PROTECTING COMPANY RESOURCES: Non-competes and confidentiality agreements in employment

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PROTECTING COMPANY RESOURCES: Non-competes and confidentiality agreements in employment"

Transcription

1 Kansas Missouri

2 PROTECTING COMPANY RESOURCES: Non-competes and confidentiality agreements in employment January 24, 2018 Association of Corporate Counsel Mid-America Chapter

3 Overview Drafting Noncompete Agreements Choice of Law & Forum Selection Consideration Reasonable Scope Trade Secrets Litigation Strategy Settlement Agreements

4 Source: Mother Jones, 2014

5 DRAFTING RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AGREEMENTS

6 Restrictive Covenants Non-Compete Agreements (NCA) Non-solicitation/anti-raiding agreements Non-disclosure/confidentiality agreements

7 Source: faircompetitionlaw.com, 2017

8 KS: A noncompetition covenant ancillary to an employment contract is valid and enforceable if the restraint on competition is reasonable under the circumstances and not adverse to the public welfare. Weber v. Tillman, 259 Kan. 457, 913 P.2d 84, 89 (Kan. 1996) MO: The term "non-compete agreement" refers to all restrictive covenants entered into between the employer and employees that restrict post-employment activities of the employees, including non-competition and non-solicitation clauses. Whelan Sec. Co. v. Kennebrew, 379 S.W.3d 835 (Mo. 2012)

9 MO: Sec , RSMo Anti-Raiding Employee Non-Solicitation Reasonable covenant prohibiting employee from soliciting, recruiting, hiring or otherwise interfering with the employment of one or more employees shall be enforceable if the employer is seeking to protect confidential or trade secret information or customer or supplier relationships, goodwill or loyalty Enforceable between employer and employee without protectable interests in customer relationships etc. if restriction lasts one year or less; except as applied to secretarial or clerical employees

10 When to Draft Agreement On Hiring On Change in Compensation On Promotion On Renewal or Other Renegotiation of Contract

11 Enforceability Multi-jurisdiction Employers Choice of Law Provision - Reasonable connection to the parties - Situs of employee? - Situs of employer? - Violate state public policy?

12 Forum Selection Clause Include forum selection clause Generally deemed enforceable unless fraud, duress

13 Reasonable Scope Geographic and Temporal Restrictions

14

15 Reasonable Scope Protection of legitimate business interests like: Trade secrets Customer contacts or relationships Specialized training Preservation of referral base Confidential business information Good will Reputation Competition by unfair means

16 Legitimate Business Interests It is well settled that only a legitimate business interest may be protected by a noncompetition covenant. If the sole purpose is to avoid ordinary competition, it is unreasonable and unenforceable. Allen, Gibbes & Houlik, LC v. Ristow, 32 Kan. App. 2d 1051 (Kan. App. 2004); Ballesteros v. Johnson, 812 S.W.2d 217 (E.D. Mo. 1991). The purpose of a non-compete agreement is "to keep the covenanting employee out of a situation in which he might be able to make use of contacts with customers to his former employer's disadvantage." Osage Glass, Inc. v. Donovan, 693 S.W.2d 71 (Mo. 1985)

17 Reasonable Scope Legitimate business interests are NOT: Ordinary competition Preclusion of employee using some general skill (Moore v. Eggers Consulting Co., 252 Neb. 396 (1997))

18 Also Not Customers that the employee brought to the employer without training or investment by the employer (See Arthur L. Gallager & Co. v. Anthony, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Ohio 2016)

19 Consideration KS: Continued employment as sufficient consideration is a question of fact MO: Continued employment and access to employer s protectable information and relationships constitutes adequate consideration for a non-compete agreement executed after inception of employment. Jumbosack Corp. v. Buyck, 407 S.W.3d 51 (Mo. 2013)

20 Reasonable Scope

21 Reasonable Scope Assignability Best practice to address assignability in agreement Include consent to assignment as to successor in interest without notice to employee

22 Reasonable Scope Tolling Restriction period automatically extended for any period of time in which violation is occurring

23 Reasonable Scope Defining Terms, Avoiding Ambiguity What is termination or separation? Who is a customer, client, lead, referrer? What constitutes solicitation?

24

25 Divert or take away customers held ambiguous and undefined and therefore more than necessary to protect the employer s legitimate interests (Pathway Med. Techs. Inc. v. Nelson, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (Ariz. 2011) Undefined terms, including competitor, business opportunity, services, similar services, perform, and pursuing, that were capable of more than one meaning including a meaning that is functionally overbroad, rendered agreement unenforceable Lanmark Tech., Inc. v. Canales, 454 F.Supp.2d 524 (E.D. Va. 2006).

26 Reasonable Scope Blue Penciling Judicial reformation of agreement to render the agreement reasonable Check choice of law and forum state law Severability clause

27 TRADE SECRETS

28 Trade Secrets State statutes: Kansas Uniform Trade Secrets Act (KUTSA), K.S.A et seq. Missouri Uniform Trade Secrets Act (MUTSA), et seq. Federal statute: Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA); 18 U.S.C et seq.

29 DTSA Federal cause of action Uniform definitions of trade secret and misappropriation Exemplary damages on finding of willful and malicious conduct Whistleblower protection immunity

30 Trade Secrets Information subject to reasonable efforts to maintain as confidential Information derives independent economic value from not being generally known

31 Common Disputes and Scenarios Employee leaves to work for competitor Is new employer truly a competitor? Employee leaves to form own company Employee leaves but only prepares to compete

32

33

34 LITIGATION STRATEGY

35 Litigation Strategy Develop case theme and strategy early What remedy does the plaintiff want? What remedy is likely? Identify defendants/parties Former employee, accomplices? New employer Provide notice of potential suit

36 Litigation Strategy Marshal evidence and litigation holds Find the NCA or other agreement Identify witnesses to and evidence of unfair competition Clients? Meet with business partners

37 Define damages Litigation Strategy Options for pleading damages Locate damages witnesses Capture and calculate/methodology for damages

38 Litigation Strategy Injunctive Relief

39 SETTLEMENT

40 Settlement Agreements and Creative Solutions Settlement Agreement Modification of Restrictive Covenant Disclosure of Trade Secrets Disclosures of Customer Lists

41 Questions?

42 Lora M. Jennings Attorney at Law Practicing In: Employment Law Health Law Insurance Defense Business Litigation

43 Lora Jennings: or

44 Kansas Missouri

wwww.foxrothschild.com

wwww.foxrothschild.com NationalSurvey Surveyon onrestrictive Restrictive Covenants Covenants National wwww.foxrothschild.com National Survey on Restrictive Covenants This survey has been provided by the Fox Rothschild Labor

More information

F I L E D Electronically :21:37 PM

F I L E D Electronically :21:37 PM F I L E D Electronically 2017-05-22 03:21:37 PM 1 BACKGROUND 2 This case concerns the alleged breach of the restrictive portions of an 3 "Agreement and Acknowledgement Regarding Confidentiality, Invention

More information

Georgia s New Restrictive Covenant Act:

Georgia s New Restrictive Covenant Act: Georgia s New Restrictive Covenant Act: What Employers Need to Know Presented by: Todd D. Wozniak Brett T. Lane What are Restrictive Covenants? Contractual provisions that serve to prohibit or limit on

More information

Are Non-Competition Agreements Enforceable or Not?

Are Non-Competition Agreements Enforceable or Not? Are Non-Competition Agreements Enforceable or Not? Non-competition agreements usually bar doctors both from encouraging patients to follow them to a new practice and from practicing medicine for a certain

More information

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 20 July Appeal by Defendants from order entered 12 February 2009, by

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 20 July Appeal by Defendants from order entered 12 February 2009, by An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)

More information

Employer Wins! Non-Competition Agreement Enforced and No Geographic Limitation

Employer Wins! Non-Competition Agreement Enforced and No Geographic Limitation Employer Wins! Non-Competition Agreement Enforced and No Geographic Limitation Posted on March 17, 2016 Nice when an Employer wins! Here the Court determined that Employers may place reasonable restrictions

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Medix Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Dumrauf Doc. 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MEDIX STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 17 C 6648 v. ) ) Judge

More information

Covenants Not to Compete in Utah: A Useful Tool for Employers

Covenants Not to Compete in Utah: A Useful Tool for Employers Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 6 3-1-1997 Covenants Not to Compete in Utah: A Useful Tool for Employers Carolyn Cox Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl

More information

THE NEW RESTRICTIVE COVENANT LAW by Mark G. Burnette

THE NEW RESTRICTIVE COVENANT LAW by Mark G. Burnette THE NEW RESTRICTIVE COVENANT LAW by Mark G. Burnette In the November 2010 general election, the voters of Georgia approved an amendment to the Georgia constitution that allows the Georgia legislature to

More information

Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Wilson Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Edward A. Fusco, Defendant/Respondent/ Cross-Appellant. Case Number:

More information

50 State DESKTOP REFERENCE. What Employers Need To Know About Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Law EDITION

50 State DESKTOP REFERENCE. What Employers Need To Know About Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Law EDITION 50 State DESKTOP REFERENCE What Employers Need To Know About n-compete and Trade Secrets Law 2016-2017 EDITION Dear Clients and Friends, We are pleased to provide you with the 2016 2017 edition of our

More information

K.S.A Supp and the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA) The statute requiring rate filings, K.S.A Supp (a), states in part:

K.S.A Supp and the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA) The statute requiring rate filings, K.S.A Supp (a), states in part: July 1, 2010 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2010-17 John W. Campbell, General Counsel Kansas Insurance Department 420 SW 9th Street Topeka, Kansas 66612 Re: Insurance--General Provisions Relating to Fire

More information

2018 IL App (3d) Opinion filed December 11, 2018 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT

2018 IL App (3d) Opinion filed December 11, 2018 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2018 IL App (3d) 170803 Opinion filed December 11, 2018 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT 2018 PAM S ACADEMY OF DANCE/FORTE ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ARTS CENTER, ) of the 13th Judicial

More information

Present: Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Stephenson, S.J.

Present: Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Stephenson, S.J. Present: Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Stephenson, S.J. OMNIPLEX WORLD SERVICES CORPORATION v. Record No. 042287 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY September 16, 2005 US INVESTIGATIONS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UPDATE, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:18cv462 ) LAWRENCE SAMILOW, ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS HURON TECHNOLOGY CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED September 11, 2014 v No. 316133 Alpena Circuit Court ALBERT E. SPARLING, LC No. 12-004990-CK Defendant-Appellee.

More information

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO. 09-13-00074-CV SHANE HODGSON and PHILLIP KITCHENS, Appellants V. U.S. MONEY RESERVE, INC. d/b/a UNITED STATES RARE COIN & BULLION RESERVE,

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 06-1958 & 06-2844 and 07-1216 & 07-1365 CINTAS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, DANIEL A. PERRY, Defendant-Appellee.

More information

Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Need to Know. May 31, 2016

Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Need to Know. May 31, 2016 Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Need to Know May 31, 2016 Today s elunch Presenters Cardelle B. Spangler Partner, Labor & Employment Chicago CSpangler@winston.com Daniel J. Fazio Partner, Labor & Employment

More information

Basic Considerations

Basic Considerations 1 Drafting Enforceable Non-Compete Agreements September 28, 2010 Presented by David S. Sanders, Esq. - Foley & Lardner LLP Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used

More information

Comparing employee non-compete arrangements in Australian and US companies. 23 September Association of Corporate Counsel

Comparing employee non-compete arrangements in Australian and US companies. 23 September Association of Corporate Counsel Association of Corporate Counsel NATIONAL WEBINAR : SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS Comparing employee non-compete arrangements in Australian and US companies 23 September 2015 Disclaimer: This presentation about

More information

1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call.

1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call. Under the Gun: A Primer on Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Non-Compete and Trade Secret Cases Thursday, November 29, 2012 Presented By the IADC Business Litigation Committee Welcome! The Webinar will

More information

by Donald W. Benson and Stephanie Bauer Daniel

by Donald W. Benson and Stephanie Bauer Daniel Littler archive This article recently appeared in the Tennessee Bar Journal, October 2005. New race to Tennessee and Georgia courthouses over noncompetition agreements by Donald W. Benson and Stephanie

More information

50 State Desktop Reference

50 State Desktop Reference 50 State Desktop Reference What Businesses Need To Know About n-compete and Trade Secrets Law 2017 2018 EDITION Dear Clients and Friends, We are pleased to provide you with the 2017 2018 edition of our

More information

Statute Summary Update. (1)Customarily and regularly solicit for the employer customers or prospective customers;

Statute Summary Update. (1)Customarily and regularly solicit for the employer customers or prospective customers; Research Log Case: Nurse Staffing, Inc. v. Smith Client Code SMI CV Date: December 7, 2011 Parties: Nurse Staffing, Inc. (a Georgia Corporation) and Julia Smith (Georgia Resident our client) Jurisdiction:

More information

Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes:

Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes: 1 Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes: Is It Possible To Put The Toothpaste Back In The Tube? Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome

More information

Grafton Data Systems, Inc. Craig Moore, et al. No CV-353 ORDER

Grafton Data Systems, Inc. Craig Moore, et al. No CV-353 ORDER MERRIMACK, SS SUPERIOR COURT Grafton Data Systems, Inc. v. Craig Moore, et al. No. 217-2016-CV-353 ORDER The Plaintiff, Grafton Data Systems, Inc. ( Grafton ), moves for a preliminary injunction against

More information

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference

Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference TRADE SECRETS Changing Landscape, US and Abroad 2017 In House Counsel Conference Presenters: Jenny Papatolis Johnson Endo Pharmaceuticals Tracy Zurzolo Quinn Reed Smith LLP Matthew P. Frederick Reed Smith

More information

Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Contracts North Carolina

Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Contracts North Carolina Enforcement of Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Contracts North Carolina Of the states neighboring Virginia, North Carolina is among the closest to Virginia's employer-friendly legal setting for enforcement

More information

Creative and Legal Communities

Creative and Legal Communities AIPLA Mergers & Acquisition Committee Year in a Deal Lecture Series Beyond the Four Corners: A Discussion of the Impact of the Choice of New York, Delaware, Texas, and California Law in Contracts Carey

More information

Case 2:07-cv DMC-MF Document 41 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:07-cv DMC-MF Document 41 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : : Case 207-cv-05793-DMC-MF Document 41 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 14 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NASC SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. DAVID JERVIS, et al., Defendants.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA January 3 2008 DA 07-0115 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2008 MT 4 ACCESS ORGANICS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDY HERNANDEZ, Defendant and Appellant, and MIKE VANDERBEEK, Defendant.

More information

Breach of Employment Contract Litigation: Contract Interpretation, Materiality of Breach, Defenses, Damages

Breach of Employment Contract Litigation: Contract Interpretation, Materiality of Breach, Defenses, Damages Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Breach of Employment Contract Litigation: Contract Interpretation, Materiality of Breach, Defenses, Damages TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2017 1pm Eastern

More information

Intellectual Property Issue-Spotting for the General Practitioner

Intellectual Property Issue-Spotting for the General Practitioner Intellectual Property Issue-Spotting for the General Practitioner Presented by Crissa Seymour Cook University of Kansas School of Law Return to Green CLE April 21, 2017 Intellectual Property Intellectual

More information

The Uncertain State of Employee Nonsolicitation Clauses in California

The Uncertain State of Employee Nonsolicitation Clauses in California From the SelectedWorks of Elena K Kouvabina December 2, 2010 The Uncertain State of Employee Nonsolicitation Clauses in California Elena K Kouvabina Available at: https://works.bepress.com/elena_kouvabina/3/

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATE OF IDAHO ) County of KOOTENAI ) ss FILED AT O'Clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI IDAHO

More information

Stop Thief! Go Recruiter! How To Stop Competitors From Stealing Your Trade Secrets And Employees, And What You Can Lawfully Poach In California

Stop Thief! Go Recruiter! How To Stop Competitors From Stealing Your Trade Secrets And Employees, And What You Can Lawfully Poach In California Stop Thief! Go Recruiter! How To Stop Competitors From Stealing Your Trade Secrets And Employees, And What You Can Lawfully Poach In California November 2006 Los Angeles/Orange County Andrew L. Satenberg,

More information

Simply the Best Movers, LLC v. Marrins Moving Sys., Ltd NCBC 28. SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 15 CVS 7065

Simply the Best Movers, LLC v. Marrins Moving Sys., Ltd NCBC 28. SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 15 CVS 7065 Simply the Best Movers, LLC v. Marrins Moving Sys., Ltd. 2016 NCBC 28. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 15 CVS 7065 SIMPLY THE BEST MOVERS,

More information

The following document is offered to PBI faculty as a sample of good written materials.

The following document is offered to PBI faculty as a sample of good written materials. The following document is offered to PBI faculty as a sample of good written materials. We are proud of the reputation of our yellow books. They are often the starting point in tackling a novel issue.

More information

Calif. Noncompete Clauses Still Unenforceable

Calif. Noncompete Clauses Still Unenforceable Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Calif. Noncompete Clauses Still Unenforceable --By

More information

Corporate Depositions: Limiting In-House Counsel Depos and Selecting/Preparing Employees for 30(b)(6) Depos

Corporate Depositions: Limiting In-House Counsel Depos and Selecting/Preparing Employees for 30(b)(6) Depos Kansas Missouri Corporate Depositions: Limiting In-House Counsel Depos and Selecting/Preparing Employees for 30(b)(6) Depos February 15, 2017 Association of Corporate Counsel Mid-America Chapter Preventing

More information

INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT

INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Independent Sales Associate Agreement (the Agreement ) is entered into on this day of February, 2015 ( Effective Date ) by and between Premiere Pharmaceutical

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 37805 T.J.T., INC., a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, ULYSSES MORI, an individual, Defendant-Respondent. Boise, November 2011 Term

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as Jacono v. Invacare Corp., 2006-Ohio-1596.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 86605 JULIE JACONO, ET AL. : : Plaintiffs-Appellees : : JOURNAL ENTRY : vs. : and :

More information

September 18, 1987 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO

September 18, 1987 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL September 18, 1987 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 87-138 The Honorable Ed C. Redmon State Fire Marshall Landon State Office Bldg. Suite 901 900 S.W. Jackson Topeka, KS

More information

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, C. J., RAY, P. J., and SELF, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely

More information

Multi-Country Survey on Covenants Not to Compete

Multi-Country Survey on Covenants Not to Compete By in-house counsel, for in-house counsel. InfoPAK SM Multi-Country Survey on Covenants Not to Compete Sponsored by: Association of Corporate Counsel 10, NW, Suite Washington, DC 200 tel +1 202.293.4103,

More information

Advanced Copy Technologies, Inc. v. Christopher Wiegman et al.

Advanced Copy Technologies, Inc. v. Christopher Wiegman et al. The Connecticut Law Reporter Advanced Copy Technologi.es, Inc. v. Wiegman, 63 Conn. L. Rptr. 211(October19, 2016) (Vitale, Elpedio N., J.) Advanced Copy Technologies, Inc. v. Christopher Wiegman et al.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. Argued: October 15, 2014 Opinion Issued: April 30, 2015

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES. Argued: October 15, 2014 Opinion Issued: April 30, 2015 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme

More information

Case 1:08-cv Document 14 Filed 07/16/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:08-cv Document 14 Filed 07/16/2008 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:08-cv-03939 Document 14 Filed 07/16/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MINTEL INTERNATIONAL GROUP, ) LTD., a United Kingdom

More information

Marsh USA, Inc. v Alliant Ins. Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 51555(U) Supreme Court, New York County. Ramos, J.

Marsh USA, Inc. v Alliant Ins. Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 51555(U) Supreme Court, New York County. Ramos, J. [*1] Marsh USA, Inc. v Alliant Ins. Servs., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 51555(U) Decided on October 19, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Ramos, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant

More information

To Compete or Not to Compete: Tips and Traps When Drafting Restrictive Covenants

To Compete or Not to Compete: Tips and Traps When Drafting Restrictive Covenants Spring Employment and Labour Law Seminar To Compete or Not to Compete: Tips and Traps When Drafting Restrictive Covenants Jeff Mitchell Chelsea Rasmussen June 10, 2016 Agenda Context: What is the playing

More information

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Virginia

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Virginia APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT Virginia Equal Employment Opportunity Policy: We are committed to providing equal employment opportunities to all employees and applicants without regard to race, religion, color,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT JAMES TACKETT, and, AMANDA TACKETT, on behalf of themselves and all Case No. 2016-CV-000103 others similarly situated Chapter 60 Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. This is a breach of contract case. Plaintiff SNS One, Inc. ( SNS One ) employed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. This is a breach of contract case. Plaintiff SNS One, Inc. ( SNS One ) employed SNS ONE, INC. v. Hage Doc. 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SNS ONE, INC. * Plaintiff * * v. * CIVIL NO. L-10-1592 * TODD HAGE * Defendant * ******* MEMORANDUM This is a breach of contract

More information

ACCOUNT TRANSFER AND AFFll..IATE AGREEMENT (Page 1 ) ACCOUNT TRANSFER AND AFFILIATE AGREEMENT between Cencom Inc., dba Alarm Partner,

ACCOUNT TRANSFER AND AFFll..IATE AGREEMENT (Page 1 ) ACCOUNT TRANSFER AND AFFILIATE AGREEMENT between Cencom Inc., dba Alarm Partner, ACCOUNT TRANSFER AND AFFll..IATE AGREEMENT (Page 1 ) ACCOUNT TRANSFER AND AFFILIATE AGREEMENT between Cencom Inc., dba Alarm Partner, hereafter called Company and above person and company who has completed

More information

Social Work Ethics and Non-Compete Clauses in Employment Contracts and Independent Contractor Agreements

Social Work Ethics and Non-Compete Clauses in Employment Contracts and Independent Contractor Agreements Social Work Ethics and Non-Compete Clauses in Employment Contracts and Independent Contractor Agreements Introduction Many social workers are required to sign a written contract as a condition of employment

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) of VETERANS AFFAIRS, ) ) Appellant, ) v. ) No. SC92541 ) KARLA O. BORESI, Chief ) Administrative Law Judge, ) ) Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE

More information

Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016)

Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies. (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016) Invention & Industry Trade Secret Misappropriation and Remedies (including a look at the new federal Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016) Eric E. Johnson ericejohnson.com Konomark Most rights sharable Remedies

More information

REPORT OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED BY THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 9, 2008

REPORT OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED BY THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 9, 2008 REPORT OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED BY THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 9, 2008 BACKGROUND In June 2006, the Judicial Council s Administrative Procedure

More information

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons

Follow this and additional works at:  Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Journal of Legislation Volume 43 Issue 2 Article 6 4-6-2017 Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 and Why the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1984 Still Matters for Trade

More information

Vance v. Griggs. Why Law Firms Shoul Agreements for Depar

Vance v. Griggs. Why Law Firms Shoul Agreements for Depar Why Law Firms Shoul Agreements for Depar Vance v. Griggs BY MICHAEL DOWNEY 1 Vance v. Griggs 2 interprets Missouri Supreme Court Rule 4-1.5 to allow a lawyer to claim a share in fees earned after the lawyer

More information

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP

Gottschlich & Portune, LLP Defense of Trade Secrets Act of 2016 Martin A. Foos June 9, 2017 Gottschlich & Portune, LLP 1 Defense of Trade Secrets Act of 2016 Effective May 11, 2016 Previous attempts to pass the Act in 2013, 2014,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON No. 139 March 25, 2015 127 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON GRANTS PASS IMAGING & DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, LLC, Plaintiff, and David OEHLING, an individual, and Yung Kho, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION WEEMS INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a LEGACY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Case No. 1:16-cv-109LRR v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY

More information

Trade Secrets Overview, Protection, and Litigation January 30, 2015 Mark C. Zebrowski

Trade Secrets Overview, Protection, and Litigation January 30, 2015 Mark C. Zebrowski Trade Secrets Overview, Protection, and Litigation January 30, 2015 Mark C. Zebrowski mofo.com Overview 2 What Is a Trade Secret? California Civil Code 3426 Information, including a formula, pattern, compilation,

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: MARCH 13, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2013-CA-000373-MR MOUNTAIN COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CORPORATION APPELLANT APPEAL FROM LETCHER CIRCUIT

More information

The Defend Trade Secrets Act: New Rights and Obligations for U.S. Employers

The Defend Trade Secrets Act: New Rights and Obligations for U.S. Employers AUDIO CONFERENCE ON The Defend Trade Secrets Act: New Rights and Obligations for U.S. Employers June 21, 2016 CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE The undersigned certifies that attended The Defend Trade Secrets

More information

Online Agreements: Clickwrap, Browsewrap, and Beyond

Online Agreements: Clickwrap, Browsewrap, and Beyond Online Agreements: Clickwrap, Browsewrap, and Beyond By Matthew Horowitz January 25, 2017 1 HISTORY: SHRINKWRAP AGREEMENTS/LICENSES Contract terms printed on (or contained inside) software packaging covered

More information

TRADE SECRETS AND NON-COMPETES

TRADE SECRETS AND NON-COMPETES TRADE SECRETS AND NON-COMPETES Sponsor: Civil Litigation Section CLE Credit: 1.0 Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:30 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. East Ballroom A-B Owensboro Convention Center Owensboro, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING

More information

John F. Dickinson and Margaret A. Philips of Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

John F. Dickinson and Margaret A. Philips of Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF

More information

A look at UCC 1-103(b) through the lens of Article 2: A practice of liberal supplementation or exclusion?

A look at UCC 1-103(b) through the lens of Article 2: A practice of liberal supplementation or exclusion? A look at UCC 1-103(b) through the lens of Article 2: A practice of liberal supplementation or exclusion? American Bar Association Business Law Section April 15, 2011 Professor Jennifer Martin St. Thomas

More information

Trade Secrets Acts Compared to the UTSA

Trade Secrets Acts Compared to the UTSA UTSA Version Adopted 1985 version 1985 Federal 18 U.S.C. 1831-1839 Economic Espionage Act / Defend Trade Secrets Act Preamble As used in this [Act], unless the context requires otherwise: 1839. Definitions

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION F.C. Franchising Systems, Inc. v. Wayne Thomas Schweizer et al Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION F.C. FRANCHISING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:11-cv-740

More information

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 April Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 3 April 2012 by

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 16 April Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 3 April 2012 by PHELPS STAFFING, LLC Plaintiff, NO. COA12-886 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 16 April 2013 v. Franklin County No. 10 CVS 1300 C. T. PHELPS, INC. and CHARLES T. PHELPS, Defendants. Appeal by plaintiff

More information

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 August 2014

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 August 2014 NO. COA14-185 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 5 August 2014 Beverage Systems of the Carolinas, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Iredell County No. 12 CVS 1519 Associated Beverage Repair, LLC, Ludine Dotoli and

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LIGHTHOUSE SPORTSWEAR, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED July 2, 2013 v No. 310777 Ingham Circuit Court MICHIGAN HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC LC No. 11-000854-CK ASSOCIATION,

More information

Applicant Co Applicant. Address. City State Zip. Home Phone# Cell Phone# Address Birth Date DL# SS# Sponsor Name

Applicant Co Applicant. Address. City State Zip. Home Phone# Cell Phone#  Address Birth Date DL# SS# Sponsor Name LLR INC. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT PROGRAM APPLICATION & AGREEMENT Applicant Co Applicant Address City State Zip Home Phone# Cell Phone# Email Address Birth Date DL# SS# Sponsor Name Effective Date This LLR

More information

Attorneys Fees in Trade Secrets Litigation

Attorneys Fees in Trade Secrets Litigation Attorneys Fees in Trade Secrets Litigation E. Todd Presnell David L. Johnson Return to publication table of contents E. Todd Presnell is a member of Miller & Martin PLLC, in Nashville. Mr. Presnell practices

More information

Nevada Right to Publicity Statute I. ISSUES PRESENTED. The client has requested research regarding Nevada s right to publicity statute

Nevada Right to Publicity Statute I. ISSUES PRESENTED. The client has requested research regarding Nevada s right to publicity statute 23400 Michigan Avenue, Suite 101 Dearborn, MI 48124 Tel: 1-(866) 534-6177 (toll-free) Fax: 1-(734) 943-6051 Email: contact@legaleasesolutions.com www.legaleasesolutions.com Nevada Right to Publicity Statute

More information

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: webcast@acc.com Thank You! Forget the Cut N Paste: Considerations

More information

Case 3:11-cv RJB Document 95 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:11-cv RJB Document 95 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 14 Case :-cv-00-rjb Document Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA ROSITA H. SMITH, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated Washington State Residents,

More information

Competing Policies in Covenants Not to Compete

Competing Policies in Covenants Not to Compete Missouri Law Review Volume 53 Issue 3 Summer 1988 Article 9 Summer 1988 Competing Policies in Covenants Not to Compete Lawrence G. Dorroh Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 119,219 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. SAMUEL W. FIELDS, Appellant,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 119,219 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. SAMUEL W. FIELDS, Appellant, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 119,219 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS SAMUEL W. FIELDS, Appellant, v. KEN MCGOVERN and DEBORAH PORTER, Appellees. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2018. Affirmed.

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CARLA HILES, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-9

More information

Brian s 1:1 Fitness, LLC. Jeremy Woodward NO CV ORDER

Brian s 1:1 Fitness, LLC. Jeremy Woodward NO CV ORDER MERRIMACK, SS SUPERIOR COURT Brian s 1:1 Fitness, LLC v. Jeremy Woodward NO. 217-2012-CV-00838 ORDER Petitioner, Brian s 1:1 Fitness ( Brian s ) seeks injunctive relief against Respondent, Jeremy Woodward

More information

Status of Partial-Birth Abortion Bans July 20, 2017

Status of Partial-Birth Abortion Bans July 20, 2017 Status of Partial-Birth Abortion Bans July 20, 2017 ---Currently in Effect ---Enacted prior to Gonzales States with Laws Currently in Effect States with Laws Enacted Prior to the Gonzales Decision Arizona

More information

John W. Terwilleger Attorney, Gunster West Palm Beach, Florida

John W. Terwilleger Attorney, Gunster West Palm Beach, Florida John W. Terwilleger Attorney, Gunster West Palm Beach, Florida Violation of General Antitrust Statutes Teaming Agreements that may constitute unreasonable restraints on trade. Restrictive Covenants Teaming

More information

Protecting Your Trade Secrets Under the DTSA

Protecting Your Trade Secrets Under the DTSA Protecting Your Trade Secrets Under the DTSA Reginald R. Goeke Partner rgoeke@mayerbrown.com Trent L. Menning Associate tmenning@mayerbrown.com Sharon A. Israel Lori Zahalka Partner Partner sisrael@mayerbrown.com

More information

Best Practices in Multi-Defendant Litigation

Best Practices in Multi-Defendant Litigation Best Practices in Multi-Defendant Litigation IPO Annual Meeting September 12-14, 2010 IPO 2010 Annual Meeting 1 Speakers Moderator: Elizabeth Ann "Betty" Morgan The Morgan Law Firm P.C. William Bergmann

More information

MEMORANDUM. RE: Research in Support of ACC NCR Litigation Forum Session on the First 90- Day Action Plan

MEMORANDUM. RE: Research in Support of ACC NCR Litigation Forum Session on the First 90- Day Action Plan Cathy A. Hinger Direct Dial: 202-857-4489 Direct Fax: 202-261-0029 E-mail: CHinger@wcsr.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: ACC NCR Litigation Forum Attendees Cathy A. Hinger, Esq. Louis R. Rouleau, Esq. DATE: July

More information

Litigation Webinar Series. Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA

Litigation Webinar Series. Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA March 30, 2017 Litigation Webinar Series Trade Secret Protection and the Defend Trade Secrets Act: What s New, What s Different? Olga May Principal San Diego, CA Martina Hufnal Principal Wilmington, DE

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,907 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JUSTIN GARBERG and TREVOR GARBERG, Appellees,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,907 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JUSTIN GARBERG and TREVOR GARBERG, Appellees, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,907 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JUSTIN GARBERG and TREVOR GARBERG, Appellees, v. ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, LLC, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

More information

Considerations When Invoking The Recently Enacted DTSA

Considerations When Invoking The Recently Enacted DTSA Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Considerations When Invoking The Recently

More information

No. 103,994 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MARGARET L. SIGG, Appellant, DANIEL COLTRANE and TANYA COLTRANE, Appellees.

No. 103,994 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. MARGARET L. SIGG, Appellant, DANIEL COLTRANE and TANYA COLTRANE, Appellees. No. 103,994 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS MARGARET L. SIGG, Appellant, v. DANIEL COLTRANE and TANYA COLTRANE, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT The statute of frauds requires that an enforceable

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV Affirmed and Opinion Filed July 14, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01221-CV JOHN E. DEATON AND DEATON LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Appellants V. BARRY JOHNSON, STEVEN M.

More information

Ellis & Winters, LLP, by Paul K. Sun and Kelly Margolis Dagger, for Plaintiffs AmeriGas Propane, L.P. and AmeriGas Propane, Inc.

Ellis & Winters, LLP, by Paul K. Sun and Kelly Margolis Dagger, for Plaintiffs AmeriGas Propane, L.P. and AmeriGas Propane, Inc. AmeriGas Propane, L.P. v. Coffey, 2016 NCBC 15. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA MADISON COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 14 CVS 376 AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC.,

More information

CMS Commercial Law Group Guide. Distribution and Agency Agreements

CMS Commercial Law Group Guide. Distribution and Agency Agreements CMS Commercial Law Group Guide Distribution and Agency Agreements February 2014 Whilst many aspects of the distribution relationship will be similar when distributing within the EU there are important

More information

BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL ALERT!

BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL ALERT! BARTKO ZANKEL BUNZEL ALERT! PRESIDENT SIGNS DEFEND TRADE SECRETS ACT OF 2016 : FEDERAL JURISDICTION FOR TRADE SECRET ACTIONS Introduction. For many years, litigants have had original federal court jurisdiction

More information

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 113 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 113 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-mmc Document Filed // Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAPU GEMS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.

More information