APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document Apr :20: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY vs. VS. ARDERS MATTHEWS APPELLANT CAUSE NO CC S-CC APPELLEE EE BRIEF OF APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED OF COUNSEL: ALBERT BOZEMAN WHITE ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL MS BAR NO ANNA CRAIN CLEMMER STAFF ATTORNEY MS BAR NO MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY POST OFFICE BOX 1699 JACKSON, MS Telephone: (601) Facsimile: (601)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... i CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS...ii TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES... iii STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES... 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE... 3 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 6 ARGUMENT... 7 CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 12

3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY vs. ARDERS MATTHEWS APPELLANT CAUSE NO CC APPEL LEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the justices of the Supreme Court and/or the judges of the Court of Appeals may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. 1. Mississippi Department of Employment Security, Appellant 2. Albert Bozeman White, Assistant General Counsel for Appellant 3. Anna Crain Clemmer, Staff Attorney for Appellant 4. Arders Matthews, Claimant 6. Honorable Carol White-Richard, District 4 Circuit Court Judge This the 8th day of April, Isl Albert Bozeman White Albert Bozeman White Assistant General Counsel (MSB #7132) Mississippi Department of Employment Security Anna Crain Clemmer Staff Attorney (MSB # ) Mississippi Department of Employment Security ii

4 TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE Allen v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm'n, So. 2d 904 (Miss. 1994) Bank of Edwards v. Cassity Auto Sales. Inc., So. 2d 579 (Miss.1992) Barnett v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm'n, So. 2d 193 (Miss.J991) Booth v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n... 7,9 588 So. 2d 422 (Miss. 1991) City of Tupelo v. Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n So. 2d lsi (Miss. 1999) Holt v. Miss. Dept. of Emp. Sec So. 2d 466 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998) Maxwell v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n So. 2d 1031 (Miss. Ct. App. 200 I) Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n v. Marion Co. Sheriffs Dept., So. 2dl165 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004) Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n v. Parker, So. 2d 42 (Miss. 2005) Richardson v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm'n, So. 2d 31 (Miss. 1992) Wheeler v. Arriola, So. 2d 1381 (Miss. 1982) Wilkerson v. Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n & Anderson-Tully Co"... 6,8 630 So. 2d 1000 (Miss. 1994) iii

5 OTHER AUTHORITIES Mississippi Code Annotated Mississippi Code Annotated A (I) (b) Mississippi Code Annotated A (I) (c) Mississippi Code Annotated Mississippi Code Annotated Mississippi Code Annotated Mississippi Code Annotated , 7 I, 6, 8, Mississippi Department of Employment Security... 6 Regulation 200m Mississippi Department of Employment Security... 4 Regulation iv

6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY VS. ARDERS MATTHEWS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 201S-CC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY STATEMENT OF ISSUE I. Whether the Circuit Court erred by failing to determine whether Arders Matthews timely filed his appeal of the Administrative Law Judge's decision to the Board of Review, pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated (1972, as amended), such that dismissal by the Board of Review was proper? 2. Whether the Circuit Court acted arbitrarily and capriciously by reversing the Board of Review decision, which dismissed Arders Matthews' appeal of the Administrative Law Judge's decision as filed twenty-nine (29) days late, and thus untimely filed? 3. Whether the Circuit Court erred by deciding Claimant's appeal based on the Employer failing to prove misconduct due to excessive absenteeism and tardiness rather than considering and deciding this appeal based on whether Arders Matthews timely filed his appeal to the Board of Review?

7 4. Whether Arders Matthews failed to establish good cause for filing his appeal of the Administrative Law Judge's decision to the Board of Review untimely? STATEMENT OF THE CASE Arders Matthews [hereinafter also "Claimant"] was employed by Harlow Casino & Resort [hereinafter also "Employer"] as a cook from July 14,2014, until January 9, 2015, when he was discharged. (R. Vol 2, p. 7-9). Mr. Matthews was discharged for excessive absenteeism and tardiness when he exceeded the allowed number of absences, tardies and early-leave points under the Employer's policy. Before discharge, he was progressively disciplined, receiving verbal and written warnings. He also was aware of the policy, and informed of his point totals, but nevertheless continued not to comply. (R. Vol. 2, p. 7-9, 35-73, and Employer Exhibits). After termination, Mr. Matthews filed for unemployment benefits. (R. Vol. 2, p. I). The Claims Examiner investigated. Based on the information obtained, the Claims Examiner determined that Mr. Matthews was discharged due to misconduct for excessive absenteeism and tardies, after receiving warnings. Thus, he was found ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits. (R. Vol. 2, p. 10, 12). Mr. Matthews appealed. (R. Vol. 2, p. 14). A telephonic hearing was noticed and held before an Administrative Law Judge [hereinafter "AU"]. (R. Vol. 2, p. 9-22,23-164). Erica Jones, Human Resource Director, testified for the Employer. Mr. Matthews also testified. (R. Vol. 2, p ). The Employer also introduced eight (8) Exhibits into evidence. (R. Vol. 2, p ). After the hearing, the AU affirmed the Claims Examiner's decision. In so doing, the AU held that Mr. Matthews committed misconduct when he exceeded the allowed number of absenteeism, early-leave and tardiness points. (R. Vol. 2, p ). The AU further noted that Mr. Matthews was progressively warned and was aware of the Employer's policy. The AU

8 concluded that he was discharged due to disqualifying misconduct due to his over-all poor attendance record. (R. Vol. 2, p ). to-wit: The ALl's Fact Findings and Reasoning and Conclusion were as follows, in pertinent part, Finding of Fact The claimant was employed as a cook for Harlow's Casino Resort & Spa from July 14,2014 until January 8, 2015 when he was discharged for obtaining ten attendance points during a twelve month period in accordance with the employer's written attendance policy. The claimant received at least two written warnings for attendance and he accrued ten attendance points due to being late twelve times and for not taking part in a mandatory staff meeting. Reasoning and Conclusion: Section A (I) (b) of the Mississippi Employment Security Law provides that an individual shall be disqualified for benefits for the week or fraction thereof which immediately follows the day on which he was discharged for misconduct connected with the work, if so found by the Department, and for each week thereafter until he has earned remuneration for personal services equal to not less than eight times his weekly benefit amount as determined in each case. Section A (I) (c) provides that in a discharge case, the employer has the burden to establish the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected to the employment. Section of the Mississippi Employment Security Law provides, in part, that an employer's experience rating shall be chargeable with benefits paid to a claimant, provided that an employer's experience rating record shall not be chargeable if the Department finds that the claimant left work voluntarily without good cause connected with the work, was discharged for misconduct connected with the work, or refused an offer of available, suitable work with the employer. In the Mississippi Supreme Court, in the case of Wheeler Vs. Arriola, 408 So. 2d 1381 (Miss. 1982), the Court held that: "The meaning of the term 'misconduct', as used in the Unemployment Compensation Statute, was conduct evincing such willful and wanton disregard of 3

9 the employer's interest as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of the standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect from his employees. Also, carelessness and negligence of such degree, or recurrence thereof, as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent or evil design, and showing an intentional or substantial disregard of the employer's interest or of the employee's duties and obligations to his employer, came within the term. Mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, failure in good performance as the result of inability or incapacity, or inadvertencies and ordinary negligence in isolated incidents, and good faith errors in judgment or discretion were not considered 'misconduct' within the meaning of the Statute." MDES Regulation 308: Mississippi Department of Employment Security Regulation provides that: A. For purposes of Mississippi Code Section , misconduct shall be defined as including but not limited to: I. The failure to obey orders, rules or instructions, or failure to discharge the duties for which an individual was employed; a. An individual shall be found guilty of employee misconduct for the violation of an employer rule only under the following conditions: I. the employee knew or should have known of the rule; ii. the rule was lawful and reasonably related to the job environment and performance; and iii. the rule is fairly and consistently enforced. 2. A substantial disregard of the employers interests or of the employees duties and obligations to the employer; 3. Conduct which shows intentional disregard - or if not intentional disregard, utter indifference - of an employers interests as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of the employee; or 4. Carelessness or negligence of such degree or recurrence as to demonstrate wrongful intent. While the claimant received one attendance point for missing a mandatory staff meeting, he was discharged for his overall attendance record which included twelve occasions of lateness after warnings. The claimant's lateness was in disregard of the employer's interests and the claimant's discharge was for misconduct connected with work under the provisions of the Mississippi Employment Security Law. Therefore the decision of the claims adjudicator is modified as to date of disqualification only. Decision Modified. The claimant is disqualified from January 9, 2015, and until the claimant has been reemployed under covered employment and has earned eight times the claimant's weekly benefit amount. The employer's experience rating record is entitled to a non-charge. 4

10 (R. Vol. 2, p ). The AU's decision was mailed to Mr. Matthews on March (R. Vol. 2, p. 169). The AU's decision stated that it would become final fourteen (14) days after the date of mailing, and that an appeal may be filed online or by phone at the number provided, or by letter to the Board of Review at Post Office Box 1699, Jackson, MS 39215, no later than March (R. Vol. 2, p. 169). On April , Mr. Matthews appealed to the Board of Review. (R. Vol. 2, p. 170). Subsequently, after carefully reviewing the record, the Board of Review found that Mr. Matthews' appeal was not timely filed; and the AU's decision became final. Mr. Matthews' appeal was dismissed as untimely filed. (R. Vol. 2, p. 177). Mr. Matthews then appealed to the Circuit Court. (R. Vol. 2 p. 178 & Vol. I, p. 1-3). Subsequently, MDES filed its Answer and the record transcript on July (R. Vol. I p. 6). On August 21, 2015, just 37 days after the record transcript was filed, the Circuit Court reversed the MDES decision; and did so without any Brief being filed by Claimant, and before the MDES Brief would be due. (R. Vol. I, p. 7-9). In so doing, the Circuit Court did not address Mr. Matthews' failure to file his appeal timely to the Board of Review. Instead, the Circuit Court erroneously based its decision on the misconduct issue. MDES appealed to this Honorable Court on September 10,2015. (R. Vol. I, p ). 5

11 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The Mississippi Supreme Court held in Wilkerson vs. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 630 So.2d 1000 (Miss. 1994) that the Mississippi Code Annotated 7l-5-5l7 (Rev. 2007) fourteen (14) day appeal time is clear and unambiguous, and that it should be strictly construed. Id. at The Court stated that no room exists for judicial construction, such that the courts must apply the clear meaning of the statute and enforce it. Id. The Court further stated that relief from the fourteen (14) day appeal filing deadline would only be appropriate lithe Notice was mailed to the wrong address, or delivered other than by mail. Id. at Said Section is the companion statute to Mississippi Code Annotated (Rev. 2007). Section provides that the aggrieved party has fourteen (14) days after the date of notification or mailing of the decision by the appeals tribunal, i.e. Administrative Law Judge ["ALJ"). Id. Benefit Appeal Regulation provides that notice shall be by mail. In this case, the ALJ's decision was mailed on March 17, 2015, to Mr. Matthews. Mr. Matthews had fourteen (14) days to appeal. The Board of Review received the appeal on April 30, Mr. Matthews' appeal should have been filed by March 31, 2015; and thus, it was filed twenty-nine (29) days late. Mr. Matthews was informed of the March 31, 2015, appeal deadline in the ALJ decision. Pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated (Rev. 2007), the Board of Review made the correct decision in dismissing Mr. Matthews' appeal as untimely filed. In fact, the Board of Review's dismissal of Mr. Matthews' appeal was mandated by the unambiguous language of 6

12 the applicable statute and the case authorities. Id. The Circuit Court ignored the timeliness issue of Mr. Matthews' appeal, and acted arbitrarily and capriciously by reversing MDES based on a finding the Claimant did not commit misconduct. This issue was not before the Circuit Court to decide. Thus, this Honorable Court should reverse the Circuit Court and affirm the Board of Review in this matter. ARGUMENT Mr. Matthews' appeal to the Circuit Court is governed by Mississippi Code Annotated (Rev. 2007), which provides for an appeal to the Circuit Court by any party aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Review. Section states that the appeals court shall consider the record made before the Board of Review and, absent fraud, shall accept the findings of fact if supported by substantial evidence, and the correct law has been applied. (Emphasis added). Richardson v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 593 So.2d 31 (Miss. 1992); Barnett v. Mississippi Emplovrnent Sec. Comm'n, 583 So.2d 193 (Miss. 1991); and Booth v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 588 So.2d 422 (Miss. 1991). Further, the Mississippi Supreme Court has held that a presumption exists in favor of the Board of Review's decision and the challenging party has the burden of proving otherwise. Allen v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 639 So.2d 904 (Miss. 1994). The appeals court must not reweigh the facts nor insert its judgment for that of the agency. Id. Regarding appeal requirements, Mississippi Code Annotated (Rev. 2007) provides in pertinent part, to-wit: The claimant or any party to the initial determination or amended initial determination may file an appeal from such initial determination or amended initial 7

13 detennination within fourteen (14) days after notification thereof, or after the date such notification was mailed to his last known address. Mississippi Code Annotated provides in pertinent part, to-wit:... an appeal tribunal...shall affinn, modify or reverse the findings of fact and initial detennination or amended initial detennination. The parties shall be duly notified of such tribunal's decision, together with its reason therefor, which shall be deemed to be the final decision of the board of review unless within fourteen (14) days after the date of notification or mailing of such decision, further appeal is initiated pursuant to Section Mr. Matthews was afforded all of the notice to which he was entitled by statute. The Administrative Law Judge Decision contains a certification of the mailing date. (R. Vol. 2, p ). The Decision clearly provides that Appellant'S appeal must be filed within fourteen (14) days "from the date this decision was mailed", and gave Mr. Matthews the exact appeal deadline that the decision would become final. (R. Vol. 2, p. 73). The purpose of the fourteen (\4) day time period appears to be for allowing four days for mailing; and thus, giving Mr. Matthews at least ten (10) days to file his appeal. The Mississippi Supreme Court has not only found the companion statute clear and unambiguous, the Court has further held that the fourteen (14) day time period begins running from the mailing date, when mailed to the Claimant's correct last known address. Further, the Court has held that the statute must be strictly construed. Wilkerson, supra at Further, in Wilkerson, supra, an appeal under similar facts as the instant case, was dismissed because it was filed one (\) day late. Id. at Apparently the reasoning behind the Mississippi Supreme Court's strict construction of the Unemployment Compensation Act appeal statutes is that there is no practical means for the Department to actually verify a party's receipt of a decision. The volume of decisions mailed 8

14 makes this impractical; and neither the legislature nor the Supreme Court has found the appeals statutes in need of revision. See Booth v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 588 So.2d 422, (Miss. 1991) (due process is satisfied if notice is reasonably calculated to apprize the interested parties of the hearing). As applied to the facts of this case, this Court should reverse the Circuit Court decision, and affirm the Board of Review's decision dismissing Mr. Matthews' appeal. As case authority thereof, in addition to the cases cited herein above and below, and the applicable Employment Security statutes cited herein above, the Court should consider Miss. Employment Sec. Comm 'n v. Parker, 903 So. 2d 42 (2005). In this case, the Supreme Court reversed the Circuit Court, and reinstated the MDES decision dismissing Ms. Parker's appeal to the MDES Board of Review as untimely filed. In this case, the Circuit Court had erroneously applied the Mississippi Rules ojcivii Procedure to Ms. Parker's MDES administrative appeal deadlines, rather than the Employment Security Law, and specifically Mississippi Code Annotated 7I (Rev. 2000). Finding that the Mississippi Rules oj Civil Procedure did not apply to administrative proceeding and appeal deadlines, the Supreme Court reversed the Circuit Court, and reinstated and affirmed the MDES Board of Review decision, holding that the fourteen (14) day appeal deadline was applicable and would be strictly construed. Id. at Further, there are many other case authorities generally upholding the MDES appeal deadlines and addressing the good cause for late filing issue. See Miss. Employment Sec. Comm' n v. Marion Co. Sheriff's Dept, 865 So. 2d 1156 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004)(fourteen day appeal deadline applied); Holt v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 724 So.2d 466 (Miss. Ct. App. 9

15 1998) (insufficient evidence was presented to overcome the presumption of proper delivery); City of Tupe\o v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 748 So.2d 151 (Miss. 1999) (City did not show good cause for filing an appeal late simply because the notice was mailed to one of several addresses for the City); Maxwell v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n 792 So. 2d 1031 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001) (where claimant waited until after his dishonorable discharge was changed to an honorable discharge to file appeal, good cause was not shown for appealing untimely); Powell v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 787 So.2d 1277 (Miss. 2001) (Circuit Court's allowance of untimely appeal based upon claimant's assertion of "unforeseen circumstances" was insufficient proof of good cause. Mr. Matthews also has not presented an excuse for late filing at all, or that would be recognized as good cause under the statutes. This Court has also previously stated that the timeliness of appeal issue is jurisdictional. Bank of Edwards v. Cassity Auto Sales. Inc., 599 So.2d 579 (Miss. 1992); Booth v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 588 So.2d 422 (Miss. 1991). CONCLUSION The primary issues in this matter are (I) whether the AU's Decision was mailed to Mr. Matthews' correct address; and (2) whether the appeal was filed within fourteen (14) days of the date mailed. Mr. Matthews' address is the last address given by him to the Department; and appears correct. Further, there is no dispute that Mr. Matthews' appeal to the Board of Review was made on April 30, 2015, being twenty-nine (29) days late. Since there is ample evidence to support the decision of the Board of Review in holding that Mr. Matthews did not timely file his appeal, 10

16 and since the law was appropriately applied to the facts and supports the Board's decision, the Board of Review's dismissal of Claimant's appeal should be affirmed, and the Circuit Court reversed. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this the 8 th day of April, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY BY: /s/ Albert Bozeman White ALBERT BOZEMAN WHITE OF COUNSEL: Albert Bozeman White MDES Assistant General Counsel MSB No Post Office Box 1699 Jackson, MS (601)

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Albert Bozeman White, Attorney for Appellee, Mississippi Department of Employment Security, do hereby certify that I have this day electronically filed the foregoing pleading with the Supreme Court of Mississippi, and a true and correct copy has been mailed to the following, to-wit: Mr. Arders Matthews 921 Cedar Street Greenville, MS Honorable Carol White-Richard Circuit Court Judge, District 4 Post Office Box 686 Indianola, MS THIS, the 8th day of April, Isl Albert Bozeman White ALBERT BOZEMAN WHITE

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 17 2015 16:00:09 2014-CC-01798 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-CC-01798 OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI

More information

1- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CC BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY

1- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CC BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY 1- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2008-CC-02142 MARGIE BROWN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT VS. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND W AL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. DEFENDANT/APPELLEES

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY STATE A TE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY STATE A TE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Sep 11 2015 14:30:20 2014-CC-00928 Pages: 22 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 11 2015 15:58:25 2014-CC-00928 Pages: 23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI VERSUS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY APPELLANT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE N THE SUPREME COURT OF MSSSSPP COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MSSSSPP EMC ENTERPRSES, NC., a Louisiana corporation APPELLANT VS. CVL ACTON NO. 2007-CC-01770 MSSSSPP DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURTY APPELLEE

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ANDREW THOMPSON, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-EC-01989 CHARLES LEWIS JONES APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PHILVESTER AND JOYCE WILLIAMS VS. AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLANTS CAUSE NO: 2009-CA-01107 APPELLEE APPELLEE'S BRIEF James D. Bell, MSB #..., BELL & ASSOCIATES,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION In the matter of: Claimant/Appellee STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION vs. Employer/Appellant R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-06014 Referee Decision No. 13-41775U ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 6, 2009 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 6, 2009 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 6, 2009 Session DOJI, INC. D/B/A DEMOS' STEAK AND SPAGHETTI HOUSE v. JAMES G. NEELEY, COMMISSIONER, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & WORKFORCE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 22 2015 12:14:02 2015-CP-00008-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY HOLTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00008 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

{*176} RANSOM, Justice.

{*176} RANSOM, Justice. IT'S BURGER TIME V. NEW MEXICO DEP'T OF LABOR, 1989-NMSC-008, 108 N.M. 175, 769 P.2d 88 (S. Ct. 1989) IN RE CLAIM OF LUCY APODACA; IT'S BURGER TIME, INC., Petitioner-Appellee, vs. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT

More information

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. E-14-956 CHARLES HOLMES V. APPELLANT Opinion Delivered MAY 20, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2014-BR-02321] DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE

More information

An appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission.

An appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ARBOR TREE MANAGEMENT, INC., d/b/a COAST CADILLAC CO., Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 15 2015 17:02:31 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NEDRA PITTMAN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CA-00502 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Feb 4 2016 13:24:50 2015-CP-00758-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RICKY EUGENE JOHNSON APPELLANT vs. VS. NO.2015-CP-00758 ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS)

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS) SAN MATEO COUNTY LAW LIBRARY RESEARCH GUIDE #13 WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS This resource guide only provides guidance, and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice you need

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 16, 2013

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 16, 2013 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 16, 2013 RUBY BLACKMON v. EATON ELECTRICAL, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-11-0673-2 Arnold

More information

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS E-Filed Document Jan 3 2017 15:44:13 2016-WC-00842-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI SHANNON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MS, INC. APPELLANTS

More information

No. 45,122-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

No. 45,122-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * Judgment rendered April 14, 2010. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 45,122-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA JERRY W. BAUGHMAN

More information

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Dan F. Turnbull, Judge.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Dan F. Turnbull, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DEBI THORKELSON, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D06-2083

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.: 2013-IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. ERIC C. HAWKINS Post Office Box 862

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.: 2013-IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. ERIC C. HAWKINS Post Office Box 862 DOROTHY ANN GLENN IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 1 NO.: 2013-IA-01112-SCT APPELLANT v. ANDREW POWELL APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL ERIC C. HAWKINS Post Office Box 862 Green~ TE~~~

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA Petition for Writ of Certiorari

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA Petition for Writ of Certiorari E-Filed Document Mar 7 2017 10:18:43 2014-CT-01079-SCT Pages: 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-01079 THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER APPELLANT VS. KIM HAMPTON, INDIVIDUALLY,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 4 2017 16:36:59 2016-CP-01145-COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THOMAS HOLDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01145 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Aug 18 2017 15:49:36 2016-CP-01539 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CP-01539 BRENT RYAN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT v. LOWNDES COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SYLVESTER YOUNG, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-2026 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Mar 18 2016 11:38:59 2015-CA-01526 Pages: 20 MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS NO. 2015-CA-01526 RICKEY W. THOMPSON APPELLANT VS. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

More information

COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TAURUS CALDWELL VS. FILED MAY 202008,,"HCE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURr ~OURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2008-CP-0150 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DERRICK POSS APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1686-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. : Petitioner : : v. : No. 164 C.D. 2014 : Submitted: July 25, 2014 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : Respondent

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-KA-0387-SCT CERTIORARI FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-KA-0387-SCT CERTIORARI FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GREGORY WAYNE HUDSON APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-0387-SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE CERTIORARI FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP-00950

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP-00950 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2009-CP-00950 MARVIN ARTHUR APPELLANT VS. TUNICA COUNTY MISSISSIPPI AND TUNICA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. APPELLEES 011 Appeal from tile Circllit COllrt of TUl1ic(/

More information

NO CA Brenda Franklin v. Cornelius Turner MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

NO CA Brenda Franklin v. Cornelius Turner MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION E-Filed Document Apr 28 2016 19:23:00 2014-CA-01006-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014 CA-01006-Brenda Franklin v. Cornelius Turner BRENDA FRANKLIN Appellant/Plaintiff

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff E-Filed Document May 10 2016 11:30:53 2015-CA-01496 Pages: 9 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA-01496 JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff BRIEF OF

More information

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators Part I. STANDARDS Rules 15.000 15.200 Part II. DISCIPLINE Rule 15.210. Procedure [No Change] Any complaint alleging violations of the Florida Rules For Qualified And Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 16:33:38 2015-CP-01418-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01418-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

Ph: (662) REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT MSB_. Attorney for Appellant IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KP-OI373 APPELLANT

Ph: (662) REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT MSB_. Attorney for Appellant IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KP-OI373 APPELLANT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-KP-OI373 WELDON FOXWORTH APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT BY: Wanda Abioto Attorney At law P. O. Box 1980

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 E-Filed Document May 23 2016 10:57:29 2015-CA-00903-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 MARKWETZEL APPELLANT VERSUS RICHARD SEARS APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DA YID BRYANT, JR. V. PAMELA RENA SMITH BRYANT -e: APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CA-00669 APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP-01387 HARRISON LEWIS, JR. APPELLANT VS. AZHARPASHA APELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CRYSTAL NICOLE KURI, Appellant,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CRYSTAL NICOLE KURI, Appellant, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CRYSTAL NICOLE KURI, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY BOARD OF REVIEW, Appellee.

More information

[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 7, 2018

[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 7, 2018 [First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY, 0 Sponsored by: Assemblyman NICHOLAS CHIARAVALLOTI District (Hudson) Assemblyman JOSEPH V. EGAN District (Middlesex and

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DEFENDANT/APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DEFENDANT/APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 11:38:08 2014-SA-01364-COA Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-TS-01364 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 26 2015 11:04:08 2014-CP-00755-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROY DALE WALLACE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION In the matter of: Claimant/Appellant vs. R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-01389 Referee Decision No. 13-641U Employer/Appellee ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP ALLENGOUL APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP ALLENGOUL APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 7 2016 08:42:41 2016-CP-00167 Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP-00167 ALLENGOUL APPELLANT v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE ON APPEAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS

More information

E-Filed Document Oct :46: IA SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No M-219

E-Filed Document Oct :46: IA SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No M-219 E-Filed Document Oct 26 2017 15:46:15 2017-IA-00219-SCT Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2017-M-219 INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee In the matter of: Claimant/Appellant STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION vs. R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-07968 Referee Decision No. 13-73425U Employer/Appellee ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,322 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. DIANA SABATINO, Appellee,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,322 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. DIANA SABATINO, Appellee, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,322 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS DIANA SABATINO, Appellee, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY BOARD OF REVIEW, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal

More information

Chapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal

Chapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal Chapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal Bargaining unit refer to contract 19.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS ON DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS 19.1.1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION ONLY PURSUANT TO THIS RULE: A permanent

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT E-Filed Document Dec 2 2016 16:11:11 2016-CA-00678 Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00678 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS BEN ALLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 17:12:34 2014-CP-01810-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AKIVA KAREEM CLARK APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-01810-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 2 2018 13:44:46 2017-KA-00853-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHN WARE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00853 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2018 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2018 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 23, 2018 Session 08/27/2018 HAMPTON CRANE SERVICE, INC. v. BURNS PHILLIPS, COMMISSIONER OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, ET

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CARNICE HODGE, Claimant-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION July 15, 2014 9:05 a.m. v No. 311387 Wayne Circuit Court U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES, INC., LC No. 12-001500-AE and Respondent-Appellant,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION

STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION In the matter of: Claimant/Appellee STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION vs. Employer/Appellant R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-05435 Referee Decision No. 13-39119U ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE

More information

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena. A. Motion to Quash Assignment Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena. Recently you prepared a subpoena. Look at the front of the subpoena where it tells you how to oppose a subpoena.

More information

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU E-Filed Document Oct 2 2014 21:28:49 2013-CA-00524-COA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-00524 CINDY WALLS APPELLANT V. FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 132 Nev., Advance Opinion IS IN THE THE STATE THE STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION; RENEE OLSON, IN HER CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR THE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION; AND KATIE JOHNSON, IN HER CAPACITY

More information

IC Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits

IC Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits IC 22-4-17 Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits IC 22-4-17-1 Rules; mass layoffs; extended benefits; posting Sec. 1. (a) Claims for benefits shall be made in accordance with rules adopted by the department.

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ALBERT ABRAHAM, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-01759 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Oral Argument Requested

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT. vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT. vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE , - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP-00623 JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Sunflower County, Mississippi

More information

APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION E-Filed Document Jan 24 201716:02:59 2015-CA-01428-COA Pages : 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELIZABETH GRAHAM and MATTHEW GRAHAM vs. JAMES R. "JAMIE" FRANKS, JR. and WHEELER AND FRANKS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1182-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2016 16:21:36 2014-KA-01520-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KENNY STEWART APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01520-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Sep 21 2016 14:36:53 2015-CA-01865-SCT Pages: 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PEMBERTON PROPERTIES, LTD d/b/a PEMBERTON APARTMENTS, PARK VILLA, LLC d/b/a EAST VILLA APARTMENTS,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G TIM W. MYATT, EMPLOYEE CITY OF PARAGOULD, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G TIM W. MYATT, EMPLOYEE CITY OF PARAGOULD, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G102656 TIM W. MYATT, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT CITY OF PARAGOULD, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WORKERS' COMP. TRUST FUND CARRIER/TPA

More information

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT How to APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT Justice Court in Maricopa County June 23, 2005 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FORM (# MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT Either party may appeal

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 14:15:34 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MILTON TROTTER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

%QlW+u ' I IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT TIMOTHY DUPUIS NO CA-1635-COA VS. APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

%QlW+u ' I IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT TIMOTHY DUPUIS NO CA-1635-COA VS. APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI %QlW+u ' I IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY DUPUIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2006-CA-1635-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Oct 20 2014 14:50:37 2014-CA-00381 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK W. DECKARD VS. LESA M. DECKARD APPELLANT CAUSE NO.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 E-Filed Document May 12 2014 14:25:52 2013-CA-01006 Pages: 18 2013-CA-01006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VINCENT BAILEY APPELLANT VS. NO. 2010-CP-0699 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Sep 7 2017 10:15:38 2016-KA-00914-COA Pages: 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHALONDA NIKKIA VALE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00914-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP HENRY HINTON APPELLANT BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP HENRY HINTON APPELLANT BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE E-Filed Document May 2 2017 15:48:02 2016-CP-01494 Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP-01494 HENRY HINTON APPELLANT v. BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee E-Filed Document Apr 4 2016 16:50:10 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT-00547-SCT 2013-CT-00547-SCT MILTON TROTTER, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee BRIEF

More information

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF E-Filed Document Sep 23 2015 13:42:39 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Trial Court Nos. 2006-109; 2006-157 / No. 2015-CA-00502-C0A NEDRA PITTMAN, Petitioner

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIAN ROBISON, et al APPELLANTS VS. NO. 2009-CA-00383 ENTERPRISE RENT -A-CAR COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 28 2015 16:28:45 2014-KA-01783-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ANDREW GRAHAM APPELLANT v. No. 2014-KA-1783-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS. v. Cause No CA LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS. v. Cause No CA LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC. E-Filed Document Feb 21 2014 14:40:09 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS v. Cause No. 2013-CA-01004 LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES ALBERT WIGGINS VS. BILLY RAY PERRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2006-CA-01126 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED LINDSEY C. MEADOR MEADOR & CRUMP P.O.

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : No. 609 C.D : Submitted: October 23, 2015 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, :

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : No. 609 C.D : Submitted: October 23, 2015 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA The Philadelphia Parking Authority, Petitioner v. No. 609 C.D. 2015 Submitted October 23, 2015 Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI E-Filed Document Dec 12 2016 13:11:01 2015-CT-00050-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2015-KA-00050 HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee E-Filed Document May 1 2015 11:58:24 2014-KA-00697 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Cause No. 2014-KA-00697 KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee APPEAL FROM

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC MARK TETZLAFF Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM N Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC MARK TETZLAFF Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM N Respondent. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC-04-591 MARK TETZLAFF Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM N Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CC GLENN TODD WILSON APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CC GLENN TODD WILSON APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CC-00288 GLENN TODD WILSON APPELLANT v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circnit Conrt of Forrest County, Mississippi

More information

Unemployment Basics. Purpose of the system Intended beneficiaries Administration by the DWD How the system is funded

Unemployment Basics. Purpose of the system Intended beneficiaries Administration by the DWD How the system is funded Unemployment Basics Purpose of the system Intended beneficiaries Administration by the DWD How the system is funded 1 Unemployment Basics Eligible claimants can qualify to receive: Up to 26 weeks After

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 1 2015 20:59:33 2013-KA-02110-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL HAMPTON APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-02110-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information