NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT FOR MEMBERS OF THE FLSA SETTLEMENT CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT FOR MEMBERS OF THE FLSA SETTLEMENT CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA"

Transcription

1 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT FOR MEMBERS OF THE FLSA SETTLEMENT CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: FOOT LOCKER, INC. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (FLSA) AND WAGE AND HOUR LITIGATION, 11-MDL JCJ OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE IMPORTANT PLEASE READ CAREFULLY YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY IT. IF SO, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TAKE ANY FURTHER ACTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT AND RECEIVE COMPENSATION. 1. Why is this Notice being sent? This Notice is to inform you of a class action settlement in the following cases: In re: Foot Locker, Inc. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Wage and Hour Litigation, 11-MDL JCJ (E.D. Pa.); Francisco Pereira v. Foot Locker, Inc.; Does 10-10, inclusive, No. 07-cv-02157; Marissa Smith v. Foot Locker, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc., and Does 1-10, No. 10-cv-12233; Joann Hernandez and Marissa Maguire v. Foot Locker, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Does 1-10, No. 10-cv-06789; Damita Kennedy v. Foot Locker, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Does 1-10, No. 10 cv-00570; Hallie Brown, David Cheatham, Jr., Eric Guzman, and Edward Woo v. Foot Locker, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and Does 1-10, No. 11-cv-02731( the Brown Action ) (collectively, the FLSA Litigation ); and Jennifer Hill, Matthew Knighton, and Andre Moore v. Foot Locker, Inc. and Does 1-10, Civil Action No. 08-CH (Cir. Ct. of Cook Cnty., Ill.) ( Illinois State Action ) (with the FLSA Litigation, Joint Litigation ). On March 2, 2010, a Notice of Class Action Lawsuit Against Foot Locker, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc. ( Foot Locker ) 1 was mailed to you. In response, you submitted a Consent to Sue Form. The FLSA Litigation has settled, and because you are a FLSA Settlement Class Member, you are receiving this Notice. 2. Description of the FLSA Litigation On May 25, 2007, Francisco Pereira ( Pereira ), an hourly retail employee of Foot Locker filed a class and collective action complaint ( Complaint ) against his employer under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 201 et. seq., ( FLSA ) and Pennsylvania state wage and hour law in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the Court ). In his Complaint, Mr. Pereira alleges that Foot Locker failed to pay him, and other similarly situated non-exempt employees, including sales associates, stock persons and cashiers for: (i) the minimum wage for all hours worked; (ii) overtime wages at the rate of one and one-half times the employee s regular rate for all hours worked in excess of forty (40) hours in any given workweek; and (iii) all wages, including overtime pay, within the required pay period. In addition, employees in other Foot Locker retail stores initiated four other representative actions against Foot Locker in both state and federal court throughout the country alleging similar claims as those asserted in Pereira. These cases were consolidated with Pereira as part of the FLSA Litigation, and are currently pending before the Honorable J. Curtis Joyner in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Shortly before the Pereira action commenced, Argenis Cortes, Carmel Smith, and Ceham Mohamed, on behalf of themselves and other employees similarly situated within the State of New York, commenced an action against Foot Locker in the Southern District of New York ( Cortes Action ) alleging New York state claims and FLSA claims, some of which are similar to those alleged in the FLSA Litigation. On December 7, 2009, the Court granted Cortes request to intervene in the FLSA Litigation for all purposes. On October 17, 2008, Plaintiffs Jennifer Hill, Matthew Knighton, and Andre Moore ( Hill Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and all other Foot Locker employees similarly situated within the State of Illinois, commenced the Illinois State Action against Foot Locker in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, to recover all unpaid wages and overtime compensation pursuant to the Illinois Minimum Wage Law and the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act. In their Complaint, the Hill Plaintiffs allege that 1 ( Defendants or Foot Locker means Foot Locker, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc., and their current, former, and future affiliates, including, without limitation, their parents, subsidiaries, and related entities, predecessors, successors, divisions, joint ventures and assigns, and each of these entities past or present directors, officers, employees, partners, members, principals, agents, insurers, co-insurers, re-insurers, shareholders, attorneys, and personal or legal representatives, in their individual and corporate capacities.) QUESTIONS? PLEASE CALL TOLL FREE. Page 1 of 5

2 Foot Locker failed to pay them, and other similarly situated hourly retail employees, including but not limited to employees with the job titles of sales associate, sales clerk, stock person and/or cashier (collectively Illinois Retail Employees ): (i) the minimum wage for all hours worked; (ii) overtime wages at the rate of one and one-half times the employee s regular rate for all hours worked in excess of forty (40) hours in any given workweek; and (iii) all wages, including overtime pay, within the required pay period. On May 13, 2011, the Circuit Court of Cook County granted the Hill Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. At the Parties request, on December 10, 2014, the Court granted leave for Pereira to amend his Complaint for purposes of including the Hill Plaintiffs and the claims pending in the Illinois State Action. Foot Locker denied and continues to deny any liability or wrongdoing, and denies any and all liability and damages to anyone with respect to the alleged facts or causes of action asserted in the Joint Litigation. Foot Locker also continues to assert general and affirmative defenses. Notwithstanding its position that it has acted in full compliance with applicable law, and that there is no merit to any of the Plaintiffs claims, Foot Locker recognizes the risks and costs as well as the uncertainties of further litigation. The Parties have reached an agreement to settle the Joint Litigation ( Settlement ), which is subject to approval by the Court. Settlement of the Joint Litigation was reached as a result of extensive, arms-length negotiations between the Parties. Specifically, the Parties participated in two formal mediation sessions with Mr. Michael E. Dickstein of Dickstein Dispute Resolution, and protracted subsequent settlement negotiations. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the terms of the Settlement, and of your rights and options in connection with it. If approved, the Settlement will resolve all claims in the Joint Litigation as described and defined in the Joint Stipulation and Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ). 3. Who is affected by the Proposed Settlement? The Settlement affects all hourly Foot Locker employees who worked for Foot Locker in a position below the level of an assistant store manager for at least one hour in the United States any time between March 2, 2007 through March 2, 2010 as non-exempt employees including, but not limited to, sales associates, stock associates and cashiers ( Retail Employees ) and (1) filed a FLSA Consent Form to participate in the FLSA Litigation; and (2) did not withdraw his or her FLSA Consent Form prior to the execution of the Settlement Agreement. This Settlement also affects all hourly Foot Locker employees who worked for Foot Locker in Illinois at any time between October 17, 2005 through May 13, 2011 as Illinois Retail Employees as defined above and in the Settlement Agreement, and did not timely request exclusion from the Illinois State Action prior to May 7, If you meet these criteria, you will be deemed a Participating Class Member, and will receive a monetary payment as described in the Settlement Agreement, and discussed below. 4. What are my options? You have three (3) options with regard to this Settlement. You can: (1) do nothing; (2) object to the Settlement; or (3) request to be excluded from the Settlement by submitting an Election to Opt Out of Settlement and Class Action Form ( Election to Opt Out Form ). Details about each option and how it will affect your rights under the law are explained below. 5. What are the terms of the Proposed Settlement? Pursuant to the Settlement, Foot Locker will pay Seven Million, One Hundred Fifty Thousand U.S. Dollars and Zero Cents ($7,150,000.00) (the Settlement Consideration ) to settle the Joint Litigation. The Settlement Consideration will be deposited into a Settlement Fund, and will cover all payments to Participating Class Members, as well as attorneys fees and reasonable litigation costs, and Enhancement Payments (as described below). After deduction of the foregoing from the Settlement Consideration, the remainder will be the Net Settlement Amount. The Net Settlement Amount will be divided by the total number of Compensable Work Hours. This calculation will produce an hourly factor, which then will be multiplied by each Participating Class Member s individual Compensable Work Hours to calculate each individual s Gross Settlement Payment. If the Settlement is approved by the Court, and you meet the criteria described in Section 3 above, you will be entitled to a Gross Settlement Payment, unless you choose to opt out of the Settlement. The Parties estimate that the minimum recovery for each Class Member will be approximately $0.51 per Compensable Work Hour. The Claims Administrator will make all legally mandated payroll deductions from any payments paid to you, and mail you a Net Settlement Payment, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. QUESTIONS? PLEASE CALL TOLL FREE. Page 2 of 5

3 In addition, Class Counsel will seek Court approval of Enhancement Payments to the following individuals in recognition of the roles they played in the prosecution and resolution of the Joint Litigation: (i) Named Plaintiffs in Pereira and Hill, in the amount of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00); (ii) Named Plaintiffs who were deposed, excluding the Named Plaintiffs in Pereira, Hill, and the Cortes Named Plaintiffs and Opt-In Plaintiffs, in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00); (iii) Named Plaintiffs who were not deposed, excluding the Named Plaintiffs in Pereira, Hill, and the Cortes Named-Plaintiffs and Opt-In Plaintiffs, in the amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00); (iv) Declarants who were not a Named Plaintiff, but were deposed, in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00); (v) Declarants who were not a Named Plaintiff and were not deposed, in the amount of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00); and (vi) Sample Opt In Plaintiffs who were served, and responded to, discovery from Foot Locker as a Sample Opt In Plaintiff, but had no Compensable Work Hours for the Applicable Class Period, in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00). Participating FLSA Settlement Class Members will fully and finally release claims arising under the FLSA and any and all state law claims of whatever kind, whether in law or equity, sounding in tort, contract, statute or other applicable law, including common law, whether known or unknown, for any type of wages, premium pay, damages, statutory damages, penalties, attorneys fees and costs, restitution, or equitable relief arising out failure to pay for all hours worked and any statutory overtime premium pay rate accrued during the period beginning on September 15, 2006 and ending on December 9, These include but are not limited to claims arising under: Alaska Stat , (a); Ariz (b); Ark. Code Ann , ; Cal. Lab. Code et seq., Cal. Lab. Code , 1197; 7 Colo. Code Regs ; Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann ; 31-76b and 31-76c; 19 Del. C. 902(a); D.C. Code Ann (a)(c); Haw. Rev. Stat. 387 et seq.; Idaho C (1); 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. 105/3(d), 105/4a, 56 Ill. Admin. Code , ; Ind. Code Ann ; Iowa Code 91D.1(1)(a); Kan. Stat. Ann and 1204, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann (1); ; 26 Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. 664(1)(3); Md. Code Ann., Lab & Empl , 415, 420; Mass. Gen. Laws ch , Mass. Gen. Laws ch ; Mich. Comp. Laws a; Minn. Stat. Ann ; Mo. Rev. Stat et seq.; Mont. Code Ann et seq.; Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann (1)(d); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann ; ; N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann and 29; N.J. Stat. Ann. 34:11-56(a), et seq., N.J. Admin. Code 12:56-5.2, ; N.M. Stat. Ann (a)-(d); N.Y. Labor Law 160(3), N.Y. Lab. Law 650 et seq.; N.Y. Labor Law 190 et seq.; 12 N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs ; N.C. Code 95-25; N.D. Admin Code (4); N.D. Cent. Code ; Ohio Rev. Code Ann ; Okla. Stat. Ann. tit ; Or. Rev. Stat and 261 et seq.; 43 Pa. Stat. Ann , et seq., 34 Pa. Code ; R.I. Gen. Laws and 4.1; S.D. Codified Laws ; Tex. Lab. Code ; Utah Code Ann ; Va. Code Ann ; Ann. Rev. Code Wash et seq; W.Va. Code 21-5C; Wis. Admin. Code Dep t of Workforce Dev and ; and any statutes and/or regulations promulgated thereunder regarding failure to pay for all hours worked and any statutory overtime premium pay. Participating FLSA Settlement Class Members who worked in California, will also fully and finally release any state law claims, causes of action, demands, damages, or liabilities, whether known or unknown, for unpaid wages or other compensation, and/or related penalties, interest, costs, attorneys fees, punitive damages, and/or injunctive or other equitable remedies, allegedly owed or available, whether in law or equity, sounding in tort, contract, statute, or other applicable law, arising out of or related to any of the claims or allegations asserted, or which could have been asserted in the Brown Action that Foot Locker: (1) subjected its employees to uncompensated off-the-clock work; (2) failed to pay required straight time and/or overtime; (3) failed to pay the legally-mandated minimum wage; (4) failed to provide required rest breaks and/or meal periods; (5) failed to pay earned and unpaid wages at the time of termination; (6) failed to keep accurate records of hours worked; (7) failed to provide semi-monthly itemized statements of total hours worked and applicable hourly rates; and/or (8) in engaging in any or all of the aforementioned conduct, violated, or is liable under, the California Labor Code, including, but not limited to, sections 201, 202, 203, 204, 210, 218.5, 218.6, 221, 226, 226.3, 226.7, 256, 510, 512, 558, 1174, , 1194, , 1197, 1198, 2698 et seq., Cal. Code tit. 8 section (California Wage Order ), and the California Business & Professions Code section 17200, et. seq. Each Participating FLSA Settlement Member who worked in California agrees to waive the benefits and rights of any statute, rule, doctrine, or common law principle of any jurisdiction whatsoever that provides that a general release does not extend to unknown claims, including, without limitation, the provisions, rights and benefits afforded by section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides: A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor [in this case, the Participating FLSA Settlement Class Member] does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor [in this case, Foot Locker]. Participating FLSA Settlement Class Members who are also Cortes Named Plaintiffs and Opt-In Plaintiffs, as defined in the Settlement Agreement, release only their claims arising under the FLSA during the Relevant Class Period when they worked in a position within the FLSA Settlement Class, and do not release any claims in the Cortes Action, including any claims under the FLSA for time worked as an assistant manager or any claims under New York Labor Laws asserted in the Cortes Action. Nothing in the Settlement Agreement shall be construed or operate as a release, waiver, bar, and/or offset of any claims, monetary demands, recoveries, awards, judgments, and/or settlement proceeds of the Cortes Named Plaintiffs and Opt In Plaintiffs in the Cortes Action not specifically released herein. QUESTIONS? PLEASE CALL TOLL FREE. Page 3 of 5

4 Nothing herein or in the Settlement Agreement is intended to release, waive, bar, and/or offset any monetary demands, recoveries, judgments, attorneys fees claims, or awards in the Cortes Action. Participating Illinois Settlement Class Members will fully and finally release any and all state law claims of whatever kind, whether in law or equity, sounding in tort, contract, statute or other applicable law, whether known or unknown, for any type of wages, premium pay, damages, statutory damages, penalties, attorneys fees and costs, restitution, or equitable relief arising out of or related to any of the claims or allegations asserted, or which could have been asserted, in the Illinois State Action that accrued during the period beginning on October 17, 2005 and ending on December 9, Who represents the Settlement Classes? For more information about the settlement, visit If you have any questions concerning the Settlement, you should contact one of the Class Counsel attorneys listed below: Peter A. Muhic James Maro Monique Myatt Galloway KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA (610) Judith P. Broach Amy F. Shulman BROACH & STULBERG, LLP One Penn Plaza, Suite 2016 New York, NY (212) How will the attorneys for the Settlement Classes be paid? Class Counsel s fees and costs will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Lead Class Counsel will seek an award of attorneys fees not to exceed 33⅓% of the Settlement Fund, or $2,383, and reimbursement of reasonable and necessary litigation costs. The actual amount of fees and expenses awarded will be determined by the Court. 8. How do I participate in the Settlement and what happens if I do? Since you have opted in to the Settlement, you do not need to take further action in order to participate in the Settlement. If the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, you will have agreed to be bound by all of the provisions of the Settlement, and to have fully and finally released Foot Locker from the Released Claims. If the Court approves the Settlement, you will receive a Net Settlement Payment calculated as described in Section 5 above. 9. No Retaliation Federal law prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who exercise their rights under federal wage and hour laws. In the event that you feel you have been threatened or retaliated against with respect to your participation in the Settlement, you should immediately contact one of the Class Counsel attorneys listed in Section 6 above. 10. What if I choose to object to the Settlement? You can object to the terms of the Settlement before final approval. However, if the Court approves the Settlement, you may still be bound by the terms of the Settlement. You may both object to the Settlement and participate in it. To object, you must send a letter or other writing stating that you object to the Settlement in In re: Foot Locker, Inc. Fair labor Standard Act (FLSA) and Wage and Hour Litigation, No. 11-MDL JCJ. Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, location of the store where you were employed, signature, and a full explanation of the reasons why you object to the Settlement. Your written Objection must be sent to the counsel listed in Section 6 above, and must be postmarked no later than March 9, You must also mail your Objection to the Clerk of the Court of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania no later than March 9, The address is: Clerk of the Court United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 601 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania QUESTIONS? PLEASE CALL TOLL FREE. Page 4 of 5

5 Any attorney who intends to represent an individual Class Member objecting to the Settlement, and any Class Member who wishes to proceed pro se (i.e., to represent him or herself and not be represented by Class Counsel) must file a notice of appearance with the Court on or before March 9, If you do not object in the manner described above, you shall be deemed to have waived any objections, and shall forever be foreclosed from objecting to the fairness or adequacy of the Settlement, the payment of attorneys fees, litigation costs, Enhancement Payments, the claims process, and any and all other aspects of the Settlement. 11. What if I choose to exclude myself or Opt Out of the Settlement? You may request to be excluded from the Settlement by submitting an Election to Opt Out Form to the Claims Administrator. If you exclude yourself, you will not receive any monetary payment from the Settlement Fund. You will, however, retain the right to assert any claims you may have against Foot Locker. To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must complete, sign, date, and return the enclosed Election to Opt Out Form by mailing it to the Claims Administrator, postmarked no later than March 9, The envelope containing your completed, signed, and dated Election to Opt Out Form must be postmarked on or before March 9, If you Opt Out, you will not be subject to the Released Claims set forth in the Settlement Agreement, and you will not receive any monies under this Settlement. 12. What if I do nothing? If you do nothing, you will participate in the Settlement, receive a monetary payment, and release claims against Foot Locker as described in the Settlement Agreement, and discussed in Section 5 above. 13. Tax Implications For income and payroll tax purposes, 75% of each Gross Settlement Payment to Participating Class Members shall be deemed payment in settlement of claims for unpaid wages (which shall be subject to required withholdings and deductions and be reported as wage income as required by law), and 25% of each Gross Settlement Payment shall be deemed payment in settlement of claims for liquidated damages/penalties and interest (which shall not be subject to required withholdings and deductions and shall be reported as non-wage income as required by law). To the extent the Settlement Payments are deemed payment of unpaid wages, they (a) shall be subject to required withholdings and deductions by the Claims Administrator; and (b) shall be reported in the year of payment as wage income to the Participating Claimant on a Form W-2 issued by the Claims Administrator and such other state or local tax reporting forms as may be required by law. One hundred percent (100%) of Enhancement Payments shall be non-wage payments not subject to payroll withholdings and deductions. Foot Locker and Class Counsel make no representations as to the taxability of any payments pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. If you have any questions regarding the tax treatment of any payments pursuant to the Settlement, you should consult your own tax advisor. 14. Final Approval Hearing The Court will hold a Final Approval Hearing on the fairness and adequacy of the Settlement, the plan of distribution, Lead Class Counsel s request for attorneys fees and costs, the Administrative Costs, and the Enhancement Payments on May 28, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable J. Curtis Joyner of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, located at 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The Final Approval Hearing may be continued or adjourned without further notice to Class Members. If you wish to attend, you should confirm the date of the Final Approval Hearing with counsel listed in Section 6 above. You are not required to appear at the hearing to participate in or opt out of the Settlement. If you so wish, you may be heard at that hearing by either appearing in person or through an attorney, but you must advise the Court in advance of your intention to appear. 15. Where can I get more information about the Settlement? For more information about the Settlement, or if you have any questions regarding the Settlement, you may contact the Claims Administrator at ILYM Group, Inc., P.O. Box 57087, Irvine, CA 92619; regarding the Foot Locker Wage and Hour Settlement. Class Counsel has also established an address if you prefer to your change of address or questions: footlockerotsettlement@ktmc.com. The full Settlement Agreement, important case documents, the information contained in this Notice, and a list of frequently asked questions related to the Settlement will be posted at: You may also contact the Class Counsel attorneys listed above. PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT DIRECTLY ABOUT THIS MATTER. THE COURT CANNOT PROVIDE YOU WITH LEGAL ADVICE OR ANY OPINION REGARDING THE FLSA LITIGATION OR THE SETTLEMENT. QUESTIONS? PLEASE CALL TOLL FREE. Page 5 of 5

STATE PRESCRIPTION MONITORING STATUTES AND REGULATIONS LIST

STATE PRESCRIPTION MONITORING STATUTES AND REGULATIONS LIST STATE PRESCRIPTION MONITORING STATUTES AND REGULATIONS LIST Research Current through June 2014. This project was supported by Grant No. G1399ONDCP03A, awarded by the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: Salazar v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Pending before the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles Case No. BC556145 If you worked for Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ( Sedgwick

More information

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A To: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Antoine Turnage v. Joerns LLC, et al., Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG16808099 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS JOHN STELL and CHARLES WILLIAMS, ) JR., on behalf of themselves individually ) and as class representatives on

More information

Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes

Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln College of Law, Faculty Publications Law, College of 2015 Survey of State Civil Shoplifting Statutes Ryan Sullivan University

More information

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed. AL ALABAMA Ala. Code 10-2B-15.02 (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A-2-15.02.] No monetary penalties listed. May invalidate in-state contracts made by unqualified foreign corporations.

More information

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter.

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter. RE: JAVIER MATTER C/O RUST CONSULTING, INC. - 5273 P.O. BOX 2396 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* - UAA

More information

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Perez, et al. v. Centinela Feed, Inc. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC575341 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY To: A California

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMY WOODS, JOSHUA FROST, JORDAN KNOWLES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general

More information

- 1 - Questions? Call:

- 1 - Questions? Call: Patrick Sinay, et al. v. Essendant Co., et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC651043 ATTENTION: ALL CURRENT AND FORMER HOURLY-PAID OR NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES

More information

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC CPT ID: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC1305688

More information

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION MAMDOOH HUSEIN, on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) v. ) ) BRAVO BRIO RESTAURANT ) GROUP, INC. )

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. ("LA QUINTA") YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. (LA QUINTA) YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Sergio Peralta, et al. v. LQ Management L.L.C, et al. United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 3:14-cv-01027-DMS-JLB ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CONCERNING SEVERANCE CLAIMS The United States Bankruptcy Court for

More information

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015 Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance UPDATED MARCH 30, 2015 State Statute Year Statute Alabama* Ala. Information Technology Policy 685-00 (Applicable to certain Executive

More information

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES

APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES APPENDIX D STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES 218 STATE PERPETUITIES STATUTES State Citation PERMITS PERPETUAL TRUSTS Alaska Alaska Stat. 34.27.051, 34.27.100 Delaware 25 Del. C. 503 District of Columbia D.C.

More information

Statutes of Limitations for the 50 States (and the District of Columbia)

Statutes of Limitations for the 50 States (and the District of Columbia) s of Limitations in All 50 s Nolo.com Page 6 of 14 Updated September 18, 2015 The chart below contains common statutes of limitations for all 50 states, expressed in years. We provide this chart as a rough

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA JULIUS DENNIS V. PLANETECHS, LLC PABLO LINN V. PLANETECHS, LLC GREGORY TATUM V. PLANETECHS, LLC CASE NOS. 15CV000787, RG16799430 and 16CV00363

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs Overview Financial crimes and exploitation can involve the illegal or improper

More information

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix Corp., et al United

More information

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES

APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES APPENDIX C STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES 122 STATE STATE UNIFORM TRUST CODE STATUTES CITATION Alabama Ala. Code 19-3B-101 19-3B-1305 Arkansas Ark. Code Ann. 28-73-101 28-73-1106 District of Columbia

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION EBRAHIM SHANEHCHIAN, et al., Plaintiff, v. MACY S, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-cv-00828-SAS-SKB Judge S. Arthur Spiegel

More information

APPENDIX STATE BANS ON DEBTORS PRISONS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEBT

APPENDIX STATE BANS ON DEBTORS PRISONS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEBT APPENDIX STATE BANS ON DEBTORS PRISONS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEBT This Appendix identifies and locates the critical language of each of the forty-one current state constitutional bans on debtors prisons.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. United States District Court, Central District of California Case No. 2:14-cv-04378 (RGk) SHx THIS NOTICE

More information

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers

Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers Survey of State Laws on Credit Unions Incidental Powers Alabama Ala. Code 5-17-4(10) To exercise incidental powers as necessary to enable it to carry on effectively the purposes for which it is incorporated

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Daniel L. Warshaw (SBN 185365) Bobby Pouya (SBN 245527) PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Tel: (818)

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JAVIER PEREZ, as an individual and

More information

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT EXHIBIT 1 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement ( Settlement Agreement ) is reached by and between Plaintiff Sonia Razon ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all members of the

More information

States Permitting Or Prohibiting Mutual July respondent in the same action.

States Permitting Or Prohibiting Mutual July respondent in the same action. Alabama No Code of Ala. 30-5-5 (c)(1) A court may issue mutual protection orders only if a separate petition has been filed by each party. Alaska No Alaska Stat. 18.66.130(b) A court may not grant protective

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Richard Terry v. Hoovestol, Inc. Case No. 3:16-cv-05183-JST A court authorized this notice. This is

More information

States Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012

States Adopt Emancipation Day Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012 Source: Weekly State Tax Report: News Archive > 2012 > 03/16/2012 > Perspective > States Adopt Deadline for Individual Returns; Some Opt Against Allowing Delay for Corporate Returns in 2012 2012 TM-WSTR

More information

State-by-State Lien Matrix

State-by-State Lien Matrix Alabama Yes Upon notification by the court of the security transfer, lien claimant has ten days to challenge the sufficiency of the bond amount or the surety. The court s determination is final. 1 Lien

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DONNA MOORE, FRENCHOLA HOLDEN, and KEITH MCMILLON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs,

More information

Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53

Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53 Section 4. Table of State Court Authorities Governing Judicial Adjuncts and Comparison Between State Rules and Fed. R. Civ. P. 53 This chart originally appeared in Lynn Jokela & David F. Herr, Special

More information

STATUTES OF REPOSE. Presented by 2-10 Home Buyers Warranty on behalf of the National Association of Home Builders.

STATUTES OF REPOSE. Presented by 2-10 Home Buyers Warranty on behalf of the National Association of Home Builders. STATUTES OF Know your obligation as a builder. Educating yourself on your state s statutes of repose can help protect your business in the event of a defect. Presented by 2-10 Home Buyers Warranty on behalf

More information

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Emily Hunt v. VEP Healthcare, Inc. Case No. 16-cv-04790 A court authorized this notice.

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CPT ID SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALL PERSONS WHO WORKED FOR DEFENDANT ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SANDRA KAFENBAUM and STEVEN SCHULMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CA 00 413L vs. GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

More information

State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders

State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders State Statutory Provisions Addressing Mutual Protection Orders Revised 2014 National Center on Protection Orders and Full Faith & Credit 1901 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1011 Arlington, Virginia 22209

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

State Prescription Monitoring Program Statutes and Regulations List

State Prescription Monitoring Program Statutes and Regulations List State Prescription Monitoring Program Statutes and Regulations List 1 Research Current through May 2016. This project was supported by Grant No. G1599ONDCP03A, awarded by the Office of National Drug Control

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017

Name Change Laws. Current as of February 23, 2017 Name Change Laws Current as of February 23, 2017 MAP relies on the research conducted by the National Center for Transgender Equality for this map and the statutes found below. Alabama An applicant must

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued. NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION LAWSUIT Brown, et al. v. Health Resource Solutions, Inc., et al. Case No. 16-cv-10667, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

More information

H.R and the Protection of State Conscience Rights for Pro-Life Healthcare Workers. November 4, 2009 * * * * *

H.R and the Protection of State Conscience Rights for Pro-Life Healthcare Workers. November 4, 2009 * * * * * H.R. 3962 and the Protection of State Conscience Rights for Pro-Life Healthcare Workers November 4, 2009 * * * * * Upon a careful review of H.R. 3962, there is a concern that the bill does not adequately

More information

State By State Survey:

State By State Survey: Connecticut California Florida By Survey: Statutes of Limitations and Repose for Construction - Related Claims The Right Choice for Policyholders www.sdvlaw.com Statutes of Limitations and Repose 2 Statutes

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Subject to final approval by the Court, this Settlement Agreement is between Plaintiff Emily Hunt ( Plaintiff or Hunt or Named Plaintiff ) and Defendant VEP Healthcare,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU ARE NOT BEING SUED. A FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. CASE NAME AND DOCKET NUMBER: CHELSEA KOENIG V.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance

Laws Governing Data Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance Laws Governing Security and Privacy U.S. Jurisdictions at a Glance State Statute Year Statute Adopted or Significantly Revised Alabama* ALA. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY 685-00 (applicable to certain

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DIVISION IN RE ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. Master File No. 07 C 7083 SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To:

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS Oscar Torres and Anthony Quintana, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, vs. Plaintiffs, Salinas Farm Labor

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION BARRETT v. FOREST SETTLEMENT c/o RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 (866) 742-4955 ,

More information

Accountability-Sanctions

Accountability-Sanctions Accountability-Sanctions Education Commission of the States 700 Broadway, Suite 801 Denver, CO 80203-3460 303.299.3600 Fax: 303.296.8332 www.ecs.org Student Accountability Initiatives By Michael Colasanti

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION ------------------------------------------------------x IN RE CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES : Civil Action No. W-04-CA-177 SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 RICHARD A. HOYER (State Bar No. 151931) rhoyer@hoyerlaw.com 2 RYAN L. HICKS (State Bar No. 260284) rhicks@hoyerlaw.com 3 HOYER & HICKS 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 4 San Francisco, California 94111

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET... NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING Frank Ortegon-Ramirez v. Cedar Fair, L.P., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (CASE NO. 1-13-CV-254098)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO If You Are or Were a Non-Exempt Employee of Gale Pacific USA, Inc., or Worked for Gale Pacific USA, Inc. as a Temporary Worker,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Civil Action No. 05-CV-2827-RMB ELECTRONICALLY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF PATRICK LENTSCH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-00012-DAK-EJF VISTA OUTDOOR INC., MARK W. DEYOUNG,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, AEROPOSTALE, INC., THOMAS P. JOHNSON and MARC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you have or had a residential purchase or refinance mortgage loan owned and/or serviced by Chase and Chase, directly or indirectly,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE CONN S, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-00548 (KPE) (Consolidated Action) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE 360NETWORKS SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) 02 CV 4837 (MGC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'

More information

QUESTIONS? Call toll free, or visit

QUESTIONS? Call toll free, or visit UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x In re : : Master Docket No. 11 Civ. 0796 (LAK) CHINA VALVES TECHNOLOGY SECURITIES

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE HIBERNIA FOODS, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------------- THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement.

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court

More information

Relationship Between Adult and Minor Guardianship Statutes

Relationship Between Adult and Minor Guardianship Statutes RELATIONSHIP DEFINITION STATES TOTAL Integrated Statutory provisions regarding authority over personal AR, DE, FL, IN, IA, KS, KY, MO, NV, NC, OH, OR, 17 matters are applicable to both adults and minors

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LEONARD BUSTOS and MARY WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 06 Civ. 2308 (HAA)(ES) VONAGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : (ECF CASE) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CELESTICA INC. SEC. LITIG. : : : : : Civil Action No.: 07-CV-00312-GBD (ECF CASE) Hon. George B. Daniels NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date:

A SUMMARY OF YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES. You May: Summary: Due Date: IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE: YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A proposed Settlement has been reached in a class action alleging that HD Supply, Inc. ( HDS or Defendant ) sent marketing

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NICOLE COGDELL, et al., ) ) Case No. SACV 12-01138 AG (ANx) Plaintiffs, ) ) Honorable Andrew J. Guilford v. ) ) THE WET SEAL,

More information

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13 6:15-cv-02475-MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Roger DeBenedetto, individually and on ) behalf

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION PETER KALTMAN, MALCOLM LORD, CELESTE NAVON, DAVID W. ORTBALS, PAUL E. STEWARD, GARCO INVESTMENTS, LLP Individually

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VISWANATH V. SHANKAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. IMPERVA, INC., et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST and THEODORE HYER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. ICG, INC. a/k/a INTERNATIONAL COAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN RE NEUSTAR, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 14-CV-00885 JCC TRJ NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x IN RE PROFIT RECOVERY GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION x ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE HEATHER DAVIS, SBN AMIR NAYEBDADASH, SBN PROTECTION LAW GROUP, LLP Main Street, Suite A El Segundo, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHARD RAMMER and ROBERT KINSCH SUPERIOR

More information

CAUSE NO

CAUSE NO CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY!

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! YOU ARE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT UNDER THIS SETTLEMENT IF YOU WORKED FOR COIT SERVICES, INC. (dba

More information

IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES HOME HEALTH BETWEEN MARCH 1, 2007 AND THE PRESENT,

IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES HOME HEALTH BETWEEN MARCH 1, 2007 AND THE PRESENT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Dusan-Speck et al. v. St. Charles Health System, Inc., No. 6:13-cv-00358-AA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES

More information