Sheldon Halpern and the Right of Publicity
|
|
- Joshua Wright
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Sheldon Halpern and the Right of Publicity MARSHALL LEAFFER TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. RIGHT OF PUBLICITY REVISITED III. SHELDON HALPERN AND ASSOCIATIVE VALUE OF PERSONALITY IV. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION I met Sheldon Halpern several decades ago when he decided to leave corporate practice and become a full-time teacher. I was immediately impressed by the warmth of his personality and his intense interest in intellectual property law. From that time on, we never lost contact. Halpern was one of those people who knew no strangers and was blessed with so many friendships both in the United States and abroad. I immediately knew he would be a credit to our teaching profession, and my guess was right on. Halpern had a distinguished career as a teacher and a scholar. He organized several outstanding conferences, which he orchestrated with panache Halpern at his generous, outgoing best. Although we never served on the same faculty, we kept in touch regularly and we always picked up where we left off. He was family. I used to kid him by saying that he reminded me of my Uncle Manny from the Bronx. We always had things to talk about, whether we were discussing law or life or anything else. We sometimes disagreed on some legal issues, but it was always fun to see Halpern trying to set you straight. One issue of continuous debate was about the right of publicity, a subject on which Halpern was a recognized expert. So, in this remembrance of my dear friend, I would like to single out one of Halpern s contributions to the literature, his justification of the right of publicity, which he called the associative value of personality. 1 Halpern s espousal of the right of publicity differed from his colleagues in the field who have largely disdained this newest right in the domain of Professor of Law, Indiana University, Maurer School of Law, Distinguished Scholar in Intellectual Property Law and University Fellow. 1 See generally Sheldon W. Halpern, The Right of Publicity: Commercial Exploitation of the Associative Value of Personality, 39 VAND. L.REV (1986) [hereinafter Halpern, Publicity]; Sheldon W. Halpern, The Right of Publicity: Maturation of an Independent Right Protecting the Associative Value of Personality, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 853 (1995) [hereinafter Halpern, Associative Value].
2 274 OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 78:2 intellectual property. 2 For the most part, IP scholars in the academy overwhelmingly take the position that we have improperly extended intellectual property rights to the detriment of the public domain and, as such, have almost uniformly expressed a disdain for the right of publicity. Professor Halpern was not of this opinion, however, finding a solid basis for this relatively new right. I found it refreshing that Halpern took a position contrary to so many of his colleagues in presenting a cogent argument in favor of the right of publicity. I have chosen this topic as a basis for my remembrance because it illustrates the way in which Halpern approached his chosen subject matter. Before discussing Halpern s justification of publicity rights, I would like to present a brief overview of the right. II. RIGHT OF PUBLICITY REVISITED The right of publicity appeared for the first time in 1953 in Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. 3 Judge Frank explained its basis as an economic rather than personal right: We think that, in addition to and independent of that right of privacy...,a man has a right in the publicity value of his photograph... [and] to grant the exclusive privilege of publishing his picture, and that such a grant may validly be made in gross... This right might be called a right of publicity. 4 The right of publicity quickly became a formalized property right, distinct from the right of privacy, that enjoys all the attributes of property, which includes transferability of the right. 5 In the years after Haelan, the right of publicity has taken hold in a spectacular manner and is now established by statute or common law in most states. 6 In its various state-law iterations, the right of publicity has taken shape into an almost boundless, descendible, and assignable property right. 7 The problem is that the subject matter of the right and its transferability differs appreciably between states. 8 Periodically, 2 For a comprehensive polemic criticizing the right of publicity, see generally Michael Madow, Private Ownership of Public Image: Popular Culture and Publicity Rights, 81 CALIF.L.REV. 125 (1993). 3 Haelan Labs., Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., 202 F.2d 866, 868 (2d Cir. 1953) (concerning the use of baseball player images on cards). 4 Id. 5 Marshall Leaffer, The Right of Publicity: A Comparative Perspective, 70 ALB. L. REV. 1357, 1360 (2007). 6 Id. 7 Id. 8 Id.
3 2017] IN MEMORIAM: PROFESSOR HALPERN 275 the notion of a harmonized federal law of the right has been debated, but so far, no unifying federal statue has emerged. 9 Since its advent in U.S. law in 1953, the contours of the right of publicity have grown to embrace not only name and likeness, but also anything roughly relating to identity. 10 These new identifiers comprise of objects associated with the celebrity s fame such as a racecar driver s car, 11 a football player s nickname (Crazylegs), 12 a catch phrase identified with a talk show host (Here s Johnny), 13 a distinctive voice (Bette Midler), 14 the likeness of a television personality (Vanna White), 15 and a pitcher s stance (Don Newcombe) 16 to list a few examples. 17 But why extend the right of publicity to encompass such tenuous attributes of identity such as nicknames, objects, and catchphrases? The search for a rationale for a right to publicity runs the gamut from natural law to various instrumentalist, incentive-based justifications. 18 In my view, these attempts to validate the right of publicity are largely unpersuasive, whether based on Lockean labor theory and various concepts of human dignity or more instrumentalist justifications, like those supporting copyright or patent law to encourage the investment in the development of persona or to properly allocate scarce resources. 19 III. SHELDON HALPERN AND ASSOCIATIVE VALUE OF PERSONALITY Unlike some of his colleagues in academia, Halpern never took a reflex reaction against a robust regime of intellectual property rights. As for the right of publicity, a body of law disdained by his contemporaries, he took a characteristically pragmatic justification for this right, which he termed the associative value of personality. 20 His concept of associative value, which he argues is the essential basis for the right of publicity, relates to the realities of the marketplace and the role that celebrities play in selling goods or 9 Id. at Id. at Motschenbacher v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821, 827 (9th Cir. 1974). 12 Hirsch v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., 280 N.W.2d 129, (Wis. 1979) (referencing Crazylegs Elroy Hirsch, a football star). 13 Carson v. Here s Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc., 698 F.2d 831, 836 (6th Cir. 1983) (referencing Here s Johnny Johnny Carson, a television host). 14 Midler v. Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460, 461, (9th Cir. 1988). 15 White v. Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc., 989 F.2d 1512, 1514 (9th Cir. 1993). 16 Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Co., 157 F.3d 686, (9th Cir. 1998). 17 Leaffer, supra note 5, at See, e.g., Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Fame, 73 IND. L.J. 1, (1997) (discussing a few of the different rationales for the right to privacy). 19 See generally Leaffer, supra note See generally Halpern, Publicity, supra note 1; Halpern, Associative Value, supra note 1.
4 276 OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 78:2 services. 21 When a company desires to promote a product, it will often turn to the use of celebrities, paying substantially for the privilege. Thus, the sale of an individual s persona to promote commercial products has developed into big business. 22 The right of publicity gives legal recognition to the value that celebrities provide to the promotion of goods and services. As Halpern put it: The phenomenon of celebrity generates commercial value. A celebrity s persona confers an associative value an economic impact upon the marketability of a product. As the Third Circuit...observed, [a] famous individual s name, likeness, and endorsement carry value and an unauthorized use harms the person both by diluting the value of the name and depriving that individual of compensation. Whatever the social merit of commercialization of personality or the morality of commercializing one s identity, the economic reality persists. 23 Halpern discounted the critics of the right who questioned its moral or economic soundness, and whether the right encourages individual creativity. To him, all this was beside the point: At bottom lies unhappiness with the reality of celebrity value, the commodification of personality. For many, a certain moral repugnance attaches to the commercialization of fame. As a purely personal matter, I suppose I would be happier intellectually in a society that did not endow fame with an economic value apart from the activity that creates the notoriety. But my personal aversion to market reality does not change that reality nor should it serve as a basis for devaluing a legal construct that recognizes that reality. 24 In effect, whatever its conceptual underpinnings, the reality of associative value is an unavoidable and omnipresent fact of our commercial lives. Thus, when the courts deal with the right of publicity, they do not create the value; rather, as a matter of policy, the courts determine the extent to which one must compensate the person who has generated the economic value for use of the persona and the limits of the celebrity s control over the exploitation of his or her personality. 25 Halpern also took a realistic position concerning the extension of the right of publicity beyond mere name or likeness. In his view, it should not be important how a defendant appropriates the plaintiff s identity, but whether the defendant actually did so. 26 He would point to Motschenbacher, Carson, and 21 See Halpern, Associative Value, supra note 1, at Id. at Id. at 857 (second alteration in original) (footnotes omitted) (quoting McFarland v. Miller, 14 F.3d 912, 919 (3d Cir. 1994)). 24 Id. at (footnote omitted). 25 Id. at Id. at
5 2017] IN MEMORIAM: PROFESSOR HALPERN 277 Midler, cases that demonstrate the impracticality of extending the right of publicity to a bright-line list enumerating the specific means of appropriating identity. 27 After all, for some people, other indicia of persona may encompass traits, characteristics, mannerisms, or even paraphernalia unique to that person. 28 Thus, a rule that would limit the right of publicity to specific methods of appropriation, such as name or likeness, would undermine, even eviscerate, the associative value of personality. Of course, Halpern was not arguing that all identifiers used by third parties should constitute actionable appropriation. Those identifiers that merit protection must unambiguously identify the person so that their use would enable the defendant to appropriate the commercial value of the person s identity. 29 Halpern made the point that the associative value basis for the right of publicity applies only to cases of commercial exploitation. Thus, the right of publicity does not ordinarily encompass the use of a person s identity in news reporting, commentary, entertainment, or in [sic] works of fiction or nonfiction or in advertising that is incidental to such uses. 30 The newsworthy, entertainment, critical, satirical, or parodic uses are privileged because they go past the unadorned act of appropriation. 31 IV. CONCLUSION In revisiting Halpern s 1995 article, I am particularly impressed by his common sense, pragmatic approach to the right of publicity. This was his attitude about the many other legal issues in our chosen field. Sometimes I disagreed with Halpern on certain issues, and he was persistent in trying to convince me that I was wrong. I will miss those exchanges. In my discussions with Halpern through the years, I have taken a less than enthusiastic view concerning the right of publicity. In my view, the right of publicity was born out of expediency, and has evolved in an explosive if not haphazard manner, leaving it to the courts and commentators to provide a sound justification for the right. The literature is voluminous, and I have yet to encounter totally persuasive justification for this all-inclusive right for the misappropriation of persona. On review of the literature, I am more convinced than ever that whatever interests the publicity right serves, trademark law, unfair competition law, and the growing law of false endorsement under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act can satisfy those interests. 32 Despite my somewhat jaundiced 27 See cases cited supra notes 11, Halpern, Associate Value, supra note 1, at Id. at 863 (quoting RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION 46cmt. d (AM.LAW INST. 1995)). 30 Id. at 868 (quoting RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION 47). 31 Cher v. Forum Int l, Ltd., 692 F.2d 634, 638 (9th Cir. 1982); see also Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994, 1005 (2d Cir. 1989); Halpern, Associative Value, supra note 1, at See generally Leaffer, supra note 5.
6 278 OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 78:2 view about the right of publicity, I believe that Halpern s rationale for this controversial right is based on a sound ethical principal. Simply put, one who has created celebrity value should be the one to benefit from it, rather than a free rider who uses it and dissipates its value to obtain a commercial advantage.
In Memoriam Professor Sheldon W. Halpern
In Memoriam Professor Sheldon W. Halpern Sheldon W. Halpern was born on December 16, 1935. He earned his B.A. from Cornell University in 1957, and earned his J.D. from Cornell Law School in 1959, graduating
More informationRutter Guide Chapter: Right of Publicity
Rutter Guide Chapter: Right of Publicity 1. Common Law Misappropriation of Name or Likeness: common law provides a cause of action for one whose name or likeness has been appropriated by another for the
More informationUnauthorized Use of a Celebrity's Name in a Movie Title: Section 43(A) of the Lanham Act and the Right of Publicity
Missouri Law Review Volume 55 Issue 1 Winter 1990 Article 8 Winter 1990 Unauthorized Use of a Celebrity's Name in a Movie Title: Section 43(A) of the Lanham Act and the Right of Publicity Richard E. Wawrzyniak
More informationHow the Other Half Lives (Revisited): Twenty Years Since Midler v. Ford A Global Perspective on the Right of Publicity
How the Other Half Lives (Revisited): Twenty Years Since Midler v. Ford A Global Perspective on the Right of Publicity By Alain J. Lapter, Esq. B.S., May 1998, University of Colorado at Boulder J.D., May
More informationFOCUS - 29 of 58 DOCUMENTS. Copyright (c) 2007 State Bar of Texas, Intellectual Property Law Section Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal
Page 1 LENGTH: 49863 words FOCUS - 29 of 58 DOCUMENTS Copyright (c) 2007 State Bar of Texas, Intellectual Property Law Section Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Winter, 2007 15 Tex. Intell. Prop.
More informationAdvertisers Beware: Bette Midler Doesn't Want to Dance
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Law Reviews 1-1-1989 Advertisers Beware:
More informationKeeping up with the Evolving Right of Publicity
Keeping up with the Evolving Right of Publicity Presented at the ABA Forum on Entertainment and Sports Industries at the Americana Music Festival, Nashville, 2013 by Stephen J. Zralek 1, September 2013
More informationProblems With the Modern Right of Publicity
Seton Hall University erepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2014 Problems With the Modern Right of Publicity Michael John Herb Follow this and additional works at:
More informationTEXAS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW JOURNAL
TEXAS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW JOURNAL The University of Texas School of Law Volume 18 Fall 2009 Number 1 ARTICLES ONE TRADEMARK PER SOURCE 1 David W. Barnes SO LONG AS YOU LIVE UNDER MY ROOF, YOU LL
More informationSlide 2 Image of Vanessa Redgrave Letter
Slide 1 Title Slide Disclaimer: Presentation is for discussion purposes only, and is not legal advice. Similar to presentation originally given at the Choices & Challenges Symposium at the Henry Ford.
More informationPROTECTING CELEBRITY RIGHTS THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONCEPTIONS
615 PROTECTING CELEBRITY RIGHTS THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONCEPTIONS Souvanik Mullick* & Swati Narnaulia** The rights of celebrities to make choices regarding the levels of exposure they wish to accept
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE WENDT, an individual; JOHN RATZENBERGER, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOST INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; Defendant-Appellee, and PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, a Delaware
More informationThe Right of Publicity: Maturation of an Independent Right Protecting the Associative Value of Personality
Hastings Law Journal Volume 46 Issue 3 Article 4 1-1995 The Right of Publicity: Maturation of an Independent Right Protecting the Associative Value of Personality Sheldon W. Halpern Follow this and additional
More informationUCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review
UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title Image as Personal Property: How Privacy Law Has Influenced the Right of Publicity Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5v91z41v Journal UCLA Entertainment
More informationCase 4:05-cv MLM Document 131 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-00252-MLM Document 131 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION C.B.C. DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING, INC., ) ) Plaintiff/Counter
More informationCase 6:13-cv MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 6:13-cv-00215-MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION JMAN2 ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. Plaintiff, vs. Kevin
More informationJeff Foxworthy case edited for classroom use trademark issue only. 879 F.Supp (1995)
Jeff Foxworthy case edited for classroom use trademark issue only 879 F.Supp. 1200 (1995) Jeff FOXWORTHY v. CUSTOM TEES, INC., and Stewart R. Friedman [1]. No. 1:94-CV-3477-RCF. United States District
More informationPUBLICITY RIGHTS AND CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENTS IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
PUBLICITY RIGHTS AND CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENTS IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Trinidad and Tobago boasts of being the most cosmopolitan of the islands comprising the Commonwealth Caribbean. With a population descended
More informationPublicity STATUTORY RIGHT OF. Michigan Needs a ACES. Fast Facts: By Jeffrey Richardson
ARTS, COMMUNICATIONS, ENTERTAINMENT, AND SPORTS LAW ACES Michigan Needs a STATUTORY RIGHT OF Publicity By Jeffrey Richardson Fast Facts: Michigan is the only Sixth Circuit state without a right of publicity
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, COMICMIX LLC; GLENN HAUMAN; DAVID JERROLD FRIEDMAN a/k/a JDAVID GERROLD; and
More informationHastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal
Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 31 Number 2 Article 5 1-1-2009 C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, L.P.: the First Amendment Versus
More informationPublicity Rights in the United States and Germany: A Comparative Analysis
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Law Reviews 3-1-1999 Publicity Rights
More informationMICHIGAN CASE LAW ON THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY. Michigan Courts
MICHIGAN CASE LAW ON THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY Michigan Courts Pallas v Crowley, Milner & Co., 322 Mich 411 (1948). First Michigan case to recognize misappropriation of likeness as one of the four elements
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Nos. 06-3357/3358 C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Appeals from the United States Major League Baseball Advanced District
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 9/12/14 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE TIMED OUT, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. B242820 (Los Angeles County
More informationJournal of Intellectual Property Law
Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 7 October 2010 "Hasta La Vista, Funny Guys": Arnold Schwarzenegger's Fictional Voice Misappropriation Lawsuit Against Comedians Imitating
More informationA Critical Examination of New York's Right of Publicity Claim
St. John's Law Review Volume 74, Fall 2000, Number 4 Article 5 A Critical Examination of New York's Right of Publicity Claim Tara B. Mulrooney Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview
More informationFame, Property & Identity: The Purpose and Scope of the Right of Publicity
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 25 Volume XXV Number 1 Volume XXV Book 1 Article 4 2014 Fame, Property & Identity: The Purpose and Scope of the Right of Publicity
More informationCommercial Speech and the Transformative Use Test: The Necessary Limits of a First Amendment Defense in Right of Publicity Cases
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 24 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Article 8 Commercial Speech and the Transformative Use Test: The Necessary Limits of a First Amendment Defense
More informationCase Western Reserve Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet Volume 1, Number 2 Spring Reshma Amin * TABLE OF CONTENTS
Case Western Reserve Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet Volume 1, Number 2 Spring 2010 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CALIFORNIA S RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AND THE UNITED KINGDOM S APPROACH TO THE PROTECTION
More informationCatching Smoke, Nailing JELL-O to a Wall: The Vanna White Case and the Limits of Celebrity Rights
Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 3 October 1995 Catching Smoke, Nailing JELL-O to a Wall: The Vanna White Case and the Limits of Celebrity Rights David S. Welkowitz Whittier
More informationPrivacy Rights of Entertainers and Other Celebrities: A Need for Change
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review 4-1-1988 Privacy Rights of Entertainers and Other Celebrities: A Need for Change L. Lee Byrd
More informationJUST ANOTHER BROWN-EYED GIRL: TOWARD A LIMITED FEDERAL RIGHT OF PUBLICITY UNDER THE LANHAM ACT IN A DIGITAL AGE OF CELEBRITY DOMINANCE
JUST ANOTHER BROWN-EYED GIRL: TOWARD A LIMITED FEDERAL RIGHT OF PUBLICITY UNDER THE LANHAM ACT IN A DIGITAL AGE OF CELEBRITY DOMINANCE SUSANNAH M. ROONEY * TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 922 II.
More informationWaits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. the Ninth Circuit Rides the Right of Publicity Down a Slippery Slope
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Law Reviews 9-1-1993 Waits v. Frito-Lay,
More informationPERSONALITY BEYOND BORDERS: THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL RIGHT OF PUBLICITY
PERSONALITY BEYOND BORDERS: THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL RIGHT OF PUBLICITY W. Woods Drinkwater * Introduction... 116 I. Property Rights Privacy, Publicity, and the First Amendment... 119 II. State Rights and
More informationMOCK CLASS CASE BRIEFING
Hamline University School of Law Orientation 2014 MOCK CLASS CASE BRIEFING Review this case briefing booklet carefully. The materials will guide your creation of brief sections for the Mock Class Session
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07CV042-P-B
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION ELLEN JOHNSTON, VS. ONE AMERICA PRODUCTIONS, INC.; TWENTIETH-CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION; JOHN DOES 1 AND 2,
More informationNews Gathering, Intangible Property Rights and 900-Line Telephone Services: One Court Makes a Bad Connection
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Law Reviews 3-1-1991 News Gathering,
More informationequity, together with the statutes of general application that were in force in England on the 1st day of January, 1900, shall, in so far as they rela
ENFORCING PERSONALITY RIGHTS IN NIGERIA 20-03-18 IP rights protection, especially copyright, is key to the economic development of any country, however should it supercede the protection of one s right
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
In the Supreme Court of the United States NO. 07-123 VIRTUAL FOOTBALL OWNER, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationSilent Ethics in the Mobile Phone Sector? The Case of the por qué no te callas? Ringtone
218 COMMENTS: [2009] E.I.P.R. away some of the debris that has accumulated around patent-eligibility, however, and probably failed to make things any worse. It got rid of the inane useful, concrete, and
More informationComment on Groove is in the Hart : A Workable Solution for Applying the Right of Publicity to Video Games
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 72 Issue 1 Article 9 Winter 1-1-2015 Comment on Groove is in the Hart : A Workable Solution for Applying the Right of Publicity to Video Games Christopher B. Seaman
More informationThe Right of Publicity and Vocal Larceny: Sounding Off on Sound-Alikes
Fordham Law Review Volume 57 Issue 3 Article 5 1988 The Right of Publicity and Vocal Larceny: Sounding Off on Sound-Alikes Leonard A. Wohl Recommended Citation Leonard A. Wohl, The Right of Publicity and
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 03-2184 JUNE TONEY, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, L OREAL USA, INC., THE WELLA CORPORATION, and WELLA PERSONAL CARE OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
More informationComments. By ELLEN S. BASs* Introduction
Comments A Right in Search of a Coherent Rationale-Conceptualizing Persona in a Comparative Context: The United States Right of Publicity and German Personality Rights By ELLEN S. BASs* Introduction THE
More informationTHE JOHN MARSHALL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
THE JOHN MARSHALL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW THE CONFLICT BETWEEN AN ATHLETE S RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT EDWARD KUESTER ABSTRACT The recent rise of fantasy sports has created
More informationCONSULTING FOR THE REAL TIME 1
CONSULTING FOR THE REAL TIME 1 In 1952, singer Peggy Lee entered an agreement with Disney to work on the animated film Lady and the Tramp. Peggy Lee wrote six songs, sang three, and was the voice for four
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 0 JAMES JIM BROWN, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC. a Delaware Corporation; and DOES - 0, Defendants. Case No. :0-cv-0-FMC-RZx ORDER GRANTING
More informationIS MY FACE REALLY MINE? By face I mean image. Does it depend on whether you are a celebrity or on
IS MY FACE REALLY MINE? By face I mean image. Does it depend on whether you are a celebrity or on whether your face has value that can be exploited? These two questions seem to address the same issue but
More informationThe Intent of the Law in Waivers: For the Persona or the "Other" Entity?
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 11 Issue 2 Fall 2001 Article 6 The Intent of the Law in Waivers: For the Persona or the "Other" Entity? Gabrielle Stormo Follow this
More informationUSE OF AN IMAGE OR PERSONAL IDENTIFIER WITHOUT PERMISSION. By Michael M. Ratoza. [June 2009]
USE OF AN IMAGE OR PERSONAL IDENTIFIER WITHOUT PERMISSION By Michael M. Ratoza [June 2009] This presentation addresses the appropriation or use of a person s image, or an item of a person s identification,
More informationCybaris. Caitlin Kowalke. Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 4
Cybaris Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 4 2017 When Individual Rights Should Tackle Unfair Commercialization: How the Transformative Use Test Should be Tailored to Meet Evolving Technological Needs in Right of
More informationGroove is in the Hart : A Workable Solution for Applying the Right of Publicity to Video Games
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 72 Issue 1 Article 7 Winter 1-1-2015 Groove is in the Hart : A Workable Solution for Applying the Right of Publicity to Video Games R. Garrett Rice Washington and Lee
More informationThe Celebrity Behind the Brand International Protection of the Right of Publicity
Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum Volume 6 Issue 1 Spring 2016 Article 5 April 2016 The Celebrity Behind the Brand International Protection of the Right of Publicity Eliana Torres
More informationMastercard Int'l Inc. v. Nader Primary Comm., Inc WL , 2004 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 3644 (2004)
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 15 Issue 1 Fall 2004 Article 9 Mastercard Int'l Inc. v. Nader Primary Comm., Inc. 2004 WL 434404, 2004 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 3644 (2004)
More informationCHAPTER 2 UNDERSTANDING FORMAL INSTITUTIONS: POLITICS, LAWS, AND ECONOMICS
CHAPTER 2 UNDERSTANDING FORMAL INSTITUTIONS: POLITICS, LAWS, AND ECONOMICS LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter, you should be able to: 1. explain the concept of institutions and their key role
More informationPrivacy, Property, and Publicity 1. Mark A. Lemley 2. In Jennifer Rothman s new book The Right of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined for a Public
Privacy, Property, and Publicity 1 Mark A. Lemley 2 In Jennifer Rothman s new book The Right of Publicity: Privacy Reimagined for a Public Age, she argues that we have wrongly reconceived the right of
More informationJournal of Intellectual Property Law
Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 16 Issue 1 Symposium - James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer's Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovations at Risk Article 6 October 2008
More informationMODEL RELEASES, RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF NAME AND LIKENESS. By Pablo Balana
MODEL RELEASES, RIGHT OF PUBLICITY AND MISAPPROPRIATION OF NAME AND LIKENESS By Pablo Balana At Nimia Legal we are sure that at some point in your professional careers you have raised or will raise questions
More informationIntroduction to the Symposium
Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 30 Issue 3 Article 1 2005 Introduction to the Symposium Samuel Murumba Follow this and additional works at: http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended
More informationThe Cheated Never Prosper: Recognizing Economic Harm in Sports From the Intentional Deprivation of Prospective Value in Publicity Rights
University of La Verne From the SelectedWorks of Ernest Cardenas March 14, 2010 The Cheated Never Prosper: Recognizing Economic Harm in Sports From the Intentional Deprivation of Prospective Value in Publicity
More informationCase 2:14-cv JPM-tmp Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Case 2:14-cv-02263-JPM-tmp Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ABG EPE IP LLC, Plaintiff, v. NO. Fabbrica d Armi
More informationPOLITICAL AUTHORITY AND PERFECTIONISM: A RESPONSE TO QUONG
SYMPOSIUM POLITICAL LIBERALISM VS. LIBERAL PERFECTIONISM POLITICAL AUTHORITY AND PERFECTIONISM: A RESPONSE TO QUONG JOSEPH CHAN 2012 Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), Vol. 2, No. 1 (2012): pp.
More informationFred Astaire Dances Again: California Passes the Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act
DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 10 Issue 2 Spring 2000: American Association of Law Schools Intellectual Property Section Meeting Article 11 Fred Astaire Dances Again:
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 17 3051 AKEEM DANIELS, CAMERON STINGILY, and NICHOLAS STONER, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. FANDUEL, INC., and DRAFTKINGS, INC., Defendants
More informationParis Hilton Avoids Getting Slapped: The Application of California's Anti-SLAPP Statute to a Right of Publicity Claim in Hilton v.
Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 6 2011 Paris Hilton Avoids Getting Slapped: The Application of California's Anti-SLAPP Statute to a Right of Publicity Claim in Hilton v. Hallmark Cards Lindsay C. Hanifan Follow
More informationCase 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:18-cv-05611-JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TREVOR ANDREW BAUER CIVIL ACTION No. 18-5611 Plaintiff VS BRENT POURCIAU
More informationNo In the Supreme Court of the United States OLIVIA DE HAVILLAND, DBE, Deadline. FX NETWORKS, LLC and PACIFIC 2.1 ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
No. 18-453 In the Supreme Court of the United States OLIVIA DE HAVILLAND, DBE, v. FX NETWORKS, LLC and PACIFIC 2.1 ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the California Court
More informationCREIGHTON LAW REVIEW. [Vol. 22
THE EVOLVING DOCTRINE OF RIGHT OF PUBLICITY: JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF CELEBRITY'S PECUNIARY INTEREST FROM COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION OF HIS OR HER IDENTITY AND THEATRICAL STYLE ADDISON E. DEWEY* INTRODUCTION
More informationNevada Right to Publicity Statute I. ISSUES PRESENTED. The client has requested research regarding Nevada s right to publicity statute
23400 Michigan Avenue, Suite 101 Dearborn, MI 48124 Tel: 1-(866) 534-6177 (toll-free) Fax: 1-(734) 943-6051 Email: contact@legaleasesolutions.com www.legaleasesolutions.com Nevada Right to Publicity Statute
More informationCase 3:16-cv RS Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-0-rs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JULIAN METTER, v. Plaintiff, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION Case No. -cv-0-rs
More informationCan the Right of Publicity Afford Free Speech - A New Right of Publicity Test for First Amendment Cases
Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 27 Number 1 Article 5 1-1-2004 Can the Right of Publicity Afford Free Speech - A New Right of Publicity Test for First Amendment Cases Jason
More informationUNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Third Edition
UNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Third Edition (2016 Pub.3162) UNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Third Edition Mary LaFrance IGT Professor of Intellectual Property Law William S. Boyd School of Law University of
More informationChoice of Law and the Right of Publicity: Domicile as an Essential First Step
Brooklyn Law Review Volume 66 Issue 4 The Jury in the Twenty-First Century: An Interdisciplinary Conference Article 10 6-1-2001 Choice of Law and the Right of Publicity: Domicile as an Essential First
More informationMeiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton & Eberz P.C.
Meiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton & Eberz P.C. ! Initially identified as a privacy and/or property right grounded in common law tort! First appeared in Federal court jurisprudence in 1953 when the right
More informationThe Right of Publicity: Understanding a Misunderstood Right after Hoffman v. Capital Cities/ABC
Santa Clara Law Review Volume 43 Number 4 Article 7 1-1-2003 The Right of Publicity: Understanding a Misunderstood Right after Hoffman v. Capital Cities/ABC Natalie Fisher Follow this and additional works
More informationFOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) BACKGROUND
0 0 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ultimate Creations, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff, vs. THQ Inc., a corporation, Defendant. FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CV-0--PHX-SMM ORDER Pending
More informationRecent Right of Publicity Legislation
Maherin Gangat Media Law Resource Center Recent Right of Publicity Legislation Successful Efforts Washington In March 2008, the Washington passed an amendment to the state s right of publicity statute,
More informationDo Consumers Have Private Remedies for Violations of the Reporting Requirements Under the Rules of the Consumer Product Safety Act?
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 19, Number 4 (19.4.50) Product Liability By: James W. Ozog and Staci A. Williamson* Wiedner
More informationThe Wrong of Publicity
Pace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum Volume 6 Issue 1 Spring 2016 Article 6 April 2016 The Wrong of Publicity Albert Vetere Pace Law School, avetere@law.pace.edu Follow this and
More informationIN DEFENSE OF THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS / SEARCH FOR TRUTH AS A THEORY OF FREE SPEECH PROTECTION
IN DEFENSE OF THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS / SEARCH FOR TRUTH AS A THEORY OF FREE SPEECH PROTECTION I Eugene Volokh * agree with Professors Post and Weinstein that a broad vision of democratic self-government
More informationCase 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:12-cv-01124-TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16 Joseph Pia, joe.pia@padrm.com (9945) Tyson B. Snow tsnow@padrm.com (10747) Fili Sagapulete fili@padrm.com (13348) PIA ANDERSON DORIUS REYNARD
More informationHandout - Right of Publicity ( )
John Marshall Law School From the SelectedWorks of William K. Ford October 23, 2017 Handout - Right of Publicity (10-24-2018) William K. Ford, John Marshall Law School This work is licensed under a Creative
More informationIN THE ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR PETITIONER. TEAM DD Counsel of Record
07-123 IN THE VIRTUAL FOOTBALL OWNER, INC., v. Petitioner, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH CIRCUIT
More informationThe Service Mark Alternative to the Right of Publicity: Estate of Presley v. Russen
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review Law Reviews 1-1-1982 The Service Mark
More informationCase 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.
Case 9:13-cv-80700-KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. THE ESTATE OF MARILYN MONROE, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. MONROE
More informationIs Tiger Woods s Swing Really a Work of Art? Defining the Line. Between the Right of Publicity and the First Amendment. By: Michael Suppappola
Is Tiger Woods s Swing Really a Work of Art? Defining the Line Between the Right of Publicity and the First Amendment By: Michael Suppappola The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of
More informationA Bill Third Extraordinary Session, 2016 HOUSE BILL 1002
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. Act of the Third Extraordinary Session 0 0 0 State of Arkansas Call Item 0th General Assembly A Bill Third
More information(No ) (Approved July 13, 2011) AN ACT
(S. B. 1750) (No. 139-2011) (Approved July 13, 2011) AN ACT To adopt a new statute that regulates the use and protection of an individual s likeness for commercial purposes in Puerto Rico, which shall
More informationTrademark Laws: New York
Martin Thomas Photography / Alamy Stock Photo Trademark Laws: New York The State Q&A guides on Practical Law provide common questions and answers on state-specific content for a variety of topics and practice
More informationLesson 3: The Declaration s Ideas
Lesson 3: The Declaration s Ideas Overview This two day lesson (with an optional third day) examines the ideas in the Declaration of Independence and the controversy surrounding slavery. On day one, students
More informationNot For Just Another Pretty Face: Providing Full Protection Under the Right of Publicity
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review 4-1-1994 Not For Just Another Pretty Face: Providing Full Protection Under the Right of Publicity
More informationCase 1:04-cv RJS Document 90 Filed 09/13/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:04-cv-04607-RJS Document 90 Filed 09/13/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIFFANY (NJ) INC. & TIFFANY AND CO., Plaintiffs, No. 04 Civ. 4607 (RJS) -v- EBAY,
More informationDilution's (Still) Uncertain Future
Chicago-Kent College of Law From the SelectedWorks of Graeme B. Dinwoodie 2006 Dilution's (Still) Uncertain Future Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Chicago-Kent College of Law Available at: https://works.bepress.com/graeme_dinwoodie/47/
More informationLicensing. Journal THE DEVOTED TO LEADERS IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1
JANUARY 2014 DEVOTED TO LEADERS IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY THE Licensing VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1 Journal Edited by Gregory J. Battersby and Charles W. Grimes Protecting and Exploiting
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Chris West and Automodeals, LLC, Plaintiffs, 5:16-cv-1205 v. Bret Lee Gardner, AutomoDeals Inc., Arturo Art Gomez Tagle, and
More informationAgricultural Policy Analysis: Discussion
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28,1 (July 1996):52 56 O 1996 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Agricultural Policy Analysis: Discussion Lyle P. Schertz ABSTRACT Agricultural economists
More informationThe following definitions shall have the following meaning as used in these general terms and conditions:
PART OF THE ELEQT GROUP LTD GENERAL TERMS OF USE These general terms and conditions of use are used by ELEQT Group Ltd. a company duly organized under the laws of The United Kingdom.: trading as Rockethub.
More informationElvis Is Alive, But He Shouldn't Be: The Right of Publicity Revisited
BYU Law Review Volume 1992 Issue 3 Article 2 9-1-1992 Elvis Is Alive, But He Shouldn't Be: The Right of Publicity Revisited Lee Goldman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview
More informationTrademark Rights; Overview of Provisions in the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement
Trademark Rights; Overview of Provisions in the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement Geneva, 15 March 2012 Octavio Espinosa WIPO Nature of IP Rights Intellectual property (IP) confers a right to exclude
More information