GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
|
|
- Tyler Crawford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION JUNE 2015 VOL. 1 NO. 3 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE PROTEST ALLEGATIONS Victoria Prussen Spears PROTEST ALLEGATIONS: DISCUSSIONS WITH OFFERORS PART I Luke Levasseur and Michelle E. Litteken THE RISING TIDE OF SUSPENSIONS AND DEBARMENTS IN GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS PART II Vincent J. Napoleon and Kevin T. Saunders POLICING BREACH OF CONTRACT WITH FRAUD: FOURTH CIRCUIT ADOPTS IMPLIED CERTIFICATION THEORY OF LIABILITY UNDER THE FCA J. Andrew Howard and Jessica L. Sharron FINAL ANTI-HUMAN TRAFFICKING FAR AND DFARS RULES CREATE SIGNIFICANT NEW SUPPLY CHAIN BURDENS AND LIABILITIES FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS Robert K. Huffman, Scott M. Heimberg, Kimberly A. Ball, and Carroll A. Skehan GENDER POLICIES AND PRACTICES UNDER THE MICROSCOPE FOR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS Colleen P. Lewis and Faith C. Whittaker IN THE COURTS Steven A. Meyerowitz LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS Steven A. Meyerowitz INDUSTRY NEWS Victoria Prussen Spears
2 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT VOLUME 1 NUMBER 3 JUNE 2015 Editor s Note Protest Allegations Victoria Prussen Spears 77 Protest Allegations: Discussions with Offerors Part I Luke Levasseur and Michelle E. Litteken 79 The Rising Tide of Suspensions and Debarments in Government Contracts Part II Vincent J. Napoleon and Kevin T. Saunders 86 Policing Breach of Contract with Fraud: Fourth Circuit Adopts Implied Certification Theory of Liability under the FCA J. Andrew Howard and Jessica L. Sharron 92 Final Anti-Human Trafficking FAR and DFARS Rules Create Significant New Supply Chain Burdens and Liabilities for Government Contractors Robert K. Huffman, Scott M. Heimberg, Kimberly A. Ball, and Carroll A. Skehan 97 Gender Policies and Practices under the Microscope for Federal Government Contractors Colleen P. Lewis and Faith C. Whittaker 101 In the Courts Steven A. Meyerowitz 104 Legislative and Regulatory Developments Steven A. Meyerowitz 109 Industry News Victoria Prussen Spears 111
3 QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION? For questions about the Editorial Content appearing in these volumes or reprint permission, please call: Heidi A. Litman at For assistance with replacement pages, shipments, billing or other customer service matters, please call: Customer Services Department at (800) Outside the United States and Canada, please call (518) Fax Number (518) Customer Service Web site For information on other Matthew Bender publications, please call Your account manager or (800) Outside the United States and Canada, please call (518) Library of Congress Card Number: ISBN: (print) Cite this publication as: [author name], [article title], [vol. no.] PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT [page number] (LexisNexis A.S. Pratt); Michelle E. Litteken, GAO Holds NASA Exceeded Its Discretion in Protest of FSS Task Order, 1 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT 30 (LexisNexis A.S. Pratt) Because the section you are citing may be revised in a later release, you may wish to photocopy or print out the section for convenient future reference. This publication is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. A.S. Pratt is a trademark of Reed Elsevier Properties SA, used under license. Copyright 2015 Reed Elsevier Properties SA, used under license by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. No copyright is claimed by LexisNexis, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., or Reed Elsevier Properties SA, in the text of statutes, regulations, and excerpts from court opinions quoted within this work. Permission to copy material may be licensed for a fee from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Mass , telephone (978) An A.S. Pratt Publication Editorial Offices 630 Central Ave., New Providence, NJ (908) Mission St., San Francisco, CA (415) (2015 Pub.4938)
4 Editor-in-Chief, Editor, & Board of Editors EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEVEN A. MEYEROWITZ President, Meyerowitz Communications Inc. EDITOR VICTORIA PRUSSEN SPEARS Senior Vice President, Meyerowitz Communications Inc. BOARD OF EDITORS MARY BETH BOSCO Partner, Holland & Knight LLP DARWIN A. HINDMAN III Shareholder, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC J. ANDREW HOWARD Partner, Alston & Bird LLP KYLE R. JEFCOAT Counsel, Latham & Watkins LLP JOHN E. JENSEN Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP DISMAS LOCARIA Partner, Venable LLP MARCIA G. MADSEN Partner, Mayer Brown LLP KEVIN P. MULLEN Partner, Jenner & Block VINCENT J. NAPOLEON Partner, Nixon Peabody LLP STUART W. TURNER Counsel, Arnold & Porter LLP WALTER A.I. WILSON Senior Partner, Polsinelli PC PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT is published twelve times a year by Matthew Bender & Company., Inc. Copyright 2015 Reed Elsevier Properties SA., used under license by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this journal may be reproduced in any form by microfilm, xerography, or otherwise or iii
5 incorporated into any information retrieval system without the written permission of the copyright owner. For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from Pratt s Government Contracting Law Report, please access or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For subscription information and customer service, call Direct any editorial inquires and send any material for publication to Steven A. Meyerowitz, Editor-in-Chief, Meyerowitz Communications Inc., PO Box 7080, Miller Place, NY 11764, smeyerowitz@meyerowitzcommunications.com, Material for publication is welcomed articles, decisions, or other items of interest to bankers, officers of financial institutions, and their attorneys. This publication is designed to be accurate and authoritative, but neither the publisher nor the authors are rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services in this publication. If legal or other expert advice is desired, retain the services of an appropriate professional. The articles and columns reflect only the present considerations and views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated, any of the former or present clients of the authors or their firms or organizations, or the editors or publisher. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Pratt s Government Contracting Law Report, LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 630 Central Avenue, New Providence, NJ iv
6 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT Policing Breach of Contract with Fraud: Fourth Circuit Adopts Implied Certification Theory of Liability under the FCA By J. Andrew Howard and Jessica L. Sharron * Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for the first time recognized the validity of the implied certification theory of False Claims Act liability. The authors of this article discuss the case and its implications. As every government contracts lawyer knows, the False Claims Act ( FCA ) was originally passed in the midst of the American Civil War to combat procurement fraud perpetrated by unscrupulous suppliers to and agents of the Union Army. The legislative intent behind the law was primarily to preserve and protect the U.S. Treasury to ensure taxpayer dollars were spent on goods and services that met the government s needs and specifications. Today, after major amendments to the law in 1986 and, more recently, in 2009, the FCA is applied to situations surely never contemplated in the latter part of the 19th Century, including in situations where the government receives precisely the quality and quantity of goods and services it bargained for, and at the agreed upon price. These cases usually involve what has become known as the implied false certification theory of liability under the FCA. Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit joined the majority of other circuit courts of appeals and recognized that a contractor s implied representation of compliance with material terms of a contract can state a claim for fraud liability under the FCA in appropriate circumstances. The Fourth Circuit s decision is a timely reminder that largely because of the FCA s qui tam provisions contractors increasingly find themselves defending allegations of fraud in cases perhaps more appropriately brought directly by the government as contract claims under the Contract Disputes Act ( CDA ). UNITED STATES V. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. In United States v. Triple Canopy, Inc., 1 the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for the first time recognized the validity of the implied certification theory of FCA liability. In Triple Canopy, a relator filed a qui tam complaint against Triple * J. Andrew Howard, a member of the Board of Editors of Pratt s Government Contracting Law Report, is a partner and Jessica L. Sharron is a senior associate in Alston & Bird s Construction and Government Contracts practice group Los Angeles, CA. The authors may be contacted at andy.howard@alston.com and jessica.sharron@alston.com, respectively. 1 No (4th Cir. Jan. 8, 2015). 92
7 POLICING BREACH OF CONTRACT WITH FRAUD Canopy, Inc., arising out of a June 2009 task order to provide security services at the Al Asad Airbase in Iraq. Background Pursuant to its contract, Triple Canopy agreed, among other things, to provide internal operations at entry control points, to prevent unauthorized access to the airbase, and to check ammunition lists. Triple Canopy also was responsible for ensuring that all employees received initial weaponry training and earned qualifying scores on a U.S. Army marksmanship qualification course (the marksmanship requirement ). Notably, nothing in Triple Canopy s contract expressly conditioned payment to Triple Canopy on compliance with these responsibilities. To satisfy its obligations under the contract, Triple Canopy hired over 300 Ugandan guards to serve at the airbase. Once the guards arrived, however, Triple Canopy supervisors discovered that the guards could not meet the marksmanship requirement. Nonetheless, Triple Canopy submitted monthly invoices for payment to the government for the guards. The government also alleged that Triple Canopy falsified scorecards for the guards indicating that they satisfied the marksmanship requirement even though they had not. During the single year that Triple Canopy provided security services at the Al Asad Airbase, Triple Canopy submitted 12 invoices for payment totaling over $4.4 million. Significantly, all of the information provided on each invoice (e.g., the number of guards employed and the amount of money due) was correct. Against this backdrop, a relator filed a qui tam action against Triple Canopy alleging multiple counts of FCA liability. The government intervened and filed a superseding complaint, alleging Triple Canopy knowingly presented false claims to the government for payment in violation of 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(1)(A) (Count I), and caused the creation of a false record material to a false claim in violation of 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(1)(B) (Count II). Triple Canopy moved to dismiss the Count I claim on grounds that the government failed to plead facts sufficient to establish that Triple Canopy submitted a claim for payment that contained an objectively false statement. The district court agreed and dismissed the claim. The government appealed. The Fourth Circuit s Decision On appeal, the government argued that Triple Canopy submitted actionable false claims because its monthly invoices sought the full amount of payment despite the company s knowledge that the guards for which it was invoicing had not complied with one of contract s requirements the marksmanship requirement. The Fourth Circuit agreed and reversed the district court s dismissal, concluding that the government had pleaded an FCA claim against Triple 93
8 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT Canopy under an implied certification theory of liability sufficient to withstand dismissal at the pre-answer stage of the litigation. In deciding the appeal, the Fourth Circuit focused on the FCA elements of scienter and materiality, stating that the pertinent inquiry is whether, by submitting a demand for payment, a contractor knowingly and falsely implied that it was entitled to payment under all material terms of the underlying agreement for goods or services. Unlike common law fraud, the FCA defines knowing and knowingly to mean actual knowledge of the information ; deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information ; or reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. 2 The court easily concluded that the government s allegations that Triple Canopy knew of the contract s marksmanship requirement and knew that the guards failed to satisfy that requirement adequately pleaded facts to establish the requisite scienter for liability under the FCA. The court observed that the statute defines material as having a natural tendency to influence, or be capable of influencing, the payment or receipt of money or property. 3 The appellate panel explained that materiality under the FCA may be established in several ways, such as express contractual language that constitutes dispositive evidence or through testimony demonstrating that the parties to the contract understood that payment was conditioned on compliance with the term at issue. With these principles in mind, the Fourth Circuit held that the marksmanship requirement was material because common sense suggests that the government s decision to pay for security services would be impacted by the failure of its guards to satisfy the marksmanship requirement and because Triple Canopy s actions in falsifying the scorecards also suggested that this requirement was material to the government s decision to pay. Based on these conclusions, the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court s dismissal of Count I. In resolving these issues, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals joined several other circuits in adopting the implied certification theory of liability under the FCA. For this reason alone, this decision is important in that it expands generally the reach of the FCA. The more significant takeaway from this case, 2 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(1) U.S.C. 3729(b)(4). It is worth noting that although this definition of material comes directly from the FCA, the term only appears in 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(1)(B). The FCA claim at issue here, however, is under 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(1)(A), which does not include a materiality component. Although outside the scope of this article, this potentially raises the question of whether the definition of material set forth in the FCA is the appropriate standard to apply in the context of an implied certification claim. 94
9 POLICING BREACH OF CONTRACT WITH FRAUD however, is how the court applied this theory and the future impact it may have. THE IMPACT OF TRIPLE CANOPY As an initial matter, the direct impact of the Triple Canopy decision is already evident: on February 10, 2015, the District Court for the Western District of Virginia reconsidered its prior decision to dismiss several counts of a qui tam case under the FCA. Previously, the district court had concluded that the complaint at issue should be dismissed because the implied certification theory of liability (upon which the relator s claims were based) was not recognized in the Fourth Circuit. Following the Triple Canopy decision, however, and upon a motion for reconsideration, the district court reversed its prior ruling because of a change in the law. 4 In terms of the broader impact of this decision, this change in the law further evidences that traditional contract claims under the CDA are being eschewed in favor of fraud claims under the FCA. In other words, the question of where to draw the line between an FCA claim and a CDA claim is becoming less clear and perhaps nonexistent. In Triple Canopy, this lack of distinction is less bothersome because there was a level of deceit alleged (i.e., the alleged fact that the contractor falsified records) that sounded as much like common law fraud as the underlying failure to supply fully qualified security personnel sounded like breach of contract. However, under Triple Canopy, FCA liability may still attach when a contractor, with the requisite scienter, makes a request for payment under a contract in spite of its failure to comply with material requirements of the contract, even in the absence of the type of wrongdoing that the FCA was initially intended to combat. The implied certification theory of liability substantially raises the stakes on government contracting, as contractors could face treble damages and penalties from what in essence is a simple breach of contract claim. To be fair, the Fourth Circuit addressed this issue in its decision. The appellate court properly recognized that the FCA is not intended to police every breach of contract, nor is the implied certification theory intended to be a vehicle to turn every contractual violation into an FCA fraud claim. However, the court also acknowledged that the FCA is intended to protect the Treasury and must be applied with that objective in mind. To reconcile these potentially conflicting goals, the court adopted the implied certification theory of liability, but encouraged strict enforcement of the FCA s scienter and materiality requirements to avoid abuse and overreaching. The court also added that those who engage in abusive litigation, for example by filing an unmeritorious FCA 4 Skinner v. Armet Armored Vehicles, Inc., No. 4:12-cv (W.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2015). 95
10 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT case, remain subject to appropriate sanctions, both in the context of the FCA and otherwise. Whether this potential risk will deter the filing of meritless FCA cases (mostly by qui tam relators) remains to be seen. 96
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION JUNE 2015 VOL. 1 NO. 3 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE PROTEST ALLEGATIONS Victoria Prussen Spears PROTEST ALLEGATIONS: DISCUSSIONS WITH OFFERORS PART
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION SEPTEMBER 2015 VOL. 1 NO. 6 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: PARTNERSHIPS AND PROPOSALS Steven A. Meyerowitz PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IS THIS A NEW
More informationVOL. 5 NO. 2. gao recommends improvements to subcontracting under va s veterans First program Mitchell A. Bashur and Vijaya S.
An A.S. Pratt Publication FEBRUARY 2019 VOL. 5 NO. 2 pratt s Government Contracting Law Report Editor s NotE: CoNtraCtiNg ComplExitiEs Victoria prussen Spears BErry amendment s NoN-availaBility ExCEptioN
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION NOVEMBER 2016 VOL. 2 NO. 11 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: NEVER A DULL MOMENT Victoria Prussen Spears AGENCIES PUBLISH STRICT NEW REPORTING GUIDELINES
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION APRIL 2016 VOL. 2 NO. 4 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: A CURIOUS CASE Victoria Prussen Spears IT S GOOD TO BE THE KING: THE CURIOUS CASE OF UNITED STATES
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION NOVEMBER 2015 VOL. 1 NO. 8 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: CONTRACTORS AND HEALTH CARE DEVELOPMENTS Steven A. Meyerowitz IN CLOSELY WATCHED CASE, FEDERAL
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION MAY 2015 VOL. 1 NO. 2 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE THE BOARD SPEAKS Steven A. Meyerowitz THE RISING TIDE OF SUSPENSIONS AND DEBARMENTS IN GOVERNMENT
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION FEBRUARY 2016 VOL. 2 NO. 2 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: IMPLIED FALSE CERTIFICATION THEORY Victoria Prussen Spears WILL THE SUPREME COURT REIN IN THE
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION OCTOBER 2018 VOL. 4 NO. 10 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: COMPLIANCE Victoria Prussen Spears TINA CHANGES IMPACT COST AND PRICING COMPLIANCE Paul E.
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION FEBRUARY 2017 VOL. 3 NO. 2 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: FALSE CLAIMS ACT Victoria Prussen Spears U.S. SUPREME COURT: DISMISSAL NOT MANDATORY FOR FALSE
More informationAn A.S. PRATT PuBLICATION. vol. 4 no. 11. pratt s. Editor s Note: Supply Chain Integrity Victoria Prussen Spears. Fails to Satisfy Materiality
An A.S. PRATT PuBLICATION november 2018 vol. 4 no. 11 pratt s Government Contracting Law Report Editor s Note: Supply Chain Integrity Victoria Prussen Spears U.S. Government s Increased Efforts in Supply
More informationO n January 8, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals
Federal Contracts Report Reproduced with permission from Federal Contracts Report, 103 FCR, 02/09/2015. Copyright 2015 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com False Claims
More informationPRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT
OCTOBER 2017 VOL. 17-9 PRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: STORING ENERGY Victoria Prussen Spears ENERGY STORAGE PRESENTS OPPORTUNITIES FOR GROWTH AND INNOVATION William M. Friedman COAL PLANT SHUTDOWNS:
More informationFinancial Fraud Law Report
Financial Fraud Law Report An A.S. Pratt & Sons Publication NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2014 EDITOR S NOTE: PROTECTING THE MANY Steven A. Meyerowitz THE SEC NOBLE PROSECUTION: TAKEAWAYS FROM THE O ROURKE, JACKSON
More informationEnergy Law. TRIBAL LANDS: THE NEXT SOLAR RUSH Tara S. Kaushik. EDITOR S NOTE Victoria Prussen Spears
JANUARY 2015 VOL. 15-1 PRATT s Energy Law Report EDITOR S NOTE Victoria Prussen Spears SHALE GAS THE SOLUTION FOR GLOBAL ENERGY DEMANDS? John Lurie POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS KNOW THE RISKS M. Seth Ginther
More informationA POTENTIALLY MOMENTOUS DECISION: SECOND CIRCUIT EXPLAINS HOW TO CALCULATE CHAPTER 11 CRAMDOWN INTEREST RATE Stuart I. Gordon and Matthew V.
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT FEBRUARY/MARCH 2018 EDITOR S NOTE: DECISIONS, DECISIONS Steven A. Meyerowitz A POTENTIALLY MOMENTOUS DECISION: SECOND CIRCUIT EXPLAINS HOW TO CALCULATE CHAPTER 11 CRAMDOWN INTEREST
More informationPRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT
JULY-AUGUST 2017 VOL. 17-7 PRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: ENERGY UNDER THE SUN Victoria Prussen Spears FERC STEPS UP EFFORTS TO SUPPORT INTEGRATION OF ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES INTO WHOLESALE
More informationPRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT
JANUARY 2018 VOL. 18-1 PRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: CERCLA IN THE CIRCUITS Victoria Prussen Spears CERCLA CONTRIBUTION: NINTH CIRCUIT ADDRESSES TWO CIRCUIT SPLITS Eric A. Rey OWNER MEANS OWNER:
More informationRESOLUTION POLICY FOR BANK-CENTRIC FIRMS: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE ARE WE HEADED? Bimal Patel and Todd Arena
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT JANUARY 2016 EDITOR S NOTE: RINGING IN THE NEW YEAR! Victoria Prussen Spears RESOLUTION POLICY FOR BANK-CENTRIC FIRMS: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE ARE WE HEADED? Bimal Patel and Todd Arena
More informationLANDMARK COURT OPINION INCREASES LIABILITY RISK PROFILE FOR GERMAN PORTFOLIO COMPANY MANAGEMENT Bernd Meyer-Löwy and Carl Pickerill
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT APRIL/MAY 2018 EDITOR S NOTE: COMPARATIVE LAW Steven A. Meyerowitz WHAT S PAST IS PROLOGUE: THE EUROPEAN MOVEMENT TOWARD HARMONIZED PRE-INSOLVENCY BUSINESS RESTRUCTURINGS CONTRASTED
More informationLexisNexis A.S. Pratt OCTOBER 2018
LexisNexis A.S. Pratt OCTOBER 2018 Editor s NotE: decisions, decisions Victoria Prussen Spears seventh CirCUit ENCoUrAGEs GAMEsMANsHiP in debt disputes Ryan M. Holz and Douglas R. Sargent NOBLE ENERGY
More informationFinancial Fraud Law Report
Financial Fraud Law Report An A.S. Pratt & Sons Publication SEPTEMBER 2014 Editor s Note: International Developments Steven A. Meyerowitz MAD II Adopted by European Parliament and Council David Toube and
More informationPrivacy & Law. An A.S. Pratt Publication. vol. 3 no. 8. Editor s Note: Cybersecurity for Attorneys Victoria Prussen Spears
An A.S. Pratt Publication OCTOBER 2017 vol. 3 no. 8 pratt s Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Report Editor s Note: Cybersecurity for Attorneys Victoria Prussen Spears ACC Cybersecurity Guidelines: The What,
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No Intervenor/Plaintiff Appellant,
Case 1:11-cv-00288-GBL-JFA Document 91 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 864 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2190 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor/Plaintiff
More informationREPORT PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION APRIL 2018 VOL. 4 NO. 4. EDITOR S NOTE: SPLIT CIRCUITS Victoria Prussen Spears
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION APRIL 2018 VOL. 4 NO. 4 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: SPLIT CIRCUITS Victoria Prussen Spears FALSE CLAIMS ACT CIRCUIT SPLITS: FCA ISSUES THAT MAY SOON
More informationSeptember 2018 VOL. 18-8
September 2018 VOL. 18-8 PRATT s Energy Law Report EDITOR S NOTE: WIND POWER Victoria Prussen Spears STRONGER WINDS BLOWING OFF THE ATLANTIC COAST Joan M. Bondareff and Jonathan K. Waldron EPA S BANKRUPTCY
More informationLEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT JULY/AUGUST 2015
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT JULY/AUGUST 2015 EDITOR S NOTE: ON THE DOCKETS Steven A. Meyerowitz THE DEBTOR S REJECTION POWER: HOW IS IT CONSTRAINED AND CAN A COUNTERPARTY CONSTRAIN IT? James A. Croft U.S. SUPREME
More informationSUPREME COURT REJECTS STRUCTURED DISMISSALS. NOW WHAT? Stuart I. Gordon and Matthew V. Spero
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT JULY/AUGUST 2017 EDITOR S NOTE: A CORNUCOPIA OF CASES Victoria Prussen Spears SUPREME COURT REJECTS STRUCTURED DISMISSALS. NOW WHAT? Stuart I. Gordon and Matthew V. Spero IS PRE-PETITION
More informationEquipment Leases in Bankruptcy: A Plan for Riding Out the Storm James Heiser and Aaron M. Krieger
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT SEPTEMBER 2017 Editor s Note: Developments Victoria Prussen Spears Insolvency at Its Limits: What Management and Creditors of Insolvent LLCs and LPs Should Know About Fiduciary Duty
More informationHow Escobar Reframes FCA's Materiality Standard
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com How Escobar Reframes FCA's Materiality Standard
More informationVictoria Prussen Spears. Steven M. Wagner. Andrew V. Tenzer, Luc A. Despins, and Douglass Barron
LexisNexis A.S. Pratt November/december 2016 EDITOR S NOTE: PRATT S GOES TO COUrt Victoria Prussen Spears A FEW THOUGHTS ON THE FAIRMONT GENERAL HOSPItaL AND LOWER BUCKS HOSPItaL CASES AND PROPOSALS FOR
More informationRESOLUTION POLICY: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE ARE WE HEADED? Bimal Patel and Todd Arena
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT OCTOBER 2015 EDITOR S NOTE: RESOLUTION Victoria Prussen Spears RESOLUTION POLICY: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE ARE WE HEADED? Bimal Patel and Todd Arena REEXAMINING THE EQUITABLE POWERS
More informationLEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT SEPTEMBER 2016
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT SEPTEMBER 2016 EDITOR S NOTE: FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS Victoria Prussen Spears FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS IN THE PONZI ERA Michael Napoli and Eduardo Espinosa SUPREME COURT EXPANDS THE DEFINITION
More informationSteven A. Meyerowitz. Byungkun Lim and Aaron J. Levy. Leo T. Crowley and Margot P. Erlich. Gregory G. Hesse and Matthew Mannering. Christopher Hopkins
LexisNexis A.S. Pratt OCTOBER 2014 EDITOR S NOTE: BUSY CIRCUITS Steven A. Meyerowitz CONTRACTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR CLEARED DERIVATIVES: THE MASTER NETTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN A CLEARING CUSTOMER BANK AND A CENTRAL
More informationEditor s Note: Bankruptcy in the Courts Steven A. Meyerowitz
LexisNexis A.S. Pratt April/May 2014 Editor s Note: Bankruptcy in the Courts Steven A. Meyerowitz Fourth Circuit Affirms Lender s Good Faith in Fraudulent Transfer Case Michael L. Cook Tenth and Eleventh
More informationLEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT SEPTEMBER 2016
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT SEPTEMBER 2016 EDITOR S NOTE: FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS Victoria Prussen Spears FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS IN THE PONZI ERA Michael Napoli and Eduardo Espinosa SUPREME COURT EXPANDS THE DEFINITION
More informationPRIVACY & CYBERSECURITY LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION JULY/AUGUST 2016 VOL. 2 NO. 6 PRATT S PRIVACY & CYBERSECURITY LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: LESSONS Victoria Prussen Spears AUDIT PREP: LESSONS FROM OCR HIPAA ENFORCEMENT PART I Kimberly
More informationDOES SILENCE MEAN CONSENT? SOME COURTS HAVE FOUND THAT IT DOES NOT (AT LEAST FOR PURPOSES OF SALES UNDER SECTION 363(f)) Debora Hoehne
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2015 EDITOR S NOTE: PENSION CLAIMS IN RESTRUCTURINGS Steven A. Meyerowitz FAQ: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN U.S. LAW AFFECTING PENSION AND OPEB CLAIMS IN RESTRUCTURINGS
More informationENERGY LAW REPORT MAY 2018 VOL PRATT S
MAY 2018 VOL. 18-5 PRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: MORE FROM THE FERC Steven A. Meyerowitz FERC ACTS TO ADDRESS DECREASE IN FEDERAL CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATE Kenneth Jaffe, Sean Atkins, Michael
More informationPrivacy & Law. An A.S. Pratt Publication. vol. 3 no. 8. Editor s Note: Cybersecurity for Attorneys Victoria Prussen Spears
An A.S. Pratt Publication OCTOBER 2017 vol. 3 no. 8 pratt s Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Report Editor s Note: Cybersecurity for Attorneys Victoria Prussen Spears ACC Cybersecurity Guidelines: The What,
More informationENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT: WHERE IS LEGAL AND COMPLIANCE? Thomas C. Baxter, Jr., and Won B. Chai
An A.S. Pratt PUBLICATION JANUARY 2016 EDITOR S NOTE: WELCOME 2016! Steven A. Meyerowitz ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT: WHERE IS LEGAL AND COMPLIANCE? Thomas C. Baxter, Jr., and Won B. Chai ROBUST CAUSALITY
More informationPhysician s Guide to the False Claims Act - Part I
Physician s Guide to the False Claims Act - Part I Authored by W. Scott Keaty and Joshua G. McDiarmid June 15, 2017 As we noted in our recent articles concerning the Stark law (the Physician s Guide to
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION DECEMBER 2017 VOL. 3 NO. 12 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: FALSE CLAIMS ACT Victoria Prussen Spears UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES CAN A PRIVATE QUI TAM PLAINTIFF
More informationSUPREME COURT REJECTS STRUCTURED DISMISSALS. NOW WHAT? Stuart I. Gordon and Matthew V. Spero
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT JULY/AUGUST 2017 EDITOR S NOTE: A CORNUCOPIA OF CASES Victoria Prussen Spears SUPREME COURT REJECTS STRUCTURED DISMISSALS. NOW WHAT? Stuart I. Gordon and Matthew V. Spero IS PRE-PETITION
More informationUNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Second Edition
UNDERSTANDING TRADEMARK LAW Second Edition LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Lenni B. Benson Professor of Law & Associate Dean for Professional Development New York Law School Raj Bhala Rice
More informationPAYMENTS ON COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES LOANS CANNOT BE AVOIDED IN BANKRUPTCY Jonathan M. Sykes and Correy Karbiener
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT APRIL/MAY 2017 EDITOR S NOTE: A RESCUE CULTURE Victoria Prussen Spears THE ADVANCE OF RESCUE CULTURE BUSINESS INSOLVENCY LAWS: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD FROM CHAPTER 11 TO THE 2016
More informationFinancial Fraud Law Report
Financial Fraud Law Report An A.S. Pratt & Sons Publication may 2013 Headnote: A Look Back Steven A. Meyerowitz The Past Year s Top SEC Enforcement Events Andrew N. Vollmer, Douglas J. Davison, and Heather
More informationPRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT
JUNE 2017 VOL. 17-6 PRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: DISRUPTION Victoria Prussen Spears TRUMP JETTISONS OBAMA CLIMATE POLICIES Andrew D. Weissman, Sheila McCafferty Harvey, Matthew W. Morrison,
More informationLexisNexis A.S. Pratt september 2014
LexisNexis A.S. Pratt september 2014 EDITOR S NOTE: IN THE COURTS (AND MORE!) Steven A. Meyerowitz PUERTO RICO ADOPTS A DEBT RECOVERY ACT FOR ITS PUBLIC CORPORATIONS Lorraine S. McGowen SOME LESSONS FOR
More informationFocus. FEATURE COMMENT: Frankenstein s Monster Is (Still) Alive: Supreme Court Recognizes Validity Of Implied Certification Theory
Reprinted from The Government Contractor, with permission of Thomson Reuters. Copyright 2016. Further use without the permission of West is prohibited. For further information about this publication, please
More informationTHE FALSE CLAIMS ACT. Victor F. Luke, Esq.
THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT By: Victor F. Luke, Esq. There have been no significant changes to the law this past year. All the big news from 2013-2014 thus far has emerged from the courts. In November, 2013,
More informationDRAFTING AND ANALYZING CONTRACTS
0001 VERSACOMP (4.2 ) COMPOSE2 (4.43) NEW LAW SCH. Front Matter SAMPLE for PERFECTBOUND Pubs J:\VRS\DAT\03037\FM.GML --- r3037_fm.sty --- POST DRAFTING AND ANALYZING CONTRACTS A Guide to the Practical
More informationSession: The False Claims Act Post-Escobar. Authors: Robert L. Vogel and Andrew H. Miller THE ESCOBAR CASE: SOME PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS INTRODUCTION
Session: The False Claims Act Post-Escobar Authors: Robert L. Vogel and Andrew H. Miller THE ESCOBAR CASE: SOME PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS INTRODUCTION In United Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel.
More informationVOLUME 3 NUMBER 6 JUNE 2011
Financial Fraud Law Report VOLUME 3 NUMBER 6 JUNE 2011 HEADNOTE: ENFORCEMENT Steven A. Meyerowitz 493 THE EXPANDING SCOPE OF INSIDER TRADING LIABILITY Rita M. Glavin, Elizabeth C. Brandon, and Armita S.
More informationModel Provider DRA Policy and/or Employee Handbook Insert
Model Provider DRA Policy and/or Employee Handbook Insert PURPOSE [THE PROVIDER] is committed to its role in preventing health care fraud and abuse and complying with applicable state and federal law related
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs Appellants,
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2342 RONALD P. YOUNG; RAMONA YOUNG, v. Plaintiffs Appellants, CHS MIDDLE EAST, LLC, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States
More informationMONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE NUMBER: JC31.1 FALSE CLAIMS LAWS
MONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE NUMBER: JC31.1 FALSE CLAIMS LAWS OWNER: DEPARTMENT OF COMPLIANCE EFFECTIVE: REVIEW/REVISED: SUPERCEDES:
More informationCopyright 2013 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. SKILLS & VALUES: CIVIL PROCEDURE
SKILLS & VALUES: CIVIL PROCEDURE LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Professor of Law Pepperdine University School of Law Herzog Summer Visiting Professor in Taxation University
More informationLOUISIANA LAW OF CONVENTIONAL OBLIGATIONS A PRÉCIS SECOND EDITION
LOUISIANA LAW OF CONVENTIONAL OBLIGATIONS A PRÉCIS SECOND EDITION Alain Levasseur With the Assistance of: Kimberly Ulasiewicz LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Professor of Law
More informationVolume 2 Number 8 September 2010
Financial Fraud Law Report Volume 2 Number 8 September 2010 Headnote: Comprehensive Reform Comes to the Financial system Steven A. Meyerowitz 673 Overview and Implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
More informationA Review of the Current Health Care Fraud Enforcement Environment Brian McEvoy & Ellen Persons
A Review of the Current Health Care Fraud Enforcement Environment Brian McEvoy & Ellen Persons Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP AVENUES FOR ENFORCEMENT Administrative Enforcement Department
More informationFinancial Fraud Law Report
Financial Fraud Law Report An A.S. Pratt & Sons PublicatioN april 2014 Editor s Note: Financial Fraud Law in the Courts Steven A. Meyerowitz Fate of Securities Class Actions in Question Following Argument
More informationHouse Bill No. 5923, An Act Concerning Fraud against the State Committee on Judiciary March 19, 2008
House Bill No. 5923, An Act Concerning Fraud against the State Committee on Judiciary March 19, 2008 CCIA Position: OPPOSED Connecticut Construction Industries Association is opposed to adoption of House
More informationINTERACTIVE CITATION WORKBOOK FOR THE BLUEBOOK: A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION. Washington
INTERACTIVE CITATION WORKBOOK FOR THE BLUEBOOK: A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION Washington LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Professor of Law Pepperdine University School of Law Bridgette
More informationCopyright 2013 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. LOST IN TRANSLATION: EFFECTIVE LEGAL WRITING FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COMMUNITY
LOST IN TRANSLATION: EFFECTIVE LEGAL WRITING FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COMMUNITY LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Charles Hartsock Professor of Law University of Cincinnati
More informationVOLUME 7 NUMBER 3 APRIL TREATMENT OF MAKE-WHOLE AND NO-CALL PROVISIONS BY BANKRUPTCY COURTS David M. Hillman and Lawrence S.
Pratt s Journal of Bankruptcy Law VOLUME 7 NUMBER 3 APRIL 2011 HEADNOTE: IN THE COURTS Steven A. Meyerowitz 193 TREATMENT OF MAKE-WHOLE AND NO-CALL PROVISIONS BY BANKRUPTCY COURTS David M. Hillman and
More informationCase 1:15-cv FPG Document 1 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 32
Case 1:15-cv-00887-FPG Document 1 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : : -v- : 15-CV- : LEE STROCK, KENNETH
More informationCopyright 2012 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. PLAIN ENGLISH FOR DRAFTING STATUTES AND RULES
PLAIN ENGLISH FOR DRAFTING STATUTES AND RULES LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board William Araiza Professor of Law Brooklyn Law School Ruth Colker Distinguished University Professor & Heck-Faust
More informationGovernment Contract. Andrews Litigation Reporter. Federal Contracting Under the Government s New E-Verify Program. Expert Analysis
Government Contract Andrews Litigation Reporter VOLUME 22 h ISSUE 25 h April 20, 2009 Expert Analysis Federal Contracting Under the Government s New E-Verify Program By Jeff Belkin, Esq., and Donald Brown,
More informationCase 1:07-cv PLF Document 212 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:07-cv-01144-PLF Document 212 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., AARON J. WESTRICK, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 04-0280
More informationBryson on Virginia Civil Procedure
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2017 Bryson on Virginia Civil Procedure William Hamilton Bryson University of Richmond, hbryson@richmond.edu Follow
More informationPRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT
NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2017 VOL. 17-10 PRATT S ENERGY LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: DISRUPTION Victoria Prussen Spears THE IMPACT OF FORCE MAJEURE ON THE OIL AND GAS SUPPLY CHAIN Peter Hays SUPPLY CHAIN DISRUPTION
More informationPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE
MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS AND PAYMENT FRAUD PREVENTION 1. PURPOSE Maimonides Medical Center is committed to fully complying with all laws and regulations that apply to health care
More informationCase 1:07-cv JFA Document 400 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Case 1:07-cv-00960-JFA Document 400 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ex rel. Oberg, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationFraudMail Alert. Please click here to view our archives
FraudMail Alert Please click here to view our archives CIVIL FALSE CLAIMS ACT: Fifth Circuit Holds Prerequisite to Payment is a Fundamental Requirement in Establishing Falsity in a False Certification
More informationCopyright 2013 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. SKILLS AND VALUES: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
SKILLS AND VALUES: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Charles Hartsock Professor of Law University of Cincinnati College of Law Olympia Duhart Professor of Law
More informationHow Cos. Can Take Advantage Of DOJ False Claims Act Memo
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com How Cos. Can Take Advantage Of DOJ False
More informationLEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT OCTOBER 2016
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT OCTOBER 2016 EDITOR S NOTE: A NOVEL QUESTION Steven A. Meyerowitz U.S. SUPREME COURT TO RULE ON STRUCTURED DISMISSALS Stuart I. Gordon and Matthew V. Spero A SPLIT SUPREME COURT LEAVES
More informationELDERSERVE HEALTH, INC. FALSE CLAIMS ACTS SUMMARY
FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT as amended, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733 (FCA) FRAUD ENFORCEMENT AND RECOVERY ACT OF 2009 (FERA) PATIENT PROTECTION and AFFORDABLE CARE ACT of 2010 (PPACA) FCA Imposes liability on persons
More informationThere is no kind of dishonesty into which otherwise good people more easily and frequently fall than that of defrauding the Government.
There is no kind of dishonesty into which otherwise good people more easily and frequently fall than that of defrauding the Government. -Benjamin Franklin The False Claims Act James
More informationPOLICY STATEMENT. Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08. X Revised New Section: Corporate Compliance Number: 10.05
The Arc of Ulster-Greene 471 Albany Avenue Kingston, NY 12401 845-331-4300 Fax: 331-4931 www.thearcug.org POLICY STATEMENT Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08 X Revised New Section: Corporate
More informationTHE ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS Michael J. Lichtenstein and Sara A. Michaloski
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT JUNE 2017 EDITOR S NOTE: ANALYZING THE ISSUES Victoria Prussen Spears THE ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS Michael J. Lichtenstein and Sara A. Michaloski
More informationGovernment Contract. Andrews Litigation Reporter. Intellectual Property Rights In Government Contracting. Expert Analysis
Government Contract Andrews Litigation Reporter VOLUME 23 h ISSUE 6 h July 27, 2009 Expert Analysis Commentary Intellectual Property Rights In Government Contracting By William C. Bergmann, Esq., and Bukola
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 10-30376 Document: 00511415363 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 17, 2011 Lyle
More informationFried Frank FraudMail Alert No /17/16
FraudMail Alert Please click here to view our archives CIVIL FALSE CLAIMS ACT: Supreme Court Rejects DOJ s Expansive Theory for FCA Falsity and Requires Rigorous Materiality, Scienter Standards in All
More informationHealth Care Compliance Association
Volume Fourteen Number One Published Monthly Meet Our 10,000th member: Vernita Haynes, Compliance & Privacy Analyst, University of Virginia Health System page 17 Feature Focus: 2012 OIG Work Plan: Part
More informationOVERVIEW. Enacted during the Civil War in To fight procurement contract corruption. To redress fraud involving federal government programs
FALSE CLAIMS ACT OVERVIEW Enacted during the Civil War in 1863 To fight procurement contract corruption To redress fraud involving federal government programs Prohibits false claims involving U.S. Monies
More information#:1224. Attorneys for the United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 14
#: Filed //0 Page of Page ID 0 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Chief, Civil Division GARY PLESSMAN Chief, Civil Fraud Section DAVID K. BARRETT (Cal. Bar No. Room, Federal Building
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 SCOTT ROSE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE, Defendant. Case No. 0-cv-0-PJH ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Re: Dkt. No.
More informationRESOLUTION POLICY: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE ARE WE HEADED? Bimal Patel and Todd Arena
LEXISNEXIS A.S. PRATT OCTOBER 2015 EDITOR S NOTE: RESOLUTION Victoria Prussen Spears RESOLUTION POLICY: WHERE ARE WE AND WHERE ARE WE HEADED? Bimal Patel and Todd Arena REEXAMINING THE EQUITABLE POWERS
More informationRamifications of Fraud
Ramifications of Fraud The Institute of Internal Auditors Orange County March 18, 2016 Presentation by: Charles E. Slyngstad Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 444 S. Flower Street, Suite 2400 Los Angeles,
More informationWhat High Court's Expansion Of FCA Time Limits Would Mean
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com What High Court's Expansion Of FCA Time Limits
More informationWhat If The Government Says A False Claim Isn't
Page 1 of 5 Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19th Street, 5th floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com What If The Government Says A
More informationCase 1:09-cv LO-TCB Document 1 Filed 01/06/09 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1
Case 1:09-cv-00010-LO-TCB Document 1 Filed 01/06/09 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1 pi! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 15-513 In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES, EX REL. CORI RIGSBY, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States
More informationLife after the Supreme Court s Decisions in Escobar & Kingdomware
Life after the Supreme Court s Decisions in Escobar & Kingdomware October 13, 2016 Speakers Forum Leader - Kevin Joyce, Adobe Systems Moderator Scott Hommer, Partner, Venable LLP Bill Walsh, Partner, Venable
More informationMARYLAND FALSE CLAIMS ACT. SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:
MARYLAND FALSE CLAIMS ACT SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 8 101. (a) In this title the following words have the meanings indicated.
More informationA History of Alternative Dispute Resolution
A History of Alternative Dispute Resolution The Story of a Political, Cultural, and Social Movement Published in affiliation with the Association for Conflict Resolution A History of Alternative Dispute
More informationAbout California. 1. Restrictions on CRAs
About California 1 California is of special significance because California laws are considered by many to be both confusing and considered overwhelming. Therefore it is critical for both CRAs and employers
More informationFALSE CLAIMS ACT: District Court Rules That Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act Suspends False Claims Act s Six-Year Statute of Limitations
FraudMail Alert Please click here to view our archives FALSE CLAIMS ACT: District Court Rules That Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act Suspends False Claims Act s Six-Year Statute of Limitations What
More information