Penalty Clauses: What is left? Jonathan Owen
|
|
- Jared Morris
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Penalty Clauses: What is left? Jonathan Owen
2 The history of the issue 1. Every undergraduate law student has had to grapple with the common law rule against penalty clauses in contracts, in the sense of contractual clauses whereby one party would be entitled to recover a sum of money in respect of a breach of contract committed by a defendant which bears little or no relationship to the loss actually suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the breach by the defendant (Export Credits Guarantee Department -v- Universal Oil Products Co [1983]1 WLR 399, per Lord Roskill at p. 403). 2. The rule against penalty clauses represents a tension in the law. 3. On the one hand the common law of England and Wales has through its rules rarely sought to judge or police the fairness or prudence of bargains and has generally taken the view (as explained by Lord Roskill further on in the passage referred to above) that it is not and never has been for the courts to relieve a party from the consequences of what may in the event prove to be an onerous or possibly even a commercially imprudent bargain. This is essentially a reflection of respect for the parties freedom to contract as they wish, with the enforcement of bargains, freely entered into, offering certainty, which is one of the attractions of the law of England and Wales which has led to it being chosen as the law for many international contract, as well as simply contracts entered into, or relating to, that jurisdiction. 4. On the other hand, however, simple freedom to contract as parties wish can lead to abuse of one party by the other, with such parties not always being in an equal bargaining position. Rarely do people enter into contracts thinking that they will break them, and yet events sometimes make breach inevitable. Should the Court lend itself, in the name of certainty and freedom of contract, to the enforcement of bargains which provide for sums to be paid by a party breaching a contract which are extravagant and unconscionable in amount in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach (per Lord Dunedin in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Limited -v- New Garage & Motor Co Limited [1915] AC 79 Dunlop - at p. 87)? 5. How and if a legal system deals with penalty clauses inevitably represents a policy choice or balance between competing interests, all of which are on their own are rationally defensible. 6. The common law of England and Wales began to control penalties in the 17 th Century as Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC and Lord Sumption SCJ explained in their opinion in Cavendish Square Holding BV -v- Makdessi [2015] 3 WLR 1373 ( Makdessi ). That control originated in the concern of the courts to prevent exploitation in an age when credit was scarce and borrowers were particularly vulnerable (paragraph 34 of Makdessi per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC and Lord Sumption SCJ). 7. Freedom to contract is now restricted by extensive consumer protection regulations, none of which existed when the common law originally sought to control penalty clauses. The common law rule against penalty 2/5
3 clauses, however, continues to be of interest not merely to law students but to legal representatives involved in breach of contract cases. The previous classic formulation of the penalty clauses rule 8. As explained by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC and Lord Sumption SCJ at paragraphs 21 and 22 of Makdessi Lord Dunedin formulated in his speech in Dunlop four tests which achieved the status of a quasi-statutory code in the subsequent case law. Those tests were as follows:- (a) that the provision would be penal if the sum stipulated for is extravagant and unconscionable in amount in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach ; (b) that the provision would be penal if the breach consisted only in the non-payment of money and it provided for the payment of a larger sum; (c) that there was a presumption (but no more) that it would be penal if it was payable in a number of events of varying gravity; and (d) that it would not be treated as penal by reason only of the impossibility of precisely pre-estimating the true loss. The modern formulation of the penalty clauses rule - Makdessi 9. In Makdessi the Supreme Court had to consider directly whether the common law rule against penalties should be abolished and, if not, whether it should be extended and how it should be restated. 10. The Supreme Court determined that the rule should not be abolished by judicial decision. It was longstanding in the law of England and Wales and a comparable rule exists in many other legal jurisdictions. Further, although many contracts are regulated by statutory schemes, not all contracts are. There was a legitimate place for it. 11. Similarly, the Supreme Court did not consider that judges, rather than the legislature, should extend the rule against penalty clause. The extension of the penalty clauses rule would represent the expansion of the courts' supervisory jurisdiction into a new territory of uncertain boundaries, which has hitherto been treated as wholly governed by mutual agreement (paragraph 42 per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC and Lord Sumption SCJ). 12. Although the Court considered that there anomalies and difficulties with the rule, the Court considered that best solution was to restate and clarify the rule, focussing on the purpose of the rule:- many, though not all of these [problems with the rule] are better addressed (i) by a realistic appraisal of the substance of contractual provisions operating on breach, and (ii) by taking a more principled approach to the interests that may properly be protected by the terms of the parties' agreement (paragraph 39, per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC and Lord Sumption SCJ). 3/5
4 13. The rule was re-stated as follows in paragraph 32, per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury PSC and Lord Sumption SCJ:- 32 The true test is whether the impugned provision is a secondary obligation which imposes a detriment on the contract-breaker out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligation. The innocent party can have no proper interest in simply punishing the defaulter. His interest is in performance or in some appropriate alternative to performance. In the case of a straightforward damages clause, that interest will rarely extend beyond compensation for the breach, and we therefore expect that Lord Dunedin's four tests would usually be perfectly adequate to determine its validity. But compensation is not necessarily the only legitimate interest that the innocent party may have in the performance of the defaulter's primary obligations 14. No longer will it be enough to focus on whether a clause represents a genuine pre-estimate of loss [or] a deterrent. These distinctions originate in an over-literal reading of Lord Dunedin's four tests and a tendency to treat them as almost immutable rules of general application which exhaust the field. The effect of the reformulation of the rule 15. The reformulation of the rule against penalties in Makdessi will redefine understanding of this area of law and will require a much more nuanced and fact-sensitive approach to judging whether a contractual clause is penal in nature. 16. It will require the Court to assess what, if any, legitimate interest the clause seeks to protect and whether the means employed to protect that interest in the clause are out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligation. 17. On the one hand these are more open-textured and less certain concepts than the quasi-statutory scheme embodied by Lord Dunedin s tests in Dunlop. That superficially leads to greater uncertainty. On the other hand, however, this reformulation is likely to lead to the enforcement and upholding of what might once have been categorised as penalty clauses in greater numbers in future cases. That is because clauses will not now be unenforceable simply for offending against formal rules. Instead, the Court will focus on the substance of the contractual provision, what it seeks to achieve and whether it goes too far. Provided that a clause is not exploitative, opportunistic and can be defended as being legitimate and proportionate the Court will enforce the parties bargain. 18. This is illustrated by the application of the re-stated legal principles to the cases in issue in Makdessi itself. The first concerned a commercial contract and a clause which disentitled a defaulting shareholder from receiving money which would otherwise have been due to him as his proportion of the price of the 4/5
5 transferred shares. The Supreme Court looked at the substance of the provision. The negative effect for the defaulting shareholder bore no relationship, even approximate, with the measure of loss attributable to the breach, but, in substance it was a price adjustment clause and there was a legitimate interest in the observance of the restrictive covenants which extended beyond the recovery of that loss. The clause was upheld. It would have been otherwise had the clause been a disguised punishment for the sellers' breach. 19. The second case concerned a penalty charge incurred by a consumer parking in a private car park who over-stayed the allotted time. The 85 charge was not a genuine pre-estimate of the loss caused by a person over-staying. The rule against penalties was engaged, but it was not a penalty. The Court found that that there was a legitimate interest in the contractual scheme regulating use of the car park and that there was no reason to suppose that 85 was out of all proportion to the legitimate interest. This was so even though the charge applied no differently if someone over-stayed by 1 minute or 4 hours. The future 20. The future of penalty clauses will be less simplistic, both for those drafting such clauses and those considering such clauses after the event. The law will no longer be concerned with the mechanistic application of formalistic rules in judging whether a penalty clause is enforceable. Instead what will be required is consideration of whether there is a legitimate interest being protected by the clause, and, if so, whether or not proportionate means are being employed. Whilst the Court will still not lend its aid to enforcing disguised punishments out of all proportion to the losses incurred, this broader approach, looking more at the substance of the matter, does open up the door to the drafting and enforcement of clauses which would once have been considered to be penal in nature, as long as they are legitimate in the aims that they protect and proportionate in the means that they deploy. Jonathan Owen September 2016 Disclaimer: The information and any commentary on the law contained in this article is provided free of charge for information purposes only. The opinions expressed are those of the writer(s) and do not necessarily represent the view of Ropewalk Chambers as a whole. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the writer(s) or by Ropewalk Chambers. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are expressly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comment contained within this article. 5/5
The Commencement Date was 1/1/14 and the Time for Completion was 18 months.
Scenario for Edinburgh Working Weekend WorldTech is a multinational IT corporation. It entered into a contract with ConstructIT for the construction of a key next-generation datacentre facility in North
More informationDifferences between the Civil and Common Law: Part 2: Delay Damages and Taking-Over. Cremona Cotovelea Nina Tsaturova Jeremy Glover
Differences between the Civil and Common Law: Part 2: Delay Damages and Taking-Over Cremona Cotovelea Nina Tsaturova Jeremy Glover Sub-Clause 10.1: Taking Over The Engineer shall, within 28 days after
More informationEnforceability of take-or-pay provisions in English law contracts resolved
Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1164554 Enforceability of take-or-pay provisions in English law contracts resolved Ben Holland is a partner in the
More informationA breach of contract occurs where a party does not comply with one or more of the terms of contract, express or implied.
CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Breach and Remedy Refer to Richards, P. Law of Contract Chapters 16-18 Uff, J. Construction Law 9 th Edition Chapter 9 BREACH OF CONTRACT A breach of contract occurs where
More informationBefore : - and
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Civ 402 Case No: B2/2014/2010 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT CHELMSFORD His Honour Judge Moloney Q.C. Claim No. 3JD05152
More informationPenalty Clauses under Brazilian Law: Is there a common ground with the criteria set forth by Cavendish Square v. Makdessi?
Penalty Clauses under Brazilian Law: Is there a common ground with the criteria set forth by Cavendish Square v. Makdessi? Thiago Moreira Caio Lucas Gabra 1. Introduction Although extensively debated by
More informationThe Aarhus Convention and Costs. Andrew Hogan
The Aarhus Convention and Costs Andrew Hogan The case of R v Environment Agency and others (Number 2) (2013) UK SC 78 is perhaps now the leading case on the application of the Aarhus Convention in domestic
More informationThe highly anticipated conclusion to a five-year battle over the status of the
Rozelle Macalincag* PACIOCCO v AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD (2016) 90 ALJR 835 I Introduction The highly anticipated conclusion to a five-year battle over the status of the doctrine of penalties
More informationOil & Gas JOA Defaults: Enforcing Forfeiture Clauses after the Cavendish Square Decision
Oil & Gas JOA Defaults: Enforcing Forfeiture Clauses after the Cavendish Square Decision February 2016 The continuing decline in oil & gas prices has led to increasing numbers of defaults under oil & gas
More informationEmployment Special Interest Group
Employment law: the convenient jurisdiction to bring equal pay claims - the High Court or County Court on the one hand or the Employment Tribunal on the other hand? Jonathan Owen Introduction 1. On 24
More informationBefore : His Honour Judge Bird Sitting as a Judge of this Court. Between: -and- Hearing dates: 11 December Approved Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MANCHESTER DISTRICT REGISTRY MERCANTILE COURT Case No: BA40MA109 Date: 19 January 2016 Before : His Honour Judge Bird Sitting as a Judge of this Court
More informationPart 36, Construction and the Doctrine of Mistake. Andrew Hogan
Part 36, Construction and the Doctrine of Mistake Andrew Hogan For many reasons, the tool of choice to use for the compromise of disputes, either litigated or at the pre-litigation stage, is the part 36
More informationTHE INTERPRETATION OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES
BRIEFING THE INTERPRETATION OF EXCLUSION CLAUSES MAY 2016 LITERAL AND NATURAL MEANING IS OF PRIMARY IMPORTANCE COMMERCIALITY MAY BE CONSIDERED THE COURT MAY ALSO CONSIDER APPLICATION OF THE CONTRA PROFERENTEM
More informationEQUITABLE RELIEF IN THE LAW OF HIRE-PURCHASE
EQUITABLE RELIEF IN THE LAW OF HIRE-PURCHASE THE article by Mr. Aubrey L. Diamond in the Modern Law Review of September, 1956 (at p. 498), advanced the view that the court has power to grant equitable
More informationA LITIGATOR S GUIDE TO DAMAGES January 17, 2017 CONTRACT DAMAGES. *With special thanks to Lesley Campbell, Student-at-Law OVERVIEW
A LITIGATOR S GUIDE TO DAMAGES January 17, 2017 CONTRACT DAMAGES Harvin D. Pitch / Jennifer J. Lake *With special thanks to Lesley Campbell, Student-at-Law OVERVIEW 1. Specific Performance & Mitigation
More informationI TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CIV [2018] NZHC HOBSON STREET LIMITED First Defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE BETWEEN CIV 2016-404-2940 [2018] NZHC 32 HONEY BEES PRESCHOOL LIMITED First Plaintiff JASON JAMES Second
More informationPenalty Clauses What Has Changed?
Pace International Law Review Volume 30 Issue 1 Winter 2017 Article 4 December 2017 Penalty Clauses What Has Changed? Bruno Zeller University of Western Australia, Law School Follow this and additional
More informationBanking & Financial Services Law Association Conference 29 August Judicial Case Law Update - Australia. Justice Ashley Black
Banking & Financial Services Law Association Conference 29 August 2016 Judicial Case Law Update - Australia Justice Ashley Black Supreme Court of New South Wales I will spend about half of the paper on
More informationCompromising Civil Proceedings: The Pitfalls of Leaving the Liability for Costs to be Determined by the Court. Jonathan Owen
Compromising Civil Proceedings: The Pitfalls of Leaving the Liability for Costs to be Determined by the Court Summary 1. The Court of Appeal authority of Gossage v. Bishton [2012] EWCA Civ 717 makes clear
More informationLunch & Learn Liquidated Damages Best Practice Alistair Maughan 10 February 2014 Morrison & Foerster (UK) LLP
Lunch & Learn Liquidated Damages Best Practice Alistair Maughan 10 February 2014 Morrison & Foerster (UK) LLP 2013 Morrison & Foerster (UK) LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Lunch & Learn 2 nd Monday of
More informationBETWEEN: CLIFFORD WHITING CLAIMANTS EMILY WHITING
THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE 2003 ACTION NO. 311 OF 2003 BETWEEN: CLIFFORD WHITING CLAIMANTS EMILY WHITING AND GRANTWELL LIMITED DEFENDANTS D.B.A. COLDWELL BANKERS Ms. N. Badillo for the claimants Mr. L.
More informationLegal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide
More informationRepudiatory Breach of Contract: The Need for Aggrieved Party to Make and Communicate a Clear Choice as to Whether the Contract is at an End
Repudiatory Breach of Contract: The Need for Aggrieved Party to Make and Communicate a Clear Choice as to Whether the Contract is at an End Summary 1. In Force India Formula One Team v. Aerolab SRL [2013]
More informationCITY INSOLVENCY DISCUSSION GROUP - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND INSOLVENCY -
CITY INSOLVENCY DISCUSSION GROUP - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AND INSOLVENCY - Background I practice in the building and construction industry as a mediator and conciliator, assisting contracted parties in
More informationVicarious Liability for Workplace Violence. Jonathan Mitchell
Vicarious Liability for Workplace Violence Jonathan Mitchell On Thursday 5 th February 2015 the Court of Appeal handed down its judgement in the case of Graham v Commercial Bodyworks Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ
More informationIMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW RULE AGAINST PENALTIES
305 IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW RULE AGAINST PENALTIES Jessica Palmer * Whether a contractual term is penal and therefore unenforceable has usually been determined by distinguishing it from stipulations that
More informationThe plaintiff must show that his loss was one which resulted from a breach of contract by the defendant (a direct causal link).
1. CAUSATION The plaintiff must show that his loss was one which resulted from a breach of contract by the defendant (a direct causal link). An act of the defendant in a sequence of events leading to a
More informationRESPONSE TO TACKLING ROGUE LANDLORDS AND IMPROVING THE PRIVATE RENTAL SECTOR
RESPONSE TO TACKLING ROGUE LANDLORDS AND IMPROVING THE PRIVATE RENTAL SECTOR About the RLA The RLA represents over 20,000 landlords across England & Wales. Primarily our members are landlords in their
More informationChapter XIX EQUITY CONDENSED OUTLINE
Chapter XIX EQUITY CONDENSED OUTLINE I. NATURE AND SCOPE OF EQUITY B. Equitable Maxims and Other General Doctrines. C. Marshaling Assets. II. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS B. When Specific Performance
More informationPENALTIES AND RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE OF JOINT VENTURE INTERESTS
Penalties and Relief Against Forfeiture of Joint Venture Interests 219 PENALTIES AND RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE OF JOINT VENTURE INTERESTS Michael Lishman A common provision in an exploration joint venture
More informationLAW OFFICE OF MARK ROYSNER Mulholland Highway, Suite 382 Calabasas, CA
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Definitions of Legal Terms Typically Found in Meetings and Exhibition Industry Contracts. By Mark Roysner, Esq. This is a glossary of legal terms and phrases commonly found in hotel,
More informationEnforcement of Judgements: Orders for Sale. Jonathan Owen
Enforcement of Judgements: Orders for Sale Jonathan Owen Introduction 1. The Practice Direction to Part 70 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (hereafter the CPR ) sets out the methods of enforcing money
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. DELAWARE BAY SURGICAL SERVICES, P.A., a Delaware Professional Services Corporation, No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DELAWARE BAY SURGICAL SERVICES, P.A., a Delaware Professional Services Corporation, No. 370, 2005 Defendant-Below, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, Court Below:
More informationWassenaar v. Towne Hotel 111 Wis. 2d 518, 331 N.W.2d 357 (1983)
Wassenaar v. Towne Hotel 111 Wis. 2d 518, 331 N.W.2d 357 (1983) This court granted the employee's petition for review limiting the issue on review to whether the clause in the employment contract stipulating
More informationContract Law Highlights of 2015
Lunch & Learn Christmas Special 264856 Contract Law Highlights of 2015 14 December 2015 Alistair Maughan, Sue McLean, Sarah Wells, Mercedes Samavi 2014 Morrison & Foerster (UK) LLP All Rights Reserved
More informationI Fought the Law ANDREW HOGAN
I Fought the Law ANDREW HOGAN 1 It has been cynically observed in the author s presence, that insurance companies only care about fraud and costs, and only about care about the latter because they regard
More informationJUDGMENT. R v Sally Lane and John Letts (AB and CD) (Appellants)
REPORTING RESTRICTIONS APPLY TO THIS CASE Trinity Term [2018] UKSC 36 On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Crim 129 JUDGMENT R v Sally Lane and John Letts (AB and CD) (Appellants) before Lady Hale, President Lord
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. RAY CATENA MOTOR CAR CORP., d/b/a RAY CATENA MERCEDES-BENZ, v. Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationFEES? NOT SO SIMPLE: ANDREWS AND ORS V AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD [2012] HCA 30 (6 SEPTEMBER 2012)
FEES? NOT SO SIMPLE: ANDREWS AND ORS V AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD [2012] HCA 30 (6 SEPTEMBER 2012) LUDMILLA K ROBINSON * I INTRODUCTION On 22 September 2010 the appellants commenced representative
More informationFiat Justitia Rat Caelum? Andrew Hogan
Fiat Justitia Rat Caelum? Andrew Hogan The title of this newsletter reflects the Latin maxim Let justice be done though the heavens fall, a principle formulated originally by Terence, or Piso, and echoed
More informationBUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK
BUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK SECOND EDITION CHARLES YC CHEW CHAPTER 4: CONTRACT: TERMS AND REMEDIES FOR BREACH TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE 1. The terms of a contract may be either express or implied. Explain what is
More informationEnforcement of Foreign Judgments. The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency)
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency) The Supreme Court has just given judgment (24 October 2012) in Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others and New
More informationTHE RULE AGAINST PENALTIES IN CONTRACT: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE*
THE RULE AGAINST PENALTIES IN CONTRACT: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE* [This article considers the arguments for the abolition of the penalty doctrine in the law oj contract. The basic principles and most recent
More informationUK: Engineering, Procurement & Construction Briefing
UK: Engineering, Procurement & Construction Briefing May 2013 Contents Introduction 01 Liquidated damages vs penalty 01 causes a clear cut dichotomy? Varying the construction methods 03 to catch up how
More informationThe Prohibition of Referral Fees
The Prohibition of Referral Fees Purpose: Scope of application: Issued by: To draw barristers' attention to issues relating to payment for professional instructions All practising barristers The Ethics
More informationDEFINING YOUR LIABILITY IN ADVANCE:
DISPUTE RESOLUTION This is the sixth in our series of contract disputes practical guides, designed to provide clients with practical guidance on some key issues that feature in disputes relating to commercial
More informationFixed Advocate s Costs in Pre-Action Disclosure Applications: Are They Always Recoverable? THOMAS HERBERT
Fixed Advocate s Costs in Pre-Action Disclosure Applications: Are They Always Recoverable? THOMAS HERBERT 1 The issue 1. Following the Court of Appeal s decision in Sharp -v- Leeds City Council [2017]
More information(a) the purpose of the agreement was to achieve the objective of reconstructing the Lloyd s market:
Jones v Society of Lloyds; Standen v Society of Lloyds CHANCERY DIVISION The Times 2 February 2000, (Transcript) HEARING-DATES: 16 DECEMBER 1999 16 DECEMBER 1999 COUNSEL: D Oliver QC and R Morgan for the
More informationBar Council response to The Cab Rank Rule: Standard contractual terms and the list of defaulting solicitors consultation paper
Bar Council response to The Cab Rank Rule: Standard contractual terms and the list of defaulting solicitors consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales
More informationConditional Fee Agreements and Liens. Andrew Hogan
Conditional Fee Agreements and Liens Andrew Hogan Some years ago, at a solicitor-own client detailed assessment, I was told by my professional client that her policy was to obtain 75% of her fees on account
More informationContracts Final Exam Notes Formation of a contract What is a contract MUST Offer REASONABLE PERSON Acceptance
Contracts Final Exam Notes Formation of a contract What is a contract - Binding promise between two or more parties, reliant upon several important factors - Offer - Acceptance - Consideration - Certainty
More informationWhich Law Governs the Arbitration Agreement? An Analysis of Sulamérica CIA Nacional de Seguros S.A. and others v Enesa Engenharia S.A.
Integrity. Experience. Innovation. www.markhumphries.co.uk Which Law Governs the Arbitration Agreement? An Analysis of Sulamérica CIA Nacional de Seguros S.A. and others v Enesa Engenharia S.A. and others
More informationLiability for Injuries Caused by Dogs. Jonathan Owen
Liability for Injuries Caused by Dogs Jonathan Owen Introduction 1. This article addressed the liability for injuries caused by dogs, such as when a person is bitten, or knocked over by a dog. Such cases,
More informationMARK SCHEME for the May/June 2007 question paper 9084 LAW
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS GCE Advanced Level MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2007 question paper 9084 LAW 9084/03 Paper 3, maximum raw mark 75 This mark scheme is published as an
More information1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses?
England Simon Hart RPC London Simon.Hart@rpc.co.uk Law firm bio 1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses? There are two key challenges a party may face
More informationSection 112 of the HGCR Act is set out below, with the amendments which will be introduced under the LDEDC Act shown in bold:
SUSPENSION OF WORK By Peter Sheridan Introduction The remedy of suspension of work for non-payment or late payment is likely to be of increased interest as the credit crunch and the recession continue
More informationDawn of an English Doctrine of Equivalents: immaterial variants infringe
Dawn of an English Doctrine of Equivalents: immaterial variants infringe November 2017 The Supreme Court reinvents patent infringement The Supreme Court s landmark judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly is a
More informationfailing to get the contract signed (something that never ceases to amaze lawyers!);
Professionals involved in design-build projects should be aware of the risks they face when they contract with the owner to be solely responsible for both construction and design. In this respect, the
More informationINTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. Quarterly Review
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION Quarterly Review September 2015 In this edition of Addleshaw Goddard's International Arbitration Quarterly Review we consider an interesting case on anti-enforcement injunctions,
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION BULLETIN
Dispute Resolution December 2015 DISPUTE RESOLUTION BULLETIN Welcome to the December edition of our Dispute Resolution Bulletin. In our first article this month, Partner, Steven Paull, and Trainee Solicitor,
More informationBAR COUNCIL PARLIAMENTARY BRIEFING PRISONS AND COURTS BILL HOUSE OF COMMONS SECOND READING 20 MARCH 2017
BAR COUNCIL PARLIAMENTARY BRIEFING PRISONS AND COURTS BILL HOUSE OF COMMONS SECOND READING 20 MARCH 2017 1. This is a briefing from the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council)
More information(preliminary ruling requested by the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven)
Language JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 16 DECEMBER 1976 1 Comet BV v Produktschap voor Siergewassen (preliminary ruling requested by the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven) Case 45/76
More informationJoined Cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P to C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P. Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission of the European Communities
Joined Cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P to C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal Competition District heating pipes (pre-insulated
More informationThe Prohibition of Referral Fees
The Prohibition of Referral Fees Purpose: Scope of application: Issued by: To draw barristers' attention to issues relating to payment for professional instructions All practising barristers The Ethics
More informationSAMPLE NOTES FROM OUR LLB CORE GUIDE:
SAMPLE NOTES FROM OUR LLB CORE GUIDE: CONTRACT LAW PRIVITY CHAPTER LLB Answered is a comprehensive, first-class set of exam-focused study notes for the Undergraduate Law Degree. Please visit LLBanswered.com
More informationTHIRD-PARTY LITIGATION FUNDING IN THE IRISH CONTEXT
THIRD-PARTY LITIGATION FUNDING IN THE IRISH CONTEXT REPRINTED FROM: CORPORATE DISPUTES MAGAZINE JUL-SEP 2017 ISSUE corporate CDdisputes Visit the website to request a free copy of the full e-magazine Published
More informationDirectors' Duties in Guernsey
Directors' Duties in Guernsey March 2018 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 This note provides a brief synopsis of the common law duties owed by directors of companies ("companies") incorporated in the Island of Guernsey
More informationWebsite Disclaimer. by SEQ Legal
Website Disclaimer by SEQ Legal Website disclaimer 1 (1) Introduction This disclaimer governs your use of our website; by using our website, you accept this disclaimer in full. 2 If you disagree with any
More informationBraes of Doune Wind Farm (Scotland) Ltd v Alfred McaLpine Business Services Ltd [2008] APP.L.R. 03/13
JUDGMENT : Mr. Justice Akenhead: TCC. 13 th March 2008 Introduction 1. There are two applications before the Court relating to the First Award of an arbitrator, Mr John Uff CBE QC. This award relates to
More informationPRESCRIPTION (SCOTLAND) BILL
PRESCRIPTION (SCOTLAND) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. As required under Rule 9.3.2A of the Parliament s Standing Orders, these Explanatory Notes are published to accompany the Prescription (Scotland)
More informationIMPROVING PAYMENT PRACTICES IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
IMPROVING PAYMENT PRACTICES IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY Report of the DTI s post-consultation event held in London on 14th February 2006 On Valentine s Day 2006, the Right Honourable Alun Michael MP compared
More informationDispute Resolution Briefing
Dispute Resolution Briefing August 2014 Contents How enforceable is an obligation to negotiate? Introduction 01 The issue 01 The background facts 02 The decision 03 Conclusion 04 Contacts 05 Introduction
More informationBRIEFING NIL BY MOUTH? EXCLUDING ORAL VARIATION OF CONTRACTS MAY 2018
BRIEFING NIL BY MOUTH? EXCLUDING ORAL VARIATION OF CONTRACTS MAY 2018 THE UK SUPREME COURT HAS OVERTURNED THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, AND DETERMINED THAT NO ORAL MODIFICATION CLAUSES ARE EFFECTIVE
More informationTHE ILLEGALITY DEFENCE FOLLOWING. Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42
THE ILLEGALITY DEFENCE FOLLOWING Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42 Ronelp Marine Ltd & others v STX Offshore & Shipbuilding Co Ltd & another [2016] EWHC 2228 (Ch) at [36]: 36 Counsel for STX argued that once
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationAge Discrimination and Public Authorities. Andrew Hogan
Age Discrimination and Public Authorities Andrew Hogan Introduction 1. On 1 st October 2012 the provisions in the Equality Act 2010, which prohibit age discrimination in the provision of goods and services
More informationEU (Withdrawal) Bill- Committee stage
EU (Withdrawal) Bill- Committee stage The Law Society represents, promotes, and supports solicitors, publicising their unique role in providing legal advice, ensuring justice for all and upholding the
More informationReigning Supreme: Events at the UK Supreme Court in 2015
Reigning Supreme: Events at the UK Supreme Court in 2015 Dickson, B. (2016). Reigning Supreme: Events at the UK Supreme Court in 2015. New Law Journal, 166, 19-20. Published in: New Law Journal Document
More informationTYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES
TYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES A breach of contract entitles the non-breaching party to sue for money damages, including: Compensatory Damages: Damages that compensate the non-breaching party for the injuries
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. SUZANNE ORR & a. DAVID A. GOODWIN & a. Argued: June 26, 2008 Opinion Issued: July 15, 2008
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationCreative and Legal Communities
AIPLA Mergers & Acquisition Committee Year in a Deal Lecture Series Beyond the Four Corners: A Discussion of the Impact of the Choice of New York, Delaware, Texas, and California Law in Contracts Carey
More informationBRIBERY ACT 2010: JOINT PROSECUTION GUIDANCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
BRIBERY ACT 2010: JOINT PROSECUTION GUIDANCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Contents Introduction The Act in its wider context The legal framework Transitional
More informationPARKING EYE LIMITED. BARRY BEAVIS Defendant (Claim - 152) MARTIN WARDLEY Defendant (Claim -169)
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT CAMBRIDGE Claims Nos 3JD05152 / 3DJ05169 HHJ MOLONEY QC PARKING EYE LIMITED Claimant And BARRY BEAVIS Defendant (Claim - 152) MARTIN WARDLEY Defendant (Claim -169) Jonathan Kirk
More informationNEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES
NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory tes relate to the Neighbourhood Planning Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 7. These Explanatory tes have
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HOLLOWAY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP STEVEN GIACALONE. Argued: November 17, 2016 Opinion Issued: February 15, 2017
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationTHE CRIMINAL DEFENCE SERVICE (FUNDING) (AMENDMENT) ORDER THE COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICE (FUNDING) (AMENDMENT No2) ORDER 2011
Margaret McDonald Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ Margaret.mcdonald@justice.gsi.gov.uk 15 New Bridge Street London EC4V 6AU 8 th August 2011 Dear Ms. McDonald THE CRIMINAL DEFENCE
More informationThe Effect of Merger and Non-Reliance Clauses in the Common European Sales Law (CESL)
ABSTRACT The Effect of Merger and Non-Reliance Clauses in the Common European Sales Law (CESL) Tobias Pinkel, LL.M University of Bremen Even if parties to a contract embody the terms of their final agreement
More informationFINAL SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTION LTD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SUPPLY OF LOGISTICS SERVICES
SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTION LTD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SUPPLY OF LOGISTICS SERVICES Supply Chain Solution Ltd is not a common carrier and only accepts goods for carriage and/or storage on that condition
More informationDistinctive Features of the New Consumer Contract Law
Distinctive Features of the New Consumer Contract Law Professor Simon Whittaker, St. John s College, University of Oxford Between 2012 and 2015 a series of statutes and statutory instruments have subjected
More informationPractical Tips for Possession: The View from the Housing Possession Duty Desk and Exceptional Funding under LASPO
Practical Tips for Possession: The View from the Housing Possession Duty Desk and Exceptional Funding under LASPO 23 May 2013 Exceptional Funding Under LASPO the housing law perspective Paper produced
More informationUnilateral jurisdiction clauses Navigating the minefield
Unilateral jurisdiction clauses Navigating the minefield Article 23 September 2013 James Stacey and Angela Taylor advise caution when dealing with unilateral jurisdiction clauses. A recent French Supreme
More informationTHE COMMON LAW OF RESTITUTION
THE COMMON LAW OF RESTITUTION SIXTH STUDY PACK CONTRACTUAL BENEFITS Where the plaintiff has him/herself conferred the benefit on the defendant. Where the plaintiff conferred a benefit under an ineffective
More informationIN THE MATTER OF LEHMAN BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL (EUROPE) (IN ADMINISTRATION) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 1986
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION COMPANIES COURT Before: Mr Justice David Richards A2/2015/3763 No 7942 of 2008 IN THE MATTER OF LEHMAN BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MAIN STREET DINING, L.L.C., f/k/a J.P. PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., UNPUBLISHED February 12, 2009 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 282822 Oakland Circuit Court CITIZENS FIRST
More informationCONTRACTS / REMEDIES Copyright February State Bar of California
Copyright February 2001 - State Bar of California Owens, a homeowner, approached Carter, a licensed contractor, to discuss construction of a new garage attached to Owens' home. After several meetings,
More informationThe City of London Law Society
The City of London Law Society Response to FRC Consultation Paper on Auditor Liability Limitation Agreements 4 College Hill London EC4R 2RB Tel: 020 7329 2173 Fax: 020 7329 2190 www.citysolicitors.org.uk
More informationThe Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Centenary Conference March Speech by The Honourable Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma
The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Centenary Conference 20 21 March 2015 Speech by The Honourable Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma 1. As the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators celebrates its centenary, this
More informationPRESENTATION RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC LAW. Bar s Headquarters, Perry Gap, Roebuck Street, St. Michael. By Richard Clayton Q.C.
PRESENTATION RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC LAW Wednesday, November 28 th, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. Bar s Headquarters, Perry Gap, Roebuck Street, St. Michael By Richard Clayton Q.C. Barrister,
More informationOver 50s Life Cover Proposal and Declaration of Trust for Life Policy
Over 50s Life Cover Proposal and Declaration of Trust for Life Policy Flexible Trust It is important that you have sought professional advice before completing this trust deed. Date and Declaration of
More informationSample. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Types of consideration
Chapter 2: Consideration Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Types of consideration 2.3 Consideration must move from the promisee 2.4 Consideration must be of some value 2.5 Summary 2.1 Introduction As noted
More information