SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians filed
|
|
- Phillip Hardy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians filed their second amended complaint ("Complaint") in Sierra Club et al. v. Jackson, No. 3:10-cv CRB (N.D. Cal) against Defendant Lisa P. Jackson, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), alleging that EPA has failed to undertake certain nondiscretionary duties under the Clean Air Act ("CAA"), 42 U.S.C q, and that such alleged failure is actionable under section 304(a)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7604(a)(2); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs alleged that EPA has failed to perform a duty mandated by CAA section 110(c)(1), 42 U.S.C. 7410(c)(1), to promulgate Federal Implementation Plans ("FIPs") within twenty-four (24) months after issuing a finding of failure to submit State Implementation Plans ("SIPs") meeting applicable requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2), for North Dakota, Hawaii, Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Maryland, Virginia, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida and Georgia with regard to the hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS"); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs also alleged that EPA has failed to perform a duty mandated by CAA section 110(k)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(2), to take final action on the SIP submittals or portions of submittals meeting applicable requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2), for Maryland, Virginia, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arizona with regard to the hour ozone NAAQS; WHEREAS, on March 27, 2008, EPA published a final rule in the Federal Register finding that certain states failed to make a complete SIP submission, in whole or in part, to meet
2 certain specified applicable requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2), for the hour ozone NAAQS, 73 Fed. Reg (March 27, 2008)("Findings Notice"); WHEREAS, in the Findings Notice, EPA found the SIP submission of these states complete for those specified applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) for which EPA had not made findings of failure to submit; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that EPA's obligations under this Settlement Agreement to promulgate Federal Implementation Plans ("FIPs") pursuant to section 110(c) of the CAA are applicable only to the specific findings that certain states have failed to make complete submissions, in whole or in part, for the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) as set out in the Findings Notice; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that EPA's obligations under this Settlement Agreement to take action pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA are only applicable to the specific findings that certain states made complete submissions, in whole or in part, for the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) as set out in the Findings Notice; WHEREAS, the term "19978-hour ozone NAAQS infrastructure SIP" means for the purposes of this Settlement Agreement a submission or multiple submissions from a State addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2), as set out in the Findings Notice. The Findings Notice did not address sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i), 110(a)(2)(I), or the portions of section 110(a)(2)(C) pertaining to nonattainment area requirements, 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(D)(i), (a)(2)(i),(a)(2)(c), and, accordingly, the Parties agree that the obligations set out below do not include EPA taking any actions regarding sections 110(a)(2)(D)(i), 110(a)(2)(I), and portions of section 110(a)(2)(C) pertaining to nonattainment area requirements;
3 WHEREAS, the Parties disagree as to whether, in the context of acting upon the hour ozone NAAQS infrastructure SIPS, EPA must take affirmative action to address allegations of specific deficiencies in the existing SIPS of the affected states. Plaintiffs contend that EPA is not meeting its obligations under an existing consent decree by failing to address these issues; EPA contends that it is not required to address these substantive issues in the context of acting on the SII's in question, and hence is meeting its obligations under the consent decree; WHEREAS, the specific SIP deficiencies alleged are: (1) provisions related to excess emissions during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction at sources that may be contrary to the CAA and EPA's policies addressing such emissions ("SSM");(2) provisions related to "director's variance" or "director's discretion" that purport to permit revisions to SIl' approved emissions limits without sufficient public process or requiring approval by EPA that may be contrary to the CAA ("director's discretion"); (3) provisions for minor source new source review programs that may be inconsistent with the requirements of the CAA and EPA's regulations that pertain to such programs ("minor source NSR"); and (4) provisions for Prevention of Significant Deterioration programs that may be inconsistent with current requirements of EPA's "Final NSR Improvement Rule," 67 Fed. Reg. 80,186 (December 31, 2002), as amended by 72 Fed. Reg. 32,526 (June 13, 2007) ("NSR Reform")(collectively, the "Alleged SIP Deficiencies"); WHEREAS, Sierra Club submitted a petition for rulemaking to EPA on June 30, 2011, requesting that EPA act on specific alleged SIP deficiencies related to the SSM issue ("Plaintiff's SSM Petition"); WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to settle claims set forth in the Complaint without admission of any issue of fact or law; 3
4 WHEREAS, the Parties, by entering into this Settlement Agreement, do not waive or limit any claim or defense, on any grounds, related to any final EPA action; WHEREAS, the Parties consider this Settlement Agreement to be an adequate and equitable resolution of all claims set forth in the Complaint; WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public, the Parties, and judicial economy to resolve this matter without protracted litigation; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, intending to be bound by this Agreement, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Pursuant to section 110(c)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(c)(1), EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register: (a) no later than March 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's proposed action either approving a SIP, promulgating a FIP, or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Alaska, Hawaii, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon and Washington to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2), as identified in the Findings Notice; and (b) no later than July 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving a SIP, promulgating a FIP, or approving a SIl' in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Alaska, Hawaii, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon and Washington to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2), as identified in the Findings Notice.
5 2. Pursuant to section 110(c)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(c)(1), EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register: (a) no later than March 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's proposed action either approving a SIl', promulgating a FIl', or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Maryland and Arkansas to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), regarding NOx as a precursor for ozone, as identified in the Findings Notice; and (b) no later than July 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving a SIP, promulgating a FIP, or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Maryland and Arkansas to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), regarding NOx as a precursor for ozone, as identified in the Findings Notice. 3. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register: (a) no later than March 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's proposed action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except for portions addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), for Maryland and Arkansas. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP
6 submissions for Maryland and Arkansas are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto; and (b) no later than July 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except for portions addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), for Maryland and Arkansas. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Maryland and Arkansas are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto. 4. Pursuant to section 110(c)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(c)(1), EPA shall no later than January 31, 2012, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving a SIP, promulgating a FIP, or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Virginia to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), regarding NOx as a precursor for ozone, as identified in the Findings Notice. 5. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall no later than January 31, 2012, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except for portions addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), for Virginia and Oklahoma. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Virginia and Oklahoma are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto.
7 6. Pursuant to section 110(c)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(c)(1), EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register: (a) no later than March 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's proposed action either approving a SIP, promulgating a FIP, or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Arizona and Florida to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(G), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(G), as identified in the Findings Notice; and (b) no later than July 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving a SIP, promulgating a FIP, or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Arizona and Florida to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(G), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(G), as identified in the Findings Notice. 7. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register: (a) no later than March 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's proposed action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except for portions addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(G), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(G), for Florida. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Florida are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto; and (b) no later than July 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in 7
8 part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except for portions addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(G), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(G), for Florida. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Florida are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto. 8. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register: (a) no later than June 15, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's proposed action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP for Arizona regarding applicable requirements for section 110(a)(2)(A}-(C), (E),(F)&(H)-(M), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2) (A~(C),(E),(F)&(H)-(M). The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Arizona are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto; and (b) no later than October 15, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP for Arizona regarding applicable requirements for section 110(a)(2)(A~(C), (E),(F)&(H)-(M), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2) (A}-(C),(E),(F)&(H)-(M). The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Arizona are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto. 9. Pursuant to section 110(c)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(c)(1), EPA shall no later than January 31, 2012, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice or notices of the
9 Agency's final action either approving a SII', promulgating a FIP, or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP, for Georgia to meet the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(G), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(G), as identified in the Findings Notice 10. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall no later than January 31, 2012, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except for portions addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(G), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(G), for Georgia. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Georgia are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto. 11. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall sign for publication in the Federal Register: (a) no later than March 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's proposed action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), regarding NOx as a precursor for ozone, for Tennessee. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Tennessee are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto; and (b) no later than July 31, 2012, a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, except the
10 applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), regarding NOx as a precursor for ozone, for Tennessee. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Tennessee are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto. 12. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall no later than January 31, 2012, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP, relating to portions addressing the applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2)(C) &(J), 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(C) &(J), regarding NOx as a precursor for ozone, for Tennessee. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Tennessee are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto. 13. Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k), EPA shall no later than January 31, 2012, sign for publication in the Federal Register a notice or notices of the Agency's final action either approving, disapproving, or approving in part and disapproving in part the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIPS for Nevada and North Carolina. The hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIP submissions for Nevada and North Carolina are specifically identified in Chart "A" attached hereto. 14. Within 15 business days after taking each action required in Paragraphs 1-13, EPA shall send notice of such action to the Office of the Federal Register for review and publication. 10
11 15. Sierra Club submitted Plaintiff's SSM Petition on June 30, Plaintiff's SSM Petition addresses certain specifically identified provisions in the SIPS of states that Sierra Club contends are contrary to the CAA and EPA's policies for emissions during SSM events, and explains the basis for that contention with respect to each identified provision. EPA shall take final action to grant or to deny Plaintiffls SSM Petition by August 31, Plaintiffs agree that EPA may meet this obligation in one or more administrative actions, as EPA determines appropriate, and that EPA may elect to grant or to deny Plaintiff's SSM Petition with respect to individual alleged illegal SSM provisions, as EPA determines is consistent with the CAA and its policies. EPA further agrees that for purposes of this Settlement Agreement, a grant of the petition in question with respect to an alleged illegal SSM provision shall entail the issuance of a final SIP call under CAA section 110(k)(5) or of a final error correction under CAA section 110(k)(6), as EPA deems appropriate, by the August 31, 2012, deadline. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be construed as precluding the Plaintiff from challenging EPA's response to Plaintiff's SSM Petition in whole or in part. 16. For purposes of this Settlement Agreement only, and in consideration of EPA's agreement to act upon the Plaintiff's SSM Petition by the August 31, 2012 deadline, Plaintiffs agree that EPA is not obligated to take affirmative action to address the Alleged SIP Deficiencies in the existing SIPs in the context of acting upon the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIPS. This paragraph shall no longer apply if EPA fails to comply with the August 31, 2012 deadline in Paragraph Plaintiffs further agree, in consideration for EPA's agreement to act upon Plaintiff's SSM Petition by the August 31, 2012 deadline, not to file any motion or other pleading in the matters identified in Attachment "B" attached hereto, or file a motion to intervene 11
12 in any other litigation brought by any other party related to the hour ozone NAAQS Infrastructure SIPs, or the comparable SIPs submitted by States for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS or the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, requesting the court (i) to find EPA in violation of the consent decree in the aforementioned cases or (ii) to provide any other relief, based upon EPA's allegedly not taking final action on the SIP submissions required under CAA section 110(a)(2) for the hour ozone NAAQS, 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, or the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS with respect to the Alleged SIP Deficiencies. This paragraph shall no longer apply and Plaintiffs may file any motion or other pleading in the actions identified in Attachment "B", including a motion for contempt, if EPA fails to comply with the August 31, 2012 deadline in Paragraph 15. EPA preserves all of its defenses. 18. EPA shall provide Plaintiffs with written notice and an opportunity to cure if EPA believes Plaintiffs have failed to comply with Paragraphs 16 or 17. Plaintiffs shall not be considered in breach of this Settlement Agreement until 30 days have passed after Plaintiffs have received EPA's written notice of an alleged breach of Paragraphs 16 or 17 and Plaintiffs have not withdrawn the motion or other pleading which EPA believes was a breach of Paragraphs 16 or The Parties may agree to extend any deadlines contained in this Settlement Agreement by mutual written consent. 20. Within 15 days of signing this Settlement Agreement, the Parties agree to file a joint motion in the district court to administratively close Sierra Club et al. v. Jackson, No. 3:10- cv crb (N.D. Cal). Plaintiffs shall file a motion for voluntary dismissal of Sierra Club et al. v. Jackson, No. 3:10-cv CRB (N.D. Cal), with prejudice, in accordance with Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with respect to all claims in the Complaint within 12
13 15 days after notice appears in the Federal Register of EPA taking the last rulemaking action required under Paragraphs 1-13, and 15 of this Settlement Agreement. 21. If EPA fails to take action as set forth in Paragraphs 1-15, the Plaintiffs' sole remedy under this Settlement Agreement shall be the right to reinstate Sierra Club et al. v. Jackson, No. 3:10-cv CRB (N.D. Cal). EPA does not waive or limit any defense relating to such litigation. In Sierra Club et al. v. Jackson, No. 3:10-cv CRB (N.D. Cal), the Parties agree that contempt of court is not an available remedy under this Settlement Agreement 22. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be construed to limit or modify the discretion accorded EPA by the CAA and by general principles of administrative law, including the discretion to alter, amend or revise any responses and/or actions contemplated by this Settlement Agreement. EPA's obligation to take the actions set forth in Paragraphs 1-15 by the time specified therein does not constitute a limitation or modification of EPA's discretion within the meaning of this paragraph. 23. EPA agrees that, pursuant to section 304(d) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7604(d), Plaintiffs are both eligible and entitled to recover their costs of litigation this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred prior to execution of this Settlement Agreement. The Parties shall seek to resolve informally any claim for costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 24. The obligations imposed by EPA under this Settlement Agreement may only be undertaken using appropriated funds. No provisions of this Settlement Agreement shall be interpreted as or constitute a commitment or requirement that EPA obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other applicable federal law. 13
14 25. The Parties agree and acknowledge that prior to entering into this Settlement Agreement, EPA must provide notice of this Settlement Agreement in the Federal Register and an opportunity for public comment pursuant to section 113(g) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7413(g). After this Settlement Agreement has undergone notice and comment, the Administrator and/or the Attorney General, as appropriate, shall promptly consider any such written comments in determining whether to withdraw or withhold their consent to the Settlement Agreement, in accordance with section 113(g) of the CAA. 26. Any notices required or provided for by this Settlement Agreement shall be made in writing, via facsimile, or other means, and sent to the following: For Plaintiffs: For Defendant: Robert Ukeiley Law Office of Robert Ukeiley 435R Chestnut Street, Suite 1 Berea, KY Tel: Fax: rukeiley@igc.org Kimberly [Kasey] Sturm 260 Peachtree Street, NW Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia Tel: Fax: ksturm@stack-envirolaw.com Chief, Environmental Defense Section U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box Washington, D.C
15 Geoffrey L. Wilcox Office of the General Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Bldg. MC 2344A 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C Phone: (202) Fax: (202) The undersigned representatives of each party certify that they are fully authorized by the party that they represent to bind that party to the terms of this Settlement Agreement. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS: Dated: I ~ - Z~j. ~~' e /' t L imber [Kasey] A, St m (A mute Pro Hac e) 260 Peachtree Street, NW Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia (404) (404) ksturm@stack-envirolaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Dated: Zt~ \~ IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment &Natural Resources Division,p ~~_~ ~. Michelle R. Lambert Trial Attorney 15
16 U.S. Department of Justice Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box Washington, D.C Tel: (202) Fax: (202) Counsel for Defendant 16
17 SIP IDENTIFICATION CHART State SA 110(a)(2) Requirements * SIP Identification** Maryland 3 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), 0011; ; ; (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M) ; ; ; Arkansas 3 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 0028; Virginia 5 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). Oklahoma 5 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). December 10, 2007, Letter from David K. Paylor, Director of VADEQ, and enclosure State Implementation Plan 110(a)(2) Requirements for Ozone ; December 13, 2007, Letter from David K. Paylor, Director of VADEQ, and enclosure Status of 110(a)(2)Requirements in the Virginia State Implementation Plan 0031 Florida 7 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). Arizona 8 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2) (A) (C), (E), (F) & (H)-(M) Georgia U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M) October 14, 2009, Letter from Benjamin H. Grumbles, Director ADEQ, Re: Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision Under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) and (2); 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and hour Ozone NAAQS. 0016; Attachment A to Settlement Agreement Sierra Club et al., v. Jackson Case No. 3:10-cv-04060
18 SIP IDENTIFICATION CHART Tennessee 11,12 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). North Carolina U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). Nevada U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). 0021; May 28, 2009, Submission by Barry Stephens, Technical Secretary for TDEC, Official Submittal Request for State Implementation Plan Revisions to Construction Permits; Operating Permits; and General Provisions 0019; ; February 1, 2008, Letter from Leo M. Drozdoff, Administrator NDEP, with enclosures regarding CAA 110(a)(2)(A)-(M) Requirements in the Current Nevada State Implementation Plan for 8- hour Ozone * This Settlement Agreement only obligates EPA to act on the requirements regarding the hour ozone NAAQS addressed in the 2008 Findings Notice or other submissions cited in this chart. This does not include 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(I) and portions of section 110(a)(2)(C) pertaining to nonattainment area requirements. ** Unless otherwise specified, this is the Document ID from the docket for our 2008 completeness findings, Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR , or the date of the submission. The docket may be accessed online at 2 Attachment A to Settlement Agreement Sierra Club et al., v. Jackson Case No. 3:10-cv-04060
19 Identified Cases Relevant to Paragraph Sierra Club v. Jackson, PLF (D.D.C.) 2. WildEarth Guardians et al. v. Jackson, No. 3:11-cv WHA (N.D. Cal.) 3. WildEarth Guardians v. Jackson, No. 09-cv REB-MJW (D. Co.) Attachment B to Settlement Agreement Sierra Club et al. v. Jackson, No. 3:10-cv CRB (N.D. Cal)
Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-02112-JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, Case: 1:10-cv-02112-JEB v. LISA JACKSON, in her official
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) SIERRA CLUB, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 1:12-cv-00012 (CKK) v. ) ) LISA P. JACKSON, in her official ) capacity as Administrator, UNITED
More informationCase 1:12-cv CKK Document 12 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00012-CKK Document 12 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 1:12-cv-00012 (CKK v. LISA P. JACKSON, in
More informationCase 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-01814-PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENTUCKY ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-01814 LISA JACKSON,
More informationCase 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:12-cv-00754-RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-00754-RPM-MEH WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, v.
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2) the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and its Administrator, Gina McCarthy (collectively EPA ). WHEREAS,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1166 Document #1671681 Filed: 04/18/2017 Page 1 of 10 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT WALTER COKE, INC.,
More informationCase 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00243-RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and ) NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ) ASSOCIATION, ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-03043-RHK-JSM Document 47-1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) National Parks Conservation Association, ) Minnesota Center for Environmental )
More informationCase 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00243-RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION and ) NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ) ASSOCIATION, ) )
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is entered into by Basin Electric Power Cooperative ( Basin Electric ), the State of Wyoming ( Wyoming ), and the United States Environmental Protection Agency
More informationCase 1:13-cv GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:13-cv-01553-GK Document 27-1 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action ) No. 13-1553 (GK) v.
More informationCase 1:16-cv JDB Document 33 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00842-JDB Document 33 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-842 (JDB)
More informationCase 1:12-cv JDB Document 25-2 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00111-JDB Document 25-2 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DANIEL M. ASHE
More informationCase 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-00523-RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPALACHIAN VOICES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GINA McCARTHY, in her official
More informationstipulated that each of the above parties shall bear its own costs and fees.
CASE 0:13-cv-01751-ADM-TNL Document 156 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, and NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5 Michele D. Ross Reed Smith LLP 1301 K Street NW Suite 1000 East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 202 414-9297 Fax: 202 414-9299 Email:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 9:09-cv-00077-DWM Document 187-1 Filed 03/18/11 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, et al., v. Plaintiffs, KEN SALAZAR, et
More informationCase 1:14-cv Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01028 Document 1-1 Filed 06/17/14 Page 1 of 61 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 555 4th Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20530
More informationCase 2:13-cv JCJ Document 23-1 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:13-cv-06115-JCJ Document 23-1 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-06115-JCJ CONSENT
More informationCase 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-01008-EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:16-cv-01008-EGS S. M.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIERRA CLUB 85 Second St. 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 v. Plaintiff, ROBERT PERCIASEPE in his Official Capacity as Acting Administrator, United
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Case: 08-1200 Document: 1274843 Filed: 11/01/2010 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al., Petitioners, No. 08-1200 and consolidated
More informationUSCA Case # Document # Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) )
USCA Case #17-1099 Document #1668154 Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 MAR 2 4 2017 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
More informationGOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ
STATE OPPOSITION TO EPA S PROPOSED CLEAN POWER PLAN 1 March 2015 GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ ALABAMA 2 3 4 5 6 ALASKA 7 8 -- -- -- ARKANSAS -- 9 10 -- -- ARIZONA 11 12 13 14 15 FLORIDA -- 16 17 --
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1308 Document #1573669 Filed: 09/17/2015 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, INC. and WALTER COKE, INC.,
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:16-cv-00199 Document 3 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 66 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. Plaintiffs, HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 14, 2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA McCARTHY, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection
More informationCase 1:11-cv CMA-MEH Document 66 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26
Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 66 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH
More informationSTIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA
KARIN J. IMMERGUT, United States Attorney JEFFREY K. HANDY, OSB #84051 jeff.handy@usdoj.gov Assistant United States Attorney 1000 S.W. Third Ave., Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204-2902 Telephone: (503) 727-1013
More informationCase3:13-cv SI Document162 Filed03/02/15 Page1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SIERRA CLUB, et al., v. Plaintiffs, REGINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the
More informationCase 1:04-cv RWR Document 27-2 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-00063-RWR Document 27-2 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al., go Plaintiffs, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
Don Webb, OSB # 97429 INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE PROTECTION 2630 Elinor St. Eugene, OR 97403 Tel: (54) 434-6630 Fax: (54) 434-6702 Email: iwplit@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff RONALD J. TENPAS, Assistant
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED. No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1166 Document #1604344 Filed: 03/16/2016 Page 1 of 55 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No. 15-1166 (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA OPINION AND ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SIERRA CLUB, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No.: 13-CV-356-JHP ) OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTIC ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND
More informationCase 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:13-cv-21570-BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY; MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; MIAMI- DADE COUNTY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. CASE NO. 4:08-cv RH-WCS
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 408 Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.; et al., Plaintiffs, vs.
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
(hereinafter "Sierra Club Petitioners") fied a petition for review of the LRR Rule in the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Case 08-1193) ("Sierra Club Petition"); WHEREAS, the New York City Coalition
More informationCOALITION FOR CLEAN AIR; SIERRA CLUB, INC., v. E.P.A.
1 COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR; SIERRA CLUB, INC., v. E.P.A. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 971 F.2d 219 July 1, 1992 PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the United States District Court for the
More informationCase 4:08-cv RH-WCS Document 90 Filed 08/25/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 90 Filed 08/25/09 Page 1 of 9 FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC.; SIERRA CLUB, INC.; CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC.; ENVIRONMENTAL CONFEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA,
More informationCase 5:14-cv TLB Document 144 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 6997 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case 5:14-cv-05275-TLB Document 144 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 6997 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS IN RE GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION ICS LITIGATION Civil
More informationCASE 0:12-cv RHK-JSM Document 9 Filed 02/01/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-03043-RHK-JSM Document 9 Filed 02/01/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C
USCA Case #15-1485 Document #1590492 Filed: 12/22/2015 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT DEC 2 Z015 RECEIVED ORIGINAL IN THE UNITED SThTES Cbifp UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 10-60961 Document: 00511392286 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT STATE OF TEXAS, et ai., v. Petitioners. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
More informationUNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933
Item 1. Issuer s Identity UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 Name of Issuer Previous Name(s) None Entity Type
More informationFederalR eg ister Environm entald o cu m en ts
Page 1 of 9 file:///j:/air/airq uality/aq PortalFiles/Perm its/op /Section_110_Approval.htm Last updated o n Monday, Ju ly 0 7, 2 0 0 8 FederalR eg ister Environm entald o cu m en ts Y o u are h ere: EPA
More informationCase 1:09-cv JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:09-cv-00091-JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 09-cv-00091-JLK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION,
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #12-1342 Document #1426559 Filed: 03/21/2013 Page 1 of 5 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP, et al.,
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 66 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF CONNECTICUT, COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-00796 Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 66 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. v. SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator
More informationState Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders
State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders Revised 2014 National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit 1901 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1011 Arlington, Virginia 22209
More informationCase 3:17-cv WWE Document 52 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:17-cv-00796-WWE Document 52 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 7 STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SIERRA CLUB and Connecticut FUND FOR THE ENVIRONMENT,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma; STATE OF ALABAMA, by and through
More informationCase 1:08-mc PLF Document 300 Filed 08/17/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-mc-00511-PLF Document 300 Filed 08/17/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In re BLACK FARMERS DISCRIMINATION ) LITIGATION ) ) Misc. No. 08-mc-0511 (PLF)
More informationCase3:12-cv WHA Document59 Filed05/31/13 Page1 of 9
Case:-cv-0-WHA Document Filed0// Page of 0 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General KEVIN W. McARDLE, Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Wildlife
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases)
Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 658 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2012 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No. 04-21448-GOLD (and consolidated cases)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD/MCALILEY (and consolidated cases)
Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 458 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2010 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No. 04-21448-GOLD/MCALILEY (and consolidated
More informationCattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board (Board), established under the Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/25/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-06174, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural
More informationSoybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/06/08 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/08-507, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:09-cv-03286-TCB Document 391 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEOFFREY CALHOUN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE ) is an Oregon corporation;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION SIERRA CLUB, a non-profit corp., NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, a non-profit corp., FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, a non-profit
More informationMEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS
Knowledge Management Office MEMORANDUM Re: Ref. No.: By: Date: Regulation of Retired Judges Serving as Arbitrators and Mediators IS 98.0561 Jerry Nagle, Colleen Danos, and Anne Endress Skove October 22,
More informationShould Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund
Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? 1 Politicians are drawing their own voting maps to manipulate elections and keep themselves and their party in power. 2 3 -The U.S. Constitution requires that the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-00-rm Document 0 Filed 0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 0 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE, vs. Plaintiffs, ANIMAL & PLANT
More informationPERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No
PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES State Member Conference Call Vote Member Electronic Vote/ Email Board of Directors Conference Call Vote Board of Directors Electronic Vote/ Email
More informationTRUMP ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO KEY OBAMA ENVIRONMENTAL RULES BEING CHALLENGED IN COURT. October 6, 2017
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO KEY OBAMA ENVIRONMENTAL RULES BEING CHALLENGED IN COURT October 6, 2017 Rulemaking activities 4/18/17 EPA announced reconsideration of fugitive emission req ts. 6/5/17
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-1182 In the Supreme Court of the United States UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. EME HOMER CITY GENERATION, L.P., ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
More informationAppendix Y: States with Rules Identical to FRCP Draft. By: Tarja Cajudo and Leslye E. Orloff. February 8, 2018
Appendix Y: States with Rules Identical to FRCP 4 1 - Draft By: Tarja Cajudo and Leslye E. Orloff February 8, 2018 Question: Which states have rules of civil procedure that use near the exact language
More informationSUMMARY: On September 25, 2018, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sent the
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/08/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-24483, and on govinfo.gov ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL-9986-25-Region
More information2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State
2016 Voter s by Alabama 10/24/2016 https://www.alabamavotes.gov/electioninfo.aspx?m=vote rs Alaska 10/9/2016 (Election Day registration permitted for purpose of voting for president and Vice President
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petition for Review
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SIERRA CLUB, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, and GREENACTION FOR HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, v. Petitioners, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
More informationTRUMP ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO KEY OBAMA ENVIRONMENTAL RULES BEING CHALLENGED IN COURT. September 18, 2017
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION RESPONSE TO KEY OBAMA ENVIRONMENTAL RULES BEING CHALLENGED IN COURT September 18, 2017 API v. EPA, 13-1108 (D.C. Cir.) Case remains in abeyance. 5/18/17 Case held in abeyance. 7/21/17
More informationPNM EXHIBIT Rt~D-8. Consisting of 7 pages
PNM EXHIBIT Rt~D-8 Consisting of 7 pages STATE OF 1\'"EW MEXICO BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLA..~ FOR THE SAN JUA.~ GENERATING
More informationEPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mailcode: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC
MEMBER COMPANIES Clean Harbors Environmental Services Dow Chemical U.S.A. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Eastman Chemical Company INVISTA S.àr.l. 3M Ross Incineration Services, Inc. Veolia ES Technical Services,
More informationJudicial Consideration of Feasibility in Enforcement of The Clean Air Act
Judicial Consideration of Feasibility in Enforcement of The Clean Air Act by Jim Racobs and Christine Winn I. THE CLEAN AIR ACT AND THE PROBLEM OF FEASIBILITY Due to the increasing industrialization of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :0-cv-0-DGC Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 WO Kelly Paisley; and Sandra Bahr, vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiffs, Henry R. Darwin, in his capacity as Acting
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ) ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, ) 962 Wayne Ave, Suite 610 ) Silver Spring, MD 20910, ) ) and ) ) Elizabeth Southerland )
More informationTHE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE
THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE STATE RENEWAL Additional information ALABAMA Judgment good for 20 years if renewed ALASKA ARIZONA (foreign judgment 4 years)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0-dlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Neighbors of the Mogollon Rim, Inc., v. FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff, United States Forest Service, Federal
More informationThe Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.
The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance. Privilege and Communication Between Professionals Summary of Research Findings Question Addressed: Which jurisdictions
More informationThe Electoral College And
The Electoral College And National Popular Vote Plan State Population 2010 House Apportionment Senate Number of Electors California 37,341,989 53 2 55 Texas 25,268,418 36 2 38 New York 19,421,055 27 2
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Case: 10-1215 Document: 1265178 Filed: 09/10/2010 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, et al., ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 10-1131
More informationCall for Expedited Processing Procedures. Date: August 1, [Call for Expedited Processing Procedures] [August 1, 2013]
Topic: Question by: : Call for Expedited Processing Procedures Martha H. Brown Pennsylvania Date: August 1, 2013 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
More informationCase3:14-cv Document1 Filed09/03/14 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 SAM HIRSCH Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division MARK SABATH (Mass. Bar No. Senior Attorney Environmental Enforcement Section
More informationCopyright 2005 Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC. reprinted with permission from ELR,
35 ELR 10474 ELR NEWS&ANALYSIS EPA s Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Policy: The Cart and the Horse Are in the Ditch by John C. Evans and Donald R. van der Vaart Editors Summary: On December 14, 2004,
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:13-cv-00779-SGB Document 48 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 16 In the United States Court of Federal Claims Consolidated Nos. 13-779 C and 13-1024 C Filed: April 27, 2017 *************************************
More informationORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO
USCA Case #17-1014 Document #1670187 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 11 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO. 17-1014 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO. 15-1363 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More information28 USC 152. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS CHAPTER 6 - BANKRUPTCY JUDGES 152. Appointment of bankruptcy judges (a) (1) Each bankruptcy judge to be appointed for a judicial
More informationCooperative Federalism In the Trump Administration. LaJuana S. Wilcher English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley, LLP Bowling Green, KY
Cooperative Federalism In the Trump Administration LaJuana S. Wilcher English, Lucas, Priest & Owsley, LLP Bowling Green, KY Scott Pruitt Former Oklahoma AG & Current EPA Administrator Cooperative federalism
More informationBylaws. of the. Notre Dame Law Association. Amended September ARTICLE I Name
Bylaws of the Notre Dame Law Association Amended September 2006 ARTICLE I Name The name of the organization shall be the Notre Dame Law Association (hereinafter referred to as NDLA ). ARTICLE II Purpose
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT OPENING BRIEF OF NON-STATE PETITIONERS AND INTERVENOR-PETITIONER
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Case No. 11-1037 (and Consolidated Cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP, ET AL., Petitioners, V.
More informationCase 1:02-cv JR Document 78 Filed 01/29/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:02-cv-00253-JR Document 78 Filed 01/29/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF THE ) FORT BERTHOLD RESERVATION, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 40 CFR Part 52. [EPA-R05-OAR ; FRL Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile Organic Compounds
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/05/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-25158, and on FDsys.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
More informationNotice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code
Notice Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2009 Classification Code N 4520.201 Date March 25, 2009 Office of Primary Interest HCFB-1 1. What is the purpose of this
More informationMatthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research
Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research Arkansas (reelection) Georgia (reelection) Idaho (reelection) Kentucky (reelection) Michigan (partisan nomination - reelection) Minnesota (reelection) Mississippi
More informationDATA BREACH CLAIMS IN THE US: An Overview of First Party Breach Requirements
State Governing Statutes 1st Party Breach Notification Notes Alabama No Law Alaska 45-48-10 Notification must be made "in the most expeditious time possible and without unreasonable delay" unless it will
More informationCase 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cv-02007-EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, and PROJECT
More informationCase Doc 26 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 51. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Greenbelt Division. Chapter 11 Debtor.
Case 18-10334 Doc 26 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Greenbelt Division In re: THE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION OF THE LYNNHILL CONDOMINIUM, Case No.
More informationFederal Register, Volume 75 Issue 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010) Page 1 of 12
Federal Register, Volume 75 Issue 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010) Page 1 of 12 [Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 81874-81878] From
More informationRhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide
Rhoads Online Appointment Rules Handy Guide ALABAMA Yes (15) DOI date approved 27-7-30 ALASKA Appointments not filed with DOI. Record producer appointment in SIC register within 30 days of effective date.
More informationDISTRICT OF HAW AI'I. ) Civil No SOM-KJM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:16-cv-00597-SOM-KJM Document 40 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 167 DAVID L. HENKIN #6876 EARTHJUSTICE 850 Richards Street, Suite 400 Honolulu, Hawai'i 96813 Telephone No.: (808 599-2436 Fax
More information