2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 1514 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
|
|
- Erica Washington
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 1514 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL BRYANTON, GLENN REHAHN, CHERYL MERRILL, RICHARD L. ROBINSON, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 517M, SEIU MICHIGAN STATE COUNCIL, LATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (LA-SED), AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MICHIGAN, No. 2:12-cv HON. PAUL D. BORMAN MAG. PAUL J. KOMIVES Plaintiffs, v RUTH JOHNSON, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State, Defendant. Andrew A. Nickelhoff (P37990) Mary Ellen Gurewitz (P25724) Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1000 Farmer Street Detroit, Michigan anickelhoff@sachswaldman.com megurewitz@sachswaldman.com Ann M. Sherman (P67762) Christina M. Grossi (P67482) Denise C. Barton (P41535) Assistant Attorneys General Attorneys for Defendant P.O. Box Lansing, Michigan shermana@michigan.gov grossic@michigan.gov bartond@michigan.gov / Maryann Parker Attorney for SEIU Local 517M & SEIU Michigan State Council 1800 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington, DC Maryann.parker@seiu.org Daniel S. Korobkin (P72842) Attorney for Plaintiffs 2966 Woodward Avenue Detroit, Michigan dkorobkin@aclumich.org 1
2 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 2 of 11 Pg ID 1515 DEFENDANT S MOTION TO STRIKE In support of her Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Exhibit List and attached exhibits (R. 38) filed with the Court on October 12, 2012, Defendant Secretary of State Ruth Johnson states as follows: 1. On September 27, 2012, this Court issued an order regarding procedures for the preliminary injunction hearing on October 5, 2012 (See R. 15). 2. The Order required the parties to identify and exchange with opposing counsel each exhibit and each deposition proposed as an exhibit for the preliminary injunction hearing. Exhibits were to include both items that would be introduced and items that may be introduced at the hearing. Additionally, exhibits were to be marked by counsel in advance of the hearing. 3. The Court further ordered that agreed-upon exhibits and depositions shall be considered admitted at the outset of the hearing and may be used by either party at any time. (Court s Order Regarding Procedures for Preliminary Injunction Hearing, p 2)(emphasis added). 4. The parties identified and exchanged Exhibit Lists prior to the October 5, 2012 hearing; a Joint Exhibit List was filed with the Court on October 4, 2012 (See R. 33). 5. The Joint Exhibit List contained the exhibits that would or could be used at the hearing by each party as well as any objections to admission of the proposed exhibit (See Joint Exhibit List, R. 33). 2
3 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 3 of 11 Pg ID The Plaintiffs did not object to any of Defendant s proposed exhibits (Defendants Exhibits ); Defendant objected to forty-five (45) of Plaintiffs sixty-six (66) exhibits (See Joint Exhibit List, R. 33). 7. Pursuant to the Court s Order, exhibits not objected to were admitted at the outset of the preliminary injunction hearing on October 5, Thus, Defendant s Exhibits were deemed admitted as no objection to the same was made by Plaintiffs. In addition, Defendant introduced Exhibit 523 (Pre-Clearance Letter from the Department of Justice) during the preliminary injunction hearing and moved for its admission. Plaintiff did not object and the Court admitted Defendant s Exhibit Plaintiffs did not move for admission, nor did the Court admit, any of Plaintiffs exhibits during the hearing. 9. At the end of the hearing, this Court issued a ruling from the bench and advised the parties that a written opinion would follow on Tuesday, October 9, At this time, the parties rested and the record was closed. 10. Plaintiffs have now filed their Exhibit List (with attached exhibits) from the preliminary injunction hearing with the Court in violation of the Court s Order; accordingly, the filing must be struck. 11. In accordance with Local Court Rule, Defendant sought concurrence in this motion from Plaintiffs counsel; concurrence was denied on October 15, WHEREFORE, Defendant Secretary of State respectfully requests that this Court enter an order striking Plaintiffs Exhibit List (and attached exhibits) and 3
4 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 4 of 11 Pg ID 1517 order any further and additional relief as it deems appropriate. Furthermore, Defendant requests that she be awarded her costs and fees incurred in filing this motion as this is the third filing Plaintiffs have made in this case which is clearly contrary to the rules and/or Order of the Court (see R. 4, Plaintiffs Motion and Brief for Preliminary Injunction, R. 9, Plaintiffs Supplemental Memorandum and R. 14, Order striking Supplemental Memorandum). 4
5 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 5 of 11 Pg ID 1518 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S MOTION TO STRIKE CONCISE STATEMENT OF ISSUE PRESENTED 1. Should Plaintiff s Exhibit List (and exhibits) filed with the Court on October 12, 2012 (R. 38) be struck in that it violates the Court s Order of September 27, 2012 regarding procedures to be followed by the parties during the course of the preliminary injunction hearing? Plaintiffs say no Defendant says yes i
6 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 6 of 11 Pg ID 1519 CONTROLLING OR MOST APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of Westfield, 296 F.3d 43 (1st Cir. 2002) O'Connell v. Hyatt Hotels of Puerto Rico, 357 F.3d 152 (1st Cir. 2004) ii
7 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 7 of 11 Pg ID 1520 Introduction On September 27, 2012, this Court issued an order regarding procedures to be followed by the parties during the course of the preliminary injunction hearing which took place before the Court on October 5, (See R. 15). The Order required the parties to identify and exchange with opposing counsel each document proposed as an exhibit for the preliminary injunction hearing and was to include both exhibits that would be used and exhibits that may be used. Id. Additionally, exhibits were to be marked by counsel in advance of the hearing. Id. Furthermore, the Court specifically ordered that agreed-upon exhibits and depositions shall be considered admitted at the outset of the hearing and may be used by either party at any time. Court s Order Regarding Procedures for Preliminary Injunction Hearing, p. 2) (emphasis added). Plaintiffs and Defendant identified exhibits and exchanged lists prior to the October 5, 2012 hearing; a Joint Exhibit List was filed with the Court on October 4, (See R. 33). The Joint Exhibit List contained each party s proposed exhibits as well as any objections to the admission of the proposed exhibits by opposing counsel. (See Joint Exhibit List, R. 33). The Plaintiffs did not object to any of Defendant s proposed exhibits (Defendant s Exhibits ). Therefore, pursuant to the Court s Order, Defendant s Exhibits were deemed admitted at the outset of the hearing. During the course of the preliminary injunction hearing, Defendant also introduced an additional exhibit Preclearance Letter from the Department of Justice. (Defendant s Exhibit 523.) The letter was not on the Defendant s Exhibit List because it was not received from the Department of Justice 1
8 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 8 of 11 Pg ID 1521 until the evening of October 4, 2012 after the Joint Exhibit List had been filed with the Court. Defendant marked the Preclearance Letter as Defendant s Exhibit 523 and moved for its admission. Plaintiffs did not object, and the Court admitted Defendant s Exhibit 523. Thus, by the end of the preliminary injunctive hearing, all of Defendant s exhibits had been admitted. In the Joint Exhibit List filed by the parties, Defendant objected to forty-five (45) of Plaintiffs sixty-six (66) exhibits (See Joint Exhibit List, R. 33). 1 During the course of the hearing, Plaintiffs did not seek to offer any of the objected-to exhibits; nor did the Court admit any of the same. During the course of the preliminary injunction hearing, Plaintiffs also identified two exhibits that had not been identified on the Joint Exhibit List Plaintiff s Exhibit 167 (Official Ballot for City of Detroit) and Plaintiff s Exhibit 168 (2012 Voter Registration Totals). Despite having discussed Exhibits 167 and 168 during her opening statement to the Court, Plaintiff s counsel never moved to admit (nor did the Court admit) either Exhibit 167 or 168. Therefore, but for Plaintiffs Exhibits 101, 105, 107, 121, 133, 135, 141, , and 165 (which were stipulated to by Defendant), none of Plaintiffs Exhibits were admitted at the hearing. Legal Argument In the Court s Order Regarding Procedures for Preliminary Injunction Hearing, the Court directed the parties to file a joint list of exhibits and depositions on or before 4:00 p.m. on October 4, Id. at 2 (emphasis added). 1 Exhibits 101, 105, 107, 121, 133, 135, 141, , and 165 were stipulated to by Defendant. 2
9 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 9 of 11 Pg ID 1522 The Court did not direct either party to file an individual list or instruct that actual exhibits be filed with the Court. Contrary to the Court s Order, the Plaintiffs filed a complete list of their proposed exhibits (including the two additional exhibits identified during the course of the hearing Exhibit 167 and 168) with the Court on October 12, The Plaintiffs list and exhibits were filed with the Court a week after the hearing on the preliminary injunction and two days after the Court entered its Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff s motion for a preliminary injunction in this case. (Court s Order dated October 10, 2012, R. 34.) The Court s Order Regarding Procedures for Preliminary Injunction Hearing is analogous to a Joint Final Pretrial Order required to be filed prior to trial in accordance with LR The purpose of the Joint Final Pretrial Order is to supersed[e] the pleadings and govern[] the course of trial unless modified by further order. LR 16.2(a). In this case, the Court ordered that agreed-upon exhibits shall be considered admitted at the outset of the hearing and may be used by either party at any time. Id. at 2. Therefore, only Plaintiffs Exhibits 101, 105, 107, 121, 133, 135, 141, and 165 were admitted at the preliminary injunction hearing. The remainder of exhibits cannot be considered part of the record in this action. And, the trier of fact cannot consider evidence that was not admitted during the course of the hearing. Furthermore, the Court did not provide leave for the filing of any additional exhibits after the hearing and proofs were closed in this matter. Plaintiffs disregard of the Court s Order governing the course 3
10 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 10 of 11 Pg ID 1523 and conduct of the preliminary injunction hearing should be sanctioned by striking the offending pleading and awarding Defendant her costs and fees. 2 Conclusion and Requested Relief Pursuant to the aforementioned, Plaintiff s Exhibit List (and attached Exhibits) should be struck. The Court has not provided the parties with leave to file exhibits with the Court (to the contrary, the Court ordered that only a Joint Exhibit List be filed); and, the vast majority of the exhibits that Plaintiffs have improperly attempted to make part of the Court s record were never introduced or admitted at trial. Accordingly, Defendant Secretary of State respectfully requests that this Court enter an order striking Plaintiff's Exhibit List (and attached exhibits) and order any further and additional relief as it deems appropriate. Furthermore, Defendant requests that she be awarded her costs and fees incurred in filing this motion as this is the third action Plaintiffs have taken in this case clearly contrary to the rules and/or Order of the Court (see R. 4, Plaintiffs Motion and Brief for Preliminary Injunction, R. 9, Plaintiffs Supplemental Memorandum and R. 14, Order striking Supplemental Memorandum). 2 See also Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of Westfield, 296 F.3d 43, 46 (1st Cir. 2002) ( Scheduling orders are essential tools in [case management] and a party's disregard of such orders robs them of their utility. ). For Rule 16(b) to operate effectively, litigants cannot be permitted to treat a scheduling order as a frivolous piece of paper idly entered, which can be cavalierly disregarded without peril. O'Connell v. Hyatt Hotels of Puerto Rico, 357 F.3d 152, 155 (1st Cir. 2004) (quoting Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 610 (9th Cir. 1992)). 4
11 2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 40 Filed 10/22/12 Pg 11 of 11 Pg ID 1524 Respectfully submitted, BILL SCHUETTE Attorney General Dated: October 22, 2012 Christina M. Grossi Christina M. Grossi (P67482) Ann M. Sherman (P67762) Denise C. Barton (P41535) Assistant Attorneys General Attorneys for Defendant P.O. Box Lansing, MI grossic@michigan.gov P67482 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 22, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing of the foregoing document as well as via US Mail to all non-ecf participants. s/christina M. Grossi Christina M. Grossi P.O. Box Lansing, Michigan grossic@michigan.gov P
2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 22 Filed 10/02/12 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 1020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-14114-PDB-PJK Doc # 22 Filed 10/02/12 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 1020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL BRYANTON, GLENN REHAHN, CHERYL MERRILL, RICHARD L.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION - DETROIT
4:14-cv-11499-MAG-MKM Doc # 43 Filed 11/14/14 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 680 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION - DETROIT MARSHA CASPAR, GLENNA DEJONG, CLINT MCCORMACK, BRYAN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARTHA HAYES, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:07-cv-1237 MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Hon. Robert J. Jonker and THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No.
2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 1 Filed 05/12/14 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EDERL EDNA MOORE, and TIARA WILLIS-PITTMAN, v.
More informationCase 1:14-cv GJQ Doc #34 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#352 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00632-GJQ Doc #34 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#352 BRUCE T. MORGAN, an individual, and BRIAN P. MERUCCI, an individual, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN
More information2:10-cv AC-VMM Doc # 23 Filed 12/06/11 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 54
2:10-cv-12182-AC-VMM Doc # 23 Filed 12/06/11 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 54 PHILLIP LETTEN, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION vs. Plaintiffs, SCOTT
More information2:12-cv PDB-PJK Doc # 12 Filed 09/25/12 Pg 1 of 38 Pg ID 593 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-14114-PDB-PJK Doc # 12 Filed 09/25/12 Pg 1 of 38 Pg ID 593 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL BRYANTON, GLENN REHAHN, CHERYL MERRILL, RICHARD L.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH CASIAS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al. Defendants. Case No.:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:17-cv-13080-PDB-EAS ECF No. 82 filed 03/22/19 PageID.1437 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KRISTY DUMONT; DANA DUMONT; ERIN BUSK-SUTTON;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:16-cv-11867-RHC-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 05/25/16 Pg 1 of 51 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN DENNIS RAY ALEXANDER, FORMER CA NO: 16-001007-NO Plaintiff, DISTRICT CT. NO: v.
More information2:14-cv LPZ-RSW Doc # 21 Filed 05/08/14 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 235 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:14-cv-11296-LPZ-RSW Doc # 21 Filed 05/08/14 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 235 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT DASCOLA, vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-11296-LPZ-RSW
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR ORDER LIFTING STAY INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Chapter 9 Case no. 13-53846 Debtor. Hon. Steven W. Rhodes BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case 2:10-cv v. HON.
American Freedom Defense Initiative et al v. Suburban Mobility Authorit...ansportation (SMART) et al Doc. 54 AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE, PAMELA GELLER, and ROBERT SPENCER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-10285-BAF-MJH Doc # 82 Filed 10/02/13 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1930 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION APRIL DEBOER, et al, Plaintiffs, v RICHARD SNYDER, et al
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:00-mc-00005-DPH Doc # 1353 Filed 01/10/18 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 21734 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: CASE NO. 00-CV-00005-DT (Settlement Facility Matters)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:13-cr-20371-VAR-LJM Doc # 69 Filed 04/28/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 961 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-1 DOREEN M. HENDRICKSON,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No.
Case 2:18-cv-12692-TGB-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 08/28/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PROMOTE THE VOTE, a Michigan ballot question committee,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:13-cr-20371-VAR-LJM Doc # 65 Filed 04/21/14 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 936 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, D-1 DOREEN M. HENDRICKSON,
More informationCase 1:14-cv JTN Doc #19 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#544 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-01245-JTN Doc #19 Filed 02/11/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#544 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Michelle Semelbauer, Paulette Bosch, Denise Vos, Crisa
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 62 Filed 04/26/17 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 600 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 15-20382 Plaintiff, v Hon.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:16-cv-01164-WO-JEP Document 33 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Plaintiffs,
More information2:16-cv MAG-EAS Doc # 35 Filed 12/07/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 833 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:16-cv-14233-MAG-EAS Doc # 35 Filed 12/07/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 833 JILL STEIN and LOUIS NOVAK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:16-cv-14233-MAG-EAS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:07-CV-231 PAMELA L. HENSLEY, Plaintiff, MOTION FOR LEAVE v. TO AMEND ANSWER JOHNSTON COUNTY BOARD
More informationCase 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779
Case 4:16-cv-00732-ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Chapter 9 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes
In re: CITY OF DETROIT Debtor. / UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 13-53846-SWR Chapter 9 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes CLASS CLAIMANTS MOTION FOR ALLOWANCE
More informationCase: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883
Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., and ROBERT HART, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No.
Case 2:18-cv-12692-TGB-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 08/28/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PROMOTE THE VOTE, a Michigan ballot question committee,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:09-cv-13616-AJT-MKM Doc # 250 Filed 04/22/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 10555 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dennis Black, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pension
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. HON. NANCY G. EDMUNDS
2:10-cr-20403-NGE-MKM Doc # 503 Filed 11/14/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 16394 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, CASE No. 10-cr-20403
More information2:11-cv DML-PJK Doc # 9 Filed 12/29/11 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:11-cv-14337-DML-PJK Doc # 9 Filed 12/29/11 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN KEVIN CURTIS, Plaintiff, v C. CALDWELL, No. 2:11-cv-14337 HON. DAVID M. LAWSON
More informationDefendants Objection to Plaintiff s Proposed Judgment and Request for Briefing and Hearing Prior to Entry of Judgment
2:15-cv-12604-MOB-DRG Doc # 75 Filed 040318 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 2403 FAISAL G. KHALAF, Ph.D., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More information2:09-cv GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:09-cv-14190-GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOHN SATAWA, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-14190 Hon. Gerald
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:06-cv-01891-JTC Document 8 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM
More informationOPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY OF ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT
Case 3:04-cv-01840-DRD Document 2332 Filed 10/31/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO VAQUERIA TRES MONJITAS, INC. AND SUIZA DAIRY, INC. CASE NUMBER: 04-1840 (DRD)
More informationCase 2:06-cv AJT-VMM Document 143 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-11618-AJT-VMM Document 143 Filed 01/18/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PRISCILLA MATTHEWS, vs. Plaintiff, MICHAEL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:17-cv-10787-GAD-DRG Doc # 37 Filed 06/14/17 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1229 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN KAMAL ANWIYA YOUKHANNA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF STERLING
More informationCase 1:12-cv PLM Doc #28 Filed 10/01/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#247 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:12-cv-00976-PLM Doc #28 Filed 10/01/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#247 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM GELINEAU; GARY E. JOHNSON; ) And LIBERTARIAN PARTY
More informationCASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: DIV 71 UNIFORM ORDER REGARDING SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL, PRE-TRIAL
More information2:10-cv BAF-RSW Doc # 186 Filed 09/06/13 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 7298
2:10-cv-13101-BAF-RSW Doc # 186 Filed 09/06/13 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 7298 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, and Case No. 2:10-cv-13101-BAF-RSW SIERRA CLUB Hon. Judge Bernard A. Friedman Intervenor-Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.
2:16-cv-13717-AJT-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/19/16 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 STEPHANIE PERKINS, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, BENORE LOGISTIC SYSTEMS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase 3:12-cv DPJ-FKB Document 189 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:12-cv-00436-DPJ-FKB Document 189 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION JACKSON WOMEN S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, on
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP), as an organization and representative of its
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. No. 13-CR Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mona K.
2:13-cr-20764-PDB-MKM Doc # 587 Filed 08/10/15 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 7354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, vs. No. 13-CR-20764
More informationCase 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01295-TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-CV-01295 v. UNITED STATES
More informationCase 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.
Case :-cv-00-jlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DONALD TRUMP, in his
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-04776-LMM Document 35 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION RHONDA J. MARTIN, et al., v. BRIAN KEMP, et al.,
More informationCase: 2:18-cv MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/06/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 24
Case: 2:18-cv-01376-MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/06/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TOMMY RAY MAYS II and QUINTON NELSON
More informationCASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:00-mc-00005-DPH Doc # 962 Filed 03/24/14 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 15949 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: DOW CORNING, REORGANIZED DEBTOR CASE NO. 00-CV-00005-DPH
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Southern Division Brian J. Martin, Yahmi Nundley, and Katherine Cadeau, individually and on behalf Case No. 2:15-cv-12838 of all
More informationCase: LTS Doc#:111 Filed:05/25/17 Entered:05/25/17 13:40:50 Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO In re: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, PROMESA Title III No. 17 BK 3284 (Joint Administration
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:18-cv-12354-VAR-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 07/27/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER GRAVELINE, WILLARD H. JOHNSON,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:14-cv-11903-MFL-PJK Doc # 27 Filed 05/20/14 Pg 1 of 30 Pg ID 606 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EDERL MOORE, TIARA WILLIS- PITTMAN, CHINITA TERRY, and JOHN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SPEECH FIRST, INC., Plaintiff, Civil No. 2:18-cv-11451-LVP-EAS v. Hon. Linda V. Parker Mag. Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford MARK SCHLISSEL,
More informationCase 9:17-cv WPD Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:17-cv-80619-WPD Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 17-CV-80619-WPD FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RUTHELLE FRANK, et al., v. SCOTT WALKER, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 11-CV-1128 Defendants. LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS OF WISCONSIN,
More information2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 125 Filed 07/02/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1876
2:12-cv-00601-MOB-MKM Doc # 125 Filed 07/02/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1876 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION CASE
More informationCase 2:13-cv GJQ ECF No. 58 filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID.1293 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00106-GJQ ECF No. 58 filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID.1293 BRENDA TURUNEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION v Plaintiff, No. 2:13-cv-00106 KEITH
More information2:13-cv PDB-MKM Doc # 33 Filed 10/06/14 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 305 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:13-cv-11415-PDB-MKM Doc # 33 Filed 10/06/14 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 305 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 2:13-cv-11415-PDB-MKM v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:16-cv-14233-MAG-EAS Doc # 6 Filed 12/04/16 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 506 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JILL STEIN and LOUIS NOVAK, v Plaintiffs, CHRISTOPHER THOMAS,
More informationCase 2:68-cv MHT-CSC Document 759 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:68-cv-02709-MHT-CSC Document 759 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, TIMOTHY
More informationINDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN
INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN Revised: January 3, 2011 Chambers Deputy/Law Clerk United States District Court Jim Reily Southern District of New York (212) 805-0120 500 Pearl
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:17-cv-10310-VAR-SDD Doc # 28 Filed 02/09/17 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 301 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ARAB AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS LEAGUE ( ACRL ),
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Southern Division Detroit
2:14-cv-12214-DML-MJH Doc # 34 Filed 02/16/15 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1112 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Southern Division Detroit ) K.S., ) Case No. 2:14-cv-12214-DML-MJH
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:10-cr-20403-NGE-MKM Doc # 296 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 4615 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
PO Box 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 0--0 brianw@operation-nation.com In Propria Persona Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 1 1, Plaintiff, vs. Maricopa County; Joseph M. Arpaio,
More informationCase: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:14-cv-02331-JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Ellora s Cave Publishing, Inc., et al., ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
More informationIt is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:
FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2017 04:17 PM INDEX NO. EF006661-2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40-1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2017 COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE DATE (all parties shall appear): SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:06-cv-01891-JTC Document 31 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:17-cv-14148-DPH-SDD Doc # 7 Filed 12/27/17 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 60 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiffs, RUTH
More informationCase 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case :0-cv-0-SI Document Filed //0 Page of 0 JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General SCOTT N. SCHOOLS United States Attorney ELIZABETH J.
More informationCase 1:09-cv JCH-DJS Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:09-cv-00668-JCH-DJS Document 91 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CELIA VALDEZ, et al., v. Plaintiffs, MARY HERRERA, et al., Defendants. No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Albritton v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 14 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ERIC M. ALBRITTON v. C. A. NO. 6:08-CV-00089 CISCO SYSTEMS,
More informationIn The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia
In The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia BRET D. LANDRITH, SAMUEL K. LIPARI Case No. 12-cv-01916-ABJ Plaintiffs vs. Hon. JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., Chief Justice of the United States
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cr-00-srb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ANNALOU TIROL Acting Chief JOHN D. KELLER Illinois State Bar No. 0 VICTOR R. SALGADO DC Bar No. 0 Trial Attorneys 00 New York Ave, NW, th floor Washington,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Debtor. Chapter 9 Case No. 13-53846 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
More informationWatts v. Brunson, Robinson & Huffstutler, Attorneys, P.A. et al Doc. 55
Watts v. Brunson, Robinson & Huffstutler, Attorneys, P.A. et al Doc. 55 FILED 2017 May-24 PM 04:27 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
More informationCase 2:13-cv GJQ Doc #14 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#144
Case 2:13-cv-00284-GJQ Doc #14 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#144 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL MATWYUK and DAVID DEVARTI, vs.
More informationAGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
Case 1:09-cv-04387 Document 59 Filed 05/17/10 Page 1 of 6 ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATION, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, vs. No. 09 CV
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARC VEASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, VS. CIVIL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., and DAVID JAMES, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. 4:14-CV-139-HLM U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:12-cv-00044 Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION VOTING FOR AMERICA, PROJECT VOTE, INC., BRAD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 95 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 3450 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and
More informationU.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv PDB-DAS
CLOSED U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05-cv-73719-PDB-DAS Equal Employment Opportunity v. Michigan Seamless Tube Assigned to: Honorable Paul D Borman
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:15-cv-00833-MEM Document 42 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA FREETHOUGHT SOCIETY, Plaintiff, Civil
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. : JENNIFER BRUNNER, : Defendants. : : Case No. 2:08-CV-145 : JUDGE
More informationCase 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:11-cv-22026-MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 BERND WOLLSCHLAEGER, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 11-22026-Civ-COOKE/TURNOFF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
N. Stone Avenue, #00 ()0-0 BARBARA LAWALL PIMA COUNTY ATTORNEY By: Daniel Jurkowitz Deputy County Attorney North Stone Avenue, Suite 00 Tucson, Arizona 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () - State Bar No.
More information2:12-cv DPH-MJH Doc # 63 Filed 05/30/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1692 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-13312-DPH-MJH Doc # 63 Filed 05/30/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1692 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, a California limited liability company,
More informationUNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CIVIL DIVISION 37 Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
More informationCase 2:11-cv JTM-JCW Document 330 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:11-cv-00926-JTM-JCW Document 330 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LUTHER SCOTT, JR. and the LOUISIANA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP,
More information2:12-cv MOB-MKM Doc # 107 Filed 11/12/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1470
2:12-cv-00601-MOB-MKM Doc # 107 Filed 11/12/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1470 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION CASE
More informationCase 2:10-cv JAC-PJK Document 32 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-11859-JAC-PJK Document 32 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PALLADIUM BOOKS, INC., a Michigan corporation, Case
More informationCase 2:05-cv ABJ Document 182 Filed 05/31/12 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-00270-ABJ Document 182 Filed 05/31/12 Page 1 of 6 LAUGHLIN McDONALD American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc. 230 Peachtree Street, NW Suite 1440 Atlanta, GA 30303 (404 523-2721 FAX:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW
Case 1:16-cv-01274-LCB-JLW Document 76 Filed 05/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW N.C. STATE CONFERENCE
More informationbeing preempted by the court's criminal calendar.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF «County» «PlaintiffName», vs. «DefendantName», Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. «CaseNumber» SCHEDULING
More informationCase 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7 1 JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General 3 SCOTT N. SCHOOLS United States
More informationUnited States of America,
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 28 Filed 05/05/2009 Page 1 of 9 United States District Court For the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division United States of America, v. Peter Hendrickson Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231
PDF Documents Complete Click Here & Upgrade Expanded Features Unlimited Pages IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231 PAMELA
More information