George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS
|
|
- Stuart Jacob Garrison
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION Spring 2014 Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS Robert F. Shaffer Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202) Robert L. Burns Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Freedom Drive Reston, VA (571) John M. Williamson Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202) William B. Raich Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202) Luke McCammon Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202)
2 PATENT LITIGATION Spring 2014 Course Materials (1) Case File (2) Selected statutes, rules, cases, and articles that may be assigned for reading during the semester. 2
3 PATENT LITIGATION (SPRING 2014) CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION FILINGS 1 JAN 14 None 2 JAN 21 Draft Complaint Draft Initial Disclosures DJ Plaintiff AMC (MASON) to Serve Complaint Sun., Jan. 26 Present Web Site Overview Present Draft Position Paper 3 JAN 28 Present Revised Draft Position Paper Draft Discovery Requests DJ Defendant GGI (SUFFOLK) to Serve Answer and Counterclaims Sun., Feb. 2 Parties to Serve Initial Disclosures Sun., Feb. 2 Parties to Serve Discovery Requests Sun., Feb. 2 3
4 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 4 FEB 4 Draft Discovery Responses FILINGS Plaintiff to Serve Reply to Counterclaim Wed., Feb. 5 Parties to Serve Discovery Responses Sun., Feb. 9 5 FEB 11 Draft Claim Chart (Invalidity) Review Discovery Responses Parties to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Disclosures (Plaintiff re Infringement; Defendant re Invalidity) Sun., Feb. 16 Parties to Exchange Proposed Claim Terms To Be Construed Sun., Feb FEB 18 Draft of Markman Brief Draft Motions to Compel Parties to Meet and Confer Final Claim Terms to be Construed Fri., Feb. 21 by 5 p.m. Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions Sun., Feb. 23 Serve Motions to Compel Sun., Feb. 23 4
5 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 7 FEB 25 Continue Draft of Markman Brief Draft Reply Motion to Compel 8 MAR 4 Practice Markman Argument Review of Deposition Preparations FILINGS Parties to Serve Markman Briefs Sun., Mar. 2 Serve Reply to Motion to Compel Sun., Mar. 2 Markman Hearing Thur. Mar. 6 at 9 PM (Finnegan offices at 901 New York Ave., NW, Washington DC 20001) MAR 11 SPRING BREAK NO CLASS 9 MAR 18 Draft Motion for Summary Judgment Parties to Complete Two Depositions Each Sun. Mar. 23 Parties to Serve Any Motions for Summary Judgment Sun. Mar MAR 25 Draft Expert Reports (Technical, Legal) Parties to Serve Expert Reports Sun., Mar. 30 5
6 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 11 APR 1 Draft Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment Draft Trial Brief, Testimony FILINGS Parties to Serve Replies to Any Motions for Summary Judgment Sun., Apr. 6 Parties to Serve Trial Briefs; Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine Sun., April 6 12 APR 8 Revise Draft Trial Brief, Testimony Draft Motions in Limine Draft Jury Instructions Parties to Serve Trial Briefs; Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine Sun., April 13 Parties to Serve Proposed Jury Instructions Sun., April APR 15 Trial Preparation Draft Demonstrative Exhibits Parties to Serve Witness Lists Wed. Apr. 16 (midnight) Parties to Serve Demonstrative Exhibits Fri. April 18 (noon) Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions in Limine Fri. April 18 (noon) 6
7 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION FILINGS 14 SAT. APR. 19 (9:00 am - 5:00 pm) TRIAL BOSTON, MA 7
8 DUE DATES 1. DJ Plaintiff (GMU LAW) to Serve Complaint JAN DJ Defendant (SUFFOLK LAW) to Serve Answer and Counterclaims FEB 2 3. Plaintiff to Serve Reply to Counterclaim FEB 5 4. Parties to Serve Initial Disclosures FEB 2 5. Parties to Serve Discovery Requests FEB 2 6. Parties to Serve Discovery Responses FEB 9 7. Parties to Serve Motions to Compel (If Any) FEB Parties to Serve Infringement & Invalidity Disclosures (Plaintiff re Infringement; Defendant re Invalidity) FEB Parties to Exchange Proposed Claim Terms to be Construed FEB Parties to Meet and Confer on Final Claim Terms to be Construed FEB 21 (by 5 pm) 11. Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions FEB Parties to Serve Markman Briefs MAR Markman Hearing (video conference) MAR 6 (9:00 pm) 14. Parties to Complete Two (2) Depositions Each MAR Parties to Serve Any Motions for Summary Judgment MAR Parties to Serve Expert Reports MAR Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions for Summary Judgment APR Parties to Serve Trial Briefs (If Requested) APR Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine APR 6 8
9 20. Parties to Serve Proposed Joint Jury Instructions APR Parties to Serve Demonstrative Exhibits APR 18 (noon) 22. Parties to Serve Witness List APR 16 (noon) 23. Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions in Limine APR 18 (midnight) 24. Motions Hearing APR 19(Boston) 25. Trial APR 19 (Boston) 9
10 Local Rules 1.0 All service to be made by 10:00 p.m. on date due (unless otherwise noted). 2.0 All service to opposing counsel to be made via , with copies to and 3.0 Depositions limited to two (2) each side, one hour limit each (taking party to provide transcript in five (5) days). 4.0 Interrogatories limited to five (5) each side, counting subparts. 5.0 No requests for admission permitted. 6.0 No expert depositions permitted. 7.0 Markman hearing by video conference, 30 minutes per side. 8.0 No damages discovery permitted (damages issues bifurcated). 10
11 Assignments Web Master Lead Counsel Plaintiff (x3) Position Paper AMC Witness #1 AMC Witness #2 DJ Complaint Dispute Resolution Letter to Client Initial Disclosures Discovery Requests, Responses, and Motions to Compel Markman Proposed Claim Terms and Constructions Claim Chart (invalidity) Take Deposition 1 Take Deposition 2 Defend Deposition 1 Defend Deposition 2 Plaintiff Witness 2 Technical Expert Patent Expert A B C D E F G H I J K, L M N O P Q R S T U Summary Judgment Brief 11 V
12 Demonstrative Exhibits Motions in Limine Jury Instructions W X Y 12
George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS
George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION Spring 2016 Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS William B. Raich 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202)
More informationCase 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190
Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHELLE FLANAGAN, et al.,, vs. KAMALA HARRIS, et al.,. Case No.: LA CV-0 JAK (ASx ORDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION [PLAINTIFF][, et al.,] v. [DEFENDANT][, et al.] Case No. [2 / 6 / 5]:00-CV-000-[JRG / RSP /
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1
Case 5:06-cv-00222-DF Document 38 39 Filed 01/19/2007 01/22/2007 Page 1 of 6 KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. (a/k/a KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, vs. Plaintiff, BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS, INC.
More informationPTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences 2015 National CLE Conference Friday, January 9, 2015 Presented by Denise
More informationThese materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of
May 14, 2013 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of U.S. intellectual property law. These
More informationCourthouse News Service
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division 2001 FE8 21 P U.: 18 NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORP., ) CALEXAHDR?ARvip C URT Plaintiff, ) Case No. j )
More informationThe New Post-AIA World
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP The New Post-AIA World New Ways to Challenge a US Patent or Patent Application Erika Arner FICPI ABC 2013 Conference New Orleans, LA 0 Third Party Patent
More informationIP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability David W. Hill Partner October 11, 2012 1 U.S. is the most IP-litigious Nation 10 Most Litigious
More informationCislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs
Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs The following is a list of procedural Tasks and Deadlines for actions in the Central District of California
More informationUniversity of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Spring 2015 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA
University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS Spring 2015 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA THE ONLY ASSIGNMENT FOR THE FIRST CLASSS IS TO REVIEW THE SYLLABUS. IF YOU HAVE
More informationPaper Entered: October 24, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 10 571.272.7822 Entered: October 24, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD FEDEX CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. IPVENTURE, INC., Patent
More informationPaper Date Entered: November 2, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 21 571-272-7822 Date Entered: November 2, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD APPLE INC., Petitioner, v. VIRNETX INC., Patent
More informationPost-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO Erika Arner Advanced Patent Law Institute, Palo Alto, CA December 12, 2013 0 Post-Grant Proceedings New AIA proceedings
More informationNew Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by
New Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by Tom Irving Copyright Finnegan 2013 May 14, 2013 Disclaimer These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes
More informationFORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
FORM 4. RULE 26(f REPORT (PATENT CASES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Name of Plaintiff CIVIL FILE NO. Plaintiff, v. RULE 26(f REPORT (PATENT CASES Name of Defendant Defendant. The
More informationCASE 0:16-cv PJS-FLN Document 18 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:16-cv-00358-PJS-FLN Document 18 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ERGOTRON, INC., Plaintiff, v. HUMANSCALE CORPORATION, Defendant. C.A. No.: 0:16-cv-00358-PJS-FLN
More informationPaper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 15 571-272-7822 Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA; AXIS COMMUNICATIONS AB; AXIS
More informationPaper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 16 571-272-7822 Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA; AXIS COMMUNICATIONS AB; AXIS
More informationUsing the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool
April 12, 2016 Webinar Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool Sheryl Koval Garko Principal, Boston Monty Fusco Of Counsel, Washington, DC Overview CLE Contact: MCLETeam@fr.com Materials available
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. TIGAR A. Meeting and Disclosure Prior to Pretrial Conference At least
More informationWIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 22 May 2015 Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.
Finnegan Europe LLP WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 22 May 2015 Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. 1 Overview of Hatch-Waxman Act Enacted as part of the Drug Price Competition and Patent
More informationCase 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUANTUM STREAM INC., Plaintiff(s), No. 15CV8240-LTS-FM PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
More informationThe Tundra Docket: Western District Of Wisconsin
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Tundra Docket: Western District Of Wisconsin
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN ) jacob.schroeder@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 00 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 0-0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - Attorney for Plaintiff
More informationDRIVES, STACKED ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
s UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of _. CERTAIN SOLID STATE STORAGE DRIVES, STACKED ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME Inv. No. 337-TA-1097
More informationCase 1:10-cv GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:10-cv-00327-GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FILED 2010 APR -2 P l : ELPIDA MEMORY, INC..CLERK US DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA.
More informationOverview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence
Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence July 21, 2016 Drew DeVoogd, Member Patent Trial Proceedings in the United States In patent matters, trials typically occur in the federal
More informationCHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW
Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW 1:1 Practice tip Checklist of issues to consider when disclosing experts under Rule 26(a) 1:2 Overview 1:3
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
Linear Group Services, LLC v. Attica Automation, Inc. Doc. 56 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Linear Group Services, vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 13-10108 HON. GERSHWIN
More informationPretrial Litigation Guidelines Fall Wednesday Class 6-9 p.m. Rm TBA
Break out rooms: 3 additional rooms TBA Pretrial Litigation Guidelines Fall 2010 - Class 6-9 p.m. Rm TBA Objective of the Course: To provide law students with an opportunity to apply pre-trial rules of
More informationIntellectual Property& Technology Law Journal
Intellectual Property& Technology Law Journal Edited by the Technology and Proprietary Rights Group of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP VOLUME 29 NUMBER 9 SEPTEMBER 2017 The Use of Genetic Evidence to Defend
More informationLegal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice
Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice To get the most from an experienced and trained legal assistant1 in litigation practice, an attorney may need to open their
More informationPaper 14 Tel: Entered: July 17, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 14 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: July 17, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD CULTEC, INC., Petitioner, v. STORMTECH LLC, Patent
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Audatex North America Inc. v. Mitchell International Inc. Doc. 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 AUDATEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Plaintiff, v. MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
More informationNew Local Patent Rules In Northern District Of Ill.
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com New Local Patent Rules In Northern District
More informationCase 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-00195-TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DIGITAL CHOICE OF TEXAS, LLC V. CIVIL NO. 2:05-CV-195(TJW)
More informationInequitable Conduct Judicial Developments
Inequitable Conduct Judicial Developments Duke Patent Law Institute May 16, 2013 Presented by Tom Irving Copyright Finnegan 2013 Disclaimer These materials are public information and have been prepared
More informationInitial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties
IN THE MATTER OF: Claimant(s): Respondent(s): Case Number: Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order Parties This case was filed under the American Arbitration Association Expedited Commercial Rules.
More informationLicensing & Management of IP Assets. Covenant Not to Sue
Licensing & Management of IP Assets Covenant Not to Sue AIPLA Spring Meeting May 2, 2013 Presented by D. Patrick O Reilley Emotional Background to Covenants Implication of validity Exhaustion Lemelson
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BEIJING CHOICE ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., v. Plaintiff, CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS USA INC. and CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD.,
More informationParalegal Section MCLE Meeting DCBA Bar Center Date: November 8, 2017
Paralegal Section MCLE Meeting DCBA Bar Center Date: November 8, 2017 11:45 AM Noon Welcome/Introductions Mary Gaertner, Section Chair Noon 1:00 PM Program 100 Days to Trial Bradley Pollock, Taxman, Pollock,
More informationCIVIL PRETRIAL PRACTICE SPRING 2006 SYLLABUS
CIVIL PRETRIAL PRACTICE SPRING 2006 SYLLABUS Week 1: January 12 Lecture: Introduction to the Course, Factual and Legal Context for the Simulated Case, and Litigation Planning. Assignment: Review accident
More informationUNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. EDMUND OPTICS, INC., Petitioner, SEMROCK, INC., Patent Owner.
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 55 571-272-7822 Entered: May 13, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD EDMUND OPTICS, INC., Petitioner, v. SEMROCK, INC., Patent
More information716 West Ave Austin, TX USA
GLOBAL Headquarters the gregor building 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION About This Course... 2 Video... 2 The Law-Fact Distinction... 3 The Trial Setting... 3 Trial
More informationNebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual
Nebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Analysis, Screening & Preparation...17 I. Introduction: Case Analysis, Screening and Initial Preparation...23 II. Questions of Ethics,
More informationWIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 2016 Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Finnegan Europe LLP WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 2016 Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D. 1 U.S. Judicial System U.S. Supreme Court Quasi- Judicial Federal Agencies Federal Circuit International
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:4-cv-00-AB-E Document Filed 02// Page of Page ID #:04 2 3 4 0 2 3 4 LORRAINE FLORES, et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,
More informationPaper Date: June 5, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 49 571-272-7822 Date: June 5, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD RPX CORPORATION Petitioner v. VIRNETX INC. Patent Owner Case
More informationPresentation to SDIPLA
Presentation to SDIPLA Anatomy of an IPR Trial by Andrea G. Reister Chair, Patent Office and Advisory Practice Covington & Burling LLP February 20, 2014 Outline 1. Overview 2. Preliminary Phase 3. Decision
More informationCase 1:10-cv PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:10-cv-03013-PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 Civil Action No. 10-cv-03013-PAB-KLM BIAX CORPORATION, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
More informationWhat is Post Grant Review?
An Overview of the New Post Grant Review Proceedings at the USPTO Michael Griggs, Boyle Fredrickson May 15, 2015 What is Post Grant Review? Trial proceedings at the USPTO created by the America Invents
More informationLEG 283T.01: Trial Preparation
University of Montana ScholarWorks Syllabi Course Syllabi 1-2015 LEG 283T.01: Trial Preparation Thomas Stanton University of Montana - Missoula, Tom.Stanton@mso.umt.edu Follow this and additional works
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.
Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 IN RE: AMERANTH CASES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit KARLIN TECHNOLOGY INC. and SOFAMOR DANEK GROUP, INC., Defendants-Appellants,
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 97-1470 KARLIN TECHNOLOGY INC. and SOFAMOR DANEK GROUP, INC., Defendants-Appellants, v. SURGICAL DYNAMICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee. Donald R. Dunner,
More informationU.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv JES-DNF
Page 1 of 11 CLOSED U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv-00306-JES-DNF U.S. Equal Employemnt Opportunity Commission v. Stock Building Supply, Inc.
More informationCase 1:14-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:14-cv-12298-GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. and PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, INC.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-4182 "K" (2) PERTAINS TO: BARGE Mumford v. Ingram C.A. No. 05-5724 Boutte
More informationPost Grant Review. Strategy. Nathan Frederick Director, IP Services
Post Grant Review Strategy Nathan Frederick Director, IP Services Cardinal Intellectual Property 1603 Orrington Avenue, 20th Floor Evanston, IL 60201 Phone: 847.905.7122 Fax: 847.905.7123 Email: mail@cardinal-ip.com
More informationUniversity of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Fall 2018 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA
University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS Fall 2018 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA THE ONLY ASSIGNMENT FOR THE FIRST CLASSS IS TO REVIEW THE SYLLABUS. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS
More informationTrial Day In Court Out of Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant TRIAL GAME PLAN TRIAL CALENDAR Trial Day Court Out of Court Monday (Day -2) 7 -- Finalize Preparation for Jury Voire Dire -- Review Witness Kit for Klein Review Witness Kit for Evening
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION LAW vs. NO. of Defendant * EACH CASE WILL HAVE ITS OWN UNIQUE TRIAL MANAGEMENT ORDER. SUCH ORDERS WILL TYPICALLY BE IN THIS FORM. TRIAL
More informationCase 1:13-cv GBL-IDD Document 10-2 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 312
Case 1:13-cv-00328-GBL-IDD Document 10-2 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 312 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP,
More informationCivil Litigation Forms Library
Civil Litigation Forms Library Notice of Circumstances Giving Rise to Claim and Claim Against Governmental Subdivision, Its Officers, Employees, or Agents Notice of Claim Against State Officer, Employee,
More informationPaper: Entered: January 19, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper: 71 571-272-7822 Entered: January 19, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD NESTLÉ HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., Petitioner, v. STEUBEN
More informationPresidential Candidate Declaration of Intent
Presidential Candidate Declaration of Intent Due Friday, Feb 13th by 5:00 p.m. Name (as it appears on your Osprey 1 Card) President N number Phone number E-mail address Class Standing (Freshman, Sophomore,
More informationHow Bilski Impacts Your Patent Prosecution and Litigation Strategies. MIP Inaugural China-International IP Forum June 30, 2010, Beijing
How Bilski Impacts Your Patent Prosecution and Litigation Strategies MIP Inaugural China-International IP Forum June 30, 2010, Beijing Presenters Esther H. Lim Managing Partner, Shanghai Office Finnegan,
More information, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Case: 14-1612 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 12/23/2014 2014-1612, -1655 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION
More informationCLASS ACTION JURY TRIALS
CLASS ACTION JURY TRIALS Going the Distance Emily Harris Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner & Preece LLP The Class Action Landscape is Changing AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) Class action arbitration
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 In re Los Angeles Asbestos Litigation General Orders SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Case No. C 00000 THIRD AMENDED GENERAL ORDER NO. 0 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
More informationPatent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect
June 15, 2016 Litigation Webinar Series Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect Adam J. Kessel Principal, Boston Lawrence K. Kolodney Principal, Boston Jolynn M. Lussier
More informationTU TU
University of Houston Law Center Pretrial Litigation Spring 2012 6-9 p.m. 111 TU 2 111 TU 2 used for General Sessions, Section breakout rooms used after General Session Sections & Break out rooms availability
More informationAnthony C Tridico, Ph.D.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Patents Case Law in the U.S. Anthony C Tridico, Ph.D. 18 November, 2015 1 1. Teva v. Sandoz Federal Circuit it must apply a clear error standard when
More informationPatent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect
June 15, 2016 Litigation Webinar Series Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect Adam J. Kessel Principal, Boston Lawrence K. Kolodney Principal, Boston Jolynn M. Lussier
More informationU.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv RWT
of 21 3/19/2008 1:26 PM CASREF, CLOSED, MAG-D, MAG-S U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv-00287-RWT U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed
More informationCase 1:11-mc RLW Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-mc-00295-RLW Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOKIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, APPLE INC., v. Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:11-mc-00295-RLW
More informationWYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS
WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability. 3. Pleadings. 3.1. Commencement of action [Effective until June 1 2018.] 3.1. Commencement of action
More informationCase 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-00857-TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION,
More informationTRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005
TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005 Thomas K. Maher 312 W Franklin Street Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 (O) 929-1043 (H) 933-5674 TKMaher@tkmaherlaw.com General Instructions 1. General Information. The class will meet
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, vs. Case No: 2017- Defendant. / ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE THIS CAUSE is before the Court
More informationPaper 13 Tel: Entered: March 20, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 13 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: March 20, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ZOLL LIFECOR CORPORATIOIN Petitioner, v. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS
More informationSTIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Filed D.C. Sl\p"~rj:)r 10 Apr: ]() P03:07 Clerk ot Court C'j'FI. STEVEN 1. ROSEN Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION v. Case No.: 09 CA 001256 B Judge Erik P. Christian
More information, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION, INC., TO REFORM THE OFFICIAL CAPTION
Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION, INC., TO REFORM THE OFFICIAL CAPTION
More informationThe Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution
The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution The adversary system of trial, sometimes called the sporting approach to the truth, recalls our commitment to democracy as the least corruptible
More informationvs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )
Eff. 04/11/2014 CAUSE NO. IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 67TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN ) In accordance with Rules 166, 190 and
More informationCivil Action No.: 9= /0 C/\j /-^
Case 2:10-cv-00152-JBF-FBS Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FILED 2010 APR "2 P Us UO ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. CLERK US DISTRICT COURT
More informationCase 3:10-cv JAP -TJB Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1
Case 3:10-cv-04205-JAP -TJB Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 John E. Flaherty Jonathan M.H. Short McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07109
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed /0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ARRIVALSTAR S.A. AND MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, v. Plaintiffs, CENTRAL PUGET SOUND
More informationFirst-Inventor-to-File
First-Inventor-to-File Duke Patent Law Institute May 14, 2013 Presented by Tom Irving Copyright Finnegan 2013 Disclaimer These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable E. James Gildea Administrative Law Judge
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable E. James Gildea Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS BASE STATIONS AND COMPONENTS
More informationSTANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101
State of Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County Ronald F. Bartkowicz 2101 Richard J. Daley Center Judge Chicago, Illinois 60602 STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101 Phone Numbers: Case Coordinator:
More informationPaper Entered: August 13, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 9 571-272-7822 Entered: August 13, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., Petitioner,
More informationNorthern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules Law360,
More informationInsight from Carlton Fields
Insight from Carlton Fields Quick Trial Checklist 1. Motions To Be Made or Renewed Just Prior to Trial a. Motions to amend or supplement pleadings or pretrial statement or order b. Motions for continuance
More informationInterrogatories Are Written Questions For Which Written Answers Are Prepared And Signed Under Oath
Interrogatories Are Written Questions For Which Written Answers Are Prepared And Signed Under Oath Opposing parties use various methods, such as interrogatories and for which written answers are prepared
More informationbeing preempted by the court's criminal calendar.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF «County» «PlaintiffName», vs. «DefendantName», Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. «CaseNumber» SCHEDULING
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., and TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 14 C 206 ATTURO TIRE CORP., and SVIZZ-ONE Judge
More informationCase 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 67 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 748
Case 1:12-cv-00852-GBL-JFA Document 67 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 748 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GRAHAM SCHREIBER, Plaintiff, vs. Case
More informationEducational Briefing On Interference Proceedings Relating To CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patents. August 28, 2018
Educational Briefing On Interference Proceedings Relating To CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patents August 28, 2018 1 Today s Participants Cora Holt, Associate, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
More information