In-Site. Letters of intent
|
|
- Shannon Mason
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Summer 2010 Authors: Kevin Greene +44.(0) Robert Hadley +44.(0) Inga Hall +44.(0) Becky Rowell +44.(0) K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of 36 offices located in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information, visit Welcome to the Summer 2010 edition of In Site. This edition covers the following topics: Letters of intent and counterparts clauses in RTS v Müller; Pay-when-paid clauses; Frustration; Fraudulent misrepresentation in BSkyB v EDS; The Bribery Act 2010; and Judicial support for collateral warranties in the Scottish Widows case. For more information on any of these articles, or on any other issue relating to construction and engineering law, please contact any of the authors or your usual K&L Gates contact. Letters of intent Letters of intent are commonly used as a means of getting a project underway before the formal contract terms are fully agreed. As such, letters of intent are often a practical necessity, but they can create considerable confusion when it comes to determining if, when, and on what terms a legally binding contract comes into existence. Much can depend on the wording of the letter of intent, as well as the subsequent conduct of the parties. The complexity of the legal issues which can arise was well illustrated in RTS Flexible Systems Limited v Molkerei Alois Müller Gmbh & Co KG [2010] UKSC 14. Müller engaged RTS to supply an automated packaging system in January 2005 and work commenced under a 4 week letter of intent whilst the parties negotiated the contract terms. The letter of intent stated the parties intention that the final contract would incorporate the MF/1 model form terms (as amended). The letter of intent expired in May 2005, but RTS continued to work on the project and, although most terms were agreed by 29 June, it was not until 5 July 2005 that the parties had agreed all the contract terms. Although agreed, the contract was never signed. When a dispute later arose, the parties disagreed as to whether the contract was based on the 29 June or 5 July terms. The material difference was that the 5 July terms included a schedule ( Schedule 1 ) setting out the MF/1 terms, which included a counterparts clause stating that the contract " may be executed in any number of counterparts provided that it shall not become effective until each party has executed a counterpart and exchanged it with the other. The particular drafting of this counterparts clause meant that it was effectively a subject to contract clause. The judge in the first instance decided there was no binding contract on the 5 July terms because the counterparts clause prevented a contract coming into existence on those terms in the absence of a signed agreement. The judge held that a different contract had come into being between the parties after the letter of intent had expired based on the 29 June terms (which did not include the counterparts clause).
2 RTS successfully appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal in It argued that there was no contract between the parties at all and that therefore it would have a quantum meruit claim. The Court of Appeal was of the view that the counterparts clause in Schedule 1 applied to the whole of the draft contract, not just to the 5 July terms. As such there could be no contract, on 29 June terms or otherwise, after the letter of intent expired. The case finally made its way to the Supreme Court in 2010 when Müller appealed the Court of Appeal s decision that there was no contract. The Court unanimously allowed Müller s appeal and agreed that it was unrealistic on the facts of the case to suppose (as the Court of Appeal had) that the parties did not intend to create legal relations. Equally however, it made no commercial sense to hold (as the judge at first instance had) that the project was carried out on some, but not all, of the 5 July terms. The Court held that the parties had reached a binding agreement on the 5 July terms and had waived the subject to contract provision by continuing to perform. Lord Clarke said in the judgment that the different decisions in the courts below and the arguments in this court demonstrate the perils of beginning work without agreeing the precise basis upon which it is to be done. The moral of the story is to agree first and start work later". We all know that in practice this is not always possible. However, this case is a warning about what could happen if a contractual relationship is not formalised: parties should be aware that courts will look at factors such as communications and conduct to decide the nature of the relationship between the parties, and in particular whether the protections offered by a subject to contract clause have been waived. When a letter of intent with a stated duration expires, it is in both parties interests to agree on what basis work is, or is not, to continue. Pay-when-paid clauses The case of William Hare Limited v Shepherd Construction Limited [2010] EWCA Civ 283 shows the importance of regularly reviewing standard form contracts to ensure that they deal with any legislative changes. The 2008 sub-contract between the parties was based on a standard form that Shepherd (the main contractor) had been using since around It included a term that Shepherd would not be obliged to make any further payment to William Hare (as sub-contractor) where the employer under the main contract was insolvent. The subcontract definition of insolvency was, however, based on outdated wording. Section 113(1) of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 ( the Act ) outlawed pay-when-paid clauses in the construction industry unless it could be shown that the third-party employer was insolvent. The relevant part of the definition of a company s insolvency originally included in section 113(2)(a) of the Act (and mirrored in Shepherd s standard terms) was limited to the making of an administration order by order of the court. Shepherd s standard form wording was not updated to reflect the fact that the Enterprise Act 2002 (Insolvency) Order 2003 amended the definition of insolvency in section 113(2)(a) of the Act to include self-certifying routes as well as court orders. When the employer on the project went into administration by a self-certifying route, Shepherd sought to rely on the pay-when-paid clause to withhold from William Hare substantial sums otherwise due to it. William Hare successfully disputed this on the basis that the insolvency of the employer did not fall within the terms of the pay-when-paid clause in the subcontract. As such, Shepherd's withholding notice was invalid. Given that the mis-drafted clause worked (even if a reasonable person may suspect there was an error) there is little reason for the courts to intervene. This decision shows that Shepherd should have updated its pay-when-paid clause to take account of the amended legislation, or drafted the definition of insolvency sufficiently broadly in the first place to take account of changes in the law. Can a recession frustrate a contract? Gold Group Properties Limited v BDW Trading Limited (formerly known as Barratt Homes Limited) [2010] EWHC 323 (TCC) is a rather extreme example of how the construction industry has dealt with the economic downturn. It is a reminder to anyone thinking of arguing that a contract has been frustrated by the difficult market conditions to think again: frustration of contracts operates in very few circumstances. Gold (as landowner) and Barratt (as developer) entered into a development agreement in 2007, Summer
3 under the terms of which sales revenue generated by the sale of the units on the developed land would be split between the parties. A schedule of minimum sales prices for the units was included in the agreement. When the property market took a turn for the worse, Barratt realised that the minimum sale prices for the units were unlikely to be achieved and Barratt eventually wrote to Gold making the case that the contract had been discharged by frustration. Barratt put the keys to the site through the letterbox in the hoarding and wrote to Gold claiming monies owing for work allegedly done on site. The Court looked at previous decisions regarding frustration, including Pioneer Shipping Limited v BTP Tioxide Limited (The Nema), where the Court said that frustration is "not likely to be invoked to relieve contracting parties of the normal consequences of imprudent commercial bargains". Frustration only occurs if there is a serious event which is both unexpected and beyond the control of the parties and which will make the performance of the contract in the changed circumstances fundamentally different from performance under the contract which the parties originally entered into. The court in Gold v Barratt held that the agreement was not frustrated for four reasons: the parties foresaw the possibility that the property market would drop; as a result, the agreement made express provision for the possible reduction in the minimum sales prices; there was no injustice to Barratt in obliging them to progress the works while renegotiating the minimum prices; and there was no supervening frustrating event as the drop in the market had been envisaged. In short, there was no need for the court to intervene and dissolve the agreement. The hard, but simple, lesson from this case is that the courts will not allow parties to escape from a bad bargain simply because of a recession. Fraudulent misrepresentation In order for an action for fraudulent misrepresentation to be made out, it is necessary to establish that a false representation has been made knowingly, or without belief in its truth, or recklessly as to its truth (Derry v Peek (1889)). An absence of honest belief is needed to succeed in such an action. In contrast, an action for negligent misrepresentation will be made out if the false statement is made carelessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth. The computer case of BSkyB Ltd and anor v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd (formerly t/a Electronic Data Systems Ltd) and anor [2010] EWHC 86 (TCC) emphasises that the distinction between negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation is a significant one. Contractual liability caps are not effective to limit liability for fraudulent misrepresentation, but will limit liability for negligent misrepresentation. A well-drafted entire agreement clause can exclude liability for negligent pre-contract misrepresentations, but not fraudulent ones. Ramsay J found in this case that EDS (an IT supplier) made fraudulent misrepresentations about its ability to deliver a project within the agreed timescale, and in particular that it had falsely represented that it had carried out a proper analysis of the time needed to deliver the project. The judge found that EDS s intention in making those claims was to induce BSkyB to award the 48 million contract to EDS and as such the case for fraudulent misrepresentation was made out. Accordingly, all losses flowing from the fraudulent misrepresentation were recoverable, and the 30 million contractual liability cap in the contract did not limit EDS liability (assessed on interim basis to be in the order of 200 million). Commenting on the dishonesty of the bid team leader (whose state of mind was attributable to the company) Ramsay J said that he acted deliberately in putting forward the timescales knowing that he had no proper basis for those timescales. At the very least he was reckless, not caring whether what he said was right or wrong. The case is therefore a reminder of the importance of ensuring that bid team members do not make statements during contract negotiations that cannot be backed up, and of keeping copies of working documents such as draft programmes and resource calculations to show that, even if mistaken, statements were not made negligently or fraudulently. This case is also a caution for the drafters of entire agreement clauses. EDS had also made a negligent misrepresentation about its assessment of required resources. Unfortunately, however, for EDS, the Court held that the entire agreement clause in EDS s contract did not have the effect Summer
4 of excluding liability for negligent misrepresentation (although liability for such misrepresentations was subject to the 30 million liability cap). The safest course of action in such a situation is usually to refer expressly to the parties intention to exclude liability for negligent pre-contract misrepresentation when drafting such clauses. The Bribery Act 2010 The UK has fragmented and complex bribery offences at common law and in the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889 to These will be replaced with the Bribery Act 2010, which will provide a more effective legal framework to combat bribery in both the public and private sectors. The Act received royal assent on 8 April 2010 and is expected to come into force later this year. A detailed examination of the provisions of the Bribery Act is beyond the scope of this article, but the Act creates two general offences covering the offering, promising or giving of an advantage, and the requesting, agreeing to receive or accepting of an advantage in connection with someone's "improper" performance of his duties. There is also a specific offence relating to bribery of a foreign official. That offence in particular has implications for what would generally be regarded as ordinary corporate hospitality. The Act also creates a new offence of failure by a commercial organisation to prevent a bribe being paid on its behalf. This will mean that any UK company will commit a UK criminal offence if any person providing services on its behalf anywhere in the world commits bribery, the company s offence being a failure to prevent the bribery. It will be a defence if the organisation has adequate procedures in place to prevent bribery. At present those adequate procedures are undefined, although the Act does require the Secretary of State to publish guidance about procedures that relevant commercial organisations can put in place to prevent bribery on their behalf. These guidance notes are expected to be published shortly. As well as criminal prosecution resulting in unlimited fines and/or up to 10 years imprisonment, conviction for a corruption offence can also lead to debarment from public contracts in the EU in the future. For UK companies, and foreign companies carrying on any business in the UK, especially those operating in difficult jurisdictions or in high-risk industries, the risk of being subject to UK process if representatives abroad should cross the line will increase significantly and not to have proper anti-corruption policies/procedures in place is asking for trouble. For more information on the Bribery Act 2010 please contact Robert Hadley on or at robert.hadley@klgates.com Collateral warranties Supporters of collateral warranties will welcome the Scottish case of Scottish Widows Services & Anor v Harmon/CRM Facades [2010] ScotCS CSOH 42 in which Lord Drummond Young gives clear judicial support for the commercial intention behind collateral warranties. This case concerned a collateral warranty given by the main contractor to a beneficiary and subsequently assigned to Scottish Widows, and Scottish Widows ability to recover the costs of remedying defects from the main contractor under that collateral warranty. Lord Drummond Young said: Such warranties are an important feature of modern practice in the construction industry. In my opinion they must be construed in such a way as to further their essential purpose, namely to ensure that the party who suffers loss has a right of action against any contractor or member of the professional team who has provided defective work. He went on to say that the fundamental purpose of collateral warranties is to provide a right of action to a person who is liable to suffer loss as a result of defective performance of a building contract or a contract for professional services in connection with a building project. The views expressed by Lord Drummond Young in this case should give pause to detractors of collateral warranties who argue that they are not worth the paper they re written on. Welldrafted collateral warranties, covering the right things, given by the right people, continue to have a role to play. Summer
5 Anchorage Austin Beijing Berlin Boston Charlotte Chicago Dallas Dubai Fort Worth Frankfurt Harrisburg Hong Kong London Los Angeles Miami Moscow Newark New York Orange County Palo Alto Paris Pittsburgh Portland Raleigh Research Triangle Park San Diego San Francisco Seattle Shanghai Singapore Spokane/Coeur d Alene Taipei Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing out of 36 offices located in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East, and represents numerous GLOBAL 500, FORTUNE 100, and FTSE 100 corporations, in addition to growth and middle market companies, entrepreneurs, capital market participants and public sector entities. For more information, visit K&L Gates is comprised of multiple affiliated entities: a limited liability partnership with the full name K&L Gates LLP qualified in Delaware and maintaining offices throughout the United States, in Berlin and Frankfurt, Germany, in Beijing (K&L Gates LLP Beijing Representative Office), in Dubai, U.A.E., in Shanghai (K&L Gates LLP Shanghai Representative Office), in Tokyo, and in Singapore; a limited liability partnership (also named K&L Gates LLP) incorporated in England and maintaining offices in London and Paris; a Taiwan general partnership (K&L Gates) maintaining an office in Taipei; a Hong Kong general partnership (K&L Gates, Solicitors) maintaining an office in Hong Kong; a Polish limited partnership (K&L Gates Jamka sp. k.) maintaining an office in Warsaw; and a Delaware limited liability company (K&L Gates Holdings, LLC) maintaining an office in Moscow. K&L Gates maintains appropriate registrations in the jurisdictions in which its offices are located. A list of the partners or members in each entity is available for inspection at any K&L Gates office. This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved. Summer
In Site UK Construction and Engineering Newsletter
UK Construction and Engineering Newsletter Winter 2010/2011 Authors: Suzannah E. Boyd suzannah.boyd@klgates.com +44.(0)20.7360.8186 Kevin Greene kevin.greene@klgates.com +44.(0)20.7360.8188 Inga K. Hall
More informationIn Site. Delivery of an adjudicator s decision what happens if it is not delivered in time?
Autumn 2010 Authors: Kevin Greene kevin.greene@klgates.com +44.(0)20.7360.8188 Inga K. Hall inga.hall@klgates.com +44.(0)20.7360.8137 Suzannah E. Boyd suzannah.boyd@klgates.com +44.(0)20.7360.8186 Lee
More informationDesign Life Warranties and Fitness for Purpose in Construction Contracts: the Position in Australia and England
May 2016 Practice Group: Real Estate Design Life Warranties and Fitness for Purpose in Construction Contracts: the Position in Australia and England By Sandra Steele, Belinda Montgomery and Julia Kingston
More informationSecurity of Payment Legislation and Set-Off Under Commonwealth Insolvency Laws
1 April 2015 Practice Group(s): Energy & Infrastructure Projects and Transactions Real Estate Restructuring and Insolvency Security of Payment Legislation and Set-Off Under Commonwealth Australia Energy,
More informationBackground. 21 August Practice Group: Public Policy and Law. By Raymond P. Pepe
21 August 2014 Practice Group: Public Policy and Law Permanent Injunction of Pennsylvania s Prohibition against Establishment of Political Committees to Receive Contributions of Corporate and Labor Union
More informationDelaware Chancery Court Confirms the Invalidity of Fee-Shifting Bylaws for Stock Corporations
4 January 2017 Practice Group(s): Corporate/M&A Delaware Chancery Court Confirms the Invalidity of Fee-Shifting Bylaws for By Lisa R. Stark and Taylor B. Bartholomew In Solak v. Sarowitz, C.A. No. 12299-CB
More informationFebruary 6, Practice Groups: Class Action Litigation Defense; Financial Institutions and Services Litigation
February 6, 2013 Practice Groups: Class Action Litigation Defense; Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Knowing Where You Are Litigating is Half the Battle: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument
More information340B Update: HRSA Finalizes 340B Pricing & Penalties for Drug Manufacturers
18 January 2017 Practice Group: Health Care 340B Update: HRSA Finalizes 340B Pricing & Penalties for Drug Manufacturers By Richard P. Church, Michael H. Hinckle, Ryan J. Severson On January 5, 2017, the
More informationAdapting to a New Era of Strict Criminal Liability Enforcement under Pennsylvania s Environmental Laws
October 11, 2013 Practice Groups: Oil and Gas Environmental, Land and Natural Resources Energy Adapting to a New Era of Strict Criminal Liability Enforcement under Pennsylvania s Environmental Laws By
More informationA Useful Contribution? Incorporation of terms
A Useful Contribution? Summer 2009 In this issue: In Site Updating you on legal developments affecting the construction industry A Useful Contribution?...1 Construction Bill Update...2 Waiver Clauses...3
More informationMortgage Banking & Consumer Financial Products Alert
Mortgage Banking & Consumer Financial Products Alert May 11, 2011 Authors: R. Bruce Allensworth bruce.allensworth@klgates.com +1. 617.261.3119 Andrew C. Glass andrew.glass@klgates.com +1. 617.261.3107
More informationWhy did the MF/1 terms not apply? The judge had concluded that the MF/1 terms did not apply because:
United Kingdom Letters of intent and contract formation RTS Flexible Systems Limited (Respondents) v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh & Company KG (UK Production) (Appellants) [2010] UKSC 14C Chris Hill and
More informationGrasping for a Hold on Ascertainability : The Implicit Requirement for Class Certification and its Evolving Application
26 August 2015 Practice Groups: Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Commercial Disputes Consumer Financial Services Class Action Defense Global Government Solutions Grasping for a Hold on Ascertainability
More informationIs Inter Partes Review Set for Supreme Court Review?
October 16, 2015 Practice Groups: Patent Office Litigation IP Procurement and Portfolio Managemnet IP Litigation Is Inter Partes Review Set for Supreme Court Review? By Mark G. Knedeisen and Mark R. Leslie
More informationEagle Take Permit Program Revamped Longer Permits and Clearer Mitigation Requirements
May 2016 Practice Groups: Energy Environmental, Land and Natural Resources Eagle Take Permit Program Revamped Longer Permits and Clearer By Ankur K. Tohan, James M. Lynch, Daniel C. Kelly-Stallings, Benjamin
More informationAppeals Court Resoundingly Affirms Scope and Breadth of Shipping Act Antitrust Exemption
31 January 2017 Practice Groups: Antitrust and Trade Regulation Maritime Appeals Court Resoundingly Affirms Scope and Breadth of Shipping Act By John Longstreth, Michael Scanlon, and Allen Bachman In August
More informationImmigration Alert. New uscis Form I-9
Immigration Alert November 2007 Author: Hayes C. Stover 412.355.6476 hayes.stover@klgates.com K&L Gates comprises approximately 1,400 lawyers in 22 offices located in North America, Europe and Asia and
More informationInstant Messaging: Vote-A-Rama Provides Rare Insight into Tax Reform
March 28, 2013 Practice Groups: Public Policy and Law; Tax; Global Government Solutions Instant Messaging: Vote-A-Rama Provides Rare Insight By: Michael W. Evans, Mary Burke Baker, Karishma S. Page, Ryan
More informationThe Eyes of Texas are upon a Subsurface Trespass Case
January 13, 2014 Practice Group: Oil and Gas Environmental, Land and Natural Resources Energy, Infrastructure and Resources The Eyes of Texas are upon a Subsurface Trespass Case By John F. Sullivan, Anthony
More informationThe Bribery Act Frequently Asked Questions WHAT IS THE BRIBERY ACT 2010? WHO MUST COMPLY WITH THE UKBA?
The Bribery Act 2010 Frequently Asked Questions WHAT IS THE BRIBERY ACT 2010? The Bribery Act 2010 ( UKBA ) is the primary anti-corruption law in the United Kingdom. It came into force in July 2011 and
More informationARBITRATION IS BACK ON THE DOCKET: THE SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW THE ENFORCEABILITY OF CLASS-ACTION WAIVERS IN EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS
27 January 2017 Practice Groups: Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Labor, Employment and Workplace Safety THE SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW THE ENFORCEABILITY OF CLASS-ACTION WAIVERS IN EMPLOYMENT
More informationEnvironmental, Land and Natural Resources Alert
Environmental, Land and Natural Resources Alert October 2009 Authors: William H. Hyatt, Jr. william.hyatt@klgates.com +1.973.848.4045 Mary Theresa S. Kenny mary.kenny@klgates.com +1.973.848.4042 K&L Gates
More information20 July Practice Group: Energy. By Ankur K. Tohan, Alyssa A. Moir, Gabrielle E. Thompson
20 July 2016 Practice Group: Energy Constitutional Limits to Greenhouse Gas Regulation: 8th Circuit Relies on the Dormant Commerce Clause to Reject Minnesota s GHG Limits on Imported Power By Ankur K.
More informationPaying for the Wall: Will President Trump s Administration Scrutinize, Tax, or Seize Remittances?
13 January 2017 Practice Groups: Public Policy and Law Government Enforcement FinTech Paying for the Wall: Will President Trump s Administration Scrutinize, Tax, or Seize Remittances? By Joseph A. Valenti,
More informationThe New UK Regime on Bribery: An Introduction
The New UK Regime on Bribery: An Introduction May 2010 Introduction A fundamental change in the UK law on bribery will occur later this year, when the Bribery Act 2010 (the Act) is expected to come into
More informationCan Entire Agreement And Exclusion Clauses Cure Misrepresentations?
Can Entire Agreement And Exclusion Clauses Cure Misrepresentations? Introduction The case of BSkyB v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] QBD 267 (TCC) involved an invitation to tender by the Plaintiff
More informationGovernment Investigations Into Cybersecurity Breaches In Healthcare
11 February 2016 Practice Groups: Cyber Law and Cybersecurity; Global Government Solutions; Government Enforcement; Health Care Government Investigations Into Cybersecurity Breaches In Healthcare By: Mark
More informationNew Jersey Enacts Environmental Enforcement Enhancement Act.
April 2008 Authors: John F. Spinello +1.973.848.4061 john.spinello@klgates.com Mary Kenny +1.973.848.4042 mary.kenny@klgates.com Dawn Monsen +1.973.848.4148 dawn.monsen@klgates.com K&L Gates comprises
More informationWhere Can Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA Cases Stick After TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC?
9 June 2017 Practice Groups: Pharma and BioPharma Litigation IP Litigation Where Can Hatch-Waxman and BPCIA Cases Stick After TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC? By Elizabeth Weiskopf, Kenneth
More informationMOVING EMPLOYEES GLOBALLY:
MANAGING THE GLOBAL WORKFORCE WEBINAR SERIES MOVING EMPLOYEES GLOBALLY: STRATEGIES FOR NAVIGATING COMMON CHALLENGES Nicholas Hobson Rebecca Kelly K. Lesli Ligorner Eleanor Pelta June 6, 2018 2018 Morgan,
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 1025 May 13, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Pending a decision on BNY s appeal, structured transaction and derivative lawyers should carefully consider the drafting of current
More informationSeminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts"
Seminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts" 13 May 2014 Joyce Leung, Associate Projects (Engineering & Construction) Practice Contractual Termination Conditional upon: 1. an event -
More informationPrivate action for contempt of court?
Private action for contempt of court? May 2018 Private action for contempt of court? May 2018 1 Private action for contempt of court? Introduction In March, the UK Supreme Court handed down a landmark
More informationANTI-BRIBERY POLICY. (Covering all employees) Contents
ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY (Covering all employees) Contents 1. Introduction 2. Scope 3. Compliance 4. What is Bribery? 5. What is HITRANS Position on Bribery? 6. Preventing Bribery Adequate Procedures 7. Employee
More informationTo: All contacts in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
Briefing 11/32 July 2011 Bribery Act 2010 To: All contacts in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland Key issues New offences created to replace previous bribery crimes Both the private and public
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 1147 February 17, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department The Settlement does not affirm or overturn Judge Peck s controversial decision in the US Litigation barring enforcement of
More informationAIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law
AIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law Marie-Aimée de Dampierre, Partner 2 May 2013 IPMT / Paris Overview Trade mark registration general principles Earlier rights Distinctiveness
More informationAnti-Corruption Policy
Anti-Corruption Policy Version: 1 Page 1 of 10 INTRODUCTION 1 Our Commitment Accolade Wines conducts all of its business in an honest and ethical manner. We take a zero-tolerance approach to bribery and
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 1391 September 12, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Federal Circuit Holds that Liability for Induced Infringement Requires Infringement of a Patent, But No Single Entity
More informationANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY
ANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY 0 Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy 1 Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy Introduction This policy applies to Portmeirion Group PLC and its subsidiaries, (including Wax
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JONES DAY, ) Case No.: 08CV4572 a General Partnership, ) ) Judge John Darrah Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BlockShopper
More informationDocument Analysis Technology Group (DATG) and Records Management Alert
February 2007 Authors: Carolyn M. Branthoover +1.412.355.5902 carolyn.branthoover@klgates.com Karen I. Marryshow +1.412.355.6379 karen.marryshow@klgates.com K&L Gates comprises approximately 1,400 lawyers
More informationK&LNGAlert. Betting & Gaming U.K. Executives at Risk for Extradition
K&LNGAlert OCTOBER 2006 Betting & Gaming U.K. Executives at Risk for Extradition The Interstate Wire Act of 1961, also known as the Federal Wire Act, prohibits the operation of certain types of betting
More informationWeekly Update A summary of recent developments in insurance, reinsurance and litigation law
Weekly Update A summary of recent developments in insurance, reinsurance and litigation law 03/10 CONTENTS Habas Sinai v Sometal 2 A Clyde & Co case on the incorporation of an arbitration clause from earlier
More informationEEA and Swiss national. Children and their rights to British citizenship
EEA and Swiss national Children and their rights to British citizenship April 2019 Please note: The information set out here does not cover all the circumstances in which a child born to a European Economic
More informationAnti-Bribery and Corruption Policy
Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy CONTENTS CLAUSE 1. Policy statement... 1 2. Who is covered by the policy?... 1 3. What is bribery?... 2 4. Gifts and hospitality... 2 5. What is not acceptable?... 3
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department. The Lessons of Slayton v. American Express for Forward-Looking Statements
Number 1044 June 10, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Second Circuit Wades Into the PSLRA Safe Harbor The Lessons of Slayton v. American Express for Forward-Looking Statements Specific,
More informationZubulake Judge Defines Discovery Duties and Spoliation Negligence Standards. January 29, 2010
Zubulake Judge Defines Discovery Duties and Spoliation Negligence Standards January 29, 2010 In an amended order subheaded Zubulake Revisited: Six Years Later, Judge Shira A. Scheindlin (SDNY), author
More informationJudicial Review. Where do we stand? Will proposals for further judicial review reform make any difference? Procedure & Practice
Judicial Review Procedure & Practice Where do we stand? Will proposals for further judicial review reform make any difference? Charles Brasted & Ben Gaston Report Judicial Review November 2013 1 Where
More informationDelaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code
Latham & Watkins Number 1467 February 13, 2013 Finance Department Delaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code Josef S. Athanas, Caroline
More informationBefore : LADY JUSTICE ARDEN LORD JUSTICE LEWISON LADY JUSTICE ASPLIN Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 62 Case No: A3/2017/2781 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, COMMERCIAL COURT Mr Richard Salter QC sitting as a Deputy
More informationNew Civil Code and Contracts What You Should Know
GBA Meeting, Ho Chi Minh City, 11 September 2017 New Civil Code and Contracts What You Should Know Duane Morris Vietnam LLC Manfred Otto 2017 Duane Morris LLP. All Rights Reserved. Duane Morris is a registered
More informationGUIDE TO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ICA ARBITRATION AWARDS IN THAILAND LEGAL GUIDE FIRST EDITION
GUIDE TO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ICA ARBITRATION AWARDS IN THAILAND LEGAL GUIDE FIRST EDITION August 2015 HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS GUIDE TO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 03 OF ICA ARBITRATION AWARDS
More informationGUIDANCE NOTE. Bribery Act June 2011
GUIDANCE NOTE Bribery Act 2010 June 2011 This Guidance Note outlines the offences that will be introduced by the Bribery Act 2010 ( the Act ) which comes into force on 1 st July 2011 and the penalties
More informationDilapidations Representations
Dilapidations Representations Keith Firn BSc(Hons), MRICS, MFPWS Chartered Surveyor, Datum Building Consultancy Ltd Michael R. Watson Partner, Property Litigation, Shulmans Solicitors Dilapidations; Dishonesty;
More informationDATE: December Welcome to the FWJ INFORMER.
DATE: December 2010 Welcome to the FWJ INFORMER. We are committed to excellence and aim to provide the highest possible quality of legal services to our clients. The FWJ INFORMER explains some of the recent
More informationState-By-State Chart of Citations
State-By-State Chart of Citations Law Forum Statute Text AZ Yes Yes (A.) The following are against this state s public policy and are void and unenforceable: (1.) A provision, covenant, clause or understanding
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 866 May 14, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department The Third Circuit Clarifies the Class Action Fairness Act s Local Controversy Exception to Federal Jurisdiction In addressing
More informationAnti-Bribery Policy. Anti-Bribery. Policy. Working Together. January Borders College 15/2/ Working Together.
Anti-Bribery Working Together Policy January 2016 Borders College 15/2/2016 1 Working Together History of Changes Version Description of Change Authored by Date 1.1 New Policy approved at Audit Committee
More informationTHE BRIBERY ACT 2010 POLICY STATEMENT AND PROCEDURES
THE BRIBERY ACT 2010 POLICY STATEMENT AND PROCEDURES DECEMBER 2011 CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Objective of This Policy 3 3. The Joint Committee s Commitment to Action 3 4. Policy Statement Anti-Bribery
More informationClient Alert. Rome II and the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations. Introduction
Number 789 20 January 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Rome II and the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations Rome II will enable parties doing business across borders to
More informationANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY UK ENGINEERING RECRUITMENT LTD
Page 1 of 5 Contents: ANTI-BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY 1. Definitions 2. Introduction 3. Purpose and scope of this policy 4. The Bribery Act 2010 5. The risks of not acting with integrity 6. The benefits
More informationA Guide to the UK s Bribery Act 2010 Martin Polaine. London Centre of International Law Practice. Anti-corruption Forum, 007/ /02/2015
A Guide to the UK s Bribery Act 2010 Martin Polaine London Centre of International Law Practice Anti-corruption Forum, 007/2015 16/02/2015 This paper is downloadable at: http://www.lcilp.org/anti-corruption-forum/
More informationMOVING EMPLOYEES GLOBALLY
MOVING EMPLOYEES GLOBALLY September 27, 2016 2016 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Presenters Bart Bassett Silicon Valley Tracy Evlogidis London Matthew Howse London Humberto Padilla Gonzalez Houston Eleanor
More informationEdwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP
Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP The Legal 500 & The In-House Lawyer Legal Briefing Corporate and commercial Kimberley Cottrell, Trainee KCottrell@edwardswildman.com Christopher Pease, Associate CPease@edwardswildman.com
More informationClient Alert. Background on Discovery Requests under Section 1782
Number 1383 August 13, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Eleventh Circuit Holds That Parties to Private International Commercial Arbitral Tribunals May Seek Discovery Assistance
More informationSerco Limited Purchase Order Terms and Conditions (the "PO Terms")
1. Definitions and Interpretation For the purpose of these Conditions: 1.1 "Affiliate" means any entity that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is under the control
More informationPOLICY AGAINST BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION. Introductory Guidance. This policy has been introduced in response to the Bribery Act 2010 ( the Act )
POLICY AGAINST BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION Introductory Guidance This policy has been introduced in response to the Bribery Act 2010 ( the Act ) The Act creates four key offences:- Active bribery (the offence
More informationChallenging Government decisions in the UK. An introduction to judicial review
Challenging Government decisions in the UK An introduction to judicial review Challenging Government decisions in the UK Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of challenging
More informationCase3:12-mc CRB Document88 Filed10/04/13 Page1 of 5. October 4, Chevron v. Donziger, 12-mc CRB (NC) Motion to Compel
Case3:12-mc-80237-CRB Document88 Filed10/04/13 Page1 of 5 555 CALIFORNIA STREET, 26TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 TELEPHONE: +1.415.626.3939 FACSIMILE: +1.415.875.5700 VIA ECF United States District
More informationHIPAA Privacy Compliance Initiative: Final Rules Impact Employer Health Plans
HIPAA Privacy Compliance Initiative: Final Rules Impact Employer Health Plans www.morganlewis.com Presenters: Sage Fattahian Lauren Licastro Georgina O Hara Date: February 8, 2013 Time: 12:30-1:30 p.m.
More informationANTI-CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY POLICY
ANTI-CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY POLICY Date Approved by Governors March 2017 Review Date March 2019 On behalf of Governors signed Print name On behalf of Governors signed Print name Principal s signature All
More informationWarrego Energy Limited Level 6, 10 Bridge Street, Sydney NSW 2000 T: E: warregoenergy.com ABN
Warrego Energy Limited ACN 125 394 667 WARREGO ENERGY LIMITED ANTI-CORRUPTION & BRIBERY POLICY Contents SECTION 1. Warrego s commitment to ethical performance 1 2. Who is covered by the policy? 2 3. What
More informationENGLISH LAW CONTRACTS POST-BREXIT:
DISPUTE RESOLUTION This is the seventh in our series of contract disputes practical guides, designed to provide clients with practical guidance on some key issues that feature in disputes relating to commercial
More informationRING POWER CORPORATION GLOBAL ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY
Effective Date 4/12/2012 Approved by David Alban RING POWER CORPORATION GLOBAL ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY Statement of Policy. It is the policy of Ring Power Corporation ( Ring Power or the Company ) to conduct
More informationProject Anti-Corruption System. (Construction Projects) Template 2. Anti-Corruption Agreement
GIACC Global Infrastructure Anti-Corruption Centre TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL (UK) - PACS - Project Anti-Corruption System (Construction Projects) Template 2 Anti-Corruption Agreement Licence to use: This
More informationWhite Paper - Employer Sanctions Act
White Paper - Employer Sanctions Act Migration Amendment (Reform of Employer Sanctions) Act 2013 Introduction The Government estimates that there are 100,000 people working in Australia illegally - people
More informationChanges to the Russian Civil Code: What's new in the regulation of obligations
Changes to the Russian Civil Code: What's new in the regulation of obligations 1 Briefing note May 2015 Changes to the Russian Civil Code: What's new in the regulation of obligations As of 1 June 2015,
More informationTerms & Conditions for Heathrow ID Pass Scheme (the Terms )
Terms & Conditions for Heathrow ID Pass Scheme (the Terms ) 1. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 1.1 In these Terms where the context admits: Airport means Heathrow Airport; Airport Operator means Heathrow
More informationANTI-CORRUPTION & BRIBERY
Page 1 of 11 ANTI-CORRUPTION & BRIBERY Page 2 of 11 CONTENTS CLAUSE 1. Policy statement... 3 2. Who is covered by the policy?... 4 3. What is bribery?... 4 4. Gifts and hospitality... 5 5. What is not
More informationDirector of Customer Care & Performance. 26 April The Board is asked to consider and approve the attached draft
To: From: Subject: Status: Date of Meeting: BSO Board Director of Customer Care & Performance Anti Bribery Policy For Approval 26 April 2012 The Board is asked to consider and approve the attached draft
More informationAnti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy
Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy Version 2 Approved by: Audit and Risk Committee Approved date: 22 May 2017 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Optivo is committed to
More informationANTI-BRIBERY POLICY AND PROCEDURES
ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY AND PROCEDURES For use by: All Society employees; Members undertaking activities on behalf of the Society; agents, consultants and contractors acting for the Society. Owner Director
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution in England and Wales
Alternative Dispute Resolution in England and Wales October 2017 Contents Introduction 1 Support for ADR 2 Main features of ADR 4 Mediation 5 Other types of ADR 6 Timing 8 Cases suitable for ADR 9 Conclusion
More informationConstruction & Engineering News
Construction & Engineering News Spring 2010 When will the Court pierce the adjudicator s veil? - Geoffrey Osborne Limited v Atkins Rail Limited [2009] (TCC) Enforcing the Oracle SG South Ltd v Swan Yard
More informationCompany Policies CHEMIDOSE LIMITED. Chemical dosing specialists
Company Policies CHEMIDOSE LIMITED Chemical dosing specialists Unit 1 Centre 2000 St.Michael s Road Sittingbourne Kent ME10 3DZ Tel:01795 425169 www.chemidose.co.uk Chemidose Policies, Terms and Conditions
More informationANTI-CORRUPTION & BRIBERY POLICY
ANTI-CORRUPTION & BRIBERY POLICY REVISION HISTORY: ISSUE CHANGES DATE 1 Initial Issue 30/07/2015 2 General updates 09/03/2016 AUTHORISED BY: NAME TITLE SIGNATURE DATE Deon van Aswegen Quality Manager 09/03/2016
More informationAnti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Response Policy. Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Response Policy 2018 Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group The Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy for Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
More informationBRIBERY AND PROCUREMENT POLICY BUCKSBURN STONEYWOOD PARISH CHURCH OF SCOTLAND SC017404
BRIBERY AND PROCUREMENT POLICY OF BUCKSBURN STONEYWOOD PARISH CHURCH OF SCOTLAND SC07404 Policy statement. Further to the work and mission of the Church of Scotland and the terms of the Bribery Act 200
More informationDRAFT MYANMAR COMPANIES LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS
Post-Consultation Law Draft 1 DRAFT MYANMAR COMPANIES LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PRELIMINARY... 1 PART II CONSTITUTION, INCORPORATION AND POWERS OF COMPANIES... 6 Division 1: Registration of companies...
More informationENDEAVOURS OBLIGATIONS:
DISPUTE RESOLUTION This is the fifth in our series of contract disputes practical guides, designed to provide clients with practical guidance on some key issues that feature in disputes relating to commercial
More informationThis Policy sets out Sewtec s position on any form of bribery and corruption and provides guidelines aimed at:
ANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY Introduction Sewtec Automation Limited ( The Company ) is committed to promoting and maintaining the highest level of ethical standards in relation to all of its business
More informationAnti-Bribery Policy. Policies, Guidance & Procedures. The Collett School, St Luke s School Forest House Education Centre
The Collett School, St Luke s School Forest House Education Centre Policies, Guidance & Procedures Anti-Bribery Policy Date established: September 2015 Reviewed: August 2017 Date for review: September
More informationAnti-Bribery & Anti-Corruption Policy
Anti-Bribery & Anti-Corruption Policy Table of Contents Anti-Bribery & Anti-Corruption Policy... 1 1. What does your policy cover?... 2 2. Policy Statement... 2 3. Who is covered by the policy?... 2 4.
More informationGeneral offences. Corporate offence
Knowhow briefs The Bribery Act 2010 The Bribery Act 2010 The Bribery Act 2010 (the Act ) was enacted on 8 April 2010 and came into force on 1 July 2011. The implementation was delayed for consultation
More informationANTI-BRIBERY POLICY 1 POLICY STATEMENT
ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY Issued/approved by: Modern Water plc Board on 14 June 2011 Last updated: 17 September 2014 Applies to: Modern Water plc and any company or other entity (registered or operating anywhere
More informationMIP International Patent Forum 2013 Russia Focus
MIP International Patent Forum 2013 Russia Focus Natalia Gulyaeva, Partner Head of IP, Media & Technology, Hogan Lovells CIS 16 April 2013 Patents as a key to business expansion: produced in Russia Russian
More information29 September To Our Clients and Friends:
THE DRAFT BRIBERY BILL 29 September 2009 To Our Clients and Friends: At a moment when the U.K. Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has announced its first ever successful prosecution for corporate bribery in the
More informationClause 14: Contract Price and Payment
Clause 14: Contract Price and Payment Written by George Rosenberg 1 This important clause sets out the method of payment, certificates and release from liability. The overall methodology has not changed
More informationOBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections PART I. Preliminary PART II. Licensing Requirements for International Service Providers
1 OBJECTS AND REASONS This Bill would provide for the regulation of the providers of international corporate and trust services and for related matters. Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Application
More information