On January 11, 1996 the Plaintiff filed an amended writ of summons. 1. A declaration that a constructive trust exists between
|
|
- Lucas Willis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 '-. ) ' '"'. SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D Suit No. 78? of 1995 BETWEEN: RODNEY JACOB Plaintiff and STANISLAUS MO~ES'IE Defendant Miss F. Byron-Cox for Plaintiff Mr. M. Gordon for Defendant 1996: October 4 and 9 J U D G M E N T MATTHEW J. (In Chambers). On January 11, 1996 the Plaintiff filed an amended writ of summons c l aiming against the Defendant the following reliefs: 1. A declaration that a constructive trust exists between the Defendant and the Plaintiff on his own behalf and on behalf of the heirs of Felicien Alexander with respect to property Block 1456B Parcel No. 1 62; 2. In the alternative on behalf of h imself and the heirs o f Felicien Alexander an overriding interest over Block 1456B Parcel No. 162 under Section 28 of the Land Registration Act, 1984; 3. Rectification of the L~~~ Register Block 1456B Parcel No. 162 aforesaid; 4. General Damages; and 5. The costs hereof. The Defendant entered a conditional appearance on January 15, 1996 upon an order made to this effect on January 12, 1996 but by virtue
2 of the order of the Court it became uncondit fendant did not apply within 14 days to set as s writ. May 17, 1996 Defendant took out a summons 18 e 19 and under the inherent j sdiction of the Court to st out the writ on the ground that it is an abuse t Court or in the al ternati Vi,_; tc... stay the process of action under Order 21 e 5 until after Pl iff ll caused to be paid to the Defendant the costs directed to pa llip Bernadine to the Defendant in Suit 287 of 1992 Court and in suit 9 of 1995 the Court Appeal. Frederick swore to an affidavit in support of sh to draw attention to two paragraphs of summons I t. In paragraph 5 the deponent stated that in High Court t No Phillip Bernadine v. Stanislaus te, iff c aimed title to the same piece of land be s as an heir of Felicien Alexander; and stated: 8 aga "The Plaintiff herein, suing his as an r of Felicien Alexander on his behalf and on behalf of the other heirs, is again putting in issue ts which were dis put in issue in the aforemen oned Suit No. 287 of 1992 and which have been solemnly found against one of rs s capacity as such." May 29, 1996 the Plaintiff filed a summons for j fault of defence under Order 19 Rule 5 of Rules the Supreme Court. case. above represent the material pleadings for the purposes of this SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL Learned Counsel for the Defendant in support of his submission 2
3 tendered a type written document with his skeleton Counsel asked that the matter be thrown out as res j iance was placed on Article 1171 of the l Code whi lows: "The authority of a final judgment (res judicata) presumption incapable contradic on t of which has been the object of the judgment, when founded on the same cause, is between the same par es s. cata. is as ies a t is in the same qualities, and is for same as action adj1:dged upon. " Counsel elaborated on the article by reference to a Treatise on l Law, Volume 2, Part 1 by Marcel Planiol and Faculty of Law of the University of Paris, pages 34 - At page 34 the two essors state: "In order to determine in what cases judicata is opposable to a new demand, three tions of res long been established; it is necessary: (1) that the second t be between the same persons, that it concerns the same object, and ) t it same cause as the rst (Article 1351 " the heading, Identity of Persons, they state "Every action is li gated between defini persons, who are parties to it. The judgment ob of them against the other should not benefit or by one ure third persons, unless case of an amicable arrangement concluded by sue~ persons between themselves in lieu of pleading r respective rights. It follows, therefore that the exception of res judicata, means of which individuals respect the authority or 3
4 presumption of the truth which the law attaches to judgments, cannot be used except for the benefit of a person who was a party to the process, or who is a successor to one of the parties, and against a person who was a par ts of or who is the successor to such party." Under the haading, Identity of object, they state - "It is necessary, between the parties, to res the t of the judgment to that which was the object of litigation, and to leave them to debate tween themselves, their other rights; in a word, to ve judgment an effect limi as to its ect." authors explain the Identity of Cause by stating - "It is quite clear t if I claim of as acquired by purchase, my failure will not prevent me renewing the revindication as a legatee or r of the owner. My second action not '::he same cause as my t. 11 Learned Counsel for the Defendant went on to make a submission ed on what called the public interest princ le. that head he submitted that Court has the power r 18, e 1 and under its inherent j sdiction, to dismiss an act as vexatious and an abuse the process of the Court act ses matters which could and should have been litigated ier proceedings. He cited as authority the case YAT TUNG INVESTMENT CO. LTD. v. DAO HENG BANK LTD. and ANOTHER 1975 A.C. 581 P.C. Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff J.n reply submitted that Parties in the present case are not the same as the Parties the ier suit, No. 287 of She submitted that in the ier case, Phillip Bernadine, the natural son of Muriel Joseph, acted for himself and his claim was based on adverse possession. Counsel submitted the novel proposition that Phillip was claiming adverse 4
5 possession for himself and during s minor years, possession was to be regarded as his possession. llip's claim was against the heirs of Felicien mot said that 's includes his mother. Counsel stated that the present case is a representat act brought by one of the heir~ o~ Felicien exander and so it cannot held that the interest of llip is ical to o Rodney Jacob although admitted that ece f and was same in both actions. Counsel submitted t ses of actions are different. CONCLUSIONS From the pleadings s case it appears Felicien Al r was married to Arcenne Fel ien and they s l namely: (1) Netta Petit Frere; (2) Hortense Detervil (3) St. Martin Felicien; (4) Joseph Felicien; (5) Nemorin Felicien; and (6) Felicien Felicien It must always be noted that this is only a There not been yet any proof of the family tree. the earlier suit Phillip Bernadine, though not an s roots from St. Martin Felicien who would have ir, t s grand father via Amazilta Joseph and her daughter Muriel The pleadings state that Elizabeth Macauldy from whom the Defendant claims was the grand daughter of Joseph Felicien. It is not quite clear from the pleadings how the aintiff this action becomes the lawful great grandson of Felicien Alexander and 5
6 Arcenne Felicien as stated in paragraph 1 of the amended statement o claim, or as an heir of the said Felicien Alexander as stated s affidavit dated July 8, 1996 in opposition to summons to strike out the writ. De Is will be incumbent on him to prove those things if second suit is to succeed. s act But let me de with the summons under Order 18 Rule 19. In t course of ~aking his submissions, very e in the day, 1 Counsel for the Defendant asked to delete from arguments the following words: s let on "He sought to t Defendant's stered tle, alleging that title should be awarded to him tead, as of the said Felicien Alexander, who alleged was the true owner thereof". se words were spoken of Phillip Bernadine because Counsel just realised that Bernadine was never an lr. He is t son of an heir at most. The deletion was sought to recti basis of his argument that Phillip Bernadine was an heir. But the de etion of the words did not cure the position. words deleted were contained in the 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th lines of a ch began with the words: "No 287/92 was an action brought by Phillip Bernadine, an heir of Felicien Alexander, against Stanislaus Modeste." If I may be permitted to use the analogy of this dreadful disease, SIG C", I understand that the surgeon may remove fective s of the body affected which are clearly visible, yet t st ll remains infected parts of the body which are not so clearly sible. statement of claim in the earlier suit is an exhibit in this 6
7 case. Paragraph 2 states that 11 natural son of Muriel Bernadine Joseph, who is paragraph 1 Alexander. as the lawful great grand daughter of Felic ~~ge 2 of the skeleton arguments continues error it st - "It was further held that the Plaintiff, ll not by himself nor through his ancestors," etc. And yet at page 3, learned Counsel cites Pl ol at 36 says - "The obverse of this statement would be that if ano were to recommence the suit in the capaci as tutor of same minor, he would be subject to the of res judicata, notwithstanding the lack iden of ma person." These last words are sed on the contention 11 Bernadine was an heir just as Rodney Jacob. This leads Counsel to come to a wrong conclusion when states at page 3 of his skeleton arguments - "Thus, there is an identity of persons between No. 287/92 and No. 788/95. While the material person bringing No. 788/95 is Rodney Jacob he brings it as a representative heirs Felicien Alexander. Thus the person whose ghts were adjudicated upon in No. 287/92 and that which is now demanded to be adjudicated upon in No. 788/95 is the same: the heirs of Felicien Alexander." In my judgment therefore the Plaintiffs in both actions are materially different and are not acting in the same capacity. Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff cited the case of MARGINSON v. BLACKBURN BOROUGH COUNCIL KB as an authority on Parties 7
8 ing different. In that case the Parties were mat al same but Marginson was not estopped where he brought a second act as Personal Representative of his deceased wife when first act was brought by him his personal capacity. decis can seen as an authority for a statement at the footnote of 36 of aniol's treatise. There it is stated - "The identity of the _:;:;J.rties in the second case, whi is necessary in order that the exception of res judicata used, does not mean the material identity of persons, t identity of capacity or quality. Thus a tuto.l, having lost a case brought in the name of his ward, may recommence it in his own name, without being subject to the judicata because he is not acting in the same capaci not the same person who is pleading." of res it is It is admitted that there is a common identi of ect both actions and I have found that there is no common identi of persons. It may be unnecessary to consider i f cause. Learned Counsel for the Defenaant submitted of cause and learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submitt i to the contrary. I would be more inclined to agree that common ity of cause was lacking. Phillip Bernadine's case was on adverse possession and this is made clear at pages 1, 2, 7 and 8 of t judgment in the earlier suit. This suit seems to be a claim on behalf of the heirs of Felicien Alexander, not based on long possession, but derived from a deed of sale and possess by the owner and his heirs. I do not think it necessary to consider the public interest principle and the authority of YAT TUNG INVESTI1eNT CO. LTD. It is not here relevant where there is an absence of identity of Parties. decision of the Privy Council in that case was that the trine of res judicata in its wider sense applied and it would be an abuse of the process of the Court to raise in subsequent proceedings matters which could and should have been litigated in 8
9 the earlier proceedings." If it were found that there was identity of persons then in my view the principle could apply the cons new claims brought in the second action, that is, t cases ion of issue constructive trust and overriding interests, or coillmuni ch were absent in the earlier case. In his summons, the Defendant asked to stay t proceedings Defendant was not paid costs due to him in two ts himself and Phillip Bernadine. Order 21 Rule 5 ( 1) of the Rules of the Court is as follows:- "Where a party has discontinued an ac on or coun or withdrawn any particular claim made him s liable to pay any other party's costs ac on or counterclaim or the costs occasioned to any other claim withdrawn, then if, before payment of those costs, he subsequently brings an action for the same, or tan al the same, cause of action, the Court may order the in that action to be stayed until those costs are paid. 11 s rule is clearly inapplicable where two dif rent bringing the actions. And even if it was Phillip bringing the second action the rule would not apply in re ies are who was of the High Court action for he did not discontinue action or withdrew any particular claim in the action. F ~y learned for the Defendant at the conclusion of submissions stated - "In the event the Court should find that the action d continue we are applying for an extension of time within which to file a defence. 11 9
10 s was clearly related to the Plaintiff's summons for j referred to above and learned Counsel for the Plaintiff must been aware of it. In her reply learned Counsel for Plainti not oppose the application. I therefore grant leave to the Defendant to file and serve s fe.ncp within twenty one days failing which judgment 1 entered for the Plaintiff. costs on this summons s~~all be costs in cause to Plaintiff to be agreed or otherwise taxed. A.N.J. MATTHEW Puisne Judge 10
On February 9, 1995 the Plaintiff issued a writ indorsed with. statement of claim in which he alleged that on October 22, 1994 the
) #047 SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1995 Suit No. 114 of 1995 BETWEEN: RUFUS LOUIS and FELICITE CASTANG and others Plaintiff Defendants Mr. P. Straughn for Plaintiff Miss F. Byron
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) And
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) SUIT 877 OF 1998 BETWEEN: JOSEPH PLACIDE also known as EUNIFRED MERIUS suing herein AS THE SOLE Administrator of the Succession of the late PLACIDE MERIUS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) CORNIBERT BEATRICE GEORGE
,/ SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) Suit No. 826 of 1995 Between: J08~PH CORNIBERT vs BEATRICE GEORGE - Plaintiff/Respondent " ( - Defendant/Applicant Mr. K. Monplaisir Q. C. for Plaintiff/
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D and 1. CUTHBERT JAMES 2. AGATHA JAMES 3. VIDA JAMES. 1996: May 8 and 10.
#017 SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1996 Suit No. 171 of 1996 BETWEEN: ANNIE JAMES by her attorney Francisca Oscar and 1. CUTHBERT JAMES 2. AGATHA JAMES 3. VIDA JAMES Petitioner
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D RENEE FRANCIS MARIE FRANCIS. and KENNETH JAMES LUCIA JAMES. 1994: November 30; December 7.
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1994 Suit No. 586 of 1994 BETWEEN: RENEE FRANCIS MARIE FRANCIS and Petitioners KENNETH JAMES LUCIA JAMES Respondents APPEARANCES: Mr. C. Landers for
More information~~c_~';o~~ '.\.~ ~~~~ and CECILE BIBIANA JOSEPH. 1994: May 16; June 1. .JUDGMENT
J l., SANT LUCA: ~~c_~';o~~ '.\.~ ~~~~ N THE HGH COURT OF JUSTCE (CVL) A. D. 1994,.. GRL. O~E & 00. 28 M'r'rNlO STREET, CASTRES. SANT LUC!/l., '"' 5:J ND~ES TEL 1 r 1 58f0 iwoos FAX. 1 (758) 452 2009 SUT
More informationBETWEEN: NATO'S EDUCATIONAL AND SPORTS SUPPLIES LTD. and
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1996 Suit No. 875 of 1994 BETWEEN: NATO'S EDUCATIONAL AND SPORTS SUPPLIES LTD. a iff and NILES NATHANIEL Mr. K. Monplaisir Q.C. and Mr. P. Straughn
More informationSAINT LUCIA THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) ARTHUR VERNEUIL. and
SAINT LUCIA THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. 286 of 1997 BETWEEN: ARTHUR VERNEUIL and Claimant ELEUTHERE SEVERIN sued herein in his personal capacity and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D BETWEEN: FLORA OCTAVE. and FRANCJ:S SULAL. 1996: July 1~, and 31 JUDGMENT
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1996 SU1~ NO. 246 OF 1996 BETWEEN: FLORA OCTAVE and FRANCJ:S SULAL Plaintiff Defendant Mr. P. Husbands Q.C. for Plaintiff Mr. O. Larcher for Defendant
More informationCHESTER CLARKE MARTHE CLARKE. and BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA JULIAN COMPTON. And
., 0 ;..1 1 ( {,.:-!rr e 1 J ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CIVIL SUIT N0.39 OF 1994 BETWEEN: CHESTER CLARKE MARTHE CLARKE Substituted Plaintiff Added Plaintiff and BANK OF
More informationRANDOLPH RUSSELL. 2011: April 20th DECISION
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 227 OF 2008 BETWEEN: THELMA HALL NEE RUSSELL EWART RUSSELL (Attorney on Record
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO.: 257 of 1999 BETWEEN NATIONAL INSURANCE BOARD and Claimant Appearances For the Claimant: Ms. A. Cadie-Bruney For the Defendant: Mr. D. Theodore CHRISTOPHER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO.: 983 of 1996 BETWEEN JOAN BERNADETTE MAINGOT Executrix of the estate of Rose Mary Maingot, deceased Claimant and MONICA DEVAUX Defendant Appearances For
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Civil) A.D CARME MONTOUTE nee AMBROISE qua Executrix of the Estate of DAVIDSON AMBROISE AND
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Civil) A.D. 1998 SUIT NO: 36 of 1968 Between: CARME MONTOUTE nee AMBROISE qua Executrix of the Estate of DAVIDSON AMBROISE AND PLAINTIFF (1) MARY AMBROISE (2)
More informationand Mr. 0. Larcher for Plaintiffs Mr. K. Monplaisir Q.C. and Mi ss H. Ali for Defendanc
#023 SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF JUSTICE ( CIVI:U) A.D. 1996 Suit ~~ 194 of 1996 BEThEEN: 1. EDWARD FESSAL 2 HAYDEN FESSAL 3. i:.ily FESSAL by their at to::ney Stanislaus Fessal aintiffs r and JILL VALERIE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL)
Suit No: 471 of 1997 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) Between: ELSEE JULIET (born William) the widow of the late ALFRED JULIET who sues as (1) the sole Administratrix of the succession of the late
More informationIN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE <CIVIL> A.D. 1997
SAINT LUCIA SUIT NO: 209 of 1972 Between: IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE A.D. 1997 CHRISTOPHER CEORCE of the Village of eros-islet in the state of Saint Lucia, carpenter, acting herein Qua Administrator
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) JOSEPH CLIFFORD HARRY. 1994: March : March 3, June 13 JUDGMENT
SAINT LUCIA Suit No.299 of 1992 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) Between: CHARLES DUPLESSIS VS JOSEPH CLIFFORD HARRY Plaintiff Defendant Mr. D. Theodore for Plaintiff Mrs. V. Barnard for Defendant
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) and
SAINT LUCIA CIVIL SUIT NO. 718 OF 1997 BETWEEN: THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) HEIRS OF AVRIL AFRICAIN aka JEAN BAPTISTE JOSEPH and Heirs of JN BAPTISTE JOSEPH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTI CE
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTI CE (CIVIL) A.D. 1998 SUIT N0:146 of 1989 BETWEEN: (1) DORIS MARTELLY suing on behalf of himself and all the other lawful heirs of the said SAMUEL MAR TELL Y (2) MARY
More informationSAINT LUCIA. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Civil) Civil Suit No. 326 of 1999 BETWEEN: (1) EDWARD PHILLIP MATHURIN (2) MARTIN JULIAN. Plaintiffs.
SAINT LUCIA Civil Suit No. 326 of 1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Civil) Comment [a1]: Final copy. Issued to Parties on June 7, 2001. BETWEEN: (1) EDWARD PHILLIP MATHURIN (2) MARTIN JULIAN and Plaintiffs
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL)
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) :.. ' Suit No. 664 of 1993 Between: (1) EARDLEY ADOLPHUS GRAVESANDE, Administrator of the Estate of the late Nora Magdeleine Gravesande (also known as Nora
More informationTO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN
Annexure I New Bank Mandate Details with Attestation from Bank Branch Manager or with This is to certify that Mr. /
More informationBETWEEN: JENNIFER LONGSWORTH PLAINTIFF AND
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2009 ACTION NO. 796 OF 2009 BETWEEN: JENNIFER LONGSWORTH PLAINTIFF AND CHARLESTON CLELAND DEFENDANT Mr. Rodwell Williams SC, for the claimant. Mr. Linbert Willis for
More informationTHE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES (SMALL ESTATES) (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT. Statutory Instrument
THE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES (SMALL ESTATES) (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT. Statutory Instrument 156 1. The Administration of Estates (Small Estates) (Special Provisions) (Probate and Administration) Rules.
More informationNew Bank Mandate Details with Attestation from Bank Branch Manager
New Bank Mandate Details with Attestation from Bank Branch Manager Annexure I or with This is to certify that Mr. /
More informationQUIETING TITLES, 1959 CHAPTER 393
QUIETING TITLES, 1959 [CH.393 1 QUIETING TITLES, 1959 CHAPTER 393 QUIETING TITLES, 1959 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Investigation of title by court. 4. Form of
More informationORDER TO SHOW. NYCTL TRUST, and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON as Collateral Agent and Custodian for CAUSE
At Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings, at the Courthouse, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY, on the day of April 2018. P R E S E N T: HON. Justice
More informationLEGITIMACY (JERSEY) LAW 1973
LEGITIMACY (JERSEY) LAW 1973 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law Legitimacy (Jersey) Law 1973 Arrangement LEGITIMACY (JERSEY) LAW 1973 Arrangement
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) and ERROL MAITLAND
CLAIM NO. GDAHCV1999/0608 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) BETWEEN: DOREEN LALGIE and ERROL MAITLAND Claimant Defendant Appearances: Ms.
More informationS10A1212. ROBINSON et al. v. BAKER et al. This is an appeal from a final order of the Superior Court of Irwin County
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: November 1, 010 S10A11. ROBINSON et al. v. BAKER et al. HINES, Justice. This is an appeal from a final order of the Superior Court of Irwin County dismissing a
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CASE NO. 430 OF 2000 JENNIFER SWEEN - Claimant a.k.a Jennifer Harper acting by her Attorney on record Cynthia Sween. VS NICHOLA CONNOR - Defendant
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV No. 2009-03221 Between HV HOLDINGS LIMITED Claimant And ADELLA HAMID JUNE HAMID TREVOR HAMID Defendants Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationSEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS
SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS (a) INTER PARTES REVIEW. Chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 3 1 1. I n t e r p a r t e s r e v i e w. 3 1 2. P e
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Date of Reserve: 5th July, Date of judgment: November 06, 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Date of Reserve: 5th July, 2007 Date of judgment: November 06, 2007 CS(OS) No.1440/2000 Mela Ram... Through: Plaintiff Ms.Sonia Khurana
More informationBank Of Nova Scotia Trust Co (Caribbean) Ltd v Smith-Jordan
Page 1 The West Indian Reports/Volume 15 /Bank Of Nova Scotia Trust Co (Caribbean) Ltd v Smith-Jordan - (1970) 15 WIR 522 Bank Of Nova Scotia Trust Co (Caribbean) Ltd v Smith-Jordan (1970) 15 WIR 522 HIGH
More informationLIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT
LAWS OF KENYA LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 22 Revised Edition 2012 [2010] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012]
More informationIN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER. and LAMBERT JAMES-SOOMER
SAINT LUCIA IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO.: SLUHCV 2003/0138 BETWEEN (1) MICHELE STEPHENSON (2) MAHALIA MARS (Qua Administratrices of the Estate of ANTHONY
More informationMr. H. Giraudy for the Appellant Mr. c. Rambally for the Respondent
SAINT LUCIA IN THE eourt OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6 of 1986 BETWEEN: GIRAUDY ESTATES LTD. and EGBERT FRANCIS D!fendant/Appellant Plaintiff/Respondent Before: The Honourable Sir Lascelles Robotham The
More informationPERFORMA OF AFFIDAVIT
PERFORMA OF AFFIDAVIT Form of affidavit to be obtained from the adult heir of a deceased employee of the University who has died without making any nomination or will in relation to nominees either under
More information... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D BETWEEN: ROYAL BANK OF CAI..tAL>A. and 1. SEBASTIEN LIONEL 2. BRENDA LIONEL
... ~.- I. 'I SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1996 Suit No. 87 of 1995 BETWEEN: ROYAL BANK OF CAI..tAL>A and 1. SEBASTIEN LIONEL 2. BRENDA LIONEL Plaintiff Defendants Mrs. B. Fleming
More informationVIBERT CREESE (as administrator of the Estate of James Creese, dec' d) Defendant. 2005: October 24 RULING
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 318 OF 2004 BETWEEN: DOUGLAS O'NEAL CREESE v Claimant VIBERT CREESE (as administrator
More informationSAINT LUCIA THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL)
SAINT LUCIA THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. SLUHCV2002/0958 BETWEEN: HEIRS OF FRANCIS HARRISON PALMER (Acting herein and represented by SERENA LUBON nee
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and
SAINT LUCIA PETITION NO: SLUHCV 2007/0431 BETWEEN: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE VICTOR DELICES Claimant and [1] LINDLEY LUBIN of Over the Bridge Micoud [2] FRANCIS LUBIN of Over the Bridge Micoud For Heirs
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE MS. DELCINE THOMAS. And
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CLAIM NO. ANUHCV2007/0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE REGISTERED LAND ACT CAP 374 OF THE LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA REVISED EDITION 1992 AND IN THE MATTER OF
More informationCountry Code: MS 2002 Rev. CAP Date of entry into force: July 4, Date of Amendment: 4/1942;15/1948; SRO 15/1956; 4/2003
Country Code: MS 2002 Rev. CAP. 5.08 Title: Country: LEGITIMACY ACT MONTSERRAT Date of entry into force: July 4, 1929 Date of Amendment: 4/1942;15/1948; SRO 15/1956; 4/2003 Subject: Key words: Notes: Children
More informationTitle 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL
Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL Chapter 723: PROCEEDINGS TO QUIET TITLE Table of Contents Part 7. PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS... Section 6651. SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS... 3 Section 6652. PETITION TO REMOVE EASEMENT...
More informationEASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS SKBHCVAP2014/0017 BETWEEN: In the matter of Condominium Property registered as Condominium #5 known as Nelson Spring Condominium
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and. EUPHEMIA STEPHENS OF VILLA RICHARD MAC LEISH OF DORSETSHIRE HILL Defendants
t,.'" SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CIVIL SUIT NO. 93 OF 1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT NO 8 OF 1994. AND THE FORMER ACT CHAPTER 219 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION
More informationRULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) RULES 2007 CONSULTATION DRAFT CONTENTS PART 1 OBJECTIVES AND CASE MANAGEMENT POWERS
RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) RULES 2007 CONSULTATION DRAFT CONTENTS Rule Page 1. Orders added PART 1 OBJECTIVES AND CASE MANAGEMENT POWERS Recommendations 2, 3, 4, 81 and 82 ORDER 1A OBJECTIVES
More informationThe 2008 Florida Statutes
The 2008 Florida Statutes CHAPTER 702 FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES, AGREEMENTS FOR DEEDS, AND STATUTORY LIENS 702.01 Equity. 702.03 Certain foreclosures validated. 702.035 Legal notice concerning foreclosure
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and :January 20,21,
ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CIVIL SUIT NO. SVGHCV211/1997 CONSOLIDATED WITH SUIT NO 212/1997 BETWEEN: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ORMISTON KEN BOYEA HUDSON WILLIAMS Claimants and EASTERN CARIBBEAN
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 983 MDA 2012
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 CAROLINE AND CHRISTOPHER FARR, HER HUSBAND, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellants BLOOMN THAI, AND UNITED WATER, INC., v. Appellee
More informationSUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE ACT
SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE ACT CHAPTER 4:01 Act 12 of 1962 Amended by 14 of 1964 29 of 1968 2 of 1972 19 of 1973 2 of 1974 39 of 1975 6 of 1976 29 of 1976 50 of 1976 136/1976 22 of 1977 6 of 1978 3 of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) (1) LEON A. GEORGE (2) GERDA G GEORGE. And DANIEL HARRIGAN
EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT TERRITORY OF THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CLAIM NO. BVIHCV 143 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) BETWEEN: (1) LEON A. GEORGE (2) GERDA G GEORGE Respondents/Claimants
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ERNEST MANENO SHIJA VERSUS MAZINGA CORPORATION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Date of last Order: 19/09/2006 Date of Ruling: 06/11/2007 Mlay, J. Mzinga Corporation is
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2010
CLAIM NO. 778 OF 2010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2010 BETWEEN GLENN TILLETT CLAIMANT AND LOIS YOUNG BARROW NESTOR VASQUEZ SOCIAL SECURITY BOARD DEFENDANTS NATIONAL TRADE UNION CONGRESS OF BELIZE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No.458/2008. Date of decision: 3rd December, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No.458/2008 Date of decision: 3rd December, 2008 MUKESH KUMAR DECD. THR. LR'S and ANR.... Appellants Through: Mr.K.G.Chhokar,
More information[8] On 11 th May 2004, Mrs. Moir made application to the Family Court of Australia at Adelaide seeking final orders in relation to property
Re Nordea Trust Company (Isle of Man) Ltd. HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE ISLE OF MAN Chancery Division Judgment date: 2 November 2009 His Honour Deemster Kerruish Introduction [1] By re-amended Petition,
More informationSAINT LUCIA. IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIl) A.D Between: JUDCEMENT. Mr Kenneth Monplaisir, OC for the Plaintiff
... "i.,; ~ SAINT LUCIA IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIl) A.D. 1997 SUIT NO: 722 OF 1996 Between: CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES LTD PLAINTIFF AND DAMAR ENTERPRISES LTD AND DEFENDANT C. O. WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between LEO LARES DAMIANA LARES BERNADINE ABRAHAM CLOTHILDA JOAN MOHAMMED THEODOTA THEODORA LARES CAMILLA ALEXANDER.
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2014 01656 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between LEO LARES DAMIANA LARES BERNADINE ABRAHAM CLOTHILDA JOAN MOHAMMED THEODOTA THEODORA LARES CAMILLA ALEXANDER Claimants
More informationFIJI ISLANDS HIGH COURT ACT (CHAPTER 13) HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) RULES 1998
FIJI ISLANDS HIGH COURT ACT (CHAPTER 13) HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) RULES 1998 IN exercise of the powers conferred upon me by Section 25 of the High Court Act, I hereby make the following Rules: Citation 1.
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
SAINT LUCIA THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO:242 of 2001 BETWEEN Peter Clarke Claimant v The Attorney General et al Defendants Appearances Ms. Petra Nelson for Claimant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. 2000: January 10 and 11 JUDGMENT. [2] The Plaintiff resides on the land which is involved in this case.
..... SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CIVIL SUIT NO. 29 OF 1989 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: FITZROY MAPP AND CASSANDRA MAPP PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Appearances: Miss Zhinga Horne for the Plaintiff
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, SAN FERNANDO BETWEEN DANIEL SAHADEO ABRAHAM SAHADEO AGNES SULTANTI SELEINA SAHADEO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, SAN FERNANDO Claim. No. CV2009 01979 BETWEEN DANIEL SAHADEO ABRAHAM SAHADEO AGNES SULTANTI SELEINA SAHADEO AND Claimants PERCIVAL JULIEN
More informationCHAPTER 242 ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES (JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE) /
CHAPTER 242 ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES (JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE) 1891-15 Parts I, II, IV of this Act came into operation on 30th May, 1891. Parts III, V and VI of this Act came into operation on 15th
More informationCircuit Court, E. D. Missouri. March 26, 1886.
884 PRESTON V. SMITH. 1 Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri. March 26, 1886. 1. PLEADING WHAT A DEMURRER ADMITS. A demurrer to a bill admits the truth of facts well pleaded, but not of averments amounting to
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ESAU RALPH BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER A. RAJKUMAR. Reasons for decision
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV No. 2010-00120 BETWEEN MALYN BERNARD CLAIMANT AND NESTER PATRICIA RALPH ESAU RALPH DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 8 1
Article 8. Miscellaneous. Rule 64. Seizure of person or property. At the commencement of and during the course of an action, all remedies providing for seizure of person or property for the purpose of
More informationICC/CMI Rules International Maritime Arbitration Organization in force as from 1 January 1978
ICC/CMI Rules International Maritime Arbitration Organization in force as from January 978 Article The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the Comité Maritime International (CMI) have jointly decided,
More informationIN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE <CIVIL) A.D DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AUTHORITY. and ALFIONA INVESTMENTS. FEBRUARY 8th & 16th 1999 DECISION
SAINT LUCIA SUIT NO: 1182 OF 1998 BETWEEN IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and RYAN OLLIVIERRE
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CIVIL APPEAL NO.27 OF 2001 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: SYLVANUS LESLIE and RYAN OLLIVIERRE Appellant/Plaintiff Respondent/Defendant Before: The Hon. Sir Dennis Byron
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST.
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2012/006 BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST and Appellants [1] THE DIRECTOR
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REASONS FOR DECISON
CITATION: Lapierre v. Lecuyer, 2018 ONSC 1540 COURT FILE NO.: 16-68322/19995/16 DATE: 2018/04/10 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: MARTINE LaPIERRE, AMY COULOMBE, ANTHONY MICHAEL COULOMBE and
More informationc 128 Deserted Wives' and Children's Maintenance Act
Ontario: Revised Statutes 1970 c 128 Deserted Wives' and Children's Maintenance Act Ontario Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1970 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso
More informationLEVINDALE LEAD CO. V. COLEMAN 241 U.S. 432 (1916)
LEVINDALE LEAD CO. V. COLEMAN 241 U.S. 432 (1916) Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court: Charles Coleman, the defendant in error, brought this suit to set aside a conveyance of an undivided
More informationTransmission & New Bank Mandate Forms
TRANSMISSION DOCUMENTS MATRIX - READY RECKONER Sr. No Documents Required for Transmission Transmission to Surviving Joint Holders Demise of Solo/All unit holders & Nominee/s registered Demise of Solo/All
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SLUHCV 2006/0991 BETWEEN: MORELLA VITALIS in her capacity as executrix of the estate of the late LENNARD VITALIS deceased of Bishop Gap, Castries Claimant and Appearances:
More informationWilliam Luther Brookes and another v James Hendrickson and another CIVIL SUIT NO: 51 OF 1997
Page 1 Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court Reports/ 2000 / St. Kitts and Nevis / William Luther Brookes and another v James Hendrickson and another - [2000] ECSCJ No. 215 [2000] ECSCJ No. 215 William Luther
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2016-00756 BETWEEN CANDICE MAHADEO Claimant AND GEISHA MAHADEO NIRMAL MAHADEO Defendants Before the Honourable Madam Justice Margaret
More informationJUDGMENT. This is an exception by the plaintiff to the defendant s plea and counterclaim.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION) NOT REPORTABLE Case No.: 6104/07 Date delivered: 16 May 2008 In the matter between: GAY BOOYSEN Plaintiff and GEOFFREY LYSTER WARREN SMITH Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. Before: The Hon. Justice Nolan Bereaux. Mr Gaston Benjamin for Plaintiff Mr Carlton George for Defendants
TRINIDAD & TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA. NO.1644/99 BETWEEN ENWARD ANTHONY ISAAC Plaintiff AND ANTHONY DEO GANESS & MARCINA MARCIA GANESS Defendants Before: The Hon. Justice Nolan Bereaux Appearances:
More informationTHE PROBATE RULES. (Section 9) PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS (rules 1-3)
THE PROBATE RULES (Section 9) G.Ns. Nos. 10 of 1963 107 of 1963 369 of 1963 PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS (rules 1-3) 1. Citation These Rules may be cited as the Probate Rules. 2. Interpretation In these
More informationCayman Islands Grand Court Rules 1995
Cayman Islands Grand Court Rules 1995 (Revised Edition) Volume 2 GCR 1995 (Revised 08.09.03) APPENDIX I PRESCRIBED FORMS (O.1, r.10) GENERAL INDEX 1. Writ of summons (O.6, r.1) 2. Originating summons
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and VIOLA BUNTIN. 2008: August 26.
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2008/011 BETWEEN: GEORGE PIGOTT and VIOLA BUNTIN Appellant Respondent Before: The Hon. Mr. Dane Hamilton, QC Justice of Appeal [Ag.] Appearances: Mr. Ralph
More informationBERMUDA 1949 : 30 REGISTRATION (BIRTHS AND DEATHS) ACT
BERMUDA 1949 : 30 REGISTRATION (BIRTHS AND DEATHS) ACT 1949 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1 Interpretation 2 Registrar-General; statutory functions 3 What registers are to be kept; seal of office 4 Searches
More informationFECP Headlee Newburg Mgt. Invs. 10/06 LLC v Headlee Mgt.
FECP Headlee Newburg Mgt. Invs. 10/06 LLC v Headlee Mgt. Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 31413(U) June 4, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 111657/09 Judge: Barbara R. Kapnick Republished from New
More informationBELIZE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES PROTECTION ACT CHAPTER 31 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES PROTECTION ACT REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE NADIRA ALI JHAGROO NAEEM ALI SHALENA ALI KIMBERLY MAHARAJ SAEEDA ALI AND JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2012-02642 BETWEEN NADIRA ALI JHAGROO NAEEM ALI SHALENA ALI KIMBERLY MAHARAJ SAEEDA ALI AND PLAINTIFFS LILA SEETARAM DEFENDANT Before The
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE TERRITORY OF ANGUILLA (CIVIL) AD and
CLAIM NO. AXAHCV 1995/0021 THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE TERRITORY OF ANGUILLA (CIVIL) AD 2009 BETWEEN: RAFAEL VEGAS and 1. GRAZINA ADAMCZYK (As personal representative
More informationSang Yee Joy v BPTC Limited (In Liquidation) [1994] FJHC 173; Hbc0029d.92s (17 November 1994)
Sang Yee Joy v BPTC Limited (In Liquidation) [1994] FJHC 173; Hbc0029d.92s (17 November 1994) IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA PROBATE ACTION NO. 29 OF 1992 IN THE MATTER of the Trusts of the Will dated
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: RSA No.46/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 10.3.2011 RSA No.46/2011 VIRENDER KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr.Atul Kumar, Advocate...Appellants Versus JASWANT RAI
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Duquesne City School District and City of Duquesne v. No. 1587 C.D. 2010 Burton Samuel Comensky, Submitted August 5, 2011 Appellant BEFORE HONORABLE BERNARD L.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)
THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: Case No: 12189/2014 ABSA BANK LIMITED Applicant And RUTH SUSAN HAREMZA Respondent
More informationICC Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration 1975
ICC Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration 1975 (in force as from 1st June 1975) Optional Conciliation Article 1 (ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION. CONCILIATION COMMITTEES) 1. Any business dispute
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND AND AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE M. DEAN-ARMORER
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2008-00409 BETWEEN WINSTON SMART CLAIMANT AND ERROL RAMDIAL FIRST DEFENDANT AND BOONIRAM RAMDIAL SECOND DEFENDANT AND STELLA RAMDIAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. DERRICK HAZEL-GARVEY Respondent/Claimant. And
EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT ST. CHRISTOPHER CIRCUIT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. SKBHCV2013/0009 BETWEEN: DERRICK HAZEL-GARVEY Respondent/Claimant And MICHELLA ADRIEN (The Lawful Attorney
More informationThe Royal Court Civil Rules, 2007
O.R.C. No. IV of 2007 The Royal Court Civil Rules, 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES Rule PART I The overriding objective 1. Statement and application of overriding objective. PART II Service of documents 2. Service
More informationBELIZE LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 170 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE LIMITATION ACT CHAPTER 170 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) and. and
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) Suit No. 431 of 1999 IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to institute Civil Procedures against The Administrator-General for the succession of the
More information