UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE KIDDER PEABODY SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File Civil Action No. 94 Civ (BSJ)(MHD) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHO PURCHASED SHARES OF GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY COMMON STOCK FROM FEBRUARY 26, 1993 THROUGH APRIL 15, 1994, AND WHO CONTINUED TO HOLD SUCH SHARES THROUGH APRIL 15, IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE CLASS, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE MONEY PURSUANT TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT DESCRIBED HEREIN. This Notice is given pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to inform you of the proposed settlement (the Settlement ) of the above-captioned class action (the Action ) for $19,000,000, plus interest. There will be a hearing (the Hearing ) before the Court on May 22, 2000, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 905 at the United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, Foley Square, New York, New York to determine (1) whether the proposed Settlement, as set forth in a Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 15, 2000 (the Stipulation ), should be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of the Class; (2) whether a final judgment should be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice against all defendants; and (3) whether the request of plaintiffs attorneys for an award of fees and expenses should be granted. THE CLASS Pursuant to an Order filed March 27, 2000, the Court certified this case to proceed as a class action against defendants on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased shares of General Electric Company ( GE ) common stock from February 26, 1993 through April 15, 1994, and who continued to hold such shares through April 15, 1994 (the Class Period ). Excluded from the Class are the individual defendants; officers and directors of Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated; Kidder, Peabody Group, Inc. (collectively, Kidder ); members of the immediate family of each of the individuals named as defendants; any entity in which a defendant has or had a controlling interest; and the legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of any of such excluded person or entity. DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION On and after May 26, 1994, class actions were commenced on behalf of plaintiffs and other similarly situated purchasers of GE common stock against, among others, Kidder, Michael A. Carpenter, Richard W. O Donnell, Edward A. Cerullo (collectively, the Settling Defendants ) and Orlando Joseph Jett ( Jett ). Kidder was a wholly owned subsidiary of GE Capital Services, Inc., which, in turn, was a

2 wholly owned subsidiary of GE. The individuals named as defendants were officers, directors or employees of Kidder. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the Complaint ), which asserted claims on behalf of all purchasers of GE common stock during the period February 26, 1993, through and including April 15, In the Complaint, plaintiffs alleged that defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule l0b-5 by, among other things, materially overstating the earnings, net worth and financial performance of Kidder. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that defendants wrongful acts resulted in the inflation of Kidder s profits by approximately $350 million. Plaintiffs further alleged that, as a consequence of defendants allegedly false and misleading statements, the price of GE common stock was allegedly inflated during the Class Period. Plaintiffs sought an award of monetary damages for themselves and the members of the Class. Commencing in December, 1994, each defendant filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure to plead securities fraud with the requisite particularity and for failure to state a claim under the federal securities laws upon which relief can be granted. Following extensive briefing and oral argument, on October 4, 1995, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part defendants motions. On or after October 26, 1995, each defendant served an answer to the Complaint denying all allegations of liability, asserting affirmative defenses, and demanding judgment on the merits dismissing the Complaint. On or after September 2, 1997, each defendant filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the Action. In their motions, defendants contended, among other things, that plaintiffs had failed to produce evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact with respect to several essential elements of their case, including the materiality of the alleged misstatements and omissions, scienter, causation and damages. Following extensive briefing, on July 6, 1998, the Court issued an Opinion denying defendants motions for summary judgment. On July 29, 1998, defendants filed motions seeking reargument of certain portions of the Court s July 6, 1998 Opinion and, alternatively, in the event reargument were denied, leave to file an interlocutory appeal. Following further briefing, the Court denied defendants motions by Memorandum Order, dated September 8, Expert reports were exchanged by the parties commencing in November, On November 25, 1998, defendants filed a motion seeking to strike the reports and proposed testimony of two of plaintiffs three designated trial experts. Following briefing and oral argument, at a hearing on May 13, 1999, the Court denied defendants motion without prejudice to defendants right to renew the motion at or before trial. With the knowledge and approval of the Court, the parties submitted the matter to nonbinding mediation before an experienced mediator. In connection with that process, mediation statements were exchanged by the parties discussing the strengths and weaknesses of plaintiffs claims and defendants defenses, and the parties had two extended negotiating sessions with the mediator. The Settlement resulted from that extensive, arm s-length negotiation process. Following the extensive and intensive negotiations before the mediator, the parties to the Settlement entered into the Stipulation providing for the settlement of the Action for $19,000,000, plus interest, subject to the approval of the Court. Plaintiffs counsels decision to settle the Action was based on their analysis of the voluminous evidentiary and legal record which the parties amassed during the course of the Action. That record includes: (1) depositions of numerous officers, directors and employees of Kidder; (2) more than one million pages of documents produced by defendants and by third parties in 2

3 response to plaintiffs requests for production of documents and subpoenas; (3) tens of thousands of pages of public filings, news releases and articles that appeared in the press concerning the financial improprieties at Kidder; (4) defendants responses to interrogatories and requests for admission that were served by plaintiffs in the Action; (5) the discovery and trial proceedings in an action commenced by the Securities and Exchange Commission against Jett and in an arbitration between Kidder and Jett; and (6) expert analyses on the damages allegedly suffered by plaintiffs and the Class. Plaintiffs counsel have also made a thorough study of the legal principles appli-cable to plaintiffs claims against defendants and the potential defenses thereto, including the extensive research performed in connection with the briefing on defendants motions to dismiss the Complaint, for summary judgment and to strike the proposed testimony of plaintiffs experts. Notwithstanding their belief that they would prevail at trial, plaintiffs and their counsel recognized the expense, length and uncertainty of a trial and the inevitable appeals which would follow. Plaintiffs and their counsel also considered the defenses that defendants have interposed to plaintiffs claims and the fact that the outcome of the trial and subsequent appeals is uncertain. In view of the foregoing and the size of the recovery, plaintiffs and their counsel have concluded that it is desirable to settle the Action on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and believe the Settlement to be fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of plaintiffs and the other members of the Class. The Settling Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, each and every allegation of liability and wrongdoing made against them and assert that the claims are without merit, that the Settling Defendants have meritorious defenses to those claims, that the conduct of the Settling Defendants has been lawful and proper in all respects and that judgment or judgments should be entered dismissing all claims against the Settling Defendants with prejudice. The Settling Defendants have entered into the Settlement described herein to avoid the continuing additional risk, expense, inconvenience and distraction of this Action, and without admitting any wrongdoing or liability whatsoever. By so doing, the Settling Defendants seek to settle, compromise and terminate with prejudice the Action and to put to rest forever all claims which have, or could have, been asserted therein, or which arise from, or are in any way related to, the acts, facts, transactions, occurrences, representations or omissions alleged in the Complaint or the other complaints previously filed in this Action. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT The terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement are set forth in the Stipulation which has been filed with the Court, and the following is only a summary of its terms. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation, the Settling Defendants have agreed to pay $19,000,000, plus interest at 6% from November 15, 1999 until paid into the settlement fund (the Settlement Fund ), in settlement of all the claims which are or could have been asserted against them or any of them in the Action. The Settlement Fund, minus the costs of notice, administration of the Settlement, any applicable taxes and related expenses, and the award of fees and disbursements to counsel for plaintiffs, is referred to as the Net Settlement Fund. The Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to the members of the Class who file Proof of Claim and Release forms ( Proof(s) of Claim ) which have not been disallowed ( Authorized Claimants ) in accordance with the following Plan of Allocation: For purposes of determining the amount an Authorized Claimant may recover under the Plan of Allocation, the Class Period was divided into three subperiods corresponding to the differences in the like-lihood of establishing liability and damages at trial. The three subperiods are: (1) February 26, 1993 through and including August 13, 1993 (the last business day before GE filed its Report on SEC Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993); (2) August 16, 1993 through and including November 12, 1993 (the last business day before GE filed its Report on SEC Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 3

4 30, 1993); and (3) November 15, 1993 through and including April 15, Among other things, in order to prevail at trial, plaintiffs would have to establish that the alleged overstatements of earnings, which increased in amount over time, would have been material to a reasonable investor and that defendants acted knowingly or recklessly. The evidence obtained through discovery indicated that the amount of allegedly false profits was substantially greater during the later subperiods because of the magnitude of the transactions generating the allegedly false profits during those subperiods and the length of time the alleged losses had been accumulating. Additionally, plaintiffs counsel considered the estimates by plaintiffs damages expert concerning the likely impact on the price of GE common stock had Kidder s actual earnings been properly reported during the Class Period, and the average amount of recoverable damages per share during each subperiod, assuming that plaintiffs were able to prevail on all liability issues in the Action. Thus, generally, the amount of an Authorized Claimant s recovery under the Plan of Allocation will be greater for purchases of GE common stock that occurred in the later subperiods. Accordingly, each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Claim will be calculated as follows: (a) For shares of GE common stock that were purchased during the period February 26, 1993 through and including August 13, 1993, and retained through April 15, 1994, the Recognized Claim is $.20 per share. (b) For shares of GE common stock that were purchased during the period August 16, 1993 through and including November 12, 1993, and retained through April 15, 1994, the Recognized Claim is $.60 per share. (c) For shares of GE common stock that were purchased during the period November 15, 1993 through and including April 15, 1994, and retained through April 15, 1994, the Recognized Claim is $1.60 per share. For shares of GE common stock that were purchased and sold during the period February 26, 1993 through and including April 15, 1994, you are not a member of the Class and thus your Recognized Claim is $ -0-. To the extent there are sufficient funds in the Net Settlement Fund, each Authorized Claimant will receive an amount equal to each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Claim. If, however, the amount in the Net Settlement Fund is not sufficient to permit payment of, or exceeds, the total claim of each Authorized Claimant, then each Authorized Claimant shall be paid the percentage that each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Claim bears to the total of the Recognized Claims of all Authorized Claimants. Payment in this manner shall be deemed exclusive against all Authorized Claimants. The date of purchase or sale is the contract or trade date, as distinguished from the settlement date. For Class Members who made multiple purchases or multiple sales of GE common stock during the Class Period, the earliest subsequent sale shall be matched with the earliest purchase, and chronologically thereafter, for purposes of the claim calculations. No payment shall be made where the amount payable on a claim is $10.00 or less, but such Authorized Claimants will be bound by the final judgment entered by the Court. Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation set forth above will be conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. No Person shall have any claim against plaintiffs counsel or any claims administrator or other agent designated by plaintiffs counsel, or released persons, or defendants counsel based on the distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation and the Settlement contained therein, the Plan of Allocation, or further orders of the Court. All Class Members who fail to complete and file a valid and timely Proof of Claim will be barred from participating in distributions from the Settlement Fund (unless otherwise ordered by the Court), but otherwise will be bound by all of the terms of the Stipulation, including the terms of any judgment entered and the releases given. 4

5 ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES Counsel for plaintiffs in the Action intend to make a joint application to the Court for an award of attorneys fees in an amount not exceeding one-third of the Settlement Fund, for reimbursement of plaintiffs counsels costs and expenses (including, without limitation, the fees and expenses of plaintiffs experts and the fees and expenses incurred and to be incurred in the administration of the Settlement) and for interest on the foregoing sums for the same period and at the same rate as earned on the Settlement Fund until paid. EXCLUSION FROM THE CLASS You may, if you so desire, request to be excluded from the Class. To do so, you must mail a written request to: Settlement Administrator Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation c/o David Berdon & Co. LLP P.O. Box 4171 Grand Central Station New York, NY Fax: (212) This request for exclusion must state: (1) your name, address, and telephone number; (2) your purchases and sales of GE common stock during the Class Period, including the dates, the number of shares, and price paid or received per share for each such purchase or sale; and (3) that you wish to be excluded from the Settlement Class. TO BE VALID, A REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION MUST STATE ALL OF THE FOREGOING INFORMATION. Your exclusion request must be postmarked on or before May 8, All persons who submit valid and timely requests for exclusion shall have no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Judgment and Release. THE SETTLEMENT HEARING As set forth above, the Court has scheduled a hearing on May 22, 2000, to consider the fairness, reason-ableness and adequacy of the proposed Settlement and to consider the request of plaintiffs counsel for the award of attorneys fees and expenses. The Hearing may be adjourned by the Court without further notice to members of the Class. It is not necessary for any member of the Class to appear at the Hearing. If you do not appear, you will be represented by Plaintiffs Lead Counsel, Richard Bemporad, Esq., Lowey Dannenberg Bemporad & Selinger, P.C., The Gateway, 11 th Floor, One North Lexington Avenue, White Plains, New York Any member of the Class who does not timely request exclusion therefrom may, however, appear at the Hearing, in person or by counsel, and show cause why the proposed Settlement should not be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate, or why plaintiffs counsel should not be awarded fees and expenses as requested, or why a judgment should not be entered dismissing the Action as described above, provided, however, that no Class member or any other person shall be heard or entitled to contest any of these matters unless, on or before May 8, 2000, that person has served by hand or first-class mail: (1) a notice of intention to appear; (2) a statement identifying the number of shares of GE common stock purchased and the dates of purchase and sale of such common stock during the Class Period; (3) a state- 5

6 ment of such Class member s specific objections to the Stipulation and the judgment to be entered in the Action, and/or the application of plaintiffs counsel for attorneys fees and expenses; and (4) all other documents and writings which such Class member desires the Court to consider, upon: Richard Bemporad, Esq. Mark C. Hansen, Esq. Lowey Dannenberg Bemporad Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Selinger, P.C. and & Evans, P.L.L.C. The Gateway, 11 th Floor 1301 K Street, N.W. One North Lexington Avenue Suite 1000 West White Plains, NY Washington, D.C Plaintiffs Lead Counsel Attorneys for Kidder Said objections, papers and briefs must be filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, Foley Square, New York, New York (which may be done by first-class mail). Any such objections should bear the caption, In re Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation, 94 Civ (BSJ)(MHD). Any member of the Class who does not make his, her or its objection in this manner shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness or adequacy of the proposed Settlement or to the fee and expense request of plaintiffs counsel. THE JUDGMENT AND RELEASE If the Court approves the Settlement provided for in the Stipulation, a final judgment or judgments will be entered (1) approving the proposed Settlement; (2) awarding plaintiffs counsel such fees, expenses and disbursements as the Court deems appropriate; and (3) dismissing with prejudice as to all defendants the Complaint and the prior complaints previously filed in this Action. Additionally, plaintiffs and all members of the Class who have not been excluded therefrom, on behalf of themselves, their respective heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns and any person(s) they represent (collectively, the Releasors ), in any and every capacity whatsoever, shall be deemed to have irrevocably remised, released and forever discharged each and every one of the defendants and their respective present and former agents, servants, attorneys, investment bankers, members, partners, employees, officers, directors, managing directors, parents and subsidiaries, affiliates, stockholders, heirs, executors, representatives, accountants, auditors, successors, assigns, and any person, firm, trust, corporation, officer, director or other individual or entity in which any defendant has a controlling interest or which is related to or affiliated with any of the defendants (collectively, the Released Parties ) from each and every class or individual claim, cause or causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, judgments, extents, execution of claims, liens, obligations, undertakings, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses of any and every nature, whatsoever, (including, without limitation, attorneys fees and court costs), whether at law or in equity, known or unknown, fixed or contingent, actual or constructive, which have been or might have been or in the future might be asserted in the Complaint or the complaints previously filed in the Action in connection with, arising out of or in any way related to any acts, facts, transactions, occurrences, representations or omissions set forth, alleged, or otherwise embraced therein, including any claims for violations of federal, state or other law, or of the common law, and any claims relating to or arising from the activities of Jett during his employment by any defendant or any defendant s actual or alleged supervision of Jett, which the Releasors, or any of them, had, now have, or may hereafter have as a member of the Class or as individuals, against the aforementioned Released Parties, or any of them excepting any claim to enforce the terms of the Stipulation. 6

7 SUBMISSION OF PROOFS OF CLAIM BY MEMBERS OF THE CLASS IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, TO RECEIVE ANY PAYMENTS FROM THE SETTLEMENT FUND YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROOF OF CLAIM AND SEND IT, TOGETHER WITH THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTATION, BY PREPAID FIRST-CLASS MAIL, POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 15, 2000, ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS: Settlement Administrator Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation c/o David Berdon & Co. LLP P.O. Box 4171 Grand Central Station New York, NY Any person submitting a Proof of Claim may be required to furnish such additional or other proof of purchase of GE common stock as may reasonably be required to establish the claimant s right to participate in the Net Settlement Fund. The burden shall be on the Class Members to establish their right to participate in the Net Settlement Fund by competent proof (e.g., broker s confirmation slips, brokerage account statements, letters from brokers, the Schedule D from your applicable tax return, or other satisfactory proof). The Class Members shall, upon submission of his, her or its Proof of Claim, be subject to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any Class Member who fails to establish his, her or its claim to the satisfaction of the Court within the time allowed therefor will not be entitled to receive payment but will nevertheless continue to be deemed for all purposes to be a member of the Class and will be bound by the provisions of the Settlement, if it is approved by the Court. Any Class Member who has not received a Notice and a Proof of Claim and Release, or desires additional copies thereof, may obtain copies from the following website, or in writing to: Settlement Administrator Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation c/o David Berdon & Co. LLP P.O. Box 4171 Grand Central Station New York, NY Fax: (212) Website: INQUIRIES For more details on the matters involved in the Action, you may review the pleadings, the Stipulation and the other papers on file with the Court. Those documents may be inspected during normal business hours at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY ALL QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS NOTICE, THE ACTION, OR THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND THE SETTLEMENT HEARING SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO: Richard Bemporad, Esq. Lowey Dannenberg Bemporad & Selinger, P.C. The Gateway, 11 th Floor One North Lexington Avenue White Plains, NY Telephone: (914) Plaintiffs Lead Counsel PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK OF THE COURT. 7

8 NOTICE TO BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES If you were a nominee for any purchasers of GE common stock during the Class Period, you are requested either to: (1) forward this Notice and accompanying Proof of Claim to the former beneficial owners or, in the alternative, (2) provide the Settlement Administrator with the names and addresses of such beneficial owners, preferably on mailing labels, at the above address. Additional copies of this Notice and accompanying Proof of Claim and Release may be requested in writing from David Berdon & Co. LLP, at the mailing address, fax number, or website address set forth above. You are entitled to reimbursement of your reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with the foregoing upon request and submission of appropriate supporting documentation to the Settlement Administrator. Dated: New York, New York April 10, 2000 BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 8

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE KIDDER PEABODY SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File Civil Action No. 94 Civ (BSJ)(MHD) PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. To recover as a member of the Class (as defined in the accompanying Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (the Notice )), based on your claims in the action entitled, In re Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation, 94 Civ (BSJ)(MHD) (the Class Action ), you must complete and, on page 14 hereof, sign this Proof of Claim and Release. If you fail to submit a properly addressed Proof of Claim and Release by September 15, 2000, (as set forth in paragraph 3 below) your claim may be rejected and you may be precluded from any recovery from the Settlement Fund created in connection with the proposed Settlement of the Class Action. 2. Submission of this Proof of Claim and Release, however, does not assure that you will share in the proceeds of the Settlement of the Class Action. 3. YOU MUST MAIL YOUR COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 15, 2000, ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS: Settlement Administrator Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation c/o David Berdon & Co. LLP P.O. Box 4171 Grand Central Station New York, NY If you are a member of the Class and you did not timely request exclusion in connection with the proposed Settlement, you are bound by the terms of any judgment entered in the Class Actions, WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUBMIT A PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. 5. If you are NOT a member of the Class, DO NOT submit a Proof of Claim and Release form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION 1. If you purchased General Electric Company ( GE ) common stock and held the certificate(s) in your name, you are the beneficial purchaser as well as the record purchaser. If, however, you purchased GE stock and the certificate(s) were registered in the name of a third party, such as a nominee or brokerage firm, you are the beneficial purchaser, and the third party is the record purchaser. 9

10 2. Use Part I of this form, entitled Claimant Identification, to identify each purchaser of record ( nominee ), if different from the beneficial purchaser of GE common stock, that forms the basis of this claim. THIS CLAIM MUST BE FILED BY THE ACTUAL BENEFICIAL PURCHASER OR PUR- CHASERS, OR THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF SUCH PURCHASER OR PURCHASERS, OF THE GE COMMON STOCK UPON WHICH THIS CLAIM IS BASED. 3. All joint purchasers must sign this claim. Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees must complete and sign this claim on behalf of the person(s) represented by them, and their authority must accompany this claim and their titles or capacities must be stated. The Social Security (or taxpayer identification) number and telephone number of the beneficial owner may be used in verifying the claim. Failure to provide the foregoing information could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of the claim. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS 1. Use Part II of this form, entitled Schedule of Transactions in GE Common Stock, to supply all required details of your transaction(s) in GE common stock. If you need more space or additional schedules, attach separate sheets giving all of the required information in substantially the same form. Sign and print or type your name on each additional sheet. 2. On the schedules, provide all of the requested information with respect to all of your purchases and all of your sales of GE common stock that took place at any time during the Class Period (as defined in the Notice), whether such transactions resulted in a profit or a loss. Failure to report all such transactions may result in the rejection of your claim. 3. List each transaction in the Class Period separately and in chronological order, by trade date, beginning with the earliest. You must accurately provide the month, day and year of each transaction you list. 4. The date of covering a short sale is deemed to be the date of purchase of GE common stock. The date of a short sale is deemed to be the date of sale of GE common stock. 5. Brokers confirmations or other documentation of your transactions and positions in GE common stock must be attached to your claim. Failure to provide this documentation could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of your claim. 10

11 Part I: Claimant Identification UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In Re Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation Master File Civil Action No. 94 Civ (BSJ)(MHD) PROOF OF CLAIM Must be Postmarked No Later Than: September 15, 2000 Please Type or Print DETACH HERE Beneficial Owner s Name (First, Middle, Last) Joint Beneficial Owner s Name (First, Middle, Last) Street Address City State Zip Code Foreign Province Foreign Country Individual Corporation/Other Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number (Work) (Home) Area Code Telephone Number Area Code Telephone Number Record Owner s Name (if different from beneficial owner listed above) 11

12 Part II: Schedule of Transactions in GE Common Stock A) Number of shares of GE common stock held at the close of trading on February 25, 1993:. B) Purchases of GE common stock during the period February 26, April 15, 1994, inclusive: Trade Date (list chronologically) No. of Shares Total 1 Month/Day/Year Purchased Purchase Price 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ IMPORTANT: Identify by number listed above all purchases in which you covered a short sale. C) Sales of GE common stock during the period February 26, April 15,1994, inclusive: Trade Date (list chronologically) No. of Shares Net Sales 2 Month/Day/Year Sold Proceeds 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ HERE D) Number of shares of GE common stock held at the close of trading on April 15, 1994:. If you require additional space, attach extra schedules in the same format as above. Sign and print your name on each additional page. YOU MUST READ AND SIGN THE RELEASE ON PAGE Include brokers commissions, transfer taxes or other fees. 2 Deduct brokers commissions, transfer taxes or other fees. DETACH 12

13 SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION OF COURT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I (We) submit this Proof of Claim and Release under the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement described in the Notice. I (We) also submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, with respect to my (our) claim as a Class Member and for purposes of enforcing the release set forth herein. I (We) further acknowledge that I am (we are) bound by and subject to the terms of any judgment that may be entered in the Action. I (We) agree to furnish additional information to Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel or the Settlement Administrator to support this claim if required to do so. I (We) have not submitted any other claim covering the same purchases or sales of GE common stock during the Class Period and know of no other person having done so on my (our) behalf. RELEASE A. I (We) hereby acknowledge full and complete satisfaction of, and do hereby fully, finally and forever settle, release and discharge each and all of the defendants and each and all of the Released Parties (as defined in the Notice) from each of the released claims (as described in the Notice). B. This release shall be of no force or effect unless and until the Court enters the Judgment approving the Stipulation of Settlement and such Judgment becomes a final judgment. DETACH HERE C. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) are not excluded from the Class and have not assigned or transferred or purported to assign or transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily, any matter released pursuant to this release or any other part or portion thereof. D. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have included information about all of my (our) transactions in GE common stock that occurred during the Class Period, as well as the number of shares of GE common stock held by me (us) at the commencement of trading on February 26, 1993, and held by me (us) at the close of trading on April 15, E. I (We) certify that I am (we are) not subject to backup withholding under the provisions of Section 3406(a)(1)(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. NOTE: If you have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you are subject to backup withholding, please strike out the language that you are not subject to backup withholding in the certification above. 13

14 I (We) declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information supplied by the undersigned is true and correct and that this Proof of Claim and Release form was executed this day of, 2000 in,, (month) (city) (state). (country) Signature of Claimant Type or print your name here: Signature of Joint Claimant (if any) Type or print your name here: ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING TAKES A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. Capacity of persons signing (e.g., Beneficial Owner, Executor or Administrator) HERE Reminder Checklist: 1. Please sign the above release and declaration. 2. Remember to attach supporting documentation. 3. Do not send originals of stock certificates. 4. Keep a copy of this claim form for your records. 5. If you desire an acknowledgment of receipt of your claim form, please send it Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. 6. If you move, or if this Notice was sent to you at an old or otherwise incorrect address, please send us your new address. 7. If you have any questions concerning this Proof of Claim and Release, contact: Settlement Administrator Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation c/o David Berdon & Co. LLP P.O. Box 4171 Grand Central Station New York, NY Telephone: (800) Fax: (212) Website: DETACH 14

15 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 15

16 Settlement Administrator Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation c/o David Berdon & Co. LLP P.O. Box 4171 Grand Central Station New York, NY PRESORTED FIRST-CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID SOUTHEASTERN, PA PERMIT NO. 203 FIRST CLASS MAIL PLEASE FORWARD IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ROBERT WINN, JAMES WINN and MARVIN GILL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, No. IP00-0310

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In the United States District Court For the Western District of Oklahoma NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Must be Postmarked (if Mailed) or Received (if Submitted Online) No Later Than June 29, 2018 PO Box 10552 1-866-281-1098 info@plygemsecuritiessettlementcom wwwplygemsecuritiessettlementcom PGH *P-PGH-POC/1*

More information

IXIA CLAIM FORM GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

IXIA CLAIM FORM GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN JUNE 23, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. Ixia, et al. CASE NO. CV13-08440-DMG(SHx)

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Autoliv Securities Litigation Website: www.autolivsecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@autolivsecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 4259 Toll Free: 1-877-880-0181 Portland, OR 97208-4259

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.: 1:07-cv-1757-RC For Official

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re VELTI PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 3:13-cv-03889-WHO (Consolidated

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CHINA MOBILE GAMES & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LTD SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:14-CV-04471 (KMW) This Document Relates To: All Actions Deadline

More information

EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA IN RE YONGYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION Consolidated Case No. A-12-670468-B DEPT. NO.: XI Consolidated with: A-12-670758-B A-12-670874-B

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 14, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS VACATION FUND, et al., v. THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP, PLC, et al.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN RE SEMGROUP ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P., SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 08-MD-1989-GKF-FHM I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN RE SWISHER HYGIENE, INC. SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION X X MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION MIDDLESEX RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, Case No. CV 06-6863-DOC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN : : : No. 01-C-1034 Judge Adelman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN : : : No. 01-C-1034 Judge Adelman IN RE SHOPKO SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN : : : No. 01-C-1034 Judge Adelman NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. No. 4:10-MD Honorable Keith P. Ellison PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. No. 4:10-MD Honorable Keith P. Ellison PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re BP p.l.c. Securities Litigation No. 4:10-MD-02185 Honorable Keith P. Ellison I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS and ROBERT LIFSON, Plaintiffs, v. ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC. and LAURIE BEBO, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Case

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re ELAN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 02-CV-0865(RMB)(FM) This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. CLASS ACTION PROOF OF

More information

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY Must be Postmarked No Later Than June 28, 2006 UNR Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator *P-UNRF-APOC/1* PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick,

More information

x : : : : : : : x INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

x : : : : : : : x INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Master File No. 207-cv-03359-JS-GRB CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Xybernaut Securities Litigation Settlement c/o Analytics Inc., Claims Administrator P.O. Box 2007 Chanhassen, MN 55317-2007 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Complete and Sign this Form and Return Postmarked

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE In re General Electric Co. Sec. Litig. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE To recover from the Net Settlement Fund as

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff, - against - U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements), Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box Dublin, OH

Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box Dublin, OH Must be Postmarked No Later Than November 22, 2018 Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10634 Dublin, OH 43017-9234 www.nathanvmattashareholderslitigation.com SRM *P-SRM-POC/1*

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CAROLYN LYNN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, ARTHUR F. HELF, H. LAMAR COX, MICHAEL

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION 02 Civ. 6919 (GEL) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IF YOU PURCHASED

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR Gentiva Securities Litigation Website: www.gentivasecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@gentivasecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 3058 Toll Free: 888-593-7570 Portland, OR 97208-3058

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Enzymotec Securities Litigation Toll-Free Number: 844-418-6627 Claims Administrator Website: www.enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com PO Box 4079 Email: info@enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com Portland OR

More information

Doral Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH

Doral Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 29, 2016 Doral Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o GCG PO Box 10284 Dublin, OH 43017-5784 wwwdoralsecuritieslitigationcom DFI *P-DFI-POC/1* ID Number:

More information

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL Case 2 : 04-cv-06180 -RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 q@.^1wa7ict COURT NOV ^ 8 2007 [CENL-7'^AL CT F CALIFORNIA DEPUTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 1506 (CAS) ALL CASES STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC,

More information

Proof of Claim and Release Form DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: AUGUST 4, 2017

Proof of Claim and Release Form DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: AUGUST 4, 2017 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 4, 2017 In re Energy Recovery, Inc Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10358 Dublin, OH 43017-0358 (844) 634-8908 Fax: (855) 409-7129 Questions@EnergyRecoverySecuritiesLitigationcom

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Must Be Postmarked No Later Than November 26, 2018 Vista Outdoor Inc Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10603 Dublin, OH 43017-9203 1-888-558-9299 info@vistaoutdoorsecuritiessettlementcom wwwvistaoutdoorsecuritiessettlementcom

More information

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13 Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page2 of 13 1 SCOTT+SCOTT LLP MARY K. BLASY (211262) 2 WALTER W. NOSS (pro hac

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) No. 1:08-cv EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) No. 1:08-cv EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL No. 1:08-cv-10551 EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and (Consolidated On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and Final Approval Hearing

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. -against- Civil Action No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. -against- Civil Action No UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENNIS WALSINGHAM, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -against- Civil Action No. 96-809 BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY,

More information

Esposito v. American Renal Assocs. Holdings, Inc. et al. Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box 10538

Esposito v. American Renal Assocs. Holdings, Inc. et al. Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box 10538 Must be Postmarked No Later Than July 6, 2018 REA Esposito v American Renal Assocs Holdings, Inc et al Claims Administrator c/o GCG PO Box 10538 *P-REA-POC/1* Dublin, Ohio 43017-4538 (888) 684-5083 wwwarasecuritiessettlementcom

More information

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:14-cv-03251-JPO Document 190-2 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:14-cv-03251-JPO Document 190-2 Filed 10/02/18 Page 2 of 14 Exhibit A-1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE 1. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated October 12, 2018 ( Stipulation

More information

01-CA4180. X0791 v.05 1

01-CA4180. X0791 v.05 1 In re ProNAi Shareholder Litigation Settlement Claims Administrator c/o Epiq P.O. Box 5053 Portland, OR 97208-5053 Toll Free Number: (877) 734-5338 Settlement Website: www.pronaishareholderlitigation.com

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Deadline for Submission: September 15, 2017 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED CAESARSTONE, LTD. COMMON STOCK ( CAESARSTONE ) DURING THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 12, 2014

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES No. 98 C 3450 CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Judge David H. Coar THIS DOCUMENT RELATES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION BRAD MAUSS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, NUVASIVE, INC., ALEXIS V. LUKIANOV,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. v. C.A. No MLW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. v. C.A. No MLW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MOLTEN METAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION C.A. No. 97-10325-MLW MARILYN AXLER, et al., Plaintiffs, SCIENTIFIC ECOLOGY GROUP, INC.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Address: City: Zip Code:

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Address: City: Zip Code: Must Be Postmarked No Later Than: October 31, 2005 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: OM Group, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARTHUR MENALDI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, -against- Plaintiff(s), Civil Action No. 14 Civ. 3251 (JPO) OCH-ZIFF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DIVISION IN RE ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. Master File No. 07 C 7083 SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To:

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHER DISTRICT OF CALIFORIA In re MITEK SSTEMS, IC. SECURITIES ) Master File o. LITIGATIO ) 00CV2028L(AJB) ) This Document Relates To: ) CLASS ACTIO ) ALL ACTIOS. ) ) PROOF

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE MDCO Securities Litigation Toll-Free Number: (888) 653-7709 Claims Administrator Website: www.mdcosecuritieslitigation.com PO Box 4230 Email: info@mdcosecuritieslitigation.com Portland OR 97208-4230 Deadline

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re TOMMY HILFIGER SECURITIES : Lead Case No. 1:04-CV-07678-SAS LITIGATI ELECTRICALLY FILED This Document Relates To : : CLASS ACTI ALL ACTIS.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE PART I - CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION... 2 PART II - SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN KINROSS COMMON STOCK... 3

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE PART I - CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION... 2 PART II - SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN KINROSS COMMON STOCK... 3 Must be Postmarked No Later Than September 17, 2015 City of Austin Police Retirement System v Kinross Gold Corp Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10165 Dublin OH 43017-3165 1-877-940-5048 wwwkinrossgoldcorpsecuritiessettlementcom

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WEST END CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC Individually And On Civil Action No. 06-CV-02951 (TPG) Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. v. Case No Civ - Moreno/Dube

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. v. Case No Civ - Moreno/Dube UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION JAMES P. MORIARTY, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 99-0225 Civ - Moreno/Dube

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division In re: TVIA INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document relates to: ALL ACTIONS. X :: X :: : : X No. C-06-06304-RMW CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A-3

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A-3 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-3 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 7 EXHIBIT A-3 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-3 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 7 Exhibit A-3 Must Be Postmarked No Later Than, 2015 City of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) City State ZIP Code

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) City State ZIP Code Rentrak Corporation Shareholders Litigation Website: www.rentrakcorporationshareholderslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@rentrakcorporationshareholderslitigation.com PO Box 4234 Phone: (888)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM AND SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM AND SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9 In re American Business Financial Services Inc. Noteholders Litigation I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA X X Master File No. 05-232 PROOF OF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS X In re NUTRAMAX PRODUCTS, INC. SECURITIES : Civil Action No. LITIGATION : 00-CV-10861 (RGS) : This document relates to: : : Each action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS In re ) Thomas & Betts Securities Litigation ) Civil Action No. 00-CV-2127 ) TO: NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : x STANLEY YEDLOWSKI, etc., v. Plaintiffs, ROKA BIOSCIENCE, INC., et al., Defendants x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : Case No. 14-CV-8020-FLW-TJB NOTICE OF: (1) PENDENCY

More information

District of New Hampshire X :: : X

District of New Hampshire X :: : X United States District Court District of New Hampshire In re: StockerYale, Inc. Securities Litigation. X :: : X Master File No. 1:05cv00177-SM CIVIL ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTER DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMA DIVISIO In re DAISTEK ITERATIOAL LITIGATIO Master Docket o. 4:03-CV-212 This Document Relates To: CLASS ACTIO ALL ACTIOS. PROOF OF CLAIM AD RELEASE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV PHX-RJB CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CIV PHX-RJB CLASS ACTION In re AMERCO SECURITIES LITIGATIO This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIOS. UITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZOA o. CIV-04-2182-PHX-RJB CLASS ACTIO PROOF OF CLAIM AD RELEASE I. GEERAL ISTRUCTIOS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION WESTER PESLVAIA ELECTRICAL EMPLOEES PESIO FUD, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. CADELA CORPORATIO, et al., UITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION GUANGYI XU, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. Case No: 2:15-cv-07952-CAS (RAOx) CHINACACHE INTERNATIONAL

More information

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 23, 2016 PLC Polycom, Inc Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 *P-PLC-POC/1* Dublin, OH 43017-5781 1-855-907-3170 wwwgardencitygroupcom/cases-info/polycomsettlement

More information

GLS Dublin OH *P-GLS$F-POC/1*

GLS Dublin OH *P-GLS$F-POC/1* Must be Postmarked No Later Than March 26, 2010 Ladmen Partners v Globalstar Settlement c/o The Garden City Group, Inc PO Box 9349 GLS Dublin OH 43017-4249 1-866-396-5584 *P-GLSF-POC/1* Claim Number: Control

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CABLEVISION/RAINBOW MEDIA TRACKING STOCK LITIGATION Cons. C.A. No. 19819-VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website:

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website: SAP Must be Postmarked No Later Than Arena Securities Litigation April 13, 2018 c/o GCG *P-SAP-POC/1* PO Box 10526 Dublin, OH 43017-0526 Toll-Free: (877) 981-9683 Settlement Website: wwwarenapharmaceuticalsclassactionsettlementcom

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING THEREON, RIGHT TO APPEAR, AND RELATED MATTERS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING THEREON, RIGHT TO APPEAR, AND RELATED MATTERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually And On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No.:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv WHA CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv WHA CLASS ACTION In re LEDIGCLUB SECURITIES LITIGATIO This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIOS. UITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ORTHER DISTRICT OF CALIFORIA Case o. 3:16-cv-02627-WHA CLASS ACTIO PROOF OF CLAIM AD RELEASE I. GEERAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE ENGINEERING ANIMATION SECURITIES CIVIL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING THEREON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE FOAMEX SECURITIES LITIGATION 99 CV 3004 (DC) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING THEREON TO: ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN SETTLEMENT FUND

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN SETTLEMENT FUND UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE GLOBALSTAR SECURITIES LITIGATION 01 Civ. 1748 (PKC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re INTERMUNE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-03-2954-SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. Case No. 14 Civ. 8925 (KMW) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ALA WILLIS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIG LOTS, IC., et al., Defendants. UITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHER DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTER DIVISIO o. 2:12-cv-00604-MHW-KAJ

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE REVLON, INC. SECURITIES : Master File No. LITIGATION : 99-CV-10192 (SHS) x This Document Relates to: : All Actions : x NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois Eastern Division IN RE CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 03 C 8884 Honorable

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN RE NEUSTAR, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 14-CV-00885 JCC TRJ NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:04CV99

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:04CV99 IN RE SPX CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) This Document Relates To: ) ALL ACTIONS ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:04CV99

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. MODEL N, INC., et al., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information