Case T-395/94. Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case T-395/94. Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities"

Transcription

1 Case T-395/94 Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Liner conferences Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 Scope Block exemption Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68 Individual exemption) Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), 28 February 2002 II Summary of the Judgment 1. Competition Maritime transport Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Agreement between shipping lines on the scheduled transport between Northern Europe and the United States and the inland carriage of containers Relevant market Restrictions of competition within the common market Certain member lines established outside the Community No effect (EC Treaty, Art. 85 (now Art. 81 EC)) II - 875

2 SUMMARY CASE T-395/94 2. Competition Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Effect on trade between Member States Criteria (EC Treaty, Art. 85(1) (now Art. 81(1) EC)) 3. Competition Maritime transport Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Effect on trade between Member States Agreement between shipping lines relating to the conditions for the sale of maritime and inland transport services Effect on trade in port and auxiliary services linked to the carriage of goods (EC Treaty, Art. 85(1) (now Art. 81(1) EC)) 4. Competition Maritime transport Regulation No 4056/86 Block exemption Scope (Council Regulation No 4056/86, Art. 3) 5. Competition Maritime transport Regulation No 4056/86 Block exemption Strict interpretation Exemption for liner conference agreements Scope (EC Treaty, Art. 85(1) and (3) (now Art. 81(1) and (3) EC); Council Regulation No 4056/86, Art. 3) 6. Community law Definitions Interpretation Definition taken from an international convention Interpretation with regard to that convention 7. Competition Maritime transport Liner conferences Definition Block exemption of liner conference agreements Conditions Setting uniform freight rates for all conference members Tariff rates varying between members Whether unlawful (Council Regulation No 4056/86, Art. 3) 8. Competition Maritime transport Regulation No 4056/86 Block exemption of liner conference agreements Justification Stabilising effect of uniform freight rates for all conference members Independent action on the part of one conference member Whether lawful (Council Regulation No 4056/86, Art. 3) II - 876

3 ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINU AND OTHERS v COMMISSION 9. Actions for annulment Commission decision refusing to grant individual exemption Complex economic appraisal judicial review Limits (EC Treaty, Art. 85(3) (now Art. 81(3) EC), and Art. 173 (now, after amendment. Art. 230 EC)) 10.Competition Maritime transport Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Prohibition Exemption Conditions Discretion of the Commission (EC Treaty, Art. 85(3) (now Art. 81(3) EC); Council Regulation No 4056/86) 11. Competition Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Prohibition Exemption Conditions Cumulative nature (EC Treaty, Art. 85(3) (now Art. 81(3) EC)) 12.Competition Maritime transport Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Prohibition Exemption Relevant market Delimitation Criteria Agreement between shipping lines relating to the scheduled transport of containers between Northern Europe and the United States 13.Competition Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Prohibition Exemption Conditions Possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the relevant services Must be assessed as a whole (EC Treaty, Art. 85(3) (now Art. 81(3) EC)) 14. Competition Maritime transport Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Prohibition Exemption Conditions Possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the relevant services Assessment criteria Agreement between shipping lines fixing maritime transport rates (EC Treaty, Art. 85(3) (now Art. 81(3) EC); Council Regulation No 4056/86, Art. 11) 15. Procedure Intervention Plea in law not raised by the applicant Whether inadmissible (EC Statute of the Court of justice, Art. 37, fourth para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 116(3)) II - 877

4 SUMMARY CASE T-395/ Competition Administrative procedure Decision finding that there has been an infringement Order compelling the undertakings concerned to inform their customers that they may renegotiate or rescind the contracts Decision departing from the Commission's usual practice Failure to state that fact in the statement of objections Infringement of the obligation to state reasons (EC Treaty, Art. 85(1) (now Art. 81(1) EC); Council Regulations No 1017/68, Art. 11, and No 4056/86, Art. 11) 1. In the case of an agreement between shipping lines on the scheduled transport of containers across the Atlantic between Northern Europe and the United States and on the inland carriage of the containers, the relevant markets directly affected are those in transport services and not that in the export of goods to the United States. The restrictions of competition occur within the common market because it is there that the members of the agreement, including several shipping companies established in the Community, are in competition to sell their services to clients, namely shippers, established in the Community. The fact that certain members of the agreement are not established in the Community does not cast doubt on that conclusion. between Member States, it must be possible to foresee with a sufficient degree of probability and on the basis of objective factors of law or fact that it may have an influence, direct or indirect, actual or potential, on the pattern of trade between Member States, such as might prejudice the realisation of the aim of a single market between States. In particular, it is not necessary that the conduct in question should in fact have substantially affected trade between Member States. It is sufficient to establish that the conduct is capable of having such an effect. (see paras 79, 90) (see para. 72) 2. For an agreement between undertakings to be capable of affecting trade 3. An agreement between shipping companies, including a number established in the Community, which related to the conditions for the sale of maritime and inland transport services to shippers established in various Member States of the Community is capable of affecting trade between Member States for the purposes of Article 85(1) of the Treaty (now Article 81(1) EC). II - 878

5 ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AND OTHERS v COMMISSION Furthermore, such an agreement is capable of modifying the pattern of trade in goods transiting through the ports served by the shipping companies which are members of an agreement. As a result, that agreement must be regarded as having affected trade between Member States, over and above the trade consisting of only maritime transport services, since port and auxiliary services linked to the carriage of goods were also affected. The existence of a liner conference within the meaning of Regulation No 4056/86 depends on the charging of 'uniform or common freight rates' by its members. (sec paras 140, 143) Finally, although more indirectly, the relevant agreement has, or at the very least is capable of having, an effect on the trade in goods between Member States, in so far as the transport prices fixed by the agreement represent a proportion of the end selling price of the goods transported. (see paras 80-82) 4. An agreement can qualify for the exemption provided for in Article 3 of Regulation No 4056/86 laying clown detailed rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty to maritime transport only if it is a liner conference agreement. 5. Having regard to the general principle of the prohibition of agreements restricting competition in Article 85(1) of the Treaty (now Article 81(1) EC), provisions derogating therefrom in an exempting regulation must, by their nature, be strictly interpreted. This conclusion applies, a fortiori, to the provisions of Regulation No 4056/86 relating to maritime transport by virtue of its unlimited duration and the exceptional nature of the restrictions on competition authorised (horizontal agreement having as its object the fixing of prices). It follows that the block exemption provided for by Article 3 of Regulation No 4056/86 cannot be interpreted broadly and progressively so as to cover all the agreements which shipping companies deem it useful, or even necessary, to adopt in order to adapt to market conditions. The exemption can relate only to the types of agreement which the Council, when Regulation II - 879

6 SUMMARY CASE T-395/94 No 4056/86 was adopted, regarded, in the light of experience, as satisfying the conditions of Article 85(3) of the Treaty. Apart from the power enjoyed by the Council, if the need arose, to amend Regulation No 4056/86, the undertakings concerned also always have the option to apply for an individual exemption to offset any disadvantages of the limitations inherent in the block exemption. (see para. 146) which presents itself as such on the market vis-à-vis both users and competitors. The conference puts itself forward as an entity on the market since it fixes uniform freight rates for all its members, in the sense that the same price will be charged for the carriage of the same cargo from point A to point B, regardless of which shipowning member of the conference is responsible for carriage. 6. The definition of 'liner conference' in Article 1(3)(b) of Regulation No 4056/86 was taken word for word from the United Nations Convention on a Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences. That code thus constitutes an important point of reference for the interpretation of the concept of liner conference referred to in Regulation No 4056/86. By contrast, an agreement between carriers providing for a scheme of tariffs which vary according to the members cannot be regarded as a liner conference under Regulation No 4056/86. (see paras 157, 167) (see para. 147) 7. By its very nature and in the light of its objectives, a liner conference, as defined by the Council for the purposes of qualification for block exemption under Regulation No 4056/86, can be characterised as a collective entity 8. Liner conferences qualify for a block exemption because of their stabilising effect. That stability is best ensured if all the members of the conference adopt uniform freight rates rather than if there are several rates according to the members concerned. A uniform level of freight rates within the conference also allows users, account of II - 880

7 ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINE AND OTHERS v COMMISSION whose interests is also a requirement for the exemption, to be assured of being able to obtain the transport service at the same price, whichever conference member it approaches. That interest of the shippers in having access to a reference rate in respect of a particular commodity is appreciably reduced if the members of the conference do not charge one rate, but two or more, in respect of the same product. Furthermore, the possibility of fixing different levels of prices makes it possible to attract into the group shipping lines which, without that flexibility, would remain independent and this situation is likely to lead to the elimination of external competition; by contrast, the obligation to fix uniform freight rates for all conference members is not such as to encourage all operators to join the conference, which guarantees the existence of external competition. (see paras , 162) That interpretation of the concept of liner conference is not inconsistent with the possibility for a conference member to take independent action. That action is fundamentally different from the system of differentiated prices. The taking of independent action, which enables a conference member, subject to notice, to offer, for a specific product, a lower freight rate than that in the conference tariff, does not create another level of prices which may be generally charged, since that action concerns only a single ad hoc transaction. The stabilising effect of the existence of uniform or common freight rates for all conference members therefore continues in the event of independent action, whereas it is undermined where the conference tariff, which lists all the freight rates applicable, is replaced by a system of rates which vary according to the members. 9. In the context of an action for annulment pursuant to Article 173 of the Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 230 EC), the review undertaken by the Court of the complex economic appraisals made by the Commission when it exercises the discretion conferred on it by Article 85(3) of the Treaty (now Article 81(3) EC), with regard to each of the four conditions laid down in that provision, is necessarily limited to verifying whether the rules on procedure and on the giving of reasons have been complied with, whether the facts have been accurately stated and whether there has been any manifest error of assessment or a misuse of powers. (see para. 257) II - 881

8 SUMMARY CASE T-395/ Although stability in the maritime transport sector, to the extent that it contributes to assuring shippers of reliable services, may be an advantage for the purposes of the first condition of Article 85(3) of the Treaty (now Article 81(3) EC), the Commission cannot be obliged to grant individual exemption to every agreement between shipping lines which, in the opinion of the parties, may contribute to such stability. Within the limits imposed by Regulation No 4056/86, the Commission retains its discretion in applying Article 85(3) of the Treaty. (see para. 262) 11. The four conditions for granting an exemption under Article 85(3) of the Treaty (now Article 81(3) EC) are cumulative and therefore non-fulfilment of only one of those conditions will render it necessary to refuse the exemption. Article 81(3) EC), the market to be taken into consideration comprises the totality of the products which, with respect to their characteristics, are particularly suitable for satisfying constant needs and are only to a limited extent interchangeable with other products. In the case of an agreement between shipping lines for the scheduled transport of containers across the Atlantic between Northern Europe and the United States the relevant market is that for containerised liner shipping. The fact that other modes of transport, whether maritime or air, may engage in marginal competition on the market in containerised liner shipping services in respect of a limited number of products, does not mean that, for that reason, they can be regarded as forming part of the same market. (see paras ) (see para. 264) 12. In assessing an agreement with a view to granting an exemption under Article 85(3) of the Treaty (now 13. The possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the services in question within the meaning of Article 85(3) of the Treaty (now Article 81(3) EC), must be assessed as a whole, taking into account in particular the specific characteristics of the relevant market, the restrictions of competition brought II - 882

9 ATLANTIC: CONTAINER LINE AND OTHERS v COMMISSION about by the agreement, the market shares of the parties to that agreement and the extent and intensity of external competition, both actual and potential. In the context of this comprehensive approach, those different elements are closely interlinked or may balance each other out. Thus, the greater the restrictions of internal competition between the parties, the more necessary it is for external competition to be keen and substantial if the agreement is to qualify for exemption. Similarly, the larger the market shares of the parties to the agreement, the stronger the potential competition must be. (see para. 300) 14. In order to determine whether an agreement affords its signatory parties the possibility, in respect of a substantial part of the products in question, of eliminating competition within the meaning of Article 85(3)(b) of the Treaty (now Article 81(3)(b) EC), the Commission cannot, in principle, rely merely on the fact that the agreement in question eliminates competition between those parties and that they account for a substantial part of the relevant market. First, the prohibition on eliminating competition is a narrower concept than that of the existence or acquisition of a dominant position, so that an agreement could be regarded as not eliminating competition within the meaning of Article 85(3)(b) of the Treaty, and therefore qualify for exemption, even if it established a dominant position for the benefit of its members. Second, potential competition must be taken into consideration before concluding that an agreement eliminates competition for the purposes of Article 85(3) of the Treaty. Taking into account and analysing external competition, both actual and potential, is all the more necessary where it is a question of examining whether an agreement between shipping companies fixing maritime transport rates qualifies for individual exemption under Article 12 of Regulation No 4056/86. (see paras ) 15. Interveners must, under Article 116(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, accept the case as they find it at the time of their intervention and their submissions in an application to intervene are, under the fourth paragraph of Article 37 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, limited to II - 883

10 SUMMARY CASE T-395/94 supporting the submissions of one of the main parties, an intervener is not entitled to raise a plea in law that was not raised by the applicant. (see para. 382) 16. In a decision finding that the provisions of an agreement between shipping lines fixing the rates and conditions of maritime transport infringe the Treaty's competition rules, an order compelling the undertakings concerned to inform customers with whom they have concluded service contracts and other contractual relations in the context of that agreement 'that such customers are entitled, if they so wish, to renegotiate the terms of those contracts or to terminate them forthwith', which was not obviously necessary and does not correspond to an established line of Commission decisions, requires that institution expressly to set out its reasoning. Even if that order may be regarded as necessary for re-establishing compliance with the law and as coming within the limits of the Commission's power to order the undertakings concerned, in accordance with Article 11 of Regulations No 1017/68 and No 4056/86, 'to bring such infringement to an end', the statement of objections should in any event have set out, even briefly, but in sufficiently clear terms, the measures which the Commission intended to take in order to bring an end to the infringements and should have given the applicants all the information necessary in order to enable them properly to defend themselves before the Commission adopted a final decision on that point. That conclusion is all the more necessary where the individual service contracts account for a substantial part of the turnover of the undertakings concerned and the obligation to renegotiate with customers could thus have significant consequences for those undertakings, and could even amount to a penalty more serious than a fine. (see paras 411, 415, 418) II - 884

Joined Cases C-395/96 P and C-396/96 P. Compagnie Maritime Belge Transports SA and Others v Commission of the European Communities

Joined Cases C-395/96 P and C-396/96 P. Compagnie Maritime Belge Transports SA and Others v Commission of the European Communities Joined Cases C-395/96 P and C-396/96 P Compagnie Maritime Belge Transports SA and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Competition International maritime transport Liner conferences Regulation

More information

Case T-67/01. JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities

Case T-67/01. JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities Case T-67/01 JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Article 81 EC Distribution agreements) Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), 13 January 2004 II-56 Summary

More information

Case C-163/99. Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities

Case C-163/99. Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities Case C-163/99 Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Exclusive rights Airport administration Landing charges Article 90(3) of the EC Treaty (now Article 86(3) EC)) Opinion

More information

Case T-193/02. Laurent Piau v Commission of the European Communities

Case T-193/02. Laurent Piau v Commission of the European Communities Case T-193/02 Laurent Piau v Commission of the European Communities (Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) Players'Agents Regulations Decision by an association of undertakings Articles

More information

Case T-114/02. BaByliss SA v Commission of the European Communities

Case T-114/02. BaByliss SA v Commission of the European Communities Case T-114/02 BaByliss SA v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Concentrations Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 Action brought by a third party Admissibility Commitments in the course of the

More information

Joined Cases T-213/95 and T-18/96

Joined Cases T-213/95 and T-18/96 Joined Cases T-213/95 and T-18/96 Stichting Certificatie Kraanverhuurbedrijf (SCK) and Federatie van Nederlandse Kraanverhuurbedrijven (FNK) v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Mobile

More information

B REGULATION No 17 First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty. (OJ P 13, , p. 204)

B REGULATION No 17 First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty. (OJ P 13, , p. 204) 1962R0017 EN 18.06.1999 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B REGULATION No 17 First Regulation implementing

More information

CONSOLIDATED ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION

CONSOLIDATED ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION CONSOLIDATED ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION A C T No. 143/2001 Coll. of 4 April 2001 on the Protection of Competition and on Amendment to Certain Acts (Act on the Protection of Competition) as amended

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 28 February 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 28 February 2002 * JUDGMENT OF 28. 2. 2002 CASE T-18/97 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 28 February 2002 * In Case T-18/97, Atlantic Container Line AB, established in Göteborg (Sweden), Cho Yang Shipping

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 28 February 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 28 February 2002 * ATLANTIC CONTAINER LINU AND OTHERS v COMMISSION JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 28 February 2002 * In Case T-395/94, Atlantic Container Line AB, established in Gothenburg (Sweden),

More information

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 76/2009. of 30 June 2009

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 76/2009. of 30 June 2009 EN EN EN DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 76/2009 of 30 June 2009 amending Protocol 10 on simplification of inspections and formalities in respect of carriage of goods and Protocol 37 containing

More information

Joined Cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P to C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P. Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission of the European Communities

Joined Cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P to C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P. Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission of the European Communities Joined Cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P to C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal Competition District heating pipes (pre-insulated

More information

Judgment of the Court of Justice, Costa v ENEL, Case 6/64 (15 July 1964)

Judgment of the Court of Justice, Costa v ENEL, Case 6/64 (15 July 1964) Judgment of the Court of Justice, Costa v ENEL, Case 6/64 (15 July 1964) Caption: A fundamental judgment of the Court in respect of principles, the Costa v ENEL judgment shows that the EEC Treaty has created

More information

- USING ECONOMICS IN COURTS - * * * THE JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE FROM THE EU

- USING ECONOMICS IN COURTS - * * * THE JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE FROM THE EU - Beijing, 16 March 2018 - - USING ECONOMICS IN COURTS - * * * THE JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE FROM THE EU PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES President EU General Court 1 - USING ECONOMICS IN COURTS - * * * THE JUDICIAL

More information

Case C-199/92 P. Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities

Case C-199/92 P. Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities Case C-199/92 P Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance Reopening of the oral procedure Commission's Rules of Procedure Procedure for

More information

Case T-282/02. Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission of the European Communities

Case T-282/02. Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission of the European Communities Case T-282/02 Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Control of concentration of undertakings Articles 2, 3 and 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 Concept

More information

4 Are there any rules applying to the unilateral conduct of non-dominant. 5 Is dominance controlled according to sector?

4 Are there any rules applying to the unilateral conduct of non-dominant. 5 Is dominance controlled according to sector? Greece Constantinos Lambadarios and Lia Vitzilaiou Lambadarios Law Offices General 1 What is the legislation applying specifically to the behaviour of dominant firms? The legislation applying specifically

More information

Case T-351/02. v Commission of the European Communities

Case T-351/02. v Commission of the European Communities Case T-351/02 Deutsche Bahn AG v Commission of the European Communities (State aid Competitor's complaint Directive 92/81/EEC Excise duties on mineral oils Mineral oils used as fuel for the purpose of

More information

Law on Protection of Competition. Part I. General Provisions. Subject Matter. Article 1

Law on Protection of Competition. Part I. General Provisions. Subject Matter. Article 1 Law on Protection of Competition Part I General Provisions Subject Matter Article 1 This Law regulates mode, proceeding and measures for protection of competition on the relevant market and defines competencies

More information

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents 1996L0049 EN 24.11.2006 006.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 96/49/EC of 23 July 1996 on

More information

STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2002 NO THE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE (EC DIRECTIVE) REGULATIONS Statutory Instruments No. 2013

STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2002 NO THE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE (EC DIRECTIVE) REGULATIONS Statutory Instruments No. 2013 STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2002 NO. 2013 THE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE (EC DIRECTIVE) REGULATIONS 2002 Statutory Instruments 2002 No. 2013 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS The Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations

More information

Introduction. amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (OJ L 341 of 24 December 2015, p.

Introduction. amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (OJ L 341 of 24 December 2015, p. Court of Justice of the European Union Report submitted pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute

More information

African Maritime Transport Charter, 1994.

African Maritime Transport Charter, 1994. Downloaded on January 31, 2019 African Maritime Transport Charter, 1994. Region African Union Subject Maritime Sub Subject Type Charters Reference Number Place of Adoption Tunis, Tunisia Date of Adoption

More information

Joined Cases T-127/99, T-129/99 and T-148/99

Joined Cases T-127/99, T-129/99 and T-148/99 Joined Cases T-127/99, T-129/99 and T-148/99 Territorio Histórico de Álava Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission of the European Communities (State aid Concept of State aid Tax measures Selective

More information

Worksheets on European Competition Law

Worksheets on European Competition Law Friedrich Schiller University of Jena From the SelectedWorks of Christian Alexander Winter February, 2018 Worksheets on European Competition Law Christian Alexander Available at: https://works.bepress.com/

More information

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 10.02.2004 COM(2004)73 final 2000/0069 (COD) Amended proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Council Regulation

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 16 March 2000 * Compagnie Maritime Beige Transports SA (C-395/96 P), established in Antwerp, Belgium,

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 16 March 2000 * Compagnie Maritime Beige Transports SA (C-395/96 P), established in Antwerp, Belgium, JUDGMENT OF 16. 3. 2000 JOINED CASES C-395/96 P AND C-396/96 P JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 16 March 2000 * In Joined Cases C-395/96 P and C-396/96 P, Compagnie Maritime Beige Transports SA (C-395/96

More information

NIGERIAN SHIPPERS' COUNCIL ACT

NIGERIAN SHIPPERS' COUNCIL ACT NIGERIAN SHIPPERS' COUNCIL ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Establishment of the Nigerian Shippers' Council. 2. Membership. 3. Functions of the Council. 4. Power of the Minister to give directions to the

More information

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 11 June /08 Interinstitutional File: 2004/0209 (COD) SOC 357 SAN 122 TRANS 199 MAR 82 CODEC 758

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 11 June /08 Interinstitutional File: 2004/0209 (COD) SOC 357 SAN 122 TRANS 199 MAR 82 CODEC 758 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 11 June 2008 10583/08 Interinstitutional File: 2004/0209 (COD) SOC 357 SAN 122 TRANS 199 MAR 82 CODEC 758 COVER NOTE from : Council Secretariat to : Delegations

More information

COMPETITION LAW REGULATION OF HUNGAROPHARMA GYÓGYSZERKERESKEDELMI ZÁRTKÖRŰEN MŰKÖDŐ RÉSZVÉNYTÁRSASÁG

COMPETITION LAW REGULATION OF HUNGAROPHARMA GYÓGYSZERKERESKEDELMI ZÁRTKÖRŰEN MŰKÖDŐ RÉSZVÉNYTÁRSASÁG COMPETITION LAW REGULATION OF HUNGAROPHARMA GYÓGYSZERKERESKEDELMI ZÁRTKÖRŰEN MŰKÖDŐ RÉSZVÉNYTÁRSASÁG EXTRACT FOR EXTERNAL USE Effective as of 15 January 2017 2 I. Preamble 1. The aim of this Regulation

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 1 February 2018 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 1 February 2018 (*) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 1 February 2018 (*) (Appeal Competition Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Article 101 TFEU Price fixing International air freight forwarding services Pricing

More information

Case T-325/01. DaimlerChrysler AG v Commission of the European Communities

Case T-325/01. DaimlerChrysler AG v Commission of the European Communities Case T-325/01 DaimlerChrysler AG v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Article 81 EC Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Agency agreements Distribution of motor vehicles Economic

More information

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 October 2013 *

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 October 2013 * Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 October 2013 * (Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations Articles 3 and 7(2) Freedom of choice of the parties Limits Mandatory

More information

THE TANZANIA CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU ACT, 1981 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Title 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation.

THE TANZANIA CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU ACT, 1981 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Title 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. THE TANZANIA CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU ACT, 1981 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section Title 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II THE TANZANIA CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU 3.

More information

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents 1992L0013 EN 09.01.2008 004.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992

More information

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.6.2012 COM(2012) 332 final 2012/0162 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing

More information

Act on the Civil Jurisdiction of Japan with respect to a Foreign State, etc.

Act on the Civil Jurisdiction of Japan with respect to a Foreign State, etc. Act on the Civil Jurisdiction of Japan with respect to a Foreign State, etc. (Act No. 24 of April 24, 2009) Table of Contents Chapter I General Provisions (Articles 1 to 3) Chapter II Scope of Jurisdiction

More information

ECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME

ECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME ECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME I. INTRODUCTION 1. In a system of parallel competences between the Commission and National Competition Authorities, an application for leniency 1 to one authority is not to

More information

PROTOCOL (No 3) ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

PROTOCOL (No 3) ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION C 83/210 Official Journal of the European Union 30.3.2010 PROTOCOL (No 3) ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES, DESIRING to lay down the Statute of

More information

O THE SOVEREIG BASE AREAS OF THE U ITED KI GDOM OF GREAT BRITAI A D ORTHER IRELA D I CYPRUS

O THE SOVEREIG BASE AREAS OF THE U ITED KI GDOM OF GREAT BRITAI A D ORTHER IRELA D I CYPRUS PROTOCOL o 3 O THE SOVEREIG BASE AREAS OF THE U ITED KI GDOM OF GREAT BRITAI A D ORTHER IRELA D I CYPRUS THE HIGH CO TRACTI G PARTIES, RECALLING that the Joint Declaration on the Sovereign Base Areas of

More information

Swedish Competition Act

Swedish Competition Act Swedish Competition Act Swedish Competition Act 1 Swedish Competition Act List of Contents Chapter 1 Introductory provision 3 Chapter 2 Prohibited restrictions of competition 5 Chapter 3 Actions against

More information

PART 1: EVOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION PART 2: INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND LAW MAKING

PART 1: EVOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION PART 2: INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND LAW MAKING Contents Table of European Union Treaties Table of European Union Secondary Legislation Table of UK Primary and Secondary Legislation Table of European Cases Table of UK, French, German and US Cases PART

More information

(Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION

(Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION C 277 I/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.8.2018 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION Guidance Note Questions and Answers:

More information

Article 11(3) Decisions the Commission s Discretion Analysis of the judgment of the Court of First Instance in case T-145/06 Omya v Commission

Article 11(3) Decisions the Commission s Discretion Analysis of the judgment of the Court of First Instance in case T-145/06 Omya v Commission Article 11(3) Decisions the Commission s Discretion Analysis of the judgment of the Court of First Instance in case T-145/06 Omya v Commission John Gatti ( 1 ) 1 The examination of Omya AG s (Omya) proposed

More information

Notice of 16 May 2011 on the Method Relating to the Setting of Financial Penalties

Notice of 16 May 2011 on the Method Relating to the Setting of Financial Penalties RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE Notice of 16 May 2011 on the Method Relating to the Setting of Financial Penalties I. The legal provisions applicable to the setting of financial penalties 1. Pursuant to Section I

More information

Disability Discrimination Act CHAPTER 13 CONTENTS. Go to Preamble. Public authorities

Disability Discrimination Act CHAPTER 13 CONTENTS. Go to Preamble. Public authorities Disability Discrimination Act 2005 2005 CHAPTER 13 CONTENTS Go to Preamble Public authorities 1. Councillors and members of the Greater London Authority 2. Discrimination by public authorities 3. Duties

More information

Competition Law No 44/2005, ammended by Ammendments No 52/2007 and 94/2008. Competition Law No 44/2005. Chapter I Objectives and scope

Competition Law No 44/2005, ammended by Ammendments No 52/2007 and 94/2008. Competition Law No 44/2005. Chapter I Objectives and scope This is an English translation. The original Icelandic text, as published in the Law Gazette (Stjórnartíðindi), is the authoritative text. Should there be discrepancy between this translation and the authoritative

More information

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION This text contains the consolidated version of Protocol (No 3) on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,

More information

Freedom of Contract under the Rotterdam Rules

Freedom of Contract under the Rotterdam Rules Francesco Berlingieri * 1. PREAMBLE Although the Hague Rules 1921 and the ensuing International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading 1924 (Brussels Convention

More information

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED VERSION)

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED VERSION) STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED VERSION) This text contains the consolidated version of Protocol (No 3) on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,

More information

OJ Ann. I(I) L. 156(I) 2004 No 3851,

OJ Ann. I(I) L. 156(I) 2004 No 3851, MARKT/2004/11328-00-00 OJ Ann. I(I) L. 156(I) 2004 No 3851, 30.4.2004 The Law on Certain Aspects of Information Society Services, in particular Electronic Commerce, and Related Matters of 2004 is issued

More information

INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT

INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT Focus Business Services (Malta) Limited STRAND TOWERS Floor 2 36 The Strand Sliema, SLM 1022 P O BOX 84 MALTA T: +356 2338 1500 F: +356 2338 1111 enquiries@fbsmalta.com www.fbsmalta.com

More information

AN BILLE UM CHOSAINT FOSTAITHE (OBAIR GHNÍOMHAIREACHTA SHEALADACH), 2011 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (TEMPORARY AGENCY WORK) BILL 2011

AN BILLE UM CHOSAINT FOSTAITHE (OBAIR GHNÍOMHAIREACHTA SHEALADACH), 2011 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (TEMPORARY AGENCY WORK) BILL 2011 AN BILLE UM CHOSAINT FOSTAITHE (OBAIR GHNÍOMHAIREACHTA SHEALADACH), 2011 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (TEMPORARY AGENCY WORK) BILL 2011 Mar a ritheadh ag Dáil Éireann As passed by Dáil Éireann ARRANGEMENT OF

More information

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark TABLE OF CONTENTS pages TITLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS... 4 TITLE II THE LAW RELATING

More information

agreement on ThE EUroPEaN ECoNoMiC area1 ParT iv CoMPETiTioN and other CoMMoN rules ChaPTEr 1 rules applicable To UNdErTaKiNGs Article 53

agreement on ThE EUroPEaN ECoNoMiC area1 ParT iv CoMPETiTioN and other CoMMoN rules ChaPTEr 1 rules applicable To UNdErTaKiNGs Article 53 Agreement on the European Economic Area 1 PART IV COMPETITION AND OTHER COMMON RULES CHAPTER 1 RULES APPLICABLE TO UNDERTAKINGS Article 53 1. The following shall be prohibited as incompatible with the

More information

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES JORDAN EURO-MEDITERRANEAN AGREEMENT

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES JORDAN EURO-MEDITERRANEAN AGREEMENT EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES JORDAN EURO-MEDITERRANEAN AGREEMENT establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the

More information

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 11.12.2002 COM (2002) 709 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION A framework for target-based tripartite contracts and agreements between the Community,

More information

Personal Data Protection Act

Personal Data Protection Act Personal Data Protection Act Promulgated State Gazette No. 1/4.01.2002, effective 1.01.2002, supplemented, SG No. 70/10.08.2004, effective 1.01.2005, SG No. 93/19.10.2004, No. 43/20.05.2005, effective

More information

Disclaimer This text is an unofficial translation and may not be used as a basis for solving any dispute

Disclaimer This text is an unofficial translation and may not be used as a basis for solving any dispute Disclaimer This text is an unofficial translation and may not be used as a basis for solving any dispute Law of 2 May 2007 on disclosure of major holdings in issuers whose shares are admitted to trading

More information

Implementation of Directive 2005/29/EC Concerning Unfair Business-to-Consumer Commercial Practices in the Internal Market

Implementation of Directive 2005/29/EC Concerning Unfair Business-to-Consumer Commercial Practices in the Internal Market Implementation of Directive 2005/29/EC Concerning Unfair Business-to-Consumer Commercial Practices in the Internal Market Ilie-Cătălin Ungureanu To Link this Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i7/4393

More information

Case C-387/97. Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

Case C-387/97. Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic Case C-387/97 Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations Judgment of the Court establishing such failure Non-compliance Article 171

More information

(2002/309/EC, Euratom)

(2002/309/EC, Euratom) Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport 144 Agreed by decision of the Council and of the Commission of 4 April 2002 (2002/309/EC, Euratom) THE SWISS CONFEDERATION

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 21 April 2005 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 21 April 2005 * JUDGMENT OF 21. 4. 2005 CASE T-28/03 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 21 April 2005 * In Case T-28/03, Holcim (Deutschland) AG, formerly Alsen AG, established in Hamburg (Germany),

More information

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES By the present Recommendation the ECN Competition Authorities (the Authorities) express their common views on the power to adopt interim measures.

More information

CHAPTER 379 COMPETITION ACT

CHAPTER 379 COMPETITION ACT COMPETITION [CAP. 379. 1 CHAPTER 379 COMPETITION ACT To regulate competition, enable the application of Council Regulation (EC) 1/2003 and provide for fair trading in Malta. III. 2004.125. 1st February,

More information

COMMISSION DECISION. of on outside activities and assignments and on occupational activities after leaving the Service

COMMISSION DECISION. of on outside activities and assignments and on occupational activities after leaving the Service Ref. Ares(2018)6424877-13/12/2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 29.6.2018 C(2018) 4048 final COMMISSION DECISION of 29.6.2018 on outside activities and assignments and on occupational activities after

More information

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 161/ 128. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 866/2004 of

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 161/ 128. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 866/2004 of 30.4.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 161/ 128 COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 866/2004 of 29.4.2004 on a regime under Article 2 of Protocol No 10 of the Act of Accession THE COUNCIL OF THE

More information

THE SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS LAWS 1972 AND (English translation and consolidation) NICOSIA

THE SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS LAWS 1972 AND (English translation and consolidation) NICOSIA REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS 57 of 1972 85(I) of 1997 THE SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS LAWS 1972 AND 1997 (English translation and consolidation) Office of the Law Commissioner Nicosia, April, 2010 ΓΕΝ (Α) L.102 ISBN

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 7 September 2006 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 7 September 2006 * VULCAN SILKEBORG JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 7 September 2006 * In Case C-125/05, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, from the Østre Landsret (Denmark), made by decision

More information

Interim Measures in EEC Competition Cases

Interim Measures in EEC Competition Cases Berkeley Journal of International Law Volume 3 Issue 1 Summer Article 5 1985 Interim Measures in EEC Competition Cases Virginia Morris Recommended Citation Virginia Morris, Interim Measures in EEC Competition

More information

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS 27.5.2011 Official Journal of the European Union L 141/1 I (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) No 492/2011 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 3 December 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 3 December 2003 * VOLKSWAGEN v COMMISSION JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 3 December 2003 * In Case T-208/01, Volkswagen AG, established in Wolfsburg (Germany), represented by R. Bechtold, lawyer,

More information

10 th Congress of the IASAJ Sydney March 2010.

10 th Congress of the IASAJ Sydney March 2010. 10 th Congress of the IASAJ Sydney March 2010. REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS OF GOVERNMENT BY ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS AND TRIBUNALS. THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Aindrias Ó Caoimh 1 This

More information

C 337 E/278 Official Journal of the European Communities Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent (2000/C 337 E/45)

C 337 E/278 Official Journal of the European Communities Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent (2000/C 337 E/45) C 337 E/278 Official Journal of the European Communities 28.11.2000 Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent (2000/C 337 E/45) (Text with EEA relevance) COM(2000) 412 final 2000/0177(CNS)

More information

Léon Gloden and Katrien Veranneman Elvinger Hoss Prussen, Luxembourg

Léon Gloden and Katrien Veranneman Elvinger Hoss Prussen, Luxembourg Léon Gloden and Katrien Veranneman Elvinger Hoss Prussen, Luxembourg LEGISLATION AND JURISDICTION 1. What is the relevant merger control legislation? Is there any pending legislation that would affect

More information

Consolidation Act on the Prohibition of Differences of Treatment in the Labour Market etc. 1)

Consolidation Act on the Prohibition of Differences of Treatment in the Labour Market etc. 1) Consolidation Act on the Prohibition of Differences of Treatment in the Labour Market etc. 1) This is an unofficial translation for informational purposes only. In case of discrepancy, the Danish text

More information

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Contract comprises the Sales Confirmation overleaf and these terms and conditions to the exclusion of all other terms and conditions (including any terms or conditions which Buyer purports to apply

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 2 October 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 2 October 2003 * THYSSĽN STAHL v COMMISSION JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 2 October 2003 * In Case C-194/99 P, Thyssen Stahl AG, established in Duisburg (Germany), represented by F. Montag, Rechtsanwalt, with an

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber) 28 September 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber) 28 September 1999 * JUDGMENT OF 28. 9. 1999 CASE T-612/97 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber) 28 September 1999 * In Case T-612/97, Cordis Obst und Gemüse Großhandel GmbH, a company incorporated under

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 12 July 2001 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 12 July 2001 * JUDGMENT OF 12. 7. 2001 JOINED CASES T-202/98, T-204/98 AND T-207/98 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 12 July 2001 * In Joined Cases T-202/98, T-204/98 and T-207/98, Tate & Lyle

More information

DECISION n 124. of the Administrative Board of the European Railway Agency adopting measures concerning unpaid leave for temporary and contract staff

DECISION n 124. of the Administrative Board of the European Railway Agency adopting measures concerning unpaid leave for temporary and contract staff DECISION n 124 of the Administrative Board of the European Railway Agency adopting measures concerning unpaid leave for temporary and contract staff THE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD OF THE EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY,

More information

COMPETITION ACT NO. 89 OF 1998

COMPETITION ACT NO. 89 OF 1998 COMPETITION ACT NO. 89 OF 1998 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 20 OCTOBER, 1998] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 30 NOVEMBER, 1998] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the President) This Act has

More information

Page 1 of 11 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 26 October 2010 (*) (Action for annulment Decision

More information

Oversight of NHS-controlled providers: guidance

Oversight of NHS-controlled providers: guidance Oversight of NHS-controlled providers: guidance February 2018 We support providers to give patients safe, high quality, compassionate care within local health systems that are financially sustainable.

More information

Civil Procedure Act 2010

Civil Procedure Act 2010 Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and

More information

Recent Developments in EU Public Law. Scottish Public Law Group Annual Summer Conference 9 June 2014

Recent Developments in EU Public Law. Scottish Public Law Group Annual Summer Conference 9 June 2014 Recent Developments in EU Public Law Scottish Public Law Group Annual Summer Conference 9 June 2014 Presentation overview 1. Application and Interpretation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights When

More information

CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU [Cap.239

CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU [Cap.239 CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU [Cap.239 CHAPTER 239 CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU Law No. 26 of 1973. A LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CENTRAL FREIGHT BUREAU OF SRI LANKA FOR THE PURPOSE OF CENTRALIZATION

More information

12083/08 DSI/JGC/kjf DG B III

12083/08 DSI/JGC/kjf DG B III COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 22 September 2008 (OR. en) 12083/08 Interinstitutional File: 2007/0223 (CNS) PECHE 204 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: COUNCIL REGULATION establishing

More information

Self-Assessment of Agreements Under Article 81 EC: Is There a Need for More Commission Guidance?

Self-Assessment of Agreements Under Article 81 EC: Is There a Need for More Commission Guidance? OCTOBER 2008, RELEASE TWO Self-Assessment of Agreements Under Article 81 EC: Is There a Need for More Commission Guidance? Michele Piergiovanni & Pierantonio D Elia Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

More information

Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 (23 November 1998)

Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 (23 November 1998) Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 (23 November 1998) Caption: Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions. Source: Official

More information

EFTA Surveillance Authority Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases

EFTA Surveillance Authority Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases EFTA Surveillance Authority Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases A. The present notice is issued pursuant to the rules of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA

More information

TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC AND CURRENT EC LEGISLATION ON FREE MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE OF UNION CITIZENS WITHIN THE EU

TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC AND CURRENT EC LEGISLATION ON FREE MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE OF UNION CITIZENS WITHIN THE EU TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC AND CURRENT EC LEGISLATION ON FREE MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE OF UNION CITIZENS WITHIN THE EU DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

More information

REGULATORY APPROXIMATION ARTICLE 1. Scope

REGULATORY APPROXIMATION ARTICLE 1. Scope Disclaimer: Please note that the present documents are only made available for information purposes. The official version of the Association Agreement once signed will be published in the Official Journal

More information

REGULATIONS EN Official Journal of the European Union L 286/1

REGULATIONS EN Official Journal of the European Union L 286/1 29.10.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 286/1 I (Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory) REGULATIONS COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September

More information

REGULATION (EC) No 764/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 9 July 2008

REGULATION (EC) No 764/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 9 July 2008 13.8.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 218/21 REGULATION (EC) No 764/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 9 July 2008 laying down procedures relating to the application

More information

APPEALS under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, lodged on 27 May, 29 May and 1 June 2015, respectively,

APPEALS under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, lodged on 27 May, 29 May and 1 June 2015, respectively, JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 26 January 2017 (*) (Appeal Dumping Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 Imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia Extension

More information

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL FENNELLY delivered on 29 October 1998 *

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL FENNELLY delivered on 29 October 1998 * COMPAGNIE MARITIME BELGE TRANSPORTS AND OTHERS V COMMISSION OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL FENNELLY delivered on 29 October 1998 * Table of Contents I Introduction I - 1373 II Legal and factual background

More information

General Terms and Conditions. General Terms and Conditions WILAmed GmbH, Kammerstein, Germany. 4. Delivery, Passing of the Risk

General Terms and Conditions. General Terms and Conditions WILAmed GmbH, Kammerstein, Germany. 4. Delivery, Passing of the Risk WILAmed GmbH, Kammerstein, Germany 1. Scope of Application 1.1. Unless explicitly agreed otherwise in writing, any deliveries and services by WILAmed GmbH ("WILAmed ) shall only be made in accordance with

More information

Official Journal L 018, 21/01/1997 P

Official Journal L 018, 21/01/1997 P Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services Official Journal L 018, 21/01/1997 P.

More information

PUBLIC. Brussels, 29 November 2005 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION /05 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0255 (COD) LIMITE

PUBLIC. Brussels, 29 November 2005 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION /05 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0255 (COD) LIMITE Conseil UE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 29 November 2005 14881/05 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0255 (COD) LIMITE PUBLIC CODEC 1085 TRANS 252 SOC 463 COVER NOTE Subject : Proposal for a European

More information