Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff s Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph
|
|
- Stella Carr
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2003 Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff s Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph Suzette M. Malveaux The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Suzette M. Malveaux, Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff s Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph, 25 ADVOCATE 20 (2003). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact edinger@law.edu.
2 20 ADVOCATE * WINTER 2003 ARBITRATION AND THE SUPREME COURT: A CRITIQUE FROM PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL IN GREEN TREE V. RANDOLPH O NE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES facing our legal system today is the proliferation of arbitration agreements and the United State's Supreme Court's deference to enforcing those agreements. The explosion of pre-dispute arbitration agreements in employment contracts and commercial transactions is moving us towards an unparalleled privatization of the justice system. This issue is important because the procedural protections established by the court system are critical to the enforcement of certain rights, particularly federal statutory civil rights and consumer protection laws. The Expansion of the Court's Endorsement of Private Arbitration Agreements Arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act were originally a means of alternative dispute resolution between commercial entities of equal bargaining power, each of whom negotiated provisions from a vantage point of sophistication and business experience. Within this context, the parties agreed to submit any future disputes to arbitration and negotiated terms that preserved their business relationship in the future. However, arbitration agreements are increasingly being used by employers as a condition of employment and by lenders and retailers in non-negotiable contracts of adhesion. Since the Supreme Court's holding in Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnsont Lante Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991), employers are conditioning employment on an individual's willingness to waive his or her right to sue their employer in court. Employees, consumers and others with little bargaining power and less knowledge about arbitration, are being compelled to forego their day in court because they signed an arbitration clause which appeared in fine print on the back of a form application or contract which they did not understand, and of which they may not have even been aware. Despite Congress's admonition in enacting the Civil Rights Act of 1991 that "American workers should not be forced to choose between their jobs and their civil rights," H.R. Rep. No (I), at 104 (1991), many employees are facing this dilemma. Not only has the Court endorsed BY SUZETTE M. MALVEAUX the availability of arbitration in favor of just about any kind of civil dispute over which a court could have jurisdiction, but it has rejected challenges to arbitration on a plethora of significant grounds. The Impact of the Court's Endorsement of Private Arbitration The Court's recent decisions, and its endorsement of arbitration in the past, have contributed to a burgeoning practice on the part of companies and employers to insert mandatory arbitration clauses in their standardized, non-negotiable contracts, compelling consumers and employees to forego the option of using the courts to vindicate rights they may someday believe were infringed. The proliferation of mandatory, binding arbitration, which began around 1985, has grown dramatically since the early 1990's. Today, it threatens to deny employees, consumers and others lacking the power to bargain over the terms of arbitration, the basic procedural protections that most Americans take for granted. The supporters of arbitration, most of which are big business and employers, tout its speed and flexibility as well as the potential to save litigation expenses as features which commend its broad use. However, they fail to disclose the serious risk that arbitration will ride roughshod over the parties', and particularly the individuals', substantive and procedural rights which the judicial system is designed to protect. The Impact of Green Tree Financial Corp. - Alabama v. Randolph Has the pendulum swung too far in the direction of endorsing pre-dispute arbitration agreements without a sufficient examination of whether the underlying terms of those agreements preclude someone from having to vindicate their statutory rights? Moreover, as a matter of policy, should we permit people to contract away certain procedural rights which may in fact be tantamount to their substantive rights? And are there circumstances where waiver of certain procedures will deprive society of important and meaningful development of the law and articulation of our
3 ADVOCATE WINTER public values? These are the kinds of questions we as legal scholars, practitioners and judges need to ask ourselves as the courts divert cases from an overloaded federal judiciary to private forums. These are the kinds of questions I have asked myself since representing the plaintiff, Ms. Randolph, in Greeni Tree Fin. Corp. -Alabama v. Ranidolph, 531 U.S. 79 (2000) ("Green Tree I"). In Greeni Tree I, Ms. Randolph, a mortgage holder, sued Green Tree Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary for failing to disclose a $15 insurance premium, in violation of the Truth in Lending Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Green Tree sought to enforce a compulsory pre-dispute arbitration agreement, leading the district court to dismiss the case and compel arbitration. The Eleventh Circuit reversed, concluding that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because it failed to provide the minimum guarantees that Ms. Randolph could vindicate her statutory rights. Specifically, it concluded that because the agreement was silent as to arbitration costs and their allocation, the agreement posed a risk that Ms. Randolph would not be able to vindicate hcr statutory rights because of steep arbitration costs. While holding the arbitration agreement enforceable 5-4, the Supreme Court recognized that an agreement which imposes large costs on a consumer may render the agreement unenforceable. Having explained in prior decisions that arbitration agreements which cause a party to forego substantive rights provided by the underlying statute should not be enforced, the Court's ruling in Greeni Tree I strongly signals that evidence of high arbitration costs could leave an agreement void. However, in Greeni Tree I, the plaintiff had failed to make such a record and the Court offered no guidance as to the quantum of evidence required. Therefore, the agreement was enforceable. In response to Greeni Tree I, the lower courts have held that the party seeking to invalidate an arbitration agreement on the grounds that arbitration is prohibitively expensive bears the burden of demonstrating that compulsory arbitration will effectively deprive him from vindicating his statutory rights. For example, the Third Circuit has interpreted Greeni Tree I to require that the claimant produce evidence of what the actual arbitration fees would be in the particular case and "The explosion of pre-dispute arbitration agreements in employment contracts and commercial transactions is moving us towards an unparalleled privatization of the Justice system." evidence verifying that she could not afford such fees. See Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases, 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. 464 (3d Cir. 2002). In Blair the district court and the Third Circuit rejected the claimant's affidavit that she was insolvent as self-serving and insufficient, thereby forcing her to prove her insolvency in a full-blown inquiry upon remand. Given the courts' disinclination to determine the issue of fees, the parties themselves will most likely bear the burden of sorting through this issue with the arbitrator. More importantly and ideally, one would hope that the drafters of arbitration agreements would make clear up front what the arbitration expenses are and how they are to be allocated amongst the parties. Certain ADR neutrals are promulgating rules that are explicit and are in fact, shifting the costs from the consumer to the defendant company. While Greent Tree I recognized that exorbitant costs could make an arbitration agreement unenforceable, it did not go far enough. The arbitration agreement in Green Tree I failed to insure that the cost of access to the arbitral forum would be no greater than the cost of access to the judicial forum. Because Ms. Randolph was contracted out of one forum and barred financially from another, she was foreclosed from pursuing her claim at all. The Supreme Court's analysis in Green Tree I was flawed in its failure to consider the deterrent effect that such an arbitration agreement might have on others. Given the agreement's silence as to the cost and cost allocation, consumers with grievances would have no way of knowing if they could afford to challenge Green Tree's disclosure practices, and therefore might not pursue arbitration out of fear they would be saddled with exorbitant costs. Unfortunately, that risk remains today. The Impact of Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Bazzle The question that the Supreme Court declined to address in Green Tree I-the enforceability of an arbitration agreement that was silent about the availability of class actions-was resolved just recently in Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Bazzle, 123 S. Ct (2003) (Green Tree II). In Green Tree II, the Supreme Court held that where a commercial lending contract's arbitration clause was silent about the availability of the class action device it did not clearly preclude class arbitration. The FAA did not foreclose class arbitration, but it was an
4 22 ADVOCATE * WINTER 2003 issue of contract interpretation under state law. While the South Carolina Supreme Court held that under certain circumstances class-wide arbitration could be ordered on the absence of arbitration clause's language to the contrary, the United States Supreme Court vacated this ruling, concluding that the arbitrator and not the court should make this determination. Rather than establishing class arbitration under the FAA, Greeni Tree II has left individual arbitrators to determine the propriety of class arbitration-thereby leaving similar agreements open to various interpretations by a different arbitrator. While Greeni Tree II has opened the door to class arbitration, it has also created unpredictability and uncertainty in its wake. The next question before the Court is likely to be whether arbitration clauses that explicitly prohibit class actions are permissible. Many neutral ADR organizations have promulgated rules that outright forbid the consolidation or joinder of unrelated actions, and preclude class actions. Ironically, as a result of Green Tree II, more companies are rewriting their arbitration agreements to expressly prohibit class actions. However, some neutrals, such as the American Arbitration Association, whose rules are silent on the subject, are in the process of creating rules that address class arbitration and administering such cases. The availability of class actions is critical in safeguarding the civil rights of employees, consumers and other individuals. The class action device is critical to the enforcement of such laws because plaintiffs are able to successfully aggregate small claims and benefit from the economies of scale the class action device provides. The mere potential of a class action is often enough to encourage voluntary compliance, but the arbitral forum is increasingly being abused. Some lenders, employers and other corporate entities are using arbitration to shield themselves from liability by not allowing for class actions. This procedural tactic, for all intents and purposes, immunizes them from the requirements of some consumer protection laws and civil rights statutes. The Court's Continued Endorsement of Private Arbitration Agreements Notwithstanding the Court's receptivity to considering costs on the enforceability of arbitration agreements (Greeni Tree I), and the Court's willingness to let arbitrators determine the propriety of class arbitration, it is plain that the Court's propensity to enforce arbitration agreements has not waned and that arbitration agreements are here to stay. In Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 121 S.Ct (2001), the final case of a trilogy considered in the same term as Green Tree Financial Corporation - Alabama v. Randolph, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its approval of the private resolution of disputes. In Circuit City, the Court narrowly construed an exception to the Federal Arbitration Act to ensure that persons with EEO claims in non-unionized workplaces stion before ion the woud o be covered by the Act and by its presumption Court Is likel) y t :o be whether favoring enforcement of arbitralauses that Ic explicitly proh ilbit class actions as part of an employment appli- Issible."cation form and later brought ml tion agreements. An employee signed an arbitration agreement suit against his employer, Circuit City, pursuant to California's anti-discrimination statute and other common law state tort claims. Circuit City sought to force him to arbitrate his claims, but the Ninth Circuit disagreed, concluding that the FAA did not apply to employment contracts which did not fall within a narrow scope of transportation workers. The Supreme Court's recent ruling overturned this, confirming that the FAA covers disputes arising out of employment relationships and continuing a trend of rejecting challenges to the arbitrability of federal statutory claims under the FAA. In doing so, the Court demonstrated its long-standing reluctance to exclude any discrete category of claims from coverage by the FAA. To the extent that insight may be gleaned from the Court's decision in Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, 531 U.S. 57 (2000), a case involving arbitration in the context of collective bargaining, it looks as if the traditional deference to an arbitration award will continue. In United Mine Workers, the Court held that it was not a violation of public policy for an arbitrator to reinstate an employee in a safety sensitive position who had twice tested positive for marijuana use. In reaching this conclusion, the Court endorsed its broad deference to the award of an arbitrator, even where the employer claimed it would jeopardize the health and safety of others. While arising from a unionized workplace, the deference to arbitrator awards may find equal support from this Court in awards under the FAA. The Court's decision in EEOC v. Waffle House, 534 U.S. 279
5 ADVOCATE WINTER (2002), has not signaled a change in the Court's propensity to favor enforcement of arbitration agreements. In Waffle House, it simply held that the EEOC was not a party to the arbitration agreement and therefore was free to pursue victim-specific relief on behalf of an employee who signed an arbitration agreement with his employer. Thus, Waffle House did little to change the pro-arbitration path the Court has taken. Conclusion Given the Court's endorsement of arbitration, the primary action today is found in the lower courts which will continue to face challenges to arbitration on the basis of the unique features of pre-dispute arbitration agreements that have proliferated amongst the business and employment communities. Given that pre-dispute compulsory arbitration is here to stay, the battle has turned to due process procedures within the arbitration. Legal scholars, the courts, the parties and arbitrators themselves continue to debate what constitutes a fair and affordable arbitration process. Given the steady erosion of the court system in favor of privatized dispute resolution, we must continue to protect what is ultimately at stake-justice itself. Suzette Malveaux is assistant professor of law at the Uiversity of Alabama School of Law. As an associate at Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld and Toll, Ms. Malveaux represented Ms. Randolph before the United States Supreme Court in the October 2000 term. This article expands on themes initially presented at the Georgetown Uiversity Law Center CLE at the 191h Annual GULC/CLE Employment Law and Litigation Institute with Joseph M. Sellers, in May, *
Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Employment Context
Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Employment Context By Joshua M. Javits Special to the national law journal During the last year and half, the legal environment surrounding the use of alternative
More informationArbitration Provisions in Employment Contract May Be Under Fire
Labor and Employment Law Notes Arbitration Provisions in Employment Contract May Be Under Fire The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in the case of Hall Street Associates, L.L.C.
More informationThe Battle Over Class Action: Second Circuit Holds that Class Action Waiver for Antitrust Actions Unenforceable Under the Federal Arbitration Act
Arbitration Law Review Volume 4 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 24 7-1-2012 The Battle Over Class Action: Second Circuit Holds that Class Action Waiver for Antitrust Actions Unenforceable
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL30934 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Federal Arbitration Act: Background and Recent Developments Updated August 15, 2003 Jon O. Shimabukuro Legislative Attorney American
More informationArbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees: The Sixth Circuit Says the EEOC Is Not Bound - EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & (and) Crafts, Inc.
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2000 Issue 1 Article 17 2000 Arbitration Agreements between Employers and Employees: The Sixth Circuit Says the EEOC Is Not Bound - EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & (and)
More informationLast Chance Agreements Last Chance or Not? Webinar May 9, :00 p.m. ET
Last Chance Agreements Last Chance or Not? Webinar May 9, 2013 2:00 p.m. ET PROGRAM SUMMARY Speaker: Lisa Salkovitz Kohn, Esq. Last chance agreements are a familiar tool in the workplace: In return for
More informationConsumer Class Action Waivers Post-Concepcion
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Consumer Class Action Waivers Post-Concepcion Law360,
More informationMILES E. LOCKER LOCKER FOLBERG LLP 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 422 San Francisco, California (415)
MILES E. LOCKER LOCKER FOLBERG LLP 71 Stevenson Street, Suite 422 San Francisco, California 94105 (415) 962-1626 mlocker@lockerfolberg.com Hon. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Chief Justice and the Honorable Associate
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D. C. Docket No CV-WCO-1. versus
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 06-15516 D. C. Docket No. 05-03315-CV-WCO-1 FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
More informationRandolph v. Green Tree Financial Corp: Does a Failure to Allocate Arbitration Clause Prevent Consumers from Vindicating Their Cause of Action
Loyola Consumer Law Review Volume 13 Issue 3 Article 4 2001 Randolph v. Green Tree Financial Corp: Does a Failure to Allocate Arbitration Clause Prevent Consumers from Vindicating Their Cause of Action
More informationArbitrating Managed Care Disputes
Arbitrating Managed Care Disputes Presented by: Kathleen Taylor Sooy Tracy Roman April Nelson HOOPS 2007 - Washington, DC October 15-16 Advantages of Traditional Arbitration Less expensive than court litigation
More informationDISCUSSION. Page Md. LEXIS 115, *7
2007 Md. LEXIS 115, *7 Page 4 [*8l DISCUSSION Koons Ford contends that under the FAA, arbitration agreements are enforceable absent a showing that Congress intended to override the FAA by precluding binding
More informationARBITRATION AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO RESOLVING DISPUTES ARISING IN THE WORKPLACE
ARBITRATION AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO RESOLVING DISPUTES ARISING IN THE WORKPLACE Provided by David J. Comeaux Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, LLC Hospitality Law H L C 2004 Conference When
More informationChicken or Egg: Applying the Age- Old Question to Class Waivers in Employee Arbitration Agreements
Chicken or Egg: Applying the Age- Old Question to Class Waivers in Employee Arbitration Agreements By Bonnie Burke, Lawrence & Bundy LLC and Christina Tellado, Reed Smith LLP Companies with employees across
More informationMay 7, By: Christopher M. Mason, Steven M. Richards and Brian M. Childs
May 7, 2010 The United States Supreme Court speaks loudly in Stolt- Nielsen: The Federal Arbitration Action Act does not permit class arbitrations when the parties have been silent on the subject By: Christopher
More informationMarie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp. I. INTRODUCTION The First Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp., 1 regarding the division of labor between
More informationCase 3:17-cv EDL Document 53 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCELLA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Defendant. Case No.-cv-0-EDL ORDER GRANTING
More informationSTATE BAR OF TEXAS LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW SECTION STATE OF ADR
29 TH ANNUAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW INSTITUTE STATE BAR OF TEXAS LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW SECTION STATE OF ADR Charles C. High, Jr. Brian Sanford WHAT IS ADR? Common term we all understand Federal government
More informationClass Actions. Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Class Actions Unconscionable Consumer Class Action Waivers And The Federal Arbitration Act by Marc J. Goldstein Marc J. Goldstein Litigation and Arbitration Chambers New York,
More informationBy: Professor Jean R. Sternlight University of Nevada Las Vegas Boyd School of Law
The Ultimate Arbitration Update: Examining Recent Trends in Labor and Employment Arbitration in the Context of Broader Trends with Respect to Arbitration By: Professor Jean R. Sternlight University of
More informationRICHARD A. BALES & MARK B. GERANO I. INTRODUCTION
DETERMINING THE PROPER STANDARD FOR INVALIDATING ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS BASED ON HIGH PROHIBITIVE COSTS: A DISCUSSION ON THE VARYING APPLICATIONS OF THE CASE-BY-CASE RULE RICHARD A. BALES & MARK B. GERANO
More informationThe Supreme Court Opens the Door to Mandatory Arbitration of Discrimination Claims for Union Members
A Timely Analysis of Legal Developments A S A P In This Issue: April 2009 On April 1, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court in 14 Penn Plaza L.L.C. v. Pyett, held that a provision in a collective bargaining agreement
More informationCOLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION CASES: FORUM SHOPPING THEIR WAY INTO A NEW YORK DISTRICT COURT NEAR YOU!
Brigham Young University Hawaii From the SelectedWorks of George Klidonas September 24, 2009 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION CASES: FORUM SHOPPING THEIR WAY INTO A NEW YORK DISTRICT
More informationExpert Analysis Consumer Class Actions Take Another Hit: Supreme Court Rules Class-Action Arbitration Waiver Covers Antitrust Claims
Westlaw Journal CLASS ACTION Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 20, ISSUE 6 / AUGUST 2013 Expert Analysis Consumer Class Actions Take Another Hit: Supreme Court
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA DEADRA D. CUMMINS, on her own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated, and IVAN and LaDONNA BELL, on their own _,._ behalf and on behalf of
More informationThe Roberts Court VS. the Regulators: Surveying Arbitration's Next Battleground
The Alexander Blewett III School of Law The Scholarly Forum @ Montana Law Faculty Law Review Articles Faculty Publications 2012 The Roberts Court VS. the Regulators: Surveying Arbitration's Next Battleground
More informationPOLICY STATEMENT REVISED UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT (RUAA)
POLICY STATEMENT REVISED UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT (RUAA) 1. Background and Objectives of RUAA The Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA) was adopted by the Conference in 1955 and has been widely enacted (in 35 jurisdictions,
More informationCase 3:08-cv HA Document 43 Filed 05/26/09 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 555
Case 3:08-cv-01178-HA Document 43 Filed 05/26/09 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 555 Amy R. Alpera, OSB No. 840244 Email: aalpern@littler.com Neil N. Olsen, OSB No. 053378 Email: nolsen@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON,
More informationAfter Stolt-Nielsen, Circuits Split, But AAA Filings Continue
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report After Stolt-Nielsen, Circuits Split, But AAA Filings Continue by Gregory A. Litt Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP New York Tina Praprotnik Duke Law
More informationEXTENDING THE USE OF ARBITRATION TO NONUNION ENVIRONMENTS: JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DUE PROCESS HARVEY M. SHRAGE * I.
EXTENDING THE USE OF ARBITRATION TO NONUNION ENVIRONMENTS: JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DUE PROCESS HARVEY M. SHRAGE * I. INTRODUCTION With the rise in the cost of litigation, 1 the lengthy litigation process,
More informationSupreme Court Finds the Discover Bank Rule Preempted by FAA
To read the decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, please click here. Supreme Court Finds the Discover Bank Rule Preempted by FAA April 28, 2011 INTRODUCTION Yesterday, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion,
More informationChapter 1. By David J. Laurent Brandon D. Coneby Babst, Calland, Clements and Zomnir Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
CITE AS 23 Energy & Min. L. Inst. ch. 1 (2003) Chapter 1 Mandatory Arbitration of Employment Claims after Circuit City v. Adams and EECO v. Waffle House: When Is an Arbitration Agreement Valid and Enforceable?
More informationAre Arbitrators Right Even When They Are Wrong?: Second Circuit Upholds Arbitral Ruling Allowing Implicit Reference to Class Arbitration
Arbitration Law Review Volume 4 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 26 7-1-2012 Are Arbitrators Right Even When They Are Wrong?: Second Circuit Upholds Arbitral Ruling Allowing Implicit Reference
More informationUnited States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver
United States Supreme Court Considering A California Appellate Court Opinion Invalidating A Class Action Arbitration Waiver By: Roland C. Goss August 31, 2015 On October 6, 2015, the second day of this
More informationS15G1295. BICKERSTAFF v. SUNTRUST BANK. certain deadline, containing certain identifying information such as name and
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: July 8, 2016 S15G1295. BICKERSTAFF v. SUNTRUST BANK. Benham, Justice. Appellee SunTrust Bank created a deposit agreement to govern its relationship with its depositors
More informationCase: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302
Case: 4:15-cv-01361-JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY H. JONES, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:15-cv-01361-JAR
More informationMarc L. Silverman, for appellant. William H. Roth, for respondent Brady. At issue is whether petitioner met her burden of
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationLinda James, v. McDonald's Corporation Readers were referred to this case on page 630
Linda James, v. McDonald's Corporation Readers were referred to this case on page 630 Linda James, v. McDonald's Corporation. 417 F.3d 672 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit August 2, 2005 RIPPLE,
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIR- CUIT U.S. App. LEXIS November 5, 2013, Decided
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT REED ELSEVIER, INC., through its LexisNexis Division, Plaintiff Appellee, v. CRAIG CROCKETT, as alleged assignee of Dehart and Crockett, P.C.; CRAIG M. CROCKETT, P.C., d b a Crockett
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT WINCHESTER MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT WINCHESTER DAVID HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:14-CV-0046 ) Phillips/Lee TD AMERITRADE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant
More informationARBITRATION PROVISION
ARBITRATION PROVISION READ THIS ARBITRATION PROVISION SET OUT BELOW CAREFULLY. IF YOU DO NOT REJECT ARBITRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 1 BELOW, THIS ARBITRATION PROVISION WILL GOVERN ANY AND ALL
More informationCase 2:12-cv GP Document 27 Filed 01/17/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:12-cv-02526-GP Document 27 Filed 01/17/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUE VALERI, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION v. : : MYSTIC INDUSTRIES
More informationArbitration Agreements and Class Actions
Supreme Court Enforces Arbitration Agreement with Class Action Waiver, Narrowing the Scope of Ability to Avoid Such Agreements SUMMARY The United States Supreme Court yesterday continued its rigorous enforcement
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Rel:03/17/2017 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT PILOT CATASTROPHE SERVICES, INC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant,
More informationPage 1 of 6. Page 1. (Cite as: 287 F.Supp.2d 1229)
Page 1 of 6 Page 1 Motions, Pleadings and Filings United States District Court, S.D. California. Nelson MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. John Hine PONTIAC, and Does 1-30 inclusive, Defendants. No. 03CVI007IEG(POR).
More informationCase 3:06-cv TBR Document 12 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00569-TBR Document 12 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:06-CV-569-R TIMOTHY LANDIS PLAINTIFF v. PINNACLE
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 KELSI WEIDNER Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MCCANN EDUCATION CENTERS, INC. AND DELTA CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION Appellants
More informationJournal of Dispute Resolution
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1995 Issue 2 Article 4 1995 Mandatory Arbitration and Title VII: Can Employees Ever See Their Rights Vindicated through Statutory Causes of Action - Metz v. Merrill
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW 3 rd ANNUAL CLE CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 5, 2009 WASHINGTON, D.C. Pyett v.
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW 3 rd ANNUAL CLE CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 5, 2009 WASHINGTON, D.C. Pyett v. 14 Penn Plaza Kathleen Phair Barnard Schwerin Campbell Barnard Iglitzin
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAREN MACKALL, v. Plaintiff, HEALTHSOURCE GLOBAL STAFFING, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-who ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Re:
More informationQui Tam Claims - A Way to Pierce the Federal Policy on Arbitration?: A Comment on Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.
Arbitration Law Review Volume 8 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 12 5-1-2016 Qui Tam Claims - A Way to Pierce the Federal Policy on Arbitration?: A Comment on Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North
More informationTHE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Vicki F. Chassereau, Respondent, v. Global-Sun Pools, Inc. and Ken Darwin, Petitioners. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Hampton
More information1. How This Agreement Applies
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT This Arbitration Agreement is a legal contract and covers important issues relating to your rights. It is your sole responsibility to read it and understand it. You are free to seek
More informationCOMPULSORY EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION: PROS AND CONS FOR EMPLOYERS
COMPULSORY EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION: PROS AND CONS FOR EMPLOYERS by Frank Cronin, Esq. Snell & Wilmer 1920 Main Street Suite 1200 Irvine, California 92614 949-253-2700 A rbitration of commercial disputes
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CONSECO FINANCE SERVICING CORPORATION, f/k/a GREEN TREE FINANCIAL SERVICING CORPORATION, UNPUBLISHED November 18, 2003 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellee, v No. 241234
More informationCase 0:13-cv JIC Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:13-cv-60066-JIC Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2013 Page 1 of 9 ABRAHAM INETIANBOR, v. Plaintiff, CASHCALL, INC., Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 561 U. S. (2010) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 09 497 RENT-A-CENTER, WEST, INC., PETITIONER v. ANTONIO JACKSON ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH
More informationEEOC v. Waffle House, Inc.*
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc.* I. INTRODUCTION One year ago we confidently declared that "[e]mployers need no longer worry that the arbitration agreements they include in contracts of
More informationCase 0:13-cv JIC Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:13-cv-60066-JIC Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 13-60066-CIV-COHN-SELTZER ABRAHAM INETIANBOR Plaintiff,
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: webcast@acc.com Thank You! 1 AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion Avoiding
More informationHarris v. Green Tree Financial Corp. *
Harris v. Green Tree Financial Corp. * I. INTRODUCTION In the 1980s, the Supreme Court of the United States reinterpreted the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)' and stated that it "create[d] a 'liberal federal
More informationArkansas Supreme Court Holds Invalid Arbitration Agreement For Lack of Mutuality
Arbitration Law Review Volume 7 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 17 2015 Arkansas Supreme Court Holds Invalid Arbitration Agreement For Lack of Mutuality Nathaniel Conti Follow this and additional
More informationL E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S. 1. Explore the option of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) strategy.
4.3 Arbitration L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S 1. Explore the option of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) strategy. 2. Explore contemporary issues of fairness in arbitration. 3.
More informationThe Supreme Court will shortly be considering
Arbitration at a Cross Road: Will the Supreme Court Hold the Federal Arbitration Act Trumps Federal Labor Laws? By John Jay Range and Bryan Cleveland The Supreme Court will shortly be considering three
More informationJURY WAIVERS AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS
JURY WAIVERS AND ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS David H. Peck Taft, Stettinius and Hollister, LLP 425 Walnut Street, Suite 1800 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 357-9606 (513) 730-1534 (pager) peck@taftlaw.com JURY
More informationConstruction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)
Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2009 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective
More informationThe Future of Class Actions: Fallout from Concepcion and American Express January 28, 2014 Association of Corporate Counsel James M.
The Future of Class Actions: Fallout from Concepcion and American Express January 28, 2014 Association of Corporate Counsel James M. Schurz 2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com The
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LAWRENCE HILL, ADAM WISE, ) NO. 66137-0-I and ROBERT MILLER, on their own ) behalves and on behalf of all persons ) DIVISION ONE similarly situated, )
More informationMagnuson-Moss Warranty Act v. the Federal Arbitration Act The Makings for a Battle
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act v. the Federal Arbitration Act The Makings for a Battle I. INTRODUCTION By Nathan White* In 1975 Congress passed the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:15-cv-01180-D Document 25 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ASHLEY SLATTEN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-15-1180-D
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division KIM J. BENNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 3:10CV39-JAG DILLARD S, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-1620 Cellular Sales of Missouri, LLC lllllllllllllllllllllpetitioner v. National Labor Relations Board lllllllllllllllllllllrespondent ------------------------------
More informationNo IN THE 6XSUHPH&RXUWRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV. U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INCORPORATED, Respondent.
No. 99-1823 IN THE 6XSUHPH&RXUWRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INCORPORATED, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of
More informationArbitration in the Supreme Court: Dire Results, Dire Predictions, Or Limited Holdings?
Arbitration in the Supreme Court: Dire Results, Dire Predictions, Or Limited Holdings? Two cases decided in 2010, and one decision which will be issued in 2011, may substantially affect court involvement
More informationThe Changing Landscape: The Supreme Court, Class Actions and Arbitrations
The Changing Landscape: The Supreme Court, Class Actions and Arbitrations William Frank Carroll Board Certified, Civil Trial Law and Civil Appellate Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization (214) 698-7828
More informationx : : : : : : : : : x Plaintiffs, current and former female employees of defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- LARYSSA JOCK, et al., Plaintiffs, -v- STERLING JEWELERS, INC., Defendant. -------------------------------------
More informationDoes Title VII Preclude Enforcement of Compulsory Arbitration Agreements - The Ninth Circuit Says Yes - Duffield v. Robertson Stephens & (and) Co.
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1999 Issue 1 Article 8 1999 Does Title VII Preclude Enforcement of Compulsory Arbitration Agreements - The Ninth Circuit Says Yes - Duffield v. Robertson Stephens &
More informationARBITRATION: CHALLENGES TO A MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION: CHALLENGES TO A MOTION TO COMPEL TARA L. SOHLMAN 214.712.9563 Tara.Sohlman@cooperscully.com 2019 This paper and/or presentation provides information on general legal issues. I is not intended
More informationGRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES FOR ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO EMPLOYEES AND JOB APPLICANTS OF BILL S ELECTRIC COMPANY
ADR FORM NO. 2 GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES FOR ANY DISPUTES RELATING TO EMPLOYEES AND JOB APPLICANTS OF BILL S ELECTRIC COMPANY 1. General Policy: THIS GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE does
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PATTY J. GANDEE, individually and on ) behalf of a Class of similarly situated ) No. 87674-6 Washington residents, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) En Banc ) LDL
More informationFuture of Mandatory Employee Arbitration Agreements, The
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2014 Issue 1 Article 8 2014 Future of Mandatory Employee Arbitration Agreements, The Marcy Greenwade Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Law Commons
Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal Volume 21 Issue 1 Article 5 2003 Recent Supreme Court Decisions Affecting the Employer-Employee Relationship: Arbitration of Employment Disputes, the Scope and
More informationFAA and the USERRA: Pro-Arbitration Policies Can Undermine Federal Protection of Military Personnel
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2007 Issue 1 Article 20 2007 FAA and the USERRA: Pro-Arbitration Policies Can Undermine Federal Protection of Military Personnel Laura Bettenhausen Follow this and
More informationINTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES (Including Mediation and Arbitration Rules) Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 available online at icdr.org Table of Contents Introduction.... 5 International
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE TOMMY D. GARREN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 3:17-cv-149 ) v. ) Judge Collier ) CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al. ) Magistrate Judge Poplin
More informationPreventing the Runaway Arbitration: Practical Strategies and Solutions
ABA Section of Litigation 2012 Section Annual Conference April 18-20, 2012: How to Prevent a Runaway Arbitration Preventing the Runaway Arbitration: Practical Strategies and Solutions Patricia O Prey GE
More informationArbitration Agreements v. Wage and Hour Class Actions
Arbitration Agreements v. Wage and Hour Class Actions Brought to you by Winston & Strawn s Labor and Employment Practice Group 2013 Winston & Strawn LLP Today s elunch Presenters Monique Ngo-Bonnici Labor
More informationCase 1:08-cv Document 44 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-03009 Document 44 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KENNETH THOMAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08 C 3009 ) AMERICAN
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2107 NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal
More informationIllegality. Illegality. Meaning of Illegality. Irwin/McGraw-Hill 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Illegality Chapter 15 (8) Slide 1 Illegality When an agreement involves an act or a promise that violates some legislative or court-made rule, agreement will not be enforceable on ground of illegality
More informationCLAIM SUMMARY / DETERMINATION FORM
CLAIM SUMMARY / DETERMINATION FORM Claim Number : A10005-0004 Claimant : O'Briens Response Management OOPS Type of Claimant : OSRO Type of Claim : Removal Costs Claim Manager : Amount Requested : $242,366.26
More informationJournal of Dispute Resolution
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2000 Issue 1 Article 15 2000 Appeals from Arbitration Orders under the Federal Arbitration Act: Pro-Arbitration Policy Clashes with the Right to Appeal Final Decisions
More informationJournal of Dispute Resolution
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2001 Issue 2 Article 8 2001 Be Careful What You Say in Mediation - Indiana Supreme Court Rules That Oral Settlement Agreements Reached in Mediation Must Be in Writing
More informationJournal of Dispute Resolution
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1999 Issue 1 Article 6 1999 Collective Bargaining Agreements, Arbitration Provisions and Employment Discrimination Claims: Compulsory Arbitration or Judicial Remedy
More informationLabor and Mandatory Arbitration Agreements: Background and Discussion
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents May 2001 Labor and Mandatory Arbitration Agreements: Background and Discussion Jon O. Shimabukuro Congressional
More informationSetting the Standard for Overturning an Arbitrator's Award That Violates Public Policy - United Paperworkers International v. Misco, Inc.
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1989 Issue Article 13 1989 Setting the Standard for Overturning an Arbitrator's Award That Violates Public Policy - United Paperworkers International v. Misco, Inc.
More informationWhat Michigan Attorneys and Arbitrators Must Know about the New Revised Uniform Arbitration Act
Michigan State University College of Law Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law Faculty Publications 1-1-2013 What Michigan Attorneys and Arbitrators Must Know about the New Revised
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 532 U. S. (2001) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationSOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY
SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY Southern Glazer s Arbitration Policy July - 2016 SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY A. STATEMENT
More information