Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media"

Transcription

1 Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media Authenticating, Admitting and Objecting to Admission of Evidence and Testimony THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Jeffrey Owen Anderson, Partner, Orsinger Nelson Downing & Anderson, Dallas Michael P. Judge, Esq., Burns & Levinson, Boston Sheri Lake, Partner, Smith & Lake, Decatur, Ga. The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions ed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at ext. 10.

2 Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

3 Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location Click the SEND button beside the box If you have purchased Strafford CLE processing services, you must confirm your participation by completing and submitting an Official Record of Attendance (CLE Form). You may obtain your CLE form by going to the program page and selecting the appropriate form in the PROGRAM MATERIALS box at the top right corner. If you'd like to purchase CLE credit processing, it is available for a fee. For additional information about CLE credit processing, go to our website or call us at ext. 35.

4 Program Materials FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the ^ symbol next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

5 EVIDENTIARY CHALLENGES IN DIVORCE CASES Sheri T. Lake, Esq. Smith & Lake, LLC Decatur, Georgia 5

6 I believe in evidence. I believe in observation, measurement, and reasoning, confirmed by independent observers. I'll believe anything, no matter how wild and ridiculous, if there is evidence for it. The wilder and more ridiculous something is, however, the firmer and more solid the evidence will have to be. Isaac Asimov, The Roving Mind 6

7 The Cornerstones of All Evidence: Relevance Authenticity Reliability 7

8 Relevance of Evidence (FRE ) First requirement of all evidence. Relevant evidence is any evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. 8

9 Authenticating Evidence (FRE ) The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility shall be satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. Authentication or identification under rule 901 merely involves the process of presenting sufficient evidence to make out a prima-facie case that the proffered evidence is what it purports to be. Once that prima-facie showing has been made, the evidence should be admitted, although it remains for the trier of fact to appraise whether the proffered evidence is in fact what it purports to be. 9

10 Self-Authenticating Evidence Non-public: Newspapers and magazines Inscriptions, signs or labels affixed in the course of business and indicating ownership, control or origin Notarized documents Commercial paper, instruments and documents related thereto Affidavits establishing the foundation for ordinary business records Public: Public records with a certificate or attestation by public officer 10

11 Reliability of Evidence: Hearsay (FRE ) Hearsay is an out of court statement by a non-testifying declarant offered for the truth of the matter asserted, i.e. Joe said he saw Husband s car at the mistress s house therefore Joe s car (and Joe) must have been at the mistress s house. Always look at: Exclusions: Prior inconsistent statements (impeaching a witness) Opposing party s statement Exceptions State of mind Present Sense impression Excited Utterance Reputation concerning character Business record Family records Public records Child s out of court statement regarding sexual contact or abuse (in some jurisdictions) 11

12 Practical Considerations for Hearsay Consider whether your state has any special hearsay exceptions relating to a child s out of court statement describing abuse For example, Georgia has a Child Hearsay Statute which allows for statements by the child describing any acts of sexual conduct or physical abuse to be admissible through the testimony of the person to whom the statements were made if the child is available to testify 12

13 Reliability of Evidence: Best Evidence Rule (FRE ) If there is an original piece of evidence, a writing, recording, or photograph, the original must be produced as an exhibit unless excused. For example, instead of having a witness testify about the contents of a video, the video must be played. Exceptions If a copy has the same content, it is admissible unless there are genuine issues regarding authenticity of the original. Summaries of voluminous records are allowed but the original records must be made available to the opposing party and Court. Contents may be proved by testimony, deposition or written statement of party against whom evidence is offered. 13

14 Lay witness opinion testimony (FRE 701) A lay witness may testify in the form of an opinion if the opinion is one that is: (1) Rationally based on the witness s perception (i.e. they have first-hand knowledge) (2) Helpful to clearly understanding the witness s testimony or to determining a fact at issue; and (3) Not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702 (expert testimony). 14

15 Considerations for lay witness opinions Lay witnesses may testify to fair market value of property (real or personal) if they have a reasonable basis for their opinion, i.e. I have researched what houses in our area currently sell for and are listed on the market for a based my estimate on that. Witness must testify to their personal opinion and may not be a conduit for others. Probative value and weight of the evidence and credibility of the witness is a question for the trier of fact. Lay witnesses may express opinions that logically flow from their observations, for example, speed of a car, cause of an accident, state of mind, or whether a person is intoxicated. Lay witnesses may not engage in speculation or conjecture. The distinction between lay and expert opinion is that lay testimony results from a process of reasoning familiar in everyday life, whereas expert testimony results from a process of reasoning that can only be mastered by specialists in the field. This specialized knowledge involves education or training, whether formal or informal. 15

16 Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases From Writings and Photographs to Text Messages and Social Media Michael P. Judge, Esq. 125 Summer Street Boston, Massachusetts burnslev.com

17 ORIGINAL EVIDENCE RULE When does it apply? Often referred to as the Best Evidence Rule Governed by FRE Rule requires the use of an original writing or photograph to prove content if content is the central issue. Duplicates are generally allowed, unless a genuine question is raised about the original s authenticity or it is unfair to admit a duplicate. The burden is on opponent to raise dispute. 17

18 DEFINITIONS Writings: Documents which consist of words, numbers and recordings. Photographs: Include photographs, x-rays, video tapes and motion pictures. Original: The writing or record itself, or any copy intended to have same effect. Duplicate: A copy of a writing or record, not intended to be original. Secondary evidence 18

19 INTRODUCTION OF WRITING INTO EVIDENCE Writing must be authenticated to be admitted, except as provided by statute or common law. Requires proper foundation. Writing must be trustworthy. Testimony that may be otherwise inadmissible, may be admitted to prove the content of the writing because the original is lost, destroyed, or beyond the reach of a subpoena. 19

20 MASSACHUSETTS BEST EVIDENCE RULE Where the original has been lost, destroyed, or otherwise made unavailable, its production may be excused and other evidence of its contents will be admissible, provided that certain findings are made: 20

21 ADMISSIBILITY OF OTHER EVIDENCE OF CONTENTS Original is lost or destroyed. Original is not obtainable. Original in possession of party opponent. Collateral matters (writing or record is not closely related to a controlling issue). 21

22 EXCEPTIONS TO BEST EVIDENCE Writings or records admissible by common law or statute: Official or Business Records (Foreign or Domestic) ex. M.G.L. c. 233, 79G.(Medical bills and medical records) In Massachusetts, the Best Evidence rule does not apply to party admissions. 22

23 HOW TO PROPERLY ADMIT A SUMMARY Governed by F.R.E Purpose: In the court s discretion, litigants may use summary charts, spreadsheets, diagrams, or graphs to condense what is otherwise voluminous admissible evidence. Some states, like Massachusetts, do not allow summaries to be evidence. Rather, they are called chalks, and are used to summarize information that is otherwise admissible. 23

24 PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING A SUMMARY How to admit a summary: Must use actual data to compile a summary. Example: Summarize the number of times a spouse withdrew funds from a retirement or investment account(s) over a certain period of time.the summary is an aid to the Court to highlight the evidence sought to be introduced, which is otherwise voluminous. 24

25 EXAMPLE OF A SUMMARY EXHIBIT DATE INSTITUTION ACCOUNT AMOUNT 1/1/2014 LPL (Exh. A) Brokerage $15,000 2/1/2014 Merrill Lynch (Exh. B) IRA $10,000 3/1/2014 Fidelity (Exh. C) 401K $25,000 4/1/2014 Mass Mutual (Exh. D) Roth IRA $20,000 5/1/2014 ING (Exh. E) Money Market $25,000 6/1/2014 Fidelity (Exh. F) IRA $5,000 TOTAL WITHDRAWALS: $100,000 25

26 PROCEDURE FOR ADMISSION OF A SUMMARY A witness must prepare and authenticate a summary. The witness takes the stand to testify. A proper foundation needs to be laid. The summary needs to be an accurate reflection of the otherwise voluminous documents. 26

27 PROCEDURE FOR ADMISSION OF A SUMMARY (continued): Ask the witness if the actual bank statements are voluminous and properly documented in the summary. To sustain an objection, you must make sure that the actual, summarized records. You should make the records to be summarized, available to the opposition. Most judges will allow this into evidence pursuant to FRE

28 EXAMPLES OF SUMMARIES IN FAMILY LAW Bank, investment, and retirement account statements. Asset summaries. Cellular telephone records. Bank deposit records. Job search records. Records of ATM withdrawals. 28

29 INTRODUCTION OF SUMMARY Rule 1006 of the Texas Rules of Evidence Questions to ask witness: I am handing you what I have marked as Petitioner s Exhibit 1. Will you please identify this for me? Did you prepare this with the aid of my office (or did you prepare this)? 29

30 INTRODUCTION OF SUMMARY (continued) Were you familiar with the underlying facts and documentation that went into the preparation of this document? Does this document accurately reflect the underlying facts and documentation as you understand them? If I were to ask you about each and every item on this document, would your answer be in conformity with what is there written? 30

31 USE OF SUMMARY IN MASSACHUSETTS The content of voluminous writings or records which cannot conveniently be examined in court may be presented in the form of a summary, chart, or the like, which accurately reflects the contents of the underlying records. The originals or duplicates may be available for inspection or copying by the opponent. The summary is not an exhibit, but the court will accept the summary as an aid to the court. 31

32 Jeffrey Owen Anderson Orsinger Nelson Downing & Anderson

33 Demonstrative Evidence is important because it has a persuasive and compelling effect in court: Used to describe/explain concepts that are difficult or impossible to verbalize 33

34 Admissibility of Demonstrative Evidence: Trial judge has a broad latitude to admit or deny demonstrative evidence To obtain a reversal based on error in admission of evidence, a losing party must show more than the ruling was error. In family court, we often use summaries of testimony to help condense a large amount of information for the trial judge: The admission of summaries of testimony is within the broad discretion of the trial judge, and we often see trial judges admit such evidence 34

35 In order to admit a demonstrative aid, the following should be known: 1. The witness recognized the exhibit; 2. The exhibit will assist the witness in testifying; 3. The matter reasonably depicts what is offered to represent. 35

36 In order to admit demonstrative evidence, the following should be known: 1. The exhibit is a fair and accurate representation of what it purports to represent; 2. The exhibit will assist the witness in testifying; 3. It will help the trier of fact to better understand that testimony. 36

37 Hearsay is a statement, other than the one made by the declarant when testifying at a trial or hearing, that is being offered as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. A statement is defined as any written or oral expression, or even nonverbal conduct of a person, if that conduct is intended to substitute for verbal expression. The matter asserted is any matter explicitly and implied by a statement, if not the probative value of the statement as offered, flows from declarant s belief as to the matter. 37

38 What is not Hearsay (and therefore admissible): Admission by a party-opponent Depositions in the same proceedings Prior statements by a witness 38

39 Hearsay is not admissible unless it falls within a statutory exception. Regardless of the availability of a declarant as a witness, the following are statements that are not excluded by the hearsay rule: Present sense impression Excited Utterance Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition Statements made for purposes of medical treatment or diagnosis Recorded Recollection 39

40 Records of regularly recorded activity Absence of entry in records kept in the ordinary course of business Public records and reports Records of vital statistics Absence of public record of entry Religious organization records Marriage, Baptismal and similar certificates Family records 40

41 Hearsay Statement of Child Abuse Victim pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article Prerecorded Statement of a Child as provided in Texas Family Code

42 Remote Televised Broadcast of Testimony of Child as provided by Texas Family Code Hearsay Statement of a Child Abuse Victim pursuant to Texas Family Code

43 Introducing Exhibits Practical Considerations Where time permits, exchange exhibits prior to hearing or trial and stipulate to their admissibility. When possible, pre-mark exhibits for efficiency. Bring at least 3 copies, one for opposing counsel, one for the witness and one for the judge. Always show opposing counsel the exhibit, or give them a copy, prior to approaching the witness. Ask for permission to approach the witness for purposes of identification. Once preliminary questions have been asked, make sure you move to admit the exhibit. Keep a list of admitted exhibits. Consider if the exhibit will be more effective blown up or displayed through assistive technology? 43

44 Introducing a Handwritten Note [Q] Mrs. Witness, handing you what s been marked as Plaintiff s Exhibit 1 for identification purposes, do you recognize this? [A] Yes. [Q] Can you identify what it is? [A] It is a letter the Defendant wrote to me. [Q] How do you know this letter is from Defendant and not someone else? [A] I recognize his handwriting from other writings I ve observed in the time we were married. Alternatives: [A] The handwritten letter has specific information that only he and I know. [A] I saw him write the letter. 44

45 45

46 46

47 Introducing a Typewritten Note [Q] Mrs. Witness, handing you what s been marked as Plaintiff s Exhibit 1 for identification purposes, do you recognize this? [A] Yes. [Q] Can you identify what it is? [A] It is a typed letter the Defendant wrote to me. [Q] How do you know this letter is from Defendant and not someone else? [A] It has specific information that only he and I know. Alternatives: [A] It was on the family computer that is password protected and only he and I have the password. [A] He gave it to me and stated he wrote it. 47

48 48

49 Introducing Social Media [Q] Mrs. Witness, handing you what s been marked as Plaintiff s Exhibit 1 for identification purposes, do you recognize this? [A] Yes. [Q] Can you identify what it is? [A] It is a page from the Defendant s Facebook page dated November 23, [Q] Do you have access to Defendant s Facebook page? [A] Yes, I am Defendant s Facebook friend and I can see her profile on Facebook. (Alternatively, My daughter is Defendant s Facebook friend and I viewed Defendant s Facebook profile through my daugher s login information, which she provided to me. ) [Q] How do you know this is from Defendant s Facebook page and not from some other person s Facebook page. [A] The page identifies Defendant by her name, and the profile picture is of Defendant. 49

50 Introducing Picture 50

51 51

52 Introducing Pictures [Q] Did you take pictures of your home prior to moving out? [A] I did. [Q] Handing you what s been marked collectively as Defendant s Exhibit # 5 for identification purposes; do you recognize these photographs? [A] Yes, these are the pictures I took of my home the day I moved out. [Q] Are each of these photos fair and accurate representations of your home as it appeared the day you moved out? [A] Yes. 52

53 53

54 54

55 Introducing Pictures [Q] Are you concerned that your wife has an alcohol abuse problem? [A] I do. [Q] Have you seen her drink alcoholic drinks in the home? [A] Yes. [Q] Did you take pictures of alcoholic beverages that your wife drinks in the home? [A] I did. [Q] When did you take the photographs? [A] I took the photographs on March 1, [Q] Handing you what s been marked collectively as Defendant s Exhibit # 6 for identification purposes; do you recognize these photographs? [A] Yes, these are the pictures I took of the different bottles of alcoholic beverages in our home. [Q] Are each of these photos fair and accurate representations of the bottles of alcoholic beverages in your home when you took the photos on March 1, 2012? [A] Yes. 55

56 56

57 57

58 58

59 QUESTIONS? Sheri T. Lake, Esq. Smith & Lake, LLC (404)

60 HOW TO INTRODUCE AN OR TEXT MESSAGE Authentication of the electronic or digital communication is necessary. Confirming circumstances are needed which allow a reasonable fact finder to conclude that this evidence is what it claims to be. Identify the address or phone number from the message. What is the date of the or text? 60

61 HOW TO INTRODUCE AN OR TEXT MESSAGE (continued): Who is the sender of the or text? Who is the recipient of the or text? How did you get the or text? Show the reproduction of the text or . Put the or text in the proper context. 61

62 SAMPLE To: Jane Smith From: John Smith Date: January 1, 2015 Re: Spousal Support Jane: I hate you! If you want alimony from me, you will have to pull it from my cold, dead hands. Happy New Year! John 62

63 S, TEXT MESSAGE & BEST EVIDENCE In Massachusetts, the use of s and text messages is not forbidden by the Best Evidence rule, even though there is no original in the traditional sense. In Massachusetts, the marital disqualification does not apply to writings, including s and text messages. Commonwealth v. Szczuka, 391 Mass. 666, 678, n. 14 (1984). 63

64 Over the years, courts have become more receptive toward electronic evidence and social media Social media information can make or break a case Individuals often fail to restrict access to their social media profiles Attorneys can perform a simple public internet search to obtain unfiltered evidence of his/her relationships, emotions, thoughts, and activities Attorneys can also obtain this information through the discovery process 64

65 Exhibits containing website information (including social media) are subject to the same requirements of authentication and admissibility as other paper documents 65

66 Evidence Rule 901(a) provides that the requirement of authentication as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent proclaims Rule 901 does not erect a particularly high hurdle, and that hurdle mar be cleared by circumstantial evidence 66

67 In a jury trial, the preliminary question for the trial court to decide is simply whether or not the proponent of the proffered evidence has supplied facts that are sufficient to support a reasonable jury determination that the evidence is authentic 67

68 Raises three separate issues: 1. What was actually on the website? 2. Does the exhibit accurately reflect it? 3. Is it attributable to the owner of the site? 68

69 Although courts generally have moved away from a categorical distrust of websites, they have demanded different amounts of supporting material before accepting a website as authenticated. Information downloaded from an established website of well-known business will most likely need less proof to authenticate the document as opposed to a less credible or known website. 69

70 The production of a document in response to written discovery authenticates the document for use against that party unless within 10 days or a longer or shorter time ordered by the court, after the producing party has actual notice that the document will be used the party objects to the authenticity of the document. If an objection is properly made then the party attempting to rely on the document will be given a reasonable opportunity to establish its authenticity. 70

71 1. Evidence Rule 902: Is an exception to the general manner in which documents must be authenticated. The rule provides a list documents that are self-authenticating, meaning that the proponent of the document does not have to provide extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility. Many of the items listed under this rule can be obtained from different internet sources. 71

72 The following is a list of such documents found under Evidence Rule 902: 1. Domestic public documents under seal; 2. Domestic public documents not under seal; 3. Foreign public documents; 4. Certified copies of public records; 5. Official publications; 6. Newspapers and periodicals; 7. Trade inscriptions and the like; 8. Acknowledged documents; 9. Commercial paper and related documents; 10. Business records accompanied by affidavit. 72

73 For example, some courts have considered printouts from government-run websites to self-authenticating official publications under Rule 902(5), as long as the printout displays the website URL and date of access 73

74 Evidence Rule 901(b) provides a nonexhaustive list of methods to satisfy the general authentication requirements of Rule 901(a) 74

75 Attorneys trying to authenticate exhibits that have information from the Internet websites would most likely rely upon, singly or in combination, the following subsections of Rule 901(b): The testimony of a witness with knowledge who can testify that a matter is what it is claimed to be. Rule 901(b)(1). Expert Testimony Rule. Rule 901(b)(3). 75

76 The Distinctive Characteristics of the Website Rule 901(b)(4). Public Records Rule 901(b)(7) System or process capable of producing a reliable result Rule 901(b)(9) Official Publications Rule 901(b)(5) The amount of evidence will vary with the type of website. The two common methods generally used for websites are Rule 901(b)(1) and Rule 901(b)(4). 76

77 Assume Attorney A wants to get a social media page printout into evidence and the witness is author of the printout. What would Attorney A ask the witness to get the printout into evidence? 1. Witness has a login and password for social media account; 2. Witness recognizes the exhibit; 3. Witness authored the words on the exhibit OR witness believes the words in the exhibit are true 4. The exhibit accurately reflects the page as it appeared on that day; and 5. Witness authored the words on the printout 77

78 Now assume that the Witness is not the Author of the Printout: 1. Witness printed the exhibit; 2. Witness is familiar with the computer and printer used to print the exhibit; and 3. The exhibit accurately depicts the web site as it appeared on that day. 78

79 In Tienda v. State (out of the Court of Criminal Appears), the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting printouts from MySpace pages with sufficient distinctive characteristics to establish that defendant created them; pages contained photos of defendant, references to murder victim, details of shooting, mentions of defendant s gang, and references to defendant s widely known nickname as well. Different social media profiles often have photos, background information, commentary, and other distinctive characteristics of the user that can be offered to authenticate the content of the website. 79

80 Character Evidence: Whether social media evidence is improper character evidence Evidence of the person s character or trait is not admissible for the purpose of proving action in conformity therewith on a particular occasion. 80

81 Hearsay: Most of the information attorneys will seek to admit from social media websites (other than photographs) will qualify as out-of-court statements potentially subject to the hearsay rule. However, because these statements are typically admissions by a party opponent, are not offered for their truth, or fall within a hearsay exception, they are generally not excluded under the hearsay rule. 81

82 A statement is not hearsay if it is offered against a party and it is the own party s statements, in either an individual or representative capacity. A party cannot offer its own out-of-court statement as admissions. 82

83 Even if a statement from a social media website is not an admission by a party opponent, it may me admissible because it is not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. To prove that they had knowledge of the information, or to explain what they did after having heard it. An out-of-court statement that is offered to show its effect on the hearer s state of mind is not hearsay and courts will admit statements from social media websites for impeachment purposes as prior inconsistent statements. 83

84 If the statements fall within these exceptions then they are not excluded as hearsay: Present Sense Impression; The existing mental, emotional, or physical condition; or Excited Utterance 84

85 Rule 902(10): Business records accompanied by a properly phrased and executed affidavit are self-authenticating under rule 902(10). Using this rule will save time for the court, parties, and businesses. Be sure to look at the rules regarding the filing time for business records affidavits. In Texas, the business records affidavit must be on file for 14 days before a trial or hearing. 85

86 If a business record is introduced without an affidavit, then the testimony of a custodian of records or another qualified person must be present at a hearing or trial in order to properly authenticate the documents. 86

87 Under the business records exception Rule 803(6), evidence becomes admissible if the person offering the evidence shows that: 1. The records were made and kept in the ordinary course of business; 2. It was the regular practice of the business activity to create such records; 3. The records were created at or near the time of the event recorded; 4. And the records were created by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge who was acting in the regular course of business. 87

88 This rule is very broad: Business records includes reports, memorandums, records, or data compilations The requirement that the records be created at or near the time of the event recorded is based on the probability that the recorder in the particular case will be accurate in the specific entry, not so much as in the amount of time passed by between the recording and the event or act. The person with knowledge can have the facts in the business records transmitted to them as long as each person in the chain of reporting has a duty to report. The duty to report holds to ensure the accuracy and trustworthiness. 88

89 Questions to ask Witness: 1. Witness is custodian or other person with knowledge of the business filing system; 2. The record was made in the ordinary course of business; 3. The record was made at or near the time of the event in question; 4. In the regular course of business, a person with knowledge made the record or was furnished with the information for the record; and 5. It was the regular practice of that business activity to make such a record. 89

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Admissibility of Electronic Evidence PAUL W. GRIMM AND KEVIN F. BRADY 2018 Potential Authentication Methods Email, Text Messages, and Instant Messages Trade inscriptions (902(7)) Certified copies of business

More information

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy

More information

Summary Judgment Motions: Advanced Strategies for Civil Litigation

Summary Judgment Motions: Advanced Strategies for Civil Litigation Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Summary Judgment Motions: Advanced Strategies for Civil Litigation Weighing the Risk of Showing Your Hand, Leveraging Discovery Tools and Timing,

More information

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A E-Signatures and Electronic Loan Documentation in Real Estate Finance: ESIGN and UETA, Interplay With UCC Enforceability, Authentication and Admissibility;

More information

Deposing Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Witnesses

Deposing Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Witnesses Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Deposing Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Witnesses Preparing the Deposition Notice, Questioning the Corporate Representative, Raising and Defending Objections,

More information

Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers*

Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers* John Rubin UNC School of Government Rev d May 19, 2011 Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers* The defendant allegedly made a statement in the form of an email, text message,

More information

DOCUMENTARY, VOICE IDENTIFICATION AND E-EVIDENCE -- FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS W. David Lee Superior Court Judges Fall Conference October 23-26, 2007

DOCUMENTARY, VOICE IDENTIFICATION AND E-EVIDENCE -- FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS W. David Lee Superior Court Judges Fall Conference October 23-26, 2007 DOCUMENTARY, VOICE IDENTIFICATION AND E-EVIDENCE -- FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS W. David Lee Superior Court Judges Fall Conference October 23-26, 2007 Court rules governing the authentication of traditional

More information

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive

TRIAL OBJECTIONS. Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive TRIAL OBJECTIONS Albert E. Durkin, Esq. Miroballi Durkin & Rudin LLC Considerations Effect on the jury Scrutinous Judiciously Effective/Disruptive Will the answer hurt your case? Protecting the record

More information

Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes

Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes Negotiating Exhaustion of Infringing Materials, Restrictions on Future Trademark

More information

Evidence. Admissibility of Social Media Evidence in Illinois

Evidence. Admissibility of Social Media Evidence in Illinois January 2017 Volume 105 Number 1 Page 38 The Magazine of Illinois Lawyers Evidence Admissibility of Social Media Evidence in Illinois By Richard S. Kling, Khalid Hasan, and Martin D. Gould Social media

More information

Leveraging USPTO Technology Evolution Pilot Program

Leveraging USPTO Technology Evolution Pilot Program Presenting a live 60-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Leveraging USPTO Technology Evolution Pilot Program Amending Identifications of Goods and Services in Trademark Registration TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15,

More information

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq.

Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. Evidence Presented by: Ervin Gonzalez, Esq. This seminar focuses on the fundamentals of evidence in Florida including documentary evidence, demonstrative evidence, expert testimony, trial objectives and

More information

ARTICLE IX. AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION

ARTICLE IX. AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION 225 Rule 901 ARTICLE IX. AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence. 902. Evidence That is Self-Authenticating. 903. Subscribing

More information

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Michael A. Brusca, Shareholder, Stark & Stark, Lawrenceville, N.J.

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Michael A. Brusca, Shareholder, Stark & Stark, Lawrenceville, N.J. Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Personal Injury Opening Statements and Closing Arguments: Preparing and Delivering, Handling Objections and Related Motions Developing and Presenting

More information

Admissibility of Social Media Evidence in Illinois

Admissibility of Social Media Evidence in Illinois BY RICHARD S. KLING, KHALID HASAN, AND MARTIN D. GOULD RICHARD S. KLING is a practicing criminal defense attorney and Clinical Professor of Law at Chicago Kent College of Law in Chicago, where he has been

More information

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope

Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS. Rule 101. Scope Oklahoma High School Mock Trial Program RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope These Simplified Federal Rules of Evidence (Mock Trial Version) govern the trial proceedings of the

More information

Thinking Evidentially

Thinking Evidentially Thinking Evidentially Writing & Arguing Powerful Motions October 17, 2013 2013 www.rossdalecle.com Presentation of Proof Plaintiff (or prosecutor) presents case-in-chief, then rests; When witnesses are

More information

Original Writing Privilege Relevance Authentication Hearsay. Donald Beskind, Raleigh Attorney

Original Writing Privilege Relevance Authentication Hearsay. Donald Beskind, Raleigh Attorney June 2009 Original Writing Privilege Relevance Authentication Hearsay Donald Beskind, Raleigh Attorney 15 year-old Johnnie is accused of communicating threats to 14 year-old George. During the adjudication

More information

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Legal Opinions for Article 9 Security Interests: Navigating the Complexities and Avoiding Liability Scope and Limitations, Interests of

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (updated 10/07) In American trials complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to

More information

Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses

Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23,

More information

RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS

RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS Digital evidence or electronic evidence is any probative information stored or transmitted in digital form that a party to a court case may use at trial. The use of digital

More information

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice,

Index. Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, Administrative Rules Judicial notice, Index References in this index from 900 to 911 are to sections of the Wisconsin Rules of Evidence, and references from 1 to 33 are to chapters of this book. A Adjudicative Facts Judicial notice, 902.01

More information

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Satya Narayan, Attorney, Royse Law Firm, Palo Alto, Calif.

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Satya Narayan, Attorney, Royse Law Firm, Palo Alto, Calif. Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Nondisclosure Agreements for Information Technology Transactions Negotiating Key Provisions and Exclusions, Navigating Challenges for Information

More information

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE

EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE Recognized Objections I. Authority RULE OBJECTION PAGE 001/002 Outside the Scope of the Ordinance 3 II. Rules of Form RULE OBJECTION PAGE RULE OBJECTION PAGE 003 Leading 3 004

More information

Social Media Evidence in Personal Injury Litigation: Admissibility Challenges

Social Media Evidence in Personal Injury Litigation: Admissibility Challenges Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Social Media Evidence in Personal Injury Litigation: Admissibility Challenges Navigating Authentication, Relevance and Hearsay Issues to Keep Out

More information

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources...

Contents. Dedication... v. About the Author... xvii. Acknowledgments... xix. Foreword... xxi. Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources... Dedication... v About the Author... xvii Acknowledgments... xix Foreword... xxi Preface... xxv A Note about Primary Sources... xxvi Chapter 1 Trial Process and Procedure... 1 The Role of the Trial Judge

More information

Defeating Liability Waivers in Personal Injury Cases: Substantive and Procedural Strategies

Defeating Liability Waivers in Personal Injury Cases: Substantive and Procedural Strategies Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Defeating Liability Waivers in Personal Injury Cases: Substantive and Procedural Strategies THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 2015 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am

More information

HIPAA Compliance During Litigation and Discovery

HIPAA Compliance During Litigation and Discovery Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A HIPAA Compliance During Litigation and Discovery Safeguarding PHI and Avoiding Violations When Responding to Subpoenas and Discovery Requests THURSDAY,

More information

Memorandum from Thomas Isely 1. Items of Evidence 2. Letter from John Paul Ripka, Investigator 3. Walker on Evidence in the Franklin Courts 5

Memorandum from Thomas Isely 1. Items of Evidence 2. Letter from John Paul Ripka, Investigator 3. Walker on Evidence in the Franklin Courts 5 MPT 3: Rivera v. Baldisari Amusement Parks, Inc. FILE Memorandum from Thomas Isely 1 Items of Evidence 2 Letter from John Paul Ripka, Investigator 3 LIBRARY Walker on Evidence in the Franklin Courts 5

More information

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features: Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A In House Counsel Depositions: Navigating Complex Legal and Ethical Issues Responding to Deposition Notices and Subpoenas and Protecting Privileged

More information

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading

Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading Why? Test Specific Knowledge Course Coverage Test Critical Reading Objective Grading Part of a Continuum MBE Essay PT Memorize law Critical reading Identify relevant facts Marshal facts Communication skills

More information

E-Discovery Best Practices: Admissibility

E-Discovery Best Practices: Admissibility E-Discovery Best Practices: Admissibility Electronic evidence, no matter how probative it may be, is useless if it cannot be used in court. Thus, from the outset of a case, practitioners must pay careful

More information

Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers*

Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers* John Rubin, May 2011 UNC School of Government Rev d by Shea Denning, April 2013 Admissibility of Electronic Writings: Some Questions and Answers* The defendant allegedly made a statement in the form of

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question While driving their cars, Paula

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dave brought his sports car into

More information

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) 2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that

More information

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) (ADOPTED 9/4/2012) INDEX ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101 Scope... 1 Rule 102 Purpose and Construction... 1 ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE... 1 Rule 201

More information

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE

2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE 2011 RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"

More information

INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS

INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS What are exhibits? Exhibits are types of evidence that are tangible. There are basically four types of exhibits. First, there is real evidence (the gun involved

More information

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE

American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Last Updated: January 6, 2014 American Mock Trial Association MIDLANDS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I. Rule 101. Scope; Definitions (a) Scope. These rules apply to proceedings in the courts of the State of

More information

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804

Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 Hearsay Exceptions Rules 803 and 804 These exceptions are allowed because the rules feel that they have inherent indicia of reliability. Therefore, they can be allowed even though they re hearsay. The

More information

Litigating Employment Discrimination

Litigating Employment Discrimination Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Litigating Employment Discrimination Claims: Filing in State vs. Federal Court Evaluating Substantive and Procedural Advantages and Risks of Each

More information

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. EVIDENCE

FULL OUTLINE. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM.  EVIDENCE FULL OUTLINE www.barexamdoctor.com EVIDENCE I. RELEVANCE a. Definition i. Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the

More information

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMITTEE ON RULES OF EVIDENCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING. Proposed Amendment of Comment to Pa.R.E.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMITTEE ON RULES OF EVIDENCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING. Proposed Amendment of Comment to Pa.R.E. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMITTEE ON RULES OF EVIDENCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Proposed Amendment of Comment to Pa.R.E. 901 and 902 Proposed amendment of Pa.R.E. 901 and 902 governing authentication

More information

Lay Witness and Expert Witness Depositions in Personal Injury Cases: Advanced Deposition Techniques

Lay Witness and Expert Witness Depositions in Personal Injury Cases: Advanced Deposition Techniques Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Lay Witness and Expert Witness Depositions in Personal Injury Cases: Advanced Deposition Techniques Leveraging Restatement, Summarization, Boxing-In

More information

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003

RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article I. General Provisions 101. Scope 102. Purpose and Construction RULES OF EVIDENCE Pennsylvania Mock Trial Version 2003 Article IV. Relevancy and its Limits 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"

More information

Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions

Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions Leveraging the Appeals Process and Courts to Overcome ICANN Determinations Absent

More information

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE

DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE DELAWARE HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF EVIDENCE In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that

More information

Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser

Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser Power Point Presentation By Rachel Scott Decker Ward Black Law 208 West Wendover Avenue Greensboro, North Carolina 27401 (336) 273-3812 www.wardblacklaw.com Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser Since

More information

What if the other parent is not making child support payments? The court will consider whether a parent is helping to support their child.

What if the other parent is not making child support payments? The court will consider whether a parent is helping to support their child. How Does the Court Decide Which Parent Should Have Custody? Will the Court ask what I want? The court will allow each parent to tell who the child should live with and why. Will the Court ask my child

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dustin has been charged with participating

More information

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice Impeachment by omission Impeachment for inconsistent statement The Evidence Dance Opening Statement Tip Twice Closing Argument The Love Boat Story: A Vicious Tale Top Six Objections Evidence Review Housekeeping

More information

Preparing for and Navigating PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit

Preparing for and Navigating PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Preparing for and Navigating PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit Conducting PTAB Trials With Eye to Appeal, Determining Errors for Appeal, Understanding

More information

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW SIMULATED MBE ANALYSIS: EVIDENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT PUSHAW PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW Editor's Note 1: This handout contains a detailed answer explanation for each Evidence question that appeared

More information

58 th Mid-Year Meeting Introducing Evidence in Family Court

58 th Mid-Year Meeting Introducing Evidence in Family Court Vermont Bar Association Seminar Materials 58 th Mid-Year Meeting Introducing Evidence in Family Court March 20, 2014 Hilton Burlington, VT Faculty: Hon. Amy Davenport Priscilla Bondy Dubé, Esq. Christopher

More information

Defeating Rule 23(b)(3)'s Predominance Requirement Using Defenses and Counterclaims

Defeating Rule 23(b)(3)'s Predominance Requirement Using Defenses and Counterclaims Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Defeating Rule 23(b)(3)'s Predominance Requirement Using Defenses and Counterclaims Evaluating Effectiveness of Strategy in Light of Differing Lower

More information

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO STRIKE

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO STRIKE Neponset Landing Corporation v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Doc. 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NEPONSET LANDING CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff/Defendant-in-Counterclaim,

More information

AUTHENTICATION AND ORIGINAL WRITINGS

AUTHENTICATION AND ORIGINAL WRITINGS AUTHENTICATION AND ORIGINAL WRITINGS W. David Lee Superior Court Judge, District 20B Advanced Criminal Evidence Seminar May 22, 2008 I. Standard for Authenticating Verbal and Physical Evidence A. GENERAL

More information

Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy: Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of Bankruptcy and Environmental Laws

Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy: Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of Bankruptcy and Environmental Laws Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy: Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of Bankruptcy and Environmental Laws Addressing Pre- vs. Post-Petition

More information

Article III Standing and Rule 23(b)(3) Certification: Emerging Litigation Trends

Article III Standing and Rule 23(b)(3) Certification: Emerging Litigation Trends Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Article III Standing and Rule 23(b)(3) Certification: Emerging Litigation Trends Strategies for Plaintiff and Defense Counsel to Pursue or Challenge

More information

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions in Employment Litigation

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions in Employment Litigation Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Responding to a Deposition Notice, Selecting and Preparing

More information

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES

TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES K.I.S.S. TOP TEN NEW EVIDENCE RULES Paul S. Milich Georgia State University College of Law Atlanta, Georgia 1 of 9 Institute of Continuing Legal Education K.I.S.S Keep It Short & Simple November 14, 2014

More information

The Most Common Foundations for Exhibits Francis J. Carney

The Most Common Foundations for Exhibits Francis J. Carney The Most Common Foundations for Exhibits Francis J. Carney 1. Photographs a. Establish familiarity with scene depicted. b. Mark and show photo. c. Establish that the photo accurately depicts scene. Shiozawa

More information

Spoliation of Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: Mitigation and Prevention

Spoliation of Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: Mitigation and Prevention Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Spoliation of Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: Mitigation and Prevention Identifying and Responding to Potential Evidence Spoliation and Drafting

More information

Evidentiary Disclosures in Parallel Criminal and Civil Proceedings

Evidentiary Disclosures in Parallel Criminal and Civil Proceedings Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Evidentiary Disclosures in Parallel Criminal and Civil Proceedings Navigating the Discovery Minefield and Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege WEDNESDAY,

More information

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence

The Nuts & Bolts of the Rules of Evidence Vicki Voisin, ACP And Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. 2011 Vicki Voisin, Inc. and Allen R. Telgenhof, Esq. All rights reserved. No part of this handout may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic

More information

Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests

Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests Drafting Defensible Opinions and Minimizing

More information

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section)

COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) COMMON OBJECTIONS CHART (excluding Hearsay, covered in next section) Rev. January 2015 This chart was prepared by Children s Law Center as a practice aid for attorneys representing children, parents, family

More information

The following items of evidence are self-authenticating; they require no extrinsic evidence of authenticity in order to be admitted:

The following items of evidence are self-authenticating; they require no extrinsic evidence of authenticity in order to be admitted: Rule 902. Evidence That Is Self-Authenticating The following items of evidence are self-authenticating; they require no extrinsic evidence of authenticity in order to be admitted: (1) Domestic Public Documents

More information

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC

Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and:

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Paul sued David in federal court

More information

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question.

Example: (1) Your honor, (2) I object (3) to that question (4) because it is a compound question. MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Criminal trials are conducted using strict rules of evidence to promote fairness. To participate in a Mock Trial, you need to know its rules of evidence. The California

More information

Mexico's New Anti-Corruption Laws and Implementing Regulations: Private Entities and Individuals in the Crosshairs

Mexico's New Anti-Corruption Laws and Implementing Regulations: Private Entities and Individuals in the Crosshairs Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Mexico's New Anti-Corruption Laws and Implementing Regulations: Private Entities and Individuals in the Crosshairs Key Provisions, Ensuring Compliance

More information

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Rules of Evidence (Abridged) Article IV: Relevancy and its Limits Rule 401. Test for Relevant Evidence Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would

More information

TRIAL DOCUMENTS PROVING, TENDERING AND CROSS-EXAMINATION

TRIAL DOCUMENTS PROVING, TENDERING AND CROSS-EXAMINATION TRIAL DOCUMENTS PROVING, TENDERING AND CROSS-EXAMINATION I take my topic to require a discussion of the use of documents in one s own case evidence in chief and in the opponent s case cross-examination.

More information

Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions

Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions Defining Scope, Limitations and Key Terms; Minimizing Liability Risks for Opinion Giver THURSDAY,

More information

Recanting Victims 7/19/2018. Goals of Presentation. Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial

Recanting Victims 7/19/2018. Goals of Presentation. Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial Recanting Victims SIMONE HYLTON SENIOR ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY STONE MOUNTAIN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Goals of Presentation Give effective ways of dealing with recanting victims pre-trial Give tools to use

More information

E. Expert Testimony Issue. 1. Defendants may assert that before any photographs or video evidence from a camera

E. Expert Testimony Issue. 1. Defendants may assert that before any photographs or video evidence from a camera In the wake of the passage of the state law pertaining to so-called red light traffic cameras, [See Acts 2008, Public Chapter 962, effective July 1, 2008, codified at Tenn. Code Ann. 55-8- 198 (Supp. 2009)],

More information

E-Discovery and Spoliation Issues: Litigation Pitfalls, Duty to Preserve, and Claw-Back Agreements

E-Discovery and Spoliation Issues: Litigation Pitfalls, Duty to Preserve, and Claw-Back Agreements Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A E-Discovery and Spoliation Issues: Litigation Pitfalls, Duty to Preserve, and Claw-Back Agreements THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm

More information

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Summary Judgment Motions in Wage and Hour Class and Collective Actions: Pre- and Post-Certification Strategies Disposing of or Limiting Claims,

More information

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq.

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Lorraine E. Parker, Esq. Lauren E. Sykes, Esq. Krista Maher, Esq. LIST OF CHAPTERS Chapter 1 PRETRIAL.............................................. 1 Joseph J. Mellon, Esq. Chapter 2 MOTIONS IN LIMINE................................... 17 Thomas J. Tomazin, Esq. Chapter

More information

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline

EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline EVIDENCE CALIFORNIA DISTINCTIONS Bar Exam Outline Law applying to both FRE & CEC is in black Law applying to FRE only is in blue Law applying to CEC only is in red WHEN TO APPLY CALIFORNIA LAW - only on

More information

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Federal Rules of Evidence Federal Rules of Evidence ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 101. Scope Rule 102. Purpose and Construction Rule 103. Rulings on Evidence Rule 104. Preliminary Questions Rule

More information

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1 DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE Title 6 Page 1 TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 GENERAL 6-1-1 Scope, Purpose and Construction 6-1-2

More information

E-Signatures and Electronic Loan Documentation: Complying with ESIGN/UETA, Interplay With the UCC

E-Signatures and Electronic Loan Documentation: Complying with ESIGN/UETA, Interplay With the UCC Presenting a 90-Minute Encore Presentation of the Webinar with Live, Interactive Q&A E-Signatures and Electronic Loan Documentation: Complying with ESIGN/UETA, Interplay With the UCC Navigating Issues

More information

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE

MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Revised August 2015 Rules Unique to Middle School Mock Trial I. Invention of Facts and Extrapolation The object of these rules is to prevent a team

More information

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 136 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 136 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed /0/0 Page of VICTORIA K. HALL (SBN 00 LAW OFFICE OF VICTORIA K. HALL 0 N. Washington St. Suite 0 Rockville MD 0 Victoria@vkhall-law.com Telephone: 0-- Facsimile: 0-- Attorney

More information

Chapter 48. Evidence Act Certified on: / /20.

Chapter 48. Evidence Act Certified on: / /20. Chapter 48. Evidence Act 1975. Certified on: / /20. INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA. Chapter 48. Evidence Act 1975. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. Interpretation. bank business

More information

Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics

Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics for Licensees Post-AIA Structuring Contractual Protections and Responding When Licensed Patents Are Challenged

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE. GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1983 SESSION CHAPTER 701 HOUSE BILL 96 AN ACT TO SIMPLIFY AND CODIFY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE. The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: Section 1. A new Chapter is

More information

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION)

SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION) SUPPLEMENT TO MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL UNITED STATES MILITARY RULES OF EVIDENCE (2012 EDITION) The Supplement to the 2012 Edition of the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) is a complete revision of the Military

More information

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012)

Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) of 27 2/26/2012 10:34 AM Published on Federal Evidence Review (http://federalevidence.com) Federal Rules Of Evidence (2012) The Federal Rules of Evidence Page provides the current version of the Federal

More information

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions Responding to a Deposition Notice, Selecting and Preparing Witnesses

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions Responding to a Deposition Notice, Selecting and Preparing Witnesses Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions Responding to a Deposition Notice, Selecting and Preparing Witnesses THURSDAY, APRIL 18, 2013 1pm

More information

Electronic Evidence Issues in District Court. Discussion Questions. June 2009

Electronic Evidence Issues in District Court. Discussion Questions. June 2009 1 Cheryl Howell School of Government Electronic Evidence Issues in District Court Discussion Questions June 2009 1. Juvenile delinquency court. 15 year-old Johnnie is accused of communicating threats to

More information

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE

TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE RELEVANCE TIPS ON OFFERING EVIDENCE by Curtis E. Shirley RELEVANCE Indiana Evidence Rule 401: Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the

More information

Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge

Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge Asked and Answered Outside the Scope of Cross Examination

More information

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq. EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS Laurie Vahey, Esq. KINDS OF EVIDENCE Testimonial Including depositions Make sure you comply with CPLR requirements Experts Real Documentary Demonstrative Visual aid

More information

Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media

Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Evidentiary Challenges in Divorce Cases: From Writings and Photos to Text Messages and Social Media Authenticating, Admitting and Objecting to Admission

More information

Strategic Use of Joint Defense Agreements in Litigation: Avoiding Disqualification and Privilege Waivers

Strategic Use of Joint Defense Agreements in Litigation: Avoiding Disqualification and Privilege Waivers Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Strategic Use of Joint Defense Agreements in Litigation: Avoiding Disqualification and Privilege Waivers Drafting Agreements That Minimize Risks

More information