UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
|
|
- Frank Morton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA R.J. ZAYED, in his capacity as court ) appointed receiver for the Estates of ) Trevor G. Cook, Patrick J. Kiley, Jason ) Bo-Alan Beckman, UBS Diversified ) Growth, LLC, Market Shot, LLC, Oxford ) Global Advisors, LLC, Oxford Global ) Case No. 12-cv Oxford Growth FX L.P., and other ) Receivership Entities, ) ) The Receiver, ) ) v. ) ) PEREGRINE FINANCIAL GROUP, ) INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER NOW COMES Defendant, Peregrine Financial Group, Inc. ( PFG ), by and through its undersigned attorneys, and for its Memorandum in Support of PFG s Motion to Transfer, states as follows: I. STATEMENT OF FACTS In November of 2009, R. J. Zayed was appointed as Receiver in connection with actions filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission ( S.E.C ) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) against the receivership entities named herein (the Receivership Entities ). The Receiver has been charged with the administration of the estates of the Receivership Entities, with the primary purpose being the recovery of
2 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 2 of 12 funds on behalf of investors in the various estates. The Receiver has, in turn, filed this action against PFG, a futures commission merchant ( FCM ) registered pursuant to the provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 1, et seq. However, the Receiver is attempting to advance this cause in an improper forum. Of critical importance here is the well-settled principle that a receiver stands in the shoes of the entity for which the receiver has been appointed with no greater or better rights than it had. Keyes v. First Nat. Bank, 25 F.2d 684, 689 (8th Cir. 1928); see also Witherspoon v. Choctaw Culvert & Machinery Co., 56 F.2d 984, 987 (8th Cir. 1932). This has been the law in the Eighth Circuit and elsewhere for nearly a century. See id.; Knauer v. Jonathon Roberts Financial Group, Inc., 348 F.3d 230, 236 (7th Cir. 2003) (A receiver stands precisely in the shoes of the entity for which the receiver has been appointed); Wuliger v. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co. (USA), 567 F.3d 787, (6th Cir. 2009) (receiver s rights as plaintiff are subject to the same claims and defenses as the received entity he represents); Javitch v. First Union Securities, Inc., 315 F.3d 619, 625 (6th Cir. 2003) ( Because they stand in the shoes of the entity in receivership, receivers have been found to lack standing to bring suit unless the receivership entity could have brought the same action ); Lank v. New York Stock Exchange, 548 F.2d 61, 67 (2d Cir. 1977) ( A receiver stands in the shoes of the corporation and can assert only those claims which the corporation could have asserted ); Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. President and Directors of Manhattan Co., 105 F.2d 130, 131 (2d Cir. 1939) (an equity receiver has no better title than the defendant whose possession he takes over). Each of the Receivership Entities have signed a contract with PFG providing that all litigation 2
3 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 3 of 12 arising in connection with that Entity s relationship with PFG shall be adjudicated in an Illinois forum in accordance with Illinois law. On July 25, 2005, UBS Diversified Growth, LLC d/b/a UBS Diversified LLC ( UBS ) entered into an independent Forex broker agreement with PFG, which contains a choice of law provision: This Agreement shall be governed by the substantive laws of the State of Illinois. See 25 of Exhibit A to the Declaration of Susan O Meara (the O Meara Declaration ) that is itself attached as Exhibit A to the Motion to Transfer. The independent Forex broker agreement further states: The parties agree that all actions, disputes, claims or proceedings, including, but not limited to, any arbitrations proceeding, arising directly or indirectly in connection with, out of, or related to or from this Agreement, any other agreement between the Independent Broker and PFG, whether or not initiated by PFG, shall be adjudicated only in courts or other dispute resolution forums whose situs is within the City of Chicago, State of Illinois. Independent Broker hereby specifically consents and submits to the jurisdiction of any State or Federal Court, or arbitration proceedings located within the City of Chicago, State of Illinois. Id. Market Shot, LLC, Oxford FX Growth, LP, Oxford Global FX, LLC, Trevor G. Cook ( Cook ), and Christopher Pettengill ( Pettengill ) each executed a customer agreement with PFG when their various Forex and futures accounts were opened. Likewise, the customer agreements signed by these Receivership Entities also contain an Illinois choice of law provision: This Agreement, and the parties rights and obligations hereto, shall be governed by, construed and enforced in all respects by the laws of the State of Illinois. 3
4 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 4 of 12 See 30 of Exhibits B through J of the O Meara Declaration. Further, each of these customer agreements of the other Receivership Entities contain the following forum selection clause: Customer agrees that all actions, disputes, claims or proceedings, including, but not limited to, any arbitrations proceeding, including NFA arbitrations, arising directly or indirectly in connection with, out of, or related to or from this Agreement, any other agreement between the Customer and PFG or any orders entered or transactions effected for Customer s Account, whether or not initiated by PFG, shall be adjudicated only in courts or other dispute resolution forums whose situs is within the City of Chicago, State of Illinois. Customer hereby specifically consents and submits to the jurisdiction of any State or Federal Court, or arbitration proceedings located within the City of Chicago, State of Illinois. See 40 or 42 of Exhibits B through J of the O Meara Declaration. Regarding the accounts themselves, all funds for the accounts were sent to the attention of PFG in Chicago, Illinois and were deposited in financial institutions located in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13A and 13B. All orders submitted for the accounts were received by PFG in Chicago, Illinois and executed there. O Meara Declaration at 13C and 13D. All account opening documents related to the accounts were received and approved by PFG personnel located in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13E. The PFG personnel who received and executed the orders are also located in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13F. All orders related to the accounts were received and executed by PFG personnel located in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13F. All wire-transfer requests related to the accounts were received and approved by PFG personnel located in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13G. The independent Forex broker agreement executed by UBS was 4
5 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 5 of 12 received and approved by PFG in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13H. All requests for commissions by UBS were either approved or disapproved by PFG personnel located in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13I. PFG personnel located in Chicago, Illinois accomplished all compliance-related reviews of the accounts. O Meara Declaration at 13J. Also, all conversations with PFG personnel with the persons and entities named in this litigation occurred with PFG personnel located in Chicago, Illinois. O Meara Declaration at 13K. Finally, the persons on whose behalf the Receiver is seeking recovery are located throughout the United States and are not concentrated in Minnesota. The lead attorneys for the Receiver have their offices in Texas and New York City. And, the persons and entities named in the Complaint on whose behalf the Receiver is attempting to recover funds had entered into contracts with PFG (UBS Diversified Growth, LLC d/b/a/ UBS Diversified LLC ( UBS ) had entered into an independent Forex broker agreement with PFG, while the other persons and entities had entered into PFG s standard customer agreement). II. ARGUMENT A. The Receiver Stands In The Shoes of the Receivership Entities, and Cannot Bring Litigation Against PFG in a Forum in Which the Receivership Entities Could Not Initiate Litigation Against PFG on Their Own Behalf As stated in the foregoing, the Receiver stands in the shoes of the Receivership Entities, and obtains no greater rights than the Receivership Entities themselves 5
6 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 6 of 12 possessed. See, e.g., Javitch, 315 F.3d 619 at 625; Witherspoon, 56 F.2d 984 at 987. All causes advanced by the Receiver on behalf of the Receivership Entities are subject to the same defenses. Wuliger, 567 F.3d at In the case at bar, each of the Receivership Entities signed a contract with PFG mandating that all litigation arising in connection with that Receivership Entity s relationship with PFG be adjudicated in an Illinois forum in accordance with Illinois law. These contractual provisions bind the Receiver. As discussed below, this forum clause, as well as the other factors to be considered in deciding a motion to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), requires that this matter be transferred forthwith to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. B. The Forum Selection and Choice of Law Provisions Are Mandatory The UBS independent broker agreement employs broad forum selection language:... all actions, disputes, claims or proceedings, including, but not limited to, any arbitrations proceeding, arising directly or indirectly in connection with, out of, or related to or from this Agreement... See 25 of Exhibit A to the O Meara Declaration (emphasis supplied). The PFG customer agreements contain the same broad forum selection language:... all actions, disputes, claims or proceedings, including, but not limited to, any arbitrations proceeding, arising directly or indirectly in connection with, out of, or related to or from this Agreement, any other agreement between the Independent Broker and PFG, whether or not initiated by PFG. See 40 or 42 of Exhibits B through J of the O Meara Declaration (emphasis supplied). Therefore, 6
7 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 7 of 12 the claims asserted by the Receiver fall within the purview of the above forum selection clause. Terra Intern., Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp., 119 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 1997). While other factors must be considered in determining a 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) motion, a valid forum selection clause is a significant factor that figures centrally in the district court's calculus in deciding a motion to transfer. Stewart Org., Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29, 108 S.Ct. 2239, , 101 L.Ed.2d 22 (1988) (emphasis supplied). Further, [A] forum selection clause is enforceable unless it is invalid or enforcement would be unreasonable and unjust. Dominium Austin Partners v. Emerson, 248 F.3d 720, 726 (8th Cir. 2001); see also M.B. Rests., Inc. v. CKE Rests., Inc., 183 F.3d 750, 752 (8th Cir. 1999) ( Forum selection clauses are prima facie valid and are enforced unless they are unjust or unreasonable or invalid for reasons such as fraud or overreaching. Here, the forum selection clauses are mandatory, employing the words shall and only, as do the choice of law provision specifying Illinois law. Dunne v. Libbra, 330 F.3d 1062, 1064 (8th Cir. 2003). Moreover, enforcement of the forum selection clauses in the agreements at issue here will not deprive the opposing parties of their fair day in court as the case will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. M.B. Rests, Inc., 183 F.3d at 752 ( [Forum selection clauses] are enforceable unless they would actually deprive the opposing party of his fair day in court. (citing Carnival Cruise Lines Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, , 113 L. Ed. 2d 622, 111 S. Ct (1991)). 7
8 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 8 of 12 C. The Other Factors Also Weigh In Favor of Transfer The other factors in addition to the forum selection clauses that must be considered by the Court when considering a Motion to Transfer Venue pursuant to 1404(a) are:... (1) the convenience of the parties, (2) the convenience of the witnesses- -including the willingness of witnesses to appear, the ability to subpoena witnesses, and the adequacy of deposition testimony, (3) the accessibility to records and documents, (4) the location where the conduct complained of occurred, and (5) the applicability of each forum state's substantive law. Under the category titled Interest of Justice the court also considered (1) judicial economy, (2) the plaintiff's choice of forum, (3) the comparative costs to the parties of litigating in each forum, (4) each party s ability to enforce a judgment, (5) obstacles to a fair trial, (6) conflict of law issues, and (7) the advantages of having a local court determine questions of local law. Terra, 119. F.3d, at 696 (internal citation omitted). These considerations parallel the factors that courts typically analyze under section 1404(a). Id. (citing Jumara v. State Farm Ins. Co., 55 F.3d 873, ; Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc., 928 F.2d 1509, 1516 (10th Cir.1991) (quoting Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter, 371 F.2d 145, 147 (10th Cir.1967)). While it might be more convenient for the Receiver to have the case retained in this Court, as the Eighth Circuit explained, the Supreme Court s decision in M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 92 S.Ct. 1907, 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972), places a heavy burden on any argument that inconvenience trumps a forum selection clause: Following Bremen, we have held that mere "inconvenience to a party is an insufficient basis to defeat an otherwise enforceable forum selection clause." M.B. Restaurants, 183 F.3d at Instead, a party seeking to avoid his promise must demonstrate that proceeding in the contractual 8
9 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 9 of 12 forum will be so gravely difficult and inconvenient that he will for all practical purposes be deprived of his day in court. Dominium Austin Partners., LLC v. Emerson, 248 F.3d 720, 727 (8th Cir.2001) (quoting Bremen, 407 U.S. at 18, 92 S.Ct. 1907). 6. Indeed, Bremen explicitly rejected mere inconvenience as a reason for avoiding enforcement of a bargained-for forum selection clause, reasoning that the parties contemplated such inconvenience when they entered into their agreement. 407 U.S. at 17-18, 92 S.Ct Servewell Plumbing, LLC v. Federal Ins. Co., 439 F.3d 786, 790 (8th Cir. 2006) (emphasis supplied). Turning to the first consideration, convenience of the parties, while the Receiver is located in Minnesota, PFG and all of its witnesses reside in Illinois, as do its attorneys, whereas the lead attorneys for the Receiver reside in Dallas, Texas and New York City. Therefore, this factor clearly favors transferring the case to the Northern District of Illinois. Since the Receiver s case turns on the supposed red flags ignored by PFG s personnel, the overwhelming number of witnesses, if not all the witnesses other than the Receiver s expert witness, will be from Chicago. It would be extremely costly for PFG to transport and board those witnesses in Minneapolis. Given the volatile nature of the commodity and Forex markets, having a succession of crucial PFG employees waiting to testify in Minneapolis could severely impact PFG s ability to conduct its business. See O Meara Declaration at 14. Similarly, the executing brokers and financial institutions whose employees would potentially be called by PFG, are also located in Chicago, Illinois. See O Meara Declaration at 13B, 13C, and 13D. All of PFG s records and documents, as well as that of the financial institutions where the funds at issue were 9
10 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 10 of 12 deposited, and the executing brokers involved in effecting the customers trades and the depositing of their funds are also located in Chicago, Illinois. Therefore, the second and third factors (convenience of the parties and location of records) also strongly favor transfer of this matter to the Northern District of Illinois. The losses did not occur in Minnesota as alleged by the Receiver but, instead, occurred in accounts located at PFG in Chicago, and relate directly to funds deposited in banks also located in Chicago for aggrieved investors located throughout the country. The alleged missing of the red flags that is the gist of the Receiver s complaint occurred entirely in Chicago, Illinois. Therefore, the fourth factor, location of the conduct at issue, also heavily favors the transfer of this case to the Northern District of Illinois. As to the fifth factor, the applicability of the forum state s law, clearly Illinois law controls pursuant to the above agreements. However, since this is a case being decided in federal district court, regardless of whether Illinois or Minnesota law is applicable, whatever district court hears the case is fully capable of applying the law of another state, a frequent endeavor in diversity cases. Therefore, the fifth factor, applicability of the forum state s law, is neutral. As to the seven factors listed as Interests of Justice discussed by the Eighth Circuit in Terra, supra, this matter is a separate case from the S.E.C. proceeding, so there is no judicial economy in having the case heard in Minnesota as opposed to Illinois. The respective cost to the parties, as stated above, favors transfer to the Northern District of Illinois, given that it is in that district where the overwhelming number of witnesses 10
11 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 11 of 12 reside and virtually all the relevant documents are stored. Factors such as each party s ability to enforce a judgment, obstacles to a fair trial, conflict of law issues, and the advantages of having a local court determine questions of local law are neutral since a district court in either state can effectively deal with those issues. Therefore, the only factor that weighs against transfer is the Receiver s choice of forum; however, that has been waived by the forum selection clauses in the contracts. Moreover, the Receiver cites to the PFG Customer Agreement in its Complaint, arguing that specific sections of the Agreement are applicable to the instant matter. See Complaint at pp It is well established that contracts should be interpreted as a whole. DeJong v. Sioux Ctr., 168 F.3d 1115, 1120 (8th Cir. 1999). As the Receiver is seeking relief under one section of the contract, it is essentially conceding that the Agreement s terms are effective. Therefore, the other sections of the Agreement, including the forum selection clause, would also be applicable. D. Inconvenience, Even Considerable Inconvenience, Does Not Outweigh A Valid Forum Selection Clause Clearly, the factors to be considered in determining a 1404(a) motion weigh, decidedly, in favor of transferring this matter to the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. However, even assuming, arguendo, that, on balance, the other factors to be considered favor the Minnesota District Court retaining jurisdiction, those factors do not outweigh the forum selection clauses agreed upon by the parties. As stated by the Eighth Circuit in Terra, supra: 11
12 CASE 0:12-cv MJD-FLN Document 10 Filed 02/28/12 Page 12 of 12 Even if we tend to believe that the convenience factors weigh in favor of an Iowa forum, however, we cannot say that they so overwhelmingly favor Iowa as to outweigh the significance of the agreed-upon forum selection clause and moreover, to such a degree that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that a transfer was warranted. Terra, 119 F.3d at 697 (emphasis supplied). III. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated herein PFG respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order transferring this matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. KUTAK ROCK LLP Dated: February 28, 2012 By: s/ Jessica L. Roe Jessica L. Roe, # U.S. Bank Plaza South 220 South Sixth St., Suite 1750 Minneapolis, MN (fax) 12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:11-cv-00574-MJD -FLN Document 163 Filed 08/24/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-cv-574
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 0:09-cv-03333-MJD-FLN Document 515 Filed 09/28/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/FLN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 0:09-cv-03333-MJD-JJK Document 255 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK
Case 0:09-cv-03332-MJD-JJK Document 351 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LEROY GREER, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-07-2543 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:0-cv-0-RS Document Filed0/0/ Page of **E-filed //0** 0 0 LISA GALAVIZ, etc., v. Plaintiff, JEFFREY S. BERG, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:09-cv-03333-MJD-FLN Document 763 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/FLN
More informationCase 3:07-cv Document 38 Filed 12/28/2007 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:07-cv-00615 Document 38 Filed 12/28/2007 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DONALD KRAUSE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-0615-L v.
More informationCase 0:09-cv MJD-JJK Document 14 Filed 11/23/09 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 0:09-cv-03333-MJD-JJK Document 14 Filed 11/23/09 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
NO. 12-929 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. J-CREW MANAGEMENT, INC. Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-05448-EDL Document 26 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : RICKY R. FRANKLIN, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL
More informationCase 5:12-cv JLV Document 14 Filed 12/17/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION
Case 5:12-cv-05057-JLV Document 14 Filed 12/17/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION PAUL ARCHAMBAULT, individually, and as Administrator of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION OPINION AND ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION HUGH JARRATT and JARRATT INDUSTRIES, LLC PLAINTIFFS v. No. 5:16-CV-05302 AMAZON.COM, INC. DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff Case No: 013-cv-1896 SRN/ SER
CASE 0:13-cv-01896-SRN-SER Document 142 Filed 04/18/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA R.J. Zayed, In His Capacity As Court-Appointed Receiver For Oxford Global Partners,
More informationContractual Clauses That Impact Disputes. By David F. Johnson
Contractual Clauses That Impact Disputes By David F. Johnson Introduction In the process of drafting contracts, parties can shape the process for resolving their future disputes. They can potentially select
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901
Case: 1:13-cv-01569 Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAUL DUFFY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case
More informationCase 1:16-cv DLH-CSM Document 91 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Case 1:16-cv-00103-DLH-CSM Document 91 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Enerplus Resources (USA Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationJeffrey Podesta v. John Hanzel
2017 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-27-2017 Jeffrey Podesta v. John Hanzel Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2017
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
CASE 0:17-cv-05009-JRT-FLN Document 123 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MANAGEMENT REGISTRY, INC., v. Plaintiff, A.W. COMPANIES, INC., ALLAN K. BROWN, WENDY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Koning et al v. Baisden Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MICHAEL KONING, Dr. and Husband, and SUSAN KONING, Wife, v. Plaintiffs, LOWELL BAISDEN, C.P.A., Defendant.
More informationCase 2:16-cv JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:16-cv-00832-JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8 Milo Steven Marsden (Utah State Bar No. 4879) Michael Thomson (Utah State Bar No. 9707) Sarah Goldberg (Utah State Bar No. 13222) John J.
More informationCase 1:09-cv MGC Document 72 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2010 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:09-cv-21765-MGC Document 72 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2010 Page 1 of 8 NATIONAL AUTO LENDERS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 09-21765-CIV-COOKE/BANDSTRA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Clemons v. Google, Inc. Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION RICHARD CLEMONS, v. GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-00963-AJT-TCB
More informationSports & Entertainment Management, LLC ("Paramount") and Counterclaim Defendant Alvin
Case 2:18-cv-00412-RAJ-RJK Document 19 Filed 12/07/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 235 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division PARAMOUNT SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT
More informationAleph Towers, LLC et al v. Ambit Texas, LLC et al Doc. 128
Aleph Towers, LLC et al v. Ambit Texas, LLC et al Doc. 128 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------){ YURI (URI) KASPAROV,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SOUTHERN DIVISION) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 Mark Anchor Albert (SBN 0 LAW OFFICES OF MARK ANCHOR ALBERT South Grand Avenue, th Floor 00 Tel: ( - Fax: ( - Email: markalbert@maalawoffices.com Attorneys for Defendant OurPLANE Corp. BLUME ENGINEERING
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case: 18-131 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2018 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit In re: INTEX RECREATION CORP., INTEX TRADING LTD., THE COLEMAN
More informationCase 3:13-cv B Document 47 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1417 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:13-cv-01090-B Document 47 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1417 This case is now being edited by American Maritime Cases ("AMC") for placement in AMC's book product and its searchable web-based
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff Case No: 013-cv-1896 SRN/SER
CASE 0:13-cv-01896-SRN-SER Document 119 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA R.J. ZAYED, In His Capacity As Court-Appointed Receiver For Oxford Global Partners,
More informationCase 8:15-cv EAK-TBM Document 18 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 151
Case 8:15-cv-00434-EAK-TBM Document 18 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 151 MOISTTECH CORPORATION, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION vs. SENSORTECH SYSTEMS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 08-0238 444444444444 IN RE INTERNATIONAL PROFIT ASSOCIATES, INC.; INTERNATIONAL TAX ADVISORS, INC.; AND IPA ADVISORY AND INTERMEDIARY SERVICES, LLC, RELATORS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. JOINT RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL REPORT vs.
CASE 0:11-cv-01319-MJD -FLN Document 15 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA R.J. Zayed, In his Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for Trevor G. Cook, et al.,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: March 11, 2015 Decided: August 7, 2015) Docket No.
--cv 0 0 0 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 0 (Argued: March, 0 Decided: August, 0) Docket No. cv ELIZABETH STARKEY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. G ADVENTURES, INC., Defendant
More informationThe Supreme Court will shortly be considering
Arbitration at a Cross Road: Will the Supreme Court Hold the Federal Arbitration Act Trumps Federal Labor Laws? By John Jay Range and Bryan Cleveland The Supreme Court will shortly be considering three
More informationCASE 0:13-cv DSD-JSM Document 101 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:13-cv-00232-DSD-JSM Document 101 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA R.J. ZAYED, in his capacity as court appointed receiver for the Oxford Global Partners,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 009-cv-01750-ADM -JSM Document 153 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No.
Case: 15-12066 Date Filed: 11/16/2015 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-12066 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-01397-SCJ
More information2:07-cv DCN Date Filed 02/20/2008 Entry Number 167 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
2:07-cv-00919-DCN Date Filed 02/20/2008 Entry Number 167 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Civil Action No.:07-cv-00919-DCN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-0-bhs Document Filed 0// Page of THE HON. BENJAMIN H. SETTLE 0 0 TWO GUYS, INC., a Washington Corporation, a.k.a. FRANCHISE INFUSION, INC., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
Conditionally granted and Opinion Filed September 12, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00690-CV IN RE BAMBU FRANCHISING LLC, BAMBU DESSERTS AND DRINKS, INC., AND
More informationCase5:12-cv EJD Document54 Filed02/15/13 Page1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case:-cv-0-EJD Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LIBERTY CITY CHURCH OF CHRIST, INC.; MARY DINISH; KAUISHA SMITH; LARRY RUCKS; and ROBERT BURKE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated
More informationFIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
FIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) OMTRON USA, LLC ) Case No.: 12-13076 (BLS) ) Debtor. ) Hearing Date: January 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. ) Objection
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 43 Filed: 09/08/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:233
Case: 1:17-cv-03155 Document #: 43 Filed: 09/08/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:233 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:06-cv TBR Document 12 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00569-TBR Document 12 Filed 09/06/2007 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:06-CV-569-R TIMOTHY LANDIS PLAINTIFF v. PINNACLE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DISTRICT
-JO Mahmood et al v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DISTRICT TALAT MAHMOOD, et al., Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, 10-12723
More informationCarolyn A. Bates, St Paul, MN, Gregory A. Madera, Michael E. Florey, Fish & Richardson PC, Mpls, MN, for Plaintiff.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota. IMATION CORP, Plaintiff. v. STERLING DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC, Defendants. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc, Third-Party Defendants. Civil File No. 97-2475
More informationCase 0:13-cv JIC Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2013 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:13-cv-60066-JIC Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2013 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 13-60066-CIV-COHN-SELTZER ABRAHAM INETIANBOR Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No
Case: 17-10883 Document: 00514739890 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT VICKIE FORBY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
More informationCase 3:15-cv SDD-SCR Document /20/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 3:15-cv-00115-SDD-SCR Document 8-1 04/20/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA AUDUBON REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES, INC. v. AUDUBON REALTY, L.L.C. NO. 3:15-cv-00115-SDD-SCR
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:10-cv-00277-LY Document 3-7 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION MEDICUS INSURANCE CO., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:10-cv-00277-LY
More informationCase 6:14-cv CEM-TBS Document 31 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1331
Case 6:14-cv-01400-CEM-TBS Document 31 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1331 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., MARRIOTT VACATIONS
More informationTEMPLATE: DO NOT SEND TO NFA NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION
Instructions for Using the Exempt Foreign Firm Application Template This document is not an application form. Do not send this document to NFA. It is a template that you may use to assist in filing the
More informationCASE 0:17-cv DSD-FLN Document 23 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No.
CASE 0:17-cv-00424-DSD-FLN Document 23 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 7 Dave Long, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 17-424(DSD/FLN) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Jill Miller, Defendant. Mark
More informationCase 3:14-cv CRS Document 56 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 991 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE
Case 3:14-cv-01015-CRS Document 56 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 991 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CHINOOK USA, LLC PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-01015-CRS
More informationCase 1:18-cv DLH-CSM Document 12 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Case 1:18-cv-00057-DLH-CSM Document 12 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Shingobee Builders, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-00057-DLH-CSM v. Plaintiff, North
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-gpc-jma Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 DAVID R. ZARO (BAR NO. ) South Figueroa Street, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00- Phone: () - Fax: () 0- E-Mail: dzaro@allenmatkins.com EDWARD
More informationCase 2:12-cv DN Document 12 Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:12-cv-00076-DN Document 12 Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION R. WAYNE KLEIN, the Court-Appointed Receiver of U.S. Ventures,
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS ZABOROWSKI; VANESSA BALDINI; KIM DALE; NANCY PADDOCK; MARIA
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No.
14 781 cv Cohen v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No. 14 781 cv x ELIOT COHEN,
More information2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
Not Reported in F.Supp.2d Page 1 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. PEMAQUID UNDERWRITING BROKERAGE, INC., United Messenger Courier Program,
More information4 (Argued: February 6, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009)
07-5300-cv Yakin v. Tyler Hill Corp, Inc. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2008 4 (Argued: February 6, 2009 Decided: May 12, 2009) 5 Docket No. 07-5300-cv 6 7 SARA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Case No. 10-cv-1875 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Orthoflex, Inc., et al., v. ThermoTek, Inc. Doc. 52 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORTHOFLEX, INC. d/b/a INTEGRATED ORTHOPEDICS, MOTION MEDICAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:12-CV REDRIDGE FINANCE GROUP, LLC
Leed HR, LLC v. Redridge Finance Group, LLC Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00797 LEED HR, LLC PLAINTIFF v. REDRIDGE FINANCE GROUP,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS NICOLE TURCHECK, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION October 3, 2006 9:05 a.m. v No. 269248 Wayne Circuit Court AMERIFUND FINANCIAL, INC., d/b/a ALL- LC No. 05-533831-CK
More informationR. Teague, Jerko Gerald Zovko and Wesley J. K. Batalona [collectively, "Decedents"]. These
Case 2:06-cv-00049-F Document 13 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 10 BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC and BLACKWATER LODGE AND TRAINING CENTER, INC., Petitioners, RICHARD P. NORDAN, as Ancillary Administrator
More informationCase 2:16-cv JAD-VCF Document 29 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ORDER
Case :-cv-0-jad-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** 0 LISA MARIE BAILEY, vs. Plaintiff, AFFINITYLIFESTYLES.COM, INC. dba REAL ALKALIZED WATER, a Nevada Corporation;
More informationCase 1:16-cv DLH-CSM Document 4 Filed 05/05/16 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:16-cv-00103-DLH-CSM Document 4 Filed 05/05/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION ENERPLUS RESOURCES (USA CORPORATION, a Delaware
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 23 Filed: 08/22/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:148
Case: 1:16-cv-02127 Document #: 23 Filed: 08/22/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:148 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CATHERINE GONZALEZ, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-000-spl Document Filed 0// Page of William R. Mettler, Esq. S. Price Road Chandler, Arizona Arizona State Bar No. 00 (0 0-0 wrmettler@wrmettlerlaw.com Attorney for Defendant Zenith Financial
More informationCase 2:17-cv DB Document 48 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:17-cv-00207-DB Document 48 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION HOMELAND MUNITIONS, LLC, BIRKEN STARTREE HOLDINGS, CORP., KILO CHARLIE,
More informationCase 2:16-cv RCM Document 9-1 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-00711-RCM Document 9-1 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RAYANNE REGMUND, GLORIA JENSSEN MICHAEL NEWBERRY AND CAROL NEWBERRY,
More informationCase 2:12-cv GP Document 27 Filed 01/17/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:12-cv-02526-GP Document 27 Filed 01/17/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUE VALERI, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION v. : : MYSTIC INDUSTRIES
More informationCase M:06-cv VRW Document 151 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP John A. Rogovin (pro hac vice Randolph D. Moss (pro hac vice Samir C. Jain # Brian M. Boynton # Benjamin C. Mizer
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,907 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JUSTIN GARBERG and TREVOR GARBERG, Appellees,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,907 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JUSTIN GARBERG and TREVOR GARBERG, Appellees, v. ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, LLC, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationWillis Group Holding plc v Smith 2011 NY Slip Op 33824(U) July 8, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Anil C.
Willis Group Holding plc v Smith 2011 NY Slip Op 33824(U) July 8, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 650161/11 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationCase 3:16-cv EMC Document 382 Filed 07/24/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of Theodore A. Griffinger, Jr. (SBN 0) Ellen A. Cirangle (SBN ) LUBIN OLSON & NIEWIADOMSKI LLP The Transamerica Pyramid 00 Montgomery Street, th Floor San Francisco,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D.
E-Filed Document Jan 12 2017 15:26:19 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2016-CA-01085 MARLIN BUSINESS BANK APPELLANT V. STEVENS
More informationCase 2:12-cv JD Document 50 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:12-cv-03783-JD Document 50 Filed 03/29/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHERIE LEATHERMAN, both : CIVIL ACTION individually and as the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-2689-N ORDER
Case 3:14-cv-02689-N Document 15 Filed 01/09/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 141 149 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JOHN N. TEDFORD, IV (State Bar No. 0) jtedford@dgdk.com DANNING, GILL, DIAMOND & KOLLITZ, LLP 100 Avenue of the Stars, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00-0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile:
More informationCase 1:17-cv CSM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00202-CSM Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION HALCÓN OPERATING CO., INC., vs. Plaintiff, REZ ROCK N WATER,
More informationCase 1:18-cv LG-RHW Document 17 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-00109-LG-RHW Document 17 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION MISSISSIPPI RISING COALITION, RONALD VINCENT,
More informationCase: 1:03-cv Document #: 869 Filed: 09/03/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:15984
Case: 1:03-cv-03904 Document #: 869 Filed: 09/03/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:15984 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:17-cr-00229-AT-CMS Document 42 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JARED WHEAT, JOHN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BRETT DANIELS and BRETT DANIELS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-CV-1334 SIMON PAINTER, TIMOTHY LAWSON, INTERNATIONAL SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS,
More informationtjt Doc 2391 Filed 10/21/14 Entered 10/21/14 16:40:26 Page 1 of 5
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., et al. 1, Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166 (Jointly Administered) Judge Thomas
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2013 INDEX NO. 650841/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK GEM HOLDCO, LLC, -against- Plaintiff,
More informationGOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION CLAUSES Q&A: US (NEW YORK)
by Ronald R. Rossi, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP This document is published by Practical Law and can be found at: uk.practicallaw.com/w-006-6180 To learn more about legal solutions from Thomson Reuters,
More informationCase 1:18-cv JAP-KBM Document 15 Filed 02/05/19 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:18-cv-01194-JAP-KBM Document 15 Filed 02/05/19 Page 1 of 12 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations ROBERT J. URAM, Fed. Bar No.
More informationCase 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:17-cv-00155-VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00155-VAB MARK
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 19, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 19, 2006 Session SEVIER COUNTY BANK v. PAYMENTECH MERCHANT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 02-6-304 Jerry
More informationPROTECTING THE LOYAL HARDWORKER: THE NEED FOR A FAIR ANALYSIS OF VENUE CLAUSES IN ERISA PLANS
PROTECTING THE LOYAL HARDWORKER: THE NEED FOR A FAIR ANALYSIS OF VENUE CLAUSES IN ERISA PLANS Part I. Introduction Imagine this scenario. A participant 1 in an ERISA-covered retirement plan separates from
More information: : : : : : : This action was commenced by Relator-Plaintiff Hon. William J. Rold ( Plaintiff ) on
United States of America et al v. Raff & Becker, LLP et al Doc. 111 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------- x UNITED STATES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Case 2:10-cv-00272-TJW Document 1 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION GEOTAG INC., Plaintiff vs. YELLOWPAGES.COM, LLC, Defendant.
More informationEnforcing Forum-Selection Clauses: The Federal Court Dilemma and the Arbitration Clause Alternative
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1990 Issue 2 Article 7 1990 Enforcing Forum-Selection Clauses: The Federal Court Dilemma and the Arbitration Clause Alternative Lee R. Hardee Follow this and additional
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/2016 01:39 PM INDEX NO. 155249/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2016 BAKER, LESHKO, SALINE & DRAPEAU, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs One North Lexington Avenue
More informationCase 9:17-cv KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:17-cv-80649-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2018 Page 1 of 13 JAMES D. SALLAH, not individually, but solely in his capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for JCS Enterprises Inc., d/b/a
More informationCase 2:09-cv CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:09-cv-00394-CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NEXTCARD, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A., CITIBANK
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CHAMBLISS v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC. Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION STACEY CHAMBLISS, vs. Plaintiff, DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a THE OLIVE GARDEN,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 4:15-cv-00510-CWD Document 26 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO IDAHO PACIFIC CORPORATION, an Idaho corporation, v. Plaintiff, BINEX LINE CORPORATION,
More information