June 7, 2018 FILED ELECTRONICALLY.
|
|
- Phoebe Hudson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Capital Power Corporation Street NW Edmonton, AB T5H 0E9 June 7, 2018 FILED ELECTRONICALLY Alberta Utilities Commission Eau Claire Tower 1400, 600 Third Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 0G5 Attention: Mr. Carl Fuchshuber, Director, Capacity Market Dear Mr. Fuchshuber: Re: Bulletin Consultation initiated for changes to AUC Rule 017, to reflect amendments to the Electric Utilities Act AUC Rule 017: Procedures and Process for Development of ISO Rules and Filing of ISO Rules with the Alberta Utilities Commission Initial Comments of Capital Power Corporation On May 14, 2018, the Alberta Utilities Commission ( AUC or the Commission ) issued draft AUC Rule 017: Procedures and Process for Development of ISO Rules and Filing of ISO Rules with the Alberta Utilities Commission (the draft Rule ). Capital Power Corporation ( Capital Power ) has reviewed the draft Rule and provides the following comments for consideration. Enclosed please find Capital Power s initial comments on the draft Rule (Attachment 1). At this time, Capital Power does not believe that a second stakeholder consultation meeting on Rule 017 is required, but requests the opportunity to review an updated draft and provide written comments ahead of finalization. In addition, Capital Power provides the following general comments for the Commission s consideration. General Comments 1. The provisional rule approval process for the first Independent System Operator ( ISO ) capacity market rules must be clearly scoped and adhere to clear timelines to provide certainty for all market participants. Amendments proposed to the Electric Utilities Act ( EUA ) in section of Bill 13: An Act to Secure Alberta s Electricity Future ( Bill 13 ), establish a provisional rule approval process for the first ISO rules relating to the capacity market and grant the AUC authority to direct that an ISO rule be considered under section if, in the Commission s opinion, the ISO rule is not essential for the establishment or operation of the capacity market 1. 1 Bill 13: An Act to Secure Alberta s Electricity Future, p. 21.
2 In the interest of ensuring an efficient and focused process for provisional approval of the first capacity market rules, it is important that the Commission engage stakeholders, including the ISO, at the outset of the process to determine appropriate scope and timelines. As such, Capital Power supports the AUC s proposal at the May 31, 2018 Rule 017 Consultation Meeting to open the provisional approval process early and solicit stakeholder views on the issues to be examined in the provisional approval process and the approval criteria. This will help ensure provisional rules are approved in a timely manner, allowing ISO implementation activities to proceed and providing certainty to all market participants in advance of and preparation for the first auction. In conjunction with a clearly defined scope, Capital Power recommends the AUC establish firm timelines for the provisional rule approval process, considering the pre-qualification for the first auction is expected to commence in November The risk of retroactive rule-making should be reduced, if not, eliminated. Bill 13 would potentially allow the AUC some limited ability to make orders regarding capacity market rules that apply on a retroactive basis. This ability applies to both provisional and going forward rules. The threat of retroactive rule changes is problematic for all investors, existing and new. It represents an unacceptable and unnecessary risk that, from an investor perspective, is unmanageable and as such will be accounted for by capacity providers in their bids, likely increasing costs to consumers, or worse, result in insufficient investment levels that may have a negative effect on reliability. Therefore, Capital Power submits that retroactive rule-making must be avoided. Clarity in this respect could be provided by the AUC in Rule 017 by specifying that that the first set of capacity market rules approved on a provisional basis will not be considered interim and/or subject to retroactive adjustment based on the results of the 24-month approval process under section and that any changes that result would apply on a prospective basis only. 3. In the interest of regulatory efficiency, recognition should be given to the ISO stakeholder consultation process in approving ISO rules. Capital Power recommends establishing an abbreviated rule approval process in cases where an ISO stakeholder consultation process has resulted in undisputed, collective support of a proposed rule or package of rules. Such a process would allow the Commission to avoid repeating a consultation process and ensure efficient use of agency and stakeholder time and resources, while also avoiding delay in implementation of rules, ensuring greater certainty for market participants. To be clear, Capital Power is not recommending the standard ISO Rule complaint process be removed or modified; that process should continue to provide stakeholders with an avenue to challenge rules approved by the Commission. Capital Power appreciates the Commission s responsibility to perform an independent review, however, in instances where the ISO has conducted a lengthy and comprehensive consultation process that has resulted in the full support of stakeholders, it would be inefficient for the AUC to re-open all aspects of a rule package in the hearing process. As such, Capital Power submits that the AUC should exercise its discretion, particularly in the case of the provisional capacity market rule approval, to give deference to the results of ISO consultation. Re-opening all aspects of a rule package would diminish the value of the ISO performing robust consultation and could discourage stakeholders from fully engaging in ISO consultation initiatives. Assuming the ISO has conducted appropriate consultation resulting in collective support, an expedited rule approval process should follow. This would help balance the AUC s obligation of review and responsibility to foster regulatory efficiency. Conclusion Respectfully, Capital Power requests that the AUC: Clearly scope the provisional rule approval process in consultation with agencies and stakeholders, and conduct that process along a clearly established timeline; Reduce or eliminate the risk of retroactive rule-making as it applies to capacity market rules both provisional and going forward ; and 2
3 Formally recognize the results of the ISO s stakeholder consultation process and other potential opportunities to abbreviate the rule approval process and ensure regulatory efficiency. Capital Power appreciates the opportunity to participate in the AUC s stakeholder engagement process. Should you have any questions, or wish to discuss, please contact me at (403) Regards, Capital Power Corporation Jason Comandante, Vice President, Regulatory and Environmental Policy, Capital Power Attachment 1- Comment Matrix of Capital Power re: AUC Rule 017 Amendments 3
4 Comment Matrix of Capital Power Amendments to AUC Rule 017: Procedures and Process for Development of ISO Rules and Filing of ISO Rules with the Alberta Utilities Commission SECTION Part 1: General Matters Section 1 COMMENTS Part 2: Procedures and process for development of proposed rules and application for Commission approval Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 4 sets out an effective and transparent process for issuing notice of proposed rule development. However, Section 4 does not specify any notice requirements for the ISO with respect to issuing notice of its decision not to develop a proposed rule based on a proposal received under Section of the Electric Utilities Act ( EUA ). Capital Power believes that Section 4 could be enhanced by adding a requirement for the Independent System Operator (the ISO ) to issue, at minimum, written notice on its website when it determines that an issue does not require a proposed rule. Adding such a requirement will create an expectation that the ISO, in instances where they determine a proposed rule is not necessary, is required to provide written justification to stakeholders of their decision. Section 5 Section 6 Section 6 describes the consultation process that the ISO must adhere to in the development of proposed rules. Draft subsection 6.1 states that [u]pon receipt of any request to participate in consultation, the ISO must: (a) form a working group or working groups composed of any parties who submitted a request to participate in consultation. The language at draft subsection 6.1 is broad and should be clarified to ensure that it is not applied too prescriptively. Capital Power recommends adding the proposed language denoted in red font as follows: Upon receipt of any request to participate in consultation in response to a Notice issued under Section 4 with respect to a proposed ISO rule, the ISO must: Capital Power recommends that language be added to Section 6 requiring that all written comments provided to the ISO as part of the consultation process with respect to a proposed rule (whether from the Market Surveillance Administrator ( MSA ), market participants, interested parties, and/or other agencies) must be posted publicly by the ISO. While this is largely in-line with current practice, making it a requirement in Rule 017 will ensure consistency and transparency. At Section 8 of current Rule 017, it stipulates that [t]he ISO must consider the comments received in response to a letter of notice and prepare a reply to the comments, including whether the ISO has made changes to the draft ISO rule attached to a letter of notice. Further at Section 10, it stipulates that [t]he ISO s reply must be sent to market participants, or other persons who submitted comments and must be posted on the ISO website. Capital Power believes that the requirement to respond to comments and post replies publicly is a critical element of Rule 017 that ensures transparency and understanding. Such requirements must be retained. As Page 1 of 6
5 such, language should be added to new Section requiring the ISO to consider all comments received and to publicly post a response. To ensure regulatory efficiency and, in particular, that the level of ISO consultation is commensurate with the materiality of a proposed new rule or amendment to or removal of an existing rule, consideration should be given to enabling the ISO to exercise discretion in establishing the level and form of consultation undertaken (i.e. working groups or an alternative forums) as well as the composition of members. There are circumstances where working groups may not be appropriate and where the ISO may need to exercise discretion in to determining the best approach. Section 7 With respect to subsection 7.2 (b), Capital Power believes that the question of whether a rule relates to the capacity market or the electricity market creates an unhelpful and unnecessary separation of the two markets which is both counter to the way they are being designed and the way they will ultimately function and operate. It is imperative that the Commission continue to consider market rules within the context of the entire electricity market, which includes the forward capacity market, the real-time energy market, and the ancillary services market. While each market operates with distinct characteristics, they are highly interrelated and will together work to achieve the goals of legislation. Ignoring this interrelation in the consideration of market rules creates an unnecessary separation that could lead to major unintended consequences. To address this issue, Capital Power recommends changing the language of 7.2 (b) as follows: an explanation of whether how the proposed rule impacts and relates to: (i) the capacity market and why; or (ii) the electricity market and why ; and/or (iii) the ancillary service market and why;. The intention of allowing the ISO to specify whether a proposed capacity market rule will be in effect for a fixed term under Section 7.2 (c) remains unclear. Capital Power recognizes that key capacity market parameters the demand curve, Cost of New Entry ( CONE ) and net-cone (perhaps among others) will need to be developed with stakeholder and third-party input, updated regularly (i.e. annually), and approved by the Commission. However, Capital Power believes that the foundation for these calculations what ultimately gets put in to market rules should be general enough as to allow these types of updates to be approved by the AUC without re-opening or changing of market rules since the ISO can re-open a market rule as required if they identify an issue with it. Similarly, the Commission has the ability to approve a rule for a fixed period as required. Based on the above, Capital Power sees no purpose for subsection 7.2 (c) and suggests that it be removed. Investors require certainty regarding the market framework and clarity of the market rules in order to build and operate long-term assets with the confidence that, given their longevity, the market framework will not be re-opened subjecting these investments to material and unnecessary risk from changes on a continual or recurring basis. Capital Power supports subsection 7.2 (e) and recommends adding the following language a copy of any analysis conducted or commissioned by the ISO supporting the proposed rule, with a description of assumptions and methodology and accompanying non-commercially sensitive data. As it relates to subsection 7.2 (h), Capital Power reiterates the support expressed in its cover letter regarding the AUC s proposal to commence the provisional rule approval Page 2 of 6
6 process early and solicit stakeholder views on issues to be examined as well as the approval criteria to be used. A key element of the approval criteria that warrants discussion is ensuring a reliable supply of electricity at a reasonable cost to customers. Early discussion will help ensure provisional rules are approved in a timely manner, allowing ISO implementation activities to proceed and providing certainty to all market participants in advance of the first auction. Consistent with requirements of the EUA, Capital Power recommends adding an additional requirement at Subsection 7.2 requiring that an ISO application for approval of a proposed rule must also include a description of how the proposed rule is not technically deficient. Part 3: Procedures and process for development of proposed provisional rules and proposed initial rules and application for Commission approval Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Capital Power is unclear of the purpose for Section It is Capital Power s understanding that the provisional rule approval process will only be used for provisional approval of first ISO rules relating to the capacity market. As such, Capital Power is not aware of any circumstances whereby a proposal received by the ISO under Section of the EUA would require the ISO to establish a provisional rule and not a permanent rule subject to full approval. Allowing such an option as specified in at subsection 10.2 only creates further uncertainty as to what items will be in scope of the provisional proceeding to approve the first set of capacity market rules. For these reasons, Capital Power requests that subsection 10.2 should be removed. Section 11 Section 12 Many of the comments below raise similar issues as identified in the comments above with respect to Section 6. Nonetheless these comments are repeated below in the context of Section 12. Section 12 describes the consultation process that the ISO must adhere to in the development of proposed provisional rules. Subsection 12.1 states that [u]pon receipt of any request to participate in consultation, the ISO must: (a) form a working group or working groups composed of any parties who submitted a request to participate in consultation. The language at subsection 12.1 is broad and should be clarified to ensure that it is not applied too prescriptively. Capital Power recommends amending the proposed language as follows: Upon receipt of any request to participate in consultation in response to a Notice issued under Section 10 with respect to a proposed provisional ISO rule, the ISO must: Capital Power recommends that language be added to Section 12 requiring that all written comments provided to the ISO as part of the consultation process with respect to a proposed rule (whether from the Market Surveillance Administrator ( MSA ), market participants, interested parties, and/or other agencies) must be posted publicly by the ISO. While this is largely in-line with current practice, making it a requirement in Rule 017 will ensure consistency and transparency. At subsection 8 of current Rule 017, it stipulates that [t]he ISO must consider the comments received in response to a letter of notice and prepare a reply to the Page 3 of 6
7 comments, including whether the ISO has made changes to the draft ISO rule attached to a letter of notice. Further, at current Section 10, it stipulates that [t]he ISO s reply must be sent to market participants, or other persons who submitted comments and must be posted on the ISO website. Capital Power believes that the requirement to respond to comments and post replies publicly is a critical element of Rule 017 that ensures transparency and understanding. Such requirements must be retained. As such, language should be added to new Section 12 requiring the ISO to consider all comments received and to prepare and public post its reply. To ensure regulatory efficiency and, in particular, that the level of ISO consultation is commensurate with the materiality of a proposed new rule or amendment to or removal of an existing rule, consideration should be given to enabling the ISO to exercise discretion in establishing the level and form of consultation undertaken (i.e. working groups or an alternative forums) as well as the composition of members. There are circumstances where working groups may not be appropriate and where the ISO may need to exercise discretion in to determining the best approach. Section 13 Capital Power supports draft Rule 017 s recognition of the significant consultation that has been undertaken by the ISO with respect to the capacity market design since June 2017 and the ability for the ISO to refer to working group consultations that took place in order to meet the requirements for consultation on a proposed provisional rule. Such an approach is necessary to ensure an effectively scoped provisional rule approval proceeding and timely approval of the provisional rules for the first two capacity auctions. Capital Power has been an active participant in the ISO s capacity market design consultations and recognizes the significant and meaningful efforts that have been made to date by the ISO and stakeholders with respect to developing the capacity market design. As mentioned in its cover letter, Capital Power supports the AUC s proposal to commence the provisional rule approval process early and solicit stakeholder views on the scope of issues and the approval criteria. A preliminary discussion of scope with stakeholders will ensure an efficient provisional approval process. Section 14 Many of the comments below raise similar issues as identified in the comments above with respect to Section 7. Nonetheless these comments are repeated below in the context of Section 14. With respect to subsection 14.2 (b), Capital Power believes that the question of whether a proposed provisional rule relates to the capacity market or the electricity market creates an unhelpful and unnecessary separation of the two markets which is both counter to the way they are being designed and the way they will ultimately function and operate. It is imperative that the Commission continue to consider market rules within the context of the entire electricity market, which includes the forward capacity market, the real-time energy market, and the ancillary services market. While each market operates with distinct characteristics, they are highly interrelated and will together work to achieve the goals of legislation. Ignoring this interrelation in the consideration of market rules creates an unnecessary separation that could lead to major unintended consequences. To address this issue, Capital Power recommends changing the language of 14.2 (b) as follows: an explanation of whether how the proposed rule impacts and relates to: Page 4 of 6
8 (i) the capacity market and why; or (ii) the electricity market and why ; and/or (iii) the ancillary service market and why;. Capital Power understands that the first set of provisionally approved capacity market rules will apply only for a fixed term (i.e. the first two auctions). Capital Power is unclear, however, in what circumstances the ISO would specify that some provisionally approved rules would be put in to effect for different term lengths than others given the requirement under Bill 13 that provisionally approved rules will be subject to the full approval process after 24 months. The potential for the effective dates of different rules to be misaligned creates the potential for needless uncertainty during the market transition and major scoping issues for the future full approval process. For these reasons, Capital Power suggests removing subsection 14.2 (c). If the Commission disagrees this question should form part of the scoping discussions in the proposed early opening of the provisional proceeding. Capital Power supports subsection 14.2 (e) and recommends adding the following language: a copy of any analysis conducted or commissioned by the ISO supporting the proposed rule, with a description of assumptions and methodology and accompanying data. As it relates to subsection 14.2 (h), Capital Power reiterates its supports expressed in its cover letter regarding the AUC s proposal to commence the provisional rule approval process early and solicit stakeholder views on issues to be examined during the provisional approval process as well as the approval criteria to be applied. A key element of the approval criteria that warrants discussion is ensuring a reliable supply of electricity at a reasonable cost to customers. Early discussion will help ensure provisional rules are approved in a timely manner, allowing ISO implementation activities to proceed and providing certainty to all market participants in advance of the first auction. It is unclear why subsection 14.2 (j) requests that the ISO s targeted capacity procurement volumes for the first two capacity market auctions be included as part of the provisional rule approval application. Please provide additional rationale. If subsection 14.2 (j) is retained in new AUC Rule 017, Capital Power believes that the ISO s targeted capacity procurement volumes should be accompanied by the target reliability level expressed in Expected Unserved Energy along with the ISO explanation of how it set the reliability level. Consistent with requirements of the EUA, Capital Power recommends adding language to subsection 14.2 requiring that an ISO application for approval of a proposed rule must also include a description of how the proposed rule is not technically deficient. Part 4: Application for Commission approval of expedited rules Section 15 Section 16 Section 17 See comments below re: Section 18. Section 18 Capital Power believes that Section 18 needs to be strengthened to ensure that expedited rule filings are communicated to market participants in a timely manner and that they are ultimately subject to meaningful ISO consultation and full AUC approval. Page 5 of 6
9 Capital Power recommends adding language to Section 17 or 18 specifying that the ISO must issue a notice to market participants when it determines that an expedited rule filing is required. Capital Power suggest the following language: When the ISO identifies an issue, that, in the opinion of the ISO, may require an expedited rule, the ISO must issue written notice to the Market Surveillance Administrator, market participants, and other interested parties as soon as practicable and must post the notice on the ISO s website. Capital Power recommends adding language to Section 18 specifying that once an expedited rule has been approved by the Commission (such that the urgency of the AESO s expediated filing has been alleviated), the AESO must engage in consultation and seek approval with the Commission as per Part 2. Page 6 of 6
AUC Rule 017: June 14, proposed changes
AUC Rule 017: June 14, proposed changes Stakeholder comments: Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO), AltaLink Management Ltd. (AltaLink), ATCO Electricity Generation (ATCO), Capital Power Corporation
More informationProcedures and Process for Development of ISO Rules and Filing of ISO Rules with the Alberta Utilities Commission
Rule 017 Procedures and Process for Development of ISO Rules and Filing of ISO Rules with the Alberta Utilities Commission This rule was approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission on
More informationAlberta Electric System Operator
Decision 23917-D01-2018 Rejection of Reliability Standard MOD-026-1 November 5, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 23917-D01-2018 Rejection of Reliability Standard MOD-026-1 Proceeding 23917 Application
More informationAlberta Electric System Operator
Decision 2011-501 Alberta Electric System Operator Approval of Alberta reliability standard BAL-002-AB-1 December 20, 2011 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2011-501: Alberta Electric System Operator
More informationDate: January 14, 2011 Re: Final Offer Behaviour Enforcement Guidelines and stakeholder comments on the draft
NOTICE TO MARKET PARTICIPANTS AND STAKEHOLDERS Date: January 14, 2011 Re: Final Offer Behaviour Enforcement Guidelines and stakeholder comments on the draft Effective today the MSA is releasing its finalized
More informationAlberta Electric System Operator
Decision 20509-D01-2015 Approval of Alberta reliability standard BAL-002-WECC-AB1-2 June 26, 2015 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20509-D01-2015 Approval of Alberta reliability standard BAL-002-WECC-AB1-2
More informationENMAX Power Corporation
Decision 23798-D01-2018 ENMAX No. 36 Substation Transformer Capacity Upgrade August 21, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 23798-D01-2018 ENMAX No. 36 Substation Transformer Capacity Upgrade Proceeding
More informationRebasing for the PBR Plans for Alberta Electric and Gas Distribution Utilities. First Compliance Proceeding
Decision 23245-D01-2018 Rebasing for the 2018-2022 PBR Plans for Alberta Electric and Gas Distribution Utilities April 27, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 23245-D01-2018 Rebasing for the 2018-2022
More informationENMAX Power Corporation
Decision 21717-D01-2016 Distribution 2015-2017 Performance-Based Regulation- Negotiated Settlement Application and Interim X Factor September 26, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 21717-D01-2016
More informationReliabilityFirst Corporation Reliability Standards Development Procedure Version 4
ReliabilityFirst Corporation Reliability Standards Development Procedure Version 4 NERC BoT Approved May 24, 2012 ReliabilityFirst Board Approved December 1, 2011 ReliabilityFirst Corporation Reliability
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. North American Electric Reliability ) Docket No. RR16- Corporation )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION North American Electric Reliability ) Docket No. RR16- Corporation ) PETITION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION
More informationREVOKED AS OF APRIL 11, 2016
MSA Hearing Procedures Table of Contents PART 1 INTERPRETATION 1 Definitions 2 Application of Procedures PART 2 GENERAL MATTERS 3 Directions 4 Setting of time limits and extending or abridging time 5 Variation
More informationSalt Box Coulee Water Supply Company Ltd. Customer Complaints - Infrastructure Repair Expense
Decision 23401-D01-2018 Customer Complaints - Infrastructure Repair Expense October 22, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 23401-D01-2018 Customer Complaints Infrastructure Repair Expense Proceeding
More informationTexas Reliability Entity Standards Development Process
Texas Reliability Entity Table of Contents I. Introduction... 3 II. Background... 3 III. Regional Standards Definition... 4 IV. Roles in the Texas RE Regional... 5 V. Texas RE Regional... 6 A. Assumptions
More information( ) Page: 1/13 COMMUNICATION FROM INDIA TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
RESTRICTED S/C/W/372 TN/S/W/63 S/WPDR/W/58 23 February 2017 (17-1111) Page: 1/13 Council for Trade in Services Council for Trade in Services - Special Session Working Party on Domestic Regulation Original:
More informationDecision D ATCO Electric Ltd Annual Performance-Based Regulation Rate Adjustment Filing. Costs Award
Decision 22281-D01-2017 2017 Annual Performance-Based Regulation Rate Adjustment Filing February 10, 2017 Decision 22281-D01-2017 2017 Annual Performance-Based Regulation Rate Adjustment Filing Proceeding
More informationTexas Reliability Entity Standards Development Process
Texas Reliability Entity AA Approved by FERC Effective May 6, 2010 Cover page updated March 23, 2016 Table of Contents I. Introduction... 4 II. Background... 4 III. Regional Standards Definition... 5 IV.
More informationJULY Scottish Police Authority. complaints audit
JULY 2014 Scottish Police Authority complaints audit 2013-14 section contents 1 background 2 introduction 3 methodology 4 findings and recommendations 5 conclusions 6 summary of recommendations Appendix
More informationNATIONAL POLICY GUIDANCE FOR PROXY ADVISORY FIRMS
NATIONAL POLICY 25-201 GUIDANCE FOR PROXY ADVISORY FIRMS PART 1 PURPOSE AND APPLICATION 1.1 Purpose of this Policy The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA or we) recognize that proxy voting is an important
More informationMNsure. DRAFT Procurement Policies and Procedures. Section 1. Statement of Purpose. Section 2. Statutory Authority. Section 3. Conflicts of Interest
MNsure DRAFT Procurement Policies and Procedures Section 1 Statement of Purpose These procurement policies and procedures are intended to establish an open, competitive and transparent procurement process
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Grid Reliability and Resilience Pricing ) RM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Grid Reliability and Resilience Pricing ) RM18-1-000 JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED TREAMENT OF THE
More informationSRR Public Comment Policy. Request for Public Comments. Proposal August 30, 2016 October 31, 2016
SRR Public Comment Policy Request for Public Comments Proposal 2016-2 August 30, 2016 October 31, 2016 The State Regulatory Registry invited public comments on the adoption of policies governing the procedures
More informationINFORMATION BULLETIN
INFORMATION BULLETIN #25 REVIEW OF ARBITRATIONS - TRANSITIONAL I. INTRODUCTION Most collective agreements provide for grievance arbitration as the method for resolving disputes over the meaning or application
More informationAlberta Electric System Operator. Provost to Edgerton and Nilrem to Vermilion Transmission System Reinforcement Needs Identification Document
Decision 23137-D01-2018 Provost to Edgerton and Nilrem to Vermilion Transmission System Reinforcement March 8, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 23137-D01-2018 Provost to Edgerton and Nilrem to
More informationDevonia Rural Electrification Association Ltd.
Decision 22222-D01-2016 December 21, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22222-D01-2016 Proceeding 22222 Application 22222-A001 December 21, 2016 Published by the: Alberta Utilities Commission Fifth
More informationISBN Project no / Public version
ISBN 978-1-869456-22-1 Project no. 14.11/15108 Public version Companion Paper to amendments to the pilot asset health grid output measures and asset health pilot reporting requirements in the Transpower
More informationDRAFT R E S O L U T I O N. Resolution E Registration Process for Community Choice Aggregators.
DRAFT PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Item #9 (Rev. 1) Agenda ID #16190 ENERGY DIVISION RESOLUTION E-4907 February 8, 2018 SUMMARY R E S O L U T I O N Resolution E-4907. Registration
More informationSERC Regional Standards Development Procedure Exhibit C to the Amended and Restated Regional Entity Delegation Agreement between
SERC Regional Standards Development Procedure Exhibit C to the Amended and Restated Regional Entity Delegation Agreement between North American Electric Reliability Corporation and SERC Reliability Corporation
More informationSTATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER PROCUREMENT REPORT
STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER PROCUREMENT REPORT BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS A. Matthew Boxer COMPTROLLER June 8, 2011 PR-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...
More informationMay 21, By Marcia E. Asquith Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA 1735 K Street, NW Washington, DC
May 21, 2012 By Email (pubcom@finra.org) Marcia E. Asquith Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA 1735 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-1506 Re: FINRA Regulatory Notice 12-18, Request for Comment on
More informationEnergy Regulatory Office of Kosovo. Tariff Application Guidelines
Hamdi Mramori Street, No 1 Prishtina 10000 Kosovo Tel: +381 (0) 38 247 615 ext. 103 Fax: +381 (0) 38 247 620 e-mail: info@ero-ks.org www.ero-ks.org Energy Regulatory Office of Kosovo Tariff Application
More informationCentral Alberta Rural Electrification Association Limited
Decision 2012-181 Central Alberta Rural Electrification Association Limited Application for a Declaration under the Hydro and Electric Energy Act July 4, 2012 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision
More informationPublic Consultation Guidelines For Electricity, Gas & Water Licences and Electricity & Gas Standard Form Contracts July 2006
Public Consultation Guidelines For Electricity, Gas & Water Licences and Electricity & Gas Standard Form Contracts July 2006 1 A full copy of this document is available from the website at www.era.wa.gov.au.
More informationMIDWEST RELIABILITY ORGANIZATION
Page 1 of 7 MIDWEST RELIABILITY ORGANIZATION Policy and Procedure 1: MRO Board of Directors Objective The objective of this policy and procedure is to set forth the general procedures regarding board composition
More informationAltaLink Management Ltd.
Decision 21818-D01-2016 Southwest Calgary Ring Road Transmission Project November 4, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 21818-D01-2016 Southwest Calgary Ring Road Transmission Project Proceeding
More informationFRCC REGIONAL RELIABILITY STANDARD DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MANUAL
FRCC REGIONAL RELIABILITY STANDARD DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MANUAL FRCC-RE-STD-001 Effective Date: March 3, 2017 Version: 1 3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 600 Tampa, Florida 33607-8410 (813) 289-5644 - Phone (813)
More informationReliability Standards Development Procedures
Reliability Standards Development Procedures WECC Standards Department WECC Standards Committee FERC Approved October 27, 2017 155 North 400 West, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84103-1114 Reliability
More information3. The Town and Country Planning (Referrals and Appeals) (Written Representation Procedure) (Wales) Regulations 2015
Explanatory Memorandum to: 1. The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Wales) (Amendment) Order 2015 2. Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations
More informationTO THE CREDITORS OF ALBERTA LTD., carrying on business as SPAREPARTS
KPMG Inc. 205 5th Avenue SW Suite 3100 Calgary AB T2P 4B9 Tel 403-691-8000 Fax 403-691-8008 www.kpmg.ca October 5, 2017 TO THE CREDITORS OF 1031084 ALBERTA LTD., carrying on business as SPAREPARTS Please
More informationDrayton Valley Rural Electrification Association Ltd.
Decision 22208-D01-2016 Varied Code of Conduct Regulation Compliance Plan December 21, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22208-D01-2016 Varied Code of Conduct Regulation Compliance Plan Proceeding
More informationGlobal Sustainability Standards Board Due Process Protocol October 2018
Global Sustainability Standards Board Due Process Protocol October 2018 The Global Sustainability Standards Board (GSSB) is authorized by its Terms of Reference to develop and issue authoritative pronouncements.
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC Dynegy Morro Bay, LLC El Segundo Power LLC Reliant Energy, Inc. Complainants, v. California Independent
More informationAA4 submission to the Economic Regulation Authority No. 2: Western Power s proposed standard electricity transfer access contract 8 December 2017
AA4 submission to the Economic Regulation Authority No. 2: Western Power s proposed standard electricity transfer access contract 8 December 2017 DMS# 15104172 Page 1 of 24 Contents A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...
More informationLaw No. 02/L-44 ON THE PROCEDURE FOR THE AWARD OF CONCESSIONS
UNITED NATIONS United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo UNMIK NATIONS UNIES Mission d Administration Intérimaire des Nations Unies au Kosovo PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT Law
More informationAccountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance
Guidance Financial Reporting Council April 2018 Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance The FRC s mission is to promote transparency and integrity in business. The FRC sets the UK Corporate Governance and
More information2009 Bill 50. Second Session, 27th Legislature, 58 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 50 ELECTRIC STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2009
2009 Bill 50 Second Session, 27th Legislature, 58 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 50 ELECTRIC STATUTES AMENDMENT ACT, 2009 THE MINISTER OF ENERGY First Reading.......................................................
More informationAmendments to IIROC Rule 20 Corporation Hearing Processes to Eliminate IIROC s Appeal Panels and Response to Public Comment RULE 20
13.1.2 Amendments to IIROC Rule 20 Corporation Hearing Processes to Eliminate IIROC s Appeal Panels and Response to Public Comment PART 1 DEFINITIONS 20.1 In this Rule: "Applicant" means: RULE 20 CORPORATION
More information1. On 27 August 2017, the National Energy Regulator (the Energy Regulator) approved
NATIONAL ENERGY REGULATOR OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter regarding APPROVAL OF THE TARIFF METHODOLOGY FOR PETROLEUM LOADING FACILITIES AND STORAGE FACILITIES THE DECISION 1. On 27 August 2017, the National
More informationRoles and Responsibilities: Standards Drafting Team Activities (Approved by Standards Committee July, 2011)
Roles and Responsibilities: Standards Drafting Team Activities (Approved by Standards Committee July, 2011) Standards are developed by industry stakeholders, facilitated by NERC staff, following the process
More information2016 Lobbyists Act Legislative Review. Recommended Amendments to the Alberta Lobbyists Act and the Lobbyists Act General Regulation
2016 Lobbyists Act Legislative Review Recommended Amendments to the Alberta Lobbyists Act and the Lobbyists Act General Regulation Submitted by the Office of the Ethics Commissioner to the Standing Committee
More informationRe: Proposed Amendments to the Trade-marks and Industrial Design Practices Involving the Grant of Extension of Time
October 30, 2009 By Email: Stephanie.golden@ic.gc.ca Dessins-Industriels-Industrial-Designs@ic.gc.ca Ms. Stephanie Golden and Ms. Rita Carreau Canadian Intellectual Property Office 50 Victoria Street Place
More information4. To act as the audit committee for any federally chartered Canadian financial institution beneficially owned by the Bank as determined by the Board.
CHARTER AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee ) has the responsibilities and duties as outlined below: AUDIT
More informationFinal Rule Change Report: Specific Transition Provisions for the 2015 Reserve Capacity Cycle (RC_2015_05)
Specific Transition Provisions for the 2015 Reserve Capacity Cycle (RC_2015_05) Standard Rule Change Process 7 August 2015 Executive summary On 13 March 2015, the IMO received a Ministerial Direction to
More informationJanuary 19, Executive Summary. the two-stage interim grant of immunity process,
COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTIONS OF ANTITRUST LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN RESPONSE TO THE CANADIAN COMPETITION BUREAU REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING ITS DRAFT IMMUNITY PROGRAM
More informationNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Rules of Procedure Effective in Manitoba April 1, 2012
North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Rules of Procedure Effective in Manitoba April 1, 2012 Contents: Document Title Version with NERC Effective Date Comments NERC Rules of Procedure
More informationFeedback on Revised Guidelines for Obtaining Meaningful Online Consent
April 26, 2018 Via email: Melanie.Millar-Chapman@priv.gc.ca Melanie Millar-Chapman Manager, Policy and Research, Policy Research and Parliamentary Affairs Directorate Office of the Privacy Commissioner
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC No
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Petition of Neustar, Inc. for a Declaratory Ruling Concerning The Local Number Portability Administration Request for
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. [Docket No. FR-6030-N-01]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/15/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-09730, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code: 4210-67 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
More informationTHE WORLD BANK INSPECTION PANEL S EARLY SOLUTIONS PILOT APPROACH: THE CASE OF BADIA EAST, NIGERIA
THE WORLD BANK INSPECTION PANEL S EARLY SOLUTIONS PILOT APPROACH: THE CASE OF BADIA EAST, NIGERIA In July 2014 the World Bank Inspection Panel, the Bank s complaints mechanism for people who believe that
More informationKAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (the Guidelines )
Roles and Responsibilities KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (the Guidelines ) 1. Role of the Board The board of directors (the Board ), which is elected by the stockholders
More informationReview and Investigation Procedures
Review and Investigation Procedures The purpose of this document is to provide parties with a summary of the procedures under which reviews and investigations are conducted by the Office of the Information
More informationGENERAL COUNSEL. DATE: May 30, 2009
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: BOARD OF TRUSTEES DAVID COOK GENERAL COUNSEL DATE: May 30, 2009 SUBJECT: REQUESTS FOR ACTION WITHOUT A MEETING (1) Appointment of Michael Walker as new CFO and Treasurer (2) Approval
More informationOffice of the Compliance Officer and Community Liaison (COCL)
Office of the Compliance Officer and Community Liaison (COCL) Rosenbaum & Watson, LLP COCL Office: Dennis Rosenbaum, Ph.D. 525 NE Oregon, Suite 250 Amy Watson, Ph.D. Portland, OR 97232 Thomas Christoff,
More informationStandards Committee Charter
Standards Committee Charter Approved by the Standards Committee December 9, 2014 Table of Contents Standards Committee Charter...2 Section 1. Purpose...2 Section 2. Reporting...2 Section 3. Overview and
More informationUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Principles and Best Practices for Oversight of Federal Environmental Programs Implemented by States
More informationArmena Rural Electrification Association Ltd.
Decision 21989-D01-2016 December 14, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 21989-D01-2016 Proceeding 21989 Application 21989-A001 December 14, 2016 Published by the: Alberta Utilities Commission Fifth
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD
TERMS OF REFERENCE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD Page 2 Terms of Reference: Audit Committee Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 2 MANDATE IN RESPECT OF SUBSIDIARIES AND DIVISIONS... 3 3 PURPOSE OF THE
More informationRules of Procedure. Effective: May 4, 2016
Rules of Procedure Effective: May 4, 2016 Rules of Procedure of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 100 APPLICABILITY OF RULES OF PROCEDURE... 1 SECTION 200 DEFINITIONS
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE. The Scientific Committees on. Consumer Safety (SCCS) Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER)
RULES OF PROCEDURE The Scientific Committees on Consumer Safety (SCCS) Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) APRIL 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION
More informationSavanna Villas Condominium Association
Decision 21765-D01-2016 Meter Consolidation Dispute with AltaGas Utilities Inc. November 8, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 21765-D01-2016 Meter Consolidation Dispute with AltaGas Utilities
More informationINTERIM GUIDANCE FOR INVESTIGATING TITLE VI ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINTS CHALLENGING PERMITS
INTERIM GUIDANCE FOR INVESTIGATING TITLE VI ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINTS CHALLENGING PERMITS Introduction This interim guidance is intended to provide a framework for the processing by EPA s Office of Civil
More informationScope of Audit Committee s Responsibilities. Specific Committee Responsibilities: Leadership & Stewardship
Scope of Audit Committee s Responsibilities The Audit Committee s scope of responsibilities includes: External Audit (Annual Audit) Annual Financial Statements Auditor Performance and Review Adequacy of
More informationRegulatory Accountability Act of Key Differences Between the Senate RAA and H.R. 5
Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017 Promoting transparency, accountability, and common sense in the regulatory process Sponsored by Senators Rob Portman and Heidi Heitkamp Key Differences Between the
More informationGOVERNANCE, NOMINATING AND CORPORATE SOCIAL REPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE CHARTER
- DONE GOVERNANCE, NOMINATING AND CORPORATE SOCIAL REPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE CHARTER I. ROLE AND OBJECTIVES The Governance, Nominating and Corporate Social Responsibility Committee (the "Committee") is a
More informationTranspower capex input methodology review
ISBN 978-1-869456-38-2 Project no. 14.11/16274 Public version Transpower capex input methodology review Companion paper to final amendments determination Date of publication: 25 May 2018 Associated documents
More informationBill C-23, Preclearance Act, 2016
Bill C-23, Preclearance Act, 2016 CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION IMMIGRATION LAW, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND COMMODITY TAX SECTIONS March 2017 500-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5S8 tel/tél : 613.237.2925
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System ) Operator Corporation ) Docket No. ER18-728-000 PETITION FOR LIMITED TARIFF WAIVER OF THE CALIFORNIA
More information9478/18 GW/st 1 DG E 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 June 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0378 (COD) 9478/18 ENER 185 CODEC 884 NOTE From: Permanent Representatives Committee (Part 1) To: Council No.
More informationBipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015: Section-by-Section Summary
Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015: Section-by-Section Summary Overview: Section 1: Short Title Section 2: Trade Negotiating Objectives Section 3: Trade Agreements
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION California Independent System ) Docket Nos. ER02-1656-017 Operator Corporation ) ER02-1656-018 ) ER02-1656-019 ) ER04-928-000 Public
More informationBill Werry Deputy Minister Alberta Aboriginal Relations
Bill Werry Deputy Minister Alberta Aboriginal Relations OUTLINE Aboriginal context in Alberta Current Government of Alberta approach First Nations Consultation Policy Future Initiatives Questions and dialogue
More informationPART 206 Comptroller Approval of Contracts Made by State Authorities.
Part 206 is added to Title 2 of NYCRR as follows: PART 206 Comptroller Approval of Contracts Made by State Authorities. (Statutory Authority: N.Y. Const. Art. X, 5; State Finance Law 8 (14); and Public
More information2018 Bill 13. Fourth Session, 29th Legislature, 67 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 13
2018 Bill 13 Fourth Session, 29th Legislature, 67 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 13 AN ACT TO SECURE ALBERTA S ELECTRICITY FUTURE THE MINISTER OF ENERGY First Reading.......................................................
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC ) Docket No. RR RELIABILITY CORPORATION )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC ) Docket No. RR06-1-000 RELIABILITY CORPORATION ) QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY
More informationThe SIAC Arbitration Rules 2016: A detailed look at the new rules 1 August 2016
The SIAC Arbitration Rules 2016: A detailed look at the new rules 1 August 2016 The SIAC Arbitration Rules 2016 (the 2016 Rules) came into force on 1 August 2016 and apply to all arbitrations commenced
More informationCITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW COMMUNITY STANDARDS AND LICENCE APPEAL COMMITTEE BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JULY 12, 2016)
CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW 15166 COMMUNITY STANDARDS AND LICENCE APPEAL COMMITTEE BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JULY 12, 2016) THE CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW 15166 COMMUNITY STANDARDS AND LICENCE APPEAL COMMITTEE BYLAW
More informationConstitution of European Fund and Asset Management Association
Constitution of European Fund and Asset Management Association [The official text is in French English convenience translation for information purposes only] Contents TITLE I. NAME. LEGAL FORM. TERM. REGISTERED
More informationBefore the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ANTITRUST DIVISION Washington, D.C. COMMENTS OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS. Introduction and Summary
Before the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ANTITRUST DIVISION Washington, D.C. In re Antitrust Consent Decree Review: American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers/Broadcast Music, Inc. COMMENTS OF
More informationFebruary 20, Dear Acting Administrator Wheeler and Assistant Secretary James:
February 20, 2019 The Honorable Andrew Wheeler The Honorable R.D. James Acting Administrator Assistant Secretary for the Army for Civil Works U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
More informationIntroduction to the A-BBPP Draft Program Agreement December 19, 2017 updated January 8, 2018
Introduction to the A-BBPP Draft Program Agreement December 19, 2017 updated January 8, 2018 Background On August 14, 2017, the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change sent a letter to the Resource
More informationPARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SRI LANKA ELECTRICITY ACT, No. 20 OF 2009 [Certified on 8th April, 2009] Printed on the Order of Government Published as a Supplement to Part
More informationIntroduction. Standard Processes Manual VERSION 3.0: Effective: June 26,
VERSION 3 Effective: June 26, 2013 Introduction Table of Contents Section 1.0: Introduction... 3 Section 2.0: Elements of a Reliability Standard... 6 Section 3.0: Reliability Standards Program Organization...
More informationPublic Services and Procurement Canada Departmental Oversight Branch
Public Services and Procurement Canada Departmental Oversight Branch Fixed Wing Search and Rescue Replacement Aircraft FAIRNESS MONITOR CONTRACTOR S FINAL REPORT June 14, 2016 Submitted to: Director, Fairness
More informationDraft Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection revised version of Rules 1 to 11 of SC/16/13
SC/22/13 Orig.: en Munich, 22.11.2013 SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY: ADDRESSEES: Draft Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection revised version of Rules 1 to 11 of SC/16/13 President of the European Patent
More informationJanuary 11, Mr. Gerard Poliquin Secretary of the Board National Credit Union Administration 1775 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314
Mr. Gerard Poliquin Secretary of the Board National Credit Union Administration 1775 Duke Street Alexandria, VA 22314 RE: Federal Credit Union Bylaws (RIN 3133-AE86) Dear Mr. Poliquin: On behalf of the
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF ) ) DOCKET NO. RM83-31 EMERGENCY NATURAL GAS SALE, ) TRANSPORTATION AND EXCHANGE ) DOCKET NO. RM09- TRANSACTIONS
More informationSABRE INSURANCE GROUP PLC AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE
SABRE INSURANCE GROUP PLC AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE These terms of reference were adopted by the Audit and Risk Committee on 9 November 2017 and approved by the board of directors of
More informationGuidelines on self-regulation measures concluded by industry under the Ecodesign Directive 2009/125/EC
WORKING DOCUMENT Guidelines on self-regulation measures concluded by industry under the Ecodesign Directive 2009/125/EC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OBJECTIVE OF THE GUIDELINES... 2 2. ROLE AND NATURE OF ECODESIGN
More informationTOUCHSTONE EXPLORATION INC. HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESERVES COMMITTEE MANDATE
TOUCHSTONE EXPLORATION INC. HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESERVES COMMITTEE MANDATE Role and Objective The Health, Safety, Environment and Reserves Committee (the Committee ) is a committee of the
More informationRe: File No. SR-NASD Amendments to NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure Rules and 10205(h) Relating to Injunctive Relief
January 12, 2000 Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549-1001 Mail Stop 10-1 Dear Ms. England:
More information