Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 22 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 22 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA"

Transcription

1 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Honorable Ronald B. Leighton 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA LEONARD PELTIER, CHAUNCEY PELTIER, Plaintiffs, vs. JOEL SACKS, individually and in his capacity as DIRECTOR OF the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES; TIMOTHY CHURCH, individually and in his capacity as PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER of the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES; JAY INSLEE, individually and in his capacity as GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; EDWARD P. WOODS; LARRY LANGBERG; DOES - 00, Defendants. I. MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. :-cv-00-rbl REPLY IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS AGAINST LANGBERG AND WOODS AND MOTION TO STRIKE HILDES DECLARATION AND EXHIBITS NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: June 0, 0 In opposition to this Joint Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs have filed a declaration and eleven exhibits (Dkt. # & attachments) that are well beyond the scope of review under Rule (b)(). Pursuant to LCR (g), Defendants move to strike Mr. Hildes impermissible declaration. This Court should disregard the entirety of Mr. Hildes declaration for the reasons set forth below. REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

2 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of In the Ninth Circuit, the general rule is that the scope of review on a motion to dismiss... is limited to the contents of the complaint. Marder v. Lopez, 0 F.d, (th Cir. 00) (citation omitted). There are two exceptions to this general rule that allows material extrinsic to the complaint to be considered without converting a Rule (b)() motion to dismiss into a Rule motion for summary judgment. Mr. Hildes declaration, however, fails to trigger the application of either exception. As to the first exception, a court may consider materials that involve matters of public record of which a court may take judicial notice. See Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 0 F.d, (th Cir. 00). Neither Mr. Hildes declaration nor any of the exhibits attached thereto are matters of public record. Thus, this exception does not apply. Under the other exception, courts may consider material upon which a complaint necessarily relies if: () the complaint refers to the document; () the document is central to the plaintiff s claim; and () no party questions the authenticity of the copy attached to the (b)() motion. Marder, 0 F.d at (citations omitted). The court may treat such a document as part of the complaint, and thus may assume that its contents are true for purposes of a motion to dismiss[.] Id. (citing U.S. v. Ritchie, F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. 00)). As the Ritchie court explained, a document outside the complaint may be incorporated by reference if the plaintiff refers extensively to the document or the document forms the basis of the plaintiff s complaint. Ritchie, F.d at 0. Here, while the letter written by Mr. Langberg (Dkt. # at ) and the letter written by Mr. Woods (Dkt. #) form the sole basis of Plaintiffs Complaint against them, Mr. Hildes declaration (prepared in response to the Joint Motion) certainly was not mentioned in Plaintiffs Complaint. Compare Dkt. # (Complaint) with Dkt. # (Declaration). The Ritchie court ruled that declarations such as Mr. Hildes in this case are not allowed as pleading exhibits unless they form the basis of the REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

3 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of complaint. Ritchie, F.d at 0 (disapproving the Hieronymus declaration, prepared in response to Homer s motion, because that declaration was obviously not mentioned in the motion ). For these reasons, this Court should strike and disregard Mr. Hildes declaration (and exhibits) as a matter of law. II. REPLY As an initial matter, Plaintiffs challenge whether this Joint Motion to Dismiss is actually being pursued under Rule (b)(). See Dkt. #0, at. A defense of immunity, such as Messrs. Langberg s and Woods joint motion here, is a proper basis for dismissal on Rule (b)() grounds. See, e.g., Schneider v. Amazon.com, Inc., 0 Wn. App.,, P.d (00) (affirming dismissal of a defamation and tortious interference lawsuit under CR (b)() on grounds [defendant] was immune from liability ). In response to this Rule (b)() motion, Plaintiffs devote considerable space in their -page opposition trying to dispute the content of Messrs. Langberg s and Woods letters and in trying to showcase Leonard Peltier s contributions to humanitarian and charitable causes. See Dkt. # 0, at -. None of that is germane. A. RCW..0 Immunity Applies to All Civil Liability Claims, Including Defamation. Plaintiffs have not rebutted Defendants showing of immunity under RCW..0. Plaintiffs confirm that their sole basis for liability against Defendant Langberg and Defendant Woods is for the content of letters they sent to public officials regarding their concern of the public display of art by a person convicted of murdering two FBI agents in cold blood. See Dkt. #0, at -. Plaintiffs allege that the letters included defamatory statements that are the basis of their claims against the moving parties. Plaintiffs are under the mistaken impression that RCW..0 immunity does not protect against defamation claims. See Dkt. #0, at ( Defendants cannot use an anti-slapp statute to REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

4 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of protect them from claims made by Plaintiffs. ). Plaintiffs cite no authority for this argument. They cannot do so because there are no Washington authorities that support it. Furthermore, the Washington legislature has already indicated that communications with government officials are protected First Amendment speech. See Henne v. City of Yakima, Wn.d,, P.d (0) ( the RCW..0 immunity that was designed to protect the exercise of individuals First Amendment rights... and rights under article I, section of the Washington State Constitution. ) (quoting Segaline v. Dep t of Labor and Indus., Wn.d,, P.d 0 (00)). Contrary to Plaintiffs assertion, the applicability of RCW..0 does not hinge on whether the SLAPP action contains a defamation claim or not. The Washington Supreme Court has made clear that RCW..0 immunity applies to all civil liabilities. In Right-Price Recreation, LLC v. Connells Prairie Community Council, for instance, citizen groups made public statements at a Pierce County Council meeting concerning a land developer s activities, and the land developer then sued the citizen groups based on statements they made at the meeting. Wn.d 0,, P.d (00). Specifically, the land developer filed a defamation action against the groups that alleged slander and commercial disparagement; tortious interference with binding sewer agreements; tortious interference with the hearing process; and civil conspiracy. Id. On review, the Washington Supreme Court held that, even if the statements made at the meeting were defamatory, the defendant citizen groups were still entitled to immunity under RCW..0 from developer plaintiff s tortious interference, disparagement, slander, and civil conspiracy claims against them. Id. at ( Even if there had been statements at the meetings which were claimed to be defamatory, the citizens groups were entitled to immunity under former RCW REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

5 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of [.] ). In arriving at its decision, the Right-Price court made no distinction between plaintiff s tortious interference, disparagement, slander, and civil conspiracy claims when it applied RCW..0 to bar all of plaintiff s claims against defendants. Id. at -. This lack of distinction is significant because it shows that no civil claim, including defamation, falls beyond the immunity provided by RCW..0. The statute does not concern itself with specific claims asserted against a defendant seeking the protection of its immunity. Rather, RCW..0 protects a defendant s communication efforts regardless of the claim asserted by plaintiff that arise out of the content of that communication. See Bailey v. State, Wn. App.,, P.d (00) (holding that the defendant was entitled to immunity under RCW..0 from plaintiff s claims arising out of statements made by defendant at a public Spokane County air pollution control board meeting). B. The Application of RCW..0 Immunity Does Not Require Good Faith. The Ninth Circuit, in affirming the Eastern District of Washington s dismissal of defamation claims on grounds of RCW..0 immunity, made clear that a defendant seeking to invoke the immunity does not have to satisfy a good faith requirement. See Cornu-Labat v. Merred, 0 Fed. Appx. (0). In affirming the dismissal and application of RCW..0, the Merred court reasoned as follows: Cornu-Labat s claims of outrage, defamation, and false light against Merred fail because Merred is immune from civil liability under Washington s anti-slapp statute, [RCW]..0. Merred s calls to law enforcement and school employees were reasonably of concern to both, for law enforcement to enforce the protection order and for the school to ensure the safety of its students. Washington law does not require good faith on the part of Merred to receive this statutory protection. The 00 amendments to RCW..0 brought Washington law... in line with these court decisions which recognize[] that the United States Constitution protects advocacy to government, regardless of content or motive, so long as it is designed to have some effect on government decision making. LAWS OF 00, ch., (emphasis added). REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

6 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Id. at (internal citations omitted); see also Phoenix Trading, Inc. v. Loops LLC, F.d, (th Cir. 0) ( Section..0 grants imun[ity] from civil liability for statements to any branch or agency of federal, state, or local government... regarding any matter reasonably of concern to that agency. ). The case law is clear that the Washington Legislature removed the good faith requirement for entitlement to RCW..0 immunity in 00. See Bailey, Wn. App. at ( Former RCW..0 () contained a good faith requirement. This phrase was deleted by amendment. LAWS OF 00, ch.,. ); see also Engler v. City of Bothell, No. C--JLR, 0 WL, at * (W.D. Wash. June 0, 0) ( The communicator need not have acted in good faith in order to be entitled to immunity under this statute [RCW..0]. ). C. Authors of the Letters at Issue are Immune from Civil Liability under RCW..0. For immunity to apply under RCW..0, the communication needs to be made to a public official or agency that regard[s] any matter reasonably of concern to that agency or organization. RCW..0. Plaintiffs do not dispute that Messrs. Langberg s and Woods letters meet these requirements. Moreover, Plaintiffs acknowledge that Defendants letters satisfy the elements for the application of immunity here. Plaintiffs acknowledge that Defendant Woods wrote a letter to Washington Governor Jay Inslee[.] Dkt. #0, at. Plaintiffs acknowledge that Defendant Langberg wrote a letter to Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Director Joel Sacks[.] Dkt. #0, at. Plaintiffs acknowledge that Messrs. Langberg s and Woods letters sought the removal of paintings by Plaintiff Leonard Peltier... from a National American Indian Heritage Month art display in an L&I office. Dkt. #0, at. Lastly, Plaintiffs acknowledge that public controversy exists REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

7 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of surrounding Plaintiff Leonard Peltier s case[.] Dkt. #0, at. In short, Plaintiffs acknowledge that Mr. Langberg and Mr. Woods wrote letters to high-ranking officials in Washington State government in an effort to remove artwork by Leonard Peltier, who is the subject of public controversy. Given that Plaintiffs concede that the elements of RCW..0 are present here, Mr. Langberg and Mr. Woods are immune from the civil claims in Plaintiffs Complaint against them. Accordingly, all claims against them should be dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, Messrs. Langberg and Woods are each entitled to their costs, reasonable attorneys fees, and statutory damages of $0,000. D. Communicating about Mr. Peltier s Murder Convictions is Not Defamatory. Defendants will not attempt to address the merits of Plaintiffs defamation arguments at this juncture of the litigation (see Dkt. #0, at -0), but the content of the letters by Messrs. Langberg s and Woods did not contain defamatory language. It is a fact that on April,, Leonard Peltier was found guilty of the June,, premeditated murder of Jack Coler and Ronald Williams, special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). U.S. v. Peltier, 00 F.d, (th Cir. ). It is evident that Plaintiffs still dispute Mr. Peltier s murder convictions that occurred more than 0 years ago. See Dkt. #0, at ( Support for Leonard Peltier comes... at the result of the government not knowing who killed Agents Coler and Williams. ) While Mr. Peltier and his The Eighth Circuit affirmed Mr. Pelier s conviction on September,. See U.S. v. Peltier, F.d, (th Cir. ) ( Peltier was tried by a jury, was convicted on both counts, and was sentenced to life imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run consecutively. ), cert. denied, 0 U.S. (). Mr. Peltier s motion to vacate his conviction and for a new trial was denied and affirmed on appeal. See U.S. v. Peltier, 00 F.d (th Cir. ), cert. denied, U.S. (). Mr. Peltier s post-conviction request to set aside the conviction was denied and affirmed on appeal. See Peltier v. Henman, F.d (th Cir. ). Mr. Peltier s petition for habeas relief seeking immediate release on parole was denied and affirmed on appeal. See Peltier v. Booker, F.d (0th Cir. 00), cert. denied, U.S. 00 (00). Mr. Peltier has persistently challenged his convictions, but the appellate courts and U.S. Supreme Court have repeatedly rejected them. It is a fact that he was convicted of double murder. REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

8 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of supporters continue to litigate his convictions, the fact that Messrs. Langberg and Woods commented on Mr. Peltier s convictions in their letters does not mean that such statements are defamatory. The U.S. Supreme Court has denied Mr. Peltier s post-conviction certiorari petitions three times. See 0 U.S. (); U.S. (); and U.S. 00 (00). Thus, it remains true that Mr. Peltier was convicted of murdering two FBI agents. E. An Award of Statutory Damages is Warranted as there is No Evidence of Bad Faith. A person prevailing upon the immunity defense at issue shall receive statutory damages of ten thousand dollars but such damages may be denied if the court finds that the complaint or information was communicated in bad faith. RCW..0. Plaintiffs acknowledge that Mr. Langberg wrote a letter to Director Joel Sacks and Mr. Woods wrote a letter to Governor Inslee to ask for the removal of paintings by Plaintiff Leonard Peltier... from a National American Indian Heritage Month art display in an L & I office. Dkt. #0, at. Further, the fact that Mr. Peltier was convicted on multiple murder charges is also undisputed. This does not constitute bad faith. Therefore, Mr. Langberg and Mr. Woods are each entitled to $0, in statutory penalties. III. CONCLUSION Under RCW..0, Mr. Langberg and Mr. Woods are immune from civil liability for Plaintiffs claims against them when the following elements are met: () defendants provide a communication to a government agency; () a civil complaint is filed against the defendants based upon the communication provided by the defendants; and () the communication is on an issue of concern to the government agency. Here, all elements have been satisfied. Consequently, Plaintiffs claims against Mr. Langberg and Mr. Woods must be dismissed as a matter of law. Mr. Langberg and Mr. Woods are entitled to an award of costs and reasonable attorneys fees. They are also entitled to an award of $0,000 in statutory damages. REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

9 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 As to Mr. Hildes declaration, it is beyond the scope of review on this Rule (b)() motion and, therefore, should be stricken. For the reasons set forth above, and the arguments advanced in their opening motion (Dkt. #), Defendants Langberg and Woods respectfully request that this Court enter an Order striking Mr. Hildes declaration (Dkt. #), dismissing all claims against them, and awarding them costs, fees, and statutory damages. DATED this 0 th day of June III BRANCHES LAW, PLLC /s/ Joan K. Mell Joan K. Mell, WSBA # joan@brancheslaw.com 0 Regents Blvd. Ste. 0 Fircrest, Washington Counsel for Edward Woods SMITH FREED EBERHARD, P.C. /s/ Jeremy H. Rogers Jeremy H. Rogers, WSBA No. jrogers@smithfreed.com Kyle D. Riley, WSBA No. 0 kriley@smithfreed.com Seattle, Washington 0 Counsel for Larry Langberg & The Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

10 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page 0 of 0 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the above REPLY IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ALL CLAIMS AGAINST LANGBERG AND WOODS and MOTION TO STRIKE HILDES DECLARATION AND EXHIBITS have been filed with the United States District Court via the CM/ECF system which gives automatic notification to the following attorneys of record: Lawrence A. Hildes Law Offices of Lawrence A. Hildes P.O. Box 0 Bellingham, Washington lhildes@earthlink.net Counsel for Plaintiffs Peter J. Helmberger Office of the Attorney General 0 Pacific Avenue, Suite 0 Tacoma, Washington 0 peterh@atg.wa.gov Counsel for Joel Sacks, Timothy Church, & Gov. Jay Inslee DATED this 0 th day of June 0. Joan K. Mell III Branches Law, PLLC 0 Regents Boulevard, Suite 0 Fircrest, Washington joan@brancheslaw.com Counsel for Edward Woods /s/ Jeremy H. Rogers Jeremy H. Rogers, WSBA No. 0 REPLY RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE - 0 of 0 i Case No. :-cv-00-rbl Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -0

Case 3:17-cv KLS Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 19

Case 3:17-cv KLS Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 19 Case :-cv-00-kls Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON LEONARD PELTIER, CHAUNCEY ) NO. PELTIER, ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 1 1 1 0 1 LEONARD PELTIER, CHAUNCEY PELTIER, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Plaintiffs, JOEL SACKS, individually and in his capacity

More information

Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 42 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 42 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 17 Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA The Honorable Karen Strombom 0 LEONARD PELTIER, CHAUNCEY PELTIER, v. Plaintiffs, JOEL SACKS,

More information

Case 2:16-cv JLR Document 7 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:16-cv JLR Document 7 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case 2:16-cv-00298-JLR Document 7 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 10 1 THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BRIAN JACOBSEN, CONNIE JACOBSEN, RYAN

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING I. REPLY STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING I. REPLY STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS Honorable Kimberley Prochnau Noted for: July, 0 at a.m. (with oral argument) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING HUGH K. SISLEY and MARTHA E. SISLEY,

More information

Case 3:13-cv RBL Document 31 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ORDER

Case 3:13-cv RBL Document 31 Filed 09/17/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ORDER Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed 0// Page of HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON SHERRI BLACK, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR VACATUR AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR VACATUR AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 22 Case :-cr-00-srb Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Dennis I. Wilenchik, #000 John D. Wilenchik, #0 admin@wb-law.com 0 Mark Goldman, #0 Vincent R. Mayr, #0 Jeff S. Surdakowski, #00 North th Street, Suite Scottsdale,

More information

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -vs- LEONARD PELTIER,

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -vs- LEONARD PELTIER, NO. 02-1761 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -vs- LEONARD PELTIER, Plaintiff - Appellee, Defendant - Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 2:12-cv RAJ Document 13 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 2:12-cv RAJ Document 13 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 16 Case :-cv-00-raj Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 0 THE TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON v. Plaintiff, STATE OF WASHINGTON; WASHINGTON STATE GAMBLING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Western National Assurance Company v. Wipf et al Doc. 1 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON WESTERN NATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, v. ROBERT WARGACKI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

More information

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-35945, 08/14/2017, ID: 10542764, DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 (1 of 8) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED AUG 14 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT

More information

Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 20 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 23

Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 20 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 23 Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 BEFORE THE HON. RONALD B. LEIGHN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGN LEONARD PELTIER, CHAUNCEY ) NO. : cv 0 RBL PELTIER,

More information

Case 2:12-cv TSZ Document 33 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:12-cv TSZ Document 33 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 14 Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 0 THE NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE OF WASHINGTON and the NOOKSACK BUSINESS

More information

Vs. C : PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS JACOB COLBY PERRY : STATE OF LOUISIANA FILED: : DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

Vs. C : PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS JACOB COLBY PERRY : STATE OF LOUISIANA FILED: : DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT CAROLYN LOUVIERE : 31 st JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT Vs. C-056817 : PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS JACOB COLBY PERRY : STATE OF LOUISIANA FILED: : DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO STRIKE OF JACOB

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED OCT 03 2016 STEVEN O. PETERSEN, on behalf of L.P., a minor and beneficiary and as Personal Representative of the estate of

More information

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8 Case 1:12-cv-22439-MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8 MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a sovereign nation and Federally recognized Indian tribe, vs. Plaintiff, IN THE

More information

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Case :-cv-00-jlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DONALD TRUMP, in his

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING ) ))

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING ) )) 1 Honorable Laura Gene Middaugh 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 1 16 17 l8~ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington municipal Corporation, No. 11-2-11719-7

More information

Case 2:17-cv RSM Document 14 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:17-cv RSM Document 14 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Hon. Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 REBECCA ALEXANDER, a single woman, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 Case :0-cv-0-RLH -PAL Document Filed /0/0 Page of 0 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 0 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 (0) - telephone

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION DALE DANIELSON, a Washington State employee; BENJAMIN RAST, a Washington State employee;

More information

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant.

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant. ==================================================================== IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT USCA No. 14-3890 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. SANTANA DRAPEAU,

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before GORSUCH, SEYMOUR, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before GORSUCH, SEYMOUR, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT November 25, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellee, v.

More information

Case 3:18-cv RJB Document 50 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:18-cv RJB Document 50 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 8 Case :-cv-00-rjb Document 0 Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 DALE DANIELSON, BENJAMIN RAST, and TAMARA ROBERSON, v. Plaintiffs, AMERICAN FEDERATION

More information

Case 2:18-cv KJD-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:18-cv KJD-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 7 Case :-cv-0-kjd-cwh Document Filed // Page of 0 MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 HUNTER S. DAVIDSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 00 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RED BARN MOTORS, INC. et al v. NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC. et al Doc. 133 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION RED BARN MOTORS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, vs. COX ENTERPRISES,

More information

Case 4:13-cv RC-ALM Document 13 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 106

Case 4:13-cv RC-ALM Document 13 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 106 Case 4:13-cv-00175-RC-ALM Document 13 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 106 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOSEPH BONGIOVANNI, Plaintiff, -v- Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION Terrell v. Costco Wholesale Corporation Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 1 1 JULIUS TERRELL, Plaintiff, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., Defendant. CASE NO. C1-JLR

More information

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS Case 1:17-cv-00289-RBJ Document 30 Filed 06/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-289-RBJ ZAKARIA HAGIG, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9 Case 3:16-cv-00350-CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION NYKOLAS ALFORD and STEPHEN THOMAS; and ACLU

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Joseph v. Fresenius Health Partners Care Systems, Inc. Doc. 0 0 KENYA JOSEPH, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Plaintiff, RENAL CARE GROUP, INC., d/b/a FRESENIUS

More information

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 15 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 15 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-00-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE SAMMAMISH HOMEOWNERS, a Washington non-profit corporation;

More information

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 12 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:13-cv BJR Document 12 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JAMES R. HAUSMAN and CAROL D. HAUSMAN, a husband and wife;

More information

Case 3:14-cv RBL Document 26 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 3:14-cv RBL Document 26 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed // Page of HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JANE ROE AND JANE ROE on behalf of themselves and on

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 16-1468 In the Supreme Court of the United States SCOTT KERNAN, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL DANIEL CUERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH

More information

Case 2:09-sp RSM Document 296 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:09-sp RSM Document 296 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :0-sp-0000-RSM Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 30 2014 19:56:53 2013-CP-02159-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02159-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

Case 1:11-cr KBM Document 149 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:11-cr KBM Document 149 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Case 1:11-cr-02432-KBM Document 149 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CR 11-2432 MCA

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 5:11-cv-01078-D Document 16 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, vs. Plaintiff, TGS ANADARKO LLC; and WELLS

More information

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 120 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 120 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2 Case :-cv-000-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 0 MARGRETTY RABANG, OLIVE OSHIRO, DOMINADOR AURE, CHRISTINA PEATO, and ELIZABETH OSHIRO, v. Plaintiffs, ROBERT KELLY, JR.,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON NORMAN WHERRETT, an individual; and ANABELLA WHERRETT, an individual Appellants and Cross Respondents, v. LAVONNE EKREN, an individual; MARY WHITE, an

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY I. RELIEF REQUESTED

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY I. RELIEF REQUESTED FILED OCT AM : 1 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --0- SEA 1 MARK PHILLIPS, v. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY Plaintiff, CHAD HAROLD RUDKIN

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 09BA-CV02314 GALEN SUPPES, WILLIAM R. SUTTERLIN, JURY TRIAL DEMAND RENEWABLE ALTERNATIVES,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two November 22, 2016 MICHAEL NOEL, and DIANA NOEL, individually and as the marital community

More information

Case 2:16-cv JCC Document 17 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:16-cv JCC Document 17 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 JASON E. WINECKA, NATALIE D. WINECKA, WINECKA TRUST,

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 12-30208 02/08/2013 ID: 8507509 DktEntry: 17 Page: 1 of 12 No. 12-30208 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. JERAD JOHN KYNASTON

More information

Case 1:08-cv JD Document 1 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:08-cv JD Document 1 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Case 1:08-cv-00105-JD Document 1 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Chad Evans, Petitioner v. No. Richard M. Gerry, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison,

More information

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 23 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 23 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 17 Case :-cv-00-rbl Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ANNIE McCULLUMN, NANCY RAMEY and TAMI ROMERO, on behalf

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 1 1 PATRICIA BUTLER and WESLEY BUTLER, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiffs, HARVEST MANAGEMENT SUB, LLC d/b/a HOLIDAY RETIREMENT, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION

More information

Case 2:14-cv R-RZ Document 52 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:611

Case 2:14-cv R-RZ Document 52 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:611 Case :-cv-0-r-rz Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 ANDY DOGALI Pro Hac Vice adogali@dogalilaw.com Dogali Law Group, P.A. 0 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 00 Tampa, Florida 0 Tel: () 000 Fax: () EUGENE FELDMAN

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/15/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION Justin Carey; JoBeth Deibel; David Gaston; Roger Kinney; and Keith Sanborn,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees, Case: 14-16840, 03/25/2015, ID: 9472629, DktEntry: 25-1, Page 1 of 13 14-16840 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEFF SILVESTER, BRANDON COMBS, THE CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., a

More information

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:14-cv-20945-KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9 AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

More information

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE and SIERRA CLUB v. Plaintiffs, SCOTT PRUITT, in

More information

Case 4:05-cv Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 4:05-cv Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Case 4:05-cv-00470-Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION RICHARD FRAME, WENDELL DECKER, and SCOTT UPDIKE, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

6:14-cv KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

6:14-cv KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 6:14-cv-00182-KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) CHOCTAW NATION OF ) OKLAHOMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case

More information

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program --0 EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC Ronald B. Leighton Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA McGary v. Cunningham et al Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 DARNELL O McGARY, v. Plaintiff, KELLY CUNNINGHAM, DON GAUNTZ, Dr. HOLLY CORYELL, ED YOUNG, Dr. BRUCE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN RE: BLACKWATER ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT LITIGATION Case No. 1:09-cv-615 Case No. 1:09-cv-616 Case No. 1:09-cv-617

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Appellant, CASE NO. SC v. Lower Tribunal No CFAWS RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Appellant, CASE NO. SC v. Lower Tribunal No CFAWS RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NATHAN RAMIREZ, Appellant, CASE NO. SC04-154 v. Lower Tribunal No. 95-1073CFAWS STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE COMES NOW Appellee, the State

More information

Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 35 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ORDER

Case 3:17-cv RBL Document 35 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ORDER Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 0 ALAA ELKHARWILY, M.D., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Plaintiff, FRANCISCAN HEALTH

More information

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5 Case :-cv-00-raj Document Filed 0// Page of HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 CITY OF SEATTLE and CITY OF PORTLAND, vs. Plaintiffs, DONALD J. TRUMP,

More information

PlainSite. Legal Document. Washington Western District Court Case No. 3:14-cr BHS USA v. Wright et al. Document 173. View Document.

PlainSite. Legal Document. Washington Western District Court Case No. 3:14-cr BHS USA v. Wright et al. Document 173. View Document. PlainSite Legal Document Washington Western District Court Case No. :-cr-0-bhs USA v. Wright et al Document View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation.

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 02-56256 05/31/2013 ID: 8651138 DktEntry: 382 Page: 1 of 14 Appeal Nos. 02-56256, 02-56390 & 09-56381 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEXIS HOLYWEEK SAREI, ET AL., Plaintiffs

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 12 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CHARLES L. RYAN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VS. STEVEN CRAIG JAMES, Petitioner, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the

More information

Case 2:17-cv TSZ Document 30 Filed 07/12/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:17-cv TSZ Document 30 Filed 07/12/18 Page 1 of 11 Case :-cv-00-tsz Document 0 Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 NIRP PASADENA, PLLC, and NIRP SUGAR LAND, PLLC, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Aug 18 2017 15:49:36 2016-CP-01539 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CP-01539 BRENT RYAN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT v. LOWNDES COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL.

More information

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Case: 13-57095 07/01/2014 ID: 9153024 DktEntry: 17 Page: 1 of 8 No. 13-57095 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA TEACHERS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 1 1 ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General COLLEEN M. MELODY PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ Assistant Attorneys General Seattle, WA -- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD

More information

USA v. Frederick Banks

USA v. Frederick Banks 2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-29-2010 USA v. Frederick Banks Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-2452 Follow this and

More information

Case 1:08-cv GBL-TCB Document 21 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 652

Case 1:08-cv GBL-TCB Document 21 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 652 Case 1:08-cv-00254-GBL-TCB Document 21 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 652 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NEMET CHEVROLET LTD. 153-12 Hillside

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Dec 16 2014 18:57:22 2014-CP-00558 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI BARRON BORDEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-00558 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE

More information

Case 4:12-cv RC-DDB Document 66 Filed 09/16/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 741

Case 4:12-cv RC-DDB Document 66 Filed 09/16/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 741 Case 4:12-cv-00375-RC-DDB Document 66 Filed 09/16/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 741 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GREGORY C. MORSE Plaintiff, v. HOMECOMINGS

More information

Case 1:05-cv LEK-DRH Document 42 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:05-cv LEK-DRH Document 42 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:05-cv-00441-LEK-DRH Document 42 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID VAN WORMER Plaintiff, -against- 1:05-CV-441 (LEK/DRH) CITY OF RENSSELAER,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OE WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM I. RELIEF REQUESTED

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OE WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM I. RELIEF REQUESTED 1 The Honorable Deborra E. Garrett 0 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OE WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM MARGRETTY RABANG, and ROBERT RABANG, V. Plaintiffs, RORY GILLIAND, MICHAEL ASHBY,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Case 3:15-cv-05483-BHS Document 10 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA DONALD ISAAC JOHNSON, V. Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE CASE NUMBER:

More information

Hearing Date/Time: 4 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. No.

Hearing Date/Time: 4 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. No. Hearing Date/Time: SUPERIOR COURT OF SHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY MARK R. ZMUDA, v. Plaintiff, CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEATTLE d.b.a. THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SEATTLE, and EASTSIDE CATHOLIC SCHOOL,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SAMUEL K. LIPARI, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 07-CV-02146-CM-DJW U.S. BANCORP, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendants. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM

More information

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5 Case :-cv-0-sc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN ) PRATT & ASSOCIATES The Alameda, Suite San Jose, CA Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -0 pgore@prattattorneys.com David P. Wilson (admitted

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED MAR 9 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS TAYLOR & LIEBERMAN, An Accountancy Corporation, v. Plaintiff-Appellant,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 1 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA #01 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 Julio Carranza, WSBA #1 R. Joseph Sexton, WSBA # 0 Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel 01 Fort Road/P.O. Box 1 Toppenish, WA (0) - Attorneys

More information

Case 3:11-cv BHS Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:11-cv BHS Document 1 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 15 Case :-cv-0-bhs Document 1 Filed 0/1/ Page 1 of 1 1 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA TWO GUYS, INC., a Washington Corporation, a.k.a. FRANCHISE INFUSION, No.: INC.,

More information

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 16, 2012] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 16, 2012] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #11-5205 Document #1358116 Filed: 02/13/2012 Page 1 of 16 [ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 16, 2012] No. 11-5205 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. Henry v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI HATTIESBURG DIVISION JOHNNY ISHMEL HENRY PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:09CV99-KS-MTP

More information

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3 Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 0 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. 0 Washington, D.C. 000 Phone: (0 -; Fax: (0-0 Attorneys for the Government Defs.

More information

Case 1:19-cr ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:19-cr ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ROGER J. STONE, JR., Defendant. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE DIVISION 0 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, PATH AMERICA, LLC; PATH AMERICA SNOCO LLC;

More information

Case 1:16-cv RCL Document 16 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case 1:16-cv RCL Document 16 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case 1:16-cv-01606-RCL Document 16 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 12 PATRICIA SMITH and CHARLES WOODS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-02010

More information

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Case 1:17-cv-01258-JB-KBM Document 27 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DANIEL E. CORIZ, Petitioner, v. CIV 17-1258 JB/KBM VICTOR RODRIGUEZ,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case :-cv-00-psg -FFM Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 MARC M. SELTZER () mseltzer@susmangodfrey.com SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 0 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: (0) -00

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff, Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff, Defendant. Case :-cv-00-tor Document 0 Filed 0// 0 J. CHRISTOPHER LYNCH, WSBA # JEFFREY R. SMITH, WSBA #0 RHETT V. BARNEY, WSBA # 0 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 00 Spokane, WA Phone: (0) - Fax: (0) - Emails: chris@leehayes.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) JOSEPH BASTIDA, et al., ) Case No. C-RSL ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) NATIONAL HOLDINGS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH CASIAS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al. Defendants. Case No.:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, Plaintiff, C.A. No. 1:04CV01032 (JDB v. JOHN ASHCROFT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ISLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC, LIDS CAPITAL LLC, DOUBLE ROCK CORPORATION, and INTRASWEEP LLC, v. Plaintiffs, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,

More information

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, Case No

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, Case No NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0585n.06 Filed: August 14, 2007 Case No. 03-5681 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RONNIE LEE BOWLING, Petitioner-Appellant, v.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION V. A-13-CA-359 LY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION V. A-13-CA-359 LY Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. HRA Zone, L.L.C. et al Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. V. A-13-CA-359 LY HRA ZONE, L.L.C.,

More information

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, GREAT FALLS DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) CAUSE NO.: CV F-BMM-RKS

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, GREAT FALLS DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) CAUSE NO.: CV F-BMM-RKS Case 4:14-cv-00024-BMM-JTJ Document 75 Filed 08/20/14 Page 1 of 8 Lawrence A. Anderson Attorney at Law, P.C. 300 4 th Street North P.O. Box 2608 Great Falls, MT 59403-2608 Telephone: (406) 727-8466 Facsimile:

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Honorable Janet M. Helson IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 1 COURTNEY ALLEN and STEVEN ALLEN, a married couple, v. Plaintiffs, TODD ZONIS and the MARITAL COMMUNITY

More information