EXPOSING THE FAULT LINES UNDER STATE UDAP STATUTES
|
|
- Curtis Peters
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EXPOSING THE FAULT LINES UNDER STATE UDAP STATUTES MATTHEW W. SAWCHAK TROY D. SHELTON* State statutes on unfair and deceptive acts and practices (UDAP statutes) have been on the books for half a century now. UDAP statutes are meant to supplement the enforcement of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices. 1 Although only the FTC can sue under Section 5, 2 UDAP statutes allow state attorneys general and private litigants to sue under similar, if not broader, legal theories. If widespread use is a measure of success, UDAP statutes are a smash hit. As Professors James Cooper and Joanna Shepherd show in this symposium, the volume of UDAP claims nationwide has increased over time. 3 This increased enforcement is not welcome news to everyone. In recent years, a number of articles have criticized the broad scope of UDAP statutes. 4 These and criticisms have spurred legislative action. * Mr. Sawchak is the Solicitor General of North Carolina and a member of the North Carolina State Bar. Mr. Shelton is a member of the North Carolina State Bar. Mr. Sawchak s remarks here are his own views, not positions of the North Carolina Department of Justice. Mr. Shelton s remarks here are his own views, not necessarily those of Ellis & Winters LLP or of any client. Mr. Sawchak thanks the outstanding authors in this Symposium. He also thanks his fellow Symposium editor, Bruce Hoffman, and his fellow editors of the Antitrust Law Journal U.S.C. 45(a)(1) (2012). 2 Id. 45(a)(2), (b). 3 James Cooper & Joanna Shepherd, State Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Laws: An Economic and Empirical Analysis, infra this issue, 81 ANTITRUST L.J. 947, (2017). 4 See, e.g., Henry N. Butler & Jason S. Johnston, Reforming State Consumer Protection Liability: An Economic Approach, 2010 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. 1, 89 90; Henry N. Butler & Joshua D. Wright, Are State Consumer Protection Acts Really Little-FTC Acts?, 63 FLA. L. REV. 163, 188 (2011); Prentiss Cox, Amy Widman & Mark Totten, Strategies of Public UDAP Enforcement, HARV. J. ON LEGIS. (forthcoming) (manuscript at 9 14), papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id= ; Michael M. Greenfield, Unfairness Under Section 5 of the FTC Act and Its Impact on State Law, 46 WAYNE L. REV. 1869, (2000); Ryan P. O Quinn & Thomas Watterson, Fair Is Fair Reshaping Alaska s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, 28 ALASKA L. REV. 295, 326 (2011); Victor E. Schwartz & Cary Silverman, Common-Sense Construction of Consumer Protection Acts, 54 U. KAN. L. REV. 1, 69 (2005); Cary Silverman & Antitrust Law Journal No. 3 (2017). Copyright 2017 American Bar Association. Reproduced by permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.
2 904 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 81 For instance, Rhode Island has proposed amending its UDAP statute to exempt transactions and practices that are regulated by other federal and state agencies, such as the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 5 In Louisiana, a legislative committee has been assigned to study whether the state s UDAP statute should require proof of reliance, whether the statute should limit damages to monetary losses, and whether the statute is straining the resources of the state s courts. 6 In contrast, however, South Carolina recently expanded the scope of its UDAP statute. 7 The articles in this Symposium address expanded UDAP enforcement with a mixture of critique and defense. These articles reveal some areas of agreement, but also areas of sharp disagreement, among scholars in this area. I. THE NATURE AND ROLE OF STATE UDAP STATUTES As all of the symposium authors agree, the story of UDAP enforcement begins with federal law. In 1914, Congress passed the FTC Act. 8 The Act, as amended in 1938, 9 gives the FTC (and only the FTC) the authority to sue to enjoin unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. 10 In the latter half of the 20th century, all 50 states adopted UDAP statutes: enactments meant to mirror or supplement Section 5. As the symposium authors note, the states adopted these statutes with the encouragement of the FTC. 11 UDAP statutes follow a few different models. Some states have Little FTC Acts : statutes that track the text of Section Other states have adopted the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. 13 This model statute does not use Jonathan L. Wilson, State Attorney General Enforcement of Unfair or Deceptive Acts and Practices Laws: Emerging Concerns and Solutions, 65 U. KAN. L. REV. 209, (2016). 5 H.R. 5292, 2017 Leg. Sess. (R.I. 2017), webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/billtext17/housetext17/ h5292.htm. 6 H.R. Study Request No. 3, 2016 Reg. Sess. (La. 2016), ment.aspx?d= Act of June 5, 2016, 2016 S.C. Acts 244 (amending scattered parts of the S.C. Code). The Act expanded the South Carolina UDAP statute s definition of consumer credit transactions, expanded the statute to cover motor-vehicle sales, and expanded the jurisdiction of the South Carolina Commission on Consumer Affairs to take enforcement actions against businesses engaged in consumer loan businesses. 8 Federal Trade Commission Act, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 719 (1914). 9 Wheeler-Lea Amendment, Pub. L. No. 447, 52 Stat. 111 (1938) (amending 15 U.S.C. 41, 44, 45, 52 58). 10 See 15 U.S.C. 45(a)(2), (b). 11 See, e.g., Elise M. Nelson & Joshua D. Wright, Judicial Cost-Benefit Analysis Meets Economics: Evidence from State Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Laws, infra this issue, 81 ANTITRUST L.J. 997, 1003 & text accompanying note 32 (2017). 12 Cooper & Shepherd, supra note 3, at Id. at 954.
3 2017] EXPOSING THE FAULT LINES 905 broad terms; instead, it condemns a list of specific practices. 14 Finally, the FTC itself has proposed a different model statute, one that combines a list of specific banned practices with a broad ban on other unfair or deceptive practices. 15 Most notably, all of these UDAP statutes allow enforcement by state attorneys general and by private plaintiffs. 16 However, states enforcement strategies vary widely. 17 II. THE FAULT LINES IN UDAP ENFORCEMENT This Symposium illustrates ongoing debates over UDAP enforcement. The articles in the Symposium diverge on two sets of issues: the conduct standards under UDAP statutes and the procedures for enforcing these statutes. A. DEBATING THE CONDUCT STANDARDS UNDER UDAP STATUTES Although UDAP statutes stem from Section 5 of the FTC Act, the tests that courts apply in UDAP lawsuits often reach far beyond Section 5 doctrine. The symposium authors differ on whether this added scope is a blessing or a curse. Most states seek to construe their UDAP statutes in harmony with the FTC s interpretation of Section In practice, however, this harmony seems elusive. The scope of unfairness under UDAP statutes illustrates the continuing dissonance between federal and state law. For many years, the FTC relied on an open-ended standard, called the Cigarette Rule, as the agency s interpretation of unfairness under Section In 1980, however, the FTC rejected the Cigarette Rule in favor of a new policy statement that asks, among other questions, 14 Id. 15 Id. 16 See, e.g., Dee Pridgen, The Dynamic Duo of Consumer Protection: State and Private Enforcement of Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Laws, infra this issue, 81 ANTITRUST L.J. 911, (2017). 17 Cox, supra note 4 (manuscript at 39 51); see also Silverman & Wilson, supra note 4, at (describing how some state attorneys general have used no-bid contracts to hire private lawyers to litigate state claims). 18 Nelson & Wright, supra note 11, at Unfair or Deceptive Advertising and Labeling of Cigarettes in Relation to the Health Hazards of Smoking, Statement of Basis and Purpose, 29 Fed. Reg. 8324, 8325 (July 2, 1964). The Cigarette Rule identified three factors to guide the Commission when it decided whether a defendant s conduct was unfair under the FTC Act: (1) whether the conduct offends public policy that falls within at least the penumbra of some common-law, statutory, or other established concept of unfairness ; whether the conduct is immoral, unethical, oppressive, or unscrupulous ; and whether the conduct causes substantial injury to consumers (or competitors or other businessmen). Id. at 8355; see also FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 405 U.S. 233, 244 n.5 (1972) (reciting the factors from the FTC s Cigarette Rule); Nelson & Wright, supra note 11, at (describing the Cigarette Rule s genesis and enforcement).
4 906 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 81 whether condemning the defendant s conduct would satisfy a cost-benefit analysis. 20 Although most state UDAP decisions say that they seek to follow FTC doctrine, many states still follow the Cigarette Rule a doctrine that the FTC laid aside 37 years ago. 21 As of 2010, only five states were applying post-cigarette-rule unfairness criteria. 22 Similar dissonance marks the ways that Section 5 and state UDAP statutes are being enforced. Through empirical work, Elise Nelson and Professor Joshua Wright have found disparities between the types of facts that violate Section 5 and the types of facts that violate state UDAP statutes. Nelson and Wright asked five economists to review 50 hypothetical fact patterns and opine on how these fact patterns would turn out under the FTC s cost-benefit analysis. 23 Some of the hypotheticals were based on actual FTC enforcement proceedings; among those hypotheticals, the economists found that over 80 percent would satisfy the FTC s cost-benefit analysis. 24 By contrast, the shadow economists found that only 31 percent of the hypotheticals that were based on reported state UDAP cases would satisfy the FTC s cost-benefit analysis. 25 Nelson and Wright conclude that these figures show a fundamental divide between the enforcement of Section 5 and the enforcement of state UDAP statutes. 26 Based on this conclusion, the authors question whether state UDAP statutes are up to the task of protecting consumers in a well-tailored way. 27 Other studies have voiced similar doubts. 28 By contrast, Professor Dee Pridgen concludes that state UDAP enforcement has reached a level of maturity and strength that is quite impressive. 29 Professor Pridgen focuses on UDAP enforcement by state attorneys general and by private parties two forms of enforcement that do not exist under the FTC Act. Enforcers of state law, she argues, have used UDAP statutes to protect consumers during periods of less vigorous enforcement by federal agencies Nelson & Wright, supra note 11, at ; see also FTC Act 5(n), 15 U.S.C. 45(n) (enacted 1994) (codifying the standards in the FTC s 1980 policy statement on unfairness). 21 See, e.g., David L. Belt, Should the FTC s Current Criteria for Determining Unfair Acts or Practices Be Applied to State Little FTC Acts?, ANTITRUST SOURCE, at 1, 10 (Feb. 2010), dam.pdf. 22 Id. at Nelson & Wright, supra note 11, at Id. at Id. 26 Id. at Id. at See, e.g., Butler & Wright, supra note 4, at ; Greenfield, supra note 4, at Pridgen, supra note 16, at Id. at
5 2017] EXPOSING THE FAULT LINES 907 State-law enforcers have also used UDAP statutes to develop more innovative consumer protection theories than the theories applied by the FTC. 31 Similarly, Professor Pridgen sees private UDAP enforcement as helpfully pushing the frontiers of legal theories, although she acknowledges that sometimes appellate courts need to step in to adjust these frontiers. 32 The recent introduction of a new federal consumer protection agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, further complicates the relationship between federal enforcement norms and state-law norms. Thomas Brown and Dae Ho Lee discuss these complications in their article. 33 In the Dodd-Frank Act, 34 Congress gave the CFPB jurisdiction, concurrent with the FTC s jurisdiction, to prohibit unfair practices in the consumer financial services market. 35 Although the CFPB has so far said that it intends to follow the FTC s interpretation of unfairness, it has explicitly said that it is not bound to follow the FTC s interpretation. 36 Indeed, as other authors have shown, the current enforcement strategies of the CFPB and the FTC differ significantly. 37 Brown and Lee also suggest that federal consumer protection law could take some lessons from state courts experience under their UDAP statutes. For instance, a recent appeal in the Third Circuit asked whether merely negligent conduct can qualify as unfair under the FTC Act. 38 In the end, the court declined to decide this issue. 39 However, several state courts have already addressed this same question under UDAP statutes. 40 As this example shows, the 31 Id. at Id. at Thomas P. Brown & Dae Ho Lee, Unfair Practices in the Financial Services Industry: The New Boss Is the Same as the Old Boss, infra this issue, 81 ANTITRUST L.J. 981, 982 (2017). 34 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No , 124 Stat (2010) (codified as amended in multiple titles of the U.S. Code). The CFPB faces an uncertain future. In October 2016, the D.C. Circuit held that the CFPB s structure was unconstitutional because the CFPB is an independent agency that is headed by a single director. PHH Corp. v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, 839 F.3d 1, 36 (D.C. Cir. 2016), reh g en banc granted and panel decision vacated, No , 2017 WL (D.C. Cir. Feb. 16, 2017). However, the D.C. Circuit has recently agreed to rehear the case en banc and has vacated the panel s opinion. PHH, 2017 WL , at *1. In any event, congressional Republicans have vowed to neuter the CFPB. Alan Rappeport, Consumer Watchdog Faces Attack by House Republicans, N.Y. TIMES (Feb. 9, 2017), U.S.C. 5531(c). 36 Brown & Lee, supra note 33, at Cox, supra note 4 (manuscript at 36 39). The CFPB has consistently sought large monetary penalties and refunds to consumers, but the relief sought by the FTC has been much more variable. Id. 38 Id. at 9 10 (discussing FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 799 F.3d 236 (3d Cir. 2015)). 39 See FTC v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 799 F.3d 236, (3d Cir. 2015). 40 Brown & Lee, supra note 33, at
6 908 ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 81 connection between federal and state consumer protection standards could productively operate in both directions. B. EVALUATING THE PROCEDURAL LIMITS ON STATE UDAP ENFORCEMENT The Symposium authors also offer conflicting views on whether the procedures for UDAP enforcement are appropriately broad or inappropriately chaotic. Professor Pridgen views broad rights of action as crucial for the success of UDAP enforcement. She argues that it is especially important to allow plaintiffs to supplement government enforcement with private lawsuits. 41 New York, for example, has underscored the importance of private enforcement of its UDAP statute by allowing private plaintiffs to recover minimum statutory damages and attorney fees. 42 In the eyes of Professors Cooper and Shepherd, however, the procedural breadth of UDAP enforcement is a source of counterproductive chaos. Cooper and Shepherd develop this point by contrasting UDAP statutes with Section 5. Although Section 5 gives the FTC relatively broad substantive standards to apply, the statute blunts the impact of those standards by limiting the remedies available to the FTC. For example, the FTC is limited to seeking mostly equitable relief, and its enforcement proceedings must satisfy a public interest standard. 43 As Cooper and Shepherd explain, early state UDAP statutes likewise allowed only limited remedies. For example, some early statutes allowed private plaintiffs to pursue injunctions alone. 44 Today, however, most UDAP statutes offer much more extensive remedies. Nearly a third of today s UDAP statutes expressly allow class actions, even in the absence of concrete injuries; all UDAP statutes allow some private enforcement; and nearly all UDAP statutes allow private plaintiffs to recover enhanced damages and attorney fees. 45 Based on these remedies, as well as the broader substantive standards under today s UDAP statutes, Cooper and Shepherd argue that these statutes have drifted from consumer protection statutes to consumer litigation statutes Pridgen, supra note 16, at Id. at 933. It bears noting, however, that New York allows lawsuits under the state s UDAP statute only if the defendant s conduct was consumer-oriented. Oswego Laborers Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A., 647 N.E.2d 741, 744 (N.Y. 1995). 43 Cooper & Shepherd, supra note 3, at 952, Id. at Id. at Id. at 958.
7 2017] EXPOSING THE FAULT LINES 909 Professor Pridgen responds to these concerns by proposing limited reforms to state UDAP doctrine. 47 She suggests that the states limit or eliminate the use of UDAP statutes in business-versus-business litigation, add a public interest requirement, and add an ascertainable loss requirement for private lawsuits. 48 III. CONCLUSION As Cooper and Shepherd show, the filing of UDAP lawsuits in state and federal courts is accelerating. 49 This trend is likely to sharpen the debate over the wisdom of current UDAP enforcement practices. It is not clear what the next phase of UDAP enforcement will look like. Perhaps current political trends will cause legislators or courts to dial back the substantive breadth and procedural liberality of UDAP statutes. On the other hand, it is unclear whether there is any institutional force, comparable to the FTC of the 1960s, to advocate for change in a single direction. Regardless of the direction of change, the articles in this Symposium offer valuable guidance for those who formulate state law in this sensitive area. 47 Pridgen, supra note 16, at Id. at Other writers, including one of the authors of this note, have made similar suggestions. See, e.g., Matthew W. Sawchak & Kip D. Nelson, Defining Unfairness in Unfair Trade Practices, 90 N.C. L. REV. 2033, (2012) (recommending that North Carolina require private plaintiffs to show that they suffered an injury that they could not have reasonably avoided). In fact, some states have already taken steps to limit the procedural liberality of their UDAP statutes. See, e.g., 2011 Tennessee Laws Pub. Ch. 510 (H.B. 2008) (eliminating class actions under the Tennessee CPA and limiting private rights of action to specifically enumerated categories of prohibited conduct). The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has proposed its own model act for state UDAP statutes a model act that would likewise reduce the current procedural liberality in private enforcement. See Model Act on Private Enforcement of Consumer Protection Statutes, AM. LEGISLATIVE EXCH. COUNCIL (last amended Jan. 9, 2014), But see Dee Pridgen, Wrecking Ball Disguised as Law Reform: ALEC s Model Act on Private Enforcement of Consumer Protection Statutes, 39 N.Y.U. REV. L. & SOC. CHANGE 279 (2015) (criticizing ALEC s model act). 49 Cooper & Shepherd, supra note 3, at
8
Advanced Topics Under Section Matt Sawchak February 7, 2013
Advanced Topics Under Section 75-1.1 Matt Sawchak February 7, 2013 Topics for Today Overview of section 75-1.1 The uncertain scope of unfairness liability Per se violations Choice of law Overview of section
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L.T. No. 3D
Filing # 17117813 Electronically Filed 08/14/2014 04:18:50 PM RECEIVED, 8/14/2014 16:23:41, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-1375 L.T. No. 3D11-12-2829
More informationUNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS AND BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 17200
UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS AND BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 17200 Marc M. Seltzer Partner Susman Godfrey L.L.P. Los Angeles, CA USC Law School and L.A. County Bar Corporate Law Departments Section
More informationCase: 3:14-cv wmc Document #: 360 Filed: 04/20/17 Page 1 of 10
Case: 3:14-cv-00513-wmc Document #: 360 Filed: 04/20/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, v. Plaintiff, THE MORTGAGE
More informationExamining The Statute Of Limitations In CFPB Cases: Part 2
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Examining The Statute Of Limitations In CFPB
More informationThe Challenges For CEA Price Manipulation Plaintiffs
The Challenges For CEA Price Manipulation Plaintiffs By Mark Young, Jonathan Marcus, Gary Rubin and Theodore Kneller, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP Law360, New York (April 26, 2017, 5:23 PM EDT)
More informationE. I. dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher: Toward a Higher Standard of Commercial Morality
SMU Law Review Volume 25 1971 E. I. dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher: Toward a Higher Standard of Commercial Morality Bruce A. Cheatham Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.smu.edu/smulr
More informationPTAB At 5: Part 3 Fed. Circ. Statistics
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com PTAB At 5: Part 3 Fed. Circ. Statistics By
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case 1:11-cv-00760-BMK Document 47 Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 722 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII STEVEN D. WARD, vs. Plaintiff, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 13-1881 Elaine T. Huffman; Charlene S. Sandler lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Credit Union of Texas lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
More informationFTC POLICY STATEMENT ON UNFAIRNESS Appended to International Harvester Co., 104 F.T.C. 949, 1070 (1984). See 15 U.S.C. 45(n).
FTC POLICY STATEMENT ON UNFAIRNESS Appended to International Harvester Co., 104 F.T.C. 949, 1070 (1984). See 15 U.S.C. 45(n). FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20580 The Honorable Wendell H. Ford
More informationStates Still Fighting Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims
November 25, 2014 States Still Fighting Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims by Published in Law360 In June, we wrote about states efforts to fight patent assertion entities through consumer protection
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2012
1-1-cv Bakoss v. Lloyds of London 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Submitted On: October, 01 Decided: January, 01) Docket No. -1-cv M.D.
More information5 Suits Against Federal Officers or Employees
5 Suits Against Federal Officers or Employees 5.01 INTRODUCTION TO SUITS AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES Although the primary focus in this treatise is upon litigation claims against the federal
More informationMeyer v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.
May 2009 Recent Consumer Law Developments at the California Supreme Court: What Ever Happened to Prop. 64 and What Will Consumer Class Actions Look Like in the Future? In the first half of 2009, the California
More informationStates Attempt to Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims
May 2014 States Attempt to Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims In addition to some states fighting patent assertion entities through consumer protection laws (see our previous Alert on this topic
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES) v. : : MEMORANDUM OPINION WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE : and ORDER
More information9:06-cv RBH Date Filed 07/31/2006 Entry Number 14 Page 1 of 8
9:06-cv-01995-RBH Date Filed 07/31/2006 Entry Number 14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION Benjamin Cook, ) Civil Docket No. 9:06-cv-01995-RBH
More informationStatus of Partial-Birth Abortion Bans July 20, 2017
Status of Partial-Birth Abortion Bans July 20, 2017 ---Currently in Effect ---Enacted prior to Gonzales States with Laws Currently in Effect States with Laws Enacted Prior to the Gonzales Decision Arizona
More informationTrademark Laws: New York
Martin Thomas Photography / Alamy Stock Photo Trademark Laws: New York The State Q&A guides on Practical Law provide common questions and answers on state-specific content for a variety of topics and practice
More information2 Noerr-Pennington Rulings Affirm Narrow Scope Of Immunity
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 2 Noerr-Pennington Rulings Affirm Narrow
More information4 General Statutory Waivers Of Sovereign Immunity
4 General Statutory Waivers Of Sovereign Immunity 4.01 CATEGORIZATION OF STATUTORY WAIVERS OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: SPECIFIC AND GENERAL As discussed at the beginning of Chapter 3, 1 this treatise divides
More informationCRS-2 morning and that the federal and state statutes violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. 4 The Trial Court Decision. On July 21
Order Code RS21250 Updated July 20, 2006 The Constitutionality of Including the Phrase Under God in the Pledge of Allegiance Summary Henry Cohen Legislative Attorney American Law Division On June 26, 2002,
More informationAdvocacy, Practice & Procedure Committee
Jack Skip McCowan, Jr., is a partner in the San Francisco office of Gordon & Rees and is a member and former chair of the Advocacy, Practice and Procedure Committee. Andrew Davis is an associate in the
More informationThe Statute of Limitations in the Fair Housing Act: Trap for the Unwary
Florida State University Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 3 Winter 1977 The Statute of Limitations in the Fair Housing Act: Trap for the Unwary Edward Phillips Nickinson, III Follow this and additional
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -
Filing # 81074486 E-Filed 11/20/2018 03:30:35 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE
More informationIs it Time to Extinguish. CUTPA s Cigarette Rule. The Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act ( CUT- By Robert M. Langer and Benjamin M.
General Session Track Speaker ctlegalconference.com Reprinted with permission of the Connecticut Bar Association from Volume 26, Number 6. Copyright the Connecticut Lawyer. Is it Time to Extinguish? CUTPA
More informationTHE LAW OF UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES. Practical tips for dealing
THE LAW OF UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES Practical tips for dealing with UTP statutes Is this unfair? Price of roses on Valentine s Day: 42% increase (NYC Dep t of Consumer Affairs) Raleigh area: price increases
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. REGISTERED AGENT
More informationWHY THE SUPREME COURT WAS CORRECT TO DENY CERTIORARI IN FTC V. RAMBUS
WHY THE SUPREME COURT WAS CORRECT TO DENY CERTIORARI IN FTC V. RAMBUS Joshua D. Wright, George Mason University School of Law George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series 09-14 This
More informationOregon enacts statute to make improper patent license demands a violation of its unlawful trade practices law
ebook Patent Troll Watch Written by Philip C. Swain March 14, 2016 States Are Pushing Patent Trolls Away from the Legal Line Washington passes a Patent Troll Prevention Act In December, 2015, the Washington
More informationLaw360. States Try To Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims. By J. Michael Martinez de Andino and Matthew Nigriny
Law360 June 18, 2014 States Try To Prohibit Bad-Faith Patent Infringement Claims By J. Michael Martinez de Andino and Matthew Nigriny Alabama In addition to some states fighting patent assertion entities
More informationA Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Arbitral Forum: The Latest On The Use of Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements In the United States
A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Arbitral Forum: The Latest On The Use of Class Action Waivers In Arbitration Agreements In the United States by Ed Lenci, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP What is an arbitral
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 16-3808 Nicholas Lewis, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Scottrade, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll
More informationBUSINESS TORTS & RICO NEWS
Volume 9, Issue 3 Summer 2013 American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law Business Torts & Civil RICO Committee BUSINESS TORTS & RICO NEWS Inside this issue: Business Torts as Little 1 FTC Act Claims:
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. August Term, (Argued: October 28, 2015 Decided: June 26, 2017) Docket No Plaintiff Appellant,
14 3709 Crupar Weinmann v. Paris Baguette America, Inc. 14 3709 Crupar Weinmann v. Paris Baguette America, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2015 (Argued: October
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc JODIE NEVILS, APPELLANT, vs. No. SC93134 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC., and ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., RESPONDENTS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY Honorable
More informationState Data Breach Laws
State Data Breach Laws 1 Alaska Personal information means a combination of (A) an individual s name;... and (B) one or more of the following information elements: (i) the individual s social security
More informationCLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Benjamin Heikali (SBN 0) Joshua Nassir (SBN ) FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-mail: bheikali@faruqilaw.com jnassir@faruqilaw.com Attorneys
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Todd M. Friedman () Adrian R. Bacon (0) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 0 Oxnard St., Suite 0 Woodland Hills, CA Phone: -- Fax: --0 tfriedman@toddflaw.com
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 11-1460 Michael R. Nack, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Douglas Paul
More informationAssessing Conflict, Impact, and Common Methods of Proof in Intermediate Indirect- Purchaser Class Action Litigation
Assessing Conflict, Impact, and Common Methods of Proof in Intermediate Indirect- Purchaser Class Action Litigation Pierre Y. Cremieux, Adam Decter, and Steven Herscovici, Analysis Group Robert Mascola,
More informationapreme ourt of toe i tnitel tateg
No. 09-1374 JUL 2. 0 ZOIO apreme ourt of toe i tnitel tateg MELVIN STERNBERG, STERNBERG & SINGER, LTD., v. LOGAN T. JOHNSTON, III, Petitioners, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Ninth
More informationEmerging Issues in UDAP: Preemption. By: Travis P. Nelson 1
Emerging Issues in UDAP: Preemption By: Travis P. Nelson 1 One of the broadest tools in a plaintiffs attorneys arsenal, and that of public prosecutors as well, is state unfair and deceptive acts and practices
More informationWal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes: The Supreme Court Reins In Expansive Class Actions
July 18, 2011 Practice Group: Mortgage Banking & Consumer Financial Products Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes: The Supreme Court Reins In Expansive Class Actions The United States Supreme Court s decision
More informationFederal Securities Regulation: The Purchase Requirement for Group Filings Under Section 13(d) of the 1934 Securities Act, GAF Corp. v.
Washington University Law Review Volume 1972 Issue 3 Symposium: One Hundred Years of the Fourteenth Amendment Its Implications for the Future January 1972 Federal Securities Regulation: The Purchase Requirement
More informationThe Michigan. What s left after Smith v Globe? BY GARY M. VICTOR
The Michigan What s left after Smith v Globe? BY GARY M. VICTOR 22 When the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) 1 was passed in 1977, it appeared to be one of the broadest and most powerful consumer
More informationInsight. NLRB Continues Attack on Class and Collective Action Waivers FEBRUARY 22, 2016 IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION. NLRB Decisions
IN-DEPTH DISCUSSION FEBRUARY 22, 2016 NLRB Continues Attack on Class and Collective Action Waivers BY WILLIAM EMANUEL, MISSY PARRY, HENRY LEDERMAN, AND MICHAEL LOTITO There seems to be no end in sight
More informationRe: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No
The Honorable Donald S. Clark, Secretary Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No. 121-0081 Dear Secretary Clark: The
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:12-cv-1848-T-33TBM ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION LIZETH LYTLE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated who consent to their inclusion in a collective action, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No
Case: 10-56971, 04/22/2015, ID: 9504505, DktEntry: 238-1, Page 1 of 21 (1 of 36) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No. 10-56971 Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationTORTS-THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT-ABSOLUTE LIABILITY, THE DISCRETIONARY FUNCTION EXCEPTION, SONIC BooMs. Laird v. Nelms, 92 S. Ct (1972).
TORTS-THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT-ABSOLUTE LIABILITY, THE DISCRETIONARY FUNCTION EXCEPTION, SONIC BooMs. Laird v. Nelms, 92 S. Ct. 1899 (1972). J IM NELMS, a resident of a rural community near Nashville,
More informationThe Supreme Court Rejects Liability of Customers, Suppliers and Other Secondary Actors in Private Securities Fraud Litigation
The Supreme Court Rejects Liability of Customers, Suppliers and Other Secondary Actors in Private Securities Fraud Litigation Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. (In re Charter
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff,
More informationRobert M. Langer. Hartford:
Robert M. Langer PARTNER rlanger@wiggin.com Hartford: +1 860 297 3724 Bob is recognized as one of the country s foremost authorities on antitrust, consumer protection, and trade regulation law. He possesses
More informationClass Actions. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler The Ninth Circuit Addresses A New Twist In The Law Of Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Class Actions Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler The Ninth Circuit Addresses A New Twist In The Law Of Cross-Jurisdictional Tolling by John P. Phillips and Sean D. Unger Paul, Hastings,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-1620 Cellular Sales of Missouri, LLC lllllllllllllllllllllpetitioner v. National Labor Relations Board lllllllllllllllllllllrespondent ------------------------------
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Case: 11-50814 Document: 00511723798 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/12/2012 No. 11-50814 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit TEXAS MEDICAL PROVIDERS PERFORMING ABORTION SERVICES, doing
More information4:11-cv RBH Date Filed 12/31/13 Entry Number 164 Page 1 of 9
4:11-cv-00302-RBH Date Filed 12/31/13 Entry Number 164 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Mary Fagnant, Brenda Dewitt- Williams and Betty
More informationROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 262 F.3D 1306 (FED. CIR. 2001)
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 17 Spring 4-1-2002 ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 262 F.3D 1306 (FED. CIR. 2001)
More informationCase 3:12-cv WDS-SCW Document 26 Filed 12/19/12 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #340
Case 3:12-cv-01077-WDS-SCW Document 26 Filed 12/19/12 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #340 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MARK MURFIN, M.D., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 12-CV-1077-WDS
More informationThe Need for Sneed: A Loophole in the Armed Career Criminal Act
Boston College Law Review Volume 52 Issue 6 Volume 52 E. Supp.: Annual Survey of Federal En Banc and Other Significant Cases Article 15 4-1-2011 The Need for Sneed: A Loophole in the Armed Career Criminal
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW
Case 1:16-cv-01274-LCB-JLW Document 71 Filed 04/28/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW N.C. STATE CONFERENCE
More informationCase 0:08-cv MGC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 7
Case 0:08-cv-61996-MGC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 7 EDWIN MORET, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No.: 08-61996-CIV COOKE/BANDSTRA
More informationCase: /20/2014 ID: DktEntry: 56-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 13) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 12-16258 03/20/2014 ID: 9023773 DktEntry: 56-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 13) FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH
More information2017 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1
Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Devorah CRUPAR-WEINMANN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationSecurities Fraud -- Fraudulent Conduct Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 10-1-1964 Securities Fraud -- Fraudulent Conduct Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Barry N. Semet Follow this
More informationCase3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16
Case:-cv-00 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 0 helland@nka.com Daniel S. Brome, CA State Bar No. dbrome@nka.com NICHOLS KASTER, LLP One Embarcadero Center, Suite San Francisco,
More informationArbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees: The Sixth Circuit Says the EEOC Is Not Bound - EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & (and) Crafts, Inc.
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2000 Issue 1 Article 17 2000 Arbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees: The Sixth Circuit Says the EEOC Is Not Bound - EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & (and)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
MICHAEL COLE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA GENE BY GENE, LTD., a Texas Limited Liability Company
More informationSupreme Court Holds that SEC Administrative Law Judges Are Unconstitutionally Appointed
Supreme Court Holds that SEC Administrative Law Judges Are Unconstitutionally Appointed June 26, 2018 On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v. SEC 1 that Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationPENDING LEGISLATION REGULATING PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS
PENDING LEGISLATION REGULATING PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS By Edward W. Correia* A number of bills have been introduced in the United States Congress this year that are intended to eliminate perceived
More informationCASENOTES. Paroline v. United States, 134 S. Ct (2014). J.D. MARSH
CASENOTES CRIMINAL LAW CHILD PORNOGRAPHY RESTITUTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. 2259 LIMITED TO THE INJURY PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE INDIVIDUAL POSSESSOR S CRIME. Paroline v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1710 (2014).
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-4159 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. (a.k.a. OOIDA ) AND SCOTT MITCHELL, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
Case :-cv-000 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Frontier Law Center Robert Starr (0) Adam Rose (00) Manny Starr () 0 Calabasas Road, Suite Calabasas, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-Mail: robert@frontierlawcenter.com
More informationThe Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act: A New Approach To Trade Regulation in FloridaA
Florida State University Law Review Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 1 Spring 1974 The Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act: A New Approach To Trade Regulation in FloridaA Rod Tennyson Follow this and additional
More informationDEFINING UNFAIRNESS IN UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES *
SAWCHAK.BKP2 7/15/12 1:39 DEFINING UNFAIRNESS IN UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES * MATTHEW W. SAWCHAK ** & KIP D. NELSON *** North Carolina s unfair or deceptive acts or practices statute, section 75-1.1 of the
More informationLocal Government Lawyers: Take Care Asserting Governmental Immunity
Local Government Lawyers: Take Care Asserting Governmental Immunity When a city, county, or other unit of local government is sued for negligence or other torts, it s common practice for the unit s attorney
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. CV T
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 05-11556 D.C. Docket No. CV-05-00530-T THERESA MARIE SCHINDLER SCHIAVO, incapacitated ex rel, Robert Schindler and Mary Schindler,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO.14-4085 BARRY D. BRAAN, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION
Filing # 87165149 E-Filed 03/29/2019 10:14:23 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
More informationA Short Guide to the Prosecution of Market Manipulation in the Energy Industry: CFTC, FERC, and FTC
JULY 2008, RELEASE TWO A Short Guide to the Prosecution of Market Manipulation in the Energy Industry: CFTC, FERC, and FTC Layne Kruse and Amy Garzon Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. A Short Guide to the Prosecution
More informationDIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY BANKRUPTCY STAYS OF LITIGATION AGAINST NON-DEBTORS JUNE 12, 2003 JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN S IMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY BANKRUPTCY STAYS OF LITIGATION AGAINST NON-DEBTORS JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP JUNE 12, 2003 Most courts have held the insured versus insured exclusion
More informationCase 5:16-cv LEK-ATB Document 15 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 7
Case 5:16-cv-00549-LEK-ATB Document 15 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the matter of BRENDA M. BOISSEAU, Individually and as executor of the estate
More informationCase tnw Doc 29 Filed 11/15/16 Entered 11/15/16 14:10:56 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 IN RE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PIKEVILLE DIVISION PATRICIA EILEEN NELSON CASE NO. 11-70281 DEBTOR ALI ZADEH V. PATRICIA EILEEN NELSON PLAINTIFF
More informationNelson v. NASA, No , 512 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2008), withdrawn and superseded, 530 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 2008).
Nelson v. NASA, No. 07-56424, 512 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2008), withdrawn and superseded, 530 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 2008). KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, with whom CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting
More information6/8/2007 9:42:17 AM SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. XL:4
Immigration Law Nunc Pro Tunc Relief Unavailable Where Erroneous Legal Interpretation Rendered Alien Ineligible for Deportation Waiver Pereira v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 38 (1st Cir. 2005) An alien convicted
More information4 Takeaways From The High Court's New Rule On RICO's Reach
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 4 Takeaways From The High Court's New Rule
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-bas-wvg Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ADRIANA ROVAI, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv--bas
More informationANALYSIS. A. The Census Act does not use the terms marriage or spouse as defined or intended in DOMA.
statistical information the Census Bureau will collect, tabulate, and report. This 2010 Questionnaire is not an act of Congress or a ruling, regulation, or interpretation as those terms are used in DOMA.
More informationPandemic Flu and Medical Biodefense Countermeasure Liability Limitation
Pandemic Flu and Medical Biodefense Countermeasure Liability Limitation Edward C. Liu Legislative Attorney February 12, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members
More informationCase 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:17-cv-80495-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO. 9:17-CV-80495-MARRA-MATTHEWMAN
More informationDOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY
Protecting Your Trademarks In a Global Economy October, 2008 DOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY TRADEMARK LITIGATION VERSES CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 337 OF THE ITC by J. Daniel
More informationThe Continuing Questions Regarding Citizen Suits Under the Clean Water Act: Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 46 Issue 1 Article 11 Winter 1-1-1989 The Continuing Questions Regarding Citizen Suits Under the Clean Water Act: Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEREK GUBALA, Case No. 15-cv-1078-pp Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationRecognition of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Suzanne Reynolds, Reporter
Recognition of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Suzanne Reynolds, Reporter The committee begins its work on recognition of Canadian domestic violence protection orders with the benefit of years
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 12-1286 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JOSEPH DINICOLA,
More informationWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
Page D-1 ANNEX D REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PANEL BY ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION WT/DS285/2 13 June 2003 (03-3174) Original: English UNITED STATES MEASURES AFFECTING THE CROSS-BORDER
More informationMaking Full Use of the Court:
Making Full Use of the Court: Come to Settle First, Litigate Second by Morton Denlow Your grocery chain client presents you with a $750,000 breach of contract dispute, arising out of an agreement to purchase
More informationCase 2:11-cv SLB Document 96 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:11-cv-02746-SLB Document 96 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 8 FILED 2011 Sep-30 PM 03:17 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More information