INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 1/1-8/18 BETWEEN NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND
|
|
- Alan Mills
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 1/1-8/18 BETWEEN NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND ALOR SETAR HOLIDAY VILLA SDN. BHD. AWARD NO. : 1375 OF 2018 CORAM: YA TUAN EDDIE YEO SOON CHYE - PRESIDENT EN. KAMARUL BAHARIN B. MANSOR - EMPLOYEES' PANEL EN. SIMUNIR BIN ABBAS - EMPLOYERS' PANEL VENUE : Industrial Court Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur FILING OF FORM S : DATE OF MENTION : DATES OF HEARING : ; UNION'S SUBMISSIONS : RESPONDENT'S SUBMISSIONS : REPRESENTATION : Lim Chooi Phoe (Rusli Affandi with him); Representative for the Complainant/Union. A. Ramadass (T. Kavita with him) of Messrs Ramadass & Associates; Counsel for the Respondent/Hotel. 1
2 A W A R D [1] This is a complaint of non-compliance filed in Form S pursuant to Rule 56 (1) Industrial Relations Act 1967 and Rule 24A (1) of the Industrial Court Rules 1967 in respect of the Fourth Collective Agreement between Alor Setar Holiday Villa Sdn. Bhd. and National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers, Peninsular Malaysia for the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2013 (Cognisance No, 237/2011) registered on 20 September [2] When the case was called for hearing on 5 April 2018 and 7 May 2018 representative from the Union and counsel from Messrs Ramadass & Associates for the Hotel made their oral submissions on the respective dates before this Court based on their written submissions, Bundle of Authorities and pleadings filed. [3] A complaint was hereby lodged by the National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers, Peninsular Malaysia that the provisions of the above-mentioned Collective Agreement have not been complied with: Article 28: Retrenchment/Redundancy Benefits. Article 12: Service Charge. [4] Article 28 (UB1 p. 31) reads as follows: ARTICLE 28: RETRENCHMENT / REDUNDANCY BENEFITS (a) The provisions of this Article shall apply only to those employees who are declared redundant by the Hotel and shall not apply to dismissals for disciplinary reasons, resignations, retirements or termination of employment for any other case or reason. 2
3 (b) Employees whose services are terminated by reasons of retrenchment or redundancy shall be entitled to retrenchment or redundancy benefits in accordance with the Employment Act (Termination & Lay off Benefits) Regulation (c) The Hotel shall give written notice of retrenchment to employees in accordance with section 12 Employment Act 1955 or pay wages in lieu of notice. (d) The principle of 'Last In, First Out' shall be followed within each category of employees subject to the need for the efficient operation of the Hotel. (e) In the event of a vacancy arising within 12 months of retrenchment, the Hotel shall give preference to applications from ex-employees declared redundant previously. [5] Article 12 (UB1 p. 126) reads as follows: ARTICLE 12: SERVICE CHARGE (a) The Hotel shall retain 10% out of the 100% service charge imposed on all bills monthly. The remaining 90% service charge shall be distributed to all employees covered within the scope of this Agreement as listed in Appendix C. (b) The Hotel shall furnished to the Union Head Office not later than the fourteen (14 th ) working day of the following month, a copy of the monthly statement of accounts of the service charges and to extend the same to the House Committee as follows: (i) The total service charge for each outlet; (ii) The grand total service charge; (iii) The total number of service charge points of the employees; (iv) The total number of service charge points increased or decreased; (v) The value of service charge per point; (vi) The names, designation, department, date of employment and individual service charge together with the individual value. 3
4 (c) The Hotel shall permit the Union to inspect at a time suitable to both parties the documents pertaining to the 10% service charge and the Union shall give at least seven (7) working days advance notice of its intention. (d) In the event of an employee filling a newly created position where the service charge point entitlement is not shown in Appendix C to this Agreement, the Hotel together with the Union shall determine the number of service charge points for the category of employee. STATEMENT OF CASE [6] The Union avers that the Hotel has not taken into account the service charge into the computation of the retrenchment benefits. The whole list of the 30 employees is exhibited in UB 1 (pp. 12 & 13) 'Holiday Villa Alor Setar Computation solely on Service Charge' amounting to RM127, [7] The Union states that the Hotel has wrongfully computed the retrenchment benefits based on basic salary for each year of service instead of wages for each year of service which would include the service charge. The service charge under Article 12 is a contractual term in the Collective Agreement and is not excluded by the definition under section 2 of the Employment Act and therefore, it is wages. The technical rule of estoppel is inapplicable in industrial adjudication and the employees legitimate claims ought to be taken into account. The failure of the Hotel to include the service charge in the computation of the retrenchment benefits of the employees is in breach of the terms of Article 28 & Article 12 of the said Collective Agreement. 4
5 [8] The Union prays that the Court orders the Hotel to: i) comply with the terms of the Collective Agreement by including the service ii) charge in the computation of retrenchment benefits; made the payment of RM127, through the Union within two weeks from the date of Award. STATEMENT IN REPLY [9] The Respondent denies the contention by the Union that Mohd Rizal bin Ismail had written to the Company protesting against the non-inclusion of service charge in the computation of retrenchment benefits. The Respondent puts the Union to strict proof that service charges should be taken into consideration in computing the retrenchment benefits and that failure to do so amounts to non-compliance of Article 28 & Article 12 of the Collective Agreement. THE UNION'S SUBMISSIONS [10] The Union submits that service charge is a contractual term in Article 12 of the Collective Agreement and is not an ex-gratia payment. It is not excluded under wages in section 2 of the Employment Act 1955 and therefore has to be included in the computation of retrenchment benefits. [11] The Union submits that the complaint under section 56 falls within the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court to simultaneously interpret Article 28 & Article 12 of the Collective Agreement which are in consonance with section 56 (2A) of the Industrial Relations Act
6 [12] The Union further submits that the Hotel has committed a breach of the terms of the Collective Agreement by refusing to include the component of the service charge into the computation of the retrenchment benefits. [13] The Industrial Court in the case of Hotel Fortuna Management Services Sdn. Bhd. v. National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers, Peninsular Malaysia [2000] 2 ILR 159 at pp. 161, 162 (Award No. 361 of 2000) decided as follows: The issue before the court is whether the hotel is in compliance of the above provision of the collective agreement by not including service charge as an element of 'wages' when computing the retirement benefits. It is the unanimous finding of the court that as the Employment Act 1955 does not exclude service charge from its definition of 'wages' and the collective agreement is silent on this point, service charge forms a part of 'wages' for the purpose of computing retirement benefits. [14] The Industrial Court in the case of Hotel Fortuna Management Services Sdn. Bhd. v. National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers, Peninsular Malaysia [2000] 2 ILR 163 at pp. 165, 166 (Award No. 362 of 2000) decided as follows: The issue before the court is whether the hotel is in compliance of the above provision of the collective agreement by not including service charge as an element of 'wages' when computing the retirement benefits. It is the unanimous finding of the court that as the Employment Act 1955 does not exclude service charge from its definition of 'wages' and the collective agreement is silent on this point, service charge forms a part of 'wages' for the purpose of computing retirement benefits. [15] The Kuala Lumpur High Court in Originating Summons No. R dismissed the application for judicial review by Hotel Fortuna in respect of Awards No. 361 & 362 of 2000 on 19 August Subsequently the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. W
7 03 dismissed the appeal by the Hotel Fortuna on 15 August [16] In the case of Ritz Garden Hotel Sdn. Bhd. v. National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers, Peninsular Malaysia [2000] 3 ILR 542 at p. 545 the Industrial Court decided as follows:. In the Employment Act 1955, however, wages means basic wages and all other payments in cash payable to an employee for work done in respect of this contract of service but does not include that is, all items enumerated from (a) to (f) are excluded. But in all the excluded items, 'service charge' has not been specifically excluded. Therefore, service charge falls within the definition of 'wages' under the Employment Act 1955, as one of the items of retrenchment 'benefits' agreed under art. 27 of the CA. [17] The Industrial Court in the case of PIHP (Selangor) Bhd. v. Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja-Pekerja Hotel, Bar & Restoran Semenanjung Malaysia [2003] 3 ILR 1365 at p decided as follows: Therefore, the court finds that the word 'wages' in art. 28 include service charges. The hotel had not included this in the calculation of the retrenchment benefits under art. 28. The hotel had therefore not complied with the said article. The court therefore orders the hotel to do so. [18] The Kuala Lumpur High Court in Originating Summons No. R dismissed the application for judicial review by PIHP (Selangor) Berhad (Beroperasi sebagai Hilton Petaling Jaya) in respect of Award No. 545 of 2003 on 17 February [19] The Industrial Court decided in the case of Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja- Pekerja Hotel, Bar & Restoran Semenanjung Malaysia v. Impiana Casuarina 7
8 Hotel. Ipoh (Cash Hotel Sdn. Bhd.) [Award No of 2010] at p. 12 as follows: The court held that the retrenchment benefits as provided in Article 29 of the said collective agreement which was calculated in accordance with the said regulations included service charge. [20] The Court of Appeal decided in the case of Abdul Aziz Abdul Majid & 141 lagi v. Kuantan Beach Hotel Sdn. Bhd., Alam Venture Sdn. Bhd. & Industrial Court [2012] 1 LNS 1294 at p. 19 as follows: [38] In the third place, Article 39 of the Collective Agreement provides that where an employee's services is terminated for retrenchment by reason of redundancy, the employee shall be entitled to retrenchment benefits based on the last drawn wages for every year of service. Accordingly the service charge which is part of wages, will have to be dealt with in computing termination benefits or back wages. The schedule to the termination letter shows that the service charge element listed therein is in respect of salary paid and not in respect of termination benefits. Estoppel [21] The High Court in the case of Nadarajah & Anor. v. Golf Resort (M) Sdn. Bhd. [1991] 1 ILR 704 at p. 707 as follows: It is therefore to be observed that in view of the provisions of s. 30 (5) of the Act, the Industrial Court must act according to equity, good conscience and the substantial merits of the case without regard to technicalities and legal form. Technical rules such as estoppel, limitation, laches, acquiescence etc. (unless otherwise provided for in the Act) have no place in industrial adjudication and they should not be allowed to be invoked for defeating claims which are just and proper. [22] The Supreme Court in the case of Marlin bte Rajiman & Ors. v. MAA Services Sdn. Bhd. [1994] 2 MLJ 404 at p. 406 decided as follows: The learned High Court judge when considering an application for certiorari 8
9 to quash the award of the Industrial Court correctly decided that the industrial Court committed an error going to jurisdiction because estoppel does not under s. 30 (5) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967, apply to industrial adjudication. [23] The Supreme Court in the case of Kumpulan Perangsang Selangor Bhd. v. Zaid Mohd. Noh [1997] 2 CLJ 11 at p. 13 decided as follows: [8] It is trite that the Industrial Court must act according to equity, good conscience and the substantial merits of the case without regard to technicalities and legal form. The doctrine of estoppel hence, is not to be applied in industrial adjudication. [24] The Federal Court in the case of Tanjong Jara Beach Hotel Sdn. Bhd. v. National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers Peninsular Malaysia [2004] 3 ILR i at p. xiv decided as follows: A tedious and cumbersome cycle of events emerges with no resolution of the complaint in sight. It becomes an exercise in futility. Clearly, that cannot have been the intention of the legislature given the expansive powers provided to the court under s. 29, in particular para. (g) thereof which states that in any proceeding before it, the court may direct and do all things as are necessary or expedient for the expeditious determination of the matter before it. THE HOTEL'S CASE & SUBMISSIONS [25] The Hotel's counsel in his prelude to his oral submissions presented before the Court on 7 May 2018 referred the 'Notice of Payment' dated 31 March 2017 (Encl. 1 p. 10) sent by the Hotel to Mohd. Rizal Bin Ramli where there was no evidence that he raised any protest in respect of the payment received. The submissions made was based on the facts of the case. Since the entire service charge that was collected, the Hotel has not taken from the service charge as revenue, hence on what basis it should now include 9
10 service charge in the computation of the retrenchment benefits. The Court was informed that the Hotel has ceased business from 30 April 2018 and one of the reason is because of higher wages to be paid by the Hotel. [26] The Hotel admits that there was a disagreement as to the correct computation of retrenchment benefits but avers that the meeting was held on 30 March The Hotel wrote to the employees regarding the computation of the retrenchment benefits. Apart from setting out the computation of the termination benefits, the Company had also notified the employees details regarding payment in lieu of short notice given, utilised leave entitlement and pro rate bonus payments to employees. The Law [27] In the case of Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Perkilangan Perusahaan Makanan v. Gold Coin Specialities Sdn. Bhd. [2017] 2 ILR 260 at p. 262 where the Industrial Court referred the case of Holiday Inn, Kuala Lumpur v. National Union of Hotel, Bar and Restaurant Workers [1988] 1 CLJ 133 in relation the application of section 56 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 where the Supreme Court decided as follows: Now, section 56 is concerned with the enforcement in a summary manner of an award made by the Industrial Court or of a collective agreement which has been taken cognisance of by the court under section 17 after a complaint has been lodged as to its non-compliance. The non-compliance of a term of the award or collective agreement must exist as an antecedent fact before the Industrial Court can exercise its power contained in subsection (2) thereof. It is therefore, a condition precedent to the exercise of those powers that there should be in existence a breach or non-observance of a term of the award or collective agreement. There must be satisfactorily established by the complainant. 10
11 [28] The Supreme Court decided in the case of Dragon & Phoenix Berhad v. Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Perusahaan Membuat Tekstil & Pakaian Pulau Pinang & Anor [1990] 2 ILR 515 at p. 616 as follows: In a complaint of non-compliance with any term of a collective agreement or award under section 56 of the Industrial Court should, as a general rule, look at the terms of the contract by confining itself to within the four walls of the collective agreement or award and decide whether the term has or has not been complied with. It is purely enforcement function. Decision [29] The issue for the determination and decision of this Court is regarding the computation of the retrenchment benefits due to the employees concerned and whether the service charges should be taken into account when computing the retrenchment benefits. The failure to do so amounted to a non-compliance of Article 28 & 12 of the Collective Agreement. [30] The question of whether the service charge should be included in the calculation of wages in the retirement benefits was decided by the Court of Appeal in the case of National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers Peninsular Malaysia & Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur v. Masyhur Mutiara Sdn. Bhd. (Sheraton Langkawi Beach Resort) [2018] 1 ILR 241 at pages referred to the Industrial Court findings as follows: [14] The learned Chairman went on to say:- The service charge system is unique to the hotel industry. We must note two important features of the system. One is that the money does not come from the employer but collected from the customers of the Hotel put in a fund. The fund is jointly owned by the hotel and its employees. The second is that pure income or the employee and it is paid to the employee under his 11
12 contract of service with the hotel. [20] We are in full agreement with the view expressed by the learned Chairman of the Industrial Court that in the light of the definition as provided for by the Employment Act 1955, the word wages in art. 27 of the said CA is to include all payments paid to employees for work done in respect of his contract of service which not only confine to basic salary. Indeed, the Industrial Court s award followed a long line of authority on the issue. [21] The learned Chairman had dealt with the definition of wages in the said award at pp. 10 and 11 as follows: The material words in section 2 are work done in respect of his contract of service. In the Supreme Court case of Lee Fatt Seng v. Harper Gilfillan [1988] 1 CLJ 270 at p. 248 Wan Hamzah SCJ stated as follows: It seems that the words work done in the definition of wages are used so as to stress on the requirement that the remuneration must be for work done in respect of the contract of service of the employee concerned, so that any payment made to him by the employer ex gratia not for work done or to be done, and not in connection with the contract of service, is not part of the wages. What this case highlights is that payment must be made in connection with the employee s contract of service and it must be for work done, for it to be regarded as part of wages. But where the payment is made as gift or as a favour then it cannot be part of wages. In the present case, the hotel had paid the service charge to aggrieved retiree in connection with her contract of employment as a cook by virtue of Article 12 of the Collective Agreement. The hotel was contractually bound to pay in accordance with the service charge points as stated in Appendix B under Article 12 Clause (a). Further, by virtue of section 17(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 the said Article of the Collective Agreement is also an implied term of her contract of employment. Hence, it is clear from the facts of the case that the hotel paid the service charge to her in return for her services as a cook and not given as a gift. As such, the payment of service charge points to her would be regarded as wages under section 2 of the Employment Act 1955 and further it has not been excluded by its definition. (Emphasis added). [22] The cases relied upon by the learned Judge are cases on minimum wages under the National Wages Council Act 2011 and not under the Employment Act These cases are rightly decided because the minimum wages does not include the service charge. [25] In Port View Seafood Village Sdn Bhd v. Rocelyn Tubal Raneses [2011] 4 CLJ 959, David Wong Dak Wah J (as His Lordship then was) had carried out an exhaustive recounting of the line of authorities relating to wages and 12
13 concluded at para. [13] of the GOJ as follows: [13] Reverting to the issue at hand and applying the established principle of constructing legislation of giving the words their natural meaning and bearing in mind that there was no amendment to the Employment Act after the Pereira case, I concur with the interpretation given by the learned Chairman. The pivotal words in my view are work done in respect of his contract of service and as long payments are made because of that service, it is caught by the definition of wages. In this case there cannot be any denial that the service charge is payment made for work done in respect of his contract of service. My view is of course fortified by the decision of the Privy Council. (emphasis added) [31] The Union's contention is undisputed that the computation of the retrenchment benefits should be based on basic salary for each year of service instead of wages for each year of service which would include the service charge. The service charge under Article 12 is a contractual term in the Collective Agreement and is not excluded by the definition under section 2 of the Employment Act 1955 and therefore it is wages. [32] In Article 28 of the said Collective Agreement, the calculation of the retrenchment benefits was based on the said Employment Act (Termination & Lay off Benefits) Regulation The Employment Act 1955 which is the parent Act does not expressly exclude service charge from its definition of 'wages' in section 2 of the said Act. It is crystal clear that service charge forms a part of 'wages' for the purpose of computing retirement benefits. Therefore, service charge falls within the definition of 'wages' under the Employment Act 1955, as one of the items of retrenchment benefits agreed under Article 28 of the Collective Agreement. [33] The Court finds that service charge should be included in the calculation of wages in the retirement benefits. The Court is of a unanimous view that the Union has 13
14 established satisfactorily the existence of a breach and non-observance of a term of the Collective Agreement in Article 28 and Article 12 and therefore finds that there was noncompliance of the said terms of the Collective Agreement. Accordingly, the application for an order of non-compliance is hereby allowed. [34] In conclusion, the Court in handing down the Award is unanimous in its decision having taken into consideration the totality of the submissions by both parties. In arriving at the decision, the Court has acted with equity and good conscience and substantial merits of the case without regard to the technicalities and legal form as stated under section 30(5) of the Industrial Relations Act Conclusion [35] The Court hereby makes the following order: (a) to comply with the terms of the Collective Agreement by including the service charge in the computation of retrenchment benefits; and (b) made the payment of RM127, through the Union within 30 days from the date of Award. HANDED DOWN AND DATED THIS 14 TH JUNE 2018 ~ signed ~ ( EDDIE YEO SOON CHYE ) PRESIDENT INDUSTRIAL COURT MALAYSIA 14
ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB
Abdul Aziz Ismail & Ors [2015] 2 MELR v. Royal Selangor Club 325 ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Eddie Yeo Soon Chye Award No: 327 of 2015 [Case No: 13(25)(22)(25)/4-1255/2011]
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 2/4-346/15 BETWEEN MOHAMED HASLAM BIN ABDUL RAZAK AND PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 2/4-346/15 BETWEEN MOHAMED HASLAM BIN ABDUL RAZAK AND PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD AWARD NO. 552 OF 2018 Before : Y.A. PUAN ROSENANI BINTI ABD RAHMAN - Chairman
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-173/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BHD. AND KARTHIGESU A/L V. CHINNASAMY AWARD NO : 2230 OF 2005
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-173/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BHD. AND KARTHIGESU A/L V. CHINNASAMY AWARD NO : 2230 OF 2005 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue:
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 15/4-388/14 BETWEEN YASMIN BINTI HARON AND EXTOL CORPORATION (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 342 OF 2017
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 15/4-388/14 BETWEEN YASMIN BINTI HARON AND EXTOL CORPORATION (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 342 OF 2017 Before : Y.A. PUAN REIHANA BTE ABD.RAZAK CHAIRMAN (SITTING ALONE)
More informationANCOM LOGISTICS BERHAD (6614-W) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
(Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES OF THE 52 ND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT SELANGOR BALLROOM 1, DORSETT GRAND SUBANG, JALAN SS12/1, 47500 SUBANG JAYA SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN ON THURSDAY,
More informationADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD
353 ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Mary Shakila G Azariah Award No: 521 of 2012 [Case No: 24/4-906/10] 24 April 2012 Dismissal: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Company
More informationFor the appellants Lim Kian Leong (Tony Ng TT, Keith Kwan & Rachel Tan Pak Theen with him); M/s Mohd Zain & Co
NGAN & NGAN HOLDINGS SDN BHD & ANOR v. CENTRAL MERCANTILE CORPORATION (M) SDN BHD [2010] 3 CLJ 818 COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA HELILIAH MOHD YUSOF JCA, KN SEGARA JCA, RAMLY ALI JCA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-02-85-2007]
More informationMALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KUCHING SUIT NO II BETWEEN AND
MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KUCHING SUIT NO. 22-74-08-II BETWEEN CMS ENERGY SDN BHD (Company No.34309-A) Level 6, Wisma Mahmud Jalan Sungai Sarawak 930 Kuching, Sarawak Plaintiff
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18(12)/4-411/15 ZAKARIA BIN ISMAIL DAN EASTERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION BERHAD AWARD NO: 857 OF 2017
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18(12)/4-411/15 ZAKARIA BIN ISMAIL DAN EASTERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION BERHAD AWARD NO: 857 OF 2017 Before : Y.A. TUAN GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ CHAIRMAN
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUSASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUSASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02-2133-2011 ANTARA BOUNTY DYNAMICS SDN BHD (dahulunya dikenali sebagai MEDA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD) PERAYU DAN CHOW TAT MING DAN 175
More information195 WAGES COUNCILS ACT
Wages Councils 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 195 WAGES COUNCILS ACT 1947 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF
More informationAWARD NO. : 1614 OF 2018
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : BETWEEN NAZREEN BEGUM BINTI MOHAMED YAACOB AND PETRONAS / PETRONAS CHEMICALS GROUP BERHAD AWARD NO. : 1614 OF 2018 Before Venue : PUAN ANNA NG FUI CHOO - Chairman
More informationWong Kian Wah v Ng Kien Boon
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Hamid Sultan Abu Backer, JCA; Abdul Rahman Sebli, JCA; Mary Lim, JCA Wong Kian Wah v Ng Kien Boon Citation: [2018] MYCA 230 Suit Number: Civil Appeal No. W 02(NCVC)(W)
More informationSCAN ASSOCIATES BERHAD ( P) (Incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act, 1965)
THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in doubt as to the course of action to be taken, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or
More informationPilecon Engineering Bhd ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA ARIFIN ZAKARIA, JCA NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, JCA 23 FEBRUARY 2007
COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA Bintulu Development Authority - vs - Coram Pilecon Engineering Bhd ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA ARIFIN ZAKARIA, JCA NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, JCA 23 FEBRUARY 2007 Judgment of the
More informationMALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN. CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/ BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD..
MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/8-2016 BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD.. PLAINTIFF AND DIRECTOR OF LANDS AND SURVEYS.. 1 ST DEFENDANT SABAH
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA Thye Hin Enterprises Sdn Bhd - vs - Daimlerchrysler
Coram COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA Thye Hin Enterprises Sdn Bhd - vs - Daimlerchrysler MOHD GHAZALI JCA NIK HASHIM JCA H.B. LOW J 28 JULY 2004 Judgment Mohd Ghazali JCA (delivering the judgment of the court)
More information1.1 This Contest is organised by Telekom Malaysia Berhad (hereby known as TM ) and Visa Worldwide Pte. Limited (hereby known as VISA ).
VISA-TM AUTOPAY CONTEST 2014 TERMS AND CONDITIONS By entering the Visa-TM Autopay Contest (hereby known as Contest), you (hereby known as Contestant ) is deemed to have read and agreed to be bound by the
More informationBRIGHT PACKAGING INDUSTRY BERHAD
THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt as to the course of action to be taken, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant
More informationPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION If you are in any doubt as to the course of action you should take, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant
More informationBETWEEN. LAI CHENG OOI (f) (the executrix of the estate of Lee Tain Lee Thien Chiung, deceased) AND
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO. S-01(IM)(NCVC)-145-04/2016 [Kota Kinabalu High Court OS No. BKI-24NCVC-44/5-2015] BETWEEN LAI CHENG OOI (f) (the
More informationTHE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.]
THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.] An Act to provide for the adjudication or trial by Administrative Tribunals of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment
More information"collective agreement" means an agreement as to industrial matters;
Page 1 of 36 Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Industrial Relations Act. Interpretation 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires "award" means an award made by a Court; "collective
More informationNotice of Annual General Meeting
MAXIS BERHAD (Company No. 867573-A) (Incorporated in Malaysia) Notice of Annual General Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Ninth Annual General Meeting of MAXIS BERHAD ( the Company ) will be held
More informationCountry Code: MS 2002 Rev. CAP Reference: 19/1979. Date of entry into force: April 1, 1980 (SRO 8/1980)
Country Code: MS 2002 Rev. CAP. 15.03 Title: Country: EMPLOYMENT ACT MONTSERRAT Reference: 19/1979 Date of entry into force: April 1, 1980 (SRO 8/1980) Date of Amendment: 5/1986; 10/1989; 5/1996 Subject:
More informationIREKA CORPORATION BERHAD
Page 1 of 7 IREKA CORPORATION BERHAD (Co. No. 25882A) (Incorporated in Malaysia) EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE FORTYFIRST ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT DEWAN BERJAYA, BUKIT KIARA EQUESTRIAN
More information(Company No T) (Incorporated in Malaysia) AMENDMENTS. To: The Shareholders of Affin Bank Berhad
(Company No. 25046-T) (Incorporated in Malaysia) AMENDMENTS To: The Shareholders of Affin Bank Berhad Dear Sir/Madam Reference is made to the 2017 Annual Report of Affin Bank Berhad. We wish to inform
More informationJUDGMENT (Court enclosure no. 4)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA CIVIL SUIT NO: WA-22IP-37-09/2017 BETWEEN DARUL FIKIR (Business Registration No.: 000624088-H)
More informationNYLEX (MALAYSIA) BERHAD (9378-T) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
(Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES OF THE 47TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT SELANGOR BALLROOM 1, DORSETT GRAND SUBANG, SS12/1, 47500 SUBANG JAYA, SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, ON THURSDAY, 19
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18/4-352/2008 TEOH CHYE LYN ALLSTAFF OUTSOURCING SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 577 OF 2010
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18/4-352/2008 TEOH CHYE LYN V. ALLSTAFF OUTSOURCING SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 577 OF 2010 Before : Y.A. RAJENDRAN NAYAGAM CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial Court
More informationDENMARK. The Ombudsman Act. Act No. 473 of 12 June 1996
DENMARK The Ombudsman Act Act No. 473 of 12 June 1996 Chapter I Election, dismissal etc 1. (1) After every general election and when a vacancy occurs, the Folketing shall elect an Ombudsman. (2) In the
More informationTHE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009
THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009 JW MARRIOT 1 The long title of the Industrial Relations
More informationNOTICE OF 20TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
ANNUAL REPORT 2016 NOTICE OF 20TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Twentieth (20th) Annual General Meeting ( AGM ) of the Company will be held at Hazel & Ivy Room, Level 2M, One World
More informationIN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: 01(i)-15-04/2014(C) BETWEEN SERUAN GEMILANG MAKMUR SDN BHD AND SUMMARY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: 01(i)-15-04/2014(C) BETWEEN SERUAN GEMILANG MAKMUR SDN BHD.. APPELLANT AND 1. KERAJAAN NEGERI PAHANG DARUL MAKMUR 2. PENGARAH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA SUMMONS WRIT NO: BETWEEN AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA SUMMONS WRIT NO: 22-753-2005 BETWEEN WING FAH ENTERPRISE SDN BHD PLAINTIFF AND MATSUSHITA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS (M)
More informationNotice of Annual General Meeting
Annual Report 2018 233 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Tenth of MAXIS BERHAD ( the Company ) will be held on Thursday, 25 April 2019 at 10.00 a.m. at Connexion Conference & Event Centre, Grand Nexus (Level
More informationDecision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 29 July 2016, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Santiago Nebot (Spain), member John Bramhall
More informationAJIYA BERHAD ( W) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
AJIYA BERHAD (377627-W) (Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES OF THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF AJIYA BERHAD HELD AT VIP HOTEL, BATU 1, JALAN BULOH KASAP, 85000 SEGAMAT, JOHOR ON FRIDAY, 27 APRIL
More information(Company No D) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
(Company No. 132493-D) (Incorporated in Malaysia) SUMMARY RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 9.21(2) OF BURSA MALAYSIA MAIN MARKET LISTING REQUIREMENTS
More informationERRATA. To: All Shareholders of BIMB Holdings Berhad
ERRATA To: All Shareholders of BIMB Holdings Berhad With reference to our Integrated Annual Report 2017, please be informed that the following parts of the Notice of the Twenty-First Annual General Meeting
More informationCOMPANY LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE Held: [1] [2]
1 TAN SRI ABDUL AZIZ ZAIN & ORS v. UNITED OVERSEAS LAND LTD & ORS HIGH COURT MALAYA, PULAU PINANG ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD J CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-265-95 12 OCTOBER 1998 [1998] 4 CLJ 321 COMPANY LAW: Suit by Company
More informationZELAN BERHAD (Company No: V) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
MINUTES OF THE FORTY-FIRST (41 ST ) ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ( AGM OR MEETING ) OF ZELAN BERHAD ( ZELAN OR COMPANY ) HELD AT MAHKOTA II, BR LEVEL, HOTEL ISTANA, 73, JALAN RAJA CHULAN, 50250 KUALA LUMPUR
More informationDispute Board Rules. in force as from 1 September Standard ICC Dispute Board Clauses. Model Dispute Board Member Agreement
Dispute Board Rules in force as from September 004 with Standard ICC Dispute Board Clauses Model Dispute Board Member Agreement International Chamber of Commerce 8 cours Albert er 75008 Paris - France
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/1-154/02 BETWEEN AMPAC MARKETING SDN. BHD. AND. JULIUS A/L J. ANTHONYSAMY (deceased) AWARD NO : 40 OF 2006
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/1-154/02 BETWEEN AMPAC MARKETING SDN. BHD. AND JULIUS A/L J. ANTHONYSAMY (deceased) AWARD NO : 40 OF 2006 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - CHAIRMAN LIM WENG KHUAN - EMPLOYERS
More informationOMBUDSMAN BILL, 2017
Arrangement of Sections Section PART I - PRELIMINARY 3 1. Short title...3 2. Interpretation...3 3. Application of Act...4 PART II OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN 5 ESTABLISHMENT AND FUNCTIONS OF OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN
More information2A. To reappoint the following directors who are above the 70 years of age and have offered themselves for re-election:- Note 2A
Incorporated in Malaysia AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF 10 TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY FORM Dear shareholders of Hap Seng Plantations Holdings Berhad, Reference is made to the notice of 10 th Annual
More informationBOILERMECH HOLDINGS BERHAD (Company No: T) (Incorporated In Malaysia)
BOILERMECH HOLDINGS BERHAD (Company No: 897694-T) (Incorporated In Malaysia) Minutes of the Sixth Annual General Meeting of Boilermech Holdings Berhad held at Throne, Empire Hotel Subang, Empire Subang,
More informationUEM EDGENTA BERHAD (Company No M) (Incorporated in Malaysia) SUMMARY RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 55 TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ( AGM )
UEM EDGENTA BERHAD (Company No. 5067-M) (Incorporated in Malaysia) SUMMARY RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 55 TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ( AGM ) VENUE: BANQUET HALL, MENARA KORPORAT, PERSADA PLUS, PERSIMPANGAN
More informationNotice 0f Annual General Meeting
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the 49 th Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Concorde Ballroom 1, Lobby Level, Concorde Hotel, Jalan Sultan Ismail, 50250 Kuala Lumpur on Friday, 21 April
More informationMinister of Human Resources, Malaysia v Diamet Klang (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2015] 2 AMR 659; [2013] 1 LNS * 1466 (CA)
Legal Updates April 2015 Cases Administrative Law Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia v Diamet Klang (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2015] 2 AMR 659; [2013] 1 LNS * 1466 (CA) Whether (i) minister
More informationthe court has jurisdiction to grant a mandatory injunction on an ex parte application in urgent and exceptional cases;
[1986] 1 MLJ 256 BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BHD v TINTA PRESS SDN BHD & ORS OCJ KUALA LUMPUR ZAKARIA YATIM J CIVIL SUIT NO C2518 OF 1984 20 August 1985 Practice and Procedure Interlocutory mandatory injunction
More informationJUDGMENT. Low Hop Bing JCA:
DANCOM TELECOMMUNICATION (M) SDN BHD v. UNIASIA GENERAL INSURANCE BHD COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA LOW HOP BING JCA, HELILIAH YUSOF JCA, ABDUL MALIK ISHAK JCA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-02-259-2005] 1 AUGUST 2008
More informationDUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY Introductory Provisions. Article (1) Definitions
DUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY 2011 Introductory Provisions Article (1) Definitions 1.1 The following words and phrases shall have the meaning assigned thereto unless
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. B /2014 ANTARA PROFIL SAUJANA (M) SDN BHD DAN
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. B-02-857-05/2014 PROFIL SAUJANA (M) SDN BHD AZABAR HOLDINGS ANTARA DAN PERAYU RESPONDEN (DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI DI SHAH
More informationCaribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat
Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat Back to Model Legislation on issues affecting women CARICOM MODEL LEGISLATION ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT Explanatory Memorandum: Long Title The long title outlines the
More informationIOI PROPERTIES GROUP BERHAD
IOI PROPERTIES GROUP BERHAD (Company Registration No: 1035807-A) (Incorporated in Malaysia) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Fifth Annual General Meeting ( Fifth AGM ) of the Company will be held at Putrajaya
More informationESSENTIALS OF EMPLOYMENT LAW MALAYSIA & ASIA Topic: MALAYSIAN EMPLOYMENT & INDUSTRIAL LAW : BRIEF OVERVIEW AND SPECIFIC INSIGHTS
ESSENTIALS OF EMPLOYMENT LAW MALAYSIA & ASIA 2008 Topic: MALAYSIAN EMPLOYMENT & INDUSTRIAL LAW : BRIEF OVERVIEW AND SPECIFIC INSIGHTS 2008 All Rights Reserved. Trevor George De Silva. 1 Malaysian Employment
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) SITTING AT KUCHING, SARAWAK CIVIL APPEAL NO. Q /2013. Appellant YUNG ING ING
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) SITTING AT KUCHING, SARAWAK CIVIL APPEAL NO. Q-02-2628-12/2013 Appellant YUNG ING ING v. Respondent HUNFARA CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. [In the matter
More informationPART 8 ARBITRATION REGULATIONS CONTENTS
PART 8 ARBITRATION REGULATIONS * CONTENTS Section Page 1 Definitions and Interpretations 8-1 2 Commencement 8-2 3 Appointment of Tribunal 8-3 4 Procedure 8-5 5 Notices and Communications 8-5 6 Submission
More informationSUNWAY CONSTRUCTION GROUP BERHAD (Company No W) (Incorporation in Malaysia)
SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION GROUP BERHAD (Company No. 1108506-W) (Incorporation in Malaysia) EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE THIRD ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SUNWAY CONSTRUCTION GROUP BERHAD HELD AT GRAND BAHAMAS,
More information7. To re-appoint Messrs. Deloitte PLT as Auditors of the Company for the ensuing year and to authorise the Directors to fix their remuneration.
53 rd Annual General Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Fifty-Third ( 53 rd ) Annual General Meeting ( AGM ) of KUB Malaysia Berhad ( KUB or the Company ) will be held at Shah Alam Hall 2, Shah Alam
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 27 th January, ARB. P. No.373/2015. versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 27 th January, 2016 + ARB. P. No.373/2015 CONCEPT INFRACON PVT. LTD... Petitioner Through: Mr.Balaji Subramanium, Adv. with Mr.Samar
More informationMAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C-20-09/2014 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR DAN
MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C--09/14 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR PLAINTIF DAN 1. PROJEK LEBUHRAYA USAHASAMA BERHAD (No. Syarikat
More informationAllan Kinsey & Anor v Sunway Rahman Putra Sdn Bhd & Anor; Dekon Sdn Bhd (Third Party)
Allan Kinsey & Anor v Sunway Rahman Putra Sdn Bhd & Anor; Dekon Sdn Bhd (Third Party) HIGH COURT, SHAH ALAM SUIT NO: 22(NCVC) 971 2011 PRASAD SANDOSHAM ABRAHAM J 16 APRIL 2015 [2016] 1 CIDB-CLR 72 The
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 31 July 2013, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Joaquim Evangelista (Portugal), member Ivan Gazidis
More informationLABOUR ARBITRATION RULES
THE INSTITUTE of ARBITRATORS & MEDIATORS AUSTRALIA ACN 008 520 045 ARBITRATORS MEDIATORS CONCILIATORS LABOUR ARBITRATION RULES Preamble The preferred method of resolving a dispute between an employer and
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 17 January 2014, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Mario Gallavotti (Italy), member Damir Vrbanovic
More informationINDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 4(23)/4-772/13 BETWEEN KAMAL AZIZUL BIN AZIZ AND AMBANK (M) BERHAD AWARD NO : 475 OF 2017
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 4(23)/4-772/13 BETWEEN KAMAL AZIZUL BIN AZIZ AND AMBANK (M) BERHAD AWARD NO : 475 OF 2017 BEFORE: VENUE: Y.A. PUAN SAROJINI A/P KANDASAMY Chairman (Sitting alone)
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Reportable Case no: JA 80/16 In the matter between: PARDON RUKWAYA AND 31 OTHERS Appellants and THE KITCHEN BAR RESTAURANT Respondent Heard: 03 May 2017
More informationDALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA
DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA YEOH LIANG CHUAN (No. K/P: 481027-07-5351). PERAYU DAN JAGJIT SINGH (mendakwa sebagai
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 17 June 2016, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Theodore Giannikos (Greece), member Carlos González
More informationSKRINE ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS. IS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND PAYMENT ADJUDICATION ACT 2012 RETROSPECTIVE OR PROSPECTIVE? Shannon Rajan Partner SKRINE
SKRINE ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS IS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND PAYMENT ADJUDICATION ACT 2012 RETROSPECTIVE OR PROSPECTIVE? Shannon Rajan Partner SKRINE Global Arbitration Review (GAR) Ranked in Top 100 International
More informationECM LIBRA FINANCIAL GROUP BERHAD ( ECM or the Company ) (Company No K) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
ECM LIBRA FINANCIAL GROUP BERHAD ( ECM or the Company ) (Company No. 713570-K) (Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES of the Thirteenth Annual General Meeting of ECM Libra Financial Group Berhad held at Dewan
More informationPREVIOUS CHAPTER 10:18 OMBUDSMAN ACT
TITLE 10 TITLE 10 PREVIOUS CHAPTER Chapter 10:18 OMBUDSMAN ACT Acts 16/1982, 24/1985, 8/1988, 1/1989, 3/1994, 22/2001. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation.
More informationThe Companies Bill Revamping the Companies Act December LEE SHIH & SHEBA GUMIS
1 The Companies Bill 2013- Revamping the Companies Act 1965 17 December 2013 - LEE SHIH & SHEBA GUMIS SUMMARY OF PART TWO Company Secretaries Meetings and Written Resolutions Issues Relating to Directors
More informationMALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD ( MRCB OR THE COMPANY )
MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD ( MRCB OR THE COMPANY ) MANAGEMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN KWASA UTAMA SDN BHD ( KUSB ) AND MRCB FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MRCB AS THE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR IN CONNECTION WITH
More informationDr. Nael Bunni, Chairman, Dispute Resolution Panel, Engineers Ireland, 22 Clyde Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4. December 2000.
Preamble This Arbitration Procedure has been prepared by Engineers Ireland principally for use with the Engineers Ireland Conditions of Contract for arbitrations conducted under the Arbitration Acts 1954
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 24 August 2018, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Johan van Gaalen (South Africa), member Joaquin
More informationRULES OF PERSATUAN KAJIAN OBESITI MALAYSIA (Malaysian Association for the Study of Obesity)
RULES OF PERSATUAN KAJIAN OBESITI MALAYSIA (Malaysian Association for the Study of Obesity) ARTICLE I Name and Place of Business 1. The Association shall be known as Persatuan Kajian Obesiti Malaysia [Malaysian
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO.: W-02(IM)(NCC) /2014 BETWEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO.: W-02(IM)(NCC)-676-04/2014 BETWEEN ZAMIL STEEL VIETNAM BUILDINGS CO. LTD. - APPELLANT AND G.T.K. BERHAD (Company No.: 198500-P)
More informationDebtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 256 DEBTORS ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006
Debtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 256 DEBTORS ACT 1957 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION
More informationTribunal By-Laws In effect as of May 26, 2014
Tribunal By-Laws In effect as of May 26, 2014 Part 1 Jurisdiction and Establishment of Tribunals 1. Adoption of By-law 1.1 This By-law comes into operation on 26/5/2014 and is binding on all members of
More informationBasketball Model Tribunal By-law
Basketball Model Tribunal By-law For adoption by Constituent Association Members and their affiliated bodies Date adopted by BA Board 23 August 2009 Date Blood Policy Effective 23 August 2009 Basketball
More informationBASKETBALL everyone s game
BASKETBALL everyone s game Basketball Tribunal By-law For adoption by Constituent Association Members and their affiliated bodies Date adopted by Basketball Australia Board 21 September 2012 Date Tribunal
More informationNOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Seventeenth (17th) Annual General Meeting ( AGM ) of the Company will be held at Ballroom 1 & 2, Setia City Convention Centre, No. 1, Jalan Setia
More informationConstruction Industry Payment and Adjudication 1. construction industry payment and adjudication act 2012
Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication 1 laws OF MALAYSIA construction industry payment and adjudication act 2012 2 Laws of Malaysia Date of Royal Assent...... 18 June 2012 Date of publication
More informationCASE SUMMARY by Alliff Benjamin Suhaimi
CASE SUMMARY by Alliff Benjamin Suhaimi Recognition of Common Law defences in defamation claims in Malaysia: Reynolds Privilege and Lucas Box Federal Court Civil Appeal No.: 02(f)- 31-03/2014(W) : Syarikat
More informationRAYUAN SIVIL NO. W Antara. 5. Kamil Ahmad Merican. Perayu-Perayu. Dan. Didengar bersama-sama dengan
DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W-02-1003-2009 Antara 1. Ace Heights (M) Sdn. Bhd. (No. Syarikat 400572 D) 2. Dato Abdullah B. Mohd Yusof 3. Abbas Bin Yaacob 4. Harith
More informationRegistered Date 7 November 2017
Constitution of Tribe FM Incorporated Registered Date 7 November 2017 (Accepted at the Tribe FM SGM 1pm 22-10-2017) This constitution is made available to all members of the association in electronic form
More informationPETRONAS DAGANGAN BERHAD (Incorporated in Malaysia)
PETRONAS DAGANGAN BERHAD (Incorporated in Malaysia) THIRTY-FOURTH (34 TH ) ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Minutes of the Thirty-Fourth (34 th ) Annual General Meeting of PETRONAS Dagangan Berhad held at Sapphire
More information1. Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 14 January 2009 (OJ L 24 of , p.
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL This edition consolidates: the Rules of Procedure of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 25 July 2007 (OJ L 225 of 29.8.2007, p.
More informationSHELL REFINING COMPANY (FEDERATION OF MALAYA) BERHAD (Company No: 3926-U) (Incorporated in Malaysia) CIRCULAR TO SHAREHOLDERS
THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION If you are in any doubt as to the course of action to be taken, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant
More informationCONSTITUTION. c. It shall strive to be seen as a worthwhile organisation by the local community.
CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE The PROBUS name and emblem are registered under the Australian and New Zealand Trade Marks Acts. They may be used only by Probus clubs, Probus Associations and other bodies accredited
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN [CIVIL SUIT NO: ] BETWEEN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN [CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-510-2003] BETWEEN A & AT ADVANCED POWER SYSTEMS SDN BHD... PLAINTIFF AND PERNEC CORPORATION BHD (NO SYARIKAT:
More informationThe Public Guardian and Trustee Act
1 The Public Guardian and Trustee Act being Chapter P-36.3* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1983 (effective April 1, 1984) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1984-85-86, c.34 and 105; 1988-89,
More informationThe Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006]
The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 [As amended by the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 No. 43 of 2006] THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, 1993* No. 10 of 1994 (8th January, 1994)
More information(Company No D) (Incorporated in Malaysia)
(Company No. 380100-D) (Incorporated in Malaysia) SUMMARY RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 9.21(2) OF BURSA MALAYSIA MAIN MARKET LISTING
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC)
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 16 November 2012, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Theo van Seggelen (Netherlands), member
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 15 May 2009, in the following composition: Slim Aloulou (Tunisia), Chairman Mario Gallavotti (Italy), member Caio Cesar Vieira
More informationPARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995
PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) Arbitration Act. No. 11 of 1995 1 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) L.D. O.10/93
More information