(Application for stay of execution from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam)
|
|
- Oliver Price
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO 82 OF 2008 NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION. APPLICANT AND HAMISI LUSWAGA... 1 ST RESPONDENT PETER KASIDI..2 ND RESPONDENT CHRISTOPHER SEME.. 3 RD RESPONDENT ADILI AUCTION MART... 4 TH RESPONDENT (Application for stay of execution from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam) (Rugazia, J.) dated the 26 th day of March, 2008 in Misc. Land Case No. 14 of RULING 5 February & 12 March, 2009 KILEO, J.A.: The dispute in this case centers on a farm N situate at Boko area in Kinondoni District. The applicant claims to be the owner of this farm having bought it from one Joseph Daudi Hayila on 29 th September The applicant also possesses a letter of offer No. LD/164666/28 over the farm for a period of 99 years. The applicant has made some development on the land under a project styled Boko Phase III Housing Scheme. The respondents on the other hand claim to be the lawful owners who have been in occupation of the same farm since the 1980s. The dispute over the farm began by the respondents filing a suit in the Ward Tribunal of Bunju (Civil Case No. 94 of 2004) against Joseph David Hayila. They won their case in the Ward Tribunal. The applicant was not a party to that case. Having won their case in the Ward Tribunal, the respondents, pursuant to section 16 (3) of the Land Courts Act, No 2 of 1
2 2002, applied to the Kinondoni District Land and Housing Tribunal (DLHT) for execution of their decree. The DLHT in turn issued an Eviction Order vide Miscellaneous Application No 55 of The threat of eviction prompted the applicant to act by filing a suit (Land Case No.210 of 2005) in the High Court of Tanzania, Land Division. The prayers in the plaint were for a declaration that the plaintiff is the lawful owner of the disputed land and for a permanent injunctive order against the defendants and their agents from unlawfully evicting the plaintiff from the disputed farm. The defendants in the land case, who are the present respondents, raised a preliminary point of objection on the ground that the suit was res judicata it having been conclusively determined by the Ward Tribunal. The High Court sustained the preliminary objection and the suit was struck out. Being aggrieved by the decision of the High Court, the applicant filed the requisite Notice of Appeal and applied for leave to appeal to this Court. While the application for leave to appeal was pending, the respondents obtained an Eviction Order from the DLHT directing the 4 th respondent to demolish walls and remove bricks together with everything on farm No Boko Magereza Kinondoni Dar es salaam. Following this Eviction Order, the applicant filed in the High Court an application, (Misc. Application No.14 of 2007) for an order of stay of execution so as to preserve the status quo pending the results of applicant s application for leave to appeal and the intended appeal in the event leave was granted. Preliminary point of objection was raised to the effect that the High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the application on account of the fact that a Notice of Appeal had already been lodged in this Court. The preliminary objection was upheld and the application was dismissed. At the same time the High Court granted leave to the applicant to appeal against its decision dismissing Land Case No. 210 of The dismissal of the application gave birth to the present application before this Court. The application by way of Notice Motion is brought under Rule 3 (2) (a) and (b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 and it seeks an order that the respondents be restrained from executing the Eviction Order issued by the DLHT of Kinondoni District vide Miscellaneous Application No. 55 of 2005 dated the 15 th February 2007 on the following grounds: (i) Whereas the Eviction Order was served upon the Applicant and directed against its property, the Applicant was not party to any proceedings that resulted into the said Order; 2
3 (ii) Whereas the Eviction Order was issued by District Land and Housing Tribunal for Kinondoni District (at Magomeni) on the basis of a Decision of the Bunju Ward Tribunal, the Applicant was not party to any of the proceedings before those Tribunals and it has no locus standi therein; (iii) The Applicant had applied before The High Court of Tanzania (Land Division) at Dar es Salaam seeking an Order of stay against the execution of that Execution Order pending results of the Applicant s Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal and appeal against the Decision of The High Court of Tanzania (Land Division) at Dar es Salaam in Land Case No. 210/2005 that had been dismissed allegedly on the grounds of being res judicata; the said Court did simultaneously grant the leave Application while dismissing the one for stay of execution; (iv) The subject matter in the intended appeal and for which leave to appeal was granted by the High Court is the same as in the eviction proceedings referred to in grounds (i) and (ii) above; and (v) The dismissal Order in respect of the Applicant s Application for stay of execution is not capable of being stayed yet it exposes the Applicant in that the Respondents may go back to the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Kinondoni District (at Magomeni) and proceed with execution on the basis of the Order of Execution. The Notice of Motion is supported by the affidavit of Mr. Kamara, learned advocate, who also argued the application on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Kamara s arguments can be summarized as follows: That there is nothing in the High Court, the execution of which is capable of being stayed, and yet the applicant is exposed to the effects of the case in the DLHT while at the same time continuing with the process of appeal. Referring to Athanas Albert and 4 others v. Tumaini University Civil Application No 50 of 1999 (unreported), the learned counsel submitted that the present application has been brought under Rule 3 (2) (a) and (b) with prayers for restraint orders. He submitted that the Court is enjoined to ensure that justice is done and has inherent powers to issue injunctive orders. He cited Tanzania Union of Industrial and Commercial Workers (TUICO-OTTU UNION) and another vs. Tanzania and Italian Petroleum Refining Co. Ltd (TIPPER) Civil Application No. 110 of 1999, Court of Appeal of Tanzania (unreported) in support of his arguments. Mr. Kamara pointed out that though the normal procedure in the circumstances of the case would have been to file objection proceedings in the DLHT, his 3
4 clients, pursuant to operation of the law had no locus in that tribunal and the only place where they could file their grievances was in the High Court, Land Division. The learned counsel argued further that since the subject matter in the application for leave to appeal and the application for stay of execution was one and the same, then one would have expected that the application for leave having been granted, the application for stay of execution would also, logically have been granted because you cannot in one breath give permission to appeal and in the next breath throw out application for preservation of status quo. The learned counsel was quick to point out that proceedings for execution are continuing in a forum where the applicant cannot appear. He argued that if the execution is allowed to proceed while at the same time leave to appeal has been granted the appeal stands to be nugatory. In the event the applicant wins on appeal at most a retrial will be ordered and in the event demolition will have taken place it means that the applicant will suffer irreparable loss, the learned counsel further submitted. Mr. Marando, learned advocate represented the respondents at the hearing of the application. Resisting the application, Mr. Marando argued that the decision of the Ward Tribunal, which is a competent court in land cases stands against all the world as long it has not been challenged either by way of appeal or otherwise. In this case, he argued, as long as the decision of the Ward Tribunal has not been challenged in any way then that decision cannot be said to be before this Court and therefore the Court lacks jurisdiction to make an intervention concerning the case in the Ward Tribunal. The learned counsel opined that the applicant could have invoked revisional proceedings, or instituted a new case challenging the decision affecting them or appealed against the decision of the High Court in its refusal to stay execution. Putting all the arguments and the circumstances of the case on the table I think that the whole matter revolves around the following two main issues: One, was the Ward Tribunal case brought before the High Court? And two, does this Court have jurisdiction to order that the respondents be restrained from executing the eviction order issued by the DLHT vide Miscellaneous Application No. 55 of 2005 dated 15 th February 2007? 4
5 The answer to issue No one is simple. Mr. Marando argued that the decision of the Ward Tribunal is not before the Court because it has neither been challenged by appeal nor through revisional proceedings or through a fresh case. As observed by Mr. Kamara, revision in the circumstances of this case would not be sustainable because the DLHT did not decide anything on the rights of the parties and there was no error on the face of the record which would have warranted the High Court to intervene by way of revision. Mr. Marando contended that the decision of the Ward Tribunal has not been brought before the Court. However, the question to ask is; if the decision of the Ward Tribunal was not before the Court, as claimed, how then was it observed to be res judicata? Moreover, looking at the pleadings in the High Court, the case in the Ward Tribunal was called to the attention of the court - see for example paragraphs 9 and 11 of the plaint in the High Court. These paragraphs refer to the case in the DLHT, which was based on the case in the Ward Tribunal. We are indeed faced with a novel situation here as observed by Mr. Kamara. The law, in terms of section 37 (d) of the Land Disputes Courts Act, Act No 2 of 2002 as amended by the Written Laws Miscellaneous Amendments) (No 2) of 2005, bars the applicant from appearance in either the Ward Tribunal or the DLHT. Save for areas where there is no Land Division High Court Registry, the applicant s locus is otherwise in the High Court, Land Division. The applicants could therefore not go to either the Ward Tribunal or the DLHT for redress as the dispute arose in Dar es salaam where there is a High Court Land Division Registry. The second issue for consideration is whether this Court has jurisdiction to make an order restraining the respondents from executing the Eviction Order issued by the DLHT pursuant to the decision of the Ward Tribunal. It is noteworthy that the High Court granted leave to the applicant to appeal to this Court. The subject matter in the application for leave to appeal is the same as the subject matter in the proceedings for execution in the DLHT. I agree with Mr. Kamara s submission that if leave to appeal has been granted and execution is allowed to proceed, then the appeal may be rendered nugatory. On whether this Court has jurisdiction to restrain the respondents from executing the eviction order issued by the DLHT I have no doubt that it has such jurisdiction. The High Court decision which struck out the suit as being res judicata is not capable of execution and therefore not capable of stay. The Ward Tribunal s decision is however capable of 5
6 execution and as already pointed out the subject matter in the Ward Tribunal is the same subject matter in the intended appeal for which leave has already been granted. I wish to associate myself with the holding of Ramadhani, J.A as he then was, in Sudi Kipetio & Three Others v. Bakari Ally Mwera (Civil Application No 94 of 2004) unreported. In that case, discussing the question whether the Court of Appeal has power to stay execution of a Primary Court decree, the learned Justice of Appeal held that it has such powers. He stated as follows: It is my considered opinion that as long as there is a notice of appeal before this Court and the order to be stayed, though given by a sub ordinate court, was nevertheless given in respect of a matter subject of the pending appeal, this Court has jurisdiction to entertain an application for stay of execution. Consequently, I have jurisdiction to deal with this application for staying the execution of an order given by the Primary Court. Though the applicant did not exactly pray for stay of execution, however the grant of the restraint order prayed for would automatically result in a stay of the decree of the Ward Tribunal. Ramadhani s decision is therefore directly relevant to the matter at hand. Mr. Kamara also brought to the attention of the Court the holding in the Indian case of Bhame v. Venkappa, A 1961 K 178 cited in Sarkar s The Law of Civil Procedure- 11 th Edition Reprint at page 822. In that case the Indian court, having discussed the inherent powers of the court as provided under section 151 of the Indian Code of Civil Procedure, which is similar to our section 95 of the Civil Procedure Code, held that the Court can stay delivery proceedings in execution of a decree to which the applicant was not a party. Of course the Court of Appeal is governed by The Appellate Jurisdiction Act and the Court of Appeal Rules. I however think that, where the interests of justice demand, as in the present situation, the Court of Appeal has inherent powers under Rule 3 (2) (a) and (b) to give an order restraining a party from executing the decree of a sub-ordinate court where the applicant was not a party. The Ward Tribunal is one of the sub-ordinate courts in the hierarchy of land courts and it may be equated to a Primary Court. The applicant, as already pointed out, has no locus in the Ward Tribunal, nor did it have locus in the DLHT which is the executing court. 6
7 It is in the light of the above considerations that I find good cause for granting the application. I accordingly order that the respondents be restrained from executing the Eviction Order issued by the DLHT for Kinondoni District vide Miscellaneous Application No 55 of 2005 dated the 15 th February 2007 pending the hearing of the intended appeal. Costs of this application will abide the result of the intended appeal. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 4 th Day of March, E. A. KILEO JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. (P. B. KHADAY) DEPUTY REGISTRAR 7
RULING OF THE COURT. The third respondent herein, Elias K. Musiba, used to be an employee
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RUTAKANGWA, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MASSATI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2010 TANZANIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LTD... APPLICANT VERSUS
More informationSTAY OF EXECUTION-whether the application has been overtakenusually,
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAZA SHABIR BHAIJEE 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE Vs. 1. SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO, 2. REGISTRAR OF TITLES- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF
More informationThis is an application for revision in terms of the provisions of
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ESSALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, l.a., MROSO, l.a., And MSOFFE, l.a.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 183 OF 2005 1. ABBAS SHERALLY ] 2. MEHRUNISSA ABBAS SHERALLY ]................
More informationAT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT Date of last order - 29/2/2008 Date of Ruling - 31/03/2008 RULING
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CORAM: RAMADHANI, J. A. NSEKELA, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
1 In the Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam Civil Application No. 173 of 2004 KAJI, J.A STELLA TEMU VS TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY (Application for Revenue from the judgement of the Court of Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: MROSO, J. A, MSOFFE, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A.) CIVIL REFERECE NO.
1 Civil Reference No 14 of 2005 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Mroso, J.A, Msoffe, J.A and Kaji, J.A Philip Chumbuka VS. Masudi Ally Kasele (Appeal from the Judgement Decision of the Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And MSOFFE, J.A. CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 3 OF 2007
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 3 OF 2007- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM- MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And MSOFFE, J.A. HARUNA MPANGAOS AND OTHERS Vs. TANZANIA
More information(CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2008 AGNESS SIMBAMBILI GABBA. APPELLANT VERSUS DAVID SAMSON GABBA RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REFERENCE NO.12 OF 2004 DAVID MWAKIKUNGA. APPELANT VERSUS
1 Civil reference No.12 of 2004 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Munuo, J.A, Kaji, J.A and Kimaro. David Mwakikunga Vs Mzumbe University (inccessor of the title of IDM Mzumbe) (Reference from
More information(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2006 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RUPIANA TUNGU 3 OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RUPIANA TUNGU 3 OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS Date of Last Order:08/05/2008 Date of Judgment: 27/05/2008 According to the memorandum of appeal filed in this court
More informationSELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR BHAIJEE... RESPONDENTS 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2007 In the Matter of an Intended Appeal SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2014 URSINO PALMS ESTATE LIMITED... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. KYELA VALLEY FOODS LTD.................... lst RESPONDENT 2. THE
More informationIn this application made under Rule 11 (2) (b) of the Court of. Appeal Rules, 2009, the applicant, Indian Ocean Hotels Ltd. t/a
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RUTAKANGWA, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MASSATI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 82 A OF 2010 INDIAN OCEAN HOTELS LTD. t/a GOLDEN TULIP DAR ES SALAAM
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING
/".1", IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 311 OF 1999 MWENGE GAS AND LUB OIL LTD PLAINTIFF VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM DEFENDANT RULING A.Shangwa,J. On 17/8/1999, DR.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DARE S SALAAM MAIN REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 36 OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DARE S SALAAM MAIN REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2008 1. WINSTON MABAGARA 2. NYANGINDU MARTINE 3. MOFEST AUGUSTINE APPLICANTS 4. GEORGE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA COMMERCIAL DIVISION AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC.COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.70 OF 2013 VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA COMMERCIAL DIVISION AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC.COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.70 OF 2013 1. ANDREW WISTON KALELA NDIMBO 1 st APPLICANT 2. CHRISTINA ANDREW NDIMBO 2 nd APPLICANT VERSUS 1.
More informationELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants ATTORNEY GENERAL AND TWO OTHERS...RESPONDENTS
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., MSOFFE, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2006 ELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants
More informationCitation Parties Legal Principles Discussed
1 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2007- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM- MSOFFE, J.A, KAJI, J. A; and RUTAKANGWA, J. A. 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C Appeal No.19/2011 S.C. (HC) CA LA No.261/10 WP/HCCA/Kalutara
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CHARLES MUSAMA NYIRABU PLAINTIFF VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN (DSM) CITY COMMISSION & OTHERS...
l@ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CHARLES MUSAMA NYIRABU PLAINTIFF VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN (DSM) CITY COMMISSION & OTHERS...DEFENDANT Mr. Jasson, Advocate, for 1st Defendant and Mr. Ngalo,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM 1. ATTORNEY GENERAL} 2. T.R.A RULING Mlay, J. This ruling is on a preliminary objection on points of law to an application for leave to apply for the orders
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ERNEST MANENO SHIJA VERSUS MAZINGA CORPORATION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Date of last Order: 19/09/2006 Date of Ruling: 06/11/2007 Mlay, J. Mzinga Corporation is
More informationappeal, it is desirable to state the following, albeit briefly.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A.; BWANA, J.A. AND MANDIA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2008 SHENGENA LTD...... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4453 OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY. APPELLANT VERSUS TINY @ ANTONY & ORS..RESPONDENTS J UD
More informationREGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED... RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2007 REGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED.... RESPONDENT (Application for
More information(CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2008 1. MIRE ARTAN ISMAIL....1 ST APPELLANT 2. ZAINABU MZEE...2 ND APPELLANT
More informationAr_JlAB K~ ~bij.bb.m
/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA Ar_JlAB K~ ~bij.bb.m CIVIL CASE NO. 247 OF 1997 BASIL NICHOLAS ALEXANDER JENNINGS BRAMLY VERSUS 1. PHOKION FILIOS 2. A & F CONTRACTORS 3. EXPO TANZANIA LTD LTD. KAI!Rm~..x_A-,--.J._L
More information1 ST ADILI BANCORP LIMITED.APPELLANT VERSUS ISSA HUSSEIN SAMMA...RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 78 OF 2006 1 ST ADILI BANCORP LIMITED.APPELLANT VERSUS ISSA HUSSEIN SAMMA....RESPONDENT
More informationDate of last Order. Date of Ruling
Date of last Order Date of Ruling TIMA HAJI through the services of K. MWITTAWAISSAKA ADVOCATE,has made an application by Chamber Summons under the Civil Procedure Code 1966 seeking from this court, the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER VERSUS 1. OYSTERBAY PROPERTIES LTD 1 st RESPONDENT
More information2yh August, Supplement No THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT (CAP.
ISSN 0856-034X Supplement No. 34 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 2yh August, 2014 to the Gazette of the United Republic of Tanzania No. 35 Vol 95 dated 2cjh August, 2014 Printed by the Government Printer, Dar es
More information2 October, & 16 November, 2006.
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ( RAMADHANL J. A,: MUNUO. J. A.: And KILEO, J. A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2000 SALIMA HUSSEIN... APPELLANT VERSUS HUSSEIN IBRAHIM SADIKI & SONS... RESPONDENT
More informationCivil Appeal No 4 of 2003 in the court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam
1 Civil Appeal No 4 of 2003 in the court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam DAHABURALI E. SHAMJI TADEMA OVERSEAS LIMITED Vs. 1. The Treasury Registrar Ministry of Finance Tanzania. 2. The Attorney
More informationR U L I N G. The Plaintiff has instituted this suit against the Defendants jointly and severally with prayers as follows:-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION) AT DAR ES SALAAM LAND CASE NO. 4 OF 2011 BRITANIA BISCUITS LIMITED. PLAINTIFF VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED 1 ST DEFENDANT SILVANUS BENEDICT MLOLA..2
More informationIn this omnibus application there are two basic prayers. Extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal AND leave
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., KILEO, J.A., And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2010 RUTAGATINA C.L. APPLICANT VERSUS 1. THE ADVOCATES COMMITTEE 2. CLAVERY
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION. (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.) APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2013 (ARISING FROM APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2012)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM IN THE MATTER OF THE LAW REFORM (FATAL ACCIDENTS AND MISC. PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE CAP.360 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ALLAN T. MATERU APPELLANT / APPLICANT VERSUS AKIBA COMMERCIAL BANK... RESPONDENT
..... --...,:. IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ALLAN T. MATERU APPELLANT / APPLICANT VERSUS AKIBA COMMERCIAL BANK... RESPONDENT The applicant, Allan Materu, sued his former employer, Akiba
More informationCitation Parties Legal Principles Discussed. Valambhia, Civil Application No.18 of 1993 (Unreported). J.A, NSEKELA, - that it has inherent J.
1 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CRIMINAL ROBERT EDWARD The Court may only review APPLICATION MORINGE@KADOGOO its decisions as spelt out in NO.9 OF 2005 VS THE REPUBLIC- Chandrakand Joshubhai
More informationCivil Application No. 06 of 2014.
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA {Coram: Dr. Kisaakye, JSC. and Dr. Odoki, Tsekooko, Okello & Kitumba, Ag. JJSC.} Civil Application No. 06 of 14. 1 LUKWAGO ERIAS LORD MAYOR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 (From the Ruling of The Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisutu in Civil Case No.78 of 1997 Mgetta, ISSA. H. NANGUPECHI. SRM)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., MASSATI,J.A., And MUGASHA,J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., MASSATI,J.A., And MUGASHA,J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 171 OF 2015 1. JOHN PAUL SHIBUDA ~ 2.TANZANIAINTERNATIONA AGRI INPUT CO-L
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OFT AN ZAN IA (COMMERCIAL DIVTSfON) AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OFT AN ZAN IA (COMMERCIAL DIVTSfON) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO 70 OF 2017 (ARISING FROM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 127 OF 2016) BETWEEN MAN TRAC T ANZANTA LIMITED --------------------------------------------A
More informationThe appellants, through the services of the Women's Legal Aid. Centre (WLAC) lodged the present appeal to challenge the dismissal of
1 IN THE COURTOF APPEALOF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM (CORAM: RAMAOHANI, C.l., MUNUO, l.a., RUTAKANGWA, l.a., KIMARO, l.a., And BWANA, l.a.) CIVIL APPEAL NO.4 OF 2007 ELIZABETH STEPHEN 1ST APPELLANT SALOME
More informationThis is an application for extension of time within which to lodge an. application for leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court sitting
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., RUTAKANGWA, J.A., And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 182 A OF 2007 SELINA CHIBAGO... APPLICANT VERSUS FINIHAS CHIBAGO... RESPONDENT
More informationJune was consistent with Art 2.3 (9) of the Constitution."
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE NO. 7 OF 1998 CORAM: HON. MR. JUSTICE S.T. MANYINDO, DC, HON. MR. JUSTICE G.M. OKELLO, J.A., HON. MR. JUSTICE
More informationGOVERNMENT NOTICE NO published on. THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT (CAP.141) RULES. (fv1ade under section 12) THE TANZANI COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009
GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO published on. THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT (CAP.141) RULES (fv1ade under section 12) THE TANZANI COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES CITATION PART 1 AND INTERPRET ATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT the demolition Notice cis 12(2) and 64 of the township Rules Cap. 101. district and Dar es Salaam Region, erecting a Dwelling house
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)
Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed TANZANIA SEWING MACHINES COMPANY LIMITED Vs. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.56 of 2007 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Munuo, J.A MJAKE ENTERPRISES LIMITED.
More informationRAMADHANI, C.J., LUBUVA, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) KAPINGA & COMPANY ADVOCATES... APPELLANT VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED...
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., LUBUVA, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2007 KAPINGA & COMPANY ADVOCATES... APPELLANT VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF
More informationDenis Wafula Okinda v Linus Ouma Asiba & 5 others [2017] eklr
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE POLITICAL PARTIES DISPUTES TRIBUNAL AT NAIROBI COMPLAINT NO. 24 OF 2017 BETWEEN DENIS WAFULA OKINDA CLAIMANT/APPLICANT AND LINUS OUMA ASIBA....1 ST DEFENDANT THE RETURNING OFFICER
More information(CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2004 VICTOR FRANK ISHEBABI (a person of weak mind by his next friend) MAHAMOUD
More informationIn the Resident Magistrate Court of Shinyanga sitting at Shinyanga, the appellant KAUNGUZA S/O MACHEMBA was charged with four counts.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TABORA (CORAM: LUANDA, J.A., ORIYO, J.A., And KAIJAGE, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 157B OF 2013 KAUNGUZA S/O MACHEMBA... APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC... RESPONDENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER
Case 2:13-cv-00274-EJL Document 7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ST. ISIDORE FARM LLC, and Idaho limited liability company; and GOBERS, LLC., a Washington
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL C.R.P. (CRP.ART.227) NO. 32 OF 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL C.R.P. (CRP.ART.227) NO. 32 OF 2014 The Planning and Development Authority, Manipur through its Secretary, having its Office at North AOC, P.O. Imphal, Imphal East
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2013 VENANT MASENGE...APPLICANT VERSUS
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION (Coram: Isaac Lenaola, DPJ, Faustin Ntezilyayo, J, Monica K. Mugenyi J.) APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2013 (Arising from Reference No. 9 of
More informationTHE SUMATRA (COMPLAINTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURE) RULES, 2008
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE SUMATRA (COMPLAINTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURE) RULES, 2008 [GN. No. 15 OF 2008] PRINTED BYTHE GOVERNMENT PRINTER, DAR ES SALAAM-TANZANIA ANDAND THE SUMATRA (COMPLAINTS AND
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017 1. SMTI. TETERI DEVI, Wife of Late Mohendra Harizon. 2. SHRI RAMANANDA HARIZON, Son of Late Mohendra
More informationCivil Revision PRESENT: THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE KALIDAS MUKHERJEE Judgment on:
Civil Revision PRESENT: THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE KALIDAS MUKHERJEE Judgment on: 29.01.2010. C.O. NO. 3691 OF 2008 Kallol Kumar Das Vs. Kanan Bala Das & Ors. Point: New Connection: A tenant against whom a
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIIVIL APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2006 STANBIC BANK TANZANIA LTD.. APPLICANT VERSUS
1 Civil Application No 111 of 2006 court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam Msoffe, J.A Stanbic Bank Tanzania Ltd Vs Plexus Cotton Ltd (Application for stay of execution from decision of High Court
More informationTHE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006 This edition of the Tax Revenue Appeals Act, Cap. 408 incorporates all amendments up to 30th November, 2006
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA In an application for Leave to Appeal/Appeal in terms of Section 5(c) (1) of the High Court of the Provinces (Special Provisions)(Amendment)
More information(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2003 MR. ANJUM VICAR SALEEM ABDI.. APPELLANT VERSUS MRS. NASEEM AKHTAR SALEEM
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG ELIZABETH MATLAKALA BODIBE
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 490/15 In the matter between: ELIZABETH MATLAKALA BODIBE Applicant and PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL DANIEL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CS(OS)No.1307/2006 Date of decision:16th January, 2009 SMT. TARAN JEET KAUR... Through: Plaintiff Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Reserve: January 14, Date of Order: January 21, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION Date of Reserve: January 14, 2008 Date of Order: January 21, 2009 CS(OS) No.2582/2008 and IA No.425/2009 M/S DRISHTICON PROPERTIES
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA (Coram: Moijo M. ole Keiwua P, Joseph Mulenga VP, Augustino S. L. Ramadhani J, Kasanga Mulwa J, Joseph S. Warioba J) REFERENCE NO. 1 OF 2006 PROF. PETER ANYANG
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2011 Claim No: 386 ( NINA SOMKHISHVILI Claimant/Respondent ( BETWEEN ( AND ( ( NIGG, CHRISTINGER & PARTNER Defendants/Applicants (YOSIF SHALOLASHVILI ( PALOR COMPANY
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA (Coram: Moijo M. ole Keiwua P, Augustino S. L. Ramadhani J, Kasanga Mulwa J, Mary Stella Arach-Amoko J. and Harold R. Nsekela J) REFERENCE NO. 2 OF 2007 BETWEEN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 38 OF VERSUS RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2003. MR. HAMIS A. E. MKORA APPLICANT VERSUS THE CHIEF SECRETARY PRESIDENTSOFFICE & OTHERS... RESPONDENT Date of last Order:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8241 OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT VERSUS DIDAR SINGH & ANR. RESPONDENTS N.V. RAMANA, J. JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2008
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2008 The Saraswat Co-operative Bank Limited (Formerly Maratha Mandir Co-operative Bank Limited)
More informationAT DODOMA DOM CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF HARUNI PIASON 2. IBRAHIM MTANI... APPLICANTS VERSUS DORINA NDALIJE...
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA CRIMINAL APPLICATIO N NO. 1 OF 2007 MSOFFE, J.A 1] HARUNI PIASON 2)IBRAHIM TANI VS DORINA NDALIJE (Applicatio n for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against
More informationEric Kyalo Mutua v Wiper Democratic Movement & another [2017] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE POLITICAL PARTIES DISPUTES TRIBUNAL AT NAIROBI
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE POLITICAL PARTIES DISPUTES TRIBUNAL AT NAIROBI COMPLAINT NO. 306 OF 2017 ERIC KYALO MUTUA........CLAIMANT -VERSUS- WIPER DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT.. 1 ST RESPONDENT GIDEON MUTEMI MULYUNGI..2
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO. 89 OF 2016 VERSUS RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO. 89 OF 2016 WENGERT WINDROSE SAFARIS (TANZANIA) LIMITED APPLICANT VERSUS THE MINISTER FOR NATURAL
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 149/2000 1. Musstt. Sufia Khatun, W/O Late Danish Ali. 2. Md. Mintu Sheikh alias
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION)
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION) HCT - 00 - CC - OS 248-2007 (Arising out of Civil Suit No. 735 2006) INSPECTORATE OF GOVERNMENT ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
More informationENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT ACT
LAWS OF KENYA ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT ACT NO. 19 OF 2011 Revised Edition 2015 [2012] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. M/s Raptakos, Brett & Co. Ltd... Appellant(s) J U D G M E N T. 1) The above appeal has been filed against the judgment
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1464 OF 2008 M/s Raptakos, Brett & Co. Ltd.... Appellant(s) Versus M/s Ganesh Property... Respondent(s) J U D G M
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7843 OF 2009 CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEE, APPELLANT(s) SRI RAM MANDIR JAGTIAL KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT, A.P VERSUS S. RAJYALAXMI
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 013 OF 2014 BETWEEN
5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (Coram: Katureebe; C.J., Tumwesigye; Arach-Amoko; Mwangusya; Mwondha; JJ.S.C.) 10 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 013 OF 2014 BETWEEN 15 KAMPALA CAPITAL
More informationTrial of Civil Suits And Criminal Cases
Trial of Civil Suits And Criminal Cases justice Mohammad Hamidul TRIAL OF CIVIL SUITS Contents Jurisdiction of civil courts 1-8 Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Territorial Jurisdiction of civil courts Legal
More informationcourt of appeal rules
court of appeal rules TABLE OF CONTENTS Court of Appeal 1 Title PART I Title and Interpretation 2 Interpretation Part II Purpose and Application of the Rules 3 Purpose of rules 4 Application of the rules
More informationPrem Lala Nahata & Anr vs Chandi Prasad Sikaria on 2 February, 2007
Supreme Court of India Prem Lala Nahata & Anr vs Chandi Prasad Sikaria on 2 February, 2007 Author: P Balasubramanyan Bench: S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 446 of 2007 PETITIONER:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTEMPT OF COURT. Contempt case No. 293/2003 (With CM No /2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTEMPT OF COURT Contempt case No. 293/2003 (With CM No. 12091/2006) Reserved on : October 13, 2006 Pronounced On : November 13, 2006 DARYA GANJ J.M.T.C.H.B.S.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Dated of Reserve: July 21, Date of Order : September 05, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Dated of Reserve: July 21, 2008 Date of Order : September 05, 2008 CM(M) No.819/2007 Rajiv Sud...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta
More informationBETWEEN: AND AND RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 28 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/M/8529/13 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REVISION NO. 57 OF 2004 MAH MUD SHAMTE APPLICANT VERSUS MARY SHAMTE RESPONDENT RULING A. Shangwa,J. On 14 th May, 2004, learned counsel for the applicant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GITHINJI, SICHALE & KANTAI, JJ. A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 97 OF 2016 (UR 76/2016)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GITHINJI, SICHALE & KANTAI, JJ. A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 97 OF 2016 (UR 76/2016) BETWEEN SATROSE AYUMA... 1 ST APPLICANT JOSEPH SHIKANGA....2 ND APPLICANT JOSEPH
More informationTANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD...APPLICANT/J.DEBTOR INTEREBEST INVESTMENT CO. LIMITED.RESPONDENT/D. HOLDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 68 OF 2000 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD....APPLICANT/J.DEBTOR VERSUS INTEREBEST INVESTMENT CO. LIMITED.RESPONDENT/D.
More informationpc. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 (Original Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 IIala District Court before Mr. Mnengo H.M.)
AT DAR ES SALAAM pc. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 (Original Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 IIala District Court before Mr. Mnengo H.M.) CHARLES MOSES.... APPELLANT I APPLICANT VERSUS Date of last order - 21/12/2007
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FAO (OS) No.178/2008. Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FAO (OS) No.178/2008 Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008 Judgment pronounced on : 9th January, 2009 Ms. Jyotika Kumar...
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D SECOND TIME LIMITED. KISS THIS LIMITED (dba Tackle Box Bar and Grill )
CLAIM NO. 222 OF 2015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2015 BETWEEN: SECOND TIME LIMITED Claimant AND KISS THIS LIMITED (dba Tackle Box Bar and Grill ) Defendant In Court. BEFORE: Hon. Chief Justice
More informationGOLDEN RULES OF DRAFTING. Paper by James O Reilly SC Monday 23 rd March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS 1
BAR COUNCIL SEMINAR GOLDEN RULES OF DRAFTING Paper by James O Reilly SC Monday 23 rd March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTORY OBSERVATIONS 1 II. THE ANATOMY OF AN AFFIDAVIT.1 III. THE ANATOMY OF A
More informationTHE LAW OF LIMITATION ACT, 1971 PART I. Title PART II
THE LAW OF LIMITATION ACT, TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART I PRELIMINARY Title PART II LIMITATION OF ACTIONS 3. Dismissal of proceedings instituted after period of limitation.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: SAMATTA, C.J, MUNUO,J, A, AND RUTAKANGWA, J, A.)
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed SULTAN S/O Non-compliance with the MOHAMED VS provisions of section 240 (3) of the THE REPUBLIC. Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 (Appeal from the R.E 2002 is
More information#1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. MR RAJBIR ORS... Defendant Through: Ex Parte
#1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 222/2016 TATA SONS LIMITED Through:... Plaintiff Ms. Geetanjali Visvanathan with Ms. Asavari Jain, Advocates versus MR RAJBIR JINDAL @ ORS...
More informationRULING OF THE COURT. The appellant, John s/o Ayoub was charged in the District. Court of Tunduru in Ruvuma Region with two economic offences;
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT IRINGA (CORAM: MBAROUK, J.A., MMILLA,J.A., And MWARIJA,J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2014 JOHN IKLAND @ AYOUB APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC. RESPONDENT (Appeal
More information