APPELLATE AND SUPREME COURT LITIGATION
|
|
- Cleopatra Carson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPELLATE AND SUPREME COURT LITIGATION Our Clients Public and private companies, trade associations, and others across industries and throughout the country count on Katten's Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation practice to tackle their most challenging cases and issues in state and federal trial and appellate courts. Our experienced appellate advocates regularly team with colleagues in other practices to handle critical legal issues from appellate briefs to dispositive trial motions. Our Services Katten represents clients in high-stakes appeals involving a broad range of legal subjects and industries, including environmental and workplace safety, intellectual property, real estate, health care, media, consumer class action, white collar criminal defense, and many others. Our Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation practice includes more than two dozen former law clerks to federal and state appellate judges, as well as attorneys who obtained substantial appellate and critical motions experience as members of US Attorneys' Offices and the US Department of Justice. Combined, the members of our Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation practice have briefed and argued hundreds of appeals, including actions in all 13 US courts of appeals and numerous state supreme and intermediate appellate courts. In addition to handling cases on appeal, the members of our practice are fully integrated into our trial teams as well as teams advocating before administrative agencies. We draft dispositive motions, prepare favorable jury instructions, assist with the development of the record, and advise on how best to position our clients' cases for success on appeal whether the case arises from a state or federal trial court, a rulemaking proceeding or a permitting action. Clients also hire us following wins or losses, recognizing that appellate advocacy is a separate discipline that frequently requires specialized training and skills distinct from those honed in trial courts or before administrative agencies. Indeed, Katten attorneys have served in every possible role at the appellate stage from serving as national appellate counsel for a Fortune 500 company coordinating and leading appeals in eight federal circuits across the country, to being hired either to take over the entirety of high-profile appeals from other law firms or to serve as co-counsel in the appellate court alongside trial counsel, to remaining behind the scenes offering strategic advice, drafting and editing briefs, and preparing other counsel for oral argument. Our goal is simple: to use our appellate advocacy experience to secure victories for our clients when the stakes are highest. Environmental and Workplace Safety Katten attorneys are routinely at the forefront of highprofile, cutting-edge cases that are shaping environmental law across the country. Members of the Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation practice work closely with our colleagues in the Environmental and Workplace Safety practices in bet-the-company administrative and trial proceedings, including a federal criminal trial in which we drafted critical motions and a
2 first-of-its-kind jury instruction that served as a cornerstone of our client's defense and helped secure verdicts of not guilty on all charges. Intellectual Property Katten attorneys have built one of the nation's premier intellectual property practices and have maintained that distinction at the appellate stage. Our appellate litigators have handled dozens of cases before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that have originated from federal district courts, the US Patent and Trademark Office including the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the International Trade Commission. Our team represents US and international clients across industries including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, life sciences, electronics, software, e- commerce and telecommunications. Our clients have trusted Katten's appellate experience in cases involving products and services that have generated billions of dollars in sales. Katten attorneys litigate appeals at the forefront of trademark and copyright law. We have protected on appeal some of the world's most famous brands, including those of Microsoft Corporation, Bausch & Lomb and E! Entertainment. Katten attorneys also have litigated precedent-setting copyright cases, including an appeal in the Seventh Circuit on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America against a file-sharing network that had allowed users to exchange unlawfully millions of copyrighted works. Commercial/Real Estate Katten has a strong track record handling general commercial and real estate litigation on appeal. Our lawyers regularly handle sophisticated commercial contract and property disputes in various state and federal appellate courts. In a case involving a major mixed-use development, for example, Katten successfully defended against a request for injunctive relief in district court, which the Fourth Circuit then affirmed on appeal in an important, precedential opinion. And as another example, our lawyers helped a retail center preserve its rights to bring state law trespass and nuisance claims against union members engaged in a secondary boycott on the center's property through a successful appeal before the Ninth Circuit involving the intersection of federal preemption, labor law, property rights and state constitutional law. Securities and Financial Services Clients regularly call on Katten in securities and financial services cases when the stakes are highest. To cite just one example, in a case characterized by a panel of the Sixth Circuit as one of "Dickensian proportions," Katten litigators saved a client from a contempt finding for the client's role in an asset sale that had been enjoined by the district court. As another example, Katten attorneys briefed and argued an important case involving the rights of secured lenders, successfully defending the dismissal of a complaint against the firm's client. The decision, written by the First Department in Manhattan, included powerful language reaffirming a secured lender's ability to engage in negotiations and preserve its rights to declare a default, noting that "a contrary holding could have a chilling effect on parties' willingness to renegotiate mutually acceptable terms rather than simply foreclose on collateral or resort to costly litigation." Consumer Class Action Katten is at the forefront of assisting clients before state and federal appellate courts in enforcing the terms of their class action waivers, consumer arbitration agreements and forum selection clauses, resulting in the avoidance of class action lawsuits. One of our victories was a unanimous decision from the Missouri Supreme Court, which held that the presence of a class action waiver is not, standing alone, grounds for finding "unconscionable" an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act. We also regularly represent consumer lenders on appeals to enforce choice-of-law provisions in consumer loan contracts, often in cases in which Katten did not serve as trial counsel. Health Care We are frequently called upon by hospital systems, academic medical centers, large independent medical practices, medical associations and patient safety organizations to handle appeals involving issues of first impression in state and federal appellate courts. For example, our appellate litigators have briefed and argued the highest-profile cases interpreting state physician self-referral laws. In one such case, in which our clients garnered extensive amicus curiae support from national medical societies, we convinced the Supreme Court of Washington that orthopaedic surgeons and other physicians are permitted to employ physical therapists in their medical practices. On another
3 novel issue, we filed an amicus curiae brief in the Kentucky Supreme Court on behalf of 30 patient safety organizations regarding the Patient Safety Act's preemption of state laws governing access to hospital records generated in connection with quality improvement activities, and the scope of the protection for such documents in medical malpractice cases. Our appellate litigators have argued and won cases in a number of federal appellate courts. For example, Katten attorneys prevailed in the Fourth and Sixth Circuits in complex administrative law and constitutional cases that secured tens of millions of dollars in premiums for health benefit plans. We also secured a victory worth $180 million on behalf of 76 New York-area hospitals when the Second Circuit, while upholding the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS') adoption of new Metropolitan Statistical Areas, held unlawful a determination by CMS to phase in a congressionally mandated Occupational Mix Adjustment. Further, our litigators have handled a number of complex False Claims Act cases, including an appeal before the Second Circuit involving allegations of fraudulent billing to a variety of federal health care programs. In each case, we have drawn on our appellate experience to enhance our nationally recognized Health Care practice. Supreme Court Practice Clients routinely call upon our appellate litigators to brief their most important cases in the US Supreme Court, whether it be the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari, an opposition to certiorari or at the merits stage. The same breadth of subject matter experience we employ in litigating cases in the state and federal appellate courts extends to our work in the US Supreme Court. In the last several years, our appellate litigators have briefed novel issues of administrative, patent, tax, bankruptcy, trademark and environmental law at the certiorari and merits stages for both parties and amici curiae. In one such case, our appellate litigators were successful in obtaining from the Supreme Court the vacatur of an adverse appellate decision issued by the Federal Circuit, which ultimately led to a complete victory for our client in a closely watched tax case. And in cases presenting complex issues of bankruptcy and constitutional law, our petitions for writ of certiorari have been identified by a leading Supreme Court website as "Petition[s] of the Day." In addition, trade associations, industry groups and other clients often call upon our appellate litigators to prepare amicus curiae briefs in high-profile Supreme Court cases at both the certiorari and merits stages. Pro Bono Consistent with Katten's commitment to pro bono service, our appellate litigators devote their time, resources and talent to serving individuals and organizations in need of representation in the state and federal appellate courts and in the US Supreme Court, often teaming with prominent public interest organizations. Through a direct appointment by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Katten attorneys handled an appeal on behalf of a transgender ironworker and developed arguments, credited by the Second Circuit, that helped to establish important protections for transgender union members under the National Labor Relations Act. In partnership with the American Civil Liberties Union and Lambda Legal, Katten attorneys also won in the Seventh Circuit a challenge to a Wisconsin statute that specifically restricted funding for certain medical procedures such as hormone therapy for transgender prisoners and then successfully opposed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the US Supreme Court in that case. In addition, on behalf of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, various municipalities, and local gun safety organizations, Katten attorneys have filed amicus curiae briefs in the US Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits, and the Illinois Supreme Court in defense of the constitutionality of assault weapons bans enacted by the States of Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, and New York, Cook County (Illinois), and the municipalities of Sunnyvale, California, and Highland Park, Illinois. We have defended the Fourth Amendment rights of parolees in a case in the Second Circuit, and we have helped multiple asylum applicants who face torture or other forms of persecution if returned to their home countries appeal their cases to the Fifth, Seventh and Ninth Circuits, often working in conjunction with the National Immigrant Justice Center to protect the interests of the asylum applicants. Our Experience Health Care Representation of the Washington State Orthopaedic Association and an orthopaedic practice in the Supreme Court of Washington in a
4 case that protected the rights of orthopaedic surgeons to employ physical therapists in their medical practices and refer patients to those therapists for treatment. With more than two dozen state and national medical associations joining the case as amici curiae, the Court held in favor of our clients that physician employment of physical therapists and related patient referrals are lawful under Washington's anti-rebate statute, professional service corporation act and common-law corporate practice of medicine doctrine. The unanimous ruling has had broad implications across the country for protecting physician-owned physical therapy services and other ancillary health care services furnished in physician offices. Columbia Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Benton Franklin Orthopedic Associates, PLLC, et al., 168 Wash. 2d 421 (Wash. 2010). Representation of petitioner medical group practices in the Maryland Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) in a case interpreting the Maryland Patient Referral Law on the issue of whether treating physicians in the fields of orthopaedics, urology, gastroenterology, cardiology and emergency medicine are permitted to furnish patients with medically necessary MRI and CT services within the medical office setting. Potomac Valley Orthopaedic Associates, et al. v. Maryland State Board of Physicians, et al., 417 Md. 622 (Md. 2011). Representation of 76 New York-area hospitals in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a case that, while upholding the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) adoption of new Metropolitan Statistical Areas, held unlawful a determination by CMS to phase in a congressionally mandated Occupations Mix Adjustment. The victory was worth $180 million to our clients. Bellevue Hosp. Center v. Leavitt, 443 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2006). Representation of 30 patient safety organizations as amici curiae in the Kentucky Supreme Court in litigation regarding the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act's preemption of state laws governing access to hospital records generated in connection with quality improvement activities and the scope of the protection for such documents in medical malpractice cases. The Court ruled that post-incident health information was not privileged under the Act. Tibbs v. Bunnell, --- S.W.3d ---, No SC , 2014 WL (Ky. Aug. 21, 2014). Representation of a 50-doctor physician group practice in litigation before Maryland's intermediate and highest appellate courts in which a variety of competitors sought to challenge a consent agreement, entered between the group practice and the Maryland Board of Physicians, which declined to find a violation of the group's referrals of patients for radiation therapy services under the Maryland Patient Referral Law. The state's highest court denied so-called bypass review, and the state's intermediate appellate court affirmed the dismissal of the litigation. Blumberg v. Md. Bd. of Physicians, Nos (Md.), (Md. Ct. Sp. App.). Copyright and Trademark Representation of Microsoft Corporation in the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a reverse trademark infringement case in which Kinbook LLC alleged that Microsoft's trademarks "Kinect" and "KIN" were confusingly similar to Kinbook's "Kinbox" and "Munchkinbox" trademarks. In a victory for our client, the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment that no reasonable jury could find a likelihood of confusion between the parties' marks. Kinbook LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 490 F. App'x 491 (3d Cir. 2013). Representation of NBCUniversal and the producers of the series Heroes in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a case filed by Carnival of Souls graphic novel writer Jazan Wild, alleging a federal claim for copyright infringement and various state law claims. The Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our clients, affirming the district court's dismissal, with prejudice, of the copyright claim for lack of substantial similarity. Wild v. NBCUniversal, 513 F. App'x 640 (9th Cir. 2013). Representation of NBCUniversal in the California Court of Appeal in a case granting a rarely issued peremptory writ of mandate directing the trial court to grant summary judgment for our clients. The opinion creates important new precedent in the entertainment industry on the statute of limitations defense applied to idea submission claims. The court ruled that plaintiffs' claims accrued and the statute of limitations began to run no later than the
5 date the Ghost Hunters television series was first released to the public and that neither the discovery rule nor the continuous accrual doctrine could extend the accrual date past the initial telecast of the first episode of the series. This is the first-known published opinion applying the statute of limitations on idea submission claims to episodic television. NBCUniversal Media, LLC v. Superior Court, 225 Cal.Rptr.4th 1222 (Cal. App. 2 Dist. 2014). Representation of Relativity Media and the creators and producers of the horror film The Unborn in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a case filed by screenwriter Daniel Segal, alleging a federal claim for copyright infringement and a state law claim for breach of implied contract. The Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of our clients, affirming the district court's dismissal, with prejudice, of the copyright claim for lack of substantial similarity. The Ninth Circuit also affirmed the district court's denial of leave to amend to reassert the claim for breach of implied contract. Segal v. Rogue Pictures, 544 F. App'x 769 (9th Cir. 2013). Patent Representation of appellant Apotex on appeal of a district court decision relating to the blockbuster drug Plavix. The court reversed an award of more than $100 million in prejudgment interest under a settlement agreement. Sanofi-Aventis v. Apotex Inc., 659 F.3d 1171 (Fed. Cir. 2011). Representation of defendant-appellant Apotex, Inc. in appeal of a district court decision relating to the manufacture of a generic modafinil-based drug used to treat sleeping disorders, in which Apotex alleged the patent was invalid and unenforceable on multiple grounds, including because the patent had been procured through inequitable conduct. Apotex v. Cephalon, 500 F. App'x 959 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (per curiam). Successful representation of a multinational electronics manufacturer in defense of a patent infringement lawsuit and in inter partes review proceedings before the USPTO PTAB. The two patents-in-suit allegedly covered the scalable display of Internet content on mobile devices, and were asserted in the same lawsuit against several smartphone manufacturers, including our client. SoftView LLC v. Apple, Inc. et al., No (consolidated) (D. Del.). Katten filed petitions for inter partes review of the asserted patent claims with the PTAB the only IPR petitions filed before the deadline expired. The PTAB granted both petitions, and the district court then granted our motion to stay the lawsuit, pending the outcome of the PTAB proceedings. The PTAB's final written decisions held all of the asserted patent claims unpatentable. The patent owner appealed both decisions to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Katten briefed and argued the appeal, and the Federal Circuit affirmed both of the PTAB's decisions with a Rule 36 order in favor of Katten's client. Softview LLC v. Kyocera Corporation, et al., Nos , (Fed. Cir., February 9, 2015). Commercial/Real Estate Representation of Retail Property Trust, a wholly owned subsidiary of Simon Property Group, Inc., in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) does not preempt traditional state-law property claims for trespass and private nuisance asserted against a labor union that was arguably engaged in a secondary boycott at the time. The Ninth Circuit agreed in an important precedential opinion that overturned an adverse decision by the district court. Retail Property Trust v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 768 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2014). Representation of the owner of a shopping mall in Rockville, Maryland, in a case involving the owner's ongoing efforts to redevelop the mall into a major mixed-use, town-center-style development. An anchor tenant of the mall sought to enjoin further redevelopment of the mall under a reciprocal easement agreement. In an important published decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of the anchor tenant's request for injunctive relief, holding that the proposed injunction would have required the district court to either supervise the restoration of the mall or freeze the mall's ongoing redevelopment efforts, both of which the court of appeals deemed infeasible. Lord & Taylor, LLC V. White Flint, L.P., 780 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2015).
6 Environmental Representation of Targa Resources Corp., a midstream provider of oil and gas services, in litigation against the EPA in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. This complex litigation challenged the EPA's air quality nonattainment designations in the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards rulemaking. Mississippi Comm'n on Envt'l. Quality v. EPA, No (D.C. Cir.). Representation of the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), the leading voice of the US ethanol industry, in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, defending the district court's preliminary injunction and summary judgment rulings in favor of our client that California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program violates the dormant Commerce Clause of the US Constitution by discriminating against out-of-state corn-derived ethanol while favoring in-state corn ethanol and impermissibly regulating extraterritorial conduct. Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey, 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct (2014), on remand, No. 1:09-cv-2234 (E.D. Cal.). Representation of the RFA as an amicus curiae in litigation before the Supreme Court of Indiana regarding the classification of ethanol production facilities under that state's implementation of the federal Clean Air Act's Prevention of Significant Deterioration program. The Court ultimately sided with the RFA's position, holding that Indiana could reduce regulatory burdens on the State's ethanol industry without formally revising its State Implementation Plan with the EPA. Nat'l Res. Def. Council v. POET Biorefining North Manchester, LLC, 15 N.E.3d 555 (Ind. 2014). Consumer Class Action Representation of Title Lenders in the Supreme Court of Missouri in which we obtained a unanimous decision for our client, holding that the presence of a class action waiver is not, in itself, grounds for finding that an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act is "unconscionable" under state law. Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc., 364 S.W.3d 505 (Mo. 2012). Tax Representation of taxpayers in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and US Supreme Court in a case where we obtained a ruling in favor of clients on the issue of whether an understatement of income resulting from an overstatement of tax basis for sold property can qualify as an omission from gross income giving rise to an extended sixyear (as opposed to three-year) period for tax assessment. The victory against the IRS was a multimillion-dollar win for our clients and is projected to have as much as a billion-dollar impact in tax cases across the country. Grapevine Imports, Ltd. v. United States, 636 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2011), vacated and remanded by 132 S. Ct (2012). Pro Bono Representation of a transgender ironworker in an appeal before the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit alleging discrimination and retaliation against his union and two of its officials. In a precedential opinion reinstating the client's lawsuit, the Second Circuit recognized for the first time that allegations of transgender discrimination are sufficient to state a claim for breach of a labor union's duty of fair representation, an implied cause of action under the National Labor Relations Act. The Second Circuit also ordered the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to reconsider the client's claims of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, holding that the failure to exhaust administrative remedies with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission did not mandate dismissal, and recognizing that the client's failure to exhaust might be excused on one or more equitable grounds. The Second Circuit lauded Katten's work during the argument and noted in its opinion that the client was "ably represented" on appeal. Fowlkes v. Ironworkers Local 40, 790 F.3d 378 (2d Cir. 2015). Representation, in cooperation with the National Immigrant Justice Center, in the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit of a woman who had emigrated from Nicaragua and was facing removal from the United States based on "fraudulent marriage" charges. Despite our client's repeated requests, the immigration judge denied our client a subpoena to obtain the opportunity to cross-examine
7 her estranged husband the only source for the charges who had fled the jurisdiction by the time of her hearing. The Seventh Circuit held that the removal had been ordered in violation of our client's procedural rights and reversed the removal order. The case was not only a victory for our client, but an important decision protecting an alien's statutory entitlement to cross-examine adverse witnesses. Malave v. Holder, 610 F.3d 483 (7th Cir. 2010). Representation of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, the City of Chicago, the Major Cities Chiefs Association and the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys as amici curiae in the Illinois Supreme Court in defense of the constitutionality of Cook County's ban on assault weapons and largecapacity ammunition magazines. Wilson v. Cook County, 968 N.E.2d 641 (Ill. Sup. Ct. April 5, 2012). Current representation of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and local gun safety organizations as amici curiae in defense of the constitutionality of bans on assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition magazines in Friedman v. City of Highland Park, No (7th Cir.); Kolbe v. O'Malley, No (4th Cir.) (MD statute); Fyock v. City of Sunnyvale, No (9th Cir.); Shew v. Malloy, No (2d Cir.) (CT statute); Nojay v. Cuomo, No (2d Cir.) (NY statute); and Colorado Outfitters Ass'n v. Hickenlooper, No (10th Cir.) (CO statute). Representation, as co-counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., of plaintiff transgender prison inmates in the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a facial challenge to a Wisconsin statute prohibiting the use of public funds for hormone therapy or sexual reassignment surgery for inmates of Wisconsin prisons, without regard to medical need as determined by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections' physicians. The Seventh Circuit unanimously affirmed the district court in holding that the statute, on its face, violated the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011).
APPELLATE AND SUPREME COURT LITIGATION
APPELLATE AND SUPREME COURT LITIGATION RECOGNIZED BY Our Clients Public and private companies, trade associations, and others across industries and throughout the country count on Katten's Appellate and
More informationRobert T. Smith. Partner Washington, DC p Practices. Recognition. Education.
Robert T. Smith Partner robert.smith1@kattenlaw.com Washington, DC p +1.202.625.3616 Practices FOCUS: Litigation and Dispute Resolution White Collar, Investigations and Compliance Appellate and Supreme
More informationRobert T. Smith. Partner Washington, DC p Practices. Recognition. Education.
Robert T. Smith Partner robert.smith1@kattenlaw.com Washington, DC p +1.202.625.3616 Practices FOCUS: Litigation White Collar, Investigations and Compliance Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Insurance
More informationEmily Stern. Partner Madison Avenue New York, NY Practices. Industries. Selected Experience
Emily Stern Partner +1.212.940.8515 emily.stern@kattenlaw.com 575 Madison Avenue, NY 10022-2585 Practices FOCUS: and Dispute Resolution Securities and Enforcement White Collar, Investigations and Compliance
More informationCase 3:17-cv BEN-JLB Document 89-1 Filed 04/01/19 PageID.8145 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00-ben-jlb Document - Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 0 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California State Bar No. MARK R. BECKINGTON Supervising Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 00 ANTHONY
More informationWILLIAM E. CORUM. Kansas City, MO office:
WILLIAM E. CORUM Partner Kansas City, MO office: 816.983.8139 email: william.corum@ Overview As a trial lawyer, Bill is sought out by national and global companies for his litigation strategy and direction.
More informationNAMSDL Case Law Update
In This Issue This issue of NAMSDL Case Law Update focuses on seven cases related to the access to and use of prescription monitoring program ( PMP ) records. The issues addressed in these decisions involve:
More informationFIREARMS LITIGATION REPORT March 2016
FIREARMS LITIGATION REPORT March 2016 Prepared By: NRA/CRPA and Ninth Circuit Litigation Matters CA CCW "good cause" requirement Peruta v. San Diego Oral arguments took place before an 11- judge "en banc"
More informationNo In the Supreme Court of the United States ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC., COVIDIEN LP., et al.,
No. 16-366 In the Supreme Court of the United States ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC., Petitioner, v. COVIDIEN LP., et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationSuture Express, Inc. v. Owens & Minor Distrib., Inc., 851 F.3d 1029 (10th Cir.)
Antitrust Law Case Summaries Coordinated Conduct Case Summaries Prosterman et al. v. Airline Tariff Publishing Co. et al., No. 3:16-cv-02017 (N.D. Cal.) Background: Forty-one travel agents filed an antitrust
More informationUnited States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver
United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver By: Roland C. Goss August 31, 2015 On October 6, 2015, the second day of this
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1471 CLEARPLAY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MAX ABECASSIS and NISSIM CORP, Defendants-Appellants. David L. Mortensen, Stoel Rives LLP, of Salt
More information1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT. 3. STAPLE ALL ADDITIONAL PAGES 1/30/2014 3:13CV739
Case: 14-319 Document: 7-1 Page: 1 02/14/2014 1156655 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CIVIL APPEAL PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT (FORM C) 1. SEE NOTICE ON REVERSE. 2. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT.
More informationU.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET CHART 2015 TERM October 18 October 24. Amicus cases = yellow highlight Petitions scheduled for conference green highlight
U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET CHART 2015 TERM October 18 October 24 Amicus cases = yellow highlight Petitions scheduled for conference green highlight CASE/DOCKET NO./LOWER COURT MOST RECENT PETITIONS FOR
More informationDe Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144 (C.A.9 (Cal.), 1990)
Page 1144 912 F.2d 1144 Steven M. De LONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, Respondent-Appellee. Steven M. De LONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Ruth MANSFIELD; Gloria Gonzales; Patricia Denning;
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,
USCA Case #17-1145 Document #1683079 Filed: 07/07/2017 Page 1 of 15 NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT No. 17-1145 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CLEAN AIR
More informationLAMAR F. JOST Partner P F
Partner jost@wtotrial.com P 303.244.1905 F 303.244.1879 EDUCATION University of Wyoming College of Law, J.D., 2002 Order of the Coif Wyoming Law Review, Comment Editor University of Wyoming, B.S., 1999,
More information$199,375, New York Counties Tobacco Trust V Tobacco Settlement Pass-Through Bonds Series 2005 S1 through Series 2005 S4
BLX Group LLC 51 West 52 nd Street New York, NY 10019 p. 212 506 5200 f. 212 506 5151 $199,375,348.20 Broome Tobacco Asset Securitization Corporation ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT REPORT Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 17-127 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STEPHEN V. KOLBE,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT February 6, 2009 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court MONSEL DUNGEN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. AL ESTEP;
More informationLIBRARY. CERCLA Case Law Developments ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE. Full Article
ENVIRONMENTAL COST RECOVERY & LENDER LIABILITY UPDATE As a service to Jenner & Block's clients and the greater legal community, the Firm's Environmental, Energy and Natural Resources Law practice maintains
More informationSILLY LAWYER TRICKS III. By Tom Donlon March 4, appeals by real lawyers. Similar examples probably appear in your local
SILLY LAWYER TRICKS III By Tom Donlon March 4, 2016 This is the latest in our continuing series reporting on real mistakes made in appeals by real lawyers. Similar examples probably appear in your local
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc JODIE NEVILS, APPELLANT, vs. No. SC93134 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC., and ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., RESPONDENTS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY Honorable
More informationR. Kenyon Meyer Partner
R. Kenyon Meyer Partner kenyon.meyer@dinsmore.com Louisville, KY Tel: (502) 540-2325 Kenyon is the office managing partner of the Louisville office. He has tried a wide variety of cases in state and federal
More informationJeremy A. Mercer. Partner
Jeremy A. Mercer Jeremy is an experienced commercial litigator who, for more than a decade, has focused on energy, with an emphasis on oil and gas litigation. His extensive experience in the shale and
More informationSPECIAL REPORT May 2018 SURPREME COURT FINDS USPTO S ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT TRIALS CONSTITUTIONAL AND SETS GROUND RULES FOR THEIR CONDUCT BY THE PTAB
SPECIAL REPORT May 2018 Spring 2017 SURPREME COURT FINDS USPTO S ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT TRIALS CONSTITUTIONAL AND SETS GROUND RULES FOR THEIR CONDUCT BY THE PTAB On April 24, 2018, the United State Supreme
More informationTECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC
TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC www.tblawadvisors.com Fall 2011 Business Implications of the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA)
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON In the Matter of GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS (CAMAS LLC and CLATSKANIE PEOPLE' S UTILITY DISTRICT Petitioners. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ REPLY BRIEF OF NOBLE
More informationBruce M. Sabados. Partner Madison Avenue New York, NY Practices. Industries.
Bruce M. Sabados Partner +1.212.940.6369 bruce.sabados@kattenlaw.com 575 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022-2585 Practices FOCUS: and Dispute Resolution Securities and Enforcement Appellate and Supreme
More informationCase 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9
Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE and SIERRA CLUB v. Plaintiffs, SCOTT PRUITT, in
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit CELGARD, LLC, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. LG CHEM, LTD. AND LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellants. 2014-1675,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1385 Document #1670218 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Murray Energy Corporation,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 13-1881 Elaine T. Huffman; Charlene S. Sandler lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Credit Union of Texas lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
More informationCase: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302
Case: 4:15-cv-01361-JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY H. JONES, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:15-cv-01361-JAR
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
Case 1:16-cv-04599-MHC Document 1 Filed 12/14/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION KAMELA BAILEY, on behalf of herself and all others
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, INC., APP PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, PLIVA HRVATSKA D.O.O., TEVA
More informationWhen is a ruling truly final?
When is a ruling truly final? When is a ruling truly final? Ryan B. McCrum at Jones Day considers the Fresenius v Baxter ruling and its potential impact on patent litigation in the US. In a case that could
More informationRAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust
RAMBUS, INC. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Impact on Standards and Antitrust American Intellectual Property Law Association IP Practice in Japan Committee October 2009, Washington, DC JOHN A. O BRIEN LAW
More informationCase 1:07-cv RMU Document 71-2 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 6. ANDA , Amlodipine Besylate Tablets, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg.
Case 1:07-cv-00579-RMU Document 71-2 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 6 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES ANDA 76-719, Amlodipine Besylate Tablets, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg. SENT BY FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
More informationNO In The Supreme Court of the United States. Petitioner, v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GULF COAST, INC., ET AL., Respondents.
NO. 17-1492 In The Supreme Court of the United States REBEKAH GEE, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS, Petitioner, v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GULF COAST, INC., ET AL., Respondents. On
More informationCase 2:13-cv JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 12 Document 1
Case 2:13-cv-00071-JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 12 Document 1 Case 2:13-cv-00071-JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 2 of 12 Document 1 Case 2:13-cv-00071-JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 3 of 12 Document 1 Case 2:13-cv-00071-JPS
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.
Appellate Case: 16-4154 Document: 01019730944 Date Filed: 12/05/2016 Page: 1 No. 16-4154 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation,
More informationSTATUTES GOVERNING CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES AND THREE-JUDGE PANELS
1 STATUTES GOVERNING CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES AND THREE-JUDGE PANELS 1-267.1. Three-judge panel for actions challenging plans apportioning or redistricting State legislative or congressional districts;
More informationAIA: How U.S. PTO Proceedings. are Changing Patent Litigation. Post-Grant Review Under the. Practice. David Hoffman. James Babineau.
December 11, 2014 Post-Grant Review Under the AIA: How U.S. PTO Proceedings are Changing Patent Litigation Practice Matthew Wernli David Hoffman James Babineau Post-Grant Review Under the AIA Agenda I.
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET
ILND 44 (Rev. 07/10/17 Case: 1:18-cv-04144 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET The ILND 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor
More informationGeorge D. Sax
George D. Sax gsax@scharfbanks.com 312-662-6995 George D. Sax concentrates his practice in civil litigation. Mr. Sax has represented numerous individual and business clients in a variety of matters, including
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly Register at www.acc.com/education/mym17 If you have any technical problems, please contact us via email at: webcast@acc.com Recent Developments in Patent and Post-Grant
More informationUnit 3 Dispute Resolution ARE 306. I. Litigation in an Adversary System
Unit 3 Dispute Resolution ARE 306 I. Litigation in an Adversary System In an adversarial system, two parties present conflicting positions to a judge and, often, a jury. The plaintiff (called the petitioner
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 13-15984, 06/26/2015, ID: 9589135, DktEntry: 67-1, Page 1 of 7 Case 1:12-cv-01213-RRB Document 25 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 7 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHILIP
More informationHow to Handle Complicated IPRs:
How to Handle Complicated IPRs: Obviousness Requirements in Recent CAFC Cases and Use of Experimental Data OCTOBER 2017 nixonvan.com District Court Lawsuit Statistics Number of New District Court Cases
More informationU.S. Supreme Court Could Dramatically Reshape IPR Estoppel David W. O Brien and Clint Wilkins *
David W. O Brien and Clint Wilkins * Since the June grant of certiorari in Oil States Energy Services, 1 the possibility that the U.S. Supreme Court might find inter partes review (IPR), an adversarial
More informationInsight. NLRB Continues Attack on Class and Collective Action Waivers FEBRUARY 22, 2016 IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION. NLRB Decisions
IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION FEBRUARY 22, 2016 NLRB Continues Attack on Class and Collective Action Waivers BY WILLIAM EMANUEL, MISSY PARRY, HENRY LEDERMAN, AND MICHAEL LOTITO There seems to be no end in sight
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit G. DAVID JANG, M.D., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Petitioners. 2014-134 On Petition
More informationCommon law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.
Litigation U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3 20122 Milano Comparing England and Wales and the U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3
More informationNos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Case: 14-1361 Document: 83 Page: 1 Filed: 09/29/2014 Nos. 14-1361, -1366 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE BRCA1- AND BRCA2-BASED HEREDITARY CANCER TEST PATENT LITIGATION
More informationNC DENTAL FALLOUT LITIGATION SNAPSHOT
NC Dental Board v. FTC Allibone v. Texas Medical Board Axcess Medical v. MS State Bd. of Medical Licensure Ballinger v. OH State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors Barry v.
More informationCase 7:16-cv O Document 100 Filed 11/20/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1792
Case 7:16-cv-00054-O Document 100 Filed 11/20/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1792 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS et al., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, Case No
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, 2007 Case No. 03-5681 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RONNIE LEE BOWLING, Petitioner-Appellant, v.
More informationSupreme Court to Address Removal of State Parens Patriae Actions to Federal Courts Under CAFA
theantitrustsource w w w. a n t i t r u s t s o u r c e. c o m A u g u s t 2 0 1 3 1 Supreme Court to Address Removal of State Parens Patriae Actions to Federal Courts Under CAFA Blake L. Harrop S States
More informationNos , , PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. (ffk/a PHILIP MORRIS, INC.) and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., et al. and LORILLARD TOBACCO CO.
Nos. 09-976, 09-977, 09-1012 I J Supreme Court, U.S. F I L E D HAY252910 PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. (ffk/a PHILIP MORRIS, INC.) and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., et al. and LORILLARD TOBACCO CO., V. Petitioners,
More information2:14-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
2:14-cv-02072-CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 E-FILED Tuesday, 15 April, 2014 02:59:14 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION NAYA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No P. versus. WARDEN, Respondent Appellee.
Case: 17-14027 Date Filed: 04/03/2018 Page: 1 of 10 KEITH THARPE, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-14027-P versus Petitioner Appellant, WARDEN, Respondent Appellee.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., v. MERUS N.V.,
Case: 16-1346 Document: 105 Page: 1 Filed: 09/26/2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2016-1346 REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., v. MERUS N.V., Plaintiff-Appellant, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationChicken or Egg: Applying the Age- Old Question to Class Waivers in Employee Arbitration Agreements
Chicken or Egg: Applying the Age- Old Question to Class Waivers in Employee Arbitration Agreements By Bonnie Burke, Lawrence & Bundy LLC and Christina Tellado, Reed Smith LLP Companies with employees across
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-WQH -NLS Document Filed 0// Page of 0 CHINMAX MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC., a Chinese Corporation, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-CV Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 14-CV-1466 FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS LLC et al., Defendants. FIRST QUALITY BABY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 DWAYNE DENEGAL (FATIMA SHABAZZ), v. R. FARRELL, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. CASE NO. :-cv-0-dad-jlt (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF S REQUEST
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 45 Filed: 08/03/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:189
Case: 1:16-cv-07054 Document #: 45 Filed: 08/03/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:189 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SAMUEL LIT, Plaintiff, v. No. 16 C 7054 Judge
More informationHow To ID Real Parties-In-Interest In Inter Partes Review
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com How To ID Real Parties-In-Interest In Inter Partes
More informationPostconviction Relief Actions Hon. Robert J. Blink 5 th Judicial District of Iowa
Postconviction Relief Actions Hon. Robert J. Blink 5 th Judicial District of Iowa Basics Protecting yourself preventing PCRs o Two step approach Protect your client Facts & law Consult experienced lawyers
More informationSeeking Disapproval: Presidential Review Of ITC Orders
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Seeking Disapproval: Presidential Review Of ITC Orders
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 547 U. S. (2006) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationNavigating the Post-Grant Landscape
Navigating the Post-Grant Landscape John Alemanni Matthew Holohan 2017 Kilpatrick Townsend Overview Substantial Changes Proposed Scope of Estoppel Remains Uncertain Appellate Issues and Cases Covered Business
More informationFEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254
FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 Meredith J. Ross 2011 Clinical Professor of Law Director, Frank J. Remington Center University of Wisconsin Law School 1) Introduction Many inmates
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: webcast@acc.com Thank You! 1 Quarterly Federal Circuit and Supreme
More informationPrintable Lesson Materials
Printable Lesson Materials Print these materials as a study guide These printable materials allow you to study away from your computer, which many students find beneficial. These materials consist of two
More informationDana L. Eismeier Shareholder Litigation
Contact Office 303.796.2626 Email deismeier@bfwlaw.com Mr. Eismeier is Chair of Burns, Figa & Will, P.C. s Litigation Department. He is a trial attorney with experience in all forms of business disputes
More informationNo OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, Petitioner, v. GREENE S ENERGY GROUP, LLC, ET AL., Respondents.
No. 16-712 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, Petitioner, v. GREENE S ENERGY GROUP, LLC, ET AL., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
More informationCase 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 4:15-cv-00386-CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, in his official
More informationCase 1:16-cv DLH-CSM Document 91 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Case 1:16-cv-00103-DLH-CSM Document 91 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Enerplus Resources (USA Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationArbitration-Related Litigation in Texas
Arbitration-Related Litigation in Texas MARK TRACHTENBERG Overview Pre-arbitration litigation Procedures for enforcing arbitration clause Strategies for defeating arbitration clause Post-arbitration litigation
More information~upreme ourt of ti)e ~niteb ~tate~
I supreme Court, U,S. ~ No. 06-1463 [~FFICE OF THECLERK I ~upreme ourt of ti)e ~niteb ~tate~ ARNOLD M. PRESTON, Petitioner, ALEX E. FERRER, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court
More informationwhich we were successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction against borrowers. Additionally, SAC later received summary judgment over all of Plaint
JOHN A. (JACK) CRAWFORD, JR. Jackson Office (601) 985-4532 jack.crawford@butlersnow.com Jack is experienced in financial services litigation and commercial litigation matters. He has been AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell
More informationSupreme Court Invites Solicitor General s View on Safe Harbor of the Hatch-Waxman Act
Supreme Court Invites Solicitor General s View on Safe Harbor of the Hatch-Waxman Act Prepared By: The Intellectual Property Group On June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court invited the Solicitor
More informationCase 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 2:18-cv-03821-SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 BARSHAY SANDERS, PLLC 100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 500 Garden City, New York 11530 Tel: (516 203-7600 Fax: (516 706-5055 Email:
More informationPTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences 2015 National CLE Conference Friday, January 9, 2015 Presented by Denise
More informationOregon enacts statute to make improper patent license demands a violation of its unlawful trade practices law
ebook Patent Troll Watch Written by Philip C. Swain March 14, 2016 States Are Pushing Patent Trolls Away from the Legal Line Washington passes a Patent Troll Prevention Act In December, 2015, the Washington
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Staples v. United States of America Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA WILLIAM STAPLES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-10-1007-C ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationL DATE FILED: ~-~-~ lll'f
Case 1:13-cv-03777-AKH Document 154 Filed 08/11/14 I USDC Page SL ~ y 1 of 10 I DOCJ.. 1.' '~"'"T. ~ IFLr"l 1-... ~~c "' ' CALL\ ELED DOL#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT L DATE FILED: ~-~-~ lll'f SOUTHERN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-jst ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY Re: ECF
More informationJudicial Estoppel: Key Defense In Discrimination Suits
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Judicial Estoppel: Key Defense In Discrimination
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC
Appellate Case: 14-3246 Document: 01019343568 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 1 Kail Marie, et al., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Case No. 14-3246 Robert Moser,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 14-171 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- KENNETH TROTTER,
More informationCase4:12-cv PJH Document22-2 Filed07/23/12 Page1 of 8. Exhibit B
Case:-cv-0-PJH Document- Filed0// Page of Exhibit B Case Case:-cv-0-PJH :-cv-0000-jls-rbb Document- Filed0// 0// Page of of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LIBERTY MEDIA
More information2 California Procedure (5th), Courts
2 California Procedure (5th), Courts I. INTRODUCTION A. Judges. 1. [ 1] Qualification. 2. Selection. (a) Reviewing Courts. (1) [ 2] In General. (2) [ 3] Confirmation Election. (b) [ 4] Superior Court.
More informationThe America Invents Act : What You Need to Know. September 28, 2011
The America Invents Act : What You Need to Know September 28, 2011 Presented by John B. Pegram J. Peter Fasse 2 The America Invents Act (AIA) Enacted September 16, 2011 3 References: AIA = America Invents
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 537 U. S. (2002) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 92 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1591
Case: 1:10-cv-05135 Document #: 92 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1591 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RHONDA EZELL, JOSEPH I. BROWN, )
More informationMEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 3:05-cv-00287-GPM-CJP Document 90 Filed 08/25/2005 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RONALD ALSUP, ROBERT CREWS, and MAGNUM PROPERTIES, L.L.C.,
More informationPaper Entered: August 30, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 21 571-272-7822 Entered: August 30, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP., and ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS
More information