IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 20TH DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: - HON
|
|
- Lynne Jemimah Parsons
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 20 TH DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: - HON. JUSTICE M.A NASIR COURT NO.:- HIGH COURT TWENTY TWO (22) MOTION NO.:- FCT/HC/CV/856/2012 BETWEEN: OKON NKANU EFUT, SAN PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT AND MR. ABDULKADIR TANKO MADUGU DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING Before this Court is a motion on notice dated 19 th December, 2012 brought pursuant to Order 7, Order 23 Rule 1 of the High Court Civil Procedure Rules and under the inherent jurisdiction of this Court. The plaintiff/applicant is praying this Court for an order of interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant by himself or acting through any person or persons from encroaching or further encroaching, trespassing or further trespassing, destroying or further destroying, taking over or further taking over, taking control or further taking control of the plot of land situate, lying and being at plot No. XK 671 A, Apo layout, Abuja and which is covered by the offer of the terms of grant/conveyance of approval dated the 16 th August, 2006, Page 1
2 and which measures an area of approximately 800 square metres pending the determination of the substantive suit. 2. An order of interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant either by himself or acting through any of the servants, agents, privies or through any person or persons howsoever from encroaching or further encroaching, trespassing or further trespassing, taking over or further taking over, exercising or further exercising any right whether possessory or otherwise, or taking any further steps towards the development of the plot of land situate, lying an dbeing at plot No. XK 671 A, Apo layout, Abuja and which is covered by the offer of the terms of grant/conveyance of approval dated the 16 th August, 2006 and which measures an area of approximately 800 square metres pending the determination of the substantive suit. And the omnibus prayer. The application is supported by an affidavit of 22 paragraphs deposed to by one Cyril Agu. Attached are 6 annexures and a written address duly adopted. Peter Oche Ofikwu Esq raised one issue therein which is whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of an order of interlocutory Page 2
3 injunction and thereby entitled to the exercise of the discretion of the Court. Counsel submitted that the position of law as crystallized is whenever an application for interlocutory injunction is pending before the Court for determination, four questions need to be determined. And in Kotoye vs. CBN (2001) FWLR (part 49) 1567 at 1576, the relevant factors were stated as follows: (a) Whether there is a serious question to be tried. (b) In whose favour is the balance of convenience? (c) Will damages be adequate compensation for the applicant? (d) Whether there was delay in bringing the application. Counsel argued that on hearing and determination of an application for interlocutory injunction, the first thing the applicant has to show is that there is a serious question to be tried, which the applicant has successfully shown in his affidavit. Reference was made to Khadiya vs. Khadiya (2001) FWLR (part 70), 1586 at 1588, Ihunde vs. Samson Rogers Nig. Ltd (2000) FWLR (part 16) 2782 at He added that it is not necessary for the applicant to even show that he has prospects of obtaining a permanent injunction at the end of the trial. All that is required of him at this stage is to show that there is a Page 3
4 serious question of law between the parties to be tried at the hearing. He cited Onyesoh vs. Nnebedum (1992) 3 NWLR (part 229) 315, Bolatito vs. Sole Administration (1986) 5 NWLR (part 42) 496 at 312. He further submitted that for an application for interlocutory injunction to be granted all the Court needs to look at is the pleadings and the affidavit evidence placed before it. Also the Court should not make pronouncements which may prejudice the trial of the claims filed and still pending. He cited Obeya Memorial Hospital vs. Federation (1987) 3 NWLR (part 60) 325, Akpomude vs. Gov. Delta State (2003) 9 NWLR (part 826) 561, Ekwomchi vs. Ukwu (2002) 1 NWLR (part 749) 90, Globe Fishing Industries Ltd vs. Coker (1990) 7 NWLR (part 162) 265. On the balance of convenience, counsel cited ACB vs. Awogboro (1991) 2 NWLR (part 176) 711 at while submitting that the applicant will suffer a lot of hardship and inconvenience if the respondent is allowed to continue his acts of trespass and adverse possession. Page 4
5 On whether damages can adequately compensate the plaintiffs if this application is refused and judgment turns out in his favour, counsel submitted that it has been held in plethora of cases that where an award of damages will not compensate the applicants, the Court should grant the application for injunction. Counsel cited quite a number of cases. And added that the essence of interlocutory injunction is to maintain status quo ante pending the determination of the substantive suit. On whether the applicant is guilty of delay counsel argued that from the antecedents of events that transpired the applicant is not guilty of delay. The defendant filed a 19 paragraphs counter affidavit deposed to by one Abdulkadir Tanko Madugu supported by 4 annexures and a written address wherein Adisa Olugbemi Robinson Esq raised one issue for determination i.e. whether the plaintiff has placed sufficient materials before the Court by way of facts and documents to justify the exercise of this Courts discretion of granting interlocutory injunction in his favour. Counsel submitted that an applicant for interlocutory injunction must place before the Court by way of cogent and compelling evidence, the legal right he is seeking to protect by Page 5
6 the grant of the injunction. He cited Buhari vs. Obasanjo (2003) FWLR (part 187) 202. He added that the applicant having failed to produce the necessary documents including the consent of the minister to assign to him coupled with the contradiction in his case has failed to establish a legal right worthy of protection by a grant of interlocutory injunction. He cited Savannah Bank vs. Agilo (1989) 9) 1 NWLR (part 97) at 306, Mcfoy vs. UAC (1961) All ER at 11. He argued that the plaintiff stands to lose nothing as the defendant is not doing any development on the land, the balance of convenience therefore is in refusing the application as no loss or inconvenience will be suffered by the plaintiff, instead it is the defendant who has established a legal right to possession of the land that will suffer if he is unable to possess his land. He cited ACB vs. Awogboro (1991) 2 NMLR (part 176) at 718. He argued further that the plaintiff is seeking for N30 Million as damages and this is an indication that the plaintiff has quantified his damages which will be an adequate compensation. He cited The Registered Trustees of the Peoples Club of Nig. vs. The Registered Trustees of Ansar Ud Deen Page 6
7 Society of Nig. (2000) 5 NWLR (part 657) 368. He added that the applicant is guilty of delay in this instance. Counsel has further added that the plaintiff has failed to ascertain the boundaries of his land and therefore an injunction cannot be granted. He cited Lawal vs. Adeleke (2004) 48 WRN 35. Counsel finally urged the Court to order for accelerated hearing. Reference was made to Isyaku vs. Master (2003) 5 NWLR (part 814) 443. The whole essence of interlocutory injunction is to restrain a party from taking special steps. It is made before the actual trial of a case and is granted to keep matters in status quo until trial. See Anthony vs. Surveyor Gen. Ogun State (2007) All FWLR (part 354) page 375 at 390, Novartis Pharma Services Inc. vs. Swissco Nig. Ltd (2004) 2 NWLR (part 856) page 28. The conditions for the grant of an interlocutory injunction are now fairly well settled. They have been set out in the submissions of plaintiffs counsel. A fundamental rule of law is that it is for an applicant for an interlocutory injunction to satisfy the Court that there is a serious question to be tried as between him (applicant) and the defendant (respondent). An applicant must satisfy the Court, if Page 7
8 he is to succeed, that there is a serious question to be tried in addition to his satisfying the Court that he has a right which ought to be protected. See Union Beverages Ltd vs. Pepsicola International Ltd & ors (1994) LPELR SC. 81/1990. In this instance, there is no doubt that there is a subsisting suit vide the writ of summons dated 15 th of November, The applicant has the burden to satisfy this Court that there is a serious issue to be tried in relation to him having a right which ought to be protected by the Court. The applicant at this stage is not expected to show a strong prima facie case. Once the applicant establish that there is a substantial issue to be tried at the hearing, the burden is discharged see Oduntan vs. General Oil Ltd (1995) 4 NWLR (part 387) page 1 at 13. From the averments in the supporting affidavit and exhibits attached as well as argument of counsel, this Court is satisfied that there are serious questions to be tried. The applicant must also show that he has a legal right over the subject matter of the suit, the protection of which an injunctive order could be invoked. See James Obijuru & ors vs. Lawrence Anokwuru & ors (2001) 17 NWLR (part 743) page 685. Page 8
9 The arguments of the respondents counsel on this issue certainly calls for the determination in the substantive suit. I am therefore mindful not to say anything with respect to those arguments in order not to prejudge the issues arising for determination in the substantive suit. Furthermore in the case of Adewale vs. Gov. Ekiti State (2007) 2 NWLR (part 1019) page 634 at 638, the Court held that an applicant seeking an order of interlocutory injunction is required to show that he is not guilty of delay in bringing the application, because delay defeats equity. The applicant seeking an order of interlocutory injunction has to show that the balance of convenience is on his side, that is to say, more justice will result in granting the application than in refusing it. See Okafor vs. Att. Gen. Anambra State (1988) 2 NWLR (part 79) page 739. The applicant has deposed to the fact that he has been in possession of the plot since the 15 th of June, 1995 when it was allocated to him until early in the month of September, 2012 when he discovered that some unknown persons went and destroyed the fence, which prompted him to report to the Police, and investigation began on the matter. This suit was filed on Page 9
10 the 15 th of November, It is my considered view that the applicant is not guilty of delay. The next issue to consider is balance of convenience. In considering the balance of convenience this is determined by what the applicant will lose if the application is refused and they succeed at the trial, and what the respondent will lose if the application is granted and they succeed at the trial. One must look at the whole case to see whether there is a question to tried, then look at the balance of convenience between the parties bearing in mind that there is a good reason why the status quo should be maintained. See American Cynamid vs. Ethicon Ltd (1975) 1 AC, Orji vs. Zaria Industries (1992) 2 NSCC page 313 and Laffri Nig. Ltd vs. Nal Merchant Bank Plc (2001) 35 WRN. It is the duty of the Court in finding balance of convenience to be satisfied that there are facts disclosed in the affidavit in the matter before it. See the case of Bello vs. A. G. Lagos State (2006) All FWLR (Part 324) page The law does not require mathematical exactness, it suffices if from the measurement of the scales of justice, the pendulum tilts in favour of the applicant. See ACB vs. Awogboro (1991) 2 NWLR (part 176) page 711 at 719. Page 10
11 Learned counsel to the applicant has urged the Court to hold that the balance of convenience tilts in favour of the applicant. Counsel to the defendants on the other has argued that it is the defendant who has established a legal right to possession of the land who will suffer, if he is unable to possess his land upon which he has a legal right. The plaintiff stated that he is the owner of the plot in question has been to the Abuja Geographic Information System (AGIS) to process the Certificate of Occupancy since Nobody has told him anything about the land being allocated to someone else. The defendant on the other hand stated that he was allocated the plot on the 22 nd October, 2010 and he laid claim to the plot and took the plaintiffs successor in title to the issuing authority but his identity was not found. And the plaintiff has never been in possession of the plot. The defendant has also deposed to the fact that the plaintiff has nothing to lose since there is no development on the plot. The Courts have always emphasized the need for litigating parties to abide by rule of law. Once parties have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court, they must not resort to self help. Page 11
12 In other words, once the Court is seized of a matter no party has a right to take the matter into his own hands. It is always better to keep matters in status quo. See Nwadiajuebowe vs. Nwawo (2004) 6 NWLR (part 869) page 435. Similarly in Okomo v. Umoetuk (2004) 10 NWLR (part 882) 526, the Court held where the facts deposed to in an application for interlocutory injunction filed in a suit where Pleadings have been completed, relate and touch on the substantive issue in the suit, the proper order to make is an order for accelerated hearing of the suit, so that the suit can be determined once and for all. I have gone through the reliefs in this application and I must say that they are similar to the substantive reliefs before this Court. And the best course to take in the circumstance is to accelerate the hearing of the substantive suit. Accordingly, accelerated hearing is thus ordered and both parties must maintain the status quo pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit. Signed Honourable Judge Appearances: Peter Ofikwu for the plaintiff/applicant O.R. Adisa for the defendant/respondent Page 12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT GWAGWALADA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP.HON. JUSTICE M.BALAMI COURT CLERK..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT GWAGWALADA SUIT NO: FCT /HC/GWD/CV/585/11 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP.HON. JUSTICE M.BALAMI COURT CLERK..PAUL OJILE BETWEEN ZIP SYSTEM LTD &2 ORS.PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE U.P KEKEMEKE MOTION NO. FCT/HC/M/389/11 DATE: 23/10/13 BETWEEN: MRS. OLGA
More informationRULING. i.e. whether having regard to the circumstances of this case the applicant is entitled to the Court s discretion ion in granting
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE APO ABUJA ON THE 4 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: - HON. JUSTICE M.A NASIR COURT NO.:- HIGH COURT TWENTY TWO
More informationRULING ON NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTION. The applicant by a preliminary objection dated 5/4/13 moved the court to:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF NIGERIA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT LUGBE ABUJA ON, 17 TH OCTOBER, 2013. BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP:- HON. JUSTICE A. O. OTALUKA. SUIT NO.:-
More informationBEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE OJO JUDGE: BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2563/12 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE
More informationBEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI PRESIDING JUDGE IBRAHIM DOMA WOKILI PLAINTIFF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA. IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ABUJA ON THE 5 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON.JUSTICE D.Z. SENCHI COURT CLERKS: T. P. SALLAH & ORS. COURT NUMBER:
More information(2018) LPELR-44008(CA)
BLUEBAY GLOBAL CONCEPTS LTD & ANOR v. CITY VIEW ESTATES LTD CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Abuja Judicial Division Holden at Abuja ON TUESDAY, 6TH FEBRUARY, 2018 Suit No: CA/A/301/2016 EMMANUEL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE SALISU GARBA COURT CLERKS: BWALA NATHAN & OTHERS COURT NUMBER:
More informationJUDGMENT. The plaintiff claims against the defendant as follows:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 14 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE M.M. KOLO COURT NO. HIGH COURT THIRTY
More informationMOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/9227/13 BETWEEN: CHUKWU CHRISTIAN NWEKE JUDGMENT CREDITOR/ RESPONDENT AND MOSES NWOBODO...JUDGMENT DEBTOR/ APPLICANT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE A.A.I BANJOKO JUDGE MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/9227/13 BETWEEN: CHUKWU CHRISTIAN
More informationAND 1. NATIONAL AGENCY FOR FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND CONTROL (NAFDAC) 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL NAFDAC RULING A.
FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON MONDAY THE 15 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE A. F. A. ADEMOLA JUDGE SUIT NO: FHC/ABJ/CS/760/13
More informationAjiroghene Aruga Esq, for the Applicant A. N. Shuru Esq for the Party seeking to be Joined. RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 11 TH OF JUNE, 2013 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE A. B. MOHAMMED SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/599/12 BETWEEN:
More informationBETWEEN: AND AND RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 28 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/M/8529/13 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE
More informationSUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/1599/10 MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/3716/10 FCT/H/G/15/M/75/10 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE A.A.I. BANJOKO JUDGE SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/1599/10 MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/3716/10
More information(2017) LPELR-43361(CA)
MUHAMMED GONI COLLEGE OF LEGAL & ISLAMIC STUDIES & ANOR v. ALI & ORS CITATION: ADAMU JAURO In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON TUESDAY, 11TH JULY, 2017 Suit No: CA/J/121M/2016(R)
More information(2017) LPELR-43312(CA)
SHETIMA v. GADAL & ORS CITATION: ADZIRA GANA MSHELIA UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON FRIDAY, 2ND JUNE, 2017 Suit No: CA/J/73M/2017(R) Before Their
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE SALISU GARBA COURT CLERKS: BWALA NATHAN & OTHERS COURT NUMBER:
More information(2018) LPELR-45396(CA)
FRSC & ORS v. MOHAMMED CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON THURSDAY, 3RD MAY, 2018 Suit No: CA/J/269M/2012(R) UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM Before Their Lordships: HABEEB
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA. OJI PRESIDING JUDGE SUIT NO: FCT\HC\CV\6015\11 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA. IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ABUJA ON THE 13 TH DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI PRESIDING
More informationSUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2900/12 BETWEEN: SAVANNAH BANK OF NIGERIA LIMITED - PLAINTIFF AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 23 RD OF JANUARY, 2013. BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE A. B. MOHAMMED SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2900/12
More information(2017) LPELR-42383(CA)
FIRST BANK OF NIGERIA PLC. v. ALDAR & CO.LTD. & ANOR CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Ibadan Judicial Division Holden at Ibadan ON FRIDAY, 17TH MARCH, 2017 Suit No: CA/I/76/2010 Before Their Lordships:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA HOLDEN AT ABUIA ON TUESDAY, 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2011 BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLV ANUS RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA HOLDEN AT ABUIA ON TUESDAY, 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2011 BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLV ANUS C. ORIll SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/217/2008 MOTION MOTION NO. M/4750/2009
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA BETWEEN HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE A.A.I. BANJOKO-JUDGE BETWEEN: SUIT NO: FCT/HC/CV/ 2175/12 1. SENATOR
More informationCURRENT FEATURES OF THE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT PROCEDURE UNDER THE HIGH COURT OF LAGOS STATE (CIVIL PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 *
CURRENT FEATURES OF THE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT PROCEDURE UNDER THE HIGH COURT OF LAGOS STATE (CIVIL PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 * The declared objective of the 2004 Lagos High Court Civil Procedure Rules is the achievement
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 7 TH DAY OF MAY 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2055/11 M/2997/12 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE
More informationI.S. G. VEMBEH for the Plaintiff Plaintiff is in Court. Defendant in Court. JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT COURT NO.36 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON JUSTICE A.S ADEPOJU ON THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013 SUIT NO:
More information(2018) LPELR-44208(CA)
OKAFOR & ORS v. EZEATU CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Enugu Judicial Division Holden at Enugu ON TUESDAY, 13TH FEBRUARY, 2018 Suit No: CA/E/165/2015 MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU FREDERICK
More information(2018) LPELR-44252(CA)
IKURAV (NIG) LTD & ANOR v. MADUGU & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Makurdi Judicial Division Holden at Makurdi JUMMAI HANNATU SANKEY ONYEKACHI AJA OTISI JOSEPH EYO EKANEM 1. IKURAV (NIG) LTD
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO ABUJA ON THE 1 ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO ABUJA ON THE 1 ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI PRESIDING JUDGE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION (APPELLATE DIVISION) HOLDEN AT APO, ABUJA DATED 21/03/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION (APPELLATE DIVISION) HOLDEN AT APO, ABUJA DATED 21/03/13 BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS: HON. JUSTICE U.P. KEKEMEKE (PRESIDING
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT ABUJA BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLVANUS C. ORIJI RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON TUESDAY, 21 ST DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLVANUS C. ORIJI SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/866/2012 BETWEEN LIVING EYES INTERNATIONAL
More information(2018) LPELR-44058(CA)
UBA PLC v. ACCESS BANK & ANOR CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Sokoto Judicial Division Holden at Sokoto ON FRIDAY, 2ND FEBRUARY, 2018 Suit No: CA/S/21/2017 MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU
More information(2016) LPELR-40330(CA)
MIJINYAWA & ANOR v. ANAS CITATION: TIJJANI ABDULLAHI JUMMAI HANNATU SANKEY SAIDU TANKO HUSSAINI In the Court of Appeal In the Yola Judicial Division Holden at Yola ON TUESDAY, 26TH JANUARY, 2016 Suit No:
More informationBETWEEN: 1. CHIEF EBENEZER OGBONNA 2 ELDER EPELLE AGIRIGA === 1 ST SET OF 3. CHIEF JOSAIAH NWOGU PLAINTIFFS 4. ELDER NWOBILOR NWELE
IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA IN THE UMUAHIA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT UMUAHIA ON WEDNESDAY THE 29 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE F. A. OLUBANJO JUDGE SUIT NO: FHC/UM/CS/64/2005
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT JABI - ABUJA THIS TUESDAY, THE 4 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT JABI - ABUJA THIS TUESDAY, THE 4 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013 BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE UGOCHUKWU A. OGAKWU - JUDGE MOTION NO. FCT/HC/M/1882/2012 BETWEEN:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE M.M.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY BETWEEN:- HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 18 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE M.M. KOLO COURT NO. HIGH COURT THIRTY
More informationIn The Supreme Court of Nigeria On Friday, the 14 th Day of January 2011
In The Supreme Court of Nigeria On Friday, the 14 th Day of January 2011 Before Their Lordships Aloma Mariam Mukhtar Justice, Supreme Court Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen Justice, Supreme Court Francis Fedode
More informationRULING. This is a motion on notice wherein the judgment debtor/applicant seeks the following reliefs:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/M/8912/13 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE
More informationPROFESSOR ALBERT FOLORUNSHO OGUNSOLA V. ALHAJI MOHAMMED ABIODUN USMAN (For himself and other members of the Executive Committee of Kwara State branch
PROFESSOR ALBERT FOLORUNSHO OGUNSOLA V. ALHAJI MOHAMMED ABIODUN USMAN (For himself and other members of the Executive Committee of Kwara State branch of AH Peoples Party (APP)) COURT OF APPEAL (ILORIN
More informationBEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS
I t. ' IN - THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON 14 TH JANUARY, 2011 BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS ALOMA MARIAM MUKHTAR WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI IBRAHIM T ANKO MUHAMMAD MUHAMMED
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2013 VENANT MASENGE...APPLICANT VERSUS
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION (Coram: Isaac Lenaola, DPJ, Faustin Ntezilyayo, J, Monica K. Mugenyi J.) APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2013 (Arising from Reference No. 9 of
More information(2016) LPELR-40165(CA)
MOUDKAS NIG ENT. LTD & ORS v. OBIOMA & ORS CITATION: UZO I. NDUKWE-ANYANWU JOSEPH SHAGBAOR IKYEGH SAMUEL CHUKWUDUMEBI OSEJI In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON FRIDAY,
More information(2018) LPELR-45834(CA)
BRAINS & ANOR v. NWAFOR CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Abuja Judicial Division Holden at Abuja ABUBAKAR DATTI YAHAYA ON THURSDAY, 12TH JULY, 2018 Suit No: CA/A/102/2009 TINUADE AKOMOLAFE-WILSON
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA FCT/HC/CV/1072/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON.JUSTICE D.Z. SENCHI COURT CLERKS: TSENYEN P. SALLAH COURT NUMBER:
More informationNigeria Weekly Law Report Yakubu vs Ashipa 1 1. ALHAJA SAFURAT OLUFUNKE YAKUBL 2. ALHAJ 1 MOMODIJ OVVODINA
1 1. ALHAJA SAFURAT OLUFUNKE YAKUBL 2. ALHAJ 1 MOMODIJ OVVODINA V 1. BAALE SSULAIMAH Y.O. ASHIPA 2. YEKINI ASHIPA 3. MUDASHIRU YARO 4. GANI ASHIPA 5. KOLA OLUSHIN 6. SAKA OWODINA 7. FATAI ASHIPA 8. PERSONS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2011 Claim No: 386 ( NINA SOMKHISHVILI Claimant/Respondent ( BETWEEN ( AND ( ( NIGG, CHRISTINGER & PARTNER Defendants/Applicants (YOSIF SHALOLASHVILI ( PALOR COMPANY
More informationWEST AFRICAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL & ORS V. MRS. NKOYO EDET IKANG & ORS CITATION: (2011) LPELR-5098(CA)
1 WEST AFRICAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL & ORS V. MRS. NKOYO EDET IKANG & ORS CITATION: (2011) LPELR-5098(CA) In The Court of Appeal (Calabar Judicial Division) On Thursday, the 17th day of March, 2011 Suit
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT ABUJA THIS THURSDAY, THE 25 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT ABUJA THIS THURSDAY, THE 25 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE UGOCHUKWU A. OGAKWU - JUDGE MOTION NO. M/4719/2013 BETWEEN: 1. COSMOS
More informationTOPIC 13 CIVIL REMEDIES. LTC Harms Japan 2017
TOPIC 13 CIVIL REMEDIES LTC Harms Japan 2017 SOURCES INTERNATIONAL: TRIPS NATIONAL Statute law: Copyright Act Trade Marks Act Patents Act Procedural law CIVIL REMEDIES Injunctions Interim injunctions Anton
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON FRIDAY THE 19 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS
Hotel Licensing and other related matters Powers of Lagos State House of Assembly to legislate on Constitutionality of ALOMA MARIAM MUKHTAR IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON FRIDAY THE
More informationThe defendant did not defend this suit. She neither entered appearance nor file any pleadings.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT COURT NO.36 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON JUSTICE A.S ADEPOJU ON THE 19 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 SUIT NO:
More informationSAINT LUCIA. IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIl) A.D Between: JUDCEMENT. Mr Kenneth Monplaisir, OC for the Plaintiff
... "i.,; ~ SAINT LUCIA IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIl) A.D. 1997 SUIT NO: 722 OF 1996 Between: CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES LTD PLAINTIFF AND DAMAR ENTERPRISES LTD AND DEFENDANT C. O. WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION
More information(2018) LPELR-44758(CA)
SURU WORLDWIDE VENTURES (NIG) LTD v. ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION OF (NIG) & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON WEDNESDAY, 20TH JUNE, 2018 Suit No: CA/L/1257/2017(R)
More informationSUIT NO: FCT/HC/CV/1811/09. CARDIFF PROPERTIES LIMITED : : : (Suing as the Lawful Attorney of : : : Dr. Lawrence Ojemeni (MFR) : : :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE F.C.T. IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO ON WEDNESDAY, THE 9 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE U. A. INYANG J U D G E SUIT NO: FCT/HC/CV/1811/09.
More informationSALISU & ANOR V MOBOLAJI & ORS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON FRIDAY THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013
SALISU & ANOR V MOBOLAJI & ORS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON FRIDAY THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013 ELECTRONIC CITATION: LER[ ]SC.272/2008 OTHER CITATIONS: [ ] ANLR CORAM IBRAHIM TANKO
More information(2018) LPELR-45382(CA)
WAWU v. ABDULLAHI CITATION: ADAMU JAURO In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON THURSDAY, 22ND FEBRUARY, 2018 Suit No: CA/J/16/2016 UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM Before Their Lordships:
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 21/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Babulal Choudhury and others Appellants -Versus- Ganesh Chandra Bharali and another... Respondents
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA ACCRA-AD 2016
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA ACCRA-AD 2016 BETWEEN Suit No: 1. ABU RAMADAN H/NO. 27 4 TH ABEKA KWAME STREET ABEKA-LAPAZ, ACCRA 2. EVANS NIMAKO H/NO. AP174 APLAKU-ISRAEL
More information(2017) LPELR-42702(CA)
SIJUADE v. ELUGBINDIN & 3 ORS. CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Akure Judicial Division Holden at Akure ON MONDAY, 15TH MAY, 2017 Suit No: CA/AK/48/2014 Before Their Lordships: UZO IFEYINWA NDUKWE-ANYANWU
More information(2018) LPELR-45114(CA)
ASHIMIYU v. BOLAJI & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos MOHAMMED LAWAL GARBA JOSEPH SHAGBAOR IKYEGH YARGATA BYENCHIT NIMPAR ON FRIDAY, 8TH JUNE, 2018 Suit
More information(2018) LPELR-44129(CA)
RAKUMI v. BAYAWA CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Sokoto Judicial Division Holden at Sokoto ON WEDNESDAY, 28TH MARCH, 2018 Suit No: CA/S/117S/2013 MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU FREDERICK
More information(2018) LPELR-43991(CA)
AGHOMI v. STATE CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Owerri Judicial Division Holden at Owerri ON WEDNESDAY, 28TH MARCH, 2018 Suit No: CA/OW/207C/2017(R) RAPHAEL CHIKWE AGBO Before Their Lordships:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D BT TRADING LIMITED GEORGE POPESCU ALPHA SERVICES LIMITED
CLAIM NO. 325 OF 2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2014 BETWEEN: KEVIN MILLIEN Claimant AND BT TRADING LIMITED GEORGE POPESCU ALPHA SERVICES LIMITED 1 st Defendant 2 nd Defendant 3 rd Defendant
More informationBERMUDA RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BERMUDA BX 1 / 1965
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BERMUDA BX 1 / 1965 [made under section 9 of the Court of Appeal Act 1964 and brought into operation on 2 August 1965] TABLE OF CONTENTS
More information(2018) LPELR-45112(CA)
MONSOUR v. FRN CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON MONDAY, 21ST MAY, 2018 Suit No: CA/L/234CM/2018(R) MOHAMMED LAWAL GARBA JOSEPH SHAGBAOR IKYEGH YARGATA
More information(2017) LPELR-43954(CA)
PETER & ORS v. UJAM CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Enugu Judicial Division Holden at Enugu ON THURSDAY, 7TH DECEMBER, 2017 Suit No: CA/E/208/2008 MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU FREDERICK
More informationNIGERIA BAR ASSOCIATION DISCIPLINARY PANEL A, LAGOS HOLDEN AT LAGOS
NIGERIA BAR ASSOCIATION DISCIPLINARY PANEL A, LAGOS HOLDEN AT LAGOS BEFORE: CASE NO: 40/2014 MR. C. A. CANDIDE-JOHNSON SAN (CHAIRMAN); MR. KEMI PINHEIRO SAN; DR FABIAN AJOGWU SAN; MRS. IFEOMA OKWUSOA;
More information(2018) LPELR-44734(CA)
ADEBO v. EXECUTIVE GOVERNOR OF OYO STATE & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Ibadan Judicial Division Holden at Ibadan CHINWE EUGENIA IYIZOBA HARUNA SIMON TSAMMANI NONYEREM OKORONKWO ON WEDNESDAY,
More information(2018) LPELR-45291(CA)
KAAN INTL DEVELOPMENT LTD v. LITTLE ACORNS TURNKEY PROJECTS LTD & ANOR CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Abuja Judicial Division Holden at Abuja ON WEDNESDAY, 27TH JUNE, 2018 Suit No: CA/A/82/2014
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA KERRY WERTH CHARMAINE WERTH AND GL VNIS RICHARDSON
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CLAIM NO. ANUHCV 2013/0150 BETWEEN: KERRY WERTH CHARMAINE WERTH Claimants AND GL VNIS RICHARDSON DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY Page 1 HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE APO ABUJA ON THE 6 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: - HON. JUSTICE M.A NASIR COURT NO.:- HIGH COURT TWENTY
More information(2017) LPELR-43016(CA)
USMAN & ORS v. FRN CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Yola Judicial Division Holden at Yola OYEBISI FOLAYEMI OMOLEYE JAMES SHEHU ABIRIYI SAIDU TANKO HUSAINI 1. ALHAJI INIWA USMAN 2. ALHAJI CHINDO
More information(2018) LPELR-46032(CA)
BUBA v. ISA CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Yola Judicial Division Holden at Yola ON WEDNESDAY, 28TH NOVEMBER, 2018 Suit No: CA/YL/08/2018 OYEBISI FOLAYEMI OMOLEYE JAMES SHEHU ABIRIYI SAIDU TANKO
More information(2018) LPELR-45327(CA)
MV CORAL GEM & ORS v. OISEOMAYE & ORS CITATION: TIJJANI ABUBAKAR In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON WEDNESDAY, 13TH JUNE, 2018 Suit No: CA/L/492/2014 BIOBELE ABRAHAM
More information(2018) LPELR-44671(CA)
OBISIKE & ANOR v. HANOTU & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Port Harcourt Judicial Division Holden at Port Harcourt ON FRIDAY, 18TH MAY, 2018 Suit No: CA/PH/311/2015 ALI ABUBAKAR BABANDI GUMEL
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Nigeria On Friday, the 23 rd day of March 2012
In the Supreme Court of Nigeria On Friday, the 23 rd day of March 2012 Before their Lordships Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen... Justice Supreme Court Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad... Justice Supreme Court Olufunlola
More information(2018) LPELR-45301(CA)
AKADAMAZIA SCIENTIFIC CO. LTD v. NIPOST & ANOR CITATION: TIJJANI ABUBAKAR In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON TUESDAY, 24TH JULY, 2018 Suit No: CA/L/1357/2016 BIOBELE
More information(2017) LPELR-42284(CA)
AGWALOGU & ORS v. TURA INT'L LTD NIGERIA & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Owerri Judicial Division Holden at Owerri ON THURSDAY, 23RD MARCH, 2017 Suit No: CA/OW/217/2010 Before Their Lordships:
More informationHIGH COURT OF JUSTICE [1] IGNATIUS KARL HOOD. and [1] TILLMAN THOMAS [2] NAZIM BURKE [3] FRANKA BERNADINE [4] KEN JOSEPH [5] BERNARD ISSAC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES GRENADA HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO. GDAHCV 2012/0463 BETWEEN: [1] IGNATIUS KARL HOOD and Claimant/Applicant [1] TILLMAN THOMAS [2]
More informationThe Undefended List Provisions in the Uniform High Court Civil Procedure Rules. Yusuf O. Ali
The Undefended List Provisions in the Uniform High Court Civil Procedure Rules By Yusuf O. Ali INTRODUCTION: Prior to 1987, the various states of Nigeria had their own High Court Civil Procedure Rules
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE JAMILU Y. TUKUR CLERK OF COURT: S. K. USMAN & OTHERS COURT NUMBER: 20 DATE:
More information(2018) LPELR-45445(CA)
KAWU v. CHIEF SHERIFF, KEBBI STATE & ANOR CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Sokoto Judicial Division Holden at Sokoto MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU FREDERICK OZIAKPONO OHO ON THURSDAY, 12TH
More information(2018) LPELR-45103(CA)
BASHIR v. FRN CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Kaduna Judicial Division Holden at Kaduna ON FRIDAY, 22ND JUNE, 2018 Suit No: CA/K/453/2017 Before Their Lordships: UZO IFEYINWA NDUKWE-ANYANWU MOHAMMED
More information(2017) LPELR-43426(CA)
LEAGUE MANAGEMENT CO. LTD & ANOR v. ABUBAKAR & ANOR CITATION: ADAMU JAURO UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON FRIDAY, 7TH APRIL, 2017 Suit No: CA/J/231/2016
More information(2017) LPELR-43190(CA)
MOHAMMED & ANOR v. GWARZO & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Kaduna Judicial Division Holden at Kaduna IBRAHIM SHATA BDLIYA ON WEDNESDAY, 10TH MAY, 2017 Suit No: CA/K/114/M/2015(R) Before Their
More informationDate of CAV : Pronounced on 11/2/2014. appellants against the order dated passed by Learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc Appeal No. 224 of 2011 Abdul Hamid and others... Appellants State of Jharkhand and others Versus Respondents Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2014-02188 BETWEEN DEOLAL GANGADEEN Claimant AND HAROON HOSEIN Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice Robin N. Mohammed
More informationWRIT PETITION No.31126/2012 (GM-CPC)
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013 BEFORE R THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.31126/2012 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NARASAMMA
More information(2018) LPELR-45051(CA)
ANYA v. ANYA CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Owerri Judicial Division Holden at Owerri ON FRIDAY, 22ND JUNE, 2018 Suit No: CA/OW/299M/2016(R) RAPHAEL CHIKWE AGBO Before Their Lordships: AYOBODE
More information(2018) LPELR-45450(CA)
IBRAHIM & ANOR v. YARBAWA CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Sokoto Judicial Division Holden at Sokoto MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU FREDERICK OZIAKPONO OHO ON FRIDAY, 13TH JULY, 2018 Suit
More informationIn The Supreme Court of Nigeria On Friday, the 12 th day of April 2002
In The Supreme Court of Nigeria On Friday, the 12 th day of April 2002 Before their Lordships Idris Legbo Kutigi.. Justice, Supreme Court Emmanuel Obioma Ogwuegbu.. Justice, Supreme Court Anthony Ikechukwu
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C Appeal No.19/2011 S.C. (HC) CA LA No.261/10 WP/HCCA/Kalutara
More information(2016) LPELR-40227(CA)
DILLI v. ADAMU & ANOR CITATION: MOORE ASEIMO A. ADUMEIN TANI YUSUF HASSAN JOSEPH EYO EKANEM In the Court of Appeal In the Abuja Judicial Division Holden at Abuja ON TUESDAY, 8TH MARCH, 2016 Suit No: CA/A/236/2008
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT MAITAMA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE A. S. UMAR RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT MAITAMA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE A. S. UMAR MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/178/13 BETWEEN: CORNELIUS NWAPI - JUDGEMENT CREDITOR VS MR. OLATOKUNBO
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.
1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO. 35464 OF 2013) Behram Tejani & Ors..Appellants Versus Azeem Jagani.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN. Between. And WYCLIFFE HACKETT DALTON HACKETT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE M.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2016-00393 Civil Appeal No. T040/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN Between EARLIN AGARD Claimant And WYCLIFFE HACKETT DALTON HACKETT WENDY BAIRD Defendants
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO (OS) 367/2007. Date of Decision : 08 TH FEBRUARY, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Code of Civil Procedure FAO (OS) 367/2007 Date of Decision : 08 TH FEBRUARY, 2008 EUREKA FORBES LTD. & ANR.... Appellants Through : Mr. Valmiki Mehta,
More information(2016) LPELR-40192(CA)
SCOA (NIG) PLC & ANOR v. REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF METHODIST CHURCH OF NIG & ANOR CITATION: AMINA ADAMU AUGIE YARGATA BYENCHIT NIMPAR JAMILU YAMMAMA TUKUR SCOA NIGERIA PLC SCOATRAC In the Court of Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL [1] GORDON LESTER BRATHWAITE [2] DAVID HENDERSON. and [1] ANTHONY POTTER [2] GILLIAN POTTER
GRENADA CIVIL APPEAL NO.18 OF 2002 BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL [1] GORDON LESTER BRATHWAITE [2] DAVID HENDERSON and [1] ANTHONY POTTER [2] GILLIAN POTTER Appellants Respondents Before: The Hon. Mr.
More information