George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS"

Transcription

1 George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION Spring 2014 Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. Classroom 329 SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS Robert F. Shaffer Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202) Robert L. Burns Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Freedom Drive Reston, VA (571) John M. Williamson Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202) William B. Raich Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202) Luke McCammon Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C (202)

2 PATENT LITIGATION Spring 2014 Course Materials (1) Case File (2) Selected statutes, rules, cases, and articles that may be assigned for reading during the semester. 2

3 PATENT LITIGATION (SPRING 2014) CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION FILINGS 1 JAN 14 None 2 JAN 21 Draft Complaint Draft Initial Disclosures DJ Plaintiff AMC (MASON) to Serve Complaint Sun., Jan. 26 Present Web Site Overview Present Draft Position Paper 3 JAN 28 Present Revised Draft Position Paper Draft Discovery Requests DJ Defendant GGI (SUFFOLK) to Serve Answer and Counterclaims Sun., Feb. 2 Parties to Serve Initial Disclosures Sun., Feb. 2 Parties to Serve Discovery Requests Sun., Feb. 2 3

4 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 4 FEB 4 Draft Discovery Responses FILINGS Plaintiff to Serve Reply to Counterclaim Wed., Feb. 5 Parties to Serve Discovery Responses Sun., Feb. 9 5 FEB 11 Draft Claim Chart (Invalidity) Review Discovery Responses Parties to Serve Infringement and Invalidity Disclosures (Plaintiff re Infringement; Defendant re Invalidity) Sun., Feb. 16 Parties to Exchange Proposed Claim Terms To Be Construed Sun., Feb FEB 18 Draft of Markman Brief Draft Motions to Compel Parties to Meet and Confer Final Claim Terms to be Construed Fri., Feb. 21 by 5 p.m. Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions Sun., Feb. 23 Serve Motions to Compel Sun., Feb. 23 4

5 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 7 FEB 25 Continue Draft of Markman Brief Draft Reply Motion to Compel 8 MAR 4 Practice Markman Argument Review of Deposition Preparations FILINGS Parties to Serve Markman Briefs Sun., Mar. 2 Serve Reply to Motion to Compel Sun., Mar. 2 Markman Hearing Thur. Mar. 6 at 9 PM (Finnegan offices at 901 New York Ave., NW, Washington DC 20001) MAR 11 SPRING BREAK NO CLASS 9 MAR 18 Draft Motion for Summary Judgment Parties to Complete Two Depositions Each Sun. Mar. 23 Parties to Serve Any Motions for Summary Judgment Sun. Mar MAR 25 Draft Expert Reports (Technical, Legal) Parties to Serve Expert Reports Sun., Mar. 30 5

6 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION 11 APR 1 Draft Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment Draft Trial Brief, Testimony FILINGS Parties to Serve Replies to Any Motions for Summary Judgment Sun., Apr. 6 Parties to Serve Trial Briefs; Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine Sun., April 6 12 APR 8 Revise Draft Trial Brief, Testimony Draft Motions in Limine Draft Jury Instructions Parties to Serve Trial Briefs; Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine Sun., April 13 Parties to Serve Proposed Jury Instructions Sun., April APR 15 Trial Preparation Draft Demonstrative Exhibits Parties to Serve Witness Lists Wed. Apr. 16 (midnight) Parties to Serve Demonstrative Exhibits Fri. April 18 (noon) Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions in Limine Fri. April 18 (noon) 6

7 CLASS DATE STUDENT PRESENTATION FILINGS 14 SAT. APR. 19 (9:00 am - 5:00 pm) TRIAL BOSTON, MA 7

8 DUE DATES 1. DJ Plaintiff (GMU LAW) to Serve Complaint JAN DJ Defendant (SUFFOLK LAW) to Serve Answer and Counterclaims FEB 2 3. Plaintiff to Serve Reply to Counterclaim FEB 5 4. Parties to Serve Initial Disclosures FEB 2 5. Parties to Serve Discovery Requests FEB 2 6. Parties to Serve Discovery Responses FEB 9 7. Parties to Serve Motions to Compel (If Any) FEB Parties to Serve Infringement & Invalidity Disclosures (Plaintiff re Infringement; Defendant re Invalidity) FEB Parties to Exchange Proposed Claim Terms to be Construed FEB Parties to Meet and Confer on Final Claim Terms to be Construed FEB 21 (by 5 pm) 11. Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions FEB Parties to Serve Markman Briefs MAR Markman Hearing (video conference) MAR 6 (9:00 pm) 14. Parties to Complete Two (2) Depositions Each MAR Parties to Serve Any Motions for Summary Judgment MAR Parties to Serve Expert Reports MAR Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions for Summary Judgment APR Parties to Serve Trial Briefs (If Requested) APR Parties to Serve Any Motions in Limine APR 6 8

9 20. Parties to Serve Proposed Joint Jury Instructions APR Parties to Serve Demonstrative Exhibits APR 18 (noon) 22. Parties to Serve Witness List APR 16 (noon) 23. Parties to Serve Responses to Any Motions in Limine APR 18 (midnight) 24. Motions Hearing APR 19(Boston) 25. Trial APR 19 (Boston) 9

10 Local Rules 1.0 All service to be made by 10:00 p.m. on date due (unless otherwise noted). 2.0 All service to opposing counsel to be made via , with copies to and 3.0 Depositions limited to two (2) each side, one hour limit each (taking party to provide transcript in five (5) days). 4.0 Interrogatories limited to five (5) each side, counting subparts. 5.0 No requests for admission permitted. 6.0 No expert depositions permitted. 7.0 Markman hearing by video conference, 30 minutes per side. 8.0 No damages discovery permitted (damages issues bifurcated). 10

11 Assignments Web Master Lead Counsel Plaintiff (x3) Position Paper AMC Witness #1 AMC Witness #2 DJ Complaint Dispute Resolution Letter to Client Initial Disclosures Discovery Requests, Responses, and Motions to Compel Markman Proposed Claim Terms and Constructions Claim Chart (invalidity) Take Deposition 1 Take Deposition 2 Defend Deposition 1 Defend Deposition 2 Plaintiff Witness 2 Technical Expert Patent Expert A B C D E F G H I J K, L M N O P Q R S T U Summary Judgment Brief 11 V

12 Demonstrative Exhibits Motions in Limine Jury Instructions W X Y 12

George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS

George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Spring Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS George Mason University School of Law PATENT LITIGATION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION Spring 2016 Tuesdays 8:00-9:50 P.M. SYLLABUS INSTRUCTORS William B. Raich 901 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20001 (202)

More information

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190 Case :-cv-0-jak-as Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHELLE FLANAGAN, et al.,, vs. KAMALA HARRIS, et al.,. Case No.: LA CV-0 JAK (ASx ORDER

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION [PLAINTIFF][, et al.,] v. [DEFENDANT][, et al.] Case No. [2 / 6 / 5]:00-CV-000-[JRG / RSP /

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1 Case 5:06-cv-00222-DF Document 38 39 Filed 01/19/2007 01/22/2007 Page 1 of 6 KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. (a/k/a KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, vs. Plaintiff, BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS, INC.

More information

PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences

PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP PTAB Trial Proceedings and Parallel Litigation: Impact, Strategy & Consequences 2015 National CLE Conference Friday, January 9, 2015 Presented by Denise

More information

These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of

These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of May 14, 2013 These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes to contribute to the understanding of U.S. intellectual property law. These

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division 2001 FE8 21 P U.: 18 NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORP., ) CALEXAHDR?ARvip C URT Plaintiff, ) Case No. j )

More information

The New Post-AIA World

The New Post-AIA World Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP The New Post-AIA World New Ways to Challenge a US Patent or Patent Application Erika Arner FICPI ABC 2013 Conference New Orleans, LA 0 Third Party Patent

More information

IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability

IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability David W. Hill Partner October 11, 2012 1 U.S. is the most IP-litigious Nation 10 Most Litigious

More information

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs The following is a list of procedural Tasks and Deadlines for actions in the Central District of California

More information

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Spring 2015 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Spring 2015 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS Spring 2015 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA THE ONLY ASSIGNMENT FOR THE FIRST CLASSS IS TO REVIEW THE SYLLABUS. IF YOU HAVE

More information

Paper Entered: October 24, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper Entered: October 24, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 10 571.272.7822 Entered: October 24, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD FEDEX CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. IPVENTURE, INC., Patent

More information

Paper Date Entered: November 2, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Paper Date Entered: November 2, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Trials@uspto.gov Paper 21 571-272-7822 Date Entered: November 2, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD APPLE INC., Petitioner, v. VIRNETX INC., Patent

More information

Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO

Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO Erika Arner Advanced Patent Law Institute, Palo Alto, CA December 12, 2013 0 Post-Grant Proceedings New AIA proceedings

More information

New Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by

New Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by New Post Grant Proceedings: Basics by Tom Irving Copyright Finnegan 2013 May 14, 2013 Disclaimer These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational and entertainment purposes

More information

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA FORM 4. RULE 26(f REPORT (PATENT CASES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Name of Plaintiff CIVIL FILE NO. Plaintiff, v. RULE 26(f REPORT (PATENT CASES Name of Defendant Defendant. The

More information

CASE 0:16-cv PJS-FLN Document 18 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:16-cv PJS-FLN Document 18 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:16-cv-00358-PJS-FLN Document 18 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ERGOTRON, INC., Plaintiff, v. HUMANSCALE CORPORATION, Defendant. C.A. No.: 0:16-cv-00358-PJS-FLN

More information

Paper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 15 571-272-7822 Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA; AXIS COMMUNICATIONS AB; AXIS

More information

Paper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 16 571-272-7822 Entered: July 29, 2013 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA; AXIS COMMUNICATIONS AB; AXIS

More information

Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool

Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool April 12, 2016 Webinar Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool Sheryl Koval Garko Principal, Boston Monty Fusco Of Counsel, Washington, DC Overview CLE Contact: MCLETeam@fr.com Materials available

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. TIGAR A. Meeting and Disclosure Prior to Pretrial Conference At least

More information

WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 22 May 2015 Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.

WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 22 May 2015 Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. Finnegan Europe LLP WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 22 May 2015 Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. 1 Overview of Hatch-Waxman Act Enacted as part of the Drug Price Competition and Patent

More information

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7 Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUANTUM STREAM INC., Plaintiff(s), No. 15CV8240-LTS-FM PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

More information

The Tundra Docket: Western District Of Wisconsin

The Tundra Docket: Western District Of Wisconsin Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Tundra Docket: Western District Of Wisconsin

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN ) jacob.schroeder@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 00 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 0-0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

DRIVES, STACKED ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME

DRIVES, STACKED ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME s UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of _. CERTAIN SOLID STATE STORAGE DRIVES, STACKED ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME Inv. No. 337-TA-1097

More information

Case 1:10-cv GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:10-cv GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Case 1:10-cv-00327-GBL-TRJ Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FILED 2010 APR -2 P l : ELPIDA MEMORY, INC..CLERK US DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA.

More information

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence

Overview of Trial Proceedings Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence Role of Judge/Jury, Markman Hearings, and Introduction to Evidence July 21, 2016 Drew DeVoogd, Member Patent Trial Proceedings in the United States In patent matters, trials typically occur in the federal

More information

CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW

CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. DISCLOSING EXPERT WITNESSES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES: AN OVERVIEW 1:1 Practice tip Checklist of issues to consider when disclosing experts under Rule 26(a) 1:2 Overview 1:3

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN Linear Group Services, LLC v. Attica Automation, Inc. Doc. 56 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Linear Group Services, vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 13-10108 HON. GERSHWIN

More information

Pretrial Litigation Guidelines Fall Wednesday Class 6-9 p.m. Rm TBA

Pretrial Litigation Guidelines Fall Wednesday Class 6-9 p.m. Rm TBA Break out rooms: 3 additional rooms TBA Pretrial Litigation Guidelines Fall 2010 - Class 6-9 p.m. Rm TBA Objective of the Course: To provide law students with an opportunity to apply pre-trial rules of

More information

Intellectual Property& Technology Law Journal

Intellectual Property& Technology Law Journal Intellectual Property& Technology Law Journal Edited by the Technology and Proprietary Rights Group of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP VOLUME 29 NUMBER 9 SEPTEMBER 2017 The Use of Genetic Evidence to Defend

More information

Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice

Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice To get the most from an experienced and trained legal assistant1 in litigation practice, an attorney may need to open their

More information

Paper 14 Tel: Entered: July 17, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper 14 Tel: Entered: July 17, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 14 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: July 17, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD CULTEC, INC., Petitioner, v. STORMTECH LLC, Patent

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Audatex North America Inc. v. Mitchell International Inc. Doc. 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 AUDATEX NORTH AMERICA INC., Plaintiff, v. MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

More information

New Local Patent Rules In Northern District Of Ill.

New Local Patent Rules In Northern District Of Ill. Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com New Local Patent Rules In Northern District

More information

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11 Case 2:05-cv-00195-TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DIGITAL CHOICE OF TEXAS, LLC V. CIVIL NO. 2:05-CV-195(TJW)

More information

Inequitable Conduct Judicial Developments

Inequitable Conduct Judicial Developments Inequitable Conduct Judicial Developments Duke Patent Law Institute May 16, 2013 Presented by Tom Irving Copyright Finnegan 2013 Disclaimer These materials are public information and have been prepared

More information

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties IN THE MATTER OF: Claimant(s): Respondent(s): Case Number: Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order Parties This case was filed under the American Arbitration Association Expedited Commercial Rules.

More information

Licensing & Management of IP Assets. Covenant Not to Sue

Licensing & Management of IP Assets. Covenant Not to Sue Licensing & Management of IP Assets Covenant Not to Sue AIPLA Spring Meeting May 2, 2013 Presented by D. Patrick O Reilley Emotional Background to Covenants Implication of validity Exhaustion Lemelson

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BEIJING CHOICE ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., v. Plaintiff, CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS USA INC. and CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD.,

More information

Paralegal Section MCLE Meeting DCBA Bar Center Date: November 8, 2017

Paralegal Section MCLE Meeting DCBA Bar Center Date: November 8, 2017 Paralegal Section MCLE Meeting DCBA Bar Center Date: November 8, 2017 11:45 AM Noon Welcome/Introductions Mary Gaertner, Section Chair Noon 1:00 PM Program 100 Days to Trial Bradley Pollock, Taxman, Pollock,

More information

CIVIL PRETRIAL PRACTICE SPRING 2006 SYLLABUS

CIVIL PRETRIAL PRACTICE SPRING 2006 SYLLABUS CIVIL PRETRIAL PRACTICE SPRING 2006 SYLLABUS Week 1: January 12 Lecture: Introduction to the Course, Factual and Legal Context for the Simulated Case, and Litigation Planning. Assignment: Review accident

More information

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. EDMUND OPTICS, INC., Petitioner, SEMROCK, INC., Patent Owner.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. EDMUND OPTICS, INC., Petitioner, SEMROCK, INC., Patent Owner. Trials@uspto.gov Paper 55 571-272-7822 Entered: May 13, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD EDMUND OPTICS, INC., Petitioner, v. SEMROCK, INC., Patent

More information

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA GLOBAL Headquarters the gregor building 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION About This Course... 2 Video... 2 The Law-Fact Distinction... 3 The Trial Setting... 3 Trial

More information

Nebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual

Nebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual Nebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Analysis, Screening & Preparation...17 I. Introduction: Case Analysis, Screening and Initial Preparation...23 II. Questions of Ethics,

More information

WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 2016 Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 2016 Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D. Finnegan Europe LLP WIPO Conference on IP Dispute Resolution in Life Sciences 2016 Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D. 1 U.S. Judicial System U.S. Supreme Court Quasi- Judicial Federal Agencies Federal Circuit International

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:4-cv-00-AB-E Document Filed 02// Page of Page ID #:04 2 3 4 0 2 3 4 LORRAINE FLORES, et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,

More information

Paper Date: June 5, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper Date: June 5, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 49 571-272-7822 Date: June 5, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD RPX CORPORATION Petitioner v. VIRNETX INC. Patent Owner Case

More information

Presentation to SDIPLA

Presentation to SDIPLA Presentation to SDIPLA Anatomy of an IPR Trial by Andrea G. Reister Chair, Patent Office and Advisory Practice Covington & Burling LLP February 20, 2014 Outline 1. Overview 2. Preliminary Phase 3. Decision

More information

Case 1:10-cv PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:10-cv PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:10-cv-03013-PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 Civil Action No. 10-cv-03013-PAB-KLM BIAX CORPORATION, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

More information

What is Post Grant Review?

What is Post Grant Review? An Overview of the New Post Grant Review Proceedings at the USPTO Michael Griggs, Boyle Fredrickson May 15, 2015 What is Post Grant Review? Trial proceedings at the USPTO created by the America Invents

More information

LEG 283T.01: Trial Preparation

LEG 283T.01: Trial Preparation University of Montana ScholarWorks Syllabi Course Syllabi 1-2015 LEG 283T.01: Trial Preparation Thomas Stanton University of Montana - Missoula, Tom.Stanton@mso.umt.edu Follow this and additional works

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 IN RE: AMERANTH CASES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit KARLIN TECHNOLOGY INC. and SOFAMOR DANEK GROUP, INC., Defendants-Appellants,

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit KARLIN TECHNOLOGY INC. and SOFAMOR DANEK GROUP, INC., Defendants-Appellants, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 97-1470 KARLIN TECHNOLOGY INC. and SOFAMOR DANEK GROUP, INC., Defendants-Appellants, v. SURGICAL DYNAMICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee. Donald R. Dunner,

More information

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv JES-DNF

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv JES-DNF Page 1 of 11 CLOSED U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Ft. Myers) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv-00306-JES-DNF U.S. Equal Employemnt Opportunity Commission v. Stock Building Supply, Inc.

More information

Case 1:14-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:14-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:14-cv-12298-GAO Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. and PHILIPS SOLID-STATE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, INC.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-4182 "K" (2) PERTAINS TO: BARGE Mumford v. Ingram C.A. No. 05-5724 Boutte

More information

Post Grant Review. Strategy. Nathan Frederick Director, IP Services

Post Grant Review. Strategy. Nathan Frederick Director, IP Services Post Grant Review Strategy Nathan Frederick Director, IP Services Cardinal Intellectual Property 1603 Orrington Avenue, 20th Floor Evanston, IL 60201 Phone: 847.905.7122 Fax: 847.905.7123 Email: mail@cardinal-ip.com

More information

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Fall 2018 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA

University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS. Fall 2018 Thursday 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA University of Houston Law Center PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION SYLLABUS Fall 2018 6:00-9:00 p.m. Room 111 TU2 Breakout Rooms TBA THE ONLY ASSIGNMENT FOR THE FIRST CLASSS IS TO REVIEW THE SYLLABUS. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS

More information

Trial Day In Court Out of Court

Trial Day In Court Out of Court Plaintiff v. Defendant TRIAL GAME PLAN TRIAL CALENDAR Trial Day Court Out of Court Monday (Day -2) 7 -- Finalize Preparation for Jury Voire Dire -- Review Witness Kit for Klein Review Witness Kit for Evening

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION LAW vs. NO. of Defendant * EACH CASE WILL HAVE ITS OWN UNIQUE TRIAL MANAGEMENT ORDER. SUCH ORDERS WILL TYPICALLY BE IN THIS FORM. TRIAL

More information

Case 1:13-cv GBL-IDD Document 10-2 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 312

Case 1:13-cv GBL-IDD Document 10-2 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 312 Case 1:13-cv-00328-GBL-IDD Document 10-2 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 312 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP,

More information

Civil Litigation Forms Library

Civil Litigation Forms Library Civil Litigation Forms Library Notice of Circumstances Giving Rise to Claim and Claim Against Governmental Subdivision, Its Officers, Employees, or Agents Notice of Claim Against State Officer, Employee,

More information

Paper: Entered: January 19, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper: Entered: January 19, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper: 71 571-272-7822 Entered: January 19, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD NESTLÉ HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., Petitioner, v. STEUBEN

More information

Presidential Candidate Declaration of Intent

Presidential Candidate Declaration of Intent Presidential Candidate Declaration of Intent Due Friday, Feb 13th by 5:00 p.m. Name (as it appears on your Osprey 1 Card) President N number Phone number E-mail address Class Standing (Freshman, Sophomore,

More information

How Bilski Impacts Your Patent Prosecution and Litigation Strategies. MIP Inaugural China-International IP Forum June 30, 2010, Beijing

How Bilski Impacts Your Patent Prosecution and Litigation Strategies. MIP Inaugural China-International IP Forum June 30, 2010, Beijing How Bilski Impacts Your Patent Prosecution and Litigation Strategies MIP Inaugural China-International IP Forum June 30, 2010, Beijing Presenters Esther H. Lim Managing Partner, Shanghai Office Finnegan,

More information

, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated Case: 14-1612 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 12/23/2014 2014-1612, -1655 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION

More information

CLASS ACTION JURY TRIALS

CLASS ACTION JURY TRIALS CLASS ACTION JURY TRIALS Going the Distance Emily Harris Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner & Preece LLP The Class Action Landscape is Changing AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) Class action arbitration

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 In re Los Angeles Asbestos Litigation General Orders SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Case No. C 00000 THIRD AMENDED GENERAL ORDER NO. 0 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

More information

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect June 15, 2016 Litigation Webinar Series Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect Adam J. Kessel Principal, Boston Lawrence K. Kolodney Principal, Boston Jolynn M. Lussier

More information

TU TU

TU TU University of Houston Law Center Pretrial Litigation Spring 2012 6-9 p.m. 111 TU 2 111 TU 2 used for General Sessions, Section breakout rooms used after General Session Sections & Break out rooms availability

More information

Anthony C Tridico, Ph.D.

Anthony C Tridico, Ph.D. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Patents Case Law in the U.S. Anthony C Tridico, Ph.D. 18 November, 2015 1 1. Teva v. Sandoz Federal Circuit it must apply a clear error standard when

More information

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect June 15, 2016 Litigation Webinar Series Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect Adam J. Kessel Principal, Boston Lawrence K. Kolodney Principal, Boston Jolynn M. Lussier

More information

U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv RWT

U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv RWT of 21 3/19/2008 1:26 PM CASREF, CLOSED, MAG-D, MAG-S U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:05-cv-00287-RWT U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed

More information

Case 1:11-mc RLW Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-mc RLW Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:11-mc-00295-RLW Document 4 Filed 06/03/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOKIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, APPLE INC., v. Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:11-mc-00295-RLW

More information

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability. 3. Pleadings. 3.1. Commencement of action [Effective until June 1 2018.] 3.1. Commencement of action

More information

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:14-cv-00857-TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION,

More information

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005 TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005 Thomas K. Maher 312 W Franklin Street Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 (O) 929-1043 (H) 933-5674 TKMaher@tkmaherlaw.com General Instructions 1. General Information. The class will meet

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, vs. Case No: 2017- Defendant. / ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE THIS CAUSE is before the Court

More information

Paper 13 Tel: Entered: March 20, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper 13 Tel: Entered: March 20, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 13 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: March 20, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ZOLL LIFECOR CORPORATIOIN Petitioner, v. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS

More information

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Filed D.C. Sl\p"~rj:)r 10 Apr: ]() P03:07 Clerk ot Court C'j'FI. STEVEN 1. ROSEN Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION v. Case No.: 09 CA 001256 B Judge Erik P. Christian

More information

, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION, INC., TO REFORM THE OFFICIAL CAPTION

, ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION, INC., TO REFORM THE OFFICIAL CAPTION Case: 14-1612 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PARKERVISION, INC., TO REFORM THE OFFICIAL CAPTION

More information

The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution

The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution The adversary system of trial, sometimes called the sporting approach to the truth, recalls our commitment to democracy as the least corruptible

More information

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN ) Eff. 04/11/2014 CAUSE NO. IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 67TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN ) In accordance with Rules 166, 190 and

More information

Civil Action No.: 9= /0 C/\j /-^

Civil Action No.: 9= /0 C/\j /-^ Case 2:10-cv-00152-JBF-FBS Document 1 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FILED 2010 APR "2 P Us UO ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. CLERK US DISTRICT COURT

More information

Case 3:10-cv JAP -TJB Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1

Case 3:10-cv JAP -TJB Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 Case 3:10-cv-04205-JAP -TJB Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1 John E. Flaherty Jonathan M.H. Short McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07109

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed /0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ARRIVALSTAR S.A. AND MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, v. Plaintiffs, CENTRAL PUGET SOUND

More information

First-Inventor-to-File

First-Inventor-to-File First-Inventor-to-File Duke Patent Law Institute May 14, 2013 Presented by Tom Irving Copyright Finnegan 2013 Disclaimer These materials are public information and have been prepared solely for educational

More information

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable E. James Gildea Administrative Law Judge

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable E. James Gildea Administrative Law Judge UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable E. James Gildea Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS BASE STATIONS AND COMPONENTS

More information

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101 State of Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County Ronald F. Bartkowicz 2101 Richard J. Daley Center Judge Chicago, Illinois 60602 STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101 Phone Numbers: Case Coordinator:

More information

Paper Entered: August 13, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Paper Entered: August 13, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Trials@uspto.gov Paper 9 571-272-7822 Entered: August 13, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., Petitioner,

More information

Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules

Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Northern Ill.'s New Local Patent Rules Law360,

More information

Insight from Carlton Fields

Insight from Carlton Fields Insight from Carlton Fields Quick Trial Checklist 1. Motions To Be Made or Renewed Just Prior to Trial a. Motions to amend or supplement pleadings or pretrial statement or order b. Motions for continuance

More information

Interrogatories Are Written Questions For Which Written Answers Are Prepared And Signed Under Oath

Interrogatories Are Written Questions For Which Written Answers Are Prepared And Signed Under Oath Interrogatories Are Written Questions For Which Written Answers Are Prepared And Signed Under Oath Opposing parties use various methods, such as interrogatories and for which written answers are prepared

More information

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF «County» «PlaintiffName», vs. «DefendantName», Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. «CaseNumber» SCHEDULING

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No: 14 C 206 ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD., and TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 14 C 206 ATTURO TIRE CORP., and SVIZZ-ONE Judge

More information

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 67 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 748

Case 1:12-cv GBL-JFA Document 67 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 748 Case 1:12-cv-00852-GBL-JFA Document 67 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 748 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GRAHAM SCHREIBER, Plaintiff, vs. Case

More information

Educational Briefing On Interference Proceedings Relating To CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patents. August 28, 2018

Educational Briefing On Interference Proceedings Relating To CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patents. August 28, 2018 Educational Briefing On Interference Proceedings Relating To CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology Patents August 28, 2018 1 Today s Participants Cora Holt, Associate, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett

More information