations. 38 Nevertheless, although the UNFCCC is a framework convention, it does contain elements of a substantive agreement as well. 39 Currently, with 194 State parties and one regional economic organization, the European Union (EU), the Convention enjoys a universal membership. 40 A.2 Objective and principles 41 In most treaties, the intention of the Parties and the general principles are included in the preamble. The negotiating Parties to the UNFCCC instead decided to place them in the 34 L. RAJAMANI, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2OO6 (hereinafter: L. RAJAMANI, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law), 181; J. WERKSMAN and K. HERBERTSON, The Legal Character of National Actions and Commitments in a Copenhagen Agreement: Options and Implications, World Resources Institute 2009, (1) (hereinafter: J. WERKSMAN, K. HERBERTSON, The Legal Character of National Actions), J. BRUNNÉE, COPing with Consent: Law-Making under Multilateral Environmental Agreements, LJIL 2002, vol. 15, (1) (hereinafter: J. BRUNNÉE, COPing with Consent), Also in this case, see infra: 2.C The Kyoto Protocol. 37 The framework-protocol model has evolved into the most common approach for Multilateral Environmental Agreements (hereinafter: MEA): J. BRUNNÉE, COPing with Consent, supra note 34, 7; J. BRUNNÉE, The United States and International Environmental Law: Living with an Elephant, EJIL 2004, vol. 15, (617) (hereinafter: J. BRUNNÉE, Living with an Elephant), H. E. OTT, Climate Policy Post-2012, supra note 18,14; R. FALKNER, H. STEPHAN and J. VOGLER, International Climate Policy after Copenhagen: Towards a Building Blocks Approach, Global Policy 2010, vol. 1, (252) (hereinafter: R. FALKNER et al., Towards a Building Blocks Approach), See infra, 2.A.3 Commitments; D. BODANSKY, The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary, Yale J. Int l L. 1993, vol. 18, (451) (hereinafter: D. BODANSKY, The UNFCCC: A Commentary), 496; R. GORDON, Climate change and the poorest nations: further reflections on global inequality, University of Colorado Law Review 2007, vol. 78, (1559) (hereinafter: R. GORDON, Climate change and the poorest nations), UNFCCC, Status of Ratification of the Convention, (providing a list of signatories and ratification of the Convention as of 2 April 2011). 41 Although the UNFCCC contains several principles (such as sustainable development, sustainable economic growth, equity), only the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and the precautionary principle will be examined in more detail as they are of particular relevance for the post problem. 7
19 operative part of the Convention. This indicates that some states sought to emphasize the importance of these provisions and to grant them a higher legal status. 42 A.2.1 Objective The ultimate objective of the UNFCCC is to achieve stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system (UNFCCC, article 2, emphasis added). However, it was not specified what constituted dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. 43 The outcome of the negotiations already reflects several differing views, concerns and interests. 44 Moreover, the lack of scientific consensus at the time made it difficult to estimate this level more precisely. Even now that scientists can determine what the likely effects of different greenhouse gas levels are; whether these effects are dangerous is actually a value judgement, and thus a policy question. 45 Currently, the common opinion is that global temperature increases should not surpass a two-degrees Celsius threshold above pre-industrial levels, in order to respect the Convention s objective D. BODANSKY, The UNFCCC: A Commentary, supra note 39, J. E. ALDY and R. N. STAVINS, Architectures for agreement: addressing global climate change in the post-kyoto world, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007 (hereinafter: J. E. ALDY, R. N. STAVINS, Architectures for agreement), 6; D. JAMIESON, The Post-Kyoto Climate: A Gloomy Forecast, GIELR 2008, vol. 20, (537) 541; A.M. HALVORSSEN, Global Response to Climate Change, supra note 21, J. DE MULDER and F. MAES, Verhandelbare emissierechten in het klimaatbeleid : een inventarisatie van de juridische aspecten, Universiteit Gent 2006, (1) (hereinafter: J. DE MULDER, F. MAES, Verhandelbare emissierechten in het klimaatbeleid), IPCC, Summary Policymakers, supra note 3, 18; D. BODANSKY, The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?, AJIL 1999, vol. 93, (596) (hereinafter: D. BODANSKY, The Legitimacy of International Governance), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions- Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius: The way ahead for 2020 and beyond, G8 Chair s Summary, L Aquila Summit 2009, In the G8 session, Leaders recognised the scientific view on the need to keep global temperature rise below two degrees Celsius above pre- industrial levels ; The Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate, Declaration of the Leaders, L Aquila Summit 2009, We recognize the scientific view that the increase in global average temperature above pre-industrial levels ought not to exceed 2 degrees C ; For a deeper reflection, See infra: 4.C.3.1, Content of the Copenhagen accord. 8
20 The legal status of this ultimate objective has in former times been subject to debate. Starting point in defining the legal status is the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 47. This Convention contains rules regarding the object and purpose of treaties. Particularly, Parties have a duty not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty 48 and a treaty shall be interpreted ( ) in the light of its object and purpose 49. Whether the stabilization of GHG concentrations qualified as the object and purpose in this sense was questioned. The adding of the word ultimate may have been an attempt to prevent the Convention s objective from being equated with object and purpose. 50 Notwithstanding the minor textual differences, the majority of authors now threats article 2 UNFCCC exactly as the Convention s object and purpose. 51 A.2.2 The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CDR) Parties should pursue the Convention s objective, in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Accordingly, developed country Parties should take the lead in combating climate change and the adverse effects thereof (UNFCCC, article 3.1). Two features characterize States responsibilities. First, the responsibilities are common; and second, they are differentiated. That responsibilities are common is easy to understand. 1 ton of GHGs emitted in the United States (US) has the same ecological effect as 1 ton of GHGs emitted in Tanzania. This pollution cannot be confined to a geographic region; it instead poses a global environmental 47 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331; reprinted in 8 I.L.M. 679 (hereinafter: VCLT). 48 VCLT, supra note 47, article VCLT, supra note 47, article D. BODANSKY, The UNFCCC: A Commentary, supra note 39, 500; Y. KAMEYAMA and I. KUBOTA, What are the objectives meant to be? A comparative study of multilateral environmental agreements on articles on objectives, with primary attention on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2010, vol. 11, (1) L. RAJAMANI, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law, supra note 34, 162; T. HONKONEN, The Principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibility in Post-2012 Climate Negotiations, RECIEL 2009, (257) (hereinafter: T. HONKONEN, The Principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibility), 267; A. M. HALVORSSEN, Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime- Amending the Kyoto Protocol to include Annex C and the Annex C Mitigation Fund, CJIELP 2007, vol. 2, (247) (hereinafter: A. M. HALVORSSEN, Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime),
21 problem. No state has the capability to prevent global climate change on its own, and no state is able to isolate itself from it; all countries will have to cooperate to confine the problem. More troublesome, responsibilities are also differentiated. This differentiation is based on two criteria: countries contribution to GHG emissions and the resources they posses to take remedial measures. 52 When dealing with differentiated responsibilities, one notices that certain elements are generally accepted, while others remain highly debated. Consensus exists to the point that developing nations have contributed to a small degree to the emission of GHG and developed nations to a very high degree; and consequently, that their respective responsibilities should reflect this historical responsibility. Additionally, the majority agrees that developed nations possess more recourses to take remedial measures. 53 Contrarily, the criteria for differentiation between individual state responsibilities have become the subject of discussion. 54 Most developed countries prefer an evolving, flexible categorization of Parties to enable that differences between developing countries can be taken into account when assigning obligations. To the contrary, most developing countries oppose any form of differentiation between them, as this would disrupt the burden sharing architecture of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol 55, and threaten their negotiating power L. RAJAMANI, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law, supra note 34, 130; Y. MATSUI, Some Aspects of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2002, vol. 2, (151) (hereinafter: Y. MATSUI, Some Aspects of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities), J. BRUNNÉE, Climate change, global environmental justice and international environmental law in J. EBBESSON and P. OKOWA (eds.), Environmental Law and Justice in Context, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, ( ); E. LOUKA, International Environmental Law- Fairness, Effectiveness, and World Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, 54; J. BRUNNÉE, From Bali to Copenhagen, supra note 21, 93; K. W. DANISH, An Overview of the International Regime Addressing Climate Change, SDLP 2007, vol. 7, (10) 10; A. M. HALVORSSEN, Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime, supra note 51, ; Y. MATSUI, Some Aspects of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities, supra note 52, 154; T. E. WIRTH, A Way forward on Climate Change, supra note 27, This differentiation could be made based upon current emissions of countries, the per capita emissions, the historical responsibility for emissions, :J. BRUNNÉE, From Bali to Copenhagen, supra note 21, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, December 10, 1997, 37 I.L.M. 22 (hereinafter: Kyoto Protocol); for detailed information see infra: 2.C: The Kyoto Protocol. 56 L. RAJAMANI, Differentiation in the Post-2012 Climate Regime, Pol y Q. 2008, vol. 4, (48) (hereinafter: L. RAJAMANI, Differentiation in the Post-2012 Climate Regime),
22 Notwithstanding the considerable importance of the principle in the climate change regime, there are limits to its scope. Two limitations are identified. Firstly, the CDR principle only applies for a limited time period, necessary for developing countries to reach the same level of economic growth as developed countries. Once this discrepancy in economic standard is cleared, the differential treatment should cease to apply. 57 On this point, RAJAMANI provides some sharp and justified commentary. If the CDR principle is included in the conviction that the responsibilities ought to be divided based on the different situations of countries in order to be just, one must admit that the considerable differences within the group of developing nations should also be taken into account. Currently, the nations within the Group of 77 (G-77) 58 are considered to be developing nations. But this broad brush approach neglects fundamental differences between them. Indeed, it is hard to see how countries as Singapore and Qatar, who are both classified as high-income country by the World Bank and as very high human development country by the UN Development Program, 59 can be qualified as developing countries under the climate regime, just as for example Ethiopia and Madagascar, classified as low-income and low human development countries, 60 only because of their membership of the G The second limitation to CDR principle implies that its application should not be incompatible with the object and purpose of the UNFCCC. As noted, a treaty must be interpreted in the light of the object and purpose of it. 62 If the implementation of the CDR principle impedes the Convention s objective from being realized, it has gone beyond the limits of the treaty A. M. HALVORSSEN, Global Response to Climate Change, supra note 21, 849; A. M. HALVORSSEN, Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime, supra note 51, See infra 2.B: Negotiating Blocks. 59 The World Bank, Gross national income per capita, United Nations Development Program, Human Development Index, 2010 Report, 60 Ibid. 61 L. RAJAMANI, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law, supra note 34, VCLT, supra note 47, article L. RAJAMANI, Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law, supra note 34, 162; A. M. HALVORSSEN, Global Response to Climate Change, supra note 21, 850; A. M. HALVORSSEN, Common, but Differentiated Commitments in the Future Climate Change Regime, supra note 51,
23 Within the UNFCCC, the CDR principle manifests through the division of Parties into different groups, in order to take on different responsibilities 64 : Annex I countries (developed countries and countries undergoing a transition to a market economy), Annex II countries (the Annex I countries with financial obligations, i.c. OECD countries) and non-annex I countries (developing countries). The text of the UNFCCC does not mention the aforementioned limitations to the CDR principle. The absence of limitations in the text leaves room for discussions. Another example of application of CDR that could provide guidance on this point is the Montreal Protocol 65 : Developing countries are allowed a delay in compliance with the terms of the Protocol for ten years and receive financial support. Nonetheless, the substantive obligations in the Montreal Protocol are identical for both developed and developing nations. 66 The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities is not precisely defined 67 and contains no legal obligation in itself. Nonetheless, it is stated to be of sufficient legal weight to form the legal and philosophical basis for the interpretation of existing obligations and the elaboration of future international legal obligations within the context of existing instruments in the on-going regime-building process. 68 The subsequent Protocol to the UNFCCC clearly follows this principle, since it only imposes obligations on developed nations. 69 A.2.3 The precautionary principle Article 3.3 UNFCCC contains the precautionary principle, according to which parties should take precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize the causes of climate change and mitigate its adverse effects. Additionally, where there are threats of serious or 64 D. BUSHEY and S. JINNAH, Evolving Responsibility? The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility in the UNFCCC, BJIL Publicist 2010, vol. 6, (1) 1; P. K. WATERMAN, From Kyoto to ANWR: Critiquing the Bush Administration s Withdrawal From the Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change, TLCP 2003, vol. 13, (749) (hereinafter: P.K. WATERMAN, From Kyoto to ANWR), Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, September 16, 1987, 1513 U.N.T.S. 323 (hereinafter: Montreal Protocol). 66 Montreal Protocol, supra note 65, article 5: Special situation of developing countries. 67 C. D. STONE, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law, AJIL 2004, vol. 98, (276) ; J. DE MULDER, F. MAES, Verhandelbare emissierechten in het klimaatbeleid, supra note 44, L. RAJAMANI, The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility and the Balance of Commitments under the Climate Regime, RECIEL 2000, vol. 9, (120) See infra, 2.C: The Kyoto Protocol. 12
24 irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing such measures (UNFCCC, article 3.3). 70 The measures taken by Parties are affected by the precautionary principle in two ways; in timing as well as in substance. Parties should anticipate, thus take measures before actually experiencing the harm and these measures should be adopted with a margin of error, thus balance should tip in favour of more severe measures in case it is impossible to assess the environmental risk with full certainty. 71 This principle of precaution has an important role in the climate change regime, as the latter is actually founded on the premise of precaution. 72 It eventually supports the arguments of Parties who are in favour of strong international action. 73 Nevertheless, the use of the word should, instead of the mandatory language shall, indicates the principle is no hard principle. 74 A.3 Commitments As stated supra, the UNFCCC contains different commitments for the three respective groups. Certain general commitments are directed to all State Parties, both developed and developing (UNFCCC, article 4.1, 5 and 6). These commitments are qualitative, not quantitative in nature 75 and include among others: the development and publication of national inventories of anthropogenic emissions; formulation and implementation of programs to adapt to climate 70 P. K. WATERMAN, From Kyoto to ANWR, supra note 64, 756; J. CAMERON, J. ABOUCHAR, The Precautionary Principle: A Fundamental Principle of Law and Policy for the Protection of the Global Environment, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 1991, vol. 14, (1) D. BODANSKY, The Precautionary Principle and International Law, Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, C. SCHWARTE, International climate change litigation, supra note 9, 10-11; A. TROUWBORST, Precautionary Rights and Duties of States, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006, S. ANDRESEN, L. WALLOE and K. ROSENDAL, The Precautionary Principle: Knowledge Counts but Power Decides? in R. COONEY and B. DICKSON, Biodiversity and the Precautionary Principle: Risk and Uncertainty in Conservation and Sustainable Use, London, Earthscan, 2005, (39) 45; INTERNATIONAL LAW ASSOCIATION (ed.), Legal Principles relating to Climate Change, The Hague Conference (2010), (1) (hereinafter: ILA, Legal Principles), ILA, Legal Principles, supra note 72, D. BODANSKY, Deconstructing the Precautionary Principle in D. D. CARON and H.N. SCHEIBER (eds.), Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters, Leiden, Martinus Nijfhoff Publishers, 2004, (381) 382; A. TROUWBORST, Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law, The Hague, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002, D. BODANSKY, The UNFCCC: A Commentary, supra note 39,
25 change; the promotion of sustainable development and the promotion and cooperation in exchange of information (UNFCCC, article 4.1). The UNFCCC also stipulates that the extent to which developing country Parties will effectively carry out these commitments will depend on the effective implementation by developed country Parties of their commitments under the Convention related to financial resources and transfer of technology (UNFCCC, article 4.7). The level of assistance from developed countries is thus a pivotal factor in the implementation of these general commitments. This arrangement constitutes a compromise between developed countries, which preferred the same methodology for the preparation of GHG inventories to be used by all countries; and developing countries, which argued that these methodologies were not appropriate for them. Parties agreed that developing countries would engage in reporting, with the precondition of developed countries paying the full costs. 76 The UNFCCC installs some additional duties for Annex I Parties. The most notable commitment for Annex I Parties is the adoption of national policies and corresponding measures on the mitigation of climate change. This mitigation should take place by limiting the anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and protecting and enhancing greenhouse gas sinks and reservoirs (UNFCCC, article 4.2 (a)). These policies were purported to demonstrate that developed countries take the lead in modifying longer-term trends in anthropogenic emissions, as Parties consequently recognized that returning by the end of the decade (2000) to earlier levels would contribute to such modification. This commitment is followed by the information requirements, which are also stricter for Annex I Parties: initial reports must be communicated within 6 months of the entry into force of the Convention, and periodically thereafter, with the aim of returning emissions individually or jointly to their 1990 levels (UNFCCC, article 4.2 (b)). The combination of these two provisions (article 4.2 (a) and (b)) made some parties conclude that the UNFCCC demanded Annex I Parties to reduce their emissions by the year 2000 to the 1990 levels. However, since this article is drafted rather vaguely, without a clear connection 76 D. BODANSKY, The UNFCCC: A Commentary, supra note 39,
UNITED NATIONS. Distr. GENERAL. FCCC/CP/2009/3 13 May Original: ENGLISH. Note by the secretariat
UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL FCCC/CP/2009/3 13 May 2009 Original: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Fifteenth session Copenhagen, 7 18 December 2009 Item X of the provisional agenda Draft protocol to
More informationLegal considerations relating to a possible gap between the first and subsequent commitment periods
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change FCCC/KP/AWG/2010/10 Distr. General 20 July 2010 Original: English Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol
More informationKYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. Final draft by the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole
CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Third session Kyoto, 1-10 December 1997 Agenda item 5 FCCC/CP/1997/CRP.6 10 December 1997 ENGLISH ONLY KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
More information7517/12 MDL/ach 1 DG I
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 March 2012 7517/12 ENV 199 ONU 33 DEVGEN 63 ECOFIN 241 ENER 89 FORETS 22 MAR 23 AVIATION 43 INFORMATION NOTE from: General Secretariat to: Delegations Subject:
More informationKYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE The Parties to this Protocol, Being Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, hereinafter referred
More informationA Post-Kyoto Framework for Climate Change
Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Presentations and Speeches Faculty Scholarship 9-2-2008 A Post-Kyoto Framework for Climate Change Daniel M. Bodansky University of Georgia School of Law, bodansky@uga.edu
More informationKYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE*
KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE* The Parties to this Protocol, Being Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, hereinafter referred
More informationThe Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR&RC) and the Compliance Branch of the Paris Agreement
The Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR&RC) and the Compliance Branch of the Paris Agreement Estefanía Jiménez Climate Change and the Paris Agreement
More informationKYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATECHANGE
KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATECHANGE The Parties to this Protocol, Being Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, hereinafter referred
More informationCOP Decisions: Binding or Not? 1
CAN Ad-Hoc Legal Working Group June 8, 2009 COP Decisions: Binding or Not? 1 The LCA-Negotiating Text states that several Parties have expressed the view that decisions by the COP would suffice to ensure
More informationFCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.3 English Page 14. Decision 22/CP.7
Page 14 Decision 22/CP.7 Guidelines for the preparation of the information required under Article 7 of the Kyoto Protocol The Conference of the Parties, Recalling its decisions 1/CP.3, 1/CP.4, 8/CP.4,
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUENOS AIRES PLAN OF ACTION: ADOPTION OF THE DECISIONS GIVING EFFECT TO THE BONN AGREEMENTS
UNITED NATIONS Distr. LIMITED FCCC/CP/2001/L.28 9 November 2001 Original: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Seventh session Marrakesh, 29 October - 9 November 2001 Agenda item 3 (b) (i) IMPLEMENTATION
More informationFrom Copenhagen to Mexico City The Future of Climate Change Negotiations
From Copenhagen to Mexico City Shyam Saran Prime Minister s Special Envoy for Climate Change and Former Foreign Secretary, Government of India. Prologue The Author who has been in the forefront of negotiations
More informationDecision 1/CP.6 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUENOS AIRES PLAN OF ACTION. Recalling the provisions of the Convention and its Kyoto Protocol,
Decision 1/CP.6 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUENOS AIRES PLAN OF ACTION The Conference of the Parties, Recalling the provisions of the Convention and its Kyoto Protocol, Further recalling its decision 1/CP.4,
More informationInternational treaty examination of the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol
International treaty examination of the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Contents Recommendation 2 What the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol
More informationNationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) for Pakistan
3 November 2010 Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) for Pakistan What is a NAMA A Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action (NAMA) aims to mitigate the impact of climate change. NAMAs will
More informationPARIS AGREEMENT. Being Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, hereinafter referred to as "the Convention",
PARIS AGREEMENT The Parties to this Agreement, Being Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, hereinafter referred to as "the Convention", Pursuant to the Durban Platform for
More informationFramework Convention on Climate Change
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Distr.: General 8 March 2011 Original: English Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention Fourteenth session Bangkok,
More informationCOP23: main outcomes and way forward. LEONARDO MASSAI 30 November 2017
COP23: main outcomes and way forward LEONARDO MASSAI 30 November 2017 CONTENTS Paris Agreement COP23 Way forward 2 3 PARIS AGREEMENT: Objective, Art. 2 aims to strengthen the global response to the threat
More informationTopics for the in-session workshop
11 September 2006 ENGLISH ONLY UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON FURTHER COMMITMENTS FOR ANNEX I PARTIES UNDER THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Second session Nairobi, 6 14
More information14747/14 MDL/ach 1 DG E1B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 29 October 2014 (OR. en) 14747/14 INFORMATION NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations CLIMA 94 ENV 856 ONU 125 DEVGEN 229 ECOFIN 979
More informationFCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1 Annex Paris Agreement
Annex Paris Agreement The Parties to this Agreement, Being Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, hereinafter referred to as the Convention, Pursuant to the Durban Platform
More informationViews on an indicative roadmap
17 May 2010 ENGLISH ONLY UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON LONG-TERM COOPERATIVE ACTION UNDER THE CONVENTION Tenth session Bonn, 1 11 June 2010 Item 3 of the
More informationProblems and Prospects of International Legal Disputes on Climate Change
Problems and Prospects of International Legal Disputes on Climate Change OKAMATSU, Akiko * Introduction Tuvalu, whose territory is in peril of sinking beneath the waves as sea levels rise because of global
More informationPriorities for Nairobi: Charting the course for a safe climate post-2012
Priorities for Nairobi: Charting the course for a safe climate post-2012 WWF Position Paper November 2006 At this UN meeting on climate change governments can open a new chapter in the history of the planet.
More informationChapter 2: International Legal Approaches: Treaties and Non-Binding Agreements
Chapter 2: International Legal Approaches: Treaties and Non-Binding Agreements Chapter 2: International Legal Approaches: Treaties and Non-Binding Agreements... 1 A. The Complexities of International Law...
More information12165/15 MDL/ach 1 DG E 1B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 September 2015 (OR. en) 12165/15 INFORMATION NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations CLIMA 101 ENV 571 ONU 111 DEVGEN 165 ECOFIN
More informationEnvironmental Integrity Group (EIG), comprising Liechtenstein, Mexico, Monaco, the Republic of Korea, and Switzerland
Environmental Integrity Group (EIG), comprising Liechtenstein, Mexico, Monaco, the Republic of Korea, and Switzerland Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP): scope, design
More informationPRELIMINARY TEXT OF A DECLARATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES IN RELATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
Intergovernmental Meeting for the Preparation of a Declaration of Ethical Principles in relation to Climate Change Paris, UNESCO Headquarters / Siège de l UNESCO Room XII / Salle XII 27-30 June 2017 /
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS ANALYSIS OF THE DOHA GATEWAY (UNFCCC 18TH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES)
Last revised 29 May 2013 HUMAN RIGHTS ANALYSIS OF THE DOHA GATEWAY (UNFCCC 18TH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES) In December 2012, the negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
More informationREPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Submission to the Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) October 2014
REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS Submission to the Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) October 2014 AMBITION IN THE ADP AND THE 2015 AGREEMENT 1. This submission responds
More informationNI Summary of COP 15 Outcomes
Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions Working Paper NI WP 09-06 December 2009 NI Summary of COP 15 Outcomes Joshua Schneck Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University
More informationEssential Readings in Environmental Law IUCN Academy of Environmental Law (www.iucnael.org)
Essential Readings in Environmental Law IUCN Academy of Environmental Law (www.iucnael.org) COMMON BUT DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITY PRINCIPLE Sumudu Atapattu, University of Wisconsin, USA OVERVIEW OF
More informationCOP21 and Paris Agreement. 14 Dec 2015 Jun ARIMA Professor, GrasPP, Tokyo University Executive Senior Fellow, 21 st Century Public Policy Institute
COP21 and Paris Agreement 14 Dec 2015 Jun ARIMA Professor, GrasPP, Tokyo University Executive Senior Fellow, 21 st Century Public Policy Institute Road to Paris Agreement Kyoto Protocol (1997) Developed
More informationDecision 15X/CMP.81. Guidelines for the preparation of the information required under Article 7 of the Kyoto Protocol for the second commitment period
Page 1 Decision 15X/CMP.81 Formatted: Not Highlight Guidelines for the preparation of the information required under Article 7 of the Kyoto Protocol for the second commitment period The Conference of the
More informationFCCC/CP/2011/INF.2/Add.1
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Distr.: General 7 October 2011 English only Conference of the Parties Seventeenth session Durban, 28 November to 9 December 2011 Item 11 of the provisional
More information5 TH CLIMATE CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA ANNUAL CONFERENCE (CCDA-V) KYOTO TO PARIS: AN AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE
5 TH CLIMATE CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA ANNUAL CONFERENCE (CCDA-V) KYOTO TO PARIS: AN AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE 1. The Climate Change Regime: Milestones C 1990 UNGA Resolution 45/212 Negotiating mandate
More informationOptions for the Legal Form of the Paris Outcome
Climate Change Negotiation Skills: Training for LDC Negotiators 29-31 July 2015 Bangkok, Thailand Event Paper Options for the Legal Form of the Paris Outcome UNEP Author information This report was written
More informationBefore and after the Copenhagen Accord: stocktaking pros and cons of the new legal architecture of the climate change regime
T.M.C Asser Institute Before and after the Copenhagen Accord: stocktaking pros and cons of the new legal architecture of the climate change regime Leonardo Massai EAERE-FEEM-VIU European Summer School
More informationPROTECTING THE MOST VULNERABLE: SECURING A LEGALLY BINDING CLIMATE AGREEMENT
PROTECTING THE MOST VULNERABLE: SECURING A LEGALLY BINDING CLIMATE AGREEMENT Remarks by Mary Robinson, former President of Ireland and President of the Mary Robinson Foundation Climate Justice LSE Centre
More informationAdvance unedited version
Decision -/CP.24 Preparations for the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the first session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement The Conference
More informationUnited Nations Climate Change Sessions (Ad hoc Working Group on Durban Platform ADP 2.6) Bonn, October 2014
Technical paper 1 United Nations Climate Change Sessions (Ad hoc Working Group on Durban Platform ADP 2.6) Bonn, 20-25 October 2014 Prepared by: Daniela Carrington (formerly Stoycheva) Istanbul, Turkey,
More informationProcedural Rules of the Climate Negotiations Introduction
Procedural Rules of the Climate Negotiations 1 1. Introduction The formal rules for the conduct of the negotiations are contained in the Convention s Rules of Procedure. 2 Article 7.2(k), together with
More informationHuman Rights and Climate Change
Human Rights and Climate Change Briefing Paper drafted for the purpose of informing the Climate Justice Dialogue on 7 February 2015, co-hosted by the OHCHR and the Mary Robinson Foundation in Geneva Embedding
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web 98-2 ENR Updated July 31, 1998 Global Climate Change Treaty: The Kyoto Protocol Susan R. Fletcher Senior Analyst in International Environmental Policy
More informationUN FCCC: COP 18/CMP 8
CoP 101: An Informal Newcomers Guide to the UNFCCC Climate Change Meeting Process UN FCCC: COP 18/CMP 8 Norine Kennedy Doha CoP 18, CMP 8 Brian Flannery December 4, 2012 Nick Campbell 1 Background and
More information11 Legally binding versus nonlegally binding instruments
11 Legally binding versus nonlegally binding instruments Arizona State University Although it now appears settled that the Paris agreement will be a treaty within the definition of the Vienna Convention
More informationFCCC/SBSTA/2016/3. United Nations. Provisional agenda and annotations. I. Provisional agenda
United Nations FCCC/SBSTA/2016/3 Distr.: General 29 August 2016 Original: English Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice Forty-fifth session Marrakech, 7 14 November 2016 Item 2 of the
More informationDecision 5/SS6: Climate Change and Africa s preparations for COP22 under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Decision 5/SS6: Climate Change and Africa s preparations for COP22 under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change We, African ministers of the environment, Having met in Cairo from 18
More informationSpeaker Profiles. Graeme Dennis Partner, Sydney T F
Speaker Profiles Brendan Bateman Partner, Sydney T +61 2 9353 4224 F +61 2 8220 6700 bbateman@claytonutz.com Graeme Dennis Partner, Sydney T +61 2 9353 4106 F +61 2 8220 6700 gdennis@claytonutz.com Brendan
More informationPRINCIPLES GOVERNING IPCC WORK
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING IPCC WORK Approved at the Fourteenth Session (Vienna, 1-3 October 1998) on 1 October 1998, amended at the 21 st Session (Vienna, 3 and 6-7 November 2003) and at the 25 th Session (Mauritius,
More informationOVERVIEW SCHEDULE. United Nations Climate Change Conference Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia 3-14 December 2007
OVERVIEW SCHEDULE United Nations Climate Change Conference Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia 3-14 December 2007 Thirteenth Session of the Conference of the Parties ( 13) Third Session of the Conference of the
More informationFCCC/PA/CMA/2018/3/Add.1
ADVANCE VERSION United Nations Distr.: General 19 March 2019 Original: English Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement Contents Report of the Conference of
More informationNote by the Chair. Addendum
UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/10/Add.2 1 July 2009 Original: ENGLISH AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON FURTHER COMMITMENTS FOR ANNEX I PARTIES UNDER THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Ninth session Bangkok, 28
More informationLaw. Environment and Development Journal THE BALI FIREWALL AND MEMBER STATES FUTURE OBLIGATIONS WITHIN THE CLIMATE CHANGE REGIME.
Environment and Development Journal Law LEAD THE BALI FIREWALL AND MEMBER STATES FUTURE OBLIGATIONS WITHIN THE CLIMATE CHANGE REGIME Christopher Smith ARTICLE VOLUME 6/3 LEAD Journal (Law, Environment
More informationFramework Convention on Climate Change
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Distr.: General 4 March 2011 Original: English Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol Sixteenth session
More informationH.E ARC. DARIUS DICKSON ISHAKU
STATEMENT BY H.E ARC. DARIUS DICKSON ISHAKU SUPERVISING HONOURABLE MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA AT THE OCCASION OF THE 19 TH SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF PARTIES TO THE UNITED NATIONS
More informationBOOK REVIEW Equality Among Unequals in International Environmental Law: Differential Treatment for Developing Countries. By Anita
BOOK REVIEW Equality Among Unequals in International Environmental Law: Differential Treatment for Developing Countries. By Anita Margrethe Halvorssen., Westview Press, 1999. Pp. 200. Reporter: 11 COLO.
More informationSent via electronic mail and certified mail. February 5, 2018
Sent via electronic mail and certified mail Secretary Rex W. Tillerson U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 Re: Notice of Intent to File Suit with Respect to the Overdue Seventh
More informationTracking Down the Future Climate Regime An Assessment of Current Negotiations under the U.N.
4 Tracking Down the Future Climate Regime Tracking Down the Future Climate Regime An Assessment of Current Negotiations under the U.N. Camilla Bausch and Michael Mehling* Heads of State of eight major
More informationSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LAW ON CLIMATE CHANGE
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LAW ON CLIMATE CHANGE LEGAL WORKING PAPER SERIES 07 CANCUN CONFERENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE: ENHANCED ATTENTION ON ADAPTATION By Benoît Mayer February, 2011 IDLO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
More informationWHAT IS KYOTO PROTOCOL ANNEX A & B ARTICLE 25, 26: RATIFICATION KYOTO THERMOMETER POST KYOTO
International Law and China : Treaty system Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) WHAT IS KYOTO PROTOCOL ANNEX A & B ARTICLE 25, 26: RATIFICATION KYOTO THERMOMETER POST
More informationMobilizing and transferring knowledge on post-2012 climate policy implications
Grant Agreement N : 603847 Project Acronym: POLIMP Mobilizing and transferring knowledge on post-2012 climate policy implications D3.4: Criteria for evaluating Climate Policy scenarios Project Coordinator:
More information2018 Facilitative Dialogue: A Springboard for Climate Action
2018 Facilitative Dialogue: A Springboard for Climate Action Memo to support consultations on the design of the FD2018 during the Bonn Climate Change Conference, May 2017 1 The collective ambition of current
More informationSummary of the round tables under workstream 1 ADP 2, part 2 Bonn, Germany, 4 13 June 2013
Summary of the round tables under workstream 1 ADP 2, part 2 Bonn, Germany, 4 13 June 2013 Note by the Co-Chairs 25 July 2013 I. Introduction 1. At the second part of its second session, held in Bonn,
More informationPre-COP Ministerial meeting Mexico City, November 4-5, 2010 Marquis Reforma Hotel, Mexico
Pre-COP Ministerial meeting Mexico City, November 4-5, 2010 Marquis Reforma Hotel, Mexico Elements for a balanced outcome Speaking notes AWG-LCA Chair, Mrs. Margaret Mukahanana-Sangarwe Introduction I
More informationKIRUNA DECLARATION KIRUNA, SWEDEN 15 MAY 2013
KIRUNA DECLARATION KIRUNA, SWEDEN 15 MAY 2013 From left: Sergey Lavrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia; Erkki Tuomioja, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Finland; John F. Kerry, Secretary of State
More informationDecision 13/CMP.1 Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts under Article 7, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol
Page 23 Decision 13/CMP.1 Modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts under Article 7, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the
More informationSBI: Financial shortfall confronts Secretariatmandated activities, key issues deferred to Paris
122 SBI: Financial shortfall confronts Secretariatmandated activities, key issues deferred to Paris Kuala Lumpur, 16 June (Hilary Chiew) The 42 nd session of the Subsidiary Body on Implementation (SBI)
More informationARRANGEMENTS FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETINGS. amendments to the Convention or its Annexes
UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL FCCC/SBI/1997/15 20 June 1997 Original: ENGLISH SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR IMPLEMENTATION Sixth session Bonn, 28 July - 5 August 1997 Item 8 (a) of the provisional agenda ARRANGEMENTS
More informationThe Paris Agreement: A Legal Reality Check
The Paris Agreement: A Legal Reality Check Feja Lesniewska (PhD) SOAS, University of London Berlin Conference on Global Environmental Change 24 May 2016 1 Content The Paris Agreement: overview Equity and
More informationSEEKING CLIMATE JUSTICE: A CRITICAL RESPONSE TO SINGER
SEEKING CLIMATE JUSTICE: A CRITICAL RESPONSE TO SINGER Md. Zakir Hossain Masters in Applied Ethics (MAE) Centre for Applied Ethics (CTE) Linkoping University June 9, 2010. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number
More informationFCCC/SB/2013/INF.8. United Nations. Report on the in-forum workshop on area (c)
United Nations Distr.: General 25 September 2013 English only Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice Thirty-ninth session Warsaw, 11 16 November 2013 Item 9(a) of the provisional agenda
More informationIntegrating Human Rights in the Paris Implementation Guidelines State of Play after the COP-23
The implementation guidelines currently negotiated under the APA will shape long-term implementation of the Paris Agreement and define the scope of international cooperation on climate change. The integration
More informationSpanish Parliament Commission for Climate Change Madrid, 25 June 2009
Spanish Parliament Commission for Climate Change Madrid, 25 June 2009 Address by Yvo de Boer, Executive Secretary United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Honourable Members, ladies and gentlemen,
More informationParis Agreement; Sustainable Development Goals; mutual supportiveness; loss and damage; cooperative mechanisms.
Paris, Climate Change, and Sustainable Development Francesco Sindico Reader in International Environmental Law, University of Strathclyde Law School; Director of the Strathclyde Centre for Environmental
More informationRepublic of Korea-EU Summit, Seoul, 23 May 2009 JOINT PRESS STATEMENT
Republic of Korea-EU Summit, Seoul, 23 May 2009 JOINT PRESS STATEMENT The Fourth Summit Meeting between the Republic of Korea and the European Union was held in Seoul, 23 May 2009. The Republic of Korea
More informationProposal from Tuvalu for amendments to the Kyoto Protocol
UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/4 12 June 2009 Original: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES SERVING AS THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Fifth session Copenhagen, 7 18 December
More informationSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LAW ON CLIMATE CHANGE
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT LAW ON CLIMATE CHANGE LEGAL WORKING PAPER SERIES 13 TRADE & INVESTMENT UNDER THE UNFCCC: THE OUTCOMES OF CANCUN, AND THE ROAD TO DURBAN By Joshua Roberts March, 2011 IDLO SUSTAINABLE
More informationArrangements for intergovernmental meetings
UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL FCCC/SBI/2010/8 7 May 2010 Original: ENGLISH SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR IMPLEMENTATION Thirty-second session Bonn, 31 May to 11 June 2010 Item 16 (a d) of the provisional agenda
More informationThe Association Agreement between the EU and Moldova
Moldova State University Faculty of Law Chisinau, 12 th February 2015 The Association Agreement between the EU and Moldova Environmental Cooperation Gianfranco Tamburelli Association Agreements with Georgia,
More informationGoverning Climate Change: General Principles and the Paris Agreement
+ Governing Climate Change: General Principles and the Paris Agreement Jolene Lin Associate Professor, NUS Law Director, Asia-Pacific Centre for Environmental Law (APCEL) Jolene.lin@nus.edu.sg + Outline
More informationPROVISIONAL AGENDA AND ANNOTATIONS. Note by the Executive Secretary CONTENTS I. PROVISIONAL AGENDA
70+6'& 0#6+105 Distr. GENERAL FCCC/CP/2000/1 31 August 2000 Original: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Sixth session The Hague, 13-24 November 2000 Item 2 (c) of the provisional agenda PROVISIONAL AGENDA
More informationNUUK DECLARATION. On the occasion of the Seventh Ministerial Meeting of. The Arctic Council. 12 May 2011, Nuuk, Greenland
NUUK DECLARATION On the occasion of the Seventh Ministerial Meeting of The Arctic Council 12 May 2011, Nuuk, Greenland Ministers representing the eight Arctic States, convening in Nuuk, Greenland, for
More informationeuropean capacity building initiative (ecbi)
european capacity building initiative (ecbi) for sustained capacity building in support of the international climate change negotiations 2007 ecbi Regional Workshop for SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA 29 31 October
More informationUNILATERAL CARBON BORDER. Anuradha R.V. Partner, CLARUS LAW ASSOCIATES
UNILATERAL CARBON BORDER MEASURES: LEGAL ISSUES Anuradha R.V. Partner, CLARUS LAW ASSOCIATES anuradha.rv@claruslaw.com 2 Outline Unilateral Trade Measures under the UNFCCC Copenhagen Accord, Cancun & After
More informationInformation on subsidiary bodies
Distr.: General 25 February 2009 English only International Conference on Chemicals Management Second session Geneva, 11 15 May 2009 Item 2 (a) of the provisional agenda Organizational matters: adoption
More informationUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Towards 2015 Agreement Bahrain May 05, 2015 1 Overview I. Key messages II. III. IV. Background Key Issues to be Resolved Status of Negotiations
More informationIn Pursuit of a Binding Climate Agreement: Negotiators expand the mitigation tent but reinforce the ambition gap
In Pursuit of a Binding Climate Agreement: Negotiators expand the mitigation tent but reinforce the ambition gap Jessica Boyle December 2011 www.iisd.org Published by the International Institute for Sustainable
More informationFrom Paris to Marrakech: 7th - 18th November 2016 Marrakech, Morocco. GUIDANCE NOTE COP22
From Paris to Marrakech: 7th - 18th November 2016 Marrakech, Morocco. GUIDANCE NOTE COP22 Pacific Islands Development Forum Secretariat 56 Domain Road, Nasese, P.O Box 2050, Government Buildings, Suva,
More informationI. Background: mandate and content of the document
Experience of the facilitative branch of the Kyoto Protocol Compliance Committee in providing advice and facilitation to Parties in implementing the Kyoto Protocol I. Background: mandate and content of
More informationJoint Statement of the 22 nd EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Brussels, Belgium, 21 January 2019
Joint Statement of the 22 nd EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Brussels, Belgium, 21 January 2019 We, the Foreign Ministers of Member States of the European Union and the High Representative of the Union for
More informationTHE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW. Climate Change & Human Rights: A Primer
THE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Climate Change & Human Rights: A Primer Introduction The body of the world s leading climate scientists convened by the UN, the Intergovernmental Panel on
More informationBefore I may do so, allow me to paraphrase a passage from the Genesis chapter 1, verse 26 of the Bible where it states that our
MINISTRY FOR ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE PARLIAMENTARY STATEMENT BY HON. JOHN PUNDARI, CMG, MP 22 March 2016 I thank you for giving me the floor to speak. For the benefit of all you
More informationNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT NO. 39 OF 2004
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT NO. 39 OF 2004 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 19 FEBRUARY, 2005] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 11 SEPTEMBER, 2005] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text
More informationBringing the Copenhagen Global Climate Change Negotiations to Conclusion
Bringing the Copenhagen Global Climate Change Negotiations to Conclusion JOHN WHALLEY SEAN WALSH CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 2458 CATEGORY 7: TRADE POLICY NOVEMBER 2008 PRESENTED AT CESIFO VENICE SUMMER INSTITUTE
More informationGetting Serious About Global Climate Change: What s Coming in the Post-Kyoto Era
Getting Serious About Global Climate Change: What s Coming in the Post-Kyoto Era Robert N. Stavins Albert Pratt Professor of Business and Government John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University
More information29 May 2017 Without prejudice CHAPTER [XX] TRADE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Article X.1. Objectives and Scope
29 May 2017 Without prejudice This document is the European Union's (EU) proposal for a legal text on trade and sustainable development in the EU-Indonesia FTA. It has been tabled for discussion with Indonesia.
More informationLegal Remedy for Climate Change Refugees: Possibilities and Challenges. Yu GONG
2nd Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2016) Legal Remedy for Climate Change Refugees: Possibilities and Challenges Yu GONG Law School of Xiamen
More informationMontanan Model UN High School Conference
Montanan Model UN Security Council Topic Background Guide Topic 2: Global Warming as a Security Issue 1 7 August 2014 Before 2007, the UN treated climate change as falling under the organization s goal
More information