DEATH GIVES BIRTH TO THE NEED FOR NEW LAW:
|
|
- Lee Hunt
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DEATH GIVES BIRTH TO THE NEED FOR NEW LAW: The case for law reform regarding medical end of life decisions. Introduction Many people who oppose the legalisation of euthanasia and/or physician assisted suicide argue that to do so would increase the risk of abuse of people when they are most vulnerable. It is argued that no legislation can be written that would provide adequate safeguards to ensure that once allowed, the process of euthanasia would not be abused. In this paper, I will argue that those fears although valid, do not and cannot serve as the coup de grace to calls for euthanasia. I propose to show that such safeguards are not present in law at the moment, yet we do not see or hear about a rash of cases where people are being pressured to make decisions that prematurely end their life, and there is no sound reason for believing that such issues would arise in the future, were euthanasia allowed. On the way, I shall also argue that if we are serious about the demands for safeguards to ensure that people, as they approach the end of their lives, are not subject to undue pressure, then those safeguards are required now, whether or not we ever accept the legalisation of euthanasia.
2 The current law For the sake of the argument I shall assume that the following statements represent the true position of the law as it stands on medical end of life decisions. That is: A person may refuse any and all medical treatment even if the consequence is that they will die; A doctor cannot be compelled to administer treatment that in his or her professional opinion is futile, and as there is no duty to administer futile treatment, it is not unlawful to withdraw such treatment even when the consequence is that the patient will die; and A doctor may with immunity administer treatment to a person with the intention of relieving their pain and suffering, even though it is foreseeable that the treatment itself may shorten the person s life. Provided the intention is merely to alleviate symptoms, and not to end the person s life, then the action is permissible at law. (The so called doctrine of double effect ). I say that I accept the above for the sake of the argument for I am not convinced that the doctrine of double effect is part of the law in Australia (or New South Wales at least). The authority that is usually given for that proposition, R v Adams 1, is not a binding decision on any court in Australia, and the doctrine would seem to be inconsistent with the decision in R v Crabbe 2 that held that a person is guilty of murder (under the Northern Territory law as it then was, and under the definition of 1 2 R v Adams R v Crabbe
3 murder still contained in the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) 3 ) if the death of the deceased is caused by the act of the accused, when the accused realised that the probable consequence of his or her action would, in fact, be death. Notwithstanding that, the literature seems to accept the proposition that the doctrine has some role in the law today, and it is not certain that the High Court would not agree if the matter came before it, and so I shall, as I say, accept the proposition for the sake of the argument. The objections. Dr Brian Pollard is one advocate who argues that we cannot legalise euthanasia due to the inability to provide proper safeguards. In a submission to the Select Committee reporting on the Rights of the Terminally Ill Bill in the Northern Territory, he said: The chief difficulties in making euthanasia law, which have not been able to be solved, are: - determining the real intention of the one doing the killing. While the universal reason given is the exercise of compassion, that claim could be used as a cover for medical ineptitude, a distorted concept of rights, callousness, a conflict of interests or, in the worst case, a malicious intent. Though the same can be said of other laws, in every instance of abuse of a euthanasia law, a person would have been killed without consent. - the possibility of a wrong diagnosis. This would not be a major factor. - defining distress or suffering in such a way that the law could never be applied to those for whom it was never intended. Whether definitions are simple or complex, they must be interpreted against a 3 Section 18
4 background of subjectivity, either by the person or an observer. What one person finds intolerable, another can readily bear. There could be no possibility of standards of measurement or comparison to enable judgments of distress to be made to an acceptable level of legal certainty. - guaranteeing a person's freedom to give or withhold consent. In the unstable emotional context of dying, confusion, anger, depression, resentment, anxiety, fear, misunderstanding and feelings of worthlessness are common, with the ever present possibility of coercion, especially in subtle form. It would often be impossible to confirm coercion, even when it was suspected, and thus, this form of abuse would be virtually impossible to eliminate. I shall take these points as being representative of the types of arguments I am trying to address. If the current law does not address any of the objections raised above, and if those objections are legitimate reasons not to legalise euthanasia, then they are also legitimate reasons to demand a change in the law that currently governs the making of medical end of life decisions. First of all, consider the decision to withhold treatment from a patient. I stated above that a doctor cannot be required to give treatment that is considered futile, even if that treatment is keeping the patient alive. If, however, we leave it to the medical profession to determine when treatment should be withdrawn (as is currently the case in Australia), we face the very same problem that Dr Pollard has identified with regard to euthanasia, that is we cannot determine the real intention behind the action. It may be that the doctor withdraws treatment (or gives increasing doses of analgesia) with the stated reason of acting out of compassion or in the patient s best interests, but
5 that cannot be tested under current law. It is equally true now that such an action could be... used as a cover for medical ineptitude, a distorted concept of rights, callousness, a conflict of interests or, in the worst case, a malicious intent. Dr Pollard acknowledges that... the same can be said of other laws, [but]... in every instance of abuse of a euthanasia law, a person would have been killed without consent. That consequence is also the consequence that will follow when life support treatment is removed. The possibility of a wrong diagnosis is equally a possibility now. There are occasional media reports of people coming out of long term comas and so it is equally plausible that inadequate or inappropriate treatment is now given, or appropriate treatment is withdrawn with the consequence that a death occurs sooner than is necessary. Exactly why the law needs to define distress or suffering for euthanasia is not clear, for there is no attempt to do so at the moment. The law allows a person to refuse treatment for whatever reason (suicide is perhaps an exception, but the attempts to distinguish suicide from refusal of treatment are so convoluted that I shall not attempt to clarify them here). A decision on whether to accept treatment, or what treatment to accept is always made by a patient. Treatment options must always be subjective, and there is no requirement that a person accept treatment that others find generally acceptable. That
6 There could be no possibility of standards of measurement or comparison to enable judgments of distress to be made to an acceptable level of legal certainty is true, but irrelevant. Doctors today must consider the level of distress occasioned to each patient and determine how best to deal with that. In Victoria, under the Medical Treatment Act 1988, a person may appoint an agent to make medical treatment decisions on their behalf. That agent may refuse treatment for the person but only where (a) (b) the medical treatment would cause unreasonable distress to the patient; [or] there are reasonable grounds for believing that the patient, if competent, and after giving serious considerations to his or her health and well-being, would consider that the medical treatment is unwarranted. 4 Clearly the question of whether treatment causes unreasonable distress or whether the person would consider medical treatment as unwarranted are subjective matters. There is no attempt to impose a standard or measure of comparison. The question of whether a treatment such as a blood transfusion or euthanasia are acceptable are inherently subjective and should remain so. The fact that these things cannot be measured is no bar to euthanasia, just as they are no bar to current medical practices. One of the major arguments against euthanasia is that we cannot guarantee a 4 s. 5B(2)
7 ... a person's freedom to give or withhold consent. In the unstable emotional context of dying, confusion, anger, depression, resentment, anxiety, fear, misunderstanding and feelings of worthlessness are common, with the ever present possibility of coercion, especially in subtle form. It would often be impossible to confirm coercion, even when it was suspected, and thus, this form of abuse would be virtually impossible to eliminate. Such abuse is of course impossible to eliminate now, as all abuse is. Under current law, however, there is very little attempt to eliminate such action. Under the Natural Death Act 1988 (Northern Territory) there are no requirements to ensure that the decision to sign an advance directive was not made at the time that a person was suffering clinical depression, or that it was not made as a result of pressure brought to bear upon the patient by relatives or medical or other staff concerned about the resources that may be used in the treatment. Even if a doctor were of the opinion that a person were depressed or subject to undue influence in the execution of an advance directive that would not, of itself, warrant the doctor acting contrary to the terms of the directive, for the Act says, at s. 4(3), that it is the duty of the doctor to act in accordance with the directive unless there is reasonable ground to believe- (a)... (b) that the patient was not, at the time of giving the direction, capable of understanding the nature and consequence of the direction. The test is whether the person was capable of understanding the nature and consequence of the direction, not whether they were depressed or subject to undue
8 influence. Both may be true, but if there is nothing to suggest that, as a result, they did not understand the nature and consequence of the direction then the treating medical practitioner is duty bound to comply with the request so executed. The Medical Treatment Act of Victoria 1988 (which is the basis of similar legislation in the ACT) provides minimal safeguards against improper motive or undue influence. Section 5(1)(b) requires a medical practitioner and another person to be satisfied that the decision by the person to refuse treatment is made voluntarily and without inducement or compulsion. Exactly what is considered to be an inducement or compulsion is not spelt out in the Act, so it would clearly be up to the proposed witnesses to consider whether any conduct by any other person constituted an inducement or the imposition of compulsion. The Act also requires that the witnesses are both satisfied that the person signing the certificate is... of sound mind These Acts can be compared to the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act 1995 of the Northern Territory. That Act allows active euthanasia but requires, before a request can be acted upon, that the person seeking euthanasia has been examined by at least 3 doctors, one of whom must be a psychiatrist and another a palliative care expert 6. The treating doctors must satisfy themselves that the patient is of sound mind and the decision to end his or her life has been made freely, voluntarily and after due 5 6 s. 5(1)(d) s. 7(3)
9 consideration 7, and, if necessary, all relevant conversations and documents must have been translated by an appropriately qualified interpreter 8. In the Northern Territory alone, therefore, a patient may present a doctor with a completed Direction under the Natural Death Act 1988 which the doctor is required to comply with unless there is some evidence that the Direction has been revoked or the patient was not capable of understanding the nature and effect of the document. On the other hand if the same patient requests euthanasia the doctor must be satisfied as the voluntariness of the request, arrange further consultations and wait the prescribed period before he or she can act. In each case, however, the decision to act will certainly mean the death of the patient concerned. In New South Wales, there is no legislation to cover the withdrawal of life sustaining treatment or the right of a patient to refuse treatment. Such matters are dealt with in guidelines issued by the NSW Health Department in March These guidelines say: Health professionals who apply these guidelines, in conjunction with the accepted clinical standard of their peers, armed with accurate information and adequate consultation, should feel confident to make the decision to withhold futile treatment. If we can accept and expect that doctors will comply with such guidelines and act in accordance with the principles of respect for human life; patient autonomy; 7 8 s. 7(h) s. 7(4)
10 consultation; access; and professionalism 9 when it comes to decisions to withdraw treatment or respect patient wishes, then why can we not expect the same when it comes to euthanasia? We cannot guarantee a person's freedom to give or withhold consent, we never can in any circumstances. If what we want is guarantees we would never act. We could not treat a patient because we could not guarantee that they truly consented, that the treatment would really be in their best interests, that the diagnosis was correct etc. We could not refuse treatment for the same reason. If we want guarantees, the uncertain nature of the world would prohibit any action. Accordingly we settle for less than guarantees, and the law does not require guarantees, it requires reasonable evidence or reasonable grounds. We do not however, read of a flood of cases where people are being pressured to refuse medical treatment by greedy relatives with their eyes on the estate of the soon to be deceased. We do not read reports of people using their last gasp, as the life support is turned off, to say that they didn t mean it. Why should we expect such things if the treatment under consideration was active euthanasia? 9 Dying with Dignity; Interim Guidelines on Management, NSW Health, March 1993, pp. 2-3
11 The consequences of the lack of safeguards The law as it currently stands is, to use the words of Lord Keith in Airedale NHS Trust v Bland... intellectually and morally misshapen 10. That this is true was made clear when a jury in Michigan in the United States acquitted Dr Kevorkian of a charge of assisting suicide when he provided his patient with a canister of carbon monoxide gas, turned the gas on and then watched as the patient removed a clip from the tubing, inhaled the gas and died. Dr Kevorkian s defence relied upon a section of the relevant statute that incorporated the doctrine of double effect. The New York Times 11 reported that: [t]he law said that a person is not guilty of criminal assistance of suicide if that person was administering medications or procedures with the intent to relieve pain and discomfort and not to cause death even if the treatment may hasten or increase the risk of death. When the doctrine of double effect cannot distinguish between the administration of legitimate pain killing drugs and carbon monoxide, its use to distinguish permissible from impermissible medical end of life decisions is clearly limited. The law cannot stop the abuses that Dr Pollard and others worry about now, nor can it stop the use that Dr Kevorkian makes of it to do what was intended to be illegal. If we are concerned to ensure that safeguards exist and that they can be policed, then the whole law, as it stands, needs reform Airedale v Bland New York Times, Saturday March 9
12 What is required is a codification of the law to set out the safeguards that must be met before medical end of life decisions are to be made. Some of those safeguards would, I am sure, impose on the doctor-patient relationship in a way that would be considered offensive to many practitioners but would be necessary if we want to ensure that decisions that cause the premature death of a person are made only with regard to proper considerations and, where possible, with the voluntary, informed consent of the patient. Some things that may be required would be ensuring that a psychiatrist examined a person who wished to refuse life sustaining treatment, subjecting any case where it was proposed to withdraw life sustaining treatment to an appropriately constituted ethics committee for review and ensuring that penalties existed to punish any person who for improper motives encouraged others to refuse medical treatment. Persons who witness advance directives regarding the withdrawal of life support treatment should not benefit under the estate of the deceased in the same way that a witness to a request under the Northern Territory s Rights of the Terminally Ill Act would not benefit. There is, however, another edge to this sword. If we can trust the medical profession, on the whole, to act with care, compassion and concern for their patients; if we can, as we do, ask them when dealing with the dying to respect human life; patient autonomy; consultation; access; and professionalism 12, then there is no reason to believe that they (and the families of dying persons) cannot be trusted with the added responsibility of practising euthanasia and physician assisted suicide.
13 Conclusions. The current law does not, as it stands, address the concerns of those who would oppose euthanasia on the grounds that any legislation that is written to authorise such conduct cannot provide adequate safeguards. It is clear that the law cannot guarantee that decisions to withdraw or refuse treatment are made solely for relevant and legitimate considerations nor that doctors will not engage in prohibited conduct. The law, as it stands (ignoring for the moment differences between United States and Australian jurisdiction) cannot stop Dr Kevorkian and his death machines nor can it stop doctors engaging in prohibited euthanasia 13. What is required is law that prohibits that which we want to prohibit, and allows that which we, as a community, want to allow. The current law does not do that. The current law does not provide the safeguards that are otherwise demanded, and does not serve to stop that which is prima facie illegal. What is required is a codification of the law to set out all the relevant law on end of life decisions so that the community and the medical profession will know where they stand and what is permissible. Conduct outside such a code would be easier to identify and prosecute thereby ensuring that we stop any slide down the feared slippery slope. There is, however, nothing to suggest that such a law must, of necessity, draw the line at euthanasia, for the safeguards that are demanded for euthanasia are just as important for any other medical end of life decision, and once Dying with Dignity; Interim Guidelines on Management, NSW Health, March 1993, pp. 2-3 as admitted to by Dr Brendan Nelson, then President of the Australian Medical Association in a letter to the Sunday Territorian, May 21, 1995
14 codified could be applied equally well to euthanasia as to the refusal of medical treatment. Anyone who has an interest in this area of law and medicine, and who is serious about protecting the welfare of patients and the integrity of the medical profession, should now be advocating for law reform in this area. Whether that law reform should include clear approval or clear rejection of euthanasia is another matter, but the law as it stands cannot provide the protection for patients or the medical profession that both are entitled to. Michael Eburn B. Com., LL.B., BA(Hons) Lecturer in Law University of New England.
Who this guidance is for and when it should be used
References to Good medical practice updated in March 2013 Guidance for the Investigation Committee and case examiners when considering allegations about a doctor s involvement in encouraging or assisting
More informationGeriatric Refresher Day The Regional Geriatric Program of Eastern Ontario Dr. Thomas Foreman, Director Champlain Centre for Health Care Ethics,
Geriatric Refresher Day The Regional Geriatric Program of Eastern Ontario Dr. Thomas Foreman, Director Champlain Centre for Health Care Ethics, Director TOH Department of Clinical and Organizational Ethics
More informationCanada, the Netherlands, Switzerland and the states of Colorado, Vermont, Montana, California, Oregon and Washington DC in the United States of Americ
IN THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) 215 of 2005 IN THE MATTER OF: COMMON CAUSE...PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA...RESPONDENTS Note on Arguments of
More informationAssisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill [HL]
Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill [HL] CONTENTS 1 Authorisation of assisted dying 2 Qualifying conditions 3 Offer of palliative care 4 Declaration made in advance Further duties of attending physician
More informationLw,- 4~ '~'r~
SIXTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC ) OF THE PHILIPPINES ) First Regular Session ) 'l.i IlCT SEN,;\TE S. No. ].887 Introduced by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago r EXPLANATORY NOTE Adult persons have the
More informationTENNESSEE LIVING WILL
TENNESSEE LIVING WILL I,, willfully and voluntarily make known my desire that my dying shall not be artificially prolonged under the circumstances set forth below, and do hereby declare: If at any time
More informationSUPREME COURT UPHOLDS PASSIVE EUTHANASIA, ISSUES GUIDELINES ON ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN LANDMARK JUDGEMENT
NEWSFLASH SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS PASSIVE EUTHANASIA, ISSUES GUIDELINES ON ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN LANDMARK JUDGEMENT 14 March 2018 A Constitution Bench of the Hon ble Supreme Court of India, comprising of
More information3. Legally binding advance directives may impose unworkable obligations upon medical professionals.
Scottish Council on Human Bioethics Eric Liddell Centre, 15 Morningside Road, Edinburgh EH10 4DP, Tel: 0131 447 6394 or 0774 298 4459 Position statement: Advance Directives 1. Advance directives may be
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 HOUSE BILL DRH10229-MG-122A (03/23) Short Title: End of Life Option Act. (Public)
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 HOUSE BILL DRH-MG-1A (0/) H.B. Apr, 0 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK D Short Title: End of Life Option Act. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Harrison,
More informationAssisted Dying Bill [HL]
Assisted Dying Bill [HL] CONTENTS 1 Assisted dying 2 Terminal illness 3 Declaration 4 Assistance in dying Conscientious objection 6 Criminal liability 7 Inquests, death certification etc. 8 Codes of practice
More informationRhode Island Statute CHAPTER Health Care Power of Attorney
Rhode Island Statute CHAPTER 23-4.10 Health Care Power of Attorney 23-4.10-1 Purpose. (a) The legislature finds that adult persons have the fundamental right to control the decisions relating to the rendering
More informationPalliative Sedation. A legal perspective
Palliative Sedation A legal perspective Palliative sedation means the intentional administration of sedative medication to reduce a patient s level of consciousness, with the intent to alleviate suffering
More informationPRESS SUMMARY. On appeal from R (Conway) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 2447 (Admin)
27 June 2018 PRESS SUMMARY R (on the application of Conway) (Appellants) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) and Humanists UK, Not Dead Yet (UK) and Care Not Killing (Interveners) On appeal
More informationChalmers, J. (2017) Clarifying the law on assisted suicide? Ross v Lord Advocate. Edinburgh Law Review, 21(1), pp (doi: /elr.2017.
Chalmers, J. (2017) Clarifying the law on assisted suicide? Ross v Lord Advocate. Edinburgh Law Review, 21(1), pp. 93-98. (doi:10.3366/elr.2017.0391) This is the author s final accepted version. There
More informationOffences 3. S300 Unlawful homicide 3. S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4. S303 Manslaughter 7. S335 Common Assault 9
4032LAW Exam Notes Offences 3 S300 Unlawful homicide 3 S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4 S303 Manslaughter 7 S335 Common Assault 9 S339 Assault occasioning bodily harm 10 S340 Serious assaults 11 S317 Acts
More informationLegal Framework: Advance Care Planning Gippsland Region Palliative Consortium and McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer (Cancer Council Victoria)
Legal Framework: Advance Care Planning Gippsland Region Palliative Consortium and McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer (Cancer Council Victoria) Claire McNamara, Legal Officer 1300 309 337 www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 23 1
Article 23. Right to Natural Death; Brain Death. 90-320. General purpose of Article. (a) The General Assembly recognizes as a matter of public policy that an individual's rights include the right to a
More informationParliamentary Research Branch THE RODRIGUEZ CASE: A REVIEW OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA DECISION ON ASSISTED SUICIDE
Background Paper BP-349E THE RODRIGUEZ CASE: A REVIEW OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA DECISION ON ASSISTED SUICIDE Margaret Smith Law and Government Division October 1993 Library of Parliament Bibliothèque
More informationLegal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016
Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No. 45 21st April, 2016 181 LEGAL NOTICE NO. 55 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, CHAP. 12:02 RULES MADE BY THE RULES COMMITTEE UNDER SECTION
More informationRight to a natural death.
90-321. Right to a natural death. (a) The following definitions apply in this Article: (1) Declarant. A person who has signed a declaration in accordance with subsection (c) of this section. (1a) Declaration.
More informationMedical Treatment (Enduring Power of Attorney) Act 1990
Medical Treatment (Enduring Power of Attorney) Act 1990 No. 7 of 1990 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section 1. Purposes 2. Commencement 3. Principal Act 4. Amendment of section 1 purpose 5. Amendment of section
More informationThe Health Information Protection Act
1 The Health Information Protection Act being Chapter H-0.021* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1999 (effective September 1, 2003, except for subsections 17(1), 18(2) and (4) and section 69) as amended
More information(1) Adult shall mean any person who is nineteen years of age or older or who is or has been married;
STATE OF NEBRASKA STATUTES Section 30-3401 Legislative intent. (1) It is the intent of the Legislature to establish a decision making process which allows a competent adult to designate another person
More information- 79th Session (2017) Assembly Bill No. 474 Committee on Health and Human Services
Assembly Bill No. 474 Committee on Health and Human Services CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to drugs; requiring certain persons to make a report of a drug overdose or suspected drug overdose; revising provisions
More informationIntroduction 3. The Meaning of Mental Illness 3. The Mental Health Act 4. Mental Illness and the Criminal Law 6. The Mental Health Court 7
Mental Health Laws Chapter Contents Introduction 3 The Meaning of Mental Illness 3 The Mental Health Act 4 Mental Illness and the Criminal Law 6 The Mental Health Court 7 The Mental Health Review Tribunal
More informationBar & Bench (
1 IN THE MATTER OF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 215 OF 2005 COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY) PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA RESPONDENT WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER
More information~ Ohio ~ Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care Christian Version NOTICE TO ADULT EXECUTING THIS DOCUMENT
~ Ohio ~ Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care Christian Version NOTICE TO ADULT EXECUTING THIS DOCUMENT This is an important legal document. Before executing this document, you should know these facts:
More informationHealth Care Directives
Wills and Estates Section 3 Contents Introduction...WE-3-1 Background...WE-3-2 (Living Wills)...WE-3-2 Who Can Make a Health Care Directive...WE-3-4 Types of Directives...WE-3-4 Construction of a Health
More informationHealth Care Consent Act
Briefing Note 2005, 2007 College of Physiotherapists of Ontario 2009 Contents Overview...3 Putting the in Context...3 The HCCA in Brief...4 Key Principles Governing Consent to Treatment...4 Key Aspects
More informationLaws Relating to Individual Decision Making
Laws Relating to Individual Decision Making CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 3 Impaired Decision-making Capacity 3 Powers of Attorney 4 General Powers of Attorney 5 Enduring Powers of Attorney 6 Advance Health
More informationDECLARATION OF A DESIRE FOR A NATURAL DEATH STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
DECLARATION OF A DESIRE F A NATURAL DEATH STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF I, Social Security Number,, being at least eighteen years of age and a resident of and domiciled in the City of County of, State
More informationA GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE
A GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE A GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE THE AIM OF THIS BOOKLET IS TO PROVIDE SOME ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE CONTENTS 02
More informationIC Chapter 6. Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST)
IC 16-36-6 Chapter 6. Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) IC 16-36-6-1 "Consent" Sec. 1. As used in this chapter, "consent" means authorization to provide, withhold, or withdraw treatment. IC
More informationWASHINGTON HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE (LIVING WILL / HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY) SAMPLE. John Doe
WASHINGTON HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE (LIVING WILL / HEALTH CARE POWER OF ATTORNEY) OF John Doe Directive made this day of, 20. I, John Doe, being of sound mind and disposing mind and memory, do hereby make
More informationDOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:
DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET: This is a standard advance directive for your state, made available to you as a courtesy by Lifecare Directives, LLC. You should be aware that extensive research has demonstrated that
More informationBefore: THE SENIOR PRESIDENT OF TRIBUNALS LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM The Divisional Court Sales LJ, Whipple J and Garnham J CB/3/37-38 Before: Case No: C1/2017/3068 Royal
More informationAdvance decisions and proxy decision-making in medical treatment and research Guidance from the BMA s Medical Ethics Department
Ethics Department Advance decisions and proxy decision-making in medical treatment and research Guidance from the BMA s Medical Ethics Department Assessing mental capacity Advance decisions Proxy decision-makers
More informationProstitution Control Act 1994
No. 102 of 1994 Section 1. Purpose 2. Commencement 3. Definitions 4. Objects of Act TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 OFFENCES CONNECTED WITH PROSTITUTION 5. Causing or inducing child to take
More informationGuidance on making referrals to Disclosure Scotland
Guidance on making referrals to Disclosure Scotland Introduction 1 This document provides guidance on our power to refer information to Disclosure Scotland (DS) when certain referral grounds are met. The
More informationATTORNEY-GENERAL. Report of the. under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 on the End of Life Choice Bill
J.4 Report of the ATTORNEY-GENERAL under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 on the End of Life Choice Bill Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Section 7 of the New Zealand Bill of
More informationIsobel Kennedy, SC Law Library
8 th ANNUAL NATIONAL PROSECUTORS CONFERENCE SATURDAY, 19 MAY 2007 DUBLIN CASTLE CONFERENCE CENTRE Isobel Kennedy, SC Law Library ~ Defence of Diminished Responsibility 1.GENERAL 8 th Annual National Prosecutors
More informationRight to Die Laws. The bill requires confirmation of a terminal condition by two physicians.
Right to Die Laws Principal Provisions of MODEL BILL The following is a summary of the provisions of a Model Bill drafted in a Yale Legislative Services project, undertaken with the sponsorship of the
More informationNeed some help filling out your Living Will document below?
! Need some help filling out your Living Will document below? You can now fill out a customized step-by-step version of this form and many others (your Will, Health Care Power of Attorney, and more) completely
More informationAdvance Directive Forms
Advance Directive Forms The following forms include a Health Care Directive and a Durable Power of Attorney. These are considered advance directives. It is helpful to talk with those you are close to when
More informationConsent to treatment
RDN-004 - Resource 4 Consent to treatment (Including the right to withhold consent, not for resuscitation orders, and the right to detain and restrain patients without their consent) Assault and the defence
More informationHEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 24170-24179.5 Page 1 of 6 24170. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act. 24171. The Legislature hereby
More informationWisconsin: Living Will
Wisconsin: Living Will NOTE: This form is being provided to you as a public service. The attached forms are provided as is and are not the substitute for the advice of an attorney. By providing these forms
More informationRasouli and Consent to Withdraw Treatment
Rasouli and Consent to Withdraw Treatment Mark D. Lerner President, The Advocates Society Partner, Lerners LLP Rivka Birkan Associate, Lerners LLP In Rasouli v. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2011
More informationMental Capacity Act 2005 Keeling Schedule
Mental Capacity Act 2005 Keeling Schedule Showing changes which will be effected by the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill (Bill 117 This schedule has been prepared by the Department for Health and Social
More informationDOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:
DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET: This is a standard advance directive for your state, made available to you as a courtesy by Lifecare Directives, LLC. You should be aware that extensive research has demonstrated that
More information2006 N BERBICE (CIVIL JURISDICTION)
2006 N0. 141 BERBICE IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE (CIVIL JURISDICTION) BETWEEN: 1. CLIFTON AUGUSTUS CRAWFORD, substituted by second named plaintiff by order of Court dated 14 th
More informationThe doctrine of judicial precedent with special reference to the cases concerning seriously ill new born infants.
The doctrine of judicial precedent with special reference to the cases concerning seriously ill new born infants. Christopher Stone November 2009 Introduction The doctrine of precedent will be illustrated
More informationAruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India, (2011) 4 SCC 454
Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug v. Union of India, (2011) 4 SCC 454 Kinds of euthanasia - Active and passive euthanasia - Voluntary and non- voluntary euthanasia - Legality and permissibility - Relationship
More informationLiving and Dying Well Keeping the law safe for sick and disabled people
Living and Dying Well Keeping the law safe for sick and disabled people Autonomy and Assisted Suicide By Professor Onora O'Neill We reproduce here, with permission from the author, the text of an address
More informationMental Capacity Act 2005 AS IT IS TO BE AMENDED BY THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2007
Mental Capacity Act 2005 AS IT IS TO BE AMENDED BY THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2007 Purpose This document is intended to show how the Mental Capacity Act 2005 will look as amended by the Mental Health Act 2007,
More informationAdvance Care Directives Act 2013
Advance Care Directives Act 2013 An overview- what s new, what s different Today. > Current regime > Advance Care Directives Act > What s new, what s different > Changes to consent provisions > Next steps
More informationComing to a person s aid when off duty
Coming to a person s aid when off duty Everyone might, at times, be first on scene when someone needs assistance. Whether it s coming across a car accident, seeing someone collapse in the shops, the sporting
More informationIrish Law Reform Commission Advance Care Directives Current Legal Approach
Irish Law Reform Commission Advance Care Directives Current Legal Approach Mary Keys, School of Law, NUI Galway Introduction International Dimension UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities
More informationMaking a complaint about YOUR Solicitor
Making a complaint about YOUR Solicitor Making a complaint about YOUR solicitor I 1 Making a complaint about YOUR Solicitor The Law Society of Northern Ireland is the governing body of solicitors in Northern
More informationGeneral Insurance - Domestic Insurance - Home Contents - FSP Decision - Denial of claim
Determination Case number: 299529 General Insurance - Domestic Insurance - Home Contents - FSP Decision - Denial of claim 11 July 2013 Background 1. The Applicant and her former husband (WB) held a home
More information, a person of the full age of majority and a resident of the Parish of, State of Louisiana, and residing at
SPECIAL LIMITED MEDICAL POWER OF ATTORNEY BY: TO: STATE OF LOUISIANA PARISH OF CITY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, duly commissioned and qualified in and for the State of Louisiana, and in
More informationNeed some help filling out your Living Will document below?
! Need some help filling out your Living Will document below? You can now fill out a customized step-by-step version of this form and many others (your Will, Health Care Power of Attorney, and more) completely
More informationNY SCPA 1750-B HEALTH CARE DECISIONS FOR MENTALLY RETARDED PERSONS
NY SCPA 1750-B HEALTH CARE DECISIONS FOR MENTALLY RETARDED PERSONS 385 386 McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York Annotated Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (Refs & Annos) Chapter 59-a. Of the Consolidated
More informationWASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG United States Supreme Court 521 U.S. 702, 117 S.Ct. 2258, 138 L.Ed.2d. 772 (1997)
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG United States Supreme Court 521 U.S. 702, 117 S.Ct. 2258, 138 L.Ed.2d. 772 (1997) In this case the U.S. Supreme Court reviews a state statute prohibiting doctor-assisted suicide.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 19, 2002 v No. 224027 Oakland Circuit Court DANIEL ALAN HOPKINS, LC No. 98-159567-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationVictims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill [HL]
Victims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill [HL] CONTENTS 1 Overview 2 Victims 3 Victims code of practice 4 Enforcement of the victims code of practice Area victims
More informationCausing death or allowing to die? Developments in the law
Jtournal ofmedical Ethics 1997; 23: 368-372 Causing death or allowing to die? Developments in the law Pamela R Ferguson University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland Abstract Several cases which have been considered
More informationMedical Treatment Act 1988
Section 1. Purpose. 2. Commencement. 3. Definitions. 4. Other legal rights not affected. Medical Treatment Act 1988 No. 41 of 1988 TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PREUMINARY PART 2 REFUSAL OF TREATMENT 5. Refusal
More informationSection 17 Lesser Evils Defense 535. Chapter Ten. Offenses Against the Person. Article One. Causing Death
Section 17 Lesser Evils Defense 535 THE LAW Israeli Penal Law (1995) (5737-1977, as amended in 5754-1994) Section 298. Manslaughter Chapter Ten. Offenses Against the Person Article One. Causing Death If
More informationThe role of doctors in Australian assisted dying law reform
CRICOS No.00213J The role of doctors in Australian assisted dying law reform Jodhi Rutherford Centre for Research Excellence in End of Life Care Influence in law reform: a methodological minefield Literature
More informationRe A (Children) [2001] 1 Fam 147 (HL), [2001] 2 WLR 480, [2000] 4 All ER 961, [2001] 57 BMLR 1.
Necessity and murder Re A (Children) [2001] 1 Fam 147 (HL), [2001] 2 WLR 480, [2000] 4 All ER 961, [2001] 57 BMLR 1. Jodie and Mary were conjoined twins. On appeal, the Court of Appeal was asked to determine
More informationBecause the king ultimately claimed all the land, he considered himself above the law. This was tolerated until 1215, when King John was forced by
Because the king ultimately claimed all the land, he considered himself above the law. This was tolerated until 1215, when King John was forced by the nobles to sign the Magna Carta. This contract subjected
More informationMEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT 1996
TASMANIA MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT 1996 No. 2 of 1996 CONTENTS PARTI-PRELmuNARY 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Interpretation 4. Act binds Crown PART 2 - MEDICAL COUNCIL OF TASMANIA Division
More informationESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE (EXCERPT) Act 386 of 1998 PART 5 DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND DESIGNATION OF PATIENT ADVOCATE
ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE (EXCERPT) Act 386 of 1998 PART 5 DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY AND DESIGNATION OF PATIENT ADVOCATE 700.5501 Durable power of attorney; definition. Sec. 5501. A durable
More informationBERMUDA MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS ACT : 38
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS ACT 1950 1950 : 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 5AA 5AB 5A 5B 6 7 7A 7B 8 9 10 11 12 12AA 12A 13 13A 14 15 16 17 PRELIMINARY Interpretation Unqualified
More informationRESPONSE BY THE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT: SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND A SCOTTISH SENTENCING COUNCIL
1 RESPONSE BY THE SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION TO THE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT: SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND A SCOTTISH SENTENCING COUNCIL The Sheriffs Association welcomes the opportunity to respond to this consultation
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO This decision was followed by an appeal, the results of which can be found at the end of this document. PANEL: Sarah Corkey, RN Chairperson Susan
More informationCoroners Act. Purpose: Where the Act Applies: How the Act Works
Coroners Act Purpose: The purpose of this act is to provide for the appointment of coroners and a Chief Coroner. The Act requires persons to notify a coroner or police of any death in certain circumstances
More informationLaw Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response
Law Commission consultation on the Sentencing Code Law Society response January 2018 The Law Society 2018 Page 1 of 12 Introduction The Law Society of England and Wales ( The Society ) is the professional
More informationHuman Research Protection Program Policies & Procedures
Human Research Protection Program Policies & Procedures Consent Forms: Assurance of the Required Elements of Informed Consent Version 2.0 Date Effective: 6/8/2011 Research Integrity Office Mail code L106
More informationIntroduction to Criminal Law
Introduction to Criminal Law CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Crimes versus Civil Wrongs 2 Types of Criminal Offences 3 General Principles of Criminal Law 4 Accessories and Parties to Crimes 5 Attempted
More informationmay obviously affect both the way in which his or her case, "a person is completely at liberty to decline to
Jourmal of Medical Ethics 1997; 23: 154-158 The right to refuse treatment is not a right to be killed Susan L Lowe Department of Philosophy, University ofdurham Abstract It is widely accepted now that
More informationDOWNLOAD COVERSHEET:
DOWNLOAD COVERSHEET: This is a standard advance directive for your state, made available to you as a courtesy by Lifecare Directives, LLC. You should be aware that extensive research has demonstrated that
More informationBALANCING THE TREATMENT OF PERSONAL INFORMATION UNDER FOI AND PRIVACY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE AUSTRALIAN ANALYSIS. PART 2
BALANCING THE TREATMENT OF PERSONAL INFORMATION UNDER FOI AND PRIVACY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE AUSTRALIAN ANALYSIS. PART 2 Mick Batskos* Part 1 of this paper, published in AIAL Forum 80, looked briefly at:
More informationSubmission of the. to the. NSW Department of Health
Submission of the NEW SOUTH WALES COUNCIL FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES to the NSW Department of Health Review of the forensic provisions of the Mental Health Act 1990 & the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act
More informationGeorgia Statutory Short Form Durable Power of Attorney For Health Care
Georgia Statutory Short Form Durable Power of Attorney For Health Care NOTICE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY IS TO GIVE THE PERSON YOU DESIGNATE (YOUR AGENT) BROAD POWERS TO MAKE HEALTH CARE DECISIONS
More informationCapacity to Consent Policy
Capacity to Consent Policy Document Reference POL018 Document Status Version: V4.0 Approved DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY Initiated by Date Author Director of Clinical Quality August 2010 Safeguarding Lead Version
More informationVictims of Crime Etc (Rights, Entitlements and Related Matters) Bill
Victims of Crime Etc (Rights, Entitlements and Related Matters) Bill CONTENTS 1 Victims 2 Duty to notify police of child sexual abuse 3 Establishment and conduct of homicide reviews 4 Statutory duty on
More informationFirst Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED. Bill Summary
First Regular Session Seventy-second General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. -00.0 Jerry Barry x SENATE BILL - SENATE SPONSORSHIP Lee, HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Weissman and Landgraf, Senate Committees
More informationSecond medical use or indication claims. Winnie Tham, Edmund Kok, Nicholas Ong
Question Q238 National Group: Title: Contributors: Reporter within Working Committee: AIPPI SINGAPORE Second medical use or indication claims Winnie Tham, Edmund Kok, Nicholas Ong THAM, Winnie Date: 17
More informationBELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS REGISTRATION ACT CHAPTER 318 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner
More informationGUIDANCE No. 26 ORGAN DONATION
GUIDANCE No. 26 ORGAN DONATION 1. The purpose of this guidance is to help coroners with decision-making in situations that concern organ and tissue donation. It is intended to assist coroners on the law
More informationRight to life case - Leslie Burke appeal rejected by European. Court of Human Rights
8 August 2006 Right to life case - Leslie Burke appeal rejected by European Court of Human Rights Leslie Burke, who suffers from Friedreich's ataxia, a rare and progressive neurological condition, has
More information32A-4 through 32A-7. Reserved for future codification purposes.
Chapter 32A. Powers of Attorney. Article 1. Statutory Short Form Power of Attorney. 32A-1 through 32A-3: Repealed by Session Laws 2017-153, s. 2.8, effective January 1, 2018. 32A-4 through 32A-7. Reserved
More informationThird Parties Making Health Care and End of Life Decisions
Third Parties Making Health Care and End of Life Decisions I. Judgment of Third Parties II. Who Are the Third Parties? III. Types of Documents Third Parties Need to Make Health Care Decisions I am mainly
More informationCorrective Action/Fair Hearing Plan. For. The Medical Staff of Indiana University Blackford Hospital Hartford City, IN 47348
Corrective Action/Fair Hearing Plan For The Medical Staff of Indiana University Blackford Hospital Hartford City, IN 47348 April, 2001 June, 2002 May 2008 November 2011 November 29, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationCOPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Introduction to the Legal System CHAPTER 1. Ingrid Granne 1 and Lorraine Corfield 2. Case law
CHAPTER 1 Introduction to the Legal System Ingrid Granne 1 and Lorraine Corfield 2 1 Clinical Research Fellow and Specialist Registrar, Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of
More informationPharmacy Case Law Update 2016: Worse Than an Unruly Horse, It is an Imaginary One
CPE Information and Disclosures Pharmacy Case Law Update : Worse Than an Unruly Horse, It is an Imaginary One Col(r) David W. Bobb, BSPh, MA, JD Office of the National Coordinator U.S. Dept. of Health
More informationThe forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues
The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues A guide to the Report 01 The Nuffield Council on Bioethics has published a Report, The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues. It considers the
More informationTO LIVE OR LET DIE The Laws of Informed Consent
TO LIVE OR LET DIE The Laws of Informed Consent OBJECTIVES Provide an understanding of the law of informed consent, substitute decision makers and minors rights to accept or refuse treatment. *The information
More information