GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS COMMITTEE
|
|
- Clifton Horn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS COMMITTEE Contribution to ECTA s comments on draft amendments to OHIM s Guidelines, WP2, 2014 In accordance with its specific competencies, the Geographical Indications Committee will provide its input on the amendments affecting directly GIs and related signs (traditional terms and traditional specialities guaranteed), i.e. Articles 7.1 (j) and (k) CTMR, and also the GI related aspects of Article 8.4 CTMR. 1/ GIs as absolute grounds for refusal, Articles 7.1 (j) and (k) CTMR The Office has completely re-drafted the parts dedicated to the implementation of Articles 7.1 (j) and 7.1 (k) CTMR, in the part of the Guidelines dedicated to Absolute Grounds for Refusal: parts 2.9 & 2.10, pages 37 to 69. The modifications brought are impressive: in a couple of years only, GIs have occupied a very relevant place in the Guidelines, and in the practice, while they were previously totally left apart. The mere fact that over 30 pages of the Guidelines are now dedicated to the interpretation of the absolute grounds for refusal dealing specifically with GIs speaks for itself. ECTA can solely congratulate the Office for this development. In this respect, we note that the draft follows a very systematic (we could even say scholar ) approach, with many explanations and examples. We have no comments regarding the overall structure, which is perfectly fine. ECTA Secretariat, Rue des Colonies 18/24, 9th Floor, BE- Brussels, Belgium Tel 32/ Fax 32/ ecta@ecta.org Internet A company limited by guarantee. Reg. in England and Wales No Reg. address: 15 Southampton Place, London WC1A 2AJ, England. VAT No. BE
2 In the end, the current draft is a confirmation of the practice implemented last year. Nothing has changed in terms of substance, and in this respect the Office already knows the position of ECTA: the new practice is a great step forward, very much welcome, but not an entirely correct or complete one, in our opinion. Basically, these are the remaining areas of discrepancy (some of which are referred to in the developments): - Direct enforcement of the GI Regulations on Wine, Spirits and Foodstuff; - Enforcement, also, of the Regulation on Aromatised Wines; - Enforcement of the Regulations covering related signs, such as Traditional terms and Traditional Specialties Guaranteed. Actually, it would make perfect sense, for the Office, to anticipate the innovations of the Legislative Package; - Correct enforcement of the Spirits Regulation (the grounds for refusal of trade marks are very broad); - Wider approach to the concept of comparable goods (see, in this respect, the position paper which was communicated to the Office in January 2014). This being said, you will find below our comments concerning specifically the draft guidelines: 1.1/ Article 7.1.j (par. 2.9 of the draft) Page 38 (par ), and throughout the document New legal framework for Wines Regulation No. 1234/2007 (Wine) was recently repealed. The current legal framework now corresponds to Regulation No. 1308/2013. ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
3 - While this new Regulation does not bring changes in substance (scope of protection of PDOs and PGIs, and relationship with trade marks), the numbering of the relevant provisions and annexes have changed. This is the table of equivalence: Regulation 1234/2007 Regulation 1308/2013 Article 118b(1) Article 93 Article 118l(1) Article Article 118m(2) Article Annexe XIb Annexe VII, part 2 Page 40 (par ) GI databases We are a little bit surprised to read that the examiners are invited to refer to the databases of the Commission (E-Bachus, as far as wines are concerned). Does it imply that the own Excel database of the Office is not reliable any longer? Is it not easier, indeed, to refer to a single and global database, instead of having to check each and every database of the Commission? The impossibility to rely on a single, exhaustive, official, database for GIs protected in the EU, is really a strong concern. We know that this is not the responsibility of the OHIM, but maybe your Office should take initiatives in this field. The OHIM could play a much greater role for GIs, in the future. Besides, should we infer from the last paragraph of this page that all the GIs protected as a result of agreements with third countries are necessarily registered in the databases of the Commission? Further clarification would be appreciated. As you know, the Fourth Board of Appeal has considered that a GI originating in the EU, and protected as a result of an agreement concluded with a third country, should also be enforced by the OHIM, even if it is not registered as such as a PDO / PGI in a EU scheme (R1546/2011-4, , Font de la Figuera ). This is probably a rare situation, but it seems that the draft does not follow this interpretation. Again, clarification would be appreciated. Pages 44 and 45 (par ) Concept of evocation ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
4 We do not agree when the draft mentions that the Office considers the terms imitation and evocation as two corollaries of essentially the same concept (etc.). Evocation is a different concept overall, and it is much wider that the concept of imitation, as known in trade mark litigation. For example, a GI can be evoked by the mere reproduction of a specific design or shape, typical of the GI, while this would certainly not be considered as an imitation under trade mark law. In this respect, ECTA fully supports, for example, the approach taken by the CTM Court of Alicante in the Mamiella case (judgement No. 419/13 of 31/10/2013, Consejo Regulador de la D.O. Protegida Queso Tetilla v- Industrias Lacteas Monteverde S.A.). The second example provided for in the table might not be the most appropriate one. Indeed, in this case the BoA considered that the expression Salame di Parma was an evocation of the GI Prosciutto di Parma, but it forgot to mention, also, that the word PARMIGIANI was also an evocation of the GI Parmigiano Reggiano (while this CTM covered a variety of foodstuff, including dairy products. Page 47 (par ) translated PGOs / PGIs We note that the draft provides for an invented example: COGNAC v- KONJAKKI. But reference could be made to real cases, including for example the refusal of a CTM Uvita de Plata BORGOÑA No for wine. Page 48 (par ) reputation of PDOs / PGIs As mentioned in our introductory comments: the OHIM does not apply correctly the Spirits Regulation. This Regulation makes it mandatory to refuse trade marks that may imitate or evocate GIs registered for spirits, not only for spirits, but also for comparable goods, and also for non comparable goods if the use of the trade mark would be detrimental to the reputation of the GI. Pages 48 and 49 (par ) relevant goods ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
5 We strongly disagree with the approach taken in the Manual. The Office cannot, in any case, state that the reference to a specific annexe, and the reference to the notion of comparable goods, is to be considered as synonyms. We cannot believe that this is what the legislator intends. A basic scope of protection is provided for, when the GI Regulations refer to the goods listed in a specific annexe. And then, a wider approach is also offered, when the same regulations refer to the concept of comparable goods. The approach of the Manual is wrong, and it is also misleading: the notion of comparable goods plays an important role when it comes to applying relative grounds for refusal, and this notion cannot be interpreted as if it was equivalent to the reference to a mere annexe. In this respect, we also refer to the position paper on comparable goods, sent by ECTA in January. 1.2/ Article 7.1.k (par of the draft) Page 63 (par ) notion of comparable goods Is it really true that the notions of products of the same type and comparable products should be interpreted as being synonyms? This is far from being evident, in our opinion. Basically, if the legislator itself has used a different wording, in the very same regulation, there might be a reason for that. Did the Office liaise with the Commission, in this respect? One could be tempted to make a comparison with the GI Regulation for wines, which has adopted a three steps approach: a reference to goods listed in an annexe, then a wider scope of protection for comparable goods, and finally a broader protection for GIs with a specific reputation, if a number of conditions are fulfilled. Would it be plausible to consider that the expression products of the same type constitutes a first range of protection, following the example of the annexes referred to in other regulations? In this sense, the notion of products of the same type refers, basically, to identical goods. Besides, and as expressed in our previous position paper, the approach to the notion of comparable goods is deemed too strict. For examples, fruit should be held comparable to a product such as jam (page 64). ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
6 Page 66 (par ) Products used as ingredients If a PDO/PGI is used as an ingredient, this does not necessarily mean that the PDO/PGI may be mentioned in the name of the foodstuff. In this regard, some guidance is given by the Commission Communication Guidelines on the labelling of foodstuffs using protected designations of origin (PDOs) or protected geographical indications (PGIs) as ingredients: Indeed, amongst others, the Commission takes the view that a name registered as a PDO or PGI may only be mentioned in or close to the trade name of a foodstuff incorporating products benefiting from a registered name, as well as in the labelling, presentation and advertising relating to that foodstuff, provided that certain conditions are met, and in particular, that: - The foodstuff in question should not contain any other comparable ingredient, i.e. any other ingredient which may partially or totally replace the ingredient benefiting from a PDO or PGI. As a non-restrictive example of the concept of comparable ingredient, the Commission considers that a blue-veined cheese (commonly known as blue cheese ) could be considered comparable to Roquefort cheese. - This ingredient should also be used in sufficient quantities to confer an essential characteristic on the foodstuff concerned. However, given the wide range of possible scenarios, the Commission is not able to suggest a minimum percentage to be uniformly applied. As an example, the incorporation of a minimum amount of a spice benefiting from a PDO/PGI in a foodstuff could, if appropriate, be sufficient to confer an essential characteristic on that foodstuff. By contrast, the incorporation of a minimum amount of meat benefiting from a PDO/PGI in a foodstuff would not a priori be sufficient to confer an essential characteristic on a foodstuff. - The percentage of incorporation of an ingredient with a PDO or PGI should ideally be indicated in or in close proximity to the trade name of the relevant foodstuff or, failing that, in the list of ingredients, in direct relation to the ingredient in question. ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
7 Now, whether the Office should take into account these elements when examining a trade mark, and how it should conduct such examination, is a very difficult question. On the one side, one could take the view that the draft guidelines do not appear to be in line with the above Communication of the Commission. Accordingly, and as the Office is probably not able to establish criteria to assess the commercial relevance of an ingredient, and neither will the Office know whether the PDO/PGI ingredient will be actually used in the foodstuff, in which quantity, if other comparable ingredients will be used as well, etc., then a CTM should also be refused for products that may contain the PDO/PGI as ingredients. For example, abstractly and ex ante, a figurative trademark application containing, e.g., Pizza with ROQUEFORT, even if restricted for Pizza with cheese complying with the specification for PDO ROQUEFORT, could be rejected. Indeed, can it really be considered correct to obtain, as a third party, that easily a trade mark registration containing a PDO/PGI (without any guarantees): shouldn t it be enough to be able to use the PDO/PGI in, or close to, the label or trade name (upon meeting certain conditions)? But, on the other side, one could also be of the opinion that the reference to the GI may be to some extent legitimate, and that only the actual use of the trade mark will determine whether it is misleading or not. This is a difficult question, and at this stage ECTA is solely providing some thoughts, for further discussion. These comments are made irrespective of possible course of actions based on relative grounds for refusal (see also in part 2 below). Indeed, for example, it is reasonable to obtain the refusal of a CTMA (BRAND + CHAMPAGNE) for ice cream, even if the specification is limited to ice cream containing wine with the PDO Champagne as an ingredient? Indeed, in such case the registration of this CTM could exploit the reputation of Champagne (to be evaluated on a case by case basis, of course). ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
8 2/ GIs as relative grounds for refusal, Article 8.4 CTMR Again, ECTA wishes to express its strong support to the development of the Guidelines in the field of GIs, including in the developments of Article 8.4 CTMR. The Guidelines are clear and very complete. Still, we wish to mention some discrepancies or suggestions, as follows: Page 10 (par ), and throughout the document current Wine Regulation Regulation No. 1234/2007 (Wine) was recently repealed. The current legal framework now corresponds to Regulation No. 1308/2013. Page 14 (par ) scope of protection of GIs and services In contrast, for relative grounds, the provisions of the EU Regulations preventing use contemplate situations where a PGI can be invoked even against goods or services which fall outside the scope of objectionable goods under absolute grounds, subject to the conditions of the relevant provisions of the corresponding EU regulations. For instance, under Article 13(1)(a), Article 118m(2)(a)(ii) and Article 16(a) of the Foodstuffs, Wines and Spirits Regulations respectively, a PGI which has been proven to have repute can be invoked against products and services which would not be objectionable under absolute grounds. We note that the Guidelines refer, for the first time, to the possible refusal of a CTMA which designates services, in compliance with the relevant provisions of some of the GI Regulations. This is much welcome, although some clarification is necessary. Will the refusals be limited to situations where the CTMA could unduly benefit from the reputation of the GI, as indicated in the second part of the above-quoted paragraph? ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
9 Page 14, last paragraph ( ) scope of protection of GIs and reputation Nevertheless, either under EU or national legislation, the scope of protection of PGIs cannot exceed what is required in order to safeguard the function of the PGI, the function in question is to designate goods as being from a particular geographic origin and the special qualities connected therewith. Unlike other signs, PGIs are not used to indicate the commercial origin of goods and they afford no protection in this regard. Therefore, where the specification of a CTMA is limited to goods in conformity with the specification of the relevant protected PGI, the function of the PGI in question is safeguarded in relation to those products because the CTMA only covers products from the particular geographic origin and the special qualities connected therewith. Consequently, an opposition against a CTMA which has been appropriately limited will not succeed. See in this regard Article 12(1) of the Foodstuffs Regulation or Article 118m of the Wines Regulation. We believe that this statement is relatively unclear and is likely to be misunderstood. It fails to take into account the fact that the protection afforded by the different EU Regulations in the fields of PDOs/PGIs also aims to prevent third parties from unfairly exploiting the reputation of the concerned PDO/PGI. We do not quite like the general rule which is being expressed; the OHIM should always conduct an assessment on a case-by-case basis. This should, at the very least, be the case as regards CTMAs filed for goods which are not themselves in conformity with the specification of the relevant protected PDO/PGI but only contain as one of their ingredients a product which is in conformity with the specification of the relevant protected PDO/PGI. Assume, for example, that a CTMA is filed for chocolates which contain, as one of their ingredients, sparkling wines in conformity with the specification of the relevant PDO/PGI. In such cases, the OHIM should still check, in opposition proceedings, if the CTMA unduly exploits the reputation of the PDO/PGI (for instance because the PDO/PGI is mentioned in a way which is overly dominant in the overall trade mark). Page 15 ( ) use in the course of trade ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
10 It would be appropriate to emphasize here that documents mentioning a PDO/PGI in a nontrade context (e.g. books, encyclopedias, dictionaries, etc.), while not relevant to prove that the sign is used in the course of trade of more than mere local significance, may, on the contrary, be relevant when it comes to proving the reputation of the PDO/PGI. ECTA GI Cttee Comments on draft guidelines of the OHIM,
ECTA POSITION PAPER. Brussels, 19 September 2012
Brussels, 19 September 2012 ECTA POSITION PAPER Revision of the OHIM Manual - Article 7(1)(i) regarding the protection of emblems other than those in Article 6 ter of the Paris Convention and Articles
More informationECTA HARMONIZATION COMMITTEE
13 June 2012 ECTA HARMONIZATION COMMITTEE Project: Investigations to assess the differences in the scope of protection a CTM enjoys in the EU Member States with regard to Article 110 (2) of CTMR (Project
More informationFeedback form for comments on the draft Guidelines. International Trademark Association (INTA)
User Association/National Office International Trademark Association (INTA) Contribur (name & position) NONTRADITIONAL MARKS COMMITTEE Part B Section 4. Absolute Grounds for Refusal Article 7(1)(e) Page
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART B EXAMINATION SECTION 4
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART B EXAMINATION SECTION 4 ABSOLUTE GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL CHAPTER 12 TRADE MARKS IN CONFLICT
More information3 rd SESSION OF THE WIPO WORKING GROUP ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LISBON SYSTEM (APPELLATION OF ORIGIN), MAY 2011, GENEVA
1 June 2011 3 rd SESSION OF THE WIPO WORKING GROUP ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LISBON SYSTEM (APPELLATION OF ORIGIN), 23-27 MAY 2011, GENEVA Reported by Florent Gevers, Chair of the ECTA Geographical Indications
More informationNew Regulation on the European protection system of geographical indications What does it mean for Geographical Indications producers?
New Regulation on the European protection system of geographical indications What does it mean for Geographical Indications producers? Introduction Since 1992, names of some agricultural products and foodstuffs
More informationThe following aspects have been taken into consideration:
ECTA s additional comments further to the Questionnaire of the Permanent Delegation of the Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the EU to the EU Court of Justice and the EU General Court regarding
More informationa) has the stipulation of Article 5(2) of the Directive been adopted literally into your national law?
B. Have those provisions been established as a consequence of harmonization of the national trademark law in your country, that is to say, in order to nationally realize the option granted by Article 5(2)
More informationCollective Trademarks : application and validity in the EU. Annick Mottet Haugaard ECTA President ASIPI - 31 October 2011
Collective Trademarks : application and validity in the EU Annick Mottet Haugaard ECTA President ASIPI - 31 October 2011 Collective trademarks A. Regulation B. Definition C. Function D. Applicant / Future
More informationNew OHIM practices Update on latest changes in OHIM Manual. Dr. Andreas Renck, Hogan Lovells
New OHIM practices Update on latest changes in OHIM Manual Dr. Andreas Renck, Hogan Lovells Outline of contents - 1 Absolute grounds - OHIM's examination practice on: Geographical Indications (GI) Deceptiveness
More informationINTERATIONAL LEAGUE OF COMPETITION LAW. Geneva Congress 6-3 October Question B
INTERATIONAL LEAGUE OF COMPETITION LAW Geneva Congress 6-3 October 2016 Question B 1.- Italian legislation on indications of origin has developed in a fragmentary manner often through the adoption of special
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 1 December 2016 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 December 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0392 (COD) 15121/16 AGRI 651 WTO 344 CODEC 1803 PROPOSAL From: date of receipt: 1 December 2016 To: No. Cion
More informationGeographical indications. Iustinianus Primus, March 16, 2016 Dr. Anke Moerland
Geographical indications Iustinianus Primus, March 16, 2016 Dr. Anke Moerland Outline Today What are geographical indications? Terminology Rationale for protecting GIs International framework of protection
More informationGIs in the EU: value, legal framework and enforcement
GIs in the EU: value, legal framework and enforcement Cape Town, South Africa 20 November 2017 Cristina Miranda Gozálvez Unit AGRI A.1: Global issues and relations with ACPs EU Quality schemes PDO: Protected
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2012R1151 EN 03.01.2013 000.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B REGULATION (EU) No 1151/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN
More informationArticle 12 Geographical Indications. Article 12.1 Protection of Geographical Indications
This document contains the consolidated text resulting from the 30th round of negotiations (6-10 November 2017) on geographical indications in the Trade Part of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement. This
More informationAre the CTM and the Benelux systems Harmonized?
Round Table in The Netherlands Are the CTM and the Benelux systems Harmonized? From a legal point of view: absolute grounds of refusal in examination and cancellation proceedings - The differences by Sophie
More informationWORLDWIDE SYMPOSIUM ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
ORIGINAL: English DATE: June 10, 2009 E THE PATENT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WORLDWIDE SYMPOSIUM ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS jointly organized by the World
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) Opposition Division OPPOSITION No B 2 338 120 Instituto Dos Vinhos Do Douro e Do Porto, IP, Rua dos Camilos, 90, 050-272 Peso da
More informationEUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on geographical indications and designations of origin
EUROPEAN UNION Council Regulation on geographical indications and designations of origin COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations
More informationECTA HARMONIZATION COMMITTEE
ECTA HARMONIZATION COMMITTEE Project (35) Project Coordinator Survey on acceptance of electronic certified copies from OHIM by national Offices/Courts/other institutions Monika Wenz Siebeke Lange Wilbert,
More informationCOMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX
Ref. Ares(2018)2528401-15/05/2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2018) XXX draft COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART C OPPOSITION
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART C OPPOSITION SECTION 4 RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 8(4) CTMR Page 1 Table
More informationThe European Union NGO acting in the field of Trade Marks, Designs and related rights. Caring for a balance of rights over three decades
The European Union NGO acting in the field of Trade Marks, Designs and related rights Caring for a balance of rights over three decades ECTA Secretariat, Rue des Colonies 18/24, 9th Floor, BE- Brussels,
More informationECTA Council Meeting
ECTA Council Meeting Porto, Portugal October 30, 2009 An explanation on the basic requirements, registration procedure of a geographical indication and the conflict with a trade mark, based on the BAVARIA
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART C OPPOSITION
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART C OPPOSITION SECTION 4 RIGHTS UNDER ARTICLE 8(4) CTMR Guidelines
More informationNot all roads lead to Rome...
Community Collective Marks Not all roads lead to Rome... Dimitris Botis Deputy Director Legal Affairs OHIM ECTA, Bucharest 19 June 2013 Alicante 2 Introduction System of Collective Marks: Little used...
More informationPosition paper transmitted to EU27 on Intellectual property rights (including geographical indications)
6 September 2017 TF50 (2017) 11 Commission to EU 27 Subject: Position paper transmitted to EU27 on Intellectual property rights (including geographical indications) Origin: European Commission, Task Force
More informationorigin flash Questions to be Addressed in Response to the Survey on the Lisbon System
origin flash Questions to be Addressed in Response to the The Basis for Protection in the Country of Origin Some have interpreted the phrase recognized and protected as such in Article 1(2) of the Lisbon
More informationThe Community Trade Mark and the National Trade Marks Are they in harmony? The Benelux point of view.
Round Table ECTA-BOIP-OHIM The Community Trade Mark and the National Trade Marks Are they in harmony? The Benelux point of view. Are the CTM and Benelux systems harmonized? Relative grounds of refusal
More informationCOMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX. (Text with EEA relevance)
Ref. Ares(2018)34773-04/01/2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX SANTE/11425/2016 (POOL/E1/2016/11425/11425-EN.doc) [ ](2017) XXX draft COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX laying down
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
L 147/6 Official Journal of the European Union 2.6.2011 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 538/2011 of 1 June 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 laying down certain detailed rules for the implementation
More informationGuidelines Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Guidelines Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Part D, Section 2: Cancellation proceedings, substantive provisions Draft, DIPP Status:
More informationDraft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2011
EN AGRI/D EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, COM(2011) XXX final Draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2011 of /2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 laying down certain detailed rules for the implementation
More informationGuidelines Concerning Proceedings before the. Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market. (Trade Marks and Designs) Part C: OPOSITION GUIDELINES
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) TRADE MARKS DEPARTMENT Guidelines Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
More informationECTA ACTIVITY REPORT June 2016 June 2017
Brussels, 15 June 2017 ECTA ACTIVITY REPORT June 2016 June 2017 Content Page I. Position Papers 2 II. Participation in Multilateral and Bilateral Meetings with the EUIPO, European Commission and Entities
More informationWORKSHOP ECTA BMM WIPO BOIP INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF DESIGNS 12 DECEMBER 2011, THE HAGUE
15 December, 2011 WORKSHOP ECTA BMM WIPO BOIP INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF DESIGNS 12 DECEMBER 2011, THE HAGUE Reported by Annick Mottet Haugaard, ECTA President, Partner, Lydian, BE and Bram Van Eeckhout,
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
Ref. Ares(2013)2557589-02/07/2013 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate F - Food and Veterinary Office DG(SANCO) 2012-6811 - MR FINAL FINAL REPORT OF AN AUDIT CARRIED
More informationThe German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR)
The German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR) The Secretary General German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR) Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 11. RheinAtrium.
More informationMain Provisions and Benefits of the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement (2015)
Main Provisions and Benefits of the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement (2015) In today s crowded global marketplace, product differentiation is crucial. That makes branding crucial too. Appellations of
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, hereinafter referred to as the Republic of Macedonia,
27.12.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 342/9 * The Secretariat for European Affairs intervened in the text by replacing the reference former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia with the
More informationCOMMENTS ON THE KENYA DRAFT GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS BILL
COMMENTS ON THE KENYA DRAFT GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS BILL Introduction The provisions of the Draft Geographical Indications Bill 2007 appear to meet the minimum protection required by Article 22 and Article
More informationMax Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law Munich - Germany
Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law Munich - Germany Study on the Overall Functioning of the Trade Mark System in Europe Hearing on 8 June 2010-10:30-17:30 The meeting
More informationECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association 27 th Annual Meeting in Killarney
ECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association 27 th Annual Meeting in Killarney Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings Similarities and Differences Vincent O Reilly, Director Department for Industrial
More informationMeeting of 25 June DG AGRI working document on international protection of EU Geographical Indications: objectives, outcome and challenges
Ref. Ares(2012)669394-06/06/2012 ADVISORY GROUP INTERNATIONAL ASPECT OF AGRICULTURE Meeting of 25 June 2012 DG AGRI working document on international protection of EU Geographical Indications: objectives,
More informationFederal Act on the Protection of Trade Marks and Indications of Source
English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force. Federal Act on the Protection of Trade Marks and Indications
More informationWorldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications. Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, 29 June to 1 July 2017
Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, 29 June to 1 July 2017 Session: 30 June 2017: 16.15 17.15 Recent Developments at the International Level Moderator: Ms. Liu Yan,
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 27.7.2018 COM(2018) 350 final 2018/0214 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the accession of the European Union to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations
More informationLAW OF GEORGIA ON APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS OF GOODS
LAW OF GEORGIA ON APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS OF GOODS ARTICLE 1. SPHERE OF REGULATION This Law regulates the relations formed in connection with registration, protection and use
More informationReport Germany to Question B
LIDC Congress Geneva 2016 Report Germany to Question B What rules should govern claims by suppliers about the national or geographic origin of their goods or services? Prof. Dr. Olaf Sosnitza 1. Do your
More information(OJ L 12, , p. 14) No page date M1 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 357/2012 of 24 April L
2012R0029 EN 01.01.2016 005.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 29/2012
More informationLaw On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin
Text consolidated by Valsts valodas centrs (State Language Centre) with amending laws of: 8 November 2001 [shall come into force on 1 January 2002]; 21 October 2004 [shall come into force on 11 November
More informationFINAL MINUTES MEETING OF THE ADVISORY GROUP SPIRIT DRINKS
FINAL MINUTES MEETING OF THE ADVISORY GROUP SPIRIT DRINKS 9 November 2011, 9:30-13:00 hrs European Commission Rue de la Loi 130, room L130B 1049 Brussels Chairman: Mr Bosco Torremocha GP.R110-020-2011
More informationLIST OF KEY MARKET ACCESS BARRIERS IN MEXICO UNDER THE MARKET ACCESS STRATEGY 22 September 2016 MAAC/
Barrier LIST OF KEY MARKET ACCESS BARRIERS IN MEXICO UNDER THE MARKET ACCESS STRATEGY 22 September 2016 MAAC/2016-037 Description Protection and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights The huge market
More informationQ&A Manual European Legislation on Geographical Indications. 1
Q&A Manual European Legislation on Geographical Indications www.ipr2.org 1 Prepared February 2011 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents are the sole
More informationLIBE Committee Inquiry on electronic mass surveillance of EU citizens. Public Hearing, Strasbourg, 7 October 2013 Contribution of Peter Hustinx (EDPS)
LIBE Committee Inquiry on electronic mass surveillance of EU citizens Public Hearing, Strasbourg, 7 October 2013 Contribution of Peter Hustinx (EDPS) Thank you for the invitation. The focus of your programme
More informationSTANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS
STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS Introduction 1) The purpose of this questionnaire is to seek information from AIPPI's National and Regional Groups on developments
More informationStrengthening aspects of the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial in criminal proceedings
Briefing Initial Appraisal of a European Commission Impact Assessment Strengthening aspects of the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial in criminal proceedings Impact Assessment
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 28 October 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 October 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0089 (COD) 10374/15 PI 43 CODEC 950 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: Position of the Council
More informationRound Table ECTA BOIP OHIM 14 april 2008 Are the CTM and Benelux system harmonized? From a Procedural point of view:
Round Table ECTA BOIP OHIM 14 april 2008 Are the CTM and Benelux system harmonized? From a Procedural point of view: Maron Galama, European Trademark Attorney - VEREENIGDE Pieter Veeze, Lawyer Legal Affairs
More informationLaw on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin
Law on Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin Adopted: Entered into Force: Published: 16.06.1999 15.07.1999 Vēstnesis, 01.07.1999, Nr. 216 With the changes of 08.11.2001 Chapter I General Provisions
More informationHow to Cut the Cheese: Homonymous Names of Registered Geographic Indicators of Foodstuffs in Regulation 510/2006
Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 33 Issue 1 Article 7 1-1-2010 How to Cut the Cheese: Homonymous Names of Registered Geographic Indicators of Foodstuffs in Regulation 510/2006
More informationCOMMUNITY TRADE MARK ORDER 2014
[Draft] Community Trade Mark Order 2014 Article 1 Statutory Document No. XXXX/14 c European Communities (Isle of Man) Act 1973 COMMUNITY TRADE MARK ORDER 2014 Draft laid before Tynwald: 2014 Draft approved
More informationOverview. From an existing agreement to a new one
Overview From an existing agreement to a new one The EU and Mexico already have a close trading and investment relationship. 2000 In 1997 the EU and Mexico signed an Economic Partnership, Political Coordination
More informationINTERNATIONAL LEAGUE OF COMPETITION LAW ILCL. 6-9 October 2016 GENEVA
INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE OF COMPETITION LAW ILCL 6-9 October 2016 GENEVA AEDC/VSRM report Association pour l étude du droit de la concurrence Vereniging voor de studie van het mededingingsrecht Belgium Question
More informationNotes on the Conversion Form
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (OHIM) Trade Marks and Designs Notes on the Conversion Form General Remarks The conversion form is made available by the Office for Harmonization in the
More informationOPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SAUGMANDSGAARD ØE delivered on 22 February 2018 (1) Case C 44/17
Provisional text OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SAUGMANDSGAARD ØE delivered on 22 February 2018 (1) Case C 44/17 The Scotch Whisky Association, The Registered Office v Michael Klotz (Request for a preliminary
More informationWorking Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin)
E LI/WG/DEV/8/2 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: OCTOBER 11, 2013 Working Group on the Development of the Lisbon System (Appellations of Origin) Eighth Session Geneva, December 2 to 6, 2013 DRAFT REVISED LISBON
More informationImpact of the CTM. on the daily work of the trademark profession. Dominique Kaesmacher Chief IP Attorney
Impact of the CTM on the daily work of the trademark profession by Dominique Kaesmacher Chief IP Attorney Round Table ECTA - BOIP - OHIM The Hague, April 14, 2008 «If you can't convince them, confuse them»
More informationhaving regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0161),
P7_TA-PROV(2014)0118 Community trade mark ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 February 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council
More informationLOCAL TO GLOBAL: PROVENANCE BRANDING AND FARMER CO-OPERATION FOR HIGH VALUE EXPORT MARKETS
RESEARCH SUMMARY LOCAL TO GLOBAL: PROVENANCE BRANDING AND FARMER CO-OPERATION FOR HIGH VALUE EXPORT MARKETS This report concerns how farmers can best secure maximum returns from producing high quality
More informationIP Translator brand owner perspectives
IP Translator brand owner perspectives Zoltán Kovári Kovári and Partners Patent and Trademark Attorneys LLC ECTA ROUND TABLE SESSION BRAND OWNERS LIFE BEFORE AND AFTER IP TRANSLATOR 6 NOVEMBER 2013, BUDAPEST,
More informationLaw on Trademarks and Geographical Indications
Disclaimer: The English language text below is provided by the Translation and Terminology Centre for information only; it confers no rights and imposes no obligations separate from those conferred or
More informationAgriculture How the agreement benefits the EU. 1.4 billion 2 The value of the EU's annual food and drink exports to Mexico
Agriculture How the agreement benefits the EU 1.4 billion 2 The value of the EU's annual food and drink exports to Mexico Mexico's ranking amongst the EU's trading partners in Latin America 1. Scrapping
More informationSTANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS
STANDING COMMITTEE ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE TO NATIONAL GROUPS Introduction 1) The purpose of this questionnaire is to seek information from AIPPI's National and Regional Groups on developments
More informationBRAND MGT. NWS Page 1 MCKEOWN-BRAND Intellectual Property Newsletters December 2010
BRAND MGT. NWS. 2011-01 Page 1 BRAND MGT. NWS. 2011-01 Intellectual Property Newsletters December 2010 McKeown's Brand Management In Canadian Law Newsletter John McKeown Thomson Reuters Canada Limited
More informationAdopted text. - Trade mark regulation
Adopted text - Trade mark regulation The following document is an unofficial summary of the text adopted by the legal affairs committee (JURI) of the European Parliament from 17 December 2013. The text
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 201/21
26.7.2013 Official Journal of the European Union L 201/21 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 716/2013 of 25 July 2013 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the
More informationEU ADMINISTRATIVE LAW SECTORAL REPORT: TRADE MARKS 1. INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVERSARY AND INQUISITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS.
EU ADMINISTRATIVE LAW SECTORAL REPORT: TRADE MARKS 1. INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVERSARY AND INQUISITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. EU law and practice is more inquisitorial and less
More informationCZECH REPUBLIC Trademark Act No. 441/2003 Coll. of December 3, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 2004
CZECH REPUBLIC Trademark Act No. 441/2003 Coll. of December 3, 2003 ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I TRADE MARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Definition of a trade mark Section
More informationNational Intellectual Property Center of Georgia Sakpatenti
National Intellectual Property Center of Georgia Sakpatenti www.sakpatenti.org.ge Antalya, 27-28 October, 2016 Georgia - Cradle of Wine Georgia - 8 000 years of unbroken tradition of winemaking 525 indigenous
More informationThe Ministry of Justice March 5, 2013 Stockholm
1 The Ministry of Justice March 5, 2013 Stockholm TRADE MARKS ACT (Swedish Statute Book, SFS, 2010:1877) Unofficial translation CHAPTER 1. General Provisions Scope of Application Trade marks and other
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION. on the conclusion of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.4.2018 COM(2018) 192 final 2018/0091 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan
More informationReport on the 8 th Meeting of the OAMI Trade Mark Group Alicante, 25 November By Martin Sick Nielsen
Report on the 8 th Meeting of the OAMI Trade Mark Group Alicante, 25 November 2002 By Martin Sick Nielsen Representatives of the following organisations were present: AIM, AIPPI, BEDA, CNIPA, ECTA, EFPIA,
More informationCOUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING GUIDANCE
If you require this information in the alternative formats of either audio, large print or Braille, please contact us. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELLING GUIDANCE Our aims in producing this advice are to help:
More informationArticle 4. Signs, registered as trademarks The following signs may be registered as trademarks:
THE LAW OF AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC "ON TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS" This Law shall govern the relations arising out the registration, legal protection and use of trademarks and geographical indications
More informationON TRADEMARKS LAW ON TRADEMARKS CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS
Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosovo - Republic of Kosovo Kuvendi - Skupština - Assembly Law No. 04/L-026 ON TRADEMARKS Assembly of Republic of Kosovo; Based on article 65 (1) of Constitution of the Republic
More informationTITLE II CONCEPT OF A TRADEMARK AND REGISTRATION PROHIBITIONS
SPAIN Trademark Act Law No. 17/2001 of December 7, 2001 (Consolidated Text Including the Amendments Made by Law 20/2003, of July 7, 2003, on Legal Protection of Industrial Designs) TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE
More informationECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association
ECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association Summary Report on the Workshop on the Changes in the Implementing Regulations and CTM Renewals held in Alicante on October 4, 2005 ECTA attended the above
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Communities
L 277/10 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1829/2002 of 14 October 2002 amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 with regard to the name Feta (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) Communication No 2/12 of the President of the Office.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) The President Communication No 2/12 of the President of the Office of 20/06/2012 concerning the use of class headings in lists
More informationGEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. Allen Johnson Consortium for Common Food Names
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS Allen Johnson Consortium for Common Food Names CCFN: Who We Are Purpose Protect rights of producers and consumers to use common food names Structure Based in Washington, members
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2004R1935 EN 07.08.2009 001.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B REGULATION (EC) No 1935/2004 OF THE EUROPEAN
More informationUK (England and Wales)
Intellectual Property 2007/08 UK (England and Wales) UK (England and Wales) Ian Kirby and Rochelle Pizer, Arnold & Porter (UK) LLP www.practicallaw.com/2-234-5952 Registering a trade mark 1. What marks
More informationConsultation draft 31 March, 2005
APPENDIX 5 Draft Regulation EC 882/2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules Guidance Notes for enforcement
More informationMadrid Easy. A rough and easy guide how international registrations designating the European Community will be processed by the OHIM
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) Trade Marks Department IP Matters Alicante, 14 September 2004 DS/ab -TMD/04 Madrid Easy Or: A rough and easy guide how international
More informationWORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
WIPO SCT/6/3 ORIGINAL: English DATE: January 25, 2001 E WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS Sixth
More informationSummary Report. Question Q191. Relationship between trademarks and geographical indications
Summary Report Question Q191 Relationship between trademarks and geographical indications I) Introduction This question has been selected to examine the relationship between trademarks and geographical
More informationANNEX 1 TERMS AND THEIR DEFINITIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT
1 ANNEX 1... 1 1.1 Text of Annex 1... 1 1.2 General... 2 1.3 Annex 1.1: "technical regulation"... 3 1.3.1 Three-tier test... 3 1.3.2 "identifiable product or group of products"... 3 1.3.3 "one or more
More informationInstitutional and Legal Framework for GIs: Needs and Governance
Institutional and Legal Framework for GIs: Needs and Governance Discussion Points FAO/SINER-GI Meeting on Sharing Views on Quality Products Linked to Geographical Origin: How Can They Contribute to Rural
More information