IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) INTERNATIONAL FERRO METALS (SA) THE MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY INSPECTORATE,
|
|
- Jessica Harper
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) Not Reportable Case No.J1673/13 In the matter between: INTERNATIONAL FERRO METALS (SA) Applicant (PROPRIETORY) LIMITED And THE MINISTER OF MINERAL RESOURCES First Respondent THE HONOURABLE MS S SHABANGU N.O. THE MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY INSPECTORATE, THE CHIEF INSPECTOR OF MINES, MR D MSISA N.O. THE PRINCIPAL INSPECTOR, NORTH WEST REGION, Second Respondent Third Respondent Fourth Respondent MR M.H. MOTHIBA N.O. THE INSPECTOR OF MINES, MR O TLHAPI N.O. THE NATIONAL UNION OF MINE WORKERS Fifth Respondent Sixth Respondent THE NATIONAL UNION OF METAL WORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA Seventh Respondent Heard: 25 June 2014 Delivered: 21 January 2015
2 2 JUDGEMENT SHAI AJ Introduction [1] This is an application by the Applicant in terms of which it seeks the following order: Part A (1) that the rules relating to forms of and services as required in accordance with the provisions of Rule 7 of the Rules of conduct of proceedings in the Labour Court be dispensed with and that the matter be heard as one of urgency, (2) Suspending the operation of the Fifth Respondent s instruction dated 26 July 2013 in terms of Section 54(1)(a) of the mine Health and Safety Act No.29 of 1996 ( the MHSA )(the Section 54 instruction)(a copy of which is attached to the founding affidavit marked FA pending the final determination of an appeal against the section 54 instruction to the third respondent as contemplated in section 57 (1) of the MHSA; and 2.2. pending the final determination of the relief sought in Part B hereof; (3) in the alternative to prayer 2 above, suspending the operation of the Section 54 instruction (a copy of which is attached to the founding affidavit marked FA1 and declaring that the relief set out herein will operate with immediate effect as a rule nisi pending the return thereof;
3 directing that any of the respondents who wish to oppose the rule nisi may anticipate its return date on at least 48 hours notice to other parties to this participation; 3.3. calling upon the respondents to show cause on or before a date to be determined by the Registrar as to why the rule nisi should not be confirmed; and such respondents who oppose the relief sought in Part A hereto should not be ordered to pay the costs of this portion of the application, jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved; (4) costs of suit against such respondents who oppose the relief sought in Part A hereto, jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved; PART B (5) declaring the second respondent s enforcement guideline issued by the third respondent ( the Guideline ) as is required in terms of section 49 (6) of the MHSA and as a consequence setting aside the Guideline; and 5.2. interdicting the respondents forthwith from relying on the Guideline in the enforcement of the provisions of the MHSA and in particular, the issuing of any instructions pursuant to section 54(1) of the MHSA; (6) in the alternative to prayer 5 above declaring paragraph 7.4. of the Guideline dealing with the purpose of halting mining operations (the directive ) to be unlawful in that it is inconsistent with and ultra vires the provisions of section 54(1) of the MHSA; and/or it unfairly and unlawfully limits the discretion of an inspector of mines as contemplated in section 54(1); 6.2. declaring annexure 1 to the Guideline, which document is incorporated by reference in the directive and which is in practice used by the respondents as DMR235 ( DMR235 ) to issue instructions contemplated in section 54(1) of the MHSA, to be unlawful in that-
4 it is inconsistent with the provisions of section 54(1) of the MHSA; and it unfairly and unlawfully limits the discretion of an inspector of mines as contemplated in section 54(1); 6.3. interdicting the respondents forthwith from using form DMR235, or any other document, in the exercise of an inspector of mines discretion to issue any instruction as contemplated in section 54(1) of the MHSA, which prescribes partial or total halting of mining operation upon an inspector of mines having reason to believe that any occurrence, practice or condition poses an actual or potential danger to the health and safety of any person working at such mining operations; and prescribes the weighing of historical data by an inspector of mines in either determining the actual or potential danger, or the determination of an appropriate instruction to address such actual or potential danger within the meaning of section 54(1) of the MHSA; 6.4. directing the third respondent to amend the Guideline to remove any reference to the directive and DMR235; to publish the amended Guideline in the Gazette as contemplated in section 49(6) of the MHSA within 30 days from date of such order, alternatively, within such time period as this Honourable Court may direct; and to communicate such amendment to the Guideline in writing to all officers, administrators and inspectors of mines appointed by and/or employed within the second respondent upon the amended Guideline being gazetted; (7) directing that an instruction partially and completely halt any mining operations within the contemplation of section 54(1) of the MHSA should not be imposed unless an inspector of mines has considered imposing less invasive and appropriate instructions in the circumstances to address the actual or potential danger;
5 has in the circumstances determined such less invasive instructions to be inappropriate or ineffective to address such actual or potential danger; and 7.3. has communicated his reasons for rejecting such less invasive instructions in writing to the person(s) appointed by the applicant as the employer representative in terms of section 4(1), alternatively, the manager appointed in terms of section 3(1)(a) of the MHSA and who is responsible for the particular mining operations to be affected by the instruction; (8) directing the third respondent to communicate the terms of this order in writing to all officers, administrators and inspectors of mines appointed by and/or employed within the second respondent within 7 days from such order, alternatively, within such tie period as this Honourable Court may direct; (9) costs of suit against such respondents who oppose this application, jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved; (10) further and/or alternative relief. [2] Only Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Respondents oppose the application. [3] Part A was settled by parties and same made an order of court. [4] What remain to be determined are issues pertaining to Part B. [5] Further that, at the beginning of the proceedings the Applicant abandoned prayers The Facts [6] The Applicant is a company duly incorporated in terms of the laws of the Republic of South Africa with its principal place of business at Buffelsfontein, 465 J4, in the district of Mooinooi. [7] The Applicants operate a chrome mine with a ferrochrome smelter within its mining operations. [8] The Applicant is a holder of a mining licence under Mining Licence number ML88/2003 to mine chrome seams and platinum group of metals on certain
6 6 portions of the farm Buffelsfontein 465 J4( the Mining Right ). The Mining Right was issued on the 22 December 2003 to Transvaal Ferro-Chrome SA Limited under the (now repeated) Minerals Act. Transvaal Ferro-Chrome SA Limited was the predecessor of the Applicant and its name was changed to that of the Applicant. The company was also converted from a public company to a private company. [9] The Applicant has applied to the Department of Minerals Resources ( DMR ) for the conversion of the Mining Right to a new order right as contemplated in Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act No.28 of 2002 ( the MPRDA ), which conversion has been granted, but not yet executed as a new order right. The execution of the said right is imminent. [10] The Applicant is therefore the owner and the employer within the meaning ascribed thereto in terms of the MHSA and bears the responsibility for health and safety of all persons working at its mining operations as circumscribed in Section 2 of the MHSA and has made the necessary requisite statutory, regulatory and discretionary appointments of responsible persons as contemplated in MHSA. [11] The Fifth Respondent issued an instruction to the Applicant on 26 July 2013 within the meaning of Section 54(1)(a) of the MHSA. [12] The Applicant contended that the said Section 54 instruction required the Applicant to halt its operations at its Ferrochrome smelter which took effect at 16h00 on the 26 July 2013, with a limited indulgence by the Fourth Respondent for the Applicant s furnaces to be shut down by 20h00 on 26 July [13] On the other hand it was contended for the Respondent that it is not correct that the instruction required the Applicant to halt its operations at its Ferrochrome smelter but that the instruction required the Applicant to review the carbon monoxide gas procedure which was incorrectly set at above legal limits to the detriment of the employees health and well-being and that until that is done, the applicant should withdraw employees who are employed at the CO designated areas, including employees working at sinter screens and
7 7 the bunker tunnel. The said instruction was lawful, so it was argued for the Respondents. [14] The Applicant contended further that Section 54 should not have been issued for reasons that will follow below, hence the relief sought under paragraph 1 above. On the other hand it was contended for the Respondents that it is incorrect that Section 54 should not have been issued, the only instance when Section 54 instruction ought not to be issued is when there is compliance with the provisions of MHSA. Further that since the Applicant admitted that it had not complied and acceded to taking remedial steps it is not understandable why Section 54 ought not to have been issued. The Respondents view is that the Applicant should have applied to the Chief Inspector. [15] It must be noted that Part A was sought as an urgent relief whereas Part B was not sought urgently as it takes the form of a review of the conduct of the Respondents. As I have indicated above part A has been sorted between parties. The nature of Section 54 instruction [16] With regard to Section 54 Instructions the Fifth Respondent found the following transgressions: Inadequate Carbon Monoxide gas procedures (alarm levels set at above 100pm and evacuation at 200ppm; MHSA schedule 22 0 EL S (the first transgression) Poor training of employees on CO alarm levels and evacuation procedure (MHSA sec 10(1) ) ( the second transgression ) Excessive dust observed at screen plant and the banker tunnel (CV 604) MHSA SECS (1) ( the third transgression ) No monitoring programme/annual texting of self-contained selfrescuers MHSA Reg 16.4.(1) (the fourth transgression ). [17] In response to these transections the Fifth Respondent gave the following instructions.
8 In respect of the first transection, the Applicant was instructed to review the CO Gas Procedure and occupational exposure limits; In respect of the second and third transgression, the applicant was instructed to withdraw all employees working at the sinter screen and the bunker tunnel and then to retrain these employees in respect of the revised carbon monoxide procedure, and that such training must involve an accredited independent trainer; In respect of the fourth transection, the Applicant was instructed to comply with MHSA Regulation 16.4.(1) which requires the Applicant to annually test its self-contained self-rescuers. [18] Further that, the Applicant contended that the removal of employees in compliance with the Section 54 instruction from carbon monoxide designated areas as outlined above had the effect that none of the areas designated as carbon monoxide risk areas as carbon monoxide risk areas can be operated e.g. furnace building and casting bay had to be shut down on withdrawal of the employees. [19] It was contended that the Applicant operated two submerged area furnaces which operated on a continuous basis and the section 54 instruction had the effect of or resulted with the complete cessation of the operations at the Applicant s ferro-chrome smelter. [20] On the other hand the Respondents contended that as long as the Applicant had not complied with the instruction as outlined, the Applicant remain in breach and Respondents are entitled to have the employees withdrawn from the said areas. The guideline [21] The said Section 54 instruction was issued on or contained in a DMR 235 which a pro forma form being an annexure to enforcement guideline issued by the Acting Chief inspector of mines Mr D. Mziza, Third Respondent. [22] The said guideline appears to have been issued in terms of Section 49(6) of the MHSA. Section 49 (6) of MHSA requires that such guideline be gazetted.
9 9 It is common cause between the parties that the said guideline was not gazetted as required. [23] The Applicant prays that the said guideline be set aside due to the failure by the Respondent to gazette the said guideline since the Respondent relied in the main on the guideline in effecting the Section 54 instruction. Further that, it was contended for the Applicant that the said guideline and annexure DMR 235 introduces the consideration of historical data in determining the Section 54 instruction thereby taking away the inspector s discretion in deciding whether to halt the operation or not. On the other hand it was contended for Respondents that the guideline neither prescribes nor uses the historical data in determining the actual or potential danger. Further that, that the inspectors do not rely on the guideline as such and could deviate therefrom. [24] Section 49(6) no 29 of Mine Health and Safety Act 1996 provides as follows: The Chief Inspector of Mines must issue guidelines by notice in the Gazette. It is common cause between parties that the relevant guidelines were not gazetted as prescribed above. [25] Section 54 of the Mine and Safety Act 29 Mine Health and Safety Act 1996 provides as follows: (1) If an inspector has a reason to believe that any occurrence, practice or condition at a mine endangers or may endanger the health or safety of any person at the mine, the inspector may give any instruction necessary to protect the Health or safety of persons at the mine, including but not limited to an instruction that:- a) operations at the mine or a part of the mine be halted; b) the performance of any act or practice at the mine or a part of the mine be suspended or halted, and may place conditions on the performance of that act or practice; c) the employer must take the steps set out in the instruction, within the specified period, to rectify the occurrence, practice or condition; or
10 10 d) all affected persons, other than those who are required to assist in taking steps referred to in paragraph (c), be moved to safety. (2) An instruction under subsection (1) must be given to the employer or a person designated by the employer or, in their absence, the most senior employee available at the mine to when the instructions can be issued. (3). [26] The objective of the guideline is stated as follows: The objective of this document is to provide guidance for inspectors, industry and public on the enforcement measures used by the department to enforce the legislation, particularly the principle according to which the inspector s powers to deal with dangerous conditions and ensuring compliance should be exercised. [27] The purpose of the guideline is stated as follows: This document outlines the guidelines upon which enforcement decisions are made and aims to achieve the following: - appropriate and timely enforcement interventions - consistency in the enforcement of the MHSA by Regional offices of the inspectorate; - a structured frame work for decisions concerning the levels of enforcement. [28] The guideline promotes the following enforcement principles: consistency, impartiality and non-discriminatory: enforcement action must be fair, impartial, consistency and equitable, taking into account the attitude, towards health and safety and actions of alleged offender and any history of previous incidents and breaches of the MHSA. Enforcement actions should result in similar outcomes in similar circumstance. [29] Attached to the Guideline is DMR 235 which records the factors to consider as follows: - Does the transgressions endanger or may endanger health or safety of persons. - Any similar or related transgression detected in the past 12 months.
11 11 - How many injury/ accidents related to this transgression were reported in the past 12 months. - How many fatal accidents related to this transgression were reported in the past 12 months. If the answer is yes to the question, the risk is rated 5 and if the answer is yes to question 2, 3, and for the risk is rated at 3. [30] What is clear is that questions 2, 3 and 4 require historical data to be taken into account before scoring the transaction and deciding on an instruction to halt the operations. [31] I indicated above that it is common cause between the parties that the Guideline was not gazetted. What is also clear is that the guideline does not comply with Section 49 (6) of Act 29 of 1996 as amended in so far as publication is concerned. [32] The Respondent contended that Guideline neither binds nor takes away the discretion of the inspectors when they issue section 54 instruction. [33] I have shown above the objectives, purpose and principles promoted by the Guidelines and the usage of the annexure thereto, DMR 235. It is clear from this that the usage of the Guideline affects the rights and interests of those these measures are taken against. I see no reason why the Respondents contend that the said Guideline is not binding and may be deviated from. If one looks at the wording and the application thereof by the Respondents this militates against the above contention. Since its application affects the interests and rights as aforesaid it is critical that the said Guideline be compliant with the law, namely Section 49 (6) with regard to publication. The wording of the said section suggests that it is peremptory that the guideline be gazetted. This has not been done. [34] In the premise I make the following order: a) The Guideline as contained at page 111 of index-volume 2 marked FA 13 is set aside.
12 12 b) The Respondents are forthwith interdicted from relying on the Guideline in the enforcement of the provisions of the MHSA and in particular, the issuing of any instructions pursuant to Section 54(1) of the MHSA. c) Second to Fifth Respondents are ordered to pay the costs of suit jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved. Shai AJ Judge of the Labour Court of South Africa
13 13 Appearances For the Applicant: Instructed by: Advocate A J Eyles Hogan Lovells SA For the Respondent: Instructed by: Advocate Mokhari SC The State Attorney
Whilst employers are primarily responsible for providing safe and healthy workplaces;
1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Purpose 3. The Principles of Enforcement 4. Enforcement Measures 5. Information and Education 6. Withdrawal of Exemption, Permission or Approval 7. Statutory Instruction
More informationPowers of the inspectorate to close a working place
Powers of the inspectorate to close a working place Mine and Occupational Health and Safety 2010 Portions compiled by Willem Le Roux a director of Brink Cohen Le Roux Inc. Updated, supplied and presented
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY
Reportable: YES/ NO Circulate to Judges: YES/ NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/ NO Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES/ NO In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION,
More informationNOTICE 1103 OF 2013 DEPARTMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT, 1996 (ACT NO 29 OF 1996)
STAATSKOERANT, 15 NOVEMBER 2013 No. 37027 3 GENERAL NOTICE NOTICE 1103 OF 2013 DEPARTMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT, 1996 (ACT NO 29 OF 1996) PUBLICATION OF AND INVITATION TO COMMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) CASE NO: In the matter between: MINISTER OF POLICE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO: MINISTER OF POLICE NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No 427/96 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In die matter of: GNH OFFICE AUTOMATION C.C. First Appellant NAUGIS INVESTMENTS C.C. Second Appellant and PROVINCIAL
More informationTHE SUSPENSION OR CANCELLATION OF CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY
1 THE SUSPENSION OR CANCELLATION OF CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY PRESENTED BY EDWARD JAMES Associate Brink Cohen le Roux Inc. BCLR Place 85 Central Street Houghton, Johannesburg Tel: (011) 242 8000 Fax:
More informationGOVERNANCE OF CANADIAN PUBLIC TRUSTS
GOVERNANCE OF CANADIAN PUBLIC TRUSTS CCGG has identified that Canadian public entities structured as trusts (including income trusts and REITs) do not have uniform provisions in their constating documents
More informationMINE HEALTH AND SAFETY AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 00000 of 00????????
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DENGETENGE HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case CCT 39/13 [2013] ZACC 48 DENGETENGE HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD Applicant and SOUTHERN SPHERE MINING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD RHODIUM REEFS LTD
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT BARBERTON MINES (PTY) LTD
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J1780/14 In the matter between: BARBERTON MINES (PTY) LTD Applicant and ASSOCIATION OF MINEWORKERS AND CONSTRUCTION UNION
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) MOGALE, DAISY DIBUSENG PAULINAH...First Applicant
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO:83409/2015 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... DATE
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT Reportable Case no. D552/12 In the matter between: HEALTH AND OTHER SERVICES PERSONNEL TRADE UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA TM SOMERS First
More informationBAREKI & ANOTHER V GENCOR LTD & OTHERS 2006 (1) SA 432 (T)
BAREKI & ANOTHER V GENCOR LTD & OTHERS 2006 (1) SA 432 (T) Importance This case is notorious in environmental circles for being the judgment that failed to confirm the retrospective application of s 28
More informationHOW TO DEAL WITH ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF LAND
ILLEGAL LAND OCCUPATION HOW TO DEAL WITH ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF LAND ILLEGAL LAND OCCUPATION The purpose of the documents is to make a clear distinction between: Unlawful access to property and squatting,
More informationKuria Greens Limited v Registrar of Titles & another [2011] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI PETITION NO.
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI PETITION NO. 107 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLE 19, 22, 23, 40, 47, 50 & 64 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA IN THE MATTER OF: THE GOVERNMENT LANDS
More information(11 February to date) NATIONAL FORESTS ACT 84 OF (Gazette No , Notice No dated 30 October 1998)
(11 February 2005 - to date) NATIONAL FORESTS ACT 84 OF 1998 (Gazette No. 19408, Notice No. 1388 dated 30 October 1998) ASSIGNMENT OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL FORESTS ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 84 OF
More informationNot reportable 19 March 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
Not reportable 19 March 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA [NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA] In the matter between: CASE NO: 25382/2008 TECMED AFRICA (PTY) LTD Applicant and MINISTER OF HEALTH CANCARE
More informationOCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT NO 85 OF 1993
REVISION No.: 0 Page 1 of 23 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT NO 85 OF 1993 CONTENTS CLICK ON PAGE NUMBER TO GO TO SECTION OR REGULATION AND USE WEB TOOLBAR TO NAVIGATE Pre-amble 3 Section 7 3 Section
More information(HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO: D633/11 SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN AND MINING INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD ( SAWIMIH ) JUDGMENT
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO: D633/11 In the matter between: NOLUTHANDO LANGENI Applicant and SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN AND MINING INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS (PTY) LTD ( SAWIMIH
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: JS 1505/16 In the matter between: MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Applicant and FUSI JOHN MOTLOUNG SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT,
More informationPROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS ORDINANCE CHAPTER 50 SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 51. Corporate Practices (Registration) Rules
PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS ORDINANCE CHAPTER 50 SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 51 Corporate Practices (Registration) Rules Authority and Commencement 1. These Rules are made by the Council (the Council) of the Hong
More information(28 February 2014 to date) FINANCIAL ADVISORY AND INTERMEDIARY SERVICES ACT 37 OF 2002
(28 February 2014 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 28 February 2014, i.e. the date of commencement of the Financial Services Laws General Amendment Act 45 of 2013 to date] FINANCIAL
More informationLABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL (As proposed by the Portfolio Committee on Labour (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill) (MINISTER OF LABOUR)
More informationNew South Wales. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT 1983 No 20. Justices Legislation Amendment (Appeals) Act 1998 No 137
New South Wales OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT 1983 No 20 CURRENT AS AT 3 JULY 2000 COVER SHEET (ONLY) MODIFIED 24 AUGUST 2001 INCLUDES AMENDMENTS (SINCE REPRINT No 6 OF 20.1.1999) BY: Justices Legislation
More informationOBO RICHARD CHARLES MATOLA MBOMBELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: J2566/14 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION OBO RICHARD CHARLES MATOLA Applicant
More informationCOMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT
New Mexico State Land Office SHORT TERM Oil, Gas, and Minerals Division Revised Feb. 2013 COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT Online Version STATE OF NEW MEXICO ) ss) COUNTY OF) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LABOUR OF SOUTH AFRICA COURT, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT NATIONAL PETROLEUM REFINERS (PTY) LIMITED
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LABOUR OF SOUTH AFRICA COURT, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: JR2799/11 In the matter between: NATIONAL PETROLEUM REFINERS (PTY) LIMITED Applicant and NATIONAL BARGAINING
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN) ESKOM HOLDINGS (SOC) LIMITED NOTICE OF MOTION: URGENT APPLICATION
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN) In the matter between: MATSHELA MOSES KOKO CASE NO: J 200/18 Applicant and ESKOM HOLDINGS (SOC) LIMITED Respondent NOTICE OF MOTION: URGENT APPLICATION
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
Of interest to other Judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, In the matter between: HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case no: J1746/18 JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN BUS SERVICES SOC LTD Applicant and DEMOCRATIC MUNCIPAL
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
In the matter between: THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOT REPORTABLE Case no: 513/2013 ANSAFON (PTY) LTD DIAMOND CORE RESOURCES (PTY) LTD FIRST APPELLANT SECOND APPELLANT and THE
More informationOil, Gas, & Minerals Division
NM State Land Office Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT ONLINE Version KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: STATE/STATE OR STATE/FEE Revised. 201 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ) SS) COUNTY OF ) THAT
More informationMINE HEALTH AND SAFETY AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY AMENDMENT BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Minerals and Energy (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill) (MINISTER
More informationCoal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999
Queensland Coal Mining Safety and Health Act 1999 Reprinted as in force on 14 December 2007 Reprint No. 2B This reprint is prepared by the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel Warning This reprint
More informationOccupational Safety and Health Act 1984
Western Australia Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 As at 29 Nov 2012 Version 07-e0-01 Western Australia Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 CONTENTS Part I Preliminary 1. Short title 2 2. Commencement
More informationPROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS ORDINANCE CHAPTER 50 SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 51. Corporate Practices (Registration) Rules
Authority and Commencement PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS ORDINANCE CHAPTER 50 SECTIONS 17, 18 AND 51 Corporate Practices (Registration) Rules 1. These Rules are made by the Council (the "Council") of the Hong
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHASWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
CASE NO : 265/02 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHASWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In thematterbetween: TSHEPO JOHN MAAGA APPLICANT and BRIAN ST CLAIR COOPER NO BLESSING GCABASHE NO FERDINAND ZONDAGH
More informationThe Mines Regulation Act
The Mines Regulation Act being Chapter 271 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1940 (effective February 1, 1941). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated for convenience
More informationUpdate No (Issued 14 December 2018) Document Reference and Title Instructions Explanations. revised page i.
Update No. 222 (Issued 14 December 2018) Document Reference and Title Instructions Explanations VOLUME I Contents of Volume I STATEMENT Statement 1.102 Corporate Practices (Registration) Rules Statement
More informationBYLAWS OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED. A Delaware Corporation (Effective as of August 15, 2017) ARTICLE I OFFICES, CORPORATE SEAL
BYLAWS OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED A Delaware Corporation (Effective as of August 15, 2017) ARTICLE I OFFICES, CORPORATE SEAL Section 1.01. Registered Office. The address of the corporation s registered
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT FREE STATE GAMBLING AND LIQUOR AUTHORITY FREE STATE LIQUOR AND GAMBLING AUTHORITY
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Of interest to other judges Case no: J773/15 In the matter between: FREE STATE GAMBLING AND LIQUOR AUTHORITY Applicant and COMMISSION
More informationNew Mexico State Land Office Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised Feb. 2013
New Mexico State Land Office OG-CO2 Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised Feb. 2013 COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT ONLINE Version KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: STATE OF NEW MEXICO ) COUNTY OF ) THAT THIS
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, PORT ELIZABETH JUDGMENT
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, PORT ELIZABETH JUDGMENT Not Reportable CASE NO: P 322/15 In the matter between ANDILE FANI Applicant and First Respondent EXECUTIVE MAYOR,
More informationMASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT. Entered into between LANDYNAMIX CC. Registration number: 2006/140439/23. Hereinafter duly represented by PETER CLARKE
MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT Entered into between LANDYNAMIX CC Registration number: 2006/140439/23 Hereinafter duly represented by PETER CLARKE In his capacity as the EXECUTIVE MEMBER Duly authorised thereto
More informationMOLEFI THOABALA INCORPORATED
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Case No.: 2289/2013 MOLEFI THOABALA INCORPORATED Applicant and MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN First Respondent MUNICIPALITY THE
More informationFinancial Advisory and intermediary Service ACT 37 of (English text signed by the President)
Financial Advisory and intermediary Service ACT 37 of 2002 [ASSENTED TO 15 NOVEMBER 2002] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 15 NOVEMBER 2002] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the President) Regulations
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MINERAL AND ENERGY AFFAIRS JUDGMENT. [2] The Court was also faced with an application to intervene by the Land Claims
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NUMBER: LCC 37/03 Held at CAPE TOWN on 14 June 2007 Before Gildenhuys J and Pienaar AJ Decided on 14 August 2007 In the matter between: MACCSAND CC Applicant
More information1. The name of the society shall be THE POLOKWANE SOCIETY OF ADVOACTES (hereinafter referred to as the Society ).
CONSTITUTION OF THE POLOKWANE SOCIETY OF ADVOCATES (AS ADOPTED AT A SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS HELD ON 16 OCTOBER 2014, AT BLUE VALLEY COUNTRY CLUB, MIDRAND) I. NAME AND OBJECTS 1. The name of
More informationOil, Gas, & Minerals Division Revised March 2017 COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT
NM State Land Office Oil, Gas, & Minerals Division STATE/STATE OR STATE/FEE Revised March 2017 COMMUNITIZATION AGREEMENT ONLINE Version KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Well Name: STATE OF NEW MEXICO )
More informationNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT LAWS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 76); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More information(1 May 2008 to date) ELECTRICITY REGULATION ACT 4 OF 2006
(1 May 2008 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 1 May 2008, i.e. the date of commencement of the Electricity Regulation Amendment Act 28 of 2007 - to date] ELECTRICITY REGULATION
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT KHULULEKILE LAWRENCE MCHUBA PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J 392/14 In the matter between KHULULEKILE LAWRENCE MCHUBA Applicant and PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY
More informationDainfern Homeowners Association (Association incorporated under Section 21) ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT ESTATE AGENTS
Dainfern Homeowners Association (Association incorporated under Section 21) ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT For ESTATE AGENTS 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT entered into by and between THE DAINFERN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
More informationTrade Disputes Act Ch. 48:02
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION VOLUME: X TRADE DISPUTES CHAPTER: 48:02 PART I Preliminary 1. Short title 2. Interpretation PART II Establishment of panel and procedure for settlement of trade disputes
More information(EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) CASE NO.: 812/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) CASE NO.: 812/2012 In the matter between: CLIMAX CONCRETE PRODUCTS CC t/a CLIMAX CONCRETE PRODUCTS CC Registration Number CK 1985/014313/23
More informationELECTRICITY REGULATIONS FOR COMPULSORY NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR RETICULATION SERVICES (GN R773 in GG of 18 July 2008)
ELECTRICITY REGULATION ACT 4 OF 2006 [ASSENTED TO 27 JUNE 2006] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 AUGUST 2006] (except s. 34: 1 December 2004) (English text signed by the President) as amended by Electricity Regulation
More information13 Procedural Rules for Fast Track Proceedings
13 Procedural Rules for Fast Track Proceedings 13.1 General 13.1.1 Fast Track Proceedings shall proceed according to the provisions of this Protocol, including the general procedural rules at Section 10
More information11. Absence of Chief Inspector and Deputy Chief Inspector of Coal Mines
- As at 23 December 2006 - Act 67 of 1982 TABLE OF PROVISIONS TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 - PRELIMINARY 1. Name of Act 2. Commencement 3. (Repealed) 4. Act applies only to coal mines except where otherwise
More informationIn the matter between: -
IN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, PRETORIA (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES (3) REVISED. In the matter between: - CASE NO.: 2015/80133 JEREMIAH PHEHELLO
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN CASE NO.: C611/07
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN CASE NO.: C611/07 In the matter between : SAMWU (OBO M. ABRAHAMS & 106 OTHERS) Applicant and CITY OF CAPE TOWN Respondent JUDGMENT [1] This is an application
More information7 01 THE WORKFORCE GROUP (PTY) (LTD) A...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA Case number 57110/2011 In the matter of THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR THE COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER First Applicant
More informationWhistleblower Protection Act 10 of 2017 (GG 6450) ACT
(GG 6450) This Act has been passed by Parliament, but it has not yet been brought into force. It will come into force on a date set by the Minister in the Government Gazette. ACT To provide for the establishment
More informationMETHOD OF INQUIRY INTO ALLEGED IMPROPER CONDUCT: ENGINEERING PROFESSION OF SOUTH AFRICA ACT, 1990 (ACT NO. 114 OF 1990) SCHEDULE
Government Gazette No. 18454, 28 November 1997 Page 1 BOARD NOTICE 106 OF 1997 Engineering Council of South Africa METHOD OF INQUIRY INTO ALLEGED IMPROPER CONDUCT: ENGINEERING PROFESSION OF SOUTH AFRICA
More information21:03 PREVIOUS CHAPTER
TITLE 21 Chapter 21:03 TITLE 21 PREVIOUS CHAPTER GOLD TRADE ACT Acts 19/1940, 40/1952, 12/1954, 25/1956 (s. 15), 14/1962 (s. 2), 19/1963 (s. 12), 10/1964, 31/1964, 18/1965 (s. 32), 6/1967 (s. 15), 11/1968
More informationSIBUSISO M SIGUDO THE MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION THE CHIEF DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION (NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND ASSESSMENT)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2016/19144 (1) (2) OF I ISITFIREST TO OTHER4IJ (3) REVISED: - 3- Ncvemer 2017 In the matter between: SIBUSISO M SIGUDO Applicant
More informationALLEN COUNTY CODE TITLE 6 - BUILDING DEPARTMENT 6-2 ARTICLE 2 - BUILDING CODE OF ALLEN COUNTY, INDIANA TITLE. Chapter 2. AUTHORITY
ALLEN COUNTY CODE TITLE 6 - BUILDING DEPARTMENT 6-2 ARTICLE 2 - BUILDING CODE OF ALLEN COUNTY, INDIANA 6-2-1 Chapter 1. TITLE This ordinance, and all ordinances supplemental or amendatory hereto, shall
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN SIVAPRAGASEN KRISHANAMURTHI NAIDU
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL
More informationIN THE STUDENT COURT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH (HELD IN STELLENBOSCH) 30 August In the matter between: Kerwin Cameron Jacobs
IN THE STUDENT COURT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF STELLENBOSCH (HELD IN STELLENBOSCH) 30 August 2017 In the matter between: Kerwin Cameron Jacobs Applicant And 2016/2017 Huis Visser Primarius 1 st Respondent 2016/2017
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Reportable CASE NO: J20/2010 In the matter between: MOHLOPI PHILLEMON MAPULANE Applicant and MADIBENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY First Respondent ADV VAN
More informationIN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER TRIBUNAL HELD AT CENTURION MOBILE TELEPHONE NETWORKS (PTY) LTD THE NATIONAL CONSUMER COMMISSION
IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER TRIBUNAL HELD AT CENTURION Case No: In The Matter Between: MOBILE TELEPHONE NETWORKS (PTY) LTD Applicant and THE NATIONAL CONSUMER COMMISSION Respondent DATE OF HEARING: 10 and
More information(11 November 1996 to date) OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT 85 OF 1993
(11 November 1996 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 11 November 1996, i.e. the date of commencement of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 to date] OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
More information27626/13-MLS 1 JUDGMENT (GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG)
27626/13-MLS 1 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO: 27626/13 DATE: 2014-03-10 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: No (2) OF INTEREST
More informationOCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT NO. 85 OF 1993
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT NO. 85 OF 1993 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 23 JUNE, 1993] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 JANUARY, 1994] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text signed by the State President)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LESOTHO HELD AT MASERU. and
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LESOTHO HELD AT MASERU C of A (CIV) No 24/2016 CIV/APN/91/2016 DANIEL RANTLE Appellant and METHODIST CHURCH OF SOUTHERN AFRICA First Respondent ZIPHOZIHLE DANIEL SIWA, PRESIDING
More informationBYLAW 906 (2016) WHEREAS AND WHEREAS AND WHEREAS, AND WHEREAS AND WHEREAS AND WHEREAS AND WHEREAS AND WHEREAS
WHEREAS Section 177(2)(a) of the Irrigation Districts Act permits the District to make a bylaw governing the delivery and distribution of water to users; AND WHEREAS the District, pursuant to a bylaw under
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Of interest to other judges Case No: J 580/18 In the matter between: AUBREY NDINANNYI TSHIVHANDEKANO Applicant and MINISTER OF MINERAL RESOURCES THE
More informationTHE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT, 1999 Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Object of Act 4. Interpretation 5. Non-application of Act 6. Act binds the State Arrangement of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA DELETE WHICH IS NOT APPLICABLE [1] REPORTABLE: YES / NO [2] OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES / NO [3] REVISED DATE SIGNATURE
More informationPAIA MANUAL: SA UNDERWRITING AGENCIES (PTY) LTD. SA UNDERWRITING AGENCIES (PTY) LTD (Registration No: 1992/03324/07) Hereafter referred to as SAU
Physical: S.A. Underwriters Place, Bond Street Business Park, Randburg Postal: PO Box 3606, Randburg, 2125 Telephone: 011 777 7200 After hours: 0861 727 253 Fax: 011 777 7345 Email: info@saunderwriters.com
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, IN JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Not reportable THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, IN JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT CASE NO: D 623/14 In the matter between: JUMBO CASH & CARRY (PTY) LTD Applicants and SOUTH AFRICAN COMMERCIAL,
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHNNESBURG)
1 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHNNESBURG) Not Reportable Case No.JR877/12 In the matter between NATIONAL UNION MINEWORKERS First Applicant obo RUTH MASHA and METAL AND ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES
More informationTHE PERSONAL DATA (PROTECTION) BILL, 2013
THE PERSONAL DATA (PROTECTION) BILL, 2013 [Long Title] [Preamble] CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. (1) This Act may be called the Personal Data (Protection) Act, 2013. (2)
More informationANGLOGOLD HEALTH SERVICE (PTY) LTD
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO J1143/99 In the matter between: ANGLOGOLD HEALTH SERVICE (PTY) LTD Applicant and THE NATIONAL UNION OF MINEWORKERS First Respondent THE
More informationGAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 28070/2015 ( 1) REPORT ABLE: YES (2) OF INTEREST TO OT (3) REVISED. ~J.0.Jrq l?.. DATE SIGNATURE In the matter between: JILLIAN
More informationNIGERIAN MINING CORPORATION ACT
NIGERIAN MINING CORPORATION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Establishment of the Nigerian Mining Corporation. 2. Membership. 3. Tenure of office, etc. 4. Functions of the Corporation. 5. Powers of the Corporation.
More informationISLAMABAD, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2010
REGISTERED No. M. 302. L.-7646 The Gazette of Pakistan EXTRAORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISLAMABAD, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2010 PART II Statutory Notification (S.R.O.) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN PAKISTAN
More informationKWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG CASE NO: 8054/2011 In the matter between: ZUBEIR GOOLAM HOOSEN KADWA N.O. LAYLA MAHOMEDY N.O. AHMED YOUSUF KADWA N.O.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between: Case No.: 3048/2015 STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED Plaintiff And JOROY 0004 CC t/a UBUNTU PROCUREM 1 st
More informationSCHEDULE 1 FINANCIAL SECTOR LAWS. (Section 1(1)) Financial Supervision of the Road Accident Fund Act, 1993 (Act No. 8 of 1993)
SCHEDULE 1 FINANCIAL SECTOR LAWS (Section 1(1)) Pension Funds Act, 1956 (Act No. 24 of 1956) Friendly Societies Act, 1956 (Act No. 25 of 1956) Banks Act, 1990 (Act No. 94 of 1990) Financial Services Board
More informationCAPE KILLARNEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD v MAHAMBA AND OTHERS 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Vivier Adcj, Howie JA and Brand AJA
CAPE KILLARNEY PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD v MAHAMBA AND OTHERS 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Citation Case No 495/99 Court Judge 2001 (4) SA 1222 (SCA) Supreme Court of Appeal Heard August 28, 2001 Vivier
More informationCAMBODIA Trademark Law The Law Concerning Marks, Trade Names and Acts of Unfair Competition as amended on February 07, 2002
CAMBODIA Trademark Law The Law Concerning Marks, Trade Names and Acts of Unfair Competition as amended on February 07, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 General Provisions Article 1 Article 2 Article 3
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS DOWDUPONT INC. Incorporated Under The Laws of Delaware EFFECTIVE AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2017
AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF DOWDUPONT INC. Incorporated Under The Laws of Delaware EFFECTIVE AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2017 ARTICLE I CAPITAL STOCK 1.1 Certificates. Shares of the capital stock of DOWDUPONT
More informationSOUTH AFRICA Designs Regulations Government Notice R843 of 2 July 1999 as amended by Government Notice R1182 of 1 December 2006
SOUTH AFRICA Designs Regulations Government Notice R843 of 2 July 1999 as amended by Government Notice R1182 of 1 December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Definitions 1A. Electronic services 2. Office hours
More informationNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT NO. 39 OF 2004
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: AIR QUALITY ACT NO. 39 OF 2004 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 19 FEBRUARY, 2005] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 11 SEPTEMBER, 2005] (Unless otherwise indicated) (English text
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) PATRICK S. MPAKA SIMLINDILE MNAMATHA XOLISA BANTSHI NOLWANDO LITHOLI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, MTHATHA) CASE NO: 3627/2015 In the matter between: PATRICK S. MPAKA SIMLINDILE MNAMATHA XOLISA BANTSHI NOLWANDO LITHOLI 1 ST Applicant 2
More informationEAST SUSSEX FIRE & RESCUE SERVICE PROHIBITION NOTICE
EAST SUSSEX FIRE & RESCUE SERVICE PROHIBITION NOTICE Notice No ESFRS/BH/004/P/16 Notice requiring the use of the premises to be Prohibited or Restricted under Article 31 of the Regulatory Reform (Fire
More informationSHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT. This SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made on this day of.., 20..,
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT This SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made on this day of.., 20.., Between UTTAR PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956,
More informationE/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.3
20 October 2017 Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and
More information