Explain the meaning of the terms actus reus and mens rea in criminal law
|
|
- Myles Morrison
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 Question 1 Explain the meaning of the terms actus reus and mens rea in criminal law Actus reus and mens rea are the basic foundations of criminal law. In this first part of the question we are going to study the meaning of the statement actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea. This statement simply means that an act is not enough to make a person guilty unless his mind is guilty too. We will study the statement in two parts; actus reus and mens rea. Actus reus simply means guilty action, while mens rea means guilty mind. For a person to be convicted of a criminal offence, the two have to be clearly proven 1. The guilty mind is the difficult part to prove in any criminal case. An act can be completed but the liability fails to fall on the defendant if he can disapprove mens rea through a very good defence or a reasonable mistake. The difficulty of proving mens rea lies in the fact that you have to draw conclusions from the behavior of the defendant before, during, and after the event occurred. This is because nobody has the power to read minds. Failing to prove one of the two in a criminal case makes such a huge difference to the case. That is the only difference between murder and manslaughter 2. A person is convicted for murder if he kills and it is clearly proven that the act was there and the intention to kill was present. However, if the act is present and the intention to kill is not proven, then the case turns to manslaughter. A case of a murderer and that of manslaughter have different sentences in court. However, there are several complications related 1 M. J Allen, Textbook On Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2015). 2 Herbert Broom, A Selection Of Legal Maxims, Classified And Illustrated (Lawbook Exchange 2000).
2 2 to the guilty act and guilty mind statement. These include the omission to act, legal causation, intention and recklessness. Omission to Act Omission or failure to act basically carries no liabilities at all. A person can only be criminally liable where they have actually performed a positive act 3. For example, John might be walking past a house that is on fire and Tom is trapped inside. John can save Tom just by placing a ladder on the window where Tom is trapped. John ignores Tom s cry for help and walks away. John is not liable for Tom s death. This rule has its own exceptions discussed below. The first one is that of duty arising from a statute. A good example is the Children and Young Persons Act of 1933 which makes omissions culpable by people over the age of 16 failing to take care of those under 16. If a child is not provided with food and there was a person of over 16 years in the house then that is reason enough to convict the person over 16 years. The second exemption comes in the case of duty arising from relationships of a special nature. R V Gibbins and Proctor (1918) ruled that a man and his wife were guilty of murder by simply failing to feed the man s daughter. They were guilty because the woman hated the daughter and that was enough to incriminate her. There is also the assumption of care. The statutory law states that parents are no longer liable for their children after the age of 16 but common law in the case of R v Chattaway (1922) imposed a duty of care upon parents where their child is over 16 as long as he continues to live under their roof. 3 Casenote Legal Briefs (Aspen Law & Business 2002).
3 3 Legal Causation This is where conduct is linked to a result. We have factual causation that is conducted using the but-for test and legal causation that uses the proximate cause rule 4. A good example we can say that if a mechanic did not build a car then manslaughter would not have happened. It has been ruled in R v Cheshire (1991) that medical negligence amounts to a break in the chain of causation, unless it was so independent of the defendants act or so potent in causing death. Intention This is the mens rea of all serious offences such as murder. There is direct intent and oblique intent. The direct intent is easily linked to the defendants aim 5. Oblique intent is where the defendant did not anticipate the consequences of his actions, but they were certain to occur. In R v Maloney (1985), the jury was asked to consider two questions: was murder or serious injury a natural consequence of the defendants act? Did the defendant foresee that consequence as being a natural consequence of their act? If the answer to both is yes, the crime was intentional. Recklessness 4 'Criminal Damage' (Inbrief.co.uk, 2016) < accessed 7 April Casenote Legal Briefs (Aspen Law & Business 2002).
4 4 According to R v Cunningham (1957), recklessness is foreseeing that a particular kind of harm may be done, but going ahead to do it anyway 6. However, according to R v Caldwell (1981), recklessness was carrying out an activity that poses obvious risk while giving no thought of the possible risk at hand but just go on to do it anyway. Evaluate whether Lord Hailsham s statement represents an accurate definition of all the elements which should be proved by the prosecution in order to establish liability for a criminal offence. The defendant appealed against his conviction for handling stolen goods. The stolen goods were to be delivered to him in a van, but they were intercepted and recovered by the police. The defendant based his argument on the fact that he cannot be convicted of attempting an impossible crime. This is because the stolen meat was no longer stolen as it was intercepted by the police and returned to lawful custody 7. The court of appeal agreed with the basis of his argument and allowed it. The prosecutor tried to appeal but failed. According to section 22, the goods had to be stolen or remain stolen at the time of the attempted handling. The prosecution had already filed the charge of handling and it was not possible to change it into an offence by naming it an attempted handling 8. Acts that would propel another act which if committed would not be an offence could not be an offence themselves. 6 'Defining The Mens Rea In Criminal Attempts Part 1 CL&J' (Criminallawandjustice.co.uk, 2016) < accessed 7 April Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire (Belknap Press 1986). 8 'Haughton -V- Smith, On Appeal From Regina -V- Smith (Roger); HL 21 Nov 1973' (swarb.co.uk, 2015) < accessed 7 April 2016.
5 5 Lord Hailsham stated that an act does not make a man guilty of a crime, unless his mind be guilty too. The offence of handling stolen goods is a criminal offence. This means that if proved that there was a guilty act and guilty mind then you will be prosecuted in a criminal court. Section 24 of the Theft Act 1968 defines stolen goods as any goods which have been stolen, obtained by deception, or by blackmail. Under the Theft Act 1968, in order for the offence of handling stolen goods to occur, the goods must remain stolen at the time of handling. According to section 24 of the Theft Act, no good which has been stolen will be regarded as stolen goods if any of the following events takes place. The goods will not be stolen anymore once they have been restored to the person from whom they were stolen. Secondly, the goods will not be stolen once in lawful custody 9. They will not be stolen once all the people who have a share in goods cease to claim restitution. Lord Hailsham s statement was very accurate since the defendant did not even touch the goods that were stolen. They were already in lawful custody. There was no actus reus since the act of handling the goods did not get a chance to happen. We cannot prove mens rea without the actual action. Question 2 Advise Anna as to her criminal liability for criminal damage, if any Criminal damage can be defined as any damage caused to property by an individual. A case against criminal damage is normally brought in a criminal court by the state against the 9 Thomas J Gardner and Terry M Anderson, Criminal Law (Thomson/Wadsworth 2009).
6 6 individual who caused the damage 10. The best example for a criminal damage case is arson. When dealing with a criminal damage case, the Criminal Damage Act 1971 is the primary piece of legislation. There are some offences considered to be criminal damage cases contained under the Malicious Damage Act However, the main body of legislation is under the Criminal Damage Act According to the Criminal damage Act 1971, damage is defined as occurring when a person who has no lawful excuse, damages or destroys any property belonging to another intending to destroy or damage any such property or being reckless as to whether any such property shall be damaged or destroyed shall be guilty of the offence. There are a few elements that must be established and they are listed below. Damage, To property, Belonging to another, That was damaged without lawful excuse, Intention to cause the damage or recklessness as to whether the damage would be caused 11. The Criminal Damage Act of 1971 has no specific definition for damage. The definition is therefore established on a case to case basis depending on the circumstances of the case at hand. When thinking about damage, it is important to have some things in mind. First, it is not a must that the damage be permanent. Damage can include smearing of mud or paint. Secondly, it is not a must the damage be visible. Affecting the proper functioning of a property is considered to be damage despite the fact that it cannot be seen. Recklessness 10 Bryan A Garner, A Dictionary Of Modern Legal Usage (Oxford University Press 1995). 11 'Handling Stolen Goods: When Will I Face Prosecution?' (Inbrief.co.uk, 2016) < accessed 7 April 2016.
7 7 One of the major aspects of proving criminal damage is to prove beyond doubt that the defendant acted in a reckless manner. Section 1 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 defines recklessness in the following ways; A person is considered to have acted recklessly based on a circumstance when he is aware of a risk that will exist or will exist. He may also be considered to have acted recklessly based on a result when he is aware of a risk that will occur 12. These two are used as the basis for recklessness especially when it is unreasonable to take the risk in the circumstances known to the defendant. In such cases there is no point in separating intention and recklessness. This is because recklessness is sufficient to prove the offence. Property Under section 10 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971, property is defined in a wider range than under the Theft Act 1968 such that it includes land. This simply means that dumping of waste onto another person s land is taken as a criminal damage offence. Property will be said to belong to any person who has custody or control of it. It can also be said to belong to any person who has a propriety right or interest on the land 13. Thirdly, it can be said to belong to any person who has a charge on it. This means that an owner can be prosecuted for criminal damage if he damages his own property if at the same time it belongs to someone else according to the above definitions. A good example is a property such a house owned by an individual and at the same time owned by the mortgage company. 12 Anand Ballabh Kafaltiya, Interpretation Of Statutes (Universal Law Pub Co 2008). 13 Alon Harel and Keith N Hylton, Research Handbook On The Economics Of Criminal Law (Edward Elgar 2012).
8 8 According to section 5 of the Criminal damage Act 1971, there are circumstances under which someone would damage property and have a lawful excuse to act as a defence against a criminal damage charge 14. A few are discussed below. First case is whereby at that time the defendant believed that consent was given. Second excuse is when damage was caused during protection of that persons own property 15. If that property was in need of immediate protection and that the protections means taken against that property were reasonable. Lastly, the damage will be said to be without lawful excuse if it does not fall within section 5 of the Criminal Damage Act Section 2 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 makes it an offence to destroy or damage property intending thereby to endanger the life of another or being reckless as to whether the life of another would thereby be endangered. Where it is not a simple case of criminal damage, the judge separates it into two accounts to assist the jury and help the judge to know on what account the jury was convinced 16. Intention and recklessness are seen as one and the same thing when it comes to damage committed to property. However, they are separated when it comes to whether there was intention to endanger the life of another or not. This is mostly seen in cases dealing with arson. Section 2 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 creates two offences of threatening to destroy or damage property belonging to the person threatened or a third person or, the defendants own property in a way which is likely to endanger the life of the person threatened or 14 Kristina Janjac and Dorina Andoni, The Mental Element. 15 Nicola Monaghan, Criminal Law. 16 Jonathan Herring, Criminal Law.
9 9 a third person 17. In both cases the defendant has to intend that the person threatened would fear that the threat would be carried out. In the case of Anna and Epi, Anna has a hard time to prove that there was no mens rea in her actions. This is because in the beginning when she found the unflattering photo of Epi, she said she was going to smash her digital memory card. She then went ahead and did it. This shows that Anna was angry; she said she was going to destroy the digital memory card, then she did it a few minutes later using a hammer. In this case, Anna is liable for criminal damage. This is because there was the actus reus and the mens rea. This makes her liable for criminal damage. Anna also smoked a cigarette in the studio after Epi left then threw it into the waste paper bin. This can make her liable for a criminal charge of property damage. This is because a smoked cigarette is not supposed to be thrown into the waste paper bin before it is put out. Otherwise it is almost guaranteed that it will start a fire. Anna was aware of the risk involved when she threw the cigarette into the bin. This makes it very difficult for her to prove that there was no mens rea especially after smashing Epi s digital memory card into pieces. Anna is likely to be liable for recklessness since she had shown her anger by destroying the digital memory card and then throwing the cigarette without thinking about the risk involved. 17 Kristina Janjac and Dorina Andoni, The Mental Element.
10 10 Bibliography Allen M, Textbook On Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2015) Broom H, A Selection Of Legal Maxims, Classified And Illustrated (Lawbook Exchange 2000) Casenote Legal Briefs (Aspen Law & Business 2002) 'Criminal Damage' (Inbrief.co.uk, 2016) < accessed 7 April 2016 'Defining The Mens Rea In Criminal Attempts â Part 1 CL&J' (Criminallawandjustice.co.uk, 2016) < Attempts-%E2%80%93-Part-1> accessed 7 April 2016 Dworkin R, Law's Empire (Belknap Press 1986) Emanuel S, Criminal Law (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business/Aspen Publishers 2007) Gardner T and Anderson T, Criminal Law (Thomson/Wadsworth 2009) Garner B and Garner B, Garner's Dictionary Of Legal Usage (Oxford University Press 2011)
11 11 Garner B, A Dictionary Of Modern Legal Usage (Oxford University Press 1995) 'Handling Stolen Goods: When Will I Face Prosecution?' (Inbrief.co.uk, 2016) < accessed 7 April 2016 Harel A and Hylton K, Research Handbook On The Economics Of Criminal Law (Edward Elgar 2012) 'Haughton -V- Smith, On Appeal From Regina -V- Smith (Roger); HL 21 Nov 1973' (swarb.co.uk, 2015) < accessed 7 April 2016 Herring J, Criminal Law Janjac K and Andoni D, The Mental Element Kafaltiya A, Interpretation Of Statutes (Universal Law Pub Co 2008) Monaghan N, Criminal Law
12 12
1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention
1) 11 CHOOSE THE BEST CHOICE AND MARK IT ON YOUR ANSWER SHEET. Part A: Fill in the Blanks 1. The physical element of a crime is the a. mens rea b. actus reus c. offence d. intention. A person is where
More informationCriminal Law Fact Sheet
What is criminal law? Murder, fraud, drugs, sex, robbery, drink driving stories of people committing crimes fills the news headlines every single day. It is an area of law which captures the imagination
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 - CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2011
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 - CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2011 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationHSC Legal Studies. Year 2017 Mark Pages 46 Published Feb 6, Legal Studies: Crime. By Rose (99.4 ATAR)
HSC Legal Studies Year 2017 Mark 97.00 Pages 46 Published Feb 6, 2017 Legal Studies: Crime By Rose (99.4 ATAR) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Your notes author, Rose. Rose achieved an ATAR of 99.4 in
More informationCHIEF EXAMINER COMMENTS
CHIEF EXAMINER COMMENTS WITH SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2018 LEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW Note to Candidates and Learning Centre Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide candidates and learning
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2018
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2018 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide candidates and tutors with guidance as to the key points candidates
More informationChoose the best choice and mark it on your answer sheet. Part A: Fill in the Blanks
: : : : ( ) : : : : : / Choose the best choice and mark it on your answer sheet. Part A: Fill in the Blanks 1-The physical element of a crime is the 1. mens rea 2. actus reus 3. offence 4. intention 2-A
More informationCRIMINAL LAW. Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series. 4th edition
CRIMINAL LAW Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series 4th edition Alan Reed, M.A., LL.M., Solicitor Professor of Criminal and Private International Law, University of Sunderland and Ben Fitzpatrick, B.A., P.G.C.L.T.H.E.
More informationCriminal Law. Text, Cases, and Materials. Janet Loveless. Third Edition UNIVERSITY PRESS
Criminal Law Text, Cases, and Materials Third Edition Janet Loveless UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Guide to using the book Guide to the Online Resource Centre this edition Preface Acknowledgements Table cases
More informationElements of a Crime. Actus Reus: The guilty act the voluntary action, omission, or state of being that is forbidden by the criminal code.
Elements of a Crime To convict a person of a criminal offence in Canada, the Crown must usually prove that two elements existed at the time the offence was committed: the act itself, and the intention
More informationTHE CRIMINAL EQUATION
THE CRIMINAL EQUATION Actus Reus + Mens Rea = CRIME Actus Reus Latin for guilty act This simply means the physical act of committing a crime 1 Mens Rea Latin for guilty In the Criminal Code you will find
More informationWilful Damage Charging Policy 2017/18
Wilful Damage Charging Policy 2017/18 Criminal Damage Page 1-4 Local Context Page 5 Policy Objective Page 6 Procedure Page 6 Threshold Page 6 Process Management Page 7 Red Amber Green Partnerships Page
More informationQuestion 2. With what crimes, if any, could Al be charged and what defenses, if any, could he assert? Discuss.
Question 2 Al and his wife Bobbie owned a laundromat and lived in an apartment above it. They were having significant financial difficulties because the laundromat had been losing money. Unbeknownst to
More informationAnswers to practical exercises
Answers to practical exercises Chapter 15: Answering problem questions Page 360: Evaluation/Marking Exercise Evaluating the work of others can be a really powerful way of improving your own work. The question
More informationPreview from Notesale.co.uk Page 1 of 63
Criminal Law General Elements of Criminal Liability A guilty act (Actus Reus) + A guilty mind (Mens Rea) - Defense (Absence of a relevant defense) = Criminal liability The terms AR and MR are simply use
More informationLegal Liability. Sophie Foyston ROB
Legal Liability Sophie Foyston ROB14236233 Contents Task 1... 3 Part 1 (P1 and P2)... 3 Neighbour Principle... 3 Duty of Care... 3 Breach of Duty... 3 Damage... 4 Compensation... 4 Part 2 (M1)... 5 Part
More informationADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW. Name: Period: Row:
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW Name: Period: Row: I. INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW A. Understanding the complexities of criminal law 1. The justice system in the United States
More informationContents PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY Chapter 1: Fundamental Principles of Criminal Liability 1: Actus Reus 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Conduct as
More informationCriminal Law. Protect people and property Maintain order Preserve standards of public decency
A Crime is any action or omission of an act that is prohibited and punishable by law. There are four conditions in which an action or omission becomes a crime: The act is considered a wrong for society.
More informationIntroduction Crime, Law and Morality. Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax.
Introduction Crime, Law and Morality Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax. Objective Principles: * Constructive-murder rule: a person may be guilty of murder, if while in
More informationMLL214: CRIMINAL LAW
MLL214: CRIMINAL LAW 1 Examinable Offences: 2 Part 1: The Fundamentals of Criminal Law The definition and justification of the criminal law The definition of crime Professor Glanville Williams defines
More informationLEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2012
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2012 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More information1.2 Explain the nature of an actus reus. 1.4 Identify principal types of mens rea. 1.5 Explain the meaning and significance of transferred malice.
Unit 3 Title: Criminal Law Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the fundamental principles of criminal liability Assessment criteria The learner can: 1.1 Define actus
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW *
9 June 2015 Level 3 CRIMINAL LAW Subject Code L3 3 THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW * Time allowed: 1 hour and 30 minutes plus 15 minutes reading time Instructions to Candidates
More informationPART 1: THE FUNDAMENTALS...
Contents PART 1: THE FUNDAMENTALS... 6 The Fundamentals of Criminal Law (CHAPTER 1)... 6 Sources of criminal law:... 6 Criminal capacity:... 7 Children:... 7 Corporations:... 7 Classifications of crimes:...
More informationINSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES CRIMINAL LAW EXAMINER S REPORT AUTUMN 2007
Subject 23 INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES CRIMINAL LAW EXAMINER S REPORT AUTUMN 2007 Comments on Overall performance There were some very good responses to some of the questions, but the standard of exam
More informationPart of the requirement for a criminal offence. It is the guilty act.
Level 1 Award/Certificate/Diploma in Legal Studies Glossary of Terms Term Action Actus reus Barrister Breach of duty of care Case law Chartered Legal Executive Civil law Claimant Common law compensation
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Define what is meant by a crime
Tech Level Unit Title: LAW OF CRIME Level: Level 3 Credit Value: 10 Guided Learning Hours 60 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1. Understand the principles of criminal liability Assessment criteria The
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2014 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationBy the end of this topic you will be able to:
INCHOATE OFFENCES: ATTEMPTS By the end of this topic you will be able to: Explain what is meant by an attempt and the reasons that we criminalise this behaviour. Understand the problems surrounding the
More informationBusiness Law Chapter 9 Handout
Major Differences: 2 Felonies Serious crimes, punishable by Death or prison for more than one (1) year. Misdemeanors Non-serious (petty) crimes punishable by jail for less than one(1) year and/or by fines.
More informationAttempts. -an attempt can be charged separately or be found as an included offence.
Attempts Crim law: week 10 Section 24(1) of the Criminal Code Every one who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits to do anything for the purpose of carrying out the intention is guilty
More informationCRIM EXAM NOTES. Table of Contents. Weeks 1-4
CRIM EXAM NOTES Weeks 1-4 Table of Contents Setup (jurisdiction, BOP, onus)... 2 Elements, AR, Voluntariness... 3 Voluntariness, Automatism... 4 MR (intention, reckless, knowledge, negligence)... 5 Concurrence...
More informationSample. Aims of this Chapter. 2.1 Introduction. Outline. s1 CDA 1971 provides for two criminal damage offences:
Chapter 2: Criminal Damage Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The basic offence 2.3 The aggravated offence 2.4 Lawful excuse 2.5 Summary 2.1 Introduction Aims of this Chapter This chapter will enable you to
More informationLEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2012
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS JANUARY 2012 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More information10: Dishonest Acquisition
WEEK (week beginning Monday) 1 (28 July) 1 2 (4 August) 3 CLASS CHAPTER TOPIC PAGE NOS. 2 5: Homicide 4 3 (11 August) 5 4 (18 August) 7 6 6: Defences 8 Introduction, (some classes may view a video and/or
More informationIndex. MISCARRIAGE, 268, ACCOMPLICES accomplice to attempt, attempt to aid and abet, counselling,
Index ABANDONMENT abandonment going to elements of offence, 50 51, 328 329 defence of abandonment arguments against, 326 328 arguments for, 323 325 availability Australia, 317 319 Canada and England, 312
More informationTo begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be:
Homicide Offences To begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be: Murder or voluntary manslaughter if partial defences
More informationFAULT ELEMENTS, STRICT LIABILITY AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY. Generally involves an actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind).
FAULT ELEMENTS, STRICT LIABILITY AND ABSOLUTE LIABILITY CRIME A wrong punishable by the State. Generally involves an actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind). Description of a prohibited behaviour
More informationHSC Legal Studies. Year 2016 Mark Pages 33 Published Feb 7, Legal- Crime Notes. By Annabelle (97.35 ATAR)
HSC Legal Studies Year 2016 Mark 94.00 Pages 33 Published Feb 7, 2017 Legal- Crime Notes By Annabelle (97.35 ATAR) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Your notes author, Annabelle. Annabelle achieved an ATAR
More informationLAW1114: CRIMINAL LAW EXAM NOTES
LAW1114: CRIMINAL LAW EXAM NOTES CONTENTS TOPIC COMMON OTHER 1 S OF A CRIME 2 NON- FATAL, NON- SEXUAL AGAINST THE PERSON 3 SEXUAL 4 HOMICIDE 5 DEFENCES AR (p3) - Positive, voluntary act (PVA) - Causation
More informationMens Rea case law problem
Mens Rea case law problem Hyam v DPP (1975) HL D sought to frighten an occupant of a house by pouring petrol though the letterbox and then igniting it, resulting in the death of two occupants by asphyxia.
More informationESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM. CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY
I. PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW a. Actus reus b. Mens rea c. Concurrence d. Causation II. III. ESSAY APPROACH www.barexamdoctor.com CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY a. Elements of accomplice liability
More informationFOREWORD... 1 LAW... 2
FOREWORD... 1 LAW... 2 GCE Advanced Level... 2 Paper 9084/01 Law and the Legal Process... 2 Paper 9084/02 Legal Liabilities... 3 This booklet contains reports written by Examiners on the work of candidates
More informationSOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 3: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada 1
SOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 3: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada 1 * Today we begin considering the role of law in society. This includes such issues as: - what is an offence
More informationBUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes
BUSINESS LAW Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes Learning Objectives List and describe the essential elements of a crime. Describe criminal procedure, including arrest, indictment, arraignment, and
More informationCRIMINAL OFFENCES. Chapter 9
CRIMINAL OFFENCES Chapter 9 LEVELS OF OFFENCES In the Canadian legal system we have three levels of criminal offences. Summary Conviction Offences Indictable Offences Hybrid Offences LEVELS OF OFFENCES:
More informationCRIMINAL LAW TJ MCINTYRE SEAN Ô TOGHDA
CRIMINAL LAW TJ MCINTYRE SEAN Ô TOGHDA ROUND HALL THOMSON REUTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Preface Table of Cases Table of vii ix xix xxxi CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES 1 Defining the Criminal Law 1 Background
More informationBy the end of this topic you will be able to (AO1): You will also be able to evaluate (AO2): Homework. End of Unit Assessment.
*REMINDER: THIS IS THE SYNOPTIC TOPIC FOR 2012* Inchoate Offences: ATTEMPTS By the end of this topic you will be able to (AO1): Explain what is meant by an attempt and the reasons why we criminalise this
More informationSession 18. Criminal Law 1
Criminal Law 1 Crimes Wrongful acts that the State recognizes as deserving of control and punishment in the interests of society as a whole the State prosecutes the alleged perpetrators to ensure the safety
More informationLECTURE 2 BASIC ELEMENTS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY
LECTURE 2 BASIC ELEMENTS OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY Criminal liability requires a concurrence, or unity, of two general criteria: (a) an act or physical element, known as the actus reus; and (b) a certain mental
More informationA CASEBOOK ON SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW
A CASEBOOK ON SCOTTISH CRIMINAL LAW Fourth Edition Christopher H.W. Gane, LL.B., Professor of Scots Law, University of Aberdeen Charles N. Stoddart, LL.B., LL.M. (McGill), Ph.D., Formerly Sheriff of Lothian
More informationBTT Syllabus Part A Subject areas relating to the QLD/CPE Foundation subjects August 2017
BTT Syllabus Part A Subject areas relating to the QLD/CPE Foundation subjects August 2017 Contents Public Law (Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Human Rights) Syllabus... 2 Law of the European
More informationPlaintiff Entrapment Municipal Hearsay Substantive Trafficking Counter Claim Provocation Probation Justice of the peace
Mr. Thorburn CLU 3M1 January 2015 Review all tests, notes, handouts and other material from the entire semester. 1) Read all instructions and exam questions carefully. 2) Write your name on the top of
More informationCRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD
CRIMINAL LAW SUMMARY LAWSKOOL.CO.UK LAWSKOOL PTY LTD CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW 7 DEFINITION OF CRIMINAL LAW 7 Deterrence 7 Rehabilitation 7 Public Protection 7 Retribution 8 CRIMINAL LAW AND
More informationI. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.
I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i. A specific intent crime is one in which an actual intent on the part of the
More informationElements of a crime. roofs: File not for distribution without prior permission from Pearson Education. This chapter explains:
1 Elements of a crime This chapter explains: that the defendant must usually have both committed an actus reus (a guilty act) and have a mens rea (a guilty mind) to be liable for a criminal offence; that
More informationVictim Protection in Criminal Proceedings Legislation: A pan-european Comparison"
Victim Protection in Criminal Proceedings Legislation: A pan-european Comparison" Country Report: Sweden Author: Martin Sunnqvist 1 The questions in the Guidelines are answered briefly as follows below,
More informationCriminal Law Outline intent crime
This outline was created for the July 2006 Oregon bar exam. The law changes over time, so use with caution. If you would like an editable version of this outline, go to www.barexammind.com/outlines. Criminal
More informationLAWS1206 Criminal Law and Procedure 1 st Semester 2005
LAWS1206 Criminal Law and Procedure 1 st Semester 2005 How to Use this Script: These sample exam answers are based on problems done in past years. Since these answers were written, the law has changed
More informationGCE GENERAL ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY MENS REA 2: RECKLESSNESS SUGGESTED IDEAS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING
GCE LAW: GENERAL ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY MENS REA 2: RECKLESSNESS SUGGESTED IDEAS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING SUGGESTED IDEAS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING Teacher /Lecturer: Course: A Level Law Topic: General
More informationCSE 3482 Introduction to Computer Security. Law & Ethics
CSE 3482 Introduction to Computer Security Law & Ethics Instructor: N. Vlajic, Winter 2017 Learning Objectives Upon completion of this material, you should be able to: Differentiate between law and ethics.
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationQUESTION What charges can reasonably be brought against Steve? Discuss. 2. What charges can reasonably be brought against Will? Discuss.
QUESTION 2 Will asked Steve, a professional assassin, to kill Adam, a business rival, and Steve accepted. Before Steve was scheduled to kill Adam, Will heard that Adam s business was failing. Will told
More informationLecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 14:15-15:15. Session 3, 16 Oct 2018
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 14:15-15:15 e-mail: miljen.matijasevic@gmail.com Session 3, 16 Oct 2018 Criminal Law, part 1 1. What does criminal law involve? 2. What is actus reus and
More informationActus Reus - Introduction
Actus Reus - Introduction 1/10 MR e.g. Unlawful application of force ( Lord Steyn in R v Ireland [1997]) - Conduct Crime Assault causing actual bodily harm (s47 OAPA) - Result Crime Actus Reus - Introduction
More informationCriminal Law Doctrine and Theory
Criminal Law Doctrine and Theory Third edition William Wilson Hartow, England - London New York Boston San f rancisco Toronto Sydney Tokyo Singapore Mong Kong Seoul Taipei New Delhi Cape Town Madrid Mexico
More informationINSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW *
17 January 2012 Level 3 CRIMINAL LAW Subject Code L3-3 INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW * Time allowed: 1 hour and 30 minutes plus 15 minutes reading time Instructions to Candidates You
More informationLoveless, Allen, and Derry: Complete Criminal Law 6e, Chapter 14. In the examples below, has D entered a building as a trespasser?
Think box 14.1 In the examples below, has D entered a building as a trespasser? 1. D inserts a long hook on the end of a pole through the window of a warehouse to drag out some expensive oriental carpets.
More informationUnderstanding CPS Decision Making. Charlotte Triggs. Senior Policy Advisor
Understanding CPS Decision Making Charlotte Triggs Senior Policy Advisor The role of CPS The Code for Crown Prosecutors http://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/code_for_crown_prosecutors/ The Full Code Test
More informationCRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS
CRIMINAL LAW: TEXT AND MATERIALS Fifth Edition by C. M. V. CLARKSON, B.A.,LL.B.,LL.M. Trofessor oflaw, University ofleicester H. M. KEATING, LL.M. Senior Lecturer in Law, University ofsussex LONDON SWEET
More informationUNIT 2 Part 1 CRIMINAL LAW
UNIT 2 Part 1 CRIMINAL LAW 1 OBJECTIVES: Differentiate between federal and state laws and develop understanding between crimes against people, and crimes against property. NBEA STANDARD I: Analyze the
More informationOBJECTIVES: Differentiate between federal and state laws and develop understanding between crimes against people, and crimes against property.
UNIT 2 CRIMINAL LAW 1 OBJECTIVES: Differentiate between federal and state laws and develop understanding between crimes against people, and crimes against property. NBEA STANDARD I: Analyze the different
More informationDeWolf, Final Exam Sample Answer, December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 6. Professor DeWolf Fall 2015 Criminal Law December 19, 2015 FINAL -- SAMPLE ANSWER
DeWolf, Final Exam Sample Answer, December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 6 Professor DeWolf Fall 2015 Criminal Law December 19, 2015 FINAL -- SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. (a) is incorrect because he still has
More informationFALL 2011 December 12, 2011 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE
CRIMINAL LAW PROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2011 December 12, 2011 FINAL EXAM SAMPLE ANSWER MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. (A) is incorrect, because a solicitation does not require agreement on the part of the object of the
More informationCHAPTER FIVE: MENS REA, CONCURRENCE, AND CAUSATION
Men Rea, Concurrence, and Causation INTRODUCTION CHAPTER FIVE: MENS REA, CONCURRENCE, AND CAUSATION The bedrock principle of criminal law is that a crime requires an act or omission and a criminal intent.
More information(1) Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment for five years.
SAMPLE Aggravated Assault s 59 Assault Occasioning ABH 59 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (1) Whosoever assaults any person, and thereby occasions actual bodily harm, shall be liable to imprisonment
More informationSOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 4&5: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada II:
SOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 4&5: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada II: In the next 2 classes we will consider: (i) Canadian constitutional mechanics; (ii) Types of law; (iii)
More informationThe Criminal Attempts Act 1981 was intended to improve the law on attempts. The extent to which it has succeeded is open to doubt.
Attempts By the end of this topic you will be able to (AO1): Explain what is meant by an attempt and the reasons why we criminalise this behaviour. Understand the problems surrounding the actus reus of
More informationLecture 3: The American Criminal Justice System
Lecture 3: The American Criminal Justice System Part 1. Classification of Law Part 2. Functions of Criminal Law Part 3: Complexity of Law Part 4: Legal Definition of Crime Part 5: Criminal Defenses Part
More informationSKILLS Workshop Series Academic Support:
Criminal Law: Applying Test-taking Skills to Substantive Law Prof Homer: jhomer@law.whittier.edu Prof Dombrow: kdombrow@law.whittier.edu Prof Gutterud: hgutterud@law.whittier.edu SKILLS Workshop Series
More informationCHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law
CHAPTER 14 Criminal Law and Juvenile Law CRIMINAL LAW Chapter 14 Section I Case File and 345-347 Review the case file at the beginning of the chapter. Think about the situation (however exaggerated it
More informationComparative Criminal Law 6. Defences
Comparative Criminal Law 6 Defences 11.03.2013 Content Defenses. Infringement. Guilt. Corporate responsibility. Two, three or more elements? Actus reus and mens rea (-defenses) Actus reus, infringement
More informationCRIMINAL LITIGATION PRE-COURSE MATERIALS
Legal Practice Course 2014-2015 CRIMINAL LITIGATION PRE-COURSE MATERIALS Copyright Bristol Institute of Legal Practice, UWE AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LITIGATION 1. Introduction: You will be studying
More informationPrinciples of Common Law 4 January 2017
Prof. Dr. iur. Kern Alexander Fall 06 Principles of Common Law 4 January 07 Duration: 0 minutes Please check both at receipt as well as at submission of the exam the number of question sheets. The examination
More informationCriminal Law Training Module
Criminal Law Training Module For additional information please contact: Forum Legal PL 62 (Kutomotie 18) 00381 Helsinki Finland Tel: +358 44 088 1177 Fax: +358 9 565 96300 Email: info@forum-legal.com Internet:
More informationUniversity of Washington School of Law Criminal Law, Law A505 C Professor Hardisty Syllabus and Reading Assignments for Spring Quarter 2012
Revised 3/27/2012 University of Washington School of Law Criminal Law, Law A505 C Syllabus and Reading Assignments for Spring Quarter 2012 Class Schedule Class meets Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday,
More informationTable of Contents. Table of Cases...
Table of Contents Table of Cases... xiii Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1. Prefatory Remarks... 1 2. An Attempt to Commit an Offence is an Offence in its Own Right... 3 3. Definitional Elements... 3 4. Introductory
More informationAPPENDIX E. MINORITY REPORT 7.7 Manslaughter
APPENDIX E MINORITY REPORT 7.7 Manslaughter Bart Schneider Member, Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases Assistant State Attorney, Seventh Judicial Circuit Committee on Standard Jury
More informationBar Council response to the Reform of Offences against the Person Scoping Consultation Paper
Bar Council response to the Reform of Offences against the Person Scoping Consultation Paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to the Law
More informationA-level LAW. Paper 1 SPECIMEN MATERIAL
SPECIMEN MATERIAL Please write clearly, in block capitals. Centre number Candidate number Surname Forename(s) Candidate signature A-level LAW Paper 1 Specimen 2016 Time allowed: 2 hours Instructions Use
More informationMLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES
MLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES Contents Topic 1: Course Overview... 3 Sources of Criminal Law... 4 Requirements for Criminal Liability... 4 Topic 2: Homicide and Actus Reus... Error! Bookmark not defined. Unlawful
More informationDEPARTMENTAL EXAMINATION OF IAS/HAS OFFICERS (H.P)FEB I) Attempt any five questions, but at least one from each part;
DEPARTMENTAL EXAMINATION OF IAS/HAS OFFICERS (H.P)FEB.2006 PAPER.I CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE Time Allowed: 3 Hours Max Marks:100 Note: I) Attempt any five questions, but at least one from each part; ii)
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationThe Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1
CONTENTS Preface xiii Acknowledgments About the Author xv xvii I. CHAPTER 1 The Sources of and Limits on Criminal Law 1 A. Introduction 1 1. The Purpose of Criminal Law 1 a) Morality and Blame 2 b) The
More informationHart s View Criminal law should only act on bare minimum and it should not extend into the private realm
NATURE OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY What is Crime? Two thought pools: Criminal law not linked to central morals of society Views of positivists Criminal law is linked to morals or views
More informationSergeants OSPRE Part 1 Statistics - Evidence
Sergeants OSPRE Part 1 Statistics - Evidence Topic 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Probability Rating 7 Question 6 Question 6 Question 5 Question 4 Question 5.6 Questions Grounds for Refusing Bail x2 Police Bail
More informationJURD7122/LAWS1022 Criminal Laws
JURD7122/LAWS1022 Criminal Laws MURDER... 5 ELEMENTS... 5 ACTUS REUS... 5 Voluntariness... 5 Ommission... 5 Causation... 5 MENS REA... 5 Heads of mens rea:... 5 Intention to kill... 5 Intention to inflict
More informationTHE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW *
15 January 2013 Level 3 CRIMINAL LAW Subject Code L3-3 THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW * Time allowed: 1 hour and 30 minutes plus 15 minutes reading time Instructions to
More informationPrincipals and Accessories after Jogee
1 Principals and Accessories after Jogee The best way in to understanding the state of the law on principals and accessories 1 after the UKSC s decision in Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 is by considering a number
More information