The Engineer as an Expert Witness Truthful Independent Unbiased. John Garrett

Transcription

1 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Truthful Independent Unbiased John Garrett 1 28 th February 2013

2 Please note The opinions expressed in this presentation are not to be taken as professional advice. This slideshow can be viewed by clicking into 2

3 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Aims:- TosharewhatIhavelearnedasanExpert Witness To demonstrate in practice the Engineer as an Expert Witness To heighten Safety Awareness 3

4 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Learning Outcomes:- Know the difference between evidence of fact and expert opinion evidence Understand the role and duties of the Expert Witness Be able to prepare with confidence to act as an Expert Witness Be more aware of how simple things can lead to accidents 4

5 The Law Reform Commission 2008 published a Consultation Paper on Expert Evidence (LRC CP ) Made provisional recommendations to ensure the continued benefits of having reliable expert evidence available to courts 5

6 Provisional Recommendations included The term expert shouldbe defined Should be detailed guidelines containing a list of factors which can be used to help the court assess the reliability of expert evidence Should be a formal guidance code for expert witnesses (which could be statutory or non-statutory) 6

7 Provisional Recommendations included (2) Should be a ban on any fee arrangements with expert witnesses which are conditional on the outcome of a case. Submissions invited as to whether both parties should be required to exchange expert reports relating to all civil claims Should be a set form and structure for expert reports. There were many more recommendations 7

8 Witness testimony Fact or Expert Rule against Opinion Evidence It is a long standing rule of our law of evidence that, with certain exceptions, a witness may not express an opinion as to a fact in issue It is for the tribunal of fact -judge or jury as the case may be to draw inferences of fact, form opinions and come to conclusions AG (Ruddy) V Kenny (1960) 94 I.L.T.R. 185 at 190 8

9 Witness Testimony (2) Fact or Expert The Main Exception is Expert Opinion Evidence An opinion may be given by a witness who has expertise in a particular area which is relevant to the issue at hand. The purpose of this is to provide the judge or jury with the necessary specialist criteria for testing the accuracy of their conclusions, and enable them to form their own independent judgement by applying these criteria to the facts proven in evidence As Per Cooper LJ in Davie v Edinburgh Magistrates (1953) SLT 54 9

10 What is an Expert Witness? There is an amount of Judicial Commentary on definition of Expert Witness. An expert may be defined as a person whose qualifications or expertise give an added authority to opinions or statements given or made by him within his area of expertise (2000) IESC 78 at 85 10

11 Section 25(5) of the Civil Liability and Courts Act defines an "expert" as a person who has a special skill or expertise and who (a) has been engaged by or on behalf of a plaintiff or defendant in a personnel injuries action to give expert evidence in that action, or (b) for the purposes of or in contemplation of a personnel injuries action has been requested to carry out an examination or investigation in relation to any matter for which such special skill or expertise is necessary." Section 2 of the 2004 Act defines expert evidence as "evidence of fact or opinion given by a person who would not be competent to give such evidence unless he or she had a special skill or expertise". 11

12 Legislative Guidance on Definition of an Expert Report or reports or statement from accountants, actuaries, architects, dentists, doctors, engineers, occupational therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists, scientists, or any other expert whatsoever intended to be called to give evidence in relation to an issue in the action. Rules of the Superior Courts (No.6) (Disclosure of Reports and Statements) 1998(S.I. No. 391 of 1998). 12

13 Necessary Experience and Qualifications???? Therefore whether the expertise stems entirely from practical experience or from formal study or a mixture of the two is irrelevant once the person can prove that they have acquired knowledge that gives them an expertise not possessed by the ordinary person. Cl Law Reform Commission (LRC CP } 13

14 Role and Function of Expert Witness The main role and function of the expert witness is:- to furnish the judge or jury with the necessary scientific criteria for testing the accuracy of their conclusions, so as to enable the judge or jury to form their own independent judgement by the application of these criteria to facts provided in evidence. Per Lord President Cooper in Davie v Edinburgh Magistrates (1953) SLT 54 14

15 However, there is more to it than that (1) Help instructing party to decide whether there is a case along with strengths and weaknesses Prepare report Help prepare Statement of Claim or Defence Advise on Disclosure Documents 15

16 However there is more to it than that.. (2) Advise instructing Solicitor and Barrister on questions for other party s expert Meet other experts and try to limit the issues Advise on settlement negotiations 16

17 Overriding Duty to the Court It should be firmly implanted into the expert s mind that his or her function:- is the provision of unbiased information to the court, and not to provide a one-sided opinion preferred by the instructing party. Law Reform Commission, Consultation Paper on Expert Evidence(LRC CP ), Paragraph

18 Proving Expertise (1) The party calling the expert bears the burden of proving the expert s qualifications and credentials as an expert in the field in question. This is normally done by way of preliminary questions during the examination-inchief stage of the proceedings after the witness has taken an oath. Healy Irish Laws of Evidence (2004Thomson Roundhall) at

19 Proving Expertise (2) If there is a challenge to the witness s expertise, this can be proved by the expert by testifying about his qualifications and/or experience. In the absence of a rebuttal of expertise, the judge will accept the witness s testimony of his qualifications or experience as prima facie evidence of his expertise and primary evidence of this will not be required. Martin v Quinn [1980] I.R. 244; Minister for Agriculture v Concannon, High Court, 14 April 1980; DPP v O'Donoghue [1991] 1 I.R Cited in McGrath Evidence (Thomson Roundhall 2005) at

20 Expert reports The Law Reform Commission recommends that there should be a set form and structure for expert reports:- The report must be addressed to the court and not to the party or parties from whom instructions have been received The expert s qualifications and experience should be outlined in detail and relevant certificates of proof attached The terms and conditions of the appointment of the expert witness including the payment arrangements should be explained 20

21 Expert reports (Continued 2) All material instructions, oral and written, which were given to the expert, and on the basis of which the report was written must be outlined If a potential conflict of interest arises, the facts relating to this should be stated All relevant information relating to the issue, including that which is capable of detracting from the expert s opinion, should be outlined All materials used by the expert in coming to the opinion, clearly distinguishing between matters of fact and matters of opinion 21

22 Expert reports (Continued 3) Where tests or experiments have been conducted in the course of creating the report all related information must be included such as methodologies, results and details about the individuals and qualifications of those involved in the carrying out of these tests The expert should indicate if the opinion is provisional or conditional on certain factors, or if they believe they cannot give a formal opinion on the issue without further information, or where they believe they cannot make an opinion without qualification 22

23 Expert reports (Continued 4) A signed declaration that the contents of the report are true and that the expert understands the overriding duty owed to the court and that the report has been created in compliance with this If, subsequent to the completion of a report, an expert changes his or her opinion on any material issue in the report, the expert witness must state this in a supplementary report 23

24 Have access to an authentic library of information 24

25 The Law Reform Commission 2017 published its report 25

26 Key Recommendations Recommendations to be incorporated into an Evidence Bill Expert a person who appears to the court to possess the appropriate qualifications, skills or experience about the matter to which the person s evidence relates (whether the evidence is of fact or of opinion), and who may be called upon by the court to give independent and unbiased testimony outside the knowledge and experience of the court 26

27 Key Recommendations (2) Provide for key duties of the expert witness Minister of justice may publish codes of practice for expert witnesses Expert witness to comply with code of practice Expert witness has overriding duty to the court to provide truthful, independent and impartial evidence to the court, irrespective of any duty owed to the instructing party 27

28 Key Recommendations (3) The expert has a duty to state the facts and assumptions (and, where relevant any underlying scientific methodology) on which his or her evidence is based and to fully inform himself or herself of any and all surrounding facts, including those which could detract from his or her evidence and, where relevant, his or her expressed opinion 28

29 Key Recommendations (4) Confine evidence to matters within scope of his or her expertise State clearly when a matter falls outside the scope of his or her expertise Distinguish between matters of fact and matters of opinion when giving his or her expert evidence, whether given orally or in the form of a written report 29

30 Key Recommendations (5) The expert has a duty to his or her instructing party to act with due care, skill and diligence, including a duty to take reasonable care in drafting any written report A prior professional or clinical relationship should not necessarily prevent a person from acting as an expert witness 30

31 Key Recommendations (6) A trial judge may rule inadmissible the evidence of any expert witness who fails to comply with any of the duties set out in the draft Evidence Bill Solicitor instructing an expert witness who is not covered by indemnity insurance is under an obligation to make his or her client aware of the possible consequences of the failure to obtain such insurance 31

32 Key Recommendations (7) The Commission recommends that, to the extent (if any) that the common law immunity of an expert witness from civil liability has survived, the draft Evidence Bill should provide that it is abolished and that it is replaced with civil liability of an expert witness limited to circumstances in which it is established that the expert has acted with gross negligence in giving his or her evidence, or in the preparation of an expert report in anticipation of civil or criminal proceedings, that is, falling far short of the standard of care expected of such an expert. There are other recommendations in the report 32

33 In relation to immunity Note the case of Jones v Kaney 33

34 The Engineer as an Expert Witness At some stage in your career you may be required to give evidence in court as an Expert Witness. Scared? See it as a tremendous compliment that you should be put in such a position of trust. 34

35 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Prepare! Be truthful, independent and unbiased Dispel any notions that you are a hired gun You are not an advocate 35

36 Powerful questions an expert witness should ask himself or herself What are the issues/claims/allegations which concern me. Do these represent what I see as the true issues? Am I comfortable that they are within my area of expertise? Have I studied all witness statements and documents disclosed to clarify and understand the facts? Have I surveyed and made all relevant factual observations of places, machines, buildings, accounts etc.? 36

37 Powerful questions continued Have I clearly identified all assumptions I shall rely on so that, if challenged, I can explain them and identify all my sources? What do I see as the points of my assumptions, observations and conclusions that may be challenged and what are my answers to them? 37

38 Powerful Questions Continued As an expert with a responsibility to inform the court fully, have I improperly omitted anything relevant? Have I prepared my report in simple language, using as few technical words as possible? Have I explained technical words where I have to use them? 38

39 What really matters What really matters in most cases are the reasons given for the opinion. As a practical matter a well constructed experts report containing opinion evidence sets out the opinion and the reasons for it. If the reasons stand up, the opinion does, if not, not. Jacob LJ in Routestone v Minories Finance (1997) BCC

40 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Are you a competent person to assist the judge or jury in this case? 40

41 Use proper equipment Aquality camera is a must, always have appropriate personal protective equipment and ensure all measuring devices are accurately calibrated 41

42 Cross-examination is the questioning of a witness by the party who did not call them The purpose is for your evidence to be tested The other party s Barrister may try to:- 1. Show that your information and opinions are inaccurate or unreliable 2. Elicit evidence that is helpful to their case You should expect:- 1. Searching questions 2. Attacks on your credibility as an expert 3. Attacks on your expert opinion You should remember:- 1. This is an adversarial system 2. The cross examining barrister is only doing his or her job 42

43 Cross-examination useful tips Be friendly, warm and helpful Maintain good eye contact with the Judge Listen to and understand the question Stay calm Direct your answer to the judge See every question as an opportunity to put forward the strongest points in your evidence 43

44 In the Barrister s toolbox Getting you to agree to absolutes Asking you to speak up Looking at you with disbelief Silence Sarcasm Interruption Pretending to be confused Direct attack on your ability Passing notes to colleagues Repeating earlier questions Picking up on typos in your report Getting your name wrong Focusing on irrelevant points Running questions together Attacking your qualifications Comparing you to other experts Never say never or always 44

45 Visualise Visualisation is a very powerful tool in preparing for the court case. Find someplace quiet. Close your eyes. Breath deeply. Now imagine yourself in the witness box. Sitting comfortably. Well prepared you are in control. You have pre-empted every question and every challenge put to you in cross-examination. You have three or four well researched reasons for every opinion. You are clear, polite and friendly. Firm when necessary. You have the judge s attention. He/she is enjoying learning from you. He/she respects your professionalism as an expert witness. He/she accepts what you say. You thank the judge and leave the witness box. Job well done! 45

46 More to be aware of S.I. 254/2016 Rules of the Superior Courts (Conduct of Trials) S.I. No. 255/2016 -Rules of the Superior Courts (Chancery and Non-Jury Actions: Pretrial procedures) Came into operation on 1 st October

47 S.I.254 of 2016 Statement of claim to disclose intention to offer expert evidence and state field of expertise and matters on which expert evidence is intended or proposed to be offered. As above for defendant (including counterclaim). Do not apply to personal injuries actions. 47

48 Assessors Court may appoint an assessor. Assessor shall take part as the Court may direct, prepare report for the Court on any matter at issue, attend trial and be available to assist the Court. Court shall cause a copy of the report to be sent to each of the parties. Any party may use that report at the trial. 48

49 Assessors contd.. Where an assessor provides advice or other information to the Court, the Court shall inform the parties of such advice or information and afford each of them an opportunity to make submissions in respect of it. 49

50 Expert Evidence A Judge may direct each party to identify the field of expertise required and where practicable the name of the proposed expert. Fix time or times for exchange of reports. Direct that evidence be given by a single joint expert. Select expert from a list prepared or identified by the relevant parties or direct that the expert be selected in such other manner as the court directs. 50

51 Expert Evidence Condt. Subject to certain rules and time limits, a party may put concise written questions concerning report to an expert instructed by another party or to a single appointed joint expert. Answers shall be treated as part of the expert s report. 51

52 Expert Evidence Contd. Expert s can be required to meet privately and discuss their proposed evidence and prepare a joint report identifying such evidence as is agreed between them and such evidence as is not agreed. Trial judge may require opposing experts to be examined and cross-examined or apply the debate among experts then examination, cross-examination and re-examination if deemed necessary by the Trial Judge. 52

53 S.I 255 of 2016 Judge may order or give directions regarding exchange of documents or information. Require a list of the persons expected to give evidence. Require information on any matter of a scientific or technical nature which may be at issue or may be the subject of evidence. Require details of any arbitration or ADR process that may be available to the parties. 53

54 Pre-trial conference Where the parties intend to rely on expert evidence, make an order that experts meet and prepare joint report. Require a booklet containing the experts reports on each side and any reports of any single joint expert. A book of exhibits appropriately numbered. 54

55 Expert evidence Written report containing a summary of the evidence signed and dated by the expert. Supplemental report within specific time frame. 55

56 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Why not visit the courts and observe Expert Witnesses in action? Assess the witness by asking the following questions.. 56

57 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Was the Expert Witness appropriately dressed? Was he/she respectful when taking the Oath or making the Affirmation? Was he/she composed? Did he/she demonstrate good listening skills? Did he/she maintain good eye contact throughout? 57

58 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Were his/her responses to questions clear? Did he/she talk to the Judge? Did he/she appear confident? Did he/she demonstrate a good attitude? Was it evident that he/she was well prepared? 58

59 The Engineer as an expert Witness Did he/she use authentic references? Did he/she come across as being credible? Did he/she come across as being unbiased? Did he/she come across as being independent? Did he/she have an understanding of the issues? 59

60 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Had he/she the ability not to take things personally? Was it evident that he/she had pre-empted questions? Did he/she maintain control during cross examination? Was he/she able to get his/her message across? Did he/she assist the Court? 60

61 Never do, say or sign anything you are not comfortable with Your integrity is not for sale at any price. 61

62 The Engineer as an Expert Witness Your message to the court is more important than your nerves 62

63 Useful references Law Reform Commission Consultation Paper on Expert Evidence Law Reform Commission Report on Consolidation and Reform of Aspects of the Law of Evidence Rules of the Superior Courts ( Conduct of Trials) S.I. 254 of Rules of the Superior Courts (Chancery and Non-Jury Actions and Other Designated Proceedings: Pre-Trial Procedures)

64 Thank you for listening 64