SUPPLEMENT TO UPDATE ON LAND USE AND CEQA CASES
|
|
- August Reynolds
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 611 ANTON BOULEVARD, FOURTEENTH FLOOR COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA DIRECT ALL MAIL TO: POST OFFICE BOX 1950 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE FACSIMILE INTERNET ADDRESS ORANGE COUNTY SILICON VALLEY (408) A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS Philip D. Kohn Direct Dial: (714) pkohn@rutan.com SUPPLEMENT TO UPDATE ON LAND USE AND CEQA CASES (Cases Reported Between August 13, 2004 and September 15, 2004) Philip D. Kohn City Attorney City of Laguna Beach City Attorneys Department League of California Cities Annual Conference September 17, a03/19/12
2 e 1 Updated Citations to Cases in Main Paper Native American Sacred Site and Environmental Protection Assn. v. City of San Juan Capistrano (July 22, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R now 120 Cal.App.4th 961 Travis v. County of Santa Cruz (July 29, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R now 33 Cal.4th 757 Change in Status of Cases Reported at Spring Conference Big Creek Lumber v. County of Santa Cruz (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 952 now accepted for review by California Supreme Court Pacific Lumber Co. v. California State Water Resources Control Board (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1232 now accepted for review by California Supreme Court Watch List: Cases Awaiting Hearing/Decision by California Supreme Court Barratt American Inc. v. City of Encinitas (2004) formerly 115 Cal.App.4th 837 issue: whether challenge to building permit and plan review fees is time-barred, and whether challenge is viable on the merits Barratt American Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga (2003) formerly 109 Cal.App.4th 709 issue: whether challenge to building permit and plan review fees is time-barred, and whether challenge is viable on the merits City of Marina and Fort Ord Reuse Authority v. Bd. of Trustees of the State of California (2003) formerly 109 Cal.App.4th 1179 issue: whether CEQA requires university to expend funds to mitigate off-campus traffic and fire safety impacts Sierra Club v. California Coastal Commission (2003) formerly 107 Cal.App.4th 1030 issue: whether the Coastal Commission can consider the environmental impacts of development outside the coastal zone when analyzing a project that straddles the coastal zone a03/19/12 1
3 e 2 Watch List: Cases Awaiting Hearing/Decision by U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Elsinore Christian Center v. City of Lake Elsinore (August 21, 2003) 291 F.Supp.2d 1083 (C.D. Cal.) Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter (November 19, 2003) Case No. CV S (E.D. Cal.) both cases involve RLUIPA issues New Cases Since Main Paper Case Name...Page City of Malibu v. California Coastal Commission (August 23, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Grand Canyon Trust v. Tucson Electric Power Co. (September 2, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Headwaters, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service (September 8, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R High Sierra Hikers v. Blackwell (August 25, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Santa Barbara County Flower and Nursery Growers Assn., Inc. v. County of Santa Barbara (August 17, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Save Our Sonoran v. Flowers (August 26, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Sierra Club v. County of Napa (September 1, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R The Lands Council v. Powell (August 13, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R * * * * * * a03/19/12 2
4 e 3 CHAPTER X LAND USE Part 12. California Coastal Act City of Malibu v. California Coastal Commission (August 23, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Facts: Malibu is required by the Coastal Act to adopt and implement a local coastal program (LCP) to guide development. In the absence of an LCP, coastal development permits (CDPs) are subject to processing and approval by the Coastal Commission ( Commission ). As of 2000, nine years after Malibu s incorporation, the city had not adopted an LCP. The Commission reportedly tired of the obligation to process CDP applications, and persuaded the Legislature and Governor to approve an amendment to the Coastal Act that directed the Commission to write an LCP for the city. The Commission did so in The city s voters then qualified a referendum petition on the LCP. The Commission disputed the city s contention that the effectiveness of the Commission-adopted LCP was suspended. The Commission further claimed that its adoption of the LCP was not subject to referendum. The city filed a petition for writ of mandate seeking to compel the Commission to process CDP applications while the referendum was pending. The Commission cross-complained, seeking an injunction to force the city to implement the LCP and process permits. A group of city taxpayers and property owners were allowed to intervene, and they asked the court to set aside the city s decision to place the LCP amendment on the ballot. The trial court denied the petition, granted the Commission s injunction, and granted the relief requested by the interveners. The city appealed. Holding: The court of appeal affirmed. The city claimed that the amendment to the Coastal Act constitutes unconstitutional special legislation as it was confined solely to Malibu rather than all other coastal cities that had also not implemented an LCP. The court of appeal disagreed, stating that the decision to focus on Malibu was rational because Malibu stood head and shoulders above other entities in the burden it placed on the Commission, measured by the number of CDP applications that were generated. [T]he state is entitled to solve a problem incrementally, starting with the worst offenders first. The city further claimed that special legislation may not preempt the local exercise of land use regulatory powers. However, the court of appeal held that the Coastal Act deals with matters of general statewide concern. The court of appeal also rejected the city s claim that the statute improperly delegated legislative powers to an administrative agency. Finally, the court of appeal concurred with the Commission s contention that the Legislature effectively withdrew the right of referendum as to the LCP adopted by the Commission. (All parties agreed that a city-adopted LCP is subject to referendum.) Finally, the court of appeal observed that Malibu s dissatisfaction called for political, not judicial, remedies: the city could petition the Commission to amend the LCP if it was not to the city s liking, and could lobby the Legislature to regain the power to draft a new LCP. see Santa Barbara County Flower and Nursery Growers Assn., Inc. v. County of Santa Barbara below a03/19/12 3
5 e 4 CHAPTER XI PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT Part 2. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Santa Barbara County Flower and Nursery Growers Assn., Inc. v. County of Santa Barbara (August 17, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Facts: The California Coastal Commission directed the county to submit a proposed amendment to its local coastal plan (LCP) concerning greenhouse development in a certain region, together with an environmental assessment of such development. In response, the county caused the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR). The county later certified the EIR and adopted an amendment to the LCP s implementing ordinances to regulate future greenhouse expansions. The plaintiff association filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the adequacy of the EIR. More particularly, the association claimed that the EIR did not adequately discuss the environmental effects of open field agriculture or alternatives to the project, or adequately analyze the project in relation to applicable state policies, general and regional plans, and local ordinances. The trial court denied the petition, and the plaintiff appealed. Holding: The court of appeal affirmed, concluding that preparation of an EIR was unnecessary. ( The Association understandably may have been dismayed that a significant administrative proceeding was conducted through error. ) Because the activities of the county were required for the preparation and adoption of a local coastal program, the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA. Therefore, the county had no duty to comply with CEQA in processing its LCP amendment. The fact that an EIR had been prepared by the county and accepted by the Coastal Commission did not waive application of the exemption. Sierra Club v. County of Napa (September 1, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Facts: The County s Conservation, Development and Planning Department issued a use permit to Beringer Wine Estates for the development of a winery. The proposed winery was located within the boundaries of an airport industrial special plan. An environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared for the project. The EIR recognized that the project would result in the loss of some seasonal wetlands, which served as a habitat for fairy shrimp. The EIR was certified as adequate and complete, the project was conditionally approved, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted. The Sierra Club filed a petition for writ of mandate, contending that approval of the use permit violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Sierra Club also claimed that issuance of the use permit was inconsistent with the specific plan. The trial court denied the petition, and the Sierra Club appealed. Holding: The court of appeal affirmed. The EIR complied with CEQA s mandate to identify and analyze a project s significant effects on the environment, alternatives to the project, and feasible mitigation measures. The Sierra Club argued that the EIR s failure to analyze the economic feasibility of alternatives prevented members of the public from debating the issue a03/19/12 4
6 e 5 However, the court of appeal stated that CEQA does not require the public to be a part of economic feasibility debates, although CEQA does expect agency officials to inform the public when they choose economic feasibility over environmental concerns in approving a project. Thus, the analysis demanded by the Sierra Club was not required in this case. The court of appeal also found that the findings concerning alternatives were adequate and supported by the record. As to the specific plan claim, the court of appeal accorded great deference to the county s interpretation of the plan. With respect to provisions of the specific plan declaring that wetland and stream habitat shall be protected in their natural state unless shown to be infeasible, the court of appeal rejected the Sierra Club s argument that infeasible is synonymous with impossible. The county found that preservation was not feasible under the circumstances, and the determination was supported by substantial evidence. Part 4. Water Quality Save Our Sonoran v. Flowers (August 26, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Brief Holding: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the federal district court s determination to issue a preliminary injunction suspending the development of a gated residential community. The plaintiff raised serious questions under the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act about the validity of a dredge-and-fill permit issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, including the scope of the Corps jurisdiction and the effect of the proposed activity on surrounding areas. A challenge to the plaintiff s standing was rejected as was the developer s claim of unreasonable hardship. Part 5. Air Quality Grand Canyon Trust v. Tucson Electric Power Co. (September 2, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Brief Holding: Many years ago, the defendant utility obtained a permit from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to construct a coal-powered electric plant. A subsequent regulation required new power plants to use state-of-the-art pollution controls if plant construction did not commence until after a specified date. The facts were disputed as to when the defendant began construction. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed summary judgment in favor of the defendant and remanded for further proceedings. Also, the Ninth Circuit rejected the doctrine of laches as a basis for summary judgment. (Approximately 22 years expired since the prescribed construction deadline and the filing of the legal action, and years had passed since construction of the units was completed.) * * * * * a03/19/12 5
7 e 6 Miscellaneous Headwaters, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service (September 8, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Brief Holding: An environmental group sued under the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, and the Administrative Procedures Act to contest the validity of certain sales of timber in a national forest. Other environmental groups previously had challenged the same sales. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the federal district court s dismissal of the case on res judicata grounds. High Sierra Hikers v. Blackwell (August 25, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Brief Holding: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the U.S. Forest Service did not comply with the mandates of the National Environmental Policy Act when it issued multi-year special use permits and granted renewals of special use permits to commercial packstock operators in the Ansel Adams and John Muir Wilderness Areas. The Forest Service failed to prepare an environmental impact statement prior to taking the challenged actions. The Ninth Circuit also found triable issues of fact as to whether the Forest Service violated the Wilderness Act. The Lands Council v. Powell (August 13, 2004) 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R Brief Holding: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals directed the federal district court to enter summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs who challenged the adequacy of an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared for a watershed restoration project in a national forest. The project involved the logging of timber for commercial lumber. The U.S. Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act because the EIS failed to adequately examine the cumulative effects of the project on prior timber harvests and on a trout species. The EIS relied on stale data and a faulty water and sediment yield analysis. The Forest Service also violated provisions of the National Forest Management Act a03/19/12 6
UPDATE ON LAND USE AND CEQA CASES
611 ANTON BOULEVARD, FOURTEENTH FLOOR COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1931 DIRECT ALL MAIL TO: POST OFFICE BOX 1950 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92628-1950 TELEPHONE 714-641-5100 FACSIMILE 714-546-9035 INTERNET
More information1 LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS FORM
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 1 LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS FORM This form is required for the Legislative Program Committee to consider taking an advocacy position on an issue or legislative item BILL NUMBER: AUTHOR:
More informationTOP 3 FOR OCTOBER 2004
October 5, 2004 TOP 3 FOR OCTOBER 2004 ( Click on case name for details) Ø Records revealed: The statutory protection for police personnel files does not bar the press from obtaining an officer s disciplinary
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE
Filed 1/17/18 Johnston v. City of Hermosa Beach CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
More informationLAW OFFICES OF ALAN WALTNER
LAW OFFICES OF ALAN WALTNER 779 DOLORES STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94110 TEL (415) 641-4641 WALTNERLAW@GMAIL.COM Memorandum Date: To: Fort Ord Reuse Authority Board of Directors From: Alan Waltner,
More informationCEQA Reform and Litigation Reports on the Legislature and the Supreme Court
CEQA Reform and Litigation Reports on the Legislature and the Supreme Court Thursday, September 19, 2013; 1:00 2:30 p.m. Christian L. Marsh, Downey Brand League of California Cities 2013 Annual Conference;
More informationLESHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents v. CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, Defendant and Appellant
LESHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents v. CITY OF WALNUT CREEK, Defendant and Appellant Supreme Court of California 52 Cal. 3d 531 (1990) JUDGES: Opinion by Eagleson, J. Lucas,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 10/23/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SAVE LAFAYETTE TREES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LAFAYETTE,
More informationUPDATE ON LAND USE AND CEQA CASES (Cases Reported Between September 2002 and March 14, 2003)
UPDATE ON LAND USE AND CEQA CASES (Cases Reported Between September 2002 and March 14, 2003) Thomas B. Brown City Attorney City Attorneys Department City of Napa League of California Cities P.O. Box 660
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 3/23/17; mod. and pub. order 5/25/17 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE FRIENDS OF OUTLET CREEK, v. Plaintiff and Appellant,
More informationCities in Orange County California that have passed ordinances restricting persons required to register under Penal Code 290
City of Aliso Viejo City of Anaheim City of Brea code Chapter 7.60 Child Safety Zones City of Buena Park 8.50.030 Prohibitions 2012 City of Costa Mesa City of Cypress CHAPTER XIII. SEX OFFENDERS PROHIBITED
More informationWireless Facility Siting
Wireless Facility Siting Javan N. Rad Assistant City Attorney March 10, 2010 1 State Law Public Utilities Code Public Utilities Commission orders 2 Public Utilities Code 7901 Allows telephone companies
More informationCivil No. C [Sacramento County Superior Court Case No ] IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Civil No. C070484 [Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34-2011-80000952] IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT City of Cerritos et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants;
More informationBackground Paper 85-2 THE TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY AFTER AMENDMENT OF THE BISTATE COMPACT IN 1980
Background Paper 85-2 THE TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY AFTER AMENDMENT OF THE BISTATE COMPACT IN 1980 The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency After Amendment of the Bistate Compact in 1980 Table of Contents
More informationJULIA L. BOND. Julia L. Bond Principal. 707 Wilshire Boulevard, 24th Floor Los Angeles, CA T: F:
JULIA L. BOND Julia L. Bond Principal 707 Wilshire Boulevard, 24th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 T: 213.626.2906 F: 213.626.0215 jbond@meyersnave.com Practice Groups Writs and Appeals Environmental Law Land
More informationUPDATE ON LAND USE AND CEQA CASES
611 ANTON BOULEVARD, FOURTEENTH FLOOR COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1931 DIRECT ALL MAIL TO: POST OFFICE BOX 1950 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92628-1950 TELEPHONE 714-641-5100 FACSIMILE 714-546-9035 INTERNET
More informationDecember 17, (Third District Court of Appeal Case No. C066996)
REMY I MOOSE I MANLEY LLP Whitman F. Manley wma nley@rmmenvirolaw.com The Honorable William J. Murray The Honorable Vance W. Raye The Honorable Harry E. Hull California Court of A peal, Third Appellate
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIF'ORr,:A. FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
2 F L Cltrk of fht SUjltrlor Com E D DEC 18 By~ A. Wagoner 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIF'ORr,:A. FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 10 Petitioners Building Industry Association of San Case Nos.: -1-0002-CU-WM-NC/
More informationExistence and Scope of the Common Interest Privilege Before and After Ceres
Existence and Scope of the Common Interest Privilege Before and After Ceres Wednesday, May 7, 2014 General Session; 1:00 2:45 p.m. Sarah E. Owsowitz, Best Best & Krieger League of California Cities 2014
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Brian Gaffney, SBN 1 Thomas N. Lippe, SBN 0 Kelly A. Franger, SBN Bryant St., Suite D San Francisco, California Tel: (1) -00 Fax: (1) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs: ALAMEDA CREEK ALLIANCE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 7/19/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT et al., v. Plaintiffs and Appellants,
More informationCITY OF TRACY Office of the City Attorney 325 East Tenth Street Tracy, CA fax
CITY OF TRACY Office of the City Attorney 325 East Tenth Street Tracy, CA 95376 209-831-4050 209-831-4153 fax attorney@ci.tracy.ca.us City Attorney's Department Spring Conference League of California Cities
More informationMay 15, RE: Invitation to Appear. Dear Chairman Lee and Committee Members:
KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General State of California DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1300 I STREET, SUITE 125 P.O. BOX 944255 SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2550 Public: (916) 445-9555 Telephone: (916) 323-9259 Facsimile:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/25/14; pub. order 7/22/14 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE WILLIAM JEFFERSON & CO., INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v.
More informationUnfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, et seq.) Pending Cases
HORVITZ & LEVY LLP Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, 17200 et seq.) Pending Cases Horvitz & Levy LLP 15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1800, Encino, California 91436-3000 Telephone: (818) 995-0800;
More information8-7. Communications and Legislation Committee. Board of Directors. 4/9/2019 Board Meeting. Subject. Executive Summary. Details
Board of Directors Communications and Legislation Committee 4/9/2019 Board Meeting Subject Express opposition, unless amended, to SB 1 (Atkins, D-San Diego; Portantino, D-La Canada Flintridge; and Stern,
More informationApplication Sunrise Powerlink Project: Request for Extension of NEPA / CEQA Scoping Comment Period and Additional Scoping Meetings
SIERRA CLUB, SAN DIEGO CHAPTER San Diego and Imperial Counties 3820 Ray Street San Diego, CA 92104-3623 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY BECAUSE LIFE IS GOOD P.O. Box 710, Tucson, AZ 85702-0710 October
More informationLand Use And CEQA Litigation Update Wednesday, May 6, 2015 Opening General Session; 1:00 3:00 p.m.
Land Use And CEQA Litigation Update Wednesday, May 6, 2015 Opening General Session; 1:00 3:00 p.m. Christian L. Marsh, Downey Brand DISCLAIMER: These materials are not offered as or intended to be legal
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Craig A. Sherman, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 171224) LAW OFFICE OF CRAIG A. SHERMAN 1901 First Avenue, Ste. 335 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 702-7892 Facsimile: (619) 702-9291 Attorneys for Petitioner
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL MINUTE ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL MINUTE ORDER DATE: 04/19/2013 TIME: 03:36:00 PM JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: Timothy Taylor CLERK: Patricia Ashworth REPORTER/ERM: Not Reported
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Arbor Resources Limited Liability : Company, Pasadena Oil & Gas : Wyoming, L.L.C, Hook 'Em Energy : Partners, Ltd. and Pearl Energy : Partners, Ltd., : Appellants
More informationThe Highway 68 Coalition v. County of Monterey. Opinion
The Highway 68 Coalition v. County of Monterey Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District July 31, 2017, Opinion Filed H042891 Reporter 14 Cal. App. 5th 883 *; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 744 **;
More informationMANHATTAN TOWERS 1230 ROSECRANS AVENUE, SUITE 110 MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA (310) FAX (310)
MICHAEL JENKINS CHRISTI HOGIN MARK D. HENSLEY BRADLEY E. WOHLENBERG KARL H. BERGER GREGG KOVACEVICH JOHN C. COTTI ELIZABETH M. CALCIANO LAUREN B. FELDMAN JENKINS & HOGIN, LLP A LAW PARTNERSHIP MANHATTAN
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL - FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D052237
Filed 1/9/09; pub. & mod. order 1/30/09 (see end of opn.) COURT OF APPEAL - FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RIVERWATCH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. D052237 (San Diego
More informationRECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors consider the following options:
MONTEREY COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: January 3, 2007; 10:30 a.m. AGENDA NO.: S-2 SUBJECT: Public hearing on the 2006 General Plan Update (PLN050045) to consider: a. Adopting a resolution certifying
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D068185
Filed 10/14/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA UNION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA PATIENTS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. D068185 (Super.
More informationSa>aJos. Memorandum. FROM: Harry Freitas TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: September 21, 2015 COUNCIL DISTRICT: 6
COUNCIL AGENDA: 9/22/15 ITEM: 11.2 Sa>aJos CITY OF ~ CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Harry Freitas SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: September 21, 2015 Date SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationSOUTHBOROUGH WETLANDS BY-LAW First Draft 1/2/92, (last revised 2/22/95) Approved at Annual Town Meeting of April 10, 1995 (Article #48)
SOUTHBOROUGH WETLANDS BY-LAW First Draft 1/2/92, (last revised 2/22/95) Approved at Annual Town Meeting of April 10, 1995 (Article #48) CHAPTER 170-1. PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to protect
More informationYour Legal Powers and Obligations
Disclaimer: This paper is provided for general information only and is not offered or intended as legal advice. Readers should seek the advice of an attorney when confronted with legal issues and attorneys
More informationLAND USE AND CEQA LITIGATION UPDATE
League of California Cities 2010 Fall Conference City Attorneys Department September 16, 2010 LAND USE AND CEQA LITIGATION UPDATE (May 1, 2010 through August 10, 2010) M. Katherine Jenson City Attorney,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE ) is an Oregon corporation;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION SIERRA CLUB, a non-profit corp., NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, a non-profit corp., FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, a non-profit
More informationAssembly Bill No. 243 CHAPTER 688
Assembly Bill No. 243 CHAPTER 688 An act to add Article 6 (commencing with Section 19331), Article 13 (commencing with Section 19350), and Article 17 (commencing with Section 19360) to Chapter 3.5 of Division
More informationEnvironmental Law, Eleventh Circuit Survey
Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 12-1-2008 Environmental Law, Eleventh Circuit Survey Trimble University of Georgia, ttrimble@uga.edu Repository Citation Trimble, Environmental
More informationCase 2:13-cv RJS Document 105 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00217-RJS Document 105 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION DEREK KITCHEN, MOUDI SBEITY, KAREN ARCHER, KATE CALL, LAURIE
More informationLEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
0 TIMOTHY J. SABO, SB # E-mail: sabo@lbbslaw.com KAREN A. FELD, SB# E-Mail: kfeld@lbbslaw.com 0 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 00 San Bernardino, California 0 Telephone: 0..0 Facsimile: 0.. Attorneys for
More informationCITY Of RANCHO SANTA MAR GAR IT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Page 1 CITY Of RANCHO SANTA MAR GAR IT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DATE: May 10, 2017 TO: City Council of the City of Rancho Santa Margarita FROM: Jennifer M. Cervantez, City Manager ~ BY: Cheryl Kuta,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0-kaw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Andrea Issod (SBN 00 Marta Darby (SBN 00 Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 0 Webster Street, Suite 00 Oakland, CA Telephone: ( - Fax: (0 0-0 andrea.issod@sierraclub.org
More informationCALLING AN ELECTION OR PLACING A MEASURE ON THE BALLOT FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
CALLING AN ELECTION OR PLACING A MEASURE ON THE BALLOT FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS Santa Barbara County Registrar of Voters P.O. Box 61510 Santa Barbara, CA 93160-1510 (800) SBC-VOTE, (800) 722-8683 www.sbcvote.com
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF ELK GROVE AND THE WILTON RANCHERIA
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF ELK GROVE AND THE WILTON RANCHERIA This Memorandum of Understanding ( Agreement ) is entered into this day of 2011, among the County
More informationSMDFUND, Inc. v. Fort Wayne-Allen County Airport Auth. 831 N.E.2d 725 Supreme Court of Indiana, August 2, 2005,
SMDFUND, Inc. v. Fort Wayne-Allen County Airport Auth Readers were referred to this case on page 243 of the 9 th edition SMDFUND, Inc. v. Fort Wayne-Allen County Airport Auth. 831 N.E.2d 725 Supreme Court
More informationCOUNTY OF JOHNSTON, Plaintiff v. CITY OF WILSON, Defendant No. COA (Filed 7 March 2000)
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON, Plaintiff v. CITY OF WILSON, Defendant No. COA98-1017 (Filed 7 March 2000) 1. Judges--recusal--no evidence or personal bias, prejudice, or interest The trial court did not err in denying
More informationJAN - 3 2Q17. January 3, 201?
~ ^ - -, g R A N D Donald E.Sobelmon Downey Brand LlP dsobelman@downeybrand.com 455 Market Street, Suite 1500 415.848.4824 Direct San Francisco, CA 94105 415.848.4831 Fax 415.848.4800 Main downeybrand.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
1 1 1 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Democratic National Committee, DSCC, and Arizona Democratic Party, v. Plaintiffs, Arizona Secretary of State s Office, Michele Reagan,
More informationCase 5:18-cv Document 85 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 7313
Case 5:18-cv-11111 Document 85 Filed 03/21/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 7313 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Elkins Division CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, 378 Main
More informationWhen and How to Call an Election
When and How to Call an Election A Guide for Jurisdictions that Call Elections PREPARED BY: THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ CITY CLERK S DIVISION Bren Lehr, City Clerk Administrator / Elections Official 809 Center
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
Filed 8/12/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT FRIENDS OF THE WILLOW GLEN TRESTLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, H041563 (Santa Clara County
More informationORD-3258 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
ORD-3258 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 30-57, 30-58, 30-60, 30-60.1, 30-71, 30-73, 30-74 AND 30-77 AND ADD SECTIONS 30-62
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 564 U. S. (2011) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationDear Chief Justice George and Associate Justices of the California Supreme Court:
California Supreme Court 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102 Re: County of Orange v. Barratt American, Inc. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 420 Amicus Curiae Letter In Support of Review (Rule
More informationArticle X. - Establishment and Operation of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Sec Purpose. The purpose of interim urgency Ordinance 4770 is to
Article X. - Establishment and Operation of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Sec. 18-75. - Purpose. The purpose of interim urgency Ordinance 4770 is to extend the moratorium enacted by Ordinance 4743 for
More informationFriends of the Willow Glen Trestle v. City of San Jose
Reporter 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 676 Friends of the Willow Glen Trestle v. City of San Jose Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District August 12, 2016, Opinion Filed H041563 FRIENDS OF THE WILLOW
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE
Filed 12/4/17 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
More informationSTAFF REPORT FROM: BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ~
TO: STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ~ SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 14-04 AMENDING GROVER BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
More informationClean Water Act Section 401: Background and Issues
Clean Water Act Section 401: Background and Issues Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy July 2, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 97-488 Summary Section
More informationLITIGATION UPDATE. January 21, 2010
1400 K Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org LITIGATION UPDATE January 21, 2010 The following report summarizes the cases reviewed by the
More informationSTATUS REPORT - RIPARIAN CORRIDOR POLICY/ORDINANCE STUDY WORK PLAN
CED AGENDA: 10/26/15 ITEM: D (3) CITY OF SANjOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: Harry Freitas SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: October 9, 2015 Approved
More informationOFF-LICENSE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS
OFF-LICENSE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS This Off-License Settlement Agreement ( OLSA ) is entered into
More informationNative Vegetation Conservation Act 1997 No 133
New South Wales Native Vegetation Conservation Act 1997 No 133 Contents Part 1 Preliminary 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Name of Act Commencement Objects of Act Definitions and notes Definition of clearing
More informationPART I Introduction to Civil Litigation for the Paralegal
PART I Introduction to Civil Litigation for the Paralegal CHAPTER 1 Litigation and the Paralegal KEY POINTS Civil Litigation in California State Courts is regulated by: California Code of Civil Procedure
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 1 JOHN G. McCLENDON (State Bar No. A Professional Corporation Mill Creek Drive Suite Laguna Hills, California Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -0 email: john@ceqa.com Attorneys for Petitioner FOOTHILL
More informationEnvironmental Defense Fund, Inc., et al. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et al. Supreme Court of California.
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., et al. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et al. Supreme Court of California. 26 Cal.3d 183, 605 P.2d 1, 161 Cal. Rptr. 466 (1980) Three corporations and three individuals,
More informationADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW. Deborah L. Cade Law Seminars International SEPA & NEPA CLE January 17, 2007
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW Deborah L. Cade Law Seminars International SEPA & NEPA CLE January 17, 2007 OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION STANDING STANDARD OF REVIEW SCOPE OF REVIEW INJUNCTIONS STATUTE
More informationThe Delta Plan. Ensuring a reliable water supply for California, a healthy Delta ecosystem, and a place of enduring value DELTA STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL
The Delta Plan Ensuring a reliable water supply for California, a healthy Delta ecosystem, and a place of enduring value DELTA STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL B000415 A. Promote Options for New and Improved Infrastructure
More informationBUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AGENDA REPORT
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY For the meeting of: April 3, 2018 AGENDA REPORT TO: VIA: FROM: TITLE: Honorable Mayor and City Council David Boesch, Interim City Manager Jessica Blair,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 12/16/13 Certified for publication 1/3/14 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff
More informationPit River Tribe v. U.S. Forest Service
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2010-2011 Pit River Tribe v. U.S. Forest Service Matt Newman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr Recommended
More informationTable of Contents. Both petitioners and EPA are supported by numerous amici curiae (friends of the court).
Clean Power Plan Litigation Updates On October 23, 2015, multiple parties petitioned the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to review EPA s Clean Power Plan and to stay the rule pending judicial review. This
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO B207188
Filed 12/1/08 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO MARTIN L. BURKE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. B207188 (Los Angeles County
More informationNO. S IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. En Banc
NO. S189476 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA En Banc KRISTIN M. PERRY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff, Intervenor and Respondent; v. EDMUND
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc RUTH CAMPBELL, ET AL., ) ) Appellants, ) ) vs. ) No. SC94339 ) COUNTY COMMISSION OF ) FRANKLIN COUNTY, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) ) UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, ) d/b/a AMEREN
More informationof Citizens for Beach Rights v. City of San Diego, Case No. D069638, Filed Filed March March 28, 28, Haller: and Rules of Court, rule (c).
Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District. Division One Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District. Division One Kevin J. Lane, Clerk/Administrator 1901 Harrison 1 Street - Suite - Suite 900 Kevin J.
More informationMarch 13, 2017 ORDER. Background
United States Department of the Interior Office of Hearings and Appeals Interior Board of Land Appeals 801 N. Quincy St., Suite 300 Arlington, VA 22203 703-235-3750 703-235-8349 (fax) March 13, 2017 2017-75
More informationCITY OF FORTUNA, Defendant. /
0 Jack Silver, Esq. SBN#0 Kimberly Burr, Esq. SBN#0 Northern California Environmental Defense Center 0 Occidental Road Sebastopol, CA Telephone: (0)- Facsimile : (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Northern
More informationAdministrative & Judicial Challenges to Environmental Permits. Greg L. Johnson
Administrative & Judicial Challenges to Environmental Permits Greg L. Johnson A Professional Law Corporation New Orleans Lafayette Houston 1 Outline Challenges to Permits issued by LDEQ Public Trust Doctrine
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division
Case :0-cv-00-PGR Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 DENNIS K. BURKE United States Attorney District of Arizona SUE A. KLEIN Assistant U.S. Attorney Arizona State Bar No. Two Renaissance Square 0 North Central
More informationConservation Congress v. U.S. Forest Service
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Fall 2013 Case Summaries Conservation Congress v. U.S. Forest Service Katelyn J. Hepburn University of Montana School of Law, katelyn.hepburn@umontana.edu
More informationLand Use and CEQA Litigation Update
Land Use and CEQA Litigation Update Thursday, September 22, 2011 General Session; 1:00 2:45 p.m. Andrew W. Schwartz, Shute Mihaly & Weinberger 2011 League of California Cities Annual Conference City Attorneys
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 11/20/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE KENNEDY COMMISSION et al., Plaintiffs and
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Robert Kightlinger, : Appellant : : v. : No. 1643 C.D. 2004 : Bradford Township Zoning Hearing : Submitted: February 3, 2005 Board and David Moonan and : Terry
More informationLOCAL CLAIMS FILING REGULATIONS
City Attorneys Department League of California Cities Continuing Education Seminar February 2003 Kevin D. Siegel Anne Q. Pollack Attorneys LOCAL CLAIMS FILING REGULATIONS INTRODUCTION The Tort Claims Act
More informationL. Regulation of surface water transfers. (a) Certificate Required. No person, without first obtaining a certificate from the Commission,
143-215.22L. Regulation of surface water transfers. (a) Certificate Required. No person, without first obtaining a certificate from the Commission, may: (1) Initiate a transfer of 2,000,000 gallons of
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES SUMMARY FINAL ORDER
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION-HOA BRAXTON MILLER, Petitioner, v. Case
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPELLANTS CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, INC. AND PETER GALVIN S
S167578 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, INC., and PETER GALVIN, Supreme Court No. S167578 Plaintiffs and Appellants, vs. FPL GROUP, INC.; FPL ENERGY, LLC;
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 57 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL*
ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE Chapter 57 * * Editor s Note: Ord. No. 08-01, adopted January 26, 2008, amended Ch. 57, in its entirety, to read as herein set out. 57-1. Title. 57-1. Title. 57-2. Purpose. 57-3.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LIBERTARIAN PARTY, LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF LOUISIANA, BOB BARR, WAYNE ROOT, SOCIALIST PARTY USA, BRIAN MOORE, STEWART ALEXANDER CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-582-JJB
More informationVenice Coalition to Preserve Unique Community Character v. City of Los Angeles
Cited As of: March 26, 2019 5:47 PM Z Venice Coalition to Preserve Unique Community Character v. City of Los Angeles Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Eight January 9,
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SENATE BILL 410 RATIFIED BILL
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SENATE BILL 410 RATIFIED BILL AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A PROGRAM FOR THE LEASING OF PUBLIC BOTTOM AND SUPERJACENT WATER COLUMN FOR MARINE AQUACULTURE, TO REQUIRE
More informationEXHIBIT B SANTA ANA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR (SARI) LINE LOAN AND REPAYMENT AGREEMENT NO. D10-022D
SANTA ANA REGIONAL INTERCEPTOR (SARI) LINE LOAN AND REPAYMENT AGREEMENT NO. D10-022D12-031. This Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) Line Loan and Repayment Agreement ( AGREEMENT ), which supersedes
More informationSouth Carolina General Assembly 115th Session,
South Carolina General Assembly 115th Session, 2003-2004 A39, R91, S204 STATUS INFORMATION General Bill Sponsors: Senators McConnell, Martin and Knotts Document Path: l:\s-jud\bills\mcconnell\jud0017.gfm.doc
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2009 JERRY L. DEMINGS, SHERIFF OF ORANGE COUNTY, ET AL., Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D08-1063 ORANGE COUNTY CITIZENS REVIEW
More information