IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO"

Transcription

1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK ) CASE NO. CV ) ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HINDA T. APPLE ) JOURNAL ENTRY GRANTING ) HUNTINGTON S MOTION FOR Defendant. ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Huntington National Bank sued defendant Hinda T. Apple on a promissory note on February 22, Huntington has now filed a motion for summary judgment. Apple opposed the motion and Huntington replied to Apple s brief in opposition. This entry follows. On October 12, 2007, Apple signed and delivered to Huntington a promissory note in the principal amount of $600,000. Among other terms, the note provides: PROMISE TO PAY. I ( Borrower ) jointly and severally promise to pay to the Huntington National Bank ( Lender ), or order, in lawful money of the United States of America, on demand, the principal amount of Six Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($600,000) or so much as may be outstanding, together with interest on the unpaid outstanding principal balance of each advance. Interest shall be calculated from the date of each advance until repayment of each advance. PAYMENT. I will pay this loan in full immediately upon lender s demand. The note replaced a $400,000 note delivered on June 22, 2007, which, in turn, apparently replaced a loan made on November 17, Apple also agreed to make regular monthly payments. The note goes on to define the failure to make any payment when due as an event of default and gives Huntington the right to declare all unpaid principal and interest due if Apple defaults. 1 Plaintiff s reply brief, exhibit A, consumer pledge agreement. This is dated November 17, 2006, and was apparently executed in connection with the original loan. 1

2 On January 29, 2013, Huntington sent a letter to Apple demanding full payment. Apple did not pay and, as of June 13, 2013, the amount of unpaid principal was $562, and interest had accumulated in the amount of $206, Interest continues to accrue at an annual rate of 8½%. Apple admits that she signed the note for herself and, pursuant to a 2001 power of attorney, for her husband, Irwin J. Apple. Yet Apple makes several arguments opposing summary judgment. First, she claims Huntington is estopped by its own conduct from enforcing the note. Specifically, she asserts that Huntington employees assured her that, if she defaulted on the note, Huntington would never seek recourse from any source other than stock in the Ohio Savings Financial Corporation that she pledged as collateral. Second, she argues that Huntington itself is in breach of the note by failing to use reasonable care in preserving the collateral. 2 Third, Apple says that Huntington s oral agreement not to pursue her for collection beyond the security waived its rights to collect, in the event of default, from any other asset. Last, the defendant argues that the loan documents contain material misstatements that preclude their enforcement. As an alternative to her position that there are genuine issues of material fact about whether she is even liable on the note, Apple argues that Huntington is still in possession of her collateral and there is a genuine question of material fact about the amount owed because Huntington s calculation of damages, as attested to by the affidavit of Huntington vice president Andy Kelly in support of the summary judgment motion, does not account for anything the plaintiff received for the sale of her collateral, the Ohio Savings stock. These arguments will be addressed in the order they were presented by the defendant. 2 Brief in opposition, page 7. 2

3 A promissory note is defined as a written promise to pay a certain sum of money at a future time, unconditionally. Burke v. State, 104 Ohio St. 220, 222 (1922). Ohio courts treat promissory notes as contracts, meaning that the precepts of contract law govern their interpretation. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Freed, 3 rd Dist. No , 2012-Ohio-5941, 37. One of those governing principles is the parol evidence rule. The parol evidence rule is a principle of substantive law providing that a writing intended by the parties to be a final embodiment of their agreement cannot be modified by evidence of earlier or contemporaneous agreements that might add to, vary, or contradict the writing. Bellman v. Am. Internatl. Group, 113 Ohio St.3d 323, 2007-Ohio-2071, 7. The rule operates to prevent a party from introducing extrinsic evidence of negotiations that occurred before or while the agreement was being reduced to its final written form because it assumes that the formal writing reflects the parties' minds at a point of maximum resolution and, hence, that duties and restrictions that do not appear in the written document were not intended by the parties to survive. Id. A contract is integrated, and the rule applies, when there is a single and final memorial of the understanding of the parties. Galmish v. Cicchini, 90 Ohio St. 3d 22, 27 (2000). The contract between Apple and Huntington is integrated. It identifies the parties, the amount of the loan, the interest rate, payment terms, and is explicit that the principal amount is payable on demand. The parol evidence rule is therefore applicable to exclude from consideration Apple s testimony by affidavit testimony that Huntington s employees George Tamas and Roger Godin advised me that the bank s only recourse in the event of default would be the pledge of the 100 shares of Ohio Savings Financial Corporation stock. The bank officers assured me that the bank would not seek payment from me and my husband in the event of a default. I would not have agreed to execute the loan documents unless these representations had been made. 3 3 Br. in opp., exhibit 1, Apple affidavit, 9. 3

4 To allow that testimony to create a genuine issue of material fact would be to do exactly what the parol evidence rule is designed to prohibit. An oral agreement cannot be enforced in preference to a signed writing which pertains to exactly the same subject matter, yet has different terms. Marion Production Credit Assn. v. Cochran, 40 Ohio St. 3d 265 (1988), syllabus three. Nor can Apple use the fraudulent inducement exception to avoid the application of the parol evidence rule because she claims only to have received an oral promise that is merely inconsistent with the terms of the writing instead of a promise that is consistent with, or made independently of, the written agreement. Since Apple s testimony about oral terms that are inconsistent with the contract s written terms is not admissible, her affidavit cannot be used to create a genuine issue of material fact about the note s terms and whether she is in default. Her next argument is that Huntington breached the parties contract before she did because the bank failed to monitor the stock [pledged as collateral], to advise Mrs. Apple regarding the value of the stock and whether the stock had increased or decreased in value, and/or did not recommend the sale of the volatile investment. 4 Apple and her husband originally pledged the stock as security for money borrowed on November 17, Huntington s and Apple s obligations with respect to the collateral are contained in a consumer pledge agreement of that same date. 5 By that separate contract, Apple agreed that Huntington, without first obtaining her consent, could exchange or release the stock. She also agreed that Huntington could hold the stock until the loan was fully paid and that she would not sell or otherwise dispose of the shares. Finally, the agreement includes the following limitations on Huntington s obligations: 4 Br. in opp, p. 6 to 7. 5 Reply brief, exhibit A, consumer pledge agreement. 4

5 Lender will use ordinary reasonable care in the physical preservation and custody of the Property in Lender s possession, but will have no other obligation to protect the Property or its value. Lender will not be responsible for (A) collecting or protecting any income from the Property; (B) preserving rights against parties to the Property or against third persons; (C) ascertaining any maturities, calls, conversions, exchanges, offers, tenders, or similar matters relating to any of the Property; or (D) informing me about any of these matters, whether or not Lender has or is deemed to have knowledge of such matters. Except as provided above, Lender will have no responsibility or liability whatsoever to me or to anyone else for any deterioration or decrease in the value of the Property. (Emphasis in italics added.) Apple is unable to point to any contractual terms that impose a duty on Huntington to monitor the stock s price and advise her whether to hold or sell the shares. As a result, Huntington s failure to do so cannot be considered a breach of contract preventing its recovery for Apple s breach. To the extent that Huntington has any duty outside the contract to preserve the value of the stock and assuming 1) such a duty cannot be waived by contract and 2) it was owed to Apple as a principal borrower 6 Apple has a separate cause of action that she waived by not asserting it as a counterclaim here. Moreover, Apple s answer to the complaint does not include the affirmative defense of impairment of collateral, so it too is waived. Apple s second argument is unsupported by the law and the evidence. The defendant s next rationale in opposition to summary judgment is essentially the same as her claim that there is a genuine issue of material fact about whether the contract included a term that Huntington could only recover from the pledged collateral. Here, she refers back to the alleged promises not to collect from her other than by executing against the collateral and claims that Huntington understood that it was waiving its rights [to collect other than through the stock] by making representations to that effect to Apple. 7 But whether she characterizes the 6 The defense of impairment of collateral is ordinarily extended only to a surety, not a principal borrower. See Huron Cty. Banking Co. v. Knallay, 22 Ohio App. 3d 110 (6 th Dist. 1984). While on the subject of defenses, it is noteworthy that Apple s brief in opposition to summary judgment alludes to her age and her husband s infirmity as reasons the note can t be enforced, yet she never asserted the affirmative defense of duress provided by R.C (A)(1)(b). 7 Br. in opp, p. 9. 5

6 oral promise not to seek recourse from anything other than the collateral as a contract term or a waiver of a contract term, evidence of the inconsistent oral promise is excluded by the parol evidence rule and does not operate to create a genuine issue of material fact. For her last reason why summary judgment on the question of her liability for repayment is not appropriate, Apple says that the promissory note uses Huntington s prime commercial interest rates as the basis for the interest rate even though her loan was a consumer loan. Apple, however, does not support this argument with reference to any statutory or case law, presumably because there is no prohibition against using a commercial interest rate to calculate the interest rate for a consumer loan. Finally, Apple contends that even if she is liable for repayment there is a genuine issue of material fact as to the amount she owes because Huntington has not accounted for the proceeds it received as a result of its liquidation, sale or transfer of the Ohio Savings Financial Corporation stock. 8 The only evidence in support of this argument is at paragraph 15 of Apple s affidavit, where she says that Huntington has never accounted to me for any proceeds received as a result of its possession, liquidation, sale or transfer of the stock. Missing from the affidavit, and the record in this case, is any evidence that Huntington sold, transferred or liquidated the stock. Indeed, the opposite is true: Huntington has not liquidated the collateral. 9 As a result, Apple s affidavit does not create a genuine issue of material fact and leaves as the only evidence of the amount due on the note the uncontradicted affidavit of Kelly attached as exhibit B to the motion for summary judgment. Because there are no genuine issues of material fact about 1) Apple s obligation to repay Huntington under the terms of the promissory note and 2) the amount of principal and interest 8 Br. in opp, p Reply br., exhibit B, affidavit of Andy Kelly, 2. 6

7 due, Huntington s June 26, 2013, motion for summary judgment is granted and judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff Huntington National Bank and against defendant Hinda T. Apple in the principal amount of $562, with interest at a rate of 8½% per annum beginning June 13, 2013, plus interest accrued to that date in the amount of $206,410.60, plus court costs. IT IS SO ORDERED: Judge John P. O Donnell Date following: SERVICE A copy of this journal entry was sent by this day of August, 2013, to the David D. Black, Esq. dblack@cavitch.com Daniel C. Wolters, Esq. dwolters@cavitch.com Attorneys for the plaintiff Steven B. Potter, Esq. spotter@dhplaw.com Benjamin D. Carnahan, Esq. bcarnahan@dhplaw.com Joseph M. Saponaro, Esq. jsaponaro@dhplaw.com Attorneys for the defendant Judge John P. O Donnell 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-60683 Document: 00513486795 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar EDWARDS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, L.P.; BEHER HOLDINGS TRUST,

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO NAVY PORTFOLIO ALPHA, LLC ) CASE NO. CV 14 825363 ) ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL Plaintiff, ) ) JOURNAL ENTRY DENYING ) THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR vs. )

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, SUCCESSOR- IN-THE INTEREST TO THE PARK AVENUE BANK, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee H. JACK MILLER, ARI

More information

STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS [Cite as Phillips v. Farmers Ethanol, L.L.C., 2014-Ohio-4043.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT MARTIN PHILLIPS, ) ) CASE NO. 12 JE 27 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) ) -

More information

Case 5:18-cv C Document 53 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 79 PageID 669

Case 5:18-cv C Document 53 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 79 PageID 669 Case 5:18-cv-00234-C Document 53 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 79 PageID 669 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION FIRST BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff. v. Cause No. 5:18-cv-00234-C

More information

LOAN AGREEMENT RECITALS

LOAN AGREEMENT RECITALS LOAN AGREEMENT THIS LOAN AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is entered into effective as of September 22, 2009 ( Effective Date ) by and between the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Union City, a

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO KRISTEN KRAUS, ) CASE NO. CV 09 683945 ) Plaintiff ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) BANK OF AMERICA, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) John P.

More information

Guarantee. THIS DEED is dated. 1. Definitions and Interpretation. 1.1 Definitions. In this Deed:

Guarantee. THIS DEED is dated. 1. Definitions and Interpretation. 1.1 Definitions. In this Deed: Guarantee THIS DEED is dated 1. Definitions and Interpretation 1.1 Definitions In this Deed: We / us / our / the Lender Bank of Cyprus UK Limited, trading as Bank of Cyprus UK, incorporated in England

More information

SCHEDULE 2 to Collateral Annex (with Optional Changes)

SCHEDULE 2 to Collateral Annex (with Optional Changes) SCHEDULE 2 to Collateral Annex (with Optional Changes) *Each redline edit below represents an acceptable modification to the standard form of Guaranty that a Guarantor can adopt. GUARANTY THIS GUARANTY

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARK W. DUPUIS, Plaintiff/Garnishee Plaintiff- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 30, 2006 v No. 266443 Oakland Circuit Court VARIOUS MARKETS, INC., LC No. 1999-016013-CK Defendant,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Parrish, 2015-Ohio-4045.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Wells Fargo Bank, NA, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 15AP-243 (C.P.C. No. 12CV-3792) v.

More information

SECURITY AGREEMENT :v2

SECURITY AGREEMENT :v2 SECURITY AGREEMENT In consideration of one or more loans, letters of credit or other financial accommodation made, issued or extended by JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (hereinafter called the "Bank"), the undersigned

More information

ZB, N.A., a National Banking Association, Plaintiff/Appellee,

ZB, N.A., a National Banking Association, Plaintiff/Appellee, IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE ZB, N.A., a National Banking Association, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. DANIEL J. HOELLER, an individual; and AZAR F. GHAFARI, an individual, Defendants/Appellants.

More information

Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity

Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity To: Shenwan Hongyuan Securities (H.K. Limited Shenwan Hongyuan Futures (H.K. Limited 1. In consideration of your granting and/or continuing to make available advances, credit

More information

COST OVERRUN AND COMPLETION GUARANTEE. (Leslieville)

COST OVERRUN AND COMPLETION GUARANTEE. (Leslieville) 462 N 463 IS MADE BY: COST OVERRUN AND COMPLETION GUARANTEE (Leslieville) THIS AGREEMENT dated as of July 13, 2011 IN FAVOUR OF: URBANCORP (LESLIEVILLVE) DEVELOPMENTS INC., URBANCORP (RIVERDALE) DEVELOPMENTS

More information

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff : CASE NO CVH 00482

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff : CASE NO CVH 00482 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO LYKINS OIL COMPANY : Plaintiff : CASE NO. 2012 CVH 00482 vs. : Judge McBride CHARLES E. CULP, et al. : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant : Finney, Stagnaro, Saba & Patterson

More information

Master Asset Finance Agreement

Master Asset Finance Agreement NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED ABN 12 004 044 937 Contract Number Master Asset Finance Agreement ATTENTION: INTENDING GUARANTORS The guarantor should seek independent legal and financial advice on the

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. BARRY NUSSBAUM, Appellant V. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. BARRY NUSSBAUM, Appellant V. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee AFFIRM; Opinion Filed May 21, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00081-CV BARRY NUSSBAUM, Appellant V. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial

More information

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER

Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Stonecrest Building Company v Chicago Title Insurance Company Docket No. 319841/319842 Amy Ronayne Krause Presiding Judge Kirsten Frank Kelly LC No. 2008-001055

More information

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff leased space at the property to defendants Akari

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff leased space at the property to defendants Akari IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO SEVERANCE SPE LEASECO, L.L.C. CASE NO. CV 12 781709 Plaintiff, JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL vs. AKARI TICHAVAKUNDA, M.D., et al. JOURNAL ENTRY Defendants.

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO HKS ARCHITECTS, INC. ) CASE NO. CV 12 777455 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL BENZA & ASSOCIATES, ) INC. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT CRAWFORD COUNTY FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF OHIO, CASE NO O P I N I O N

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT CRAWFORD COUNTY FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF OHIO, CASE NO O P I N I O N [Cite as First Fed. Bank of Ohio v. Angelini, 2010-Ohio-2300.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT CRAWFORD COUNTY FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF OHIO, CASE NO. 3-09-03 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

More information

SURETYSHIP AND SUBORDINATION OF CLAIMS. (Personal Loans)

SURETYSHIP AND SUBORDINATION OF CLAIMS. (Personal Loans) SURETYSHIP AND SUBORDINATION OF CLAIMS (Personal Loans) TO: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA DEFINITIONS The terms defined below are used throughout this document. We recommend that you read these definitions. They

More information

COMMERCIAL CREDIT APPLICATION LEGAL NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: SIN #: CORPORATION/LTD/LLC SOCIETY COOPERATIVE PROPRIETORSHIP PARTNERSHIP OTHER

COMMERCIAL CREDIT APPLICATION LEGAL NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: SIN #: CORPORATION/LTD/LLC SOCIETY COOPERATIVE PROPRIETORSHIP PARTNERSHIP OTHER COMMERCIAL CREDIT APPLICATION APPLICANT (the Applicant ) LEGAL NAME: DATE OF BIRTH: SIN #: TYPE OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATION: CORPORATION/LTD/LLC SOCIETY COOPERATIVE PROPRIETORSHIP PARTNERSHIP OTHER MAILING

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued July 9, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00473-CV ROBERT R. BURCHFIELD, Appellant V. PROSPERITY BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 127th District Court

More information

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DATE OF REPORT August 7, 2003 (Date of Earliest

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FLAGSTAR BANK, F.S.B., Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED July 6, 2010 v No. 289856 Macomb Circuit Court VINCENT DILORENZO and ANGELA LC No. 2007-003381-CK TINERVIA, Defendants-Appellants.

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 20, 2016. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00626-CV ARGENT DEVELOPMENT, L.P., Appellant V. LAS COLINAS GROUP, L.P. AND BILLY BOB BARNETT,

More information

Newbank v Parcare Servs. Inc NY Slip Op 30200(U) January 30, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 30639/2010 Judge: Robert J.

Newbank v Parcare Servs. Inc NY Slip Op 30200(U) January 30, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 30639/2010 Judge: Robert J. Newbank v Parcare Servs. Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 30200(U) January 30, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 30639/2010 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Republished from New York State Unified Court System's

More information

venture. Menter acted as the operating member of the partnership, while Consolo

venture. Menter acted as the operating member of the partnership, while Consolo [Cite as Consolo v. Menter, 2011-Ohio-6241.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) WILLIAM CONSOLO C.A. No. 25394 Appellant v. RICK MENTER, et al. Appellees

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON. No. 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES HEREIN, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON. No. 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES HEREIN, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON 1 1 CREDIT UNION, fka CREDIT UNION, a Washington corporation, vs., Plaintiff, Defendant. No. 1 ANSWER, GENERAL DENIAL, AND SPECIAL OR AFFIRMATIVE

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/01/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/01/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/01/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/01/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x CAPITAL ONE EQUIPMENT FINANCE CORP., D/B/A CAPITAL ONE TAXI MEDALLION

More information

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 IL App (1st 141689 No. 1-14-1689 Opinion filed May 27, 2015 Third Division IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT THE PRIVATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, EMS INVESTORS,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court No. CI Appellant Decided: February 26, 2010 * * * * *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court No. CI Appellant Decided: February 26, 2010 * * * * * [Cite as Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Montgomery, 2010-Ohio-693.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Appellee Court of Appeals No. L-09-1169

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF ) COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF ) COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF ) COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV 10 727247 MICHAEL P. HARVEY CO., LPA, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ) ANTHONY RAVIDA,

More information

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. S & S DEVELOPMENT, INC., Brian K. Swain and Donald K. Stephens, Defendants.

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. S & S DEVELOPMENT, INC., Brian K. Swain and Donald K. Stephens, Defendants. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. S & S DEVELOPMENT, INC., Brian K. Swain and Donald K. Stephens, Defendants. No. 8:13 cv 1419 T 30TGW. Signed May 28, 2014. ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PETER R. MORRIS, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 12, 2004 v No. 245563 Wayne Circuit Court COMERICA BANK, LC No. 00-013298-CZ Defendant/Counter

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/17/2016 EXHIBIT A

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/17/2016 EXHIBIT A FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/2016 05:06 PM INDEX NO. 650837/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/17/2016 EXHIBIT A JAMS COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 201B jul q P 12 5^

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 201B jul q P 12 5^ 104500613 RODGER SAFFOLD, II Plaintiff 104500613. f' c IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 201B jul q P 12 5^ Case No: CV-17-878065 CLERK OF COURTS CUYAHOGA COUNTY Judge: JOHN P O'DONNELL

More information

APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL CREDIT ACCOUNT TRADING TERMS AND CONDITIONS

APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL CREDIT ACCOUNT TRADING TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL CREDIT ACCOUNT TRADING TERMS AND CONDITIONS These Trading Terms and Conditions are to be read and understood prior to the execution of the Application for Commercial Credit Account.

More information

MEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT

MEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT MEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT THIS MEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT ( Memorandum ) is made on BETWEEN: (1) KGI SECURITIES (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., a company incorporated in the Republic of Singapore and having its registered

More information

CONTRACTS AND SALES QUESTION 1

CONTRACTS AND SALES QUESTION 1 CONTRACTS AND SALES QUESTION Peter responded to an advertisement placed by Della, a dentist, seeking a dental hygienist. After an interview, Della offered Peter the job and said she would either: () pay

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :26 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/14/ :26 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/14/2017 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/14/2017 1126 AM INDEX NO. 650803/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF 02/14/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------

More information

BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION. Rules for Gas Marketers

BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION. Rules for Gas Marketers APPENDIX A To Order A-12-13 Page 1 of 3 BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION Rules for Gas Marketers Section 71.1(1) of the Utilities Commission Act (Act) requires a person who is not a public utility

More information

Goddard Inv. II, LLC v Goddard Dev. Partners II, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 31335(U) May 20, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013

Goddard Inv. II, LLC v Goddard Dev. Partners II, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 31335(U) May 20, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Goddard Inv. II, LLC v Goddard Dev. Partners II, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 31335(U) May 20, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653907/2013 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE "Redacted" Case Document 98 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION v. v.,.,, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON ELECTRONICALLY FILED FIFTH THIRD BANK 250 West Main Street Lexington, Kentucky 40507 Plaintiff, ZAYAT STABLES, LLC

More information

APPLICATION FOR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT To: Dominion Bank and Trust Customers

APPLICATION FOR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT To: Dominion Bank and Trust Customers APPLICATION FOR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT To: Dominion Bank and Trust Customers L/C NO. (FOR BANK USE ONLY) DATE: Please issue for our account an irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit as set

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON John Casey Mills, P.C. OSB No. 844179 casey.mills@millernash.com Bruce A. Rubin, P.C. OSB No. 763185 bruce.rubin@millernash.com 3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204-3699

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Jain v. Omni Publishing, Inc., 2009-Ohio-5221.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92121 MOHAN JAIN DBA BUSINESS PUBLISHING PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK O'NEIL, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 15, 2004 v No. 243356 Wayne Circuit Court M. V. BAROCAS COMPANY, LC No. 99-925999-NZ and CAFÉ

More information

Terms and Conditions of the Supply of Goods

Terms and Conditions of the Supply of Goods Terms and Conditions of the Supply of Goods 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions. Business Day: a day (other than a Saturday, Sunday or public holiday) when banks in London are open for business. Conditions:

More information

6. Finding on the mortgage or lien, including priority and entitlement to foreclose.

6. Finding on the mortgage or lien, including priority and entitlement to foreclose. Sample Proposed Decision (Revised 10-19-2016) The following provides a framework. 1. List of pleadings and dispositive motions. 2. Finding that all who are necessary to the action have been joined and

More information

AGREEMENT FOR PHYSICIAN SERVICES RECITALS. B. The District owns and operates Hospital in, Washington (the "Hospital");

AGREEMENT FOR PHYSICIAN SERVICES RECITALS. B. The District owns and operates Hospital in, Washington (the Hospital); AGREEMENT FOR PHYSICIAN SERVICES This Agreement for Physician Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of, by and between Public Hospital District No. of County, Washington (the "District"),

More information

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories 1. The practitioner may desire to combine Request for Admissions, Interrogatories and Request

More information

COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Pagani, 2009-Ohio-5665.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST JUDGES COMPANY Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee

More information

2017 PA Super 256. Appeal from the Order Entered August 3, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Civil Division at No(s): GD

2017 PA Super 256. Appeal from the Order Entered August 3, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Civil Division at No(s): GD 2017 PA Super 256 ENTERPRISE BANK Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. FRAZIER FAMILY L.P., A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Appellee No. 1171 WDA 2016 Appeal from the Order Entered August

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES: [Cite as JPMorgan Chase Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Fallon, 2014-Ohio-525.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

Agreement to UOB Banker s Guarantee Terms and Conditions

Agreement to UOB Banker s Guarantee Terms and Conditions Agreement to UOB Banker s Guarantee Terms and Conditions In consideration of United Overseas Bank Limited (the Bank ) agreeing at the Applicant s request to issue the Banker s Guarantee, the Applicant

More information

Corning Credit Union v Spencer 2017 NY Slip Op 30014(U) January 6, 2017 Supreme Court, Steuben County Docket Number: CV Judge: Marianne

Corning Credit Union v Spencer 2017 NY Slip Op 30014(U) January 6, 2017 Supreme Court, Steuben County Docket Number: CV Judge: Marianne Corning Credit Union v Spencer 2017 NY Slip Op 30014(U) January 6, 2017 Supreme Court, Steuben County Docket Number: 2015-0238CV Judge: Marianne Furfure Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI GEORGE

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/19/ :19 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/19/ :19 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/19/2014 08:19 AM INDEX NO. 651190/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014 SUPREME COURT : STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK _ TRUSTY CAPITAL INC., Plaintiff

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Urbanski, 2014-Ohio-2362.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT U.S. Bank National Association, as : Trustee for BNC Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-2, Mortgage

More information

AOR DIRECT L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Petitioner,

AOR DIRECT L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Petitioner, IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE AOR DIRECT L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE, Judge of the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA,

More information

NOTE- All drafts must be pre-approved by Vectren before final execution. Please contact Vectren Credit Risk for assignment of document number.

NOTE- All drafts must be pre-approved by Vectren before final execution. Please contact Vectren Credit Risk for assignment of document number. NOTE- All drafts must be pre-approved by Vectren before final execution. Please contact Vectren Credit Risk for assignment of document number. GUARANTY AGREEMENT GTYSCO##-### THIS GUARANTY AGREEMENT GTYSCO##-###

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, : Case No. 16 CV 137. v.

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, : Case No. 16 CV 137. v. IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, : Case No. 16 CV 137 v. : Judge Berens : JONATHAN B. BROOKS, ET AL., : Entry Regarding Plaintiff s Motion

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY ) CASE NO. CV-98-360749 THEODORE M. GARVER et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) vs ) FINDINGS OF FACT ) AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AQUATIC AMUSEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re: MODERN PLASTICS CORPORATION, Debtor. / NEW PRODUCTS CORPORATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 09-00651 Hon. Scott W.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: Case No: 12189/2014 ABSA BANK LIMITED Applicant And RUTH SUSAN HAREMZA Respondent

More information

LOAN GUARANTEE AGREEMENT. dated as of [ ], 20[ ] among. THE HOLDERS identified herein, their successors and permitted assigns, and

LOAN GUARANTEE AGREEMENT. dated as of [ ], 20[ ] among. THE HOLDERS identified herein, their successors and permitted assigns, and [FLOATING RATE GUARANTEED OBLIGATIONS] LOAN GUARANTEE AGREEMENT dated as of [ ], 20[ ] among THE HOLDERS identified herein, their successors and permitted assigns, and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,

More information

STATEMENT OF THE CASE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS. defendant s exhibits 2 through 13 were admitted into evidence.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS. defendant s exhibits 2 through 13 were admitted into evidence. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO THE PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING ) CASE NO. CV 11 762467 CO., INC. ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs. ) ) BRYAN EQUIPMENT SALES, INC. ) JOURNAL ENTRY

More information

LIBERTY SAVINGS BANK GARNETTE REDUS, ET AL.

LIBERTY SAVINGS BANK GARNETTE REDUS, ET AL. [Cite as Liberty Sav. Bank v. Redus, 2009-Ohio-28.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90571 LIBERTY SAVINGS BANK PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

More information

KOSTELNIK, EXR., APPELLANT, v. HELPER ET AL., APPELLEES.

KOSTELNIK, EXR., APPELLANT, v. HELPER ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Kostelnik v Helper, 96 Ohio St.3d 1, 2002-Ohio-2985.] KOSTELNIK, EXR., APPELLANT, v. HELPER ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Kostelnik v. Helper, 96 Ohio St.3d 1, 2002-Ohio-2985.] Civil actions Wrongful

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee, Appeal from Montgomery County Court of Appeals, Second District

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee, Appeal from Montgomery County Court of Appeals, Second District OR1GiN,qt IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO LASALLE BANK N.A., Supreme Court Case No. 10-164$ V. Plaintiff-Appellee, Appeal from Montgomery County Court of Appeals, Second District BELLE MEADOWS SUITES, LP,

More information

[PARTICIPANT], a company incorporated in [England and Wales] (registered number [])

[PARTICIPANT], a company incorporated in [England and Wales] (registered number []) THIS DECLARATION OF TRUST is made as a deed on BETWEEN [PARTICIPANT], a company incorporated in [England and Wales] (registered number []) having its registered office at (the Participant); and BANK OF

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 21, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Nos. 3D17-575 and 3D17-433 Lower Tribunal No. 16-27643

More information

ATHANASIOS KORONIADIS Appellant. BANK OF NEW ZEALAND Respondent. Cooper, Venning and Williams JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

ATHANASIOS KORONIADIS Appellant. BANK OF NEW ZEALAND Respondent. Cooper, Venning and Williams JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA522/2013 [2015] NZCA 337 BETWEEN AND ATHANASIOS KORONIADIS Appellant BANK OF NEW ZEALAND Respondent Hearing: 18 June 2015 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Cooper, Venning

More information

Case 1:04-cv RHB Document 171 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:04-cv RHB Document 171 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 1:04-cv-00026-RHB Document 171 Filed 08/11/2005 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION STEELCASE, INC., v. Plaintiff, HARBIN'S, INC., an Alabama

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO [Cite as Parker v. Turek, 2011-Ohio-3889.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO JAMES MICHAEL PARKER, et al., : O P I N I O N Plaintiffs-Appellees, : - vs - : CASE

More information

Greenberg v DeRosa 2019 NY Slip Op 30046(U) January 2, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases

Greenberg v DeRosa 2019 NY Slip Op 30046(U) January 2, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases Greenberg v DeRosa 2019 NY Slip Op 30046(U) January 2, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652424/2018 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 30, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D18-2190 Lower Tribunal No. 14-12224 Laptopplaza,

More information

STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT [Cite as Galloway v. Horkulic, 2003-Ohio-5145.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ATTORNEY WILLIAM GALLOWAY, ) ) CASE NO. 02 JE 52 PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) - VS -

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session PATSY C. CATE v. JAMES DANIEL THOMAS A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 58062 The Honorable Steven Stafford,

More information

JUDGMENT. Sagicor Bank Jamaica Limited (Appellant) v Taylor-Wright (Respondent) (Jamaica)

JUDGMENT. Sagicor Bank Jamaica Limited (Appellant) v Taylor-Wright (Respondent) (Jamaica) Easter Term [2018] UKPC 12 Privy Council Appeal No 0011 of 2017 JUDGMENT Sagicor Bank Jamaica Limited (Appellant) v Taylor-Wright (Respondent) (Jamaica) From the Court of Appeal of Jamaica before Lord

More information

RBS Citizens, N.A. v Barnett 2010 NY Slip Op 31971(U) July 16, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Timothy S.

RBS Citizens, N.A. v Barnett 2010 NY Slip Op 31971(U) July 16, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Timothy S. RBS Citizens, N.A. v Barnett 2010 NY Slip Op 31971(U) July 16, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 010167-09 Judge: Timothy S. Driscoll Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts

More information

LG Funding, LLC v Filton LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33289(U) December 14, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /17 Judge: Jack L.

LG Funding, LLC v Filton LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33289(U) December 14, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /17 Judge: Jack L. LG Funding, LLC v Filton LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33289(U) December 14, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 606949/17 Judge: Jack L. Libert Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY

More information

THE COMPANIES NAMED IN THIS GUARANTEE

THE COMPANIES NAMED IN THIS GUARANTEE EXECUTION VERISON Dated 16 AUGUST 2018 for THE COMPANIES NAMED IN THIS GUARANTEE as Original Guarantors ASTRO BIDCO LIMITED as Beneficiary GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. DEFINITIONS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS [Cite as Huntington Bank v. Popovec, 2013-Ohio-4363.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT THE HUNTINGTON BANK SUCCESSOR BY MERGER WITH CASE NO. 12 MA 119 SKY BANK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

More information

DEPOSITORY COLLATERAL AGREEMENT

DEPOSITORY COLLATERAL AGREEMENT Exhibit B DEPOSITORY COLLATERAL AGREEMENT This Depository Collateral Agreement ( Agreement ), dated, is between (the Bank ), having an address at, and (the Public Depositor ), having an address at. WITNESSETH:

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/2016 0415 PM INDEX NO. 652739/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

COURT OF APPEALS COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Hunter v. Green, 2012-Ohio-5801.] COURT OF APPEALS COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAM W. HUNTER, JR. JUDGES Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. John W.

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Brookdale Senior Living v. Johnson-Wylie, 2011-Ohio-1243.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95129 BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

More information

(THIS FORM HAS 7 PAGES AND MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL)

(THIS FORM HAS 7 PAGES AND MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL) PRIME INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS PTY LTD ACN 131 559 772 69 CRAIGIE STREET, PO BOX 5003 BUNBURY WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6230 PHONE: 08 9780 1111 FAX: 08 9726 0399 EMAIL: admin@primesupplies.com.au 30 DAY CREDIT ACCOUNT

More information

Defendants Black Bear Industrial Inc., Jeffrey P. Richard, and Northern Mountain I. BACKGROUND

Defendants Black Bear Industrial Inc., Jeffrey P. Richard, and Northern Mountain I. BACKGROUND I, STATE OF MAINE OXFORD, SS. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCK.ET NO. RE-17-14 WBL SPE II, LLC, V. Plaintiff BLACK BEAR INDUSTRIAL INC.,' JEFFREY P. RICHARD, and NORTHERN MOUNTAIN CONSTRUCTION, LLC., Defendants

More information

BURHANI QARDAN HASANA CORPORATION (America) APPLICATION Part II

BURHANI QARDAN HASANA CORPORATION (America) APPLICATION Part II BURHANI QARDAN HASANA CORPORATION (America) APPLICATION Part II PROMISSORY NOTE FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, unconditionally promises to pay to the order of Burhani Qardan Hasana Corporation (America)

More information

MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT. - and - - and - - and. NORTHERN SUNRISE COUNTY (hereinafter referred to as "NSC") - and

MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT. - and - - and - - and. NORTHERN SUNRISE COUNTY (hereinafter referred to as NSC) - and MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made in effective the day of, 20 AMONG: TOWN OF PEACE RIVER (hereinafter referred to as "Peace River") OF THE FIRST PART - and - MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF PEACE NO. 135

More information

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert N. Scola, Jr., Judge.

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Robert N. Scola, Jr., Judge. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2006 MARTIN J. BRADLEY, III, and MARIA P. BRADLEY,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT TERRITORY OF GUAM. CITIZENS SECURITY BANK (GUAM), INC., Appellee, vs. ESTER R. BIDAURE, Appellant.

IN THE SUPREME COURT TERRITORY OF GUAM. CITIZENS SECURITY BANK (GUAM), INC., Appellee, vs. ESTER R. BIDAURE, Appellant. IN THE SUPREME COURT TERRITORY OF GUAM CITIZENS SECURITY BANK (GUAM), INC., Appellee, vs. ESTER R. BIDAURE, Appellant. Civil Case No. CVA96-010 Filed: March 20, 1997 Cite as: 1997 Guam 3 Appeal from the

More information

Eastern Funding LLC v 843 Second Ave. Symphony, Inc NY Slip Op 31588(U) August 20, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Eastern Funding LLC v 843 Second Ave. Symphony, Inc NY Slip Op 31588(U) August 20, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Eastern Funding LLC v 843 Second Ave. Symphony, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 31588(U) August 20, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652205/2015 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich Cases posted with

More information

WILLIAM BOWEN ) CASE NO. CV ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs ) ) FARMERS INS. CO., et al. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendants.

WILLIAM BOWEN ) CASE NO. CV ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs ) ) FARMERS INS. CO., et al. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendants. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO WILLIAM BOWEN ) CASE NO. CV 09 688770 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs ) ) FARMERS INS. CO., et al. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendants. ) John P.

More information