If You Returned a Rented U-Haul Truck in California,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "If You Returned a Rented U-Haul Truck in California,"

Transcription

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Aron v. U-Haul Company of California, et.al., Case No. BC If You Returned a Rented U-Haul Truck in California, The Settlement of A Class Action Lawsuit May Affect You. The lawsuit concerns persons who rented a U-Haul truck and returned it in California any time between April 27, 2000 through December 31, A California Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Aron v. U-Haul is a legal case that involves persons who rented a truck at either a U-Haul rental center or at a U-Haul dealer in California or outside California, and then returned the truck in California during the period April 27, 2000 through December 31, 2007 (the Class Period ) to either a U-Haul rental center or to a U-Haul dealer. You are a Class member as part of the Underfill Group if you returned the truck with the truck s dashboard fuel gauge showing less fuel than when you picked up the truck and: * * * you paid a fueling fee of either $20 or $30, or you paid a per gallon fuel charge of between $2 and $4, or you paid both a fueling fee and a per gallon fuel charge. You are a Class member as part of the Overfill Group if you returned the truck with the truck s dashboard fuel gauge showing more fuel than when you picked up the truck and you were not reimbursed for the excess fuel. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. This Notice includes information about the settlement of the lawsuit. Please read the entire Notice carefully. Your rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this notice. You may object to the settlement by October 15, see Question 12 You may file a Claim Form no later than January 14, 2015*, and receive the benefits of the settlement. see Questions 11 & 12 *Changes to the Claim Form deadline, if any, will be posted at You may enter an appearance through your own counsel. see Questions 12 & 16 Page 1 of 7

2 WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS BASIC INFORMATION..... PAGES Why is there a notice? Who are the Defendant companies? What is this lawsuit about? Has the Court made any rulings in the case? Why is the lawsuit settling? What is a class action? MEMBERS OF THE CLASS PAGES How do I know if I am a Member of the Class? What is a Qualifying Transaction? What types of vehicle rentals are included in this class action? Do I need to have a copy of my U-Haul truck rental contract in order to Claim the Benefits of the Settlement? Do I need copies of my fuel receipts to Claim the Benefits of the Settlement? What are the Terms of the Settlement? What are my rights in the Lawsuit Now? What If I Did Not Previously Opt Out? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU... PAGES Do I have a lawyer in the case? How will the lawyers be paid? THE SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING PAGE When and Where will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? Do I have to Come to the Fairness Hearing? May I Speak at the Fairness Hearing? GETTING MORE INFORMATION. PAGE How do I get more information? CLAIM FORM. PAGE 7 BASIC INFORMATION 1. Why is there a notice? The parties have agreed to settle this case. You have the right to know about the litigation and the terms of the proposed settlement and your legal rights and options before you decide what to do. The Court in charge of the case is the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. The case is Aron v. U-Haul Company of California, et al., Case No. BC , assigned to The Honorable Elihu M. Berle, Central Civil West Department 323. The person who sued is called the Plaintiff and the companies he sued are called Defendants. 2. Who are the Defendant companies? The Defendant companies are U Haul Co. of California, a California corporation, and U Haul International, Inc., a Nevada corporation. Both companies are jointly referred to as U Haul. 3. What is this lawsuit about? The lawsuit alleges that U-Haul s commercial use of the truck s dashboard fuel gauge to measure fuel was illegal during the Class Period, from April 27, 2000 to December 31, 2007, because the gauge was Page 2 of 7

3 not a lawful measurement instrument under California law before January 1, The lawsuit seeks restitution of the amount of the fueling fees and fuel charges paid by the Underfill Group Class Members and also seeks restitution of the value of the excess fuel provided by the Overfill Group Class Members. 4. Has the Court made any rulings in the case? The Court has determined that during the Class Period, from April 27, 2000 to December 31, 2007, the commercial use of the truck s dashboard fuel gauge to measure fuel violated the California Unfair Competition Law, Business and Professions Code section et seq. The Court certified a class by an order entered on July 31, 2012, allowing the case to proceed as a class action. On February 21, 2013 the Court granted U-Haul's motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the ground that the case was not brought to trial within the 5-year period, with extensions, as required by California law. The Court has not yet entered a final, appealable order of dismissal. 5. Why is the lawsuit settling? U-Haul continues to deny that it did anything wrong. Class Counsel are prepared to appeal the dismissal if an appealable order is entered. Nonetheless, the named Plaintiff and the U-Haul defendants have now reached a settlement that reflects the procedural posture of the case, recognizing that this litigation could proceed for many more years into the future and the ultimate outcome is uncertain. The Court has preliminarily approved the terms of this settlement. 6. What is a class action? In a class action, one or more people, called class representatives, sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. Here, there is a single class representative, Leonard E. Aron. The class members are all the people on whose behalf the Class Representative has sued. MEMBERS OF THE CLASS 7. How do I know if I am a Member of the Class? What is a Qualifying Transaction? The Class consists of all U-Haul customers who rented a truck at either a U-Haul rental center or at a U-Haul dealer and during the period April 27, 2000 through December 31, 2007, returned the rented truck in California to either a U-Haul rental center or to a U-Haul dealer (i) with the truck s fuel gauge reading less fuel than at the start of the rental and paid a fueling fee and/or a per gallon charge for the number of gallons that U-Haul estimated had been used; or (ii) with the truck s fuel gauge reading more fuel than at the start of the rental and U-Haul did not reimburse the customer for the value of the excess fuel. If you fall within either (i) or (ii) above, then you have had a qualifying transaction for purposes of this settlement, as explained below. You are not a member of the Class if you requested exclusion on or before November 5, What types of vehicle rentals are included in this class action? This lawsuit covers U-Haul rental trucks and vans, including pickup trucks, cargo vans, or any size truck or moving van as long as the rental vehicle had a dashboard fuel gauge. Page 3 of 7

4 9. Do I need to have a copy of my U-Haul truck rental contract in order to Claim the Benefits of the Settlement? No. If you meet the class definition described in paragraph 7 above, you are a member of the Class and entitled to the benefits of the settlement even if you did not retain a copy of your U-Haul truck rental contract. 10. Do I need copies of my fuel receipts to Claim the Benefits of the Settlement? No. If you meet the class definition described in paragraph 7 above, you are a member of the Class and entitled to the benefits of the settlement whether or not you have receipts for fuel purchased for your U-Haul truck. 11. What are the Terms of the Settlement? The settlement provides that U-Haul will issue a $10 truck rental discount certificate -- one certificate for each qualifying transaction -- to every class member who requests one or more certificates. Only one such certificate may be used at a U-Haul rental center in California per new truck rental transaction. The new rental must start and the discount certificate presented within one year of issuance of the Discount certificates by U-Haul in response to a timely claim. Class members may transfer the discount certificate to an immediate family member. U-Haul has also agreed that if less than $3 million worth of discount certificates is used in new truck rental transactions, within the time allowed, U-Haul will contribute the difference between the total dollar face value of the certificates used in new transactions and $3 million in in-kind goods or services to various disaster relief programs or charities such as the Wounded Warrior Project or the American Red Cross. U-Haul has also agreed to fund up to $1.4 million in cash, to be used for providing notice and administering the settlement, and as allowed by the Court, for attorney s fees and reimbursement of expenses for Class Counsel (not to exceed $1.2 million of the $1.4 million), and for an incentive award of up to $5,000 for the named Plaintiff and Class Representative, Leonard E. Aron. To date Class Counsel have not received any compensation in this case. If less than the $1.4 million is used as described above, the difference will be added to the $3 million in in-kind goods or services to the charities. Important information about the case and about the settlement (including the complete Stipulation of Settlement) is on the website, Please check the website to be kept informed about any future developments. The Settlement also provides that all members of the Class shall be deemed to have released U-Haul from any and all claims that are related to (1) U-Haul s use of a fuel gauge to measure fuel to determine fuel charges, fueling or refueling fees, or any other charge or fee relating to the rental of a vehicle, and/or (2) U-Haul s policy of not reimbursing customers for excess fuel in the rental vehicle at the time of return of the vehicle. 12. What are my rights in the Lawsuit Now? Do Nothing: Do nothing and you will not receive any benefit from the settlement. However, you will be bound by the judgment if the Court finally approves the settlement. Complete a Claim Form to Receive the Benefit of the Settlement: Complete the Claim Form at the end of this Notice or as available by mail or on the website and return it by January 14, 2015 (or such later date as may be ordered by the Court; visit for updated information), to receive the benefits of the settlement. You will be bound by the judgment if the Court finally approves the settlement. Object to the Settlement and/or Appear at the Fairness Hearing: You may file a written objection to the settlement and appear at the Fairness Hearing, as described below by October 15, You Page 4 of 7

5 may consult your own attorney at your own expense about the rights, if any, you may have against UHaul concerning the issues in this case. To object to the settlement you must file a written objection that states your name and the reasons why you object to the settlement and you must file that written objection with the Court and serve it on Class Counsel and U-Haul's counsel. COURT Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Department S. Commonwealth Ave. Los Angeles, CA CLASS COUNSEL U-HAUL S COUNSEL Drew E. Pomerance, Esq. Roxborough, Pomerance, Nye & Adreani 5820 Canoga Ave., Ste. 250 Woodland Hills, CA Gary L. Birnbaum, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Dickinson Wright/Mariscal Weeks 2901 N. Central Avenue, Ste. 200 Phoenix, AZ Harold J. Tomin, Esq. Harold J. Tomin, A Law Corporation 146 S. Fuller Ave. Los Angeles, CA James R. Evans, Jr., Esq. Alston & Bird L.L.P. 333 S. Hope St., 16th Floor Los Angeles, CA Jerome S. Billet, Esq. Billet & Kaplan Eastborne Ave. Los Angeles, CA What If I Did Not Previously Opt Out? Persons who did not exclude themselves by November 5, 2012, continue to be part of the Class and will be bound by the Court s judgment if it finally approves the settlement. THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU 14. Do I have a lawyer in this case? The Court has appointed the attorneys listed above under Class Counsel as your attorneys. 15. How will the lawyers be paid? You do not have to pay Class Counsel to represent you. Class Counsel will be paid only if they are successful in achieving a recovery and they will be paid attorneys fees and expenses only as may be approved by the Court. The Court will set the amount that Class Counsel will be paid as fees and for reimbursement of expenses and costs, if any at the Fairness Hearing described below. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, and have that lawyer appear in court for you in this case, you must hire one at your own expense. Class Counsel will also request that an amount not exceeding $5,000 be awarded to the Class Representative who brought the suit and helped Class Counsel on behalf of the whole Class. Page 5 of 7

6 THE SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING 16. When and Where will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? Do I have to Come to the Fairness Hearing? May I Speak at the Fairness Hearing? The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on November 15, 2013 at the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Dept. 323, 600 S. Commonwealth Ave., Los Angeles CA The hearing may be moved to a different day and/or time without any new notice, so it is a good idea to check At the hearing the Court will then consider whether the Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate. The Court will also consider the fee and expense reimbursement applications of Class Counsel, not to exceed $1.2 million. The Court will also consider the application for an incentive award to Mr. Aron not exceeding $5,000. The Court will also consider any objections to the Settlement that have been timely and properly filed and served. The Court may or may not make its ruling at the hearing. You do not have to attend the hearing. Class Counsel will be present to respond to the Court. You are welcome, however, to come at your own expense. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but that is not necessary or required. If you want to object to the settlement, you must file yourself or through your own lawyer, a written Notice of Objection that must identify yourself, your attorney, if any, and explain the reasons for your objection. Any such objection must be filed with the Court and delivered by mail or personally to all of Class Counsel and to U-Haul s counsel (as identified above) no later than 21 days before the date set for the Fairness Hearing, as set out above. If you file and serve an objection, you do not have to come to the Fairness Hearing to talk about it. As long as you timely filed and served the objection, the Court will consider it. If you decide to be represented by your own lawyer at the Fairness Hearing, and that lawyer is not identified in any objection to the Settlement that you might make, your attorney must file with the Court and deliver personally or by mail to Class Counsel and to U-Haul's lawyers a Notice of Appearance, in accordance with California procedure and practice, at least 10 days before the Fairness Hearing. GETTING MORE INFORMATION 17. How do I get more information? This Notice summarizes the lawsuit, the settlement and the proceedings to finally approve the settlement. You can get more information about the lawsuit at or by writing to: U-Haul Fuel Gauge Settlement c/o The Notice Company Inc. PO Box 778 Hingham, MA The complete Court file in this case is available at the Clerk s Office, Los Angeles County Superior Court, 600 S. Commonwealth Ave., Los Angeles, CA PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT WITH QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT Page 6 of 7

7 CLAIM FORM Complete, detach and mail by no later than January 14, 2015* to: U-Haul Fuel Gauge Claims U-Haul International, Inc. Legal Department 2721 North Central Avenue, 5th Floor Phoenix, AZ The undersigned hereby certifies under penalty of perjury that I had qualifying class transactions, which were U-Haul truck rentals returned in California involving underfill or overfill costs associated with fuel gauge readings during the period April 27, 2000 through December 31, I request a Discount Certificate for each qualifying class transaction. I understand that the Discount Certificates will expire one year from issuance and that only one Discount Certificate may be used per new truck rental transaction from a U-Haul rental center in California. *Changes to the Claim Form deadline, if any, will be posted at Sign Name: Print Name: Print Mailing Address: Date: Check here if you prefer to receive your Discount Certificate by . Print Address: PHOENIX v1 Page 7 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Los Angeles County Superior Court South v. RMG Sunset, Inc. et al., Case No. BC 652905 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT You are a class member if you purchased food and/or beverages at any Cabo

More information

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ( NOTICE ) Mark Thompson v. Professional Courier & Newspaper Distribution, Inc., et al. Case No. BC568018 600 South Commonwealth Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90005 If you are

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO If You Are or Were a Non-Exempt Employee of Gale Pacific USA, Inc., or Worked for Gale Pacific USA, Inc. as a Temporary Worker,

More information

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION NICOLE MONTGOMERY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ORBITZ, LLC, Defendant. Superior Court of the State of California

More information

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE COUNTY IF YOU ARE A RESIDENT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WHO ENTERED INTO A DEBT SETTLEMENT PROGRAM WITH THE INIGUEZ LAW FIRM, YOU COULD BE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT. This is the only way to receive a payment. Basic Information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT. This is the only way to receive a payment. Basic Information United States District Court for Eastern District of Michigan If You Received a Prerecorded Phone Call on Your Telephone from Art Van Furniture, LLC ( Art Van ), You Could Get a Payment from a Class Action

More information

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, KITTITAS COUNTY IF YOU ARE A WASHINGTON STATE RESIDENT WHO ENTERED INTO A DEBT SETTLEMENT PROGRAM WITH DEBT AID PROCESSING, INC., YOU COULD BE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT FROM

More information

Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Josefina Hernandez v. Logix Federal Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD

More information

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING ACCOUNT

More information

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING ACCOUNT

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: Salazar v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Pending before the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles Case No. BC556145 If you worked for Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ( Sedgwick

More information

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union

Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union Todd Wodja v. Washington State Employees Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. THIS NOTICE

More information

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD If you made a purchase at a Godiva store in the United States

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Harris v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Case No.:4:06-cv-00175-KGB If You Are or

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana If you are or were a contractor for FedEx Ground, a class action settlement may affect your rights. Margaret Gibson, et al. v. FedEx Ground

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HARLEY SEEGERT v. Case No. 37-2017-00016131-CU-MC-CTL P.F. CHANG S CHINA BISTRO, INC., et al. TO: NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date: IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A proposed Settlement has been reached in a class action alleging that HD Supply, Inc. ( HDS or Defendant ) sent marketing

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you purchased goods using a credit card from a Sur La Table store in California during the period of time between February

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-00715-KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND HEARING If you

More information

NADINE MAZARD, ET AL. v. BTLS, INC. d/b/a BALISE TOYOTA MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. SUCV BLS2 SETTLEMENT NOTICE

NADINE MAZARD, ET AL. v. BTLS, INC. d/b/a BALISE TOYOTA MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. SUCV BLS2 SETTLEMENT NOTICE NADINE MAZARD, ET AL. v. BTLS, INC. d/b/a BALISE TOYOTA MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. SUCV2014-01726-BLS2 SETTLEMENT NOTICE AS A CUSTOMER OF BTLS, INC. d/b/a BALISE TOYOTA YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO

More information

If you were a borrower on a mortgage loan account held or serviced by Wells Fargo, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you were a borrower on a mortgage loan account held or serviced by Wells Fargo, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 1:16-cv-09483 If you were a borrower on a mortgage loan account held or serviced by Wells Fargo,

More information

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully. If you received treatment through a Swedish Health Services Emergency Department and were uninsured, you could be entitled to benefits under a class action settlement. The King County Superior Court authorized

More information

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JEROME JENSON, BETTY TAIT, EILEEN HORTON and JOSEPH RISSE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action IF YOU WERE CHARGED A FUEL SURCHARGE OR FUEL/ENVIRONMENTAL FEE IN FLORIDA BY SOUTHERN WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC D/B/A SUN DISPOSAL ( SWS ) FROM 01/14/12

More information

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY United States District Court for the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION X AMIT PATEL, on behalf of himself and all others

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CPT ID SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALL PERSONS WHO WORKED FOR DEFENDANT ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL

More information

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 1:15-cv-24326-CMA If you made a purchase at a Microsoft retail store using a credit card

More information

Superior Court of California, County of Alameda

Superior Court of California, County of Alameda Superior Court of California, County of Alameda If You Lived in an Apartment or Townhome at the 1440 Mowry Avenue Apartment Complex Known as the Royal Pines Apartments and Townhomes in Fremont, California

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana If you are or were a contractor for FedEx Ground, a class action settlement may affect your rights. Gary Lee Larson, et al., v. FedEx Ground

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET... NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING Frank Ortegon-Ramirez v. Cedar Fair, L.P., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (CASE NO. 1-13-CV-254098)

More information

Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement

Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Honda and Acura Rear Brake Pad Settlement If you received this Notice by mail, or if you are a current or former owner or lessee of

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (Newark) Civil Action NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (Newark) Civil Action NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (Newark) PHYLLIS SALTERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Civil Action vs. Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-02775-SRC-MAS

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS United States District Court for the Eastern District of California If You Purchased Certain Zicam Products, You May Be Eligible to Receive a Payment as Part of a Proposed Class Action Settlement A federal

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Superior Court for the State of Connecticut Judicial District of Hartford If you were a customer of Starion Energy s variable rate electricity supply services you could receive a cash payment from a class

More information

Barbara Allen v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC, now known as CIOX Technologies, LLC, Fla. 13 th Jud. Cir. Ct. Case No. 12-CA

Barbara Allen v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC, now known as CIOX Technologies, LLC, Fla. 13 th Jud. Cir. Ct. Case No. 12-CA Barbara Allen v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC, now known as CIOX Technologies, LLC, Fla. 13 th Jud. Cir. Ct. Case No. 12-CA-013154 You have been identified as someone who may have a claim regarding charges

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA Case No. 1:08-CV WTL-JMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA Case No. 1:08-CV WTL-JMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA Case No. 1:08-CV-01684-WTL-JMS IF YOU APPLIED THROUGH TICKETMASTER TO PURCHASE PRELIMINARY ROUND TICKETS FOR THE 2009 NCAA MEN S COLLEGE BASKETBALL

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Perez, et al. v. Centinela Feed, Inc. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC575341 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY To: A California

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re INTERMUNE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-03-2954-SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

LEGAL NOTICE IF YOU REFINANCED A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE IN CONNECTICUT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

LEGAL NOTICE IF YOU REFINANCED A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE IN CONNECTICUT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT LEGAL NOTICE IF YOU REFINANCED A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE IN CONNECTICUT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT The District Court has authorized this Notice. It is not a solicitation

More information

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING

More information

If You purchased a Rescue It! Product You Could Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement

If You purchased a Rescue It! Product You Could Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION If You purchased a Rescue It! Product You Could Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement A Federal Court authorized

More information

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement & Final Fairness Hearing

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement & Final Fairness Hearing Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement & Final Fairness Hearing Walker v. Cutolo Law Firm, LLC Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County Docket No. MID-L-007498-11 This notice is

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV AHS (MLGx) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV AHS (MLGx) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor America ) Case No. SACV 06-345 AHS (MLGx) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO: ALL CURRENT OR FORMER OWNERS AND

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA WILD RIDES INTERNET CAFE, LLC, and CLIMATE MASTERS HEATING & COOLING, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, WASTE INDUSTRIES, LLC, Defendant. Case No.: 17 CV 756-1

More information

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID»

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» American Casino Recording Class Action c/o Dahl Administration LLC P.O Box 3614 Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614 *«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» UNIQUE ID:

More information

Djoric v. Justin Brands, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

Djoric v. Justin Brands, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement Djoric v. Justin Brands, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC574927 Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement IF YOU PURCHASED A PAIR OF CHIPPEWA BRAND BOOTS OR OTHER CHIPPEWA FOOTWEAR BETWEEN

More information

Submit a Claim Exclude Yourself Object Go to a Hearing Do Nothing

Submit a Claim Exclude Yourself Object Go to a Hearing Do Nothing If you purchased a Tire Protection Package, Service Central Road Hazard, King Royal Tire Service or other vehicle service contract providing for road hazard protection from Big O Tires, LLC on or after

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIRENA TORRES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 1:16-cv-01915-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. PICK-A-PART AUTO

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. You are not being sued. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. You are not being sued. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Bishop, et al. v. Behr Process Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-04464 (N.D. Ill.) If you used Behr DeckOver between September 1,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Southern Division Brian J. Martin, Yahmi Nundley, and Katherine Cadeau, individually and on behalf Case No. 2:15-cv-12838 of all

More information

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

THESE RIGHTS AND OPTIONS AND THE DEADLINES TO EXERCISE THEM ARE EXPLAINED IN THIS NOTICE. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A proposed settlement has been reached in a class action alleging that Hewlett-Packard Company, now known as HP Inc.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you Incurred One or More $35 Extended Overdrawn Balance Charges in Connection with your BANK OF AMERICA personal checking account,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Comerica Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Comerica Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Comerica Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court authorized

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If you purchased any Babyganics Products Between September 7, 2010 and June 26, 2018 You May be Eligible to Receive a Payment from a Class

More information

This Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights. A Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

This Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights. A Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. LEGAL NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Gladys Flores, et al. v. Locus Telecommunications, Inc., et al. Case No. BC492907 Consumers of Locus Telecommunications, Inc. s Prepaid Calling Cards

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JAVIER PEREZ, as an individual and

More information

A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A federal court authorized this supplemental notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you are a current or former owner

More information

If you received a telephone call regarding the sale or leasing of a residential solar panel system, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a telephone call regarding the sale or leasing of a residential solar panel system, a class action settlement may affect your rights. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Dobkin v. NRG Residential Solar Solutions LLC, Case No. 3:15-cv-05089 If you received a telephone call regarding the sale or leasing of a residential

More information

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION IF YOU BOUGHT A MONSTER HDMI CABLE WITH AN ADVERTISED BANDWIDTH EXCEEDING 10.2 GBPS BETWEEN AUGUST 25, 2011 AND MARCH 6, 2018,

More information

If You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Summary of Your Rights and Choices:

If You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Summary of Your Rights and Choices: United States District Court District of Columbia If You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Proposed Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CONCERNING SEVERANCE CLAIMS The United States Bankruptcy Court for

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE CAST IRON SOIL PIPE AND FITTINGS ANTITRUST LITIGATION 1:14-md-2508-HMS-CHS THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. United States District Court, Central District of California Case No. 2:14-cv-04378 (RGk) SHx THIS NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Case No. RG06254835) A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However,

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Synovus Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Synovus Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Synovus Bank, You May be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court authorized

More information

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE CHINACAST EDUCATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. CV 12-4621-JFW (PLAx NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION To: All persons

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to Get $15 Or More Per Package from a Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to Get $15 Or More Per Package from a Class Action Settlement United States District Court for the Southern District of New York In re Scotts EZ Seed Litigation, Case No. 7:12-cv-4727 (VB) (PED) If You Purchased Scotts Turf Builder EZ Seed, You May Be Eligible to

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ARTHUR STEIN, EDWIN HUMPHRIES, DAVID BAILEY, and ROBERT MACCINI, on behalf of the Employee Investment Plan of Stone & Webster Incorporated and Participating

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

February 14, 2018 at 9:00 A.M.

February 14, 2018 at 9:00 A.M. Eck, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al. Case No. BC577028 If You Were A Retail Electricity Customer Of The Los Angeles Department Of Water And Power from January 29, 2012 to September 14, 2017, This

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you receive this Notice, you have been identified as someone

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to TD Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to TD Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to TD Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court directed this

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE Mary Ketner v. State Employees Credit Union of Maryland, Inc. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS!

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Audino,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL R. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, LP, Defendant. Case No. 2:13-cv-00767 MAGISTRATE JUDGE

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NICOLE COGDELL, et al., ) ) Case No. SACV 12-01138 AG (ANx) Plaintiffs, ) ) Honorable Andrew J. Guilford v. ) ) THE WET SEAL,

More information

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods;

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods; SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TYRONE WINDHAM, TERRY COLLINS, and TIMOTHY DAVIS, et al. V. T.F. LOUDERBACK, INC. dba BAY AREA BEVERAGE COMPANY, ET AL. - CASE NO. MSC16-00861

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA If You Received a Letter from the Law Firm of Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP Dated between October 23, 2009 and October 22,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Have you purchased and used Align probiotic supplements, but received no digestive relief or other digestive benefit? If so, you may be entitled to

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IF YOU RECEIVED CORRESPONDENCE FROM OR WERE SUBJECTED TO A LIEN BY WITTSTADT TITLE & ESCROW, LLC BETWEEN JUNE 21, 2011, AND JUNE 20, 2012.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re TERAYON COMMUNICATION ) Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION ) This Document Relates To:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al.

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Cause No. 2016-74799; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. A class action settlement involving administrative billing fees allegedly

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT Matthews, et al. v. TCL Communication, Inc. et al., Case No. NO. 3:17-cv-95 (WDNC) OWNERS OF CERTAIN MODELS OF ALCATEL ONETOUCH IDOL 3 BRAND SMARTPHONES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND KENTUCKY MAY CLAIM SETTLEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information