In the Maori AppeIIate Court of New Zealand Te Waipounamu Registry
|
|
- Mark Phelps
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 In the Maori AppeIIate Court of New Zealand Te Waipounamu Registry Appeals 1998/3-9 IN THE MATTER of an appeal by the Attorney-General AND Port Marlborough New Zealand Limited, AND Te Atiawa Manawhenua Ki Te Tau Ih11 Trust, Rima EdwardsjTe Runanga 0 Muriwhenua, Marlborough District Council, New Zealand Marine Farming Association Inc, New Zealand Aquaculture Council Incorporated. AGAINST 3. preliminary decision of the Maori Land Court made on the 22nd of December 1997 (22A Nelson Minute Book 1-10) in respect of the foreshore and seabed of the Marlborough Sounds ansmg from an application made by Ngati Apa, Ngati Kaoata, Ngati Kuia, Ngati Rarua, Ngati Tamar Ngati Toa, Rangitane and Te Atiawa under sections 18, 131 and 132 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993.
2 2 Parties: Appellants The Attorney-General Solicitor-General J J McGrath QC, Counsel Assisted by Helen Aikman, Counsel Port Marlborough New Zealand Limited Mr M J Hunt, Counsel. Te Atiawa Manawhenua Ki Te Tau Ihu Trust Ms K L Ertel, Counsel Rima Edwards/Te Runanga 0 Muriwhenua Mr J M Dawson, Counsel Marlborough District Council Mr P J Radich, Counsel New Zealand Marine Farming Association Incorporated Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Counsel New Zealand Aquaculture Council Incorporated Ms K Feint, Counsel Respondent Te Tau lhu lwi Mr J Williams, Counsel Hearing: Coram: Heard at Wellington on 11 May 1998 His Honour Chief Judge ETJ Durie, Presiding His Honour Deputy Chief Judge N F Smith His Honour Judge G D Carter His Honour Judge W W Isaac Decision delivered at Wellington on the 19th day of October 1998 by Deputy Chief Judge N F Smith
3 Decision Application was made to the Maori Land Court by eight hapu from the northern part of the South Island seeking orders in respect to the land specified in the application, but described for the purpose of this decision as the Seabed and Foreshore of the Marlborough Sounds and the waters relating thereto, as follows: 1. An order under sections 131 and 18(h) of Te Ture Wn.enua Maori Act 1993 (the Act) declaring that the land is customary Maori land; or 2. A.n order under section 18(1)(i) of the Act declaring that the land is held by the Crown in a fiduciary capacity and 3. An order under Section 132 of the Act that an investigation be carried out as to the relative interests of the applicants in the land; and 4. Costs and all such other orders that the Court thinks just. The Court directed that it would deal first with the application under sections 18(1)(h) and 131 of the Act as to the status of the land concerned. It further indicated that, on the basis of the acceptance by the Crown and other objectors that Maori held customary right/title to the foreshore and seabed at the time of the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi, it would enquire into whether those rights/ title have since been extinguished. The matter was heard at Nelson on 30 and 31 October 1997 and dealt with legal submissions only, no formal evidence being presented. On the 22nd December 1997 the Court delivered a preliminary determination at the same time granting leave to the parties to appeal in accordance with the provisions of section 59(1) of the Act.
4 [n its decision the Court commenced from the premise that" it is assumed that there were exlsting MilOri cllstomary rights prior to 1340". It also acknowledged that there had been no evidential inquiry to establish that there were such rights, since the investigation would entail extended hearings and it was considered that the legal question was best determined before such a lengthy inquiry. The learned Judge dealt with the matter under two headings first, the foreshore, and at 22A Nelson Niinute Book folio 4 found: - ""When the Marlborough Sound Maori were separated from their customary lands adjacent to the foreshore by purchase, the customary rights to the foreshore not included in the sales or not having been expressly extinguished since sale by an Act OT other statutory instruments still remain. The Court is aware that there may have been express extinguishment of some of the foreshore but clarification of this must wait presentation of evidence." The second part of the decision related to the seabed and at 22A Nelson Minute Book folio 10 the Court found: "1 am of the opinion (as mentioned above) that a sovereignty title of similar import and characteristics to the radical title of the cornmon law passed and the customary rights (if any) still remain." The above issues involved the Court in a consideration at the Court of Appeal decision in re The Ninetv Mile Beach (1963) NZLR 461 and the interpretation of section 7 of the Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone and Exclusive Economic Zone Act Appeals Vlere lodged against the decision of the Court by the seven bodies mentioned in the heading hereto. Without exception all stated in their grounds for appeal, inter alia, that the lower Court erred in its interpretation of the Ninetv I\,{i!" Rp~ch case decision and its application to the matter andl or in failing to state
5 a case to the High Court requesting clarification of the correctness or otherwise of the principles expounded in that case. placed on section 7 referred to above. Most also disputed the interpretation The Appellate Court gave notice first that it would hear as a preliminary matter, argument as to whether a case should be stated to the High Court to test the application of the Ninetv Mile Beach decision but later amended this direction to hear argument to determine: -- 1 Should a case be stated for the opinion of the High Court and if so; 2. Tne nature and substance of that case to be stated. Tne appeal was then to be adjourned to a later date for the hearing of the substantive appeals. The Maori AppeJlate Court sat on the 11th May 1998 to hear submissions. As a preliminary matter the Maori Appellate Court was required to rule on the - - status of Rima Edwards/Te Runanga 0 Muriwhenua and the rights of that party to be heard on appeal or on the question or the case stated. After hearing submissions from 1vfr Radich, counsel for the Marlborough District Council, challenging the right of Te Runanga 0 Muriwhenua to appear, and NIT Dawson in support of Te Runanga 0 l'lfuriwhenua's appearance, this Court ruled that Rima Edwards/Te Runanga 0 Muriwhenua had a particular interest in the challenge to the Ninetv Mile Beach case sufficient to be materially affected to a greater extent than the public at large. Therefore, in terms of sections 58(2) or 59(2) of the Act the runanga was entitled to be heard. That greater interest is exemplified if one considers that Muriwhenua are bound by the Ninetv Mile Beach decision through the doctrine of stare decisis as opposed to other coastal
6 tribes who may argue against or distinguish that decision. U there is to be any reconsideration of that decision it is most appropriate that Muriwhenua be represented. Counsel for the respondent argued against the Maori Appellate Court stating a case on any matter to the High Court, while counsel for Te Atiawa Manawhenua Ki Te Tau lhli Trust advocated, as did counsel for Muriwhenua, that any case stated should be limited to questions relating to the Ninetv Mile Beach decision of the Court of Appeal. All other counsel pressed for a case to be stated on much wider grounds including questions relating to the seabed. During submissions it appeared generally accepted tb.at much of the dissatisfaction arising from the Ninetv Mile Beach decision was caused by tbe inadequacy and inaccuracy of evidence available to the Court determining tbe question at that time. The Solicitor-General on behalf of the Crown at paragraph 39 of his submission - submitted that the question at stake raised fundamental issues as to the ownership of New Zealand resources and the status of customary law in New Zealand and went on to say: "It is important that these issues be examined by the highest Courts in New Zealand, drawing on both the common law and international law. Once those Courts have established the parameters of customary law in New Zealand, it will be appropriate for the Maori Land Court to consider whether specific areas are held as customary land in accordance with tikanga Maori." VVhilst this Court is in sympathy with the Crown submissions the concerns expressed by Ms Ertel thilt the referral of a case stated at this point of time is premature has considerable merit. If a Court is to deliberate on and answer any questions referred by way of a case stated, then to ensure that there is no _LL ~, 'ho n"rnnrb"d oroblems arising from the Ninety)v!ile Beach case that
7 Court should have berore it at least a resume of the facts, sufficient to apprise it of the position pertaining. There are no facts to bolster a case stated at this stage. The learned Judge in the lower Court, made it clear that his decision, headed "Interim Decision" was brought down in the absence of any evidential inquiry. At Y'A Nelson Minute Book folio '* following his determination in respect of customary rights relating to fares hares, as stated above, the learned Judge commented" the Court is aware that there may well have been express extinguishment of some of the foreshore but clarification of this must await presentation of roidence," Again at 22A Nelson Minute Book folio 7 it is recorded: "Te Ture Whenua Maori Act gives the Maori Land Court jurisdiction to determine whether such land has the status of Maori customa..ry land (5131/93), Once the Court so decides it has exclusive jurisdiction to investigate the title to the land and determine who are the owners (5132/93). "It is clearly incumbent upon the Tau Ihu Maori to prove to this Court that they hold the bed of Marlborough Sounds in accordance with tikanga Maori" and if they so prove that this Court can then proceed to the next statutory step - the investiga tion of Title". This Court accepts that it would be premature at this stage to state any case for consideration by the High Court in the absence of any factual matrix to which a Court charged with answering a case stated by this Court might refer. The application of principles of law often depend upon the facts and there is always the prospect that a party may wish to rely upon factual evidence to distinguish some precedent that might otherwise apply. rn reaching this decision we are conscious of the findings of Anderson J, in re Hauraki Maori Trust Board v Treatv of Waitangi Fisheries Commission (1995) NZLR 702 in which it was held first, that the Court should not prematurely or unnecessarily state a case, and secondly, that the essential merits of the plaintiff's case in public law can be exercised on the
8 s basis ot assumptions. This Court has some reservations as to the latter statement in that any case stated in this present ijlstance, whilst clearly having an impact upon" public la1v", must have its genesis in customary law, a matter which the Maori Land Court and Maori Appellate Court as a specialist Court should provide some guidance. This Court believes that the factual matrix required to support a case stated could best be established through inquiry by the Maori Land Court charged with the duty of hea..-ing the evidence contemplated by the lower Court to be taken for the purposes of establishil1g customary title to the land in question. That evidence, without any findings being made by the lower Court, should then be submitted back to the this Court for fu.rther consideration as to whether a case should be stated to the High Court. At that time the Appeilate Court will reconvene to hear argument as to whether a case should be stated and if so the nature of the question(s) to be answered. Accordingly, the Maori Land Court is now directed to conduct a full hearing of the application currently before it for the purposes of determining what land, if any, is customary land within the provisions of section 129 of the Act and on completion of the hearing, and without making any determination, refer the evidence back to this Court. This Court notes: 1 That in so far as the decision of the lower Court is recorded as an" interim" or "provisional determination" the appellants, for the purposes of section 58(6) of the Act and the preservation of their respective rights of appeal from any final determination bv the Court quite properly filed their notices of appeal, the substance of which will be considered when the hearing resumes.
9 q 2. There is one matter of concern to this Court which was adverted to during the hearing by the Chief Judge as presiding Officer, and that is the status of the applicants in the lower Court, now the respondents in the Appellate Court. Section 37(1) of the Act provides that the Maori Land Court may exercise its jurisdiction in the application of - (i) (ii) Any person claiming to have an interest in the matter; or "Not applicable" or (iii) The Court may grant to any person body or association leave to make an application to the Court for the exercise of its jurisdiction where the Court is satisfied:- (a) That a question of importance to the Maori people or any tribe or group of the Maori people is involved; and (b) That, because of the standing of the proposed applicant among the Maori people concerned and the proposed applicants relationship to or connection with any land to which the application relates, it is appropriate that leave be granted. A perusal of the record, minutes of the hearings, and judicial conference does not reveal that any such leave was sought or granted. This Court acknowledges the assistance afforded by the various counsel appearing through their very extensive and erudite submissions. The failure of trus Court to address each and everyone of those submissions individually in no way detracts from the weight applied thereto or the extent of the assistance those submissions
10 !O have afforded this Court. We congratulate all counsel on their submissions and thank them tor their assistance. The Appellate Court hearing is now adjourned sine die pending the taking of evidence as directed. Consequent upon the appointment of His Honour Chief Judge Durie to the Bench of the High Court, he will no longer be available to preside over this appeal, and the Maori Appellate Court will be reconstituted. His Honour N F Smith Deputy Chief Judge
11 Having read the decision to be delivered by Deputy Chiet Judge N F Smith I concur with the decision. His Honour E11 Durie Chief Judge His Honour G D Carter Judge -----, _._-- His Honour W W Isaac Judge
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
Judgment Date: 19/06/2003 Decision of: JUDGMENTS OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND BETWEEN CA173/01 CA75/02 Coram: NGATI APA, NGATI KOATA, NGATI KUIA, NGATI RARUA, NGATI TAMA, NGATI TOA
More informationTHE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V NGATI APA ( NGATI APA OR MARLBOROUGH SOUNDS ) CASE
THE NEW ZEALAND POSTGRADUATE LAW E-JOURNAL ISSUE 3 THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V NGATI APA ( NGATI APA OR MARLBOROUGH SOUNDS ) CASE S Fiorletta-Leroy THE NEW ZEALAND POSTGRADUATE LAW E-JOURNAL (NZPGLEJ) - ISSUE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV [2014] NZHC 251. Part 30 of the High Court Rules. ATTORNEY-GENERAL Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV-2013-485-4843 [2014] NZHC 251 UNDER the Judicature Amendment Act 1972 AND UNDER BETWEEN AND Part 30 of the High Court Rules MICHAEL ANTHONY KANE,
More informationHAURAKI MAORI TRUST BOARD
RECEI V ED HAURAKI MAORI TRUST BOARD Kia mau ki te Rangatiratanga o te iwi o Haurabi 1 7 eeb2003 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 14 February 2003 Marie Alexander Clerk of the Committee Local Government
More informationPRINCIPLES OF THE TREATY
This is a brief review of how key legislation relevant to environmental management deals with Crown obligations under te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi (the Treaty). The issues arising from these
More informationEmbargoed. Embargoed. Embargoed
Chapter 1 Introduction The Wai 785 (Te Tau Ihu) inquiry completed its hearings in 2004. In January 2006, the claimants requested a preliminary report on issues relating to their customary rights in order
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A MAATAI ARIKI RAWIRI KAUAE TE TOKI Applicant
2013 Chief Judge s Minute Book 456 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20120008996 UNDER Section 30, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN Hako Hauraki -
More informationTe Hunga Roia Maori o Aotearoa (Maori Law Society Inc.) SUBMISSION: TREATY OF WAITANGI (REMOVAL OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST) AMENDMENT BILL
Te Hunga Roia Maori o Aotearoa (Maori Law Society Inc.) SUBMISSION: TREATY OF WAITANGI (REMOVAL OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST) AMENDMENT BILL 6 AUGUST 2007 TE HUNGA ROIA MAORI O AOTEAROA, SUBMISSION REGARDING
More informationSubmission on the Draft New Zealand National Report for Public Consultation
17 March 2009 Sent by email to UPR@mfat.govt.nz Submission on the Draft New Zealand National Report for Public Consultation This feedback is submitted jointly by the Aotearoa Indigenous Rights Trust, Peace
More informationResource Management (Aquaculture Moratorium Extension) Amendment Bill. Government Bill 2003 No Commentary
Resource Management (Aquaculture Moratorium Extension) Amendment Bill Government Bill 2003 No 97-2 Commentary As reported from the Primary Production Committee Recommendation The Primary Production Committee
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CIV [2017] NZHC 56. JOANNE MIHINUI, MATATAHI MIHINUI, TANIA MIHINUI Appellants
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CIV-2016-463-000181 [2017] NZHC 56 UNDER the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND of an appeal from a decision of the District Court
More informationTe Hunga Roia Māori o Aotearoa (The New Zealand Māori Law Society Incorporated)
Te Hunga Roia Māori o Aotearoa (The New Zealand Māori Law Society Incorporated) Submission on the Marine and Coastal Area Bill to the Māori Affairs Select Committee 19 NOVEMBER 2010 TE HUNGA ROIA MĀORI
More informationReport to ENVIRONMENT & POLICY COMMITTEE for decision
13/373 Subject: Recognition of a Protected Customary Right and Customary Marine Title by Rongomaiwahine under the Marine and Coastal (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 Prepared by: Keriana Wilcox-Taylor (Senior
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A IN THE MATTER OF Lot 2, DP 29547
145 Taitokerau MB 4 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20170001439 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 2, DP 29547 BETWEEN DIANNE DONEY, TUARI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC TE RUNANGA O NGĀTI MANAWA Plaintiff
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV-2011-485-1233 [2016] NZHC 1183 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND the Judicature Amendment Act 1972 an/or Part 30 of the High Court Rules Central
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV [2012] NZHC THE NEW ZEALAND MĀORI COUNCIL Applicant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV 2012-485-2187 [2012] NZHC 3338 BETWEEN AND AND AND THE NEW ZEALAND MĀORI COUNCIL Applicant THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL First Respondent THE MINISTER OF
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A Hearing: 364 Aotea MB dated 13 December 2016
366 Aotea MB 274 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20160005718 UNDER Rule 4.10(3), Maori Land Court Rules 2011 IN THE MATTER OF Ruapehu 2 block and a decision of the Deputy Registrar
More informationMACA CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE NELSON 31 MAY 2018 at am
MACA CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE NELSON 31 MAY 2018 at 10.00 am Thank you all for coming. I just want to make a few preliminary comments primarily for the benefit of the people who are at the back of the
More informationI TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE ROTORUA-NUI-A-KAHUMATAMOMOE ROHE CIV [2018] NZHC NGĀTI WĀHIAO Defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE ROTORUA-NUI-A-KAHUMATAMOMOE ROHE CIV-2013-463-000448 [2018] NZHC 1991 BETWEEN AND NGĀTI HURUNGATERANGI, NGĀTI TAEOTU ME NGĀTI
More informationTe Runanga o Toa Rangatira Inc.
Te Runanga o Toa Rangatira Inc. PO Box 50355, Takapuwahia PORIRUA Ph 04 237-6070 Fax 04 238-4529 Email runanga@ngatitoa.iwi.nz Supplementary Submission on the Te Tau lhu Claims Settlement Bill To the Maori
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A UNDER Section 134, Te Ture Whenua Māori 1993
60 Tairawhiti MB 90 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A20120006345 UNDER Section 134, Te Ture Whenua Māori 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Awapuni 1F3 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC 683. SIR EDWARD TAIHAKUREI DURIE Plaintiff
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV 2016-485-217 [2016] NZHC 683 UNDER the Declaratory Judgments Act 1908 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND the Māori Community Development Act 1962 and
More informationIN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A PHILIP DEAN TAUEKI Appellant. HOROWHENUA SAILING CLUB First Respondent
2014 Maori Appellate Court MB 60 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20130008562 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND AND AND Horowhenua
More informationNEW ZEALAND BRIEFING TO THE UN COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, 48 TH SESSION, MAY 2012
NEW ZEALAND BRIEFING TO THE UN COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, 48 TH SESSION, MAY 2012 Amnesty International Publications First published in 2012 by Amnesty International Publications
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A
163 Waiāriki MB 10 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20170001931 UNDER Section 59,Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Matangareka 3B Ahu Whenua Trust - orders
More informationIN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 28 Taitokerau MB 217 (28 TTK 217) A A
IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 28 Taitokerau MB 217 (28 TTK 217) A20110008223 A20110008445 UNDER Sections 19, 26C and 98, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Determination
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY
337 Aotea MB 131 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20140011189 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF Section 67 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Mangaporou Ahu Whenua Trust Hearing 17 March 2015,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA241/07 CA246/07 [2007] NZCA 269
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA241/07 CA246/07 [2007] NZCA 269 BETWEEN AND AND AND AND AND NEW ZEALAND MAORI COUNCIL First Appellant THE FEDERATION OF MAORI AUTHORITIES INCORPORATED Second Appellant
More informationNORMAN TANE Appellant. Appearances: Mr S Webster & Mr J Koning for the Ruapuha and Uekaha Hapu Trust Mr K J Catran for Norman Tane
IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT 2010 MAORI APPELLATE COURT MB 512 (2010 APPEAL 512) A20080016920 A20080016617 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Section 59, Te Ture
More informationThe Kermadecs Conundrum
Toni Love The Kermadecs Conundrum marine protected areas and democratic process Introduction Marine protected areas (MPAs) are on the increase. Their creation is heralded as a significant response to severe
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND INVERCARGILL REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC TONI COLIN REIHANA Applicant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND INVERCARGILL REGISTRY CIV-2014-425-000102 [2016] NZHC 2048 UNDER the Judicature Amendment Act 1972 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND AND of Judicial Review and related tortious
More informationIN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A APPEAL 2017/1. Applicant. RUNANGA 2C2B1 AHU WHENUA TRUST Respondent
2017 Māori Appellate Court MB 150 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20160007140 APPEAL 2017/1 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Runanga
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CIV MICHAEL D PALMER First Defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CIV-2004-463-825 BETWEEN AND AND CONCRETE STRUCTURES (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff MICHAEL D PALMER First Defendant MONCUR ENGINEERING LIMITED Second Defendant
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A Allotments Parish of Manurewa
158 Taitokerau MB 248 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20160006578 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND Sections 18(1)(h) and 19(1)(b), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Allotments
More informationo land over 0.4 hectares that includes or adjoins any lake (the bed of which exceeds 8 hectares):
Overseas Investment Bill Government Bill 2004 No 222-1 Explanatory Note General policy statement The purpose of this Bill is to introduce changes to the way that overseas investment is regulated in New
More informationWaka Umanga (Māori Corporations) Bill. Government Bill. Explanatory note. General policy statement
Seq: 1 Free lead 35D*points, Next lead 310D, Vjust R PCO 7687/8 Drafted by Parliamentary Counsel IN CONFIDENCE Bill Government Bill Explanatory note General policy statement The primary purpose of this
More informationPROPRIETORS OF WAKATŪ First Appellant. ATTORNEY-GENERAL Respondent. NGĀTI RĀRUA IWI TRUST AND NGĀTI KŌATA TRUST Interveners
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA436/2012 [2014] NZCA 628 BETWEEN PROPRIETORS OF WAKATŪ First Appellant RORE PAT STAFFORD Second Appellant RORE PAT STAFFORD, PAUL TE POA KARORO MORGAN, WAARI WARD-HOLMES
More informationIN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 2010 Chief Judge's MB 355 (2010 CJ 355) A A
IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 2010 Chief Judge's MB 355 (2010 CJ 355) A20100007368 A20100010143 UNDER Section 30(1)(b), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Applications
More informationWai 2366 Wai 2364 Wai 2372 Wai 1699 Wai applications for Resumption of Land by HAAMI PIRIPI on behalf of himself and TE RARAWA
2 IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL Wai 2366 Wai 2364 Wai 2372 Wai 1699 Wai 1701 IN THE MATTER OF AND the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 applications for Resumption of Land by HAAMI PIRIPI on behalf of himself and
More informationHauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000
Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000 Public Act 2000 No 1 Date of assent 27 February 2000 Commencement see section 2 Preamble I Title 2 Commencement 3 Purpose 4 Interpretation 5 Act to bind the Crown 6 Treaty
More informationINTRODUCTION TO NZ LEGAL SYSTEMS SUMMARY 2011
INTRODUCTION TO NZ LEGAL SYSTEMS SUMMARY 2011 LAWSKOOL NEW ZEALAND TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. THE WESTERN LEGAL TRADITIONS 5 1.1 COMMON LAW 5 1.2 CIVIL LAW 6 2. ENGLISH LEGAL HISTORY 6 2.1 FEUDALISM 7 2.1.1
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT A RAKIURA MĀORI LANDS TRUST Respondent
21 Te Waipounamu MB 35 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT A20130002529 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Sections 237 and 238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Rakiura Māori
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC Plaintiff. AUCKLAND COUNCIL Defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2015-404-002795 [2016] NZHC 1199 BETWEEN AND ALWYNE JONES Plaintiff AUCKLAND COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: 29 February 2016 Appearances: R Pidgeon for
More informationIN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A Sections 18,37, 67, 150 and 151 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993
312 Aotea MB 104 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20130005451 UNDER Sections 18,37, 67, 150 and 151 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waiokura Te Kauae blocks, Section
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2017] NZHC 389. NGĀTI WHĀTUA ŌRĀKEI TRUST Plaintiff
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2015-404-2033 [2017] NZHC 389 BETWEEN AND AND AND NGĀTI WHĀTUA ŌRĀKEI TRUST Plaintiff ATTORNEY-GENERAL First Defendant NGĀTI PAOA IWI TRUST Second
More informationI TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA409/2018 [2018] NZCA 533. CAROLINE ANN SAWYER Applicant. Applicant. 29 November 2018 at pm JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA409/2018 [2018] NZCA 533 BETWEEN AND CAROLINE ANN SAWYER Applicant VICE-CHANCELLOR OF VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON Respondent CA410/2018
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A PETER NEE HARLAND Applicant. THE CROWN Interested Party
57 Tākitimu MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A20160006109 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND Section 30(1)(b) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Mana Ahuriri Incorporated
More informationThe Local Government and Environment Select Committee
He tono nā ki te The Local Government and Environment Select Committee e pā ana ki te Environmental Protection Authority Bill 28 January 2011 contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...3 TE RŪNANGA O NGĀI TAHU...4 TE
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A A
82 Taitokerau MB 139 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140007693 A20140007694 UNDER Sections 18(1)(a), 18(1)(c), 19(1)(a) and 24, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER
More informationAppellant. ALAN PAREKURA TOROHINA HARONGA First Respondent. TE AITANGA A MĀHAKI TRUST Second Respondent. WAITANGI TRIBUNAL Third Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA353/2015 [2016] NZCA 626 BETWEEN AND AND AND AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL Appellant ALAN PAREKURA TOROHINA HARONGA First Respondent TE AITANGA A MĀHAKI TRUST Second
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND SC 127/2014 [2014] NZSC 196. TERRANOVA HOMES AND CARE LIMITED Applicant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND SC 127/2014 [2014] NZSC 196 BETWEEN AND TERRANOVA HOMES AND CARE LIMITED Applicant SERVICE AND FOODWORKERS UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INCORPORATED First Respondent KRISTINE
More informationExclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Bill
Submission to The Local Government and Environment Select Committee on the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Bill Introduction This submission from Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee
More information1. INTRODUCTION Acknowledgements 1.1. We wish to acknowledge the valuable contribution of Peace Movement Aotearoa 1 in the drafting of this paper.
Te Rarawa (Māori Peoples of Aotearoa) Priorities Te Rūnanga o Te Rarawa Submission: Contact catherinedavis@hotmail.co.nz UN World Conference on Indigenous Peoples Pacific Preparatory meeting Sydney 19-21
More informationDownloaded from
T E T A U I H U O T E W A K A A M A U I T E T A U I H U O T E W A K A A M A U I P r e l i m i n a r y R e p o r t o n C u s t o m a r y R i g h t s i n t h e N o r t h e r n S o u t h I s l a n d W A
More informationWai 2180:Taihape Rangitīkei ki Rangipō District Issue No. 6 February 2018 Huitanguru
Winiata Marae. Wharenui built by Winiata Te Whaaro in 1896 on the site of his second farming enterprise at Mangaone. Now the kāinga of his descendants. Wai 2180:Taihape Rangitīkei ki Rangipō District Issue
More informationJUDGMENT. Bimini Blue Coalition Limited (Appellant) v The Prime Minister of The Bahamas and others (Respondents)
[2014] UKPC 23 Privy Council Appeal No 0060 of 2014 JUDGMENT Bimini Blue Coalition Limited (Appellant) v The Prime Minister of The Bahamas and others (Respondents) From the Court of Appeal of the Commonwealth
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INFLUENCE YEARLY MEETING 20 MAY 2011
CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INFLUENCE YEARLY MEETING 20 MAY 2011 Introduction Constitutional review is on the political agenda thanks to the agreement on confidence and supply between the
More informationEXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE AND CONTINENTAL SHELF (ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS) ACT 2012 (the Act)
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE AND CONTINENTAL SHELF (ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS) ACT 2012 (the Act) Trans-Tasman Resources Limited iron sand extraction and processing application M37 Minute of the Decision-Making
More informationIN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A Appeal 2017/3
2017 Māori Appellate Court MB 62 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20170001285 Appeal 2017/3 UNDER Section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV [2012] NZHC PORT NICHOLSON BLOCK SETTLEMENT TRUST Plaintiff
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV-2012-485-1837 [2012] NZHC 3181 UNDER the Judicature Amendment Act and Part 30 of the High Court Rules AND UNDER the Contractual Remedies Act 1979
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A VICTOR WILLIAM ROBERT HEKE Applicant. ADELINE HEKE Respondent
2013 Chief Judge s MB 996 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120013889 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Estate of James Heke - orders
More informationIN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101) A Applicant DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE WW ISAAC
IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101) A20120002122 UNDER Section 43 (1), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP TAUEKI Applicant Judgment:
More informationNew Zealand Journal of Public and International Law
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAW VOL 2 NO 2 NOVEMBER 2004 NEW ZEALAND CENTRE FOR PUBLIC LAW Te Wananga o nga Kaupapa Ture a Iwi o Aotearoa New Zealand Journal of Public and International
More informationPractice Standards for Legal Aid Providers. February 2017
Practice Standards for Legal Aid Providers February 2017 Contents General Practice Standards... 3 General Principles... 4 General Responsibilities to Clients... 5 Legal Aid Funding... 5 Relations with
More information2018 Māori Appellate Court MB 32
2018 Māori Appellate Court MB 32 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20170006144 APPEAL 2017/21 UNDER Section 58, of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Punakitere
More informationTHE TURANGI TOWNSHIP REMEDIES REPORT
THE TURANGI TOWNSHIP REMEDIES REPORT THE TURANGI TOWNSHIP REMEDIES REPORT WA I 84 WAITANGI TRIBUNAL REPORT 1998 The cover design by Cliä Whiting invokes the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A Section 330 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act FIONA MARIE PHILLIPS Applicant
31 Tairawhiti MB 175 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT A20120008238 UNDER Section 330 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application to transfer an occupation
More informationRULES OF THE SPORTS TRIBUNAL OF NEW ZEALAND 2012
RULES OF THE SPORTS TRIBUNAL OF NEW ZEALAND 2012 AS AMENDED ON 6 MARCH 2012 Please check Sports Tribunal website for any updates to the Rules of the Sports Tribunal At the date of printing, these Rules
More informationCONSTITUTION / LEGAL STATUS. Memorandum of Evidence
ATTACHMENT B VITAL INFORMATION CONSTITUTION / LEGAL STATUS Memorandum of Evidence 1.In 1908 the Crown of England agreed to (Aotearoa) New Zealand and the Parliament of New South Wales residing in Wellington,
More informationChapter 6. Terms of Negotiation
Chapter 6 Contents Introduction 119 Strategic planning where do we want to go? 119 what are they? 119 The Real World what can we learn? 120 Appendices to 122 Analysis 123 1. The parties 123 2. Background
More informationTHE CROWN PARE HAURAKI COLLECTIVE REDRESS DEED SCHEDULE: GENERAL MATTERS
HAKO NGĀI TAI KI TĀMAKI NGĀTI HEI NGĀTI MARU NGĀTI PAOA NGĀTI POROU KI HAURAKI NGĀTI PŪKENGA NGĀTI RĀHIRI TUMUTUMU NGĀTI TAMATERĀ NGĀTI TARA TOKANUI NGAATI WHANAUNGA TE PATUKIRIKIRI THE CROWN PARE HAURAKI
More informationPARLIAMENT SELECT COMMITTEE Parliament Buildings Wellington 26 January 2015 SUBMISSION TO ; HAWKES BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE BILL
PARLIAMENT SELECT COMMITTEE Parliament Buildings Wellington 26 January 2015 SUBMISSION TO ; HAWKES BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE BILL MAORI COMMITTEE BILL Tena koe RE: Inclusion of representation of
More informationIN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL WAI IN THE MATTER of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 OPENING SUBMISSIONS FOR THE CLAIMANTS. Dated: 21 October 2016
Wai 2358, # 3.3.21 IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL WAI 2358 IN THE MATTER of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND IN THE MATTER of the National Freshwater and Geothermal Resources Inquiry OPENING SUBMISSIONS FOR
More informationMINUTE (No.2) OF COLLINS J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I TE KQTI MATUA 0 AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARAROHE IN THE MATTER OF CIV-2017-485-000218 An application by HORI TURI ELKINGTON, of Wellington, trustee
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU REGISTRY A CJ 2010/57. DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CHRISTCHURCH Applicant
2016 Chief Judge s MB 963 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU REGISTRY A20100005776 CJ 2010/57 UNDER Section 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND Te Muera Ruka
More informationIN THE MATTER BETWEEN. Judges JA Smith and DA Kirkpatrick. At Auckland on 18 October 2017
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT [2017] NZEnvC \"l'l IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST
More informationPower of Court to grant specific performance of leases of Maori freehold land
Te Ture Whenua Maori Amendment Bill Maori Land Amendment Bill Government Bill As further reported from the committee of the whole House Hon Parekura Horomia Te Ture Whenua Maori Amendment Bill Maori Land
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2014] NZHC 2483 BETWEEN. Plaintiff
NOTE: PURSUANT TO S 437A OF THE CHILDREN, YOUNG PERSONS, AND THEIR FAMILIES ACT 1989, ANY REPORT OF THIS PROCEEDING MUST COMPLY WITH SS 11B TO 11D OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1980. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,
More informationWaikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River Settlement Bill 2008 (2010 No 302-2)
Digest No. 1763 Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River Settlement Bill 2008 (2010 No 302-2) Date of Introduction: 23 September 2008 Portfolio: Select Committee: Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Māori
More informationTE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI MUTUNGA CHARTER 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TE MANAWA O NGĀTI MUTUNGA... 1 HE WHAKAMARAMA... 1
TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI MUTUNGA CHARTER 20 SEPTEMBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TE MANAWA O NGĀTI MUTUNGA... 1 HE WHAKAMARAMA... 1 1. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS... 2 1.1. DEFINED TERMS:... 2 1.2. INTERPRETATION:...
More informationTERRITORIAL SEA AND EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE 1977 No. 16 ANALYSIS
COOK ISLANDS [also in 1994 Ed.] TERRITORIAL SEA AND EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE 1977 No. 16 Title 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation ANALYSIS PART I THE TERRITORIAL SEA OF THE COOK ISLANDS 3.
More informationSUMMARY OF FEEDBACK FROM TE RŌPŪ TŪHONO ON ROUND 2 HUI NGĀPUHI PROPOSAL ON EVOLVED MANDATE AND NEGOTIATION STRUCTURE
SUMMARY OF FEEDBACK FROM TE RŌPŪ TŪHONO ON ROUND 2 HUI NGĀPUHI PROPOSAL ON EVOLVED MANDATE AND NEGOTIATION STRUCTURE Te Rōpū Tūhono Te Rōpū Tūhono is Hone Saddler, Raniera Tau (Tūhoronuku Independent Mandate
More informationWai 2660, # ln THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL AND
Wai 2660, #2.5.8 ln THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL CONCERNING the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND claims concerning the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 (Wai 2577, Wai 2579, Wai 2580, Wai 2581,
More informationBEFORE THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL. APPLICATION FOR CLAIM TO BE HEARD URGENTLY Dated 23 June 2015
BEFORE THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL WAI IN THE MATTER OF The Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND IN THE MATTER OF Urgent inquiry into the Crown s actions concerning the Trans- Pacific Partnership Agreement APPLICATION
More informationAttorney- General Briefing for the Incoming Minister Ministry of Justice
Attorney- General 2017 Briefing for the Incoming Minister Ministry of Justice Contents The Attorney-General s role and responsibilities... 2 Key responsibilities... 3 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990...
More informationB e f o r e: MR JUSTICE BLAIR Between: THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF ABDULLAH Claimant
Neutral Citation Number: [2009] EWHC 1771 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No. CO/11937/2008 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Date:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC MALCOLM EDWARD RABSON Applicant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV-2016-485-781 [2016] NZHC 3162 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND the Judicature Amendment Act 1972 and s 27(2) of the New Zealand Bill of Rights
More informationWai 2566, # IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL Wai 2566 CONCERNING. the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND
Wai 2566, #2.5.2 IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL Wai 2566 CONCERNING the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND an application for an urgent hearing by Vernon Winitana on behalf of Ngati Ruapani DECISION OF THE DEPUTY
More informationBarristers and Solicitors
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON IN THE MATTER of the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012 AND IN THE MATTER of applications for marine
More informationBEFORE THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL
Wai 2523, #1.1.1 BEFORE THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL WAI IN THE MATTER OF The Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND IN THE MATTER OF Urgent inquiry into the Crown s actions concerning the Trans-Pacific Partnership
More informationLEGAL SYSTEMS/ LAW AND SOCIETY SUMMARY
LEGAL SYSTEMS/ LAW AND SOCIETY SUMMARY LAWSKOOL NEW ZEALAND Table of Contents Legal Systems and The Law... 7 The place of Law in society... 7 Structure of Laws... 7 Sources of Law... 7 The New Zealand
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules
THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules Part 1 General Authority and Purpose 1.1 These Rules are made pursuant to The Chartered Insurance Institute Disciplinary Regulations 2015.
More informationWai 2358: The Interim Report on the National Freshwater and Geothermal Resources Claim
Wai 2358: The Interim Report on the National Freshwater and Geothermal Resources Claim Te Wai Maori Trust has put together this short report which summarises and provides some commentary on the Waitangi
More informationThis code is applicable to all employees of Finbond Mutual Bank, including temporary employees.
POLICY NUMBER 1 DISCIPLINARY CODE OF CONDUCT A) Purpose The Disciplinary Code of Conduct acts as a guide and regulatory tool to both management and employees in the handling of disciplinary matters. The
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA169/04
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA169/04 BETWEEN AND TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Appellant ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF NEW ZEALAND Respondent Hearing: 9 September 2004 Coram: McGrath J Hammond J William
More informationINTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA
INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA YEAR 1998 11 March 1998 List of cases: No. 2 THE M/V "SAIGA" (No. 2) CASE (SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES v. GUINEA) Request for provisional measures ORDER
More informationIN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A UNDER Rule 4.10(3), Māori Land Court Rules Applicant
2018 Chief Judge s MB 842 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20180006300 UNDER Rule 4.10(3), Māori Land Court Rules 2011 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN Waitara East Section 81 B (Rohutu)
More informationBEFORE THE HEARINGS PANEL FOR THE CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL. Management Act 1991 AND. Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan
BEFORE THE HEARINGS PANEL FOR THE CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of Plan Change 5 to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan STATEMENT
More informationSpeech of H.E. Mr. Ronny Abraham, President of the International Court of Justice, to the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly
Speech of H.E. Mr. Ronny Abraham, President of the International Court of Justice, to the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly Mr. Chairman, Ladies and gentlemen, It is once again an honour for me to
More informationDECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL
Wai 2224, #2.5.8 WAITANGI TRIBUNAL Wai2224 CONCERNING the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 the Radio Spectrum and Telecommunications Urgent Claim DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL Introduction 1. On 4 July 2013 a statement
More information