Case 2:11-cv FMO-SS Document 256 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:11349

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 2:11-cv FMO-SS Document 256 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:11349"

Transcription

1 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division MARK SABATH mark.sabath@usdoj.gov Massachusetts Bar Number: RICHARD GLADSTEIN richard.gladstein@usdoj.gov District of Columbia Bar Number: 0 ANGELA MO angela.mo@usdoj.gov California Bar Number: DAVIS H. FORSYTHE davis.forsythe@usdoj.gov Massachusetts Bar Number: STEFAN J. BACHMAN stefan.bachman@usdoj.gov South Carolina Bar Number: 0 Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box Washington, DC 00- Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - Attorneys for Plaintiff the United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ) CALIFORNIA, ex rel. CALIFORNIA ) DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND ) WILDLIFE and CALIFORNIA ) REGIONAL WATER QUALITY ) CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL ) COAST REGION, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) HVI CAT CANYON, INC., f/k/a ) GREKA OIL & GAS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) CV -00 FMO (SSx) UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO HVI CAT CANYON, INC. S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING OUTCOME OF CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE RULEMAKING REGARDING NAVIGABLE WATERS ) ) PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE ORDER

2 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY... II. FACTS... III. ARGUMENT... A. Ex Parte Applications Are Disfavored, and HVI-CC Fails to Show That Its Application Could Not Have Been Pursued Through Ordinary Motion Practice... B. An Indefinite Stay of Litigation Is Not Justified, and Would Substantially Prejudice the United States and the Public Interest.... Plaintiffs Will be Damaged If a Stay Is Granted and Necessary Injunctive Relief Is Indefinitely Delayed.... HVI-CC s Alleged Hardship If a Stay Is Denied Is Highly Speculative, and Its Cost of Continuing to Defend This Litigation Cannot Outweigh the Damage to Plaintiffs if Injunctive Relief Is Indefinitely Delayed.... An Indefinite Stay Will Not Advance the Orderly Course of Justice Indefinite Stays of Litigation Are Especially Disfavored... IV. CONCLUSION... 0 ii UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

3 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Aldapa v. Flower Packing Co., 0 WL (E.D. Cal. Oct., 0)... 0 CMAX, Inc. v. Hall, 00 F.d (th Cir. )... Dependable Highway Exp., Inc. v. Navigators Ins. Co., F.d 0 (th Cir. 00)... In re Toys R US-Delaware, Inc. Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) Litigation, 00 WL 0 (C.D. Cal. Aug., 00)... Landis v. N. Am. Co., U.S. ()...,, Larsen v. City of L.A., 0 WL (C.D. Cal. Aug., 0)... Leyva v. Certified Grocers of Cal., Ltd., F.d (th Cir. )... Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., F.d 0 (th Cir. 00)...,,, 0, Mediterranean Enters., Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp., 0 F.d (th Cir. )... Mission Power Eng g Co. v. Cont l Cas. Co., F. Supp. (C.D. Cal. )... Wild Fish Conservancy v. Irving, 0 WL (E.D. Wash. Apr., 0)... Yong v. Ins, 0 F.d (th Cir. 000)..., Statutes Clean Water Act, U.S.C. to ( CWA ) CWA Section 0(a), U.S.C. (a)... CWA Section 0(b), U.S.C. (b)... iii UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

4 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Regulations Fed. Reg., (Apr., 0)... 0 Fed. Reg.,0 (June, 0)... Fed. Reg., (Mar., 0)... Other Authorities Executive Order No., Fed. Reg., (Feb., 0)..., 0 0 iv UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

5 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Plaintiff the United States of America ( United States ) hereby opposes Defendant HVI Cat Canyon, Inc. s ( HVI-CC s ) Ex Parte Application for an Order Staying Proceedings Pending Outcome of Current Administrative Rulemaking Regarding Navigable Waters Pursuant to Executive Order. ECF No. ( Ex Parte Application ). This case under the Clean Water Act ( CWA ) and the Oil Pollution Act of 0 ( OPA ) concerning HVI-CC s numerous oil spills from, and inadequate spill prevention measures at, its oil production facilities was initially filed in June 0. Now, nearly six years into litigation and less than four months from trial, HVI-CC seeks to indefinitely stay these already lengthy proceedings. HVI-CC fails to justify making this demand on an ex parte basis rather than complying with the Court s ordinary motion practice procedures. HVI-CC also cannot show that an indefinite stay is warranted based on the United States pending review of a CWA regulation regarding waters of the United States, a regulation which the United States has never relied on and need not rely on to prevail at trial in the instant action. Moreover, even if relevant, HVI-CC offers only speculation regarding the potential outcome of the new rulemaking. And HVI-CC s cost of defending this case does not constitute a hardship sufficient to justify a stay. Accordingly, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny the Ex Parte Application. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs the United States and the People of the State of California, ex rel. the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region (collectively, Plaintiffs ) filed their Complaint in this case on June, 0. ECF No.. The Complaint was titled Complaint for Civil Penalties, Injunctive Relief, Cost Recovery, and Damages Under the Clean Water Act, Oil Pollution Act of 0, California Water Code, and UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

6 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 California Fish and Game Code (emphasis added). The Complaint alleged that, [s]ubject to a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery, violations of Section 0(a) of the CWA, U.S.C. (a) [i.e. oil spills of the type alleged in the Complaint], are likely to continue unless enjoined by an order of the Court. Id.. The Complaint further alleged that Defendant is subject to appropriate injunctive relief pursuant to Section 0(b) of the CWA, U.S.C. (b), to prevent further discharges from its facilities into waters of the United States. Id.. The First Amended Complaint was filed February, 0, was similarly titled, and contained identical allegations regarding injunctive relief. ECF No.,. In 0 and 0, the United States joined the other parties in seeking several brief, time-limited stays of litigation to allow pursuit of settlement negotiations, which were ultimately unsuccessful. ECF Nos., and. Over the United States objection, the Court also stayed this litigation for nearly a year, between December 0 and November 0, pending resolution of HVI-CC s motion for terminating sanctions, which the Court denied in substantial part. ECF Nos., 0,. On February, 0, the United States disclosed to HVI-CC the expert opinion of Michael Kinworthy, which included a detailed appendix specifying actions that HVI-CC must undertake at its oil production facilities to come into compliance with the Clean Water Act and prevent future oil spills. Forsythe Decl.. On March, 0, the United States filed a Joint Memorandum of Points and Authorities Re United States Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, in which the United States seeks a judgment as to HVI-CC s liability under the CWA and OPA, and in connection with its oil spills and threatened spills, as to the amount of the United States recoverable response costs. ECF No. ( Partial Summary Judgment Motion ). Among the issues the United States reserved for trial is the UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

7 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 appropriate scope of injunctive relief. Id. at :-0. II. FACTS HVI-CC s Facts section starts with a lengthy argument regarding the legal definition of the term navigable waters. Ex Parte Application :-:0. The United States has explained its position that the receiving waters for HVI-CC s oil spills are navigable waters under controlling Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit law. See Partial Summary Judgment Motion (ECF No. -) at -0,, -. Even prior to the United States Partial Summary Judgment Motion, the Court set forth the legal basis for finding navigable waters in its September 0, 0 opinion denying in substantial part HVI-CC s own motion for partial summary judgment, and finding that three of the receiving waters for HVI-CC s oil spills are navigable waters within the meaning of the CWA. See ECF No. 0 at -. On February, 0, the President of the United States signed Executive Order No., Fed. Reg., (Feb., 0) ( Executive Order ), directing the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( Corps ) to review a recent Clean Water Act rule concerning navigable waters determinations ( 0 Rule ), and publish for notice and comment a proposed rule rescinding or revising the rule, as appropriate and consistent with the law. Executive Order. Section of the Executive Order stated: Definition of Navigable Waters in Future Rulemaking. In connection with the proposed rule described in section (a) of this order [rescinding or revising the 0 Rule], the Administrator [of EPA] and the Assistant Secretary [of the Army for Civil Works] shall consider interpreting the term navigable waters in a manner consistent with the opinion of Antonin Scalia in Rapanos v. United States. Id.. The Executive Order, by its terms, is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

8 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. Id. (c). Shortly following issuance of the Executive Order, EPA and the Corps published a Federal Register notice indicating their intent, in accordance with the Executive Order, to review and rescind or revise the 0 Rule consistent with the principles outlined in the Executive Order and the agencies legal authority. Fed. Reg., (Mar., 0) ( Notice of Intent ). In the Notice of Intent, EPA and the Army stated that in a forthcoming proposed rulemaking [to review the 0 Rule] consistent with the Executive Order the agencies will consider interpreting the term navigable waters, as defined in the CWA in a manner consistent with the opinion of Justice Scalia in Rapanos. Id. As HVI-CC concedes, the United States has never relied on the 0 Rule to establish that the receiving waters for HVI-CC s spills were navigable waters. Ex Parte Motion at n.. Indeed, the United States position has consistently been that [f]or purposes of this case, the regulation in place at the time of [HVI-CC s oil] spills controls. Partial Summary Judgment Motion (ECF No., at n.). This case was filed in 0; the 0 Rule was proposed in 0, Fed. Reg., (Apr., 0), and finalized in 0, 0 Fed. Reg.,0 (June, 0). On March, 0, HVI-CC wrote to the United States requesting that it indefinitely suspend the prosecution of this case pending resolution of the rulemaking required under the Executive Order. Bledsoe Decl. & Ex.. On March, 0, the United States responded that it was aware of the Executive Order, that there has been no change in the position of the United States related to this case, and that it intended to continue complying with existing case deadlines. Id. & Ex.. On March, 0, HVI-CC requested that the parties meet and confer regarding this issue, which they did on March, 0. Id., & Exs.,. UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

9 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 On March, 0, in response to an from the United States requesting a discussion of the scheduling of expert witness depositions in light of the pending April, 0 expert discovery deadline, counsel for HVI-CC stated that we intend to defer addressing the issue of expert depositions until the Court has ruled on our motion to stay proceedings. Forsythe Decl.. III. ARGUMENT A. Ex Parte Applications Are Disfavored, and HVI-CC Fails to Show That Its Application Could Not Have Been Pursued Through Ordinary Motion Practice. HVI-CC fails to show that ex parte relief is warranted here. The Ex Parte Application should be denied, and HVI-CC should be directed to pursue any request for a further stay of this litigation as a regularly noticed motion under Local Rule. The Court has stated that ex parte applications are entertained only in extraordinary circumstances, 0 Initial Standing Order, at InitialStandingOrder.0.pdf (accessed Mar., 0). As this Court held in Toys R US, a party seeking ex parte relief bears the burden of demonstrating the irreparable harm it will suffer by not having its [ex parte application] heard according to regular noticed motion procedures. In re Toys R US-Delaware, Inc. Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) Litigation, 00 WL 0 at * (C.D. Cal. Aug., 00) (citing Mission Power Eng g Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., F. Supp., (C.D. Cal. )). An ex parte motion is the forensic equivalent of standing in a crowded theater and shouting, Fire! There had better be a fire. Mission Power, F. Supp. at. There is no fire here. HVI-CC fails to demonstrate irreparable harm because, as outlined below, it cannot establish that an indefinite stay of this litigation is warranted at all, much less on an emergency, ex parte basis. Under UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

10 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page 0 of Page ID #: 0 0 these circumstances, HVI-CC s costs of continuing to defend this case for an additional few weeks pending hearing on a conventional motion cannot justify ex parte consideration of HVI-CC s page brief, which Plaintiffs received on short notice and with minimal opportunity to respond. If the Court elects to further entertain HVI-CC s request for an indefinite stay of litigation, HVI-CC should be directed to pursue normal motion practice under the Local Rules, and in the meantime to comply with the existing case schedule, including scheduling and conduct of expert discovery. B. An Indefinite Stay of Litigation Is Not Justified, and Would Substantially Prejudice the United States and the Public Interest. HVI-CC s request for an indefinite stay is unwarranted, and could delay resolution of this case for years while the parties and the Court await the final outcome of agency revised rulemaking that took several years to complete originally and was subject to challenge and stay in more than one federal court a rule that was never relied upon by the United States in this action. HVI-CC speculates that it may benefit from future changes to the 0 Rule under the Executive Order, but mere speculation cannot justify an indefinite stay. And the ongoing costs to HVI-CC of defending this action if a stay is not granted are not the type of harm necessary to justify a stay. The Ex Parte Motion should therefore be denied, and the parties should be directed to carry on with litigation under the existing case management orders. A district court possesses the inherent power to control its own docket and calendar, and accordingly has discretion to stay litigation before it. Mediterranean Enterprises, Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp., 0 F.d, (th Cir. ). In evaluating a request to stay pending litigation, the competing interests As described in Section II, above, HVI-CC has refused to discuss scheduling of expert witness depositions with the United States until this motion is resolved. Forsythe Decl.. UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

11 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 which will be affected by the granting or refusal to grant a stay must be weighed. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. 00) (quoting CMAX Inc. v. Hall, 00 F.d, (th Cir. )). Under the Supreme Court case Landis v. North American Co., U.S. (), among the competing interests to be considered are: [] the possible damages which may result from the granting of a stay, [] the hardship or inequality which a party may suffer in being required to go forward, and [] the orderly course of justice measured in terms of the simplifying or complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be expected to result from a stay. Lockyer, F.d at 0 (quoting CMAX, 00 F.d at ) (citing Landis) (numbers added). In addition to these factors, the Court must also consider the length of the proposed stay. Wild Fish Conservancy v. Irving, et al., 0 WL (E.D. Wash. Apr., 0) (citing Yong v. INS, 0 F.d, (th Cir. 000) ( If a stay is especially long or its term is indefinite, we require a greater showing to justify it. )). As set forth below, the competing interests identified in Landis and related cases weigh against HVI-CC s request for an indefinite stay. The Ex Parte Application should accordingly be denied.. Plaintiffs Will Be Damaged If A Stay Is Granted and Necessary Injunctive Relief Is Indefinitely Delayed. As to the first Landis factor, the possible damages which may result from the granting of a stay, the Plaintiffs brought this action in June 0 to hold HVI-CC responsible for its chronic violations of federal and state clean water law and to obtain injunctive relief to ensure future compliance. See Compl., ECF No. ; First Am. Compl., ECF No.. Beyond the interest all parties have in the prompt and timely resolution of litigation, the Plaintiffs seek and expect to obtain at trial substantial injunctive relief that will require HVI-CC to bring its oil UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

12 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 production operations into compliance with the Clean Water Act. Compliance with the law here is more than a matter of correcting minor paperwork violations the Plaintiffs will establish at trial that HVI-CC must substantively modify its operations to improve its capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to future oil spills at the affected facilities. Delayed implementation of injunctive relief is precisely the kind of harm courts look for in weighing potential damage granting a stay may cause. See Lockyer, F.d at (stay not justified where plaintiff sought injunctive relief against ongoing and future harm, though stays were granted in other cases where plaintiffs sought only [money] damages for past harm ). In fact, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay will work damage to someone else, the party seeking the stay must make out a clear case of hardship or inequity. Id. (quoting Landis, U.S. at ) (emphasis added). HVI-CC asserts, without citation or explanation, that the United States primary claims in this matter are for money damages, reimbursement of response costs, and civil monetary penalties. Ex Parte Application at :0-. This is incorrect. HVI-CC need look no further than the Complaint itself to ascertain that the Plaintiffs allege ongoing violations and seek appropriate injunctive relief. First Am. Compl., (ECF No. ). Moreover, HVI-CC was recently served with the expert report of Michael Kinworthy, which includes a detailed list of corrective actions necessary to address ongoing issues at its facilities. Forsythe Decl.. Yet HVI-CC does not address the Plaintiffs demands for injunctive relief, perhaps because it cannot establish hardship sufficient to offset the potential environmental harm an indefinite stay would cause. While HVI-CC does not discuss injunctive relief, it argues that, given the prior stays in the case, the United States cannot now complain that a new, indefinite stay on the eve of trial will damage it. Ex Parte Application at :-. The United States stipulated to several brief stays only in furtherance of settlement negotiations, which it hoped would speed resolution of the case and implementation of necessary injunctive relief. And HVI-CC does not and cannot UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

13 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0. HVI-CC s Alleged Hardship If a Stay Is Denied Is Highly Speculative, and Its Cost of Continuing to Defend This Litigation Cannot Outweigh the Damage to Plaintiffs if Injunctive Relief Is Indefinitely Delayed. As to the second Landis factor, the hardship or inequity which a party may suffer in being required to go forward, Lockyer, F.d at 0, HVI-CC argues that it would be unfair to require it to expend resources defending this case when a new administrative rule will almost certainly change the substantive law applicable to this case and may definitively resolve the United States claims in HVI-CC s favor, and the substantive law regarding the most important issue in this case will likely change soon. Ex Parte Application at :-; :-. (emphasis added). HVI-CC s entire argument for harm is premised on a string of speculation about a rulemaking process. Even if the Court were to entertain HVI-CC s speculation, any injury HVI-CC may suffer in continued costs of litigation cannot, as a matter of law, constitute the clear case of hardship or inequity necessary to offset the damage to the Plaintiffs and the public interest if necessary injunctive relief is indefinitely delayed. Lockyer, F.d at (quoting Landis, U.S. at ). HVI-CC concedes that the United States has never relied on the 0 Rule to support its case. Ex Parte Motion at n.. Instead, the United States has relied upon controlling Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit law, see (ECF No. -) at - 0,, -, just as this Court has in interpreting the term navigable waters under the CWA. See ECF No. 0 at -. This is unsurprising given that the spills at issue in this case occurred between 00 and 00, and the initial complaint was filed in 0, years before the 0 Rule was proposed or finalized. allege that the United States was a cause of or in agreement with the lengthy stay pending resolution of HVI-CC s motion for terminating sanctions, which it did not obtain. Id. In this context, Larsen v. City of Los Angeles, 0 WL (C.D. Cal. Aug., 0), is inapposite. UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

14 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 HVI-CC s request for a stay should also be denied because its alleged harm comes down to the cost of continuing to defend this case through trial and any subsequent appeal. But the law is clear that being required to defend a suit, without more, does not constitute a clear case of hardship or inequity within the meaning of Landis, as would be necessary to justify a stay in face of the Plaintiffs established interest in obtaining meaningful injunctive relief. Lockyer, F.d at. See also Aldapa v. Flower Packing Co., 0 WL at * (E.D. Cal. Oct., 0) ( the increased harm a stay would cause to individuals who seek injunctive relief for ongoing violations has been recognized ). HVI-CC provides no meaningful argument to offset the increased harm Plaintiffs and the public would suffer if injunctive relief is indefinitely delayed.. An Indefinite Stay Will Not Advance the Orderly Course of Justice. As to the third factor, the orderly course of justice measured in terms of the simplifying or complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be expected to result from a stay, HVI-CC again falls back on speculation and conclusory statements regarding the potential outcome of a rulemaking process. See Ex Parte Application at :- ( An administrative rule defining the term navigable waters will significantly simplify issues, proof and questions of law relevant to the case [and] it is possible that the new administrative rule will completely obviate the need for trial ) (emphasis added). See also id. at :- : ( it is likely that the EPA and Corps will provide administrative guidance on this point while this case is pending, either before this Court or on appeal. ) (emphasis added). Again, the prospect of judicial economy is too speculative here to support imposition of an open-ended stay, especially when weighed against the real hardship to Plaintiffs and the public if injunctive relief is further delayed. 0 UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

15 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0. Indefinite Stays of Litigation Are Especially Disfavored. In addition to the three Landis factors discussed above, the law is clear that [g]enerally, stays should not be indefinite in nature. Dependable Highway Exp., Inc. v. Navigators Ins. Co., F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. 00) ( the district court erred by issuing a stay without any indication that it would last only for a reasonable time ). See also Lockyer, F.d at (quoting Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd., F.d, (th Cir. ) for proposition that [a] stay should not be granted unless it appears likely the other proceedings will be concluded within a reasonable time in relation to the urgency of the claims presented to the court. ); Yong, 0 F.d at ( If a stay is especially long or its term is indefinite, we require a greater showing to justify it. ). For the reasons stated above, HVI-CC cannot make the greater showing necessary to obtain the stay it seeks, or otherwise justify departure from the general presumption against indefinite stays. IV. CONCLUSION HVI-CC fails to establish that its costs in continuing litigation while pursuing its request for a stay through routine motion practice would constitute irreparable harm sufficient to justify extraordinary ex parte relief. HVI-CC likewise cannot show that the ongoing costs of defending this case through trial outweigh the potential damage to the Plaintiffs and the public interest if an indefinite stay is granted. Accordingly, the Ex Parte Application should be denied. HVI-CC cites Chronicle Publishing Co. v. National Broadcasting Co., F.d, (th Cir. ), for the proposition that a case may be stayed for months, if not years pending resolution of agency action. The case is readily distinguishable, both on the nature of the administrative proceedings and the fact the plaintiff sought money damages, and the court expressly left open the possibility that, if injunctive relief were later sought, the stay might be lifted. Id. at. UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

16 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Dated: March, 0 Respectfully submitted, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA /s/ Davis H. Forsythe DAVIS H. FORSYTHE MARK SABATH RICHARD GLADSTEIN ANGELA MO STEFAN J. BACHMAN Environmental Enforcement Section U.S. Department of Justice UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO

Case 2:11-cv FMO-SS Document 254 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 31 Page ID #:11238

Case 2:11-cv FMO-SS Document 254 Filed 03/16/17 Page 1 of 31 Page ID #:11238 Case :-cv-00-fmo-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 STEPHEN G. LARSON (SBN ) slarson@larsonobrienlaw.com ROBERT C. O'BRIEN (SBN ) robrien@larsonobrienlaw.com STEVEN E. BLEDSOE (SBN ) sbledsoe@larsonobrienlaw.com

More information

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 85 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 85 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 13 Case 2:17-cv-00135-JLR Document 85 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 13 The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JUWEIYA ABDIAZIZ ALI, et al., v. Plaintiffs,

More information

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8 Case3:15-cv-01723-VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MAYER BROWN LLP DALE J. GIALI (SBN 150382) dgiali@mayerbrown.com KERI E. BORDERS (SBN 194015) kborders@mayerbrown.com 350

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:16-cv-06848-CAS-GJS Document 17 Filed 12/14/16 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:268 Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Barbara Waldrup v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al Doc. 148 Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Catherine Jeang Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys

More information

Case3:12-cv SI Document33 Filed10/21/14 Page1 of 10

Case3:12-cv SI Document33 Filed10/21/14 Page1 of 10 Case:-cv-00-SI Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 Shelley Mack (SBN 0), mack@fr.com Fish & Richardson P.C. 00 Arguello Street, Suite 00 Redwood City, CA 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 Michael J. McKeon

More information

Case 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 4:15-cv-00386-CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, in his official

More information

United States District Court

United States District Court Case :0-cv-0-JSW Document 0 Filed 0//00 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, No. C 0-0 JSW v. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

More information

Case 1:15-cv IMK Document 8 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 137

Case 1:15-cv IMK Document 8 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 137 Case 1:15-cv-00110-IMK Document 8 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 137 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CLARKSBURG DIVISION MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER Calista Enterprises Ltd. et al v. Tenza Trading Ltd Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CALISTA ENTERPRISES LTD., Case No. 3:13-cv-01045-SI v. Plaintiff, OPINION AND

More information

Case 3:15-cv CAR Document 10 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv CAR Document 10 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION Case 3:15-cv-00012-CAR Document 10 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION MELISSA BROWN and : BEN JENKINS, : : Plaintiffs, : v.

More information

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 175 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 175 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Case :-cv-00-jlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DONALD TRUMP, in his

More information

KBW ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. JAYNES CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:13-cv GMN-CWH

KBW ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. JAYNES CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:13-cv GMN-CWH Page 1 KBW ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. JAYNES CORPORATION, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:13-cv-01771-GMN-CWH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18220

More information

Case 2:16-cv JAD-VCF Document 29 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ORDER

Case 2:16-cv JAD-VCF Document 29 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ORDER Case :-cv-0-jad-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** 0 LISA MARIE BAILEY, vs. Plaintiff, AFFINITYLIFESTYLES.COM, INC. dba REAL ALKALIZED WATER, a Nevada Corporation;

More information

Case 2:17-cv JAD-VCF Document 38 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:17-cv JAD-VCF Document 38 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case :-cv-00-jad-vcf Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Jewell Bates Brown, Plaintiff v. Credit One Bank, N.A., Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No.: :-cv-00-jad-vcf Order Denying

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JOHN DOE, ) Plaintiff ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:16cv-30184-MAP v. ) ) WILLIAMS COLLEGE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE EX

More information

Case 2:18-cv RSL Document 125 Filed 09/13/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:18-cv RSL Document 125 Filed 09/13/18 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 0 KING COUNTY, v. Plaintiff, BP P.L.C., a public limited company of England and Wales,

More information

Case 3:17-cv BR Document 7 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 18

Case 3:17-cv BR Document 7 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 18 Case 3:17-cv-00117-BR Document 7 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 18 Michael Fuller, OSB No. 09357 Lead Trial Attorney for Estrella Olsen Daines PC US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., Suite 3150 Portland, Oregon

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-00-rmp Document Filed 0// UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, WORKLAND & WITHERSPOON, PLLC, a limited liability company; and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-sjo-ffm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 BLAKELY LAW GROUP BRENT H. BLAKELY (CA Bar No. ) Parkview Avenue, Suite 0 Manhattan Beach, California 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0

More information

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Case :-cv-00-sba Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Thomas R. Burke (State Bar No. 0) thomasburke@dwt.com 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Linda Lye (State

More information

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3 Case :-cv-0-kjm-dad Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of M. REED HOPPER, Cal. Bar No. E-mail: mrh@pacificlegal.org ANTHONY L. FRANÇOIS, Cal. Bar No. 0 E-mail: alf@pacificlegal.org Pacific Legal Foundation Sacramento,

More information

Case 3:17-cv SK Document 82 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv SK Document 82 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-sk Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General ALEX G. TSE Acting United States Attorney MARCIA BERMAN Assistant Branch Director KAREN S. BLOOM Senior

More information

Case 2:16-cv BJR Document 34 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:16-cv BJR Document 34 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 0 PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, CENTER FOR JUSTICE, RE SOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-jst ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY Re: ECF

More information

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9 Case 2:16-cv-00315-NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9 JOHN R. GREEN Acting United States Attorney NICHOLAS VASSALLO (WY Bar #5-2443 Assistant United States Attorney P.O. Box 668 Cheyenne, WY 82003-0668

More information

J S - 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE NO. CV JST (FMOx) GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF.

J S - 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE NO. CV JST (FMOx) GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF. Case :-cv-00-jls-fmo Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF vs. Plaintiffs, THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 10-cv-02242-WYD-KLM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel MICHAEL JASON MARTINEZ; ELIZABETH FRITZ; THOMAS TRUJILLO; AMBER HUGENOT;

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. Case :0-cv-0-WQH-MDD Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 CAROLYN MARTIN, vs. NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE, ( NCIS ) et. al., HAYES, Judge:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-COHN/SELTZER ORDER STAYING CASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-COHN/SELTZER ORDER STAYING CASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-61798-CIV-COHN/SELTZER JLIP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STRATOSPHERIC INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. / ORDER STAYING CASE THIS CAUSE

More information

Case3:13-cv SI Document28 Filed09/25/13 Page1 of 5

Case3:13-cv SI Document28 Filed09/25/13 Page1 of 5 Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 HARMEET DHILLON, v. DOES -0, Plaintiff, Defendants. / No. C - SI ORDER DENYING IN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 1 Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA #01 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 Julio Carranza, WSBA #1 R. Joseph Sexton, WSBA # 0 Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel 01 Fort Road/P.O. Box 1 Toppenish, WA (0) - Attorneys

More information

Case 2:13-cv LDD Document 23 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:13-cv LDD Document 23 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:13-cv-01999-LDD Document 23 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORP. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : NO. 13-cv-01999

More information

Case 3:15-cv HSG Document 67 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv HSG Document 67 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-hsg Document Filed /0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALIPHCOM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FITBIT, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-hsg ORDER GRANTING MOTION

More information

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Case :-cv-00-jlr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable James L. Robart UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DONALD TRUMP, in his

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 1:13-cv-1364 -v- ) ) HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, CORP., )

More information

Case 1:15-mc JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:15-mc JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10 Case 1:15-mc-00056-JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10 United States District Court Southern District of New York SUSANNE STONE MARSHALL, ET AL., Petitioners, -against- BERNARD L. MADOFF, ET AL.,

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 29 Filed: 08/14/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:429

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 29 Filed: 08/14/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:429 Case: 1:13-cv-03292 Document #: 29 Filed: 08/14/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:429 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Martin Ozinga III, et al., Plaintiffs, No.

More information

Case3:06-mc SI Document105 Filed06/03/10 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:06-mc SI Document105 Filed06/03/10 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:0-mc-0-SI Document0 Filed0/0/0 Page of 0 0 KRONENBERGER BURGOYNE, LLP Karl S. Kronenberger (Bar No. ) Henry M. Burgoyne, III (Bar No. 0) Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld (Bar No. ) 0 Post Street, Suite 0 San

More information

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 217 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Defendants.

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 217 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Defendants. Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No. :-cv--mjp DEFENDANTS

More information

Case 1:12-cv GMS Document 60 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1904

Case 1:12-cv GMS Document 60 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1904 Case 1:12-cv-00617-GMS Document 60 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1904 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AIP ACQUISITION LLC, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 12-617-GMS LEVEL

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #13-1108 Document #1670157 Filed: 04/07/2017 Page 1 of 7 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE,

More information

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 24 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 24 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 Case :-cv-00-lb Document Filed // Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division CARLO LABRADO, Case No. -cv-00-lb Plaintiff, v. METHOD PRODUCTS, PBC, ORDER

More information

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 61 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 61 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed // Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, et al., v. Plaintiffs, ANDREW

More information

Case 2:14-cv ODW-RZ Document 66 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:791

Case 2:14-cv ODW-RZ Document 66 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:791 Case :-cv-0-odw-rz Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 MICHAEL FEUER (SBN CITY ATTORNEY mike.feuer@lacity.org JAMES P. CLARK (SBN 0 CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY james.p.clark@lacity.org CITY OF LOS

More information

40 CFR Parts 110, 112, 116, 117, 122, 230, 232, 300, 302, and 401. Definition of Waters of the United States Amendment of Effective Date of 2015 Clean

40 CFR Parts 110, 112, 116, 117, 122, 230, 232, 300, 302, and 401. Definition of Waters of the United States Amendment of Effective Date of 2015 Clean The EPA Administrator, Scott Pruitt, along with Mr. Ryan A. Fisher, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, signed the following proposed rule on 11/16/2017, and EPA is submitting it for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:16-cv-05505-PA-AS Document 21 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1123 Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Stephen Montes Kerr None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD (and consolidated cases) Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 658 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2012 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No. 04-21448-GOLD (and consolidated cases)

More information

Case: 3:13-cv bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9

Case: 3:13-cv bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9 Case: 3:13-cv-00346-bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1056 Document #1726769 Filed: 04/16/2018 Page 1 of 6 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:15-cv-02573-PSG-JPR Document 31 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:258 #19 (7/13 HRG OFF) Present: The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge Wendy Hernandez Deputy Clerk

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:14-cv-04857-ADM-HB Document 203 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA M-I Drilling Fluids UK Ltd. and M-I LLC, Case No. 14-cv-4857 (ADM/HB) v. Dynamic Air

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Case 3:15-cv-00162 Document 132 Filed in TXSD on 08/22/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL

More information

Manier et al v. Medtech Products, Inc. et al Doc. 22

Manier et al v. Medtech Products, Inc. et al Doc. 22 Manier et al v. Medtech Products, Inc. et al Doc. 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON MANIER, TERI SPANO, and HEATHER STANFIELD, individually, on behalf of themselves,

More information

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:16-cv CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9 Case 3:16-cv-00350-CWR-LRA Document 25 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION NYKOLAS ALFORD and STEPHEN THOMAS; and ACLU

More information

Case 1:17-cv CKK Document 75 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ORDER (December 11, 2017)

Case 1:17-cv CKK Document 75 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ORDER (December 11, 2017) Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 75 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants Civil Action

More information

Case 2:05-cv DDP-RZ Document 132 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:337

Case 2:05-cv DDP-RZ Document 132 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:337 Case :0-cv-0-DDP-RZ Document Filed 0//0 Page of Page ID #: 0 Eugene P. Ramirez, State Bar No. L. Trevor Grimm, State Bar No. 0 MANNING & MARDER KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ LLP th Floor at 0 Tower 0 South Figueroa

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Brickman v. Facebook, Inc. Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COLIN R. BRICKMAN, Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-teh ORDER GRANTING FACEBOOK S MOTION

More information

Case 3:06-cv VRW Document 346 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:06-cv VRW Document 346 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 9 Case :0-cv-00-VRW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 IN RE: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1492 Document #1696614 Filed: 10/03/2017 Page 1 of 9 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) SIERRA CLUB,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17CV240

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17CV240 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17CV240 JOSEPH CLARK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM AND ) RECOMMENDATION HARRAH S NC CASINO COMPANY,

More information

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 32-2 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 32-2 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-00295-LY Document 32-2 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LTD., and CONSUMER

More information

Case 1:13-cv RDM Document 60 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv RDM Document 60 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:13-cv-02007-RDM Document 60 Filed 05/19/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES ASSOCIATION OF REPTILE KEEPERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.

More information

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1381 Document #1675253 Filed: 05/15/2017 Page 1 of 14 ORAL ARGUMENT REMOVED FROM CALENDAR No. 15-1381 (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER Civil File No (MJD/AJB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER Civil File No (MJD/AJB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER Civil File No. 09 3601 (MJD/AJB) FURUNO ELECTRIC CO. LTD., FURUNO U.S.A., INC.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION O R D E R

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION O R D E R IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORP., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & CO., et al. Defendants. O R D E R 2:06-CV-72-DF Before the Court

More information

Case 1:10-cv MEA Document 285 Filed 03/19/14 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:10-cv MEA Document 285 Filed 03/19/14 Page 1 of 8 Case 1:10-cv-02333-MEA Document 285 Filed 03/19/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- BRUCE LEE ENTERPRISES,

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) USCA Case #15-1385 Document #1670271 Filed: 04/10/2017 Page 1 of 11 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MURRAY ENERGY CORP.,

More information

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9 Case :-cv-0-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE and SIERRA CLUB v. Plaintiffs, SCOTT PRUITT, in

More information

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 51 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 51 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 14 Case :-cv-0-who Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Gary J. Smith (SBN BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, P.C. Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0- Telephone: ( -000 Facsimile: ( -00 gsmith@bdlaw.com Peter J.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, : Case No. 1:12-cv-552 : Plaintiff, : Judge Timothy S. Black : : vs. : : TEAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Sherman v. Yahoo! Inc. Doc. 1 1 1 1 RAFAEL DAVID SHERMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, YAHOO!

More information

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 238 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 238 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 8 Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Plaintiffs,

More information

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 207 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 207 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 3:17-cv-04934-VC Document 207 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Plaintiff, Case No. 17-cv-04929-VC v. CHEVRON CORP., et al.,

More information

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 121 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:17-cv MJP Document 121 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 6 Case :-cv-0-mjp Document Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 0 RYAN KARNOSKI, et al. Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al. Defendants. STATE OF WASHINGTON,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT AND PORT JEFFERSON STEAMBOAT COMPANY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 3:03 CV 599 (CFD) - against - BRIDGEPORT PORT AUTHORITY, July 13, 2010

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:14-cv-09281-PSG-SH Document 34 Filed 04/02/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:422 Present: The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge Wendy Hernandez Deputy Clerk Attorneys Present for

More information

Case3:12-cv MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5

Case3:12-cv MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5 Case3:12-cv-00240-MEJ Document5 Filed01/18/12 Page1 of 5 JERROLD ABELES (SBN 138464) Abelesierr a)arentfox.com DAVID G. AYLES SBN 208112) Ba les.david a)arentfox.com A ENT FOX LLP 555 West Fifth Street,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) and ) ) SIERRA CLUB, ) No. 4:11 CV 77 RWS ) Plaintiff-Intervenor, ) ) vs. ) ) AMEREN

More information

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8 Case 2:16-cv-00285-SWS Document 129 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 8 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General MARISSA PIROPATO, Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS, et al. CV 16-21-GF-BMM Plaintiffs, vs. U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an

More information

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:16-cv-02113-JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AARP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Case No.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Case: 10-1215 Document: 1265178 Filed: 09/10/2010 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, et al., ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 10-1131

More information

Case 1:15-cv IMK Document 32 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 514

Case 1:15-cv IMK Document 32 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 514 Case 1:15-cv-00110-IMK Document 32 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 514 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. // CIVIL

More information

Case4:12-cv PJH Document22-2 Filed07/23/12 Page1 of 8. Exhibit B

Case4:12-cv PJH Document22-2 Filed07/23/12 Page1 of 8. Exhibit B Case:-cv-0-PJH Document- Filed0// Page of Exhibit B Case Case:-cv-0-PJH :-cv-0000-jls-rbb Document- Filed0// 0// Page of of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LIBERTY MEDIA

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1381 Document #1668276 Filed: 03/28/2017 Page 1 of 12 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) STATE OF NORTH

More information

Case 7:14-cv O Document 57 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 996

Case 7:14-cv O Document 57 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 996 Case 7:14-cv-00087-O Document 57 Filed 01/26/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 996 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION NEWCO ENTERPRISES, LLC, v. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

More information

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 82 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 82 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 6 Case 3:14-cv-01279-BR Document 82 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 6 Brenna K. Legaard, OSB #001658 Email: blegaard@schwabe.com Jeffrey S. Eden, OSB #851903 Email: jeden@schwabe.com SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s. Case :-cv-0-jak -JEM Document #:0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JONATHAN BIRDT, Plaintiff/s, v. CHARLIE BECK, et al., Defendant/s. Case No. LA CV-0

More information

COVER SHEET for PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF FILED FEBRUARY 13, 2012 IN THE PACIFIC DAWN CASE

COVER SHEET for PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF FILED FEBRUARY 13, 2012 IN THE PACIFIC DAWN CASE Agenda Item F.1.d Supplemental Public Comment 2 March 2012 COVER SHEET for PLAINTIFFS REPLY BRIEF FILED FEBRUARY 13, 2012 IN THE PACIFIC DAWN CASE This supplemental public comment is provided in its entirety

More information

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10 Case :0-cv-0-RLH -GWF Document Filed 0// Page of 0 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 0 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 Tel: (0) 0-0

More information

Case 2:12-cv JFC Document 152 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:12-cv JFC Document 152 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:12-cv-00207-JFC Document 152 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GENEVA COLLEGE; WAYNE L. HEPLER; THE SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY,

More information

Case 3:15-cv BTM-BLM Document 6 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:15-cv BTM-BLM Document 6 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 7 Case :-cv-0-btm-blm Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, v. Plaintiff, JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address..., Defendant. Case

More information

Case 2:08-cv GAF-AJW Document 253 Filed 01/06/2009 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:08-cv GAF-AJW Document 253 Filed 01/06/2009 Page 1 of 6 Case :0-cv-00-GAF-AJW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 GLASER, WEIL, FINK, JACOBS, & SHAPIRO, LLP Patricia L. Glaser (0 Kevin J. Leichter ( pglaser@chrisglase.com kleichter@chrisglase.com 00 Constellation

More information

) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants, ) Nominal Defendant.

) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants, ) Nominal Defendant. Case :-cv-0-gpc-ksc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 ANDREW CALCATERRA, derivatively on behalf of BOFI HOLDING, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA and BOFI HOLDING, INC.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH PLAINTIFFS V. NO. 1:06cv1080-LTS-RHW STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, FORENSIC

More information

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY PENDING SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS Case 1:17-cv-00289-RBJ Document 30 Filed 06/22/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-289-RBJ ZAKARIA HAGIG, v. Plaintiff,

More information

EXHIBIT E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EXHIBIT E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :0-cv--NG :0-cv-00-L-AJB Document - Filed 0//0 0/0/0 Page of 0 MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY, L.P., a California limited partnership; WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC., a Delaware corporation; and SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,

More information

Case 1:08-cv RMU Document 53 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:08-cv RMU Document 53 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:08-cv-00380-RMU Document 53 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPALACHIAN VOICES, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 08-0380 (RMU) : v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BARBARA GRUTTER, vs. Plaintiff, LEE BOLLINGER, et al., Civil Action No. 97-CV-75928-DT HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN Defendants. and

More information