IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No of Decided On:
|
|
- Marsha Melanie Gilbert
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Hon'ble Judges: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD Civil Misc. Writ Petition No of 2010 Decided On: Appellants: Shiva Ent Udyog Vs. Respondent: National Human Rights Commission and Ors. Sunil Ambwani and Jayashree Tiwari, JJ. Acts/Rules/Orders: Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 2, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 3, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 12, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 12(1), Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 13, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 13(4), Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 193, Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, Section 228; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act; Protection of Human Rights Act, Section 13, Protection of Human Rights Act, Section 14, Protection of Human Rights Act, Section 14(2), Protection of Human Rights Act, Section 18; Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Indian Penal Code - Section 196, Indian Penal Code - Section 196(5) Disposition: Petition dismissed JUDGMENT 1. We have heard Shri Shashi Nandan, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Nitin Gupta for the Petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State Respondents. 2. The Petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated issued by the Assistant Registrar (Law) of the National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi, directing the District Magistrate, Bulandshahr to initiate action against the Petitioner under the provisions of 1 P a g e
2 Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, and to send action taken report to the Commission within six weeks. 3. The Petitioner is a firm, engaged in the business of running a brick kiln at village Dulhaira, Vair Road, Tehsil Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahr, U.P. in the name and style of 'Shiva Bhatta'. One Shri Gopal son of Shri Bahori resident of Banal, Tehsil Shikarpur, Police Station Pahasu, District Bulandshahr made a complaint to National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), alleging that he along with his family members are held as bonded labourers by one Shri Pappan and Babu owners of 'Shiva Bhatta' situated at village Dulehara, Vair Road, District Bulandshahr. He also alleged ill-treatment and misbehaviour with women; nonpayment of wages and restrictions placed on their movement. The Commission was requested to rescue them and other persons held as bonded labourers. 4. The Director General (Investigation) NHRC was directed by the Commission to depute competent authority and to take appropriate action in the matter, as some officers of the district administration could not be examined. A further direction was given on to look into the matter. The investigation team of NHRC submitted a report after examining the documents, and the persons available on the spot and the district authorities. 5. The Commission found that a Head Constable Khurshid AH, P.S. Kotwali, Sikandrabad, had first enquired into the matter and submitted a report that there was no one at the brick kiln found as bonded labour. The Commission was of the opinion, that the police officer did not have any authority to either enquire into the matter or to verify the register, books of accounts etc. 6. The Commission further found that the District Magistrate, Bulandshahr had marked the complaint to the Assistant Labour Commissioner, who in turn directed the Labour Officer to enquire into the matter. The Labour Officer submitted a report after examining the brick kiln owners, reporting that the labourers have gone back to their home on On the statement of the employer, the non-payment of wages was not established. The brick kiln owner did not produce the register and documents relating to wages and attendance before the Labour Officer. A challan was submitted against the brick kiln owner. 7. The Assistant Registrar (Law), NHRC observed that the Sub Divisional Magistrate did not enquire into the matter. The Additional District Magistrate had appeared before the Commission and informed, that the Sub Divisional Magistrate forwarded the report to the District Magistrate. The State Government, for the reasons best known to itself, had stayed the notification under the Minimum Wages Act for the category of employment. So far as the wages of Rs per thousand brick is concerned, there was no such power with the State Government to notify the rates. By indirect method, the wages are being fixed between employer and employees. The Additional District Magistrate did not bother to collect any 2 P a g e
3 documents or agreement which may have been entered into between the workers of the brick kiln and the owners. No settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act before the Conciliation Officer was entered into or produced to verify the payment of wages. The brick kiln owner did not produce the relevant records, on which the employer was fined for Rs. 250/-. Instead of protecting the interest of the labourers, the NHRC found that all the authorities got together to protect the brick kiln owner. 8. The Assistant Registrar (Law), NHRC, thereafter recorded finding that one Shri Deep Chand Thekedar brought families to the brick kiln, and had paid different amounts in advance to the labourers ranging from Rs at the village. After their arrival at the brick kiln, the owners had paid the labourers ranging from Rs. 20,000 to Rs. 40,000 each. The books of account, registers, wage slips were not maintained. The brick kiln owner thereafter detained them at the brick kiln, until he had recovered the advance. On the arrival of the police, they were set free, and in the process the payment of minimum wages was forgotten by all concerned. No one had taken action for enforcement and payment of minimum wages at all. 9. Shri Shashi Nandan appearing for the Petitioner submits that on the material available before the NHRC, it could not have come to the conclusion, that the Petitioner had committed any offence under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (in short, the Act of 1976). The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, does not give powers to the National Human Rights Commission to record findings of violations of law and for taking action under the Act of 1976 unless there was sufficient material to arrive at such finding. The Act of 1993 provides for limited powers for enquiries in case of detention of a person. The direction given to the District Magistrate passed in haste without giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, and without making out the basic ingredients of the offence under the Act of 1976, is entirely illegal and is required to be set aside by this Court. 10. The documents annexed to the writ petition would show that the complaint was made to the District Magistrate, Bulandshahr on alleging that the Applicants are poor, dalit labourers belonging to 'Jatav' caste working at 'Shiv Bhatta'. They are engaged as labourers, for pathai and other manual work by Shri Pappan & Babu - the owners of the brick kiln. They were not paid wages for six months. They were abused and threatened, if they demand their wages. They do not have any other source of income and were finding it difficult to maintain their families. They wanted to be released from the brick kiln, to work at some other place. The complaint was made by Shri Gopal son of Shri Bahori and 19 other persons including minor children. The police officers, who visited the spot after receiving the complaint from the District Magistrate, reported that the complainants were working at the brick kiln. They had some differences with the contractor on payment of wages on which they had under some instigation lodged the complaint. The allegations in the complaint were not found to be true and were baseless. The report was accompanied with signed statements of some labourers dated including some of the complainants namely Kalawati; Arti; Ajai; Suresh; 3 P a g e
4 Gyan Singh; Geeta and Khushbu who had stated that they had made the complaint under some ones instructions. They are living at the brick kiln and that they had no complaint against the owner of the brick kiln nor they have any dues to be paid by him. The Labour Enforcement Officer, Sikandrabad visited the brick kiln ten days after the police had visited the spot. He had relied upon the statement given to the police that the complainants had no further grievance, and arrear of wages due to be paid, and that they had left the brick kiln on their own. Shri Satish Babu had given statement that some workmen were engaged by him for Pathai which were on Rs. 2000/- per thousand brick. They were not bonded labourers. They were paid at the interval of 15 days and were living at the brick kiln. The Labour Enforcement Officer reported that the complainants had left the brick kiln but that the brick kiln owner did not produce the attendance register; payment register and the register under the Minimum Wages Act, He enclosed the statement of brick kiln owner dated The Sub Divisional Magistrate visited the spot on and confirmed the facts found by the Labour Enforcement Officer. He also relied upon the report of the police and Labour Enforcement Officer and the statements of the brick kiln owner and recorded the statement of one Shri Hira Lal and Deep Chand. They were not the complainant. These persons stated that there were some dispute between the workmen and the brick kiln owner on which they have left the brick kiln to some where else. There were no dues pending to be paid to them. The Assistant Labour Commissioner, Bulandshahr also filed a similar report. 11. In the statement of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sikandrabad dated same facts were repeated with the admission that the required registers and documents were not maintained by the brick kiln owner. The Additional District Magistrate reiterated the statement on There is absolutely nothing to show that the complaint was investigated by the police. The Labour Enforcement Officer or the Sub Divisional Magistrate also did not make enquires. All of them recorded statements of brick kiln owner and some labourers who were found on the brick kiln. Their reports were based only on the material produced by the brick kiln owner. 13. The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 was enacted to fulfill the obligation of the Government of India as a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 16th December, Though the human rights as embodied in the covenant stand substantially protected by the Constitution, the growing concern in the country and abroad about issues relating to human rights, the changing social realities and the emerging trends in the nature of crime and violence, and the review of the existing laws required greater accountability and transparency of the enforcement of the existing laws, procedures and system of administration of justice. It was thought proper to devise efficient methods of dealing with the situation. The human rights are defined under Section 2(d) to mean rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual 4 P a g e
5 guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and enforceable by Courts in India. The "International Covenants" have been defined under Section 2(f) as substituted by Act 43 of 2006 to mean the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on the 16th December, 1966 and such other Covenant or Convention adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations as the Central Government may, by notification, specify. 14. The National Commission of Human Rights constituted under Section 3, is the highest body for protection of human rights in the country chaired by a Chairperson, who has been a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and consists of members one of whom is or has been Chief Justice of the High Court; two persons having knowledge of, or practical experience in matters relating to human rights are appointed as members. The Chairperson of National Commission for Minorities; National Commission for the Scheduled Castes, the National Commission for the Scheduled Tribes and the National Commission for Women, are its deemed members. 15. The functions and powers of the National Human Rights Commission are enumerated in Section 12 including in Section 12(1), such other functions as the Commission may consider necessary for the promotion of human rights. The violation of human rights or abetment thereof; negligence in the prevention of such violation by a public servant is also under the purview of the enquiries either suo motu or on a petition presented to it by a victim. The Commission may intervene in any proceedings, visit any jail or other institutions where persons are detained; review the safeguards provided under the Constitution or any law for the time being in force for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation. 16. The Commission is given powers under Section 13 of a Civil Court trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and has power of summoning and requiring any person, subject to privilege which may be claimed by him to furnish information on such points or matters as are useful for making enquiries. It shall be deemed to be a Civil Court under Sub-section (4) and proceedings are judicial proceedings within the meaning of Section 193 and 228 and for the purposes of Section 196 of the Indian Penal Code, under Sub-section (5). In the investigation under Section 14 the Commission can utilize the services of any officer or investigation agency of the Central Government or any State Government, which may be subject to the directions and control of the Commission under Sub-section (2) to summon and enforce the attendance of any person and examine him; require the discovery and production of any document and requisition of any public records. 17. After enquiry the Commission may take any of the steps provided in Section 18 including the payment of compensation or damages to the complainant or to the victims or members of 5 P a g e
6 his family, if any violation.of human rights or negligence in the prevention of violation of human rights is found. The Commission can also initiate proceeding for prosecution and for suitable action as it may deem fit against the person or persons under Sub-section (a) of Section In the present case the Commission has not taken any action by imposing any damages or in recommending prosecution under Section 18 against the concerned persons to the concerned Government. It has, after recording prima facie findings that the enquiry conducted by the District Magistrate through the Additional District Magistrate and Sub Divisional Magistrate and Labour Enforcement Officer, was insufficient and that the facts brought out in the complaints were verified by non-maintenance of any records by the brick kiln owners and for non payment of the minimum wages, directed the District Magistrate, which is included within the meaning of authority under Section 18(a) to initiate action in the matter and submit action taken report within six weeks. 19. The submission of Shri Shashi Nandan, that the violations under Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 was not established and that in any case the National Human Rights Commission has no authority to direct implementation of the Act of 1976 and for prosecution under the Act is wholly unfounded. His further argument, that prima facie findings do not establish any violation of the Act of 1976 completely overlooks the definition of the Bonded Labour System defined under Section 2(g) and its abolition under Section The complaint in substance alleged that one Shri Deep Chand Thekedar had paid different amounts in advance to the families to work at the brick kiln at the rate ranging from Rs to Rs. 4000/- at the village and on the arrival at the brick kiln the owner paid an amount ranging from Rs. 20,000/- to Rs. 40,000/- to the labourers. In lieu of this amount of which no record was kept despite mandate of law, they were required to work at the brick kiln. This system of payment is not only in violation of the Minimum Wages Act and Payment of Wages Act, but also clearly amounts to Bonded Labour System which means a system of forced or partly forced labour under which a surety for a debtor enters, or has, or is presumed to have entered into an agreement with the creditor to the effect that in consideration of an advance and in consideration of interest by any of his lineal ascendants or descendants and in consideration of the interest, where such advance is evidenced by any document, would be treated as bonded labour system, in addition to any customary or social obligation or any obligation devolving of succession or for any economic consideration received by him or by any of his lineal ascendants or descendants. The definition of bonded labour system is very wide, and includes in the explanation any system of forced or partly forced labour under which any workman including contract labour as defined in Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 or an Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 is required to render labour or service in circumstances of the 6 P a g e
7 nature mentioned in sub Clause (1) of the clause and is subjected to all or any of the disabilities under sub Clauses (2) to (4). 21. If an amount is advanced in consideration of promise to engage in work, coupled with some more advance paid it has to be presumed that the parties to the arrangement entered into an agreement of labour in consideration of such advance, whether or not it is evidenced by any document, taken by him or any of his lineal ascendants or descendants being the economic consideration for such work is included in the bonded labour system. This arrangement has to be deemed to be included, of forced labour or forfeiture of the freedom of the employment or any other means of livelihood and to move freely throughout the country. This form of contract labour is also included in the bonded labour system. 22. The submission, that the bonded labour system must precede a debt which is to be repaid by manual labour, is too narrow and a limited understanding by the bonded labour system prevalent in the country. The definition of bonded labour system under Section 2(g) of the Act of 1976 takes into consideration all kind of systems of forced labour prevalent in the country, including the forced labour performed by the labourers at the brick kiln in consideration to the amount advanced to bring them to the site of the work and thereafter payment made to them as a consideration of the agreement of work. It is nothing but a bond under which they have to work forfeiting their freedom of employment or any other means of livelihood or to move freely throughout the territory of India. 23. Coming to the present case we find that the complaint included all the elements of bonded labour system as defined under Sub-section (2) (g) of the Act of It was not investigated properly by the police, administration and the Labour Enforcement Officer. They simply took the statement of brick kiln owner and the workers, who are found to be working other than the complainant on the site. The district administration and labour enforcement authorities were required to conduct a detailed enquiry to find out whether the brick kiln owner had engaged them on giving advance forfeiting their rights arising out of their employment and freedom of their livelihood. A police Constable and thereafter the Sub Divisional Magistrate completed the formality of inspecting the brick kiln and thereafter the Labour Enforcement Officer. 24. The violation of the The Bonded Labour System, (Abolition) Act of 1976, is without any doubt a violation of human rights as defined under Section 2(d) and (f) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 for which the National Human Rights Commission has the authority conferred by the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, to enquire, investigate and to take steps provided under Sections 13, 14 and 16 of the Act. 25. The writ petition is dismissed. 7 P a g e
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006]
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006] THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, 1993* No. 10 of 1994 (8th January, 1994)
More informationThe Protection of Human Rights Act, No 10 of 1994
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 No 10 of 1994 An Act to provide for the constitution of a National Human Rights Commission. State Human Rights Commission in States and Human Rights Courts for
More informationTHE BONDED LABOUR SYSTEM (ABOLITION) ACT, 1976 ACT NO. 19 OF 1976 [9th February, 1976.] An Act to provide for the abolition of bonded labour system
THE BONDED LABOUR SYSTEM (ABOLITION) ACT, 1976 ACT NO. 19 OF 1976 [9th February, 1976.] An Act to provide for the abolition of bonded labour system with a view to preventing the economic and physical exploitation
More informationTHE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR CHILDREN BILL, DRAFT BILL. Chapter-I. Preliminary
THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR CHILDREN BILL, 2001. A DRAFT BILL To constitute a National Commission for the better protection of child rights and for promoting the best interests of the child for matters
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981
81 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 82 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 Rules Contents Page No. 1. Title 83 2. Definition 83
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Reserved on : Date of decision :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Reserved on : 05.02.2009 Date of decision : 10.02.2009 Crl.M.C. 2296/2008 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. and ORS. Through: Petitioners
More informationTAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008
TAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008 The seven directives of the Supreme Court on bringing new reforms in the
More informationCopyright, Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, 2011
Introduction National Human Rights Institutions in India A Comparative Table Human rights institutions are meant to function as independent human rights watchdogs at the domestic level. Their key functions
More informationState Of A.P vs V. Sarma Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc on 10 November, 2006
Supreme Court of India State Of A.P vs V. Sarma Rao & Ors. Etc. Etc on 10 November, 2006 Author: S Sinha Bench: S.B. Sinha, Dalveer Bhandari CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 1136 of 2006 PETITIONER: State of A.P.
More informationContempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975
Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, 1992 Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975 THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS (CAT) RULES, 1992* In exercise of the powers conferred by section 23 of
More informationTHE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN (PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS, 2016 FOR DEALING WITH COMPLAINTS IN NRI CELL
THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN (PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS, 2016 FOR DEALING WITH COMPLAINTS IN NRI CELL National Commission for Women under section 9(2) of the National Commission for Women Act, 1990 (20
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner
More informationCentre for Child and the Law National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Judicial Decisions On Human Rights Institutions,2011 (Digest 2)
Judicial Decisions On Human Rights Institutions,2011 (Digest 2) Absence of power to set aside a concluded inquiry In Karanataka Antibiotics and Anr v. National Commission SC and ST 1, the Karnataka High
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINTS: INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION
HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINTS: INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION Introduction Dr.V.Ramaraj * The Protection of Human Rights Act was enacted in the year 1993. The main objectives of the Act is to provide for the
More informationBar & Bench (
Court No. - 9 Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 29706 of 2018 Petitioner :- Brijesh @ Puchchi Thru Mother Rajkumari Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru Prin Secy Home Lko & Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Srivastava,Devki
More informationFOOD SAFETY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
FOOD SAFETY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN Appeal Filing No. 820170076 Nestle India Ltd., through Nominee Shri Dharmendra Hansraj Kotak, Nestle India Ltd., M-5A, Connaught Circus, New Delhi (Head
More informationTHE RIGHT OF CITIZENS FOR TIME BOUND DELIVERY OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND REDRESSAL OF THEIR GRIEVANCES BILL, 2011
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 131 of 2011 THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS FOR TIME BOUND DELIVERY OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND REDRESSAL OF THEIR GRIEVANCES BILL, 2011 CLAUSES ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 70 of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth Year of
More informationBare Acts & Rules. Hello Good People! Free Downloadable Formats. LaLas
Bare Acts & Rules Free Downloadable Formats Hello Good People! LaLas ACT 1 OF 2007 THE KERALA FARMERS' DEBT RELIEF COMMISSION ACT, 2006 An Act to provide relief to those farmers who are in distress due
More informationBONDED LABOUR SYSTEM (ABOLITION) ACT, An Act to provide for abolition of bonded labour system
BONDED LABOUR SYSTEM (ABOLITION) ACT, 1992 An Act to provide for abolition of bonded labour system [11 March 1992] Whereas clause (2) of Article 11 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan
More informationCITIZENS RIGHT TO GRIEVANCE REDRESS BILL, A Bill. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
1 CITIZENS RIGHT TO GRIEVANCE REDRESS BILL, 2011 A Bill to lay down an obligation upon every public authority to publish citizens charter stating therein the time within which specified goods shall be
More information$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 Date of decision:
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 SHIV KUMAR & ANR. Through: Date of decision: 03.12.2015... Petitioners Mr.Vikas Padora and Mr.Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advocates. STATE versus
More informationCrl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017
Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 31.07.2017 Heard Mr. Pallab Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nava Kumar Kalita, learned Additional Public
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Criminal Appeal No of 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No of 2010) Decided On:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 1334 of 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1383 of 2010) Decided On: 31.08.2012 Appellants: State of N.C.T. of Delhi Vs. Respondent: Ajay Kumar Tyagi
More informationSupreme Court of India. S.N. Sharma vs Bipen Kumar Tiwari And Ors on 10 March, 1970
Supreme Court of India Equivalent citations: 1970 AIR 786, 1970 SCR (3) 946 Author: V Bhargava Bench: Bhargava, Vishishtha PETITIONER: S.N. SHARMA Vs. RESPONDENT: BIPEN KUMAR TIWARI AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Judgment reserved on:07.02.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 10.02.2012 W.P.(C) 734/2012 Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Another Petitioners Versus
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No(s) OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C ) No.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 3122 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C ) No. 34559 of 2016) Pooran Singh Appellant(s) VERSUS Dhaniram (since dead)
More informationTHE MADHYA PRADESH ACT NO. 37 of 1981
THE MADHYA PRADESH ACT NO. 37 of 1981 (Received the assent of the President on the 16 th September, 1981. Assent first published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette (Extra- ordinary) dated the 15 th October,
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 6.9.2007 Bill No. 70-C of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth
More informationKSR & Co Company Secretaries LLP PRACTISING COMPANY SECRETARIES & TRADE MARK AGENTS COIMBATORE & CHENNAI
KSR & Co Company Secretaries LLP PRACTISING COMPANY SECRETARIES & TRADE MARK AGENTS COIMBATORE & CHENNAI Assuring Assuring Compliances Compliances & Solutions & Solutions Beyond Beyond Challenge Challenge
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(C) 6034/2013 DATE OF DECISION :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(C) 6034/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 16.07.2014 SANDEEP KUMAR... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.G. Sharma, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA
More informationTHE RULES TO REGULATE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONTEMPT OF THE SUPREME COURT, 1975'
THE RULES TO REGULATE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONTEMPT OF ' In exercise of the powers under section 23 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with article 145 of the Constitution of India and all other powers
More informationW.P. (C) No. 8579/2007 Page 1 of 5
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI WP (C) No. 8579/2007 + DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION...Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Kumar Advocate. Versus MOHINDER PAL SHARMA...Respondent Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan
More informationCHAPTER 17. Lunatics. Part A GENERAL. (b) Lunatics for whose detention in an asylum a reception order has been passed.
Ch. 17 Part A] CHAPTER 17 Lunatics Part A GENERAL 1. Classification Lunatics may be classed as follows: (a) Criminal lunatics. (b) Lunatics for whose detention in an asylum a reception order has been passed.
More informationLAND (GROUP REPRESENTATIVES)ACT
LAWS OF KENYA LAND (GROUP REPRESENTATIVES)ACT CHAPTER 287 Revised Edition 2012 [1970] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev.
More informationTHE INDIAN JURIST
ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI 1 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.34251/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order
More informationThe Orissa Electricity (Duty) Act, 1961.
The Orissa Electricity (Duty) Act, 1961. An Act to levy a duty on the consumption of electrical energy on the State of Orissa. Be it enacted by the legislature of the State of Orissa in the Twelfth year
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 1048-1049 of 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos. 5064-5065 of 2010), Criminal Appeal Nos. 1050-1052 of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 5112-5114
More informationTHE INTER-STATE MIGRANT WORKMEN (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT, (No. 30 of 1979)
THE INTER-STATE MIGRANT WORKMEN (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT, 1979 (No. 30 of 1979) [11 th June, 1979] An Act to regulate the employment of inter-state migrant workmen and to
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012 M/S SUNDERLAL JAIN CHARITABLE HOSPITAL... Petitioner Through:
More informationMetropolitan Transport... vs The Presiding Officer on 15 March, Metropolitan Transport... vs The Presiding Officer on 15 March, 2004
Madras High Court In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 15/03/2004 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice R.Jayasimha Babu and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.Karpagavinayagam Writ Appeal No.64 of 2001
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8444/2011 Date of Decision: 29 th September, 2015 REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY... Petitioner Through Mr.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.857 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(Crl.) No.387/2018)
1 Non Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.857 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(Crl.) No.387/2018) OM PRAKASH SINGH...APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD. Cri. Misc. Writ Petition No of Decided On: Appellants: Dr. Mehboob Alam Vs.
Equivalent Citation: 2002CriLJ1218 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD Cri. Misc. Writ Petition No. 5896 of 2000 Decided On: 06.09.2001 Appellants: Dr. Mehboob Alam Vs. Respondent: State of U.P. and Ors. Hon'ble
More informationPREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DRUG DEPENDENCY ACT 20 OF 1992
Page 1 of 32 PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DRUG DEPENDENCY ACT 20 OF 1992 (English text signed by the State President) [Assented To: 3 March 1992] [Commencement Date: 30 April 1993 unless otherwise indicated]
More informationTHE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Prevention of sexual harassment. ARRANGEMENT
More informationCHAPTER 18:01 SOCIETIES
CHAPTER 18:01 SOCIETIES ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title 2. Act not to apply to certain societies 3. Interpretation 4. Appointment of Registrar of Societies 5. Societies deemed to be established
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 132 OF 2011 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 307 OF 2011 WRIT PETITION NO. 132 OF 2011 Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, 21 st Floor, RBI Building, Shahid
More informationEXTRAORDINARY Published by Authority
Regd. No. NW/CH-22 Regd. No. CHD/0092/2015-2017 Price : Rs 2.70 Part - I Part - II Part - III EXTRAORDINARY Published by Authority CHANDIGARH, WEDNESDAY, JULY 19, 2017 (ASADHA 28, 1939 SAKA) LEGISLATIVE
More informationAppendix C THE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS (PROTECTION) BILL, ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and
Appendix C THE REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS (PROTECTION) BILL, 2006 1 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Principles applicable to refugee
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Judgment delivered on: CS(OS) 2318/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Judgment delivered on: 14.08.2012 CS(OS) 2318/2006 MR. CHETAN DAYAL Through: Ms Yashmeet Kaur, Adv.... Plaintiff versus MRS. ARUNA MALHOTRA
More informationICSI-CCGRT. ICSI-CCGRT GEETA SAAR A Brief of Premier on Company Law. Registered Office of a company (Sec 12)
GEETA SAAR A Brief of Premier on Company Law 1. Company to have a Registered Office Registered Office of a company (Sec 12) The company shall have on and from fifteenth day of its incorporation and all
More informationTHE CRIMINAL LAW (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE, 1968
THE CRIMINAL LAW (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE, 1968 SECTIONS 1. Short title and extent. 2. Definitions. 3. Trial of scheduled offences. (W.P. Ord. II of 1968) C O N T E N T S 4. Cognizance of scheduled
More informationOBC OFFICER EMPLOYEES (DISCIPLINE & APPEAL) REGULATIONS, 1982
OBC OFFICER EMPLOYEES (DISCIPLINE & APPEAL) REGULATIONS, 1982 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 19 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 (40 of 1980)
More informationMaintenance Act 9 of 2003 section 49
MADE IN TERMS OF section 49 Government Notice 233 of 2003 (GG 3093) came into force on date of publication: 17 November 2003 The Government Notice which issues these regulations repeals the regulations
More informationImpact of enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the sections to the Companies Act, 2013
Impact of enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the sections to the Companies Act, 2013 Section 245 to 255 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 enlists the amendments, resulting
More informationBONDED LABOR FREE TO STARVE
BONDED LABOR FREE TO STARVE Bonded labor, also called debt bondage, is defined as a form of slavery by the Abolition of Forced Labor Convention 1957 (No 105) and a form of forced labor under ILO Forced
More informationE X T R A O R D I N A R Y PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
MANIPUR GAZETTE E X T R A O R D I N A R Y PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 601 Imphal, Saturday, December 24, 2011 (Pausa 3, 1933) GOVERNMENT OF MANIPUR SECRETARIAT : LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT N O
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 925/2015 Reserved on: Date of Decision: versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 925/2015 Reserved on: 09.12.2015 Date of Decision: 18.12.2015 RAJESH KUMAR Through... Petitioner Mr.Sumit Kumar, Mr.Pulkit Agarwal & Mr.Palav Agarwal,
More informationW.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI
BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....
More information27. Ins. by Act 27 of Ins. by Act 27 0f Ins. by Act 41 of 1986 (w.e.f ) 30. Subs. by Act 27 of 1973.
CHAPTER - II APPRENTICES AND THEIR TRAINING 3. Qualifications for being engaged as an apprentice - A person shall not be qualified for being engaged as an apprentice to undergo apprenticeship training
More informationLatestLaws.com. All About Process to Compel the Production of Things. Under Chapter VII of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973.
All About Process to Compel the Production of Things Under Chapter VII of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 By Pinky Dass Part A- ( Summons to Produce ) The law regarding processes to compel the production
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: 21.03.2012 W.P.(C) No.1616/2012 Ex. Constable Mohan Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents
More informationREGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No. 120 of 2010 % Date of Reserve: July 29, 2010 Date of Order: 12 th August, 2010 12.08.2010 MOHAN LAL JATIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Sud,
More informationIndian Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976
Indian Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 In exercise of the Powers conferred by Section 19 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 20007 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.16749 of 2010) Anil Kumar Singh...Appellant(s) VERSUS Vijay Pal Singh &
More informationThe Gazette of India. EXTRAORDINARY PART-II-Section 1 PUBLISHD BY AUTHORITY No.39, NEW DELHI, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1989/ BHADRA 21, 1911
The Gazette of India EXTRAORDINARY PART-II-Section 1 PUBLISHD BY AUTHORITY No.39, NEW DELHI, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1989/ BHADRA 21, 1911 MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Legislative Department) New Delhi,
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19)
COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19) IN exercise of the powers conferred on the Rules of Court Committee by Article 157(2) of the Constitution these Rules are made this 24th day of July, 1997. PART I-GENERAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 4674 of 2012 Mahendra Kumar Ruiya................Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand through. 2. Gautam Kumar Dubey..........Opp. Parties ----------
More informationKARNATAKA ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF 2012 THE KARNATAKA POLICE (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE, 2012 Arrangement of Sections
KARNATAKA ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF 2012 THE KARNATAKA POLICE (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE, 2012 Arrangement of Sections Sections: 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Substitution of section 6 3. Insertion of
More informationCHAPTER I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II THE ADVISORY BOARDS
SECTIONS THE CONTRACT LABOUR (REGULATION AND ABOLITION) ACT, 1970 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. 3. Central Advisory
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009. Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972. BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009 Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 16th January,2012 SUDESH KUMAR
More informationTHE KARNATAKA CATTLE TRESPASS ACT, 1966
1 THE KARNATAKA CATTLE TRESPASS ACT, 1966 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Statement of Objects and Reasons: Sections: CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II POUNDS AND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CCP 55/2000, 1141/99 and 82/1999 IN CS (OS) 635/1992. Judgment delivered on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 CCP 55/2000, 1141/99 and 82/1999 IN CS (OS) 635/1992 Judgment delivered on: 5.12.2007 ANAND KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR... Petitioners
More informationIN THE COURT OF KUSHAL SINGLA, PCS. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE Ist CLASS, CHANDIGARH.
IN THE COURT OF KUSHAL SINGLA, PCS. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE Ist CLASS, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Case No : 572 Date of Instt. : 17.2.2016 Date of decision : 12.6.2017 State Versus Rohit Sharma s/o Sh. MM Sharma r/o
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 133/2011 Reserved on: January 6, 2012 Decision on: January 9, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE EX.P. 133/2011 Reserved on: January 6, 2012 Decision on: January 9, 2012 AMAR SINGH SEWARA In person.... Petitioner versus REGIONAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Sections 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Ordinance (II) 2002 W.P.(C) 191/2008
More informationGOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU NOTIFICATION
679 GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU NOTIFICATION JAMMU, THE 6 TH December 1978. SRO 755. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 10 of the Jammu and Kashmir Good Conduct
More informationCentre for Child and the Law National Law School of India University, Bangalore. Judicial Decisions Relevant to Human Rights Institutions (Digest 1)
Judicial Decisions Relevant to Human Rights Institutions (Digest 1) The Supreme Court of India and the various High Courts have in several cases opined on the powers, jurisdiction, functions, and limitations
More informationThe Motor Dealers Act
1 MOTOR DEALERS c. M-22 The Motor Dealers Act Repealed by Chapter C-30.2 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2013 (effective February 1, 2016). Formerly Chapter M-22 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan,
More informationAct 7 of 1975 THE KEALA BUILDING TAX ACT, 1975 [6] An Act to provide for the levy of a tax on buildings
1 of 12 27/02/2013 11:25 PM Back >> Home Page >> Act Contents >> Location Map >> Principal Act >> Act 7 of 1975 THE KEALA BUILDING TAX ACT, 1975 [6] S I D E M E N U An Act to provide for the levy of a
More informationTHE GRAM NYAYALAYAS BILL, 2008
i TO BE INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. XLVII of 2008 THE GRAM NYAYALAYAS BILL, 2008 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CLAUSES 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions.
More informationMaheshwary Ispat Limited vs Tata Capital Financial Services... on 17 April, 2015
Calcutta High Court Maheshwary Ispat Limited vs Tata Capital Financial Services... on 17 April, 2015 Author: Banerjee Form No. J.(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original
More informationTHE KARNATAKA SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PROHIBITION OF TRANSFER OF CERTAIN LANDS) ACT, 1978
1 THE KARNATAKA SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PROHIBITION OF TRANSFER OF CERTAIN LANDS) ACT, 1978 Statement of Object and Reasons Sections: 1. Short title and commencement. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
More informationK.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT. 2. By the order impugned, the High Court. of Madhya Pradesh has negatived the challenge
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S) 547 OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL] NO.6064 OF 2017] K.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S)
More informationJ U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 5124/06) A.K. MATHUR, J.
Supreme Court of India State Of West Bengal vs Dinesh Dalmia on 25 April, 2007 Author: A Mathur Bench: A.K.Mathur, Tarun Chatterjee CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 623 of 2007 PETITIONER: State of West Bengal
More informationAtyant Pichhara Barg Chhatra Sangh & Another Vs Jharkhand State Vaishya Federation & Others Civil
Atyant Pichhara Barg Chhatra Sangh & Another Vs Jharkhand State Vaishya Federation & Others Civil Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.:- Leave granted. CASE NUMBER Appeal No. 3430 of 2006 EQUIVALENT CITATION 2006-(007)-JT-0514-SC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1051 of 2013 Umesh Prasad Gupta.. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Birbal Singh Munda... Opposite Parties Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY.
More informationHigh Cour~ of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu
1 High Cour~ of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu Notification No:- ~~ Dated:- L. S' \ ~ \~ '8 In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 2 3 of the J&K Contempt of Courts Act- 1997, (Act No. XXY of 1997)
More informationThe Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999
The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 30 th December, 1999, and is hereby published for general information: The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and
More informationA.F.R. ***** This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
1 Court No. - 25 Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 4136 of 2015 Applicant :- Arvind Kejriwal Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P And Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahmood Alam,Mohd. Rijwan Khan Counsel for
More informationAPPRENTICES ACT, 1961
APPRENTICES ACT, 1961 [52 OF 1961] An Act to provide for the regulation and control of training of apprentices 1 [***] and for matters connected therewith. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Twelfth Year
More informationPCH-HA(3)25/ ,
(Authoritative English text of this Department Notification Number PCH-HA(3)25/2007-1407-31, 22 nd May. 2009 as required under clause(3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India) Government of Himachal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTRACT. W.P.(C) No /2006. Reserved on: Date of Decision: November 18, 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTRACT W.P.(C) No. 15536-636/2006 Reserved on: 3.11.2006 Date of Decision: November 18, 2006 Ramesh Kumar and Ors.... PETITIONERS Through Ms. Asha Jain
More informationThe parties to the present dispute are married to each other and the said marriage was solemnized on 17 th February, 2000.
MANU/SC/1193/2013 Equivalent Citation: 2013(14)SCALE370 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal No. 1999 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2190 of 2012) Decided On: 25.11.2013 Appellants: Saraswathy
More informationTHE PUNJAB PROHIBITION OF CHILD LABOUR AT BRICK KILNS ORDINANCE 2016 (V OF 2016) CONTENTS
THE PUNJAB PROHIBITION OF CHILD LABOUR AT BRICK KILNS ORDINANCE 2016 (V OF 2016) CONTENTS 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 3. Contract of engagement on work 4. Limit of Advance (peshgi)
More informationCalifornia Labor Code (Sections )
California Labor Code (Sections 1770-1781) The California Labor Code can be found at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.html/lab_table_of_contents.html 1770. The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
More informationTHE BLACK MONEY (UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN INCOME AND ASSETS) AND IMPOSITION OF TAX BILL, 2015
AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 11 MAY, Bill No. 84-C of THE BLACK MONEY (UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN INCOME AND ASSETS) AND IMPOSITION OF TAX BILL, ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I CLAUSES PRELIMINARY 1. Short title,
More informationBar & Bench (
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 456 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P (Crl.) No. 208 of 2019) PERIYASAMI AND ORS....APPELLANTS Versus S. NALLASAMY...RESPONDENT
More information