Case 2:11-cv LRS Document 130 Filed 12/14/12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
|
|
- Merryl Long
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 Samuel D. Hough Luebben Johnson & Barnhouse LLP th Street N.W. Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM Telephone: (0) - Fax: (0) - shough@luebbenlaw.com Adam Moore Adam Moore Law Firm North Second Street Yakima, WA 0 Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) - mooreadamlawfirm@qwestoffice.net Randolph H. Barnhouse Luebben Johnson & Barnhouse LLP th Street N.W. Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM Telephone: (0) - Fax: (0) - dbarnhouse@luebbenlaw.com (pro hac vice motion pending) Attorneys for Plaintiff for Summary Judgment - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON The Honorable Lonny R. Suko KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO ) CO., INC., and THE CONFEDERATED ) Case No.: CV--0-LRS TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE ) YAKAMA NATION, ) ) Plaintiffs, )REPLY TO DEFENDANT S )MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION )TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR vs. )SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) ROBERT MCKENNA, Attorney General ) of the State of Washington, ) ) Defendant. )
2 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 for Summary Judgment - ARGUMENT I. There Are No Evidentiary Inferences in Defendant s Favor. A. Defendant s attack on the standard for Treaty interpretation fails. Defendant s sole challenge to the legal standard for Indian treaty interpretation is his claim that this Court is limited to a purely legal interpretation of the Treaty determining the technical meaning of its words to learned lawyers without resort to other evidence in the record. ECF at,, citing Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, U.S., - (). But Plaintiffs do not have to prove that there is an express exemption written on the face of the Treaty. Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass n, U.S., - () (Yakama treaty must be construed, not according to the technical meaning of its words to learned lawyers, but in the sense in which they would naturally be understood by the Indians ); Yakama Indian Nation v. Flores, F.Supp., (E.D. Wash. ) (plaintiffs need only show that the Yakamas understood the Treaty to secure the right at issue). An unbroken chain of cases require that the Treaty be interpreted: ) in accordance with liberal canons of treaty interpretation; ) in the manner the Treaty was understood by the Yakamas; and ) with ambiguities resolved in favor of the Yakamas. Fishing Vessel, U.S. at -; United States v. Smiskin, F.d 0, (th Cir. 00); Cree v. Flores, F.d, (th Cir. ) (Cree II); Yakama Indian Nation v. Flores, F.Supp., (E.D. Wash. ). Indeed: the court must examine the treaty language as a whole, the circumstances surrounding the treaty, and the conduct of the parties since the treaty was signed. Cree v. Waterbury, F.d 0, () (Cree I).
3 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 Defendant concedes that there is no support in the law for his face of the treaty theory. ECF at ( Cree [II] and Smiskin provide legal standards for interpreting the travel right in Article III of the Yakama Treaty. ). He also admits that historical information is critical to understanding the issues. ECF at. B. Defendant Failed to Meet His Burden of Production.. Plaintiffs met Their Burden. Citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, U.S., (), Defendant correctly states that the party moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden to demonstrate its right to judgment in its favor. ECF at -. Plaintiffs met that initial burden. They provided specific statements of material fact, and thirty pages of detailed legal argument. E.g., ECF at -. They cited unrebutted testimony from Yakama elders learned in oral history and in the meaning of the Treaty to the Yakamas. ECF at -. Plaintiffs submitted hundreds of pages of exhibits including reports from Dr. Deward Walker. Flores, F. Supp. at - (recognizing the experience and impressive credentials of Dr. Walker ). Plaintiffs, having demonstrated all of the material facts necessary to an award of judgment in their favor, met their initial burden.. The Burden of Production Shifted to Defendant. Plaintiffs affirmative showing shifted the burden to Defendant. Cline v. Indus. Maint. Eng g & Contracting Co., 00 F.d, (th Cir. 000) (party opposing a properly supported motion for summary judgment may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings, but... must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial (quotations and citations omitted)).. Defendant Made no Attempt to Meet his Evidentiary Burden. for Summary Judgment -
4 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 Once the burden shifted to Defendant, he was required either to produce evidentiary materials that demonstrate the existence of a genuine issue for trial or to submit an affidavit requesting additional time for discovery. Celotex, U.S. at 0- (White, J., concurring); Fed. R. Civ. P. (e). Acknowledging the Plaintiffs substantial evidentiary showing [ECF at, ] Defendant did not cite or argue any facts to demonstrate the existence of a genuine issue. Instead, [i]n opposing King Mountain s argument, the Attorney General relies primarily on the Treaty itself. ECF at. Although Defendant claims there is ample evidence in the record to support the Attorney General s position [Id. at ] he never identified that evidence. He did not offer his own proffered expert s reports regarding Article III, failed to identify an expert to testify regarding Article II, did not depose Plaintiffs Tribal Elder witnesses, never questioned deponents regarding Article II, and did not depose Dr. Walker. As a result, Defendant has no admissible evidence to demonstrate a genuine issue of fact and indeed admits that [t]he Attorney General agrees that any dispute over the actual facts in this case is immaterial. Id. at. Plaintiff met its initial burden, shifting the burden to Defendant. But Defendant offered nothing that would create a genuine issue of material fact; failing to meet his burden, and requiring entry of judgment in Plaintiffs favor. II. The Escrow Statutes Violate Article II Rights As a Matter of Law. A. Mescalero does not displace canons of Indian treaty interpretation. Six years after Mescalero, the Supreme Court continued to apply the canons of construction favoring Indians to interpret the Yakama Treaty. Fishing Vessel, U.S. at -. In doing so, the Court confirmed that the Treaty must be interpreted with extrinsic evidence. Oregon Dep t of Fish and Wildlife v. for Summary Judgment -
5 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 Klamath Indian Tribe is not to the contrary: the language of the Yakama Treaty must be viewed in historical context and given a fair appraisal (emphasis added). See ECF at citing Klamath, U.S. at. In Fishing Vessel, the Supreme Court explained that a fair appraisal required the Court to interpret the Treaty in the context of the treaty negotiations, the Treaty language, and prior Treaty construction. U.S. at. Twenty four years after Mescalero, this Court phrased the fair appraisal requirement another way: if the language of the Treaty as naturally understood by the Yakamas is unambiguous, the court need go no further in its analysis. Flores, F.Supp. at. B. The Yakama Understood Article II to Guaranty They Would Always Have the Exclusive Use And Benefit of the Income from Their Lands. Indisputable material facts demonstrate that the Yakama negotiators understood that in exchange for ceding nearly million acres of their land, Yakamas would enjoy the use and occupancy of the land they were able to keep. ECF at -. for Summary Judgment - They understood that generations to come would have the exclusive use and benefit of these remaining lands and the income from activities on these lands. (SOF -). This understanding of exclusive use and benefit included gathering, cultivation, use and trade in tobacco. (SOF, -, -). The exclusive right to benefit from cultivation is underscored in Defendant s claimed slippery slope is unpersuasive. ECF at,. Federal laws, not intended to generate revenue, apply to Plaintiffs. Defendant s cited state statutes are not at issue here and do not apply on reservations. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 0 U.S. 0, 0 ().
6 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 Article V s promise to build an agricultural school. Stat. at. The Treaty encourages modernization of trade and farming operations. Accord Cree II, F. d at -, 0. Ignoring controlling law, Defendant provides a two page recitation of what Article II means to the Attorney General (ECF at -), overlooking the rule that the Treaty is to be construed, not according to the technical meaning of its words to learned lawyers, but in the sense in which they would naturally be understood by the Indians. Fishing Vessel, U.S. at. Defendant s Treaty language as a whole argument was rejected in Cree II, F.d at - (declining to interpret the treaty against the grain of Supreme Court precedent and in contravention of the district court s factual inquiry into the meaning of the language in the context of the Treaty. ). C. Defendant s Citations Do Not Refute Uncontested Evidence Confirming the Escrow Statutes Violate Article II Guarantees. Defendant does not contest that a state law that imposes preconditions and burdens on Yakama economic activity violates Article II guarantees of exclusive use and benefit. Instead, he declares (without evidentiary support) that the Escrow Statues contain no preconditions or burdens. He is wrong. For example, cigarettes of manufacturers who do not comply with the Escrow Statutes are contraband" and subject to seizure and forfeiture. (Wash. Rev. Code 0..00). It is unlawful to affix a stamp, possess for sale or import for sale in this state tobacco products the Defendant does not include in his directory. Wash. Rev. Code 0..00()(b). One cannot transport unstamped cigarettes. Wash. Rev. Code... The Escrow Statutes not only purport to impose these preconditions and burdens on King Mountain, they also impose an economic for Summary Judgment -
7 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 burden and precondition on reservation derived resources if, as Defendant claims, King Mountain must deposit escrow payments for a period of years ostensibly to prevent it from deriving large, short term profits. Although courts have discussed Article II, none has decided the question now before the Court. ECF at. However, in Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, U.S. 0, (), the Supreme Court noted that under Article II, the Yakama have a power unknown to any other sovereignty in this Nation: a power to exclude nonmembers entirely from territory reserved for the tribe. Id. at. The Court recognized that exclusive use and benefit provided the Yakama with regulatory authority over non-indian fee land in the Reservation s closed area because it contained timber that was a major source of income. Id. at. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of Colville Indian Reservation, U.S., () is not to the contrary. First, growing tobacco and producing cigarettes on the reservation is not marketing of a state tax exemption on imported products. Second, Colville does not support allowing the state to derive income by regulating the distribution and sale of tobacco products manufactured on the Reservation. Cabazon Band, 0 U.S. at (distinguishing Colville from cases where the value marketed is generated on the reservation). Defendant s citation to Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New Mexico, 0 U.S. () is similarly flawed. Addressing state taxes imposed on a non-indian lessee of tribal trust land, the Court adopted a pre-emption analysis requiring a particularized examination of the relevant state, federal, and tribal interests. Id. at. And use and occupation in an Executive Order is interpreted under rules of statutory construction, which are not analogous to the treaty construction necessary for Summary Judgment -
8 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 here. D. Defendant Failed to Challenge Plaintiffs Article II Evidence. Defendant did not challenge or address Plaintiffs evidence confirming the proper interpretation of Article II. In apparent recognition of this shortcoming, Defendant offers inadmissible internet hearsay to establish the truth of the matter asserted his contention that in the Yakamas were only consuming or trading wild tobacco. ECF at -. In doing so, he admits the Yakama were consuming and trading tobacco, and does not explain why a distinction between wild tobacco and commercial grown tobacco is relevant. It is not. The Treaty prevented imposition of fees on hauling timber to off-reservation mills which did not begin until the late 0 s. Flores, F.Supp. at. III. The Escrow Statutes Impose Preconditions and Economic Restrictions on Article III Trade and Travel Rights. A. Article III Prohibits Economic Restrictions or Pre-Conditions on King Mountain s Trade in Tobacco. Defendant concedes that Cree I, Cree II, Flores and Smiskin confirm the Plaintiffs rights to bring goods to market free from state preconditions or restrictions that impose a fee. ECF at -. In Smiskin the Ninth Circuit refuse[d] to draw what would amount to an arbitrary line between travel and trade in this context, holding, as the Government suggests, that the Yakama Treaty does not protect the commerce at issue. F.d at. The court held that: whether the goods at issue are timber or tobacco products, the right to travel overlaps with the right to trade under the Yakama Treaty such that excluding commercial exchanges from its purview would effectively abrogate our decision in Cree II and render the Right to Travel truly impotent. Id. at -. ECF at -. Nothing in United States v. Baker, F.d for Summary Judgment -
9 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 (th Cir. ) is to the contrary. Indeed, Smiskin distinguishes Baker because Baker involved application of a federal statute to a different treaty with only an implied right to trade. F.d at. Finally, and contrary to Defendant s parade of horribles, proper Treaty interpretation does not require jettisoning non-discriminatory, non-revenue generating state laws that are not a pre-condition on travel. ECF at. And neither authority nor logic supports Defendant s bald assertion that Plaintiffs do not have a right to engage in all the activities for which tribal members traveled at treaty time. Id. B. The Treaty Right to Trade Is Express. Article III s right to travel and trade is express under the Yakamas understanding as confirmed by applicable canons of construction. Smiskin, F.d at n. (Article III right is sufficiently specific ). Plaintiffs are not seeking a great extension of Smiskin. ECF at. They merely ask the Court to apply Smiskin and confirm that Article III guarantees prevent application of the escrow statutes preconditions and fees on King Mountain. F.d at -. IV. Admissions Regarding the Limits of State Taxing Power Confirm The Propriety of Judgment for Plaintiffs on Their Federal Law Claims. Defendant recognizes that enforcement of the Escrow Statutes is the raison d'être of this action. He opened his memorandum in support of his own summary judgment motion by arguing the applicability of the Escrow Statutes. ECF at -. He then committed the first nine pages of that memorandum to a detailed The Court distinguished United States v. Farris, F.d 0 (th Cir. 0) for similar reasons. Smiskin, F.d at n.. for Summary Judgment -
10 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 discussion of these state laws. for Summary Judgment - Defendant also recognizes the State s determination that King Mountain s on-reservation sales are not subject to State taxation. [ECF at [Department of Revenue letter ruling states that sales by King Mountain within reservation boundaries are state tax exempt ]. And he admits that cigarettes not subject to the excise tax are exempt from escrow: The Attorney General recognizes that sales made on the Yakama reservation to Yakama members or members of compact tribes are not subject to the State s escrow requirements because the units sold definition includes only sales subject to the state excise tax. ECF at - n.. Defendant does not contest the Department of Revenue s power to determine the scope of State taxing authority. ECF at. These admissions confirm that limits on the scope of state taxing authority prohibit state taxation of King Mountain s on reservation activities. As Plaintiffs memorandum in support points out: ) King Mountain is exempt from State Escrow obligations for its on-reservation sales based on the State s determination that these sales are not taxable [ECF at (emphasis added)]; ) cigarettes sold with a Tribe tax stamp are not units sold and therefore not subject to the State Escrow obligation [Id. at (emphasis omitted)]; and ) whatever taxing authority the state might have over other taxpayers on subsequent sales of King Mountain product, King Mountain is not required to collect state or local sales taxes or affix state cigarette stamps to its products that it manufactures and sells within the reservation even if those sales are to non- Indians or non-yakama tribal members. Id. at. Plaintiffs address the fallacy of Defendant s new claim accusation in their Response in Opposition to Defendant s Motion to Strike. ECF.
11 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 Other than its new claim objection, Defendant s only responsive argument is that subsequent off-reservation sales might be subject to escrow requirements even though they are made by third parties not under Plaintiffs control. Defendant seeks through the back door what it cannot achieve through the front: to exercise state police power on the Yakama Nation based on off-reservation conduct of unrelated third party non-indians. ECF at ( If state excise tax is imposed at any stage, King Mountain is required to escrow for the cigarette ). This is not minimal record keeping, but instead is a demand that on reservation Indians (over whom it has no regulatory authority) control the entire off reservation distribution of a reservation made product. Defendant does not have the power to impose that requirement on King Mountain. Cabazon, 0 U.S. at 0 (no state regulatory jurisdiction where Tribes are generating value on the reservations through activities in which they have a substantial interest ). for Summary Judgment - III. CONCLUSION The Court should enter judgment for Plaintiffs as a matter of law. Dated: December, 0 s/ Samuel D. Hough Samuel D. Hough Luebben Johnson & Barnhouse LLP th Street N.W. Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM Telephone: (0) - Fax: (0) - shough@luebbenlaw.com s/ Adam Moore Adam Moore Adam Moore Law Firm Yakima, WA Defendant concedes that sales to compacted reservations are not subject to escrow. ECF at.
12 Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed // 0 for Summary Judgment - Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) - mooreadamlawfirm@questoffice.net Randolph H. Barnhouse (pro hac vice) Luebben Johnson & Barnhouse LLP th Street N.W. Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM Telephone: (0) - Fax: (0) - dbarnhouse@luebbenlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December, 0, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with the clerk of the court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification to the following: David M. Hankins, david.hankins@atg.wa.gov Rene D. Tomisser, renet@atg.wa.gov Joshua Weissman, joshuaw@atg.wa.gov Attorneys for Defendant Adam Moore, mooreadamlawfirm@qwestoffice.net Irwin H. Schwartz, irwin@ihschwartz.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs s/ Samuel D. Hough Samuel D. Hough
Case 2:11-cv LRS Document 159 Filed 04/05/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-lrs Document Filed 0/0/ 0 KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.; CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, -vs- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 0 Randolph H. Barnhouse Justin J. Solimon (Pro Hac Vice Johnson Barnhouse & Keegan LLP th Street N.W. Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM 0 Telephone: (0 - Fax: (0 - Email: dbarnhouse@indiancountrylaw.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,
0 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Acting Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HARRINGTON Assistant United States Attorney, E.D.WA JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director KENNETH E. SEALLS Trial Attorney U.S. Department of
More information~upreme ~ourt of tbe Wniteb ~tate~ Jn 1!J;bt. No WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, Petitioner,
No. 16-1498 Jn 1!J;bt ~upreme ~ourt of tbe Wniteb ~tate~ ---- ---- WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, v. Petitioner, COUGAR DEN, INC., A YAKAMA '.NATION CORPORATION, Respondent. ---- ---- On Petition
More informationCase 3:10-cv HLH Document 19 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:10-cv-00315-HLH Document 19 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, A federally recognized Indian Tribe, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationCase 1:08-cv EJL Document 12 Filed 04/06/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 1:08-cv-00396-EJL Document 12 Filed 04/06/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO STATE OF IDAHO by and through LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, Attorney General; and the IDAHO STATE TAX
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-0-lrs Document Filed 0// 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT ) NO. CV---LRS LICENSING, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER
More informationCase 6:11-cv CJS Document 76 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendant.
Case 6:11-cv-06004-CJS Document 76 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CAYUGA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, -v- SENECA COUNTY, NEW YORK, Plaintiff, Defendant.
More information15 Alli 18 AlO :18 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR YAKIMA COUNTY
1 2 9 IO COUGAR DEN INC., a Yakama Nation corporation, FILED COUtHY CL.EHi\ 1 Alli 1 AlO :1 SUPERIOR CIUR. YAKIMA cs WI, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR YAKIMA COUNTY CaseNo.: 1-2-01- pages 12
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN RE: BLACKWATER ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT LITIGATION Case No. 1:09-cv-615 Case No. 1:09-cv-616 Case No. 1:09-cv-617
More informationCase 3:08-cv BHS Document 217 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :0-cv-0-BHS Document Filed /0/ Page of The Honorable Benjamin H. Settle 0 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION, et al., v. Plaintiffs, THURSTON COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, et al., Defendants.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 97 1337 MINNESOTA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MILLE LACS BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationCase3:11-cv JW Document14 Filed08/29/11 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-00-JW Document Filed0// Page of 0 Robert A. Rosette (CA SBN ) Richard J. Armstrong (CA SBN ) Nicole St. Germain (CA SBN ) ROSETTE, LLP Attorneys at Law Blue Ravine Rd., Suite Folsom, CA 0 () -0
More informationCase 1:05-cv TLL-CEB Document 150 Filed 01/30/2009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-10296-TLL-CEB Document 150 Filed 01/30/2009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff, and
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION MICHELLE MCCRAE, et al., * * * * * * * * * ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION MICHELLE MCCRAE, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. ORDER This attorney s fee dispute is before the court on defendant the
More informationCase 5:14-cv DMG-DTB Document 110 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:925
Case :-cv-0000-dmg-dtb Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 00 SEATTLE, WA 0 0 0 DAVID J. MASUTANI (CA Bar No. 0) dmasutani@alvaradosmith.com ALVARADOSMITH, A Professional Corporation
More informationCase 3:16-cv RJB Document 110 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-0-rjb Document 0 Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ROBERT REGINALD COMENOUT, SR. and EDWARD AMOS COMENOUT III, v. Plaintiffs, REILLY PITTMAN,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 REGINA LERMA, v. Plaintiff, CALIFORNIA EXPOSITION AND STATE FAIR POLICE, et al., Defendants. No. :-cv- KJM GGH PS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
More informationCase 1:18-cv JAP-KBM Document 15 Filed 02/05/19 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:18-cv-01194-JAP-KBM Document 15 Filed 02/05/19 Page 1 of 12 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations ROBERT J. URAM, Fed. Bar No.
More informationNo IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. HO-CHUNK, INC. et al., Appellant,
USCA Case #17-5140 Document #1711535 Filed: 01/04/2018 Page 1 of 17 No. 17-5140 IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit HO-CHUNK, INC. et al., Appellant, v. JEFF SESSIONS
More informationNo In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JAMES H. GALLAHER, JR.
Case: 09-30193 10/05/2009 Page: 1 of 17 ID: 7083757 DktEntry: 18 No. 09-30193 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JAMES H. GALLAHER,
More information4:07-cv RGK-CRZ Doc # 92 Filed: 04/15/13 Page 1 of 8 - Page ID # 696 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
4:07-cv-03101-RGK-CRZ Doc # 92 Filed: 04/15/13 Page 1 of 8 - Page ID # 696 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA RICHARD M. SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, C.A. NO. 4:07-CV-3101 v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA #01 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 Julio Carranza, WSBA #1 R. Joseph Sexton, WSBA # 0 Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel 01 Fort Road/P.O. Box 1 Toppenish, WA (0) - Attorneys
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTERICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Case 4:14-cv-00050-BMM Document 31 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 17 Joe J. McKay Attorney-at-Law P.O. Box 1803 Browning, MT 59417 Phone/Fax: (406) 338-7262 Email: powerbuffalo@yahoo.com Dax F. Garza Dax F.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17CV240
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17CV240 JOSEPH CLARK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM AND ) RECOMMENDATION HARRAH S NC CASINO COMPANY,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-0-lrs Document Filed // 0 Rob Costello Deputy Attorney General Mary Tennyson William G. Clark Assistant Attorneys General Attorney General of Washington PO Box 00 Olympia, WA 0-00 Telephone:
More informationCase 2:12-cv RAJ Document 13 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 16
Case :-cv-00-raj Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 0 THE TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON v. Plaintiff, STATE OF WASHINGTON; WASHINGTON STATE GAMBLING
More informationCase 1:16-cv LRS Document 14 Filed 09/01/16
0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON KLICKITAT COUNTY, a ) political subdivision of the State of ) No. :-CV-000-LRS Washington, ) ) Plaintiff, ) MOTION TO DISMISS ) ) vs. ) )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-wqh -BGS Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 0 GLORIA MORRISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, vs. VIEJAS ENTERPRISES, an entity; VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY
More informationCase 2:12-cv JS-SIL Document 202 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: : : : : : : : : : : : : x. Defendants.
Case 212-cv-06276-JS-SIL Document 202 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 30 PageID # 12655 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x STATE OF NEW YORK, v. Plaintiff, MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY, d/b/a
More informationv. NO. 29,799 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION Gregory D. Griego, Workers Compensation Judge
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please
More informationCase 2:17-cv RSL Document 15 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, DOING BUSINESS AS CHRISTIANA
More informationCase 0:17-cv JJO Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:17-cv-60471-JJO Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 10 GRIFFEN LEE, v. Plaintiff, CHARLES G. McCARTHY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. NO. CV LRS LICENSING, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-0-lrs Document Filed 0/0/ 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT NO. CV---LRS LICENSING, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) MOTION
More informationCase 1:11-cv RJS Document 283 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 111-cv-09645-RJS Document 283 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -v- No. 11 Civ. 9645 (RJS) ELEK
More informationHoward Shale, Appellant' s Response to Brief of Amicus. Curiae
No. 44654-5 -II COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION II OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, vs. Howard Shale, Appellant. Jefferson County Superior Court Cause No. 12-1- 00194-0 The Honorable
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cr-0-tor Document Filed 0/0/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHANE SCOTT OLNEY, Defendant. NO: -CR--TOR- ORDER RE: PRETRIAL MOTIONS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00066-CG-B Document 31 Filed 04/25/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION STATE OF ALABAMA, ex rel ) ASHLEY RICH, District Attorney
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
0 0 Collette C. Leland, WSBA No. 0 WINSTON & CASHATT, LAWYERS, a Professional Service Corporation 0 W. Riverside, Ste. 00 Spokane, WA 0 Telephone: (0) - Attorneys for Maureen C. VanderMay and The VanderMay
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 02 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CON KOURTIS; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JAMES CAMERON; et
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-0-bhs Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 FRANK S LANDING INDIAN COMMUNITY, v. Plaintiff, NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, et
More informationCase 1:05-cv RAE Document 53 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-00621-RAE Document 53 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
More informationCase 2:03-cv EFS Document 183 Filed 03/12/2008
0 0 THE KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS, a Native American tribe, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, ORVILLE MOE and the marital community of ORVILLE AND DEONNE MOE, Defendants.
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 37 Filed: 08/19/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:264
Case: 1:14-cv-10070 Document #: 37 Filed: 08/19/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:264 SAMUEL PEARSON, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-00011-BMM Document 175 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE, for itself and as parens patriea,
More informationCase 0:16-cv WJZ Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:16-cv-61511-WJZ Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO. 16-cv-61511-WJZ CAROL WILDING,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-0-lrs Document 0 Filed /0/ 0 0 Rob Costello Deputy Attorney General Mary Tennyson William G. Clark Assistant Attorneys General Attorney General of Washington PO Box 00 Olympia, WA 0-00 Telephone:
More information4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 16 Filed 11/01/16 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
4:15-cv-12756-TGB-EAS Doc # 16 Filed 11/01/16 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 102 ELIZABETH SMITH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Case No. 15-12756 v. Hon. Terrence
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1 1 ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General COLLEEN M. MELODY PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ Assistant Attorneys General Seattle, WA -- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-cr-00-MJP Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 0 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, ARTHUR MONTOUR,
More informationCASE 0:13-cr JRT-LIB Document 46 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:13-cr-00072-JRT-LIB Document 46 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. Plaintiff, ) ) LARRY GOOD, ) ) Defendant. ) Criminal
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-0-rmp Document Filed 0/0/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON DANIEL SMITH, an individual, and DANETTE SMITH, an individual, v. Plaintiffs, NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES,
More informationCase 1:13-cv NBF Document 21 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:13-cv-00874-NBF Document 21 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) WINNEMUCCA INDIAN COLONY, and ) WILLIS EVANS, Chairman, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 13-874 L
More informationCase: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858
Case: 2:12-cv-00636-PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OBAMA FOR AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 2:14-cv R-RZ Document 52 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:611
Case :-cv-0-r-rz Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 ANDY DOGALI Pro Hac Vice adogali@dogalilaw.com Dogali Law Group, P.A. 0 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 00 Tampa, Florida 0 Tel: () 000 Fax: () EUGENE FELDMAN
More informationState of New York v ERW Enter., Inc NY Slip Op 30592(U) April 14, 2015 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Debra A.
State of New York v ERW Enter., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 30592(U) April 14, 2015 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 451462/13 Judge: Debra A. James Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationCase 1:13-cv S-LDA Document 16 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Case 1:13-cv-00185-S-LDA Document 16 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ) DOUGLAS J. LUCKERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 13-185
More informationNos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Appellate Case: 12-5134 Document: 01018990262 Date Filed: 01/25/2013 Page: 1 Nos. 12-5134 & 12-5136 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT State of Oklahoma, Appellee/Plaintiff, v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-who Document Filed /0/ Page of BOUTIN JONES INC. Daniel S. Stouder, SBN dstouder@boutinjones.com Amy L. O Neill, SBN aoneill@boutinjones.com Capitol Mall, Suite 00 Sacramento, CA -0 Telephone:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SAMUEL K. LIPARI, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 07-CV-02146-CM-DJW U.S. BANCORP, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendants. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 1:15-cv NBF Document 16 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:15-cv-00342-NBF Document 16 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS THE INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 15-342L
More informationCase 1:16-cv NLH-KMW Document 22 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 499 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:16-cv-01188-NLH-KMW Document 22 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 499 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHRISTINE RIDGEWAY, v. AR RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil No. 16-1188
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
0 0 MICHAEL C. ORMSBY United States Attorney PAMELA J. DeRUSHA Assistant United States Attorney Post Office Box Spokane, WA 0- Telephone: (0) - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. : CIV. NO. 3:02CV2292 (HBF) RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FEMI BOGLE-ASSEGAI : :: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : v. : CIV. NO. 3:02CV2292 (HBF) : STATE OF CONNECTICUT, : COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : AND OPPORTUNITIES, : CYNTHIA WATTS-ELDER,
More informationPROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
Case 1:17-cv-01258-JB-KBM Document 27 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DANIEL E. CORIZ, Petitioner, v. CIV 17-1258 JB/KBM VICTOR RODRIGUEZ,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Faery et al v. Weigand-Omega Management, Inc. Doc. 43 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ERIN FAERY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-2519
More informationCase 0:06-cv JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:06-cv-61337-JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 KEITH TAYLOR, v. Plaintiff, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County. Cause No.
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
More informationNos , , , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Nos. 13-3800, 13-3801, 13-3802, 13-3803 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, MICHAEL D. BROWN; JERRY A. REYES; MARC L. LYONS; FREDERICK
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
PROTOPAPAS et al v. EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. et al Doc. 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GEORGE PROTOPAPAS, Plaintiff, v. EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., Civil Action
More informationCase 2:11-cv SSV-KWR Document 48 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * * * * * *
Case 2:11-cv-00812-SSV-KWR Document 48 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KENNETH ANDERSON VERSUS GLOBALSANTAFE OFFSHORE SERVICE, TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-00-jgb-sp Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 ROBERT G. DREHER Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice F. PATRICK
More information3 Chief, Tax Division
EBRA W. YANG United States Attorney ANORA R. BROWN Chief, Tax Division DONNA FORD (California Bar No. 1) Room Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, CA 001 6 Telephone: (1) 8-8 Facsimile:
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. NARRAGANSETT INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
No. 04-1155 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT NARRAGANSETT INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, et al., Defendants-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 98-405 C (E-Filed: August 9, 2010 CROMAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Discovery; Motion to Reopen Fact Discovery Related to
More informationCase 3:18-cv MMD-CBC Document 43 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-00-mmd-cbc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney, District of Nevada GREG ADDINGTON Assistant United States Attorney 00 South Virginia Street, Suite 00 Reno, NV 0
More informationORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION ORDER
Deere & Company v. Rebel Auction Company, Inc. et al Doc. 27 ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION U.S. DISTRICT S AUGytSTASIV. 2016 JUN-3 PM3:ol
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 RAYMOND T. BALVAGE, et al., v. Plaintiffs, RYDERWOOD IMPROVEMENT AND SERVICE ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. C0-0BHS ORDER
More informationCase 2:89-sp RSM-KLS Document 27 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-sp-000-rsm-kls Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Karen L. Strombom 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., vs. Plaintiff(s),
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SELAMAWIT KIFLE WOLDE, Petitioner, v. LORETTA LYNCH, et al., Civil Action No. 14-619 (BAH) Judge Beryl A. Howell Respondents. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
More informationCase 2:17-sp RSM Document 37 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-sp-0000-rsm Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiff, vs. STATE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 1:16-cv MOC-DLH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION DOCKET NO. 1:16-cv-00118-MOC-DLH EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ORDER MISSION HOSPITAL, INC.,
More informationFEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES
954 776 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES have breached the alleged contract to guarantee a loan). The part of Count II of the amended counterclaim that seeks a declaration that the post-termination restrictive
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA In Re: Bankruptcy No. 68-00039 Great Plains Royalty Corporation, Chapter 7 Debtor. Great Plains Royalty Corporation, / Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:17-cv RBS-DEM Document 21 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 175
Case 2:17-cv-00302-RBS-DEM Document 21 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 175 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division MATTHEW HOWARD, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington
Hicks v. Lake Painting, Inc. Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION DASHAWN HICKS, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-cv-10213 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington LAKE PAINTING,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 534 U. S. (2001) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 9 Filed: 04/11/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:218
Case: 1:13-cv-01569 Document #: 9 Filed: 04/11/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:218 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAUL DUFFY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMANCHE NATION, OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff -vs- Case No. CIV-05-328-F UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
More informationSupreme Court of the Unitd Statee
No. 12-1237 IN THE Supreme Court of the Unitd Statee FILED MAY 1 3 20~ OFFICE OF THE CLERK DANIEL T. MILLER; AMBER LANPHERE; PAUL M. MATHESON, Petitioners, Vo CHAD WRIGHT, PUYALLUP TRIBE TAX DEPARTMENT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION
State Automobile Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. There Is Hope Community Church Doc. 62 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11CV-149-JHM
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-ZLOCH. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Mandate (DE 31)
Fox v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 06-81255-CIV-ZLOCH SAUL FOX, Plaintiff, vs. O R D E R PORSCHE CARS NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Emerson Electric Co. v. Suzhou Cleva Electric Applicance Co., Ltd. et al Doc. 290 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs.
More informationCase 1:14-cr JB Document 51 Filed 09/09/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:14-cr-02783-JB Document 51 Filed 09/09/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 14-CR-2783 JB THOMAS
More informationCase 3:68-cv KI Document 2589 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 3145
Case 3:68-cv-00513-KI Document 2589 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 3145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. STATE OF OREGON,
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS
INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS Nothing in my Individual Practices supersedes a specific time period for filing a motion specified by statute or Federal Rule including but not limited to
More informationPlaintiff s Memorandum of Law in Reply to the. Defendants Response to the. Plaintiff s Motion to Reconsider Order of Abstention
Case 3:11-cv-00005-JPB Document 44 Filed 10/20/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 312 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT MARTINSBURG West Virginia Citizens Defense
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:08-cv-00429-D Document 85 Filed 04/16/2010 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA TINA MARIE SOMERLOTT ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) Case No. CIV-08-429-D
More informationCase 3:11-cv JPG-PMF Document 140 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #1785
Case 3:11-cv-00879-JPG-PMF Document 140 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #1785 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS vs.
More informationCase 2:13-cv KJM-KJN Document 30 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
Case :-cv-00-kjm-kjn Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of KENNETH R. WILLIAMS, State Bar No. 0 Attorney at Law 0 th Street, th Floor Sacramento, CA Telephone: () - Attorney for Plaintiffs Jamul Action Committee,
More information